machine detector interface at electron...

Machine Detector Interface at Electron Colliders

Hongbo Zhu (IHEP, Beijing)

MDI at Electron Colliders, H. ZhuInstitute of High Energy Physics

Outline

• Introduction

• Interaction Regions

• Radiation Backgrounds

• Final Focusing Magnets

• Luminosity Measurement

• Beam Energy Measurement

• Summary

2

Single ring, pretzel scheme, head-on collision

(partial) double ring, crab-waist

Disclaimer: Not possible to cover all the MDI aspects or the machines


Interaction Region

• Extremely complicated! Requiring profound understanding of both machine and detector performance, and more …

• Necessary to optimise both machine and detector designs → trade-offs

• Started CEPC physics feasibility studies with the modified ILD design

3

QD0ILD Interaction Region


Radiation Backgrounds

• Critical for detector and machine design, originating from various sources:

‣Collision induced backgrounds:

• Beamstrahlung, ( +consequent pair production, hadronic events … )

• Radiative Bhabha scattering

‣Machine induced backgrounds:

• Synchrotron radiation

• Beam-gas interaction

• Touschek

• Beam halo

• …

• Always have to carefully evaluate each background, importance of which might differ from machine to machine

4


Beamstrahlung

• Charged particles deflected by the strong field of the opposite bunch will emit radiation (“beamstrahlung”) → potential issue of beam energy spread

• Important to keep machine/detector components sufficiently far away from the “kinematic-edge” created by the consequent pair production

5

beamstrahlung photons pair production


Beamstrahlung cont.

6

Beamstrahlung effects not concerned for low energy machines, dominant backgrounds for ILC but less critical for CEPC


Radiative Bhabha Scattering

• Backgrounds from the original process ( ) not prominent

• Dedicated to circular machines: beam particles loosing energy (larger than the machine acceptance 2%) can be kicked off their orbits when returning to the IR and hit machine/detector elements (e.g. the final focusing magnets) → → → particle shower

7

e+e� ! e+e��

QD0�QD0� QF1�QF1�


Radiative Bhabha Scattering cont.

• Sensitive to the lattice design/final focusing magnets, requiring optimised design of collimation and shielding

8

Aperture=3 cm Aperture=2 cm

Where to place the collimators?

(r=10.5mm)�

r=13.5mm�TMCcondi4on�

Collimatorwidthd[m

m]�

SuperKEKB studies inConf. Proc. C 1205201, 1104 (2012)

CEPC

What shape?SuperKEKB Type

(PEP-II as reference) CEPC collimation system

← small β


Synchrotron Radiation

• Beam particles bended by magnets emit Synchrotron Radiation photons, which are non-negligible backgrounds at circular machines and requiring special consideration on protection of machine/detector

9

Power deposition along the orbit #SR photons along the orbit

CEPC CEPC

Dominant contribution caused by the bending of the last dipole


Synchrotron Radiation cont.

• Preliminary design of the CEPC collimation system inspired by the LEP design → suppress significantly the backgrounds

• Early thoughts of the collimator design (shape, thickness …)

• Difficult to prevent forward SR photons → machine design optimisation

10


SR Collimation

11

�20mm�

�9mm�

e-�

e+�

IPbeampipe(Ti/Be/Ti)

incoming/outgoingbeampipe(Ta)

SuperKEKB

“Ridge” structure


Radiation Levels

• CEPC/ILC at the same level, benign compared to the (HL-)LHC standard

12

Radiative Bhabha Scattering

1st vertex detector layer r=1.6 cm (prel.): • Hit density ~ 1 hits/cm2/BX• Total ionisation dose (TID): 1 MRad/year• Non-ionisation energy loss (NIEL): 1012 neq/cm2/year


Final Focusing Magnets

• Final focusing magnets inside the CEPC detector due to short L*

• The magnetic fields at the pole region exceed 7T, and the two quadruple magnets are embedded inside the detector solenoid magnet of 3.5T → preferably with the Nb3Sn technology

‣ Coils in Rutherford type Nb3Sn cables clamped by stainless steel collar

‣ Conceptual design performed based on typical quadrupole block coil; magnetic field calculated with OPERA from Cobham Technical Services.

13

Magnet Length (m) Field gradient (T/m) Coil inner radius (mm)

QD0 1.25 304 20

QF1 0.72 309 20


Quadruple and Anti-Solenoid

• To minimise the impact of detector solenoid on beam stability, necessary to introduce anti-solenoid outside the quadruple

• Total integral longitudinal fields generated by the detector solenoid and anti-solenoid cancels out completely.

14

• Mechanical structure (superKEKB type)

• CEPC of similar structure but higher magnetic fields, crossing-angle to be dealt with in the double partial ring designILC prototype


Luminosity Measurement

• Desired luminosity uncertainty of ~1‰ (achieved for LEP experiments!) as required by Higgs/Z precision measurements at CEPC/ILC

‣ LumiCal: Calorimeter with silicon-tungsten sandwich structure to measure small angle radiative Bhabha scattering events

‣ Limited space before QD0 (CEPC): z∈[115,128 cm] and θ∈[60,90 mrad] requiring angular precision of ∆θ/θmin < 5×10-4

‣ Other sources of uncertainties: theoretical calculation of cross-section, polar angle bias, physics background subtraction, etc.

• Online luminosity monitor allowing fast tuning of beam parameters

‣ Even smaller angle Radiative Bhabha scattering events: → ILC (BeamCal)

‣ Radiation-hard sensors (e.g. CVD diamond) to measure radiative Bhabha events at zero photon scattering angle → CEPC/SuperKEKB

15

→ Nontrivial to achieve the target luminosity uncertainty


LumiCal

• Reference design for the CEPC LumiCal but even more challenging due to limited space in front of the final focusing magnets (N.B.: no space at all for BeamCal)

16

Layout of half plane

Sensor and electronics

LumiCal for ILD


Beam Energy Measurement

• Important to determine precisely e.g. the Higgs mass

• Which method?

‣ Spectrometers (LEP-II, ILC)

‣ Resonance depolarisation (LEP)

‣ Laser Compton scattering (ILC)

‣ Physics reference process (LEP, ILC)

‣ …

• Not yet clear how to measure the CEPC beam energy precisely (10-4)

17

Eb =c · e · L

x

Z

magnetBdl

More discussion at this conference • “Energy Calibration Issues” - Ivan Koop• “Polarization Free Methods for Beam Energy

Calibration” - Nikolay Muchnoi


Summary and Outlook

• Necessary to re-design the interaction region ← partial double ring (large crossing-angle) and new detector layout

• Performed the first round of radiation background estimation and started to repeating the studies for partial double ring (workable lattice), together with conceptual design of the collimation system

• To achieve complete magnetic field (detector solenoid and anti-solenoid) cancellation and conceptual design of QD0 (likely even more complicated for double partial ring)

• More practical thoughts on forward detectors (e.g. LumiCal) and initiate early R&D efforts on detector/electronics

• To find an appropriate way to measure the beam energy precisely

• Adding more to the long to-do list: Beampipe, mechanics …

18

machine detector interface at electron...

Documents