m. k. strickland-cohen (2011) ecs, university of oregon from “practical fba” to bsp: developing...

44
M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate Problem Behavior

Upload: constance-payne

Post on 29-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

From “Practical FBA” to BSP:Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate Problem Behavior

Page 2: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

Session #1Agenda

• Introductions

• Complete Pre-Test

• Training Objectives

• Review of Terms

• Building Competing Behavior Pathways

• Identifying Alternative Behaviors

Page 3: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

Pre-test

Page 4: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

From “Practical FBA” to BSP Training Series

4

This is the a four-part series of training sessions on utilizing FBA data to develop behavior support plans for students with mild to

moderate behavior problems in schools.

Practical Comprehensive

For: Students with mild to moderate problem behaviors (behaviors that are NOT dangerous or occurring in many settings)

Students with moderate to severe behavioral problems; may be dangerous and/or occurring in many settings

What: Relatively Simple and Efficient process for behavior support planning based on “practical” FBA data

Time-intensive process that involves emergency planning, family-centered planning, and collaboration with outside agencies

Developed by whom:

Team of school-based professionals (e.g., PBS team members whose job responsibilities include FBA and behavior support planning)

School-based team including professionals trained to develop and implement intensive interventions for students with severe problem behaviors (e.g., behavior specialist)

Page 5: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

Practical BSP Methods are designed to be used with students who:

Exhibit high frequency problem behaviors that are NOT dangerous (e.g., talking out, non-compliance, not completing work, social withdrawal)

Exhibit problem behaviors in 1 to 2 school routines (e.g., specific classroom activities, lunch, recess)

Have received interventions that did not improve problem behavior

Practical BSP Methods are NOT sufficient for use with students who:

Exhibit dangerous behaviors (e.g., hitting, throwing objects, property destruction)

Exhibit problem behaviors during 3 or more school routines

Page 6: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

Training Objectives• Training sessions focus on teaching you to lead a

behavior support team through the process of:

#1. Moving from a completed FBA to a Behavior Support Plan designed to:

- Prevent problem behaviors from occurring - Teach alternative and desired behaviors- Reward appropriate behavior while minimizing the payoff for problem behavior

#2. Developing Implementation and Evaluation plans detailing specific procedures, responsibilities, and timelines for:

- Putting the BSP into action - Evaluating the effectiveness of the plan.

Page 7: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

Training Sessions

Session #1: Building Competing Behavior Pathways

Session #2: Identifying and Selecting Function-Based Behavior Support Strategies

Session #3: Contextual Fit, and Implementation and Evaluation Planning

Session #4: Specific steps in leading a BSP Team

Page 8: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

Format for Training Sessions

Each of the 4 training sessions includes the following elements:

Objectives: Content and skills participants will learn during the session

Review: A review of terms and concepts

Activities: Practice opportunities to better understand content and develop skills

Checks for Understanding: Activities to check for understanding or identify points that need to be discussed or practiced further

Comments and Questions

Page 9: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

Objectives for Session #1: Building Competing Behavior Pathways

By the end of this training session Team Leaders will be able to:

1. Explain the difference between ‘mild to moderate’ and ‘severe/complex’ problem behaviors

2. Label the essential components of an FBA summary statement

3. Describe the three essential characteristics of alternative behavior

4. Identify examples and non-examples of appropriate alternative behaviors given sample scenarios

5. Construct an example summary statement including antecedents, behavior, consequence, and function, and provide examples of appropriate and inappropriate alternative behaviors

Page 10: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

A Quick Review of

Behavioral Terms

Page 11: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

Always Start by Defining the Behavior

2Routines/Antecedents/

Setting Events:

When _____happens….

1 Behavior:

the student does (what)__

3Consequence/Function

..because (why) ______

Page 12: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

Defining Observable Problem Behaviors

• Definitions of behaviors need to be:– Observable: The behavior is an action that

can be seen.

– Measurable: The behavior can be counted or timed.

– Defined so clearly that a person unfamiliar with the student could recognize the behavior without any doubts!

Page 13: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

Which is described in observable and measurable terms?

• hits with his fist –OR- aggressive

• bully –OR- takes money from peers

• psychotic –OR- says she hears voices

• arrives at class 10 minutes late –OR- irresponsible

• out of seat 55% of time –OR- hyperactive

Page 14: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

Review #1 (page 6)

• Provide an observable & measurable definition for ONE of these behaviors:

– Jeff is always disruptive in class. – Hailey is constantly off-task during math. – Brandon is defiant. – Alexis uses inappropriate language.

Page 15: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

Once you have defined the problem behavior…

Then: Where & When does the behavior occur? • Routines• Triggering Antecedents• Setting Events

2Routines/Antecedents/

Setting Events:

When _____happens….

1 Behavior:

the student does (what)__

Page 16: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

Antecedents vs. Setting Events

• Antecedents - occur immediately before and act as “triggers” for problem behavior

• Setting Events – indirectly “set-up” the problem behavior by temporarily altering the value of maintaining consequences.

Page 17: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

Examples of Antecedents: “Triggers”

• When told to “shut up” by a peer, Ben hits the student

• When asked to read aloud in class, Tracy gets up and tells jokes

• Jessie often begins to cry, when praised during circle time

* Note: these are also described in observable and measurable terms

Page 18: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

Examples of Setting Events: “Set ups”

• Lack of sleep or food• Having a fight on the way to school• Bad grade on a test / reprimands• Forgetting to take medication• Substitute teacher / changes in routine

Non-examples:• Diagnosis of autism or ADHD• “Bad” home life

* Note: Setting Events can be difficult to identify, are sometimes unknown.

Page 19: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

After having an argument with his sibling at home before school, when peers approach Victor in the hallway and say, “Hello”, he yells “Leave me alone!” and “Go away!” Peers call him a weirdo and walk away.

What is the triggering antecedent?

- Peers approach and say “hello”

What is the setting event?

- Argument with sibling before school

Review #2 (page 7)

Page 20: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

Once you have defined the behavior (the

What) & know Where & When the behavior occurs…

Then: WHY does the behavior continue to occur (… what happens right afterwards)? What is the REINFORCER?

2Routines/

Antecedents/Setting Events:

When _____happens….

1

Behavior:

the student does (what)__

3Consequence/Function

..because (why) ______

Page 21: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

Reinforcement

• If a behavior is continuing to occur it is being reinforced…

• A REINFORCER: – is an item, activity or event that follows a

behavior and results in an INCREASE in that behavior.

Page 22: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

Functions that Behavior Serves (page 8) ProblemBehavior

Obtain/GetSomething

Escape/Avoid

Something

SocialTangible/Activity

Adult

Stimulation/Sensory

Peer

Page 23: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

Common Functions of Problem Behavior in School Settings

Obtain/ Access :

Peer attention

Adult attention

Desired activity

Desired object/ items

Avoid/ Escape:

Difficult Task

Boring Task

Easy Task

Physical demands

Non-preferred activity

Peer or Adult attention

Page 24: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

Examples of Reinforcement

• Example 1: When Cleo yells out for teacher help during class, her teacher walks over to Cleo’s desk, tells her to keep her voice down, and explains that she is disturbing the other students. Cleo’s yelling increases.

• Example 2: When Hidalgo throws his work assignments on the floor, his teacher picks them up, marks a zero on them, & takes them away. His throwing of work assignments has increased.

Page 25: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

Understanding Challenging Behavior as a Response Class

• Response Class- a group of behaviors that serve the same function.

During independent work, Marcus often talks-out, crumples up his papers, and puts his head down on his desk, resulting in escape from difficult academic tasks.

- In this example, talking-out, crumpling papers, and “putting head down on desk” are all part of the same response class.

Page 26: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

Moving From FBA to BSP

Page 27: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

From FBA to BSP

• The most important purpose of conducting FBA is to inform the development of comprehensive Behavior Support Plans that directly address the FUNCTION of student behavior

• Start with FBA results, specifically the

Summary Statement

Page 28: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

Essential Components of FBA Summary Statements

• The summary statement should include an observable description of:– Targeted Routine– Any identified Setting events / “Set-ups” – Antecedents / “triggers” for problem behavior– Operationally defined Problem Behavior– Consequences that follow the problem

behavior– Primary Function of problem Behavior

• Multiple Functions = Multiple Summary Statements

Page 29: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

Example

Summary Statement for Ben’s BehaviorIn Social Studies, when asked to read independently, Ben (a strong reader) often gets out of his seat, walks around the room, and jokes with peers. Ben’s peers laugh and talk to him as he walks by. This behavior is most likely to happen on days when Ben’s parents bring him to school (i.e., he doesn’t ride the bus with friends).

Setting event Antecedent Behavior Consequence

Routine:

Function:

Out of seat, walks

around room, jokes

with peers

Asked to read

independently

Peers laugh and talk

to Ben

Ben brought to

school by

parents

Access peer attention

Social Studies

Page 30: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

Activity 1

Summary Statement for Jason’s Behavior:When Jason is asked to outline a book chapter in Language Arts, he often argues, refuses to work and uses profanity which results in being sent to the office for ‘disrespect’. This behavior is more likely if Jason has an altercation with a peer on the bus on the way to school.

Setting event Antecedent Behavior Consequence

Peer altercation on

bus on the way to school

Asked to outline

chapter

Arguing with teacher, refusing

to work, profanity

Teacher sends her to the office

Function: ESCAPE TASK

Routine:

(page 10)

Language Arts

Page 31: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

Activity 2 What is wrong with / missing from this

summary statement? Sarah often leaves her seat without permission, walks

around the room and talks with peers. Sarah’s peers laugh and talk with her. This behavior is more likely if she has forgotten to take her medication before school. The function of Sarah’s behavior is to gain access to teacher attention and to escape tasks.

Setting event Antecedent Behavior Consequence

Routine: _____________

Sarah forgets to take

medication

Walking around room, talking with peers

Attention from Peers

Function: Adult Attention

Escape from Tasks

Page 32: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

Check for Understanding

Page 33: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

Critical Components of Behavior Support Plans

• #1: Competing Behavior Pathway

• #2: Function-Based Behavior Support Strategies

• #3: Implementation Plan

• #4: Evaluation Plan

Page 34: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

Competing Behavior Pathway

Page 35: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

Developing a Competing Behavior Pathway

Natural Consequence

Maintaining Consequence

Desired Behavior

Problem Behavior

Alternative Behavior

AntecedentSetting Event

Targeted Routine

Summary Statement: We already have this!!!

Page 36: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

This is what we want…

Natural Consequence

Maintaining Consequence

Desired Behavior

Problem Behavior

Alternative Behavior

AntecedentSetting Event

Targeted Routine

But… start with the Alternative Behavior.

Page 37: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

Desired vs. Alternative Behaviors

• Desired Behavior– Long term goal = Follow classroom routines without

problem behavior and with minimal supports• Often requires teaching complex skills that the student is

lacking (e.g., academic skills, social/communication skills, organizational skills)

• Alternative Behavior– An immediate attempt to reduce problem behavior

• Serves the same FUNCTION as the problem behavior• Allows team to implement support plan aimed at teaching

new skills and increasing desired behaviors• Should be a behavior that the student already engages

in or can be quickly learned with minimal instruction

Page 38: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

Why the Alternative Behavior?

Success, teacher acknowledgment

Sent to hall to ‘calm down’

Function: escape task

Complete writing task

Crying, pushing

papers off desk

Raise hand & ask for break

Asked to complete

Independent writing tasks

None Identified

Routine: Language Arts

Why not go straight to the Desired Behavior?

1. This is what we’re asking the

student to do.

2. This is what the student wants now.

3. Look how different this is

from what’s happening now

4. The student is going to need to gain writing skills before being able

to do this like peers

5. So… in the meantime we

use the alternate behavior

Nadia

Page 39: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

Three Essential Characteristics of Alternative Behavior

• Alternative Behavior:– Serves the same function as the problem

behavior (reliably results in the same type of consequences as the problem behavior)

– Is easier to do than the problem behavior• Requires less (or at least no more) physical effort

than the problem behavior

– Is socially acceptable

Page 40: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

Identifying Appropriate Alternative Behavior • When Pam is asked to work on long-division

problems in math class, she argues, refuses to work, and uses profanity in order to avoid/escape the difficult task.

Which is the best alternative behavior?

• Move to sit by another student

• Request adult attention

• Request an easier task/worksheet

• Ask if she can play on the computer instead

• Ask for a reward for completing the task

1. Serve same

Function? Does it provide escape?

2. Is Behavior

easier to do than

problem behavior?

3. Is Behavior socially

acceptable?

Page 41: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

Identifying Appropriate Alternative Behavior

• During independent reading time in language arts, Audrey makes noises, talks out, and walks around the room. The FBA has shown that this behavior is maintained by adult attention.

Which is the best alternative behavior? Why/Why Not?

• Ask to sit at the teachers desk during reading

• Raise hand and ask for a break

• Request help/adult attention

• Ask for a reward for completing the task

• Request an easier task

1. Serve same Function?

2. Is it Easier?

3. Is it Socially Acceptable?

Page 42: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

Activity 3(page 12)

• Complete the next one on your own.– Please write ‘yes’ or ‘no’ for each option AND

explain why or why not?

Page 43: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

Identifying Appropriate Alternative Behavior • During independent seatwork, Ronnie makes

inappropriate noises and makes faces at peers. Based on the data collected, the team agreed that the function of Ronnie’s behavior is to obtain peer attention.

Which is the best alternative behavior?

• Ask the teacher for help

• Finish all work, then ask to talk to a peer

• Request help/adult attention

• Ask to work with a peer tutor

• Request an easier assignment

Page 44: M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon From “Practical FBA” to BSP: Developing Function-Based Support for Students with Mild to Moderate

M. K. Strickland-Cohen (2011) ECS, University of Oregon

Checks for Understanding