lte-advanced carrier aggregation ca – from design to implementation and test challenges
DESCRIPTION
II International Workshop on Challenges and Trends on Broadband Wireless Mobile Access Networks – Beyond LTE-ATRANSCRIPT
LTE-Advanced Carrier Aggregation (CA) – from design to implementation and test challenges
Andjela Ilic-Savoia
Keysight Technologies
November 2014
Page
Agenda
LTE-A Carrier Aggregation technology, and relevance in the 4G and beyond era
• Key Features of LTE-Advanced
• What is CA and why do we need it?
• Bands and CA Deployment Scenarios
• Definitions and UE Categories
• How does CA work: Where is the impact and Protocol implications
• What’s coming in Rel-11, 12
• Summary
2
Page
Keysight Technologies Began Operations, Aug 1, ‘14
• Agilent announced Sept. 19, 2013, it would separate into:
• an Electronic Measurement company (now Keysight)
• a Life Sciences, Diagnostics and Applied Markets company (to
retain the Agilent name)
3
Page
FY13 $2.9 billion revenue | 18.9% operating margin | 31% ROIC | best in class financial profile
Communications Industrial, computer,
semiconductor
Aerospace/defense
Keysight in Electronic Measurement The industry leader
(1) Presented on a non-GAAP basis; reconciliations to closet GAAP equivalent provided. See reconciliations for definition of ROIC.
4
Page
Key LTE-Advanced Features
Carrier Aggregation Enhanced MIMO
Het Nets
Higher data rates
(bps) Higher spectral
effiency
(bps/Hz)
Higher spectral
effiency
per coverage area
(bps/Hz/Km2)
5
Page
What is Carrier Aggregation?
• Combining (using) multiple LTE carriers together in order to
increase data throughput
• Extends the maximum transmission bandwidth, up to 100 MHz, by
aggregating up to five LTE carriers – a.k.a component carriers
(CCs)
• Initially defined in the 3GPP Release 10 standard
• To preserve compatibility with existing devices, all aggregated
carriers look exactly “like R8/R9” carriers.
• Can be supported in Downlink only or both in Downlink and Uplink
• Supported for FDD and TDD modes
6
Page
Why Carrier Aggregation?
• Lack of sufficient contiguous spectrum forces use of carrier
aggregation to meet peak data rate targets
• Motivation:
• Achieve wider bandwidths (for throughput, throughput
and also throughput)
• Facilitate efficient use of fragmented spectrum
• Efficient interference management for control channels
in heterogeneous networks(cross scheduling optional)
≈ f
7
Page 8
Why Carrier Aggregation - Industry Inflection Point Data Traffic Growth Driven By Smartphones
LTE-Advanced Carrier Aggregation
Benefits:
• Faster IP Data
• Wider bandwidths
• Reduced latency
• Improved spectrum efficiency
LTE Technology & Smartphones, 2014
Continued growth and opportunity
• 263 LTE networks in 97 countries*
• 1371 LTE devices*
• 918.6M Smartphone shipments**
• Global shift (US 15%, China 33%; India growing 460% in 2013-’17)*
Industry Trends
*Source GSMA, Jan 2014
150 Mbps
IP data
150 Mbps
IP data
LTE Carrier # 1
20 MHz Bandwidth
LTE Carrier # 2
20 MHz Bandwidth
LTE-A Carrier Aggregation Solution: 10 or 20 MHz fragments aggregated to get 30 - 40MHz channel bandwidth
8
Page
Band A Band B
Carrier Aggregation Modes
Intra -band
contiguous
allocation
f
≈ f
Intra-band
non-contiguous
allocation
Inter-band
non-contiguous
allocation
Component Carrier (CC)– up to 20 MHz BW
f
Band A
Band A
9
Page
3GPP Release 10 RF & Performance Requirements
f
Component Carrier (CC)– up to 20 MHz BW
Band A
Band A f
Band A Band B
≈ f
Not supported in Rel 10
Maximum 2 CCs supported
for both uplink & downlink,
FDD & TDD
Maximum 2 CC supported
ONLY for FDD-downlink
Intra -band contiguous
Intra-band non-contiguous
Inter-band allocation
10
Page
Rel-10 Defined CA Bands
Release 10 defines three CA bands:
• Intra-band contiguous CA:
• Band 1 (FDD) is defined as CA band CA_1 (IMT-2000 band)
• Band 40 (TDD) are defined as CA_40 (2300 MHz TDD band)
• For inter-band non-contiguous CA:
• R8 operating bands 1 and 5 are defined as one CA band named CA_1-5. (IMT-2000 and US Cellular 800 MHz bands)
Relaxing the constraint on Rel-10 CA
• An important aspect of frequency bands when it comes to the 3GPP releases is that they are “release independent”.
• This means that a band defined in a later release can be applied to an earlier release.
11
Page
Rel-11 Carrier Aggregation Combinations
Band Lead company Uplink Downlink Uplink Downlink Mode
CA-B3_B7 TeliaSonera 1710 - 1785 1805 - 1880 2500 - 2570 2620 - 2690 FDD
CA-B4_B17 AT&T 1710 – 1755 2110 - 2155 704 – 716 734 - 746 FDD
CA-B4_B13 Ericsson (Verizon) 1710 – 1755 2110 - 2155 777 - 787 746 - 756 FDD
CA-B4_B12 Cox Communications 1710 – 1755 2110 - 2155 698 – 716 728 - 746 FDD
CA-B20_B7 Huawei (Orange) 832 – 862 791 - 821 2500 - 2570 2620 - 2690 FDD
CA-B2_B17 AT&T 1850 – 1910 1930 - 1990 704 – 716 734 - 746 FDD
CA-B4_B5 AT&T 1710 – 1755 2110 - 2155 824 – 849 869 - 894 FDD
CA-B5_B12 US Cellular 824 – 849 869 - 894 698 – 716 728 - 746 FDD
CA-B5_B17 AT&T 824 – 849 869 - 894 704 – 716 734 - 746 FDD
CA-B20_B3 Vodafone 832 – 862 791 - 821 1710 - 1785 1805 - 1880 FDD
CA-B20_B8 Vodafone 832 – 862 791 - 821 880 – 915 925 - 960 FDD
CA-B3_B5 SK Telecom 1710 - 1785 1805 - 1880 824 – 849 869 - 894 FDD
CA-B7 China Unicom 2500 - 2570 2620 - 2690 2500 - 2570 2620 - 2690 FDD
CA-B1_B7 China Telecomm 1920 - 1980 2110 - 2170 2500 - 2570 2620 - 2690 FDD
CA-B4_B7 Rogers Wireless 1710 – 1755 2110 - 2155 2500 - 2570 2620 - 2690 FDD
CA-B25_25 Sprint 1850 - 1915 1930 - 1995 1850 - 1915 1930 - 1995 FDD
CA-B38 Huawei (CMCC) 2570 - 2620 2570 - 2620 2570 - 2620 2570 - 2620 TDD
CA-B41 Clearwire 2496 - 2690 2496 - 2690 2496 - 2690 2496 - 2690 TDD
© 2012 Agilent Technologies
Page
Band Lead company Uplink Downlink Uplink Downlink Mode
CA-B1_B18 KDDI 1920 - 1980 2110 - 2170 815 - 830 860 - 894 FDD
CA-B1_B21 NTT DoCoMo 1920 - 1980 2110 - 2170 1447.9-1462.9 1495.9-1510.9 FDD
CA-B11_B18 KDDI 1427.9–1427.9 1475.9- 1495.9 815 - 830 860 - 894 FDD
CA-B3_B8 KT 1710 - 1785 1805 - 1880 880 – 915 925 - 960 FDD
CA-B2_B4 TMO-US 1850 – 1910 1930 - 1990 1710 – 1755 2110 - 2155 FDD
CA-B1 KDDI 1920 - 1980 2110 - 2170 1920 - 1980 2110 - 2170 FDD
CA-B3_B3 SK Telecom 1710 - 1785 1805 - 1880 1710 - 1785 1805 - 1880 FDD
CA-B4_B4 TMO-US 1710 – 1755 2110 - 2155 1710 – 1755 2110 - 2155 FDD
… … …
© 2012 Agilent Technologies
Rel-11 Carrier Aggregation Combinations Continued…
13
Page
PCC (Primary Component Carrier)
• Random access procedure
• Handles the RRC/NAS connection
procedures
• Measurement and mobility (handovers)
procedures based on PCC
SCC (Secondary Component Carrier)
• Activated only when in CONNECTED mode
(can you guess why this req?)
• Can be dynamically activated/deactivated
(through MAC PDU)
• PUSCH is optional (asymmetric CA, only on
DL)
CA – How is it used?
Uplink
Downlink
14
Page
CA Deployment Scenarios (1 of 2)
Scenario #2:
• F1 and F2 cells are co-located and overlaid, but F2
has smaller coverage
• Only F1 provides sufficient coverage and F2 is
used to improve throughput.
• Likely scenario when F1 and F2 are of different
bands
F1 F2
Scenario #3:
• F1 and F2 cells are co-located but F2 antennas are
directed to the cell boundaries of F1 so that cell edge
throughput is increased.
• F1 provides sufficient coverage and F2 potentially “fills the
holes”
• Likely scenario when F1 and F2 are of different bands
Scenario #1:
• F1 and F2 cells are co-located and overlaid, providing
same coverage.
• Likely scenario when F1 and F2 are of the same band.
15
Page
CA Deployment Scenarios (2 of 2)
Scenario #4:
• F1 provides macro coverage and on F2 Remote Radio
Heads (RRHs) are used to improve throughput at hot
spots.
• Likely scenario when F1 and F2 are of different bands.
Scenario #5:
• Similar to scenario #2, but frequency selective
repeaters are deployed to extend coverage for one of
the frequencies.
16
Page
To specify different CA combinations some new definitions are used:
• Aggregated Transmission Bandwidth Configuration (ATBC): total number of aggregated physical resource blocks (PRB).
• CA bandwidth class: indicates a combination of maximum ATBC and maximum number of CCs in each band. In R10 and R11 three classes are defined:
• Class A: ATBC ≤ 100, maximum number of CC = 1
example: CA_1A_5A: BC1 and BC5, Inter-band, can do 2x up to 10MHz
• Class B: ATBC ≤ 100, maximum number of CC = 2
• Class C: 100 < ATBC ≤ 200, maximum number of CC = 2
example: CA_1C: BC1, Intra-band cont., can do 2x up to 20MHz
• Class D, E, F: ATBC up to 500 For Future Study
18
Page
UE Categories
UE
Category
Data Rate DL/UL
(Mbps)
Downlink Uplink
Max number
of layers
Max number
of layers
Support for
64QAM
1 10 / 5 1 1 No
2 50 / 25 2 1 No
3 100 / 50 2 1 No
4 150 / 50 2 1 No
5 300 / 75 4 1 Yes
6 300 / 50 2 or 4 1 or 2 No
7 300 / 100 2 or 4 1 or 2 No
8 3000 / 1500 8 4 Yes
LT
E
LT
E-A
19
Page
New UE Categories Combinations of Carrier Aggregation and Layers
• There are multiple combinations of CA and layers that can meet
the data rates for the new and existing UE categories
• The following tables define the most cases for which
performance requirements may be developed
UE category capability
[#CCs/BW(MHz)]
DL layers
[max #layers]
Category 6
1 / 20MHz 4
2 / 10+10MHz 4
2 / 20+20MHz 2
2 / 10+20MHz 4 (10MHz)
2(20MHz)
Category 7
1 / 20MHz 4
2 / 10+10MHz 4
2 / 20+20MHz 2
2 / 10+20MHz 4 (10MHz)
2(20MHz)
Category 8 [2 / 20+20MHz] 8?
UE category capability
[#CCs/BW(MHz)]
UL layers
[max #layers]
Category 6
1 / 20MHz 1
2 / 10+10MHz 1
1 / 10MHz 2
Category 7
2 / 20+20MHz 1
1 / 20MHz 2
2 / 10+20MHz 2 (10MHz)
1 ( 20MHz)
Category 8 [2 / 20+20MHz] 4?
Downlink Uplink
20
Page
CA – where is the impact?
• MAC, PHY and RF are the most impacted layers
• Aggregated carriers behave separately, including error correction,
until demodulation is complete.
• Data aggregation happens in MAC layer
• Single instance of PDCP/RLC for aggregated carriers – as if only
one carrier
21
Page
SCC communicated to UE in RRC Reconfiguration
22
Page
Protocol implications – how to agree to establish CA
During initial attach procedure, UE informs eNB of it’s capabilities in UE-
EUTRA-Capability information element: 23
Page
Further on rf-parameters v1020 UE reports in UE-EUTRA-Capability information element: 24
Page
Protocol implications – how to agree to establish CA
– SCC is enabled at MAC layer, and signaled to UE via
RRC Reconfig:
25
Page
MAC implications how to Activate/deactivate SCC
Oct 1C6C7 C5 C4 C3 C2 C1 R
Figure 6.1.3.8-1: Activation/Deactivation MAC control element
26
Page
Carrier Aggregation Design Challenges: one example
Need to design front-end components that help reduce harmonics
and other intermodulation products.
710
MHz
740
MHz 2130 MHz
Band 17 Band 4
Example: Band 17-4 combination
Third harmonic
27
Page
Evolution of carrier aggregation Rel-12 Dual connectivity for LTE
By allowing CA between sites it is possible to provide
continuous CA coverage using a low frequency
macro (umbrella) cell and local capacity
using a higher frequency small cell
Macro umbrella cell
Small
cell Small
cell
Small
cell
The separation of the sites means
that enhancements are required at the
physical layer including multiple timing advances
28
Page
Evolution of carrier aggregation Rel-13 Multi-RAT dual connectivity
The ultimate flexibility is achieved if CA is performed
across radio access technologies (RATs) and
in particular with today’s dominant small
cell technology: WLAN.
Macro umbrella cell
Small
cell WLAN
WLAN
This level of integration
will force solutions to the issues
of authentication and billing which
continue to limit the potential of WLAN today.
29
Page
LTE-Advanced Release 11, 12 &13 RAN stats
3GPP Releases 11, 12 and early 13 represent a
huge growth in features and complexity
• 58 Study items for feasibility of new work
• 75 new features (excl. carrier aggregation), 51 with new
performance requirements
• 129 new carrier aggregation combinations with
corresponding performance requirements
• 4 performance only requirements for features from
earlier releases
• 29 new conformance tests (expect ~180 at completion)
30
Page
Release 9: Summary of Key Radio Features
• Home base station (femtocell)
• MBMS – completion of MBSFN
• Positioning Support (AGNSS)
• Local Area Base Station (picocell)
• Self Organizing Networks (SON)
• Multicarrier / Multi-RAT Base Station (Multi Standard Radio)
• Dual layer beamforming (TM8)
© 2012 Agilent Technologies
31
Page
Rel-10: Stage 3 Frozen March 2011 Summary of Key Radio Features
• Simultaneous PUCCH and PUSCH
• Clustered SC-FDMA
• Relaying – continued in Release 11
• Enhanced Inter-cell Interference Coordination (eICIC)
• Minimization of Drive Test (MDT)
• Machine Type Communications (MTC)
• SON enhancements for self healing
• Transmit diversity, two- and four-layer spatial multiplexing
• Eight-layer spatial multiplexing including UE-specific RS (TM9)
© 2012 Agilent Technologies
32
Page
Rel-11: Stage 3 Frozen Sept 2012 Summary of Key Radio Features
• New carrier aggregation combinations (18)
• Verification of radiated multi-antenna reception performance of UEs in
LTE (MIMO OTA)
• Signaling and procedure for interference avoidance for in-device
coexistence
• Coordinated multi-point operation for LTE (CoMP)
• Further Enhanced Inter-cell Interference Coordination (FeICIC)
© 2012 Agilent Technologies
33
Page
Rel-12: New Frequency Bands
Three new FDD frequency bands will be defined:
• Downlink 1670 MHz–1675 MHz, uplink 1646.7 MHz–1651.7 MHz
• for ITU Region 2 (US)
• Downlink 461MHz–468 MHz, uplink 451–458 MHz
• for Brasil
• Downlink 2350–2360 MHz, uplink 2305–2315 MHz
• US Wireless Communications Service (WCS) band
There is also a study item for:
• Uplink 1980–2010 MHz and downlink 2170 MHz– 2200 MHz.
• This is currently widely allocated for satellite communications but terrestrial use now being considered, particularly for ITU Region 3.
• The potential for 110 MHz pairing with band 1 is also being considered.
© 2012 Agilent Technologies
35
Page
The following proposals from the workshop were identified as most likely to be
developed:
• Dynamic TDD
• Frequency separation between macro and small cells, using higher frequency
bands in small cells (e.g., 3.5 GHz)
• Inter-site carrier aggregation and macrocell-assisted small cells
• Interworking with Wi-Fi
• Continuous enhancements for machine-type communications, SON, MDT
• Proximity services and device-to-device communications(LTE-Direct)
© 2012 Agilent Technologies
36
3GPP Rel-12 Workshop June 2012
Page
Rel-12: Stage 1 March 2013, Stage 3 2014? Current Work Items
– The Release 12 work items that have been defined so far are:
• New frequency bands
• 13 new carrier aggregation scenarios
• Bringing the total to 31 for Rel-11 & 12 to date
• Carrier-based Het-Net ICIC for LTE
• Extends existing co-channel ICIC to include network-based carrier selection
• New Carrier Type for LTE
• The so-called “lean” carrier – not backwards compatible with Rel-8. Less control channel overhead, can be switched on and off based on load
• Further Downlink MIMO Enhancement for LTE-Advanced
• Further enhancements for H(e)NB mobility
• Inter H(eNB) and H(e)NB to macro
© 2012 Agilent Technologies
37
Page
Extras…
39
Page
End-to-end IP data throughput test 3GPP 37.901 Application Layer Data Throughput Testing
Application
Server System
Simulator
Channel
emulator
Test UE App
Layer
Protocol
System Simulator Channel emulator
profiles
FTP over
TCP/IP
LTE
- settable parameters
and
power levels, closed
loop CQI
LTE
- static, EPA5, EVA5,
EVA70, EVA200, ETU70 UDP over
IP
sf0 sf1 sf2 sf3 sf4 sf5 sf6 sf7 sf8 sf9
- 3GPP 37.901 is defined with no PDSCH data in sub-frames 0 and 5
- For LTE CAT4 this reduces the headline rate from 150Mbps to 120Mbps (20MHz channel)
- 3GPP 37.901 Application layer Throughput also excludes TCP/UDP protocol overhead and re-transmissions which reduce
the measurement result further
PDSCH data
DL
UL
DL
40
Page
E2E IP Throughput
CAT6 E2E IP Measurements on UXM
– 300Mbps achieved with 2x CCs and 20MHz bandwidth
41
Page LTE-A
CA CC#1
LTE-A
CA CC#2
W-CDMA
HSPA+
LTE
Interference
& AWGN
Multipath
fading
CA
& MIMO
Adaptive
modulation
& coding
Doppler
Real world conditions Affecting UE Performance
Need network and channel emulation to verify
LTE/LTE-A device performance
• Fading conditions
• Doppler speed
• Degree of spatial diversity
• Noise and interference conditions
• Transmission mode used
• Influence of adaptive modulation & coding
42
Page
1. End-to-end IP data throughput test for LTE/LTE-A chipsets/ UE’s
2. Receiver test complexities and challenges with 2CC CA, 4x2 MIMO and fading
3. Quickly setup multiple test sequences that require different parameters for each sequence
Overcome LTE-A UE Design Test Challenges with Agilent’s New UXM Assess design readiness with greater confidence
3. Test Parameter changes 1. E2E IP Throughput 2. Rx characterization
43
Page
• Unique receiver test Flexible channel allocation and closed-loop testing
• Trusted transmitter test X-Series measurement science
• Sustained bidirectional 300 Mbps/50 Mbps E2E IP data
• Most highly integrated solution: multiple cells, carrier aggregation, 4x2 DL MIMO, integrated fading and built-in application server
Ensure realistic category 6 performance
Achieve design confidence
LTE-Advanced carrier aggregation
Cat 6
device
DL: 300 Mbps
UL: 50 Mbps
Gain new insights for LTE-Advanced Wring out designs with a broad range of integrated capabilities
44
Page
Be ready for 4G and beyond Expand capabilities with most advanced platform architecture
• Designed for next advancements in
antenna techniques, component
carriers & data rates
• Two independent 100 MHz RF transceivers
• Two receiver paths per cell
• Enables multiple cells, carrier aggregation,
higher order MIMO, and integrated fading
• Multi-format capable
• Supports LTE FDD and TDD now
Future-ready platform
Extensible architecture
• High-speed interconnects,
upgradeable processors and
expansion slots
Versatile touchscreen
• Next-generation ease of use,
flexibility for the future
45
Page
Keysight’s Next Generation Wireless Test Sets Is your device ready?
Ramp up rapidly & optimize
full-volume manufacturing
• Ultimate scalability & port density
• Broadest multi-format coverage
• Highest throughput & yield
E7515A UXM Wireless Test Set Make a clear call
E6640A EXM Wireless Test Set Solve today, evolve tomorrow
Assess design readiness
with greater confidence
• Gain new insights for LTE-A
• Be ready for 4G and beyond
• Make a seamless transition
Agilent Technologies webcast
46