m arch living architecture

109
lecture Living Architecture Rachel Armstrong TEDGlobal Fellow, Teaching Fellow, AVATAR group The Bartlett School of Architecture [email protected]

Upload: rachel-armstrong

Post on 19-May-2015

9.823 views

Category:

Design


4 download

DESCRIPTION

Presentation slides for MArch Bartlett Students of Neil Spiller's AVATAR group. An outline of Living Architecture, the kinds of processes, materials and examples of architectural design outcomes.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: M Arch Living Architecture

MArch lecture

Living ArchitectureRachel Armstrong

TEDGlobal Fellow, Teaching Fellow, AVATAR groupThe Bartlett School of Architecture

[email protected]

Page 2: M Arch Living Architecture

Living Cities

• “Historically, the city has been seen as either mechanistic or biological in its order”

Neil Spiller, Digital Dreams

Page 3: M Arch Living Architecture

Urban Paleontology

Ming Tang, Dihua Yang, 2008

Page 4: M Arch Living Architecture

Biological Formalism

• Use of biological metaphor• Common conceptual framework• Doctrine that formal structure rather than

content is what should be represented • Shared methodological tools• the practice of scrupulous adherence to

prescribed or external forms• Top-down process

Page 5: M Arch Living Architecture

Molecular House, Mohammed Alkayer

Growing Architecture

Page 6: M Arch Living Architecture

City as An Organism

• “... Like any organism [a city] has a circulatory system in its streets, railroads and rivers, a brain in its universities and planning offices, a digestive system in its food distribution and sewage lines, muscles in its industrial centres and any city worthy of the name has an erogenous zone ...”

Matthew Dumont, Arthropods

Page 7: M Arch Living Architecture

MEtreePOLIS, Matthias Hollwich

Page 8: M Arch Living Architecture

MEtreePOLIS, Matthias Hollwich

Page 9: M Arch Living Architecture

Inertia of Real Cities

• The city is not an organism – it is made of inert materials

• The built environment consists of unrelated objects that are secondarily connected to each other to create the urban landscape

• Apparent vitality conferred by the behaviour of living systems within the built environment

Page 10: M Arch Living Architecture

Brazil, Terry Gilliam

Page 11: M Arch Living Architecture

Contemporary Materials

• Materials of built environment are not dynamic, they are simple, including the current generation of ‘smart’ materials

• Limited meaningful embodied integration of different media

• Currently parallel architectural spaces are accessed by cross-referral, analogy, metaphor & interfaced via human ‘experience’

Page 12: M Arch Living Architecture

Twelve Monkeys, Terry Gilliam

Page 13: M Arch Living Architecture

Connecting Artifice & Nature

• Requires a fundamental change in the organization model that describes the relationship between building materials and the environment

Page 14: M Arch Living Architecture

Hylazoic Soil, Philip Beesley

Page 15: M Arch Living Architecture

Living Architecture

• New model of sustainable architectural practice that directly connects the built environment to nature

• The unit of Living Architecture is the Architectural protocell

Page 16: M Arch Living Architecture

Architectural Protocell

• A protocell is a primordial atomic globule, connected to the environment through the languages of physics and chemistry. Uniquely, protocell technology possesses material complexity, and is capable of self-organisation

Page 17: M Arch Living Architecture

Architectural Protocell

• Protocells can be made of pre-existing biological materials such as protoplasm – for example, the protoplasm of the green algae Bryopsis and slime mould – or can be fabricated from scratch using organic and inorganic chemicals

Page 18: M Arch Living Architecture

Architectural Protocell

• This gives rise to the possibility of Protocell Architecture, as protocell units work together to generate their output

Page 19: M Arch Living Architecture

Manifestofor protocell architecture: against biological formalism

• We want to change the world with almost nothing.

• It is possible to generate complex materials and architectures through harnessing the fundamental energetics of matter. In other words, doing more with less

Page 20: M Arch Living Architecture

Manifestofor protocell architecture: against biological formalism

• What we call protocell architecture is, at root, a piece of Dadaist and Surrealist research, in which all the lofty questions have become involved

• The novel self-assembling material systems that arise from protocell architectural practice make no reference to, nor attempt to mimic bio-logic. As such, protocell architecture is an alien to the natural world, yet speaks the same fundamental languages of chemistry and physics. The results of these conversations and interactions constitute a parallel biology and second biogenesis whose aesthetics are described by Surrealist agendas

Page 21: M Arch Living Architecture

Manifestofor protocell architecture: against biological formalism

• Architecture is dead, long live architecture• Protocells constitute a disruptive technology for

architectural practice since they are capable of reaching a transition point when evolution emerges within the system, the outcome of which is unpredictable and therefore offer novel and surprising ways of constructing architecture that will succeed and replace conventional technologies

Page 22: M Arch Living Architecture

Manifestofor protocell architecture: against biological formalism

• Protocell architecture swallows contrast and all contradictions including the grotesquery and illogicality of life

• Protocell technology is at the beginning of an evolutionary pathway that is connected to and dependent on the environmental conditions around it. The responsiveness of protocells to stimuli, means they can be regarded as computing units. Consequently, protocells do not seek to generate idealized architectural forms but reflect and interpret the full spectrum of the processes they encounter in the real world

Page 23: M Arch Living Architecture

Manifestofor protocell architecture: against biological formalism

• What is generally termed life is really a frothy nothing that merely connects

• Protocell technology offers an opportunity for architects to engage with the evolutionary process itself. Unlike natural biological systems that evolve randomly according to Darwinian evolution, protocell technology allows deliberate and specific interventions throughout the entire course of its coming into being. By moving and metabolizing, protocells may form the basis for a synthetic surface ecology. These interventions are the basis of what we call protocell architecture

Page 24: M Arch Living Architecture

Manifestofor protocell architecture: against biological formalism

• We do not wish to imitate nature, we do not wish to reproduce nature, we want to produce architecture in the way a plant produces its fruit. We do not want to depict, we want to produce directly, not indirectly, since there is no trace of abstraction. We call it Protocell Architecture

• Protocell Architecture embodies the principles of emergence, bottom-up construction techniques and self-assembly. It is equipped with design ‘handles’ that enable the architect to persuade rather than dominate the outcome of the system through physical communication. As such, these systems are unknowable, surprising and anarchic.

Page 25: M Arch Living Architecture

Manifestofor protocell architecture: against biological formalism

• We want to collage effective biological machinery that composes itself according to the drivers of design

• Protocell Architecture is chemically programmable and operates in keeping with the organizing principles of physics and chemistry

Page 26: M Arch Living Architecture

Manifestofor protocell architecture: against biological formalism

• We want over and over again, movement and connection; we see peace only in dynamism

• Protocell Architecture gathers its energy from the tension that resides at an interface between two media such as oil and water, which causes movement, disruption and change. Protocell Architecture resists the equilibrium since this constitutes death

Page 27: M Arch Living Architecture

Manifestofor protocell architecture: against biological formalism

• The head is round, so thoughts can revolve. The head of architecture is green, robust, synthesized and exists everywhere simultaneously, whether it is large or very, very small

• Protocell Architecture is fashioned from ‘low tech biotech’ characterised by ubiquitous, durable and affordable materials

Page 28: M Arch Living Architecture

Manifestofor protocell architecture: against biological formalism

• We wish to blur the firm boundaries, which self-certain people delineate around all we can achieve

• Protocell Technology becomes a co-author in the production of architecture through the possession of living properties and its ability to self-assemble

Page 29: M Arch Living Architecture

Manifestofor protocell architecture: against biological formalism

• We tell you the tricks of today are the truths of tomorrow

• Protocell Architecture is better adapted to the prevailing physical and social conditions since it is founded on a new set of technologies that are not ‘alive’ but which possess some of the properties of living systems. As such these technologies are qualitatively different to the industrial and digital technologies that have become the mainstream tools of the twentieth century

Page 30: M Arch Living Architecture

Manifestofor protocell architecture: against biological formalism

• We will work with things that we do not want to design, things that already have systematic existence

• Protocell Technology has the capacity to transform and modify existing building materials and architecture with the potential for surprise

Page 31: M Arch Living Architecture

Manifestofor protocell architecture: against biological formalism

• You know as much as we do that architecture is nothing more than rhythms and connections

• Protocell Architecture embodies the complexity of materials in a literal, rather than metaphorical manner and becomes a physical part of our existence

Page 32: M Arch Living Architecture

Manifestofor protocell architecture: against biological formalism

• We will construct exquisite corpses not dead but alive and useful

• Protocell Architecture is central to the understanding of living systems. It allows us to work with and enhance the unavoidable inconsistency which is the essence of life itself

Page 33: M Arch Living Architecture

Manifestofor protocell architecture: against biological formalism

• We deal in a second aesthetic, one that initiates beginnings and moulds with natural forces

• Protocell Architecture is connected to the environment through constant conversation and energy exchange with the natural world in a series of chemical interactions called ‘metabolism’. This involves the conversion of one group of substances into another, either by absorbing or releasing energy - doing more with less

Page 34: M Arch Living Architecture

Architecture as Biosphere

• Living Architecture is part of the biosphere• Integrated through common chemical

language called metabolism • Metabolism connects living systems to the

environment

Page 35: M Arch Living Architecture

Metabolic Materials

• Materials that are capable of metabolism• These materials are ‘living’ and can be

thought of as Living Technology

Page 36: M Arch Living Architecture

Living Technology

• Possess some but not all of the properties of living systems

• Qualitatively different to 20th century technologies with which we are familiar

• Capable of growth, movement, sensitivity, repair, complex behaviour and even reproduction

Page 37: M Arch Living Architecture

Low Tech Biotech

• For practical purposes in the built environment, these materials need to be robust, safe, ubiquitous and inexpensive

Page 38: M Arch Living Architecture

Innovation by Design

• Use existing metabolic systems and materials to create the desired outcome:

• Crystal growth (biomorphic)• ‘Cellular Gardening’ of indigenous

microorganisms for selected characteristics

Page 39: M Arch Living Architecture

Roger Hiorns, Seizure

Seizure, Roger Hiorns

Page 40: M Arch Living Architecture

Seizure, Roger Hiorns

Page 41: M Arch Living Architecture

Seizure, Roger Hiorns

Page 42: M Arch Living Architecture

Silicon-Fixing Bacteria

Silicon Fixing Bacteria, Simon Park

Page 43: M Arch Living Architecture
Page 44: M Arch Living Architecture

Dune, Magnus Larsson

Page 45: M Arch Living Architecture

Dune, Magnus Larsson

Page 46: M Arch Living Architecture

Dune, Magnus Larsson

Page 47: M Arch Living Architecture

Bioluminescence

Bioluminescent Bacteria, Simon Park

Page 48: M Arch Living Architecture

Bioluminescent Bacteria, Simon Park

Page 49: M Arch Living Architecture

Bioluminescent Bacteria, Simon Park

Page 50: M Arch Living Architecture

Bioluminescent Bacteria, Simon Park

Page 51: M Arch Living Architecture

Bioluminescent Bacteria, Simon Park

Page 52: M Arch Living Architecture

Bioluminescent Bacteria, Simon Park

Page 53: M Arch Living Architecture

Bioluminescent Bacteria, Simon Park

Page 54: M Arch Living Architecture

Bioluminescent Bacteria, Simon Park

Page 55: M Arch Living Architecture

Bioluminescent Bacteria, Simon Park

Page 56: M Arch Living Architecture

Slime Mould

Slime Mould, Shin Tseng

Page 57: M Arch Living Architecture
Page 58: M Arch Living Architecture

Slime Mould, Shin Tseng

Page 59: M Arch Living Architecture

Slime Mould, Simon Park

Page 60: M Arch Living Architecture

Slime Mould, Simon Park

Page 61: M Arch Living Architecture

Slime Mould, Soichiro Tsuda

Page 62: M Arch Living Architecture

Slime Mould, Soichiro Tsuda

Page 63: M Arch Living Architecture

Slime Mould, Soichiro Tsuda

Page 64: M Arch Living Architecture

Slime Mould, Soichiro Tsuda

Page 65: M Arch Living Architecture

Slime Mould, Soichiro Tsuda

Page 66: M Arch Living Architecture
Page 67: M Arch Living Architecture
Page 68: M Arch Living Architecture
Page 69: M Arch Living Architecture

Diatoms

Page 70: M Arch Living Architecture

Diatom Factory, Shin Tseng

Page 71: M Arch Living Architecture

Diatom Factory, Shin Tseng

Page 72: M Arch Living Architecture

Diatom Factory, Shin Tseng

Page 73: M Arch Living Architecture

Diatom Factory, Shin Tseng

Page 74: M Arch Living Architecture

Diatom Factory, Shin Tseng

Page 75: M Arch Living Architecture

Plant/Human Nail, Shin Tseng

Page 76: M Arch Living Architecture

Bryopsis

Bryopsis, Alexandru Vladimirescu

Page 77: M Arch Living Architecture

Bryopsis, Alexandru Vladimirescu

Page 78: M Arch Living Architecture

Bryopsis & GFP Modified Bacteria, Alexandru Vladimirescu

Page 79: M Arch Living Architecture

Bryopsis & Magnetic Particles, Alexandru Vladimirescu

Page 80: M Arch Living Architecture
Page 81: M Arch Living Architecture

Bryopsis, Andrew Paine

Page 82: M Arch Living Architecture

Coralina

Coralina, Alexandru Vladimirescu

Page 83: M Arch Living Architecture

Coralina, Alexandru Vladimirescu

Page 84: M Arch Living Architecture

Limestone

Page 85: M Arch Living Architecture

Living Rocks

Blue Green Algae, Alexandru Vladimirescu

Page 86: M Arch Living Architecture
Page 87: M Arch Living Architecture

Stromatolite

Page 88: M Arch Living Architecture
Page 89: M Arch Living Architecture
Page 90: M Arch Living Architecture
Page 91: M Arch Living Architecture
Page 92: M Arch Living Architecture

Innovation by Invention

• Low tech, chemical computers• Protocell technology: an example of Living

Technology• NO DNA• Based on the chemistry of oils• Programmable using inorganic chemistry• Can produce architectural outcomes

Page 93: M Arch Living Architecture

Protocell Technology

Protocell, Martin Hanczyc

Page 94: M Arch Living Architecture

Protocell Cluster

Protocells, Martin Hanczyc

Page 95: M Arch Living Architecture

Modification of Environment

Protocells, Martin Hanczyc

Page 96: M Arch Living Architecture

Skin Shedding

Protocell, Martin Hanczyc

Page 97: M Arch Living Architecture

Producing Solid Material

Page 98: M Arch Living Architecture

Protocell Pearl

Page 99: M Arch Living Architecture

Protocell Shell

Page 100: M Arch Living Architecture

Sustainably Reclaiming Venice

• Protocell technology programmed to move away from light and deposit limestone under the wood pile foundations of the historic city

• Generation of an artificial reef• New ecological niches for marine organisms

Page 101: M Arch Living Architecture

Protocell Technology

Protocell technology Programmed to create solid out of dissolved carbon dioxideCourtesy Christian Kerrigan

Page 102: M Arch Living Architecture

Protocell Photosensitivity

Protocell technology under wood piles underneath VeniceProgrammed to move away from light filled canals to darkened foundationsCourtesy Christian Kerrigan

Page 103: M Arch Living Architecture

Protocell Activation

Protocell technology petrifying foundationsProtocell technology forms solid materials by crystallization and accretionCourtesy Christian Kerrigan

Page 104: M Arch Living Architecture

Venetian Artificial Reef

Artificial Reef underneath VeniceSensitive to environmental variables and local marine ecologyCourtesy Christian Kerrigan

Page 105: M Arch Living Architecture

Stop Press: Plastic Protocells

Plastic coated oil droplet, Andrew Loxley

Page 106: M Arch Living Architecture

Stop Press: Protein Protocells

Protein coated oil droplet, Andrew Loxley

Page 107: M Arch Living Architecture

E-ink Jacket

Page 108: M Arch Living Architecture

Summary

• Living Architecture is a new way of thinking about creating the built environment since it uses a bottom up approach to construction

• Living Architecture is in direct conversation with the environment through the physics and chemistry of the fundamental matter which can be thought of an ‘architectural protocell’

Page 109: M Arch Living Architecture

Acknowledgments

• Martin Hanczyc• Alexandru Vladimirescu• Neil Spiller• Christian Kerrigan• Shin Tseng• Andrew Paine• Andrew Loxley• Soichiro Tsuda• Simon Park• Matthias Hollwich