m i n u t e s - park ridge 9 2013.pdf · m i n u t e s committee of the ... bob rhine, 1212 brophy,...

CITY OF PARK RIDGE

505 BUTLER PLACE PARK RIDGE, IL 60068

TEL: 847- 318-5200 FAX: 847- 318-5300 TDD: 847/-318-5252 www.parkridge.us

M I N U T E S

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING OF THE PARK RIDGE CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC WORKS AND PUBLIC SAFETY

CITY HALL

COUNCIL CHAMBERS 505 BUTLER PLACE PARK RIDGE, IL 60068

REVISED

Monday, September 9, 2013 at 7:00 p.m.

I. Roll Call Mayor Schmidt called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. On roll call vote the following Aldermen indicated their presence at the meeting: Sweeney, Milissis, Smith, Knight, Mazzuca, and Maloney. There was a quorum.

II. Citizens Who Wish Comment on a Non-Agenda Item

None.

III. Public Works A. Discussion Items

1. Sewer 101 – Understanding the sewer system in Park Ridge Director Zingsheim gave a presentation on the City’s sewer system, a copy of which is attached. Discussion ensued on the City’s sewer system, the issues of capacity and conveyance, and the level of flood protection. Director Zingsheim stated that representatives of Christopher B. Burke Engineering will be at the November Public Works meeting to present the findings of the current feasibility studies. Janet Wynne, 116 Joyce, asked if a resident’s flood control can affect neighbors who do not have any. Director Zingsheim replied that it would have a very small effect. Terry Schultz, 116 Wisner, asked if the depth of a basement could effect flooding. Director Zingsheim replied that the lower the basement, the more water you may get. Francesca Janis, 136 South Delphia, questioned the City’s priorities with spending money to remove trees on Prospect and Summit instead of making residents whole from flooding issues. Alderman Maloney stated that the Summit Streetscape was being funded by an ITEP grant that had been applied for several years ago. Mayor Schmidt noted that the City had been asking for state and federal funding for sewer improvements, however funding has not been made available for these types of projects. Sam Porras, 1920 Burton, asked if there is a chance that identified study areas would not be done and if the North Park retention area could be looked at again. Director Zingsheim replied that the results of the feasibility studies will help determine if future projects are viable and the City Council would make the determination on funding at that time. Alderman Maloney detailed why the North Park project was not deemed viable and directed Mr. Porras to contact the Park Ridge Park District.

Minutes for Committee of the Whole Meeting of the Park Ridge City Council (Cont.) September 9, 2013

of 5

Janet Hitzman, 232 MichaelJohn, commented on the grade at Northeast Park. Mark DesJardins, 1912 DeCook, commented on the Burton/Fenton and Youth Campus projects. Bill Montgomery, 1810 Habberton, commented that the City’s sewers are inadequate and that it was short sighted to plan for 10 year storms. Ray Kotty, 1245 North Dee, commented on using Northwest Park for flood control. Myra Nichols, 124 South Merrill, commented on ongoing flooding issues. Adam Liggets, 2820 Mayfield, questioned what would happen if there were no viable projects for an area or if the Council decided not to fund a project. Anna Covington, 1217 Oakton, commented on recent flooding in her area, rebate programs for flood control and referendums. Judy Barclay, 524 Courtland, commented on downspouts being connected to the City’s sewer system. Jeff Julkowski, of Christopher B. Burke Engineering, commented on current feasibility studies and that they are being designed at a ten-year and greater storm protection. Pat Fragale, 1903 Burton, commented on repeated furnace loss. Alderman Maloney stated that there is a form available on the City’s website for residents to request information on their sewers. This form should be completed and submitted to staff, allowing ten business days for a response. A five minute recess was taken at 8:35 p.m.

2. AT&T U-Verse Permit Process

Director Zingsheim detailed the permit process. Discussion ensued on the process. Clarification was given that owners and associations of multi-family buildings would be notified as opposed to each unit. Alderman Mazzuca stated that the letter to residents should clearly spell out the 10 day window for objections and recommended that these objections go thru City staff. Jerome Mytych, External Affairs Director for AT&T, stated that this burden should be on AT&T and not staff. City Manager Hamilton stated that the process would be revised so that both the City and AT&T would be notified, enabling staff to track objections and follow up with AT&T and the resident. Discussion ensued on the size of the boxes being installed, with Mr. Mytych confirming that the box size would be the ALP-448 (49.8 in x 56.7 in x 47.8 in). J. Brania, 414 South Cumberland, questioned the size and location of the box slated for the parkway in front of his residence and if permits had been submitted. City Engineer Mitchell stated that there had been a preliminary review for code compliance. Joan Sandrik, 409 South Clifton, noted that AT&T has a 96-page glossary of acronyms available online. Bob Rhine, 1212 Brophy, asked what the difference was between an SAI and a VRAD. Mr. Mytych clarified that an SAI refers to existing equipment and a VRAD is the new equipment. Kathy Pennek, 244 Columbia, commented on the need for the City to be part of the process.


of 5

Bob Christopher, 300 South Fairview, suggested that AT&T go through the Appearance Commission for the placement of the boxes. Discussion ensued on the need for Appearance Commission review. Mayor Schmidt stated that he saw no role for the Appearance Commission in this process. City Manager Hamilton stated that staff would discuss this matter with AT&T, but that they could not be required to do so. Alderman Mazzuca clarified that the process would be revised to reflect the following:

The resident letter would be revised having the resident notify the City of any objections The resident letter would clearly state the 10-day window for objections All acronyms used would be explained Multi-family building owners / associations would be notified

City Manager Hamilton confirmed the above and noted that a revised letter and the outcome of discussions on Appearance Commission review would be included under the City Manager’s report and in next week’s packet. B. Action Items

1. Approval of Contract and Purchase Order for 2013 furnishing and delivering twelve (12) fire hydrants; Ziebell Water Service Products Inc., 2001 Pratt Blvd., Elk Grove Village, Illinois 60007 in the amount of $32,147.88

Director Zingsheim stated that the City opened bids for the 2013 Contract for furnishing and delivering 12 Fire Hydrants (PW-13-04) on August 28, 2013. Three (3) bids were received, with only one being responsive. The responsive bid of $32,147.88 is from Ziebell Water Service Products Inc. of Elk Grove Village, Illinois. Staff has checked their references and found them to be satisfactory.

Alderman Maloney made the following motion, Alderman Sweeney seconded. Approve the 2013 Contract for furnishing and delivering 12 Fire Hydrants, PW-13-04, with Ziebell Water Service Products, 2001 Pratt Boulevard, Elk Grove Village, Illinois 60007, and a purchase order in the amount of $32,147.88. Alderman Mazzuca stated that he had contacted the Purchasing Agent for Charleston, South Carolina regarding their recent bid for fire hydrants, noting that their price was significantly lower. He questioned staff on this cost difference. Discussion ensued on the possible reasons behind the cost difference, the use of only one type of hydrant (Waterous), and the bid process. Alderman Mazzuca made the following motion, Alderman Knight seconded. The motion passed on a roll call vote (4/2), with Aldermen Sweeney and Smith being the nay votes.

MOVE THE CITY COUNCIL REJECT ALL BIDS FOR FURNISHING AND DELIVERING 12 FIRE HYDRANTS, PW-13-04.

Staff was directed to rebid this contract, expand the bidding list, and to look for other purchasing options, such as going through a purchasing cooperative. C. Department Head Report

None.


of 5

IV. Public Safety A. Action Items - Police

1. Approve the modifications to Article 13, Chapter 10, Section 18 of the Municipal Code regarding Registration Plates

Chief Kaminski stated that 13-10-18 of the Municipal Code authorizes the Police Department to cite vehicles that do not display valid registration plates. The current ordinance only includes the word ‘roadway’ for a location as to where the vehicle can be cited. City Attorney Henn has reviewed the ordinance and feels the word roadway is not clearly defined and has recommended that it be amended as follows: ‘on any public street, highway, roadway or in a public parking facility or lot.’

Alderman Milissis made the following motion, Alderman Mazzuca seconded. The motion passed unanimously on a voice vote (6/0).

APPROVE THE MODIFICATIONS TO ARTICLE 13, CHAPTER 10, SECTION 18 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING REGISTRATION PLATES.

B. Discussion Items – Police

None. C. Department Head Report – Police

1. Monthly Report – August 2013 No discussion.

2. Complimentary Letters – August 2013 No discussion.

3. Red Speed Report – August 2013

No discussion.

4. Police Dispatch Update Chief Kaminski stated that staff was continuing to work on Police Dispatch. Preliminary numbers had been received from Glenview and they will be meeting with Wheeling.

5. 9/11 Ceremony

Chief Kaminski invited all to attend the 9/11 Ceremony being held on Wednesday, September 11, at 8 a.m. at the South Fire Station, 901 West Devon Avenue. D. Action Items – Fire None.

E. Discussion Items - Fire None.

F. Department Head Report - Fire

1. Monthly Report – August 2013 Chief Zywanski summarized the monthly report as follows:

Emergency call volume is 6% higher than last year for the same period. Fire and Police will begin partnering on car seat inspections. The Department’s Muscular Dystrophy Association Fill the Boot campaign raised over $2,700. Hydrant testing was completed on August 22, 2013. The Fire Prevention Open House will be held at the North Fire Station on October 5, from 12-

4 p.m.

2. Complimentary Letters – August 2013 No discussion.


of 5

3. Chief Zywanski stated that Des Plaines passed a Resolution for Red Center on September 3,

2013. Red Center will now hear the application on September 18, 2013.

4. Alderman Sweeney noted that the City should decide what to do regarding the display of steel from the World Trade Center. City Manager Hamilton stated that staff was currently developing alternate ideas.

V. Other City Business None.

VI. New Business A. Mayor Schmidt stated that the Cook County Board of Review would be holding seminars on the

property valuation appeals process on September 9 and September 11.

B. Mayor Schmidt stated that he had appointed Joe Baldi as chair of the Planning and Zoning Commission.

VII. Adjournment

The meeting was adjourned at 10:15 p.m.

09/12/2013

1

City of Park Ridge

Sewers 101

Watersheds A watershed is an area of land where all

of the water that drains off of it goes to one place

Watersheds are determined on the topography of the land as if there were no sewer system collecting the water

09/12/2013

2

Park Ridge’s Watershedso Sibley (55% of the City’s area)o Devon (35% of the City’s area)o North Area (10% of the City’s area)

City Sewer Map

09/12/2013

3

Park Ridge’s Sewer System The original large trunk sewers on Devon

and Touhy were built in the 1920’s During the 1960’s and 1970’s, the City

constructed four very large relief sewers on Glenlake, Touhy, Sibley, and Glenview

These large trunk and relief sewers carry sewage to the west

The rest of the City’s sewer system is made up of combined sewers on each block

Combined Systemo Storm & sanitary in same sewer lineso When sewer system & MWRDGC interceptor

fills, stormwater flows into combined sewer outflows (CSO’s)

o NPDES permits (National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System)

o Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago (MWRDGC)

o Sibley Lift Stationo Mayfield & Carol / Crain Lift Stationso Deep Tunnel

09/12/2013

4

Deep Tunnel The Deep Tunnel was built to reduce the

overflow of sewage to the rivers when the sewers are too full to transport sewage & runoff to the treatment plant

It is intended to transport the initial flow during a heavy rain that contains the most pollutants

It was not built to prevent flooding There are several large storage reservoirs that

have not been built yet

Combined Sewer Outflow LocationsDischarge Location Receiving Water Number005 Algonquin Road(E) 84” Des Plaines River

(bridge abutment)

002 Sibley Ave (E) 66” Des Plaines River

006 Sibley Ave (E) 84” Des Plaines River

003 Touhy Ave (E) 72” Des Plaines River007 Touhy Ave (E)96” Des Plaines River

004 Devon Ave (E) 102” Des Plaines River008 Devon Ave (E) 42” Des Plaines River

09/12/2013

5

Touhy Outflows

Touhy Outflow

09/12/2013

6

Sibley trough

Sibley sludge

09/12/2013

7

Mayfield Lift Station

Mayfield Lift Station Pump

09/12/2013

8

Where does the water go?o Inlets – Inlet Lateralso Catch Basinso Sewer Mainso Trunk Lineso Flushing / Root Cuttingo Sewer Lining

When does flooding occur? Sewer capacity is the amount of flow a

sewer can handle Flow into a sewer is determined by storm

intensity, or the amount of rain that falls in a given time

Flooding occurs when the storm produces an intensity that exceeds the capacity of the sewer

09/12/2013

9

Storm Level Definitions A 100-year storm is a flood event that has

a 1% probability of occurring in any given year

Likewise, a 10-year storm is a flood event that has a 10% probability of occurring in any given year

Sewer Surcharge Street flooding occurs when sewers

surcharge We can model storm levels to help

predict areas where surcharging will occur

09/12/2013

10

Inlet & Catch Basin

Catch Basin

09/12/2013

11

Sewer Manhole –Cherry & Aldine

Cherry & Aldine 15” Sewer

09/12/2013

12

Sibley 84” Trunk Line

Washout

09/12/2013

13

Cracked Sewer Line

Sewer Lining

09/12/2013

14

Flood Controlo Des Plaines Rivero Prairie Farmers Creek / Levee 50o Gate, Locks & Magic Valveso Chicago River – North Brancho Flood Wall on Dempstero Flood Wall / Berm on Riverside

Des Plaines River Storyboard

09/12/2013

15

Levee 50

Deep Tunnel Shaft by Sibley & Riverside

09/12/2013

16

Chicago River

Sewer Improvement Plan After the 2008 flood, Burke Engineering performed

a preliminary study of 6 areas In 2010, they performed a citywide sewer capacity

analysis, which is the basis of the projects in our multi-year plan

Bonds were issued in 2011 for the first 3 years of projects (approx. $5.4 million)

3 projects were constructed last year and 3 more will be constructed this year

The City Council will determine if bonds will be issued to fund the remaining projects identified in the plan

09/12/2013

17

Tracking Infrastructure Improvements The City uses GIS to map our infrastructure

and track our infrastructure and maintenance projects

Examples include water and sewer lines, sewer lining, street resurfacing, etc.

We do not have the sewer and water maps available online for security reasons

Dempster Flood Wall

09/12/2013

18

Riverside Flood Wall

Riverside Flap Gate

09/12/2013

19

Homeownerso Gravity Sewerso Overhead Sewers / Sump Pumps / Drain

Tileso Stand Pipeso Flood Control

Why do homes get sewer backup?

09/12/2013

20

What can homeowners do? Flood control systems, such as check

valves and overhead sewers, eliminate sewer back-up

Sump pumps, crack sealing, and grading help reduce seepage and overland flooding

Flood Permits Issued 2002 - 54 2003 - 22 2004 - 44 2005 - 20 2006 - 14 2007 - 40 2008 - 60 2009 - 268 2010 - 108 2011 - 201 2012 - 102 2013 (thru August – 349) TOTAL - 1282

09/12/2013

21

Storm Detentiono Municipal Code –100 year storm (critical

duration provides maximum storage)o Relief Sewers & Restrictorso Reservoirso Underground Vaultso Open Basins (greenspace)o Surface Storage

Urban Myths & Facts MYTH -Park Ridge “closed” the sewers &/or valves FACT – There are no valves in our sewer system, nor does the City have the

ability to close off sewers or divert flow from one sewer to another MYTH - Park Ridge “opened” the sewers &/or valves FACT –The City does not have the ability to open capacity in any sewers, as

they all flow by gravity MYTH - Park Ridge didn’t “flip a switch in time” FACT – There are no switches in our sewer system MYTH - Park Ridge “turned the sewers off in the Uptown area” so it wouldn’t

flood FACT – The City does not turn any sewer system on or off MYTH - Park Ridge “agreed to take flood waters” from Des Plaines so that Des

Plaines wouldn’t flood FACT – Park Ridge’s and Des Plaines’ sewer system are not even connected,

in fact we are separated by the Des Plaines River. Des Plaines actually flooded much worse than Park Ridge in all of the last major storms.

09/12/2013

22

Resident Request Form Information available on residential

sewers Form available on City website under

Flood Information

Historical –Cumberland & Crescent, 1961

09/12/2013

23

Busse & Greenwood, September 2008

m i n u t e s - park ridge 9 2013.pdf · m i n u t e s committee of the ... bob rhine, 1212 brophy,...

Documents