ltans-notareqs-02 larry masinter “requirements for data validation and certification services”...
DESCRIPTION
Larry Masinter, LTANS working group3 Summary comments Changes from previous version Terminology: avoid “notary” Remove remnants of previous drafts Please review Terminology OK? Need more use cases? Are the use cases valid? My impression Current document is “thin” needs more content, motivationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: LTANS-NOTAREQS-02 Larry Masinter “Requirements for Data Validation and Certification Services” Adobe Systems 8/1/2005](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082620/5a4d1aff7f8b9ab059986067/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
LTANS-NOTAREQS-02
Larry Masinter
“Requirements for Data Validation and Certification Services”
Adobe Systems8/1/2005
![Page 2: LTANS-NOTAREQS-02 Larry Masinter “Requirements for Data Validation and Certification Services” Adobe Systems 8/1/2005](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082620/5a4d1aff7f8b9ab059986067/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Larry Masinter, LTANS working group 2
Document review1: Introduction
Proper linkage to archive requirements?2: General requirements
Surely there are more3: Use cases
Are these sufficient? Are all of these useful?
4: Specific workflows Not complete enough; should cover use cases
5: Technical requirements Not complete; needs more details
6: Operational considerations Inserted to separate out from protocol requirements
![Page 3: LTANS-NOTAREQS-02 Larry Masinter “Requirements for Data Validation and Certification Services” Adobe Systems 8/1/2005](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082620/5a4d1aff7f8b9ab059986067/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Larry Masinter, LTANS working group 3
Summary comments Changes from previous version
Terminology: avoid “notary” Remove remnants of previous drafts
Please review Terminology OK? Need more use cases? Are the use cases valid?
My impression Current document is “thin” needs more content, motivation