lsvt loud (1)

12
LEE SILVERMAN VOICE TREATMENT (LSVT) for I Parkinson’s Disease (PD) Adrianna Gregory ETHICS DECEMBER 7TH, 2016

Upload: adrianna-gregory

Post on 23-Jan-2018

128 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: LSVT LOUD (1)

LEE SILVERMAN VOICE TREATMENT (LSVT) for I Parkinson’s Disease (PD)

Adrianna Gregory ETHICS

DECEMBER 7TH, 2016

Page 2: LSVT LOUD (1)

What is the LSVT Foundation?

● Organization based in Colorado focused on improving communication for those with neurological disorders (w/specialty in Parkinson’s disease).

Page 3: LSVT LOUD (1)

PD Hypokinetic Dysarthria & Perceptual Speech Characteristics:

1. Reduced loudness/vocal intensity

2. Hoarse vocal quality3. Monotone4. Imprecise articulation5. Vocal tremor

IMPORTANT Those with PD have a incorrect self-perception of LOUDNESS- Sensory Perception of their own loudness is that it is adequate (Ho et al., 1999) even though they are 2-4 dB below the average speaker (Fox & Ramig, 2006).

Page 4: LSVT LOUD (1)

LSVT’s approach is based on...Experience-dependent

neuroplasticity. (Kleim & Jones, 2008)-->So that pt.

With PD will achieves RECALIBRATION and GENERALIZATION.

1. Intensity

2. Repetition

3. Salience

4. Complexity

5. Timing matters

Page 5: LSVT LOUD (1)

Components of LSVT LOUD within Treatment

➔ MODEL SHOW client, don’t explain in pointless detail. (too much cognitive load).

➔ SHAPE Increased vocal loudness with healthy vocal quality.

➔ INCREASED EFFORT to drive muscle activation

➔ STABILIZE with repetitions and reinforcement

➔ CALIBRATE in order to retrain current mismatches sensory perception.

With this app, I’m confident to plan a trip to rural VietnamWendy Writer, CA

1. PATIENT WILL USE HIS/HER LOUDER VOICE HABITUALLY

2. LONG TERM CARRYOVER (OUTSIDE OF TREATMENT ROOM).

OVERARCHING GOALS OF LSVT TREATMENT PROGRAM:

Page 6: LSVT LOUD (1)

How many speech targets are focused on during LSVT Loud Treatment?

Page 8: LSVT LOUD (1)

LOUD acts as a “trigger” for effects across systems...

1. DEEP BREATH2. OPEN MOUTH3. IMPROVED ARTICULATION4. RATE REDUCTION

Page 9: LSVT LOUD (1)

Study Purpose of study Participants Results

Ramig et al. (1995) Compare changes in speech in PD pts. treated w/LSVT, in untreated patients with PD, and in healthy-aged matched controls.

1. PD treated group:

N=14

2. PD No treatment:

N=15

Treated PD group showed significant improvement on tests, while PD-Nontreated groups showed no significant difference. (Healthy controls showed no sig. difference).

Speech Volume Regulation in PD- Ho et al., (1999).

Experiment 1: Compared PD patients’regulation of vocal volume depending upon varying background noise to healthy-age matched controls’ regulation.

PD: N=12

Healthy Controls: N=12

Those in control group automatically increased vocal loudness (in reading +conversation) when background noise increased; PD failed to increase or decrease loudness in response to varying levels of background noise.

Speech Volume Regulation in PD- Ho et al., (1999).

Experiment 2: Measured abililty of a patient with Parkinson’s to modify vocal volume when provided with an explicit cue or instructions.

PD: N=12Healthy age-matched controls: N=12

When given explicit auditory cues to increase vocal loudness, those with PD were able to do so (while reading Rainbow Passage).

Page 10: LSVT LOUD (1)

Study Purrpose of Study Participants Results

Ramig et al. (1995) Compare effects of two different types of TX for PD: 1-LSVT Group: increase loudness in order to increase vf adduction and respiratory support; 2-Control Group: TX for respiratory support only.

1. LSVT group: N=

26

2. Respiratory

group: N=19

Significant changes in LSVT group as measured by: 1-reading with SPL meter; 2-family ratings of improvement in intelligibility. No clinically significant gains in Respiratory group (measured same way).

Page 11: LSVT LOUD (1)

References A.K. Ho, J.L. Bradshaw, R. Iansek and R. Alfredson, Speech volume regulation in Parkinson’s disease:

Effects of implicit cues and explicit instructions, Neuropsychologia 37 (1999), 1453–1460.

J.S. Schneider and T.I. Lidsky (1987). Basal Ganglia and Behavior: Sensory Aspects of Motor Functioning,

Toronto: Hans Huber.

Kleim, JA., Jones, TA. (2008). Principles of experience dependent neural plasticity: implications for

rehabilitation after brain damage,

L. Ramig, S. Countryman, L. Thompson and Y. Horii, Com- parison of two forms of intensive speech

treatment for Parkin- son disease, Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 38 (1995), 1232–1251.

L.O. Ramig, A. Pawlas and S. Countryman, The Lee Silver- man Voice Treatment (LSVT): A Practical

Guide to Treating the Voice and Speech Disorders in Parkinson Disease, Iowa City, IA: National Center for

Voice and Speech, 1995.

Page 12: LSVT LOUD (1)

L.O. Ramig, S. Countryman, C. O’Brien, M. Hoehn and L. Thompson, Intensive speech treatment

for people with Parkinson’s disease: short and long term comparison of two techniques,

Neurology 47 (1996), 1496–1504.

L.O. Ramig, A. Pawlas and S. Countryman, The Lee Silver- man Voice Treatment (LSVT): A

Practical Guide to Treating the Voice and Speech Disorders in Parkinson Disease, Iowa City, IA:

National Center for Voice and Speech, 1995

References