lte to 5g - 5gamericas · pdf file5g is being designed to integrate with lte, and some 5g...
TRANSCRIPT
LTE to 5GCellular and Broadband Innovation
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Development Summary5G Research and Development Accelerates
5G in early stages of definition through global efforts and many proposed technical approaches could be deployed in non-standalone versions as early as 2019 Deployment will continue through 2030 Some operators will deploy pre-standard networks for fixed wireless access in 2017
5G is being designed to integrate with LTE and some 5G features may be implemented as LTE-Advanced Pro extensions prior to full 5G availability
5G New Radio (NR) Being Defined
Key aspects of the 5G NR have been determined such as radio channel widths and use of OFDMA The first version specified in Release 15 will support low-latency beam-based channels massive Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) with large numbers of controllable antenna elements scalable-width subchannels carrier aggregation cloud radio-access network (RAN) capability and dynamic co-existence with LTE
LTE Has Become the Global Cellular Standard
A previously fragmented wireless industry has consolidated globally on LTE
LTE is being deployed more quickly than any previous-generation wireless technology
LTE-Advanced Provides Dramatic Advantages
LTE capabilities continue to improve with carrier aggregation 1 Gbps peak throughputs higher-order MIMO multiple methods for expanding capacity in unlicensed spectrum new IoT capabilities vehicle-based communications small-cell support including Enhanced Inter-Cell Interference Coordination (eICIC) lower latency Self-Organizing Network (SON) capabilities and Enhanced Coordinated Multi Point (eCoMP)
Key Conclusions (1)
2
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Development SummaryInternet of Things Poised for Massive Adoption
IoT evolving from machine-to-machine (M2M) communications is seeing rapid adoption with tens of billions of new connected devices expected over the next decade
Drivers include improved LTE support such as low-cost and low-power modems enhanced coverage higher capacity and service-layer standardization such as oneM2M
Unlicensed Spectrum Becomes More Tightly Integrated with Cellular
The industry has developed increasingly sophisticated means for integrating Wi-Fi and cellular networks such as LTE-WLAN Aggregation (LWA) and LTE-WLAN Aggregation with IPSec Tunnel (LWIP) making the user experience ever more seamless
The industry has also developed and is now deploying versions of LTE that can operate in unlicensed spectrum such as LTE-Unlicensed (LTE-U) LTE-Licensed Assisted Access (LTE-LAA) and MulteFire Cellular and Wi-Fi industry members are successfully collaborating to ensure fair spectrum co-existence
Spectrum Still Precious
Spectrum in general and in particular licensed spectrum remains a precious commodity for the industry
Recently added spectrum in the United States includes the 600 MHz band auctioned in 2017 and the 35 GHz Citizens Broadband Radio Service (CBRS) ldquosmall-cellrdquo band currently being planned for auction
5G can include current cellular spectrum bands and overall will include low mid and high band spectrum This includes ldquommWaverdquo spectrum (30 GHz to 100 GHz) with the potential of ten times (or more) as much spectrum as is currently available for cellular Radio channels of 200 MHz and 400 MHz and even wider in the future will enable multi-Gbps peak throughput
Key Conclusions (2)
3
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Development SummarySmall Cells Take Baby Steps Preparing to Stride
Operators have begun installing small cells which now number in the tens of thousands Eventually hundreds of thousands if not millions of small cells will lead to massive increases in capacity
The industry is slowly overcoming challenges that include restrictive regulations site acquisition self-organization interference management power and backhaul
Network Function Virtualization (NFV) Emerges
Network function virtualization (NFV) and software-defined networking (SDN) tools and architectures are enabling operators to reduce network costs simplify deployment of new services reduce deployment time and scale their networks
Some operators are also virtualizing the radio-access network as well as pursuing a related development called cloud radio-access network (cloud RAN) NFV and cloud RAN will be integral components of 5G
Key Conclusions (3)
4
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Broadband Transformation
5
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Mobile Broadband Transformational Elements
6
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
7
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Ultra-high-definition such as 4K and 8K and 3D videobull Augmented and immersive virtual reality Ultra-high-fidelity virtual reality can
consume 50 times the bandwidth of a high-definition video streambull Realization of the tactile internetmdashreal-time immediate sensing and control
enabling a vast array of new applicationsbull Automotive including autonomous vehicles driver-assistance systems vehicular
internet infotainment inter-vehicle information exchange and vehicle pre-crash sensing and mitigation
bull Monitoring of critical infrastructure such as transmission lines using long-battery-life and low-latency sensors
bull Smart transportation using data from vehicles road sensors and cameras to optimize traffic flow
bull Mobile health and telemedicine systems that rely on ready availability of high-resolution and detailed medical records imaging and diagnostic video
bull Public safety including broadband data and mission-critical voicebull Sports and fitness enhancement through biometric sensing real-time monitoring
and data analysisbull Fixed-broadband replacement
5G Data Drivers
8
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Global Mobile Data Growth
Source Cisco ldquoCisco Visual Networking Index Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Updaterdquo February 16 2013
Source Cisco Visual Networking Index Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Update 2016-2021 February 2017
9
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
Source Ericsson Ericsson Mobility Report June 2017
10
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
Source Ericsson IoT Security February 201711
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More than 756 billion GSM-HSPA-LTE connections
bull Greater than the worldrsquos population of 74 billion
bull 93 billion 3GPP subscriber connections expected by 2022
Source Ovum July 2017 Estimates
Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
12
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
Source Ovum (WCIS) 2017 13
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Expanding Use Cases
14
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
1G to 5G
Generation Requirements Comments
1G No official requirements
Analog technology
Deployed in the 1980s
2G No official requirements
Digital technology
First digital systems
Deployed in the 1990s
New services such as SMS and low-rate data
Primary technologies include IS-95 CDMA (cdmaOne) IS-136 (D-AMPS) and GSM
3G ITUrsquos IMT-2000 required 144 Kbps mobile 384 Kbps pedestrian 2 Mbps indoors
First deployment in 2000
Primary technologies include CDMA2000 1XEV-DO and UMTS-HSPA
WiMAX4G (Initial Technical Designation)
ITUrsquos IMT-Advanced requirements include ability to operate in up to 40 MHz radio channels and with very high spectral efficiency
First deployment in 2010
IEEE 80216m and LTE-Advanced meet the requirements
4G (Current Marketing Designation)
Systems that significantly exceed the performance of initial 3G networks No quantitative requirements
Todayrsquos HSPA+ LTE and WiMAX networks meet this requirement
5G ITU IMT-2020 has defined technical requirements for 5G and 3GPP is developing specifications
First standards-based deployments in 2019 and 2020
15
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline of Cellular Generations
16
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Carrier Aggregation With this capability already in use operators can aggregate radio carriers in the same band or across disparate bands to improve throughputs (under light network load) capacity and efficiency
bull VoLTE Initially launched in 2015 and with widespread availability in 2017 VoLTE enables operators to roll out packetized voice for LTE networks resulting in greater voice capacity and higher voice quality
bull Tighter Integration of LTE with Unlicensed Bands LTE-U became available for testing in 2016 and 3GPP completed specifications for LAA in Release 13 with deployment expected around 2018 MulteFire building on LAA will operate without requiring a licensed-carrier anchor LTEWi-Fi Aggregation through LWA and LWIP are other options for operators with large Wi-Fi deployments
bull Enhanced Support for IoT Release 13 brings Category M1 a low-cost device option along with Narrowband IoT (NB-IoT) a version of the LTE radio interface specifically for IoT devices called Category NB1
bull Higher-Order and Full-Dimension MIMO Deployments in 2017 use up to 4X4 MIMO Release 14 specifies a capability called Full-Dimension MIMO which supports configurations with as many as 32 antennas at the base station
bull Dual Connectivity Release 12 introduced the capability to combine carriers from different sectors andor base stations (ie evolved Node Bs [eNBs]) through a feature called Dual Connectivity Two architectures were defined one that supports Packet Data Convergence Protocol (PDCP) aggregation between the different eNBs and one that supports separate S1 connections on the user plane from the different eNBs to the EPC
Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
17
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull 256 QAM Downlink and 64 QAM Uplink Defined in Release 12 and already deployed in some networks higher-order modulation increases user throughput rates in favorable radio conditions
bull 1 Gbps Capability Using a combination of 256 QAM modulation 4X4 MIMO and aggregation of three carriers operator networks can now reach 1 Gbps peak speeds See below for more information
bull V2X Communications Release 14 specifies vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure communications
bull Coordinated Multi Point CoMP (and enhanced CoMP [eCoMP]) is a process by which multiple base stations or cell sectors process a User Equipment (UE) signal simultaneously or coordinate the transmissions to a UE improving cell-edge performance and network efficiency Initial usage will be on the uplink because no user device changes are required Some networks had implemented this feature in 2017
bull HetNet Support HetNets integrate macro cells and small cells A key feature is enhanced inter-cell interference coordination (eICIC) which improves the ability of a macro and a small cell to use the same spectrum This approach is valuable when the operator cannot dedicate spectrum to small cells Operators are currently evaluating eICIC and at least one operator has deployed it Further enhanced ICIC (feICIC) introduced in Rel-11 added advanced interference-cancellation receivers into devices
bull Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Communications Being specified in Release 15 URLLC in LTE will shorten radio latency to a 1 msec range using a combination of shorter transmission time intervals and faster hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) error processing
bull Self-Organizing Networks With SON networks can automatically configure and optimize themselves a capability that will be particularly important as small cells begin to proliferate Vendor-specific methods are common for 3G networks and trials are now occurring for 4G LTE standards-based approaches
Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
18
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
Source 5G AmericasRysavy Research
19
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
20
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Use Case Model
21
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Objectives
IMT-Advanced IMT-2020
Peak Data Rate DL 1 GbpsUL 005 Gbps
DL 20 GbpsUL 10 Gbps
User Experienced Data Rate 10 Mbps 100 Mbps
Spectrum Efficiency 1 (normalized) 3X over IMT-Advanced
Peak Spectral Efficiency DL 15 bpsHzUL 675 bpsHz
DL 30 bpsHzUL 15 bpsHz
Average Spectral Efficiency DL eMBB indoor 9 bpsHzDL eMBB urban 78 bpsHzDL eMBB rural 33 bpsHz
UL eMBB indoor 675 bpsHzUL eMBB urban 54 bpsHzUL eMBB rural 16 bpsHz
Mobility 350 kmh 500 kmh
User Plane Latency 10 msec 1 msec
Connection Density 100 thousand devicessqkm 1 million devices sqkm
Network Energy Efficiency 1 (normalized) 100X over IMT-Advanced
Area Traffic Capacity 01 Mbpssq m 10 Mbpssq m (hot spots)
Bandwidth Up to 20 MHzradio channel (up to 100 MHz aggregated)
Up to 1 GHz (single or multipole RF carriers)
22
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Transformation
23
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
24
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of Different Bands
Source Nokia Vision amp Priorities for Next Generation Radio Technology 3GPP RAN workshop on 5G Sep 17-18 2015
25
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
26
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Network can support both LTE and 5G NR including dual connectivity with which devices have simultaneous connections to LTE and NR
bull Carrier aggregation for multiple NR carriersbull 5 Gbps peak downlink throughput in initial releases increasing to 50 Gbps
in subsequent versionsbull OFDMA in downlink and uplink with optional Single Carrier Frequency
Division Multiple Access (SC-FDMA) for uplink Radio approach for URLLC to be defined in Release 16 but Release 15 will provide physical layer frame structure and numerology support
bull Massive MIMO and beamformingbull Ability to support either FDD or TDD modes for 5G radio bandsbull Numerologies of 2N X 15 kHz for subcarrier spacing up to 120 kHz or 240
kHz This approach depicted in Figure 17 supports both narrow radio channels (for example 1 MHz) or wide ones (for example 400 MHz) Phase 1 likely to support a maximum of 400 MHz bandwidth with 240 kHz subcarrier spacing
5G New Radio (NR) (1)
27
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Error correction through low-density parity codes (LDPC) which are computationally more efficient than LTE turbo codes at higher data rates
bull Standards-based cloud RAN support compared with proprietary LTE approaches that specifies a split between the PDCP and Radio Link Control (RLC) protocol layers
bull Self-contained integrated subframes that combine scheduling data and acknowledgement
bull Future-proofing by providing a flexible radio framework that has forward compatibility to support future currently unknown services such as URLLC to be specified in Release 16
bull Scalable transmission time intervals with short time intervals for low latency and longer time intervals for higher spectral efficiency
bull QoS support using a new modelbull Dynamic co-existence with LTE in the same radio channels
5G New Radio (NR) (2)
28
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
29
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Per ITU 95 users obtain 100 Mbps or greater
bull Typical rates of 500 Mbps appear feasible using 200 MHz radio channel
bull Typical rate of 1 Gbps appear feasible using 400 MHz radio channel
Expected 5G Performance
30
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
31
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Schedule
32
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
Source Dr Seizo Onoe NTT DOCOMO presentation at Brooklyn 5G Summit Apr 21 2016
33
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
34
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Slicing Architecture
35
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
TechnologyName
Type Characteristics Typical Downlink
Speed
Typical Uplink Speed
HSPA WCDMAData service for UMTS networks An enhancement to original UMTS data service
1 Mbps to 4 Mbps
500 Kbpsto 2 Mbps
HSPA+ WCDMAEvolution of HSPA in various stages to increase throughput and capacity and to lower latency
19 Mbps to88 Mbps in 5+5 MHz
38 Mbps to 176 Mbps with dual carrier in 10+5 MHz
1 Mbps to4 Mbps in 5+5 MHz or in 10+5 MHz
LTE OFDMA
New radio interface that can use wide radio channels and deliver extremely high throughput rates All communications handled in IP domain
65 to 263 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
60 to 130 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
LTE-Advanced OFDMA
Advanced version of LTE designed to meet IMT-Advanced requirements
Significant gains through carrier aggregation
36
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Key Features in 3GPP Releases
Release Year Key Features99 1999 First deployable version of UMTS5 2002 High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) for UMTS6 2005 High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) for UMTS7 2008 HSPA+ with higher-order modulation and MIMO8 2009 Long Term Evolution Dual-carrier HSDPA10 2011 LTE-Advanced including carrier aggregation and eICIC11 2013 Coordinated Multi Point (CoMP)12 2015 Public safety support Device-to-device communications Dual Connectivity 256 QAM
on the downlink
13 2016 LTE-Advanced Pro features LTE operation in unlicensed bands LTE-WLANAggregation Narrowband Internet of Things
14 2017 LTE-Advanced Pro additional features such as eLAA (adding uplink to LAA) andcellular V2X communications Study item for 5G ldquoNew Radiordquo
15 2018 Additional LTE-Advanced Pro features such as ultra-reliable low-latencycommunications Phase 1 of 5G Will emphasize enhanced-mobile-broadband usecase and sub-40 GHz operation Includes Massive MIMO beamforming and 4G-5Ginterworking including ability for LTE connectivity to a 5G CN
16 2019 Phase 2 of 5G Full compliance with ITU IMT-2020 requirements Will add URLLCspectrum sharing unlicensed operation and multiple other enhancements
17 2021 Further LTE and 5G enhancements
37
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Types of Cells and Characteristics
Type of Cell CharacteristicsMacro cell Wide-area coverage LTE supports cells up to 100 km in range but typical
distances are 5 to 5 km radius Always installed outdoors
Microcell Covers a smaller area such as a hotel or mall Range to 2 km 5-10W and 256-512 users Usually installed outdoors
Picocell Indoor or outdoor Outdoor cells also called ldquometrocellsrdquo Typical range 15 to 200meters outdoors and 10 to 25 meters indoors 1-2W 64-128 users Deployed byoperators primarily to expand capacity
Consumer Femtocell Indoors Range to 10 meters less than 50 mW and 4 to 6 users Capacity andcoverage benefit Usually deployed by end users using their own backhaul
Enterprise Femtocell Indoors Range to 25 meters 100-250 mW 16-32 users Capacity and coveragebenefit Deployed by operators
Distributed antenna system Expands indoor or outdoor coverage Same hardware can support multipleoperators (neutral host) since antenna can support broad frequency range andmultiple technologies Indoor deployments are typically in larger spaces such asairports Has also been deployed outdoors for coverage and capacity expansion
Remote radio head (RRH) Uses baseband at existing macro site or centralized baseband equipment Ifcentralized the system is called ldquocloud RANrdquo Requires fiber connection
Wi-Fi Primarily provides capacity expansion Neutral-host capability allows multipleoperators to share infrastructure
38
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Challenges
39
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Development Summary5G Research and Development Accelerates
5G in early stages of definition through global efforts and many proposed technical approaches could be deployed in non-standalone versions as early as 2019 Deployment will continue through 2030 Some operators will deploy pre-standard networks for fixed wireless access in 2017
5G is being designed to integrate with LTE and some 5G features may be implemented as LTE-Advanced Pro extensions prior to full 5G availability
5G New Radio (NR) Being Defined
Key aspects of the 5G NR have been determined such as radio channel widths and use of OFDMA The first version specified in Release 15 will support low-latency beam-based channels massive Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) with large numbers of controllable antenna elements scalable-width subchannels carrier aggregation cloud radio-access network (RAN) capability and dynamic co-existence with LTE
LTE Has Become the Global Cellular Standard
A previously fragmented wireless industry has consolidated globally on LTE
LTE is being deployed more quickly than any previous-generation wireless technology
LTE-Advanced Provides Dramatic Advantages
LTE capabilities continue to improve with carrier aggregation 1 Gbps peak throughputs higher-order MIMO multiple methods for expanding capacity in unlicensed spectrum new IoT capabilities vehicle-based communications small-cell support including Enhanced Inter-Cell Interference Coordination (eICIC) lower latency Self-Organizing Network (SON) capabilities and Enhanced Coordinated Multi Point (eCoMP)
Key Conclusions (1)
2
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Development SummaryInternet of Things Poised for Massive Adoption
IoT evolving from machine-to-machine (M2M) communications is seeing rapid adoption with tens of billions of new connected devices expected over the next decade
Drivers include improved LTE support such as low-cost and low-power modems enhanced coverage higher capacity and service-layer standardization such as oneM2M
Unlicensed Spectrum Becomes More Tightly Integrated with Cellular
The industry has developed increasingly sophisticated means for integrating Wi-Fi and cellular networks such as LTE-WLAN Aggregation (LWA) and LTE-WLAN Aggregation with IPSec Tunnel (LWIP) making the user experience ever more seamless
The industry has also developed and is now deploying versions of LTE that can operate in unlicensed spectrum such as LTE-Unlicensed (LTE-U) LTE-Licensed Assisted Access (LTE-LAA) and MulteFire Cellular and Wi-Fi industry members are successfully collaborating to ensure fair spectrum co-existence
Spectrum Still Precious
Spectrum in general and in particular licensed spectrum remains a precious commodity for the industry
Recently added spectrum in the United States includes the 600 MHz band auctioned in 2017 and the 35 GHz Citizens Broadband Radio Service (CBRS) ldquosmall-cellrdquo band currently being planned for auction
5G can include current cellular spectrum bands and overall will include low mid and high band spectrum This includes ldquommWaverdquo spectrum (30 GHz to 100 GHz) with the potential of ten times (or more) as much spectrum as is currently available for cellular Radio channels of 200 MHz and 400 MHz and even wider in the future will enable multi-Gbps peak throughput
Key Conclusions (2)
3
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Development SummarySmall Cells Take Baby Steps Preparing to Stride
Operators have begun installing small cells which now number in the tens of thousands Eventually hundreds of thousands if not millions of small cells will lead to massive increases in capacity
The industry is slowly overcoming challenges that include restrictive regulations site acquisition self-organization interference management power and backhaul
Network Function Virtualization (NFV) Emerges
Network function virtualization (NFV) and software-defined networking (SDN) tools and architectures are enabling operators to reduce network costs simplify deployment of new services reduce deployment time and scale their networks
Some operators are also virtualizing the radio-access network as well as pursuing a related development called cloud radio-access network (cloud RAN) NFV and cloud RAN will be integral components of 5G
Key Conclusions (3)
4
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Broadband Transformation
5
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Mobile Broadband Transformational Elements
6
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
7
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Ultra-high-definition such as 4K and 8K and 3D videobull Augmented and immersive virtual reality Ultra-high-fidelity virtual reality can
consume 50 times the bandwidth of a high-definition video streambull Realization of the tactile internetmdashreal-time immediate sensing and control
enabling a vast array of new applicationsbull Automotive including autonomous vehicles driver-assistance systems vehicular
internet infotainment inter-vehicle information exchange and vehicle pre-crash sensing and mitigation
bull Monitoring of critical infrastructure such as transmission lines using long-battery-life and low-latency sensors
bull Smart transportation using data from vehicles road sensors and cameras to optimize traffic flow
bull Mobile health and telemedicine systems that rely on ready availability of high-resolution and detailed medical records imaging and diagnostic video
bull Public safety including broadband data and mission-critical voicebull Sports and fitness enhancement through biometric sensing real-time monitoring
and data analysisbull Fixed-broadband replacement
5G Data Drivers
8
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Global Mobile Data Growth
Source Cisco ldquoCisco Visual Networking Index Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Updaterdquo February 16 2013
Source Cisco Visual Networking Index Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Update 2016-2021 February 2017
9
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
Source Ericsson Ericsson Mobility Report June 2017
10
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
Source Ericsson IoT Security February 201711
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More than 756 billion GSM-HSPA-LTE connections
bull Greater than the worldrsquos population of 74 billion
bull 93 billion 3GPP subscriber connections expected by 2022
Source Ovum July 2017 Estimates
Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
12
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
Source Ovum (WCIS) 2017 13
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Expanding Use Cases
14
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
1G to 5G
Generation Requirements Comments
1G No official requirements
Analog technology
Deployed in the 1980s
2G No official requirements
Digital technology
First digital systems
Deployed in the 1990s
New services such as SMS and low-rate data
Primary technologies include IS-95 CDMA (cdmaOne) IS-136 (D-AMPS) and GSM
3G ITUrsquos IMT-2000 required 144 Kbps mobile 384 Kbps pedestrian 2 Mbps indoors
First deployment in 2000
Primary technologies include CDMA2000 1XEV-DO and UMTS-HSPA
WiMAX4G (Initial Technical Designation)
ITUrsquos IMT-Advanced requirements include ability to operate in up to 40 MHz radio channels and with very high spectral efficiency
First deployment in 2010
IEEE 80216m and LTE-Advanced meet the requirements
4G (Current Marketing Designation)
Systems that significantly exceed the performance of initial 3G networks No quantitative requirements
Todayrsquos HSPA+ LTE and WiMAX networks meet this requirement
5G ITU IMT-2020 has defined technical requirements for 5G and 3GPP is developing specifications
First standards-based deployments in 2019 and 2020
15
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline of Cellular Generations
16
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Carrier Aggregation With this capability already in use operators can aggregate radio carriers in the same band or across disparate bands to improve throughputs (under light network load) capacity and efficiency
bull VoLTE Initially launched in 2015 and with widespread availability in 2017 VoLTE enables operators to roll out packetized voice for LTE networks resulting in greater voice capacity and higher voice quality
bull Tighter Integration of LTE with Unlicensed Bands LTE-U became available for testing in 2016 and 3GPP completed specifications for LAA in Release 13 with deployment expected around 2018 MulteFire building on LAA will operate without requiring a licensed-carrier anchor LTEWi-Fi Aggregation through LWA and LWIP are other options for operators with large Wi-Fi deployments
bull Enhanced Support for IoT Release 13 brings Category M1 a low-cost device option along with Narrowband IoT (NB-IoT) a version of the LTE radio interface specifically for IoT devices called Category NB1
bull Higher-Order and Full-Dimension MIMO Deployments in 2017 use up to 4X4 MIMO Release 14 specifies a capability called Full-Dimension MIMO which supports configurations with as many as 32 antennas at the base station
bull Dual Connectivity Release 12 introduced the capability to combine carriers from different sectors andor base stations (ie evolved Node Bs [eNBs]) through a feature called Dual Connectivity Two architectures were defined one that supports Packet Data Convergence Protocol (PDCP) aggregation between the different eNBs and one that supports separate S1 connections on the user plane from the different eNBs to the EPC
Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
17
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull 256 QAM Downlink and 64 QAM Uplink Defined in Release 12 and already deployed in some networks higher-order modulation increases user throughput rates in favorable radio conditions
bull 1 Gbps Capability Using a combination of 256 QAM modulation 4X4 MIMO and aggregation of three carriers operator networks can now reach 1 Gbps peak speeds See below for more information
bull V2X Communications Release 14 specifies vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure communications
bull Coordinated Multi Point CoMP (and enhanced CoMP [eCoMP]) is a process by which multiple base stations or cell sectors process a User Equipment (UE) signal simultaneously or coordinate the transmissions to a UE improving cell-edge performance and network efficiency Initial usage will be on the uplink because no user device changes are required Some networks had implemented this feature in 2017
bull HetNet Support HetNets integrate macro cells and small cells A key feature is enhanced inter-cell interference coordination (eICIC) which improves the ability of a macro and a small cell to use the same spectrum This approach is valuable when the operator cannot dedicate spectrum to small cells Operators are currently evaluating eICIC and at least one operator has deployed it Further enhanced ICIC (feICIC) introduced in Rel-11 added advanced interference-cancellation receivers into devices
bull Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Communications Being specified in Release 15 URLLC in LTE will shorten radio latency to a 1 msec range using a combination of shorter transmission time intervals and faster hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) error processing
bull Self-Organizing Networks With SON networks can automatically configure and optimize themselves a capability that will be particularly important as small cells begin to proliferate Vendor-specific methods are common for 3G networks and trials are now occurring for 4G LTE standards-based approaches
Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
18
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
Source 5G AmericasRysavy Research
19
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
20
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Use Case Model
21
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Objectives
IMT-Advanced IMT-2020
Peak Data Rate DL 1 GbpsUL 005 Gbps
DL 20 GbpsUL 10 Gbps
User Experienced Data Rate 10 Mbps 100 Mbps
Spectrum Efficiency 1 (normalized) 3X over IMT-Advanced
Peak Spectral Efficiency DL 15 bpsHzUL 675 bpsHz
DL 30 bpsHzUL 15 bpsHz
Average Spectral Efficiency DL eMBB indoor 9 bpsHzDL eMBB urban 78 bpsHzDL eMBB rural 33 bpsHz
UL eMBB indoor 675 bpsHzUL eMBB urban 54 bpsHzUL eMBB rural 16 bpsHz
Mobility 350 kmh 500 kmh
User Plane Latency 10 msec 1 msec
Connection Density 100 thousand devicessqkm 1 million devices sqkm
Network Energy Efficiency 1 (normalized) 100X over IMT-Advanced
Area Traffic Capacity 01 Mbpssq m 10 Mbpssq m (hot spots)
Bandwidth Up to 20 MHzradio channel (up to 100 MHz aggregated)
Up to 1 GHz (single or multipole RF carriers)
22
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Transformation
23
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
24
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of Different Bands
Source Nokia Vision amp Priorities for Next Generation Radio Technology 3GPP RAN workshop on 5G Sep 17-18 2015
25
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
26
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Network can support both LTE and 5G NR including dual connectivity with which devices have simultaneous connections to LTE and NR
bull Carrier aggregation for multiple NR carriersbull 5 Gbps peak downlink throughput in initial releases increasing to 50 Gbps
in subsequent versionsbull OFDMA in downlink and uplink with optional Single Carrier Frequency
Division Multiple Access (SC-FDMA) for uplink Radio approach for URLLC to be defined in Release 16 but Release 15 will provide physical layer frame structure and numerology support
bull Massive MIMO and beamformingbull Ability to support either FDD or TDD modes for 5G radio bandsbull Numerologies of 2N X 15 kHz for subcarrier spacing up to 120 kHz or 240
kHz This approach depicted in Figure 17 supports both narrow radio channels (for example 1 MHz) or wide ones (for example 400 MHz) Phase 1 likely to support a maximum of 400 MHz bandwidth with 240 kHz subcarrier spacing
5G New Radio (NR) (1)
27
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Error correction through low-density parity codes (LDPC) which are computationally more efficient than LTE turbo codes at higher data rates
bull Standards-based cloud RAN support compared with proprietary LTE approaches that specifies a split between the PDCP and Radio Link Control (RLC) protocol layers
bull Self-contained integrated subframes that combine scheduling data and acknowledgement
bull Future-proofing by providing a flexible radio framework that has forward compatibility to support future currently unknown services such as URLLC to be specified in Release 16
bull Scalable transmission time intervals with short time intervals for low latency and longer time intervals for higher spectral efficiency
bull QoS support using a new modelbull Dynamic co-existence with LTE in the same radio channels
5G New Radio (NR) (2)
28
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
29
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Per ITU 95 users obtain 100 Mbps or greater
bull Typical rates of 500 Mbps appear feasible using 200 MHz radio channel
bull Typical rate of 1 Gbps appear feasible using 400 MHz radio channel
Expected 5G Performance
30
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
31
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Schedule
32
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
Source Dr Seizo Onoe NTT DOCOMO presentation at Brooklyn 5G Summit Apr 21 2016
33
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
34
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Slicing Architecture
35
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
TechnologyName
Type Characteristics Typical Downlink
Speed
Typical Uplink Speed
HSPA WCDMAData service for UMTS networks An enhancement to original UMTS data service
1 Mbps to 4 Mbps
500 Kbpsto 2 Mbps
HSPA+ WCDMAEvolution of HSPA in various stages to increase throughput and capacity and to lower latency
19 Mbps to88 Mbps in 5+5 MHz
38 Mbps to 176 Mbps with dual carrier in 10+5 MHz
1 Mbps to4 Mbps in 5+5 MHz or in 10+5 MHz
LTE OFDMA
New radio interface that can use wide radio channels and deliver extremely high throughput rates All communications handled in IP domain
65 to 263 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
60 to 130 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
LTE-Advanced OFDMA
Advanced version of LTE designed to meet IMT-Advanced requirements
Significant gains through carrier aggregation
36
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Key Features in 3GPP Releases
Release Year Key Features99 1999 First deployable version of UMTS5 2002 High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) for UMTS6 2005 High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) for UMTS7 2008 HSPA+ with higher-order modulation and MIMO8 2009 Long Term Evolution Dual-carrier HSDPA10 2011 LTE-Advanced including carrier aggregation and eICIC11 2013 Coordinated Multi Point (CoMP)12 2015 Public safety support Device-to-device communications Dual Connectivity 256 QAM
on the downlink
13 2016 LTE-Advanced Pro features LTE operation in unlicensed bands LTE-WLANAggregation Narrowband Internet of Things
14 2017 LTE-Advanced Pro additional features such as eLAA (adding uplink to LAA) andcellular V2X communications Study item for 5G ldquoNew Radiordquo
15 2018 Additional LTE-Advanced Pro features such as ultra-reliable low-latencycommunications Phase 1 of 5G Will emphasize enhanced-mobile-broadband usecase and sub-40 GHz operation Includes Massive MIMO beamforming and 4G-5Ginterworking including ability for LTE connectivity to a 5G CN
16 2019 Phase 2 of 5G Full compliance with ITU IMT-2020 requirements Will add URLLCspectrum sharing unlicensed operation and multiple other enhancements
17 2021 Further LTE and 5G enhancements
37
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Types of Cells and Characteristics
Type of Cell CharacteristicsMacro cell Wide-area coverage LTE supports cells up to 100 km in range but typical
distances are 5 to 5 km radius Always installed outdoors
Microcell Covers a smaller area such as a hotel or mall Range to 2 km 5-10W and 256-512 users Usually installed outdoors
Picocell Indoor or outdoor Outdoor cells also called ldquometrocellsrdquo Typical range 15 to 200meters outdoors and 10 to 25 meters indoors 1-2W 64-128 users Deployed byoperators primarily to expand capacity
Consumer Femtocell Indoors Range to 10 meters less than 50 mW and 4 to 6 users Capacity andcoverage benefit Usually deployed by end users using their own backhaul
Enterprise Femtocell Indoors Range to 25 meters 100-250 mW 16-32 users Capacity and coveragebenefit Deployed by operators
Distributed antenna system Expands indoor or outdoor coverage Same hardware can support multipleoperators (neutral host) since antenna can support broad frequency range andmultiple technologies Indoor deployments are typically in larger spaces such asairports Has also been deployed outdoors for coverage and capacity expansion
Remote radio head (RRH) Uses baseband at existing macro site or centralized baseband equipment Ifcentralized the system is called ldquocloud RANrdquo Requires fiber connection
Wi-Fi Primarily provides capacity expansion Neutral-host capability allows multipleoperators to share infrastructure
38
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Challenges
39
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Development SummaryInternet of Things Poised for Massive Adoption
IoT evolving from machine-to-machine (M2M) communications is seeing rapid adoption with tens of billions of new connected devices expected over the next decade
Drivers include improved LTE support such as low-cost and low-power modems enhanced coverage higher capacity and service-layer standardization such as oneM2M
Unlicensed Spectrum Becomes More Tightly Integrated with Cellular
The industry has developed increasingly sophisticated means for integrating Wi-Fi and cellular networks such as LTE-WLAN Aggregation (LWA) and LTE-WLAN Aggregation with IPSec Tunnel (LWIP) making the user experience ever more seamless
The industry has also developed and is now deploying versions of LTE that can operate in unlicensed spectrum such as LTE-Unlicensed (LTE-U) LTE-Licensed Assisted Access (LTE-LAA) and MulteFire Cellular and Wi-Fi industry members are successfully collaborating to ensure fair spectrum co-existence
Spectrum Still Precious
Spectrum in general and in particular licensed spectrum remains a precious commodity for the industry
Recently added spectrum in the United States includes the 600 MHz band auctioned in 2017 and the 35 GHz Citizens Broadband Radio Service (CBRS) ldquosmall-cellrdquo band currently being planned for auction
5G can include current cellular spectrum bands and overall will include low mid and high band spectrum This includes ldquommWaverdquo spectrum (30 GHz to 100 GHz) with the potential of ten times (or more) as much spectrum as is currently available for cellular Radio channels of 200 MHz and 400 MHz and even wider in the future will enable multi-Gbps peak throughput
Key Conclusions (2)
3
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Development SummarySmall Cells Take Baby Steps Preparing to Stride
Operators have begun installing small cells which now number in the tens of thousands Eventually hundreds of thousands if not millions of small cells will lead to massive increases in capacity
The industry is slowly overcoming challenges that include restrictive regulations site acquisition self-organization interference management power and backhaul
Network Function Virtualization (NFV) Emerges
Network function virtualization (NFV) and software-defined networking (SDN) tools and architectures are enabling operators to reduce network costs simplify deployment of new services reduce deployment time and scale their networks
Some operators are also virtualizing the radio-access network as well as pursuing a related development called cloud radio-access network (cloud RAN) NFV and cloud RAN will be integral components of 5G
Key Conclusions (3)
4
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Broadband Transformation
5
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Mobile Broadband Transformational Elements
6
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
7
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Ultra-high-definition such as 4K and 8K and 3D videobull Augmented and immersive virtual reality Ultra-high-fidelity virtual reality can
consume 50 times the bandwidth of a high-definition video streambull Realization of the tactile internetmdashreal-time immediate sensing and control
enabling a vast array of new applicationsbull Automotive including autonomous vehicles driver-assistance systems vehicular
internet infotainment inter-vehicle information exchange and vehicle pre-crash sensing and mitigation
bull Monitoring of critical infrastructure such as transmission lines using long-battery-life and low-latency sensors
bull Smart transportation using data from vehicles road sensors and cameras to optimize traffic flow
bull Mobile health and telemedicine systems that rely on ready availability of high-resolution and detailed medical records imaging and diagnostic video
bull Public safety including broadband data and mission-critical voicebull Sports and fitness enhancement through biometric sensing real-time monitoring
and data analysisbull Fixed-broadband replacement
5G Data Drivers
8
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Global Mobile Data Growth
Source Cisco ldquoCisco Visual Networking Index Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Updaterdquo February 16 2013
Source Cisco Visual Networking Index Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Update 2016-2021 February 2017
9
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
Source Ericsson Ericsson Mobility Report June 2017
10
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
Source Ericsson IoT Security February 201711
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More than 756 billion GSM-HSPA-LTE connections
bull Greater than the worldrsquos population of 74 billion
bull 93 billion 3GPP subscriber connections expected by 2022
Source Ovum July 2017 Estimates
Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
12
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
Source Ovum (WCIS) 2017 13
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Expanding Use Cases
14
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
1G to 5G
Generation Requirements Comments
1G No official requirements
Analog technology
Deployed in the 1980s
2G No official requirements
Digital technology
First digital systems
Deployed in the 1990s
New services such as SMS and low-rate data
Primary technologies include IS-95 CDMA (cdmaOne) IS-136 (D-AMPS) and GSM
3G ITUrsquos IMT-2000 required 144 Kbps mobile 384 Kbps pedestrian 2 Mbps indoors
First deployment in 2000
Primary technologies include CDMA2000 1XEV-DO and UMTS-HSPA
WiMAX4G (Initial Technical Designation)
ITUrsquos IMT-Advanced requirements include ability to operate in up to 40 MHz radio channels and with very high spectral efficiency
First deployment in 2010
IEEE 80216m and LTE-Advanced meet the requirements
4G (Current Marketing Designation)
Systems that significantly exceed the performance of initial 3G networks No quantitative requirements
Todayrsquos HSPA+ LTE and WiMAX networks meet this requirement
5G ITU IMT-2020 has defined technical requirements for 5G and 3GPP is developing specifications
First standards-based deployments in 2019 and 2020
15
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline of Cellular Generations
16
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Carrier Aggregation With this capability already in use operators can aggregate radio carriers in the same band or across disparate bands to improve throughputs (under light network load) capacity and efficiency
bull VoLTE Initially launched in 2015 and with widespread availability in 2017 VoLTE enables operators to roll out packetized voice for LTE networks resulting in greater voice capacity and higher voice quality
bull Tighter Integration of LTE with Unlicensed Bands LTE-U became available for testing in 2016 and 3GPP completed specifications for LAA in Release 13 with deployment expected around 2018 MulteFire building on LAA will operate without requiring a licensed-carrier anchor LTEWi-Fi Aggregation through LWA and LWIP are other options for operators with large Wi-Fi deployments
bull Enhanced Support for IoT Release 13 brings Category M1 a low-cost device option along with Narrowband IoT (NB-IoT) a version of the LTE radio interface specifically for IoT devices called Category NB1
bull Higher-Order and Full-Dimension MIMO Deployments in 2017 use up to 4X4 MIMO Release 14 specifies a capability called Full-Dimension MIMO which supports configurations with as many as 32 antennas at the base station
bull Dual Connectivity Release 12 introduced the capability to combine carriers from different sectors andor base stations (ie evolved Node Bs [eNBs]) through a feature called Dual Connectivity Two architectures were defined one that supports Packet Data Convergence Protocol (PDCP) aggregation between the different eNBs and one that supports separate S1 connections on the user plane from the different eNBs to the EPC
Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
17
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull 256 QAM Downlink and 64 QAM Uplink Defined in Release 12 and already deployed in some networks higher-order modulation increases user throughput rates in favorable radio conditions
bull 1 Gbps Capability Using a combination of 256 QAM modulation 4X4 MIMO and aggregation of three carriers operator networks can now reach 1 Gbps peak speeds See below for more information
bull V2X Communications Release 14 specifies vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure communications
bull Coordinated Multi Point CoMP (and enhanced CoMP [eCoMP]) is a process by which multiple base stations or cell sectors process a User Equipment (UE) signal simultaneously or coordinate the transmissions to a UE improving cell-edge performance and network efficiency Initial usage will be on the uplink because no user device changes are required Some networks had implemented this feature in 2017
bull HetNet Support HetNets integrate macro cells and small cells A key feature is enhanced inter-cell interference coordination (eICIC) which improves the ability of a macro and a small cell to use the same spectrum This approach is valuable when the operator cannot dedicate spectrum to small cells Operators are currently evaluating eICIC and at least one operator has deployed it Further enhanced ICIC (feICIC) introduced in Rel-11 added advanced interference-cancellation receivers into devices
bull Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Communications Being specified in Release 15 URLLC in LTE will shorten radio latency to a 1 msec range using a combination of shorter transmission time intervals and faster hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) error processing
bull Self-Organizing Networks With SON networks can automatically configure and optimize themselves a capability that will be particularly important as small cells begin to proliferate Vendor-specific methods are common for 3G networks and trials are now occurring for 4G LTE standards-based approaches
Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
18
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
Source 5G AmericasRysavy Research
19
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
20
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Use Case Model
21
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Objectives
IMT-Advanced IMT-2020
Peak Data Rate DL 1 GbpsUL 005 Gbps
DL 20 GbpsUL 10 Gbps
User Experienced Data Rate 10 Mbps 100 Mbps
Spectrum Efficiency 1 (normalized) 3X over IMT-Advanced
Peak Spectral Efficiency DL 15 bpsHzUL 675 bpsHz
DL 30 bpsHzUL 15 bpsHz
Average Spectral Efficiency DL eMBB indoor 9 bpsHzDL eMBB urban 78 bpsHzDL eMBB rural 33 bpsHz
UL eMBB indoor 675 bpsHzUL eMBB urban 54 bpsHzUL eMBB rural 16 bpsHz
Mobility 350 kmh 500 kmh
User Plane Latency 10 msec 1 msec
Connection Density 100 thousand devicessqkm 1 million devices sqkm
Network Energy Efficiency 1 (normalized) 100X over IMT-Advanced
Area Traffic Capacity 01 Mbpssq m 10 Mbpssq m (hot spots)
Bandwidth Up to 20 MHzradio channel (up to 100 MHz aggregated)
Up to 1 GHz (single or multipole RF carriers)
22
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Transformation
23
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
24
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of Different Bands
Source Nokia Vision amp Priorities for Next Generation Radio Technology 3GPP RAN workshop on 5G Sep 17-18 2015
25
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
26
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Network can support both LTE and 5G NR including dual connectivity with which devices have simultaneous connections to LTE and NR
bull Carrier aggregation for multiple NR carriersbull 5 Gbps peak downlink throughput in initial releases increasing to 50 Gbps
in subsequent versionsbull OFDMA in downlink and uplink with optional Single Carrier Frequency
Division Multiple Access (SC-FDMA) for uplink Radio approach for URLLC to be defined in Release 16 but Release 15 will provide physical layer frame structure and numerology support
bull Massive MIMO and beamformingbull Ability to support either FDD or TDD modes for 5G radio bandsbull Numerologies of 2N X 15 kHz for subcarrier spacing up to 120 kHz or 240
kHz This approach depicted in Figure 17 supports both narrow radio channels (for example 1 MHz) or wide ones (for example 400 MHz) Phase 1 likely to support a maximum of 400 MHz bandwidth with 240 kHz subcarrier spacing
5G New Radio (NR) (1)
27
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Error correction through low-density parity codes (LDPC) which are computationally more efficient than LTE turbo codes at higher data rates
bull Standards-based cloud RAN support compared with proprietary LTE approaches that specifies a split between the PDCP and Radio Link Control (RLC) protocol layers
bull Self-contained integrated subframes that combine scheduling data and acknowledgement
bull Future-proofing by providing a flexible radio framework that has forward compatibility to support future currently unknown services such as URLLC to be specified in Release 16
bull Scalable transmission time intervals with short time intervals for low latency and longer time intervals for higher spectral efficiency
bull QoS support using a new modelbull Dynamic co-existence with LTE in the same radio channels
5G New Radio (NR) (2)
28
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
29
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Per ITU 95 users obtain 100 Mbps or greater
bull Typical rates of 500 Mbps appear feasible using 200 MHz radio channel
bull Typical rate of 1 Gbps appear feasible using 400 MHz radio channel
Expected 5G Performance
30
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
31
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Schedule
32
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
Source Dr Seizo Onoe NTT DOCOMO presentation at Brooklyn 5G Summit Apr 21 2016
33
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
34
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Slicing Architecture
35
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
TechnologyName
Type Characteristics Typical Downlink
Speed
Typical Uplink Speed
HSPA WCDMAData service for UMTS networks An enhancement to original UMTS data service
1 Mbps to 4 Mbps
500 Kbpsto 2 Mbps
HSPA+ WCDMAEvolution of HSPA in various stages to increase throughput and capacity and to lower latency
19 Mbps to88 Mbps in 5+5 MHz
38 Mbps to 176 Mbps with dual carrier in 10+5 MHz
1 Mbps to4 Mbps in 5+5 MHz or in 10+5 MHz
LTE OFDMA
New radio interface that can use wide radio channels and deliver extremely high throughput rates All communications handled in IP domain
65 to 263 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
60 to 130 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
LTE-Advanced OFDMA
Advanced version of LTE designed to meet IMT-Advanced requirements
Significant gains through carrier aggregation
36
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Key Features in 3GPP Releases
Release Year Key Features99 1999 First deployable version of UMTS5 2002 High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) for UMTS6 2005 High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) for UMTS7 2008 HSPA+ with higher-order modulation and MIMO8 2009 Long Term Evolution Dual-carrier HSDPA10 2011 LTE-Advanced including carrier aggregation and eICIC11 2013 Coordinated Multi Point (CoMP)12 2015 Public safety support Device-to-device communications Dual Connectivity 256 QAM
on the downlink
13 2016 LTE-Advanced Pro features LTE operation in unlicensed bands LTE-WLANAggregation Narrowband Internet of Things
14 2017 LTE-Advanced Pro additional features such as eLAA (adding uplink to LAA) andcellular V2X communications Study item for 5G ldquoNew Radiordquo
15 2018 Additional LTE-Advanced Pro features such as ultra-reliable low-latencycommunications Phase 1 of 5G Will emphasize enhanced-mobile-broadband usecase and sub-40 GHz operation Includes Massive MIMO beamforming and 4G-5Ginterworking including ability for LTE connectivity to a 5G CN
16 2019 Phase 2 of 5G Full compliance with ITU IMT-2020 requirements Will add URLLCspectrum sharing unlicensed operation and multiple other enhancements
17 2021 Further LTE and 5G enhancements
37
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Types of Cells and Characteristics
Type of Cell CharacteristicsMacro cell Wide-area coverage LTE supports cells up to 100 km in range but typical
distances are 5 to 5 km radius Always installed outdoors
Microcell Covers a smaller area such as a hotel or mall Range to 2 km 5-10W and 256-512 users Usually installed outdoors
Picocell Indoor or outdoor Outdoor cells also called ldquometrocellsrdquo Typical range 15 to 200meters outdoors and 10 to 25 meters indoors 1-2W 64-128 users Deployed byoperators primarily to expand capacity
Consumer Femtocell Indoors Range to 10 meters less than 50 mW and 4 to 6 users Capacity andcoverage benefit Usually deployed by end users using their own backhaul
Enterprise Femtocell Indoors Range to 25 meters 100-250 mW 16-32 users Capacity and coveragebenefit Deployed by operators
Distributed antenna system Expands indoor or outdoor coverage Same hardware can support multipleoperators (neutral host) since antenna can support broad frequency range andmultiple technologies Indoor deployments are typically in larger spaces such asairports Has also been deployed outdoors for coverage and capacity expansion
Remote radio head (RRH) Uses baseband at existing macro site or centralized baseband equipment Ifcentralized the system is called ldquocloud RANrdquo Requires fiber connection
Wi-Fi Primarily provides capacity expansion Neutral-host capability allows multipleoperators to share infrastructure
38
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Challenges
39
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Development SummarySmall Cells Take Baby Steps Preparing to Stride
Operators have begun installing small cells which now number in the tens of thousands Eventually hundreds of thousands if not millions of small cells will lead to massive increases in capacity
The industry is slowly overcoming challenges that include restrictive regulations site acquisition self-organization interference management power and backhaul
Network Function Virtualization (NFV) Emerges
Network function virtualization (NFV) and software-defined networking (SDN) tools and architectures are enabling operators to reduce network costs simplify deployment of new services reduce deployment time and scale their networks
Some operators are also virtualizing the radio-access network as well as pursuing a related development called cloud radio-access network (cloud RAN) NFV and cloud RAN will be integral components of 5G
Key Conclusions (3)
4
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Broadband Transformation
5
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Mobile Broadband Transformational Elements
6
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
7
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Ultra-high-definition such as 4K and 8K and 3D videobull Augmented and immersive virtual reality Ultra-high-fidelity virtual reality can
consume 50 times the bandwidth of a high-definition video streambull Realization of the tactile internetmdashreal-time immediate sensing and control
enabling a vast array of new applicationsbull Automotive including autonomous vehicles driver-assistance systems vehicular
internet infotainment inter-vehicle information exchange and vehicle pre-crash sensing and mitigation
bull Monitoring of critical infrastructure such as transmission lines using long-battery-life and low-latency sensors
bull Smart transportation using data from vehicles road sensors and cameras to optimize traffic flow
bull Mobile health and telemedicine systems that rely on ready availability of high-resolution and detailed medical records imaging and diagnostic video
bull Public safety including broadband data and mission-critical voicebull Sports and fitness enhancement through biometric sensing real-time monitoring
and data analysisbull Fixed-broadband replacement
5G Data Drivers
8
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Global Mobile Data Growth
Source Cisco ldquoCisco Visual Networking Index Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Updaterdquo February 16 2013
Source Cisco Visual Networking Index Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Update 2016-2021 February 2017
9
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
Source Ericsson Ericsson Mobility Report June 2017
10
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
Source Ericsson IoT Security February 201711
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More than 756 billion GSM-HSPA-LTE connections
bull Greater than the worldrsquos population of 74 billion
bull 93 billion 3GPP subscriber connections expected by 2022
Source Ovum July 2017 Estimates
Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
12
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
Source Ovum (WCIS) 2017 13
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Expanding Use Cases
14
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
1G to 5G
Generation Requirements Comments
1G No official requirements
Analog technology
Deployed in the 1980s
2G No official requirements
Digital technology
First digital systems
Deployed in the 1990s
New services such as SMS and low-rate data
Primary technologies include IS-95 CDMA (cdmaOne) IS-136 (D-AMPS) and GSM
3G ITUrsquos IMT-2000 required 144 Kbps mobile 384 Kbps pedestrian 2 Mbps indoors
First deployment in 2000
Primary technologies include CDMA2000 1XEV-DO and UMTS-HSPA
WiMAX4G (Initial Technical Designation)
ITUrsquos IMT-Advanced requirements include ability to operate in up to 40 MHz radio channels and with very high spectral efficiency
First deployment in 2010
IEEE 80216m and LTE-Advanced meet the requirements
4G (Current Marketing Designation)
Systems that significantly exceed the performance of initial 3G networks No quantitative requirements
Todayrsquos HSPA+ LTE and WiMAX networks meet this requirement
5G ITU IMT-2020 has defined technical requirements for 5G and 3GPP is developing specifications
First standards-based deployments in 2019 and 2020
15
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline of Cellular Generations
16
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Carrier Aggregation With this capability already in use operators can aggregate radio carriers in the same band or across disparate bands to improve throughputs (under light network load) capacity and efficiency
bull VoLTE Initially launched in 2015 and with widespread availability in 2017 VoLTE enables operators to roll out packetized voice for LTE networks resulting in greater voice capacity and higher voice quality
bull Tighter Integration of LTE with Unlicensed Bands LTE-U became available for testing in 2016 and 3GPP completed specifications for LAA in Release 13 with deployment expected around 2018 MulteFire building on LAA will operate without requiring a licensed-carrier anchor LTEWi-Fi Aggregation through LWA and LWIP are other options for operators with large Wi-Fi deployments
bull Enhanced Support for IoT Release 13 brings Category M1 a low-cost device option along with Narrowband IoT (NB-IoT) a version of the LTE radio interface specifically for IoT devices called Category NB1
bull Higher-Order and Full-Dimension MIMO Deployments in 2017 use up to 4X4 MIMO Release 14 specifies a capability called Full-Dimension MIMO which supports configurations with as many as 32 antennas at the base station
bull Dual Connectivity Release 12 introduced the capability to combine carriers from different sectors andor base stations (ie evolved Node Bs [eNBs]) through a feature called Dual Connectivity Two architectures were defined one that supports Packet Data Convergence Protocol (PDCP) aggregation between the different eNBs and one that supports separate S1 connections on the user plane from the different eNBs to the EPC
Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
17
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull 256 QAM Downlink and 64 QAM Uplink Defined in Release 12 and already deployed in some networks higher-order modulation increases user throughput rates in favorable radio conditions
bull 1 Gbps Capability Using a combination of 256 QAM modulation 4X4 MIMO and aggregation of three carriers operator networks can now reach 1 Gbps peak speeds See below for more information
bull V2X Communications Release 14 specifies vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure communications
bull Coordinated Multi Point CoMP (and enhanced CoMP [eCoMP]) is a process by which multiple base stations or cell sectors process a User Equipment (UE) signal simultaneously or coordinate the transmissions to a UE improving cell-edge performance and network efficiency Initial usage will be on the uplink because no user device changes are required Some networks had implemented this feature in 2017
bull HetNet Support HetNets integrate macro cells and small cells A key feature is enhanced inter-cell interference coordination (eICIC) which improves the ability of a macro and a small cell to use the same spectrum This approach is valuable when the operator cannot dedicate spectrum to small cells Operators are currently evaluating eICIC and at least one operator has deployed it Further enhanced ICIC (feICIC) introduced in Rel-11 added advanced interference-cancellation receivers into devices
bull Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Communications Being specified in Release 15 URLLC in LTE will shorten radio latency to a 1 msec range using a combination of shorter transmission time intervals and faster hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) error processing
bull Self-Organizing Networks With SON networks can automatically configure and optimize themselves a capability that will be particularly important as small cells begin to proliferate Vendor-specific methods are common for 3G networks and trials are now occurring for 4G LTE standards-based approaches
Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
18
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
Source 5G AmericasRysavy Research
19
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
20
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Use Case Model
21
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Objectives
IMT-Advanced IMT-2020
Peak Data Rate DL 1 GbpsUL 005 Gbps
DL 20 GbpsUL 10 Gbps
User Experienced Data Rate 10 Mbps 100 Mbps
Spectrum Efficiency 1 (normalized) 3X over IMT-Advanced
Peak Spectral Efficiency DL 15 bpsHzUL 675 bpsHz
DL 30 bpsHzUL 15 bpsHz
Average Spectral Efficiency DL eMBB indoor 9 bpsHzDL eMBB urban 78 bpsHzDL eMBB rural 33 bpsHz
UL eMBB indoor 675 bpsHzUL eMBB urban 54 bpsHzUL eMBB rural 16 bpsHz
Mobility 350 kmh 500 kmh
User Plane Latency 10 msec 1 msec
Connection Density 100 thousand devicessqkm 1 million devices sqkm
Network Energy Efficiency 1 (normalized) 100X over IMT-Advanced
Area Traffic Capacity 01 Mbpssq m 10 Mbpssq m (hot spots)
Bandwidth Up to 20 MHzradio channel (up to 100 MHz aggregated)
Up to 1 GHz (single or multipole RF carriers)
22
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Transformation
23
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
24
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of Different Bands
Source Nokia Vision amp Priorities for Next Generation Radio Technology 3GPP RAN workshop on 5G Sep 17-18 2015
25
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
26
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Network can support both LTE and 5G NR including dual connectivity with which devices have simultaneous connections to LTE and NR
bull Carrier aggregation for multiple NR carriersbull 5 Gbps peak downlink throughput in initial releases increasing to 50 Gbps
in subsequent versionsbull OFDMA in downlink and uplink with optional Single Carrier Frequency
Division Multiple Access (SC-FDMA) for uplink Radio approach for URLLC to be defined in Release 16 but Release 15 will provide physical layer frame structure and numerology support
bull Massive MIMO and beamformingbull Ability to support either FDD or TDD modes for 5G radio bandsbull Numerologies of 2N X 15 kHz for subcarrier spacing up to 120 kHz or 240
kHz This approach depicted in Figure 17 supports both narrow radio channels (for example 1 MHz) or wide ones (for example 400 MHz) Phase 1 likely to support a maximum of 400 MHz bandwidth with 240 kHz subcarrier spacing
5G New Radio (NR) (1)
27
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Error correction through low-density parity codes (LDPC) which are computationally more efficient than LTE turbo codes at higher data rates
bull Standards-based cloud RAN support compared with proprietary LTE approaches that specifies a split between the PDCP and Radio Link Control (RLC) protocol layers
bull Self-contained integrated subframes that combine scheduling data and acknowledgement
bull Future-proofing by providing a flexible radio framework that has forward compatibility to support future currently unknown services such as URLLC to be specified in Release 16
bull Scalable transmission time intervals with short time intervals for low latency and longer time intervals for higher spectral efficiency
bull QoS support using a new modelbull Dynamic co-existence with LTE in the same radio channels
5G New Radio (NR) (2)
28
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
29
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Per ITU 95 users obtain 100 Mbps or greater
bull Typical rates of 500 Mbps appear feasible using 200 MHz radio channel
bull Typical rate of 1 Gbps appear feasible using 400 MHz radio channel
Expected 5G Performance
30
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
31
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Schedule
32
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
Source Dr Seizo Onoe NTT DOCOMO presentation at Brooklyn 5G Summit Apr 21 2016
33
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
34
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Slicing Architecture
35
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
TechnologyName
Type Characteristics Typical Downlink
Speed
Typical Uplink Speed
HSPA WCDMAData service for UMTS networks An enhancement to original UMTS data service
1 Mbps to 4 Mbps
500 Kbpsto 2 Mbps
HSPA+ WCDMAEvolution of HSPA in various stages to increase throughput and capacity and to lower latency
19 Mbps to88 Mbps in 5+5 MHz
38 Mbps to 176 Mbps with dual carrier in 10+5 MHz
1 Mbps to4 Mbps in 5+5 MHz or in 10+5 MHz
LTE OFDMA
New radio interface that can use wide radio channels and deliver extremely high throughput rates All communications handled in IP domain
65 to 263 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
60 to 130 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
LTE-Advanced OFDMA
Advanced version of LTE designed to meet IMT-Advanced requirements
Significant gains through carrier aggregation
36
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Key Features in 3GPP Releases
Release Year Key Features99 1999 First deployable version of UMTS5 2002 High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) for UMTS6 2005 High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) for UMTS7 2008 HSPA+ with higher-order modulation and MIMO8 2009 Long Term Evolution Dual-carrier HSDPA10 2011 LTE-Advanced including carrier aggregation and eICIC11 2013 Coordinated Multi Point (CoMP)12 2015 Public safety support Device-to-device communications Dual Connectivity 256 QAM
on the downlink
13 2016 LTE-Advanced Pro features LTE operation in unlicensed bands LTE-WLANAggregation Narrowband Internet of Things
14 2017 LTE-Advanced Pro additional features such as eLAA (adding uplink to LAA) andcellular V2X communications Study item for 5G ldquoNew Radiordquo
15 2018 Additional LTE-Advanced Pro features such as ultra-reliable low-latencycommunications Phase 1 of 5G Will emphasize enhanced-mobile-broadband usecase and sub-40 GHz operation Includes Massive MIMO beamforming and 4G-5Ginterworking including ability for LTE connectivity to a 5G CN
16 2019 Phase 2 of 5G Full compliance with ITU IMT-2020 requirements Will add URLLCspectrum sharing unlicensed operation and multiple other enhancements
17 2021 Further LTE and 5G enhancements
37
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Types of Cells and Characteristics
Type of Cell CharacteristicsMacro cell Wide-area coverage LTE supports cells up to 100 km in range but typical
distances are 5 to 5 km radius Always installed outdoors
Microcell Covers a smaller area such as a hotel or mall Range to 2 km 5-10W and 256-512 users Usually installed outdoors
Picocell Indoor or outdoor Outdoor cells also called ldquometrocellsrdquo Typical range 15 to 200meters outdoors and 10 to 25 meters indoors 1-2W 64-128 users Deployed byoperators primarily to expand capacity
Consumer Femtocell Indoors Range to 10 meters less than 50 mW and 4 to 6 users Capacity andcoverage benefit Usually deployed by end users using their own backhaul
Enterprise Femtocell Indoors Range to 25 meters 100-250 mW 16-32 users Capacity and coveragebenefit Deployed by operators
Distributed antenna system Expands indoor or outdoor coverage Same hardware can support multipleoperators (neutral host) since antenna can support broad frequency range andmultiple technologies Indoor deployments are typically in larger spaces such asairports Has also been deployed outdoors for coverage and capacity expansion
Remote radio head (RRH) Uses baseband at existing macro site or centralized baseband equipment Ifcentralized the system is called ldquocloud RANrdquo Requires fiber connection
Wi-Fi Primarily provides capacity expansion Neutral-host capability allows multipleoperators to share infrastructure
38
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Challenges
39
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Broadband Transformation
5
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Mobile Broadband Transformational Elements
6
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
7
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Ultra-high-definition such as 4K and 8K and 3D videobull Augmented and immersive virtual reality Ultra-high-fidelity virtual reality can
consume 50 times the bandwidth of a high-definition video streambull Realization of the tactile internetmdashreal-time immediate sensing and control
enabling a vast array of new applicationsbull Automotive including autonomous vehicles driver-assistance systems vehicular
internet infotainment inter-vehicle information exchange and vehicle pre-crash sensing and mitigation
bull Monitoring of critical infrastructure such as transmission lines using long-battery-life and low-latency sensors
bull Smart transportation using data from vehicles road sensors and cameras to optimize traffic flow
bull Mobile health and telemedicine systems that rely on ready availability of high-resolution and detailed medical records imaging and diagnostic video
bull Public safety including broadband data and mission-critical voicebull Sports and fitness enhancement through biometric sensing real-time monitoring
and data analysisbull Fixed-broadband replacement
5G Data Drivers
8
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Global Mobile Data Growth
Source Cisco ldquoCisco Visual Networking Index Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Updaterdquo February 16 2013
Source Cisco Visual Networking Index Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Update 2016-2021 February 2017
9
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
Source Ericsson Ericsson Mobility Report June 2017
10
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
Source Ericsson IoT Security February 201711
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More than 756 billion GSM-HSPA-LTE connections
bull Greater than the worldrsquos population of 74 billion
bull 93 billion 3GPP subscriber connections expected by 2022
Source Ovum July 2017 Estimates
Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
12
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
Source Ovum (WCIS) 2017 13
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Expanding Use Cases
14
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
1G to 5G
Generation Requirements Comments
1G No official requirements
Analog technology
Deployed in the 1980s
2G No official requirements
Digital technology
First digital systems
Deployed in the 1990s
New services such as SMS and low-rate data
Primary technologies include IS-95 CDMA (cdmaOne) IS-136 (D-AMPS) and GSM
3G ITUrsquos IMT-2000 required 144 Kbps mobile 384 Kbps pedestrian 2 Mbps indoors
First deployment in 2000
Primary technologies include CDMA2000 1XEV-DO and UMTS-HSPA
WiMAX4G (Initial Technical Designation)
ITUrsquos IMT-Advanced requirements include ability to operate in up to 40 MHz radio channels and with very high spectral efficiency
First deployment in 2010
IEEE 80216m and LTE-Advanced meet the requirements
4G (Current Marketing Designation)
Systems that significantly exceed the performance of initial 3G networks No quantitative requirements
Todayrsquos HSPA+ LTE and WiMAX networks meet this requirement
5G ITU IMT-2020 has defined technical requirements for 5G and 3GPP is developing specifications
First standards-based deployments in 2019 and 2020
15
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline of Cellular Generations
16
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Carrier Aggregation With this capability already in use operators can aggregate radio carriers in the same band or across disparate bands to improve throughputs (under light network load) capacity and efficiency
bull VoLTE Initially launched in 2015 and with widespread availability in 2017 VoLTE enables operators to roll out packetized voice for LTE networks resulting in greater voice capacity and higher voice quality
bull Tighter Integration of LTE with Unlicensed Bands LTE-U became available for testing in 2016 and 3GPP completed specifications for LAA in Release 13 with deployment expected around 2018 MulteFire building on LAA will operate without requiring a licensed-carrier anchor LTEWi-Fi Aggregation through LWA and LWIP are other options for operators with large Wi-Fi deployments
bull Enhanced Support for IoT Release 13 brings Category M1 a low-cost device option along with Narrowband IoT (NB-IoT) a version of the LTE radio interface specifically for IoT devices called Category NB1
bull Higher-Order and Full-Dimension MIMO Deployments in 2017 use up to 4X4 MIMO Release 14 specifies a capability called Full-Dimension MIMO which supports configurations with as many as 32 antennas at the base station
bull Dual Connectivity Release 12 introduced the capability to combine carriers from different sectors andor base stations (ie evolved Node Bs [eNBs]) through a feature called Dual Connectivity Two architectures were defined one that supports Packet Data Convergence Protocol (PDCP) aggregation between the different eNBs and one that supports separate S1 connections on the user plane from the different eNBs to the EPC
Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
17
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull 256 QAM Downlink and 64 QAM Uplink Defined in Release 12 and already deployed in some networks higher-order modulation increases user throughput rates in favorable radio conditions
bull 1 Gbps Capability Using a combination of 256 QAM modulation 4X4 MIMO and aggregation of three carriers operator networks can now reach 1 Gbps peak speeds See below for more information
bull V2X Communications Release 14 specifies vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure communications
bull Coordinated Multi Point CoMP (and enhanced CoMP [eCoMP]) is a process by which multiple base stations or cell sectors process a User Equipment (UE) signal simultaneously or coordinate the transmissions to a UE improving cell-edge performance and network efficiency Initial usage will be on the uplink because no user device changes are required Some networks had implemented this feature in 2017
bull HetNet Support HetNets integrate macro cells and small cells A key feature is enhanced inter-cell interference coordination (eICIC) which improves the ability of a macro and a small cell to use the same spectrum This approach is valuable when the operator cannot dedicate spectrum to small cells Operators are currently evaluating eICIC and at least one operator has deployed it Further enhanced ICIC (feICIC) introduced in Rel-11 added advanced interference-cancellation receivers into devices
bull Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Communications Being specified in Release 15 URLLC in LTE will shorten radio latency to a 1 msec range using a combination of shorter transmission time intervals and faster hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) error processing
bull Self-Organizing Networks With SON networks can automatically configure and optimize themselves a capability that will be particularly important as small cells begin to proliferate Vendor-specific methods are common for 3G networks and trials are now occurring for 4G LTE standards-based approaches
Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
18
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
Source 5G AmericasRysavy Research
19
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
20
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Use Case Model
21
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Objectives
IMT-Advanced IMT-2020
Peak Data Rate DL 1 GbpsUL 005 Gbps
DL 20 GbpsUL 10 Gbps
User Experienced Data Rate 10 Mbps 100 Mbps
Spectrum Efficiency 1 (normalized) 3X over IMT-Advanced
Peak Spectral Efficiency DL 15 bpsHzUL 675 bpsHz
DL 30 bpsHzUL 15 bpsHz
Average Spectral Efficiency DL eMBB indoor 9 bpsHzDL eMBB urban 78 bpsHzDL eMBB rural 33 bpsHz
UL eMBB indoor 675 bpsHzUL eMBB urban 54 bpsHzUL eMBB rural 16 bpsHz
Mobility 350 kmh 500 kmh
User Plane Latency 10 msec 1 msec
Connection Density 100 thousand devicessqkm 1 million devices sqkm
Network Energy Efficiency 1 (normalized) 100X over IMT-Advanced
Area Traffic Capacity 01 Mbpssq m 10 Mbpssq m (hot spots)
Bandwidth Up to 20 MHzradio channel (up to 100 MHz aggregated)
Up to 1 GHz (single or multipole RF carriers)
22
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Transformation
23
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
24
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of Different Bands
Source Nokia Vision amp Priorities for Next Generation Radio Technology 3GPP RAN workshop on 5G Sep 17-18 2015
25
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
26
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Network can support both LTE and 5G NR including dual connectivity with which devices have simultaneous connections to LTE and NR
bull Carrier aggregation for multiple NR carriersbull 5 Gbps peak downlink throughput in initial releases increasing to 50 Gbps
in subsequent versionsbull OFDMA in downlink and uplink with optional Single Carrier Frequency
Division Multiple Access (SC-FDMA) for uplink Radio approach for URLLC to be defined in Release 16 but Release 15 will provide physical layer frame structure and numerology support
bull Massive MIMO and beamformingbull Ability to support either FDD or TDD modes for 5G radio bandsbull Numerologies of 2N X 15 kHz for subcarrier spacing up to 120 kHz or 240
kHz This approach depicted in Figure 17 supports both narrow radio channels (for example 1 MHz) or wide ones (for example 400 MHz) Phase 1 likely to support a maximum of 400 MHz bandwidth with 240 kHz subcarrier spacing
5G New Radio (NR) (1)
27
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Error correction through low-density parity codes (LDPC) which are computationally more efficient than LTE turbo codes at higher data rates
bull Standards-based cloud RAN support compared with proprietary LTE approaches that specifies a split between the PDCP and Radio Link Control (RLC) protocol layers
bull Self-contained integrated subframes that combine scheduling data and acknowledgement
bull Future-proofing by providing a flexible radio framework that has forward compatibility to support future currently unknown services such as URLLC to be specified in Release 16
bull Scalable transmission time intervals with short time intervals for low latency and longer time intervals for higher spectral efficiency
bull QoS support using a new modelbull Dynamic co-existence with LTE in the same radio channels
5G New Radio (NR) (2)
28
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
29
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Per ITU 95 users obtain 100 Mbps or greater
bull Typical rates of 500 Mbps appear feasible using 200 MHz radio channel
bull Typical rate of 1 Gbps appear feasible using 400 MHz radio channel
Expected 5G Performance
30
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
31
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Schedule
32
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
Source Dr Seizo Onoe NTT DOCOMO presentation at Brooklyn 5G Summit Apr 21 2016
33
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
34
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Slicing Architecture
35
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
TechnologyName
Type Characteristics Typical Downlink
Speed
Typical Uplink Speed
HSPA WCDMAData service for UMTS networks An enhancement to original UMTS data service
1 Mbps to 4 Mbps
500 Kbpsto 2 Mbps
HSPA+ WCDMAEvolution of HSPA in various stages to increase throughput and capacity and to lower latency
19 Mbps to88 Mbps in 5+5 MHz
38 Mbps to 176 Mbps with dual carrier in 10+5 MHz
1 Mbps to4 Mbps in 5+5 MHz or in 10+5 MHz
LTE OFDMA
New radio interface that can use wide radio channels and deliver extremely high throughput rates All communications handled in IP domain
65 to 263 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
60 to 130 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
LTE-Advanced OFDMA
Advanced version of LTE designed to meet IMT-Advanced requirements
Significant gains through carrier aggregation
36
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Key Features in 3GPP Releases
Release Year Key Features99 1999 First deployable version of UMTS5 2002 High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) for UMTS6 2005 High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) for UMTS7 2008 HSPA+ with higher-order modulation and MIMO8 2009 Long Term Evolution Dual-carrier HSDPA10 2011 LTE-Advanced including carrier aggregation and eICIC11 2013 Coordinated Multi Point (CoMP)12 2015 Public safety support Device-to-device communications Dual Connectivity 256 QAM
on the downlink
13 2016 LTE-Advanced Pro features LTE operation in unlicensed bands LTE-WLANAggregation Narrowband Internet of Things
14 2017 LTE-Advanced Pro additional features such as eLAA (adding uplink to LAA) andcellular V2X communications Study item for 5G ldquoNew Radiordquo
15 2018 Additional LTE-Advanced Pro features such as ultra-reliable low-latencycommunications Phase 1 of 5G Will emphasize enhanced-mobile-broadband usecase and sub-40 GHz operation Includes Massive MIMO beamforming and 4G-5Ginterworking including ability for LTE connectivity to a 5G CN
16 2019 Phase 2 of 5G Full compliance with ITU IMT-2020 requirements Will add URLLCspectrum sharing unlicensed operation and multiple other enhancements
17 2021 Further LTE and 5G enhancements
37
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Types of Cells and Characteristics
Type of Cell CharacteristicsMacro cell Wide-area coverage LTE supports cells up to 100 km in range but typical
distances are 5 to 5 km radius Always installed outdoors
Microcell Covers a smaller area such as a hotel or mall Range to 2 km 5-10W and 256-512 users Usually installed outdoors
Picocell Indoor or outdoor Outdoor cells also called ldquometrocellsrdquo Typical range 15 to 200meters outdoors and 10 to 25 meters indoors 1-2W 64-128 users Deployed byoperators primarily to expand capacity
Consumer Femtocell Indoors Range to 10 meters less than 50 mW and 4 to 6 users Capacity andcoverage benefit Usually deployed by end users using their own backhaul
Enterprise Femtocell Indoors Range to 25 meters 100-250 mW 16-32 users Capacity and coveragebenefit Deployed by operators
Distributed antenna system Expands indoor or outdoor coverage Same hardware can support multipleoperators (neutral host) since antenna can support broad frequency range andmultiple technologies Indoor deployments are typically in larger spaces such asairports Has also been deployed outdoors for coverage and capacity expansion
Remote radio head (RRH) Uses baseband at existing macro site or centralized baseband equipment Ifcentralized the system is called ldquocloud RANrdquo Requires fiber connection
Wi-Fi Primarily provides capacity expansion Neutral-host capability allows multipleoperators to share infrastructure
38
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Challenges
39
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Mobile Broadband Transformational Elements
6
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
7
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Ultra-high-definition such as 4K and 8K and 3D videobull Augmented and immersive virtual reality Ultra-high-fidelity virtual reality can
consume 50 times the bandwidth of a high-definition video streambull Realization of the tactile internetmdashreal-time immediate sensing and control
enabling a vast array of new applicationsbull Automotive including autonomous vehicles driver-assistance systems vehicular
internet infotainment inter-vehicle information exchange and vehicle pre-crash sensing and mitigation
bull Monitoring of critical infrastructure such as transmission lines using long-battery-life and low-latency sensors
bull Smart transportation using data from vehicles road sensors and cameras to optimize traffic flow
bull Mobile health and telemedicine systems that rely on ready availability of high-resolution and detailed medical records imaging and diagnostic video
bull Public safety including broadband data and mission-critical voicebull Sports and fitness enhancement through biometric sensing real-time monitoring
and data analysisbull Fixed-broadband replacement
5G Data Drivers
8
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Global Mobile Data Growth
Source Cisco ldquoCisco Visual Networking Index Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Updaterdquo February 16 2013
Source Cisco Visual Networking Index Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Update 2016-2021 February 2017
9
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
Source Ericsson Ericsson Mobility Report June 2017
10
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
Source Ericsson IoT Security February 201711
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More than 756 billion GSM-HSPA-LTE connections
bull Greater than the worldrsquos population of 74 billion
bull 93 billion 3GPP subscriber connections expected by 2022
Source Ovum July 2017 Estimates
Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
12
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
Source Ovum (WCIS) 2017 13
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Expanding Use Cases
14
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
1G to 5G
Generation Requirements Comments
1G No official requirements
Analog technology
Deployed in the 1980s
2G No official requirements
Digital technology
First digital systems
Deployed in the 1990s
New services such as SMS and low-rate data
Primary technologies include IS-95 CDMA (cdmaOne) IS-136 (D-AMPS) and GSM
3G ITUrsquos IMT-2000 required 144 Kbps mobile 384 Kbps pedestrian 2 Mbps indoors
First deployment in 2000
Primary technologies include CDMA2000 1XEV-DO and UMTS-HSPA
WiMAX4G (Initial Technical Designation)
ITUrsquos IMT-Advanced requirements include ability to operate in up to 40 MHz radio channels and with very high spectral efficiency
First deployment in 2010
IEEE 80216m and LTE-Advanced meet the requirements
4G (Current Marketing Designation)
Systems that significantly exceed the performance of initial 3G networks No quantitative requirements
Todayrsquos HSPA+ LTE and WiMAX networks meet this requirement
5G ITU IMT-2020 has defined technical requirements for 5G and 3GPP is developing specifications
First standards-based deployments in 2019 and 2020
15
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline of Cellular Generations
16
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Carrier Aggregation With this capability already in use operators can aggregate radio carriers in the same band or across disparate bands to improve throughputs (under light network load) capacity and efficiency
bull VoLTE Initially launched in 2015 and with widespread availability in 2017 VoLTE enables operators to roll out packetized voice for LTE networks resulting in greater voice capacity and higher voice quality
bull Tighter Integration of LTE with Unlicensed Bands LTE-U became available for testing in 2016 and 3GPP completed specifications for LAA in Release 13 with deployment expected around 2018 MulteFire building on LAA will operate without requiring a licensed-carrier anchor LTEWi-Fi Aggregation through LWA and LWIP are other options for operators with large Wi-Fi deployments
bull Enhanced Support for IoT Release 13 brings Category M1 a low-cost device option along with Narrowband IoT (NB-IoT) a version of the LTE radio interface specifically for IoT devices called Category NB1
bull Higher-Order and Full-Dimension MIMO Deployments in 2017 use up to 4X4 MIMO Release 14 specifies a capability called Full-Dimension MIMO which supports configurations with as many as 32 antennas at the base station
bull Dual Connectivity Release 12 introduced the capability to combine carriers from different sectors andor base stations (ie evolved Node Bs [eNBs]) through a feature called Dual Connectivity Two architectures were defined one that supports Packet Data Convergence Protocol (PDCP) aggregation between the different eNBs and one that supports separate S1 connections on the user plane from the different eNBs to the EPC
Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
17
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull 256 QAM Downlink and 64 QAM Uplink Defined in Release 12 and already deployed in some networks higher-order modulation increases user throughput rates in favorable radio conditions
bull 1 Gbps Capability Using a combination of 256 QAM modulation 4X4 MIMO and aggregation of three carriers operator networks can now reach 1 Gbps peak speeds See below for more information
bull V2X Communications Release 14 specifies vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure communications
bull Coordinated Multi Point CoMP (and enhanced CoMP [eCoMP]) is a process by which multiple base stations or cell sectors process a User Equipment (UE) signal simultaneously or coordinate the transmissions to a UE improving cell-edge performance and network efficiency Initial usage will be on the uplink because no user device changes are required Some networks had implemented this feature in 2017
bull HetNet Support HetNets integrate macro cells and small cells A key feature is enhanced inter-cell interference coordination (eICIC) which improves the ability of a macro and a small cell to use the same spectrum This approach is valuable when the operator cannot dedicate spectrum to small cells Operators are currently evaluating eICIC and at least one operator has deployed it Further enhanced ICIC (feICIC) introduced in Rel-11 added advanced interference-cancellation receivers into devices
bull Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Communications Being specified in Release 15 URLLC in LTE will shorten radio latency to a 1 msec range using a combination of shorter transmission time intervals and faster hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) error processing
bull Self-Organizing Networks With SON networks can automatically configure and optimize themselves a capability that will be particularly important as small cells begin to proliferate Vendor-specific methods are common for 3G networks and trials are now occurring for 4G LTE standards-based approaches
Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
18
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
Source 5G AmericasRysavy Research
19
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
20
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Use Case Model
21
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Objectives
IMT-Advanced IMT-2020
Peak Data Rate DL 1 GbpsUL 005 Gbps
DL 20 GbpsUL 10 Gbps
User Experienced Data Rate 10 Mbps 100 Mbps
Spectrum Efficiency 1 (normalized) 3X over IMT-Advanced
Peak Spectral Efficiency DL 15 bpsHzUL 675 bpsHz
DL 30 bpsHzUL 15 bpsHz
Average Spectral Efficiency DL eMBB indoor 9 bpsHzDL eMBB urban 78 bpsHzDL eMBB rural 33 bpsHz
UL eMBB indoor 675 bpsHzUL eMBB urban 54 bpsHzUL eMBB rural 16 bpsHz
Mobility 350 kmh 500 kmh
User Plane Latency 10 msec 1 msec
Connection Density 100 thousand devicessqkm 1 million devices sqkm
Network Energy Efficiency 1 (normalized) 100X over IMT-Advanced
Area Traffic Capacity 01 Mbpssq m 10 Mbpssq m (hot spots)
Bandwidth Up to 20 MHzradio channel (up to 100 MHz aggregated)
Up to 1 GHz (single or multipole RF carriers)
22
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Transformation
23
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
24
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of Different Bands
Source Nokia Vision amp Priorities for Next Generation Radio Technology 3GPP RAN workshop on 5G Sep 17-18 2015
25
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
26
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Network can support both LTE and 5G NR including dual connectivity with which devices have simultaneous connections to LTE and NR
bull Carrier aggregation for multiple NR carriersbull 5 Gbps peak downlink throughput in initial releases increasing to 50 Gbps
in subsequent versionsbull OFDMA in downlink and uplink with optional Single Carrier Frequency
Division Multiple Access (SC-FDMA) for uplink Radio approach for URLLC to be defined in Release 16 but Release 15 will provide physical layer frame structure and numerology support
bull Massive MIMO and beamformingbull Ability to support either FDD or TDD modes for 5G radio bandsbull Numerologies of 2N X 15 kHz for subcarrier spacing up to 120 kHz or 240
kHz This approach depicted in Figure 17 supports both narrow radio channels (for example 1 MHz) or wide ones (for example 400 MHz) Phase 1 likely to support a maximum of 400 MHz bandwidth with 240 kHz subcarrier spacing
5G New Radio (NR) (1)
27
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Error correction through low-density parity codes (LDPC) which are computationally more efficient than LTE turbo codes at higher data rates
bull Standards-based cloud RAN support compared with proprietary LTE approaches that specifies a split between the PDCP and Radio Link Control (RLC) protocol layers
bull Self-contained integrated subframes that combine scheduling data and acknowledgement
bull Future-proofing by providing a flexible radio framework that has forward compatibility to support future currently unknown services such as URLLC to be specified in Release 16
bull Scalable transmission time intervals with short time intervals for low latency and longer time intervals for higher spectral efficiency
bull QoS support using a new modelbull Dynamic co-existence with LTE in the same radio channels
5G New Radio (NR) (2)
28
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
29
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Per ITU 95 users obtain 100 Mbps or greater
bull Typical rates of 500 Mbps appear feasible using 200 MHz radio channel
bull Typical rate of 1 Gbps appear feasible using 400 MHz radio channel
Expected 5G Performance
30
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
31
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Schedule
32
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
Source Dr Seizo Onoe NTT DOCOMO presentation at Brooklyn 5G Summit Apr 21 2016
33
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
34
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Slicing Architecture
35
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
TechnologyName
Type Characteristics Typical Downlink
Speed
Typical Uplink Speed
HSPA WCDMAData service for UMTS networks An enhancement to original UMTS data service
1 Mbps to 4 Mbps
500 Kbpsto 2 Mbps
HSPA+ WCDMAEvolution of HSPA in various stages to increase throughput and capacity and to lower latency
19 Mbps to88 Mbps in 5+5 MHz
38 Mbps to 176 Mbps with dual carrier in 10+5 MHz
1 Mbps to4 Mbps in 5+5 MHz or in 10+5 MHz
LTE OFDMA
New radio interface that can use wide radio channels and deliver extremely high throughput rates All communications handled in IP domain
65 to 263 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
60 to 130 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
LTE-Advanced OFDMA
Advanced version of LTE designed to meet IMT-Advanced requirements
Significant gains through carrier aggregation
36
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Key Features in 3GPP Releases
Release Year Key Features99 1999 First deployable version of UMTS5 2002 High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) for UMTS6 2005 High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) for UMTS7 2008 HSPA+ with higher-order modulation and MIMO8 2009 Long Term Evolution Dual-carrier HSDPA10 2011 LTE-Advanced including carrier aggregation and eICIC11 2013 Coordinated Multi Point (CoMP)12 2015 Public safety support Device-to-device communications Dual Connectivity 256 QAM
on the downlink
13 2016 LTE-Advanced Pro features LTE operation in unlicensed bands LTE-WLANAggregation Narrowband Internet of Things
14 2017 LTE-Advanced Pro additional features such as eLAA (adding uplink to LAA) andcellular V2X communications Study item for 5G ldquoNew Radiordquo
15 2018 Additional LTE-Advanced Pro features such as ultra-reliable low-latencycommunications Phase 1 of 5G Will emphasize enhanced-mobile-broadband usecase and sub-40 GHz operation Includes Massive MIMO beamforming and 4G-5Ginterworking including ability for LTE connectivity to a 5G CN
16 2019 Phase 2 of 5G Full compliance with ITU IMT-2020 requirements Will add URLLCspectrum sharing unlicensed operation and multiple other enhancements
17 2021 Further LTE and 5G enhancements
37
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Types of Cells and Characteristics
Type of Cell CharacteristicsMacro cell Wide-area coverage LTE supports cells up to 100 km in range but typical
distances are 5 to 5 km radius Always installed outdoors
Microcell Covers a smaller area such as a hotel or mall Range to 2 km 5-10W and 256-512 users Usually installed outdoors
Picocell Indoor or outdoor Outdoor cells also called ldquometrocellsrdquo Typical range 15 to 200meters outdoors and 10 to 25 meters indoors 1-2W 64-128 users Deployed byoperators primarily to expand capacity
Consumer Femtocell Indoors Range to 10 meters less than 50 mW and 4 to 6 users Capacity andcoverage benefit Usually deployed by end users using their own backhaul
Enterprise Femtocell Indoors Range to 25 meters 100-250 mW 16-32 users Capacity and coveragebenefit Deployed by operators
Distributed antenna system Expands indoor or outdoor coverage Same hardware can support multipleoperators (neutral host) since antenna can support broad frequency range andmultiple technologies Indoor deployments are typically in larger spaces such asairports Has also been deployed outdoors for coverage and capacity expansion
Remote radio head (RRH) Uses baseband at existing macro site or centralized baseband equipment Ifcentralized the system is called ldquocloud RANrdquo Requires fiber connection
Wi-Fi Primarily provides capacity expansion Neutral-host capability allows multipleoperators to share infrastructure
38
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Challenges
39
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
7
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Ultra-high-definition such as 4K and 8K and 3D videobull Augmented and immersive virtual reality Ultra-high-fidelity virtual reality can
consume 50 times the bandwidth of a high-definition video streambull Realization of the tactile internetmdashreal-time immediate sensing and control
enabling a vast array of new applicationsbull Automotive including autonomous vehicles driver-assistance systems vehicular
internet infotainment inter-vehicle information exchange and vehicle pre-crash sensing and mitigation
bull Monitoring of critical infrastructure such as transmission lines using long-battery-life and low-latency sensors
bull Smart transportation using data from vehicles road sensors and cameras to optimize traffic flow
bull Mobile health and telemedicine systems that rely on ready availability of high-resolution and detailed medical records imaging and diagnostic video
bull Public safety including broadband data and mission-critical voicebull Sports and fitness enhancement through biometric sensing real-time monitoring
and data analysisbull Fixed-broadband replacement
5G Data Drivers
8
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Global Mobile Data Growth
Source Cisco ldquoCisco Visual Networking Index Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Updaterdquo February 16 2013
Source Cisco Visual Networking Index Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Update 2016-2021 February 2017
9
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
Source Ericsson Ericsson Mobility Report June 2017
10
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
Source Ericsson IoT Security February 201711
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More than 756 billion GSM-HSPA-LTE connections
bull Greater than the worldrsquos population of 74 billion
bull 93 billion 3GPP subscriber connections expected by 2022
Source Ovum July 2017 Estimates
Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
12
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
Source Ovum (WCIS) 2017 13
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Expanding Use Cases
14
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
1G to 5G
Generation Requirements Comments
1G No official requirements
Analog technology
Deployed in the 1980s
2G No official requirements
Digital technology
First digital systems
Deployed in the 1990s
New services such as SMS and low-rate data
Primary technologies include IS-95 CDMA (cdmaOne) IS-136 (D-AMPS) and GSM
3G ITUrsquos IMT-2000 required 144 Kbps mobile 384 Kbps pedestrian 2 Mbps indoors
First deployment in 2000
Primary technologies include CDMA2000 1XEV-DO and UMTS-HSPA
WiMAX4G (Initial Technical Designation)
ITUrsquos IMT-Advanced requirements include ability to operate in up to 40 MHz radio channels and with very high spectral efficiency
First deployment in 2010
IEEE 80216m and LTE-Advanced meet the requirements
4G (Current Marketing Designation)
Systems that significantly exceed the performance of initial 3G networks No quantitative requirements
Todayrsquos HSPA+ LTE and WiMAX networks meet this requirement
5G ITU IMT-2020 has defined technical requirements for 5G and 3GPP is developing specifications
First standards-based deployments in 2019 and 2020
15
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline of Cellular Generations
16
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Carrier Aggregation With this capability already in use operators can aggregate radio carriers in the same band or across disparate bands to improve throughputs (under light network load) capacity and efficiency
bull VoLTE Initially launched in 2015 and with widespread availability in 2017 VoLTE enables operators to roll out packetized voice for LTE networks resulting in greater voice capacity and higher voice quality
bull Tighter Integration of LTE with Unlicensed Bands LTE-U became available for testing in 2016 and 3GPP completed specifications for LAA in Release 13 with deployment expected around 2018 MulteFire building on LAA will operate without requiring a licensed-carrier anchor LTEWi-Fi Aggregation through LWA and LWIP are other options for operators with large Wi-Fi deployments
bull Enhanced Support for IoT Release 13 brings Category M1 a low-cost device option along with Narrowband IoT (NB-IoT) a version of the LTE radio interface specifically for IoT devices called Category NB1
bull Higher-Order and Full-Dimension MIMO Deployments in 2017 use up to 4X4 MIMO Release 14 specifies a capability called Full-Dimension MIMO which supports configurations with as many as 32 antennas at the base station
bull Dual Connectivity Release 12 introduced the capability to combine carriers from different sectors andor base stations (ie evolved Node Bs [eNBs]) through a feature called Dual Connectivity Two architectures were defined one that supports Packet Data Convergence Protocol (PDCP) aggregation between the different eNBs and one that supports separate S1 connections on the user plane from the different eNBs to the EPC
Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
17
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull 256 QAM Downlink and 64 QAM Uplink Defined in Release 12 and already deployed in some networks higher-order modulation increases user throughput rates in favorable radio conditions
bull 1 Gbps Capability Using a combination of 256 QAM modulation 4X4 MIMO and aggregation of three carriers operator networks can now reach 1 Gbps peak speeds See below for more information
bull V2X Communications Release 14 specifies vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure communications
bull Coordinated Multi Point CoMP (and enhanced CoMP [eCoMP]) is a process by which multiple base stations or cell sectors process a User Equipment (UE) signal simultaneously or coordinate the transmissions to a UE improving cell-edge performance and network efficiency Initial usage will be on the uplink because no user device changes are required Some networks had implemented this feature in 2017
bull HetNet Support HetNets integrate macro cells and small cells A key feature is enhanced inter-cell interference coordination (eICIC) which improves the ability of a macro and a small cell to use the same spectrum This approach is valuable when the operator cannot dedicate spectrum to small cells Operators are currently evaluating eICIC and at least one operator has deployed it Further enhanced ICIC (feICIC) introduced in Rel-11 added advanced interference-cancellation receivers into devices
bull Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Communications Being specified in Release 15 URLLC in LTE will shorten radio latency to a 1 msec range using a combination of shorter transmission time intervals and faster hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) error processing
bull Self-Organizing Networks With SON networks can automatically configure and optimize themselves a capability that will be particularly important as small cells begin to proliferate Vendor-specific methods are common for 3G networks and trials are now occurring for 4G LTE standards-based approaches
Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
18
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
Source 5G AmericasRysavy Research
19
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
20
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Use Case Model
21
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Objectives
IMT-Advanced IMT-2020
Peak Data Rate DL 1 GbpsUL 005 Gbps
DL 20 GbpsUL 10 Gbps
User Experienced Data Rate 10 Mbps 100 Mbps
Spectrum Efficiency 1 (normalized) 3X over IMT-Advanced
Peak Spectral Efficiency DL 15 bpsHzUL 675 bpsHz
DL 30 bpsHzUL 15 bpsHz
Average Spectral Efficiency DL eMBB indoor 9 bpsHzDL eMBB urban 78 bpsHzDL eMBB rural 33 bpsHz
UL eMBB indoor 675 bpsHzUL eMBB urban 54 bpsHzUL eMBB rural 16 bpsHz
Mobility 350 kmh 500 kmh
User Plane Latency 10 msec 1 msec
Connection Density 100 thousand devicessqkm 1 million devices sqkm
Network Energy Efficiency 1 (normalized) 100X over IMT-Advanced
Area Traffic Capacity 01 Mbpssq m 10 Mbpssq m (hot spots)
Bandwidth Up to 20 MHzradio channel (up to 100 MHz aggregated)
Up to 1 GHz (single or multipole RF carriers)
22
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Transformation
23
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
24
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of Different Bands
Source Nokia Vision amp Priorities for Next Generation Radio Technology 3GPP RAN workshop on 5G Sep 17-18 2015
25
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
26
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Network can support both LTE and 5G NR including dual connectivity with which devices have simultaneous connections to LTE and NR
bull Carrier aggregation for multiple NR carriersbull 5 Gbps peak downlink throughput in initial releases increasing to 50 Gbps
in subsequent versionsbull OFDMA in downlink and uplink with optional Single Carrier Frequency
Division Multiple Access (SC-FDMA) for uplink Radio approach for URLLC to be defined in Release 16 but Release 15 will provide physical layer frame structure and numerology support
bull Massive MIMO and beamformingbull Ability to support either FDD or TDD modes for 5G radio bandsbull Numerologies of 2N X 15 kHz for subcarrier spacing up to 120 kHz or 240
kHz This approach depicted in Figure 17 supports both narrow radio channels (for example 1 MHz) or wide ones (for example 400 MHz) Phase 1 likely to support a maximum of 400 MHz bandwidth with 240 kHz subcarrier spacing
5G New Radio (NR) (1)
27
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Error correction through low-density parity codes (LDPC) which are computationally more efficient than LTE turbo codes at higher data rates
bull Standards-based cloud RAN support compared with proprietary LTE approaches that specifies a split between the PDCP and Radio Link Control (RLC) protocol layers
bull Self-contained integrated subframes that combine scheduling data and acknowledgement
bull Future-proofing by providing a flexible radio framework that has forward compatibility to support future currently unknown services such as URLLC to be specified in Release 16
bull Scalable transmission time intervals with short time intervals for low latency and longer time intervals for higher spectral efficiency
bull QoS support using a new modelbull Dynamic co-existence with LTE in the same radio channels
5G New Radio (NR) (2)
28
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
29
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Per ITU 95 users obtain 100 Mbps or greater
bull Typical rates of 500 Mbps appear feasible using 200 MHz radio channel
bull Typical rate of 1 Gbps appear feasible using 400 MHz radio channel
Expected 5G Performance
30
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
31
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Schedule
32
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
Source Dr Seizo Onoe NTT DOCOMO presentation at Brooklyn 5G Summit Apr 21 2016
33
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
34
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Slicing Architecture
35
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
TechnologyName
Type Characteristics Typical Downlink
Speed
Typical Uplink Speed
HSPA WCDMAData service for UMTS networks An enhancement to original UMTS data service
1 Mbps to 4 Mbps
500 Kbpsto 2 Mbps
HSPA+ WCDMAEvolution of HSPA in various stages to increase throughput and capacity and to lower latency
19 Mbps to88 Mbps in 5+5 MHz
38 Mbps to 176 Mbps with dual carrier in 10+5 MHz
1 Mbps to4 Mbps in 5+5 MHz or in 10+5 MHz
LTE OFDMA
New radio interface that can use wide radio channels and deliver extremely high throughput rates All communications handled in IP domain
65 to 263 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
60 to 130 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
LTE-Advanced OFDMA
Advanced version of LTE designed to meet IMT-Advanced requirements
Significant gains through carrier aggregation
36
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Key Features in 3GPP Releases
Release Year Key Features99 1999 First deployable version of UMTS5 2002 High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) for UMTS6 2005 High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) for UMTS7 2008 HSPA+ with higher-order modulation and MIMO8 2009 Long Term Evolution Dual-carrier HSDPA10 2011 LTE-Advanced including carrier aggregation and eICIC11 2013 Coordinated Multi Point (CoMP)12 2015 Public safety support Device-to-device communications Dual Connectivity 256 QAM
on the downlink
13 2016 LTE-Advanced Pro features LTE operation in unlicensed bands LTE-WLANAggregation Narrowband Internet of Things
14 2017 LTE-Advanced Pro additional features such as eLAA (adding uplink to LAA) andcellular V2X communications Study item for 5G ldquoNew Radiordquo
15 2018 Additional LTE-Advanced Pro features such as ultra-reliable low-latencycommunications Phase 1 of 5G Will emphasize enhanced-mobile-broadband usecase and sub-40 GHz operation Includes Massive MIMO beamforming and 4G-5Ginterworking including ability for LTE connectivity to a 5G CN
16 2019 Phase 2 of 5G Full compliance with ITU IMT-2020 requirements Will add URLLCspectrum sharing unlicensed operation and multiple other enhancements
17 2021 Further LTE and 5G enhancements
37
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Types of Cells and Characteristics
Type of Cell CharacteristicsMacro cell Wide-area coverage LTE supports cells up to 100 km in range but typical
distances are 5 to 5 km radius Always installed outdoors
Microcell Covers a smaller area such as a hotel or mall Range to 2 km 5-10W and 256-512 users Usually installed outdoors
Picocell Indoor or outdoor Outdoor cells also called ldquometrocellsrdquo Typical range 15 to 200meters outdoors and 10 to 25 meters indoors 1-2W 64-128 users Deployed byoperators primarily to expand capacity
Consumer Femtocell Indoors Range to 10 meters less than 50 mW and 4 to 6 users Capacity andcoverage benefit Usually deployed by end users using their own backhaul
Enterprise Femtocell Indoors Range to 25 meters 100-250 mW 16-32 users Capacity and coveragebenefit Deployed by operators
Distributed antenna system Expands indoor or outdoor coverage Same hardware can support multipleoperators (neutral host) since antenna can support broad frequency range andmultiple technologies Indoor deployments are typically in larger spaces such asairports Has also been deployed outdoors for coverage and capacity expansion
Remote radio head (RRH) Uses baseband at existing macro site or centralized baseband equipment Ifcentralized the system is called ldquocloud RANrdquo Requires fiber connection
Wi-Fi Primarily provides capacity expansion Neutral-host capability allows multipleoperators to share infrastructure
38
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Challenges
39
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Ultra-high-definition such as 4K and 8K and 3D videobull Augmented and immersive virtual reality Ultra-high-fidelity virtual reality can
consume 50 times the bandwidth of a high-definition video streambull Realization of the tactile internetmdashreal-time immediate sensing and control
enabling a vast array of new applicationsbull Automotive including autonomous vehicles driver-assistance systems vehicular
internet infotainment inter-vehicle information exchange and vehicle pre-crash sensing and mitigation
bull Monitoring of critical infrastructure such as transmission lines using long-battery-life and low-latency sensors
bull Smart transportation using data from vehicles road sensors and cameras to optimize traffic flow
bull Mobile health and telemedicine systems that rely on ready availability of high-resolution and detailed medical records imaging and diagnostic video
bull Public safety including broadband data and mission-critical voicebull Sports and fitness enhancement through biometric sensing real-time monitoring
and data analysisbull Fixed-broadband replacement
5G Data Drivers
8
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Global Mobile Data Growth
Source Cisco ldquoCisco Visual Networking Index Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Updaterdquo February 16 2013
Source Cisco Visual Networking Index Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Update 2016-2021 February 2017
9
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
Source Ericsson Ericsson Mobility Report June 2017
10
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
Source Ericsson IoT Security February 201711
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More than 756 billion GSM-HSPA-LTE connections
bull Greater than the worldrsquos population of 74 billion
bull 93 billion 3GPP subscriber connections expected by 2022
Source Ovum July 2017 Estimates
Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
12
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
Source Ovum (WCIS) 2017 13
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Expanding Use Cases
14
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
1G to 5G
Generation Requirements Comments
1G No official requirements
Analog technology
Deployed in the 1980s
2G No official requirements
Digital technology
First digital systems
Deployed in the 1990s
New services such as SMS and low-rate data
Primary technologies include IS-95 CDMA (cdmaOne) IS-136 (D-AMPS) and GSM
3G ITUrsquos IMT-2000 required 144 Kbps mobile 384 Kbps pedestrian 2 Mbps indoors
First deployment in 2000
Primary technologies include CDMA2000 1XEV-DO and UMTS-HSPA
WiMAX4G (Initial Technical Designation)
ITUrsquos IMT-Advanced requirements include ability to operate in up to 40 MHz radio channels and with very high spectral efficiency
First deployment in 2010
IEEE 80216m and LTE-Advanced meet the requirements
4G (Current Marketing Designation)
Systems that significantly exceed the performance of initial 3G networks No quantitative requirements
Todayrsquos HSPA+ LTE and WiMAX networks meet this requirement
5G ITU IMT-2020 has defined technical requirements for 5G and 3GPP is developing specifications
First standards-based deployments in 2019 and 2020
15
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline of Cellular Generations
16
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Carrier Aggregation With this capability already in use operators can aggregate radio carriers in the same band or across disparate bands to improve throughputs (under light network load) capacity and efficiency
bull VoLTE Initially launched in 2015 and with widespread availability in 2017 VoLTE enables operators to roll out packetized voice for LTE networks resulting in greater voice capacity and higher voice quality
bull Tighter Integration of LTE with Unlicensed Bands LTE-U became available for testing in 2016 and 3GPP completed specifications for LAA in Release 13 with deployment expected around 2018 MulteFire building on LAA will operate without requiring a licensed-carrier anchor LTEWi-Fi Aggregation through LWA and LWIP are other options for operators with large Wi-Fi deployments
bull Enhanced Support for IoT Release 13 brings Category M1 a low-cost device option along with Narrowband IoT (NB-IoT) a version of the LTE radio interface specifically for IoT devices called Category NB1
bull Higher-Order and Full-Dimension MIMO Deployments in 2017 use up to 4X4 MIMO Release 14 specifies a capability called Full-Dimension MIMO which supports configurations with as many as 32 antennas at the base station
bull Dual Connectivity Release 12 introduced the capability to combine carriers from different sectors andor base stations (ie evolved Node Bs [eNBs]) through a feature called Dual Connectivity Two architectures were defined one that supports Packet Data Convergence Protocol (PDCP) aggregation between the different eNBs and one that supports separate S1 connections on the user plane from the different eNBs to the EPC
Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
17
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull 256 QAM Downlink and 64 QAM Uplink Defined in Release 12 and already deployed in some networks higher-order modulation increases user throughput rates in favorable radio conditions
bull 1 Gbps Capability Using a combination of 256 QAM modulation 4X4 MIMO and aggregation of three carriers operator networks can now reach 1 Gbps peak speeds See below for more information
bull V2X Communications Release 14 specifies vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure communications
bull Coordinated Multi Point CoMP (and enhanced CoMP [eCoMP]) is a process by which multiple base stations or cell sectors process a User Equipment (UE) signal simultaneously or coordinate the transmissions to a UE improving cell-edge performance and network efficiency Initial usage will be on the uplink because no user device changes are required Some networks had implemented this feature in 2017
bull HetNet Support HetNets integrate macro cells and small cells A key feature is enhanced inter-cell interference coordination (eICIC) which improves the ability of a macro and a small cell to use the same spectrum This approach is valuable when the operator cannot dedicate spectrum to small cells Operators are currently evaluating eICIC and at least one operator has deployed it Further enhanced ICIC (feICIC) introduced in Rel-11 added advanced interference-cancellation receivers into devices
bull Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Communications Being specified in Release 15 URLLC in LTE will shorten radio latency to a 1 msec range using a combination of shorter transmission time intervals and faster hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) error processing
bull Self-Organizing Networks With SON networks can automatically configure and optimize themselves a capability that will be particularly important as small cells begin to proliferate Vendor-specific methods are common for 3G networks and trials are now occurring for 4G LTE standards-based approaches
Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
18
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
Source 5G AmericasRysavy Research
19
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
20
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Use Case Model
21
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Objectives
IMT-Advanced IMT-2020
Peak Data Rate DL 1 GbpsUL 005 Gbps
DL 20 GbpsUL 10 Gbps
User Experienced Data Rate 10 Mbps 100 Mbps
Spectrum Efficiency 1 (normalized) 3X over IMT-Advanced
Peak Spectral Efficiency DL 15 bpsHzUL 675 bpsHz
DL 30 bpsHzUL 15 bpsHz
Average Spectral Efficiency DL eMBB indoor 9 bpsHzDL eMBB urban 78 bpsHzDL eMBB rural 33 bpsHz
UL eMBB indoor 675 bpsHzUL eMBB urban 54 bpsHzUL eMBB rural 16 bpsHz
Mobility 350 kmh 500 kmh
User Plane Latency 10 msec 1 msec
Connection Density 100 thousand devicessqkm 1 million devices sqkm
Network Energy Efficiency 1 (normalized) 100X over IMT-Advanced
Area Traffic Capacity 01 Mbpssq m 10 Mbpssq m (hot spots)
Bandwidth Up to 20 MHzradio channel (up to 100 MHz aggregated)
Up to 1 GHz (single or multipole RF carriers)
22
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Transformation
23
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
24
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of Different Bands
Source Nokia Vision amp Priorities for Next Generation Radio Technology 3GPP RAN workshop on 5G Sep 17-18 2015
25
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
26
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Network can support both LTE and 5G NR including dual connectivity with which devices have simultaneous connections to LTE and NR
bull Carrier aggregation for multiple NR carriersbull 5 Gbps peak downlink throughput in initial releases increasing to 50 Gbps
in subsequent versionsbull OFDMA in downlink and uplink with optional Single Carrier Frequency
Division Multiple Access (SC-FDMA) for uplink Radio approach for URLLC to be defined in Release 16 but Release 15 will provide physical layer frame structure and numerology support
bull Massive MIMO and beamformingbull Ability to support either FDD or TDD modes for 5G radio bandsbull Numerologies of 2N X 15 kHz for subcarrier spacing up to 120 kHz or 240
kHz This approach depicted in Figure 17 supports both narrow radio channels (for example 1 MHz) or wide ones (for example 400 MHz) Phase 1 likely to support a maximum of 400 MHz bandwidth with 240 kHz subcarrier spacing
5G New Radio (NR) (1)
27
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Error correction through low-density parity codes (LDPC) which are computationally more efficient than LTE turbo codes at higher data rates
bull Standards-based cloud RAN support compared with proprietary LTE approaches that specifies a split between the PDCP and Radio Link Control (RLC) protocol layers
bull Self-contained integrated subframes that combine scheduling data and acknowledgement
bull Future-proofing by providing a flexible radio framework that has forward compatibility to support future currently unknown services such as URLLC to be specified in Release 16
bull Scalable transmission time intervals with short time intervals for low latency and longer time intervals for higher spectral efficiency
bull QoS support using a new modelbull Dynamic co-existence with LTE in the same radio channels
5G New Radio (NR) (2)
28
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
29
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Per ITU 95 users obtain 100 Mbps or greater
bull Typical rates of 500 Mbps appear feasible using 200 MHz radio channel
bull Typical rate of 1 Gbps appear feasible using 400 MHz radio channel
Expected 5G Performance
30
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
31
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Schedule
32
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
Source Dr Seizo Onoe NTT DOCOMO presentation at Brooklyn 5G Summit Apr 21 2016
33
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
34
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Slicing Architecture
35
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
TechnologyName
Type Characteristics Typical Downlink
Speed
Typical Uplink Speed
HSPA WCDMAData service for UMTS networks An enhancement to original UMTS data service
1 Mbps to 4 Mbps
500 Kbpsto 2 Mbps
HSPA+ WCDMAEvolution of HSPA in various stages to increase throughput and capacity and to lower latency
19 Mbps to88 Mbps in 5+5 MHz
38 Mbps to 176 Mbps with dual carrier in 10+5 MHz
1 Mbps to4 Mbps in 5+5 MHz or in 10+5 MHz
LTE OFDMA
New radio interface that can use wide radio channels and deliver extremely high throughput rates All communications handled in IP domain
65 to 263 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
60 to 130 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
LTE-Advanced OFDMA
Advanced version of LTE designed to meet IMT-Advanced requirements
Significant gains through carrier aggregation
36
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Key Features in 3GPP Releases
Release Year Key Features99 1999 First deployable version of UMTS5 2002 High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) for UMTS6 2005 High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) for UMTS7 2008 HSPA+ with higher-order modulation and MIMO8 2009 Long Term Evolution Dual-carrier HSDPA10 2011 LTE-Advanced including carrier aggregation and eICIC11 2013 Coordinated Multi Point (CoMP)12 2015 Public safety support Device-to-device communications Dual Connectivity 256 QAM
on the downlink
13 2016 LTE-Advanced Pro features LTE operation in unlicensed bands LTE-WLANAggregation Narrowband Internet of Things
14 2017 LTE-Advanced Pro additional features such as eLAA (adding uplink to LAA) andcellular V2X communications Study item for 5G ldquoNew Radiordquo
15 2018 Additional LTE-Advanced Pro features such as ultra-reliable low-latencycommunications Phase 1 of 5G Will emphasize enhanced-mobile-broadband usecase and sub-40 GHz operation Includes Massive MIMO beamforming and 4G-5Ginterworking including ability for LTE connectivity to a 5G CN
16 2019 Phase 2 of 5G Full compliance with ITU IMT-2020 requirements Will add URLLCspectrum sharing unlicensed operation and multiple other enhancements
17 2021 Further LTE and 5G enhancements
37
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Types of Cells and Characteristics
Type of Cell CharacteristicsMacro cell Wide-area coverage LTE supports cells up to 100 km in range but typical
distances are 5 to 5 km radius Always installed outdoors
Microcell Covers a smaller area such as a hotel or mall Range to 2 km 5-10W and 256-512 users Usually installed outdoors
Picocell Indoor or outdoor Outdoor cells also called ldquometrocellsrdquo Typical range 15 to 200meters outdoors and 10 to 25 meters indoors 1-2W 64-128 users Deployed byoperators primarily to expand capacity
Consumer Femtocell Indoors Range to 10 meters less than 50 mW and 4 to 6 users Capacity andcoverage benefit Usually deployed by end users using their own backhaul
Enterprise Femtocell Indoors Range to 25 meters 100-250 mW 16-32 users Capacity and coveragebenefit Deployed by operators
Distributed antenna system Expands indoor or outdoor coverage Same hardware can support multipleoperators (neutral host) since antenna can support broad frequency range andmultiple technologies Indoor deployments are typically in larger spaces such asairports Has also been deployed outdoors for coverage and capacity expansion
Remote radio head (RRH) Uses baseband at existing macro site or centralized baseband equipment Ifcentralized the system is called ldquocloud RANrdquo Requires fiber connection
Wi-Fi Primarily provides capacity expansion Neutral-host capability allows multipleoperators to share infrastructure
38
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Challenges
39
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Global Mobile Data Growth
Source Cisco ldquoCisco Visual Networking Index Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Updaterdquo February 16 2013
Source Cisco Visual Networking Index Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Update 2016-2021 February 2017
9
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
Source Ericsson Ericsson Mobility Report June 2017
10
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
Source Ericsson IoT Security February 201711
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More than 756 billion GSM-HSPA-LTE connections
bull Greater than the worldrsquos population of 74 billion
bull 93 billion 3GPP subscriber connections expected by 2022
Source Ovum July 2017 Estimates
Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
12
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
Source Ovum (WCIS) 2017 13
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Expanding Use Cases
14
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
1G to 5G
Generation Requirements Comments
1G No official requirements
Analog technology
Deployed in the 1980s
2G No official requirements
Digital technology
First digital systems
Deployed in the 1990s
New services such as SMS and low-rate data
Primary technologies include IS-95 CDMA (cdmaOne) IS-136 (D-AMPS) and GSM
3G ITUrsquos IMT-2000 required 144 Kbps mobile 384 Kbps pedestrian 2 Mbps indoors
First deployment in 2000
Primary technologies include CDMA2000 1XEV-DO and UMTS-HSPA
WiMAX4G (Initial Technical Designation)
ITUrsquos IMT-Advanced requirements include ability to operate in up to 40 MHz radio channels and with very high spectral efficiency
First deployment in 2010
IEEE 80216m and LTE-Advanced meet the requirements
4G (Current Marketing Designation)
Systems that significantly exceed the performance of initial 3G networks No quantitative requirements
Todayrsquos HSPA+ LTE and WiMAX networks meet this requirement
5G ITU IMT-2020 has defined technical requirements for 5G and 3GPP is developing specifications
First standards-based deployments in 2019 and 2020
15
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline of Cellular Generations
16
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Carrier Aggregation With this capability already in use operators can aggregate radio carriers in the same band or across disparate bands to improve throughputs (under light network load) capacity and efficiency
bull VoLTE Initially launched in 2015 and with widespread availability in 2017 VoLTE enables operators to roll out packetized voice for LTE networks resulting in greater voice capacity and higher voice quality
bull Tighter Integration of LTE with Unlicensed Bands LTE-U became available for testing in 2016 and 3GPP completed specifications for LAA in Release 13 with deployment expected around 2018 MulteFire building on LAA will operate without requiring a licensed-carrier anchor LTEWi-Fi Aggregation through LWA and LWIP are other options for operators with large Wi-Fi deployments
bull Enhanced Support for IoT Release 13 brings Category M1 a low-cost device option along with Narrowband IoT (NB-IoT) a version of the LTE radio interface specifically for IoT devices called Category NB1
bull Higher-Order and Full-Dimension MIMO Deployments in 2017 use up to 4X4 MIMO Release 14 specifies a capability called Full-Dimension MIMO which supports configurations with as many as 32 antennas at the base station
bull Dual Connectivity Release 12 introduced the capability to combine carriers from different sectors andor base stations (ie evolved Node Bs [eNBs]) through a feature called Dual Connectivity Two architectures were defined one that supports Packet Data Convergence Protocol (PDCP) aggregation between the different eNBs and one that supports separate S1 connections on the user plane from the different eNBs to the EPC
Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
17
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull 256 QAM Downlink and 64 QAM Uplink Defined in Release 12 and already deployed in some networks higher-order modulation increases user throughput rates in favorable radio conditions
bull 1 Gbps Capability Using a combination of 256 QAM modulation 4X4 MIMO and aggregation of three carriers operator networks can now reach 1 Gbps peak speeds See below for more information
bull V2X Communications Release 14 specifies vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure communications
bull Coordinated Multi Point CoMP (and enhanced CoMP [eCoMP]) is a process by which multiple base stations or cell sectors process a User Equipment (UE) signal simultaneously or coordinate the transmissions to a UE improving cell-edge performance and network efficiency Initial usage will be on the uplink because no user device changes are required Some networks had implemented this feature in 2017
bull HetNet Support HetNets integrate macro cells and small cells A key feature is enhanced inter-cell interference coordination (eICIC) which improves the ability of a macro and a small cell to use the same spectrum This approach is valuable when the operator cannot dedicate spectrum to small cells Operators are currently evaluating eICIC and at least one operator has deployed it Further enhanced ICIC (feICIC) introduced in Rel-11 added advanced interference-cancellation receivers into devices
bull Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Communications Being specified in Release 15 URLLC in LTE will shorten radio latency to a 1 msec range using a combination of shorter transmission time intervals and faster hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) error processing
bull Self-Organizing Networks With SON networks can automatically configure and optimize themselves a capability that will be particularly important as small cells begin to proliferate Vendor-specific methods are common for 3G networks and trials are now occurring for 4G LTE standards-based approaches
Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
18
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
Source 5G AmericasRysavy Research
19
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
20
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Use Case Model
21
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Objectives
IMT-Advanced IMT-2020
Peak Data Rate DL 1 GbpsUL 005 Gbps
DL 20 GbpsUL 10 Gbps
User Experienced Data Rate 10 Mbps 100 Mbps
Spectrum Efficiency 1 (normalized) 3X over IMT-Advanced
Peak Spectral Efficiency DL 15 bpsHzUL 675 bpsHz
DL 30 bpsHzUL 15 bpsHz
Average Spectral Efficiency DL eMBB indoor 9 bpsHzDL eMBB urban 78 bpsHzDL eMBB rural 33 bpsHz
UL eMBB indoor 675 bpsHzUL eMBB urban 54 bpsHzUL eMBB rural 16 bpsHz
Mobility 350 kmh 500 kmh
User Plane Latency 10 msec 1 msec
Connection Density 100 thousand devicessqkm 1 million devices sqkm
Network Energy Efficiency 1 (normalized) 100X over IMT-Advanced
Area Traffic Capacity 01 Mbpssq m 10 Mbpssq m (hot spots)
Bandwidth Up to 20 MHzradio channel (up to 100 MHz aggregated)
Up to 1 GHz (single or multipole RF carriers)
22
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Transformation
23
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
24
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of Different Bands
Source Nokia Vision amp Priorities for Next Generation Radio Technology 3GPP RAN workshop on 5G Sep 17-18 2015
25
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
26
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Network can support both LTE and 5G NR including dual connectivity with which devices have simultaneous connections to LTE and NR
bull Carrier aggregation for multiple NR carriersbull 5 Gbps peak downlink throughput in initial releases increasing to 50 Gbps
in subsequent versionsbull OFDMA in downlink and uplink with optional Single Carrier Frequency
Division Multiple Access (SC-FDMA) for uplink Radio approach for URLLC to be defined in Release 16 but Release 15 will provide physical layer frame structure and numerology support
bull Massive MIMO and beamformingbull Ability to support either FDD or TDD modes for 5G radio bandsbull Numerologies of 2N X 15 kHz for subcarrier spacing up to 120 kHz or 240
kHz This approach depicted in Figure 17 supports both narrow radio channels (for example 1 MHz) or wide ones (for example 400 MHz) Phase 1 likely to support a maximum of 400 MHz bandwidth with 240 kHz subcarrier spacing
5G New Radio (NR) (1)
27
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Error correction through low-density parity codes (LDPC) which are computationally more efficient than LTE turbo codes at higher data rates
bull Standards-based cloud RAN support compared with proprietary LTE approaches that specifies a split between the PDCP and Radio Link Control (RLC) protocol layers
bull Self-contained integrated subframes that combine scheduling data and acknowledgement
bull Future-proofing by providing a flexible radio framework that has forward compatibility to support future currently unknown services such as URLLC to be specified in Release 16
bull Scalable transmission time intervals with short time intervals for low latency and longer time intervals for higher spectral efficiency
bull QoS support using a new modelbull Dynamic co-existence with LTE in the same radio channels
5G New Radio (NR) (2)
28
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
29
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Per ITU 95 users obtain 100 Mbps or greater
bull Typical rates of 500 Mbps appear feasible using 200 MHz radio channel
bull Typical rate of 1 Gbps appear feasible using 400 MHz radio channel
Expected 5G Performance
30
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
31
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Schedule
32
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
Source Dr Seizo Onoe NTT DOCOMO presentation at Brooklyn 5G Summit Apr 21 2016
33
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
34
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Slicing Architecture
35
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
TechnologyName
Type Characteristics Typical Downlink
Speed
Typical Uplink Speed
HSPA WCDMAData service for UMTS networks An enhancement to original UMTS data service
1 Mbps to 4 Mbps
500 Kbpsto 2 Mbps
HSPA+ WCDMAEvolution of HSPA in various stages to increase throughput and capacity and to lower latency
19 Mbps to88 Mbps in 5+5 MHz
38 Mbps to 176 Mbps with dual carrier in 10+5 MHz
1 Mbps to4 Mbps in 5+5 MHz or in 10+5 MHz
LTE OFDMA
New radio interface that can use wide radio channels and deliver extremely high throughput rates All communications handled in IP domain
65 to 263 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
60 to 130 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
LTE-Advanced OFDMA
Advanced version of LTE designed to meet IMT-Advanced requirements
Significant gains through carrier aggregation
36
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Key Features in 3GPP Releases
Release Year Key Features99 1999 First deployable version of UMTS5 2002 High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) for UMTS6 2005 High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) for UMTS7 2008 HSPA+ with higher-order modulation and MIMO8 2009 Long Term Evolution Dual-carrier HSDPA10 2011 LTE-Advanced including carrier aggregation and eICIC11 2013 Coordinated Multi Point (CoMP)12 2015 Public safety support Device-to-device communications Dual Connectivity 256 QAM
on the downlink
13 2016 LTE-Advanced Pro features LTE operation in unlicensed bands LTE-WLANAggregation Narrowband Internet of Things
14 2017 LTE-Advanced Pro additional features such as eLAA (adding uplink to LAA) andcellular V2X communications Study item for 5G ldquoNew Radiordquo
15 2018 Additional LTE-Advanced Pro features such as ultra-reliable low-latencycommunications Phase 1 of 5G Will emphasize enhanced-mobile-broadband usecase and sub-40 GHz operation Includes Massive MIMO beamforming and 4G-5Ginterworking including ability for LTE connectivity to a 5G CN
16 2019 Phase 2 of 5G Full compliance with ITU IMT-2020 requirements Will add URLLCspectrum sharing unlicensed operation and multiple other enhancements
17 2021 Further LTE and 5G enhancements
37
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Types of Cells and Characteristics
Type of Cell CharacteristicsMacro cell Wide-area coverage LTE supports cells up to 100 km in range but typical
distances are 5 to 5 km radius Always installed outdoors
Microcell Covers a smaller area such as a hotel or mall Range to 2 km 5-10W and 256-512 users Usually installed outdoors
Picocell Indoor or outdoor Outdoor cells also called ldquometrocellsrdquo Typical range 15 to 200meters outdoors and 10 to 25 meters indoors 1-2W 64-128 users Deployed byoperators primarily to expand capacity
Consumer Femtocell Indoors Range to 10 meters less than 50 mW and 4 to 6 users Capacity andcoverage benefit Usually deployed by end users using their own backhaul
Enterprise Femtocell Indoors Range to 25 meters 100-250 mW 16-32 users Capacity and coveragebenefit Deployed by operators
Distributed antenna system Expands indoor or outdoor coverage Same hardware can support multipleoperators (neutral host) since antenna can support broad frequency range andmultiple technologies Indoor deployments are typically in larger spaces such asairports Has also been deployed outdoors for coverage and capacity expansion
Remote radio head (RRH) Uses baseband at existing macro site or centralized baseband equipment Ifcentralized the system is called ldquocloud RANrdquo Requires fiber connection
Wi-Fi Primarily provides capacity expansion Neutral-host capability allows multipleoperators to share infrastructure
38
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Challenges
39
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
Source Ericsson Ericsson Mobility Report June 2017
10
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
Source Ericsson IoT Security February 201711
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More than 756 billion GSM-HSPA-LTE connections
bull Greater than the worldrsquos population of 74 billion
bull 93 billion 3GPP subscriber connections expected by 2022
Source Ovum July 2017 Estimates
Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
12
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
Source Ovum (WCIS) 2017 13
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Expanding Use Cases
14
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
1G to 5G
Generation Requirements Comments
1G No official requirements
Analog technology
Deployed in the 1980s
2G No official requirements
Digital technology
First digital systems
Deployed in the 1990s
New services such as SMS and low-rate data
Primary technologies include IS-95 CDMA (cdmaOne) IS-136 (D-AMPS) and GSM
3G ITUrsquos IMT-2000 required 144 Kbps mobile 384 Kbps pedestrian 2 Mbps indoors
First deployment in 2000
Primary technologies include CDMA2000 1XEV-DO and UMTS-HSPA
WiMAX4G (Initial Technical Designation)
ITUrsquos IMT-Advanced requirements include ability to operate in up to 40 MHz radio channels and with very high spectral efficiency
First deployment in 2010
IEEE 80216m and LTE-Advanced meet the requirements
4G (Current Marketing Designation)
Systems that significantly exceed the performance of initial 3G networks No quantitative requirements
Todayrsquos HSPA+ LTE and WiMAX networks meet this requirement
5G ITU IMT-2020 has defined technical requirements for 5G and 3GPP is developing specifications
First standards-based deployments in 2019 and 2020
15
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline of Cellular Generations
16
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Carrier Aggregation With this capability already in use operators can aggregate radio carriers in the same band or across disparate bands to improve throughputs (under light network load) capacity and efficiency
bull VoLTE Initially launched in 2015 and with widespread availability in 2017 VoLTE enables operators to roll out packetized voice for LTE networks resulting in greater voice capacity and higher voice quality
bull Tighter Integration of LTE with Unlicensed Bands LTE-U became available for testing in 2016 and 3GPP completed specifications for LAA in Release 13 with deployment expected around 2018 MulteFire building on LAA will operate without requiring a licensed-carrier anchor LTEWi-Fi Aggregation through LWA and LWIP are other options for operators with large Wi-Fi deployments
bull Enhanced Support for IoT Release 13 brings Category M1 a low-cost device option along with Narrowband IoT (NB-IoT) a version of the LTE radio interface specifically for IoT devices called Category NB1
bull Higher-Order and Full-Dimension MIMO Deployments in 2017 use up to 4X4 MIMO Release 14 specifies a capability called Full-Dimension MIMO which supports configurations with as many as 32 antennas at the base station
bull Dual Connectivity Release 12 introduced the capability to combine carriers from different sectors andor base stations (ie evolved Node Bs [eNBs]) through a feature called Dual Connectivity Two architectures were defined one that supports Packet Data Convergence Protocol (PDCP) aggregation between the different eNBs and one that supports separate S1 connections on the user plane from the different eNBs to the EPC
Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
17
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull 256 QAM Downlink and 64 QAM Uplink Defined in Release 12 and already deployed in some networks higher-order modulation increases user throughput rates in favorable radio conditions
bull 1 Gbps Capability Using a combination of 256 QAM modulation 4X4 MIMO and aggregation of three carriers operator networks can now reach 1 Gbps peak speeds See below for more information
bull V2X Communications Release 14 specifies vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure communications
bull Coordinated Multi Point CoMP (and enhanced CoMP [eCoMP]) is a process by which multiple base stations or cell sectors process a User Equipment (UE) signal simultaneously or coordinate the transmissions to a UE improving cell-edge performance and network efficiency Initial usage will be on the uplink because no user device changes are required Some networks had implemented this feature in 2017
bull HetNet Support HetNets integrate macro cells and small cells A key feature is enhanced inter-cell interference coordination (eICIC) which improves the ability of a macro and a small cell to use the same spectrum This approach is valuable when the operator cannot dedicate spectrum to small cells Operators are currently evaluating eICIC and at least one operator has deployed it Further enhanced ICIC (feICIC) introduced in Rel-11 added advanced interference-cancellation receivers into devices
bull Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Communications Being specified in Release 15 URLLC in LTE will shorten radio latency to a 1 msec range using a combination of shorter transmission time intervals and faster hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) error processing
bull Self-Organizing Networks With SON networks can automatically configure and optimize themselves a capability that will be particularly important as small cells begin to proliferate Vendor-specific methods are common for 3G networks and trials are now occurring for 4G LTE standards-based approaches
Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
18
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
Source 5G AmericasRysavy Research
19
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
20
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Use Case Model
21
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Objectives
IMT-Advanced IMT-2020
Peak Data Rate DL 1 GbpsUL 005 Gbps
DL 20 GbpsUL 10 Gbps
User Experienced Data Rate 10 Mbps 100 Mbps
Spectrum Efficiency 1 (normalized) 3X over IMT-Advanced
Peak Spectral Efficiency DL 15 bpsHzUL 675 bpsHz
DL 30 bpsHzUL 15 bpsHz
Average Spectral Efficiency DL eMBB indoor 9 bpsHzDL eMBB urban 78 bpsHzDL eMBB rural 33 bpsHz
UL eMBB indoor 675 bpsHzUL eMBB urban 54 bpsHzUL eMBB rural 16 bpsHz
Mobility 350 kmh 500 kmh
User Plane Latency 10 msec 1 msec
Connection Density 100 thousand devicessqkm 1 million devices sqkm
Network Energy Efficiency 1 (normalized) 100X over IMT-Advanced
Area Traffic Capacity 01 Mbpssq m 10 Mbpssq m (hot spots)
Bandwidth Up to 20 MHzradio channel (up to 100 MHz aggregated)
Up to 1 GHz (single or multipole RF carriers)
22
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Transformation
23
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
24
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of Different Bands
Source Nokia Vision amp Priorities for Next Generation Radio Technology 3GPP RAN workshop on 5G Sep 17-18 2015
25
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
26
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Network can support both LTE and 5G NR including dual connectivity with which devices have simultaneous connections to LTE and NR
bull Carrier aggregation for multiple NR carriersbull 5 Gbps peak downlink throughput in initial releases increasing to 50 Gbps
in subsequent versionsbull OFDMA in downlink and uplink with optional Single Carrier Frequency
Division Multiple Access (SC-FDMA) for uplink Radio approach for URLLC to be defined in Release 16 but Release 15 will provide physical layer frame structure and numerology support
bull Massive MIMO and beamformingbull Ability to support either FDD or TDD modes for 5G radio bandsbull Numerologies of 2N X 15 kHz for subcarrier spacing up to 120 kHz or 240
kHz This approach depicted in Figure 17 supports both narrow radio channels (for example 1 MHz) or wide ones (for example 400 MHz) Phase 1 likely to support a maximum of 400 MHz bandwidth with 240 kHz subcarrier spacing
5G New Radio (NR) (1)
27
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Error correction through low-density parity codes (LDPC) which are computationally more efficient than LTE turbo codes at higher data rates
bull Standards-based cloud RAN support compared with proprietary LTE approaches that specifies a split between the PDCP and Radio Link Control (RLC) protocol layers
bull Self-contained integrated subframes that combine scheduling data and acknowledgement
bull Future-proofing by providing a flexible radio framework that has forward compatibility to support future currently unknown services such as URLLC to be specified in Release 16
bull Scalable transmission time intervals with short time intervals for low latency and longer time intervals for higher spectral efficiency
bull QoS support using a new modelbull Dynamic co-existence with LTE in the same radio channels
5G New Radio (NR) (2)
28
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
29
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Per ITU 95 users obtain 100 Mbps or greater
bull Typical rates of 500 Mbps appear feasible using 200 MHz radio channel
bull Typical rate of 1 Gbps appear feasible using 400 MHz radio channel
Expected 5G Performance
30
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
31
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Schedule
32
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
Source Dr Seizo Onoe NTT DOCOMO presentation at Brooklyn 5G Summit Apr 21 2016
33
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
34
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Slicing Architecture
35
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
TechnologyName
Type Characteristics Typical Downlink
Speed
Typical Uplink Speed
HSPA WCDMAData service for UMTS networks An enhancement to original UMTS data service
1 Mbps to 4 Mbps
500 Kbpsto 2 Mbps
HSPA+ WCDMAEvolution of HSPA in various stages to increase throughput and capacity and to lower latency
19 Mbps to88 Mbps in 5+5 MHz
38 Mbps to 176 Mbps with dual carrier in 10+5 MHz
1 Mbps to4 Mbps in 5+5 MHz or in 10+5 MHz
LTE OFDMA
New radio interface that can use wide radio channels and deliver extremely high throughput rates All communications handled in IP domain
65 to 263 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
60 to 130 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
LTE-Advanced OFDMA
Advanced version of LTE designed to meet IMT-Advanced requirements
Significant gains through carrier aggregation
36
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Key Features in 3GPP Releases
Release Year Key Features99 1999 First deployable version of UMTS5 2002 High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) for UMTS6 2005 High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) for UMTS7 2008 HSPA+ with higher-order modulation and MIMO8 2009 Long Term Evolution Dual-carrier HSDPA10 2011 LTE-Advanced including carrier aggregation and eICIC11 2013 Coordinated Multi Point (CoMP)12 2015 Public safety support Device-to-device communications Dual Connectivity 256 QAM
on the downlink
13 2016 LTE-Advanced Pro features LTE operation in unlicensed bands LTE-WLANAggregation Narrowband Internet of Things
14 2017 LTE-Advanced Pro additional features such as eLAA (adding uplink to LAA) andcellular V2X communications Study item for 5G ldquoNew Radiordquo
15 2018 Additional LTE-Advanced Pro features such as ultra-reliable low-latencycommunications Phase 1 of 5G Will emphasize enhanced-mobile-broadband usecase and sub-40 GHz operation Includes Massive MIMO beamforming and 4G-5Ginterworking including ability for LTE connectivity to a 5G CN
16 2019 Phase 2 of 5G Full compliance with ITU IMT-2020 requirements Will add URLLCspectrum sharing unlicensed operation and multiple other enhancements
17 2021 Further LTE and 5G enhancements
37
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Types of Cells and Characteristics
Type of Cell CharacteristicsMacro cell Wide-area coverage LTE supports cells up to 100 km in range but typical
distances are 5 to 5 km radius Always installed outdoors
Microcell Covers a smaller area such as a hotel or mall Range to 2 km 5-10W and 256-512 users Usually installed outdoors
Picocell Indoor or outdoor Outdoor cells also called ldquometrocellsrdquo Typical range 15 to 200meters outdoors and 10 to 25 meters indoors 1-2W 64-128 users Deployed byoperators primarily to expand capacity
Consumer Femtocell Indoors Range to 10 meters less than 50 mW and 4 to 6 users Capacity andcoverage benefit Usually deployed by end users using their own backhaul
Enterprise Femtocell Indoors Range to 25 meters 100-250 mW 16-32 users Capacity and coveragebenefit Deployed by operators
Distributed antenna system Expands indoor or outdoor coverage Same hardware can support multipleoperators (neutral host) since antenna can support broad frequency range andmultiple technologies Indoor deployments are typically in larger spaces such asairports Has also been deployed outdoors for coverage and capacity expansion
Remote radio head (RRH) Uses baseband at existing macro site or centralized baseband equipment Ifcentralized the system is called ldquocloud RANrdquo Requires fiber connection
Wi-Fi Primarily provides capacity expansion Neutral-host capability allows multipleoperators to share infrastructure
38
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Challenges
39
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
Source Ericsson IoT Security February 201711
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More than 756 billion GSM-HSPA-LTE connections
bull Greater than the worldrsquos population of 74 billion
bull 93 billion 3GPP subscriber connections expected by 2022
Source Ovum July 2017 Estimates
Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
12
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
Source Ovum (WCIS) 2017 13
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Expanding Use Cases
14
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
1G to 5G
Generation Requirements Comments
1G No official requirements
Analog technology
Deployed in the 1980s
2G No official requirements
Digital technology
First digital systems
Deployed in the 1990s
New services such as SMS and low-rate data
Primary technologies include IS-95 CDMA (cdmaOne) IS-136 (D-AMPS) and GSM
3G ITUrsquos IMT-2000 required 144 Kbps mobile 384 Kbps pedestrian 2 Mbps indoors
First deployment in 2000
Primary technologies include CDMA2000 1XEV-DO and UMTS-HSPA
WiMAX4G (Initial Technical Designation)
ITUrsquos IMT-Advanced requirements include ability to operate in up to 40 MHz radio channels and with very high spectral efficiency
First deployment in 2010
IEEE 80216m and LTE-Advanced meet the requirements
4G (Current Marketing Designation)
Systems that significantly exceed the performance of initial 3G networks No quantitative requirements
Todayrsquos HSPA+ LTE and WiMAX networks meet this requirement
5G ITU IMT-2020 has defined technical requirements for 5G and 3GPP is developing specifications
First standards-based deployments in 2019 and 2020
15
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline of Cellular Generations
16
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Carrier Aggregation With this capability already in use operators can aggregate radio carriers in the same band or across disparate bands to improve throughputs (under light network load) capacity and efficiency
bull VoLTE Initially launched in 2015 and with widespread availability in 2017 VoLTE enables operators to roll out packetized voice for LTE networks resulting in greater voice capacity and higher voice quality
bull Tighter Integration of LTE with Unlicensed Bands LTE-U became available for testing in 2016 and 3GPP completed specifications for LAA in Release 13 with deployment expected around 2018 MulteFire building on LAA will operate without requiring a licensed-carrier anchor LTEWi-Fi Aggregation through LWA and LWIP are other options for operators with large Wi-Fi deployments
bull Enhanced Support for IoT Release 13 brings Category M1 a low-cost device option along with Narrowband IoT (NB-IoT) a version of the LTE radio interface specifically for IoT devices called Category NB1
bull Higher-Order and Full-Dimension MIMO Deployments in 2017 use up to 4X4 MIMO Release 14 specifies a capability called Full-Dimension MIMO which supports configurations with as many as 32 antennas at the base station
bull Dual Connectivity Release 12 introduced the capability to combine carriers from different sectors andor base stations (ie evolved Node Bs [eNBs]) through a feature called Dual Connectivity Two architectures were defined one that supports Packet Data Convergence Protocol (PDCP) aggregation between the different eNBs and one that supports separate S1 connections on the user plane from the different eNBs to the EPC
Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
17
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull 256 QAM Downlink and 64 QAM Uplink Defined in Release 12 and already deployed in some networks higher-order modulation increases user throughput rates in favorable radio conditions
bull 1 Gbps Capability Using a combination of 256 QAM modulation 4X4 MIMO and aggregation of three carriers operator networks can now reach 1 Gbps peak speeds See below for more information
bull V2X Communications Release 14 specifies vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure communications
bull Coordinated Multi Point CoMP (and enhanced CoMP [eCoMP]) is a process by which multiple base stations or cell sectors process a User Equipment (UE) signal simultaneously or coordinate the transmissions to a UE improving cell-edge performance and network efficiency Initial usage will be on the uplink because no user device changes are required Some networks had implemented this feature in 2017
bull HetNet Support HetNets integrate macro cells and small cells A key feature is enhanced inter-cell interference coordination (eICIC) which improves the ability of a macro and a small cell to use the same spectrum This approach is valuable when the operator cannot dedicate spectrum to small cells Operators are currently evaluating eICIC and at least one operator has deployed it Further enhanced ICIC (feICIC) introduced in Rel-11 added advanced interference-cancellation receivers into devices
bull Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Communications Being specified in Release 15 URLLC in LTE will shorten radio latency to a 1 msec range using a combination of shorter transmission time intervals and faster hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) error processing
bull Self-Organizing Networks With SON networks can automatically configure and optimize themselves a capability that will be particularly important as small cells begin to proliferate Vendor-specific methods are common for 3G networks and trials are now occurring for 4G LTE standards-based approaches
Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
18
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
Source 5G AmericasRysavy Research
19
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
20
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Use Case Model
21
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Objectives
IMT-Advanced IMT-2020
Peak Data Rate DL 1 GbpsUL 005 Gbps
DL 20 GbpsUL 10 Gbps
User Experienced Data Rate 10 Mbps 100 Mbps
Spectrum Efficiency 1 (normalized) 3X over IMT-Advanced
Peak Spectral Efficiency DL 15 bpsHzUL 675 bpsHz
DL 30 bpsHzUL 15 bpsHz
Average Spectral Efficiency DL eMBB indoor 9 bpsHzDL eMBB urban 78 bpsHzDL eMBB rural 33 bpsHz
UL eMBB indoor 675 bpsHzUL eMBB urban 54 bpsHzUL eMBB rural 16 bpsHz
Mobility 350 kmh 500 kmh
User Plane Latency 10 msec 1 msec
Connection Density 100 thousand devicessqkm 1 million devices sqkm
Network Energy Efficiency 1 (normalized) 100X over IMT-Advanced
Area Traffic Capacity 01 Mbpssq m 10 Mbpssq m (hot spots)
Bandwidth Up to 20 MHzradio channel (up to 100 MHz aggregated)
Up to 1 GHz (single or multipole RF carriers)
22
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Transformation
23
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
24
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of Different Bands
Source Nokia Vision amp Priorities for Next Generation Radio Technology 3GPP RAN workshop on 5G Sep 17-18 2015
25
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
26
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Network can support both LTE and 5G NR including dual connectivity with which devices have simultaneous connections to LTE and NR
bull Carrier aggregation for multiple NR carriersbull 5 Gbps peak downlink throughput in initial releases increasing to 50 Gbps
in subsequent versionsbull OFDMA in downlink and uplink with optional Single Carrier Frequency
Division Multiple Access (SC-FDMA) for uplink Radio approach for URLLC to be defined in Release 16 but Release 15 will provide physical layer frame structure and numerology support
bull Massive MIMO and beamformingbull Ability to support either FDD or TDD modes for 5G radio bandsbull Numerologies of 2N X 15 kHz for subcarrier spacing up to 120 kHz or 240
kHz This approach depicted in Figure 17 supports both narrow radio channels (for example 1 MHz) or wide ones (for example 400 MHz) Phase 1 likely to support a maximum of 400 MHz bandwidth with 240 kHz subcarrier spacing
5G New Radio (NR) (1)
27
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Error correction through low-density parity codes (LDPC) which are computationally more efficient than LTE turbo codes at higher data rates
bull Standards-based cloud RAN support compared with proprietary LTE approaches that specifies a split between the PDCP and Radio Link Control (RLC) protocol layers
bull Self-contained integrated subframes that combine scheduling data and acknowledgement
bull Future-proofing by providing a flexible radio framework that has forward compatibility to support future currently unknown services such as URLLC to be specified in Release 16
bull Scalable transmission time intervals with short time intervals for low latency and longer time intervals for higher spectral efficiency
bull QoS support using a new modelbull Dynamic co-existence with LTE in the same radio channels
5G New Radio (NR) (2)
28
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
29
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Per ITU 95 users obtain 100 Mbps or greater
bull Typical rates of 500 Mbps appear feasible using 200 MHz radio channel
bull Typical rate of 1 Gbps appear feasible using 400 MHz radio channel
Expected 5G Performance
30
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
31
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Schedule
32
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
Source Dr Seizo Onoe NTT DOCOMO presentation at Brooklyn 5G Summit Apr 21 2016
33
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
34
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Slicing Architecture
35
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
TechnologyName
Type Characteristics Typical Downlink
Speed
Typical Uplink Speed
HSPA WCDMAData service for UMTS networks An enhancement to original UMTS data service
1 Mbps to 4 Mbps
500 Kbpsto 2 Mbps
HSPA+ WCDMAEvolution of HSPA in various stages to increase throughput and capacity and to lower latency
19 Mbps to88 Mbps in 5+5 MHz
38 Mbps to 176 Mbps with dual carrier in 10+5 MHz
1 Mbps to4 Mbps in 5+5 MHz or in 10+5 MHz
LTE OFDMA
New radio interface that can use wide radio channels and deliver extremely high throughput rates All communications handled in IP domain
65 to 263 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
60 to 130 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
LTE-Advanced OFDMA
Advanced version of LTE designed to meet IMT-Advanced requirements
Significant gains through carrier aggregation
36
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Key Features in 3GPP Releases
Release Year Key Features99 1999 First deployable version of UMTS5 2002 High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) for UMTS6 2005 High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) for UMTS7 2008 HSPA+ with higher-order modulation and MIMO8 2009 Long Term Evolution Dual-carrier HSDPA10 2011 LTE-Advanced including carrier aggregation and eICIC11 2013 Coordinated Multi Point (CoMP)12 2015 Public safety support Device-to-device communications Dual Connectivity 256 QAM
on the downlink
13 2016 LTE-Advanced Pro features LTE operation in unlicensed bands LTE-WLANAggregation Narrowband Internet of Things
14 2017 LTE-Advanced Pro additional features such as eLAA (adding uplink to LAA) andcellular V2X communications Study item for 5G ldquoNew Radiordquo
15 2018 Additional LTE-Advanced Pro features such as ultra-reliable low-latencycommunications Phase 1 of 5G Will emphasize enhanced-mobile-broadband usecase and sub-40 GHz operation Includes Massive MIMO beamforming and 4G-5Ginterworking including ability for LTE connectivity to a 5G CN
16 2019 Phase 2 of 5G Full compliance with ITU IMT-2020 requirements Will add URLLCspectrum sharing unlicensed operation and multiple other enhancements
17 2021 Further LTE and 5G enhancements
37
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Types of Cells and Characteristics
Type of Cell CharacteristicsMacro cell Wide-area coverage LTE supports cells up to 100 km in range but typical
distances are 5 to 5 km radius Always installed outdoors
Microcell Covers a smaller area such as a hotel or mall Range to 2 km 5-10W and 256-512 users Usually installed outdoors
Picocell Indoor or outdoor Outdoor cells also called ldquometrocellsrdquo Typical range 15 to 200meters outdoors and 10 to 25 meters indoors 1-2W 64-128 users Deployed byoperators primarily to expand capacity
Consumer Femtocell Indoors Range to 10 meters less than 50 mW and 4 to 6 users Capacity andcoverage benefit Usually deployed by end users using their own backhaul
Enterprise Femtocell Indoors Range to 25 meters 100-250 mW 16-32 users Capacity and coveragebenefit Deployed by operators
Distributed antenna system Expands indoor or outdoor coverage Same hardware can support multipleoperators (neutral host) since antenna can support broad frequency range andmultiple technologies Indoor deployments are typically in larger spaces such asairports Has also been deployed outdoors for coverage and capacity expansion
Remote radio head (RRH) Uses baseband at existing macro site or centralized baseband equipment Ifcentralized the system is called ldquocloud RANrdquo Requires fiber connection
Wi-Fi Primarily provides capacity expansion Neutral-host capability allows multipleoperators to share infrastructure
38
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Challenges
39
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More than 756 billion GSM-HSPA-LTE connections
bull Greater than the worldrsquos population of 74 billion
bull 93 billion 3GPP subscriber connections expected by 2022
Source Ovum July 2017 Estimates
Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
12
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
Source Ovum (WCIS) 2017 13
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Expanding Use Cases
14
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
1G to 5G
Generation Requirements Comments
1G No official requirements
Analog technology
Deployed in the 1980s
2G No official requirements
Digital technology
First digital systems
Deployed in the 1990s
New services such as SMS and low-rate data
Primary technologies include IS-95 CDMA (cdmaOne) IS-136 (D-AMPS) and GSM
3G ITUrsquos IMT-2000 required 144 Kbps mobile 384 Kbps pedestrian 2 Mbps indoors
First deployment in 2000
Primary technologies include CDMA2000 1XEV-DO and UMTS-HSPA
WiMAX4G (Initial Technical Designation)
ITUrsquos IMT-Advanced requirements include ability to operate in up to 40 MHz radio channels and with very high spectral efficiency
First deployment in 2010
IEEE 80216m and LTE-Advanced meet the requirements
4G (Current Marketing Designation)
Systems that significantly exceed the performance of initial 3G networks No quantitative requirements
Todayrsquos HSPA+ LTE and WiMAX networks meet this requirement
5G ITU IMT-2020 has defined technical requirements for 5G and 3GPP is developing specifications
First standards-based deployments in 2019 and 2020
15
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline of Cellular Generations
16
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Carrier Aggregation With this capability already in use operators can aggregate radio carriers in the same band or across disparate bands to improve throughputs (under light network load) capacity and efficiency
bull VoLTE Initially launched in 2015 and with widespread availability in 2017 VoLTE enables operators to roll out packetized voice for LTE networks resulting in greater voice capacity and higher voice quality
bull Tighter Integration of LTE with Unlicensed Bands LTE-U became available for testing in 2016 and 3GPP completed specifications for LAA in Release 13 with deployment expected around 2018 MulteFire building on LAA will operate without requiring a licensed-carrier anchor LTEWi-Fi Aggregation through LWA and LWIP are other options for operators with large Wi-Fi deployments
bull Enhanced Support for IoT Release 13 brings Category M1 a low-cost device option along with Narrowband IoT (NB-IoT) a version of the LTE radio interface specifically for IoT devices called Category NB1
bull Higher-Order and Full-Dimension MIMO Deployments in 2017 use up to 4X4 MIMO Release 14 specifies a capability called Full-Dimension MIMO which supports configurations with as many as 32 antennas at the base station
bull Dual Connectivity Release 12 introduced the capability to combine carriers from different sectors andor base stations (ie evolved Node Bs [eNBs]) through a feature called Dual Connectivity Two architectures were defined one that supports Packet Data Convergence Protocol (PDCP) aggregation between the different eNBs and one that supports separate S1 connections on the user plane from the different eNBs to the EPC
Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
17
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull 256 QAM Downlink and 64 QAM Uplink Defined in Release 12 and already deployed in some networks higher-order modulation increases user throughput rates in favorable radio conditions
bull 1 Gbps Capability Using a combination of 256 QAM modulation 4X4 MIMO and aggregation of three carriers operator networks can now reach 1 Gbps peak speeds See below for more information
bull V2X Communications Release 14 specifies vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure communications
bull Coordinated Multi Point CoMP (and enhanced CoMP [eCoMP]) is a process by which multiple base stations or cell sectors process a User Equipment (UE) signal simultaneously or coordinate the transmissions to a UE improving cell-edge performance and network efficiency Initial usage will be on the uplink because no user device changes are required Some networks had implemented this feature in 2017
bull HetNet Support HetNets integrate macro cells and small cells A key feature is enhanced inter-cell interference coordination (eICIC) which improves the ability of a macro and a small cell to use the same spectrum This approach is valuable when the operator cannot dedicate spectrum to small cells Operators are currently evaluating eICIC and at least one operator has deployed it Further enhanced ICIC (feICIC) introduced in Rel-11 added advanced interference-cancellation receivers into devices
bull Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Communications Being specified in Release 15 URLLC in LTE will shorten radio latency to a 1 msec range using a combination of shorter transmission time intervals and faster hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) error processing
bull Self-Organizing Networks With SON networks can automatically configure and optimize themselves a capability that will be particularly important as small cells begin to proliferate Vendor-specific methods are common for 3G networks and trials are now occurring for 4G LTE standards-based approaches
Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
18
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
Source 5G AmericasRysavy Research
19
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
20
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Use Case Model
21
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Objectives
IMT-Advanced IMT-2020
Peak Data Rate DL 1 GbpsUL 005 Gbps
DL 20 GbpsUL 10 Gbps
User Experienced Data Rate 10 Mbps 100 Mbps
Spectrum Efficiency 1 (normalized) 3X over IMT-Advanced
Peak Spectral Efficiency DL 15 bpsHzUL 675 bpsHz
DL 30 bpsHzUL 15 bpsHz
Average Spectral Efficiency DL eMBB indoor 9 bpsHzDL eMBB urban 78 bpsHzDL eMBB rural 33 bpsHz
UL eMBB indoor 675 bpsHzUL eMBB urban 54 bpsHzUL eMBB rural 16 bpsHz
Mobility 350 kmh 500 kmh
User Plane Latency 10 msec 1 msec
Connection Density 100 thousand devicessqkm 1 million devices sqkm
Network Energy Efficiency 1 (normalized) 100X over IMT-Advanced
Area Traffic Capacity 01 Mbpssq m 10 Mbpssq m (hot spots)
Bandwidth Up to 20 MHzradio channel (up to 100 MHz aggregated)
Up to 1 GHz (single or multipole RF carriers)
22
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Transformation
23
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
24
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of Different Bands
Source Nokia Vision amp Priorities for Next Generation Radio Technology 3GPP RAN workshop on 5G Sep 17-18 2015
25
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
26
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Network can support both LTE and 5G NR including dual connectivity with which devices have simultaneous connections to LTE and NR
bull Carrier aggregation for multiple NR carriersbull 5 Gbps peak downlink throughput in initial releases increasing to 50 Gbps
in subsequent versionsbull OFDMA in downlink and uplink with optional Single Carrier Frequency
Division Multiple Access (SC-FDMA) for uplink Radio approach for URLLC to be defined in Release 16 but Release 15 will provide physical layer frame structure and numerology support
bull Massive MIMO and beamformingbull Ability to support either FDD or TDD modes for 5G radio bandsbull Numerologies of 2N X 15 kHz for subcarrier spacing up to 120 kHz or 240
kHz This approach depicted in Figure 17 supports both narrow radio channels (for example 1 MHz) or wide ones (for example 400 MHz) Phase 1 likely to support a maximum of 400 MHz bandwidth with 240 kHz subcarrier spacing
5G New Radio (NR) (1)
27
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Error correction through low-density parity codes (LDPC) which are computationally more efficient than LTE turbo codes at higher data rates
bull Standards-based cloud RAN support compared with proprietary LTE approaches that specifies a split between the PDCP and Radio Link Control (RLC) protocol layers
bull Self-contained integrated subframes that combine scheduling data and acknowledgement
bull Future-proofing by providing a flexible radio framework that has forward compatibility to support future currently unknown services such as URLLC to be specified in Release 16
bull Scalable transmission time intervals with short time intervals for low latency and longer time intervals for higher spectral efficiency
bull QoS support using a new modelbull Dynamic co-existence with LTE in the same radio channels
5G New Radio (NR) (2)
28
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
29
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Per ITU 95 users obtain 100 Mbps or greater
bull Typical rates of 500 Mbps appear feasible using 200 MHz radio channel
bull Typical rate of 1 Gbps appear feasible using 400 MHz radio channel
Expected 5G Performance
30
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
31
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Schedule
32
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
Source Dr Seizo Onoe NTT DOCOMO presentation at Brooklyn 5G Summit Apr 21 2016
33
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
34
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Slicing Architecture
35
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
TechnologyName
Type Characteristics Typical Downlink
Speed
Typical Uplink Speed
HSPA WCDMAData service for UMTS networks An enhancement to original UMTS data service
1 Mbps to 4 Mbps
500 Kbpsto 2 Mbps
HSPA+ WCDMAEvolution of HSPA in various stages to increase throughput and capacity and to lower latency
19 Mbps to88 Mbps in 5+5 MHz
38 Mbps to 176 Mbps with dual carrier in 10+5 MHz
1 Mbps to4 Mbps in 5+5 MHz or in 10+5 MHz
LTE OFDMA
New radio interface that can use wide radio channels and deliver extremely high throughput rates All communications handled in IP domain
65 to 263 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
60 to 130 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
LTE-Advanced OFDMA
Advanced version of LTE designed to meet IMT-Advanced requirements
Significant gains through carrier aggregation
36
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Key Features in 3GPP Releases
Release Year Key Features99 1999 First deployable version of UMTS5 2002 High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) for UMTS6 2005 High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) for UMTS7 2008 HSPA+ with higher-order modulation and MIMO8 2009 Long Term Evolution Dual-carrier HSDPA10 2011 LTE-Advanced including carrier aggregation and eICIC11 2013 Coordinated Multi Point (CoMP)12 2015 Public safety support Device-to-device communications Dual Connectivity 256 QAM
on the downlink
13 2016 LTE-Advanced Pro features LTE operation in unlicensed bands LTE-WLANAggregation Narrowband Internet of Things
14 2017 LTE-Advanced Pro additional features such as eLAA (adding uplink to LAA) andcellular V2X communications Study item for 5G ldquoNew Radiordquo
15 2018 Additional LTE-Advanced Pro features such as ultra-reliable low-latencycommunications Phase 1 of 5G Will emphasize enhanced-mobile-broadband usecase and sub-40 GHz operation Includes Massive MIMO beamforming and 4G-5Ginterworking including ability for LTE connectivity to a 5G CN
16 2019 Phase 2 of 5G Full compliance with ITU IMT-2020 requirements Will add URLLCspectrum sharing unlicensed operation and multiple other enhancements
17 2021 Further LTE and 5G enhancements
37
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Types of Cells and Characteristics
Type of Cell CharacteristicsMacro cell Wide-area coverage LTE supports cells up to 100 km in range but typical
distances are 5 to 5 km radius Always installed outdoors
Microcell Covers a smaller area such as a hotel or mall Range to 2 km 5-10W and 256-512 users Usually installed outdoors
Picocell Indoor or outdoor Outdoor cells also called ldquometrocellsrdquo Typical range 15 to 200meters outdoors and 10 to 25 meters indoors 1-2W 64-128 users Deployed byoperators primarily to expand capacity
Consumer Femtocell Indoors Range to 10 meters less than 50 mW and 4 to 6 users Capacity andcoverage benefit Usually deployed by end users using their own backhaul
Enterprise Femtocell Indoors Range to 25 meters 100-250 mW 16-32 users Capacity and coveragebenefit Deployed by operators
Distributed antenna system Expands indoor or outdoor coverage Same hardware can support multipleoperators (neutral host) since antenna can support broad frequency range andmultiple technologies Indoor deployments are typically in larger spaces such asairports Has also been deployed outdoors for coverage and capacity expansion
Remote radio head (RRH) Uses baseband at existing macro site or centralized baseband equipment Ifcentralized the system is called ldquocloud RANrdquo Requires fiber connection
Wi-Fi Primarily provides capacity expansion Neutral-host capability allows multipleoperators to share infrastructure
38
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Challenges
39
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
Source Ovum (WCIS) 2017 13
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Expanding Use Cases
14
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
1G to 5G
Generation Requirements Comments
1G No official requirements
Analog technology
Deployed in the 1980s
2G No official requirements
Digital technology
First digital systems
Deployed in the 1990s
New services such as SMS and low-rate data
Primary technologies include IS-95 CDMA (cdmaOne) IS-136 (D-AMPS) and GSM
3G ITUrsquos IMT-2000 required 144 Kbps mobile 384 Kbps pedestrian 2 Mbps indoors
First deployment in 2000
Primary technologies include CDMA2000 1XEV-DO and UMTS-HSPA
WiMAX4G (Initial Technical Designation)
ITUrsquos IMT-Advanced requirements include ability to operate in up to 40 MHz radio channels and with very high spectral efficiency
First deployment in 2010
IEEE 80216m and LTE-Advanced meet the requirements
4G (Current Marketing Designation)
Systems that significantly exceed the performance of initial 3G networks No quantitative requirements
Todayrsquos HSPA+ LTE and WiMAX networks meet this requirement
5G ITU IMT-2020 has defined technical requirements for 5G and 3GPP is developing specifications
First standards-based deployments in 2019 and 2020
15
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline of Cellular Generations
16
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Carrier Aggregation With this capability already in use operators can aggregate radio carriers in the same band or across disparate bands to improve throughputs (under light network load) capacity and efficiency
bull VoLTE Initially launched in 2015 and with widespread availability in 2017 VoLTE enables operators to roll out packetized voice for LTE networks resulting in greater voice capacity and higher voice quality
bull Tighter Integration of LTE with Unlicensed Bands LTE-U became available for testing in 2016 and 3GPP completed specifications for LAA in Release 13 with deployment expected around 2018 MulteFire building on LAA will operate without requiring a licensed-carrier anchor LTEWi-Fi Aggregation through LWA and LWIP are other options for operators with large Wi-Fi deployments
bull Enhanced Support for IoT Release 13 brings Category M1 a low-cost device option along with Narrowband IoT (NB-IoT) a version of the LTE radio interface specifically for IoT devices called Category NB1
bull Higher-Order and Full-Dimension MIMO Deployments in 2017 use up to 4X4 MIMO Release 14 specifies a capability called Full-Dimension MIMO which supports configurations with as many as 32 antennas at the base station
bull Dual Connectivity Release 12 introduced the capability to combine carriers from different sectors andor base stations (ie evolved Node Bs [eNBs]) through a feature called Dual Connectivity Two architectures were defined one that supports Packet Data Convergence Protocol (PDCP) aggregation between the different eNBs and one that supports separate S1 connections on the user plane from the different eNBs to the EPC
Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
17
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull 256 QAM Downlink and 64 QAM Uplink Defined in Release 12 and already deployed in some networks higher-order modulation increases user throughput rates in favorable radio conditions
bull 1 Gbps Capability Using a combination of 256 QAM modulation 4X4 MIMO and aggregation of three carriers operator networks can now reach 1 Gbps peak speeds See below for more information
bull V2X Communications Release 14 specifies vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure communications
bull Coordinated Multi Point CoMP (and enhanced CoMP [eCoMP]) is a process by which multiple base stations or cell sectors process a User Equipment (UE) signal simultaneously or coordinate the transmissions to a UE improving cell-edge performance and network efficiency Initial usage will be on the uplink because no user device changes are required Some networks had implemented this feature in 2017
bull HetNet Support HetNets integrate macro cells and small cells A key feature is enhanced inter-cell interference coordination (eICIC) which improves the ability of a macro and a small cell to use the same spectrum This approach is valuable when the operator cannot dedicate spectrum to small cells Operators are currently evaluating eICIC and at least one operator has deployed it Further enhanced ICIC (feICIC) introduced in Rel-11 added advanced interference-cancellation receivers into devices
bull Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Communications Being specified in Release 15 URLLC in LTE will shorten radio latency to a 1 msec range using a combination of shorter transmission time intervals and faster hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) error processing
bull Self-Organizing Networks With SON networks can automatically configure and optimize themselves a capability that will be particularly important as small cells begin to proliferate Vendor-specific methods are common for 3G networks and trials are now occurring for 4G LTE standards-based approaches
Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
18
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
Source 5G AmericasRysavy Research
19
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
20
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Use Case Model
21
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Objectives
IMT-Advanced IMT-2020
Peak Data Rate DL 1 GbpsUL 005 Gbps
DL 20 GbpsUL 10 Gbps
User Experienced Data Rate 10 Mbps 100 Mbps
Spectrum Efficiency 1 (normalized) 3X over IMT-Advanced
Peak Spectral Efficiency DL 15 bpsHzUL 675 bpsHz
DL 30 bpsHzUL 15 bpsHz
Average Spectral Efficiency DL eMBB indoor 9 bpsHzDL eMBB urban 78 bpsHzDL eMBB rural 33 bpsHz
UL eMBB indoor 675 bpsHzUL eMBB urban 54 bpsHzUL eMBB rural 16 bpsHz
Mobility 350 kmh 500 kmh
User Plane Latency 10 msec 1 msec
Connection Density 100 thousand devicessqkm 1 million devices sqkm
Network Energy Efficiency 1 (normalized) 100X over IMT-Advanced
Area Traffic Capacity 01 Mbpssq m 10 Mbpssq m (hot spots)
Bandwidth Up to 20 MHzradio channel (up to 100 MHz aggregated)
Up to 1 GHz (single or multipole RF carriers)
22
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Transformation
23
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
24
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of Different Bands
Source Nokia Vision amp Priorities for Next Generation Radio Technology 3GPP RAN workshop on 5G Sep 17-18 2015
25
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
26
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Network can support both LTE and 5G NR including dual connectivity with which devices have simultaneous connections to LTE and NR
bull Carrier aggregation for multiple NR carriersbull 5 Gbps peak downlink throughput in initial releases increasing to 50 Gbps
in subsequent versionsbull OFDMA in downlink and uplink with optional Single Carrier Frequency
Division Multiple Access (SC-FDMA) for uplink Radio approach for URLLC to be defined in Release 16 but Release 15 will provide physical layer frame structure and numerology support
bull Massive MIMO and beamformingbull Ability to support either FDD or TDD modes for 5G radio bandsbull Numerologies of 2N X 15 kHz for subcarrier spacing up to 120 kHz or 240
kHz This approach depicted in Figure 17 supports both narrow radio channels (for example 1 MHz) or wide ones (for example 400 MHz) Phase 1 likely to support a maximum of 400 MHz bandwidth with 240 kHz subcarrier spacing
5G New Radio (NR) (1)
27
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Error correction through low-density parity codes (LDPC) which are computationally more efficient than LTE turbo codes at higher data rates
bull Standards-based cloud RAN support compared with proprietary LTE approaches that specifies a split between the PDCP and Radio Link Control (RLC) protocol layers
bull Self-contained integrated subframes that combine scheduling data and acknowledgement
bull Future-proofing by providing a flexible radio framework that has forward compatibility to support future currently unknown services such as URLLC to be specified in Release 16
bull Scalable transmission time intervals with short time intervals for low latency and longer time intervals for higher spectral efficiency
bull QoS support using a new modelbull Dynamic co-existence with LTE in the same radio channels
5G New Radio (NR) (2)
28
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
29
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Per ITU 95 users obtain 100 Mbps or greater
bull Typical rates of 500 Mbps appear feasible using 200 MHz radio channel
bull Typical rate of 1 Gbps appear feasible using 400 MHz radio channel
Expected 5G Performance
30
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
31
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Schedule
32
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
Source Dr Seizo Onoe NTT DOCOMO presentation at Brooklyn 5G Summit Apr 21 2016
33
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
34
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Slicing Architecture
35
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
TechnologyName
Type Characteristics Typical Downlink
Speed
Typical Uplink Speed
HSPA WCDMAData service for UMTS networks An enhancement to original UMTS data service
1 Mbps to 4 Mbps
500 Kbpsto 2 Mbps
HSPA+ WCDMAEvolution of HSPA in various stages to increase throughput and capacity and to lower latency
19 Mbps to88 Mbps in 5+5 MHz
38 Mbps to 176 Mbps with dual carrier in 10+5 MHz
1 Mbps to4 Mbps in 5+5 MHz or in 10+5 MHz
LTE OFDMA
New radio interface that can use wide radio channels and deliver extremely high throughput rates All communications handled in IP domain
65 to 263 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
60 to 130 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
LTE-Advanced OFDMA
Advanced version of LTE designed to meet IMT-Advanced requirements
Significant gains through carrier aggregation
36
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Key Features in 3GPP Releases
Release Year Key Features99 1999 First deployable version of UMTS5 2002 High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) for UMTS6 2005 High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) for UMTS7 2008 HSPA+ with higher-order modulation and MIMO8 2009 Long Term Evolution Dual-carrier HSDPA10 2011 LTE-Advanced including carrier aggregation and eICIC11 2013 Coordinated Multi Point (CoMP)12 2015 Public safety support Device-to-device communications Dual Connectivity 256 QAM
on the downlink
13 2016 LTE-Advanced Pro features LTE operation in unlicensed bands LTE-WLANAggregation Narrowband Internet of Things
14 2017 LTE-Advanced Pro additional features such as eLAA (adding uplink to LAA) andcellular V2X communications Study item for 5G ldquoNew Radiordquo
15 2018 Additional LTE-Advanced Pro features such as ultra-reliable low-latencycommunications Phase 1 of 5G Will emphasize enhanced-mobile-broadband usecase and sub-40 GHz operation Includes Massive MIMO beamforming and 4G-5Ginterworking including ability for LTE connectivity to a 5G CN
16 2019 Phase 2 of 5G Full compliance with ITU IMT-2020 requirements Will add URLLCspectrum sharing unlicensed operation and multiple other enhancements
17 2021 Further LTE and 5G enhancements
37
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Types of Cells and Characteristics
Type of Cell CharacteristicsMacro cell Wide-area coverage LTE supports cells up to 100 km in range but typical
distances are 5 to 5 km radius Always installed outdoors
Microcell Covers a smaller area such as a hotel or mall Range to 2 km 5-10W and 256-512 users Usually installed outdoors
Picocell Indoor or outdoor Outdoor cells also called ldquometrocellsrdquo Typical range 15 to 200meters outdoors and 10 to 25 meters indoors 1-2W 64-128 users Deployed byoperators primarily to expand capacity
Consumer Femtocell Indoors Range to 10 meters less than 50 mW and 4 to 6 users Capacity andcoverage benefit Usually deployed by end users using their own backhaul
Enterprise Femtocell Indoors Range to 25 meters 100-250 mW 16-32 users Capacity and coveragebenefit Deployed by operators
Distributed antenna system Expands indoor or outdoor coverage Same hardware can support multipleoperators (neutral host) since antenna can support broad frequency range andmultiple technologies Indoor deployments are typically in larger spaces such asairports Has also been deployed outdoors for coverage and capacity expansion
Remote radio head (RRH) Uses baseband at existing macro site or centralized baseband equipment Ifcentralized the system is called ldquocloud RANrdquo Requires fiber connection
Wi-Fi Primarily provides capacity expansion Neutral-host capability allows multipleoperators to share infrastructure
38
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Challenges
39
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Expanding Use Cases
14
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
1G to 5G
Generation Requirements Comments
1G No official requirements
Analog technology
Deployed in the 1980s
2G No official requirements
Digital technology
First digital systems
Deployed in the 1990s
New services such as SMS and low-rate data
Primary technologies include IS-95 CDMA (cdmaOne) IS-136 (D-AMPS) and GSM
3G ITUrsquos IMT-2000 required 144 Kbps mobile 384 Kbps pedestrian 2 Mbps indoors
First deployment in 2000
Primary technologies include CDMA2000 1XEV-DO and UMTS-HSPA
WiMAX4G (Initial Technical Designation)
ITUrsquos IMT-Advanced requirements include ability to operate in up to 40 MHz radio channels and with very high spectral efficiency
First deployment in 2010
IEEE 80216m and LTE-Advanced meet the requirements
4G (Current Marketing Designation)
Systems that significantly exceed the performance of initial 3G networks No quantitative requirements
Todayrsquos HSPA+ LTE and WiMAX networks meet this requirement
5G ITU IMT-2020 has defined technical requirements for 5G and 3GPP is developing specifications
First standards-based deployments in 2019 and 2020
15
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline of Cellular Generations
16
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Carrier Aggregation With this capability already in use operators can aggregate radio carriers in the same band or across disparate bands to improve throughputs (under light network load) capacity and efficiency
bull VoLTE Initially launched in 2015 and with widespread availability in 2017 VoLTE enables operators to roll out packetized voice for LTE networks resulting in greater voice capacity and higher voice quality
bull Tighter Integration of LTE with Unlicensed Bands LTE-U became available for testing in 2016 and 3GPP completed specifications for LAA in Release 13 with deployment expected around 2018 MulteFire building on LAA will operate without requiring a licensed-carrier anchor LTEWi-Fi Aggregation through LWA and LWIP are other options for operators with large Wi-Fi deployments
bull Enhanced Support for IoT Release 13 brings Category M1 a low-cost device option along with Narrowband IoT (NB-IoT) a version of the LTE radio interface specifically for IoT devices called Category NB1
bull Higher-Order and Full-Dimension MIMO Deployments in 2017 use up to 4X4 MIMO Release 14 specifies a capability called Full-Dimension MIMO which supports configurations with as many as 32 antennas at the base station
bull Dual Connectivity Release 12 introduced the capability to combine carriers from different sectors andor base stations (ie evolved Node Bs [eNBs]) through a feature called Dual Connectivity Two architectures were defined one that supports Packet Data Convergence Protocol (PDCP) aggregation between the different eNBs and one that supports separate S1 connections on the user plane from the different eNBs to the EPC
Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
17
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull 256 QAM Downlink and 64 QAM Uplink Defined in Release 12 and already deployed in some networks higher-order modulation increases user throughput rates in favorable radio conditions
bull 1 Gbps Capability Using a combination of 256 QAM modulation 4X4 MIMO and aggregation of three carriers operator networks can now reach 1 Gbps peak speeds See below for more information
bull V2X Communications Release 14 specifies vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure communications
bull Coordinated Multi Point CoMP (and enhanced CoMP [eCoMP]) is a process by which multiple base stations or cell sectors process a User Equipment (UE) signal simultaneously or coordinate the transmissions to a UE improving cell-edge performance and network efficiency Initial usage will be on the uplink because no user device changes are required Some networks had implemented this feature in 2017
bull HetNet Support HetNets integrate macro cells and small cells A key feature is enhanced inter-cell interference coordination (eICIC) which improves the ability of a macro and a small cell to use the same spectrum This approach is valuable when the operator cannot dedicate spectrum to small cells Operators are currently evaluating eICIC and at least one operator has deployed it Further enhanced ICIC (feICIC) introduced in Rel-11 added advanced interference-cancellation receivers into devices
bull Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Communications Being specified in Release 15 URLLC in LTE will shorten radio latency to a 1 msec range using a combination of shorter transmission time intervals and faster hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) error processing
bull Self-Organizing Networks With SON networks can automatically configure and optimize themselves a capability that will be particularly important as small cells begin to proliferate Vendor-specific methods are common for 3G networks and trials are now occurring for 4G LTE standards-based approaches
Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
18
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
Source 5G AmericasRysavy Research
19
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
20
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Use Case Model
21
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Objectives
IMT-Advanced IMT-2020
Peak Data Rate DL 1 GbpsUL 005 Gbps
DL 20 GbpsUL 10 Gbps
User Experienced Data Rate 10 Mbps 100 Mbps
Spectrum Efficiency 1 (normalized) 3X over IMT-Advanced
Peak Spectral Efficiency DL 15 bpsHzUL 675 bpsHz
DL 30 bpsHzUL 15 bpsHz
Average Spectral Efficiency DL eMBB indoor 9 bpsHzDL eMBB urban 78 bpsHzDL eMBB rural 33 bpsHz
UL eMBB indoor 675 bpsHzUL eMBB urban 54 bpsHzUL eMBB rural 16 bpsHz
Mobility 350 kmh 500 kmh
User Plane Latency 10 msec 1 msec
Connection Density 100 thousand devicessqkm 1 million devices sqkm
Network Energy Efficiency 1 (normalized) 100X over IMT-Advanced
Area Traffic Capacity 01 Mbpssq m 10 Mbpssq m (hot spots)
Bandwidth Up to 20 MHzradio channel (up to 100 MHz aggregated)
Up to 1 GHz (single or multipole RF carriers)
22
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Transformation
23
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
24
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of Different Bands
Source Nokia Vision amp Priorities for Next Generation Radio Technology 3GPP RAN workshop on 5G Sep 17-18 2015
25
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
26
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Network can support both LTE and 5G NR including dual connectivity with which devices have simultaneous connections to LTE and NR
bull Carrier aggregation for multiple NR carriersbull 5 Gbps peak downlink throughput in initial releases increasing to 50 Gbps
in subsequent versionsbull OFDMA in downlink and uplink with optional Single Carrier Frequency
Division Multiple Access (SC-FDMA) for uplink Radio approach for URLLC to be defined in Release 16 but Release 15 will provide physical layer frame structure and numerology support
bull Massive MIMO and beamformingbull Ability to support either FDD or TDD modes for 5G radio bandsbull Numerologies of 2N X 15 kHz for subcarrier spacing up to 120 kHz or 240
kHz This approach depicted in Figure 17 supports both narrow radio channels (for example 1 MHz) or wide ones (for example 400 MHz) Phase 1 likely to support a maximum of 400 MHz bandwidth with 240 kHz subcarrier spacing
5G New Radio (NR) (1)
27
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Error correction through low-density parity codes (LDPC) which are computationally more efficient than LTE turbo codes at higher data rates
bull Standards-based cloud RAN support compared with proprietary LTE approaches that specifies a split between the PDCP and Radio Link Control (RLC) protocol layers
bull Self-contained integrated subframes that combine scheduling data and acknowledgement
bull Future-proofing by providing a flexible radio framework that has forward compatibility to support future currently unknown services such as URLLC to be specified in Release 16
bull Scalable transmission time intervals with short time intervals for low latency and longer time intervals for higher spectral efficiency
bull QoS support using a new modelbull Dynamic co-existence with LTE in the same radio channels
5G New Radio (NR) (2)
28
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
29
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Per ITU 95 users obtain 100 Mbps or greater
bull Typical rates of 500 Mbps appear feasible using 200 MHz radio channel
bull Typical rate of 1 Gbps appear feasible using 400 MHz radio channel
Expected 5G Performance
30
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
31
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Schedule
32
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
Source Dr Seizo Onoe NTT DOCOMO presentation at Brooklyn 5G Summit Apr 21 2016
33
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
34
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Slicing Architecture
35
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
TechnologyName
Type Characteristics Typical Downlink
Speed
Typical Uplink Speed
HSPA WCDMAData service for UMTS networks An enhancement to original UMTS data service
1 Mbps to 4 Mbps
500 Kbpsto 2 Mbps
HSPA+ WCDMAEvolution of HSPA in various stages to increase throughput and capacity and to lower latency
19 Mbps to88 Mbps in 5+5 MHz
38 Mbps to 176 Mbps with dual carrier in 10+5 MHz
1 Mbps to4 Mbps in 5+5 MHz or in 10+5 MHz
LTE OFDMA
New radio interface that can use wide radio channels and deliver extremely high throughput rates All communications handled in IP domain
65 to 263 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
60 to 130 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
LTE-Advanced OFDMA
Advanced version of LTE designed to meet IMT-Advanced requirements
Significant gains through carrier aggregation
36
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Key Features in 3GPP Releases
Release Year Key Features99 1999 First deployable version of UMTS5 2002 High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) for UMTS6 2005 High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) for UMTS7 2008 HSPA+ with higher-order modulation and MIMO8 2009 Long Term Evolution Dual-carrier HSDPA10 2011 LTE-Advanced including carrier aggregation and eICIC11 2013 Coordinated Multi Point (CoMP)12 2015 Public safety support Device-to-device communications Dual Connectivity 256 QAM
on the downlink
13 2016 LTE-Advanced Pro features LTE operation in unlicensed bands LTE-WLANAggregation Narrowband Internet of Things
14 2017 LTE-Advanced Pro additional features such as eLAA (adding uplink to LAA) andcellular V2X communications Study item for 5G ldquoNew Radiordquo
15 2018 Additional LTE-Advanced Pro features such as ultra-reliable low-latencycommunications Phase 1 of 5G Will emphasize enhanced-mobile-broadband usecase and sub-40 GHz operation Includes Massive MIMO beamforming and 4G-5Ginterworking including ability for LTE connectivity to a 5G CN
16 2019 Phase 2 of 5G Full compliance with ITU IMT-2020 requirements Will add URLLCspectrum sharing unlicensed operation and multiple other enhancements
17 2021 Further LTE and 5G enhancements
37
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Types of Cells and Characteristics
Type of Cell CharacteristicsMacro cell Wide-area coverage LTE supports cells up to 100 km in range but typical
distances are 5 to 5 km radius Always installed outdoors
Microcell Covers a smaller area such as a hotel or mall Range to 2 km 5-10W and 256-512 users Usually installed outdoors
Picocell Indoor or outdoor Outdoor cells also called ldquometrocellsrdquo Typical range 15 to 200meters outdoors and 10 to 25 meters indoors 1-2W 64-128 users Deployed byoperators primarily to expand capacity
Consumer Femtocell Indoors Range to 10 meters less than 50 mW and 4 to 6 users Capacity andcoverage benefit Usually deployed by end users using their own backhaul
Enterprise Femtocell Indoors Range to 25 meters 100-250 mW 16-32 users Capacity and coveragebenefit Deployed by operators
Distributed antenna system Expands indoor or outdoor coverage Same hardware can support multipleoperators (neutral host) since antenna can support broad frequency range andmultiple technologies Indoor deployments are typically in larger spaces such asairports Has also been deployed outdoors for coverage and capacity expansion
Remote radio head (RRH) Uses baseband at existing macro site or centralized baseband equipment Ifcentralized the system is called ldquocloud RANrdquo Requires fiber connection
Wi-Fi Primarily provides capacity expansion Neutral-host capability allows multipleoperators to share infrastructure
38
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Challenges
39
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
1G to 5G
Generation Requirements Comments
1G No official requirements
Analog technology
Deployed in the 1980s
2G No official requirements
Digital technology
First digital systems
Deployed in the 1990s
New services such as SMS and low-rate data
Primary technologies include IS-95 CDMA (cdmaOne) IS-136 (D-AMPS) and GSM
3G ITUrsquos IMT-2000 required 144 Kbps mobile 384 Kbps pedestrian 2 Mbps indoors
First deployment in 2000
Primary technologies include CDMA2000 1XEV-DO and UMTS-HSPA
WiMAX4G (Initial Technical Designation)
ITUrsquos IMT-Advanced requirements include ability to operate in up to 40 MHz radio channels and with very high spectral efficiency
First deployment in 2010
IEEE 80216m and LTE-Advanced meet the requirements
4G (Current Marketing Designation)
Systems that significantly exceed the performance of initial 3G networks No quantitative requirements
Todayrsquos HSPA+ LTE and WiMAX networks meet this requirement
5G ITU IMT-2020 has defined technical requirements for 5G and 3GPP is developing specifications
First standards-based deployments in 2019 and 2020
15
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline of Cellular Generations
16
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Carrier Aggregation With this capability already in use operators can aggregate radio carriers in the same band or across disparate bands to improve throughputs (under light network load) capacity and efficiency
bull VoLTE Initially launched in 2015 and with widespread availability in 2017 VoLTE enables operators to roll out packetized voice for LTE networks resulting in greater voice capacity and higher voice quality
bull Tighter Integration of LTE with Unlicensed Bands LTE-U became available for testing in 2016 and 3GPP completed specifications for LAA in Release 13 with deployment expected around 2018 MulteFire building on LAA will operate without requiring a licensed-carrier anchor LTEWi-Fi Aggregation through LWA and LWIP are other options for operators with large Wi-Fi deployments
bull Enhanced Support for IoT Release 13 brings Category M1 a low-cost device option along with Narrowband IoT (NB-IoT) a version of the LTE radio interface specifically for IoT devices called Category NB1
bull Higher-Order and Full-Dimension MIMO Deployments in 2017 use up to 4X4 MIMO Release 14 specifies a capability called Full-Dimension MIMO which supports configurations with as many as 32 antennas at the base station
bull Dual Connectivity Release 12 introduced the capability to combine carriers from different sectors andor base stations (ie evolved Node Bs [eNBs]) through a feature called Dual Connectivity Two architectures were defined one that supports Packet Data Convergence Protocol (PDCP) aggregation between the different eNBs and one that supports separate S1 connections on the user plane from the different eNBs to the EPC
Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
17
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull 256 QAM Downlink and 64 QAM Uplink Defined in Release 12 and already deployed in some networks higher-order modulation increases user throughput rates in favorable radio conditions
bull 1 Gbps Capability Using a combination of 256 QAM modulation 4X4 MIMO and aggregation of three carriers operator networks can now reach 1 Gbps peak speeds See below for more information
bull V2X Communications Release 14 specifies vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure communications
bull Coordinated Multi Point CoMP (and enhanced CoMP [eCoMP]) is a process by which multiple base stations or cell sectors process a User Equipment (UE) signal simultaneously or coordinate the transmissions to a UE improving cell-edge performance and network efficiency Initial usage will be on the uplink because no user device changes are required Some networks had implemented this feature in 2017
bull HetNet Support HetNets integrate macro cells and small cells A key feature is enhanced inter-cell interference coordination (eICIC) which improves the ability of a macro and a small cell to use the same spectrum This approach is valuable when the operator cannot dedicate spectrum to small cells Operators are currently evaluating eICIC and at least one operator has deployed it Further enhanced ICIC (feICIC) introduced in Rel-11 added advanced interference-cancellation receivers into devices
bull Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Communications Being specified in Release 15 URLLC in LTE will shorten radio latency to a 1 msec range using a combination of shorter transmission time intervals and faster hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) error processing
bull Self-Organizing Networks With SON networks can automatically configure and optimize themselves a capability that will be particularly important as small cells begin to proliferate Vendor-specific methods are common for 3G networks and trials are now occurring for 4G LTE standards-based approaches
Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
18
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
Source 5G AmericasRysavy Research
19
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
20
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Use Case Model
21
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Objectives
IMT-Advanced IMT-2020
Peak Data Rate DL 1 GbpsUL 005 Gbps
DL 20 GbpsUL 10 Gbps
User Experienced Data Rate 10 Mbps 100 Mbps
Spectrum Efficiency 1 (normalized) 3X over IMT-Advanced
Peak Spectral Efficiency DL 15 bpsHzUL 675 bpsHz
DL 30 bpsHzUL 15 bpsHz
Average Spectral Efficiency DL eMBB indoor 9 bpsHzDL eMBB urban 78 bpsHzDL eMBB rural 33 bpsHz
UL eMBB indoor 675 bpsHzUL eMBB urban 54 bpsHzUL eMBB rural 16 bpsHz
Mobility 350 kmh 500 kmh
User Plane Latency 10 msec 1 msec
Connection Density 100 thousand devicessqkm 1 million devices sqkm
Network Energy Efficiency 1 (normalized) 100X over IMT-Advanced
Area Traffic Capacity 01 Mbpssq m 10 Mbpssq m (hot spots)
Bandwidth Up to 20 MHzradio channel (up to 100 MHz aggregated)
Up to 1 GHz (single or multipole RF carriers)
22
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Transformation
23
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
24
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of Different Bands
Source Nokia Vision amp Priorities for Next Generation Radio Technology 3GPP RAN workshop on 5G Sep 17-18 2015
25
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
26
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Network can support both LTE and 5G NR including dual connectivity with which devices have simultaneous connections to LTE and NR
bull Carrier aggregation for multiple NR carriersbull 5 Gbps peak downlink throughput in initial releases increasing to 50 Gbps
in subsequent versionsbull OFDMA in downlink and uplink with optional Single Carrier Frequency
Division Multiple Access (SC-FDMA) for uplink Radio approach for URLLC to be defined in Release 16 but Release 15 will provide physical layer frame structure and numerology support
bull Massive MIMO and beamformingbull Ability to support either FDD or TDD modes for 5G radio bandsbull Numerologies of 2N X 15 kHz for subcarrier spacing up to 120 kHz or 240
kHz This approach depicted in Figure 17 supports both narrow radio channels (for example 1 MHz) or wide ones (for example 400 MHz) Phase 1 likely to support a maximum of 400 MHz bandwidth with 240 kHz subcarrier spacing
5G New Radio (NR) (1)
27
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Error correction through low-density parity codes (LDPC) which are computationally more efficient than LTE turbo codes at higher data rates
bull Standards-based cloud RAN support compared with proprietary LTE approaches that specifies a split between the PDCP and Radio Link Control (RLC) protocol layers
bull Self-contained integrated subframes that combine scheduling data and acknowledgement
bull Future-proofing by providing a flexible radio framework that has forward compatibility to support future currently unknown services such as URLLC to be specified in Release 16
bull Scalable transmission time intervals with short time intervals for low latency and longer time intervals for higher spectral efficiency
bull QoS support using a new modelbull Dynamic co-existence with LTE in the same radio channels
5G New Radio (NR) (2)
28
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
29
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Per ITU 95 users obtain 100 Mbps or greater
bull Typical rates of 500 Mbps appear feasible using 200 MHz radio channel
bull Typical rate of 1 Gbps appear feasible using 400 MHz radio channel
Expected 5G Performance
30
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
31
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Schedule
32
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
Source Dr Seizo Onoe NTT DOCOMO presentation at Brooklyn 5G Summit Apr 21 2016
33
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
34
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Slicing Architecture
35
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
TechnologyName
Type Characteristics Typical Downlink
Speed
Typical Uplink Speed
HSPA WCDMAData service for UMTS networks An enhancement to original UMTS data service
1 Mbps to 4 Mbps
500 Kbpsto 2 Mbps
HSPA+ WCDMAEvolution of HSPA in various stages to increase throughput and capacity and to lower latency
19 Mbps to88 Mbps in 5+5 MHz
38 Mbps to 176 Mbps with dual carrier in 10+5 MHz
1 Mbps to4 Mbps in 5+5 MHz or in 10+5 MHz
LTE OFDMA
New radio interface that can use wide radio channels and deliver extremely high throughput rates All communications handled in IP domain
65 to 263 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
60 to 130 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
LTE-Advanced OFDMA
Advanced version of LTE designed to meet IMT-Advanced requirements
Significant gains through carrier aggregation
36
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Key Features in 3GPP Releases
Release Year Key Features99 1999 First deployable version of UMTS5 2002 High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) for UMTS6 2005 High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) for UMTS7 2008 HSPA+ with higher-order modulation and MIMO8 2009 Long Term Evolution Dual-carrier HSDPA10 2011 LTE-Advanced including carrier aggregation and eICIC11 2013 Coordinated Multi Point (CoMP)12 2015 Public safety support Device-to-device communications Dual Connectivity 256 QAM
on the downlink
13 2016 LTE-Advanced Pro features LTE operation in unlicensed bands LTE-WLANAggregation Narrowband Internet of Things
14 2017 LTE-Advanced Pro additional features such as eLAA (adding uplink to LAA) andcellular V2X communications Study item for 5G ldquoNew Radiordquo
15 2018 Additional LTE-Advanced Pro features such as ultra-reliable low-latencycommunications Phase 1 of 5G Will emphasize enhanced-mobile-broadband usecase and sub-40 GHz operation Includes Massive MIMO beamforming and 4G-5Ginterworking including ability for LTE connectivity to a 5G CN
16 2019 Phase 2 of 5G Full compliance with ITU IMT-2020 requirements Will add URLLCspectrum sharing unlicensed operation and multiple other enhancements
17 2021 Further LTE and 5G enhancements
37
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Types of Cells and Characteristics
Type of Cell CharacteristicsMacro cell Wide-area coverage LTE supports cells up to 100 km in range but typical
distances are 5 to 5 km radius Always installed outdoors
Microcell Covers a smaller area such as a hotel or mall Range to 2 km 5-10W and 256-512 users Usually installed outdoors
Picocell Indoor or outdoor Outdoor cells also called ldquometrocellsrdquo Typical range 15 to 200meters outdoors and 10 to 25 meters indoors 1-2W 64-128 users Deployed byoperators primarily to expand capacity
Consumer Femtocell Indoors Range to 10 meters less than 50 mW and 4 to 6 users Capacity andcoverage benefit Usually deployed by end users using their own backhaul
Enterprise Femtocell Indoors Range to 25 meters 100-250 mW 16-32 users Capacity and coveragebenefit Deployed by operators
Distributed antenna system Expands indoor or outdoor coverage Same hardware can support multipleoperators (neutral host) since antenna can support broad frequency range andmultiple technologies Indoor deployments are typically in larger spaces such asairports Has also been deployed outdoors for coverage and capacity expansion
Remote radio head (RRH) Uses baseband at existing macro site or centralized baseband equipment Ifcentralized the system is called ldquocloud RANrdquo Requires fiber connection
Wi-Fi Primarily provides capacity expansion Neutral-host capability allows multipleoperators to share infrastructure
38
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Challenges
39
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline of Cellular Generations
16
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Carrier Aggregation With this capability already in use operators can aggregate radio carriers in the same band or across disparate bands to improve throughputs (under light network load) capacity and efficiency
bull VoLTE Initially launched in 2015 and with widespread availability in 2017 VoLTE enables operators to roll out packetized voice for LTE networks resulting in greater voice capacity and higher voice quality
bull Tighter Integration of LTE with Unlicensed Bands LTE-U became available for testing in 2016 and 3GPP completed specifications for LAA in Release 13 with deployment expected around 2018 MulteFire building on LAA will operate without requiring a licensed-carrier anchor LTEWi-Fi Aggregation through LWA and LWIP are other options for operators with large Wi-Fi deployments
bull Enhanced Support for IoT Release 13 brings Category M1 a low-cost device option along with Narrowband IoT (NB-IoT) a version of the LTE radio interface specifically for IoT devices called Category NB1
bull Higher-Order and Full-Dimension MIMO Deployments in 2017 use up to 4X4 MIMO Release 14 specifies a capability called Full-Dimension MIMO which supports configurations with as many as 32 antennas at the base station
bull Dual Connectivity Release 12 introduced the capability to combine carriers from different sectors andor base stations (ie evolved Node Bs [eNBs]) through a feature called Dual Connectivity Two architectures were defined one that supports Packet Data Convergence Protocol (PDCP) aggregation between the different eNBs and one that supports separate S1 connections on the user plane from the different eNBs to the EPC
Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
17
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull 256 QAM Downlink and 64 QAM Uplink Defined in Release 12 and already deployed in some networks higher-order modulation increases user throughput rates in favorable radio conditions
bull 1 Gbps Capability Using a combination of 256 QAM modulation 4X4 MIMO and aggregation of three carriers operator networks can now reach 1 Gbps peak speeds See below for more information
bull V2X Communications Release 14 specifies vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure communications
bull Coordinated Multi Point CoMP (and enhanced CoMP [eCoMP]) is a process by which multiple base stations or cell sectors process a User Equipment (UE) signal simultaneously or coordinate the transmissions to a UE improving cell-edge performance and network efficiency Initial usage will be on the uplink because no user device changes are required Some networks had implemented this feature in 2017
bull HetNet Support HetNets integrate macro cells and small cells A key feature is enhanced inter-cell interference coordination (eICIC) which improves the ability of a macro and a small cell to use the same spectrum This approach is valuable when the operator cannot dedicate spectrum to small cells Operators are currently evaluating eICIC and at least one operator has deployed it Further enhanced ICIC (feICIC) introduced in Rel-11 added advanced interference-cancellation receivers into devices
bull Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Communications Being specified in Release 15 URLLC in LTE will shorten radio latency to a 1 msec range using a combination of shorter transmission time intervals and faster hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) error processing
bull Self-Organizing Networks With SON networks can automatically configure and optimize themselves a capability that will be particularly important as small cells begin to proliferate Vendor-specific methods are common for 3G networks and trials are now occurring for 4G LTE standards-based approaches
Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
18
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
Source 5G AmericasRysavy Research
19
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
20
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Use Case Model
21
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Objectives
IMT-Advanced IMT-2020
Peak Data Rate DL 1 GbpsUL 005 Gbps
DL 20 GbpsUL 10 Gbps
User Experienced Data Rate 10 Mbps 100 Mbps
Spectrum Efficiency 1 (normalized) 3X over IMT-Advanced
Peak Spectral Efficiency DL 15 bpsHzUL 675 bpsHz
DL 30 bpsHzUL 15 bpsHz
Average Spectral Efficiency DL eMBB indoor 9 bpsHzDL eMBB urban 78 bpsHzDL eMBB rural 33 bpsHz
UL eMBB indoor 675 bpsHzUL eMBB urban 54 bpsHzUL eMBB rural 16 bpsHz
Mobility 350 kmh 500 kmh
User Plane Latency 10 msec 1 msec
Connection Density 100 thousand devicessqkm 1 million devices sqkm
Network Energy Efficiency 1 (normalized) 100X over IMT-Advanced
Area Traffic Capacity 01 Mbpssq m 10 Mbpssq m (hot spots)
Bandwidth Up to 20 MHzradio channel (up to 100 MHz aggregated)
Up to 1 GHz (single or multipole RF carriers)
22
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Transformation
23
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
24
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of Different Bands
Source Nokia Vision amp Priorities for Next Generation Radio Technology 3GPP RAN workshop on 5G Sep 17-18 2015
25
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
26
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Network can support both LTE and 5G NR including dual connectivity with which devices have simultaneous connections to LTE and NR
bull Carrier aggregation for multiple NR carriersbull 5 Gbps peak downlink throughput in initial releases increasing to 50 Gbps
in subsequent versionsbull OFDMA in downlink and uplink with optional Single Carrier Frequency
Division Multiple Access (SC-FDMA) for uplink Radio approach for URLLC to be defined in Release 16 but Release 15 will provide physical layer frame structure and numerology support
bull Massive MIMO and beamformingbull Ability to support either FDD or TDD modes for 5G radio bandsbull Numerologies of 2N X 15 kHz for subcarrier spacing up to 120 kHz or 240
kHz This approach depicted in Figure 17 supports both narrow radio channels (for example 1 MHz) or wide ones (for example 400 MHz) Phase 1 likely to support a maximum of 400 MHz bandwidth with 240 kHz subcarrier spacing
5G New Radio (NR) (1)
27
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Error correction through low-density parity codes (LDPC) which are computationally more efficient than LTE turbo codes at higher data rates
bull Standards-based cloud RAN support compared with proprietary LTE approaches that specifies a split between the PDCP and Radio Link Control (RLC) protocol layers
bull Self-contained integrated subframes that combine scheduling data and acknowledgement
bull Future-proofing by providing a flexible radio framework that has forward compatibility to support future currently unknown services such as URLLC to be specified in Release 16
bull Scalable transmission time intervals with short time intervals for low latency and longer time intervals for higher spectral efficiency
bull QoS support using a new modelbull Dynamic co-existence with LTE in the same radio channels
5G New Radio (NR) (2)
28
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
29
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Per ITU 95 users obtain 100 Mbps or greater
bull Typical rates of 500 Mbps appear feasible using 200 MHz radio channel
bull Typical rate of 1 Gbps appear feasible using 400 MHz radio channel
Expected 5G Performance
30
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
31
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Schedule
32
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
Source Dr Seizo Onoe NTT DOCOMO presentation at Brooklyn 5G Summit Apr 21 2016
33
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
34
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Slicing Architecture
35
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
TechnologyName
Type Characteristics Typical Downlink
Speed
Typical Uplink Speed
HSPA WCDMAData service for UMTS networks An enhancement to original UMTS data service
1 Mbps to 4 Mbps
500 Kbpsto 2 Mbps
HSPA+ WCDMAEvolution of HSPA in various stages to increase throughput and capacity and to lower latency
19 Mbps to88 Mbps in 5+5 MHz
38 Mbps to 176 Mbps with dual carrier in 10+5 MHz
1 Mbps to4 Mbps in 5+5 MHz or in 10+5 MHz
LTE OFDMA
New radio interface that can use wide radio channels and deliver extremely high throughput rates All communications handled in IP domain
65 to 263 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
60 to 130 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
LTE-Advanced OFDMA
Advanced version of LTE designed to meet IMT-Advanced requirements
Significant gains through carrier aggregation
36
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Key Features in 3GPP Releases
Release Year Key Features99 1999 First deployable version of UMTS5 2002 High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) for UMTS6 2005 High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) for UMTS7 2008 HSPA+ with higher-order modulation and MIMO8 2009 Long Term Evolution Dual-carrier HSDPA10 2011 LTE-Advanced including carrier aggregation and eICIC11 2013 Coordinated Multi Point (CoMP)12 2015 Public safety support Device-to-device communications Dual Connectivity 256 QAM
on the downlink
13 2016 LTE-Advanced Pro features LTE operation in unlicensed bands LTE-WLANAggregation Narrowband Internet of Things
14 2017 LTE-Advanced Pro additional features such as eLAA (adding uplink to LAA) andcellular V2X communications Study item for 5G ldquoNew Radiordquo
15 2018 Additional LTE-Advanced Pro features such as ultra-reliable low-latencycommunications Phase 1 of 5G Will emphasize enhanced-mobile-broadband usecase and sub-40 GHz operation Includes Massive MIMO beamforming and 4G-5Ginterworking including ability for LTE connectivity to a 5G CN
16 2019 Phase 2 of 5G Full compliance with ITU IMT-2020 requirements Will add URLLCspectrum sharing unlicensed operation and multiple other enhancements
17 2021 Further LTE and 5G enhancements
37
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Types of Cells and Characteristics
Type of Cell CharacteristicsMacro cell Wide-area coverage LTE supports cells up to 100 km in range but typical
distances are 5 to 5 km radius Always installed outdoors
Microcell Covers a smaller area such as a hotel or mall Range to 2 km 5-10W and 256-512 users Usually installed outdoors
Picocell Indoor or outdoor Outdoor cells also called ldquometrocellsrdquo Typical range 15 to 200meters outdoors and 10 to 25 meters indoors 1-2W 64-128 users Deployed byoperators primarily to expand capacity
Consumer Femtocell Indoors Range to 10 meters less than 50 mW and 4 to 6 users Capacity andcoverage benefit Usually deployed by end users using their own backhaul
Enterprise Femtocell Indoors Range to 25 meters 100-250 mW 16-32 users Capacity and coveragebenefit Deployed by operators
Distributed antenna system Expands indoor or outdoor coverage Same hardware can support multipleoperators (neutral host) since antenna can support broad frequency range andmultiple technologies Indoor deployments are typically in larger spaces such asairports Has also been deployed outdoors for coverage and capacity expansion
Remote radio head (RRH) Uses baseband at existing macro site or centralized baseband equipment Ifcentralized the system is called ldquocloud RANrdquo Requires fiber connection
Wi-Fi Primarily provides capacity expansion Neutral-host capability allows multipleoperators to share infrastructure
38
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Challenges
39
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Carrier Aggregation With this capability already in use operators can aggregate radio carriers in the same band or across disparate bands to improve throughputs (under light network load) capacity and efficiency
bull VoLTE Initially launched in 2015 and with widespread availability in 2017 VoLTE enables operators to roll out packetized voice for LTE networks resulting in greater voice capacity and higher voice quality
bull Tighter Integration of LTE with Unlicensed Bands LTE-U became available for testing in 2016 and 3GPP completed specifications for LAA in Release 13 with deployment expected around 2018 MulteFire building on LAA will operate without requiring a licensed-carrier anchor LTEWi-Fi Aggregation through LWA and LWIP are other options for operators with large Wi-Fi deployments
bull Enhanced Support for IoT Release 13 brings Category M1 a low-cost device option along with Narrowband IoT (NB-IoT) a version of the LTE radio interface specifically for IoT devices called Category NB1
bull Higher-Order and Full-Dimension MIMO Deployments in 2017 use up to 4X4 MIMO Release 14 specifies a capability called Full-Dimension MIMO which supports configurations with as many as 32 antennas at the base station
bull Dual Connectivity Release 12 introduced the capability to combine carriers from different sectors andor base stations (ie evolved Node Bs [eNBs]) through a feature called Dual Connectivity Two architectures were defined one that supports Packet Data Convergence Protocol (PDCP) aggregation between the different eNBs and one that supports separate S1 connections on the user plane from the different eNBs to the EPC
Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
17
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull 256 QAM Downlink and 64 QAM Uplink Defined in Release 12 and already deployed in some networks higher-order modulation increases user throughput rates in favorable radio conditions
bull 1 Gbps Capability Using a combination of 256 QAM modulation 4X4 MIMO and aggregation of three carriers operator networks can now reach 1 Gbps peak speeds See below for more information
bull V2X Communications Release 14 specifies vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure communications
bull Coordinated Multi Point CoMP (and enhanced CoMP [eCoMP]) is a process by which multiple base stations or cell sectors process a User Equipment (UE) signal simultaneously or coordinate the transmissions to a UE improving cell-edge performance and network efficiency Initial usage will be on the uplink because no user device changes are required Some networks had implemented this feature in 2017
bull HetNet Support HetNets integrate macro cells and small cells A key feature is enhanced inter-cell interference coordination (eICIC) which improves the ability of a macro and a small cell to use the same spectrum This approach is valuable when the operator cannot dedicate spectrum to small cells Operators are currently evaluating eICIC and at least one operator has deployed it Further enhanced ICIC (feICIC) introduced in Rel-11 added advanced interference-cancellation receivers into devices
bull Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Communications Being specified in Release 15 URLLC in LTE will shorten radio latency to a 1 msec range using a combination of shorter transmission time intervals and faster hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) error processing
bull Self-Organizing Networks With SON networks can automatically configure and optimize themselves a capability that will be particularly important as small cells begin to proliferate Vendor-specific methods are common for 3G networks and trials are now occurring for 4G LTE standards-based approaches
Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
18
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
Source 5G AmericasRysavy Research
19
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
20
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Use Case Model
21
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Objectives
IMT-Advanced IMT-2020
Peak Data Rate DL 1 GbpsUL 005 Gbps
DL 20 GbpsUL 10 Gbps
User Experienced Data Rate 10 Mbps 100 Mbps
Spectrum Efficiency 1 (normalized) 3X over IMT-Advanced
Peak Spectral Efficiency DL 15 bpsHzUL 675 bpsHz
DL 30 bpsHzUL 15 bpsHz
Average Spectral Efficiency DL eMBB indoor 9 bpsHzDL eMBB urban 78 bpsHzDL eMBB rural 33 bpsHz
UL eMBB indoor 675 bpsHzUL eMBB urban 54 bpsHzUL eMBB rural 16 bpsHz
Mobility 350 kmh 500 kmh
User Plane Latency 10 msec 1 msec
Connection Density 100 thousand devicessqkm 1 million devices sqkm
Network Energy Efficiency 1 (normalized) 100X over IMT-Advanced
Area Traffic Capacity 01 Mbpssq m 10 Mbpssq m (hot spots)
Bandwidth Up to 20 MHzradio channel (up to 100 MHz aggregated)
Up to 1 GHz (single or multipole RF carriers)
22
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Transformation
23
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
24
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of Different Bands
Source Nokia Vision amp Priorities for Next Generation Radio Technology 3GPP RAN workshop on 5G Sep 17-18 2015
25
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
26
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Network can support both LTE and 5G NR including dual connectivity with which devices have simultaneous connections to LTE and NR
bull Carrier aggregation for multiple NR carriersbull 5 Gbps peak downlink throughput in initial releases increasing to 50 Gbps
in subsequent versionsbull OFDMA in downlink and uplink with optional Single Carrier Frequency
Division Multiple Access (SC-FDMA) for uplink Radio approach for URLLC to be defined in Release 16 but Release 15 will provide physical layer frame structure and numerology support
bull Massive MIMO and beamformingbull Ability to support either FDD or TDD modes for 5G radio bandsbull Numerologies of 2N X 15 kHz for subcarrier spacing up to 120 kHz or 240
kHz This approach depicted in Figure 17 supports both narrow radio channels (for example 1 MHz) or wide ones (for example 400 MHz) Phase 1 likely to support a maximum of 400 MHz bandwidth with 240 kHz subcarrier spacing
5G New Radio (NR) (1)
27
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Error correction through low-density parity codes (LDPC) which are computationally more efficient than LTE turbo codes at higher data rates
bull Standards-based cloud RAN support compared with proprietary LTE approaches that specifies a split between the PDCP and Radio Link Control (RLC) protocol layers
bull Self-contained integrated subframes that combine scheduling data and acknowledgement
bull Future-proofing by providing a flexible radio framework that has forward compatibility to support future currently unknown services such as URLLC to be specified in Release 16
bull Scalable transmission time intervals with short time intervals for low latency and longer time intervals for higher spectral efficiency
bull QoS support using a new modelbull Dynamic co-existence with LTE in the same radio channels
5G New Radio (NR) (2)
28
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
29
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Per ITU 95 users obtain 100 Mbps or greater
bull Typical rates of 500 Mbps appear feasible using 200 MHz radio channel
bull Typical rate of 1 Gbps appear feasible using 400 MHz radio channel
Expected 5G Performance
30
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
31
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Schedule
32
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
Source Dr Seizo Onoe NTT DOCOMO presentation at Brooklyn 5G Summit Apr 21 2016
33
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
34
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Slicing Architecture
35
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
TechnologyName
Type Characteristics Typical Downlink
Speed
Typical Uplink Speed
HSPA WCDMAData service for UMTS networks An enhancement to original UMTS data service
1 Mbps to 4 Mbps
500 Kbpsto 2 Mbps
HSPA+ WCDMAEvolution of HSPA in various stages to increase throughput and capacity and to lower latency
19 Mbps to88 Mbps in 5+5 MHz
38 Mbps to 176 Mbps with dual carrier in 10+5 MHz
1 Mbps to4 Mbps in 5+5 MHz or in 10+5 MHz
LTE OFDMA
New radio interface that can use wide radio channels and deliver extremely high throughput rates All communications handled in IP domain
65 to 263 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
60 to 130 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
LTE-Advanced OFDMA
Advanced version of LTE designed to meet IMT-Advanced requirements
Significant gains through carrier aggregation
36
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Key Features in 3GPP Releases
Release Year Key Features99 1999 First deployable version of UMTS5 2002 High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) for UMTS6 2005 High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) for UMTS7 2008 HSPA+ with higher-order modulation and MIMO8 2009 Long Term Evolution Dual-carrier HSDPA10 2011 LTE-Advanced including carrier aggregation and eICIC11 2013 Coordinated Multi Point (CoMP)12 2015 Public safety support Device-to-device communications Dual Connectivity 256 QAM
on the downlink
13 2016 LTE-Advanced Pro features LTE operation in unlicensed bands LTE-WLANAggregation Narrowband Internet of Things
14 2017 LTE-Advanced Pro additional features such as eLAA (adding uplink to LAA) andcellular V2X communications Study item for 5G ldquoNew Radiordquo
15 2018 Additional LTE-Advanced Pro features such as ultra-reliable low-latencycommunications Phase 1 of 5G Will emphasize enhanced-mobile-broadband usecase and sub-40 GHz operation Includes Massive MIMO beamforming and 4G-5Ginterworking including ability for LTE connectivity to a 5G CN
16 2019 Phase 2 of 5G Full compliance with ITU IMT-2020 requirements Will add URLLCspectrum sharing unlicensed operation and multiple other enhancements
17 2021 Further LTE and 5G enhancements
37
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Types of Cells and Characteristics
Type of Cell CharacteristicsMacro cell Wide-area coverage LTE supports cells up to 100 km in range but typical
distances are 5 to 5 km radius Always installed outdoors
Microcell Covers a smaller area such as a hotel or mall Range to 2 km 5-10W and 256-512 users Usually installed outdoors
Picocell Indoor or outdoor Outdoor cells also called ldquometrocellsrdquo Typical range 15 to 200meters outdoors and 10 to 25 meters indoors 1-2W 64-128 users Deployed byoperators primarily to expand capacity
Consumer Femtocell Indoors Range to 10 meters less than 50 mW and 4 to 6 users Capacity andcoverage benefit Usually deployed by end users using their own backhaul
Enterprise Femtocell Indoors Range to 25 meters 100-250 mW 16-32 users Capacity and coveragebenefit Deployed by operators
Distributed antenna system Expands indoor or outdoor coverage Same hardware can support multipleoperators (neutral host) since antenna can support broad frequency range andmultiple technologies Indoor deployments are typically in larger spaces such asairports Has also been deployed outdoors for coverage and capacity expansion
Remote radio head (RRH) Uses baseband at existing macro site or centralized baseband equipment Ifcentralized the system is called ldquocloud RANrdquo Requires fiber connection
Wi-Fi Primarily provides capacity expansion Neutral-host capability allows multipleoperators to share infrastructure
38
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Challenges
39
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull 256 QAM Downlink and 64 QAM Uplink Defined in Release 12 and already deployed in some networks higher-order modulation increases user throughput rates in favorable radio conditions
bull 1 Gbps Capability Using a combination of 256 QAM modulation 4X4 MIMO and aggregation of three carriers operator networks can now reach 1 Gbps peak speeds See below for more information
bull V2X Communications Release 14 specifies vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure communications
bull Coordinated Multi Point CoMP (and enhanced CoMP [eCoMP]) is a process by which multiple base stations or cell sectors process a User Equipment (UE) signal simultaneously or coordinate the transmissions to a UE improving cell-edge performance and network efficiency Initial usage will be on the uplink because no user device changes are required Some networks had implemented this feature in 2017
bull HetNet Support HetNets integrate macro cells and small cells A key feature is enhanced inter-cell interference coordination (eICIC) which improves the ability of a macro and a small cell to use the same spectrum This approach is valuable when the operator cannot dedicate spectrum to small cells Operators are currently evaluating eICIC and at least one operator has deployed it Further enhanced ICIC (feICIC) introduced in Rel-11 added advanced interference-cancellation receivers into devices
bull Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Communications Being specified in Release 15 URLLC in LTE will shorten radio latency to a 1 msec range using a combination of shorter transmission time intervals and faster hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) error processing
bull Self-Organizing Networks With SON networks can automatically configure and optimize themselves a capability that will be particularly important as small cells begin to proliferate Vendor-specific methods are common for 3G networks and trials are now occurring for 4G LTE standards-based approaches
Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
18
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
Source 5G AmericasRysavy Research
19
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
20
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Use Case Model
21
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Objectives
IMT-Advanced IMT-2020
Peak Data Rate DL 1 GbpsUL 005 Gbps
DL 20 GbpsUL 10 Gbps
User Experienced Data Rate 10 Mbps 100 Mbps
Spectrum Efficiency 1 (normalized) 3X over IMT-Advanced
Peak Spectral Efficiency DL 15 bpsHzUL 675 bpsHz
DL 30 bpsHzUL 15 bpsHz
Average Spectral Efficiency DL eMBB indoor 9 bpsHzDL eMBB urban 78 bpsHzDL eMBB rural 33 bpsHz
UL eMBB indoor 675 bpsHzUL eMBB urban 54 bpsHzUL eMBB rural 16 bpsHz
Mobility 350 kmh 500 kmh
User Plane Latency 10 msec 1 msec
Connection Density 100 thousand devicessqkm 1 million devices sqkm
Network Energy Efficiency 1 (normalized) 100X over IMT-Advanced
Area Traffic Capacity 01 Mbpssq m 10 Mbpssq m (hot spots)
Bandwidth Up to 20 MHzradio channel (up to 100 MHz aggregated)
Up to 1 GHz (single or multipole RF carriers)
22
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Transformation
23
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
24
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of Different Bands
Source Nokia Vision amp Priorities for Next Generation Radio Technology 3GPP RAN workshop on 5G Sep 17-18 2015
25
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
26
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Network can support both LTE and 5G NR including dual connectivity with which devices have simultaneous connections to LTE and NR
bull Carrier aggregation for multiple NR carriersbull 5 Gbps peak downlink throughput in initial releases increasing to 50 Gbps
in subsequent versionsbull OFDMA in downlink and uplink with optional Single Carrier Frequency
Division Multiple Access (SC-FDMA) for uplink Radio approach for URLLC to be defined in Release 16 but Release 15 will provide physical layer frame structure and numerology support
bull Massive MIMO and beamformingbull Ability to support either FDD or TDD modes for 5G radio bandsbull Numerologies of 2N X 15 kHz for subcarrier spacing up to 120 kHz or 240
kHz This approach depicted in Figure 17 supports both narrow radio channels (for example 1 MHz) or wide ones (for example 400 MHz) Phase 1 likely to support a maximum of 400 MHz bandwidth with 240 kHz subcarrier spacing
5G New Radio (NR) (1)
27
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Error correction through low-density parity codes (LDPC) which are computationally more efficient than LTE turbo codes at higher data rates
bull Standards-based cloud RAN support compared with proprietary LTE approaches that specifies a split between the PDCP and Radio Link Control (RLC) protocol layers
bull Self-contained integrated subframes that combine scheduling data and acknowledgement
bull Future-proofing by providing a flexible radio framework that has forward compatibility to support future currently unknown services such as URLLC to be specified in Release 16
bull Scalable transmission time intervals with short time intervals for low latency and longer time intervals for higher spectral efficiency
bull QoS support using a new modelbull Dynamic co-existence with LTE in the same radio channels
5G New Radio (NR) (2)
28
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
29
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Per ITU 95 users obtain 100 Mbps or greater
bull Typical rates of 500 Mbps appear feasible using 200 MHz radio channel
bull Typical rate of 1 Gbps appear feasible using 400 MHz radio channel
Expected 5G Performance
30
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
31
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Schedule
32
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
Source Dr Seizo Onoe NTT DOCOMO presentation at Brooklyn 5G Summit Apr 21 2016
33
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
34
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Slicing Architecture
35
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
TechnologyName
Type Characteristics Typical Downlink
Speed
Typical Uplink Speed
HSPA WCDMAData service for UMTS networks An enhancement to original UMTS data service
1 Mbps to 4 Mbps
500 Kbpsto 2 Mbps
HSPA+ WCDMAEvolution of HSPA in various stages to increase throughput and capacity and to lower latency
19 Mbps to88 Mbps in 5+5 MHz
38 Mbps to 176 Mbps with dual carrier in 10+5 MHz
1 Mbps to4 Mbps in 5+5 MHz or in 10+5 MHz
LTE OFDMA
New radio interface that can use wide radio channels and deliver extremely high throughput rates All communications handled in IP domain
65 to 263 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
60 to 130 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
LTE-Advanced OFDMA
Advanced version of LTE designed to meet IMT-Advanced requirements
Significant gains through carrier aggregation
36
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Key Features in 3GPP Releases
Release Year Key Features99 1999 First deployable version of UMTS5 2002 High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) for UMTS6 2005 High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) for UMTS7 2008 HSPA+ with higher-order modulation and MIMO8 2009 Long Term Evolution Dual-carrier HSDPA10 2011 LTE-Advanced including carrier aggregation and eICIC11 2013 Coordinated Multi Point (CoMP)12 2015 Public safety support Device-to-device communications Dual Connectivity 256 QAM
on the downlink
13 2016 LTE-Advanced Pro features LTE operation in unlicensed bands LTE-WLANAggregation Narrowband Internet of Things
14 2017 LTE-Advanced Pro additional features such as eLAA (adding uplink to LAA) andcellular V2X communications Study item for 5G ldquoNew Radiordquo
15 2018 Additional LTE-Advanced Pro features such as ultra-reliable low-latencycommunications Phase 1 of 5G Will emphasize enhanced-mobile-broadband usecase and sub-40 GHz operation Includes Massive MIMO beamforming and 4G-5Ginterworking including ability for LTE connectivity to a 5G CN
16 2019 Phase 2 of 5G Full compliance with ITU IMT-2020 requirements Will add URLLCspectrum sharing unlicensed operation and multiple other enhancements
17 2021 Further LTE and 5G enhancements
37
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Types of Cells and Characteristics
Type of Cell CharacteristicsMacro cell Wide-area coverage LTE supports cells up to 100 km in range but typical
distances are 5 to 5 km radius Always installed outdoors
Microcell Covers a smaller area such as a hotel or mall Range to 2 km 5-10W and 256-512 users Usually installed outdoors
Picocell Indoor or outdoor Outdoor cells also called ldquometrocellsrdquo Typical range 15 to 200meters outdoors and 10 to 25 meters indoors 1-2W 64-128 users Deployed byoperators primarily to expand capacity
Consumer Femtocell Indoors Range to 10 meters less than 50 mW and 4 to 6 users Capacity andcoverage benefit Usually deployed by end users using their own backhaul
Enterprise Femtocell Indoors Range to 25 meters 100-250 mW 16-32 users Capacity and coveragebenefit Deployed by operators
Distributed antenna system Expands indoor or outdoor coverage Same hardware can support multipleoperators (neutral host) since antenna can support broad frequency range andmultiple technologies Indoor deployments are typically in larger spaces such asairports Has also been deployed outdoors for coverage and capacity expansion
Remote radio head (RRH) Uses baseband at existing macro site or centralized baseband equipment Ifcentralized the system is called ldquocloud RANrdquo Requires fiber connection
Wi-Fi Primarily provides capacity expansion Neutral-host capability allows multipleoperators to share infrastructure
38
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Challenges
39
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
Source 5G AmericasRysavy Research
19
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
20
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Use Case Model
21
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Objectives
IMT-Advanced IMT-2020
Peak Data Rate DL 1 GbpsUL 005 Gbps
DL 20 GbpsUL 10 Gbps
User Experienced Data Rate 10 Mbps 100 Mbps
Spectrum Efficiency 1 (normalized) 3X over IMT-Advanced
Peak Spectral Efficiency DL 15 bpsHzUL 675 bpsHz
DL 30 bpsHzUL 15 bpsHz
Average Spectral Efficiency DL eMBB indoor 9 bpsHzDL eMBB urban 78 bpsHzDL eMBB rural 33 bpsHz
UL eMBB indoor 675 bpsHzUL eMBB urban 54 bpsHzUL eMBB rural 16 bpsHz
Mobility 350 kmh 500 kmh
User Plane Latency 10 msec 1 msec
Connection Density 100 thousand devicessqkm 1 million devices sqkm
Network Energy Efficiency 1 (normalized) 100X over IMT-Advanced
Area Traffic Capacity 01 Mbpssq m 10 Mbpssq m (hot spots)
Bandwidth Up to 20 MHzradio channel (up to 100 MHz aggregated)
Up to 1 GHz (single or multipole RF carriers)
22
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Transformation
23
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
24
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of Different Bands
Source Nokia Vision amp Priorities for Next Generation Radio Technology 3GPP RAN workshop on 5G Sep 17-18 2015
25
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
26
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Network can support both LTE and 5G NR including dual connectivity with which devices have simultaneous connections to LTE and NR
bull Carrier aggregation for multiple NR carriersbull 5 Gbps peak downlink throughput in initial releases increasing to 50 Gbps
in subsequent versionsbull OFDMA in downlink and uplink with optional Single Carrier Frequency
Division Multiple Access (SC-FDMA) for uplink Radio approach for URLLC to be defined in Release 16 but Release 15 will provide physical layer frame structure and numerology support
bull Massive MIMO and beamformingbull Ability to support either FDD or TDD modes for 5G radio bandsbull Numerologies of 2N X 15 kHz for subcarrier spacing up to 120 kHz or 240
kHz This approach depicted in Figure 17 supports both narrow radio channels (for example 1 MHz) or wide ones (for example 400 MHz) Phase 1 likely to support a maximum of 400 MHz bandwidth with 240 kHz subcarrier spacing
5G New Radio (NR) (1)
27
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Error correction through low-density parity codes (LDPC) which are computationally more efficient than LTE turbo codes at higher data rates
bull Standards-based cloud RAN support compared with proprietary LTE approaches that specifies a split between the PDCP and Radio Link Control (RLC) protocol layers
bull Self-contained integrated subframes that combine scheduling data and acknowledgement
bull Future-proofing by providing a flexible radio framework that has forward compatibility to support future currently unknown services such as URLLC to be specified in Release 16
bull Scalable transmission time intervals with short time intervals for low latency and longer time intervals for higher spectral efficiency
bull QoS support using a new modelbull Dynamic co-existence with LTE in the same radio channels
5G New Radio (NR) (2)
28
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
29
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Per ITU 95 users obtain 100 Mbps or greater
bull Typical rates of 500 Mbps appear feasible using 200 MHz radio channel
bull Typical rate of 1 Gbps appear feasible using 400 MHz radio channel
Expected 5G Performance
30
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
31
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Schedule
32
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
Source Dr Seizo Onoe NTT DOCOMO presentation at Brooklyn 5G Summit Apr 21 2016
33
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
34
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Slicing Architecture
35
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
TechnologyName
Type Characteristics Typical Downlink
Speed
Typical Uplink Speed
HSPA WCDMAData service for UMTS networks An enhancement to original UMTS data service
1 Mbps to 4 Mbps
500 Kbpsto 2 Mbps
HSPA+ WCDMAEvolution of HSPA in various stages to increase throughput and capacity and to lower latency
19 Mbps to88 Mbps in 5+5 MHz
38 Mbps to 176 Mbps with dual carrier in 10+5 MHz
1 Mbps to4 Mbps in 5+5 MHz or in 10+5 MHz
LTE OFDMA
New radio interface that can use wide radio channels and deliver extremely high throughput rates All communications handled in IP domain
65 to 263 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
60 to 130 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
LTE-Advanced OFDMA
Advanced version of LTE designed to meet IMT-Advanced requirements
Significant gains through carrier aggregation
36
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Key Features in 3GPP Releases
Release Year Key Features99 1999 First deployable version of UMTS5 2002 High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) for UMTS6 2005 High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) for UMTS7 2008 HSPA+ with higher-order modulation and MIMO8 2009 Long Term Evolution Dual-carrier HSDPA10 2011 LTE-Advanced including carrier aggregation and eICIC11 2013 Coordinated Multi Point (CoMP)12 2015 Public safety support Device-to-device communications Dual Connectivity 256 QAM
on the downlink
13 2016 LTE-Advanced Pro features LTE operation in unlicensed bands LTE-WLANAggregation Narrowband Internet of Things
14 2017 LTE-Advanced Pro additional features such as eLAA (adding uplink to LAA) andcellular V2X communications Study item for 5G ldquoNew Radiordquo
15 2018 Additional LTE-Advanced Pro features such as ultra-reliable low-latencycommunications Phase 1 of 5G Will emphasize enhanced-mobile-broadband usecase and sub-40 GHz operation Includes Massive MIMO beamforming and 4G-5Ginterworking including ability for LTE connectivity to a 5G CN
16 2019 Phase 2 of 5G Full compliance with ITU IMT-2020 requirements Will add URLLCspectrum sharing unlicensed operation and multiple other enhancements
17 2021 Further LTE and 5G enhancements
37
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Types of Cells and Characteristics
Type of Cell CharacteristicsMacro cell Wide-area coverage LTE supports cells up to 100 km in range but typical
distances are 5 to 5 km radius Always installed outdoors
Microcell Covers a smaller area such as a hotel or mall Range to 2 km 5-10W and 256-512 users Usually installed outdoors
Picocell Indoor or outdoor Outdoor cells also called ldquometrocellsrdquo Typical range 15 to 200meters outdoors and 10 to 25 meters indoors 1-2W 64-128 users Deployed byoperators primarily to expand capacity
Consumer Femtocell Indoors Range to 10 meters less than 50 mW and 4 to 6 users Capacity andcoverage benefit Usually deployed by end users using their own backhaul
Enterprise Femtocell Indoors Range to 25 meters 100-250 mW 16-32 users Capacity and coveragebenefit Deployed by operators
Distributed antenna system Expands indoor or outdoor coverage Same hardware can support multipleoperators (neutral host) since antenna can support broad frequency range andmultiple technologies Indoor deployments are typically in larger spaces such asairports Has also been deployed outdoors for coverage and capacity expansion
Remote radio head (RRH) Uses baseband at existing macro site or centralized baseband equipment Ifcentralized the system is called ldquocloud RANrdquo Requires fiber connection
Wi-Fi Primarily provides capacity expansion Neutral-host capability allows multipleoperators to share infrastructure
38
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Challenges
39
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
20
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Use Case Model
21
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Objectives
IMT-Advanced IMT-2020
Peak Data Rate DL 1 GbpsUL 005 Gbps
DL 20 GbpsUL 10 Gbps
User Experienced Data Rate 10 Mbps 100 Mbps
Spectrum Efficiency 1 (normalized) 3X over IMT-Advanced
Peak Spectral Efficiency DL 15 bpsHzUL 675 bpsHz
DL 30 bpsHzUL 15 bpsHz
Average Spectral Efficiency DL eMBB indoor 9 bpsHzDL eMBB urban 78 bpsHzDL eMBB rural 33 bpsHz
UL eMBB indoor 675 bpsHzUL eMBB urban 54 bpsHzUL eMBB rural 16 bpsHz
Mobility 350 kmh 500 kmh
User Plane Latency 10 msec 1 msec
Connection Density 100 thousand devicessqkm 1 million devices sqkm
Network Energy Efficiency 1 (normalized) 100X over IMT-Advanced
Area Traffic Capacity 01 Mbpssq m 10 Mbpssq m (hot spots)
Bandwidth Up to 20 MHzradio channel (up to 100 MHz aggregated)
Up to 1 GHz (single or multipole RF carriers)
22
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Transformation
23
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
24
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of Different Bands
Source Nokia Vision amp Priorities for Next Generation Radio Technology 3GPP RAN workshop on 5G Sep 17-18 2015
25
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
26
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Network can support both LTE and 5G NR including dual connectivity with which devices have simultaneous connections to LTE and NR
bull Carrier aggregation for multiple NR carriersbull 5 Gbps peak downlink throughput in initial releases increasing to 50 Gbps
in subsequent versionsbull OFDMA in downlink and uplink with optional Single Carrier Frequency
Division Multiple Access (SC-FDMA) for uplink Radio approach for URLLC to be defined in Release 16 but Release 15 will provide physical layer frame structure and numerology support
bull Massive MIMO and beamformingbull Ability to support either FDD or TDD modes for 5G radio bandsbull Numerologies of 2N X 15 kHz for subcarrier spacing up to 120 kHz or 240
kHz This approach depicted in Figure 17 supports both narrow radio channels (for example 1 MHz) or wide ones (for example 400 MHz) Phase 1 likely to support a maximum of 400 MHz bandwidth with 240 kHz subcarrier spacing
5G New Radio (NR) (1)
27
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Error correction through low-density parity codes (LDPC) which are computationally more efficient than LTE turbo codes at higher data rates
bull Standards-based cloud RAN support compared with proprietary LTE approaches that specifies a split between the PDCP and Radio Link Control (RLC) protocol layers
bull Self-contained integrated subframes that combine scheduling data and acknowledgement
bull Future-proofing by providing a flexible radio framework that has forward compatibility to support future currently unknown services such as URLLC to be specified in Release 16
bull Scalable transmission time intervals with short time intervals for low latency and longer time intervals for higher spectral efficiency
bull QoS support using a new modelbull Dynamic co-existence with LTE in the same radio channels
5G New Radio (NR) (2)
28
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
29
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Per ITU 95 users obtain 100 Mbps or greater
bull Typical rates of 500 Mbps appear feasible using 200 MHz radio channel
bull Typical rate of 1 Gbps appear feasible using 400 MHz radio channel
Expected 5G Performance
30
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
31
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Schedule
32
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
Source Dr Seizo Onoe NTT DOCOMO presentation at Brooklyn 5G Summit Apr 21 2016
33
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
34
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Slicing Architecture
35
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
TechnologyName
Type Characteristics Typical Downlink
Speed
Typical Uplink Speed
HSPA WCDMAData service for UMTS networks An enhancement to original UMTS data service
1 Mbps to 4 Mbps
500 Kbpsto 2 Mbps
HSPA+ WCDMAEvolution of HSPA in various stages to increase throughput and capacity and to lower latency
19 Mbps to88 Mbps in 5+5 MHz
38 Mbps to 176 Mbps with dual carrier in 10+5 MHz
1 Mbps to4 Mbps in 5+5 MHz or in 10+5 MHz
LTE OFDMA
New radio interface that can use wide radio channels and deliver extremely high throughput rates All communications handled in IP domain
65 to 263 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
60 to 130 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
LTE-Advanced OFDMA
Advanced version of LTE designed to meet IMT-Advanced requirements
Significant gains through carrier aggregation
36
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Key Features in 3GPP Releases
Release Year Key Features99 1999 First deployable version of UMTS5 2002 High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) for UMTS6 2005 High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) for UMTS7 2008 HSPA+ with higher-order modulation and MIMO8 2009 Long Term Evolution Dual-carrier HSDPA10 2011 LTE-Advanced including carrier aggregation and eICIC11 2013 Coordinated Multi Point (CoMP)12 2015 Public safety support Device-to-device communications Dual Connectivity 256 QAM
on the downlink
13 2016 LTE-Advanced Pro features LTE operation in unlicensed bands LTE-WLANAggregation Narrowband Internet of Things
14 2017 LTE-Advanced Pro additional features such as eLAA (adding uplink to LAA) andcellular V2X communications Study item for 5G ldquoNew Radiordquo
15 2018 Additional LTE-Advanced Pro features such as ultra-reliable low-latencycommunications Phase 1 of 5G Will emphasize enhanced-mobile-broadband usecase and sub-40 GHz operation Includes Massive MIMO beamforming and 4G-5Ginterworking including ability for LTE connectivity to a 5G CN
16 2019 Phase 2 of 5G Full compliance with ITU IMT-2020 requirements Will add URLLCspectrum sharing unlicensed operation and multiple other enhancements
17 2021 Further LTE and 5G enhancements
37
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Types of Cells and Characteristics
Type of Cell CharacteristicsMacro cell Wide-area coverage LTE supports cells up to 100 km in range but typical
distances are 5 to 5 km radius Always installed outdoors
Microcell Covers a smaller area such as a hotel or mall Range to 2 km 5-10W and 256-512 users Usually installed outdoors
Picocell Indoor or outdoor Outdoor cells also called ldquometrocellsrdquo Typical range 15 to 200meters outdoors and 10 to 25 meters indoors 1-2W 64-128 users Deployed byoperators primarily to expand capacity
Consumer Femtocell Indoors Range to 10 meters less than 50 mW and 4 to 6 users Capacity andcoverage benefit Usually deployed by end users using their own backhaul
Enterprise Femtocell Indoors Range to 25 meters 100-250 mW 16-32 users Capacity and coveragebenefit Deployed by operators
Distributed antenna system Expands indoor or outdoor coverage Same hardware can support multipleoperators (neutral host) since antenna can support broad frequency range andmultiple technologies Indoor deployments are typically in larger spaces such asairports Has also been deployed outdoors for coverage and capacity expansion
Remote radio head (RRH) Uses baseband at existing macro site or centralized baseband equipment Ifcentralized the system is called ldquocloud RANrdquo Requires fiber connection
Wi-Fi Primarily provides capacity expansion Neutral-host capability allows multipleoperators to share infrastructure
38
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Challenges
39
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Use Case Model
21
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Objectives
IMT-Advanced IMT-2020
Peak Data Rate DL 1 GbpsUL 005 Gbps
DL 20 GbpsUL 10 Gbps
User Experienced Data Rate 10 Mbps 100 Mbps
Spectrum Efficiency 1 (normalized) 3X over IMT-Advanced
Peak Spectral Efficiency DL 15 bpsHzUL 675 bpsHz
DL 30 bpsHzUL 15 bpsHz
Average Spectral Efficiency DL eMBB indoor 9 bpsHzDL eMBB urban 78 bpsHzDL eMBB rural 33 bpsHz
UL eMBB indoor 675 bpsHzUL eMBB urban 54 bpsHzUL eMBB rural 16 bpsHz
Mobility 350 kmh 500 kmh
User Plane Latency 10 msec 1 msec
Connection Density 100 thousand devicessqkm 1 million devices sqkm
Network Energy Efficiency 1 (normalized) 100X over IMT-Advanced
Area Traffic Capacity 01 Mbpssq m 10 Mbpssq m (hot spots)
Bandwidth Up to 20 MHzradio channel (up to 100 MHz aggregated)
Up to 1 GHz (single or multipole RF carriers)
22
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Transformation
23
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
24
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of Different Bands
Source Nokia Vision amp Priorities for Next Generation Radio Technology 3GPP RAN workshop on 5G Sep 17-18 2015
25
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
26
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Network can support both LTE and 5G NR including dual connectivity with which devices have simultaneous connections to LTE and NR
bull Carrier aggregation for multiple NR carriersbull 5 Gbps peak downlink throughput in initial releases increasing to 50 Gbps
in subsequent versionsbull OFDMA in downlink and uplink with optional Single Carrier Frequency
Division Multiple Access (SC-FDMA) for uplink Radio approach for URLLC to be defined in Release 16 but Release 15 will provide physical layer frame structure and numerology support
bull Massive MIMO and beamformingbull Ability to support either FDD or TDD modes for 5G radio bandsbull Numerologies of 2N X 15 kHz for subcarrier spacing up to 120 kHz or 240
kHz This approach depicted in Figure 17 supports both narrow radio channels (for example 1 MHz) or wide ones (for example 400 MHz) Phase 1 likely to support a maximum of 400 MHz bandwidth with 240 kHz subcarrier spacing
5G New Radio (NR) (1)
27
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Error correction through low-density parity codes (LDPC) which are computationally more efficient than LTE turbo codes at higher data rates
bull Standards-based cloud RAN support compared with proprietary LTE approaches that specifies a split between the PDCP and Radio Link Control (RLC) protocol layers
bull Self-contained integrated subframes that combine scheduling data and acknowledgement
bull Future-proofing by providing a flexible radio framework that has forward compatibility to support future currently unknown services such as URLLC to be specified in Release 16
bull Scalable transmission time intervals with short time intervals for low latency and longer time intervals for higher spectral efficiency
bull QoS support using a new modelbull Dynamic co-existence with LTE in the same radio channels
5G New Radio (NR) (2)
28
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
29
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Per ITU 95 users obtain 100 Mbps or greater
bull Typical rates of 500 Mbps appear feasible using 200 MHz radio channel
bull Typical rate of 1 Gbps appear feasible using 400 MHz radio channel
Expected 5G Performance
30
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
31
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Schedule
32
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
Source Dr Seizo Onoe NTT DOCOMO presentation at Brooklyn 5G Summit Apr 21 2016
33
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
34
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Slicing Architecture
35
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
TechnologyName
Type Characteristics Typical Downlink
Speed
Typical Uplink Speed
HSPA WCDMAData service for UMTS networks An enhancement to original UMTS data service
1 Mbps to 4 Mbps
500 Kbpsto 2 Mbps
HSPA+ WCDMAEvolution of HSPA in various stages to increase throughput and capacity and to lower latency
19 Mbps to88 Mbps in 5+5 MHz
38 Mbps to 176 Mbps with dual carrier in 10+5 MHz
1 Mbps to4 Mbps in 5+5 MHz or in 10+5 MHz
LTE OFDMA
New radio interface that can use wide radio channels and deliver extremely high throughput rates All communications handled in IP domain
65 to 263 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
60 to 130 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
LTE-Advanced OFDMA
Advanced version of LTE designed to meet IMT-Advanced requirements
Significant gains through carrier aggregation
36
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Key Features in 3GPP Releases
Release Year Key Features99 1999 First deployable version of UMTS5 2002 High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) for UMTS6 2005 High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) for UMTS7 2008 HSPA+ with higher-order modulation and MIMO8 2009 Long Term Evolution Dual-carrier HSDPA10 2011 LTE-Advanced including carrier aggregation and eICIC11 2013 Coordinated Multi Point (CoMP)12 2015 Public safety support Device-to-device communications Dual Connectivity 256 QAM
on the downlink
13 2016 LTE-Advanced Pro features LTE operation in unlicensed bands LTE-WLANAggregation Narrowband Internet of Things
14 2017 LTE-Advanced Pro additional features such as eLAA (adding uplink to LAA) andcellular V2X communications Study item for 5G ldquoNew Radiordquo
15 2018 Additional LTE-Advanced Pro features such as ultra-reliable low-latencycommunications Phase 1 of 5G Will emphasize enhanced-mobile-broadband usecase and sub-40 GHz operation Includes Massive MIMO beamforming and 4G-5Ginterworking including ability for LTE connectivity to a 5G CN
16 2019 Phase 2 of 5G Full compliance with ITU IMT-2020 requirements Will add URLLCspectrum sharing unlicensed operation and multiple other enhancements
17 2021 Further LTE and 5G enhancements
37
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Types of Cells and Characteristics
Type of Cell CharacteristicsMacro cell Wide-area coverage LTE supports cells up to 100 km in range but typical
distances are 5 to 5 km radius Always installed outdoors
Microcell Covers a smaller area such as a hotel or mall Range to 2 km 5-10W and 256-512 users Usually installed outdoors
Picocell Indoor or outdoor Outdoor cells also called ldquometrocellsrdquo Typical range 15 to 200meters outdoors and 10 to 25 meters indoors 1-2W 64-128 users Deployed byoperators primarily to expand capacity
Consumer Femtocell Indoors Range to 10 meters less than 50 mW and 4 to 6 users Capacity andcoverage benefit Usually deployed by end users using their own backhaul
Enterprise Femtocell Indoors Range to 25 meters 100-250 mW 16-32 users Capacity and coveragebenefit Deployed by operators
Distributed antenna system Expands indoor or outdoor coverage Same hardware can support multipleoperators (neutral host) since antenna can support broad frequency range andmultiple technologies Indoor deployments are typically in larger spaces such asairports Has also been deployed outdoors for coverage and capacity expansion
Remote radio head (RRH) Uses baseband at existing macro site or centralized baseband equipment Ifcentralized the system is called ldquocloud RANrdquo Requires fiber connection
Wi-Fi Primarily provides capacity expansion Neutral-host capability allows multipleoperators to share infrastructure
38
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Challenges
39
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ITU Objectives
IMT-Advanced IMT-2020
Peak Data Rate DL 1 GbpsUL 005 Gbps
DL 20 GbpsUL 10 Gbps
User Experienced Data Rate 10 Mbps 100 Mbps
Spectrum Efficiency 1 (normalized) 3X over IMT-Advanced
Peak Spectral Efficiency DL 15 bpsHzUL 675 bpsHz
DL 30 bpsHzUL 15 bpsHz
Average Spectral Efficiency DL eMBB indoor 9 bpsHzDL eMBB urban 78 bpsHzDL eMBB rural 33 bpsHz
UL eMBB indoor 675 bpsHzUL eMBB urban 54 bpsHzUL eMBB rural 16 bpsHz
Mobility 350 kmh 500 kmh
User Plane Latency 10 msec 1 msec
Connection Density 100 thousand devicessqkm 1 million devices sqkm
Network Energy Efficiency 1 (normalized) 100X over IMT-Advanced
Area Traffic Capacity 01 Mbpssq m 10 Mbpssq m (hot spots)
Bandwidth Up to 20 MHzradio channel (up to 100 MHz aggregated)
Up to 1 GHz (single or multipole RF carriers)
22
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Transformation
23
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
24
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of Different Bands
Source Nokia Vision amp Priorities for Next Generation Radio Technology 3GPP RAN workshop on 5G Sep 17-18 2015
25
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
26
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Network can support both LTE and 5G NR including dual connectivity with which devices have simultaneous connections to LTE and NR
bull Carrier aggregation for multiple NR carriersbull 5 Gbps peak downlink throughput in initial releases increasing to 50 Gbps
in subsequent versionsbull OFDMA in downlink and uplink with optional Single Carrier Frequency
Division Multiple Access (SC-FDMA) for uplink Radio approach for URLLC to be defined in Release 16 but Release 15 will provide physical layer frame structure and numerology support
bull Massive MIMO and beamformingbull Ability to support either FDD or TDD modes for 5G radio bandsbull Numerologies of 2N X 15 kHz for subcarrier spacing up to 120 kHz or 240
kHz This approach depicted in Figure 17 supports both narrow radio channels (for example 1 MHz) or wide ones (for example 400 MHz) Phase 1 likely to support a maximum of 400 MHz bandwidth with 240 kHz subcarrier spacing
5G New Radio (NR) (1)
27
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Error correction through low-density parity codes (LDPC) which are computationally more efficient than LTE turbo codes at higher data rates
bull Standards-based cloud RAN support compared with proprietary LTE approaches that specifies a split between the PDCP and Radio Link Control (RLC) protocol layers
bull Self-contained integrated subframes that combine scheduling data and acknowledgement
bull Future-proofing by providing a flexible radio framework that has forward compatibility to support future currently unknown services such as URLLC to be specified in Release 16
bull Scalable transmission time intervals with short time intervals for low latency and longer time intervals for higher spectral efficiency
bull QoS support using a new modelbull Dynamic co-existence with LTE in the same radio channels
5G New Radio (NR) (2)
28
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
29
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Per ITU 95 users obtain 100 Mbps or greater
bull Typical rates of 500 Mbps appear feasible using 200 MHz radio channel
bull Typical rate of 1 Gbps appear feasible using 400 MHz radio channel
Expected 5G Performance
30
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
31
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Schedule
32
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
Source Dr Seizo Onoe NTT DOCOMO presentation at Brooklyn 5G Summit Apr 21 2016
33
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
34
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Slicing Architecture
35
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
TechnologyName
Type Characteristics Typical Downlink
Speed
Typical Uplink Speed
HSPA WCDMAData service for UMTS networks An enhancement to original UMTS data service
1 Mbps to 4 Mbps
500 Kbpsto 2 Mbps
HSPA+ WCDMAEvolution of HSPA in various stages to increase throughput and capacity and to lower latency
19 Mbps to88 Mbps in 5+5 MHz
38 Mbps to 176 Mbps with dual carrier in 10+5 MHz
1 Mbps to4 Mbps in 5+5 MHz or in 10+5 MHz
LTE OFDMA
New radio interface that can use wide radio channels and deliver extremely high throughput rates All communications handled in IP domain
65 to 263 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
60 to 130 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
LTE-Advanced OFDMA
Advanced version of LTE designed to meet IMT-Advanced requirements
Significant gains through carrier aggregation
36
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Key Features in 3GPP Releases
Release Year Key Features99 1999 First deployable version of UMTS5 2002 High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) for UMTS6 2005 High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) for UMTS7 2008 HSPA+ with higher-order modulation and MIMO8 2009 Long Term Evolution Dual-carrier HSDPA10 2011 LTE-Advanced including carrier aggregation and eICIC11 2013 Coordinated Multi Point (CoMP)12 2015 Public safety support Device-to-device communications Dual Connectivity 256 QAM
on the downlink
13 2016 LTE-Advanced Pro features LTE operation in unlicensed bands LTE-WLANAggregation Narrowband Internet of Things
14 2017 LTE-Advanced Pro additional features such as eLAA (adding uplink to LAA) andcellular V2X communications Study item for 5G ldquoNew Radiordquo
15 2018 Additional LTE-Advanced Pro features such as ultra-reliable low-latencycommunications Phase 1 of 5G Will emphasize enhanced-mobile-broadband usecase and sub-40 GHz operation Includes Massive MIMO beamforming and 4G-5Ginterworking including ability for LTE connectivity to a 5G CN
16 2019 Phase 2 of 5G Full compliance with ITU IMT-2020 requirements Will add URLLCspectrum sharing unlicensed operation and multiple other enhancements
17 2021 Further LTE and 5G enhancements
37
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Types of Cells and Characteristics
Type of Cell CharacteristicsMacro cell Wide-area coverage LTE supports cells up to 100 km in range but typical
distances are 5 to 5 km radius Always installed outdoors
Microcell Covers a smaller area such as a hotel or mall Range to 2 km 5-10W and 256-512 users Usually installed outdoors
Picocell Indoor or outdoor Outdoor cells also called ldquometrocellsrdquo Typical range 15 to 200meters outdoors and 10 to 25 meters indoors 1-2W 64-128 users Deployed byoperators primarily to expand capacity
Consumer Femtocell Indoors Range to 10 meters less than 50 mW and 4 to 6 users Capacity andcoverage benefit Usually deployed by end users using their own backhaul
Enterprise Femtocell Indoors Range to 25 meters 100-250 mW 16-32 users Capacity and coveragebenefit Deployed by operators
Distributed antenna system Expands indoor or outdoor coverage Same hardware can support multipleoperators (neutral host) since antenna can support broad frequency range andmultiple technologies Indoor deployments are typically in larger spaces such asairports Has also been deployed outdoors for coverage and capacity expansion
Remote radio head (RRH) Uses baseband at existing macro site or centralized baseband equipment Ifcentralized the system is called ldquocloud RANrdquo Requires fiber connection
Wi-Fi Primarily provides capacity expansion Neutral-host capability allows multipleoperators to share infrastructure
38
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Challenges
39
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Transformation
23
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
24
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of Different Bands
Source Nokia Vision amp Priorities for Next Generation Radio Technology 3GPP RAN workshop on 5G Sep 17-18 2015
25
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
26
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Network can support both LTE and 5G NR including dual connectivity with which devices have simultaneous connections to LTE and NR
bull Carrier aggregation for multiple NR carriersbull 5 Gbps peak downlink throughput in initial releases increasing to 50 Gbps
in subsequent versionsbull OFDMA in downlink and uplink with optional Single Carrier Frequency
Division Multiple Access (SC-FDMA) for uplink Radio approach for URLLC to be defined in Release 16 but Release 15 will provide physical layer frame structure and numerology support
bull Massive MIMO and beamformingbull Ability to support either FDD or TDD modes for 5G radio bandsbull Numerologies of 2N X 15 kHz for subcarrier spacing up to 120 kHz or 240
kHz This approach depicted in Figure 17 supports both narrow radio channels (for example 1 MHz) or wide ones (for example 400 MHz) Phase 1 likely to support a maximum of 400 MHz bandwidth with 240 kHz subcarrier spacing
5G New Radio (NR) (1)
27
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Error correction through low-density parity codes (LDPC) which are computationally more efficient than LTE turbo codes at higher data rates
bull Standards-based cloud RAN support compared with proprietary LTE approaches that specifies a split between the PDCP and Radio Link Control (RLC) protocol layers
bull Self-contained integrated subframes that combine scheduling data and acknowledgement
bull Future-proofing by providing a flexible radio framework that has forward compatibility to support future currently unknown services such as URLLC to be specified in Release 16
bull Scalable transmission time intervals with short time intervals for low latency and longer time intervals for higher spectral efficiency
bull QoS support using a new modelbull Dynamic co-existence with LTE in the same radio channels
5G New Radio (NR) (2)
28
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
29
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Per ITU 95 users obtain 100 Mbps or greater
bull Typical rates of 500 Mbps appear feasible using 200 MHz radio channel
bull Typical rate of 1 Gbps appear feasible using 400 MHz radio channel
Expected 5G Performance
30
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
31
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Schedule
32
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
Source Dr Seizo Onoe NTT DOCOMO presentation at Brooklyn 5G Summit Apr 21 2016
33
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
34
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Slicing Architecture
35
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
TechnologyName
Type Characteristics Typical Downlink
Speed
Typical Uplink Speed
HSPA WCDMAData service for UMTS networks An enhancement to original UMTS data service
1 Mbps to 4 Mbps
500 Kbpsto 2 Mbps
HSPA+ WCDMAEvolution of HSPA in various stages to increase throughput and capacity and to lower latency
19 Mbps to88 Mbps in 5+5 MHz
38 Mbps to 176 Mbps with dual carrier in 10+5 MHz
1 Mbps to4 Mbps in 5+5 MHz or in 10+5 MHz
LTE OFDMA
New radio interface that can use wide radio channels and deliver extremely high throughput rates All communications handled in IP domain
65 to 263 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
60 to 130 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
LTE-Advanced OFDMA
Advanced version of LTE designed to meet IMT-Advanced requirements
Significant gains through carrier aggregation
36
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Key Features in 3GPP Releases
Release Year Key Features99 1999 First deployable version of UMTS5 2002 High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) for UMTS6 2005 High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) for UMTS7 2008 HSPA+ with higher-order modulation and MIMO8 2009 Long Term Evolution Dual-carrier HSDPA10 2011 LTE-Advanced including carrier aggregation and eICIC11 2013 Coordinated Multi Point (CoMP)12 2015 Public safety support Device-to-device communications Dual Connectivity 256 QAM
on the downlink
13 2016 LTE-Advanced Pro features LTE operation in unlicensed bands LTE-WLANAggregation Narrowband Internet of Things
14 2017 LTE-Advanced Pro additional features such as eLAA (adding uplink to LAA) andcellular V2X communications Study item for 5G ldquoNew Radiordquo
15 2018 Additional LTE-Advanced Pro features such as ultra-reliable low-latencycommunications Phase 1 of 5G Will emphasize enhanced-mobile-broadband usecase and sub-40 GHz operation Includes Massive MIMO beamforming and 4G-5Ginterworking including ability for LTE connectivity to a 5G CN
16 2019 Phase 2 of 5G Full compliance with ITU IMT-2020 requirements Will add URLLCspectrum sharing unlicensed operation and multiple other enhancements
17 2021 Further LTE and 5G enhancements
37
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Types of Cells and Characteristics
Type of Cell CharacteristicsMacro cell Wide-area coverage LTE supports cells up to 100 km in range but typical
distances are 5 to 5 km radius Always installed outdoors
Microcell Covers a smaller area such as a hotel or mall Range to 2 km 5-10W and 256-512 users Usually installed outdoors
Picocell Indoor or outdoor Outdoor cells also called ldquometrocellsrdquo Typical range 15 to 200meters outdoors and 10 to 25 meters indoors 1-2W 64-128 users Deployed byoperators primarily to expand capacity
Consumer Femtocell Indoors Range to 10 meters less than 50 mW and 4 to 6 users Capacity andcoverage benefit Usually deployed by end users using their own backhaul
Enterprise Femtocell Indoors Range to 25 meters 100-250 mW 16-32 users Capacity and coveragebenefit Deployed by operators
Distributed antenna system Expands indoor or outdoor coverage Same hardware can support multipleoperators (neutral host) since antenna can support broad frequency range andmultiple technologies Indoor deployments are typically in larger spaces such asairports Has also been deployed outdoors for coverage and capacity expansion
Remote radio head (RRH) Uses baseband at existing macro site or centralized baseband equipment Ifcentralized the system is called ldquocloud RANrdquo Requires fiber connection
Wi-Fi Primarily provides capacity expansion Neutral-host capability allows multipleoperators to share infrastructure
38
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Challenges
39
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
24
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of Different Bands
Source Nokia Vision amp Priorities for Next Generation Radio Technology 3GPP RAN workshop on 5G Sep 17-18 2015
25
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
26
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Network can support both LTE and 5G NR including dual connectivity with which devices have simultaneous connections to LTE and NR
bull Carrier aggregation for multiple NR carriersbull 5 Gbps peak downlink throughput in initial releases increasing to 50 Gbps
in subsequent versionsbull OFDMA in downlink and uplink with optional Single Carrier Frequency
Division Multiple Access (SC-FDMA) for uplink Radio approach for URLLC to be defined in Release 16 but Release 15 will provide physical layer frame structure and numerology support
bull Massive MIMO and beamformingbull Ability to support either FDD or TDD modes for 5G radio bandsbull Numerologies of 2N X 15 kHz for subcarrier spacing up to 120 kHz or 240
kHz This approach depicted in Figure 17 supports both narrow radio channels (for example 1 MHz) or wide ones (for example 400 MHz) Phase 1 likely to support a maximum of 400 MHz bandwidth with 240 kHz subcarrier spacing
5G New Radio (NR) (1)
27
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Error correction through low-density parity codes (LDPC) which are computationally more efficient than LTE turbo codes at higher data rates
bull Standards-based cloud RAN support compared with proprietary LTE approaches that specifies a split between the PDCP and Radio Link Control (RLC) protocol layers
bull Self-contained integrated subframes that combine scheduling data and acknowledgement
bull Future-proofing by providing a flexible radio framework that has forward compatibility to support future currently unknown services such as URLLC to be specified in Release 16
bull Scalable transmission time intervals with short time intervals for low latency and longer time intervals for higher spectral efficiency
bull QoS support using a new modelbull Dynamic co-existence with LTE in the same radio channels
5G New Radio (NR) (2)
28
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
29
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Per ITU 95 users obtain 100 Mbps or greater
bull Typical rates of 500 Mbps appear feasible using 200 MHz radio channel
bull Typical rate of 1 Gbps appear feasible using 400 MHz radio channel
Expected 5G Performance
30
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
31
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Schedule
32
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
Source Dr Seizo Onoe NTT DOCOMO presentation at Brooklyn 5G Summit Apr 21 2016
33
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
34
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Slicing Architecture
35
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
TechnologyName
Type Characteristics Typical Downlink
Speed
Typical Uplink Speed
HSPA WCDMAData service for UMTS networks An enhancement to original UMTS data service
1 Mbps to 4 Mbps
500 Kbpsto 2 Mbps
HSPA+ WCDMAEvolution of HSPA in various stages to increase throughput and capacity and to lower latency
19 Mbps to88 Mbps in 5+5 MHz
38 Mbps to 176 Mbps with dual carrier in 10+5 MHz
1 Mbps to4 Mbps in 5+5 MHz or in 10+5 MHz
LTE OFDMA
New radio interface that can use wide radio channels and deliver extremely high throughput rates All communications handled in IP domain
65 to 263 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
60 to 130 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
LTE-Advanced OFDMA
Advanced version of LTE designed to meet IMT-Advanced requirements
Significant gains through carrier aggregation
36
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Key Features in 3GPP Releases
Release Year Key Features99 1999 First deployable version of UMTS5 2002 High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) for UMTS6 2005 High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) for UMTS7 2008 HSPA+ with higher-order modulation and MIMO8 2009 Long Term Evolution Dual-carrier HSDPA10 2011 LTE-Advanced including carrier aggregation and eICIC11 2013 Coordinated Multi Point (CoMP)12 2015 Public safety support Device-to-device communications Dual Connectivity 256 QAM
on the downlink
13 2016 LTE-Advanced Pro features LTE operation in unlicensed bands LTE-WLANAggregation Narrowband Internet of Things
14 2017 LTE-Advanced Pro additional features such as eLAA (adding uplink to LAA) andcellular V2X communications Study item for 5G ldquoNew Radiordquo
15 2018 Additional LTE-Advanced Pro features such as ultra-reliable low-latencycommunications Phase 1 of 5G Will emphasize enhanced-mobile-broadband usecase and sub-40 GHz operation Includes Massive MIMO beamforming and 4G-5Ginterworking including ability for LTE connectivity to a 5G CN
16 2019 Phase 2 of 5G Full compliance with ITU IMT-2020 requirements Will add URLLCspectrum sharing unlicensed operation and multiple other enhancements
17 2021 Further LTE and 5G enhancements
37
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Types of Cells and Characteristics
Type of Cell CharacteristicsMacro cell Wide-area coverage LTE supports cells up to 100 km in range but typical
distances are 5 to 5 km radius Always installed outdoors
Microcell Covers a smaller area such as a hotel or mall Range to 2 km 5-10W and 256-512 users Usually installed outdoors
Picocell Indoor or outdoor Outdoor cells also called ldquometrocellsrdquo Typical range 15 to 200meters outdoors and 10 to 25 meters indoors 1-2W 64-128 users Deployed byoperators primarily to expand capacity
Consumer Femtocell Indoors Range to 10 meters less than 50 mW and 4 to 6 users Capacity andcoverage benefit Usually deployed by end users using their own backhaul
Enterprise Femtocell Indoors Range to 25 meters 100-250 mW 16-32 users Capacity and coveragebenefit Deployed by operators
Distributed antenna system Expands indoor or outdoor coverage Same hardware can support multipleoperators (neutral host) since antenna can support broad frequency range andmultiple technologies Indoor deployments are typically in larger spaces such asairports Has also been deployed outdoors for coverage and capacity expansion
Remote radio head (RRH) Uses baseband at existing macro site or centralized baseband equipment Ifcentralized the system is called ldquocloud RANrdquo Requires fiber connection
Wi-Fi Primarily provides capacity expansion Neutral-host capability allows multipleoperators to share infrastructure
38
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Challenges
39
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of Different Bands
Source Nokia Vision amp Priorities for Next Generation Radio Technology 3GPP RAN workshop on 5G Sep 17-18 2015
25
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
26
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Network can support both LTE and 5G NR including dual connectivity with which devices have simultaneous connections to LTE and NR
bull Carrier aggregation for multiple NR carriersbull 5 Gbps peak downlink throughput in initial releases increasing to 50 Gbps
in subsequent versionsbull OFDMA in downlink and uplink with optional Single Carrier Frequency
Division Multiple Access (SC-FDMA) for uplink Radio approach for URLLC to be defined in Release 16 but Release 15 will provide physical layer frame structure and numerology support
bull Massive MIMO and beamformingbull Ability to support either FDD or TDD modes for 5G radio bandsbull Numerologies of 2N X 15 kHz for subcarrier spacing up to 120 kHz or 240
kHz This approach depicted in Figure 17 supports both narrow radio channels (for example 1 MHz) or wide ones (for example 400 MHz) Phase 1 likely to support a maximum of 400 MHz bandwidth with 240 kHz subcarrier spacing
5G New Radio (NR) (1)
27
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Error correction through low-density parity codes (LDPC) which are computationally more efficient than LTE turbo codes at higher data rates
bull Standards-based cloud RAN support compared with proprietary LTE approaches that specifies a split between the PDCP and Radio Link Control (RLC) protocol layers
bull Self-contained integrated subframes that combine scheduling data and acknowledgement
bull Future-proofing by providing a flexible radio framework that has forward compatibility to support future currently unknown services such as URLLC to be specified in Release 16
bull Scalable transmission time intervals with short time intervals for low latency and longer time intervals for higher spectral efficiency
bull QoS support using a new modelbull Dynamic co-existence with LTE in the same radio channels
5G New Radio (NR) (2)
28
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
29
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Per ITU 95 users obtain 100 Mbps or greater
bull Typical rates of 500 Mbps appear feasible using 200 MHz radio channel
bull Typical rate of 1 Gbps appear feasible using 400 MHz radio channel
Expected 5G Performance
30
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
31
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Schedule
32
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
Source Dr Seizo Onoe NTT DOCOMO presentation at Brooklyn 5G Summit Apr 21 2016
33
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
34
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Slicing Architecture
35
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
TechnologyName
Type Characteristics Typical Downlink
Speed
Typical Uplink Speed
HSPA WCDMAData service for UMTS networks An enhancement to original UMTS data service
1 Mbps to 4 Mbps
500 Kbpsto 2 Mbps
HSPA+ WCDMAEvolution of HSPA in various stages to increase throughput and capacity and to lower latency
19 Mbps to88 Mbps in 5+5 MHz
38 Mbps to 176 Mbps with dual carrier in 10+5 MHz
1 Mbps to4 Mbps in 5+5 MHz or in 10+5 MHz
LTE OFDMA
New radio interface that can use wide radio channels and deliver extremely high throughput rates All communications handled in IP domain
65 to 263 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
60 to 130 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
LTE-Advanced OFDMA
Advanced version of LTE designed to meet IMT-Advanced requirements
Significant gains through carrier aggregation
36
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Key Features in 3GPP Releases
Release Year Key Features99 1999 First deployable version of UMTS5 2002 High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) for UMTS6 2005 High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) for UMTS7 2008 HSPA+ with higher-order modulation and MIMO8 2009 Long Term Evolution Dual-carrier HSDPA10 2011 LTE-Advanced including carrier aggregation and eICIC11 2013 Coordinated Multi Point (CoMP)12 2015 Public safety support Device-to-device communications Dual Connectivity 256 QAM
on the downlink
13 2016 LTE-Advanced Pro features LTE operation in unlicensed bands LTE-WLANAggregation Narrowband Internet of Things
14 2017 LTE-Advanced Pro additional features such as eLAA (adding uplink to LAA) andcellular V2X communications Study item for 5G ldquoNew Radiordquo
15 2018 Additional LTE-Advanced Pro features such as ultra-reliable low-latencycommunications Phase 1 of 5G Will emphasize enhanced-mobile-broadband usecase and sub-40 GHz operation Includes Massive MIMO beamforming and 4G-5Ginterworking including ability for LTE connectivity to a 5G CN
16 2019 Phase 2 of 5G Full compliance with ITU IMT-2020 requirements Will add URLLCspectrum sharing unlicensed operation and multiple other enhancements
17 2021 Further LTE and 5G enhancements
37
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Types of Cells and Characteristics
Type of Cell CharacteristicsMacro cell Wide-area coverage LTE supports cells up to 100 km in range but typical
distances are 5 to 5 km radius Always installed outdoors
Microcell Covers a smaller area such as a hotel or mall Range to 2 km 5-10W and 256-512 users Usually installed outdoors
Picocell Indoor or outdoor Outdoor cells also called ldquometrocellsrdquo Typical range 15 to 200meters outdoors and 10 to 25 meters indoors 1-2W 64-128 users Deployed byoperators primarily to expand capacity
Consumer Femtocell Indoors Range to 10 meters less than 50 mW and 4 to 6 users Capacity andcoverage benefit Usually deployed by end users using their own backhaul
Enterprise Femtocell Indoors Range to 25 meters 100-250 mW 16-32 users Capacity and coveragebenefit Deployed by operators
Distributed antenna system Expands indoor or outdoor coverage Same hardware can support multipleoperators (neutral host) since antenna can support broad frequency range andmultiple technologies Indoor deployments are typically in larger spaces such asairports Has also been deployed outdoors for coverage and capacity expansion
Remote radio head (RRH) Uses baseband at existing macro site or centralized baseband equipment Ifcentralized the system is called ldquocloud RANrdquo Requires fiber connection
Wi-Fi Primarily provides capacity expansion Neutral-host capability allows multipleoperators to share infrastructure
38
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Challenges
39
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
26
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Network can support both LTE and 5G NR including dual connectivity with which devices have simultaneous connections to LTE and NR
bull Carrier aggregation for multiple NR carriersbull 5 Gbps peak downlink throughput in initial releases increasing to 50 Gbps
in subsequent versionsbull OFDMA in downlink and uplink with optional Single Carrier Frequency
Division Multiple Access (SC-FDMA) for uplink Radio approach for URLLC to be defined in Release 16 but Release 15 will provide physical layer frame structure and numerology support
bull Massive MIMO and beamformingbull Ability to support either FDD or TDD modes for 5G radio bandsbull Numerologies of 2N X 15 kHz for subcarrier spacing up to 120 kHz or 240
kHz This approach depicted in Figure 17 supports both narrow radio channels (for example 1 MHz) or wide ones (for example 400 MHz) Phase 1 likely to support a maximum of 400 MHz bandwidth with 240 kHz subcarrier spacing
5G New Radio (NR) (1)
27
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Error correction through low-density parity codes (LDPC) which are computationally more efficient than LTE turbo codes at higher data rates
bull Standards-based cloud RAN support compared with proprietary LTE approaches that specifies a split between the PDCP and Radio Link Control (RLC) protocol layers
bull Self-contained integrated subframes that combine scheduling data and acknowledgement
bull Future-proofing by providing a flexible radio framework that has forward compatibility to support future currently unknown services such as URLLC to be specified in Release 16
bull Scalable transmission time intervals with short time intervals for low latency and longer time intervals for higher spectral efficiency
bull QoS support using a new modelbull Dynamic co-existence with LTE in the same radio channels
5G New Radio (NR) (2)
28
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
29
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Per ITU 95 users obtain 100 Mbps or greater
bull Typical rates of 500 Mbps appear feasible using 200 MHz radio channel
bull Typical rate of 1 Gbps appear feasible using 400 MHz radio channel
Expected 5G Performance
30
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
31
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Schedule
32
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
Source Dr Seizo Onoe NTT DOCOMO presentation at Brooklyn 5G Summit Apr 21 2016
33
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
34
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Slicing Architecture
35
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
TechnologyName
Type Characteristics Typical Downlink
Speed
Typical Uplink Speed
HSPA WCDMAData service for UMTS networks An enhancement to original UMTS data service
1 Mbps to 4 Mbps
500 Kbpsto 2 Mbps
HSPA+ WCDMAEvolution of HSPA in various stages to increase throughput and capacity and to lower latency
19 Mbps to88 Mbps in 5+5 MHz
38 Mbps to 176 Mbps with dual carrier in 10+5 MHz
1 Mbps to4 Mbps in 5+5 MHz or in 10+5 MHz
LTE OFDMA
New radio interface that can use wide radio channels and deliver extremely high throughput rates All communications handled in IP domain
65 to 263 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
60 to 130 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
LTE-Advanced OFDMA
Advanced version of LTE designed to meet IMT-Advanced requirements
Significant gains through carrier aggregation
36
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Key Features in 3GPP Releases
Release Year Key Features99 1999 First deployable version of UMTS5 2002 High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) for UMTS6 2005 High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) for UMTS7 2008 HSPA+ with higher-order modulation and MIMO8 2009 Long Term Evolution Dual-carrier HSDPA10 2011 LTE-Advanced including carrier aggregation and eICIC11 2013 Coordinated Multi Point (CoMP)12 2015 Public safety support Device-to-device communications Dual Connectivity 256 QAM
on the downlink
13 2016 LTE-Advanced Pro features LTE operation in unlicensed bands LTE-WLANAggregation Narrowband Internet of Things
14 2017 LTE-Advanced Pro additional features such as eLAA (adding uplink to LAA) andcellular V2X communications Study item for 5G ldquoNew Radiordquo
15 2018 Additional LTE-Advanced Pro features such as ultra-reliable low-latencycommunications Phase 1 of 5G Will emphasize enhanced-mobile-broadband usecase and sub-40 GHz operation Includes Massive MIMO beamforming and 4G-5Ginterworking including ability for LTE connectivity to a 5G CN
16 2019 Phase 2 of 5G Full compliance with ITU IMT-2020 requirements Will add URLLCspectrum sharing unlicensed operation and multiple other enhancements
17 2021 Further LTE and 5G enhancements
37
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Types of Cells and Characteristics
Type of Cell CharacteristicsMacro cell Wide-area coverage LTE supports cells up to 100 km in range but typical
distances are 5 to 5 km radius Always installed outdoors
Microcell Covers a smaller area such as a hotel or mall Range to 2 km 5-10W and 256-512 users Usually installed outdoors
Picocell Indoor or outdoor Outdoor cells also called ldquometrocellsrdquo Typical range 15 to 200meters outdoors and 10 to 25 meters indoors 1-2W 64-128 users Deployed byoperators primarily to expand capacity
Consumer Femtocell Indoors Range to 10 meters less than 50 mW and 4 to 6 users Capacity andcoverage benefit Usually deployed by end users using their own backhaul
Enterprise Femtocell Indoors Range to 25 meters 100-250 mW 16-32 users Capacity and coveragebenefit Deployed by operators
Distributed antenna system Expands indoor or outdoor coverage Same hardware can support multipleoperators (neutral host) since antenna can support broad frequency range andmultiple technologies Indoor deployments are typically in larger spaces such asairports Has also been deployed outdoors for coverage and capacity expansion
Remote radio head (RRH) Uses baseband at existing macro site or centralized baseband equipment Ifcentralized the system is called ldquocloud RANrdquo Requires fiber connection
Wi-Fi Primarily provides capacity expansion Neutral-host capability allows multipleoperators to share infrastructure
38
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Challenges
39
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Network can support both LTE and 5G NR including dual connectivity with which devices have simultaneous connections to LTE and NR
bull Carrier aggregation for multiple NR carriersbull 5 Gbps peak downlink throughput in initial releases increasing to 50 Gbps
in subsequent versionsbull OFDMA in downlink and uplink with optional Single Carrier Frequency
Division Multiple Access (SC-FDMA) for uplink Radio approach for URLLC to be defined in Release 16 but Release 15 will provide physical layer frame structure and numerology support
bull Massive MIMO and beamformingbull Ability to support either FDD or TDD modes for 5G radio bandsbull Numerologies of 2N X 15 kHz for subcarrier spacing up to 120 kHz or 240
kHz This approach depicted in Figure 17 supports both narrow radio channels (for example 1 MHz) or wide ones (for example 400 MHz) Phase 1 likely to support a maximum of 400 MHz bandwidth with 240 kHz subcarrier spacing
5G New Radio (NR) (1)
27
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Error correction through low-density parity codes (LDPC) which are computationally more efficient than LTE turbo codes at higher data rates
bull Standards-based cloud RAN support compared with proprietary LTE approaches that specifies a split between the PDCP and Radio Link Control (RLC) protocol layers
bull Self-contained integrated subframes that combine scheduling data and acknowledgement
bull Future-proofing by providing a flexible radio framework that has forward compatibility to support future currently unknown services such as URLLC to be specified in Release 16
bull Scalable transmission time intervals with short time intervals for low latency and longer time intervals for higher spectral efficiency
bull QoS support using a new modelbull Dynamic co-existence with LTE in the same radio channels
5G New Radio (NR) (2)
28
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
29
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Per ITU 95 users obtain 100 Mbps or greater
bull Typical rates of 500 Mbps appear feasible using 200 MHz radio channel
bull Typical rate of 1 Gbps appear feasible using 400 MHz radio channel
Expected 5G Performance
30
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
31
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Schedule
32
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
Source Dr Seizo Onoe NTT DOCOMO presentation at Brooklyn 5G Summit Apr 21 2016
33
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
34
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Slicing Architecture
35
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
TechnologyName
Type Characteristics Typical Downlink
Speed
Typical Uplink Speed
HSPA WCDMAData service for UMTS networks An enhancement to original UMTS data service
1 Mbps to 4 Mbps
500 Kbpsto 2 Mbps
HSPA+ WCDMAEvolution of HSPA in various stages to increase throughput and capacity and to lower latency
19 Mbps to88 Mbps in 5+5 MHz
38 Mbps to 176 Mbps with dual carrier in 10+5 MHz
1 Mbps to4 Mbps in 5+5 MHz or in 10+5 MHz
LTE OFDMA
New radio interface that can use wide radio channels and deliver extremely high throughput rates All communications handled in IP domain
65 to 263 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
60 to 130 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
LTE-Advanced OFDMA
Advanced version of LTE designed to meet IMT-Advanced requirements
Significant gains through carrier aggregation
36
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Key Features in 3GPP Releases
Release Year Key Features99 1999 First deployable version of UMTS5 2002 High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) for UMTS6 2005 High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) for UMTS7 2008 HSPA+ with higher-order modulation and MIMO8 2009 Long Term Evolution Dual-carrier HSDPA10 2011 LTE-Advanced including carrier aggregation and eICIC11 2013 Coordinated Multi Point (CoMP)12 2015 Public safety support Device-to-device communications Dual Connectivity 256 QAM
on the downlink
13 2016 LTE-Advanced Pro features LTE operation in unlicensed bands LTE-WLANAggregation Narrowband Internet of Things
14 2017 LTE-Advanced Pro additional features such as eLAA (adding uplink to LAA) andcellular V2X communications Study item for 5G ldquoNew Radiordquo
15 2018 Additional LTE-Advanced Pro features such as ultra-reliable low-latencycommunications Phase 1 of 5G Will emphasize enhanced-mobile-broadband usecase and sub-40 GHz operation Includes Massive MIMO beamforming and 4G-5Ginterworking including ability for LTE connectivity to a 5G CN
16 2019 Phase 2 of 5G Full compliance with ITU IMT-2020 requirements Will add URLLCspectrum sharing unlicensed operation and multiple other enhancements
17 2021 Further LTE and 5G enhancements
37
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Types of Cells and Characteristics
Type of Cell CharacteristicsMacro cell Wide-area coverage LTE supports cells up to 100 km in range but typical
distances are 5 to 5 km radius Always installed outdoors
Microcell Covers a smaller area such as a hotel or mall Range to 2 km 5-10W and 256-512 users Usually installed outdoors
Picocell Indoor or outdoor Outdoor cells also called ldquometrocellsrdquo Typical range 15 to 200meters outdoors and 10 to 25 meters indoors 1-2W 64-128 users Deployed byoperators primarily to expand capacity
Consumer Femtocell Indoors Range to 10 meters less than 50 mW and 4 to 6 users Capacity andcoverage benefit Usually deployed by end users using their own backhaul
Enterprise Femtocell Indoors Range to 25 meters 100-250 mW 16-32 users Capacity and coveragebenefit Deployed by operators
Distributed antenna system Expands indoor or outdoor coverage Same hardware can support multipleoperators (neutral host) since antenna can support broad frequency range andmultiple technologies Indoor deployments are typically in larger spaces such asairports Has also been deployed outdoors for coverage and capacity expansion
Remote radio head (RRH) Uses baseband at existing macro site or centralized baseband equipment Ifcentralized the system is called ldquocloud RANrdquo Requires fiber connection
Wi-Fi Primarily provides capacity expansion Neutral-host capability allows multipleoperators to share infrastructure
38
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Challenges
39
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Error correction through low-density parity codes (LDPC) which are computationally more efficient than LTE turbo codes at higher data rates
bull Standards-based cloud RAN support compared with proprietary LTE approaches that specifies a split between the PDCP and Radio Link Control (RLC) protocol layers
bull Self-contained integrated subframes that combine scheduling data and acknowledgement
bull Future-proofing by providing a flexible radio framework that has forward compatibility to support future currently unknown services such as URLLC to be specified in Release 16
bull Scalable transmission time intervals with short time intervals for low latency and longer time intervals for higher spectral efficiency
bull QoS support using a new modelbull Dynamic co-existence with LTE in the same radio channels
5G New Radio (NR) (2)
28
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
29
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Per ITU 95 users obtain 100 Mbps or greater
bull Typical rates of 500 Mbps appear feasible using 200 MHz radio channel
bull Typical rate of 1 Gbps appear feasible using 400 MHz radio channel
Expected 5G Performance
30
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
31
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Schedule
32
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
Source Dr Seizo Onoe NTT DOCOMO presentation at Brooklyn 5G Summit Apr 21 2016
33
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
34
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Slicing Architecture
35
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
TechnologyName
Type Characteristics Typical Downlink
Speed
Typical Uplink Speed
HSPA WCDMAData service for UMTS networks An enhancement to original UMTS data service
1 Mbps to 4 Mbps
500 Kbpsto 2 Mbps
HSPA+ WCDMAEvolution of HSPA in various stages to increase throughput and capacity and to lower latency
19 Mbps to88 Mbps in 5+5 MHz
38 Mbps to 176 Mbps with dual carrier in 10+5 MHz
1 Mbps to4 Mbps in 5+5 MHz or in 10+5 MHz
LTE OFDMA
New radio interface that can use wide radio channels and deliver extremely high throughput rates All communications handled in IP domain
65 to 263 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
60 to 130 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
LTE-Advanced OFDMA
Advanced version of LTE designed to meet IMT-Advanced requirements
Significant gains through carrier aggregation
36
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Key Features in 3GPP Releases
Release Year Key Features99 1999 First deployable version of UMTS5 2002 High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) for UMTS6 2005 High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) for UMTS7 2008 HSPA+ with higher-order modulation and MIMO8 2009 Long Term Evolution Dual-carrier HSDPA10 2011 LTE-Advanced including carrier aggregation and eICIC11 2013 Coordinated Multi Point (CoMP)12 2015 Public safety support Device-to-device communications Dual Connectivity 256 QAM
on the downlink
13 2016 LTE-Advanced Pro features LTE operation in unlicensed bands LTE-WLANAggregation Narrowband Internet of Things
14 2017 LTE-Advanced Pro additional features such as eLAA (adding uplink to LAA) andcellular V2X communications Study item for 5G ldquoNew Radiordquo
15 2018 Additional LTE-Advanced Pro features such as ultra-reliable low-latencycommunications Phase 1 of 5G Will emphasize enhanced-mobile-broadband usecase and sub-40 GHz operation Includes Massive MIMO beamforming and 4G-5Ginterworking including ability for LTE connectivity to a 5G CN
16 2019 Phase 2 of 5G Full compliance with ITU IMT-2020 requirements Will add URLLCspectrum sharing unlicensed operation and multiple other enhancements
17 2021 Further LTE and 5G enhancements
37
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Types of Cells and Characteristics
Type of Cell CharacteristicsMacro cell Wide-area coverage LTE supports cells up to 100 km in range but typical
distances are 5 to 5 km radius Always installed outdoors
Microcell Covers a smaller area such as a hotel or mall Range to 2 km 5-10W and 256-512 users Usually installed outdoors
Picocell Indoor or outdoor Outdoor cells also called ldquometrocellsrdquo Typical range 15 to 200meters outdoors and 10 to 25 meters indoors 1-2W 64-128 users Deployed byoperators primarily to expand capacity
Consumer Femtocell Indoors Range to 10 meters less than 50 mW and 4 to 6 users Capacity andcoverage benefit Usually deployed by end users using their own backhaul
Enterprise Femtocell Indoors Range to 25 meters 100-250 mW 16-32 users Capacity and coveragebenefit Deployed by operators
Distributed antenna system Expands indoor or outdoor coverage Same hardware can support multipleoperators (neutral host) since antenna can support broad frequency range andmultiple technologies Indoor deployments are typically in larger spaces such asairports Has also been deployed outdoors for coverage and capacity expansion
Remote radio head (RRH) Uses baseband at existing macro site or centralized baseband equipment Ifcentralized the system is called ldquocloud RANrdquo Requires fiber connection
Wi-Fi Primarily provides capacity expansion Neutral-host capability allows multipleoperators to share infrastructure
38
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Challenges
39
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
29
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Per ITU 95 users obtain 100 Mbps or greater
bull Typical rates of 500 Mbps appear feasible using 200 MHz radio channel
bull Typical rate of 1 Gbps appear feasible using 400 MHz radio channel
Expected 5G Performance
30
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
31
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Schedule
32
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
Source Dr Seizo Onoe NTT DOCOMO presentation at Brooklyn 5G Summit Apr 21 2016
33
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
34
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Slicing Architecture
35
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
TechnologyName
Type Characteristics Typical Downlink
Speed
Typical Uplink Speed
HSPA WCDMAData service for UMTS networks An enhancement to original UMTS data service
1 Mbps to 4 Mbps
500 Kbpsto 2 Mbps
HSPA+ WCDMAEvolution of HSPA in various stages to increase throughput and capacity and to lower latency
19 Mbps to88 Mbps in 5+5 MHz
38 Mbps to 176 Mbps with dual carrier in 10+5 MHz
1 Mbps to4 Mbps in 5+5 MHz or in 10+5 MHz
LTE OFDMA
New radio interface that can use wide radio channels and deliver extremely high throughput rates All communications handled in IP domain
65 to 263 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
60 to 130 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
LTE-Advanced OFDMA
Advanced version of LTE designed to meet IMT-Advanced requirements
Significant gains through carrier aggregation
36
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Key Features in 3GPP Releases
Release Year Key Features99 1999 First deployable version of UMTS5 2002 High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) for UMTS6 2005 High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) for UMTS7 2008 HSPA+ with higher-order modulation and MIMO8 2009 Long Term Evolution Dual-carrier HSDPA10 2011 LTE-Advanced including carrier aggregation and eICIC11 2013 Coordinated Multi Point (CoMP)12 2015 Public safety support Device-to-device communications Dual Connectivity 256 QAM
on the downlink
13 2016 LTE-Advanced Pro features LTE operation in unlicensed bands LTE-WLANAggregation Narrowband Internet of Things
14 2017 LTE-Advanced Pro additional features such as eLAA (adding uplink to LAA) andcellular V2X communications Study item for 5G ldquoNew Radiordquo
15 2018 Additional LTE-Advanced Pro features such as ultra-reliable low-latencycommunications Phase 1 of 5G Will emphasize enhanced-mobile-broadband usecase and sub-40 GHz operation Includes Massive MIMO beamforming and 4G-5Ginterworking including ability for LTE connectivity to a 5G CN
16 2019 Phase 2 of 5G Full compliance with ITU IMT-2020 requirements Will add URLLCspectrum sharing unlicensed operation and multiple other enhancements
17 2021 Further LTE and 5G enhancements
37
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Types of Cells and Characteristics
Type of Cell CharacteristicsMacro cell Wide-area coverage LTE supports cells up to 100 km in range but typical
distances are 5 to 5 km radius Always installed outdoors
Microcell Covers a smaller area such as a hotel or mall Range to 2 km 5-10W and 256-512 users Usually installed outdoors
Picocell Indoor or outdoor Outdoor cells also called ldquometrocellsrdquo Typical range 15 to 200meters outdoors and 10 to 25 meters indoors 1-2W 64-128 users Deployed byoperators primarily to expand capacity
Consumer Femtocell Indoors Range to 10 meters less than 50 mW and 4 to 6 users Capacity andcoverage benefit Usually deployed by end users using their own backhaul
Enterprise Femtocell Indoors Range to 25 meters 100-250 mW 16-32 users Capacity and coveragebenefit Deployed by operators
Distributed antenna system Expands indoor or outdoor coverage Same hardware can support multipleoperators (neutral host) since antenna can support broad frequency range andmultiple technologies Indoor deployments are typically in larger spaces such asairports Has also been deployed outdoors for coverage and capacity expansion
Remote radio head (RRH) Uses baseband at existing macro site or centralized baseband equipment Ifcentralized the system is called ldquocloud RANrdquo Requires fiber connection
Wi-Fi Primarily provides capacity expansion Neutral-host capability allows multipleoperators to share infrastructure
38
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Challenges
39
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Per ITU 95 users obtain 100 Mbps or greater
bull Typical rates of 500 Mbps appear feasible using 200 MHz radio channel
bull Typical rate of 1 Gbps appear feasible using 400 MHz radio channel
Expected 5G Performance
30
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
31
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Schedule
32
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
Source Dr Seizo Onoe NTT DOCOMO presentation at Brooklyn 5G Summit Apr 21 2016
33
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
34
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Slicing Architecture
35
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
TechnologyName
Type Characteristics Typical Downlink
Speed
Typical Uplink Speed
HSPA WCDMAData service for UMTS networks An enhancement to original UMTS data service
1 Mbps to 4 Mbps
500 Kbpsto 2 Mbps
HSPA+ WCDMAEvolution of HSPA in various stages to increase throughput and capacity and to lower latency
19 Mbps to88 Mbps in 5+5 MHz
38 Mbps to 176 Mbps with dual carrier in 10+5 MHz
1 Mbps to4 Mbps in 5+5 MHz or in 10+5 MHz
LTE OFDMA
New radio interface that can use wide radio channels and deliver extremely high throughput rates All communications handled in IP domain
65 to 263 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
60 to 130 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
LTE-Advanced OFDMA
Advanced version of LTE designed to meet IMT-Advanced requirements
Significant gains through carrier aggregation
36
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Key Features in 3GPP Releases
Release Year Key Features99 1999 First deployable version of UMTS5 2002 High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) for UMTS6 2005 High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) for UMTS7 2008 HSPA+ with higher-order modulation and MIMO8 2009 Long Term Evolution Dual-carrier HSDPA10 2011 LTE-Advanced including carrier aggregation and eICIC11 2013 Coordinated Multi Point (CoMP)12 2015 Public safety support Device-to-device communications Dual Connectivity 256 QAM
on the downlink
13 2016 LTE-Advanced Pro features LTE operation in unlicensed bands LTE-WLANAggregation Narrowband Internet of Things
14 2017 LTE-Advanced Pro additional features such as eLAA (adding uplink to LAA) andcellular V2X communications Study item for 5G ldquoNew Radiordquo
15 2018 Additional LTE-Advanced Pro features such as ultra-reliable low-latencycommunications Phase 1 of 5G Will emphasize enhanced-mobile-broadband usecase and sub-40 GHz operation Includes Massive MIMO beamforming and 4G-5Ginterworking including ability for LTE connectivity to a 5G CN
16 2019 Phase 2 of 5G Full compliance with ITU IMT-2020 requirements Will add URLLCspectrum sharing unlicensed operation and multiple other enhancements
17 2021 Further LTE and 5G enhancements
37
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Types of Cells and Characteristics
Type of Cell CharacteristicsMacro cell Wide-area coverage LTE supports cells up to 100 km in range but typical
distances are 5 to 5 km radius Always installed outdoors
Microcell Covers a smaller area such as a hotel or mall Range to 2 km 5-10W and 256-512 users Usually installed outdoors
Picocell Indoor or outdoor Outdoor cells also called ldquometrocellsrdquo Typical range 15 to 200meters outdoors and 10 to 25 meters indoors 1-2W 64-128 users Deployed byoperators primarily to expand capacity
Consumer Femtocell Indoors Range to 10 meters less than 50 mW and 4 to 6 users Capacity andcoverage benefit Usually deployed by end users using their own backhaul
Enterprise Femtocell Indoors Range to 25 meters 100-250 mW 16-32 users Capacity and coveragebenefit Deployed by operators
Distributed antenna system Expands indoor or outdoor coverage Same hardware can support multipleoperators (neutral host) since antenna can support broad frequency range andmultiple technologies Indoor deployments are typically in larger spaces such asairports Has also been deployed outdoors for coverage and capacity expansion
Remote radio head (RRH) Uses baseband at existing macro site or centralized baseband equipment Ifcentralized the system is called ldquocloud RANrdquo Requires fiber connection
Wi-Fi Primarily provides capacity expansion Neutral-host capability allows multipleoperators to share infrastructure
38
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Challenges
39
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
31
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Schedule
32
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
Source Dr Seizo Onoe NTT DOCOMO presentation at Brooklyn 5G Summit Apr 21 2016
33
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
34
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Slicing Architecture
35
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
TechnologyName
Type Characteristics Typical Downlink
Speed
Typical Uplink Speed
HSPA WCDMAData service for UMTS networks An enhancement to original UMTS data service
1 Mbps to 4 Mbps
500 Kbpsto 2 Mbps
HSPA+ WCDMAEvolution of HSPA in various stages to increase throughput and capacity and to lower latency
19 Mbps to88 Mbps in 5+5 MHz
38 Mbps to 176 Mbps with dual carrier in 10+5 MHz
1 Mbps to4 Mbps in 5+5 MHz or in 10+5 MHz
LTE OFDMA
New radio interface that can use wide radio channels and deliver extremely high throughput rates All communications handled in IP domain
65 to 263 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
60 to 130 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
LTE-Advanced OFDMA
Advanced version of LTE designed to meet IMT-Advanced requirements
Significant gains through carrier aggregation
36
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Key Features in 3GPP Releases
Release Year Key Features99 1999 First deployable version of UMTS5 2002 High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) for UMTS6 2005 High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) for UMTS7 2008 HSPA+ with higher-order modulation and MIMO8 2009 Long Term Evolution Dual-carrier HSDPA10 2011 LTE-Advanced including carrier aggregation and eICIC11 2013 Coordinated Multi Point (CoMP)12 2015 Public safety support Device-to-device communications Dual Connectivity 256 QAM
on the downlink
13 2016 LTE-Advanced Pro features LTE operation in unlicensed bands LTE-WLANAggregation Narrowband Internet of Things
14 2017 LTE-Advanced Pro additional features such as eLAA (adding uplink to LAA) andcellular V2X communications Study item for 5G ldquoNew Radiordquo
15 2018 Additional LTE-Advanced Pro features such as ultra-reliable low-latencycommunications Phase 1 of 5G Will emphasize enhanced-mobile-broadband usecase and sub-40 GHz operation Includes Massive MIMO beamforming and 4G-5Ginterworking including ability for LTE connectivity to a 5G CN
16 2019 Phase 2 of 5G Full compliance with ITU IMT-2020 requirements Will add URLLCspectrum sharing unlicensed operation and multiple other enhancements
17 2021 Further LTE and 5G enhancements
37
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Types of Cells and Characteristics
Type of Cell CharacteristicsMacro cell Wide-area coverage LTE supports cells up to 100 km in range but typical
distances are 5 to 5 km radius Always installed outdoors
Microcell Covers a smaller area such as a hotel or mall Range to 2 km 5-10W and 256-512 users Usually installed outdoors
Picocell Indoor or outdoor Outdoor cells also called ldquometrocellsrdquo Typical range 15 to 200meters outdoors and 10 to 25 meters indoors 1-2W 64-128 users Deployed byoperators primarily to expand capacity
Consumer Femtocell Indoors Range to 10 meters less than 50 mW and 4 to 6 users Capacity andcoverage benefit Usually deployed by end users using their own backhaul
Enterprise Femtocell Indoors Range to 25 meters 100-250 mW 16-32 users Capacity and coveragebenefit Deployed by operators
Distributed antenna system Expands indoor or outdoor coverage Same hardware can support multipleoperators (neutral host) since antenna can support broad frequency range andmultiple technologies Indoor deployments are typically in larger spaces such asairports Has also been deployed outdoors for coverage and capacity expansion
Remote radio head (RRH) Uses baseband at existing macro site or centralized baseband equipment Ifcentralized the system is called ldquocloud RANrdquo Requires fiber connection
Wi-Fi Primarily provides capacity expansion Neutral-host capability allows multipleoperators to share infrastructure
38
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Challenges
39
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Schedule
32
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
Source Dr Seizo Onoe NTT DOCOMO presentation at Brooklyn 5G Summit Apr 21 2016
33
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
34
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Slicing Architecture
35
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
TechnologyName
Type Characteristics Typical Downlink
Speed
Typical Uplink Speed
HSPA WCDMAData service for UMTS networks An enhancement to original UMTS data service
1 Mbps to 4 Mbps
500 Kbpsto 2 Mbps
HSPA+ WCDMAEvolution of HSPA in various stages to increase throughput and capacity and to lower latency
19 Mbps to88 Mbps in 5+5 MHz
38 Mbps to 176 Mbps with dual carrier in 10+5 MHz
1 Mbps to4 Mbps in 5+5 MHz or in 10+5 MHz
LTE OFDMA
New radio interface that can use wide radio channels and deliver extremely high throughput rates All communications handled in IP domain
65 to 263 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
60 to 130 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
LTE-Advanced OFDMA
Advanced version of LTE designed to meet IMT-Advanced requirements
Significant gains through carrier aggregation
36
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Key Features in 3GPP Releases
Release Year Key Features99 1999 First deployable version of UMTS5 2002 High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) for UMTS6 2005 High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) for UMTS7 2008 HSPA+ with higher-order modulation and MIMO8 2009 Long Term Evolution Dual-carrier HSDPA10 2011 LTE-Advanced including carrier aggregation and eICIC11 2013 Coordinated Multi Point (CoMP)12 2015 Public safety support Device-to-device communications Dual Connectivity 256 QAM
on the downlink
13 2016 LTE-Advanced Pro features LTE operation in unlicensed bands LTE-WLANAggregation Narrowband Internet of Things
14 2017 LTE-Advanced Pro additional features such as eLAA (adding uplink to LAA) andcellular V2X communications Study item for 5G ldquoNew Radiordquo
15 2018 Additional LTE-Advanced Pro features such as ultra-reliable low-latencycommunications Phase 1 of 5G Will emphasize enhanced-mobile-broadband usecase and sub-40 GHz operation Includes Massive MIMO beamforming and 4G-5Ginterworking including ability for LTE connectivity to a 5G CN
16 2019 Phase 2 of 5G Full compliance with ITU IMT-2020 requirements Will add URLLCspectrum sharing unlicensed operation and multiple other enhancements
17 2021 Further LTE and 5G enhancements
37
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Types of Cells and Characteristics
Type of Cell CharacteristicsMacro cell Wide-area coverage LTE supports cells up to 100 km in range but typical
distances are 5 to 5 km radius Always installed outdoors
Microcell Covers a smaller area such as a hotel or mall Range to 2 km 5-10W and 256-512 users Usually installed outdoors
Picocell Indoor or outdoor Outdoor cells also called ldquometrocellsrdquo Typical range 15 to 200meters outdoors and 10 to 25 meters indoors 1-2W 64-128 users Deployed byoperators primarily to expand capacity
Consumer Femtocell Indoors Range to 10 meters less than 50 mW and 4 to 6 users Capacity andcoverage benefit Usually deployed by end users using their own backhaul
Enterprise Femtocell Indoors Range to 25 meters 100-250 mW 16-32 users Capacity and coveragebenefit Deployed by operators
Distributed antenna system Expands indoor or outdoor coverage Same hardware can support multipleoperators (neutral host) since antenna can support broad frequency range andmultiple technologies Indoor deployments are typically in larger spaces such asairports Has also been deployed outdoors for coverage and capacity expansion
Remote radio head (RRH) Uses baseband at existing macro site or centralized baseband equipment Ifcentralized the system is called ldquocloud RANrdquo Requires fiber connection
Wi-Fi Primarily provides capacity expansion Neutral-host capability allows multipleoperators to share infrastructure
38
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Challenges
39
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
Source Dr Seizo Onoe NTT DOCOMO presentation at Brooklyn 5G Summit Apr 21 2016
33
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
34
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Slicing Architecture
35
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
TechnologyName
Type Characteristics Typical Downlink
Speed
Typical Uplink Speed
HSPA WCDMAData service for UMTS networks An enhancement to original UMTS data service
1 Mbps to 4 Mbps
500 Kbpsto 2 Mbps
HSPA+ WCDMAEvolution of HSPA in various stages to increase throughput and capacity and to lower latency
19 Mbps to88 Mbps in 5+5 MHz
38 Mbps to 176 Mbps with dual carrier in 10+5 MHz
1 Mbps to4 Mbps in 5+5 MHz or in 10+5 MHz
LTE OFDMA
New radio interface that can use wide radio channels and deliver extremely high throughput rates All communications handled in IP domain
65 to 263 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
60 to 130 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
LTE-Advanced OFDMA
Advanced version of LTE designed to meet IMT-Advanced requirements
Significant gains through carrier aggregation
36
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Key Features in 3GPP Releases
Release Year Key Features99 1999 First deployable version of UMTS5 2002 High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) for UMTS6 2005 High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) for UMTS7 2008 HSPA+ with higher-order modulation and MIMO8 2009 Long Term Evolution Dual-carrier HSDPA10 2011 LTE-Advanced including carrier aggregation and eICIC11 2013 Coordinated Multi Point (CoMP)12 2015 Public safety support Device-to-device communications Dual Connectivity 256 QAM
on the downlink
13 2016 LTE-Advanced Pro features LTE operation in unlicensed bands LTE-WLANAggregation Narrowband Internet of Things
14 2017 LTE-Advanced Pro additional features such as eLAA (adding uplink to LAA) andcellular V2X communications Study item for 5G ldquoNew Radiordquo
15 2018 Additional LTE-Advanced Pro features such as ultra-reliable low-latencycommunications Phase 1 of 5G Will emphasize enhanced-mobile-broadband usecase and sub-40 GHz operation Includes Massive MIMO beamforming and 4G-5Ginterworking including ability for LTE connectivity to a 5G CN
16 2019 Phase 2 of 5G Full compliance with ITU IMT-2020 requirements Will add URLLCspectrum sharing unlicensed operation and multiple other enhancements
17 2021 Further LTE and 5G enhancements
37
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Types of Cells and Characteristics
Type of Cell CharacteristicsMacro cell Wide-area coverage LTE supports cells up to 100 km in range but typical
distances are 5 to 5 km radius Always installed outdoors
Microcell Covers a smaller area such as a hotel or mall Range to 2 km 5-10W and 256-512 users Usually installed outdoors
Picocell Indoor or outdoor Outdoor cells also called ldquometrocellsrdquo Typical range 15 to 200meters outdoors and 10 to 25 meters indoors 1-2W 64-128 users Deployed byoperators primarily to expand capacity
Consumer Femtocell Indoors Range to 10 meters less than 50 mW and 4 to 6 users Capacity andcoverage benefit Usually deployed by end users using their own backhaul
Enterprise Femtocell Indoors Range to 25 meters 100-250 mW 16-32 users Capacity and coveragebenefit Deployed by operators
Distributed antenna system Expands indoor or outdoor coverage Same hardware can support multipleoperators (neutral host) since antenna can support broad frequency range andmultiple technologies Indoor deployments are typically in larger spaces such asairports Has also been deployed outdoors for coverage and capacity expansion
Remote radio head (RRH) Uses baseband at existing macro site or centralized baseband equipment Ifcentralized the system is called ldquocloud RANrdquo Requires fiber connection
Wi-Fi Primarily provides capacity expansion Neutral-host capability allows multipleoperators to share infrastructure
38
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Challenges
39
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
34
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Slicing Architecture
35
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
TechnologyName
Type Characteristics Typical Downlink
Speed
Typical Uplink Speed
HSPA WCDMAData service for UMTS networks An enhancement to original UMTS data service
1 Mbps to 4 Mbps
500 Kbpsto 2 Mbps
HSPA+ WCDMAEvolution of HSPA in various stages to increase throughput and capacity and to lower latency
19 Mbps to88 Mbps in 5+5 MHz
38 Mbps to 176 Mbps with dual carrier in 10+5 MHz
1 Mbps to4 Mbps in 5+5 MHz or in 10+5 MHz
LTE OFDMA
New radio interface that can use wide radio channels and deliver extremely high throughput rates All communications handled in IP domain
65 to 263 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
60 to 130 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
LTE-Advanced OFDMA
Advanced version of LTE designed to meet IMT-Advanced requirements
Significant gains through carrier aggregation
36
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Key Features in 3GPP Releases
Release Year Key Features99 1999 First deployable version of UMTS5 2002 High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) for UMTS6 2005 High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) for UMTS7 2008 HSPA+ with higher-order modulation and MIMO8 2009 Long Term Evolution Dual-carrier HSDPA10 2011 LTE-Advanced including carrier aggregation and eICIC11 2013 Coordinated Multi Point (CoMP)12 2015 Public safety support Device-to-device communications Dual Connectivity 256 QAM
on the downlink
13 2016 LTE-Advanced Pro features LTE operation in unlicensed bands LTE-WLANAggregation Narrowband Internet of Things
14 2017 LTE-Advanced Pro additional features such as eLAA (adding uplink to LAA) andcellular V2X communications Study item for 5G ldquoNew Radiordquo
15 2018 Additional LTE-Advanced Pro features such as ultra-reliable low-latencycommunications Phase 1 of 5G Will emphasize enhanced-mobile-broadband usecase and sub-40 GHz operation Includes Massive MIMO beamforming and 4G-5Ginterworking including ability for LTE connectivity to a 5G CN
16 2019 Phase 2 of 5G Full compliance with ITU IMT-2020 requirements Will add URLLCspectrum sharing unlicensed operation and multiple other enhancements
17 2021 Further LTE and 5G enhancements
37
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Types of Cells and Characteristics
Type of Cell CharacteristicsMacro cell Wide-area coverage LTE supports cells up to 100 km in range but typical
distances are 5 to 5 km radius Always installed outdoors
Microcell Covers a smaller area such as a hotel or mall Range to 2 km 5-10W and 256-512 users Usually installed outdoors
Picocell Indoor or outdoor Outdoor cells also called ldquometrocellsrdquo Typical range 15 to 200meters outdoors and 10 to 25 meters indoors 1-2W 64-128 users Deployed byoperators primarily to expand capacity
Consumer Femtocell Indoors Range to 10 meters less than 50 mW and 4 to 6 users Capacity andcoverage benefit Usually deployed by end users using their own backhaul
Enterprise Femtocell Indoors Range to 25 meters 100-250 mW 16-32 users Capacity and coveragebenefit Deployed by operators
Distributed antenna system Expands indoor or outdoor coverage Same hardware can support multipleoperators (neutral host) since antenna can support broad frequency range andmultiple technologies Indoor deployments are typically in larger spaces such asairports Has also been deployed outdoors for coverage and capacity expansion
Remote radio head (RRH) Uses baseband at existing macro site or centralized baseband equipment Ifcentralized the system is called ldquocloud RANrdquo Requires fiber connection
Wi-Fi Primarily provides capacity expansion Neutral-host capability allows multipleoperators to share infrastructure
38
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Challenges
39
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Network Slicing Architecture
35
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
TechnologyName
Type Characteristics Typical Downlink
Speed
Typical Uplink Speed
HSPA WCDMAData service for UMTS networks An enhancement to original UMTS data service
1 Mbps to 4 Mbps
500 Kbpsto 2 Mbps
HSPA+ WCDMAEvolution of HSPA in various stages to increase throughput and capacity and to lower latency
19 Mbps to88 Mbps in 5+5 MHz
38 Mbps to 176 Mbps with dual carrier in 10+5 MHz
1 Mbps to4 Mbps in 5+5 MHz or in 10+5 MHz
LTE OFDMA
New radio interface that can use wide radio channels and deliver extremely high throughput rates All communications handled in IP domain
65 to 263 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
60 to 130 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
LTE-Advanced OFDMA
Advanced version of LTE designed to meet IMT-Advanced requirements
Significant gains through carrier aggregation
36
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Key Features in 3GPP Releases
Release Year Key Features99 1999 First deployable version of UMTS5 2002 High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) for UMTS6 2005 High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) for UMTS7 2008 HSPA+ with higher-order modulation and MIMO8 2009 Long Term Evolution Dual-carrier HSDPA10 2011 LTE-Advanced including carrier aggregation and eICIC11 2013 Coordinated Multi Point (CoMP)12 2015 Public safety support Device-to-device communications Dual Connectivity 256 QAM
on the downlink
13 2016 LTE-Advanced Pro features LTE operation in unlicensed bands LTE-WLANAggregation Narrowband Internet of Things
14 2017 LTE-Advanced Pro additional features such as eLAA (adding uplink to LAA) andcellular V2X communications Study item for 5G ldquoNew Radiordquo
15 2018 Additional LTE-Advanced Pro features such as ultra-reliable low-latencycommunications Phase 1 of 5G Will emphasize enhanced-mobile-broadband usecase and sub-40 GHz operation Includes Massive MIMO beamforming and 4G-5Ginterworking including ability for LTE connectivity to a 5G CN
16 2019 Phase 2 of 5G Full compliance with ITU IMT-2020 requirements Will add URLLCspectrum sharing unlicensed operation and multiple other enhancements
17 2021 Further LTE and 5G enhancements
37
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Types of Cells and Characteristics
Type of Cell CharacteristicsMacro cell Wide-area coverage LTE supports cells up to 100 km in range but typical
distances are 5 to 5 km radius Always installed outdoors
Microcell Covers a smaller area such as a hotel or mall Range to 2 km 5-10W and 256-512 users Usually installed outdoors
Picocell Indoor or outdoor Outdoor cells also called ldquometrocellsrdquo Typical range 15 to 200meters outdoors and 10 to 25 meters indoors 1-2W 64-128 users Deployed byoperators primarily to expand capacity
Consumer Femtocell Indoors Range to 10 meters less than 50 mW and 4 to 6 users Capacity andcoverage benefit Usually deployed by end users using their own backhaul
Enterprise Femtocell Indoors Range to 25 meters 100-250 mW 16-32 users Capacity and coveragebenefit Deployed by operators
Distributed antenna system Expands indoor or outdoor coverage Same hardware can support multipleoperators (neutral host) since antenna can support broad frequency range andmultiple technologies Indoor deployments are typically in larger spaces such asairports Has also been deployed outdoors for coverage and capacity expansion
Remote radio head (RRH) Uses baseband at existing macro site or centralized baseband equipment Ifcentralized the system is called ldquocloud RANrdquo Requires fiber connection
Wi-Fi Primarily provides capacity expansion Neutral-host capability allows multipleoperators to share infrastructure
38
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Challenges
39
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
TechnologyName
Type Characteristics Typical Downlink
Speed
Typical Uplink Speed
HSPA WCDMAData service for UMTS networks An enhancement to original UMTS data service
1 Mbps to 4 Mbps
500 Kbpsto 2 Mbps
HSPA+ WCDMAEvolution of HSPA in various stages to increase throughput and capacity and to lower latency
19 Mbps to88 Mbps in 5+5 MHz
38 Mbps to 176 Mbps with dual carrier in 10+5 MHz
1 Mbps to4 Mbps in 5+5 MHz or in 10+5 MHz
LTE OFDMA
New radio interface that can use wide radio channels and deliver extremely high throughput rates All communications handled in IP domain
65 to 263 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
60 to 130 Mbps in 10+10 MHz
LTE-Advanced OFDMA
Advanced version of LTE designed to meet IMT-Advanced requirements
Significant gains through carrier aggregation
36
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Key Features in 3GPP Releases
Release Year Key Features99 1999 First deployable version of UMTS5 2002 High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) for UMTS6 2005 High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) for UMTS7 2008 HSPA+ with higher-order modulation and MIMO8 2009 Long Term Evolution Dual-carrier HSDPA10 2011 LTE-Advanced including carrier aggregation and eICIC11 2013 Coordinated Multi Point (CoMP)12 2015 Public safety support Device-to-device communications Dual Connectivity 256 QAM
on the downlink
13 2016 LTE-Advanced Pro features LTE operation in unlicensed bands LTE-WLANAggregation Narrowband Internet of Things
14 2017 LTE-Advanced Pro additional features such as eLAA (adding uplink to LAA) andcellular V2X communications Study item for 5G ldquoNew Radiordquo
15 2018 Additional LTE-Advanced Pro features such as ultra-reliable low-latencycommunications Phase 1 of 5G Will emphasize enhanced-mobile-broadband usecase and sub-40 GHz operation Includes Massive MIMO beamforming and 4G-5Ginterworking including ability for LTE connectivity to a 5G CN
16 2019 Phase 2 of 5G Full compliance with ITU IMT-2020 requirements Will add URLLCspectrum sharing unlicensed operation and multiple other enhancements
17 2021 Further LTE and 5G enhancements
37
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Types of Cells and Characteristics
Type of Cell CharacteristicsMacro cell Wide-area coverage LTE supports cells up to 100 km in range but typical
distances are 5 to 5 km radius Always installed outdoors
Microcell Covers a smaller area such as a hotel or mall Range to 2 km 5-10W and 256-512 users Usually installed outdoors
Picocell Indoor or outdoor Outdoor cells also called ldquometrocellsrdquo Typical range 15 to 200meters outdoors and 10 to 25 meters indoors 1-2W 64-128 users Deployed byoperators primarily to expand capacity
Consumer Femtocell Indoors Range to 10 meters less than 50 mW and 4 to 6 users Capacity andcoverage benefit Usually deployed by end users using their own backhaul
Enterprise Femtocell Indoors Range to 25 meters 100-250 mW 16-32 users Capacity and coveragebenefit Deployed by operators
Distributed antenna system Expands indoor or outdoor coverage Same hardware can support multipleoperators (neutral host) since antenna can support broad frequency range andmultiple technologies Indoor deployments are typically in larger spaces such asairports Has also been deployed outdoors for coverage and capacity expansion
Remote radio head (RRH) Uses baseband at existing macro site or centralized baseband equipment Ifcentralized the system is called ldquocloud RANrdquo Requires fiber connection
Wi-Fi Primarily provides capacity expansion Neutral-host capability allows multipleoperators to share infrastructure
38
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Challenges
39
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Key Features in 3GPP Releases
Release Year Key Features99 1999 First deployable version of UMTS5 2002 High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) for UMTS6 2005 High Speed Uplink Packet Access (HSUPA) for UMTS7 2008 HSPA+ with higher-order modulation and MIMO8 2009 Long Term Evolution Dual-carrier HSDPA10 2011 LTE-Advanced including carrier aggregation and eICIC11 2013 Coordinated Multi Point (CoMP)12 2015 Public safety support Device-to-device communications Dual Connectivity 256 QAM
on the downlink
13 2016 LTE-Advanced Pro features LTE operation in unlicensed bands LTE-WLANAggregation Narrowband Internet of Things
14 2017 LTE-Advanced Pro additional features such as eLAA (adding uplink to LAA) andcellular V2X communications Study item for 5G ldquoNew Radiordquo
15 2018 Additional LTE-Advanced Pro features such as ultra-reliable low-latencycommunications Phase 1 of 5G Will emphasize enhanced-mobile-broadband usecase and sub-40 GHz operation Includes Massive MIMO beamforming and 4G-5Ginterworking including ability for LTE connectivity to a 5G CN
16 2019 Phase 2 of 5G Full compliance with ITU IMT-2020 requirements Will add URLLCspectrum sharing unlicensed operation and multiple other enhancements
17 2021 Further LTE and 5G enhancements
37
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Types of Cells and Characteristics
Type of Cell CharacteristicsMacro cell Wide-area coverage LTE supports cells up to 100 km in range but typical
distances are 5 to 5 km radius Always installed outdoors
Microcell Covers a smaller area such as a hotel or mall Range to 2 km 5-10W and 256-512 users Usually installed outdoors
Picocell Indoor or outdoor Outdoor cells also called ldquometrocellsrdquo Typical range 15 to 200meters outdoors and 10 to 25 meters indoors 1-2W 64-128 users Deployed byoperators primarily to expand capacity
Consumer Femtocell Indoors Range to 10 meters less than 50 mW and 4 to 6 users Capacity andcoverage benefit Usually deployed by end users using their own backhaul
Enterprise Femtocell Indoors Range to 25 meters 100-250 mW 16-32 users Capacity and coveragebenefit Deployed by operators
Distributed antenna system Expands indoor or outdoor coverage Same hardware can support multipleoperators (neutral host) since antenna can support broad frequency range andmultiple technologies Indoor deployments are typically in larger spaces such asairports Has also been deployed outdoors for coverage and capacity expansion
Remote radio head (RRH) Uses baseband at existing macro site or centralized baseband equipment Ifcentralized the system is called ldquocloud RANrdquo Requires fiber connection
Wi-Fi Primarily provides capacity expansion Neutral-host capability allows multipleoperators to share infrastructure
38
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Challenges
39
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Types of Cells and Characteristics
Type of Cell CharacteristicsMacro cell Wide-area coverage LTE supports cells up to 100 km in range but typical
distances are 5 to 5 km radius Always installed outdoors
Microcell Covers a smaller area such as a hotel or mall Range to 2 km 5-10W and 256-512 users Usually installed outdoors
Picocell Indoor or outdoor Outdoor cells also called ldquometrocellsrdquo Typical range 15 to 200meters outdoors and 10 to 25 meters indoors 1-2W 64-128 users Deployed byoperators primarily to expand capacity
Consumer Femtocell Indoors Range to 10 meters less than 50 mW and 4 to 6 users Capacity andcoverage benefit Usually deployed by end users using their own backhaul
Enterprise Femtocell Indoors Range to 25 meters 100-250 mW 16-32 users Capacity and coveragebenefit Deployed by operators
Distributed antenna system Expands indoor or outdoor coverage Same hardware can support multipleoperators (neutral host) since antenna can support broad frequency range andmultiple technologies Indoor deployments are typically in larger spaces such asairports Has also been deployed outdoors for coverage and capacity expansion
Remote radio head (RRH) Uses baseband at existing macro site or centralized baseband equipment Ifcentralized the system is called ldquocloud RANrdquo Requires fiber connection
Wi-Fi Primarily provides capacity expansion Neutral-host capability allows multipleoperators to share infrastructure
38
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Challenges
39
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Challenges
39
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Small Cell Approaches
Small-Cell Approach CharacteristicsMacro plus small cells in select areas
Significant standards support Femtocells or picocells can usesame radio carriers as macro (less total spectrum needed) or canuse different radio carriers (greater total capacity)
Macro in licensed band plus LTE operation in unlicensed bands
Being considered for 3GPP Release 13 and available fordeployment 2017 or 2018 Promising approach for augmentingLTE capacity in scenarios where operator is deploying LTE smallcells
Macro (or small-cell) cellular in licensed band plus Wi-Fi
Extensively used today with increased use anticipated Particularlyattractive for expanding capacity in coverage areas where Wi-Fiinfrastructure exists but small cells with LTE do not
LTE Wi-Fi Aggregation (being specified in Release 13) is anotherapproach as is Multipath TCP and MP-QUIC
Wi-Fi only Low-cost approach for high-capacity mobile broadband coveragebut impossible to provide large-area continuous coverage withoutcellular component
40
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
41
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
42
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
Technology Attributes
Wi-FiEver-more-sophisticated means to integrate Wi-Fi in successive 3GPP Releases
Combining Wi-Fi with cellular increases capacity
Release 13 RAN Controlled LTE WLAN Interworking
Base station can instruct the UE to connect to a WLAN for offload
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
Release 10-12 LTE-U Based on LTE-U Forum Specifications
LTE-U Forum-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum
Available in 2017 More seamless than Wi-Fi Cannot be used in some regions (eg Europe Japan)
Release 13 Licensed-Assisted Access
3GPP-specified approach for operating LTE in unlicensed spectrum Downlink only
Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe Designed to address global regulatory requirements
Release 14 Enhanced Licensed-Assisted Access
Addition of uplink operation Available in 2019-2020 timeframe
5G Unlicensed OperationRelease 15 has a study item for approaches that Release 16 will standardize
Potentially available in 2021
MulteFireDoes not require a licensed anchor
Potentially creates a neutral-host small cell solution
LWAAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at PDCP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
LWIPAggregation of LTE and Wi-Fi connections at IP layer
Part of Release 13 Available in late 2017 or 2018 timeframe
43
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Wireless Networks for IoT
Technology Coverage Characteristics StandardizationSpecifications
GSMGPRSEC-GSM-IoT
Wide area Huge global coverage
Lowest-cost cellular modems risk of network sunsets Low throughput
3GPP
HSPAWide area Huge global coverage
Low-cost cellular modems Higher power high throughput
3GPP
LTE NB-IoTWide area Increasing global coverage
Wide area expanding coverage costpower reductions in successive 3GPP releases Low to high throughput options
3GPP
Wi-Fi Local area High throughput higher power IEEEZigBee Local area Low throughput low power IEEEBluetooth Low Energy
Personal area Low throughput low power Bluetooth Special Interest Group
LoRaWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
LoRa Alliance
SigfoxWide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as 900 MHz in the US)
Sigfox
Ingenu (previously OnRamp Wireless)
Wide area Emerging deployments
Low throughput low power Using 24 GHz ISM band Uses IEEE 802154k
Ingenu
WeightlessWide area Expected deployments
Low throughput low power Unlicensed bands (sub 1 GHz such as TV White Space and 900 MHz in the US)
Weightless Special Interest Group
44
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
45
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS Capability
Source 5G Americas 46
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
Source Nokia LTE networks for public safety services 2014
47
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
48
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
Achievable Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity Per Cable (Area Denotes Capacity)
Achievable Capacity Across Entire RF Spectrum to 100 GHz
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
Additional Fiber Strands
ReadilyAvailable
49
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectral Efficiency of Technology
Amount of Spectrum
Smallness of Cell (Amount of Frequency Reuse)
Dimensions of Capacity
Rysavy Research Analysis Aggregate Wireless Network Capacity Doubles Every Three Years
50
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull More spectrum
bull Unpaired spectrum
bull Supplemental downlink
bull Spectrum sharing
bull Increased spectral efficiency
bull Smart antennas
bull Uplink gains combined with downlink carrier aggregation
bull Small cells and heterogeneous networks
bull Offload to unlicensed spectrum
bull Higher-level sectorization
bull Quality of service management
bull Off-peak hours
Bandwidth Management
51
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Acquisition Time
52
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
Frequency Band Amount of Spectrum
Comments
600 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)700 MHz 70 MHz Ultra-High Frequency (UHF)850 MHz 64 MHz Cellular and Specialized Mobile Radio
1721 GHz 90 MHz Advanced Wireless Services (AWS)-11695-1710 MHz
1755 to 1780 MHz 2155 to 2180 MHz
65 MHz AWS-3 Uses spectrum sharing
19 GHz 140 MHz Personal Communications Service (PCS)2000 to 2020 2180 to
2200 MHz40 MHz AWS-4 (Previously Mobile Satellite Service)
23 GHz 20 MHz Wireless Communications Service (WCS)25 GHz 194 MHz Broadband Radio Service Closer to 160 MHz deployable
FUTURE355 to 370 GHz 150 MHz Small-cell band with spectrum sharing and unlicensed use
Above 6 GHz Multi GHz Anticipated for 5G systems beginning in 2017 Based on wavelengths3 GHz to 30 GHz is referred to as the cmWave band and 30 GHz to300 GHz is referred to as the mmWave band
53
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
600 MHz Band Plan
Source 5G Americas member contribution
54
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
55
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
Unlicensed Pros Unlicensed Cons Licensed Pros Licensed Cons
Easy and quick to deploy
Potential of other entities using same frequencies
Huge coverage areas
Expensive infrastructure
Low cost hardware Difficult to impossible to provide wide-scale coverage
Able to manage quality of service
Each operator only has access to small amount spectrum
56
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Propagation Losses Cellular vs Wi-Fi
57
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Use and Sharing Approaches
58
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Licensed Shared Access
59
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States 35 GHz System Currently Being Developed
60
APPENDIX SECTION WITH ADDITIONAL TECHNICAL DETAILS
61
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Latency of Different Technologies
62
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 200
1
2
3
4
5
6
Required SNR (dB)
Achi
evab
le E
ffici
ency
(bps
Hz)
Shannon boundShannon bound with 3dB margin
EV-DOIEEE 80216e-2005
HSDPA
Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
Source 5G Americas member contribution
63
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
64
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
65
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
66
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
67
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture Options in Release 15
Source Nokia contribution
68
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
Source Nokia contribution
69
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
Source Nokia contribution
70
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
Source ATampT contribution
71
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
72
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
Source Nokia contribution
73
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
Source Ericsson contribution 74
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
Source Intel contribution
75
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Capabilities
bull Downlink peak data rates up to 300 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions through carrier aggregation higher-order modulation and 4X4 MIMO
bull Uplink peak data rates up to 71 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions
bull Operation in both TDD and FDD modes
bull Scalable bandwidth up to 20+20 MHz covering 14 3 5 10 15 and 20 MHz radio carriers
bull Increased spectral efficiency over HSPA by a factor of two to four
bull Reduced latency to 15 msec round-trip times between user equipment and the base station and to less than 100 msec transition times from inactive to active
bull Self-organizing capabilities under operator control and preferences that will automate network planning and will result in lower operator costs
76
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
77
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
Frequency
Resource block
Transmit on those resource blocks that are not faded
Carrier bandwidth
Source 5G Americas member contribution
78
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Antenna Schemes
Source 3G Americasrsquo white paper MIMO and Smart Antennas for 3G and 4G Wireless Systems ndash Practical Aspects and Deployment Considerations May 2010
79
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
Source 5G Americas member contribution
80
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
Source 5G Americas member contribution
81
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
82
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
83
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
Source 4G Americas Mobile Broadband Evolution Rel-12 amp Rel-13 and Beyond 2015
84
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Gains From Carrier Aggregation
85
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
CoMP Levels
86
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
87
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE UE Categories
UE Category Max DL Throughput Maximum DL MIMO Layers
Maximum UL Throughput
1 103 Mbps 1 52 Mbps2 510 Mbps 2 255 Mbps3 1020 Mbps 2 510 Mbps4 1508 Mbps 2 510 Mbps5 2996 Mbps 4 754 Mbps6 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps7 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps8 29986 Mbps 8 14978 Mbps9 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps
10 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps11 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps12 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps13 3916 Mbps 2 or 4 1508 Mbps14 39166 Mbps 8 95877 Mbps15 7988 Mbps 2 or 4 2261 Mbps16 10514 Mbps 2 or 4 1055 Mbps17 25066 Mbps 8 21194 Mbps18 12060 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 2110 Mbps19 16583 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 135639 Mbps
88
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE-Advanced Relay
Relay Link Access Link
Direct Link
89
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
90
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Traffic is FTP-like at a 50 load with a 7525 mix of indooroutdoor usersbull Throughput is at the medium-access control (MAC) protocol layer bull The configuration in the first row corresponds to low-frequency band operation
representative of 700 MHz or cellular while the remaining configurations assume high-frequency band operation representative of PCS AWS or WCS (Higher frequencies facilitate higher-order MIMO configurations and have wider radio channels available)
bull The downlink value for the first row corresponds to Release 8 device receive capability (Minimum Mean Square Error [MMSE]) while the values in the other rows correspond to Release 11 device receive capability (MMSE ndash Interference Rejection Combining [IRC])
bull The uplink value for the first row corresponds to a Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC) receiver at the eNodeB while the remaining values correspond to an IRC receiver
bull Low-band operation assumes 1732 meter inter-site distance (ISD) while high-band operation assumes 500 meter ISD The remaining simulation assumptions are listed in Table 11
bull Refer to white paper for additional assumptions
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
91
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
Mbps
Source Ericsson contribution 92
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
Source Jonas Karlsson Mathias Riback ldquoInitial Field Performance Measurements of LTErdquo Ericsson Review No 3 2008
93
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
Source LTESAE Trial Initiative ldquoLatest Results from the LSTI Feb 2009rdquo httpwwwlstiforumorg
94
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS API Profiles
Source 4G Americas VoLTE and RCS Technology ndash Evolution and Ecosystem
95
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Spectrum Use and Sharing Approaches
58
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Licensed Shared Access
59
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States 35 GHz System Currently Being Developed
60
APPENDIX SECTION WITH ADDITIONAL TECHNICAL DETAILS
61
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Latency of Different Technologies
62
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 200
1
2
3
4
5
6
Required SNR (dB)
Achi
evab
le E
ffici
ency
(bps
Hz)
Shannon boundShannon bound with 3dB margin
EV-DOIEEE 80216e-2005
HSDPA
Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
Source 5G Americas member contribution
63
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
64
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
65
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
66
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
67
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture Options in Release 15
Source Nokia contribution
68
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
Source Nokia contribution
69
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
Source Nokia contribution
70
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
Source ATampT contribution
71
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
72
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
Source Nokia contribution
73
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
Source Ericsson contribution 74
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
Source Intel contribution
75
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Capabilities
bull Downlink peak data rates up to 300 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions through carrier aggregation higher-order modulation and 4X4 MIMO
bull Uplink peak data rates up to 71 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions
bull Operation in both TDD and FDD modes
bull Scalable bandwidth up to 20+20 MHz covering 14 3 5 10 15 and 20 MHz radio carriers
bull Increased spectral efficiency over HSPA by a factor of two to four
bull Reduced latency to 15 msec round-trip times between user equipment and the base station and to less than 100 msec transition times from inactive to active
bull Self-organizing capabilities under operator control and preferences that will automate network planning and will result in lower operator costs
76
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
77
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
Frequency
Resource block
Transmit on those resource blocks that are not faded
Carrier bandwidth
Source 5G Americas member contribution
78
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Antenna Schemes
Source 3G Americasrsquo white paper MIMO and Smart Antennas for 3G and 4G Wireless Systems ndash Practical Aspects and Deployment Considerations May 2010
79
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
Source 5G Americas member contribution
80
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
Source 5G Americas member contribution
81
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
82
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
83
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
Source 4G Americas Mobile Broadband Evolution Rel-12 amp Rel-13 and Beyond 2015
84
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Gains From Carrier Aggregation
85
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
CoMP Levels
86
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
87
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE UE Categories
UE Category Max DL Throughput Maximum DL MIMO Layers
Maximum UL Throughput
1 103 Mbps 1 52 Mbps2 510 Mbps 2 255 Mbps3 1020 Mbps 2 510 Mbps4 1508 Mbps 2 510 Mbps5 2996 Mbps 4 754 Mbps6 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps7 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps8 29986 Mbps 8 14978 Mbps9 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps
10 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps11 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps12 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps13 3916 Mbps 2 or 4 1508 Mbps14 39166 Mbps 8 95877 Mbps15 7988 Mbps 2 or 4 2261 Mbps16 10514 Mbps 2 or 4 1055 Mbps17 25066 Mbps 8 21194 Mbps18 12060 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 2110 Mbps19 16583 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 135639 Mbps
88
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE-Advanced Relay
Relay Link Access Link
Direct Link
89
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
90
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Traffic is FTP-like at a 50 load with a 7525 mix of indooroutdoor usersbull Throughput is at the medium-access control (MAC) protocol layer bull The configuration in the first row corresponds to low-frequency band operation
representative of 700 MHz or cellular while the remaining configurations assume high-frequency band operation representative of PCS AWS or WCS (Higher frequencies facilitate higher-order MIMO configurations and have wider radio channels available)
bull The downlink value for the first row corresponds to Release 8 device receive capability (Minimum Mean Square Error [MMSE]) while the values in the other rows correspond to Release 11 device receive capability (MMSE ndash Interference Rejection Combining [IRC])
bull The uplink value for the first row corresponds to a Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC) receiver at the eNodeB while the remaining values correspond to an IRC receiver
bull Low-band operation assumes 1732 meter inter-site distance (ISD) while high-band operation assumes 500 meter ISD The remaining simulation assumptions are listed in Table 11
bull Refer to white paper for additional assumptions
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
91
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
Mbps
Source Ericsson contribution 92
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
Source Jonas Karlsson Mathias Riback ldquoInitial Field Performance Measurements of LTErdquo Ericsson Review No 3 2008
93
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
Source LTESAE Trial Initiative ldquoLatest Results from the LSTI Feb 2009rdquo httpwwwlstiforumorg
94
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS API Profiles
Source 4G Americas VoLTE and RCS Technology ndash Evolution and Ecosystem
95
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Licensed Shared Access
59
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States 35 GHz System Currently Being Developed
60
APPENDIX SECTION WITH ADDITIONAL TECHNICAL DETAILS
61
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Latency of Different Technologies
62
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 200
1
2
3
4
5
6
Required SNR (dB)
Achi
evab
le E
ffici
ency
(bps
Hz)
Shannon boundShannon bound with 3dB margin
EV-DOIEEE 80216e-2005
HSDPA
Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
Source 5G Americas member contribution
63
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
64
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
65
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
66
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
67
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture Options in Release 15
Source Nokia contribution
68
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
Source Nokia contribution
69
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
Source Nokia contribution
70
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
Source ATampT contribution
71
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
72
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
Source Nokia contribution
73
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
Source Ericsson contribution 74
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
Source Intel contribution
75
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Capabilities
bull Downlink peak data rates up to 300 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions through carrier aggregation higher-order modulation and 4X4 MIMO
bull Uplink peak data rates up to 71 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions
bull Operation in both TDD and FDD modes
bull Scalable bandwidth up to 20+20 MHz covering 14 3 5 10 15 and 20 MHz radio carriers
bull Increased spectral efficiency over HSPA by a factor of two to four
bull Reduced latency to 15 msec round-trip times between user equipment and the base station and to less than 100 msec transition times from inactive to active
bull Self-organizing capabilities under operator control and preferences that will automate network planning and will result in lower operator costs
76
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
77
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
Frequency
Resource block
Transmit on those resource blocks that are not faded
Carrier bandwidth
Source 5G Americas member contribution
78
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Antenna Schemes
Source 3G Americasrsquo white paper MIMO and Smart Antennas for 3G and 4G Wireless Systems ndash Practical Aspects and Deployment Considerations May 2010
79
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
Source 5G Americas member contribution
80
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
Source 5G Americas member contribution
81
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
82
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
83
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
Source 4G Americas Mobile Broadband Evolution Rel-12 amp Rel-13 and Beyond 2015
84
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Gains From Carrier Aggregation
85
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
CoMP Levels
86
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
87
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE UE Categories
UE Category Max DL Throughput Maximum DL MIMO Layers
Maximum UL Throughput
1 103 Mbps 1 52 Mbps2 510 Mbps 2 255 Mbps3 1020 Mbps 2 510 Mbps4 1508 Mbps 2 510 Mbps5 2996 Mbps 4 754 Mbps6 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps7 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps8 29986 Mbps 8 14978 Mbps9 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps
10 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps11 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps12 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps13 3916 Mbps 2 or 4 1508 Mbps14 39166 Mbps 8 95877 Mbps15 7988 Mbps 2 or 4 2261 Mbps16 10514 Mbps 2 or 4 1055 Mbps17 25066 Mbps 8 21194 Mbps18 12060 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 2110 Mbps19 16583 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 135639 Mbps
88
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE-Advanced Relay
Relay Link Access Link
Direct Link
89
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
90
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Traffic is FTP-like at a 50 load with a 7525 mix of indooroutdoor usersbull Throughput is at the medium-access control (MAC) protocol layer bull The configuration in the first row corresponds to low-frequency band operation
representative of 700 MHz or cellular while the remaining configurations assume high-frequency band operation representative of PCS AWS or WCS (Higher frequencies facilitate higher-order MIMO configurations and have wider radio channels available)
bull The downlink value for the first row corresponds to Release 8 device receive capability (Minimum Mean Square Error [MMSE]) while the values in the other rows correspond to Release 11 device receive capability (MMSE ndash Interference Rejection Combining [IRC])
bull The uplink value for the first row corresponds to a Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC) receiver at the eNodeB while the remaining values correspond to an IRC receiver
bull Low-band operation assumes 1732 meter inter-site distance (ISD) while high-band operation assumes 500 meter ISD The remaining simulation assumptions are listed in Table 11
bull Refer to white paper for additional assumptions
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
91
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
Mbps
Source Ericsson contribution 92
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
Source Jonas Karlsson Mathias Riback ldquoInitial Field Performance Measurements of LTErdquo Ericsson Review No 3 2008
93
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
Source LTESAE Trial Initiative ldquoLatest Results from the LSTI Feb 2009rdquo httpwwwlstiforumorg
94
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS API Profiles
Source 4G Americas VoLTE and RCS Technology ndash Evolution and Ecosystem
95
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
United States 35 GHz System Currently Being Developed
60
APPENDIX SECTION WITH ADDITIONAL TECHNICAL DETAILS
61
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Latency of Different Technologies
62
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 200
1
2
3
4
5
6
Required SNR (dB)
Achi
evab
le E
ffici
ency
(bps
Hz)
Shannon boundShannon bound with 3dB margin
EV-DOIEEE 80216e-2005
HSDPA
Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
Source 5G Americas member contribution
63
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
64
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
65
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
66
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
67
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture Options in Release 15
Source Nokia contribution
68
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
Source Nokia contribution
69
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
Source Nokia contribution
70
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
Source ATampT contribution
71
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
72
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
Source Nokia contribution
73
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
Source Ericsson contribution 74
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
Source Intel contribution
75
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Capabilities
bull Downlink peak data rates up to 300 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions through carrier aggregation higher-order modulation and 4X4 MIMO
bull Uplink peak data rates up to 71 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions
bull Operation in both TDD and FDD modes
bull Scalable bandwidth up to 20+20 MHz covering 14 3 5 10 15 and 20 MHz radio carriers
bull Increased spectral efficiency over HSPA by a factor of two to four
bull Reduced latency to 15 msec round-trip times between user equipment and the base station and to less than 100 msec transition times from inactive to active
bull Self-organizing capabilities under operator control and preferences that will automate network planning and will result in lower operator costs
76
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
77
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
Frequency
Resource block
Transmit on those resource blocks that are not faded
Carrier bandwidth
Source 5G Americas member contribution
78
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Antenna Schemes
Source 3G Americasrsquo white paper MIMO and Smart Antennas for 3G and 4G Wireless Systems ndash Practical Aspects and Deployment Considerations May 2010
79
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
Source 5G Americas member contribution
80
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
Source 5G Americas member contribution
81
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
82
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
83
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
Source 4G Americas Mobile Broadband Evolution Rel-12 amp Rel-13 and Beyond 2015
84
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Gains From Carrier Aggregation
85
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
CoMP Levels
86
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
87
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE UE Categories
UE Category Max DL Throughput Maximum DL MIMO Layers
Maximum UL Throughput
1 103 Mbps 1 52 Mbps2 510 Mbps 2 255 Mbps3 1020 Mbps 2 510 Mbps4 1508 Mbps 2 510 Mbps5 2996 Mbps 4 754 Mbps6 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps7 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps8 29986 Mbps 8 14978 Mbps9 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps
10 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps11 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps12 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps13 3916 Mbps 2 or 4 1508 Mbps14 39166 Mbps 8 95877 Mbps15 7988 Mbps 2 or 4 2261 Mbps16 10514 Mbps 2 or 4 1055 Mbps17 25066 Mbps 8 21194 Mbps18 12060 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 2110 Mbps19 16583 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 135639 Mbps
88
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE-Advanced Relay
Relay Link Access Link
Direct Link
89
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
90
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Traffic is FTP-like at a 50 load with a 7525 mix of indooroutdoor usersbull Throughput is at the medium-access control (MAC) protocol layer bull The configuration in the first row corresponds to low-frequency band operation
representative of 700 MHz or cellular while the remaining configurations assume high-frequency band operation representative of PCS AWS or WCS (Higher frequencies facilitate higher-order MIMO configurations and have wider radio channels available)
bull The downlink value for the first row corresponds to Release 8 device receive capability (Minimum Mean Square Error [MMSE]) while the values in the other rows correspond to Release 11 device receive capability (MMSE ndash Interference Rejection Combining [IRC])
bull The uplink value for the first row corresponds to a Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC) receiver at the eNodeB while the remaining values correspond to an IRC receiver
bull Low-band operation assumes 1732 meter inter-site distance (ISD) while high-band operation assumes 500 meter ISD The remaining simulation assumptions are listed in Table 11
bull Refer to white paper for additional assumptions
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
91
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
Mbps
Source Ericsson contribution 92
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
Source Jonas Karlsson Mathias Riback ldquoInitial Field Performance Measurements of LTErdquo Ericsson Review No 3 2008
93
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
Source LTESAE Trial Initiative ldquoLatest Results from the LSTI Feb 2009rdquo httpwwwlstiforumorg
94
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS API Profiles
Source 4G Americas VoLTE and RCS Technology ndash Evolution and Ecosystem
95
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
APPENDIX SECTION WITH ADDITIONAL TECHNICAL DETAILS
61
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Latency of Different Technologies
62
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 200
1
2
3
4
5
6
Required SNR (dB)
Achi
evab
le E
ffici
ency
(bps
Hz)
Shannon boundShannon bound with 3dB margin
EV-DOIEEE 80216e-2005
HSDPA
Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
Source 5G Americas member contribution
63
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
64
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
65
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
66
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
67
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture Options in Release 15
Source Nokia contribution
68
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
Source Nokia contribution
69
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
Source Nokia contribution
70
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
Source ATampT contribution
71
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
72
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
Source Nokia contribution
73
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
Source Ericsson contribution 74
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
Source Intel contribution
75
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Capabilities
bull Downlink peak data rates up to 300 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions through carrier aggregation higher-order modulation and 4X4 MIMO
bull Uplink peak data rates up to 71 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions
bull Operation in both TDD and FDD modes
bull Scalable bandwidth up to 20+20 MHz covering 14 3 5 10 15 and 20 MHz radio carriers
bull Increased spectral efficiency over HSPA by a factor of two to four
bull Reduced latency to 15 msec round-trip times between user equipment and the base station and to less than 100 msec transition times from inactive to active
bull Self-organizing capabilities under operator control and preferences that will automate network planning and will result in lower operator costs
76
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
77
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
Frequency
Resource block
Transmit on those resource blocks that are not faded
Carrier bandwidth
Source 5G Americas member contribution
78
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Antenna Schemes
Source 3G Americasrsquo white paper MIMO and Smart Antennas for 3G and 4G Wireless Systems ndash Practical Aspects and Deployment Considerations May 2010
79
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
Source 5G Americas member contribution
80
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
Source 5G Americas member contribution
81
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
82
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
83
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
Source 4G Americas Mobile Broadband Evolution Rel-12 amp Rel-13 and Beyond 2015
84
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Gains From Carrier Aggregation
85
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
CoMP Levels
86
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
87
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE UE Categories
UE Category Max DL Throughput Maximum DL MIMO Layers
Maximum UL Throughput
1 103 Mbps 1 52 Mbps2 510 Mbps 2 255 Mbps3 1020 Mbps 2 510 Mbps4 1508 Mbps 2 510 Mbps5 2996 Mbps 4 754 Mbps6 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps7 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps8 29986 Mbps 8 14978 Mbps9 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps
10 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps11 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps12 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps13 3916 Mbps 2 or 4 1508 Mbps14 39166 Mbps 8 95877 Mbps15 7988 Mbps 2 or 4 2261 Mbps16 10514 Mbps 2 or 4 1055 Mbps17 25066 Mbps 8 21194 Mbps18 12060 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 2110 Mbps19 16583 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 135639 Mbps
88
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE-Advanced Relay
Relay Link Access Link
Direct Link
89
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
90
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Traffic is FTP-like at a 50 load with a 7525 mix of indooroutdoor usersbull Throughput is at the medium-access control (MAC) protocol layer bull The configuration in the first row corresponds to low-frequency band operation
representative of 700 MHz or cellular while the remaining configurations assume high-frequency band operation representative of PCS AWS or WCS (Higher frequencies facilitate higher-order MIMO configurations and have wider radio channels available)
bull The downlink value for the first row corresponds to Release 8 device receive capability (Minimum Mean Square Error [MMSE]) while the values in the other rows correspond to Release 11 device receive capability (MMSE ndash Interference Rejection Combining [IRC])
bull The uplink value for the first row corresponds to a Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC) receiver at the eNodeB while the remaining values correspond to an IRC receiver
bull Low-band operation assumes 1732 meter inter-site distance (ISD) while high-band operation assumes 500 meter ISD The remaining simulation assumptions are listed in Table 11
bull Refer to white paper for additional assumptions
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
91
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
Mbps
Source Ericsson contribution 92
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
Source Jonas Karlsson Mathias Riback ldquoInitial Field Performance Measurements of LTErdquo Ericsson Review No 3 2008
93
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
Source LTESAE Trial Initiative ldquoLatest Results from the LSTI Feb 2009rdquo httpwwwlstiforumorg
94
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS API Profiles
Source 4G Americas VoLTE and RCS Technology ndash Evolution and Ecosystem
95
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Latency of Different Technologies
62
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 200
1
2
3
4
5
6
Required SNR (dB)
Achi
evab
le E
ffici
ency
(bps
Hz)
Shannon boundShannon bound with 3dB margin
EV-DOIEEE 80216e-2005
HSDPA
Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
Source 5G Americas member contribution
63
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
64
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
65
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
66
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
67
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture Options in Release 15
Source Nokia contribution
68
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
Source Nokia contribution
69
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
Source Nokia contribution
70
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
Source ATampT contribution
71
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
72
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
Source Nokia contribution
73
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
Source Ericsson contribution 74
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
Source Intel contribution
75
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Capabilities
bull Downlink peak data rates up to 300 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions through carrier aggregation higher-order modulation and 4X4 MIMO
bull Uplink peak data rates up to 71 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions
bull Operation in both TDD and FDD modes
bull Scalable bandwidth up to 20+20 MHz covering 14 3 5 10 15 and 20 MHz radio carriers
bull Increased spectral efficiency over HSPA by a factor of two to four
bull Reduced latency to 15 msec round-trip times between user equipment and the base station and to less than 100 msec transition times from inactive to active
bull Self-organizing capabilities under operator control and preferences that will automate network planning and will result in lower operator costs
76
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
77
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
Frequency
Resource block
Transmit on those resource blocks that are not faded
Carrier bandwidth
Source 5G Americas member contribution
78
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Antenna Schemes
Source 3G Americasrsquo white paper MIMO and Smart Antennas for 3G and 4G Wireless Systems ndash Practical Aspects and Deployment Considerations May 2010
79
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
Source 5G Americas member contribution
80
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
Source 5G Americas member contribution
81
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
82
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
83
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
Source 4G Americas Mobile Broadband Evolution Rel-12 amp Rel-13 and Beyond 2015
84
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Gains From Carrier Aggregation
85
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
CoMP Levels
86
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
87
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE UE Categories
UE Category Max DL Throughput Maximum DL MIMO Layers
Maximum UL Throughput
1 103 Mbps 1 52 Mbps2 510 Mbps 2 255 Mbps3 1020 Mbps 2 510 Mbps4 1508 Mbps 2 510 Mbps5 2996 Mbps 4 754 Mbps6 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps7 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps8 29986 Mbps 8 14978 Mbps9 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps
10 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps11 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps12 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps13 3916 Mbps 2 or 4 1508 Mbps14 39166 Mbps 8 95877 Mbps15 7988 Mbps 2 or 4 2261 Mbps16 10514 Mbps 2 or 4 1055 Mbps17 25066 Mbps 8 21194 Mbps18 12060 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 2110 Mbps19 16583 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 135639 Mbps
88
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE-Advanced Relay
Relay Link Access Link
Direct Link
89
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
90
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Traffic is FTP-like at a 50 load with a 7525 mix of indooroutdoor usersbull Throughput is at the medium-access control (MAC) protocol layer bull The configuration in the first row corresponds to low-frequency band operation
representative of 700 MHz or cellular while the remaining configurations assume high-frequency band operation representative of PCS AWS or WCS (Higher frequencies facilitate higher-order MIMO configurations and have wider radio channels available)
bull The downlink value for the first row corresponds to Release 8 device receive capability (Minimum Mean Square Error [MMSE]) while the values in the other rows correspond to Release 11 device receive capability (MMSE ndash Interference Rejection Combining [IRC])
bull The uplink value for the first row corresponds to a Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC) receiver at the eNodeB while the remaining values correspond to an IRC receiver
bull Low-band operation assumes 1732 meter inter-site distance (ISD) while high-band operation assumes 500 meter ISD The remaining simulation assumptions are listed in Table 11
bull Refer to white paper for additional assumptions
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
91
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
Mbps
Source Ericsson contribution 92
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
Source Jonas Karlsson Mathias Riback ldquoInitial Field Performance Measurements of LTErdquo Ericsson Review No 3 2008
93
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
Source LTESAE Trial Initiative ldquoLatest Results from the LSTI Feb 2009rdquo httpwwwlstiforumorg
94
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS API Profiles
Source 4G Americas VoLTE and RCS Technology ndash Evolution and Ecosystem
95
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 200
1
2
3
4
5
6
Required SNR (dB)
Achi
evab
le E
ffici
ency
(bps
Hz)
Shannon boundShannon bound with 3dB margin
EV-DOIEEE 80216e-2005
HSDPA
Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
Source 5G Americas member contribution
63
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
64
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
65
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
66
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
67
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture Options in Release 15
Source Nokia contribution
68
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
Source Nokia contribution
69
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
Source Nokia contribution
70
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
Source ATampT contribution
71
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
72
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
Source Nokia contribution
73
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
Source Ericsson contribution 74
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
Source Intel contribution
75
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Capabilities
bull Downlink peak data rates up to 300 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions through carrier aggregation higher-order modulation and 4X4 MIMO
bull Uplink peak data rates up to 71 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions
bull Operation in both TDD and FDD modes
bull Scalable bandwidth up to 20+20 MHz covering 14 3 5 10 15 and 20 MHz radio carriers
bull Increased spectral efficiency over HSPA by a factor of two to four
bull Reduced latency to 15 msec round-trip times between user equipment and the base station and to less than 100 msec transition times from inactive to active
bull Self-organizing capabilities under operator control and preferences that will automate network planning and will result in lower operator costs
76
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
77
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
Frequency
Resource block
Transmit on those resource blocks that are not faded
Carrier bandwidth
Source 5G Americas member contribution
78
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Antenna Schemes
Source 3G Americasrsquo white paper MIMO and Smart Antennas for 3G and 4G Wireless Systems ndash Practical Aspects and Deployment Considerations May 2010
79
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
Source 5G Americas member contribution
80
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
Source 5G Americas member contribution
81
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
82
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
83
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
Source 4G Americas Mobile Broadband Evolution Rel-12 amp Rel-13 and Beyond 2015
84
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Gains From Carrier Aggregation
85
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
CoMP Levels
86
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
87
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE UE Categories
UE Category Max DL Throughput Maximum DL MIMO Layers
Maximum UL Throughput
1 103 Mbps 1 52 Mbps2 510 Mbps 2 255 Mbps3 1020 Mbps 2 510 Mbps4 1508 Mbps 2 510 Mbps5 2996 Mbps 4 754 Mbps6 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps7 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps8 29986 Mbps 8 14978 Mbps9 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps
10 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps11 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps12 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps13 3916 Mbps 2 or 4 1508 Mbps14 39166 Mbps 8 95877 Mbps15 7988 Mbps 2 or 4 2261 Mbps16 10514 Mbps 2 or 4 1055 Mbps17 25066 Mbps 8 21194 Mbps18 12060 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 2110 Mbps19 16583 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 135639 Mbps
88
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE-Advanced Relay
Relay Link Access Link
Direct Link
89
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
90
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Traffic is FTP-like at a 50 load with a 7525 mix of indooroutdoor usersbull Throughput is at the medium-access control (MAC) protocol layer bull The configuration in the first row corresponds to low-frequency band operation
representative of 700 MHz or cellular while the remaining configurations assume high-frequency band operation representative of PCS AWS or WCS (Higher frequencies facilitate higher-order MIMO configurations and have wider radio channels available)
bull The downlink value for the first row corresponds to Release 8 device receive capability (Minimum Mean Square Error [MMSE]) while the values in the other rows correspond to Release 11 device receive capability (MMSE ndash Interference Rejection Combining [IRC])
bull The uplink value for the first row corresponds to a Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC) receiver at the eNodeB while the remaining values correspond to an IRC receiver
bull Low-band operation assumes 1732 meter inter-site distance (ISD) while high-band operation assumes 500 meter ISD The remaining simulation assumptions are listed in Table 11
bull Refer to white paper for additional assumptions
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
91
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
Mbps
Source Ericsson contribution 92
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
Source Jonas Karlsson Mathias Riback ldquoInitial Field Performance Measurements of LTErdquo Ericsson Review No 3 2008
93
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
Source LTESAE Trial Initiative ldquoLatest Results from the LSTI Feb 2009rdquo httpwwwlstiforumorg
94
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS API Profiles
Source 4G Americas VoLTE and RCS Technology ndash Evolution and Ecosystem
95
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
64
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
65
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
66
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
67
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture Options in Release 15
Source Nokia contribution
68
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
Source Nokia contribution
69
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
Source Nokia contribution
70
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
Source ATampT contribution
71
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
72
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
Source Nokia contribution
73
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
Source Ericsson contribution 74
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
Source Intel contribution
75
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Capabilities
bull Downlink peak data rates up to 300 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions through carrier aggregation higher-order modulation and 4X4 MIMO
bull Uplink peak data rates up to 71 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions
bull Operation in both TDD and FDD modes
bull Scalable bandwidth up to 20+20 MHz covering 14 3 5 10 15 and 20 MHz radio carriers
bull Increased spectral efficiency over HSPA by a factor of two to four
bull Reduced latency to 15 msec round-trip times between user equipment and the base station and to less than 100 msec transition times from inactive to active
bull Self-organizing capabilities under operator control and preferences that will automate network planning and will result in lower operator costs
76
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
77
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
Frequency
Resource block
Transmit on those resource blocks that are not faded
Carrier bandwidth
Source 5G Americas member contribution
78
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Antenna Schemes
Source 3G Americasrsquo white paper MIMO and Smart Antennas for 3G and 4G Wireless Systems ndash Practical Aspects and Deployment Considerations May 2010
79
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
Source 5G Americas member contribution
80
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
Source 5G Americas member contribution
81
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
82
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
83
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
Source 4G Americas Mobile Broadband Evolution Rel-12 amp Rel-13 and Beyond 2015
84
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Gains From Carrier Aggregation
85
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
CoMP Levels
86
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
87
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE UE Categories
UE Category Max DL Throughput Maximum DL MIMO Layers
Maximum UL Throughput
1 103 Mbps 1 52 Mbps2 510 Mbps 2 255 Mbps3 1020 Mbps 2 510 Mbps4 1508 Mbps 2 510 Mbps5 2996 Mbps 4 754 Mbps6 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps7 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps8 29986 Mbps 8 14978 Mbps9 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps
10 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps11 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps12 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps13 3916 Mbps 2 or 4 1508 Mbps14 39166 Mbps 8 95877 Mbps15 7988 Mbps 2 or 4 2261 Mbps16 10514 Mbps 2 or 4 1055 Mbps17 25066 Mbps 8 21194 Mbps18 12060 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 2110 Mbps19 16583 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 135639 Mbps
88
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE-Advanced Relay
Relay Link Access Link
Direct Link
89
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
90
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Traffic is FTP-like at a 50 load with a 7525 mix of indooroutdoor usersbull Throughput is at the medium-access control (MAC) protocol layer bull The configuration in the first row corresponds to low-frequency band operation
representative of 700 MHz or cellular while the remaining configurations assume high-frequency band operation representative of PCS AWS or WCS (Higher frequencies facilitate higher-order MIMO configurations and have wider radio channels available)
bull The downlink value for the first row corresponds to Release 8 device receive capability (Minimum Mean Square Error [MMSE]) while the values in the other rows correspond to Release 11 device receive capability (MMSE ndash Interference Rejection Combining [IRC])
bull The uplink value for the first row corresponds to a Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC) receiver at the eNodeB while the remaining values correspond to an IRC receiver
bull Low-band operation assumes 1732 meter inter-site distance (ISD) while high-band operation assumes 500 meter ISD The remaining simulation assumptions are listed in Table 11
bull Refer to white paper for additional assumptions
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
91
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
Mbps
Source Ericsson contribution 92
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
Source Jonas Karlsson Mathias Riback ldquoInitial Field Performance Measurements of LTErdquo Ericsson Review No 3 2008
93
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
Source LTESAE Trial Initiative ldquoLatest Results from the LSTI Feb 2009rdquo httpwwwlstiforumorg
94
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS API Profiles
Source 4G Americas VoLTE and RCS Technology ndash Evolution and Ecosystem
95
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
65
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
66
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
67
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture Options in Release 15
Source Nokia contribution
68
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
Source Nokia contribution
69
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
Source Nokia contribution
70
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
Source ATampT contribution
71
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
72
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
Source Nokia contribution
73
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
Source Ericsson contribution 74
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
Source Intel contribution
75
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Capabilities
bull Downlink peak data rates up to 300 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions through carrier aggregation higher-order modulation and 4X4 MIMO
bull Uplink peak data rates up to 71 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions
bull Operation in both TDD and FDD modes
bull Scalable bandwidth up to 20+20 MHz covering 14 3 5 10 15 and 20 MHz radio carriers
bull Increased spectral efficiency over HSPA by a factor of two to four
bull Reduced latency to 15 msec round-trip times between user equipment and the base station and to less than 100 msec transition times from inactive to active
bull Self-organizing capabilities under operator control and preferences that will automate network planning and will result in lower operator costs
76
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
77
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
Frequency
Resource block
Transmit on those resource blocks that are not faded
Carrier bandwidth
Source 5G Americas member contribution
78
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Antenna Schemes
Source 3G Americasrsquo white paper MIMO and Smart Antennas for 3G and 4G Wireless Systems ndash Practical Aspects and Deployment Considerations May 2010
79
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
Source 5G Americas member contribution
80
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
Source 5G Americas member contribution
81
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
82
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
83
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
Source 4G Americas Mobile Broadband Evolution Rel-12 amp Rel-13 and Beyond 2015
84
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Gains From Carrier Aggregation
85
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
CoMP Levels
86
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
87
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE UE Categories
UE Category Max DL Throughput Maximum DL MIMO Layers
Maximum UL Throughput
1 103 Mbps 1 52 Mbps2 510 Mbps 2 255 Mbps3 1020 Mbps 2 510 Mbps4 1508 Mbps 2 510 Mbps5 2996 Mbps 4 754 Mbps6 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps7 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps8 29986 Mbps 8 14978 Mbps9 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps
10 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps11 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps12 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps13 3916 Mbps 2 or 4 1508 Mbps14 39166 Mbps 8 95877 Mbps15 7988 Mbps 2 or 4 2261 Mbps16 10514 Mbps 2 or 4 1055 Mbps17 25066 Mbps 8 21194 Mbps18 12060 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 2110 Mbps19 16583 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 135639 Mbps
88
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE-Advanced Relay
Relay Link Access Link
Direct Link
89
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
90
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Traffic is FTP-like at a 50 load with a 7525 mix of indooroutdoor usersbull Throughput is at the medium-access control (MAC) protocol layer bull The configuration in the first row corresponds to low-frequency band operation
representative of 700 MHz or cellular while the remaining configurations assume high-frequency band operation representative of PCS AWS or WCS (Higher frequencies facilitate higher-order MIMO configurations and have wider radio channels available)
bull The downlink value for the first row corresponds to Release 8 device receive capability (Minimum Mean Square Error [MMSE]) while the values in the other rows correspond to Release 11 device receive capability (MMSE ndash Interference Rejection Combining [IRC])
bull The uplink value for the first row corresponds to a Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC) receiver at the eNodeB while the remaining values correspond to an IRC receiver
bull Low-band operation assumes 1732 meter inter-site distance (ISD) while high-band operation assumes 500 meter ISD The remaining simulation assumptions are listed in Table 11
bull Refer to white paper for additional assumptions
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
91
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
Mbps
Source Ericsson contribution 92
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
Source Jonas Karlsson Mathias Riback ldquoInitial Field Performance Measurements of LTErdquo Ericsson Review No 3 2008
93
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
Source LTESAE Trial Initiative ldquoLatest Results from the LSTI Feb 2009rdquo httpwwwlstiforumorg
94
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS API Profiles
Source 4G Americas VoLTE and RCS Technology ndash Evolution and Ecosystem
95
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
66
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
67
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture Options in Release 15
Source Nokia contribution
68
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
Source Nokia contribution
69
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
Source Nokia contribution
70
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
Source ATampT contribution
71
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
72
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
Source Nokia contribution
73
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
Source Ericsson contribution 74
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
Source Intel contribution
75
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Capabilities
bull Downlink peak data rates up to 300 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions through carrier aggregation higher-order modulation and 4X4 MIMO
bull Uplink peak data rates up to 71 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions
bull Operation in both TDD and FDD modes
bull Scalable bandwidth up to 20+20 MHz covering 14 3 5 10 15 and 20 MHz radio carriers
bull Increased spectral efficiency over HSPA by a factor of two to four
bull Reduced latency to 15 msec round-trip times between user equipment and the base station and to less than 100 msec transition times from inactive to active
bull Self-organizing capabilities under operator control and preferences that will automate network planning and will result in lower operator costs
76
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
77
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
Frequency
Resource block
Transmit on those resource blocks that are not faded
Carrier bandwidth
Source 5G Americas member contribution
78
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Antenna Schemes
Source 3G Americasrsquo white paper MIMO and Smart Antennas for 3G and 4G Wireless Systems ndash Practical Aspects and Deployment Considerations May 2010
79
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
Source 5G Americas member contribution
80
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
Source 5G Americas member contribution
81
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
82
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
83
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
Source 4G Americas Mobile Broadband Evolution Rel-12 amp Rel-13 and Beyond 2015
84
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Gains From Carrier Aggregation
85
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
CoMP Levels
86
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
87
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE UE Categories
UE Category Max DL Throughput Maximum DL MIMO Layers
Maximum UL Throughput
1 103 Mbps 1 52 Mbps2 510 Mbps 2 255 Mbps3 1020 Mbps 2 510 Mbps4 1508 Mbps 2 510 Mbps5 2996 Mbps 4 754 Mbps6 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps7 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps8 29986 Mbps 8 14978 Mbps9 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps
10 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps11 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps12 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps13 3916 Mbps 2 or 4 1508 Mbps14 39166 Mbps 8 95877 Mbps15 7988 Mbps 2 or 4 2261 Mbps16 10514 Mbps 2 or 4 1055 Mbps17 25066 Mbps 8 21194 Mbps18 12060 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 2110 Mbps19 16583 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 135639 Mbps
88
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE-Advanced Relay
Relay Link Access Link
Direct Link
89
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
90
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Traffic is FTP-like at a 50 load with a 7525 mix of indooroutdoor usersbull Throughput is at the medium-access control (MAC) protocol layer bull The configuration in the first row corresponds to low-frequency band operation
representative of 700 MHz or cellular while the remaining configurations assume high-frequency band operation representative of PCS AWS or WCS (Higher frequencies facilitate higher-order MIMO configurations and have wider radio channels available)
bull The downlink value for the first row corresponds to Release 8 device receive capability (Minimum Mean Square Error [MMSE]) while the values in the other rows correspond to Release 11 device receive capability (MMSE ndash Interference Rejection Combining [IRC])
bull The uplink value for the first row corresponds to a Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC) receiver at the eNodeB while the remaining values correspond to an IRC receiver
bull Low-band operation assumes 1732 meter inter-site distance (ISD) while high-band operation assumes 500 meter ISD The remaining simulation assumptions are listed in Table 11
bull Refer to white paper for additional assumptions
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
91
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
Mbps
Source Ericsson contribution 92
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
Source Jonas Karlsson Mathias Riback ldquoInitial Field Performance Measurements of LTErdquo Ericsson Review No 3 2008
93
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
Source LTESAE Trial Initiative ldquoLatest Results from the LSTI Feb 2009rdquo httpwwwlstiforumorg
94
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS API Profiles
Source 4G Americas VoLTE and RCS Technology ndash Evolution and Ecosystem
95
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
67
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture Options in Release 15
Source Nokia contribution
68
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
Source Nokia contribution
69
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
Source Nokia contribution
70
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
Source ATampT contribution
71
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
72
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
Source Nokia contribution
73
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
Source Ericsson contribution 74
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
Source Intel contribution
75
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Capabilities
bull Downlink peak data rates up to 300 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions through carrier aggregation higher-order modulation and 4X4 MIMO
bull Uplink peak data rates up to 71 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions
bull Operation in both TDD and FDD modes
bull Scalable bandwidth up to 20+20 MHz covering 14 3 5 10 15 and 20 MHz radio carriers
bull Increased spectral efficiency over HSPA by a factor of two to four
bull Reduced latency to 15 msec round-trip times between user equipment and the base station and to less than 100 msec transition times from inactive to active
bull Self-organizing capabilities under operator control and preferences that will automate network planning and will result in lower operator costs
76
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
77
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
Frequency
Resource block
Transmit on those resource blocks that are not faded
Carrier bandwidth
Source 5G Americas member contribution
78
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Antenna Schemes
Source 3G Americasrsquo white paper MIMO and Smart Antennas for 3G and 4G Wireless Systems ndash Practical Aspects and Deployment Considerations May 2010
79
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
Source 5G Americas member contribution
80
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
Source 5G Americas member contribution
81
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
82
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
83
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
Source 4G Americas Mobile Broadband Evolution Rel-12 amp Rel-13 and Beyond 2015
84
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Gains From Carrier Aggregation
85
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
CoMP Levels
86
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
87
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE UE Categories
UE Category Max DL Throughput Maximum DL MIMO Layers
Maximum UL Throughput
1 103 Mbps 1 52 Mbps2 510 Mbps 2 255 Mbps3 1020 Mbps 2 510 Mbps4 1508 Mbps 2 510 Mbps5 2996 Mbps 4 754 Mbps6 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps7 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps8 29986 Mbps 8 14978 Mbps9 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps
10 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps11 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps12 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps13 3916 Mbps 2 or 4 1508 Mbps14 39166 Mbps 8 95877 Mbps15 7988 Mbps 2 or 4 2261 Mbps16 10514 Mbps 2 or 4 1055 Mbps17 25066 Mbps 8 21194 Mbps18 12060 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 2110 Mbps19 16583 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 135639 Mbps
88
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE-Advanced Relay
Relay Link Access Link
Direct Link
89
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
90
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Traffic is FTP-like at a 50 load with a 7525 mix of indooroutdoor usersbull Throughput is at the medium-access control (MAC) protocol layer bull The configuration in the first row corresponds to low-frequency band operation
representative of 700 MHz or cellular while the remaining configurations assume high-frequency band operation representative of PCS AWS or WCS (Higher frequencies facilitate higher-order MIMO configurations and have wider radio channels available)
bull The downlink value for the first row corresponds to Release 8 device receive capability (Minimum Mean Square Error [MMSE]) while the values in the other rows correspond to Release 11 device receive capability (MMSE ndash Interference Rejection Combining [IRC])
bull The uplink value for the first row corresponds to a Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC) receiver at the eNodeB while the remaining values correspond to an IRC receiver
bull Low-band operation assumes 1732 meter inter-site distance (ISD) while high-band operation assumes 500 meter ISD The remaining simulation assumptions are listed in Table 11
bull Refer to white paper for additional assumptions
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
91
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
Mbps
Source Ericsson contribution 92
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
Source Jonas Karlsson Mathias Riback ldquoInitial Field Performance Measurements of LTErdquo Ericsson Review No 3 2008
93
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
Source LTESAE Trial Initiative ldquoLatest Results from the LSTI Feb 2009rdquo httpwwwlstiforumorg
94
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS API Profiles
Source 4G Americas VoLTE and RCS Technology ndash Evolution and Ecosystem
95
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Architecture Options in Release 15
Source Nokia contribution
68
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
Source Nokia contribution
69
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
Source Nokia contribution
70
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
Source ATampT contribution
71
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
72
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
Source Nokia contribution
73
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
Source Ericsson contribution 74
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
Source Intel contribution
75
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Capabilities
bull Downlink peak data rates up to 300 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions through carrier aggregation higher-order modulation and 4X4 MIMO
bull Uplink peak data rates up to 71 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions
bull Operation in both TDD and FDD modes
bull Scalable bandwidth up to 20+20 MHz covering 14 3 5 10 15 and 20 MHz radio carriers
bull Increased spectral efficiency over HSPA by a factor of two to four
bull Reduced latency to 15 msec round-trip times between user equipment and the base station and to less than 100 msec transition times from inactive to active
bull Self-organizing capabilities under operator control and preferences that will automate network planning and will result in lower operator costs
76
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
77
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
Frequency
Resource block
Transmit on those resource blocks that are not faded
Carrier bandwidth
Source 5G Americas member contribution
78
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Antenna Schemes
Source 3G Americasrsquo white paper MIMO and Smart Antennas for 3G and 4G Wireless Systems ndash Practical Aspects and Deployment Considerations May 2010
79
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
Source 5G Americas member contribution
80
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
Source 5G Americas member contribution
81
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
82
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
83
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
Source 4G Americas Mobile Broadband Evolution Rel-12 amp Rel-13 and Beyond 2015
84
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Gains From Carrier Aggregation
85
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
CoMP Levels
86
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
87
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE UE Categories
UE Category Max DL Throughput Maximum DL MIMO Layers
Maximum UL Throughput
1 103 Mbps 1 52 Mbps2 510 Mbps 2 255 Mbps3 1020 Mbps 2 510 Mbps4 1508 Mbps 2 510 Mbps5 2996 Mbps 4 754 Mbps6 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps7 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps8 29986 Mbps 8 14978 Mbps9 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps
10 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps11 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps12 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps13 3916 Mbps 2 or 4 1508 Mbps14 39166 Mbps 8 95877 Mbps15 7988 Mbps 2 or 4 2261 Mbps16 10514 Mbps 2 or 4 1055 Mbps17 25066 Mbps 8 21194 Mbps18 12060 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 2110 Mbps19 16583 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 135639 Mbps
88
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE-Advanced Relay
Relay Link Access Link
Direct Link
89
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
90
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Traffic is FTP-like at a 50 load with a 7525 mix of indooroutdoor usersbull Throughput is at the medium-access control (MAC) protocol layer bull The configuration in the first row corresponds to low-frequency band operation
representative of 700 MHz or cellular while the remaining configurations assume high-frequency band operation representative of PCS AWS or WCS (Higher frequencies facilitate higher-order MIMO configurations and have wider radio channels available)
bull The downlink value for the first row corresponds to Release 8 device receive capability (Minimum Mean Square Error [MMSE]) while the values in the other rows correspond to Release 11 device receive capability (MMSE ndash Interference Rejection Combining [IRC])
bull The uplink value for the first row corresponds to a Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC) receiver at the eNodeB while the remaining values correspond to an IRC receiver
bull Low-band operation assumes 1732 meter inter-site distance (ISD) while high-band operation assumes 500 meter ISD The remaining simulation assumptions are listed in Table 11
bull Refer to white paper for additional assumptions
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
91
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
Mbps
Source Ericsson contribution 92
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
Source Jonas Karlsson Mathias Riback ldquoInitial Field Performance Measurements of LTErdquo Ericsson Review No 3 2008
93
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
Source LTESAE Trial Initiative ldquoLatest Results from the LSTI Feb 2009rdquo httpwwwlstiforumorg
94
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS API Profiles
Source 4G Americas VoLTE and RCS Technology ndash Evolution and Ecosystem
95
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
Source Nokia contribution
69
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
Source Nokia contribution
70
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
Source ATampT contribution
71
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
72
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
Source Nokia contribution
73
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
Source Ericsson contribution 74
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
Source Intel contribution
75
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Capabilities
bull Downlink peak data rates up to 300 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions through carrier aggregation higher-order modulation and 4X4 MIMO
bull Uplink peak data rates up to 71 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions
bull Operation in both TDD and FDD modes
bull Scalable bandwidth up to 20+20 MHz covering 14 3 5 10 15 and 20 MHz radio carriers
bull Increased spectral efficiency over HSPA by a factor of two to four
bull Reduced latency to 15 msec round-trip times between user equipment and the base station and to less than 100 msec transition times from inactive to active
bull Self-organizing capabilities under operator control and preferences that will automate network planning and will result in lower operator costs
76
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
77
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
Frequency
Resource block
Transmit on those resource blocks that are not faded
Carrier bandwidth
Source 5G Americas member contribution
78
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Antenna Schemes
Source 3G Americasrsquo white paper MIMO and Smart Antennas for 3G and 4G Wireless Systems ndash Practical Aspects and Deployment Considerations May 2010
79
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
Source 5G Americas member contribution
80
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
Source 5G Americas member contribution
81
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
82
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
83
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
Source 4G Americas Mobile Broadband Evolution Rel-12 amp Rel-13 and Beyond 2015
84
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Gains From Carrier Aggregation
85
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
CoMP Levels
86
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
87
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE UE Categories
UE Category Max DL Throughput Maximum DL MIMO Layers
Maximum UL Throughput
1 103 Mbps 1 52 Mbps2 510 Mbps 2 255 Mbps3 1020 Mbps 2 510 Mbps4 1508 Mbps 2 510 Mbps5 2996 Mbps 4 754 Mbps6 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps7 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps8 29986 Mbps 8 14978 Mbps9 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps
10 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps11 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps12 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps13 3916 Mbps 2 or 4 1508 Mbps14 39166 Mbps 8 95877 Mbps15 7988 Mbps 2 or 4 2261 Mbps16 10514 Mbps 2 or 4 1055 Mbps17 25066 Mbps 8 21194 Mbps18 12060 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 2110 Mbps19 16583 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 135639 Mbps
88
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE-Advanced Relay
Relay Link Access Link
Direct Link
89
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
90
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Traffic is FTP-like at a 50 load with a 7525 mix of indooroutdoor usersbull Throughput is at the medium-access control (MAC) protocol layer bull The configuration in the first row corresponds to low-frequency band operation
representative of 700 MHz or cellular while the remaining configurations assume high-frequency band operation representative of PCS AWS or WCS (Higher frequencies facilitate higher-order MIMO configurations and have wider radio channels available)
bull The downlink value for the first row corresponds to Release 8 device receive capability (Minimum Mean Square Error [MMSE]) while the values in the other rows correspond to Release 11 device receive capability (MMSE ndash Interference Rejection Combining [IRC])
bull The uplink value for the first row corresponds to a Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC) receiver at the eNodeB while the remaining values correspond to an IRC receiver
bull Low-band operation assumes 1732 meter inter-site distance (ISD) while high-band operation assumes 500 meter ISD The remaining simulation assumptions are listed in Table 11
bull Refer to white paper for additional assumptions
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
91
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
Mbps
Source Ericsson contribution 92
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
Source Jonas Karlsson Mathias Riback ldquoInitial Field Performance Measurements of LTErdquo Ericsson Review No 3 2008
93
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
Source LTESAE Trial Initiative ldquoLatest Results from the LSTI Feb 2009rdquo httpwwwlstiforumorg
94
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS API Profiles
Source 4G Americas VoLTE and RCS Technology ndash Evolution and Ecosystem
95
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
Source Nokia contribution
70
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
Source ATampT contribution
71
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
72
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
Source Nokia contribution
73
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
Source Ericsson contribution 74
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
Source Intel contribution
75
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Capabilities
bull Downlink peak data rates up to 300 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions through carrier aggregation higher-order modulation and 4X4 MIMO
bull Uplink peak data rates up to 71 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions
bull Operation in both TDD and FDD modes
bull Scalable bandwidth up to 20+20 MHz covering 14 3 5 10 15 and 20 MHz radio carriers
bull Increased spectral efficiency over HSPA by a factor of two to four
bull Reduced latency to 15 msec round-trip times between user equipment and the base station and to less than 100 msec transition times from inactive to active
bull Self-organizing capabilities under operator control and preferences that will automate network planning and will result in lower operator costs
76
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
77
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
Frequency
Resource block
Transmit on those resource blocks that are not faded
Carrier bandwidth
Source 5G Americas member contribution
78
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Antenna Schemes
Source 3G Americasrsquo white paper MIMO and Smart Antennas for 3G and 4G Wireless Systems ndash Practical Aspects and Deployment Considerations May 2010
79
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
Source 5G Americas member contribution
80
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
Source 5G Americas member contribution
81
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
82
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
83
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
Source 4G Americas Mobile Broadband Evolution Rel-12 amp Rel-13 and Beyond 2015
84
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Gains From Carrier Aggregation
85
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
CoMP Levels
86
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
87
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE UE Categories
UE Category Max DL Throughput Maximum DL MIMO Layers
Maximum UL Throughput
1 103 Mbps 1 52 Mbps2 510 Mbps 2 255 Mbps3 1020 Mbps 2 510 Mbps4 1508 Mbps 2 510 Mbps5 2996 Mbps 4 754 Mbps6 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps7 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps8 29986 Mbps 8 14978 Mbps9 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps
10 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps11 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps12 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps13 3916 Mbps 2 or 4 1508 Mbps14 39166 Mbps 8 95877 Mbps15 7988 Mbps 2 or 4 2261 Mbps16 10514 Mbps 2 or 4 1055 Mbps17 25066 Mbps 8 21194 Mbps18 12060 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 2110 Mbps19 16583 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 135639 Mbps
88
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE-Advanced Relay
Relay Link Access Link
Direct Link
89
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
90
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Traffic is FTP-like at a 50 load with a 7525 mix of indooroutdoor usersbull Throughput is at the medium-access control (MAC) protocol layer bull The configuration in the first row corresponds to low-frequency band operation
representative of 700 MHz or cellular while the remaining configurations assume high-frequency band operation representative of PCS AWS or WCS (Higher frequencies facilitate higher-order MIMO configurations and have wider radio channels available)
bull The downlink value for the first row corresponds to Release 8 device receive capability (Minimum Mean Square Error [MMSE]) while the values in the other rows correspond to Release 11 device receive capability (MMSE ndash Interference Rejection Combining [IRC])
bull The uplink value for the first row corresponds to a Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC) receiver at the eNodeB while the remaining values correspond to an IRC receiver
bull Low-band operation assumes 1732 meter inter-site distance (ISD) while high-band operation assumes 500 meter ISD The remaining simulation assumptions are listed in Table 11
bull Refer to white paper for additional assumptions
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
91
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
Mbps
Source Ericsson contribution 92
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
Source Jonas Karlsson Mathias Riback ldquoInitial Field Performance Measurements of LTErdquo Ericsson Review No 3 2008
93
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
Source LTESAE Trial Initiative ldquoLatest Results from the LSTI Feb 2009rdquo httpwwwlstiforumorg
94
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS API Profiles
Source 4G Americas VoLTE and RCS Technology ndash Evolution and Ecosystem
95
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
Source ATampT contribution
71
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
72
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
Source Nokia contribution
73
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
Source Ericsson contribution 74
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
Source Intel contribution
75
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Capabilities
bull Downlink peak data rates up to 300 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions through carrier aggregation higher-order modulation and 4X4 MIMO
bull Uplink peak data rates up to 71 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions
bull Operation in both TDD and FDD modes
bull Scalable bandwidth up to 20+20 MHz covering 14 3 5 10 15 and 20 MHz radio carriers
bull Increased spectral efficiency over HSPA by a factor of two to four
bull Reduced latency to 15 msec round-trip times between user equipment and the base station and to less than 100 msec transition times from inactive to active
bull Self-organizing capabilities under operator control and preferences that will automate network planning and will result in lower operator costs
76
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
77
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
Frequency
Resource block
Transmit on those resource blocks that are not faded
Carrier bandwidth
Source 5G Americas member contribution
78
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Antenna Schemes
Source 3G Americasrsquo white paper MIMO and Smart Antennas for 3G and 4G Wireless Systems ndash Practical Aspects and Deployment Considerations May 2010
79
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
Source 5G Americas member contribution
80
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
Source 5G Americas member contribution
81
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
82
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
83
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
Source 4G Americas Mobile Broadband Evolution Rel-12 amp Rel-13 and Beyond 2015
84
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Gains From Carrier Aggregation
85
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
CoMP Levels
86
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
87
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE UE Categories
UE Category Max DL Throughput Maximum DL MIMO Layers
Maximum UL Throughput
1 103 Mbps 1 52 Mbps2 510 Mbps 2 255 Mbps3 1020 Mbps 2 510 Mbps4 1508 Mbps 2 510 Mbps5 2996 Mbps 4 754 Mbps6 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps7 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps8 29986 Mbps 8 14978 Mbps9 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps
10 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps11 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps12 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps13 3916 Mbps 2 or 4 1508 Mbps14 39166 Mbps 8 95877 Mbps15 7988 Mbps 2 or 4 2261 Mbps16 10514 Mbps 2 or 4 1055 Mbps17 25066 Mbps 8 21194 Mbps18 12060 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 2110 Mbps19 16583 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 135639 Mbps
88
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE-Advanced Relay
Relay Link Access Link
Direct Link
89
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
90
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Traffic is FTP-like at a 50 load with a 7525 mix of indooroutdoor usersbull Throughput is at the medium-access control (MAC) protocol layer bull The configuration in the first row corresponds to low-frequency band operation
representative of 700 MHz or cellular while the remaining configurations assume high-frequency band operation representative of PCS AWS or WCS (Higher frequencies facilitate higher-order MIMO configurations and have wider radio channels available)
bull The downlink value for the first row corresponds to Release 8 device receive capability (Minimum Mean Square Error [MMSE]) while the values in the other rows correspond to Release 11 device receive capability (MMSE ndash Interference Rejection Combining [IRC])
bull The uplink value for the first row corresponds to a Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC) receiver at the eNodeB while the remaining values correspond to an IRC receiver
bull Low-band operation assumes 1732 meter inter-site distance (ISD) while high-band operation assumes 500 meter ISD The remaining simulation assumptions are listed in Table 11
bull Refer to white paper for additional assumptions
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
91
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
Mbps
Source Ericsson contribution 92
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
Source Jonas Karlsson Mathias Riback ldquoInitial Field Performance Measurements of LTErdquo Ericsson Review No 3 2008
93
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
Source LTESAE Trial Initiative ldquoLatest Results from the LSTI Feb 2009rdquo httpwwwlstiforumorg
94
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS API Profiles
Source 4G Americas VoLTE and RCS Technology ndash Evolution and Ecosystem
95
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
72
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
Source Nokia contribution
73
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
Source Ericsson contribution 74
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
Source Intel contribution
75
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Capabilities
bull Downlink peak data rates up to 300 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions through carrier aggregation higher-order modulation and 4X4 MIMO
bull Uplink peak data rates up to 71 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions
bull Operation in both TDD and FDD modes
bull Scalable bandwidth up to 20+20 MHz covering 14 3 5 10 15 and 20 MHz radio carriers
bull Increased spectral efficiency over HSPA by a factor of two to four
bull Reduced latency to 15 msec round-trip times between user equipment and the base station and to less than 100 msec transition times from inactive to active
bull Self-organizing capabilities under operator control and preferences that will automate network planning and will result in lower operator costs
76
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
77
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
Frequency
Resource block
Transmit on those resource blocks that are not faded
Carrier bandwidth
Source 5G Americas member contribution
78
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Antenna Schemes
Source 3G Americasrsquo white paper MIMO and Smart Antennas for 3G and 4G Wireless Systems ndash Practical Aspects and Deployment Considerations May 2010
79
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
Source 5G Americas member contribution
80
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
Source 5G Americas member contribution
81
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
82
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
83
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
Source 4G Americas Mobile Broadband Evolution Rel-12 amp Rel-13 and Beyond 2015
84
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Gains From Carrier Aggregation
85
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
CoMP Levels
86
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
87
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE UE Categories
UE Category Max DL Throughput Maximum DL MIMO Layers
Maximum UL Throughput
1 103 Mbps 1 52 Mbps2 510 Mbps 2 255 Mbps3 1020 Mbps 2 510 Mbps4 1508 Mbps 2 510 Mbps5 2996 Mbps 4 754 Mbps6 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps7 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps8 29986 Mbps 8 14978 Mbps9 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps
10 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps11 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps12 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps13 3916 Mbps 2 or 4 1508 Mbps14 39166 Mbps 8 95877 Mbps15 7988 Mbps 2 or 4 2261 Mbps16 10514 Mbps 2 or 4 1055 Mbps17 25066 Mbps 8 21194 Mbps18 12060 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 2110 Mbps19 16583 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 135639 Mbps
88
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE-Advanced Relay
Relay Link Access Link
Direct Link
89
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
90
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Traffic is FTP-like at a 50 load with a 7525 mix of indooroutdoor usersbull Throughput is at the medium-access control (MAC) protocol layer bull The configuration in the first row corresponds to low-frequency band operation
representative of 700 MHz or cellular while the remaining configurations assume high-frequency band operation representative of PCS AWS or WCS (Higher frequencies facilitate higher-order MIMO configurations and have wider radio channels available)
bull The downlink value for the first row corresponds to Release 8 device receive capability (Minimum Mean Square Error [MMSE]) while the values in the other rows correspond to Release 11 device receive capability (MMSE ndash Interference Rejection Combining [IRC])
bull The uplink value for the first row corresponds to a Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC) receiver at the eNodeB while the remaining values correspond to an IRC receiver
bull Low-band operation assumes 1732 meter inter-site distance (ISD) while high-band operation assumes 500 meter ISD The remaining simulation assumptions are listed in Table 11
bull Refer to white paper for additional assumptions
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
91
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
Mbps
Source Ericsson contribution 92
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
Source Jonas Karlsson Mathias Riback ldquoInitial Field Performance Measurements of LTErdquo Ericsson Review No 3 2008
93
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
Source LTESAE Trial Initiative ldquoLatest Results from the LSTI Feb 2009rdquo httpwwwlstiforumorg
94
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS API Profiles
Source 4G Americas VoLTE and RCS Technology ndash Evolution and Ecosystem
95
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
Source Nokia contribution
73
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
Source Ericsson contribution 74
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
Source Intel contribution
75
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Capabilities
bull Downlink peak data rates up to 300 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions through carrier aggregation higher-order modulation and 4X4 MIMO
bull Uplink peak data rates up to 71 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions
bull Operation in both TDD and FDD modes
bull Scalable bandwidth up to 20+20 MHz covering 14 3 5 10 15 and 20 MHz radio carriers
bull Increased spectral efficiency over HSPA by a factor of two to four
bull Reduced latency to 15 msec round-trip times between user equipment and the base station and to less than 100 msec transition times from inactive to active
bull Self-organizing capabilities under operator control and preferences that will automate network planning and will result in lower operator costs
76
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
77
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
Frequency
Resource block
Transmit on those resource blocks that are not faded
Carrier bandwidth
Source 5G Americas member contribution
78
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Antenna Schemes
Source 3G Americasrsquo white paper MIMO and Smart Antennas for 3G and 4G Wireless Systems ndash Practical Aspects and Deployment Considerations May 2010
79
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
Source 5G Americas member contribution
80
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
Source 5G Americas member contribution
81
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
82
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
83
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
Source 4G Americas Mobile Broadband Evolution Rel-12 amp Rel-13 and Beyond 2015
84
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Gains From Carrier Aggregation
85
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
CoMP Levels
86
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
87
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE UE Categories
UE Category Max DL Throughput Maximum DL MIMO Layers
Maximum UL Throughput
1 103 Mbps 1 52 Mbps2 510 Mbps 2 255 Mbps3 1020 Mbps 2 510 Mbps4 1508 Mbps 2 510 Mbps5 2996 Mbps 4 754 Mbps6 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps7 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps8 29986 Mbps 8 14978 Mbps9 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps
10 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps11 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps12 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps13 3916 Mbps 2 or 4 1508 Mbps14 39166 Mbps 8 95877 Mbps15 7988 Mbps 2 or 4 2261 Mbps16 10514 Mbps 2 or 4 1055 Mbps17 25066 Mbps 8 21194 Mbps18 12060 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 2110 Mbps19 16583 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 135639 Mbps
88
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE-Advanced Relay
Relay Link Access Link
Direct Link
89
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
90
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Traffic is FTP-like at a 50 load with a 7525 mix of indooroutdoor usersbull Throughput is at the medium-access control (MAC) protocol layer bull The configuration in the first row corresponds to low-frequency band operation
representative of 700 MHz or cellular while the remaining configurations assume high-frequency band operation representative of PCS AWS or WCS (Higher frequencies facilitate higher-order MIMO configurations and have wider radio channels available)
bull The downlink value for the first row corresponds to Release 8 device receive capability (Minimum Mean Square Error [MMSE]) while the values in the other rows correspond to Release 11 device receive capability (MMSE ndash Interference Rejection Combining [IRC])
bull The uplink value for the first row corresponds to a Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC) receiver at the eNodeB while the remaining values correspond to an IRC receiver
bull Low-band operation assumes 1732 meter inter-site distance (ISD) while high-band operation assumes 500 meter ISD The remaining simulation assumptions are listed in Table 11
bull Refer to white paper for additional assumptions
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
91
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
Mbps
Source Ericsson contribution 92
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
Source Jonas Karlsson Mathias Riback ldquoInitial Field Performance Measurements of LTErdquo Ericsson Review No 3 2008
93
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
Source LTESAE Trial Initiative ldquoLatest Results from the LSTI Feb 2009rdquo httpwwwlstiforumorg
94
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS API Profiles
Source 4G Americas VoLTE and RCS Technology ndash Evolution and Ecosystem
95
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
Source Ericsson contribution 74
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
Source Intel contribution
75
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Capabilities
bull Downlink peak data rates up to 300 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions through carrier aggregation higher-order modulation and 4X4 MIMO
bull Uplink peak data rates up to 71 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions
bull Operation in both TDD and FDD modes
bull Scalable bandwidth up to 20+20 MHz covering 14 3 5 10 15 and 20 MHz radio carriers
bull Increased spectral efficiency over HSPA by a factor of two to four
bull Reduced latency to 15 msec round-trip times between user equipment and the base station and to less than 100 msec transition times from inactive to active
bull Self-organizing capabilities under operator control and preferences that will automate network planning and will result in lower operator costs
76
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
77
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
Frequency
Resource block
Transmit on those resource blocks that are not faded
Carrier bandwidth
Source 5G Americas member contribution
78
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Antenna Schemes
Source 3G Americasrsquo white paper MIMO and Smart Antennas for 3G and 4G Wireless Systems ndash Practical Aspects and Deployment Considerations May 2010
79
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
Source 5G Americas member contribution
80
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
Source 5G Americas member contribution
81
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
82
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
83
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
Source 4G Americas Mobile Broadband Evolution Rel-12 amp Rel-13 and Beyond 2015
84
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Gains From Carrier Aggregation
85
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
CoMP Levels
86
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
87
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE UE Categories
UE Category Max DL Throughput Maximum DL MIMO Layers
Maximum UL Throughput
1 103 Mbps 1 52 Mbps2 510 Mbps 2 255 Mbps3 1020 Mbps 2 510 Mbps4 1508 Mbps 2 510 Mbps5 2996 Mbps 4 754 Mbps6 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps7 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps8 29986 Mbps 8 14978 Mbps9 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps
10 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps11 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps12 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps13 3916 Mbps 2 or 4 1508 Mbps14 39166 Mbps 8 95877 Mbps15 7988 Mbps 2 or 4 2261 Mbps16 10514 Mbps 2 or 4 1055 Mbps17 25066 Mbps 8 21194 Mbps18 12060 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 2110 Mbps19 16583 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 135639 Mbps
88
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE-Advanced Relay
Relay Link Access Link
Direct Link
89
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
90
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Traffic is FTP-like at a 50 load with a 7525 mix of indooroutdoor usersbull Throughput is at the medium-access control (MAC) protocol layer bull The configuration in the first row corresponds to low-frequency band operation
representative of 700 MHz or cellular while the remaining configurations assume high-frequency band operation representative of PCS AWS or WCS (Higher frequencies facilitate higher-order MIMO configurations and have wider radio channels available)
bull The downlink value for the first row corresponds to Release 8 device receive capability (Minimum Mean Square Error [MMSE]) while the values in the other rows correspond to Release 11 device receive capability (MMSE ndash Interference Rejection Combining [IRC])
bull The uplink value for the first row corresponds to a Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC) receiver at the eNodeB while the remaining values correspond to an IRC receiver
bull Low-band operation assumes 1732 meter inter-site distance (ISD) while high-band operation assumes 500 meter ISD The remaining simulation assumptions are listed in Table 11
bull Refer to white paper for additional assumptions
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
91
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
Mbps
Source Ericsson contribution 92
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
Source Jonas Karlsson Mathias Riback ldquoInitial Field Performance Measurements of LTErdquo Ericsson Review No 3 2008
93
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
Source LTESAE Trial Initiative ldquoLatest Results from the LSTI Feb 2009rdquo httpwwwlstiforumorg
94
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS API Profiles
Source 4G Americas VoLTE and RCS Technology ndash Evolution and Ecosystem
95
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
Source Intel contribution
75
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Capabilities
bull Downlink peak data rates up to 300 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions through carrier aggregation higher-order modulation and 4X4 MIMO
bull Uplink peak data rates up to 71 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions
bull Operation in both TDD and FDD modes
bull Scalable bandwidth up to 20+20 MHz covering 14 3 5 10 15 and 20 MHz radio carriers
bull Increased spectral efficiency over HSPA by a factor of two to four
bull Reduced latency to 15 msec round-trip times between user equipment and the base station and to less than 100 msec transition times from inactive to active
bull Self-organizing capabilities under operator control and preferences that will automate network planning and will result in lower operator costs
76
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
77
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
Frequency
Resource block
Transmit on those resource blocks that are not faded
Carrier bandwidth
Source 5G Americas member contribution
78
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Antenna Schemes
Source 3G Americasrsquo white paper MIMO and Smart Antennas for 3G and 4G Wireless Systems ndash Practical Aspects and Deployment Considerations May 2010
79
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
Source 5G Americas member contribution
80
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
Source 5G Americas member contribution
81
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
82
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
83
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
Source 4G Americas Mobile Broadband Evolution Rel-12 amp Rel-13 and Beyond 2015
84
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Gains From Carrier Aggregation
85
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
CoMP Levels
86
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
87
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE UE Categories
UE Category Max DL Throughput Maximum DL MIMO Layers
Maximum UL Throughput
1 103 Mbps 1 52 Mbps2 510 Mbps 2 255 Mbps3 1020 Mbps 2 510 Mbps4 1508 Mbps 2 510 Mbps5 2996 Mbps 4 754 Mbps6 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps7 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps8 29986 Mbps 8 14978 Mbps9 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps
10 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps11 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps12 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps13 3916 Mbps 2 or 4 1508 Mbps14 39166 Mbps 8 95877 Mbps15 7988 Mbps 2 or 4 2261 Mbps16 10514 Mbps 2 or 4 1055 Mbps17 25066 Mbps 8 21194 Mbps18 12060 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 2110 Mbps19 16583 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 135639 Mbps
88
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE-Advanced Relay
Relay Link Access Link
Direct Link
89
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
90
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Traffic is FTP-like at a 50 load with a 7525 mix of indooroutdoor usersbull Throughput is at the medium-access control (MAC) protocol layer bull The configuration in the first row corresponds to low-frequency band operation
representative of 700 MHz or cellular while the remaining configurations assume high-frequency band operation representative of PCS AWS or WCS (Higher frequencies facilitate higher-order MIMO configurations and have wider radio channels available)
bull The downlink value for the first row corresponds to Release 8 device receive capability (Minimum Mean Square Error [MMSE]) while the values in the other rows correspond to Release 11 device receive capability (MMSE ndash Interference Rejection Combining [IRC])
bull The uplink value for the first row corresponds to a Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC) receiver at the eNodeB while the remaining values correspond to an IRC receiver
bull Low-band operation assumes 1732 meter inter-site distance (ISD) while high-band operation assumes 500 meter ISD The remaining simulation assumptions are listed in Table 11
bull Refer to white paper for additional assumptions
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
91
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
Mbps
Source Ericsson contribution 92
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
Source Jonas Karlsson Mathias Riback ldquoInitial Field Performance Measurements of LTErdquo Ericsson Review No 3 2008
93
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
Source LTESAE Trial Initiative ldquoLatest Results from the LSTI Feb 2009rdquo httpwwwlstiforumorg
94
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS API Profiles
Source 4G Americas VoLTE and RCS Technology ndash Evolution and Ecosystem
95
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Capabilities
bull Downlink peak data rates up to 300 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions through carrier aggregation higher-order modulation and 4X4 MIMO
bull Uplink peak data rates up to 71 Mbps with 20+20 MHz bandwidth in initial versions increasing to over 1 Gbps in subsequent versions
bull Operation in both TDD and FDD modes
bull Scalable bandwidth up to 20+20 MHz covering 14 3 5 10 15 and 20 MHz radio carriers
bull Increased spectral efficiency over HSPA by a factor of two to four
bull Reduced latency to 15 msec round-trip times between user equipment and the base station and to less than 100 msec transition times from inactive to active
bull Self-organizing capabilities under operator control and preferences that will automate network planning and will result in lower operator costs
76
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
77
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
Frequency
Resource block
Transmit on those resource blocks that are not faded
Carrier bandwidth
Source 5G Americas member contribution
78
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Antenna Schemes
Source 3G Americasrsquo white paper MIMO and Smart Antennas for 3G and 4G Wireless Systems ndash Practical Aspects and Deployment Considerations May 2010
79
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
Source 5G Americas member contribution
80
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
Source 5G Americas member contribution
81
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
82
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
83
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
Source 4G Americas Mobile Broadband Evolution Rel-12 amp Rel-13 and Beyond 2015
84
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Gains From Carrier Aggregation
85
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
CoMP Levels
86
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
87
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE UE Categories
UE Category Max DL Throughput Maximum DL MIMO Layers
Maximum UL Throughput
1 103 Mbps 1 52 Mbps2 510 Mbps 2 255 Mbps3 1020 Mbps 2 510 Mbps4 1508 Mbps 2 510 Mbps5 2996 Mbps 4 754 Mbps6 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps7 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps8 29986 Mbps 8 14978 Mbps9 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps
10 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps11 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps12 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps13 3916 Mbps 2 or 4 1508 Mbps14 39166 Mbps 8 95877 Mbps15 7988 Mbps 2 or 4 2261 Mbps16 10514 Mbps 2 or 4 1055 Mbps17 25066 Mbps 8 21194 Mbps18 12060 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 2110 Mbps19 16583 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 135639 Mbps
88
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE-Advanced Relay
Relay Link Access Link
Direct Link
89
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
90
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Traffic is FTP-like at a 50 load with a 7525 mix of indooroutdoor usersbull Throughput is at the medium-access control (MAC) protocol layer bull The configuration in the first row corresponds to low-frequency band operation
representative of 700 MHz or cellular while the remaining configurations assume high-frequency band operation representative of PCS AWS or WCS (Higher frequencies facilitate higher-order MIMO configurations and have wider radio channels available)
bull The downlink value for the first row corresponds to Release 8 device receive capability (Minimum Mean Square Error [MMSE]) while the values in the other rows correspond to Release 11 device receive capability (MMSE ndash Interference Rejection Combining [IRC])
bull The uplink value for the first row corresponds to a Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC) receiver at the eNodeB while the remaining values correspond to an IRC receiver
bull Low-band operation assumes 1732 meter inter-site distance (ISD) while high-band operation assumes 500 meter ISD The remaining simulation assumptions are listed in Table 11
bull Refer to white paper for additional assumptions
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
91
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
Mbps
Source Ericsson contribution 92
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
Source Jonas Karlsson Mathias Riback ldquoInitial Field Performance Measurements of LTErdquo Ericsson Review No 3 2008
93
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
Source LTESAE Trial Initiative ldquoLatest Results from the LSTI Feb 2009rdquo httpwwwlstiforumorg
94
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS API Profiles
Source 4G Americas VoLTE and RCS Technology ndash Evolution and Ecosystem
95
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
77
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
Frequency
Resource block
Transmit on those resource blocks that are not faded
Carrier bandwidth
Source 5G Americas member contribution
78
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Antenna Schemes
Source 3G Americasrsquo white paper MIMO and Smart Antennas for 3G and 4G Wireless Systems ndash Practical Aspects and Deployment Considerations May 2010
79
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
Source 5G Americas member contribution
80
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
Source 5G Americas member contribution
81
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
82
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
83
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
Source 4G Americas Mobile Broadband Evolution Rel-12 amp Rel-13 and Beyond 2015
84
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Gains From Carrier Aggregation
85
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
CoMP Levels
86
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
87
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE UE Categories
UE Category Max DL Throughput Maximum DL MIMO Layers
Maximum UL Throughput
1 103 Mbps 1 52 Mbps2 510 Mbps 2 255 Mbps3 1020 Mbps 2 510 Mbps4 1508 Mbps 2 510 Mbps5 2996 Mbps 4 754 Mbps6 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps7 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps8 29986 Mbps 8 14978 Mbps9 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps
10 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps11 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps12 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps13 3916 Mbps 2 or 4 1508 Mbps14 39166 Mbps 8 95877 Mbps15 7988 Mbps 2 or 4 2261 Mbps16 10514 Mbps 2 or 4 1055 Mbps17 25066 Mbps 8 21194 Mbps18 12060 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 2110 Mbps19 16583 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 135639 Mbps
88
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE-Advanced Relay
Relay Link Access Link
Direct Link
89
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
90
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Traffic is FTP-like at a 50 load with a 7525 mix of indooroutdoor usersbull Throughput is at the medium-access control (MAC) protocol layer bull The configuration in the first row corresponds to low-frequency band operation
representative of 700 MHz or cellular while the remaining configurations assume high-frequency band operation representative of PCS AWS or WCS (Higher frequencies facilitate higher-order MIMO configurations and have wider radio channels available)
bull The downlink value for the first row corresponds to Release 8 device receive capability (Minimum Mean Square Error [MMSE]) while the values in the other rows correspond to Release 11 device receive capability (MMSE ndash Interference Rejection Combining [IRC])
bull The uplink value for the first row corresponds to a Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC) receiver at the eNodeB while the remaining values correspond to an IRC receiver
bull Low-band operation assumes 1732 meter inter-site distance (ISD) while high-band operation assumes 500 meter ISD The remaining simulation assumptions are listed in Table 11
bull Refer to white paper for additional assumptions
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
91
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
Mbps
Source Ericsson contribution 92
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
Source Jonas Karlsson Mathias Riback ldquoInitial Field Performance Measurements of LTErdquo Ericsson Review No 3 2008
93
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
Source LTESAE Trial Initiative ldquoLatest Results from the LSTI Feb 2009rdquo httpwwwlstiforumorg
94
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS API Profiles
Source 4G Americas VoLTE and RCS Technology ndash Evolution and Ecosystem
95
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
Frequency
Resource block
Transmit on those resource blocks that are not faded
Carrier bandwidth
Source 5G Americas member contribution
78
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Antenna Schemes
Source 3G Americasrsquo white paper MIMO and Smart Antennas for 3G and 4G Wireless Systems ndash Practical Aspects and Deployment Considerations May 2010
79
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
Source 5G Americas member contribution
80
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
Source 5G Americas member contribution
81
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
82
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
83
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
Source 4G Americas Mobile Broadband Evolution Rel-12 amp Rel-13 and Beyond 2015
84
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Gains From Carrier Aggregation
85
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
CoMP Levels
86
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
87
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE UE Categories
UE Category Max DL Throughput Maximum DL MIMO Layers
Maximum UL Throughput
1 103 Mbps 1 52 Mbps2 510 Mbps 2 255 Mbps3 1020 Mbps 2 510 Mbps4 1508 Mbps 2 510 Mbps5 2996 Mbps 4 754 Mbps6 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps7 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps8 29986 Mbps 8 14978 Mbps9 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps
10 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps11 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps12 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps13 3916 Mbps 2 or 4 1508 Mbps14 39166 Mbps 8 95877 Mbps15 7988 Mbps 2 or 4 2261 Mbps16 10514 Mbps 2 or 4 1055 Mbps17 25066 Mbps 8 21194 Mbps18 12060 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 2110 Mbps19 16583 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 135639 Mbps
88
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE-Advanced Relay
Relay Link Access Link
Direct Link
89
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
90
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Traffic is FTP-like at a 50 load with a 7525 mix of indooroutdoor usersbull Throughput is at the medium-access control (MAC) protocol layer bull The configuration in the first row corresponds to low-frequency band operation
representative of 700 MHz or cellular while the remaining configurations assume high-frequency band operation representative of PCS AWS or WCS (Higher frequencies facilitate higher-order MIMO configurations and have wider radio channels available)
bull The downlink value for the first row corresponds to Release 8 device receive capability (Minimum Mean Square Error [MMSE]) while the values in the other rows correspond to Release 11 device receive capability (MMSE ndash Interference Rejection Combining [IRC])
bull The uplink value for the first row corresponds to a Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC) receiver at the eNodeB while the remaining values correspond to an IRC receiver
bull Low-band operation assumes 1732 meter inter-site distance (ISD) while high-band operation assumes 500 meter ISD The remaining simulation assumptions are listed in Table 11
bull Refer to white paper for additional assumptions
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
91
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
Mbps
Source Ericsson contribution 92
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
Source Jonas Karlsson Mathias Riback ldquoInitial Field Performance Measurements of LTErdquo Ericsson Review No 3 2008
93
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
Source LTESAE Trial Initiative ldquoLatest Results from the LSTI Feb 2009rdquo httpwwwlstiforumorg
94
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS API Profiles
Source 4G Americas VoLTE and RCS Technology ndash Evolution and Ecosystem
95
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Antenna Schemes
Source 3G Americasrsquo white paper MIMO and Smart Antennas for 3G and 4G Wireless Systems ndash Practical Aspects and Deployment Considerations May 2010
79
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
Source 5G Americas member contribution
80
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
Source 5G Americas member contribution
81
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
82
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
83
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
Source 4G Americas Mobile Broadband Evolution Rel-12 amp Rel-13 and Beyond 2015
84
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Gains From Carrier Aggregation
85
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
CoMP Levels
86
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
87
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE UE Categories
UE Category Max DL Throughput Maximum DL MIMO Layers
Maximum UL Throughput
1 103 Mbps 1 52 Mbps2 510 Mbps 2 255 Mbps3 1020 Mbps 2 510 Mbps4 1508 Mbps 2 510 Mbps5 2996 Mbps 4 754 Mbps6 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps7 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps8 29986 Mbps 8 14978 Mbps9 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps
10 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps11 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps12 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps13 3916 Mbps 2 or 4 1508 Mbps14 39166 Mbps 8 95877 Mbps15 7988 Mbps 2 or 4 2261 Mbps16 10514 Mbps 2 or 4 1055 Mbps17 25066 Mbps 8 21194 Mbps18 12060 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 2110 Mbps19 16583 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 135639 Mbps
88
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE-Advanced Relay
Relay Link Access Link
Direct Link
89
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
90
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Traffic is FTP-like at a 50 load with a 7525 mix of indooroutdoor usersbull Throughput is at the medium-access control (MAC) protocol layer bull The configuration in the first row corresponds to low-frequency band operation
representative of 700 MHz or cellular while the remaining configurations assume high-frequency band operation representative of PCS AWS or WCS (Higher frequencies facilitate higher-order MIMO configurations and have wider radio channels available)
bull The downlink value for the first row corresponds to Release 8 device receive capability (Minimum Mean Square Error [MMSE]) while the values in the other rows correspond to Release 11 device receive capability (MMSE ndash Interference Rejection Combining [IRC])
bull The uplink value for the first row corresponds to a Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC) receiver at the eNodeB while the remaining values correspond to an IRC receiver
bull Low-band operation assumes 1732 meter inter-site distance (ISD) while high-band operation assumes 500 meter ISD The remaining simulation assumptions are listed in Table 11
bull Refer to white paper for additional assumptions
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
91
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
Mbps
Source Ericsson contribution 92
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
Source Jonas Karlsson Mathias Riback ldquoInitial Field Performance Measurements of LTErdquo Ericsson Review No 3 2008
93
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
Source LTESAE Trial Initiative ldquoLatest Results from the LSTI Feb 2009rdquo httpwwwlstiforumorg
94
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS API Profiles
Source 4G Americas VoLTE and RCS Technology ndash Evolution and Ecosystem
95
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
Source 5G Americas member contribution
80
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
Source 5G Americas member contribution
81
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
82
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
83
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
Source 4G Americas Mobile Broadband Evolution Rel-12 amp Rel-13 and Beyond 2015
84
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Gains From Carrier Aggregation
85
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
CoMP Levels
86
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
87
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE UE Categories
UE Category Max DL Throughput Maximum DL MIMO Layers
Maximum UL Throughput
1 103 Mbps 1 52 Mbps2 510 Mbps 2 255 Mbps3 1020 Mbps 2 510 Mbps4 1508 Mbps 2 510 Mbps5 2996 Mbps 4 754 Mbps6 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps7 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps8 29986 Mbps 8 14978 Mbps9 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps
10 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps11 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps12 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps13 3916 Mbps 2 or 4 1508 Mbps14 39166 Mbps 8 95877 Mbps15 7988 Mbps 2 or 4 2261 Mbps16 10514 Mbps 2 or 4 1055 Mbps17 25066 Mbps 8 21194 Mbps18 12060 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 2110 Mbps19 16583 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 135639 Mbps
88
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE-Advanced Relay
Relay Link Access Link
Direct Link
89
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
90
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Traffic is FTP-like at a 50 load with a 7525 mix of indooroutdoor usersbull Throughput is at the medium-access control (MAC) protocol layer bull The configuration in the first row corresponds to low-frequency band operation
representative of 700 MHz or cellular while the remaining configurations assume high-frequency band operation representative of PCS AWS or WCS (Higher frequencies facilitate higher-order MIMO configurations and have wider radio channels available)
bull The downlink value for the first row corresponds to Release 8 device receive capability (Minimum Mean Square Error [MMSE]) while the values in the other rows correspond to Release 11 device receive capability (MMSE ndash Interference Rejection Combining [IRC])
bull The uplink value for the first row corresponds to a Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC) receiver at the eNodeB while the remaining values correspond to an IRC receiver
bull Low-band operation assumes 1732 meter inter-site distance (ISD) while high-band operation assumes 500 meter ISD The remaining simulation assumptions are listed in Table 11
bull Refer to white paper for additional assumptions
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
91
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
Mbps
Source Ericsson contribution 92
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
Source Jonas Karlsson Mathias Riback ldquoInitial Field Performance Measurements of LTErdquo Ericsson Review No 3 2008
93
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
Source LTESAE Trial Initiative ldquoLatest Results from the LSTI Feb 2009rdquo httpwwwlstiforumorg
94
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS API Profiles
Source 4G Americas VoLTE and RCS Technology ndash Evolution and Ecosystem
95
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
Source 5G Americas member contribution
81
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
82
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
83
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
Source 4G Americas Mobile Broadband Evolution Rel-12 amp Rel-13 and Beyond 2015
84
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Gains From Carrier Aggregation
85
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
CoMP Levels
86
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
87
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE UE Categories
UE Category Max DL Throughput Maximum DL MIMO Layers
Maximum UL Throughput
1 103 Mbps 1 52 Mbps2 510 Mbps 2 255 Mbps3 1020 Mbps 2 510 Mbps4 1508 Mbps 2 510 Mbps5 2996 Mbps 4 754 Mbps6 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps7 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps8 29986 Mbps 8 14978 Mbps9 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps
10 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps11 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps12 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps13 3916 Mbps 2 or 4 1508 Mbps14 39166 Mbps 8 95877 Mbps15 7988 Mbps 2 or 4 2261 Mbps16 10514 Mbps 2 or 4 1055 Mbps17 25066 Mbps 8 21194 Mbps18 12060 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 2110 Mbps19 16583 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 135639 Mbps
88
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE-Advanced Relay
Relay Link Access Link
Direct Link
89
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
90
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Traffic is FTP-like at a 50 load with a 7525 mix of indooroutdoor usersbull Throughput is at the medium-access control (MAC) protocol layer bull The configuration in the first row corresponds to low-frequency band operation
representative of 700 MHz or cellular while the remaining configurations assume high-frequency band operation representative of PCS AWS or WCS (Higher frequencies facilitate higher-order MIMO configurations and have wider radio channels available)
bull The downlink value for the first row corresponds to Release 8 device receive capability (Minimum Mean Square Error [MMSE]) while the values in the other rows correspond to Release 11 device receive capability (MMSE ndash Interference Rejection Combining [IRC])
bull The uplink value for the first row corresponds to a Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC) receiver at the eNodeB while the remaining values correspond to an IRC receiver
bull Low-band operation assumes 1732 meter inter-site distance (ISD) while high-band operation assumes 500 meter ISD The remaining simulation assumptions are listed in Table 11
bull Refer to white paper for additional assumptions
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
91
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
Mbps
Source Ericsson contribution 92
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
Source Jonas Karlsson Mathias Riback ldquoInitial Field Performance Measurements of LTErdquo Ericsson Review No 3 2008
93
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
Source LTESAE Trial Initiative ldquoLatest Results from the LSTI Feb 2009rdquo httpwwwlstiforumorg
94
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS API Profiles
Source 4G Americas VoLTE and RCS Technology ndash Evolution and Ecosystem
95
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
82
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
83
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
Source 4G Americas Mobile Broadband Evolution Rel-12 amp Rel-13 and Beyond 2015
84
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Gains From Carrier Aggregation
85
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
CoMP Levels
86
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
87
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE UE Categories
UE Category Max DL Throughput Maximum DL MIMO Layers
Maximum UL Throughput
1 103 Mbps 1 52 Mbps2 510 Mbps 2 255 Mbps3 1020 Mbps 2 510 Mbps4 1508 Mbps 2 510 Mbps5 2996 Mbps 4 754 Mbps6 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps7 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps8 29986 Mbps 8 14978 Mbps9 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps
10 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps11 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps12 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps13 3916 Mbps 2 or 4 1508 Mbps14 39166 Mbps 8 95877 Mbps15 7988 Mbps 2 or 4 2261 Mbps16 10514 Mbps 2 or 4 1055 Mbps17 25066 Mbps 8 21194 Mbps18 12060 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 2110 Mbps19 16583 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 135639 Mbps
88
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE-Advanced Relay
Relay Link Access Link
Direct Link
89
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
90
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Traffic is FTP-like at a 50 load with a 7525 mix of indooroutdoor usersbull Throughput is at the medium-access control (MAC) protocol layer bull The configuration in the first row corresponds to low-frequency band operation
representative of 700 MHz or cellular while the remaining configurations assume high-frequency band operation representative of PCS AWS or WCS (Higher frequencies facilitate higher-order MIMO configurations and have wider radio channels available)
bull The downlink value for the first row corresponds to Release 8 device receive capability (Minimum Mean Square Error [MMSE]) while the values in the other rows correspond to Release 11 device receive capability (MMSE ndash Interference Rejection Combining [IRC])
bull The uplink value for the first row corresponds to a Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC) receiver at the eNodeB while the remaining values correspond to an IRC receiver
bull Low-band operation assumes 1732 meter inter-site distance (ISD) while high-band operation assumes 500 meter ISD The remaining simulation assumptions are listed in Table 11
bull Refer to white paper for additional assumptions
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
91
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
Mbps
Source Ericsson contribution 92
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
Source Jonas Karlsson Mathias Riback ldquoInitial Field Performance Measurements of LTErdquo Ericsson Review No 3 2008
93
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
Source LTESAE Trial Initiative ldquoLatest Results from the LSTI Feb 2009rdquo httpwwwlstiforumorg
94
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS API Profiles
Source 4G Americas VoLTE and RCS Technology ndash Evolution and Ecosystem
95
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
83
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
Source 4G Americas Mobile Broadband Evolution Rel-12 amp Rel-13 and Beyond 2015
84
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Gains From Carrier Aggregation
85
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
CoMP Levels
86
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
87
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE UE Categories
UE Category Max DL Throughput Maximum DL MIMO Layers
Maximum UL Throughput
1 103 Mbps 1 52 Mbps2 510 Mbps 2 255 Mbps3 1020 Mbps 2 510 Mbps4 1508 Mbps 2 510 Mbps5 2996 Mbps 4 754 Mbps6 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps7 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps8 29986 Mbps 8 14978 Mbps9 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps
10 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps11 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps12 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps13 3916 Mbps 2 or 4 1508 Mbps14 39166 Mbps 8 95877 Mbps15 7988 Mbps 2 or 4 2261 Mbps16 10514 Mbps 2 or 4 1055 Mbps17 25066 Mbps 8 21194 Mbps18 12060 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 2110 Mbps19 16583 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 135639 Mbps
88
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE-Advanced Relay
Relay Link Access Link
Direct Link
89
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
90
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Traffic is FTP-like at a 50 load with a 7525 mix of indooroutdoor usersbull Throughput is at the medium-access control (MAC) protocol layer bull The configuration in the first row corresponds to low-frequency band operation
representative of 700 MHz or cellular while the remaining configurations assume high-frequency band operation representative of PCS AWS or WCS (Higher frequencies facilitate higher-order MIMO configurations and have wider radio channels available)
bull The downlink value for the first row corresponds to Release 8 device receive capability (Minimum Mean Square Error [MMSE]) while the values in the other rows correspond to Release 11 device receive capability (MMSE ndash Interference Rejection Combining [IRC])
bull The uplink value for the first row corresponds to a Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC) receiver at the eNodeB while the remaining values correspond to an IRC receiver
bull Low-band operation assumes 1732 meter inter-site distance (ISD) while high-band operation assumes 500 meter ISD The remaining simulation assumptions are listed in Table 11
bull Refer to white paper for additional assumptions
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
91
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
Mbps
Source Ericsson contribution 92
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
Source Jonas Karlsson Mathias Riback ldquoInitial Field Performance Measurements of LTErdquo Ericsson Review No 3 2008
93
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
Source LTESAE Trial Initiative ldquoLatest Results from the LSTI Feb 2009rdquo httpwwwlstiforumorg
94
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS API Profiles
Source 4G Americas VoLTE and RCS Technology ndash Evolution and Ecosystem
95
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
Source 4G Americas Mobile Broadband Evolution Rel-12 amp Rel-13 and Beyond 2015
84
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Gains From Carrier Aggregation
85
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
CoMP Levels
86
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
87
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE UE Categories
UE Category Max DL Throughput Maximum DL MIMO Layers
Maximum UL Throughput
1 103 Mbps 1 52 Mbps2 510 Mbps 2 255 Mbps3 1020 Mbps 2 510 Mbps4 1508 Mbps 2 510 Mbps5 2996 Mbps 4 754 Mbps6 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps7 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps8 29986 Mbps 8 14978 Mbps9 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps
10 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps11 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps12 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps13 3916 Mbps 2 or 4 1508 Mbps14 39166 Mbps 8 95877 Mbps15 7988 Mbps 2 or 4 2261 Mbps16 10514 Mbps 2 or 4 1055 Mbps17 25066 Mbps 8 21194 Mbps18 12060 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 2110 Mbps19 16583 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 135639 Mbps
88
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE-Advanced Relay
Relay Link Access Link
Direct Link
89
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
90
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Traffic is FTP-like at a 50 load with a 7525 mix of indooroutdoor usersbull Throughput is at the medium-access control (MAC) protocol layer bull The configuration in the first row corresponds to low-frequency band operation
representative of 700 MHz or cellular while the remaining configurations assume high-frequency band operation representative of PCS AWS or WCS (Higher frequencies facilitate higher-order MIMO configurations and have wider radio channels available)
bull The downlink value for the first row corresponds to Release 8 device receive capability (Minimum Mean Square Error [MMSE]) while the values in the other rows correspond to Release 11 device receive capability (MMSE ndash Interference Rejection Combining [IRC])
bull The uplink value for the first row corresponds to a Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC) receiver at the eNodeB while the remaining values correspond to an IRC receiver
bull Low-band operation assumes 1732 meter inter-site distance (ISD) while high-band operation assumes 500 meter ISD The remaining simulation assumptions are listed in Table 11
bull Refer to white paper for additional assumptions
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
91
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
Mbps
Source Ericsson contribution 92
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
Source Jonas Karlsson Mathias Riback ldquoInitial Field Performance Measurements of LTErdquo Ericsson Review No 3 2008
93
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
Source LTESAE Trial Initiative ldquoLatest Results from the LSTI Feb 2009rdquo httpwwwlstiforumorg
94
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS API Profiles
Source 4G Americas VoLTE and RCS Technology ndash Evolution and Ecosystem
95
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Gains From Carrier Aggregation
85
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
CoMP Levels
86
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
87
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE UE Categories
UE Category Max DL Throughput Maximum DL MIMO Layers
Maximum UL Throughput
1 103 Mbps 1 52 Mbps2 510 Mbps 2 255 Mbps3 1020 Mbps 2 510 Mbps4 1508 Mbps 2 510 Mbps5 2996 Mbps 4 754 Mbps6 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps7 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps8 29986 Mbps 8 14978 Mbps9 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps
10 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps11 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps12 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps13 3916 Mbps 2 or 4 1508 Mbps14 39166 Mbps 8 95877 Mbps15 7988 Mbps 2 or 4 2261 Mbps16 10514 Mbps 2 or 4 1055 Mbps17 25066 Mbps 8 21194 Mbps18 12060 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 2110 Mbps19 16583 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 135639 Mbps
88
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE-Advanced Relay
Relay Link Access Link
Direct Link
89
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
90
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Traffic is FTP-like at a 50 load with a 7525 mix of indooroutdoor usersbull Throughput is at the medium-access control (MAC) protocol layer bull The configuration in the first row corresponds to low-frequency band operation
representative of 700 MHz or cellular while the remaining configurations assume high-frequency band operation representative of PCS AWS or WCS (Higher frequencies facilitate higher-order MIMO configurations and have wider radio channels available)
bull The downlink value for the first row corresponds to Release 8 device receive capability (Minimum Mean Square Error [MMSE]) while the values in the other rows correspond to Release 11 device receive capability (MMSE ndash Interference Rejection Combining [IRC])
bull The uplink value for the first row corresponds to a Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC) receiver at the eNodeB while the remaining values correspond to an IRC receiver
bull Low-band operation assumes 1732 meter inter-site distance (ISD) while high-band operation assumes 500 meter ISD The remaining simulation assumptions are listed in Table 11
bull Refer to white paper for additional assumptions
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
91
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
Mbps
Source Ericsson contribution 92
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
Source Jonas Karlsson Mathias Riback ldquoInitial Field Performance Measurements of LTErdquo Ericsson Review No 3 2008
93
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
Source LTESAE Trial Initiative ldquoLatest Results from the LSTI Feb 2009rdquo httpwwwlstiforumorg
94
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS API Profiles
Source 4G Americas VoLTE and RCS Technology ndash Evolution and Ecosystem
95
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
CoMP Levels
86
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
87
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE UE Categories
UE Category Max DL Throughput Maximum DL MIMO Layers
Maximum UL Throughput
1 103 Mbps 1 52 Mbps2 510 Mbps 2 255 Mbps3 1020 Mbps 2 510 Mbps4 1508 Mbps 2 510 Mbps5 2996 Mbps 4 754 Mbps6 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps7 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps8 29986 Mbps 8 14978 Mbps9 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps
10 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps11 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps12 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps13 3916 Mbps 2 or 4 1508 Mbps14 39166 Mbps 8 95877 Mbps15 7988 Mbps 2 or 4 2261 Mbps16 10514 Mbps 2 or 4 1055 Mbps17 25066 Mbps 8 21194 Mbps18 12060 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 2110 Mbps19 16583 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 135639 Mbps
88
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE-Advanced Relay
Relay Link Access Link
Direct Link
89
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
90
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Traffic is FTP-like at a 50 load with a 7525 mix of indooroutdoor usersbull Throughput is at the medium-access control (MAC) protocol layer bull The configuration in the first row corresponds to low-frequency band operation
representative of 700 MHz or cellular while the remaining configurations assume high-frequency band operation representative of PCS AWS or WCS (Higher frequencies facilitate higher-order MIMO configurations and have wider radio channels available)
bull The downlink value for the first row corresponds to Release 8 device receive capability (Minimum Mean Square Error [MMSE]) while the values in the other rows correspond to Release 11 device receive capability (MMSE ndash Interference Rejection Combining [IRC])
bull The uplink value for the first row corresponds to a Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC) receiver at the eNodeB while the remaining values correspond to an IRC receiver
bull Low-band operation assumes 1732 meter inter-site distance (ISD) while high-band operation assumes 500 meter ISD The remaining simulation assumptions are listed in Table 11
bull Refer to white paper for additional assumptions
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
91
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
Mbps
Source Ericsson contribution 92
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
Source Jonas Karlsson Mathias Riback ldquoInitial Field Performance Measurements of LTErdquo Ericsson Review No 3 2008
93
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
Source LTESAE Trial Initiative ldquoLatest Results from the LSTI Feb 2009rdquo httpwwwlstiforumorg
94
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS API Profiles
Source 4G Americas VoLTE and RCS Technology ndash Evolution and Ecosystem
95
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
87
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE UE Categories
UE Category Max DL Throughput Maximum DL MIMO Layers
Maximum UL Throughput
1 103 Mbps 1 52 Mbps2 510 Mbps 2 255 Mbps3 1020 Mbps 2 510 Mbps4 1508 Mbps 2 510 Mbps5 2996 Mbps 4 754 Mbps6 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps7 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps8 29986 Mbps 8 14978 Mbps9 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps
10 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps11 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps12 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps13 3916 Mbps 2 or 4 1508 Mbps14 39166 Mbps 8 95877 Mbps15 7988 Mbps 2 or 4 2261 Mbps16 10514 Mbps 2 or 4 1055 Mbps17 25066 Mbps 8 21194 Mbps18 12060 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 2110 Mbps19 16583 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 135639 Mbps
88
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE-Advanced Relay
Relay Link Access Link
Direct Link
89
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
90
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Traffic is FTP-like at a 50 load with a 7525 mix of indooroutdoor usersbull Throughput is at the medium-access control (MAC) protocol layer bull The configuration in the first row corresponds to low-frequency band operation
representative of 700 MHz or cellular while the remaining configurations assume high-frequency band operation representative of PCS AWS or WCS (Higher frequencies facilitate higher-order MIMO configurations and have wider radio channels available)
bull The downlink value for the first row corresponds to Release 8 device receive capability (Minimum Mean Square Error [MMSE]) while the values in the other rows correspond to Release 11 device receive capability (MMSE ndash Interference Rejection Combining [IRC])
bull The uplink value for the first row corresponds to a Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC) receiver at the eNodeB while the remaining values correspond to an IRC receiver
bull Low-band operation assumes 1732 meter inter-site distance (ISD) while high-band operation assumes 500 meter ISD The remaining simulation assumptions are listed in Table 11
bull Refer to white paper for additional assumptions
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
91
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
Mbps
Source Ericsson contribution 92
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
Source Jonas Karlsson Mathias Riback ldquoInitial Field Performance Measurements of LTErdquo Ericsson Review No 3 2008
93
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
Source LTESAE Trial Initiative ldquoLatest Results from the LSTI Feb 2009rdquo httpwwwlstiforumorg
94
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS API Profiles
Source 4G Americas VoLTE and RCS Technology ndash Evolution and Ecosystem
95
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE UE Categories
UE Category Max DL Throughput Maximum DL MIMO Layers
Maximum UL Throughput
1 103 Mbps 1 52 Mbps2 510 Mbps 2 255 Mbps3 1020 Mbps 2 510 Mbps4 1508 Mbps 2 510 Mbps5 2996 Mbps 4 754 Mbps6 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps7 3015 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps8 29986 Mbps 8 14978 Mbps9 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps
10 4523 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps11 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 510 Mbps12 6030 Mbps 2 or 4 1020 Mbps13 3916 Mbps 2 or 4 1508 Mbps14 39166 Mbps 8 95877 Mbps15 7988 Mbps 2 or 4 2261 Mbps16 10514 Mbps 2 or 4 1055 Mbps17 25066 Mbps 8 21194 Mbps18 12060 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 2110 Mbps19 16583 Mbps 2 or 4 (or 8) 135639 Mbps
88
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE-Advanced Relay
Relay Link Access Link
Direct Link
89
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
90
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Traffic is FTP-like at a 50 load with a 7525 mix of indooroutdoor usersbull Throughput is at the medium-access control (MAC) protocol layer bull The configuration in the first row corresponds to low-frequency band operation
representative of 700 MHz or cellular while the remaining configurations assume high-frequency band operation representative of PCS AWS or WCS (Higher frequencies facilitate higher-order MIMO configurations and have wider radio channels available)
bull The downlink value for the first row corresponds to Release 8 device receive capability (Minimum Mean Square Error [MMSE]) while the values in the other rows correspond to Release 11 device receive capability (MMSE ndash Interference Rejection Combining [IRC])
bull The uplink value for the first row corresponds to a Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC) receiver at the eNodeB while the remaining values correspond to an IRC receiver
bull Low-band operation assumes 1732 meter inter-site distance (ISD) while high-band operation assumes 500 meter ISD The remaining simulation assumptions are listed in Table 11
bull Refer to white paper for additional assumptions
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
91
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
Mbps
Source Ericsson contribution 92
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
Source Jonas Karlsson Mathias Riback ldquoInitial Field Performance Measurements of LTErdquo Ericsson Review No 3 2008
93
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
Source LTESAE Trial Initiative ldquoLatest Results from the LSTI Feb 2009rdquo httpwwwlstiforumorg
94
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS API Profiles
Source 4G Americas VoLTE and RCS Technology ndash Evolution and Ecosystem
95
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE-Advanced Relay
Relay Link Access Link
Direct Link
89
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
90
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Traffic is FTP-like at a 50 load with a 7525 mix of indooroutdoor usersbull Throughput is at the medium-access control (MAC) protocol layer bull The configuration in the first row corresponds to low-frequency band operation
representative of 700 MHz or cellular while the remaining configurations assume high-frequency band operation representative of PCS AWS or WCS (Higher frequencies facilitate higher-order MIMO configurations and have wider radio channels available)
bull The downlink value for the first row corresponds to Release 8 device receive capability (Minimum Mean Square Error [MMSE]) while the values in the other rows correspond to Release 11 device receive capability (MMSE ndash Interference Rejection Combining [IRC])
bull The uplink value for the first row corresponds to a Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC) receiver at the eNodeB while the remaining values correspond to an IRC receiver
bull Low-band operation assumes 1732 meter inter-site distance (ISD) while high-band operation assumes 500 meter ISD The remaining simulation assumptions are listed in Table 11
bull Refer to white paper for additional assumptions
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
91
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
Mbps
Source Ericsson contribution 92
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
Source Jonas Karlsson Mathias Riback ldquoInitial Field Performance Measurements of LTErdquo Ericsson Review No 3 2008
93
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
Source LTESAE Trial Initiative ldquoLatest Results from the LSTI Feb 2009rdquo httpwwwlstiforumorg
94
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS API Profiles
Source 4G Americas VoLTE and RCS Technology ndash Evolution and Ecosystem
95
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
90
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Traffic is FTP-like at a 50 load with a 7525 mix of indooroutdoor usersbull Throughput is at the medium-access control (MAC) protocol layer bull The configuration in the first row corresponds to low-frequency band operation
representative of 700 MHz or cellular while the remaining configurations assume high-frequency band operation representative of PCS AWS or WCS (Higher frequencies facilitate higher-order MIMO configurations and have wider radio channels available)
bull The downlink value for the first row corresponds to Release 8 device receive capability (Minimum Mean Square Error [MMSE]) while the values in the other rows correspond to Release 11 device receive capability (MMSE ndash Interference Rejection Combining [IRC])
bull The uplink value for the first row corresponds to a Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC) receiver at the eNodeB while the remaining values correspond to an IRC receiver
bull Low-band operation assumes 1732 meter inter-site distance (ISD) while high-band operation assumes 500 meter ISD The remaining simulation assumptions are listed in Table 11
bull Refer to white paper for additional assumptions
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
91
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
Mbps
Source Ericsson contribution 92
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
Source Jonas Karlsson Mathias Riback ldquoInitial Field Performance Measurements of LTErdquo Ericsson Review No 3 2008
93
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
Source LTESAE Trial Initiative ldquoLatest Results from the LSTI Feb 2009rdquo httpwwwlstiforumorg
94
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS API Profiles
Source 4G Americas VoLTE and RCS Technology ndash Evolution and Ecosystem
95
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Traffic is FTP-like at a 50 load with a 7525 mix of indooroutdoor usersbull Throughput is at the medium-access control (MAC) protocol layer bull The configuration in the first row corresponds to low-frequency band operation
representative of 700 MHz or cellular while the remaining configurations assume high-frequency band operation representative of PCS AWS or WCS (Higher frequencies facilitate higher-order MIMO configurations and have wider radio channels available)
bull The downlink value for the first row corresponds to Release 8 device receive capability (Minimum Mean Square Error [MMSE]) while the values in the other rows correspond to Release 11 device receive capability (MMSE ndash Interference Rejection Combining [IRC])
bull The uplink value for the first row corresponds to a Maximal Ratio Combining (MRC) receiver at the eNodeB while the remaining values correspond to an IRC receiver
bull Low-band operation assumes 1732 meter inter-site distance (ISD) while high-band operation assumes 500 meter ISD The remaining simulation assumptions are listed in Table 11
bull Refer to white paper for additional assumptions
LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
91
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
Mbps
Source Ericsson contribution 92
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
Source Jonas Karlsson Mathias Riback ldquoInitial Field Performance Measurements of LTErdquo Ericsson Review No 3 2008
93
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
Source LTESAE Trial Initiative ldquoLatest Results from the LSTI Feb 2009rdquo httpwwwlstiforumorg
94
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS API Profiles
Source 4G Americas VoLTE and RCS Technology ndash Evolution and Ecosystem
95
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
Mbps
Source Ericsson contribution 92
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
Source Jonas Karlsson Mathias Riback ldquoInitial Field Performance Measurements of LTErdquo Ericsson Review No 3 2008
93
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
Source LTESAE Trial Initiative ldquoLatest Results from the LSTI Feb 2009rdquo httpwwwlstiforumorg
94
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS API Profiles
Source 4G Americas VoLTE and RCS Technology ndash Evolution and Ecosystem
95
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
Source Jonas Karlsson Mathias Riback ldquoInitial Field Performance Measurements of LTErdquo Ericsson Review No 3 2008
93
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
Source LTESAE Trial Initiative ldquoLatest Results from the LSTI Feb 2009rdquo httpwwwlstiforumorg
94
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS API Profiles
Source 4G Americas VoLTE and RCS Technology ndash Evolution and Ecosystem
95
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
Source LTESAE Trial Initiative ldquoLatest Results from the LSTI Feb 2009rdquo httpwwwlstiforumorg
94
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS API Profiles
Source 4G Americas VoLTE and RCS Technology ndash Evolution and Ecosystem
95
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of RCS API Profiles
Source 4G Americas VoLTE and RCS Technology ndash Evolution and Ecosystem
95
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
96
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
Features AMR AMR-WB EVSInput and output
sampling frequencies supported
8KHz 16KHz 8KHz 16KHz 32KHz 48 KHz
Audio bandwidth Narrowband Wideband Narrowband Wideband Super-wideband
FullbandCoding capabilities Optimized for
coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice signals
Optimized for coding human voice and general-
purpose audio (music ringtones mixed content)
signals
Bit rates supported (in kbs)
475 515 590 670 74 795
1020 1220
66 885 1265 1425 1585 1825 1985 2305 2385
59 72 8 96 (NB and WB only) 132 (NB WB
and SWB) 164 244 32 48 64 96 128 (WB and
SWB only)Number of audio
channelsMono Mono Mono and Stereo
Frame size 20 ms 20 ms 20 msAlgorithmic Delay 20-25 ms 25 ms Up to 32 ms
97
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
98
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
99
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
Source Nokia The 3GPP Enhanced Voice Services (EVS) codec 2015
100
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Evolved Packet System
101
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
LTE Quality of Service
QCI Resource Type
Priority Delay Budget
Packet Loss Examples
1 GBR (Guaranteed
Bit Rate)
2 100 msec 10-2
Conversational voice
2 GBR 4 150 msec 10-3
Conversational video (live streaming)
3 GBR 3 50 msec 10-3
Real-time gaming 4 GBR 5 300 msec 10
-6 Non-
conversational video (buffered streaming)
5 Non-GBR 1 100 msec 10-6
IMS signaling 6 Non-GBR 6 300 msec 10
-6 Video (buffered
streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
7 Non-GBR 7 100 msec 10-3
Voice video (live streaming) interactive gaming
8 Non-GBR 8 300 msec 10-6
Premium bearer for video (buffered streaming) TCP Web e-mail ftp hellip
9 Non-GBR 9 300 msec 10-6
Default bearer for video TCP for non-privileged users
102
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Load Balancing with Heterogeneous Networks
103Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Scenarios for Radio Carriers in Small Cells
104
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Traffic Distribution Scenarios
105
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Enhanced Intercell Interference Cancellation
106
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Median Throughput Gains Hotspot Scenarios
107Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
User Throughput Performance
WithWithout eICIC for Dynamic Traffic Vs Average Offered Load per Macro-Cell Area
108
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
109
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Connectivity
110
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
111Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
112
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
Device Category Category 3 Category 1 Category 0 Category M-1 Category NB-1 EC-GSM-IoT
3GPP Release 10 11 12 13 13 13
Max Data Rate Downlink
100 Mbps 10 Mbps 1 Mbps 1 Mbps 200 Kbps 74 Kbps
Max Data Rate Uplink
50 Mbps 5 Mbps 1 Mbps 1 Mbps 200 Kbps 74 Kbps
Max Bandwidth 20 MHz 20 MHz 20 MHz 108 MHz 018 MHz 02 MHz
Duplex Full Full Optional half-duplex
Optional half-duplex
Half Half
Max Receive Antennas
Two Two One One One One
Power Power Save Mode
Power Save Mode
Power Save Mode
Sleep Longer sleep cycles using Idle Discontinuous Reception (DRX)
Coverage Extended through redundant transmissions and Single Frequency Multicast
113
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Potential Cloud RAN Approach
114
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
Fully Centralized Partially Centralized
Transport Requirements Multi-Gbps usually using fiber
20 to 50 times less
Fronthaul Latency Requirement
Less than 100 microseconds
Greater than 5 milliseconds
Applications Supports eICIC and CoMP Supports centralized scheduling
Complexity High Lower
Benefit Capacity gain Lower capacity gain
115
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
Source Cisco Cisco 5G Vision Series Small Cell Evolution 2016
116
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
117Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
118
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Roaming Using Hotspot 20
119
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
120
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hybrid SON Architecture
121
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
IP Multimedia Subsystem
122
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
LTE will leverage OFDM-based broadcasting capabilities
123Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
UMTS Multi-Radio Network
Common core network can support multiple radio access networks
124
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
125
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Multi-User Diversity
Efficient scheduler favors transmissions to users with best radio conditions126
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
UE1
UE2
Uplink Downlink
127
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
Source Qualcomm contribution
128
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Throughput Evolution
Technology Downlink (Mbps) Peak Data Rate
Uplink (Mbps)Peak Data Rate
HSPA as defined in Release 6 144 576
Release 7 HSPA+ DL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 211 115
Release 7 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 16 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 280 115
Release 8 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 422 115
Release 8 HSPA+ (no MIMO)Dual Carrier 10+5 MHz 422 115
Release 9 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Dual Carrier DL and UL 10+10 MHz 840 230
Release 10 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Quad Carrier DL Dual Carrier UL 20+10 MHz
1680 230
Release 11 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO DL and UL 8 Carrier Dual Carrier UL 40+10 MHz
3360 690
No operators have announced plans to deploy HSPA in a quad (or greater) carrier configuration Three carrier configurations however have been deployed
129
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
130
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
131
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
132Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
GPRSEDGE Architecture
133
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
BCCH TCH TCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
577 microSper timeslot
4615 ms per frame of 8 timeslots
Possible BCCH carrier configuration
PBCCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Possible TCH carrier
configuration
BCCH Broadcast Control Channel ndash carries synchronization paging and other signalling informationTCH Traffic Channel ndash carries voice traffic data may alternate between frames for half-ratePDTCH Packet Data Traffic Channel ndash Carries packet data traffic for GPRS and EDGEPBCCH Packet Broadcast Control Channel ndash additional signalling for GPRSEDGE used only if needed
Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
134
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Mobile broadband remains at the forefront of innovation and development in computing networking and application development
bull Even as excitement builds about 5G LTE through ongoing advances has become the global standard
bull LTE-Advanced and LTE-Advanced Pro innovations include VoLTE 1 Gbps peak rate capability higher-order MIMO carrier aggregation LAALWALWIP IoT capabilities in Narrowband-IoT and Category M-1 V2X communications small-cell support URLLC SON dual connectivity and CoMP
bull Carriers are implementing NFV and SDN to reduce network costs improve service velocity and simplify deployment of new services
bull 5G research and development efforts have accelerated standards-based deployment will begin in 2019 and continue through 2030
bull Operators have announced pre-standard fixed-wireless deployments for 2017
bull 3GPP has implemented a 5G standardization process that began in Release 14 with a study of the new 5G radio continues now with a first phase of specifications in Release 15 that provides both non-standalone and standalone options then moves ahead with a second phase of complete specifications in Release 16
bull Small cells will play an ever-more-important role in boosting capacity benefiting from a number of technologies and developments
bull The future of mobile broadband including both LTE-Advanced and 5G is bright with no end in sight for continued growth in capability nor for the limitless application innovation that mobile broadband enables 135
Conclusion
- LTE to 5GCellular and Broadband Innovation
- Key Conclusions (1)
- Key Conclusions (2)
- Key Conclusions (3)
- Broadband Transformation
- Mobile Broadband Transformational Elements
- Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
- 5G Data Drivers
- Global Mobile Data Growth
- Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
- Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
- Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
- Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
- Expanding Use Cases
- 1G to 5G
- Timeline of Cellular Generations
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
- LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
- Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
- ITU Use Case Model
- ITU Objectives
- Network Transformation
- 5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
- Characteristics of Different Bands
- Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
- 5G New Radio (NR) (1)
- 5G New Radio (NR) (2)
- Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
- Expected 5G Performance
- Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
- 5G Schedule
- Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
- 5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
- Network Slicing Architecture
- Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
- Key Features in 3GPP Releases
- Types of Cells and Characteristics
- Small Cell Challenges
- Small Cell Approaches
- Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
- How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
- Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
- Wireless Networks for IoT
- ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
- Evolution of RCS Capability
- Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
- Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
- RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
- Dimensions of Capacity
- Bandwidth Management
- Spectrum Acquisition Time
- United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
- 600 MHz Band Plan
- LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
- Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
- Propagation Losses Cellular vs Wi-Fi
- Spectrum Use and Sharing Approaches
- Licensed Shared Access
- United States 35 GHz System Currently Being Developed
- Appendix section with additional technical details
- Latency of Different Technologies
- Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
- Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
- Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
- 5G Architecture Options in Release 15
- De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
- Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
- Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
- 5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
- 5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
- Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
- 5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
- LTE Capabilities
- LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
- Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
- LTE Antenna Schemes
- Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
- Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
- Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
- Gains From Carrier Aggregation
- CoMP Levels
- TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
- LTE UE Categories
- LTE-Advanced Relay
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
- Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
- LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
- LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
- Evolution of RCS API Profiles
- Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
- Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
- Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
- EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- Evolved Packet System
- LTE Quality of Service
- Load Balancing with Heterogeneous Networks
- Scenarios for Radio Carriers in Small Cells
- Traffic Distribution Scenarios
- Enhanced Intercell Interference Cancellation
- Median Throughput Gains Hotspot Scenarios
- User Throughput Performance
- Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
- Dual Connectivity
- Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
- Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
- Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
- Potential Cloud RAN Approach
- Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
- Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
- Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
- Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
- Roaming Using Hotspot 20
- Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
- Hybrid SON Architecture
- IP Multimedia Subsystem
- Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
- UMTS Multi-Radio Network
- HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
- HSPA Multi-User Diversity
- HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
- HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
- HSPA Throughput Evolution
- HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
- Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
- Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
- GPRSEDGE Architecture
- Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
- Conclusion
-
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Scenarios for Radio Carriers in Small Cells
104
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Traffic Distribution Scenarios
105
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Enhanced Intercell Interference Cancellation
106
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Median Throughput Gains Hotspot Scenarios
107Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
User Throughput Performance
WithWithout eICIC for Dynamic Traffic Vs Average Offered Load per Macro-Cell Area
108
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
109
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Connectivity
110
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
111Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
112
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
Device Category Category 3 Category 1 Category 0 Category M-1 Category NB-1 EC-GSM-IoT
3GPP Release 10 11 12 13 13 13
Max Data Rate Downlink
100 Mbps 10 Mbps 1 Mbps 1 Mbps 200 Kbps 74 Kbps
Max Data Rate Uplink
50 Mbps 5 Mbps 1 Mbps 1 Mbps 200 Kbps 74 Kbps
Max Bandwidth 20 MHz 20 MHz 20 MHz 108 MHz 018 MHz 02 MHz
Duplex Full Full Optional half-duplex
Optional half-duplex
Half Half
Max Receive Antennas
Two Two One One One One
Power Power Save Mode
Power Save Mode
Power Save Mode
Sleep Longer sleep cycles using Idle Discontinuous Reception (DRX)
Coverage Extended through redundant transmissions and Single Frequency Multicast
113
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Potential Cloud RAN Approach
114
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
Fully Centralized Partially Centralized
Transport Requirements Multi-Gbps usually using fiber
20 to 50 times less
Fronthaul Latency Requirement
Less than 100 microseconds
Greater than 5 milliseconds
Applications Supports eICIC and CoMP Supports centralized scheduling
Complexity High Lower
Benefit Capacity gain Lower capacity gain
115
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
Source Cisco Cisco 5G Vision Series Small Cell Evolution 2016
116
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
117Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
118
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Roaming Using Hotspot 20
119
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
120
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hybrid SON Architecture
121
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
IP Multimedia Subsystem
122
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
LTE will leverage OFDM-based broadcasting capabilities
123Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
UMTS Multi-Radio Network
Common core network can support multiple radio access networks
124
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
125
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Multi-User Diversity
Efficient scheduler favors transmissions to users with best radio conditions126
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
UE1
UE2
Uplink Downlink
127
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
Source Qualcomm contribution
128
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Throughput Evolution
Technology Downlink (Mbps) Peak Data Rate
Uplink (Mbps)Peak Data Rate
HSPA as defined in Release 6 144 576
Release 7 HSPA+ DL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 211 115
Release 7 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 16 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 280 115
Release 8 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 422 115
Release 8 HSPA+ (no MIMO)Dual Carrier 10+5 MHz 422 115
Release 9 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Dual Carrier DL and UL 10+10 MHz 840 230
Release 10 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Quad Carrier DL Dual Carrier UL 20+10 MHz
1680 230
Release 11 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO DL and UL 8 Carrier Dual Carrier UL 40+10 MHz
3360 690
No operators have announced plans to deploy HSPA in a quad (or greater) carrier configuration Three carrier configurations however have been deployed
129
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
130
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
131
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
132Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
GPRSEDGE Architecture
133
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
BCCH TCH TCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
577 microSper timeslot
4615 ms per frame of 8 timeslots
Possible BCCH carrier configuration
PBCCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Possible TCH carrier
configuration
BCCH Broadcast Control Channel ndash carries synchronization paging and other signalling informationTCH Traffic Channel ndash carries voice traffic data may alternate between frames for half-ratePDTCH Packet Data Traffic Channel ndash Carries packet data traffic for GPRS and EDGEPBCCH Packet Broadcast Control Channel ndash additional signalling for GPRSEDGE used only if needed
Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
134
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Mobile broadband remains at the forefront of innovation and development in computing networking and application development
bull Even as excitement builds about 5G LTE through ongoing advances has become the global standard
bull LTE-Advanced and LTE-Advanced Pro innovations include VoLTE 1 Gbps peak rate capability higher-order MIMO carrier aggregation LAALWALWIP IoT capabilities in Narrowband-IoT and Category M-1 V2X communications small-cell support URLLC SON dual connectivity and CoMP
bull Carriers are implementing NFV and SDN to reduce network costs improve service velocity and simplify deployment of new services
bull 5G research and development efforts have accelerated standards-based deployment will begin in 2019 and continue through 2030
bull Operators have announced pre-standard fixed-wireless deployments for 2017
bull 3GPP has implemented a 5G standardization process that began in Release 14 with a study of the new 5G radio continues now with a first phase of specifications in Release 15 that provides both non-standalone and standalone options then moves ahead with a second phase of complete specifications in Release 16
bull Small cells will play an ever-more-important role in boosting capacity benefiting from a number of technologies and developments
bull The future of mobile broadband including both LTE-Advanced and 5G is bright with no end in sight for continued growth in capability nor for the limitless application innovation that mobile broadband enables 135
Conclusion
- LTE to 5GCellular and Broadband Innovation
- Key Conclusions (1)
- Key Conclusions (2)
- Key Conclusions (3)
- Broadband Transformation
- Mobile Broadband Transformational Elements
- Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
- 5G Data Drivers
- Global Mobile Data Growth
- Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
- Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
- Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
- Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
- Expanding Use Cases
- 1G to 5G
- Timeline of Cellular Generations
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
- LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
- Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
- ITU Use Case Model
- ITU Objectives
- Network Transformation
- 5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
- Characteristics of Different Bands
- Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
- 5G New Radio (NR) (1)
- 5G New Radio (NR) (2)
- Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
- Expected 5G Performance
- Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
- 5G Schedule
- Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
- 5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
- Network Slicing Architecture
- Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
- Key Features in 3GPP Releases
- Types of Cells and Characteristics
- Small Cell Challenges
- Small Cell Approaches
- Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
- How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
- Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
- Wireless Networks for IoT
- ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
- Evolution of RCS Capability
- Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
- Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
- RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
- Dimensions of Capacity
- Bandwidth Management
- Spectrum Acquisition Time
- United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
- 600 MHz Band Plan
- LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
- Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
- Propagation Losses Cellular vs Wi-Fi
- Spectrum Use and Sharing Approaches
- Licensed Shared Access
- United States 35 GHz System Currently Being Developed
- Appendix section with additional technical details
- Latency of Different Technologies
- Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
- Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
- Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
- 5G Architecture Options in Release 15
- De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
- Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
- Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
- 5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
- 5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
- Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
- 5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
- LTE Capabilities
- LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
- Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
- LTE Antenna Schemes
- Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
- Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
- Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
- Gains From Carrier Aggregation
- CoMP Levels
- TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
- LTE UE Categories
- LTE-Advanced Relay
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
- Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
- LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
- LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
- Evolution of RCS API Profiles
- Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
- Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
- Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
- EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- Evolved Packet System
- LTE Quality of Service
- Load Balancing with Heterogeneous Networks
- Scenarios for Radio Carriers in Small Cells
- Traffic Distribution Scenarios
- Enhanced Intercell Interference Cancellation
- Median Throughput Gains Hotspot Scenarios
- User Throughput Performance
- Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
- Dual Connectivity
- Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
- Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
- Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
- Potential Cloud RAN Approach
- Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
- Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
- Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
- Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
- Roaming Using Hotspot 20
- Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
- Hybrid SON Architecture
- IP Multimedia Subsystem
- Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
- UMTS Multi-Radio Network
- HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
- HSPA Multi-User Diversity
- HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
- HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
- HSPA Throughput Evolution
- HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
- Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
- Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
- GPRSEDGE Architecture
- Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
- Conclusion
-
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Traffic Distribution Scenarios
105
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Enhanced Intercell Interference Cancellation
106
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Median Throughput Gains Hotspot Scenarios
107Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
User Throughput Performance
WithWithout eICIC for Dynamic Traffic Vs Average Offered Load per Macro-Cell Area
108
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
109
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Connectivity
110
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
111Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
112
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
Device Category Category 3 Category 1 Category 0 Category M-1 Category NB-1 EC-GSM-IoT
3GPP Release 10 11 12 13 13 13
Max Data Rate Downlink
100 Mbps 10 Mbps 1 Mbps 1 Mbps 200 Kbps 74 Kbps
Max Data Rate Uplink
50 Mbps 5 Mbps 1 Mbps 1 Mbps 200 Kbps 74 Kbps
Max Bandwidth 20 MHz 20 MHz 20 MHz 108 MHz 018 MHz 02 MHz
Duplex Full Full Optional half-duplex
Optional half-duplex
Half Half
Max Receive Antennas
Two Two One One One One
Power Power Save Mode
Power Save Mode
Power Save Mode
Sleep Longer sleep cycles using Idle Discontinuous Reception (DRX)
Coverage Extended through redundant transmissions and Single Frequency Multicast
113
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Potential Cloud RAN Approach
114
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
Fully Centralized Partially Centralized
Transport Requirements Multi-Gbps usually using fiber
20 to 50 times less
Fronthaul Latency Requirement
Less than 100 microseconds
Greater than 5 milliseconds
Applications Supports eICIC and CoMP Supports centralized scheduling
Complexity High Lower
Benefit Capacity gain Lower capacity gain
115
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
Source Cisco Cisco 5G Vision Series Small Cell Evolution 2016
116
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
117Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
118
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Roaming Using Hotspot 20
119
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
120
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hybrid SON Architecture
121
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
IP Multimedia Subsystem
122
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
LTE will leverage OFDM-based broadcasting capabilities
123Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
UMTS Multi-Radio Network
Common core network can support multiple radio access networks
124
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
125
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Multi-User Diversity
Efficient scheduler favors transmissions to users with best radio conditions126
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
UE1
UE2
Uplink Downlink
127
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
Source Qualcomm contribution
128
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Throughput Evolution
Technology Downlink (Mbps) Peak Data Rate
Uplink (Mbps)Peak Data Rate
HSPA as defined in Release 6 144 576
Release 7 HSPA+ DL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 211 115
Release 7 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 16 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 280 115
Release 8 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 422 115
Release 8 HSPA+ (no MIMO)Dual Carrier 10+5 MHz 422 115
Release 9 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Dual Carrier DL and UL 10+10 MHz 840 230
Release 10 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Quad Carrier DL Dual Carrier UL 20+10 MHz
1680 230
Release 11 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO DL and UL 8 Carrier Dual Carrier UL 40+10 MHz
3360 690
No operators have announced plans to deploy HSPA in a quad (or greater) carrier configuration Three carrier configurations however have been deployed
129
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
130
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
131
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
132Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
GPRSEDGE Architecture
133
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
BCCH TCH TCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
577 microSper timeslot
4615 ms per frame of 8 timeslots
Possible BCCH carrier configuration
PBCCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Possible TCH carrier
configuration
BCCH Broadcast Control Channel ndash carries synchronization paging and other signalling informationTCH Traffic Channel ndash carries voice traffic data may alternate between frames for half-ratePDTCH Packet Data Traffic Channel ndash Carries packet data traffic for GPRS and EDGEPBCCH Packet Broadcast Control Channel ndash additional signalling for GPRSEDGE used only if needed
Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
134
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Mobile broadband remains at the forefront of innovation and development in computing networking and application development
bull Even as excitement builds about 5G LTE through ongoing advances has become the global standard
bull LTE-Advanced and LTE-Advanced Pro innovations include VoLTE 1 Gbps peak rate capability higher-order MIMO carrier aggregation LAALWALWIP IoT capabilities in Narrowband-IoT and Category M-1 V2X communications small-cell support URLLC SON dual connectivity and CoMP
bull Carriers are implementing NFV and SDN to reduce network costs improve service velocity and simplify deployment of new services
bull 5G research and development efforts have accelerated standards-based deployment will begin in 2019 and continue through 2030
bull Operators have announced pre-standard fixed-wireless deployments for 2017
bull 3GPP has implemented a 5G standardization process that began in Release 14 with a study of the new 5G radio continues now with a first phase of specifications in Release 15 that provides both non-standalone and standalone options then moves ahead with a second phase of complete specifications in Release 16
bull Small cells will play an ever-more-important role in boosting capacity benefiting from a number of technologies and developments
bull The future of mobile broadband including both LTE-Advanced and 5G is bright with no end in sight for continued growth in capability nor for the limitless application innovation that mobile broadband enables 135
Conclusion
- LTE to 5GCellular and Broadband Innovation
- Key Conclusions (1)
- Key Conclusions (2)
- Key Conclusions (3)
- Broadband Transformation
- Mobile Broadband Transformational Elements
- Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
- 5G Data Drivers
- Global Mobile Data Growth
- Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
- Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
- Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
- Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
- Expanding Use Cases
- 1G to 5G
- Timeline of Cellular Generations
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
- LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
- Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
- ITU Use Case Model
- ITU Objectives
- Network Transformation
- 5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
- Characteristics of Different Bands
- Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
- 5G New Radio (NR) (1)
- 5G New Radio (NR) (2)
- Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
- Expected 5G Performance
- Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
- 5G Schedule
- Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
- 5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
- Network Slicing Architecture
- Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
- Key Features in 3GPP Releases
- Types of Cells and Characteristics
- Small Cell Challenges
- Small Cell Approaches
- Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
- How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
- Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
- Wireless Networks for IoT
- ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
- Evolution of RCS Capability
- Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
- Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
- RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
- Dimensions of Capacity
- Bandwidth Management
- Spectrum Acquisition Time
- United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
- 600 MHz Band Plan
- LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
- Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
- Propagation Losses Cellular vs Wi-Fi
- Spectrum Use and Sharing Approaches
- Licensed Shared Access
- United States 35 GHz System Currently Being Developed
- Appendix section with additional technical details
- Latency of Different Technologies
- Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
- Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
- Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
- 5G Architecture Options in Release 15
- De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
- Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
- Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
- 5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
- 5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
- Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
- 5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
- LTE Capabilities
- LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
- Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
- LTE Antenna Schemes
- Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
- Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
- Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
- Gains From Carrier Aggregation
- CoMP Levels
- TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
- LTE UE Categories
- LTE-Advanced Relay
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
- Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
- LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
- LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
- Evolution of RCS API Profiles
- Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
- Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
- Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
- EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- Evolved Packet System
- LTE Quality of Service
- Load Balancing with Heterogeneous Networks
- Scenarios for Radio Carriers in Small Cells
- Traffic Distribution Scenarios
- Enhanced Intercell Interference Cancellation
- Median Throughput Gains Hotspot Scenarios
- User Throughput Performance
- Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
- Dual Connectivity
- Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
- Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
- Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
- Potential Cloud RAN Approach
- Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
- Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
- Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
- Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
- Roaming Using Hotspot 20
- Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
- Hybrid SON Architecture
- IP Multimedia Subsystem
- Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
- UMTS Multi-Radio Network
- HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
- HSPA Multi-User Diversity
- HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
- HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
- HSPA Throughput Evolution
- HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
- Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
- Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
- GPRSEDGE Architecture
- Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
- Conclusion
-
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Enhanced Intercell Interference Cancellation
106
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Median Throughput Gains Hotspot Scenarios
107Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
User Throughput Performance
WithWithout eICIC for Dynamic Traffic Vs Average Offered Load per Macro-Cell Area
108
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
109
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Connectivity
110
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
111Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
112
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
Device Category Category 3 Category 1 Category 0 Category M-1 Category NB-1 EC-GSM-IoT
3GPP Release 10 11 12 13 13 13
Max Data Rate Downlink
100 Mbps 10 Mbps 1 Mbps 1 Mbps 200 Kbps 74 Kbps
Max Data Rate Uplink
50 Mbps 5 Mbps 1 Mbps 1 Mbps 200 Kbps 74 Kbps
Max Bandwidth 20 MHz 20 MHz 20 MHz 108 MHz 018 MHz 02 MHz
Duplex Full Full Optional half-duplex
Optional half-duplex
Half Half
Max Receive Antennas
Two Two One One One One
Power Power Save Mode
Power Save Mode
Power Save Mode
Sleep Longer sleep cycles using Idle Discontinuous Reception (DRX)
Coverage Extended through redundant transmissions and Single Frequency Multicast
113
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Potential Cloud RAN Approach
114
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
Fully Centralized Partially Centralized
Transport Requirements Multi-Gbps usually using fiber
20 to 50 times less
Fronthaul Latency Requirement
Less than 100 microseconds
Greater than 5 milliseconds
Applications Supports eICIC and CoMP Supports centralized scheduling
Complexity High Lower
Benefit Capacity gain Lower capacity gain
115
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
Source Cisco Cisco 5G Vision Series Small Cell Evolution 2016
116
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
117Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
118
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Roaming Using Hotspot 20
119
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
120
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hybrid SON Architecture
121
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
IP Multimedia Subsystem
122
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
LTE will leverage OFDM-based broadcasting capabilities
123Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
UMTS Multi-Radio Network
Common core network can support multiple radio access networks
124
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
125
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Multi-User Diversity
Efficient scheduler favors transmissions to users with best radio conditions126
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
UE1
UE2
Uplink Downlink
127
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
Source Qualcomm contribution
128
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Throughput Evolution
Technology Downlink (Mbps) Peak Data Rate
Uplink (Mbps)Peak Data Rate
HSPA as defined in Release 6 144 576
Release 7 HSPA+ DL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 211 115
Release 7 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 16 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 280 115
Release 8 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 422 115
Release 8 HSPA+ (no MIMO)Dual Carrier 10+5 MHz 422 115
Release 9 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Dual Carrier DL and UL 10+10 MHz 840 230
Release 10 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Quad Carrier DL Dual Carrier UL 20+10 MHz
1680 230
Release 11 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO DL and UL 8 Carrier Dual Carrier UL 40+10 MHz
3360 690
No operators have announced plans to deploy HSPA in a quad (or greater) carrier configuration Three carrier configurations however have been deployed
129
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
130
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
131
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
132Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
GPRSEDGE Architecture
133
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
BCCH TCH TCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
577 microSper timeslot
4615 ms per frame of 8 timeslots
Possible BCCH carrier configuration
PBCCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Possible TCH carrier
configuration
BCCH Broadcast Control Channel ndash carries synchronization paging and other signalling informationTCH Traffic Channel ndash carries voice traffic data may alternate between frames for half-ratePDTCH Packet Data Traffic Channel ndash Carries packet data traffic for GPRS and EDGEPBCCH Packet Broadcast Control Channel ndash additional signalling for GPRSEDGE used only if needed
Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
134
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Mobile broadband remains at the forefront of innovation and development in computing networking and application development
bull Even as excitement builds about 5G LTE through ongoing advances has become the global standard
bull LTE-Advanced and LTE-Advanced Pro innovations include VoLTE 1 Gbps peak rate capability higher-order MIMO carrier aggregation LAALWALWIP IoT capabilities in Narrowband-IoT and Category M-1 V2X communications small-cell support URLLC SON dual connectivity and CoMP
bull Carriers are implementing NFV and SDN to reduce network costs improve service velocity and simplify deployment of new services
bull 5G research and development efforts have accelerated standards-based deployment will begin in 2019 and continue through 2030
bull Operators have announced pre-standard fixed-wireless deployments for 2017
bull 3GPP has implemented a 5G standardization process that began in Release 14 with a study of the new 5G radio continues now with a first phase of specifications in Release 15 that provides both non-standalone and standalone options then moves ahead with a second phase of complete specifications in Release 16
bull Small cells will play an ever-more-important role in boosting capacity benefiting from a number of technologies and developments
bull The future of mobile broadband including both LTE-Advanced and 5G is bright with no end in sight for continued growth in capability nor for the limitless application innovation that mobile broadband enables 135
Conclusion
- LTE to 5GCellular and Broadband Innovation
- Key Conclusions (1)
- Key Conclusions (2)
- Key Conclusions (3)
- Broadband Transformation
- Mobile Broadband Transformational Elements
- Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
- 5G Data Drivers
- Global Mobile Data Growth
- Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
- Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
- Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
- Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
- Expanding Use Cases
- 1G to 5G
- Timeline of Cellular Generations
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
- LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
- Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
- ITU Use Case Model
- ITU Objectives
- Network Transformation
- 5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
- Characteristics of Different Bands
- Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
- 5G New Radio (NR) (1)
- 5G New Radio (NR) (2)
- Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
- Expected 5G Performance
- Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
- 5G Schedule
- Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
- 5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
- Network Slicing Architecture
- Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
- Key Features in 3GPP Releases
- Types of Cells and Characteristics
- Small Cell Challenges
- Small Cell Approaches
- Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
- How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
- Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
- Wireless Networks for IoT
- ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
- Evolution of RCS Capability
- Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
- Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
- RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
- Dimensions of Capacity
- Bandwidth Management
- Spectrum Acquisition Time
- United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
- 600 MHz Band Plan
- LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
- Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
- Propagation Losses Cellular vs Wi-Fi
- Spectrum Use and Sharing Approaches
- Licensed Shared Access
- United States 35 GHz System Currently Being Developed
- Appendix section with additional technical details
- Latency of Different Technologies
- Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
- Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
- Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
- 5G Architecture Options in Release 15
- De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
- Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
- Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
- 5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
- 5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
- Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
- 5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
- LTE Capabilities
- LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
- Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
- LTE Antenna Schemes
- Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
- Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
- Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
- Gains From Carrier Aggregation
- CoMP Levels
- TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
- LTE UE Categories
- LTE-Advanced Relay
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
- Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
- LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
- LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
- Evolution of RCS API Profiles
- Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
- Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
- Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
- EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- Evolved Packet System
- LTE Quality of Service
- Load Balancing with Heterogeneous Networks
- Scenarios for Radio Carriers in Small Cells
- Traffic Distribution Scenarios
- Enhanced Intercell Interference Cancellation
- Median Throughput Gains Hotspot Scenarios
- User Throughput Performance
- Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
- Dual Connectivity
- Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
- Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
- Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
- Potential Cloud RAN Approach
- Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
- Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
- Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
- Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
- Roaming Using Hotspot 20
- Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
- Hybrid SON Architecture
- IP Multimedia Subsystem
- Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
- UMTS Multi-Radio Network
- HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
- HSPA Multi-User Diversity
- HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
- HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
- HSPA Throughput Evolution
- HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
- Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
- Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
- GPRSEDGE Architecture
- Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
- Conclusion
-
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Median Throughput Gains Hotspot Scenarios
107Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
User Throughput Performance
WithWithout eICIC for Dynamic Traffic Vs Average Offered Load per Macro-Cell Area
108
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
109
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Connectivity
110
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
111Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
112
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
Device Category Category 3 Category 1 Category 0 Category M-1 Category NB-1 EC-GSM-IoT
3GPP Release 10 11 12 13 13 13
Max Data Rate Downlink
100 Mbps 10 Mbps 1 Mbps 1 Mbps 200 Kbps 74 Kbps
Max Data Rate Uplink
50 Mbps 5 Mbps 1 Mbps 1 Mbps 200 Kbps 74 Kbps
Max Bandwidth 20 MHz 20 MHz 20 MHz 108 MHz 018 MHz 02 MHz
Duplex Full Full Optional half-duplex
Optional half-duplex
Half Half
Max Receive Antennas
Two Two One One One One
Power Power Save Mode
Power Save Mode
Power Save Mode
Sleep Longer sleep cycles using Idle Discontinuous Reception (DRX)
Coverage Extended through redundant transmissions and Single Frequency Multicast
113
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Potential Cloud RAN Approach
114
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
Fully Centralized Partially Centralized
Transport Requirements Multi-Gbps usually using fiber
20 to 50 times less
Fronthaul Latency Requirement
Less than 100 microseconds
Greater than 5 milliseconds
Applications Supports eICIC and CoMP Supports centralized scheduling
Complexity High Lower
Benefit Capacity gain Lower capacity gain
115
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
Source Cisco Cisco 5G Vision Series Small Cell Evolution 2016
116
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
117Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
118
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Roaming Using Hotspot 20
119
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
120
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hybrid SON Architecture
121
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
IP Multimedia Subsystem
122
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
LTE will leverage OFDM-based broadcasting capabilities
123Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
UMTS Multi-Radio Network
Common core network can support multiple radio access networks
124
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
125
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Multi-User Diversity
Efficient scheduler favors transmissions to users with best radio conditions126
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
UE1
UE2
Uplink Downlink
127
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
Source Qualcomm contribution
128
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Throughput Evolution
Technology Downlink (Mbps) Peak Data Rate
Uplink (Mbps)Peak Data Rate
HSPA as defined in Release 6 144 576
Release 7 HSPA+ DL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 211 115
Release 7 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 16 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 280 115
Release 8 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 422 115
Release 8 HSPA+ (no MIMO)Dual Carrier 10+5 MHz 422 115
Release 9 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Dual Carrier DL and UL 10+10 MHz 840 230
Release 10 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Quad Carrier DL Dual Carrier UL 20+10 MHz
1680 230
Release 11 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO DL and UL 8 Carrier Dual Carrier UL 40+10 MHz
3360 690
No operators have announced plans to deploy HSPA in a quad (or greater) carrier configuration Three carrier configurations however have been deployed
129
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
130
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
131
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
132Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
GPRSEDGE Architecture
133
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
BCCH TCH TCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
577 microSper timeslot
4615 ms per frame of 8 timeslots
Possible BCCH carrier configuration
PBCCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Possible TCH carrier
configuration
BCCH Broadcast Control Channel ndash carries synchronization paging and other signalling informationTCH Traffic Channel ndash carries voice traffic data may alternate between frames for half-ratePDTCH Packet Data Traffic Channel ndash Carries packet data traffic for GPRS and EDGEPBCCH Packet Broadcast Control Channel ndash additional signalling for GPRSEDGE used only if needed
Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
134
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Mobile broadband remains at the forefront of innovation and development in computing networking and application development
bull Even as excitement builds about 5G LTE through ongoing advances has become the global standard
bull LTE-Advanced and LTE-Advanced Pro innovations include VoLTE 1 Gbps peak rate capability higher-order MIMO carrier aggregation LAALWALWIP IoT capabilities in Narrowband-IoT and Category M-1 V2X communications small-cell support URLLC SON dual connectivity and CoMP
bull Carriers are implementing NFV and SDN to reduce network costs improve service velocity and simplify deployment of new services
bull 5G research and development efforts have accelerated standards-based deployment will begin in 2019 and continue through 2030
bull Operators have announced pre-standard fixed-wireless deployments for 2017
bull 3GPP has implemented a 5G standardization process that began in Release 14 with a study of the new 5G radio continues now with a first phase of specifications in Release 15 that provides both non-standalone and standalone options then moves ahead with a second phase of complete specifications in Release 16
bull Small cells will play an ever-more-important role in boosting capacity benefiting from a number of technologies and developments
bull The future of mobile broadband including both LTE-Advanced and 5G is bright with no end in sight for continued growth in capability nor for the limitless application innovation that mobile broadband enables 135
Conclusion
- LTE to 5GCellular and Broadband Innovation
- Key Conclusions (1)
- Key Conclusions (2)
- Key Conclusions (3)
- Broadband Transformation
- Mobile Broadband Transformational Elements
- Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
- 5G Data Drivers
- Global Mobile Data Growth
- Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
- Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
- Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
- Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
- Expanding Use Cases
- 1G to 5G
- Timeline of Cellular Generations
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
- LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
- Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
- ITU Use Case Model
- ITU Objectives
- Network Transformation
- 5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
- Characteristics of Different Bands
- Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
- 5G New Radio (NR) (1)
- 5G New Radio (NR) (2)
- Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
- Expected 5G Performance
- Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
- 5G Schedule
- Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
- 5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
- Network Slicing Architecture
- Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
- Key Features in 3GPP Releases
- Types of Cells and Characteristics
- Small Cell Challenges
- Small Cell Approaches
- Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
- How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
- Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
- Wireless Networks for IoT
- ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
- Evolution of RCS Capability
- Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
- Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
- RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
- Dimensions of Capacity
- Bandwidth Management
- Spectrum Acquisition Time
- United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
- 600 MHz Band Plan
- LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
- Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
- Propagation Losses Cellular vs Wi-Fi
- Spectrum Use and Sharing Approaches
- Licensed Shared Access
- United States 35 GHz System Currently Being Developed
- Appendix section with additional technical details
- Latency of Different Technologies
- Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
- Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
- Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
- 5G Architecture Options in Release 15
- De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
- Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
- Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
- 5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
- 5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
- Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
- 5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
- LTE Capabilities
- LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
- Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
- LTE Antenna Schemes
- Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
- Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
- Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
- Gains From Carrier Aggregation
- CoMP Levels
- TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
- LTE UE Categories
- LTE-Advanced Relay
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
- Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
- LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
- LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
- Evolution of RCS API Profiles
- Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
- Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
- Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
- EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- Evolved Packet System
- LTE Quality of Service
- Load Balancing with Heterogeneous Networks
- Scenarios for Radio Carriers in Small Cells
- Traffic Distribution Scenarios
- Enhanced Intercell Interference Cancellation
- Median Throughput Gains Hotspot Scenarios
- User Throughput Performance
- Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
- Dual Connectivity
- Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
- Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
- Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
- Potential Cloud RAN Approach
- Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
- Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
- Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
- Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
- Roaming Using Hotspot 20
- Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
- Hybrid SON Architecture
- IP Multimedia Subsystem
- Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
- UMTS Multi-Radio Network
- HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
- HSPA Multi-User Diversity
- HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
- HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
- HSPA Throughput Evolution
- HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
- Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
- Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
- GPRSEDGE Architecture
- Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
- Conclusion
-
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
User Throughput Performance
WithWithout eICIC for Dynamic Traffic Vs Average Offered Load per Macro-Cell Area
108
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
109
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Connectivity
110
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
111Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
112
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
Device Category Category 3 Category 1 Category 0 Category M-1 Category NB-1 EC-GSM-IoT
3GPP Release 10 11 12 13 13 13
Max Data Rate Downlink
100 Mbps 10 Mbps 1 Mbps 1 Mbps 200 Kbps 74 Kbps
Max Data Rate Uplink
50 Mbps 5 Mbps 1 Mbps 1 Mbps 200 Kbps 74 Kbps
Max Bandwidth 20 MHz 20 MHz 20 MHz 108 MHz 018 MHz 02 MHz
Duplex Full Full Optional half-duplex
Optional half-duplex
Half Half
Max Receive Antennas
Two Two One One One One
Power Power Save Mode
Power Save Mode
Power Save Mode
Sleep Longer sleep cycles using Idle Discontinuous Reception (DRX)
Coverage Extended through redundant transmissions and Single Frequency Multicast
113
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Potential Cloud RAN Approach
114
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
Fully Centralized Partially Centralized
Transport Requirements Multi-Gbps usually using fiber
20 to 50 times less
Fronthaul Latency Requirement
Less than 100 microseconds
Greater than 5 milliseconds
Applications Supports eICIC and CoMP Supports centralized scheduling
Complexity High Lower
Benefit Capacity gain Lower capacity gain
115
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
Source Cisco Cisco 5G Vision Series Small Cell Evolution 2016
116
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
117Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
118
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Roaming Using Hotspot 20
119
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
120
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hybrid SON Architecture
121
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
IP Multimedia Subsystem
122
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
LTE will leverage OFDM-based broadcasting capabilities
123Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
UMTS Multi-Radio Network
Common core network can support multiple radio access networks
124
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
125
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Multi-User Diversity
Efficient scheduler favors transmissions to users with best radio conditions126
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
UE1
UE2
Uplink Downlink
127
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
Source Qualcomm contribution
128
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Throughput Evolution
Technology Downlink (Mbps) Peak Data Rate
Uplink (Mbps)Peak Data Rate
HSPA as defined in Release 6 144 576
Release 7 HSPA+ DL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 211 115
Release 7 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 16 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 280 115
Release 8 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 422 115
Release 8 HSPA+ (no MIMO)Dual Carrier 10+5 MHz 422 115
Release 9 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Dual Carrier DL and UL 10+10 MHz 840 230
Release 10 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Quad Carrier DL Dual Carrier UL 20+10 MHz
1680 230
Release 11 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO DL and UL 8 Carrier Dual Carrier UL 40+10 MHz
3360 690
No operators have announced plans to deploy HSPA in a quad (or greater) carrier configuration Three carrier configurations however have been deployed
129
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
130
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
131
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
132Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
GPRSEDGE Architecture
133
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
BCCH TCH TCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
577 microSper timeslot
4615 ms per frame of 8 timeslots
Possible BCCH carrier configuration
PBCCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Possible TCH carrier
configuration
BCCH Broadcast Control Channel ndash carries synchronization paging and other signalling informationTCH Traffic Channel ndash carries voice traffic data may alternate between frames for half-ratePDTCH Packet Data Traffic Channel ndash Carries packet data traffic for GPRS and EDGEPBCCH Packet Broadcast Control Channel ndash additional signalling for GPRSEDGE used only if needed
Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
134
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Mobile broadband remains at the forefront of innovation and development in computing networking and application development
bull Even as excitement builds about 5G LTE through ongoing advances has become the global standard
bull LTE-Advanced and LTE-Advanced Pro innovations include VoLTE 1 Gbps peak rate capability higher-order MIMO carrier aggregation LAALWALWIP IoT capabilities in Narrowband-IoT and Category M-1 V2X communications small-cell support URLLC SON dual connectivity and CoMP
bull Carriers are implementing NFV and SDN to reduce network costs improve service velocity and simplify deployment of new services
bull 5G research and development efforts have accelerated standards-based deployment will begin in 2019 and continue through 2030
bull Operators have announced pre-standard fixed-wireless deployments for 2017
bull 3GPP has implemented a 5G standardization process that began in Release 14 with a study of the new 5G radio continues now with a first phase of specifications in Release 15 that provides both non-standalone and standalone options then moves ahead with a second phase of complete specifications in Release 16
bull Small cells will play an ever-more-important role in boosting capacity benefiting from a number of technologies and developments
bull The future of mobile broadband including both LTE-Advanced and 5G is bright with no end in sight for continued growth in capability nor for the limitless application innovation that mobile broadband enables 135
Conclusion
- LTE to 5GCellular and Broadband Innovation
- Key Conclusions (1)
- Key Conclusions (2)
- Key Conclusions (3)
- Broadband Transformation
- Mobile Broadband Transformational Elements
- Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
- 5G Data Drivers
- Global Mobile Data Growth
- Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
- Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
- Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
- Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
- Expanding Use Cases
- 1G to 5G
- Timeline of Cellular Generations
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
- LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
- Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
- ITU Use Case Model
- ITU Objectives
- Network Transformation
- 5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
- Characteristics of Different Bands
- Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
- 5G New Radio (NR) (1)
- 5G New Radio (NR) (2)
- Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
- Expected 5G Performance
- Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
- 5G Schedule
- Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
- 5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
- Network Slicing Architecture
- Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
- Key Features in 3GPP Releases
- Types of Cells and Characteristics
- Small Cell Challenges
- Small Cell Approaches
- Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
- How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
- Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
- Wireless Networks for IoT
- ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
- Evolution of RCS Capability
- Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
- Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
- RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
- Dimensions of Capacity
- Bandwidth Management
- Spectrum Acquisition Time
- United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
- 600 MHz Band Plan
- LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
- Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
- Propagation Losses Cellular vs Wi-Fi
- Spectrum Use and Sharing Approaches
- Licensed Shared Access
- United States 35 GHz System Currently Being Developed
- Appendix section with additional technical details
- Latency of Different Technologies
- Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
- Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
- Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
- 5G Architecture Options in Release 15
- De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
- Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
- Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
- 5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
- 5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
- Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
- 5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
- LTE Capabilities
- LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
- Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
- LTE Antenna Schemes
- Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
- Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
- Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
- Gains From Carrier Aggregation
- CoMP Levels
- TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
- LTE UE Categories
- LTE-Advanced Relay
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
- Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
- LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
- LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
- Evolution of RCS API Profiles
- Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
- Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
- Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
- EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- Evolved Packet System
- LTE Quality of Service
- Load Balancing with Heterogeneous Networks
- Scenarios for Radio Carriers in Small Cells
- Traffic Distribution Scenarios
- Enhanced Intercell Interference Cancellation
- Median Throughput Gains Hotspot Scenarios
- User Throughput Performance
- Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
- Dual Connectivity
- Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
- Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
- Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
- Potential Cloud RAN Approach
- Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
- Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
- Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
- Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
- Roaming Using Hotspot 20
- Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
- Hybrid SON Architecture
- IP Multimedia Subsystem
- Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
- UMTS Multi-Radio Network
- HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
- HSPA Multi-User Diversity
- HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
- HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
- HSPA Throughput Evolution
- HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
- Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
- Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
- GPRSEDGE Architecture
- Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
- Conclusion
-
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
109
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Connectivity
110
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
111Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
112
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
Device Category Category 3 Category 1 Category 0 Category M-1 Category NB-1 EC-GSM-IoT
3GPP Release 10 11 12 13 13 13
Max Data Rate Downlink
100 Mbps 10 Mbps 1 Mbps 1 Mbps 200 Kbps 74 Kbps
Max Data Rate Uplink
50 Mbps 5 Mbps 1 Mbps 1 Mbps 200 Kbps 74 Kbps
Max Bandwidth 20 MHz 20 MHz 20 MHz 108 MHz 018 MHz 02 MHz
Duplex Full Full Optional half-duplex
Optional half-duplex
Half Half
Max Receive Antennas
Two Two One One One One
Power Power Save Mode
Power Save Mode
Power Save Mode
Sleep Longer sleep cycles using Idle Discontinuous Reception (DRX)
Coverage Extended through redundant transmissions and Single Frequency Multicast
113
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Potential Cloud RAN Approach
114
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
Fully Centralized Partially Centralized
Transport Requirements Multi-Gbps usually using fiber
20 to 50 times less
Fronthaul Latency Requirement
Less than 100 microseconds
Greater than 5 milliseconds
Applications Supports eICIC and CoMP Supports centralized scheduling
Complexity High Lower
Benefit Capacity gain Lower capacity gain
115
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
Source Cisco Cisco 5G Vision Series Small Cell Evolution 2016
116
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
117Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
118
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Roaming Using Hotspot 20
119
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
120
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hybrid SON Architecture
121
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
IP Multimedia Subsystem
122
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
LTE will leverage OFDM-based broadcasting capabilities
123Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
UMTS Multi-Radio Network
Common core network can support multiple radio access networks
124
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
125
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Multi-User Diversity
Efficient scheduler favors transmissions to users with best radio conditions126
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
UE1
UE2
Uplink Downlink
127
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
Source Qualcomm contribution
128
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Throughput Evolution
Technology Downlink (Mbps) Peak Data Rate
Uplink (Mbps)Peak Data Rate
HSPA as defined in Release 6 144 576
Release 7 HSPA+ DL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 211 115
Release 7 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 16 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 280 115
Release 8 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 422 115
Release 8 HSPA+ (no MIMO)Dual Carrier 10+5 MHz 422 115
Release 9 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Dual Carrier DL and UL 10+10 MHz 840 230
Release 10 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Quad Carrier DL Dual Carrier UL 20+10 MHz
1680 230
Release 11 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO DL and UL 8 Carrier Dual Carrier UL 40+10 MHz
3360 690
No operators have announced plans to deploy HSPA in a quad (or greater) carrier configuration Three carrier configurations however have been deployed
129
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
130
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
131
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
132Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
GPRSEDGE Architecture
133
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
BCCH TCH TCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
577 microSper timeslot
4615 ms per frame of 8 timeslots
Possible BCCH carrier configuration
PBCCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Possible TCH carrier
configuration
BCCH Broadcast Control Channel ndash carries synchronization paging and other signalling informationTCH Traffic Channel ndash carries voice traffic data may alternate between frames for half-ratePDTCH Packet Data Traffic Channel ndash Carries packet data traffic for GPRS and EDGEPBCCH Packet Broadcast Control Channel ndash additional signalling for GPRSEDGE used only if needed
Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
134
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Mobile broadband remains at the forefront of innovation and development in computing networking and application development
bull Even as excitement builds about 5G LTE through ongoing advances has become the global standard
bull LTE-Advanced and LTE-Advanced Pro innovations include VoLTE 1 Gbps peak rate capability higher-order MIMO carrier aggregation LAALWALWIP IoT capabilities in Narrowband-IoT and Category M-1 V2X communications small-cell support URLLC SON dual connectivity and CoMP
bull Carriers are implementing NFV and SDN to reduce network costs improve service velocity and simplify deployment of new services
bull 5G research and development efforts have accelerated standards-based deployment will begin in 2019 and continue through 2030
bull Operators have announced pre-standard fixed-wireless deployments for 2017
bull 3GPP has implemented a 5G standardization process that began in Release 14 with a study of the new 5G radio continues now with a first phase of specifications in Release 15 that provides both non-standalone and standalone options then moves ahead with a second phase of complete specifications in Release 16
bull Small cells will play an ever-more-important role in boosting capacity benefiting from a number of technologies and developments
bull The future of mobile broadband including both LTE-Advanced and 5G is bright with no end in sight for continued growth in capability nor for the limitless application innovation that mobile broadband enables 135
Conclusion
- LTE to 5GCellular and Broadband Innovation
- Key Conclusions (1)
- Key Conclusions (2)
- Key Conclusions (3)
- Broadband Transformation
- Mobile Broadband Transformational Elements
- Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
- 5G Data Drivers
- Global Mobile Data Growth
- Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
- Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
- Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
- Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
- Expanding Use Cases
- 1G to 5G
- Timeline of Cellular Generations
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
- LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
- Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
- ITU Use Case Model
- ITU Objectives
- Network Transformation
- 5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
- Characteristics of Different Bands
- Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
- 5G New Radio (NR) (1)
- 5G New Radio (NR) (2)
- Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
- Expected 5G Performance
- Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
- 5G Schedule
- Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
- 5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
- Network Slicing Architecture
- Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
- Key Features in 3GPP Releases
- Types of Cells and Characteristics
- Small Cell Challenges
- Small Cell Approaches
- Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
- How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
- Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
- Wireless Networks for IoT
- ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
- Evolution of RCS Capability
- Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
- Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
- RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
- Dimensions of Capacity
- Bandwidth Management
- Spectrum Acquisition Time
- United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
- 600 MHz Band Plan
- LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
- Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
- Propagation Losses Cellular vs Wi-Fi
- Spectrum Use and Sharing Approaches
- Licensed Shared Access
- United States 35 GHz System Currently Being Developed
- Appendix section with additional technical details
- Latency of Different Technologies
- Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
- Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
- Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
- 5G Architecture Options in Release 15
- De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
- Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
- Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
- 5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
- 5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
- Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
- 5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
- LTE Capabilities
- LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
- Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
- LTE Antenna Schemes
- Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
- Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
- Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
- Gains From Carrier Aggregation
- CoMP Levels
- TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
- LTE UE Categories
- LTE-Advanced Relay
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
- Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
- LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
- LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
- Evolution of RCS API Profiles
- Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
- Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
- Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
- EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- Evolved Packet System
- LTE Quality of Service
- Load Balancing with Heterogeneous Networks
- Scenarios for Radio Carriers in Small Cells
- Traffic Distribution Scenarios
- Enhanced Intercell Interference Cancellation
- Median Throughput Gains Hotspot Scenarios
- User Throughput Performance
- Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
- Dual Connectivity
- Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
- Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
- Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
- Potential Cloud RAN Approach
- Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
- Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
- Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
- Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
- Roaming Using Hotspot 20
- Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
- Hybrid SON Architecture
- IP Multimedia Subsystem
- Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
- UMTS Multi-Radio Network
- HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
- HSPA Multi-User Diversity
- HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
- HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
- HSPA Throughput Evolution
- HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
- Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
- Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
- GPRSEDGE Architecture
- Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
- Conclusion
-
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Connectivity
110
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
111Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
112
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
Device Category Category 3 Category 1 Category 0 Category M-1 Category NB-1 EC-GSM-IoT
3GPP Release 10 11 12 13 13 13
Max Data Rate Downlink
100 Mbps 10 Mbps 1 Mbps 1 Mbps 200 Kbps 74 Kbps
Max Data Rate Uplink
50 Mbps 5 Mbps 1 Mbps 1 Mbps 200 Kbps 74 Kbps
Max Bandwidth 20 MHz 20 MHz 20 MHz 108 MHz 018 MHz 02 MHz
Duplex Full Full Optional half-duplex
Optional half-duplex
Half Half
Max Receive Antennas
Two Two One One One One
Power Power Save Mode
Power Save Mode
Power Save Mode
Sleep Longer sleep cycles using Idle Discontinuous Reception (DRX)
Coverage Extended through redundant transmissions and Single Frequency Multicast
113
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Potential Cloud RAN Approach
114
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
Fully Centralized Partially Centralized
Transport Requirements Multi-Gbps usually using fiber
20 to 50 times less
Fronthaul Latency Requirement
Less than 100 microseconds
Greater than 5 milliseconds
Applications Supports eICIC and CoMP Supports centralized scheduling
Complexity High Lower
Benefit Capacity gain Lower capacity gain
115
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
Source Cisco Cisco 5G Vision Series Small Cell Evolution 2016
116
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
117Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
118
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Roaming Using Hotspot 20
119
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
120
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hybrid SON Architecture
121
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
IP Multimedia Subsystem
122
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
LTE will leverage OFDM-based broadcasting capabilities
123Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
UMTS Multi-Radio Network
Common core network can support multiple radio access networks
124
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
125
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Multi-User Diversity
Efficient scheduler favors transmissions to users with best radio conditions126
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
UE1
UE2
Uplink Downlink
127
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
Source Qualcomm contribution
128
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Throughput Evolution
Technology Downlink (Mbps) Peak Data Rate
Uplink (Mbps)Peak Data Rate
HSPA as defined in Release 6 144 576
Release 7 HSPA+ DL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 211 115
Release 7 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 16 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 280 115
Release 8 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 422 115
Release 8 HSPA+ (no MIMO)Dual Carrier 10+5 MHz 422 115
Release 9 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Dual Carrier DL and UL 10+10 MHz 840 230
Release 10 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Quad Carrier DL Dual Carrier UL 20+10 MHz
1680 230
Release 11 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO DL and UL 8 Carrier Dual Carrier UL 40+10 MHz
3360 690
No operators have announced plans to deploy HSPA in a quad (or greater) carrier configuration Three carrier configurations however have been deployed
129
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
130
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
131
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
132Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
GPRSEDGE Architecture
133
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
BCCH TCH TCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
577 microSper timeslot
4615 ms per frame of 8 timeslots
Possible BCCH carrier configuration
PBCCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Possible TCH carrier
configuration
BCCH Broadcast Control Channel ndash carries synchronization paging and other signalling informationTCH Traffic Channel ndash carries voice traffic data may alternate between frames for half-ratePDTCH Packet Data Traffic Channel ndash Carries packet data traffic for GPRS and EDGEPBCCH Packet Broadcast Control Channel ndash additional signalling for GPRSEDGE used only if needed
Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
134
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Mobile broadband remains at the forefront of innovation and development in computing networking and application development
bull Even as excitement builds about 5G LTE through ongoing advances has become the global standard
bull LTE-Advanced and LTE-Advanced Pro innovations include VoLTE 1 Gbps peak rate capability higher-order MIMO carrier aggregation LAALWALWIP IoT capabilities in Narrowband-IoT and Category M-1 V2X communications small-cell support URLLC SON dual connectivity and CoMP
bull Carriers are implementing NFV and SDN to reduce network costs improve service velocity and simplify deployment of new services
bull 5G research and development efforts have accelerated standards-based deployment will begin in 2019 and continue through 2030
bull Operators have announced pre-standard fixed-wireless deployments for 2017
bull 3GPP has implemented a 5G standardization process that began in Release 14 with a study of the new 5G radio continues now with a first phase of specifications in Release 15 that provides both non-standalone and standalone options then moves ahead with a second phase of complete specifications in Release 16
bull Small cells will play an ever-more-important role in boosting capacity benefiting from a number of technologies and developments
bull The future of mobile broadband including both LTE-Advanced and 5G is bright with no end in sight for continued growth in capability nor for the limitless application innovation that mobile broadband enables 135
Conclusion
- LTE to 5GCellular and Broadband Innovation
- Key Conclusions (1)
- Key Conclusions (2)
- Key Conclusions (3)
- Broadband Transformation
- Mobile Broadband Transformational Elements
- Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
- 5G Data Drivers
- Global Mobile Data Growth
- Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
- Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
- Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
- Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
- Expanding Use Cases
- 1G to 5G
- Timeline of Cellular Generations
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
- LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
- Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
- ITU Use Case Model
- ITU Objectives
- Network Transformation
- 5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
- Characteristics of Different Bands
- Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
- 5G New Radio (NR) (1)
- 5G New Radio (NR) (2)
- Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
- Expected 5G Performance
- Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
- 5G Schedule
- Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
- 5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
- Network Slicing Architecture
- Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
- Key Features in 3GPP Releases
- Types of Cells and Characteristics
- Small Cell Challenges
- Small Cell Approaches
- Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
- How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
- Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
- Wireless Networks for IoT
- ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
- Evolution of RCS Capability
- Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
- Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
- RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
- Dimensions of Capacity
- Bandwidth Management
- Spectrum Acquisition Time
- United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
- 600 MHz Band Plan
- LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
- Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
- Propagation Losses Cellular vs Wi-Fi
- Spectrum Use and Sharing Approaches
- Licensed Shared Access
- United States 35 GHz System Currently Being Developed
- Appendix section with additional technical details
- Latency of Different Technologies
- Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
- Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
- Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
- 5G Architecture Options in Release 15
- De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
- Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
- Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
- 5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
- 5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
- Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
- 5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
- LTE Capabilities
- LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
- Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
- LTE Antenna Schemes
- Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
- Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
- Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
- Gains From Carrier Aggregation
- CoMP Levels
- TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
- LTE UE Categories
- LTE-Advanced Relay
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
- Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
- LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
- LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
- Evolution of RCS API Profiles
- Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
- Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
- Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
- EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- Evolved Packet System
- LTE Quality of Service
- Load Balancing with Heterogeneous Networks
- Scenarios for Radio Carriers in Small Cells
- Traffic Distribution Scenarios
- Enhanced Intercell Interference Cancellation
- Median Throughput Gains Hotspot Scenarios
- User Throughput Performance
- Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
- Dual Connectivity
- Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
- Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
- Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
- Potential Cloud RAN Approach
- Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
- Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
- Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
- Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
- Roaming Using Hotspot 20
- Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
- Hybrid SON Architecture
- IP Multimedia Subsystem
- Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
- UMTS Multi-Radio Network
- HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
- HSPA Multi-User Diversity
- HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
- HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
- HSPA Throughput Evolution
- HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
- Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
- Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
- GPRSEDGE Architecture
- Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
- Conclusion
-
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
111Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
112
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
Device Category Category 3 Category 1 Category 0 Category M-1 Category NB-1 EC-GSM-IoT
3GPP Release 10 11 12 13 13 13
Max Data Rate Downlink
100 Mbps 10 Mbps 1 Mbps 1 Mbps 200 Kbps 74 Kbps
Max Data Rate Uplink
50 Mbps 5 Mbps 1 Mbps 1 Mbps 200 Kbps 74 Kbps
Max Bandwidth 20 MHz 20 MHz 20 MHz 108 MHz 018 MHz 02 MHz
Duplex Full Full Optional half-duplex
Optional half-duplex
Half Half
Max Receive Antennas
Two Two One One One One
Power Power Save Mode
Power Save Mode
Power Save Mode
Sleep Longer sleep cycles using Idle Discontinuous Reception (DRX)
Coverage Extended through redundant transmissions and Single Frequency Multicast
113
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Potential Cloud RAN Approach
114
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
Fully Centralized Partially Centralized
Transport Requirements Multi-Gbps usually using fiber
20 to 50 times less
Fronthaul Latency Requirement
Less than 100 microseconds
Greater than 5 milliseconds
Applications Supports eICIC and CoMP Supports centralized scheduling
Complexity High Lower
Benefit Capacity gain Lower capacity gain
115
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
Source Cisco Cisco 5G Vision Series Small Cell Evolution 2016
116
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
117Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
118
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Roaming Using Hotspot 20
119
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
120
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hybrid SON Architecture
121
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
IP Multimedia Subsystem
122
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
LTE will leverage OFDM-based broadcasting capabilities
123Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
UMTS Multi-Radio Network
Common core network can support multiple radio access networks
124
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
125
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Multi-User Diversity
Efficient scheduler favors transmissions to users with best radio conditions126
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
UE1
UE2
Uplink Downlink
127
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
Source Qualcomm contribution
128
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Throughput Evolution
Technology Downlink (Mbps) Peak Data Rate
Uplink (Mbps)Peak Data Rate
HSPA as defined in Release 6 144 576
Release 7 HSPA+ DL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 211 115
Release 7 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 16 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 280 115
Release 8 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 422 115
Release 8 HSPA+ (no MIMO)Dual Carrier 10+5 MHz 422 115
Release 9 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Dual Carrier DL and UL 10+10 MHz 840 230
Release 10 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Quad Carrier DL Dual Carrier UL 20+10 MHz
1680 230
Release 11 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO DL and UL 8 Carrier Dual Carrier UL 40+10 MHz
3360 690
No operators have announced plans to deploy HSPA in a quad (or greater) carrier configuration Three carrier configurations however have been deployed
129
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
130
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
131
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
132Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
GPRSEDGE Architecture
133
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
BCCH TCH TCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
577 microSper timeslot
4615 ms per frame of 8 timeslots
Possible BCCH carrier configuration
PBCCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Possible TCH carrier
configuration
BCCH Broadcast Control Channel ndash carries synchronization paging and other signalling informationTCH Traffic Channel ndash carries voice traffic data may alternate between frames for half-ratePDTCH Packet Data Traffic Channel ndash Carries packet data traffic for GPRS and EDGEPBCCH Packet Broadcast Control Channel ndash additional signalling for GPRSEDGE used only if needed
Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
134
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Mobile broadband remains at the forefront of innovation and development in computing networking and application development
bull Even as excitement builds about 5G LTE through ongoing advances has become the global standard
bull LTE-Advanced and LTE-Advanced Pro innovations include VoLTE 1 Gbps peak rate capability higher-order MIMO carrier aggregation LAALWALWIP IoT capabilities in Narrowband-IoT and Category M-1 V2X communications small-cell support URLLC SON dual connectivity and CoMP
bull Carriers are implementing NFV and SDN to reduce network costs improve service velocity and simplify deployment of new services
bull 5G research and development efforts have accelerated standards-based deployment will begin in 2019 and continue through 2030
bull Operators have announced pre-standard fixed-wireless deployments for 2017
bull 3GPP has implemented a 5G standardization process that began in Release 14 with a study of the new 5G radio continues now with a first phase of specifications in Release 15 that provides both non-standalone and standalone options then moves ahead with a second phase of complete specifications in Release 16
bull Small cells will play an ever-more-important role in boosting capacity benefiting from a number of technologies and developments
bull The future of mobile broadband including both LTE-Advanced and 5G is bright with no end in sight for continued growth in capability nor for the limitless application innovation that mobile broadband enables 135
Conclusion
- LTE to 5GCellular and Broadband Innovation
- Key Conclusions (1)
- Key Conclusions (2)
- Key Conclusions (3)
- Broadband Transformation
- Mobile Broadband Transformational Elements
- Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
- 5G Data Drivers
- Global Mobile Data Growth
- Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
- Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
- Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
- Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
- Expanding Use Cases
- 1G to 5G
- Timeline of Cellular Generations
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
- LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
- Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
- ITU Use Case Model
- ITU Objectives
- Network Transformation
- 5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
- Characteristics of Different Bands
- Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
- 5G New Radio (NR) (1)
- 5G New Radio (NR) (2)
- Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
- Expected 5G Performance
- Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
- 5G Schedule
- Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
- 5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
- Network Slicing Architecture
- Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
- Key Features in 3GPP Releases
- Types of Cells and Characteristics
- Small Cell Challenges
- Small Cell Approaches
- Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
- How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
- Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
- Wireless Networks for IoT
- ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
- Evolution of RCS Capability
- Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
- Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
- RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
- Dimensions of Capacity
- Bandwidth Management
- Spectrum Acquisition Time
- United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
- 600 MHz Band Plan
- LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
- Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
- Propagation Losses Cellular vs Wi-Fi
- Spectrum Use and Sharing Approaches
- Licensed Shared Access
- United States 35 GHz System Currently Being Developed
- Appendix section with additional technical details
- Latency of Different Technologies
- Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
- Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
- Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
- 5G Architecture Options in Release 15
- De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
- Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
- Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
- 5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
- 5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
- Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
- 5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
- LTE Capabilities
- LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
- Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
- LTE Antenna Schemes
- Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
- Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
- Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
- Gains From Carrier Aggregation
- CoMP Levels
- TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
- LTE UE Categories
- LTE-Advanced Relay
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
- Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
- LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
- LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
- Evolution of RCS API Profiles
- Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
- Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
- Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
- EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- Evolved Packet System
- LTE Quality of Service
- Load Balancing with Heterogeneous Networks
- Scenarios for Radio Carriers in Small Cells
- Traffic Distribution Scenarios
- Enhanced Intercell Interference Cancellation
- Median Throughput Gains Hotspot Scenarios
- User Throughput Performance
- Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
- Dual Connectivity
- Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
- Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
- Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
- Potential Cloud RAN Approach
- Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
- Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
- Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
- Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
- Roaming Using Hotspot 20
- Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
- Hybrid SON Architecture
- IP Multimedia Subsystem
- Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
- UMTS Multi-Radio Network
- HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
- HSPA Multi-User Diversity
- HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
- HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
- HSPA Throughput Evolution
- HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
- Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
- Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
- GPRSEDGE Architecture
- Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
- Conclusion
-
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
112
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
Device Category Category 3 Category 1 Category 0 Category M-1 Category NB-1 EC-GSM-IoT
3GPP Release 10 11 12 13 13 13
Max Data Rate Downlink
100 Mbps 10 Mbps 1 Mbps 1 Mbps 200 Kbps 74 Kbps
Max Data Rate Uplink
50 Mbps 5 Mbps 1 Mbps 1 Mbps 200 Kbps 74 Kbps
Max Bandwidth 20 MHz 20 MHz 20 MHz 108 MHz 018 MHz 02 MHz
Duplex Full Full Optional half-duplex
Optional half-duplex
Half Half
Max Receive Antennas
Two Two One One One One
Power Power Save Mode
Power Save Mode
Power Save Mode
Sleep Longer sleep cycles using Idle Discontinuous Reception (DRX)
Coverage Extended through redundant transmissions and Single Frequency Multicast
113
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Potential Cloud RAN Approach
114
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
Fully Centralized Partially Centralized
Transport Requirements Multi-Gbps usually using fiber
20 to 50 times less
Fronthaul Latency Requirement
Less than 100 microseconds
Greater than 5 milliseconds
Applications Supports eICIC and CoMP Supports centralized scheduling
Complexity High Lower
Benefit Capacity gain Lower capacity gain
115
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
Source Cisco Cisco 5G Vision Series Small Cell Evolution 2016
116
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
117Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
118
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Roaming Using Hotspot 20
119
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
120
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hybrid SON Architecture
121
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
IP Multimedia Subsystem
122
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
LTE will leverage OFDM-based broadcasting capabilities
123Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
UMTS Multi-Radio Network
Common core network can support multiple radio access networks
124
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
125
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Multi-User Diversity
Efficient scheduler favors transmissions to users with best radio conditions126
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
UE1
UE2
Uplink Downlink
127
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
Source Qualcomm contribution
128
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Throughput Evolution
Technology Downlink (Mbps) Peak Data Rate
Uplink (Mbps)Peak Data Rate
HSPA as defined in Release 6 144 576
Release 7 HSPA+ DL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 211 115
Release 7 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 16 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 280 115
Release 8 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 422 115
Release 8 HSPA+ (no MIMO)Dual Carrier 10+5 MHz 422 115
Release 9 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Dual Carrier DL and UL 10+10 MHz 840 230
Release 10 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Quad Carrier DL Dual Carrier UL 20+10 MHz
1680 230
Release 11 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO DL and UL 8 Carrier Dual Carrier UL 40+10 MHz
3360 690
No operators have announced plans to deploy HSPA in a quad (or greater) carrier configuration Three carrier configurations however have been deployed
129
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
130
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
131
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
132Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
GPRSEDGE Architecture
133
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
BCCH TCH TCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
577 microSper timeslot
4615 ms per frame of 8 timeslots
Possible BCCH carrier configuration
PBCCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Possible TCH carrier
configuration
BCCH Broadcast Control Channel ndash carries synchronization paging and other signalling informationTCH Traffic Channel ndash carries voice traffic data may alternate between frames for half-ratePDTCH Packet Data Traffic Channel ndash Carries packet data traffic for GPRS and EDGEPBCCH Packet Broadcast Control Channel ndash additional signalling for GPRSEDGE used only if needed
Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
134
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Mobile broadband remains at the forefront of innovation and development in computing networking and application development
bull Even as excitement builds about 5G LTE through ongoing advances has become the global standard
bull LTE-Advanced and LTE-Advanced Pro innovations include VoLTE 1 Gbps peak rate capability higher-order MIMO carrier aggregation LAALWALWIP IoT capabilities in Narrowband-IoT and Category M-1 V2X communications small-cell support URLLC SON dual connectivity and CoMP
bull Carriers are implementing NFV and SDN to reduce network costs improve service velocity and simplify deployment of new services
bull 5G research and development efforts have accelerated standards-based deployment will begin in 2019 and continue through 2030
bull Operators have announced pre-standard fixed-wireless deployments for 2017
bull 3GPP has implemented a 5G standardization process that began in Release 14 with a study of the new 5G radio continues now with a first phase of specifications in Release 15 that provides both non-standalone and standalone options then moves ahead with a second phase of complete specifications in Release 16
bull Small cells will play an ever-more-important role in boosting capacity benefiting from a number of technologies and developments
bull The future of mobile broadband including both LTE-Advanced and 5G is bright with no end in sight for continued growth in capability nor for the limitless application innovation that mobile broadband enables 135
Conclusion
- LTE to 5GCellular and Broadband Innovation
- Key Conclusions (1)
- Key Conclusions (2)
- Key Conclusions (3)
- Broadband Transformation
- Mobile Broadband Transformational Elements
- Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
- 5G Data Drivers
- Global Mobile Data Growth
- Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
- Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
- Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
- Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
- Expanding Use Cases
- 1G to 5G
- Timeline of Cellular Generations
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
- LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
- Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
- ITU Use Case Model
- ITU Objectives
- Network Transformation
- 5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
- Characteristics of Different Bands
- Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
- 5G New Radio (NR) (1)
- 5G New Radio (NR) (2)
- Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
- Expected 5G Performance
- Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
- 5G Schedule
- Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
- 5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
- Network Slicing Architecture
- Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
- Key Features in 3GPP Releases
- Types of Cells and Characteristics
- Small Cell Challenges
- Small Cell Approaches
- Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
- How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
- Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
- Wireless Networks for IoT
- ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
- Evolution of RCS Capability
- Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
- Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
- RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
- Dimensions of Capacity
- Bandwidth Management
- Spectrum Acquisition Time
- United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
- 600 MHz Band Plan
- LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
- Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
- Propagation Losses Cellular vs Wi-Fi
- Spectrum Use and Sharing Approaches
- Licensed Shared Access
- United States 35 GHz System Currently Being Developed
- Appendix section with additional technical details
- Latency of Different Technologies
- Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
- Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
- Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
- 5G Architecture Options in Release 15
- De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
- Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
- Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
- 5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
- 5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
- Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
- 5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
- LTE Capabilities
- LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
- Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
- LTE Antenna Schemes
- Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
- Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
- Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
- Gains From Carrier Aggregation
- CoMP Levels
- TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
- LTE UE Categories
- LTE-Advanced Relay
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
- Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
- LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
- LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
- Evolution of RCS API Profiles
- Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
- Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
- Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
- EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- Evolved Packet System
- LTE Quality of Service
- Load Balancing with Heterogeneous Networks
- Scenarios for Radio Carriers in Small Cells
- Traffic Distribution Scenarios
- Enhanced Intercell Interference Cancellation
- Median Throughput Gains Hotspot Scenarios
- User Throughput Performance
- Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
- Dual Connectivity
- Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
- Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
- Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
- Potential Cloud RAN Approach
- Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
- Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
- Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
- Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
- Roaming Using Hotspot 20
- Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
- Hybrid SON Architecture
- IP Multimedia Subsystem
- Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
- UMTS Multi-Radio Network
- HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
- HSPA Multi-User Diversity
- HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
- HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
- HSPA Throughput Evolution
- HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
- Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
- Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
- GPRSEDGE Architecture
- Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
- Conclusion
-
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
Device Category Category 3 Category 1 Category 0 Category M-1 Category NB-1 EC-GSM-IoT
3GPP Release 10 11 12 13 13 13
Max Data Rate Downlink
100 Mbps 10 Mbps 1 Mbps 1 Mbps 200 Kbps 74 Kbps
Max Data Rate Uplink
50 Mbps 5 Mbps 1 Mbps 1 Mbps 200 Kbps 74 Kbps
Max Bandwidth 20 MHz 20 MHz 20 MHz 108 MHz 018 MHz 02 MHz
Duplex Full Full Optional half-duplex
Optional half-duplex
Half Half
Max Receive Antennas
Two Two One One One One
Power Power Save Mode
Power Save Mode
Power Save Mode
Sleep Longer sleep cycles using Idle Discontinuous Reception (DRX)
Coverage Extended through redundant transmissions and Single Frequency Multicast
113
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Potential Cloud RAN Approach
114
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
Fully Centralized Partially Centralized
Transport Requirements Multi-Gbps usually using fiber
20 to 50 times less
Fronthaul Latency Requirement
Less than 100 microseconds
Greater than 5 milliseconds
Applications Supports eICIC and CoMP Supports centralized scheduling
Complexity High Lower
Benefit Capacity gain Lower capacity gain
115
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
Source Cisco Cisco 5G Vision Series Small Cell Evolution 2016
116
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
117Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
118
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Roaming Using Hotspot 20
119
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
120
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hybrid SON Architecture
121
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
IP Multimedia Subsystem
122
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
LTE will leverage OFDM-based broadcasting capabilities
123Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
UMTS Multi-Radio Network
Common core network can support multiple radio access networks
124
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
125
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Multi-User Diversity
Efficient scheduler favors transmissions to users with best radio conditions126
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
UE1
UE2
Uplink Downlink
127
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
Source Qualcomm contribution
128
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Throughput Evolution
Technology Downlink (Mbps) Peak Data Rate
Uplink (Mbps)Peak Data Rate
HSPA as defined in Release 6 144 576
Release 7 HSPA+ DL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 211 115
Release 7 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 16 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 280 115
Release 8 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 422 115
Release 8 HSPA+ (no MIMO)Dual Carrier 10+5 MHz 422 115
Release 9 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Dual Carrier DL and UL 10+10 MHz 840 230
Release 10 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Quad Carrier DL Dual Carrier UL 20+10 MHz
1680 230
Release 11 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO DL and UL 8 Carrier Dual Carrier UL 40+10 MHz
3360 690
No operators have announced plans to deploy HSPA in a quad (or greater) carrier configuration Three carrier configurations however have been deployed
129
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
130
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
131
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
132Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
GPRSEDGE Architecture
133
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
BCCH TCH TCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
577 microSper timeslot
4615 ms per frame of 8 timeslots
Possible BCCH carrier configuration
PBCCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Possible TCH carrier
configuration
BCCH Broadcast Control Channel ndash carries synchronization paging and other signalling informationTCH Traffic Channel ndash carries voice traffic data may alternate between frames for half-ratePDTCH Packet Data Traffic Channel ndash Carries packet data traffic for GPRS and EDGEPBCCH Packet Broadcast Control Channel ndash additional signalling for GPRSEDGE used only if needed
Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
134
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Mobile broadband remains at the forefront of innovation and development in computing networking and application development
bull Even as excitement builds about 5G LTE through ongoing advances has become the global standard
bull LTE-Advanced and LTE-Advanced Pro innovations include VoLTE 1 Gbps peak rate capability higher-order MIMO carrier aggregation LAALWALWIP IoT capabilities in Narrowband-IoT and Category M-1 V2X communications small-cell support URLLC SON dual connectivity and CoMP
bull Carriers are implementing NFV and SDN to reduce network costs improve service velocity and simplify deployment of new services
bull 5G research and development efforts have accelerated standards-based deployment will begin in 2019 and continue through 2030
bull Operators have announced pre-standard fixed-wireless deployments for 2017
bull 3GPP has implemented a 5G standardization process that began in Release 14 with a study of the new 5G radio continues now with a first phase of specifications in Release 15 that provides both non-standalone and standalone options then moves ahead with a second phase of complete specifications in Release 16
bull Small cells will play an ever-more-important role in boosting capacity benefiting from a number of technologies and developments
bull The future of mobile broadband including both LTE-Advanced and 5G is bright with no end in sight for continued growth in capability nor for the limitless application innovation that mobile broadband enables 135
Conclusion
- LTE to 5GCellular and Broadband Innovation
- Key Conclusions (1)
- Key Conclusions (2)
- Key Conclusions (3)
- Broadband Transformation
- Mobile Broadband Transformational Elements
- Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
- 5G Data Drivers
- Global Mobile Data Growth
- Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
- Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
- Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
- Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
- Expanding Use Cases
- 1G to 5G
- Timeline of Cellular Generations
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
- LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
- Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
- ITU Use Case Model
- ITU Objectives
- Network Transformation
- 5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
- Characteristics of Different Bands
- Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
- 5G New Radio (NR) (1)
- 5G New Radio (NR) (2)
- Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
- Expected 5G Performance
- Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
- 5G Schedule
- Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
- 5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
- Network Slicing Architecture
- Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
- Key Features in 3GPP Releases
- Types of Cells and Characteristics
- Small Cell Challenges
- Small Cell Approaches
- Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
- How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
- Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
- Wireless Networks for IoT
- ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
- Evolution of RCS Capability
- Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
- Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
- RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
- Dimensions of Capacity
- Bandwidth Management
- Spectrum Acquisition Time
- United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
- 600 MHz Band Plan
- LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
- Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
- Propagation Losses Cellular vs Wi-Fi
- Spectrum Use and Sharing Approaches
- Licensed Shared Access
- United States 35 GHz System Currently Being Developed
- Appendix section with additional technical details
- Latency of Different Technologies
- Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
- Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
- Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
- 5G Architecture Options in Release 15
- De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
- Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
- Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
- 5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
- 5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
- Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
- 5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
- LTE Capabilities
- LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
- Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
- LTE Antenna Schemes
- Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
- Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
- Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
- Gains From Carrier Aggregation
- CoMP Levels
- TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
- LTE UE Categories
- LTE-Advanced Relay
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
- Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
- LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
- LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
- Evolution of RCS API Profiles
- Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
- Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
- Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
- EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- Evolved Packet System
- LTE Quality of Service
- Load Balancing with Heterogeneous Networks
- Scenarios for Radio Carriers in Small Cells
- Traffic Distribution Scenarios
- Enhanced Intercell Interference Cancellation
- Median Throughput Gains Hotspot Scenarios
- User Throughput Performance
- Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
- Dual Connectivity
- Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
- Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
- Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
- Potential Cloud RAN Approach
- Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
- Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
- Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
- Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
- Roaming Using Hotspot 20
- Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
- Hybrid SON Architecture
- IP Multimedia Subsystem
- Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
- UMTS Multi-Radio Network
- HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
- HSPA Multi-User Diversity
- HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
- HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
- HSPA Throughput Evolution
- HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
- Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
- Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
- GPRSEDGE Architecture
- Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
- Conclusion
-
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Potential Cloud RAN Approach
114
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
Fully Centralized Partially Centralized
Transport Requirements Multi-Gbps usually using fiber
20 to 50 times less
Fronthaul Latency Requirement
Less than 100 microseconds
Greater than 5 milliseconds
Applications Supports eICIC and CoMP Supports centralized scheduling
Complexity High Lower
Benefit Capacity gain Lower capacity gain
115
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
Source Cisco Cisco 5G Vision Series Small Cell Evolution 2016
116
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
117Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
118
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Roaming Using Hotspot 20
119
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
120
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hybrid SON Architecture
121
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
IP Multimedia Subsystem
122
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
LTE will leverage OFDM-based broadcasting capabilities
123Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
UMTS Multi-Radio Network
Common core network can support multiple radio access networks
124
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
125
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Multi-User Diversity
Efficient scheduler favors transmissions to users with best radio conditions126
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
UE1
UE2
Uplink Downlink
127
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
Source Qualcomm contribution
128
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Throughput Evolution
Technology Downlink (Mbps) Peak Data Rate
Uplink (Mbps)Peak Data Rate
HSPA as defined in Release 6 144 576
Release 7 HSPA+ DL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 211 115
Release 7 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 16 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 280 115
Release 8 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 422 115
Release 8 HSPA+ (no MIMO)Dual Carrier 10+5 MHz 422 115
Release 9 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Dual Carrier DL and UL 10+10 MHz 840 230
Release 10 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Quad Carrier DL Dual Carrier UL 20+10 MHz
1680 230
Release 11 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO DL and UL 8 Carrier Dual Carrier UL 40+10 MHz
3360 690
No operators have announced plans to deploy HSPA in a quad (or greater) carrier configuration Three carrier configurations however have been deployed
129
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
130
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
131
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
132Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
GPRSEDGE Architecture
133
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
BCCH TCH TCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
577 microSper timeslot
4615 ms per frame of 8 timeslots
Possible BCCH carrier configuration
PBCCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Possible TCH carrier
configuration
BCCH Broadcast Control Channel ndash carries synchronization paging and other signalling informationTCH Traffic Channel ndash carries voice traffic data may alternate between frames for half-ratePDTCH Packet Data Traffic Channel ndash Carries packet data traffic for GPRS and EDGEPBCCH Packet Broadcast Control Channel ndash additional signalling for GPRSEDGE used only if needed
Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
134
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Mobile broadband remains at the forefront of innovation and development in computing networking and application development
bull Even as excitement builds about 5G LTE through ongoing advances has become the global standard
bull LTE-Advanced and LTE-Advanced Pro innovations include VoLTE 1 Gbps peak rate capability higher-order MIMO carrier aggregation LAALWALWIP IoT capabilities in Narrowband-IoT and Category M-1 V2X communications small-cell support URLLC SON dual connectivity and CoMP
bull Carriers are implementing NFV and SDN to reduce network costs improve service velocity and simplify deployment of new services
bull 5G research and development efforts have accelerated standards-based deployment will begin in 2019 and continue through 2030
bull Operators have announced pre-standard fixed-wireless deployments for 2017
bull 3GPP has implemented a 5G standardization process that began in Release 14 with a study of the new 5G radio continues now with a first phase of specifications in Release 15 that provides both non-standalone and standalone options then moves ahead with a second phase of complete specifications in Release 16
bull Small cells will play an ever-more-important role in boosting capacity benefiting from a number of technologies and developments
bull The future of mobile broadband including both LTE-Advanced and 5G is bright with no end in sight for continued growth in capability nor for the limitless application innovation that mobile broadband enables 135
Conclusion
- LTE to 5GCellular and Broadband Innovation
- Key Conclusions (1)
- Key Conclusions (2)
- Key Conclusions (3)
- Broadband Transformation
- Mobile Broadband Transformational Elements
- Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
- 5G Data Drivers
- Global Mobile Data Growth
- Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
- Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
- Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
- Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
- Expanding Use Cases
- 1G to 5G
- Timeline of Cellular Generations
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
- LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
- Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
- ITU Use Case Model
- ITU Objectives
- Network Transformation
- 5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
- Characteristics of Different Bands
- Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
- 5G New Radio (NR) (1)
- 5G New Radio (NR) (2)
- Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
- Expected 5G Performance
- Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
- 5G Schedule
- Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
- 5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
- Network Slicing Architecture
- Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
- Key Features in 3GPP Releases
- Types of Cells and Characteristics
- Small Cell Challenges
- Small Cell Approaches
- Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
- How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
- Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
- Wireless Networks for IoT
- ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
- Evolution of RCS Capability
- Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
- Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
- RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
- Dimensions of Capacity
- Bandwidth Management
- Spectrum Acquisition Time
- United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
- 600 MHz Band Plan
- LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
- Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
- Propagation Losses Cellular vs Wi-Fi
- Spectrum Use and Sharing Approaches
- Licensed Shared Access
- United States 35 GHz System Currently Being Developed
- Appendix section with additional technical details
- Latency of Different Technologies
- Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
- Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
- Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
- 5G Architecture Options in Release 15
- De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
- Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
- Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
- 5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
- 5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
- Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
- 5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
- LTE Capabilities
- LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
- Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
- LTE Antenna Schemes
- Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
- Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
- Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
- Gains From Carrier Aggregation
- CoMP Levels
- TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
- LTE UE Categories
- LTE-Advanced Relay
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
- Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
- LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
- LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
- Evolution of RCS API Profiles
- Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
- Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
- Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
- EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- Evolved Packet System
- LTE Quality of Service
- Load Balancing with Heterogeneous Networks
- Scenarios for Radio Carriers in Small Cells
- Traffic Distribution Scenarios
- Enhanced Intercell Interference Cancellation
- Median Throughput Gains Hotspot Scenarios
- User Throughput Performance
- Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
- Dual Connectivity
- Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
- Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
- Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
- Potential Cloud RAN Approach
- Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
- Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
- Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
- Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
- Roaming Using Hotspot 20
- Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
- Hybrid SON Architecture
- IP Multimedia Subsystem
- Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
- UMTS Multi-Radio Network
- HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
- HSPA Multi-User Diversity
- HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
- HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
- HSPA Throughput Evolution
- HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
- Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
- Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
- GPRSEDGE Architecture
- Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
- Conclusion
-
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
Fully Centralized Partially Centralized
Transport Requirements Multi-Gbps usually using fiber
20 to 50 times less
Fronthaul Latency Requirement
Less than 100 microseconds
Greater than 5 milliseconds
Applications Supports eICIC and CoMP Supports centralized scheduling
Complexity High Lower
Benefit Capacity gain Lower capacity gain
115
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
Source Cisco Cisco 5G Vision Series Small Cell Evolution 2016
116
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
117Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
118
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Roaming Using Hotspot 20
119
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
120
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hybrid SON Architecture
121
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
IP Multimedia Subsystem
122
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
LTE will leverage OFDM-based broadcasting capabilities
123Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
UMTS Multi-Radio Network
Common core network can support multiple radio access networks
124
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
125
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Multi-User Diversity
Efficient scheduler favors transmissions to users with best radio conditions126
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
UE1
UE2
Uplink Downlink
127
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
Source Qualcomm contribution
128
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Throughput Evolution
Technology Downlink (Mbps) Peak Data Rate
Uplink (Mbps)Peak Data Rate
HSPA as defined in Release 6 144 576
Release 7 HSPA+ DL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 211 115
Release 7 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 16 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 280 115
Release 8 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 422 115
Release 8 HSPA+ (no MIMO)Dual Carrier 10+5 MHz 422 115
Release 9 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Dual Carrier DL and UL 10+10 MHz 840 230
Release 10 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Quad Carrier DL Dual Carrier UL 20+10 MHz
1680 230
Release 11 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO DL and UL 8 Carrier Dual Carrier UL 40+10 MHz
3360 690
No operators have announced plans to deploy HSPA in a quad (or greater) carrier configuration Three carrier configurations however have been deployed
129
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
130
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
131
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
132Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
GPRSEDGE Architecture
133
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
BCCH TCH TCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
577 microSper timeslot
4615 ms per frame of 8 timeslots
Possible BCCH carrier configuration
PBCCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Possible TCH carrier
configuration
BCCH Broadcast Control Channel ndash carries synchronization paging and other signalling informationTCH Traffic Channel ndash carries voice traffic data may alternate between frames for half-ratePDTCH Packet Data Traffic Channel ndash Carries packet data traffic for GPRS and EDGEPBCCH Packet Broadcast Control Channel ndash additional signalling for GPRSEDGE used only if needed
Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
134
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Mobile broadband remains at the forefront of innovation and development in computing networking and application development
bull Even as excitement builds about 5G LTE through ongoing advances has become the global standard
bull LTE-Advanced and LTE-Advanced Pro innovations include VoLTE 1 Gbps peak rate capability higher-order MIMO carrier aggregation LAALWALWIP IoT capabilities in Narrowband-IoT and Category M-1 V2X communications small-cell support URLLC SON dual connectivity and CoMP
bull Carriers are implementing NFV and SDN to reduce network costs improve service velocity and simplify deployment of new services
bull 5G research and development efforts have accelerated standards-based deployment will begin in 2019 and continue through 2030
bull Operators have announced pre-standard fixed-wireless deployments for 2017
bull 3GPP has implemented a 5G standardization process that began in Release 14 with a study of the new 5G radio continues now with a first phase of specifications in Release 15 that provides both non-standalone and standalone options then moves ahead with a second phase of complete specifications in Release 16
bull Small cells will play an ever-more-important role in boosting capacity benefiting from a number of technologies and developments
bull The future of mobile broadband including both LTE-Advanced and 5G is bright with no end in sight for continued growth in capability nor for the limitless application innovation that mobile broadband enables 135
Conclusion
- LTE to 5GCellular and Broadband Innovation
- Key Conclusions (1)
- Key Conclusions (2)
- Key Conclusions (3)
- Broadband Transformation
- Mobile Broadband Transformational Elements
- Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
- 5G Data Drivers
- Global Mobile Data Growth
- Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
- Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
- Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
- Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
- Expanding Use Cases
- 1G to 5G
- Timeline of Cellular Generations
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
- LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
- Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
- ITU Use Case Model
- ITU Objectives
- Network Transformation
- 5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
- Characteristics of Different Bands
- Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
- 5G New Radio (NR) (1)
- 5G New Radio (NR) (2)
- Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
- Expected 5G Performance
- Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
- 5G Schedule
- Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
- 5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
- Network Slicing Architecture
- Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
- Key Features in 3GPP Releases
- Types of Cells and Characteristics
- Small Cell Challenges
- Small Cell Approaches
- Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
- How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
- Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
- Wireless Networks for IoT
- ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
- Evolution of RCS Capability
- Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
- Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
- RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
- Dimensions of Capacity
- Bandwidth Management
- Spectrum Acquisition Time
- United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
- 600 MHz Band Plan
- LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
- Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
- Propagation Losses Cellular vs Wi-Fi
- Spectrum Use and Sharing Approaches
- Licensed Shared Access
- United States 35 GHz System Currently Being Developed
- Appendix section with additional technical details
- Latency of Different Technologies
- Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
- Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
- Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
- 5G Architecture Options in Release 15
- De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
- Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
- Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
- 5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
- 5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
- Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
- 5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
- LTE Capabilities
- LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
- Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
- LTE Antenna Schemes
- Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
- Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
- Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
- Gains From Carrier Aggregation
- CoMP Levels
- TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
- LTE UE Categories
- LTE-Advanced Relay
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
- Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
- LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
- LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
- Evolution of RCS API Profiles
- Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
- Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
- Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
- EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- Evolved Packet System
- LTE Quality of Service
- Load Balancing with Heterogeneous Networks
- Scenarios for Radio Carriers in Small Cells
- Traffic Distribution Scenarios
- Enhanced Intercell Interference Cancellation
- Median Throughput Gains Hotspot Scenarios
- User Throughput Performance
- Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
- Dual Connectivity
- Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
- Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
- Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
- Potential Cloud RAN Approach
- Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
- Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
- Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
- Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
- Roaming Using Hotspot 20
- Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
- Hybrid SON Architecture
- IP Multimedia Subsystem
- Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
- UMTS Multi-Radio Network
- HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
- HSPA Multi-User Diversity
- HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
- HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
- HSPA Throughput Evolution
- HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
- Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
- Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
- GPRSEDGE Architecture
- Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
- Conclusion
-
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
Source Cisco Cisco 5G Vision Series Small Cell Evolution 2016
116
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
117Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
118
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Roaming Using Hotspot 20
119
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
120
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hybrid SON Architecture
121
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
IP Multimedia Subsystem
122
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
LTE will leverage OFDM-based broadcasting capabilities
123Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
UMTS Multi-Radio Network
Common core network can support multiple radio access networks
124
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
125
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Multi-User Diversity
Efficient scheduler favors transmissions to users with best radio conditions126
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
UE1
UE2
Uplink Downlink
127
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
Source Qualcomm contribution
128
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Throughput Evolution
Technology Downlink (Mbps) Peak Data Rate
Uplink (Mbps)Peak Data Rate
HSPA as defined in Release 6 144 576
Release 7 HSPA+ DL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 211 115
Release 7 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 16 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 280 115
Release 8 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 422 115
Release 8 HSPA+ (no MIMO)Dual Carrier 10+5 MHz 422 115
Release 9 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Dual Carrier DL and UL 10+10 MHz 840 230
Release 10 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Quad Carrier DL Dual Carrier UL 20+10 MHz
1680 230
Release 11 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO DL and UL 8 Carrier Dual Carrier UL 40+10 MHz
3360 690
No operators have announced plans to deploy HSPA in a quad (or greater) carrier configuration Three carrier configurations however have been deployed
129
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
130
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
131
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
132Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
GPRSEDGE Architecture
133
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
BCCH TCH TCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
577 microSper timeslot
4615 ms per frame of 8 timeslots
Possible BCCH carrier configuration
PBCCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Possible TCH carrier
configuration
BCCH Broadcast Control Channel ndash carries synchronization paging and other signalling informationTCH Traffic Channel ndash carries voice traffic data may alternate between frames for half-ratePDTCH Packet Data Traffic Channel ndash Carries packet data traffic for GPRS and EDGEPBCCH Packet Broadcast Control Channel ndash additional signalling for GPRSEDGE used only if needed
Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
134
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Mobile broadband remains at the forefront of innovation and development in computing networking and application development
bull Even as excitement builds about 5G LTE through ongoing advances has become the global standard
bull LTE-Advanced and LTE-Advanced Pro innovations include VoLTE 1 Gbps peak rate capability higher-order MIMO carrier aggregation LAALWALWIP IoT capabilities in Narrowband-IoT and Category M-1 V2X communications small-cell support URLLC SON dual connectivity and CoMP
bull Carriers are implementing NFV and SDN to reduce network costs improve service velocity and simplify deployment of new services
bull 5G research and development efforts have accelerated standards-based deployment will begin in 2019 and continue through 2030
bull Operators have announced pre-standard fixed-wireless deployments for 2017
bull 3GPP has implemented a 5G standardization process that began in Release 14 with a study of the new 5G radio continues now with a first phase of specifications in Release 15 that provides both non-standalone and standalone options then moves ahead with a second phase of complete specifications in Release 16
bull Small cells will play an ever-more-important role in boosting capacity benefiting from a number of technologies and developments
bull The future of mobile broadband including both LTE-Advanced and 5G is bright with no end in sight for continued growth in capability nor for the limitless application innovation that mobile broadband enables 135
Conclusion
- LTE to 5GCellular and Broadband Innovation
- Key Conclusions (1)
- Key Conclusions (2)
- Key Conclusions (3)
- Broadband Transformation
- Mobile Broadband Transformational Elements
- Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
- 5G Data Drivers
- Global Mobile Data Growth
- Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
- Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
- Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
- Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
- Expanding Use Cases
- 1G to 5G
- Timeline of Cellular Generations
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
- LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
- Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
- ITU Use Case Model
- ITU Objectives
- Network Transformation
- 5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
- Characteristics of Different Bands
- Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
- 5G New Radio (NR) (1)
- 5G New Radio (NR) (2)
- Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
- Expected 5G Performance
- Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
- 5G Schedule
- Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
- 5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
- Network Slicing Architecture
- Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
- Key Features in 3GPP Releases
- Types of Cells and Characteristics
- Small Cell Challenges
- Small Cell Approaches
- Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
- How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
- Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
- Wireless Networks for IoT
- ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
- Evolution of RCS Capability
- Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
- Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
- RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
- Dimensions of Capacity
- Bandwidth Management
- Spectrum Acquisition Time
- United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
- 600 MHz Band Plan
- LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
- Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
- Propagation Losses Cellular vs Wi-Fi
- Spectrum Use and Sharing Approaches
- Licensed Shared Access
- United States 35 GHz System Currently Being Developed
- Appendix section with additional technical details
- Latency of Different Technologies
- Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
- Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
- Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
- 5G Architecture Options in Release 15
- De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
- Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
- Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
- 5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
- 5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
- Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
- 5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
- LTE Capabilities
- LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
- Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
- LTE Antenna Schemes
- Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
- Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
- Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
- Gains From Carrier Aggregation
- CoMP Levels
- TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
- LTE UE Categories
- LTE-Advanced Relay
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
- Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
- LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
- LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
- Evolution of RCS API Profiles
- Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
- Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
- Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
- EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- Evolved Packet System
- LTE Quality of Service
- Load Balancing with Heterogeneous Networks
- Scenarios for Radio Carriers in Small Cells
- Traffic Distribution Scenarios
- Enhanced Intercell Interference Cancellation
- Median Throughput Gains Hotspot Scenarios
- User Throughput Performance
- Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
- Dual Connectivity
- Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
- Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
- Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
- Potential Cloud RAN Approach
- Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
- Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
- Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
- Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
- Roaming Using Hotspot 20
- Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
- Hybrid SON Architecture
- IP Multimedia Subsystem
- Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
- UMTS Multi-Radio Network
- HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
- HSPA Multi-User Diversity
- HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
- HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
- HSPA Throughput Evolution
- HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
- Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
- Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
- GPRSEDGE Architecture
- Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
- Conclusion
-
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
117Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
118
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Roaming Using Hotspot 20
119
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
120
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hybrid SON Architecture
121
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
IP Multimedia Subsystem
122
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
LTE will leverage OFDM-based broadcasting capabilities
123Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
UMTS Multi-Radio Network
Common core network can support multiple radio access networks
124
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
125
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Multi-User Diversity
Efficient scheduler favors transmissions to users with best radio conditions126
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
UE1
UE2
Uplink Downlink
127
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
Source Qualcomm contribution
128
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Throughput Evolution
Technology Downlink (Mbps) Peak Data Rate
Uplink (Mbps)Peak Data Rate
HSPA as defined in Release 6 144 576
Release 7 HSPA+ DL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 211 115
Release 7 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 16 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 280 115
Release 8 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 422 115
Release 8 HSPA+ (no MIMO)Dual Carrier 10+5 MHz 422 115
Release 9 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Dual Carrier DL and UL 10+10 MHz 840 230
Release 10 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Quad Carrier DL Dual Carrier UL 20+10 MHz
1680 230
Release 11 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO DL and UL 8 Carrier Dual Carrier UL 40+10 MHz
3360 690
No operators have announced plans to deploy HSPA in a quad (or greater) carrier configuration Three carrier configurations however have been deployed
129
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
130
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
131
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
132Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
GPRSEDGE Architecture
133
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
BCCH TCH TCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
577 microSper timeslot
4615 ms per frame of 8 timeslots
Possible BCCH carrier configuration
PBCCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Possible TCH carrier
configuration
BCCH Broadcast Control Channel ndash carries synchronization paging and other signalling informationTCH Traffic Channel ndash carries voice traffic data may alternate between frames for half-ratePDTCH Packet Data Traffic Channel ndash Carries packet data traffic for GPRS and EDGEPBCCH Packet Broadcast Control Channel ndash additional signalling for GPRSEDGE used only if needed
Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
134
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Mobile broadband remains at the forefront of innovation and development in computing networking and application development
bull Even as excitement builds about 5G LTE through ongoing advances has become the global standard
bull LTE-Advanced and LTE-Advanced Pro innovations include VoLTE 1 Gbps peak rate capability higher-order MIMO carrier aggregation LAALWALWIP IoT capabilities in Narrowband-IoT and Category M-1 V2X communications small-cell support URLLC SON dual connectivity and CoMP
bull Carriers are implementing NFV and SDN to reduce network costs improve service velocity and simplify deployment of new services
bull 5G research and development efforts have accelerated standards-based deployment will begin in 2019 and continue through 2030
bull Operators have announced pre-standard fixed-wireless deployments for 2017
bull 3GPP has implemented a 5G standardization process that began in Release 14 with a study of the new 5G radio continues now with a first phase of specifications in Release 15 that provides both non-standalone and standalone options then moves ahead with a second phase of complete specifications in Release 16
bull Small cells will play an ever-more-important role in boosting capacity benefiting from a number of technologies and developments
bull The future of mobile broadband including both LTE-Advanced and 5G is bright with no end in sight for continued growth in capability nor for the limitless application innovation that mobile broadband enables 135
Conclusion
- LTE to 5GCellular and Broadband Innovation
- Key Conclusions (1)
- Key Conclusions (2)
- Key Conclusions (3)
- Broadband Transformation
- Mobile Broadband Transformational Elements
- Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
- 5G Data Drivers
- Global Mobile Data Growth
- Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
- Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
- Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
- Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
- Expanding Use Cases
- 1G to 5G
- Timeline of Cellular Generations
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
- LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
- Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
- ITU Use Case Model
- ITU Objectives
- Network Transformation
- 5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
- Characteristics of Different Bands
- Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
- 5G New Radio (NR) (1)
- 5G New Radio (NR) (2)
- Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
- Expected 5G Performance
- Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
- 5G Schedule
- Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
- 5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
- Network Slicing Architecture
- Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
- Key Features in 3GPP Releases
- Types of Cells and Characteristics
- Small Cell Challenges
- Small Cell Approaches
- Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
- How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
- Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
- Wireless Networks for IoT
- ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
- Evolution of RCS Capability
- Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
- Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
- RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
- Dimensions of Capacity
- Bandwidth Management
- Spectrum Acquisition Time
- United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
- 600 MHz Band Plan
- LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
- Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
- Propagation Losses Cellular vs Wi-Fi
- Spectrum Use and Sharing Approaches
- Licensed Shared Access
- United States 35 GHz System Currently Being Developed
- Appendix section with additional technical details
- Latency of Different Technologies
- Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
- Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
- Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
- 5G Architecture Options in Release 15
- De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
- Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
- Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
- 5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
- 5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
- Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
- 5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
- LTE Capabilities
- LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
- Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
- LTE Antenna Schemes
- Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
- Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
- Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
- Gains From Carrier Aggregation
- CoMP Levels
- TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
- LTE UE Categories
- LTE-Advanced Relay
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
- Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
- LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
- LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
- Evolution of RCS API Profiles
- Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
- Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
- Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
- EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- Evolved Packet System
- LTE Quality of Service
- Load Balancing with Heterogeneous Networks
- Scenarios for Radio Carriers in Small Cells
- Traffic Distribution Scenarios
- Enhanced Intercell Interference Cancellation
- Median Throughput Gains Hotspot Scenarios
- User Throughput Performance
- Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
- Dual Connectivity
- Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
- Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
- Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
- Potential Cloud RAN Approach
- Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
- Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
- Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
- Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
- Roaming Using Hotspot 20
- Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
- Hybrid SON Architecture
- IP Multimedia Subsystem
- Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
- UMTS Multi-Radio Network
- HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
- HSPA Multi-User Diversity
- HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
- HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
- HSPA Throughput Evolution
- HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
- Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
- Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
- GPRSEDGE Architecture
- Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
- Conclusion
-
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
118
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Roaming Using Hotspot 20
119
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
120
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hybrid SON Architecture
121
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
IP Multimedia Subsystem
122
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
LTE will leverage OFDM-based broadcasting capabilities
123Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
UMTS Multi-Radio Network
Common core network can support multiple radio access networks
124
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
125
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Multi-User Diversity
Efficient scheduler favors transmissions to users with best radio conditions126
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
UE1
UE2
Uplink Downlink
127
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
Source Qualcomm contribution
128
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Throughput Evolution
Technology Downlink (Mbps) Peak Data Rate
Uplink (Mbps)Peak Data Rate
HSPA as defined in Release 6 144 576
Release 7 HSPA+ DL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 211 115
Release 7 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 16 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 280 115
Release 8 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 422 115
Release 8 HSPA+ (no MIMO)Dual Carrier 10+5 MHz 422 115
Release 9 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Dual Carrier DL and UL 10+10 MHz 840 230
Release 10 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Quad Carrier DL Dual Carrier UL 20+10 MHz
1680 230
Release 11 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO DL and UL 8 Carrier Dual Carrier UL 40+10 MHz
3360 690
No operators have announced plans to deploy HSPA in a quad (or greater) carrier configuration Three carrier configurations however have been deployed
129
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
130
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
131
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
132Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
GPRSEDGE Architecture
133
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
BCCH TCH TCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
577 microSper timeslot
4615 ms per frame of 8 timeslots
Possible BCCH carrier configuration
PBCCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Possible TCH carrier
configuration
BCCH Broadcast Control Channel ndash carries synchronization paging and other signalling informationTCH Traffic Channel ndash carries voice traffic data may alternate between frames for half-ratePDTCH Packet Data Traffic Channel ndash Carries packet data traffic for GPRS and EDGEPBCCH Packet Broadcast Control Channel ndash additional signalling for GPRSEDGE used only if needed
Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
134
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Mobile broadband remains at the forefront of innovation and development in computing networking and application development
bull Even as excitement builds about 5G LTE through ongoing advances has become the global standard
bull LTE-Advanced and LTE-Advanced Pro innovations include VoLTE 1 Gbps peak rate capability higher-order MIMO carrier aggregation LAALWALWIP IoT capabilities in Narrowband-IoT and Category M-1 V2X communications small-cell support URLLC SON dual connectivity and CoMP
bull Carriers are implementing NFV and SDN to reduce network costs improve service velocity and simplify deployment of new services
bull 5G research and development efforts have accelerated standards-based deployment will begin in 2019 and continue through 2030
bull Operators have announced pre-standard fixed-wireless deployments for 2017
bull 3GPP has implemented a 5G standardization process that began in Release 14 with a study of the new 5G radio continues now with a first phase of specifications in Release 15 that provides both non-standalone and standalone options then moves ahead with a second phase of complete specifications in Release 16
bull Small cells will play an ever-more-important role in boosting capacity benefiting from a number of technologies and developments
bull The future of mobile broadband including both LTE-Advanced and 5G is bright with no end in sight for continued growth in capability nor for the limitless application innovation that mobile broadband enables 135
Conclusion
- LTE to 5GCellular and Broadband Innovation
- Key Conclusions (1)
- Key Conclusions (2)
- Key Conclusions (3)
- Broadband Transformation
- Mobile Broadband Transformational Elements
- Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
- 5G Data Drivers
- Global Mobile Data Growth
- Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
- Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
- Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
- Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
- Expanding Use Cases
- 1G to 5G
- Timeline of Cellular Generations
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
- LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
- Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
- ITU Use Case Model
- ITU Objectives
- Network Transformation
- 5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
- Characteristics of Different Bands
- Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
- 5G New Radio (NR) (1)
- 5G New Radio (NR) (2)
- Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
- Expected 5G Performance
- Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
- 5G Schedule
- Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
- 5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
- Network Slicing Architecture
- Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
- Key Features in 3GPP Releases
- Types of Cells and Characteristics
- Small Cell Challenges
- Small Cell Approaches
- Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
- How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
- Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
- Wireless Networks for IoT
- ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
- Evolution of RCS Capability
- Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
- Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
- RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
- Dimensions of Capacity
- Bandwidth Management
- Spectrum Acquisition Time
- United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
- 600 MHz Band Plan
- LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
- Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
- Propagation Losses Cellular vs Wi-Fi
- Spectrum Use and Sharing Approaches
- Licensed Shared Access
- United States 35 GHz System Currently Being Developed
- Appendix section with additional technical details
- Latency of Different Technologies
- Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
- Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
- Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
- 5G Architecture Options in Release 15
- De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
- Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
- Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
- 5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
- 5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
- Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
- 5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
- LTE Capabilities
- LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
- Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
- LTE Antenna Schemes
- Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
- Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
- Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
- Gains From Carrier Aggregation
- CoMP Levels
- TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
- LTE UE Categories
- LTE-Advanced Relay
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
- Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
- LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
- LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
- Evolution of RCS API Profiles
- Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
- Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
- Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
- EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- Evolved Packet System
- LTE Quality of Service
- Load Balancing with Heterogeneous Networks
- Scenarios for Radio Carriers in Small Cells
- Traffic Distribution Scenarios
- Enhanced Intercell Interference Cancellation
- Median Throughput Gains Hotspot Scenarios
- User Throughput Performance
- Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
- Dual Connectivity
- Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
- Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
- Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
- Potential Cloud RAN Approach
- Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
- Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
- Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
- Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
- Roaming Using Hotspot 20
- Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
- Hybrid SON Architecture
- IP Multimedia Subsystem
- Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
- UMTS Multi-Radio Network
- HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
- HSPA Multi-User Diversity
- HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
- HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
- HSPA Throughput Evolution
- HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
- Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
- Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
- GPRSEDGE Architecture
- Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
- Conclusion
-
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Roaming Using Hotspot 20
119
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
120
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hybrid SON Architecture
121
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
IP Multimedia Subsystem
122
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
LTE will leverage OFDM-based broadcasting capabilities
123Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
UMTS Multi-Radio Network
Common core network can support multiple radio access networks
124
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
125
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Multi-User Diversity
Efficient scheduler favors transmissions to users with best radio conditions126
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
UE1
UE2
Uplink Downlink
127
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
Source Qualcomm contribution
128
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Throughput Evolution
Technology Downlink (Mbps) Peak Data Rate
Uplink (Mbps)Peak Data Rate
HSPA as defined in Release 6 144 576
Release 7 HSPA+ DL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 211 115
Release 7 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 16 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 280 115
Release 8 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 422 115
Release 8 HSPA+ (no MIMO)Dual Carrier 10+5 MHz 422 115
Release 9 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Dual Carrier DL and UL 10+10 MHz 840 230
Release 10 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Quad Carrier DL Dual Carrier UL 20+10 MHz
1680 230
Release 11 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO DL and UL 8 Carrier Dual Carrier UL 40+10 MHz
3360 690
No operators have announced plans to deploy HSPA in a quad (or greater) carrier configuration Three carrier configurations however have been deployed
129
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
130
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
131
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
132Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
GPRSEDGE Architecture
133
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
BCCH TCH TCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
577 microSper timeslot
4615 ms per frame of 8 timeslots
Possible BCCH carrier configuration
PBCCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Possible TCH carrier
configuration
BCCH Broadcast Control Channel ndash carries synchronization paging and other signalling informationTCH Traffic Channel ndash carries voice traffic data may alternate between frames for half-ratePDTCH Packet Data Traffic Channel ndash Carries packet data traffic for GPRS and EDGEPBCCH Packet Broadcast Control Channel ndash additional signalling for GPRSEDGE used only if needed
Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
134
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Mobile broadband remains at the forefront of innovation and development in computing networking and application development
bull Even as excitement builds about 5G LTE through ongoing advances has become the global standard
bull LTE-Advanced and LTE-Advanced Pro innovations include VoLTE 1 Gbps peak rate capability higher-order MIMO carrier aggregation LAALWALWIP IoT capabilities in Narrowband-IoT and Category M-1 V2X communications small-cell support URLLC SON dual connectivity and CoMP
bull Carriers are implementing NFV and SDN to reduce network costs improve service velocity and simplify deployment of new services
bull 5G research and development efforts have accelerated standards-based deployment will begin in 2019 and continue through 2030
bull Operators have announced pre-standard fixed-wireless deployments for 2017
bull 3GPP has implemented a 5G standardization process that began in Release 14 with a study of the new 5G radio continues now with a first phase of specifications in Release 15 that provides both non-standalone and standalone options then moves ahead with a second phase of complete specifications in Release 16
bull Small cells will play an ever-more-important role in boosting capacity benefiting from a number of technologies and developments
bull The future of mobile broadband including both LTE-Advanced and 5G is bright with no end in sight for continued growth in capability nor for the limitless application innovation that mobile broadband enables 135
Conclusion
- LTE to 5GCellular and Broadband Innovation
- Key Conclusions (1)
- Key Conclusions (2)
- Key Conclusions (3)
- Broadband Transformation
- Mobile Broadband Transformational Elements
- Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
- 5G Data Drivers
- Global Mobile Data Growth
- Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
- Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
- Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
- Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
- Expanding Use Cases
- 1G to 5G
- Timeline of Cellular Generations
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
- LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
- Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
- ITU Use Case Model
- ITU Objectives
- Network Transformation
- 5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
- Characteristics of Different Bands
- Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
- 5G New Radio (NR) (1)
- 5G New Radio (NR) (2)
- Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
- Expected 5G Performance
- Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
- 5G Schedule
- Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
- 5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
- Network Slicing Architecture
- Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
- Key Features in 3GPP Releases
- Types of Cells and Characteristics
- Small Cell Challenges
- Small Cell Approaches
- Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
- How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
- Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
- Wireless Networks for IoT
- ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
- Evolution of RCS Capability
- Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
- Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
- RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
- Dimensions of Capacity
- Bandwidth Management
- Spectrum Acquisition Time
- United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
- 600 MHz Band Plan
- LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
- Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
- Propagation Losses Cellular vs Wi-Fi
- Spectrum Use and Sharing Approaches
- Licensed Shared Access
- United States 35 GHz System Currently Being Developed
- Appendix section with additional technical details
- Latency of Different Technologies
- Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
- Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
- Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
- 5G Architecture Options in Release 15
- De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
- Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
- Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
- 5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
- 5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
- Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
- 5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
- LTE Capabilities
- LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
- Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
- LTE Antenna Schemes
- Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
- Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
- Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
- Gains From Carrier Aggregation
- CoMP Levels
- TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
- LTE UE Categories
- LTE-Advanced Relay
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
- Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
- LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
- LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
- Evolution of RCS API Profiles
- Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
- Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
- Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
- EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- Evolved Packet System
- LTE Quality of Service
- Load Balancing with Heterogeneous Networks
- Scenarios for Radio Carriers in Small Cells
- Traffic Distribution Scenarios
- Enhanced Intercell Interference Cancellation
- Median Throughput Gains Hotspot Scenarios
- User Throughput Performance
- Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
- Dual Connectivity
- Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
- Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
- Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
- Potential Cloud RAN Approach
- Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
- Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
- Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
- Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
- Roaming Using Hotspot 20
- Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
- Hybrid SON Architecture
- IP Multimedia Subsystem
- Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
- UMTS Multi-Radio Network
- HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
- HSPA Multi-User Diversity
- HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
- HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
- HSPA Throughput Evolution
- HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
- Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
- Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
- GPRSEDGE Architecture
- Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
- Conclusion
-
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
120
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hybrid SON Architecture
121
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
IP Multimedia Subsystem
122
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
LTE will leverage OFDM-based broadcasting capabilities
123Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
UMTS Multi-Radio Network
Common core network can support multiple radio access networks
124
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
125
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Multi-User Diversity
Efficient scheduler favors transmissions to users with best radio conditions126
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
UE1
UE2
Uplink Downlink
127
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
Source Qualcomm contribution
128
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Throughput Evolution
Technology Downlink (Mbps) Peak Data Rate
Uplink (Mbps)Peak Data Rate
HSPA as defined in Release 6 144 576
Release 7 HSPA+ DL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 211 115
Release 7 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 16 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 280 115
Release 8 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 422 115
Release 8 HSPA+ (no MIMO)Dual Carrier 10+5 MHz 422 115
Release 9 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Dual Carrier DL and UL 10+10 MHz 840 230
Release 10 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Quad Carrier DL Dual Carrier UL 20+10 MHz
1680 230
Release 11 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO DL and UL 8 Carrier Dual Carrier UL 40+10 MHz
3360 690
No operators have announced plans to deploy HSPA in a quad (or greater) carrier configuration Three carrier configurations however have been deployed
129
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
130
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
131
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
132Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
GPRSEDGE Architecture
133
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
BCCH TCH TCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
577 microSper timeslot
4615 ms per frame of 8 timeslots
Possible BCCH carrier configuration
PBCCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Possible TCH carrier
configuration
BCCH Broadcast Control Channel ndash carries synchronization paging and other signalling informationTCH Traffic Channel ndash carries voice traffic data may alternate between frames for half-ratePDTCH Packet Data Traffic Channel ndash Carries packet data traffic for GPRS and EDGEPBCCH Packet Broadcast Control Channel ndash additional signalling for GPRSEDGE used only if needed
Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
134
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Mobile broadband remains at the forefront of innovation and development in computing networking and application development
bull Even as excitement builds about 5G LTE through ongoing advances has become the global standard
bull LTE-Advanced and LTE-Advanced Pro innovations include VoLTE 1 Gbps peak rate capability higher-order MIMO carrier aggregation LAALWALWIP IoT capabilities in Narrowband-IoT and Category M-1 V2X communications small-cell support URLLC SON dual connectivity and CoMP
bull Carriers are implementing NFV and SDN to reduce network costs improve service velocity and simplify deployment of new services
bull 5G research and development efforts have accelerated standards-based deployment will begin in 2019 and continue through 2030
bull Operators have announced pre-standard fixed-wireless deployments for 2017
bull 3GPP has implemented a 5G standardization process that began in Release 14 with a study of the new 5G radio continues now with a first phase of specifications in Release 15 that provides both non-standalone and standalone options then moves ahead with a second phase of complete specifications in Release 16
bull Small cells will play an ever-more-important role in boosting capacity benefiting from a number of technologies and developments
bull The future of mobile broadband including both LTE-Advanced and 5G is bright with no end in sight for continued growth in capability nor for the limitless application innovation that mobile broadband enables 135
Conclusion
- LTE to 5GCellular and Broadband Innovation
- Key Conclusions (1)
- Key Conclusions (2)
- Key Conclusions (3)
- Broadband Transformation
- Mobile Broadband Transformational Elements
- Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
- 5G Data Drivers
- Global Mobile Data Growth
- Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
- Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
- Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
- Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
- Expanding Use Cases
- 1G to 5G
- Timeline of Cellular Generations
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
- LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
- Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
- ITU Use Case Model
- ITU Objectives
- Network Transformation
- 5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
- Characteristics of Different Bands
- Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
- 5G New Radio (NR) (1)
- 5G New Radio (NR) (2)
- Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
- Expected 5G Performance
- Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
- 5G Schedule
- Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
- 5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
- Network Slicing Architecture
- Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
- Key Features in 3GPP Releases
- Types of Cells and Characteristics
- Small Cell Challenges
- Small Cell Approaches
- Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
- How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
- Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
- Wireless Networks for IoT
- ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
- Evolution of RCS Capability
- Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
- Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
- RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
- Dimensions of Capacity
- Bandwidth Management
- Spectrum Acquisition Time
- United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
- 600 MHz Band Plan
- LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
- Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
- Propagation Losses Cellular vs Wi-Fi
- Spectrum Use and Sharing Approaches
- Licensed Shared Access
- United States 35 GHz System Currently Being Developed
- Appendix section with additional technical details
- Latency of Different Technologies
- Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
- Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
- Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
- 5G Architecture Options in Release 15
- De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
- Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
- Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
- 5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
- 5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
- Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
- 5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
- LTE Capabilities
- LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
- Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
- LTE Antenna Schemes
- Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
- Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
- Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
- Gains From Carrier Aggregation
- CoMP Levels
- TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
- LTE UE Categories
- LTE-Advanced Relay
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
- Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
- LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
- LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
- Evolution of RCS API Profiles
- Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
- Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
- Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
- EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- Evolved Packet System
- LTE Quality of Service
- Load Balancing with Heterogeneous Networks
- Scenarios for Radio Carriers in Small Cells
- Traffic Distribution Scenarios
- Enhanced Intercell Interference Cancellation
- Median Throughput Gains Hotspot Scenarios
- User Throughput Performance
- Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
- Dual Connectivity
- Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
- Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
- Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
- Potential Cloud RAN Approach
- Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
- Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
- Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
- Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
- Roaming Using Hotspot 20
- Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
- Hybrid SON Architecture
- IP Multimedia Subsystem
- Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
- UMTS Multi-Radio Network
- HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
- HSPA Multi-User Diversity
- HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
- HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
- HSPA Throughput Evolution
- HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
- Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
- Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
- GPRSEDGE Architecture
- Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
- Conclusion
-
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Hybrid SON Architecture
121
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
IP Multimedia Subsystem
122
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
LTE will leverage OFDM-based broadcasting capabilities
123Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
UMTS Multi-Radio Network
Common core network can support multiple radio access networks
124
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
125
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Multi-User Diversity
Efficient scheduler favors transmissions to users with best radio conditions126
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
UE1
UE2
Uplink Downlink
127
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
Source Qualcomm contribution
128
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Throughput Evolution
Technology Downlink (Mbps) Peak Data Rate
Uplink (Mbps)Peak Data Rate
HSPA as defined in Release 6 144 576
Release 7 HSPA+ DL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 211 115
Release 7 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 16 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 280 115
Release 8 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 422 115
Release 8 HSPA+ (no MIMO)Dual Carrier 10+5 MHz 422 115
Release 9 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Dual Carrier DL and UL 10+10 MHz 840 230
Release 10 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Quad Carrier DL Dual Carrier UL 20+10 MHz
1680 230
Release 11 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO DL and UL 8 Carrier Dual Carrier UL 40+10 MHz
3360 690
No operators have announced plans to deploy HSPA in a quad (or greater) carrier configuration Three carrier configurations however have been deployed
129
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
130
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
131
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
132Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
GPRSEDGE Architecture
133
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
BCCH TCH TCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
577 microSper timeslot
4615 ms per frame of 8 timeslots
Possible BCCH carrier configuration
PBCCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Possible TCH carrier
configuration
BCCH Broadcast Control Channel ndash carries synchronization paging and other signalling informationTCH Traffic Channel ndash carries voice traffic data may alternate between frames for half-ratePDTCH Packet Data Traffic Channel ndash Carries packet data traffic for GPRS and EDGEPBCCH Packet Broadcast Control Channel ndash additional signalling for GPRSEDGE used only if needed
Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
134
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Mobile broadband remains at the forefront of innovation and development in computing networking and application development
bull Even as excitement builds about 5G LTE through ongoing advances has become the global standard
bull LTE-Advanced and LTE-Advanced Pro innovations include VoLTE 1 Gbps peak rate capability higher-order MIMO carrier aggregation LAALWALWIP IoT capabilities in Narrowband-IoT and Category M-1 V2X communications small-cell support URLLC SON dual connectivity and CoMP
bull Carriers are implementing NFV and SDN to reduce network costs improve service velocity and simplify deployment of new services
bull 5G research and development efforts have accelerated standards-based deployment will begin in 2019 and continue through 2030
bull Operators have announced pre-standard fixed-wireless deployments for 2017
bull 3GPP has implemented a 5G standardization process that began in Release 14 with a study of the new 5G radio continues now with a first phase of specifications in Release 15 that provides both non-standalone and standalone options then moves ahead with a second phase of complete specifications in Release 16
bull Small cells will play an ever-more-important role in boosting capacity benefiting from a number of technologies and developments
bull The future of mobile broadband including both LTE-Advanced and 5G is bright with no end in sight for continued growth in capability nor for the limitless application innovation that mobile broadband enables 135
Conclusion
- LTE to 5GCellular and Broadband Innovation
- Key Conclusions (1)
- Key Conclusions (2)
- Key Conclusions (3)
- Broadband Transformation
- Mobile Broadband Transformational Elements
- Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
- 5G Data Drivers
- Global Mobile Data Growth
- Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
- Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
- Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
- Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
- Expanding Use Cases
- 1G to 5G
- Timeline of Cellular Generations
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
- LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
- Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
- ITU Use Case Model
- ITU Objectives
- Network Transformation
- 5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
- Characteristics of Different Bands
- Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
- 5G New Radio (NR) (1)
- 5G New Radio (NR) (2)
- Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
- Expected 5G Performance
- Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
- 5G Schedule
- Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
- 5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
- Network Slicing Architecture
- Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
- Key Features in 3GPP Releases
- Types of Cells and Characteristics
- Small Cell Challenges
- Small Cell Approaches
- Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
- How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
- Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
- Wireless Networks for IoT
- ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
- Evolution of RCS Capability
- Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
- Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
- RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
- Dimensions of Capacity
- Bandwidth Management
- Spectrum Acquisition Time
- United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
- 600 MHz Band Plan
- LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
- Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
- Propagation Losses Cellular vs Wi-Fi
- Spectrum Use and Sharing Approaches
- Licensed Shared Access
- United States 35 GHz System Currently Being Developed
- Appendix section with additional technical details
- Latency of Different Technologies
- Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
- Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
- Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
- 5G Architecture Options in Release 15
- De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
- Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
- Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
- 5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
- 5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
- Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
- 5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
- LTE Capabilities
- LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
- Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
- LTE Antenna Schemes
- Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
- Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
- Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
- Gains From Carrier Aggregation
- CoMP Levels
- TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
- LTE UE Categories
- LTE-Advanced Relay
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
- Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
- LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
- LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
- Evolution of RCS API Profiles
- Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
- Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
- Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
- EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- Evolved Packet System
- LTE Quality of Service
- Load Balancing with Heterogeneous Networks
- Scenarios for Radio Carriers in Small Cells
- Traffic Distribution Scenarios
- Enhanced Intercell Interference Cancellation
- Median Throughput Gains Hotspot Scenarios
- User Throughput Performance
- Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
- Dual Connectivity
- Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
- Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
- Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
- Potential Cloud RAN Approach
- Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
- Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
- Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
- Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
- Roaming Using Hotspot 20
- Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
- Hybrid SON Architecture
- IP Multimedia Subsystem
- Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
- UMTS Multi-Radio Network
- HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
- HSPA Multi-User Diversity
- HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
- HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
- HSPA Throughput Evolution
- HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
- Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
- Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
- GPRSEDGE Architecture
- Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
- Conclusion
-
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
IP Multimedia Subsystem
122
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
LTE will leverage OFDM-based broadcasting capabilities
123Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
UMTS Multi-Radio Network
Common core network can support multiple radio access networks
124
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
125
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Multi-User Diversity
Efficient scheduler favors transmissions to users with best radio conditions126
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
UE1
UE2
Uplink Downlink
127
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
Source Qualcomm contribution
128
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Throughput Evolution
Technology Downlink (Mbps) Peak Data Rate
Uplink (Mbps)Peak Data Rate
HSPA as defined in Release 6 144 576
Release 7 HSPA+ DL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 211 115
Release 7 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 16 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 280 115
Release 8 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 422 115
Release 8 HSPA+ (no MIMO)Dual Carrier 10+5 MHz 422 115
Release 9 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Dual Carrier DL and UL 10+10 MHz 840 230
Release 10 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Quad Carrier DL Dual Carrier UL 20+10 MHz
1680 230
Release 11 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO DL and UL 8 Carrier Dual Carrier UL 40+10 MHz
3360 690
No operators have announced plans to deploy HSPA in a quad (or greater) carrier configuration Three carrier configurations however have been deployed
129
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
130
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
131
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
132Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
GPRSEDGE Architecture
133
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
BCCH TCH TCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
577 microSper timeslot
4615 ms per frame of 8 timeslots
Possible BCCH carrier configuration
PBCCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Possible TCH carrier
configuration
BCCH Broadcast Control Channel ndash carries synchronization paging and other signalling informationTCH Traffic Channel ndash carries voice traffic data may alternate between frames for half-ratePDTCH Packet Data Traffic Channel ndash Carries packet data traffic for GPRS and EDGEPBCCH Packet Broadcast Control Channel ndash additional signalling for GPRSEDGE used only if needed
Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
134
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Mobile broadband remains at the forefront of innovation and development in computing networking and application development
bull Even as excitement builds about 5G LTE through ongoing advances has become the global standard
bull LTE-Advanced and LTE-Advanced Pro innovations include VoLTE 1 Gbps peak rate capability higher-order MIMO carrier aggregation LAALWALWIP IoT capabilities in Narrowband-IoT and Category M-1 V2X communications small-cell support URLLC SON dual connectivity and CoMP
bull Carriers are implementing NFV and SDN to reduce network costs improve service velocity and simplify deployment of new services
bull 5G research and development efforts have accelerated standards-based deployment will begin in 2019 and continue through 2030
bull Operators have announced pre-standard fixed-wireless deployments for 2017
bull 3GPP has implemented a 5G standardization process that began in Release 14 with a study of the new 5G radio continues now with a first phase of specifications in Release 15 that provides both non-standalone and standalone options then moves ahead with a second phase of complete specifications in Release 16
bull Small cells will play an ever-more-important role in boosting capacity benefiting from a number of technologies and developments
bull The future of mobile broadband including both LTE-Advanced and 5G is bright with no end in sight for continued growth in capability nor for the limitless application innovation that mobile broadband enables 135
Conclusion
- LTE to 5GCellular and Broadband Innovation
- Key Conclusions (1)
- Key Conclusions (2)
- Key Conclusions (3)
- Broadband Transformation
- Mobile Broadband Transformational Elements
- Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
- 5G Data Drivers
- Global Mobile Data Growth
- Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
- Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
- Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
- Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
- Expanding Use Cases
- 1G to 5G
- Timeline of Cellular Generations
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
- LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
- Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
- ITU Use Case Model
- ITU Objectives
- Network Transformation
- 5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
- Characteristics of Different Bands
- Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
- 5G New Radio (NR) (1)
- 5G New Radio (NR) (2)
- Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
- Expected 5G Performance
- Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
- 5G Schedule
- Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
- 5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
- Network Slicing Architecture
- Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
- Key Features in 3GPP Releases
- Types of Cells and Characteristics
- Small Cell Challenges
- Small Cell Approaches
- Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
- How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
- Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
- Wireless Networks for IoT
- ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
- Evolution of RCS Capability
- Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
- Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
- RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
- Dimensions of Capacity
- Bandwidth Management
- Spectrum Acquisition Time
- United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
- 600 MHz Band Plan
- LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
- Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
- Propagation Losses Cellular vs Wi-Fi
- Spectrum Use and Sharing Approaches
- Licensed Shared Access
- United States 35 GHz System Currently Being Developed
- Appendix section with additional technical details
- Latency of Different Technologies
- Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
- Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
- Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
- 5G Architecture Options in Release 15
- De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
- Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
- Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
- 5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
- 5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
- Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
- 5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
- LTE Capabilities
- LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
- Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
- LTE Antenna Schemes
- Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
- Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
- Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
- Gains From Carrier Aggregation
- CoMP Levels
- TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
- LTE UE Categories
- LTE-Advanced Relay
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
- Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
- LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
- LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
- Evolution of RCS API Profiles
- Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
- Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
- Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
- EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- Evolved Packet System
- LTE Quality of Service
- Load Balancing with Heterogeneous Networks
- Scenarios for Radio Carriers in Small Cells
- Traffic Distribution Scenarios
- Enhanced Intercell Interference Cancellation
- Median Throughput Gains Hotspot Scenarios
- User Throughput Performance
- Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
- Dual Connectivity
- Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
- Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
- Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
- Potential Cloud RAN Approach
- Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
- Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
- Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
- Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
- Roaming Using Hotspot 20
- Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
- Hybrid SON Architecture
- IP Multimedia Subsystem
- Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
- UMTS Multi-Radio Network
- HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
- HSPA Multi-User Diversity
- HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
- HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
- HSPA Throughput Evolution
- HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
- Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
- Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
- GPRSEDGE Architecture
- Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
- Conclusion
-
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
LTE will leverage OFDM-based broadcasting capabilities
123Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
UMTS Multi-Radio Network
Common core network can support multiple radio access networks
124
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
125
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Multi-User Diversity
Efficient scheduler favors transmissions to users with best radio conditions126
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
UE1
UE2
Uplink Downlink
127
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
Source Qualcomm contribution
128
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Throughput Evolution
Technology Downlink (Mbps) Peak Data Rate
Uplink (Mbps)Peak Data Rate
HSPA as defined in Release 6 144 576
Release 7 HSPA+ DL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 211 115
Release 7 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 16 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 280 115
Release 8 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 422 115
Release 8 HSPA+ (no MIMO)Dual Carrier 10+5 MHz 422 115
Release 9 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Dual Carrier DL and UL 10+10 MHz 840 230
Release 10 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Quad Carrier DL Dual Carrier UL 20+10 MHz
1680 230
Release 11 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO DL and UL 8 Carrier Dual Carrier UL 40+10 MHz
3360 690
No operators have announced plans to deploy HSPA in a quad (or greater) carrier configuration Three carrier configurations however have been deployed
129
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
130
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
131
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
132Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
GPRSEDGE Architecture
133
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
BCCH TCH TCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
577 microSper timeslot
4615 ms per frame of 8 timeslots
Possible BCCH carrier configuration
PBCCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Possible TCH carrier
configuration
BCCH Broadcast Control Channel ndash carries synchronization paging and other signalling informationTCH Traffic Channel ndash carries voice traffic data may alternate between frames for half-ratePDTCH Packet Data Traffic Channel ndash Carries packet data traffic for GPRS and EDGEPBCCH Packet Broadcast Control Channel ndash additional signalling for GPRSEDGE used only if needed
Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
134
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Mobile broadband remains at the forefront of innovation and development in computing networking and application development
bull Even as excitement builds about 5G LTE through ongoing advances has become the global standard
bull LTE-Advanced and LTE-Advanced Pro innovations include VoLTE 1 Gbps peak rate capability higher-order MIMO carrier aggregation LAALWALWIP IoT capabilities in Narrowband-IoT and Category M-1 V2X communications small-cell support URLLC SON dual connectivity and CoMP
bull Carriers are implementing NFV and SDN to reduce network costs improve service velocity and simplify deployment of new services
bull 5G research and development efforts have accelerated standards-based deployment will begin in 2019 and continue through 2030
bull Operators have announced pre-standard fixed-wireless deployments for 2017
bull 3GPP has implemented a 5G standardization process that began in Release 14 with a study of the new 5G radio continues now with a first phase of specifications in Release 15 that provides both non-standalone and standalone options then moves ahead with a second phase of complete specifications in Release 16
bull Small cells will play an ever-more-important role in boosting capacity benefiting from a number of technologies and developments
bull The future of mobile broadband including both LTE-Advanced and 5G is bright with no end in sight for continued growth in capability nor for the limitless application innovation that mobile broadband enables 135
Conclusion
- LTE to 5GCellular and Broadband Innovation
- Key Conclusions (1)
- Key Conclusions (2)
- Key Conclusions (3)
- Broadband Transformation
- Mobile Broadband Transformational Elements
- Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
- 5G Data Drivers
- Global Mobile Data Growth
- Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
- Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
- Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
- Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
- Expanding Use Cases
- 1G to 5G
- Timeline of Cellular Generations
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
- LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
- Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
- ITU Use Case Model
- ITU Objectives
- Network Transformation
- 5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
- Characteristics of Different Bands
- Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
- 5G New Radio (NR) (1)
- 5G New Radio (NR) (2)
- Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
- Expected 5G Performance
- Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
- 5G Schedule
- Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
- 5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
- Network Slicing Architecture
- Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
- Key Features in 3GPP Releases
- Types of Cells and Characteristics
- Small Cell Challenges
- Small Cell Approaches
- Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
- How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
- Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
- Wireless Networks for IoT
- ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
- Evolution of RCS Capability
- Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
- Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
- RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
- Dimensions of Capacity
- Bandwidth Management
- Spectrum Acquisition Time
- United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
- 600 MHz Band Plan
- LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
- Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
- Propagation Losses Cellular vs Wi-Fi
- Spectrum Use and Sharing Approaches
- Licensed Shared Access
- United States 35 GHz System Currently Being Developed
- Appendix section with additional technical details
- Latency of Different Technologies
- Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
- Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
- Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
- 5G Architecture Options in Release 15
- De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
- Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
- Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
- 5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
- 5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
- Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
- 5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
- LTE Capabilities
- LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
- Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
- LTE Antenna Schemes
- Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
- Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
- Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
- Gains From Carrier Aggregation
- CoMP Levels
- TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
- LTE UE Categories
- LTE-Advanced Relay
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
- Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
- LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
- LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
- Evolution of RCS API Profiles
- Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
- Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
- Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
- EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- Evolved Packet System
- LTE Quality of Service
- Load Balancing with Heterogeneous Networks
- Scenarios for Radio Carriers in Small Cells
- Traffic Distribution Scenarios
- Enhanced Intercell Interference Cancellation
- Median Throughput Gains Hotspot Scenarios
- User Throughput Performance
- Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
- Dual Connectivity
- Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
- Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
- Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
- Potential Cloud RAN Approach
- Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
- Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
- Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
- Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
- Roaming Using Hotspot 20
- Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
- Hybrid SON Architecture
- IP Multimedia Subsystem
- Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
- UMTS Multi-Radio Network
- HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
- HSPA Multi-User Diversity
- HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
- HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
- HSPA Throughput Evolution
- HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
- Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
- Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
- GPRSEDGE Architecture
- Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
- Conclusion
-
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
UMTS Multi-Radio Network
Common core network can support multiple radio access networks
124
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
125
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Multi-User Diversity
Efficient scheduler favors transmissions to users with best radio conditions126
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
UE1
UE2
Uplink Downlink
127
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
Source Qualcomm contribution
128
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Throughput Evolution
Technology Downlink (Mbps) Peak Data Rate
Uplink (Mbps)Peak Data Rate
HSPA as defined in Release 6 144 576
Release 7 HSPA+ DL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 211 115
Release 7 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 16 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 280 115
Release 8 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 422 115
Release 8 HSPA+ (no MIMO)Dual Carrier 10+5 MHz 422 115
Release 9 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Dual Carrier DL and UL 10+10 MHz 840 230
Release 10 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Quad Carrier DL Dual Carrier UL 20+10 MHz
1680 230
Release 11 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO DL and UL 8 Carrier Dual Carrier UL 40+10 MHz
3360 690
No operators have announced plans to deploy HSPA in a quad (or greater) carrier configuration Three carrier configurations however have been deployed
129
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
130
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
131
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
132Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
GPRSEDGE Architecture
133
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
BCCH TCH TCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
577 microSper timeslot
4615 ms per frame of 8 timeslots
Possible BCCH carrier configuration
PBCCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Possible TCH carrier
configuration
BCCH Broadcast Control Channel ndash carries synchronization paging and other signalling informationTCH Traffic Channel ndash carries voice traffic data may alternate between frames for half-ratePDTCH Packet Data Traffic Channel ndash Carries packet data traffic for GPRS and EDGEPBCCH Packet Broadcast Control Channel ndash additional signalling for GPRSEDGE used only if needed
Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
134
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Mobile broadband remains at the forefront of innovation and development in computing networking and application development
bull Even as excitement builds about 5G LTE through ongoing advances has become the global standard
bull LTE-Advanced and LTE-Advanced Pro innovations include VoLTE 1 Gbps peak rate capability higher-order MIMO carrier aggregation LAALWALWIP IoT capabilities in Narrowband-IoT and Category M-1 V2X communications small-cell support URLLC SON dual connectivity and CoMP
bull Carriers are implementing NFV and SDN to reduce network costs improve service velocity and simplify deployment of new services
bull 5G research and development efforts have accelerated standards-based deployment will begin in 2019 and continue through 2030
bull Operators have announced pre-standard fixed-wireless deployments for 2017
bull 3GPP has implemented a 5G standardization process that began in Release 14 with a study of the new 5G radio continues now with a first phase of specifications in Release 15 that provides both non-standalone and standalone options then moves ahead with a second phase of complete specifications in Release 16
bull Small cells will play an ever-more-important role in boosting capacity benefiting from a number of technologies and developments
bull The future of mobile broadband including both LTE-Advanced and 5G is bright with no end in sight for continued growth in capability nor for the limitless application innovation that mobile broadband enables 135
Conclusion
- LTE to 5GCellular and Broadband Innovation
- Key Conclusions (1)
- Key Conclusions (2)
- Key Conclusions (3)
- Broadband Transformation
- Mobile Broadband Transformational Elements
- Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
- 5G Data Drivers
- Global Mobile Data Growth
- Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
- Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
- Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
- Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
- Expanding Use Cases
- 1G to 5G
- Timeline of Cellular Generations
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
- LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
- Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
- ITU Use Case Model
- ITU Objectives
- Network Transformation
- 5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
- Characteristics of Different Bands
- Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
- 5G New Radio (NR) (1)
- 5G New Radio (NR) (2)
- Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
- Expected 5G Performance
- Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
- 5G Schedule
- Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
- 5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
- Network Slicing Architecture
- Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
- Key Features in 3GPP Releases
- Types of Cells and Characteristics
- Small Cell Challenges
- Small Cell Approaches
- Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
- How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
- Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
- Wireless Networks for IoT
- ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
- Evolution of RCS Capability
- Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
- Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
- RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
- Dimensions of Capacity
- Bandwidth Management
- Spectrum Acquisition Time
- United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
- 600 MHz Band Plan
- LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
- Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
- Propagation Losses Cellular vs Wi-Fi
- Spectrum Use and Sharing Approaches
- Licensed Shared Access
- United States 35 GHz System Currently Being Developed
- Appendix section with additional technical details
- Latency of Different Technologies
- Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
- Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
- Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
- 5G Architecture Options in Release 15
- De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
- Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
- Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
- 5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
- 5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
- Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
- 5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
- LTE Capabilities
- LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
- Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
- LTE Antenna Schemes
- Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
- Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
- Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
- Gains From Carrier Aggregation
- CoMP Levels
- TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
- LTE UE Categories
- LTE-Advanced Relay
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
- Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
- LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
- LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
- Evolution of RCS API Profiles
- Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
- Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
- Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
- EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- Evolved Packet System
- LTE Quality of Service
- Load Balancing with Heterogeneous Networks
- Scenarios for Radio Carriers in Small Cells
- Traffic Distribution Scenarios
- Enhanced Intercell Interference Cancellation
- Median Throughput Gains Hotspot Scenarios
- User Throughput Performance
- Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
- Dual Connectivity
- Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
- Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
- Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
- Potential Cloud RAN Approach
- Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
- Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
- Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
- Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
- Roaming Using Hotspot 20
- Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
- Hybrid SON Architecture
- IP Multimedia Subsystem
- Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
- UMTS Multi-Radio Network
- HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
- HSPA Multi-User Diversity
- HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
- HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
- HSPA Throughput Evolution
- HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
- Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
- Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
- GPRSEDGE Architecture
- Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
- Conclusion
-
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
125
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Multi-User Diversity
Efficient scheduler favors transmissions to users with best radio conditions126
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
UE1
UE2
Uplink Downlink
127
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
Source Qualcomm contribution
128
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Throughput Evolution
Technology Downlink (Mbps) Peak Data Rate
Uplink (Mbps)Peak Data Rate
HSPA as defined in Release 6 144 576
Release 7 HSPA+ DL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 211 115
Release 7 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 16 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 280 115
Release 8 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 422 115
Release 8 HSPA+ (no MIMO)Dual Carrier 10+5 MHz 422 115
Release 9 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Dual Carrier DL and UL 10+10 MHz 840 230
Release 10 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Quad Carrier DL Dual Carrier UL 20+10 MHz
1680 230
Release 11 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO DL and UL 8 Carrier Dual Carrier UL 40+10 MHz
3360 690
No operators have announced plans to deploy HSPA in a quad (or greater) carrier configuration Three carrier configurations however have been deployed
129
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
130
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
131
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
132Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
GPRSEDGE Architecture
133
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
BCCH TCH TCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
577 microSper timeslot
4615 ms per frame of 8 timeslots
Possible BCCH carrier configuration
PBCCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Possible TCH carrier
configuration
BCCH Broadcast Control Channel ndash carries synchronization paging and other signalling informationTCH Traffic Channel ndash carries voice traffic data may alternate between frames for half-ratePDTCH Packet Data Traffic Channel ndash Carries packet data traffic for GPRS and EDGEPBCCH Packet Broadcast Control Channel ndash additional signalling for GPRSEDGE used only if needed
Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
134
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Mobile broadband remains at the forefront of innovation and development in computing networking and application development
bull Even as excitement builds about 5G LTE through ongoing advances has become the global standard
bull LTE-Advanced and LTE-Advanced Pro innovations include VoLTE 1 Gbps peak rate capability higher-order MIMO carrier aggregation LAALWALWIP IoT capabilities in Narrowband-IoT and Category M-1 V2X communications small-cell support URLLC SON dual connectivity and CoMP
bull Carriers are implementing NFV and SDN to reduce network costs improve service velocity and simplify deployment of new services
bull 5G research and development efforts have accelerated standards-based deployment will begin in 2019 and continue through 2030
bull Operators have announced pre-standard fixed-wireless deployments for 2017
bull 3GPP has implemented a 5G standardization process that began in Release 14 with a study of the new 5G radio continues now with a first phase of specifications in Release 15 that provides both non-standalone and standalone options then moves ahead with a second phase of complete specifications in Release 16
bull Small cells will play an ever-more-important role in boosting capacity benefiting from a number of technologies and developments
bull The future of mobile broadband including both LTE-Advanced and 5G is bright with no end in sight for continued growth in capability nor for the limitless application innovation that mobile broadband enables 135
Conclusion
- LTE to 5GCellular and Broadband Innovation
- Key Conclusions (1)
- Key Conclusions (2)
- Key Conclusions (3)
- Broadband Transformation
- Mobile Broadband Transformational Elements
- Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
- 5G Data Drivers
- Global Mobile Data Growth
- Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
- Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
- Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
- Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
- Expanding Use Cases
- 1G to 5G
- Timeline of Cellular Generations
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
- LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
- Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
- ITU Use Case Model
- ITU Objectives
- Network Transformation
- 5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
- Characteristics of Different Bands
- Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
- 5G New Radio (NR) (1)
- 5G New Radio (NR) (2)
- Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
- Expected 5G Performance
- Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
- 5G Schedule
- Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
- 5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
- Network Slicing Architecture
- Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
- Key Features in 3GPP Releases
- Types of Cells and Characteristics
- Small Cell Challenges
- Small Cell Approaches
- Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
- How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
- Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
- Wireless Networks for IoT
- ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
- Evolution of RCS Capability
- Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
- Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
- RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
- Dimensions of Capacity
- Bandwidth Management
- Spectrum Acquisition Time
- United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
- 600 MHz Band Plan
- LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
- Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
- Propagation Losses Cellular vs Wi-Fi
- Spectrum Use and Sharing Approaches
- Licensed Shared Access
- United States 35 GHz System Currently Being Developed
- Appendix section with additional technical details
- Latency of Different Technologies
- Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
- Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
- Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
- 5G Architecture Options in Release 15
- De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
- Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
- Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
- 5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
- 5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
- Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
- 5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
- LTE Capabilities
- LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
- Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
- LTE Antenna Schemes
- Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
- Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
- Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
- Gains From Carrier Aggregation
- CoMP Levels
- TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
- LTE UE Categories
- LTE-Advanced Relay
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
- Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
- LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
- LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
- Evolution of RCS API Profiles
- Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
- Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
- Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
- EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- Evolved Packet System
- LTE Quality of Service
- Load Balancing with Heterogeneous Networks
- Scenarios for Radio Carriers in Small Cells
- Traffic Distribution Scenarios
- Enhanced Intercell Interference Cancellation
- Median Throughput Gains Hotspot Scenarios
- User Throughput Performance
- Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
- Dual Connectivity
- Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
- Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
- Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
- Potential Cloud RAN Approach
- Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
- Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
- Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
- Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
- Roaming Using Hotspot 20
- Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
- Hybrid SON Architecture
- IP Multimedia Subsystem
- Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
- UMTS Multi-Radio Network
- HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
- HSPA Multi-User Diversity
- HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
- HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
- HSPA Throughput Evolution
- HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
- Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
- Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
- GPRSEDGE Architecture
- Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
- Conclusion
-
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Multi-User Diversity
Efficient scheduler favors transmissions to users with best radio conditions126
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
UE1
UE2
Uplink Downlink
127
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
Source Qualcomm contribution
128
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Throughput Evolution
Technology Downlink (Mbps) Peak Data Rate
Uplink (Mbps)Peak Data Rate
HSPA as defined in Release 6 144 576
Release 7 HSPA+ DL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 211 115
Release 7 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 16 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 280 115
Release 8 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 422 115
Release 8 HSPA+ (no MIMO)Dual Carrier 10+5 MHz 422 115
Release 9 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Dual Carrier DL and UL 10+10 MHz 840 230
Release 10 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Quad Carrier DL Dual Carrier UL 20+10 MHz
1680 230
Release 11 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO DL and UL 8 Carrier Dual Carrier UL 40+10 MHz
3360 690
No operators have announced plans to deploy HSPA in a quad (or greater) carrier configuration Three carrier configurations however have been deployed
129
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
130
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
131
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
132Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
GPRSEDGE Architecture
133
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
BCCH TCH TCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
577 microSper timeslot
4615 ms per frame of 8 timeslots
Possible BCCH carrier configuration
PBCCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Possible TCH carrier
configuration
BCCH Broadcast Control Channel ndash carries synchronization paging and other signalling informationTCH Traffic Channel ndash carries voice traffic data may alternate between frames for half-ratePDTCH Packet Data Traffic Channel ndash Carries packet data traffic for GPRS and EDGEPBCCH Packet Broadcast Control Channel ndash additional signalling for GPRSEDGE used only if needed
Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
134
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Mobile broadband remains at the forefront of innovation and development in computing networking and application development
bull Even as excitement builds about 5G LTE through ongoing advances has become the global standard
bull LTE-Advanced and LTE-Advanced Pro innovations include VoLTE 1 Gbps peak rate capability higher-order MIMO carrier aggregation LAALWALWIP IoT capabilities in Narrowband-IoT and Category M-1 V2X communications small-cell support URLLC SON dual connectivity and CoMP
bull Carriers are implementing NFV and SDN to reduce network costs improve service velocity and simplify deployment of new services
bull 5G research and development efforts have accelerated standards-based deployment will begin in 2019 and continue through 2030
bull Operators have announced pre-standard fixed-wireless deployments for 2017
bull 3GPP has implemented a 5G standardization process that began in Release 14 with a study of the new 5G radio continues now with a first phase of specifications in Release 15 that provides both non-standalone and standalone options then moves ahead with a second phase of complete specifications in Release 16
bull Small cells will play an ever-more-important role in boosting capacity benefiting from a number of technologies and developments
bull The future of mobile broadband including both LTE-Advanced and 5G is bright with no end in sight for continued growth in capability nor for the limitless application innovation that mobile broadband enables 135
Conclusion
- LTE to 5GCellular and Broadband Innovation
- Key Conclusions (1)
- Key Conclusions (2)
- Key Conclusions (3)
- Broadband Transformation
- Mobile Broadband Transformational Elements
- Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
- 5G Data Drivers
- Global Mobile Data Growth
- Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
- Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
- Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
- Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
- Expanding Use Cases
- 1G to 5G
- Timeline of Cellular Generations
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
- LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
- Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
- ITU Use Case Model
- ITU Objectives
- Network Transformation
- 5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
- Characteristics of Different Bands
- Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
- 5G New Radio (NR) (1)
- 5G New Radio (NR) (2)
- Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
- Expected 5G Performance
- Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
- 5G Schedule
- Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
- 5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
- Network Slicing Architecture
- Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
- Key Features in 3GPP Releases
- Types of Cells and Characteristics
- Small Cell Challenges
- Small Cell Approaches
- Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
- How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
- Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
- Wireless Networks for IoT
- ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
- Evolution of RCS Capability
- Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
- Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
- RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
- Dimensions of Capacity
- Bandwidth Management
- Spectrum Acquisition Time
- United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
- 600 MHz Band Plan
- LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
- Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
- Propagation Losses Cellular vs Wi-Fi
- Spectrum Use and Sharing Approaches
- Licensed Shared Access
- United States 35 GHz System Currently Being Developed
- Appendix section with additional technical details
- Latency of Different Technologies
- Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
- Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
- Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
- 5G Architecture Options in Release 15
- De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
- Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
- Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
- 5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
- 5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
- Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
- 5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
- LTE Capabilities
- LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
- Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
- LTE Antenna Schemes
- Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
- Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
- Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
- Gains From Carrier Aggregation
- CoMP Levels
- TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
- LTE UE Categories
- LTE-Advanced Relay
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
- Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
- LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
- LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
- Evolution of RCS API Profiles
- Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
- Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
- Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
- EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- Evolved Packet System
- LTE Quality of Service
- Load Balancing with Heterogeneous Networks
- Scenarios for Radio Carriers in Small Cells
- Traffic Distribution Scenarios
- Enhanced Intercell Interference Cancellation
- Median Throughput Gains Hotspot Scenarios
- User Throughput Performance
- Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
- Dual Connectivity
- Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
- Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
- Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
- Potential Cloud RAN Approach
- Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
- Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
- Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
- Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
- Roaming Using Hotspot 20
- Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
- Hybrid SON Architecture
- IP Multimedia Subsystem
- Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
- UMTS Multi-Radio Network
- HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
- HSPA Multi-User Diversity
- HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
- HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
- HSPA Throughput Evolution
- HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
- Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
- Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
- GPRSEDGE Architecture
- Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
- Conclusion
-
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
2 x 5 MHz1 x 5 MHz
UE1
UE2
Uplink Downlink
127
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
Source Qualcomm contribution
128
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Throughput Evolution
Technology Downlink (Mbps) Peak Data Rate
Uplink (Mbps)Peak Data Rate
HSPA as defined in Release 6 144 576
Release 7 HSPA+ DL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 211 115
Release 7 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 16 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 280 115
Release 8 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 422 115
Release 8 HSPA+ (no MIMO)Dual Carrier 10+5 MHz 422 115
Release 9 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Dual Carrier DL and UL 10+10 MHz 840 230
Release 10 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Quad Carrier DL Dual Carrier UL 20+10 MHz
1680 230
Release 11 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO DL and UL 8 Carrier Dual Carrier UL 40+10 MHz
3360 690
No operators have announced plans to deploy HSPA in a quad (or greater) carrier configuration Three carrier configurations however have been deployed
129
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
130
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
131
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
132Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
GPRSEDGE Architecture
133
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
BCCH TCH TCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
577 microSper timeslot
4615 ms per frame of 8 timeslots
Possible BCCH carrier configuration
PBCCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Possible TCH carrier
configuration
BCCH Broadcast Control Channel ndash carries synchronization paging and other signalling informationTCH Traffic Channel ndash carries voice traffic data may alternate between frames for half-ratePDTCH Packet Data Traffic Channel ndash Carries packet data traffic for GPRS and EDGEPBCCH Packet Broadcast Control Channel ndash additional signalling for GPRSEDGE used only if needed
Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
134
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Mobile broadband remains at the forefront of innovation and development in computing networking and application development
bull Even as excitement builds about 5G LTE through ongoing advances has become the global standard
bull LTE-Advanced and LTE-Advanced Pro innovations include VoLTE 1 Gbps peak rate capability higher-order MIMO carrier aggregation LAALWALWIP IoT capabilities in Narrowband-IoT and Category M-1 V2X communications small-cell support URLLC SON dual connectivity and CoMP
bull Carriers are implementing NFV and SDN to reduce network costs improve service velocity and simplify deployment of new services
bull 5G research and development efforts have accelerated standards-based deployment will begin in 2019 and continue through 2030
bull Operators have announced pre-standard fixed-wireless deployments for 2017
bull 3GPP has implemented a 5G standardization process that began in Release 14 with a study of the new 5G radio continues now with a first phase of specifications in Release 15 that provides both non-standalone and standalone options then moves ahead with a second phase of complete specifications in Release 16
bull Small cells will play an ever-more-important role in boosting capacity benefiting from a number of technologies and developments
bull The future of mobile broadband including both LTE-Advanced and 5G is bright with no end in sight for continued growth in capability nor for the limitless application innovation that mobile broadband enables 135
Conclusion
- LTE to 5GCellular and Broadband Innovation
- Key Conclusions (1)
- Key Conclusions (2)
- Key Conclusions (3)
- Broadband Transformation
- Mobile Broadband Transformational Elements
- Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
- 5G Data Drivers
- Global Mobile Data Growth
- Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
- Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
- Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
- Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
- Expanding Use Cases
- 1G to 5G
- Timeline of Cellular Generations
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
- LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
- Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
- ITU Use Case Model
- ITU Objectives
- Network Transformation
- 5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
- Characteristics of Different Bands
- Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
- 5G New Radio (NR) (1)
- 5G New Radio (NR) (2)
- Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
- Expected 5G Performance
- Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
- 5G Schedule
- Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
- 5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
- Network Slicing Architecture
- Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
- Key Features in 3GPP Releases
- Types of Cells and Characteristics
- Small Cell Challenges
- Small Cell Approaches
- Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
- How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
- Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
- Wireless Networks for IoT
- ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
- Evolution of RCS Capability
- Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
- Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
- RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
- Dimensions of Capacity
- Bandwidth Management
- Spectrum Acquisition Time
- United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
- 600 MHz Band Plan
- LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
- Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
- Propagation Losses Cellular vs Wi-Fi
- Spectrum Use and Sharing Approaches
- Licensed Shared Access
- United States 35 GHz System Currently Being Developed
- Appendix section with additional technical details
- Latency of Different Technologies
- Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
- Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
- Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
- 5G Architecture Options in Release 15
- De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
- Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
- Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
- 5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
- 5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
- Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
- 5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
- LTE Capabilities
- LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
- Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
- LTE Antenna Schemes
- Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
- Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
- Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
- Gains From Carrier Aggregation
- CoMP Levels
- TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
- LTE UE Categories
- LTE-Advanced Relay
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
- Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
- LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
- LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
- Evolution of RCS API Profiles
- Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
- Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
- Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
- EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- Evolved Packet System
- LTE Quality of Service
- Load Balancing with Heterogeneous Networks
- Scenarios for Radio Carriers in Small Cells
- Traffic Distribution Scenarios
- Enhanced Intercell Interference Cancellation
- Median Throughput Gains Hotspot Scenarios
- User Throughput Performance
- Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
- Dual Connectivity
- Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
- Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
- Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
- Potential Cloud RAN Approach
- Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
- Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
- Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
- Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
- Roaming Using Hotspot 20
- Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
- Hybrid SON Architecture
- IP Multimedia Subsystem
- Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
- UMTS Multi-Radio Network
- HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
- HSPA Multi-User Diversity
- HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
- HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
- HSPA Throughput Evolution
- HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
- Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
- Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
- GPRSEDGE Architecture
- Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
- Conclusion
-
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
Source Qualcomm contribution
128
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Throughput Evolution
Technology Downlink (Mbps) Peak Data Rate
Uplink (Mbps)Peak Data Rate
HSPA as defined in Release 6 144 576
Release 7 HSPA+ DL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 211 115
Release 7 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 16 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 280 115
Release 8 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 422 115
Release 8 HSPA+ (no MIMO)Dual Carrier 10+5 MHz 422 115
Release 9 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Dual Carrier DL and UL 10+10 MHz 840 230
Release 10 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Quad Carrier DL Dual Carrier UL 20+10 MHz
1680 230
Release 11 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO DL and UL 8 Carrier Dual Carrier UL 40+10 MHz
3360 690
No operators have announced plans to deploy HSPA in a quad (or greater) carrier configuration Three carrier configurations however have been deployed
129
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
130
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
131
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
132Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
GPRSEDGE Architecture
133
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
BCCH TCH TCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
577 microSper timeslot
4615 ms per frame of 8 timeslots
Possible BCCH carrier configuration
PBCCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Possible TCH carrier
configuration
BCCH Broadcast Control Channel ndash carries synchronization paging and other signalling informationTCH Traffic Channel ndash carries voice traffic data may alternate between frames for half-ratePDTCH Packet Data Traffic Channel ndash Carries packet data traffic for GPRS and EDGEPBCCH Packet Broadcast Control Channel ndash additional signalling for GPRSEDGE used only if needed
Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
134
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Mobile broadband remains at the forefront of innovation and development in computing networking and application development
bull Even as excitement builds about 5G LTE through ongoing advances has become the global standard
bull LTE-Advanced and LTE-Advanced Pro innovations include VoLTE 1 Gbps peak rate capability higher-order MIMO carrier aggregation LAALWALWIP IoT capabilities in Narrowband-IoT and Category M-1 V2X communications small-cell support URLLC SON dual connectivity and CoMP
bull Carriers are implementing NFV and SDN to reduce network costs improve service velocity and simplify deployment of new services
bull 5G research and development efforts have accelerated standards-based deployment will begin in 2019 and continue through 2030
bull Operators have announced pre-standard fixed-wireless deployments for 2017
bull 3GPP has implemented a 5G standardization process that began in Release 14 with a study of the new 5G radio continues now with a first phase of specifications in Release 15 that provides both non-standalone and standalone options then moves ahead with a second phase of complete specifications in Release 16
bull Small cells will play an ever-more-important role in boosting capacity benefiting from a number of technologies and developments
bull The future of mobile broadband including both LTE-Advanced and 5G is bright with no end in sight for continued growth in capability nor for the limitless application innovation that mobile broadband enables 135
Conclusion
- LTE to 5GCellular and Broadband Innovation
- Key Conclusions (1)
- Key Conclusions (2)
- Key Conclusions (3)
- Broadband Transformation
- Mobile Broadband Transformational Elements
- Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
- 5G Data Drivers
- Global Mobile Data Growth
- Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
- Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
- Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
- Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
- Expanding Use Cases
- 1G to 5G
- Timeline of Cellular Generations
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
- LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
- Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
- ITU Use Case Model
- ITU Objectives
- Network Transformation
- 5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
- Characteristics of Different Bands
- Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
- 5G New Radio (NR) (1)
- 5G New Radio (NR) (2)
- Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
- Expected 5G Performance
- Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
- 5G Schedule
- Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
- 5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
- Network Slicing Architecture
- Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
- Key Features in 3GPP Releases
- Types of Cells and Characteristics
- Small Cell Challenges
- Small Cell Approaches
- Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
- How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
- Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
- Wireless Networks for IoT
- ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
- Evolution of RCS Capability
- Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
- Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
- RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
- Dimensions of Capacity
- Bandwidth Management
- Spectrum Acquisition Time
- United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
- 600 MHz Band Plan
- LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
- Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
- Propagation Losses Cellular vs Wi-Fi
- Spectrum Use and Sharing Approaches
- Licensed Shared Access
- United States 35 GHz System Currently Being Developed
- Appendix section with additional technical details
- Latency of Different Technologies
- Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
- Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
- Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
- 5G Architecture Options in Release 15
- De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
- Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
- Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
- 5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
- 5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
- Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
- 5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
- LTE Capabilities
- LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
- Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
- LTE Antenna Schemes
- Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
- Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
- Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
- Gains From Carrier Aggregation
- CoMP Levels
- TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
- LTE UE Categories
- LTE-Advanced Relay
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
- Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
- LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
- LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
- Evolution of RCS API Profiles
- Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
- Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
- Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
- EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- Evolved Packet System
- LTE Quality of Service
- Load Balancing with Heterogeneous Networks
- Scenarios for Radio Carriers in Small Cells
- Traffic Distribution Scenarios
- Enhanced Intercell Interference Cancellation
- Median Throughput Gains Hotspot Scenarios
- User Throughput Performance
- Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
- Dual Connectivity
- Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
- Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
- Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
- Potential Cloud RAN Approach
- Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
- Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
- Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
- Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
- Roaming Using Hotspot 20
- Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
- Hybrid SON Architecture
- IP Multimedia Subsystem
- Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
- UMTS Multi-Radio Network
- HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
- HSPA Multi-User Diversity
- HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
- HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
- HSPA Throughput Evolution
- HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
- Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
- Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
- GPRSEDGE Architecture
- Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
- Conclusion
-
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA Throughput Evolution
Technology Downlink (Mbps) Peak Data Rate
Uplink (Mbps)Peak Data Rate
HSPA as defined in Release 6 144 576
Release 7 HSPA+ DL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 211 115
Release 7 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 16 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 280 115
Release 8 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMODL 64 QAM UL 16 QAM 5+5 MHz 422 115
Release 8 HSPA+ (no MIMO)Dual Carrier 10+5 MHz 422 115
Release 9 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Dual Carrier DL and UL 10+10 MHz 840 230
Release 10 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO Quad Carrier DL Dual Carrier UL 20+10 MHz
1680 230
Release 11 HSPA+ 2X2 MIMO DL and UL 8 Carrier Dual Carrier UL 40+10 MHz
3360 690
No operators have announced plans to deploy HSPA in a quad (or greater) carrier configuration Three carrier configurations however have been deployed
129
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
130
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
131
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
132Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
GPRSEDGE Architecture
133
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
BCCH TCH TCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
577 microSper timeslot
4615 ms per frame of 8 timeslots
Possible BCCH carrier configuration
PBCCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Possible TCH carrier
configuration
BCCH Broadcast Control Channel ndash carries synchronization paging and other signalling informationTCH Traffic Channel ndash carries voice traffic data may alternate between frames for half-ratePDTCH Packet Data Traffic Channel ndash Carries packet data traffic for GPRS and EDGEPBCCH Packet Broadcast Control Channel ndash additional signalling for GPRSEDGE used only if needed
Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
134
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Mobile broadband remains at the forefront of innovation and development in computing networking and application development
bull Even as excitement builds about 5G LTE through ongoing advances has become the global standard
bull LTE-Advanced and LTE-Advanced Pro innovations include VoLTE 1 Gbps peak rate capability higher-order MIMO carrier aggregation LAALWALWIP IoT capabilities in Narrowband-IoT and Category M-1 V2X communications small-cell support URLLC SON dual connectivity and CoMP
bull Carriers are implementing NFV and SDN to reduce network costs improve service velocity and simplify deployment of new services
bull 5G research and development efforts have accelerated standards-based deployment will begin in 2019 and continue through 2030
bull Operators have announced pre-standard fixed-wireless deployments for 2017
bull 3GPP has implemented a 5G standardization process that began in Release 14 with a study of the new 5G radio continues now with a first phase of specifications in Release 15 that provides both non-standalone and standalone options then moves ahead with a second phase of complete specifications in Release 16
bull Small cells will play an ever-more-important role in boosting capacity benefiting from a number of technologies and developments
bull The future of mobile broadband including both LTE-Advanced and 5G is bright with no end in sight for continued growth in capability nor for the limitless application innovation that mobile broadband enables 135
Conclusion
- LTE to 5GCellular and Broadband Innovation
- Key Conclusions (1)
- Key Conclusions (2)
- Key Conclusions (3)
- Broadband Transformation
- Mobile Broadband Transformational Elements
- Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
- 5G Data Drivers
- Global Mobile Data Growth
- Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
- Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
- Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
- Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
- Expanding Use Cases
- 1G to 5G
- Timeline of Cellular Generations
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
- LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
- Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
- ITU Use Case Model
- ITU Objectives
- Network Transformation
- 5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
- Characteristics of Different Bands
- Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
- 5G New Radio (NR) (1)
- 5G New Radio (NR) (2)
- Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
- Expected 5G Performance
- Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
- 5G Schedule
- Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
- 5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
- Network Slicing Architecture
- Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
- Key Features in 3GPP Releases
- Types of Cells and Characteristics
- Small Cell Challenges
- Small Cell Approaches
- Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
- How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
- Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
- Wireless Networks for IoT
- ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
- Evolution of RCS Capability
- Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
- Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
- RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
- Dimensions of Capacity
- Bandwidth Management
- Spectrum Acquisition Time
- United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
- 600 MHz Band Plan
- LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
- Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
- Propagation Losses Cellular vs Wi-Fi
- Spectrum Use and Sharing Approaches
- Licensed Shared Access
- United States 35 GHz System Currently Being Developed
- Appendix section with additional technical details
- Latency of Different Technologies
- Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
- Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
- Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
- 5G Architecture Options in Release 15
- De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
- Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
- Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
- 5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
- 5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
- Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
- 5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
- LTE Capabilities
- LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
- Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
- LTE Antenna Schemes
- Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
- Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
- Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
- Gains From Carrier Aggregation
- CoMP Levels
- TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
- LTE UE Categories
- LTE-Advanced Relay
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
- Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
- LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
- LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
- Evolution of RCS API Profiles
- Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
- Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
- Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
- EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- Evolved Packet System
- LTE Quality of Service
- Load Balancing with Heterogeneous Networks
- Scenarios for Radio Carriers in Small Cells
- Traffic Distribution Scenarios
- Enhanced Intercell Interference Cancellation
- Median Throughput Gains Hotspot Scenarios
- User Throughput Performance
- Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
- Dual Connectivity
- Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
- Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
- Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
- Potential Cloud RAN Approach
- Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
- Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
- Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
- Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
- Roaming Using Hotspot 20
- Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
- Hybrid SON Architecture
- IP Multimedia Subsystem
- Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
- UMTS Multi-Radio Network
- HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
- HSPA Multi-User Diversity
- HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
- HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
- HSPA Throughput Evolution
- HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
- Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
- Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
- GPRSEDGE Architecture
- Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
- Conclusion
-
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
130
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
131
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
132Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
GPRSEDGE Architecture
133
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
BCCH TCH TCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
577 microSper timeslot
4615 ms per frame of 8 timeslots
Possible BCCH carrier configuration
PBCCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Possible TCH carrier
configuration
BCCH Broadcast Control Channel ndash carries synchronization paging and other signalling informationTCH Traffic Channel ndash carries voice traffic data may alternate between frames for half-ratePDTCH Packet Data Traffic Channel ndash Carries packet data traffic for GPRS and EDGEPBCCH Packet Broadcast Control Channel ndash additional signalling for GPRSEDGE used only if needed
Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
134
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Mobile broadband remains at the forefront of innovation and development in computing networking and application development
bull Even as excitement builds about 5G LTE through ongoing advances has become the global standard
bull LTE-Advanced and LTE-Advanced Pro innovations include VoLTE 1 Gbps peak rate capability higher-order MIMO carrier aggregation LAALWALWIP IoT capabilities in Narrowband-IoT and Category M-1 V2X communications small-cell support URLLC SON dual connectivity and CoMP
bull Carriers are implementing NFV and SDN to reduce network costs improve service velocity and simplify deployment of new services
bull 5G research and development efforts have accelerated standards-based deployment will begin in 2019 and continue through 2030
bull Operators have announced pre-standard fixed-wireless deployments for 2017
bull 3GPP has implemented a 5G standardization process that began in Release 14 with a study of the new 5G radio continues now with a first phase of specifications in Release 15 that provides both non-standalone and standalone options then moves ahead with a second phase of complete specifications in Release 16
bull Small cells will play an ever-more-important role in boosting capacity benefiting from a number of technologies and developments
bull The future of mobile broadband including both LTE-Advanced and 5G is bright with no end in sight for continued growth in capability nor for the limitless application innovation that mobile broadband enables 135
Conclusion
- LTE to 5GCellular and Broadband Innovation
- Key Conclusions (1)
- Key Conclusions (2)
- Key Conclusions (3)
- Broadband Transformation
- Mobile Broadband Transformational Elements
- Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
- 5G Data Drivers
- Global Mobile Data Growth
- Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
- Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
- Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
- Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
- Expanding Use Cases
- 1G to 5G
- Timeline of Cellular Generations
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
- LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
- Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
- ITU Use Case Model
- ITU Objectives
- Network Transformation
- 5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
- Characteristics of Different Bands
- Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
- 5G New Radio (NR) (1)
- 5G New Radio (NR) (2)
- Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
- Expected 5G Performance
- Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
- 5G Schedule
- Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
- 5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
- Network Slicing Architecture
- Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
- Key Features in 3GPP Releases
- Types of Cells and Characteristics
- Small Cell Challenges
- Small Cell Approaches
- Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
- How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
- Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
- Wireless Networks for IoT
- ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
- Evolution of RCS Capability
- Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
- Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
- RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
- Dimensions of Capacity
- Bandwidth Management
- Spectrum Acquisition Time
- United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
- 600 MHz Band Plan
- LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
- Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
- Propagation Losses Cellular vs Wi-Fi
- Spectrum Use and Sharing Approaches
- Licensed Shared Access
- United States 35 GHz System Currently Being Developed
- Appendix section with additional technical details
- Latency of Different Technologies
- Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
- Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
- Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
- 5G Architecture Options in Release 15
- De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
- Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
- Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
- 5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
- 5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
- Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
- 5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
- LTE Capabilities
- LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
- Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
- LTE Antenna Schemes
- Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
- Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
- Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
- Gains From Carrier Aggregation
- CoMP Levels
- TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
- LTE UE Categories
- LTE-Advanced Relay
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
- Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
- LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
- LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
- Evolution of RCS API Profiles
- Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
- Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
- Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
- EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- Evolved Packet System
- LTE Quality of Service
- Load Balancing with Heterogeneous Networks
- Scenarios for Radio Carriers in Small Cells
- Traffic Distribution Scenarios
- Enhanced Intercell Interference Cancellation
- Median Throughput Gains Hotspot Scenarios
- User Throughput Performance
- Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
- Dual Connectivity
- Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
- Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
- Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
- Potential Cloud RAN Approach
- Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
- Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
- Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
- Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
- Roaming Using Hotspot 20
- Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
- Hybrid SON Architecture
- IP Multimedia Subsystem
- Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
- UMTS Multi-Radio Network
- HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
- HSPA Multi-User Diversity
- HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
- HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
- HSPA Throughput Evolution
- HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
- Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
- Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
- GPRSEDGE Architecture
- Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
- Conclusion
-
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
131
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
132Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
GPRSEDGE Architecture
133
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
BCCH TCH TCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
577 microSper timeslot
4615 ms per frame of 8 timeslots
Possible BCCH carrier configuration
PBCCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Possible TCH carrier
configuration
BCCH Broadcast Control Channel ndash carries synchronization paging and other signalling informationTCH Traffic Channel ndash carries voice traffic data may alternate between frames for half-ratePDTCH Packet Data Traffic Channel ndash Carries packet data traffic for GPRS and EDGEPBCCH Packet Broadcast Control Channel ndash additional signalling for GPRSEDGE used only if needed
Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
134
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Mobile broadband remains at the forefront of innovation and development in computing networking and application development
bull Even as excitement builds about 5G LTE through ongoing advances has become the global standard
bull LTE-Advanced and LTE-Advanced Pro innovations include VoLTE 1 Gbps peak rate capability higher-order MIMO carrier aggregation LAALWALWIP IoT capabilities in Narrowband-IoT and Category M-1 V2X communications small-cell support URLLC SON dual connectivity and CoMP
bull Carriers are implementing NFV and SDN to reduce network costs improve service velocity and simplify deployment of new services
bull 5G research and development efforts have accelerated standards-based deployment will begin in 2019 and continue through 2030
bull Operators have announced pre-standard fixed-wireless deployments for 2017
bull 3GPP has implemented a 5G standardization process that began in Release 14 with a study of the new 5G radio continues now with a first phase of specifications in Release 15 that provides both non-standalone and standalone options then moves ahead with a second phase of complete specifications in Release 16
bull Small cells will play an ever-more-important role in boosting capacity benefiting from a number of technologies and developments
bull The future of mobile broadband including both LTE-Advanced and 5G is bright with no end in sight for continued growth in capability nor for the limitless application innovation that mobile broadband enables 135
Conclusion
- LTE to 5GCellular and Broadband Innovation
- Key Conclusions (1)
- Key Conclusions (2)
- Key Conclusions (3)
- Broadband Transformation
- Mobile Broadband Transformational Elements
- Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
- 5G Data Drivers
- Global Mobile Data Growth
- Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
- Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
- Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
- Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
- Expanding Use Cases
- 1G to 5G
- Timeline of Cellular Generations
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
- LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
- Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
- ITU Use Case Model
- ITU Objectives
- Network Transformation
- 5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
- Characteristics of Different Bands
- Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
- 5G New Radio (NR) (1)
- 5G New Radio (NR) (2)
- Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
- Expected 5G Performance
- Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
- 5G Schedule
- Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
- 5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
- Network Slicing Architecture
- Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
- Key Features in 3GPP Releases
- Types of Cells and Characteristics
- Small Cell Challenges
- Small Cell Approaches
- Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
- How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
- Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
- Wireless Networks for IoT
- ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
- Evolution of RCS Capability
- Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
- Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
- RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
- Dimensions of Capacity
- Bandwidth Management
- Spectrum Acquisition Time
- United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
- 600 MHz Band Plan
- LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
- Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
- Propagation Losses Cellular vs Wi-Fi
- Spectrum Use and Sharing Approaches
- Licensed Shared Access
- United States 35 GHz System Currently Being Developed
- Appendix section with additional technical details
- Latency of Different Technologies
- Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
- Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
- Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
- 5G Architecture Options in Release 15
- De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
- Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
- Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
- 5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
- 5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
- Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
- 5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
- LTE Capabilities
- LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
- Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
- LTE Antenna Schemes
- Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
- Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
- Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
- Gains From Carrier Aggregation
- CoMP Levels
- TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
- LTE UE Categories
- LTE-Advanced Relay
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
- Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
- LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
- LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
- Evolution of RCS API Profiles
- Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
- Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
- Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
- EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- Evolved Packet System
- LTE Quality of Service
- Load Balancing with Heterogeneous Networks
- Scenarios for Radio Carriers in Small Cells
- Traffic Distribution Scenarios
- Enhanced Intercell Interference Cancellation
- Median Throughput Gains Hotspot Scenarios
- User Throughput Performance
- Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
- Dual Connectivity
- Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
- Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
- Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
- Potential Cloud RAN Approach
- Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
- Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
- Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
- Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
- Roaming Using Hotspot 20
- Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
- Hybrid SON Architecture
- IP Multimedia Subsystem
- Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
- UMTS Multi-Radio Network
- HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
- HSPA Multi-User Diversity
- HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
- HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
- HSPA Throughput Evolution
- HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
- Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
- Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
- GPRSEDGE Architecture
- Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
- Conclusion
-
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
132Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
GPRSEDGE Architecture
133
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
BCCH TCH TCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
577 microSper timeslot
4615 ms per frame of 8 timeslots
Possible BCCH carrier configuration
PBCCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Possible TCH carrier
configuration
BCCH Broadcast Control Channel ndash carries synchronization paging and other signalling informationTCH Traffic Channel ndash carries voice traffic data may alternate between frames for half-ratePDTCH Packet Data Traffic Channel ndash Carries packet data traffic for GPRS and EDGEPBCCH Packet Broadcast Control Channel ndash additional signalling for GPRSEDGE used only if needed
Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
134
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Mobile broadband remains at the forefront of innovation and development in computing networking and application development
bull Even as excitement builds about 5G LTE through ongoing advances has become the global standard
bull LTE-Advanced and LTE-Advanced Pro innovations include VoLTE 1 Gbps peak rate capability higher-order MIMO carrier aggregation LAALWALWIP IoT capabilities in Narrowband-IoT and Category M-1 V2X communications small-cell support URLLC SON dual connectivity and CoMP
bull Carriers are implementing NFV and SDN to reduce network costs improve service velocity and simplify deployment of new services
bull 5G research and development efforts have accelerated standards-based deployment will begin in 2019 and continue through 2030
bull Operators have announced pre-standard fixed-wireless deployments for 2017
bull 3GPP has implemented a 5G standardization process that began in Release 14 with a study of the new 5G radio continues now with a first phase of specifications in Release 15 that provides both non-standalone and standalone options then moves ahead with a second phase of complete specifications in Release 16
bull Small cells will play an ever-more-important role in boosting capacity benefiting from a number of technologies and developments
bull The future of mobile broadband including both LTE-Advanced and 5G is bright with no end in sight for continued growth in capability nor for the limitless application innovation that mobile broadband enables 135
Conclusion
- LTE to 5GCellular and Broadband Innovation
- Key Conclusions (1)
- Key Conclusions (2)
- Key Conclusions (3)
- Broadband Transformation
- Mobile Broadband Transformational Elements
- Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
- 5G Data Drivers
- Global Mobile Data Growth
- Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
- Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
- Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
- Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
- Expanding Use Cases
- 1G to 5G
- Timeline of Cellular Generations
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
- LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
- Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
- ITU Use Case Model
- ITU Objectives
- Network Transformation
- 5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
- Characteristics of Different Bands
- Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
- 5G New Radio (NR) (1)
- 5G New Radio (NR) (2)
- Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
- Expected 5G Performance
- Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
- 5G Schedule
- Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
- 5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
- Network Slicing Architecture
- Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
- Key Features in 3GPP Releases
- Types of Cells and Characteristics
- Small Cell Challenges
- Small Cell Approaches
- Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
- How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
- Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
- Wireless Networks for IoT
- ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
- Evolution of RCS Capability
- Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
- Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
- RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
- Dimensions of Capacity
- Bandwidth Management
- Spectrum Acquisition Time
- United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
- 600 MHz Band Plan
- LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
- Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
- Propagation Losses Cellular vs Wi-Fi
- Spectrum Use and Sharing Approaches
- Licensed Shared Access
- United States 35 GHz System Currently Being Developed
- Appendix section with additional technical details
- Latency of Different Technologies
- Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
- Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
- Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
- 5G Architecture Options in Release 15
- De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
- Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
- Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
- 5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
- 5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
- Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
- 5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
- LTE Capabilities
- LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
- Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
- LTE Antenna Schemes
- Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
- Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
- Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
- Gains From Carrier Aggregation
- CoMP Levels
- TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
- LTE UE Categories
- LTE-Advanced Relay
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
- Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
- LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
- LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
- Evolution of RCS API Profiles
- Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
- Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
- Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
- EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- Evolved Packet System
- LTE Quality of Service
- Load Balancing with Heterogeneous Networks
- Scenarios for Radio Carriers in Small Cells
- Traffic Distribution Scenarios
- Enhanced Intercell Interference Cancellation
- Median Throughput Gains Hotspot Scenarios
- User Throughput Performance
- Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
- Dual Connectivity
- Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
- Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
- Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
- Potential Cloud RAN Approach
- Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
- Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
- Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
- Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
- Roaming Using Hotspot 20
- Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
- Hybrid SON Architecture
- IP Multimedia Subsystem
- Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
- UMTS Multi-Radio Network
- HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
- HSPA Multi-User Diversity
- HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
- HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
- HSPA Throughput Evolution
- HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
- Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
- Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
- GPRSEDGE Architecture
- Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
- Conclusion
-
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
GPRSEDGE Architecture
133
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
BCCH TCH TCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
577 microSper timeslot
4615 ms per frame of 8 timeslots
Possible BCCH carrier configuration
PBCCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Possible TCH carrier
configuration
BCCH Broadcast Control Channel ndash carries synchronization paging and other signalling informationTCH Traffic Channel ndash carries voice traffic data may alternate between frames for half-ratePDTCH Packet Data Traffic Channel ndash Carries packet data traffic for GPRS and EDGEPBCCH Packet Broadcast Control Channel ndash additional signalling for GPRSEDGE used only if needed
Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
134
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Mobile broadband remains at the forefront of innovation and development in computing networking and application development
bull Even as excitement builds about 5G LTE through ongoing advances has become the global standard
bull LTE-Advanced and LTE-Advanced Pro innovations include VoLTE 1 Gbps peak rate capability higher-order MIMO carrier aggregation LAALWALWIP IoT capabilities in Narrowband-IoT and Category M-1 V2X communications small-cell support URLLC SON dual connectivity and CoMP
bull Carriers are implementing NFV and SDN to reduce network costs improve service velocity and simplify deployment of new services
bull 5G research and development efforts have accelerated standards-based deployment will begin in 2019 and continue through 2030
bull Operators have announced pre-standard fixed-wireless deployments for 2017
bull 3GPP has implemented a 5G standardization process that began in Release 14 with a study of the new 5G radio continues now with a first phase of specifications in Release 15 that provides both non-standalone and standalone options then moves ahead with a second phase of complete specifications in Release 16
bull Small cells will play an ever-more-important role in boosting capacity benefiting from a number of technologies and developments
bull The future of mobile broadband including both LTE-Advanced and 5G is bright with no end in sight for continued growth in capability nor for the limitless application innovation that mobile broadband enables 135
Conclusion
- LTE to 5GCellular and Broadband Innovation
- Key Conclusions (1)
- Key Conclusions (2)
- Key Conclusions (3)
- Broadband Transformation
- Mobile Broadband Transformational Elements
- Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
- 5G Data Drivers
- Global Mobile Data Growth
- Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
- Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
- Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
- Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
- Expanding Use Cases
- 1G to 5G
- Timeline of Cellular Generations
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
- LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
- Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
- ITU Use Case Model
- ITU Objectives
- Network Transformation
- 5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
- Characteristics of Different Bands
- Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
- 5G New Radio (NR) (1)
- 5G New Radio (NR) (2)
- Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
- Expected 5G Performance
- Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
- 5G Schedule
- Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
- 5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
- Network Slicing Architecture
- Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
- Key Features in 3GPP Releases
- Types of Cells and Characteristics
- Small Cell Challenges
- Small Cell Approaches
- Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
- How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
- Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
- Wireless Networks for IoT
- ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
- Evolution of RCS Capability
- Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
- Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
- RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
- Dimensions of Capacity
- Bandwidth Management
- Spectrum Acquisition Time
- United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
- 600 MHz Band Plan
- LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
- Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
- Propagation Losses Cellular vs Wi-Fi
- Spectrum Use and Sharing Approaches
- Licensed Shared Access
- United States 35 GHz System Currently Being Developed
- Appendix section with additional technical details
- Latency of Different Technologies
- Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
- Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
- Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
- 5G Architecture Options in Release 15
- De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
- Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
- Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
- 5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
- 5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
- Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
- 5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
- LTE Capabilities
- LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
- Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
- LTE Antenna Schemes
- Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
- Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
- Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
- Gains From Carrier Aggregation
- CoMP Levels
- TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
- LTE UE Categories
- LTE-Advanced Relay
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
- Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
- LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
- LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
- Evolution of RCS API Profiles
- Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
- Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
- Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
- EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- Evolved Packet System
- LTE Quality of Service
- Load Balancing with Heterogeneous Networks
- Scenarios for Radio Carriers in Small Cells
- Traffic Distribution Scenarios
- Enhanced Intercell Interference Cancellation
- Median Throughput Gains Hotspot Scenarios
- User Throughput Performance
- Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
- Dual Connectivity
- Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
- Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
- Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
- Potential Cloud RAN Approach
- Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
- Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
- Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
- Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
- Roaming Using Hotspot 20
- Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
- Hybrid SON Architecture
- IP Multimedia Subsystem
- Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
- UMTS Multi-Radio Network
- HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
- HSPA Multi-User Diversity
- HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
- HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
- HSPA Throughput Evolution
- HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
- Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
- Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
- GPRSEDGE Architecture
- Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
- Conclusion
-
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
BCCH TCH TCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
577 microSper timeslot
4615 ms per frame of 8 timeslots
Possible BCCH carrier configuration
PBCCH TCH TCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH PDTCH
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7Possible TCH carrier
configuration
BCCH Broadcast Control Channel ndash carries synchronization paging and other signalling informationTCH Traffic Channel ndash carries voice traffic data may alternate between frames for half-ratePDTCH Packet Data Traffic Channel ndash Carries packet data traffic for GPRS and EDGEPBCCH Packet Broadcast Control Channel ndash additional signalling for GPRSEDGE used only if needed
Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
134
Source 5G Americas member contribution
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Mobile broadband remains at the forefront of innovation and development in computing networking and application development
bull Even as excitement builds about 5G LTE through ongoing advances has become the global standard
bull LTE-Advanced and LTE-Advanced Pro innovations include VoLTE 1 Gbps peak rate capability higher-order MIMO carrier aggregation LAALWALWIP IoT capabilities in Narrowband-IoT and Category M-1 V2X communications small-cell support URLLC SON dual connectivity and CoMP
bull Carriers are implementing NFV and SDN to reduce network costs improve service velocity and simplify deployment of new services
bull 5G research and development efforts have accelerated standards-based deployment will begin in 2019 and continue through 2030
bull Operators have announced pre-standard fixed-wireless deployments for 2017
bull 3GPP has implemented a 5G standardization process that began in Release 14 with a study of the new 5G radio continues now with a first phase of specifications in Release 15 that provides both non-standalone and standalone options then moves ahead with a second phase of complete specifications in Release 16
bull Small cells will play an ever-more-important role in boosting capacity benefiting from a number of technologies and developments
bull The future of mobile broadband including both LTE-Advanced and 5G is bright with no end in sight for continued growth in capability nor for the limitless application innovation that mobile broadband enables 135
Conclusion
- LTE to 5GCellular and Broadband Innovation
- Key Conclusions (1)
- Key Conclusions (2)
- Key Conclusions (3)
- Broadband Transformation
- Mobile Broadband Transformational Elements
- Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
- 5G Data Drivers
- Global Mobile Data Growth
- Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
- Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
- Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
- Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
- Expanding Use Cases
- 1G to 5G
- Timeline of Cellular Generations
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
- LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
- Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
- ITU Use Case Model
- ITU Objectives
- Network Transformation
- 5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
- Characteristics of Different Bands
- Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
- 5G New Radio (NR) (1)
- 5G New Radio (NR) (2)
- Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
- Expected 5G Performance
- Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
- 5G Schedule
- Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
- 5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
- Network Slicing Architecture
- Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
- Key Features in 3GPP Releases
- Types of Cells and Characteristics
- Small Cell Challenges
- Small Cell Approaches
- Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
- How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
- Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
- Wireless Networks for IoT
- ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
- Evolution of RCS Capability
- Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
- Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
- RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
- Dimensions of Capacity
- Bandwidth Management
- Spectrum Acquisition Time
- United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
- 600 MHz Band Plan
- LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
- Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
- Propagation Losses Cellular vs Wi-Fi
- Spectrum Use and Sharing Approaches
- Licensed Shared Access
- United States 35 GHz System Currently Being Developed
- Appendix section with additional technical details
- Latency of Different Technologies
- Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
- Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
- Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
- 5G Architecture Options in Release 15
- De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
- Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
- Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
- 5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
- 5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
- Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
- 5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
- LTE Capabilities
- LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
- Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
- LTE Antenna Schemes
- Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
- Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
- Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
- Gains From Carrier Aggregation
- CoMP Levels
- TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
- LTE UE Categories
- LTE-Advanced Relay
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
- Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
- LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
- LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
- Evolution of RCS API Profiles
- Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
- Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
- Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
- EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- Evolved Packet System
- LTE Quality of Service
- Load Balancing with Heterogeneous Networks
- Scenarios for Radio Carriers in Small Cells
- Traffic Distribution Scenarios
- Enhanced Intercell Interference Cancellation
- Median Throughput Gains Hotspot Scenarios
- User Throughput Performance
- Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
- Dual Connectivity
- Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
- Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
- Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
- Potential Cloud RAN Approach
- Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
- Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
- Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
- Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
- Roaming Using Hotspot 20
- Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
- Hybrid SON Architecture
- IP Multimedia Subsystem
- Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
- UMTS Multi-Radio Network
- HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
- HSPA Multi-User Diversity
- HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
- HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
- HSPA Throughput Evolution
- HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
- Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
- Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
- GPRSEDGE Architecture
- Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
- Conclusion
-
Rysavy Research 2017 White Paper
bull Mobile broadband remains at the forefront of innovation and development in computing networking and application development
bull Even as excitement builds about 5G LTE through ongoing advances has become the global standard
bull LTE-Advanced and LTE-Advanced Pro innovations include VoLTE 1 Gbps peak rate capability higher-order MIMO carrier aggregation LAALWALWIP IoT capabilities in Narrowband-IoT and Category M-1 V2X communications small-cell support URLLC SON dual connectivity and CoMP
bull Carriers are implementing NFV and SDN to reduce network costs improve service velocity and simplify deployment of new services
bull 5G research and development efforts have accelerated standards-based deployment will begin in 2019 and continue through 2030
bull Operators have announced pre-standard fixed-wireless deployments for 2017
bull 3GPP has implemented a 5G standardization process that began in Release 14 with a study of the new 5G radio continues now with a first phase of specifications in Release 15 that provides both non-standalone and standalone options then moves ahead with a second phase of complete specifications in Release 16
bull Small cells will play an ever-more-important role in boosting capacity benefiting from a number of technologies and developments
bull The future of mobile broadband including both LTE-Advanced and 5G is bright with no end in sight for continued growth in capability nor for the limitless application innovation that mobile broadband enables 135
Conclusion
- LTE to 5GCellular and Broadband Innovation
- Key Conclusions (1)
- Key Conclusions (2)
- Key Conclusions (3)
- Broadband Transformation
- Mobile Broadband Transformational Elements
- Exploding Demand from Critical Mass of Multiple Factors
- 5G Data Drivers
- Global Mobile Data Growth
- Global Mobile Traffic for Voice and Data 2014 to 2020
- Connections of Places Versus People Versus Things
- Global Usage as of 2Q 2017
- Global Adoption of 2G-4G Technologies 2010 to 2022
- Expanding Use Cases
- 1G to 5G
- Timeline of Cellular Generations
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (1)
- Most Important Features of LTE-Advanced (2)
- LTE to LTE-Advanced Pro Migration
- Successive Gains in Peak LTE Downlink Throughput
- ITU Use Case Model
- ITU Objectives
- Network Transformation
- 5G Combining of LTE and New Radio Technologies
- Characteristics of Different Bands
- Evolution to 5G Including LTE Improvements and Potential New 5G Radio Methods
- 5G New Radio (NR) (1)
- 5G New Radio (NR) (2)
- Hypothetical Example of 5G Numerology
- Expected 5G Performance
- Release 15 Non-Standalone and Standalone Options
- 5G Schedule
- Range Relative to Number of Number of Antenna Elements
- 5G Architecture for Low BandHigh Band Integration
- Network Slicing Architecture
- Characteristics of 3GPP Technologies
- Key Features in 3GPP Releases
- Types of Cells and Characteristics
- Small Cell Challenges
- Small Cell Approaches
- Timeline Relationship of LTE-U LAA eLAA and MulteFire
- How Different Technologies Harness Spectrum
- Approaches for Using Unlicensed Spectrum
- Wireless Networks for IoT
- ETSI NFV High-Level Framework
- Evolution of RCS Capability
- Summary of 3GPP LTE Features to Support Public Safety
- Sharing Approaches for Public Safety Networks
- RF Capacity Versus Fiber-Optic Cable Capacity
- Dimensions of Capacity
- Bandwidth Management
- Spectrum Acquisition Time
- United States Current and Future Spectrum Allocations
- 600 MHz Band Plan
- LTE Spectral Efficiency as Function of Radio Channel Size
- Pros and Cons of Unlicensed and Licensed Spectrum
- Propagation Losses Cellular vs Wi-Fi
- Spectrum Use and Sharing Approaches
- Licensed Shared Access
- United States 35 GHz System Currently Being Developed
- Appendix section with additional technical details
- Latency of Different Technologies
- Performance Relative to Theoretical Limits
- Comparison of Downlink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Uplink Spectral Efficiency
- Comparison of Voice Spectral Efficiency
- Data Consumed by Streaming and Virtual Reality
- 5G Architecture Options in Release 15
- De-Prioritized 5G Network Architecture Options in 3GPP Release 15
- Dual-Connectivity Options with LTE as Master
- Frequency Domain Coexistence of LTE and NR
- 5G Integrated Access and Backhaul
- 5G Downlink Performance Different ISDs Foliage vs None
- Proportion of Satisfied Users Relative to Monthly Usage
- 5G Fixed Wireless Simulation with Different Loading and Densities
- LTE Capabilities
- LTE OFDMA Downlink Resource Assignment
- Frequency Domain Scheduling in LTE
- LTE Antenna Schemes
- Single-User and Multi-User MIMO
- Median Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Cell-Edge Throughput of Feedback Mode 3-2 and New Codebook
- Performance Gains with FD-MIMO Using 200 Meter ISD
- Carrier Aggregation Capabilities across 3GPP Releases
- Gains From Carrier Aggregation
- CoMP Levels
- TDD Frame Co-Existence Between TD-SCDMA and LTE TDD
- LTE UE Categories
- LTE-Advanced Relay
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis
- LTE FDD User Throughputs Based on Simulation Analysis ndash Key Assumptions
- Drive Test of Commercial European LTE Network 10+10 MHz
- LTE Throughputs in Various Modes
- LTE Actual Throughput Rates Based on Conditions
- Evolution of RCS API Profiles
- Evolution of Voice in LTE Networks
- Comparison of AMR AMR-WB and EVS Codecs
- Combined Mean Opinion Score Values
- EVS Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- EVS Voice Capacity Compared to AMR and AMR-WB
- Evolved Packet System
- LTE Quality of Service
- Load Balancing with Heterogeneous Networks
- Scenarios for Radio Carriers in Small Cells
- Traffic Distribution Scenarios
- Enhanced Intercell Interference Cancellation
- Median Throughput Gains Hotspot Scenarios
- User Throughput Performance
- Throughput Gain of Time-Domain Interference Coordination
- Dual Connectivity
- Dual Connectivity User Throughputs
- Means of Achieving Lower Cost in IoT Devices
- Summary of IoT Features in LTE Devices
- Potential Cloud RAN Approach
- Partially Centralized Versus Fully Centralized C-RAN
- Costs and Benefits of Various RAN Decompositions
- Software-Defined Networking and Cloud Architectures
- Bidirectional-Offloading Challenges
- Roaming Using Hotspot 20
- Hotspot 20 Connection Procedure
- Hybrid SON Architecture
- IP Multimedia Subsystem
- Efficient Broadcasting with OFDM
- UMTS Multi-Radio Network
- HSPA Channel Assignment - Example
- HSPA Multi-User Diversity
- HSPA Dual-Cell Operation with One Uplink Carrier
- HSPA+ Het-net Using Multipoint Transmission
- HSPA Throughput Evolution
- HSPA+ Performance 5+5 MHz
- Dual Carrier HSPA+ Throughputs
- Summary of HSPA Functions and Benefits
- GPRSEDGE Architecture
- Example of GSMGPRSEDGE Timeslot Structure
- Conclusion
-