m&a lec 2
DESCRIPTION
Mergers and acquisitionsTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: M&a lec 2](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052601/5594141a1a28ab9a2b8b45ee/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
WHY RESTRUCTURE – DETAIL19-7-13
![Page 2: M&a lec 2](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052601/5594141a1a28ab9a2b8b45ee/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Growth strategy models
• Ansoff’s product market matrix• BCG matrix• Grand strategy matrix• Industry/product life cycle analysis• Phillip Kotler
![Page 3: M&a lec 2](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052601/5594141a1a28ab9a2b8b45ee/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Growth
![Page 4: M&a lec 2](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052601/5594141a1a28ab9a2b8b45ee/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Intensive growth
![Page 5: M&a lec 2](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052601/5594141a1a28ab9a2b8b45ee/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Integrative growth
![Page 6: M&a lec 2](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052601/5594141a1a28ab9a2b8b45ee/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Diversification growth
![Page 7: M&a lec 2](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052601/5594141a1a28ab9a2b8b45ee/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
BCG matrixfor portfolio rebalancing of multiple businesses companies
Relative market share High Medium Low
Indu
stry
sal
e gr
owth
rate
Low
Med
ium
H
igh
![Page 8: M&a lec 2](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052601/5594141a1a28ab9a2b8b45ee/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Grand strategy matrixfor single as well as multiple businesses companies
Rapid market growthW
eak
com
petit
ive
posi
tion
Strong c ompeti tive pos ition
Slow market growth
![Page 9: M&a lec 2](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052601/5594141a1a28ab9a2b8b45ee/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Industry/Product life cycle
• Introduction stage• Growth stage• Maturity stage• Decline stage
![Page 10: M&a lec 2](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052601/5594141a1a28ab9a2b8b45ee/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Other motives behind M&A
• Monopoly• Efficiency• Raider • Valuation• Empire building• Process• Disturbance
![Page 11: M&a lec 2](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052601/5594141a1a28ab9a2b8b45ee/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Friedrich Trautwein’s theories- why merge?
Merger as a rational choice Process outcome
Macroeconomic phenomenon
Merger benefits bidder’s shareholders
Benefits bidders managers
Monopoly: wealth trf (market share, market power, pricing power) from target customers
Empire building – create empires of managers rather than shareholders wealth
Process theory
Disturbance theory
Efficiency: adding to enterprise valuation through synergies
Raider: wealth trf from cash needy target’s shareholders to PE funds by valuing companies at much lower than intrinsic value
Valuation: net gains through private information that intrinsic value much higher than present market cap
![Page 12: M&a lec 2](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022052601/5594141a1a28ab9a2b8b45ee/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Efficiency theory
1. Manufacturing synergy (revenue or cost saving)
2. Operations synergy (revenue or cost saving)
3. Marketing synergy (revenue or cost saving)
4. Financial synergy (cost saving)
5. Tax synergy (cost saving)