l.y.m. group microliving and supportive housing€¦ · microliving and supportive housing...

16
Design V Prof. Andrea Johnson Prof. Joseph Vidich SUMMER 2013 NYCCT LUIS ENCARNACION YUDEYSI URRACA MATIAS ENCARNACION microliving and supportive housing L.Y.M. GROUP

Upload: others

Post on 14-Feb-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Design V Prof. Andrea Johnson Prof. Joseph Vidich

    SUMMER 2013NYCCT

    LUIS ENCARNACION YUDEYSI URRACAMATIAS ENCARNACIONm

    icr

    ol

    ivin

    g a

    nd

    su

    pp

    or

    tiv

    e h

    ou

    sin

    g L.Y.M. GROUP

  • MIC

    RO

    LIV

    ING

    AN

    D S

    UP

    PO

    RT

    IVE

    HO

    US

    ING

    Deinstitutionalization-Psyachiatric population fell from 90,000 to < 13,000.

    1980’s

    1973

    1954

    1950’s

    2012+

    SUMMER 2013 NYCCT

    LUIS ENCARNACION YUDEYSI URRACA MATIAS ENCARNACION

    Instead of using regular furniture, microliving uses multipurpose furniture in order to save space.

    250SF

    200SF

    Th anks to the multipurpose furniture and double height, we can give a better use to the spaces and increase density without sacrifi cing quality of life for tenants. Th erefore, in micro-living we can do more with less space.

    Prof. Andrea Johnson & Joseph Vidich Design V

    un

    it &

    fu

    rn

    itu

    re

    siz

    e c

    om

    pa

    ris

    ion

    an

    d c

    on

    tra

    st

    Local Law 24-Dramatic reduction in the number of SRO’S

    Mayor Lindsay established a new unit to focus on the needs of SRO’S tenats in NYC.-SRO Loan Program Moved to HPD.

    First Non-Profit group invest-ing in SRO’s program.Project FIND & St.Francis Friends of the Poor.

    Between 1982 and 1987 NYC dauly shelter population increased by more than 250% and the attempt to make per-manent the 1985 moratorium on SRO conversion and demoli-tion was overturned on appeal by a NYS Court on 1989.

    By the end of 2012, there were over 45000 units of supportive housing in NY.

    SUPPORTIVE HOUSING MICRO-LIVING

    The connection between Micro-Living and supportive housing will give the tenant a better life quality ona re-quired amount of space to live.

    Required space for a single person to live.

    Sustainable

    The goal of Microunits is to create opportunities for urban farming for a better quality of life.

    The Department of Housing Preservation, the Citizens Housing Planning Council and NYC Development Commissioner Matthew Wambua just announced a new request for proposals for two or three more micro-unit developments for the city.

    CO

    MM

    UN

    ITY

    IMP

    AC

    T O

    F S

    UP

    PO

    RT

    IVE

    HO

    US

    ING

    AN

    D M

    ICR

    OL

    IVIN

    G

    SUPPORTIVE HOUSING TIMELINE IN NYC (1950 to Present)

    MICRO-LIVING IN NYC

    SUPPORTIVE HOUSING SPACES

  • YUDEYSI URRACA DAMIAN ENCARNACION MATIAS ENCARNACION

    Prof. Andrea Johnson & Joseph Vidich Design V

    SUMMER 2013 NYCCT

    CO

    NC

    EP

    T M

    OD

    EL

    S

    SUPPORT PROGRESS PERCEPTION harmony separation SPACE HEIGHT SUPPORT

  • Prof. Andrea Johnson & Joseph VidichDesign V

    SUMMER 2013 NYCCT

    LUIS ENCARNACION YUDEYSI URRACA MATIAS ENCARNACION

    PR

    OJ

    EC

    T P

    RO

    GR

    AM

    USERS IDENTIFICATION

    PROBLEM STATEMENT

    How can cohabiting with low-income working adults provide a positive im-pact on them?

    HOMELESS YOUTHHomeless youth are a unique subset among the larger group of people experiencing home-lessness. Many of their health concerns are similar to homeless adults, however, due to their young age, high-risk behaviors and legal concerns, homeless youth require specialized ser-vices. Health care and social services geared exclusively to homeless youth can provide a place for youth to obtain needed services without the help of parents, to ensure successful transitions from childhood to adulthood, and from homelessness to being housed.

    LOW-INCOME WORKING ADULTS (Single & With Families) A non-elderly household with at least one child and one or more working adults that sub-sists on an income at or below twice the offi cial poverty line, the level at which most fami-lies are no longer eligible for federal support. About 60 percent of low-income families have at least one adult working full-time, year-round, another 10 percent regularly work at least half-time.

    OCCUPANCY RATIO

    WHY?

    0.00%

    20.00%

    40.00%

    60.00%

    80.00%

    100.00%

    30.5% Low-IncomeAdults under strain

    19.8% HomelessYouth

    NYC POPULATION

    PROGRAM DISTRIBUTION DIAGRAM

    According to NYC Population’s census of 2012 the 30.5% is consid-ered low-income adults. Also, by 2012, 19.8% of the population in NY were Homeless Youth, being this less than the 30.5% of Low-In-come Adults.

    Single Units 28%

    Corridors 10%

    Green Spaces 7%

    Double Units 34%

    Health Room 6%

    Computer Lab

    Offi ces 5%

    Library 5%

    A young adult with supportive needs re-quires an encouraging living environment.

    Mic

    ro

    liv

    ing Su

    pp

    or

    tiv

    e H

    ou

    sin

    g

    USER NEEDS

    PROJECT PROPOSAL

    HOMELESS YOUTH LOW-INCOME WORKING ADULTS

  • Prof. Andrea Johnson & Joseph VidichDesign V

    SUMMER 2013 NYCCT

    LUIS ENCARNACION YUDEYSI URRACA MATIAS ENCARNACION

    PR

    OJ

    EC

    T P

    RO

    GR

    AM

    PROGRAM BREAKDOWN

    FLOOR AREA AVAILABLE: SQUARE FT SET BACK FEET TOTAL SF LOT PERCENTAGE TO BE USED SF NOT TO BE USED Level 1-4: 4110 15 6000 69% 705 Level 4-above: 3204 PRIVATE SPACES: SF PER UNIT # OF UNITS ABOVE 4TH FLOOR # OF UNITS FLOORS 1-4 Total SF: Single Units: 200 5 8 1600 Family Units 400 6 9 3600 ADA Units 500 0 2 1000TOTAL UNIT SF :6200 PUBLIC SPACES: Corridors: 900Healthroom: 500Library: 400Comp. Lab: 400Green area: 600Offi ces 400TOTAL: 3200

    SPACES SF PER AREA PERCENTAGESingle Units homeless 1215 13%Single Units low-income 1215 13%Family Units 2970 31%ADA units 430 5% Corridors: 900 9% Healthroom: 500 5%Library: 400 4% Comp. Lab: 400 4%Green area: 600 6% Offi ces 400 4% Community Room 500 5%TOTAL: 9530

    Level 1 Level 2 Level 2.1

    Level 3 Level 4 Level 4.1

    Level 5 Legend

    Plans & Massing Program Diagrams

  • YUDEYSI URRACA DAMIAN ENCARNACION MATIAS ENCARNACION

    Prof. Andrea Johnson & Joseph Vidich Design V

    SUMMER 2013 NYCCT

    SIT

    E A

    NA

    LY

    SIS

    & M

    AS

    SIN

    G

    Zoning Information Existing Zoning District: R6B

    Residential FAR: 2.0 Lot Coverage: 80%Base Height: 30ft (min) – 40ft (max)Building Height: 50ft (max)Building Setbacks: 15ft (min) - 20ft (max)

    Site Information

    178

    6

    Site Analysis

    Transportation

    Th e Greenest Block In Brooklyn Winne 1998,1999.

    Location: 390 State St, Brooklyn 11217Block: 178 Lot: 6Lot Area: 6,000Sq FtCurrrent Zoning: R6BZoning map # 16C

    Proposed Zoning District: R6A

    Residential FAR: 3.0 Bonus FAR: 3.6( Inclusionary Housing )

    Lot Coverage: 80% Base Height: 30ft (min) – 40ft (max)Building Height: 70ft (max)Building Setbacks: 15ft (Narrow Street)

    Th e site is currently a parking lot, sor-rounded by Bond and State St.

    Site Observation

    Based on an observation of the site sorroundings we proposed our building to be green since this block was the greenest block in Brooklyn in 1998 and 1999. Our intention is that our building take back this block to what it was before and set a point of interest in the area.

    Solar Panels Water Heaters DC power

    Insulated Glass Windows Reduces energy use

    Indoor Enviromental Quality

    Its very viable to approach to the site, with three main transportation service off ered to the community.

    55' - 8 1/4"

    82'- 7

    1/2"

    19'- 2

    3/8"

    29' - 0"

    58' - 0"

    41' - 0"

    12' - 0"

    70' - 0"

    massing example with existing zoning dis-trict massing proposed zoning district

  • Prof. Andrea Johnson & Joseph VidichDesign V

    SUMMER 2013 NYCCT

    LUIS ENCARNACION YUDEYSI URRACA MATIAS ENCARNACION

    UPCOMP.LAB

    COMMUNITYROOM

    ADA UNITADA UNITADA UNIT

    OFFICE OFFICE

    LIBRARY

    DN

    DN

    UPFAMILY UNIT B1

    FAMILY UNIT B1

    FAMILY UNIT B1

    FAMILY UNIT B1

    SINGLE UNIT A1

    SINGLE UNIT A1

    DN

    UP

    UP

    UP

    UP

    UP

    SINGLE UNIT A1HEALTH ROOM

    SINGLE UNIT A1

    FAMILY UNIT B2SINGLE UNIT A2

    SINGLE UNIT A2

    FAMILY UNIT B2

    FAMILY UNIT B1

    SINGLE UNIT A2FAMILY UNIT B1

    SINGLE UNIT A2

    FAMILY UNIT B2

    SINGLE UNIT A2

    CORRIDOR

    SINGLE UNIT A2

    FAMILY UNIT B1SINGLE UNIT A2SINGLE UNIT A2

    LEVEL 1 SCALE: 1/8” = 1’ 0”

    LEVEL 2 SCALE: 1/8” = 1’ 0”

    LEVEL 2.1SCALE: 1/8” = 1’ 0”

    LEVEL 3SCALE: 1/8” = 1’ 0”

    FLO

    OR

    PLA

    N D

    RAW

    ING

    S

  • Prof. Andrea Johnson & Joseph VidichDesign V

    SUMMER 2013 NYCCT

    LUIS ENCARNACION YUDEYSI URRACA MATIAS ENCARNACION

    UP

    UP

    FAMILY UNIT B2

    SINGLE UNIT A2SINGLE UNIT A2

    FAMILY UNIT B2

    SINGLE UNIT A1

    SINGLE UNIT A1SINGLE UNIT A2 SINGLE UNIT A2

    FAMILY UNIT B2

    CORRIDOR

    DN

    DN

    FAMILY UNIT B1

    FAMILY UNIT B2

    FAMILY UNIT B1

    FAMILY UNIT B1

    SINGLE UNIT A1

    SINGLE UNIT A1

    LEVEL 4 SCALE: 1/8” = 1’ 0”

    LEVEL 4.1SCALE: 1/8” = 1’ 0”

    SITESCALE: 1/16” = 1’ 0”

    FLO

    OR

    PLA

    N D

    RAW

    ING

    S (C

    ON

    T.)

    UP

    FAMILY UNIT B2

    FAMILY UNIT B1

    SINGLE UNIT A2

    SING

    LE UN

    IT A2

    FAMILY UNIT B2SINGLE UNIT A2

    SING

    LE UN

    IT A2

    CORRIDOR

    STATE STREET

    BOND STREET

  • Level 10' - 0"

    Level 212' - 0"

    Level 329' - 0"

    Level 441' - 0"

    Level 2.121' - 0"

    Level 4.150' - 0"

    Level 558' - 0"

    Roof70' - 0"

    BULKHEAD77' - 0"

    7' -

    0"12

    ' - 0

    "17

    ' - 0

    "12

    ' - 0

    "17

    ' - 0

    "12

    ' - 0

    "

    8' -

    0"9'

    - 0"

    8' -

    0"9'

    - 0"

    BU

    ILD

    ING

    SE

    CT

    ION

    S

    Prof. Andrea Johnson & Joseph Vidich Design V

    SUMMER 2013 NYCCT

    LUIS ENCARNACION YUDEYSI URRACA MATIAS ENCARNACION

    Level 10' - 0"

    Level 212' - 0"

    Level 329' - 0"

    Level 441' - 0"

    Level 2.121' - 0"

    Level 4.150' - 0"

    Level 558' - 0"

    Roof70' - 0"

    BULKHEAD77' - 0"

    12' -

    0"

    17' -

    0"

    12' -

    0"

    17' -

    0"

    12' -

    0"

    7' -

    0"

    9' -

    0"8'

    - 0"

    9' -

    0"8'

    - 0"

    DN

    UP

    UP

    UP

    UP

    UP

    SING

    LE U

    NIT

    A1H

    EALT

    H R

    OO

    M

    - ---

    SING

    LE U

    NIT

    A1

    FAM

    ILY

    UNIT

    B2

    SING

    LE U

    NIT

    A2

    SING

    LE U

    NIT

    A2

    FAM

    ILY

    UNIT

    B2

    FAM

    ILY

    UNIT

    B1

    - ---

    WEST TO EAST SECTION

    DN

    UP

    UP

    UP

    UP

    UP

    SIN

    GLE

    UN

    IT A

    1H

    EALT

    H R

    OO

    M

    SIN

    GLE

    UN

    IT A

    1

    FAM

    ILY

    UN

    IT B

    2SI

    NG

    LE U

    NIT

    A2

    SIN

    GLE

    UN

    IT A

    2

    FAM

    ILY

    UN

    IT B

    2

    FAM

    ILY

    UN

    IT B

    1

    - ---

    - ---

    EAST TO WEST SECTION

  • Prof. Andrea Johnson & Joseph VidichDesign V

    SUMMER 2013 NYCCT

    LUIS ENCARNACION YUDEYSI URRACA MATIAS ENCARNACION

    A1 - Double height single unit

    A2 - Single height single unit

    B1 - family unit

    PLANS

    SECTIONS

    RENDERINGS

    USERSHomeless or Low Income Single-Parent with one child less than 13 years old.

    Homeless or Low Income single person

    Homeless or Low Income Couple with one teenager more than 13 years old.

    11’x 22’+11’ x 13’Deck= 374 S.F.

    11’x 22’= 242 S.F.

    EXAMPLE OF LOCATION IN PLANS

    LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN

    A1 - Double height single unit A2 - Single height single unit B1 - family unitU

    NIT

    S

    EXAMPLE OF ANOTHER A2 UNIT

    18’x 22’= 396 S.F.

  • Prof. Andrea Johnson & Joseph VidichDesign V

    SUMMER 2013 NYCCT

    LUIS ENCARNACION YUDEYSI URRACA MATIAS ENCARNACION

    A.D.A. unitB2 - family unit

    PLANS

    SECTIONS

    RENDERINGS

    USERSHomeless or Low Income Sin-gleParent with two children less than 13 years old.

    Homeless or Low Income Dis-abled Person

    18’x 22’= 396 S.F.

    B2 - FAMILY UNIT

    A.D.A. UNIT

    EXAMPLE OF LOCATION IN PLANS

    LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN

    LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN

    18’x 22’= 396 S.F.

    UN

    ITS

  • Prof. Andrea Johnson & Joseph VidichDesign V

    SUMMER 2013 NYCCT

    LUIS ENCARNACION YUDEYSI URRACA MATIAS ENCARNACION

    INTERIOR HALLWAY RENDEINGSB

    UIL

    DIN

    G R

    EN

    DE

    RIN

    GS

    IN THE HALLWAY DESIGN WE INTEGRATED THE EXTERI-OR FACADE DESIGN CONCEPT IN ORDER TO MAKE THE WHOLE BUILDING HAVE AN UNIFORM DESIGN. THEREFORE, BY MAKING USES OF SAME MATERIALS AND COLOR FROM THE EXTERIOR FACADE SUCH AS, BLUE MULLIENS, GREEN WALLS, AND GLASS, AND THE USE OF SAME PATTERS AS THE EXTERIOR FACADE, WE CREATED A VERY INTERESTING AND VERY UNIFORM HALLWAY DESIGN.

  • Prof. Andrea Johnson & Joseph VidichDesign V

    SUMMER 2013 NYCCT

    LUIS ENCARNACION YUDEYSI URRACA MATIAS ENCARNACION

    EXEPTIONS

    UNITS FACADE CONCEPTF

    AC

    AD

    E D

    ES

    IGN

    CO

    NC

    EP

    T

    SINGLE HIGHTS SINGLE UNITS ARE GOING TO HAVE BIG OPENINGS WITH LIGHTS WALLS AROUND THE WHOLE UNIT.

    DOUBLE HIGHT FAMILY UNITS ARE GOING TO HAVE GREEN WALL WITH FEW OPENINGS.

    DOUBLE HEIGHT HALL WAYS ARE GOING TO HAVE A BIG OPENING WITH MASIVE WALLS AROUND THEN AND A MULLION PATTERN IN THE CENTER.

    DOUBLE HEIGHT SINGLE UNITS ARE GOING TO HAVE MASIVE WALLS AROUND AND AS OPEN-INGS, A SMALL ONE IN THE TOP AND A HUGE ONE IN THE BOTTON SINGLE HEIGHT FAMILY

    UNITS ARE GOING TO HAVE GREEN WALL WITH SMALL OPENING WINDOWS DIFFERENT FROM THE DOUBLE HEIGHT FAMILY UNITS.

    ADA UNITS ARE GOING TO HAVE BIG WINDOW OPENINGS WITH A MUL-LION GRID AND A MAS-SIVE WALL BASE AT THE BOTTON

    LIBRARY AND COMPUTER LAB ARE GOING TO HAVE MASSIVE CUBE WALLS AROUND WITH A BIG OPENING IN THE CEN-TER AND A MULLIEN PAT-TERS SIMILAR TO DOUBLE HEIGHT ALLWAY.

    EVERY UNIT IN OUR BUILDING IS GOING TO HAVE ITS OUN TYPE OF FACADE IN ORDER TO CREATE HARMONY, WHICH WAS ONE OF OUR CONCEPT WORDS AT THE BEGGINING OF THIS PROJECT. THE DEFINITION OF HAR-MONY IS TO COMBINE DIFFERENT TYPES AND MAKE IT PLEASENT TO THE EYES. THERE-FORE BY COMBINIG DIFFERENT KIND OF FA-CADE AND USE REPETITION WE CREATED A RYTHM.

    THE ONLY UNITS THAT THE FACADE ARE GOING TO CHANGE ARE THE ONES IN WHICH THE BLUE PROGRE-SIVE PATH IS GOIN TO PASS THRU THEM. THIS IS THE WAY IN WICH WE DECIDE TO SHOW PROGRESION IN THE BUILDING. THIS WILL BE REPEATED IN ALL THREE FACES OF OUR BUILDING.

  • Prof. Andrea Johnson & Joseph VidichDesign V

    SUMMER 2013 NYCCT

    LUIS ENCARNACION YUDEYSI URRACA MATIAS ENCARNACION

    EL

    EV

    AT

    ION

    S

    EAST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION

  • Prof. Andrea Johnson & Joseph VidichDesign V

    SUMMER 2013 NYCCT

    LUIS ENCARNACION YUDEYSI URRACA MATIAS ENCARNACION

    EXTERIOR rENDERINGSB

    UIL

    DIN

    G R

    EN

    DE

    RIN

    GS

  • 0cover page1BOARD12ASSIGM4 23BOARDS24ASSIGM4 15FLOOR PLANS6BUILDING SECTIONS7UNITS8.1EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR RENDERINGS 28desing concept9EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR RENDERINGS 310EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR RENDERINGS 111modelboard