lung morphology of cursorial and non-cursorial mammals

18
JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY 230:299-316 (1996) Lung Morphology of Cursorial and Non-Cursorial Mammals: Lagomorphs As a Case Study for a Pneumatic Stabilization Hypothesis RACHEL S. SIMONS Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 841 12 ABSTRACT Gross lung morphology is examined in representative species from four genera within the order Lagomorpha (Lepuscalifornicus, Sylvilagus nuttalli, Oryctolagus cuniculus, Ochotona princeps), and compared with a representative rodent out-group (Spermophilus richardonsii ). Examination of pulmonary morphology reveals several correlations between the thoracic mor- phology and locomotor behavior. Lepus, the most cursorial species, exhibits a distinct suite of characteristics: 1) tissue of the right cranial lobe interposed between the heart and sternum; 2) well-defined grooves in the lung tissue for both the aorta and ribs; 3) a fibrous pericardial attachment to the sternum; 4) relatively large heart and lung mass. Sylvilagus, a sprinter, exhibits these features to a lesser degree, whereas Oryctolagus and Ochotona, non-cursorial species, lack most of these features. This same suite of pulmonary features is also observed in a wide range of unrelated cursorial taxa (including selected Artiodactlya, Perissodactyla, Carnivora). Corrosion casts of the internal air- ways demonstrate that the cursorial and non-cursorial taxa examined here have similar branching patterns despite their variable external morphologies. The juxtaposition of pulmonary lobes, heart, and ribs leads to the hypothesis that the lungs themselves provide mechanical support of the heart and visceral mass during locomotion. Analyses of cineradiographic and pneumotacho- graphic data obtained from Oryctolagus tend to support a pneumatic stabiliza- tion hypothesis: the lungs themselves, intimately associated with the chest walls and positively pressurized during landing, may provide some mechanical support to the viscera. This mechanism may be important in stabilizing the relatively large hearts of the most o 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Variation in gross lung structure among mammals remains largely unexplored. Al- though a few studies document anatomical differences among lungs of mammalian spe- cies (Speransky, '62; Adrian, '64), no studies consider the functional implications of these differences. Moreover, the relationship be- tween the gross pulmonary morphology and locomotor behavior remains unexamined. This paucity is in contrast to the many stud- ies in which micromorphological features of the mammalian lung such as alveolar wall thickness and diffusing area have been corre- lated with the physiological function of gas exchange (Weibel and Taylor, '81; West and Costello, '92), as well as several studies that correlate locomotor performance (speed and endurance) with indices of pulmonary func- - cursorial species during running. tion such as VOZ max (Huey, '82; Lindstedt et al., '91). In addition, other studies address the integration of mammalian locomotion with breathing (Bramble and Carrier, '83; Bramble, '89a; Young et al., '92a,b; Bramble and Jenluns, '93), and still other reports docu- ment cardiopulmonary interaction (although primarily in anesthetized or sedentary mam- mals; Lloyd, '89; Agostoni and Butler, '91; Hoffman, '93). Yet variation in the gross morphology of lungs has not been evaluated within a taxonomic or behavioral framework despite its direct relationship to physiological function. Address reprint requests to Rachel Simons, Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112. o 1996 WILEY-LISS, INC.

Upload: lydung

Post on 01-Jan-2017

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Lung morphology of cursorial and non-cursorial mammals

JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY 230:299-316 (1996)

Lung Morphology of Cursorial and Non-Cursorial Mammals: Lagomorphs As a Case Study for a Pneumatic Stabilization Hypothesis

RACHEL S. SIMONS Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 841 12

ABSTRACT Gross lung morphology is examined in representative species from four genera within the order Lagomorpha (Lepus californicus, Sylvilagus nuttalli, Oryctolagus cuniculus, Ochotona princeps), and compared with a representative rodent out-group (Spermophilus richardonsii ). Examination of pulmonary morphology reveals several correlations between the thoracic mor- phology and locomotor behavior. Lepus, the most cursorial species, exhibits a distinct suite of characteristics: 1) tissue of the right cranial lobe interposed between the heart and sternum; 2) well-defined grooves in the lung tissue for both the aorta and ribs; 3) a fibrous pericardial attachment to the sternum; 4) relatively large heart and lung mass. Sylvilagus, a sprinter, exhibits these features to a lesser degree, whereas Oryctolagus and Ochotona, non-cursorial species, lack most of these features. This same suite of pulmonary features is also observed in a wide range of unrelated cursorial taxa (including selected Artiodactlya, Perissodactyla, Carnivora). Corrosion casts of the internal air- ways demonstrate that the cursorial and non-cursorial taxa examined here have similar branching patterns despite their variable external morphologies. The juxtaposition of pulmonary lobes, heart, and ribs leads to the hypothesis that the lungs themselves provide mechanical support of the heart and visceral mass during locomotion. Analyses of cineradiographic and pneumotacho- graphic data obtained from Oryctolagus tend to support a pneumatic stabiliza- tion hypothesis: the lungs themselves, intimately associated with the chest walls and positively pressurized during landing, may provide some mechanical support to the viscera. This mechanism may be important in stabilizing the relatively large hearts of the most o 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Variation in gross lung structure among mammals remains largely unexplored. Al- though a few studies document anatomical differences among lungs of mammalian spe- cies (Speransky, '62; Adrian, '64), no studies consider the functional implications of these differences. Moreover, the relationship be- tween the gross pulmonary morphology and locomotor behavior remains unexamined. This paucity is in contrast to the many stud- ies in which micromorphological features of the mammalian lung such as alveolar wall thickness and diffusing area have been corre- lated with the physiological function of gas exchange (Weibel and Taylor, '81; West and Costello, '92), as well as several studies that correlate locomotor performance (speed and endurance) with indices of pulmonary func-

- cursorial species during running.

tion such as VOZ max (Huey, '82; Lindstedt et al., '91). In addition, other studies address the integration of mammalian locomotion with breathing (Bramble and Carrier, '83; Bramble, '89a; Young et al., '92a,b; Bramble and Jenluns, '93), and still other reports docu- ment cardiopulmonary interaction (although primarily in anesthetized or sedentary mam- mals; Lloyd, '89; Agostoni and Butler, '91; Hoffman, '93). Yet variation in the gross morphology of lungs has not been evaluated within a taxonomic or behavioral framework despite its direct relationship to physiological function.

Address reprint requests to Rachel Simons, Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112.

o 1996 WILEY-LISS, INC.

Page 2: Lung morphology of cursorial and non-cursorial mammals

300 R.S. SIMONS

-

The order Lagomorpha is well suited for examining the relationship between gross lung morphology and locomotion. Within this small but behaviorally diverse monophyletic clade, closely related species exhibit a wide range of body size and locomotive ability. Lagomorphs include two families, Ochotoni- dae (pikas) and Leporidae (rabbits, cotton- tails, and hares). Ochotonidae is considered to be the more primitive family and is com- posed of non-cursorial species (Gambaryan, '74; Dawson, '81; Corbet, '83). The leporids include numerous species whose cursorial specializations have been well documented (Camp and Borell, '37; Howell, '65; Gam- baryan, '74; Schnurr and Thomas, '84; Bramble, '89b). Hares (Lepus) are the most specialized runners, combining speed, endur- ance, and agility (Howell, '65; Gambaryan, '74; Bramble, '89b).

This study examines gross pulmonary mor- phology primarily within the order Lagomor- pha. The objectives are three-fold: 1) to describe the lung morphology and the rela- tionships of the lung to adjacent thoracic elements (ribs and heart) of selected cursors and non-cursors, 2) to experimentally evalu- ate the functional implications of pulmonary design using data from high speed cineradiog- raphy and pneumotachography from domes- tic rabbits, and 3) to introduce an hypothesis of a non-respiratory function for mammalian lungs. Based on morphological and behav- ioral differences, particular attention is given to contrasts between the functional lung morphology of the endurance runner Lepus californicus and the similarly sized but less cursorial Oryctolagus cuniculus. Lung

(ground squirrel) (non-cursorial)

Ochotona princeps 113-202 Sprinter (pika) (non-cu rsorial) -

Species

Lepus californicus 1300 - 31 00 Endurance runner (black tail jack rabbit) (highly cursorial) -

morphology of representative species from the orders Rodentia, Artiodactyla, Carnivora, and Perissodactyla are also included for com- parison.

MATERIALS AND METHODS Phylogenetic considerations

Gross lung morphology, airway branching patterns, and locomotor behaviors were exam- ined in representative lagomorph species from four genera: Lepus californicus (n = 15), Syl- vilagus nuttalli (n = 8), Oryctolagus cunicu- lus (n = 25) , and Ochotonaprinceps (n = 10) (Fig. 1). Observations from Lepus townsendii (n = 4) are also included as the pulmonary morphology of L. townsendii is indistinguish- able from that of L. californicus. Rodentia is widely considered to be the sister group to Lagomorpha (Novacek and Wyss, '86). Anon- cursorial rodent species, Spermophilus rich- ardsonii (n = 71, representing the most primi- tive rodent suborder Sciurognathi (Nowak, '91), was included for out-group comparison and character polarization. Unfortunately, the phylogenetic relationships among the leporids remain largely unresolved (Dawson, '81; Corbet, '83). For the purposes of this study, the phylogenetic hypothesis from Hib- bard ('63; Fig. 1) is used, but other phyloge- netic hypotheses (Corbet, '83; Biju-Duval et al., '91) would not substantially change the conclusions of this study. In addition to lago- morphs and rodents, cursorial and non- cursorial species from the orders Artiodact- lya ke. , pronghorn antelope and domestic pigs) and Carnivora (i.e., dogs, cats, and rac- coons) are considered in this study.

Body mass g '32 Behavior 2

Page 3: Lung morphology of cursorial and non-cursorial mammals

LAGOMORPH LUNG MORPHOLOGY 30 1

Morphology All but one lagomorph species examined

were collected from their natural habitats (collection permits obtained from Utah Divi- sion of Wildlife Resources and Nevada Depart- ment of Wildlife); Oryctolagus, the domestic rabbit, was obtained from a laboratory colony at the University of Utah. Morphological ob- servations and measurements were made on freshly dead specimens. Dried lungs were prepared by washing excised lungs with wa- ter to remove blood, then inflating the lungs (pressures of 40-60 cm HaO) to greater than 100% total lung capacity (to compensate for shrinkage; see below) with an air source at the trachea and allowed to dry (Hildebrand, ’68). As an estimate of the contact area be- tween lungs and chest wall, projected surface area measurements were obtained from video images of the dry lungs using NIH-Image software. Images were acquired with a Pana- sonic camera (AG-450) and VCR (AG-7390) interfaced with a Power Macintosh com- puter. No lateral measurements were made of Ochotona’s left lung; some distortion of the specimens precluded reliable measures. However, in life, (and before air-drying) the right and left lungs of Ochotona are sym- metrical. Therefore, the surface area mea- sures from the right lung are sufficient to describe both the right and left lungs.

As air-dried lungs dehydrate, some shrink- age occurs (Murphy and Engel, ’80). Whole lung shrinkage and regional lobar distortion were calculated by comparing the dimen- sions of dried lungs to fresh, hydrated lungs. Data from tests using Oryctolagus lungs dem- onstrated that whole lung shrinkage in lat- eral projection was approximately 20% * 2.3% of projected surface area, and the shrink- age of individual lobes was not significantly different from that of the whole lung (Table 1).

TABLE 1 , Comparison ofprojected surface areas of hydrated us. air dried lungs in adult

Oryctolagus cuniculus

Lung Tissue’ % Shrinkage (std errY

Whole lung Cranial lobe Middle lobe Caudal lobe

20.33 (2.30) 18.65 (2.17) 26.08 (3.92) 18.34 (4.09)

‘All data based on lateral view of right lungs. N = 5. ZCranial, middle, and caudal lobe shrinkages are not statistically different from that of the whole lung. (one-way ANOVA; p = 0.332).

To further characterize gross lung mor- phology, the primary branching patterns of the pulmonary airways were examined using corrosion casting techniques. Dow Corning silicone rubber (base #3112 and catalyst 1; ratio 20:l) was injected into the airways of lungs that were retained within the isolated (i.e., decapitated, limbs removed) but un- opened thorax. The thorax was maintained in a “standing” posture. The lungs were removed from the thorax following a twenty- four hour curing period and lung tissue was dissolved using a concentrated NaOH solu- tion. The corrosion casts confirmed the accu- racy of the gross morphology of the in vitro dried lung preparations.

For comparative purposes, dried lungs from other representative mammalian species (e.g., pronghorn antelope, raccoon, pig, and dog) were prepared in the same manner described above. Additional information on the pulmo- nary anatomy of various domestic species (e.g., dogs, cats, and pigs) was obtained from the literature (Getty, ’75; Evans, ’93).

Kinematic and pneumotachographic data Oryctolagus (n = 3) were trained over a

four-month period to run on a variable speed treadmill. Clear, plexiglass walls prevent indi- viduals from dodging laterally or leaping off the treadmill. At all but the fastest running speeds, leporids use a half-bound. This asym- metrical gait is similar to a gallop in that the forelimbs contact the ground sequentially. However, both the right and left hind limbs move almost in synchrony throughout the stride cycle. Cineradiographic films (100 fps) were taken of two rabbits during unencum- bered treadmill exercise using facilities avail- able at Harvard University (Bramble and Jenkins, ’93). Films were analyzed using a Vanguard Motion Analyzer (Vanguard In- strument Corp., Melville, NY). The positions of the 8th thoracic vertebra, the 3rd sterne- bra, the heart, and the liver, were all digi- tized for sequences of film in which the ani- mals were running steadily at speeds of 8-16 kph. Both forelimbs were visible in the radio- graphic films and thus enabled forelimb place- ment to be documented. Oryctolagus is a burst runner, running for approximately 1 5 4 5 sec- onds continuously. The segments of film in which the rabbits were perfectly positioned in front of the x-ray tube (i.e., entire thoracic com- partment plus anterior edge of visceral m a s visible) comprise a random sample of running.

Upon return to the University of Utah, all three rabbits were trained to wear a face

Page 4: Lung morphology of cursorial and non-cursorial mammals

302 R.S. SIMONS

mask fitted with a screen pneumotachograph (nylon screen mesh 36% open; 7 mm radius). An Omega differential pressure transducer (0-7 inches HzO) was mounted on the face mask, and air flow at the mouth was recorded while the animal was running. Combined weight of the mask and the transducer was 35 grams. The pneumotachograph signal (sampled a t 300Hz) was synchronized with a simultaneous video recording of locomotion and recorded using a Macintosh computer and custom designed software. A pulse of right (LED) was simultaneously visible on the video tape and recorded electronically along with the pneumotachograph recording. Video kinematics of the trunk, forelimbs, hind limbs, and head were analyzed using a Peak Performance System.

Radiodensity analysis (Bramble and Jen- kins, '93) was used to determine the phases of the respiratory cycle in the cineradio- graphic films for which no pneumotacho- graphic data were available. In subsequent cineradiographic and pneumotachographic experiments, synchronized kinematic and res- piratory data from these rabbits confirmed the regular relationship between the pneumo- tachographic, limb support, and radiodensity patterns (unpublished data).

RESULTS

External morphology of the pulmonary lobes

There are striking differences in the shape and relative size of pulmonary lobes among lagomorphs. The lungs of three leporids (Lepus towndsendii, Oryctolagus cuniculus, and Syluilagus nuttalli) are illustrated in Figures 2, 3. Terminology identifying lung lobes, consistent with the Nomina Anatomica Veterinaria ('941, will be used throughout this paper. The four lobar descriptors: cra- nial, middle, caudal, and accessory, are equivalent to the terms: apical or anterior; cardiac; diaphragmatic or posterior; and inter- mediate, respectively. All three leporid spe- cies have six lobes: right and left cranial lobe, right and left caudal, right middle, and right accessory lobe. However, in contrast to the externally symmetrical disposition of the right and left cranial lobes observed in Oryc- tolagus, both Sylvilagus and Lepus show pro- nounced cranial lobar asymmetry (Fig. 2). In Syluilagus, the anterior portion of the right cranial lobe turns medially toward the ven- tral midline. A similar but more exaggerated condition occurs in Lepus; the right cranial

lobe completely crosses the sternum to con- tact the left chest wall. The dorsal, anterior portion of the left cranial lobe of Lepus is relatively reduced in size and thus accommo- dates the extended wrapped-around right cra- nial lobe (Fig. 3B). The caudal lobes comprise approximately 50% of the projected surface area in direct contact with the chest walls and the cranial and middle lobes together com- prise the remaining 50% (Figs. 3 ,4 ; Table 2).

Ochotonids exhibit symmetry of the right and left lungs and have three distinct lobes in each. In contrast to the leporid condition, the cranial lobes of Ochotona have a relatively greater projected lateral surface area in con- tact with the chest walls (Table 2). Differ- ences in relative size and geometry of ocho- tonid and leporid pulmonary lobes are illustrated in Figures 2-4, and Table 2. In contrast to the condition in lagomorphs, ex- amination of the rodent outgroup reveals that the left lung of Spermophilus richardso- nii is undivided. S. richardsonii shows no extension of the right cranial lobe. The right lung is divided into four lobes: cranial, middle, caudal, and accessory (Figs. 4B, C, 5B).

The lungs of dogs, horses, pigs, and prong- horn also show varying degrees of right cra- nial lobe extension resulting in separation of the heart from the anterior chest wall and sternum (Speransky, '62; Getty, '75; pers. obs.). This arrangement is most pronounced in the pronghorn, Antilocapra americana (Figs. 2F, 4D, El, an extremely specialized endurance runner (Howell, '68; Lindstedt et al., ,911. As is observed in Lepus, a portion of the right cranial lobe of Antilocapra lies against the left chest wall and comprises approximately 20% of the left lateral pro- jected surface area (Fig. 4E). A pronghorn's right cranial lobe has its greatest anteropos- terior thickness directly anterior to the heart. Domestic pig lungs show a very similar exter- nal morphology, but the wrap-around por- tion of the right cranial lobe is relatively smaller than that of the pronghorn. Al- though less pronounced than the pulmonary anatomy of the hare or pronghorn, the lungs of dogs also exhibit an enlargement of the right cranial lobe such that there is a thicken- ing of lung tissue directly anterior to the heart (Getty, '75; Evans, '93; pers. obs.). Horse lungs are alobate but nonetheless show a cranial extension of the right anterior re- gion of the lung (Getty, '75). In contrast, such non-cursors as raccoons, primates, bats, and geomyid rodents posses an external pul-

Page 5: Lung morphology of cursorial and non-cursorial mammals

Fig. 2. Anterior views of air-dried lungs. A Lepus torunsendii. B: Ochotona princeps. C: Syluilagus nut- talli. D. Spermophilus richardsonii. E: Oryctolagus cu- niculus. F: Antilocapra americanus (new born). Lobar identification: A, cranial; L, left; M, middle; P, caudal; R, right. Cardiac fossa (0 is created by RA, RM, LA, and LM

for all species except (D) S. richardsonii, in which the right accessory (X) lobe also participates. Scale bar = 1 cm. Note: Lungs of L. californicus and L. townsendii are morphologically indistinguishable. Both species of jack rabbit are behaviorally similar and and have over-lapping ranges of body mass.

Page 6: Lung morphology of cursorial and non-cursorial mammals

304 R.S. SIMONS

Fig. 3. Lateral views of air-dried leporid lungs. A, B: Lepus townsendii. C, D Sylvilagus nuttalli. E, F: Oryctolagus cuniculus. Notice grooves on L. townsendii and S. nuttalli, where lobes are in contact with ribs of lateral chest walls. See legend of Figure 2.

monary morphology (pers. obs.) similar to that of the ground squirrel in having relative symmetry of the right and left cranial re- gions of the lung.

The accessory lobe branches off the right bronchus, posterior to the middle lobe, and is visible only in caudal view (Fig. 5A, B). This lobe lies caudal to the heart and separates the heart and diaphragm. The morphology of the accessory lobe of Lepus townsendii (Fig. 5A) is representative of the lagomorph condition and is also superficially similar to that of Spermophilus richardsonii (Fig. 5B). De-

spite the similar general shape and orienta- tion of the accessory lobes among all lago- morphs, the projected caudal surface area of the accessory lobe, measured as a percentage of the total projected caudal surface area, varies among species. The accessory lobe ac- counts for 25.8% (+ 1.5 standard error) of the surface area in Lepus (n = 3), whereas in Oryctolagus (n = 3), it comprises only 15.5% (k0.3). Sylvilagus (n = 3) and Ochotona (n = 3) have indistinguishable surface areas of 18.7% (kl.1) and 18.9% (+1.2), respec- tively. Among the lagomorphs, the relative

Page 7: Lung morphology of cursorial and non-cursorial mammals

LAGOMORPH LUNG MORPHOLOGY 305

Fig. 4. Lateral views of air-dried lungs from out-group taxa. A Ochotona princeps. B, C : Spermophilus richardsonii. D, E: Antilocapra americanus. RA', right cranial lobe against left chest wall. See Figure 2 legend.

caudal surface area varies positively with rela- tive heart mass (see Table 3 below). Sper- mophilus richardsonii (n = 5 ) has the larg- est relative accessory surface area at 30.3% (21.7) of the total projected caudal surface area. This relatively large percentage in S. richardsonii may be explained by the observa- tion that a portion of the right accessory lobe is in contact with the left chest wall (Fig. 5B)

and that the position of the accessory lobe in this rodent is analogous to that of both the accessory lobe and the ventral portion of the left anterior lobe in leporids (Fig. 4C).

In all species examined, the heart and great vessels are surrounded by lung tissue. The cranial, middle, and accessory lobes form a well-defined pocket or cardiac fossa surround- ing the heart (Figs. 2,4,5). This fossa encom-

Page 8: Lung morphology of cursorial and non-cursorial mammals

306 R.S. SIMONS

TABLE 2. Projected surface areas ofpulmonary lobes of selected lagomorphs as apercent of total lateral projected area'

Lobe Ochotona princepsZ Oryctolagus cuniculus Sylvilagus nuttalli Lepus californicus

- LA' LP RA' RA 76.35 (2.34) RM 13.78 (1.93) RP 9.87 (0.82)

- -

42.62 (3.29) 57.38 (3.29)

32.52 (2.69) 21.38 (1.86) 46.10 (3.10)

-

44.45 (2.70) 55.55 (2.70)

33.77 (2.43) 20.59 (2.24) 45.65 (3.59)

-

45.67 (1.18) 46.62 (1.23)

7.71 (0.31) 36.90 (1.37) 25.03 (1.35) 38.07 (2.02)

'LA, left cranial; LP, left caudal; FA', right cranial against left chest wall; FLA, right cranial; RM, right middle; RP, right caudal. n = 4 per genus. Standard error in parentheses. 2No measurements from Ochotonaprinceps left side (see text).

passes the heart almost completely in Lepus and to a lesser degree in Sylvilagus, Oryctola- gus, and Ochotona. In Spermophilus richard- sonii, the cardiac fossa is created by the left lung together with the right cranial, middle, and accessory lobes (Fig. 2D).

To varying degrees, lung structure also reflects interactions with the primary intra- thoracic vasculature. The thoracic aorta passes through a deep and clearly defined sulcus in the left lung. This groove maintains its structural integrity when the lungs are excised and dried in the absence of the aorta. All lagomorph species posses such an aortic groove, although it is slightly less pronounced in Oryctolagus and Sylvilagus than in Lepus and Ochotona. Antilocapra also shows a well- defined groove. No groove is visible in Sper- mophilus richardsonii. In all specimens, por- tions of the accessory lobe and right caudal

Iobe form a tunnel through which the caudal vena cava passes just before reaching the heart. The esophagus traverses a smaller opening also created by the accessory lobe, right caudal lobe, and to a lesser extent, the left caudal lobe (Fig. 5) .

Airway branching patterns Although the external morphology of the

lungs reveals obvious lobar structural differ- ences among species, the internal branching patterns of the major airways, as evidenced by corrosion casts, are similar among these species. In all species examined, the right lung has a primary bronchial pattern that includes an anterior branch, a middle branch, and a posterior branch (Fig. 6) . The left lung has an anterior branch and a posterior branch, but only the ochotonid shows a left middle branch (Fig. 6B). The internal branch-

Fig. 5 . Caudal view of air-dried lungs. A Lepus townsendii, representative of all lagomorphs. B: Spermophilus richardsonii. e, channel for the esophagus; M, middle portion of the left cranial lobe; RP, right caudal lobe; v, opening for the vena cava; X, accessory lobe. Dorsal surface is up.

Page 9: Lung morphology of cursorial and non-cursorial mammals

LAGOMORPH LUNG MORPHOLOGY 307

ing pattern of Spermophilus richardsonii (Fig. 6A) is very similar to that of the lepo- rids, although there is no external lobation of its left lung. Branching patterns of dogs (Woldenhiwot and Horsfield, '78) and pigs (Speransky, '62) are aIso similar to those of rodents and rabbits (Fig. 6E, F). However,

despite these similar internal branching pat- terns, both pigs and dogs exhibit an exter- nally distinct, left middle lobe.

Integration of lungs and ribs Comparisons of in situ and excised lung

tissue reveal that the lungs maintain their

A B

C

E

D

F

Fig. 6. Schematic representation of the branching pattern of bronchial trees. External lobar divisions (shaded circles) and branching angles are approximately to scale. Accessory lobe is omitted. A Spermophilus richurdsonii2. B: Ochotonu princeps. C: Lepus townsen- dii. D Oryctolugus cuniculus. E: dog'. F: pig2. Branch-

ing patterns of A, C, D and E are similar although external morphologies differ. a, anterior; bl, left bron- chus; br, right bronchus; 1, left; m, middle; p, posterior; r, right; T, trachea, ('Woldenhiwot and Horsfield, '78; %per- ansky, '62).

Page 10: Lung morphology of cursorial and non-cursorial mammals

308 R.S. SIMONS

form (i.e., grooves, borders) following infla- tion and air-drying. The external structure of the lung is defined by the endoskeleton of the lung itself. This fibrous skeleton of interwo- ven collagen and elastin fibers (Weibel, '841, combined with the integrity of the pleural membrane, results in gross anatomical fea- tures that maintain their identity when the lungs are excised. Thus, surface topography of the lungs reflects, but is not solely depen- dent on, the lung's juxtaposition with tho- racic structures.

The series of sulci and tori (grooves and ridges) on the lateral lung surface indicate that lobes of the lung have an intimate and interlocking relationship with the adjacent ribs and chest wall (Figs. 2, 3). All 12 ribs in leporid species are associated with grooves and ridges on the lung surface. The grooves are pronounced in Lepus, less well defined in Sylvilagus, and poorly expressed in Oryctola- gus. Rib-grooves are weakly developed in Ochotona, and Spermophilus richardsonii, has no apparent grooves. Interspecific differ- ences in the depth of the costal grooves are independent of the inflation volumes used while preparing the lungs (see Materials and Methods).

Pericardial morphology In Lepus, the heart is attached firmly to

the sternum by the sternopericardial liga- ment-a fibrous portion of the pericardial sac. This ligament anchors the apex of the ventricles to the third sternebra. The two- layered (fibrous and serous) pericardial sac is attached to the sternum in a similar location in all leporid species. However, in Lepus, the pericardium is tough and opaque due to a high fibrous component of the sac, whereas in Oryctolagus, it is extremely thin and trans- parent due to a lower fibrous content. Sylvila- gus shows an intermediate condition with a relatively small fibrous contribution to the pericardium. In Ochotona and Spermophilus richardsonii, the dominant component to the pericardial sac is serous, and thus neither species shares the fibrous anchoring of the heart observed in Lepus.

Relative mass of lungs and heart The scaling relationships of mammalian

heart and lung mass were examined using Crile and Quiring's ('40) large data set, which includes 100 species, 71 genera, and 12 or- ders of mammals. The slopes for heart and lung mass relative to body mass are not sig-

nificantly different from 1.0 (Stahl, '65; Pro- thero, '76). Average lagomorph data from the present study fall within the expected mam- malian pattern of relative heart and lung mass when mapped onto the larger data set (Fig. 7). However, a comparison of heart mass among lagomorph genera with different loco- motor behaviors reveals that the endurance runner, Lepus, has a relative heart mass approximately 2-4 times larger than that of the non-endurance runners, Oiyctolugus, Syl- uilagus, and Ochotona (Table 3). The lung masses of Lepus, Ochotona, and Spermophi- lus richardsonii are those predicted by the general mammalian scaling relationship of isometry, but the lungs of Oryctolagus and SyluiZagus are relatively smaller than those predicted for their body mass (Fig. 8). As with heart mass, comparisons within the or- der Lagomorpha reveal that Lepus has a rela- tive lung mass considerably larger than that of Oryctolagus, Sylvilagus, and Ochotona (Table 3). Unfortunately, no wild Oryctola- gus specimens were available for examina- tion in order to assess a possible influence of domestication on the size of the heart and lungs. However, such comparative measure- ments of the heart are available from the literature (Hesse, '21). These data show no significant differences (Student t-test; p = 0.39; n = 7 in each catagory) in heart mass between wild and domestic Oryctola- gus. In addition, Hesse's ('21) values for the heart mass of domestic Oryctolagus are not significantly different (p = 0.40) from those measured in this study.

The difference in heart and lung size be- tween Lepus and the other lagomorph spe- cies suggests that endurance runners, gener- ally, might have relatively larger hearts and lungs. To test this prediction, the residuals of heart and lung mass were calculated for spe- cies from 28 terrestrial mammalian families and plotted for two groups of cursorial mam- mals classified according to locomotor behav- ior: 1) endurance runners and 2) sprinters (Fig. 8). Locomotor behavior is relatively uni- form within a family (with the notable excep- tion of Leporidae) and hence this taxonomic level was selected for analysis. The following group classifications are modified from Van Valkanberg ('85): 1) endurance runners: spe- cialized for sustained, aerobic running, > 500 meters (e.g., antelopes, wolves, and jack rab- bits); 2) sprinters: short-distance runners, < 500 m, short bursts of speed (e.g., ambush hunters as well as animals that sprint to

Page 11: Lung morphology of cursorial and non-cursorial mammals

LAGOMORPH LUNG MORPHOLOGY 309

1 lnsectivora

I I I I I

-1 0 1 2

Log body mass (kg)

Fig. 7. Interordinal scaling relationships of log heart mass (top) and log lung mass (bottom) against log body mass (Crile and Quiring, '40). Data from Crile and Quir- ing ('40) (squares) from which regression is calculated; Lagomorpha shown with open circle. Heart mass slope = 0.99 f 0.02; Lung mass slope = 1.02 2 0.02.

safety such as mountain lions and cotton- tails, respectively). Residuals for heart mass of endurance runners are significantly above those for sprinters (p < .05). The differences in the residuals for lung mass of the two behavioral groups follow the same trend but are only marginally significant (p = .085) (Fig. 8). These data suggest that mammalian heart and lung mass are correlated with loco- motor behavior: endurance runners have rela- tively larger hearts and lungs than species specialized for sprinting. Again, it is worth emphasizing the range of relative heart masses witnessed within leporid lagomorphs; the difference between Lepus and Oryctola-

Endurance Sprint Lagomorphs

I *

I ' .Lc i I - U r r c d a e I

I I . oc -0 4

I

I I I . Cervldae

1 . Oasyprocfidae I I . Suidae I . O C I

Fig. 8. Residuals of log heart mass (top) and log lung mass (bottom) plotted for endurance versus sprinting mammals. Residuals calculated from regressions of log heart and lung mass against log body mass for 28 terres- trial mammalian families (Crile and Quiring, '40). See text for discussion of categories. Overall mean residual and standard error (=bars) for each locomotor category are also shown. Endurance runners have significantly larger hearts than sprinters (p < .05; one-way ANOVA). Lung mass data show a similar pattern but p = .085; one-way ANOVA. For comparison, lagomorph data from this study are mapped over familial data: LC, Lepus californicus; OC, Oryctolagus cuniculus; OP, Ochotona princeps; SN, Syluilagus nuttallz; (*I indicates single pronghorn specimen, Antilocapru americanus.

gus exceeds that of all other families com- bined (Fig. 8).

Kinematic and pneumotachographic data Kinematic displacements of a half-bound-

ing rabbit (12 kph) are plotted for three rep- resentative strides (Fig. 9). The relative posi- tions of the heart, liver, and sternum (with reference to the vertebral column) are super- imposed on the simultaneous limb position and respiratory phase. As the first forelimb reaches the ground, the sternum, liver and heart move caudally simultaneously while the vertebral column continues forward until half way through the forelimb support phase. Although the heart, liver, and sternum un- dergo simultaneous displacements, it is im- portant to note that, in Oryctolagus, neither the heart nor the liver is connected to the sternum (or to one another) by any struc-

Page 12: Lung morphology of cursorial and non-cursorial mammals

310 R.S. SIMONS

TABLE 3. Body, heart, and lung masses of lagomorph species

Species (nj Body mass (g)' Heart mass (g) HeartiBody %

Lepus californicus (14) 2145.21 (90.32) 21.27 (0.94) 0.99 (0.03) Syluilagus nuttalli (7) 793.71 (54.55) 2.54 (0.47) 0.32 (0.01) Oryctolagus cuniculus (20) 2564.05 (128.59) 6.56 (0.41) 0.26 (0.01) Ochotonaprinceps (6) 152.33 (13.64) 0.67 (0.08) 0.44 (0.04)

Species (n) mass (g) mass (gIz LungIBody 5%

Lepus californicus (5) 1901.00 (106.56) 26.83 (1.64) 1.43 (0.11) Syluilagus nuttalli (4) 781.50 (90.46) 5.76 (0.92) 0.73 (0.08) Oryctolagus cuniculus (9) 2238.67 (53.93) 12.81 (0.75) 0.58 (0.04) Ochotona princeps (3) 167.33 (17.33) 1.5 (0.04) 0.97 (0.09)

Body Lung

'Standard error in parentheses. "Lung mass measured from a subset of specimens used for heart measurements.

tures other than flexible vessels and mesen- teries.

The current pneumotachographic record- ings, together with previous observations (Bramble and Carrier, '83), indicate that, in general, a running rabbit expires during the forelimb support phase and inspires while the forelimbs are off the ground (Fig. 9). The phase relationships were determined by ana- lyzing the synchronized video and pneumo- tachographic data. Respiratory volumes were then estimated in the cineradiographic se- quences from a radiodensity analysis of the films (see Materials andMethods). The pooled pneumotachographic data from three indi- viduals show a characteristic locomotor- breathing coupling ratio of 1: 1 approximately 55% of the time (i.e., 40 of 73 stride cycles). The remaining 45% of the time, the rabbits showed either an alternative ratio of 1:2 or no locomotor-respiratory coupling.

DISCUSSION Comparative morphology

The results of this study reveal several correlations between the thoracic morphol- ogy and locomotor behavior of four lago- morph species. Lepus, the most cursorial spe- cies, exhibits a distinct suite of characteristics: 1) tissue of the right cranial pulmonary lobe interposed between the heart and sternum; 2) well-defined grooves in the lung tissue for both the aorta and ribs; 3) a strong, fibrous pericardial attachment to the sternum; and 4) relatively large heart and lung mass. Syl- uilagus, a sprinter, exhibits these features to a lesser degree, whereas Oryctolagus and Ochotona, both non-cursorial species, lack most of these features entirely. These appar- ent correlative patterns between morphology and behavior are corroborated by additional

morphological and physiological data from several previous studies on lagomorphs. Gross muscular and skeletal differences among Ochotona, Lepus, and Sylvilagus (Camp and Borell, '37) parallel a morphocline of locomo- tor specialization in which Ochotona, the least cursorial, represents one extreme and Lepus, the most cursorial, represents the other (Hall and Kelson, '59). The dominant fiber type of the locomotor musculature differs signifi- cantly between Lepus and Syluilagus. The muscles of hares (Lepus) have a much greater oxidative capacity than those of cottontails (Sylvilagus), which reflects the endurance running capabilities of Lepus versus the sprinting behavior of Syluilagus (Schnurr and Thomas, '84).

The genera Lepus and Oryctolagus illus- trate two extremes of leporid behavior. In some species of Lepus, running jumps may subject the thorax to very large decelera- tional forces upon forelimb impact (i.e,, > 12 g's; Bramble, '89b). Based on their locomotor behaviors, neither Oryctolagus nor Syluila- gus is likely to experience such large impul- sive loads. In its natural habitat, Oryctolagus burrows extensively and relies on brief sprints to find shelter from predators (Grzimek, '75). Syluilagus behavior appears to be "interme- diate" and includes sprinting and hiding from predators in holes but rarely does i t dig the holes itself (Nowak, '91). The present data suggest a morphological gradient that paral- lels this behavioral gradient.

Interspecific comparisons within North American Lepus revealed that, although the body mass of the species examined (L. townsendii, L. californicus, L. americanus) varied threefold, the gross lung structure was invariant. This finding, together with the differences in lung structure between

Page 13: Lung morphology of cursorial and non-cursorial mammals

17 200

LAGOMORPH LUNG MORPHOLOGY

I I

[/- w

I

R I -1 L

rrrrrrrntrn I I

I

250

Frame

Fig. 9. Cineradiographic kinematic data from Orycto- lugus running steadily (12 kph) on a treadmill. Horizon- tal displacements of the heart, liver, sternum, and trunk (vertebra) are plotted for three and one half stride cycles (1 second). Horizontal bars indicate when the right (R) and left (L) forelimbs are in contact with the belt. Posi- tions of the sternum, liver, and heart are relative to the vertebral column: note that all three move rearward

Lepus and Oryctolagus makes it clear that lung geometry is not a size-dependent phe- nomenon within the leporids but appears instead to be strongly correlated with locomo- tor behavior.

Comparative analysis of the external pul- monary morphology within the order Lago- morpha suggests that the inflected right cra- nial lobe (the wrapped-around portion) of Lepus and Sylvilagus is a derived condition relative to the out-groups Ochotona and Sper- mophilus richardsonii. The presumed primi- tive condition is also found in geomyid and heteromyid rodents. The evidence from lago- morphs thus suggests that the degree of in- flection of the right cranial lobe is positively correlated with endurance running. This raises the question: Does this morphological-

(1 OO/sec)

300

311

Resp. Flow

Vert.

Liver Heart

Stern.

together in a closely synchronized manner. Scale bars = 1 cm. Breathing cycles are based on corresponding ra- diodensity profiles of posterior lobes of lungs (see Materi- als and Methods; Bramble and Jenkins, '931, corrobo- rated by synchronized pneumotachographic and video recordings. Dashed and solid lines demarcate bounds of inspiratory (I) and expiratory (E) flow.

locomotor correlation exist among other taxa? Within the order Carnivora, a comparison of right cranial lung morphology among several species appears to correlate with locomotor habit: dogs (endurance runners; Van Valkan- berg, '85) show some thickening of the right cranial lobe, whereas cats (sprinters; Van Valkanberg, '85) and raccoons (non-cursors; Howell, ,651, show no such elaboration of the right cranial lobe. In addition, there has been the apparent independent acquisition of an extended right cranial lobe in several species of endurance runners within the orders Artio- dactlya and Perissodactyla (Getty, '75). This evidence, taken together with the absence of this pulmonary specialization in representa- tive, nonendurance runners from the orders Chiroptera, Rodentia, and Primata (pers.

Page 14: Lung morphology of cursorial and non-cursorial mammals

312 R.S. SIMONS

obs.; Speransky, '62) provides strong support for a functional relationship between lung morphology and locomotor behavior.

In addition to the cranial lobes, which sur- round the heart anteriorly, the accessory lobe contributes posteriorly to the cardiac fossa, thus separating the heart from the dia- phragm and creating a "back-stop'' for the heart. Superficially, the gross morphologies of the accessory lobe of both Spermophilus richardsonii and the representative lago- morph are similar in caudal view (Fig. 5) . But closer examination reveals that different lobes have produced similar structures. Such a con- vergent morphological pattern wherein the heart is surrounded by lung tissue argues that the lobar structure may have some func- tional significance related to heart-lung inter- action (see below).

Airway branching patterns Evidence presented in this study shows

that divergent external pulmonary lobe mor- phologies are associated with more conserva- tive bronchial pathways (Fig. 6). The bron- chial branching patterns of leporids and the rodent out-group are more similar to one another than they are to that of Ochotona. Ochotona, although considered the primitive sister taxon of leporids, is a highly specialized animal. The locomotor behavior of the North American species, 0. princeps, includes bounding up and down rocky slopes at high altitude. It is possible that this unusual be- havioral ecology may be reflected in its unique pulmonary structure. However, for the mo- ment, such an inference is purely speculative because no Eurasian ochotonid species were available for comparison with 0. princeps.

The similarity of the branching patterns of leporids and rodents to those of canids and suids supports the hypothesis that, overall, mammalian pulmonary branching patterns are conserved. Data presented here demon- strate that the external divisions and relative sizes of the pulmonary lobes are variable by comparison. Although the branching pat- terns and airway diameters are important to airflow patterns in resting animals (Horsfield et al., '71; Snyder and Jaeger, '83; Tsuda et al., '901, the functional implications of these branching patterns in exercising mammals are little known (but see Bramble and Jen- kins, '93).

Integrated thoracic unit The anatomical proximity of lungs, heart,

and ribs implies that these structures may

function as an integrated mechanical unit during mammalian locomotion. That the heart, lungs, and ribs are intimately associ- ated is evidenced by the pronounced cardiac fossa as well as the distinct costal and aortic grooves present on the lungs (Figs. 2, 3). Likewise, the attachment of the pericardial sac to the ventral chest wall must help main- tain the heart's position within the thoracic cavity, which, in turn, influences the poten- tial mechanical interaction of the lungs and heart (Lloyd, '89; Hoffman, '93). In addition, the residuals of heart and lung mass are positively correlated indicating that for mam- mals in general and endurance runners in particular, the sizes of lungs and heart co- vary (Fig. 8). This offers further evidence that the various anatomical elements of the mammalian thoracic complex constitute an integrated unit.

The location of the lobar divisions may greatly influence thoraco-pulmonary mechan- ics. Both the right and left lungs show an abutting interface between the caudal lobes and the two cranial lobes (Figs. 3, 10). This simple contact zone may allow sliding be- tween the anterior (i.e., cranial and middle) and caudal lobes. In contrast, the division between the cranial and middle lobes is such that sliding between these lobes may be mini- mized: the cranial and middle lobes overlap obliquely in the right lung and are almost entirely fused in the left lung (Fig. 10). The nature of this lobar junction in the right lung, and the absence of an articulation in the left lung suggests that the cranial and middle lobes together may resist forelimb loads as a single unit during such times as the overlying shoulder girdle transmits the ground reaction forces to the adjacent chest wall (see Bramble and Jenkins, '93). The caudal lobes may similarly experience loads originating from the abdominal muscles and adjacent visceral mass. A likely source of such loading would be oscillations of the vis- ceral mass, thought to be associated with galloping (Bramble and Carrier, '83; Bramble, '89b).

Pneumatic stabilization hypothesis The inflected right cranial lobe, interposed

between the heart and sternum, constitutes only a small percentage of the total lung mass (approximately 1.5% dry mass in Lepus californicus). Seemingly, a symmetrical ex- tension of the right and left anterior lobes could produce an equal amount of lung tis- sue. Thus, there seems to be no simple physi-

Page 15: Lung morphology of cursorial and non-cursorial mammals

LAGOMORPH LUNG MORPHOLOGY 313 a

\

A

b

Fig. 10. Schematic representation of the right (A) and left (B) lateral views of leporid lungs. Ribs 1-6 over lie the anterior and middle lobes (shaded). These ribs directly join the sternum via short costal cartilages. Ribs 7-12 overlie the posterior lobes (unshaded) and are at- tached to the sternum via longer costal cartilages that articulate only with the posterior-most sternebra. The dashed line (a-b) indicates the axis along which the anterior and posterior lobes abut. The line (c-d) repre- sents the axis along which the anterior and middle lobes overlap (A) or are externally fused (B). The anterior lobes are loaded directly by the forelimbs. The posterior lobes are loaded directly by the abdominal viscera during ab- dominal compression.

ological (i.e., gas exchange) explanation for the asymmetrical distribution of lung tissue within the cranial lobes of the various species described here. An alternative explanation for this peculiar geometry is mechanical and nonrespiratory: the extended right cranial lobe may act as an air cushion to stabilize and protect the relatively large heart of cursors. In theory, the wrapped-around lobe provides a seamless glove into which the heart could decelerate.

But is there a need for pneumatic stabiliza- tion of the heart? Kinematic profiles of run- ning jack rabbits (Lepus californicus) point unambiguously to an answer in the afKrma-

tive. The thoracic trunk of these hares experi- ences substantial decelerations on every stride cycle, frequently punctuated by impulsive de- celerational loads with magnitudes greater than log's (Bramble, '89b). Trunk dynamics of this type will tend to induce forward iner- tial displacements of all loosely anchored in- ternal organs, including the heart. For any given trunk deceleration, the force required to check the forward surge of the heart will be directly proportional to its mass (F = ma). This is true for both endurance running and sprinting. However, any mechanism em- ployed by Lepus to stabilize its relatively large cardiac mass against inertial displace- ment should be exaggerated in its expression compared to that of leporids with relatively smaller heart masses (e.g., Oryctolagus and Syluilagus). Consistent with this idea is the observation that the pronghorn (Antilocapra) exhibits a strongly modified right cranial lobe (Figs. 2, 4) coincident with a relatively large heart mass (Fig. 8). It is also worth noting that this inflected and extended right cranial lobe is present at birth in both Lepus and Antilocapra. In both genera the young are precocial and initiate running behavior at a very early age.

Sharp vertical and horizontal decelera- tions of the trunk in jack rabbits and domes- tic rabbits, as well as in other galloping mam- mals occur over the first half of the forelimb stance phase of the stride cycle (Alexander, '77). I t is during this interval that a putative pneumatic stabilizer might act to reduce the impact load on the heart by prolonging the duration of its deceleration and/or by provid- ing a mechanical cushion between the heart and neighboring skeletal structures with which the heart might collide. Chief among these structures are the anterior ribs and sternum, positioned immediately anterior and ventral to the cardiac mass. The threat of collision will be amplified if the impact load- ing of the forelimbs tends to drive these skeletal elements rearward at the same mo- ment inertial forces are propelling the heart forward.

In order for the lungs to function as pneu- matic stabilizers of the heart (or any other visceral mass) in a galloping mammal, the lungs must contain adequate quantities of gas at the time the forelimbs impact the ground. This condition will automatically be met if the ventilation of the lungs is synchro- nized with that of the locomotor cycle at the appropriate phase angle. Indeed, a 1 : l cou-

Page 16: Lung morphology of cursorial and non-cursorial mammals

314 R.S. SIMONS

pling of gait and breathing cycles has been widely documented in galloping mammals of varying body size and taxonomic affinity (Bramble and Carrier, ’83; Bramble, ’89b; Young et al., ’92a). These data reveal that, in all cases, the onset of the expiratory phase of the breathing cycle is closely coordinated with forelimb impact; expiratory flow from the lungs continues past the point of maximum trunk deceleration. The timing of the expira- tory phase is critical to the pneumatic stabili- zation model in that pulmonary tissue will be most effective as a shock absorber when stiff- ened by positive internal pressurization. These rapid, forceful expiratory bursts wit- nessed in galloping mammals, including lepo- rids (Oryctolagus Fig. 9; Lepus californicus Bramble and Carrier, ’83), together with the timing of the bursts relative to the forelimb loading cycle, would appear to satisfy the mechanical requirements of a pneumatic sta- bilization device.

Cineradiographic kinematic data obtained from Oryctolagus running on a treadmill al- low an analysis of trunk, sternum, heart, and liver motion during exercise. The data reveal that the vertebral column shears cranially over the sternum while the liver, heart, and sternum all move caudally together during forelimb loading (Fig. 9). As the limb impacts the treadmill, ground reaction forces are transmitted from the limbs to the chest walls via the muscular linkages offered by the pec- toralis and serratus anterior muscles. If gov- erned soley by inertial forces, synchronous displacements of the liver, heart, and ster- num would be unexpected because the vis- cera are only loosely connected to the ster- num, and the liver out-weighs the heart by one and a half orders of magnitude (i.e., heart mass = 5.2 k 0.4 g; liver mass = 77 k 5 g; n = 15). The co-oscillations of the liver and heart, together with their relationship to sternal motion, strongly suggest that the ground reaction force is transmitted from the chest wall to the viscera through the stiffened, positively pressurized lungs. It ap- pears that the relatively light heart, sur- rounded by lung tissue, is swept rearward, whereas the heavier liver may be pushed caudally by the pressurized lung tissue dur- ing expiration and landing.

A model has been constructed based on these data (Fig. 11): the thoracic cage is sim- plified showing two ribs, the vertebral col- umn and sternum. Ground reaction forces will tend to collapse the thorax by changing

Vert J . 4 Rlb

1

Sternum 7

‘ GRF

Fig. 11. Schematic representation (upper) of thorax comprised of vertebral column, anterior and posterior ribs, and sternum. Heart (H) and liver are identified. Upon landing (middle), the ground reaction force (GRF) is transmitted from limb to thorax and will act to shear the vertebral column over the sternum, changing the shape of the thorax (lower) from rectangular to rhom- boid. Solid dots indicate the location of digitized points. Open dots indicate joints between bony elements. Model based in part on kinematic data presented in Figure 10.

its shape from a rectangle to a rhomboid. The lungs provide a mechanical link between the skeletal framework and the otherwise loosely connected viscera. Such a potential, pulmo- nary-based “stabilizing” link is in contrast with the idea that viscera may move simply, and inertially, inside the thorax during loco- motion (Bramble and Carrier, ’83; Bramble, ’89a).

Pneumatic stabilization of the heart, in summary, requires that the cranial, middle, and accessory lobes wrap around the heart, and that all lobes are intimately fitted against the chest walls. Under appropriately timed positive pressurization within the locomotor

Page 17: Lung morphology of cursorial and non-cursorial mammals

LAGOMORPH LUNG MORPHOLOGY 3 15

cycle (i.e., during limb loading and expira- tion), the stiffened cranial and middle lobes may provide mechanical stabilization of the heart. In species such as Lepus and some artiodactyls, the sternopericardial ligament may also contribute to cardiac positional sta- bility, as there is a mechanical link between the pericardium and the sternum as well as between the heart and vertebral column via the great vessels (i.e., “pericardial restraint”; Lloyd, ’89, p. 310).

The degree to which a mammal requires pneumatic stabilization should be reflected in the gross pulmonary morphology and the detailed relationships of the lungs to the adja- cent thoracic structures, particularly the heart and chest walls. Although such a mech- anism is expected to be most conspicuously developed among highly cursorial mammals (e.g., the extended right apical lobe), it is likely to occur to a lesser degree in all mam- mals. The cineradiographic data from Orycto- lagus reinforce this idea because, even in this non-cursorial lagomorph, there is good evi- dence of mechanical load transfer between the forelimbs and internal organs (heart and liver) via the intervening lungs. It is probable that the relatively small hearts of sprinters are more easily stabilized pneumatically by the lungs without recourse to the special modifications of the cranial lobes observed in Lepus, Antilocapra, and other strong cur- sors. Even though gross morphological differ- ences among species may be striking, all mam- mals possess lungs at least partially surrounding the heart (Fig. 2). In this sense, the lungs of mammals are positioned to offer some degree of pneumatic support to the heart even in the absence of an overtly in- flected right cranial lobe.

Summary This study has revealed important varia-

tion in lung morphology in lagomorphs that correlates with differences in locomotor be- havior. I t provides structural evidence to sug- gest that elements of the thorax (e.g., lungs, heart, ribs) should be considered a functional unit and that differences in pulmonary anatomy are usefully evaluated in the con- text of locomotor behavior and ecology. The morphological and experimental data pre- sented support a pneumatic stabilization hy- pothesis that predicts that pulmonary mor- phology, especially that of the right cranial lobe, may reflect nonrespiratory, mechanical functions associated with pneumatic, cardiac support during locomotion.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I thank D. Bramble, J . Canfield, and S. Emerson for helpful comments on the manu- script. I gratefully acknowledge valuable dis- cussions with D. Bramble. F. Jenkins, Jr. generously made available cineradiographic equipment. F. Jenkins, Jr . and A. Glazer provided critical assistance with rabbit-tread- mill experiments. J. Maughan assisted with Oryctolagus training. A. Purgue developed custom software for data acquisition. I thank the following people for their help in securing specimens for this study: R. Barker, M. Bas- tiani, P. Berger, D. Dearing, s. Fairbanks, F. Jenkins, Jr., S. Lindstedt, R. Meyers, N. Negus, T. Underwood, and B. Sheafor. Re- search supported by NSF Dissertation Im- provement Grant IBN-9321638; NSF IBN- 9318610 to D. Bramble and F. Jenkins, Jr.; University of Utah; Sigma Xi Grants-in-aid; and American Museum of Natural History Roosevelt Fund.

LITERATURE CITED Adrian, R.W. (1964) Segmental anatomy of the cat’s

lung. Am. J. Vet. Res. 251724-1733. Agostoni, P., and J . Butler (1991) Cardiopulmonary inter-

actions in exercise. In B.J. Whipp and K. Wasserman (eds.): Lung Biology in Health and Disease. Volume 52, NewYork M. Dekker, pp. 221-252.

Alexander, R. McN. (1977) Terrestrial Locomotion. In R. McN. Alexander and G. Goldspink (eds.): Mechanics and energetics of Animal Locomotion. London: Chap- man and Hall LTD.

Biju-Duval, C., H. Ennaffaa, N. Dennebouy, M. Mon- nerot, F. Mignotte, R.C. Soriguer, A.E. Gaaied, A.E. Hili, and J.C. Mounolou (1991) Mitochondrial DNA evolution in Lagomorphs: origin of systematic heter- plasmy and organization of diversity in European rab- bits. J . Molec. Evolution 33:92-102.

Bramble, D.M. (1989a) Axial-appendicular dynamics and the integration of breathing and gait in mammals. Amer. Zool. 29:171-186.

Bramble, D.M. (1989b) Cranial specialization and locomo- tor habit in the Lagomorpha. Amer. Zool. 29:303-317.

Bramble, D.M., and D.R. Carrier (1983) Running and breathing in mammals. Science 219:251-256.

Bramble, D.M., and F.A. Jenkins Jr. (1993) Mammalian locomotor-respiratoq integration: implications for dia- phragmatic and pulmonary design. Science 262:235- 240.

Burt, H.W., and R.P. Grossenheider (1980) A Field Guide to the Mammals. 3rd edition, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Camp, C.L., and A.E. Bore11 (1937) Skeletal and muscu- lar differences in the hind limbs of Lepus, Syluilagus, and Ochotona. J. Mamm. 18:315-326.

Chapman, J.A. (1975) Syluilagus nuttallii. Mammalian Species, number 56, American Society of Mammalo-

Corbet, G.B. (1983) A review of classification in the family Leporidae. Acta Zool. Fennica. 174:ll-15.

Crile, G., and D.P. Quiring (1940) A record of the body weight and certain organ and gland weights of 3690 animals. The Ohio Journal of Science. Volume XL 5:219-259.

gists.

Page 18: Lung morphology of cursorial and non-cursorial mammals

316 R.S. SIMONS

Dawson, M.R. (1981) Evolution of the modern lago- morphs. In K. Myers and C.D. MacInnes (eds.): Proceed- ings of the World Lagomorph Conference. Guelph, Ontario: University Guelph Press; pp. 1-8.

Evans, H.E. (1993) Miller’s Anatomy of the Dog. 3rd edition, Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co.

Gambaryan, P.P. (1974) How Animals Run: Anatomical Adaptations. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Getty, R. (1975) Sisson and Grossman’s The Anatomy of the Domestic Animals. 5th edition, Volume 2, Philadel- phia: W.B. Saunders.

Grzimek, B. (ed.) (1975) Grzimek’s Animal Life Encyclo- pedia. Mammals, I-IV. New York: Van Nostrand Rein- hold, Volumes 10-13.

Hall, E.R., and K.R. Kelson (1959) The Mammals of North America. New York Ronald Press.

Hesse, R. (1921) Das Herzgewicht der wirbeltiere. Zoolo- gische Jahrbucher Abteilung fur Allgeneine Zoologie und Physiologie der Tiere. 38:243-325.

Hibbard, C.W. (1963) The origin of the P3 pattern of Syluilagus, Caprolagus, Oryctolagus, and Lepus. J. Mamm. 44:l-15.

Hildebrand, M. (1968) Anatomical Preparations. Berke- ley: University of California Press.

Hoffman, E.A. (1993) Interactions: the integrated func- tioning of heart and lungs. In S. Sideman and R. Beyar (eds.): Interactive Phenomena in the Cardiac System. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 347-364.

Horsfield, K., G. Dart, D.E. Olson, G.F. Filley, and G. Cumming (1971) Models of the human bronchial tree. J . Appl. Physiol. 31:207-217.

Howell, A.B. (1965) Speed in Animals. New York: Hafner Publishing Company Incorporated.

Huey, R. (1982) Temperature, physiology, and the ecol- ogy of reptiles. In C. Cans and F.H. Pough (eds.): Biology of the Reptilia. Volume 12, New York: Aca- demic Press, pp. 25-41.

Lim, B. (1987) Lepus townsendii. Mammalian Species, number 288, American Society of Mammalogists.

Lindstedt, S.L., J.F. Hokanson, D.L. Wells, S.D. Swain, H. Hopper, and V. Navarro (1991) Running energetics in the pronghorn antelope. Nature 353: 748-750.

Lloyd, T.C. (1989) Mechanical heart-lung interactions. In S.M. Scharf and S.S. Cassidy (eds.): Heart-lung Interactions in Health and Disease. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc., pp. 309-336.

Murphy, B.G., and L.A. Engel (1980) Shrinkage of dog lobes during air-drying fixation. J . Appl. Physiol. 49: 536-537.

Nomina AnatomicaVeterinaria (1994) 4th edition. Ithaca, New York: International Committee on Veterinary Gross Anatomical Nomenclature.

Novacek, M., and A. Wyss (1986) Higher-level relation- ships of the recent Eutherian orders: morphological evidence. Cladistics 2:257-287.

Nowak, R.M. (1991) Walker’s Mammals of the World. 5th edition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Prothero, J . (1976) Heart weight as a function of body weight in mammals. Growth 43: 139-150.

Schnurr, D.L., and V.G. Thomas (1984) Histochemical properties of locomotory muscles of European hares and cottontail rabbits. Canadian J. Zool. 62:2157- 2163.

Smith, A.T., and M. Weston (1990) Ochotona princeps. Mammalian Species, number 352, American Society of Mammalogists.

Snyder, B., and M.J. Jaeger (1983) Lobar flow patterns in a hollow cast of canine central airways. J . Appl. Physiol. 45: 749-756.

Speransky, V.S. (1962) Pulmonary zones and segments in comparative-anatomical aspects (in Russian). Ar- chives of anatomy, gestology, and embryology. 43:29- 43.

Stahl, W.R. (1965) Organ weights in primates and other mammals. Science 150: 1039-1042.

Tsuda, A., R. Kamm, and J.J. Fredberg (1990) Periodic flow a t airway bifurcations. 11. Flow partitioning. J. Appl. Physiol. 62:553-561.

Van Valkanberg, C. (1985) Locomotor diversity within past and present guilds of large predatory mammals. Paleobiol. 11 :406428.

Weibel, E.R. (1984) The Pathway for Oxygen: Structure and Function in the Mammalian Respiratory System. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Weibel, E.R., and C.R. Taylor (eds.) (1981) Design of the mammalian respiratory system. Resp. Physiol. 44: 1- 164.

West, J.B., and 0. Mathieu-Costello (1992) Strength of the pulmonary blood-gas barrier. Resp. Physiol. 88141- 148.

Woldenhiwot, Z., and K. Horsfield (1978) Diameter, length, and branching angles of the upper airways in the dog lung. Resp. Physiol. 33:213-218.

Young, IS., R.D. Warren, and J.D. Altringham (1992a) Some properties of the mammalian locomotory and respiratory systems in relation to body mass. J . Exp. Biol. 164:283-294.

Young, 13, R.McN. Alexander, A.J. Woakes, P.J. Butler, and L. Anderson (1992b) The synchronization of venti- lation and locomotion in horses (Equus caballus). J. Exp. Biol. 16619-31.