“made in the usa” claims: a marketer’s guide made in usa slides.pdf · “made in the usa”...
TRANSCRIPT
www.khlaw.com
Washington, D.C. ● Brussels ● San Francisco ● Shanghai ● Paris
Alissa D. Jijon+ 1 [email protected]
Laura D. Venker+ 1 202.434.4129
“Made in the USA” Claims:A Marketer’s Guide
April 29, 2015
Keller and Heckman LLP1001 G Street NW, Suite 500 West
Washington, DC 20001
│ www.khlaw.com │ KELLER AND HECKMAN LLP2 Copyright © 2015
Preliminary Word
This presentation provides information about thelaw. Legal information is not the same as legaladvice, which involves the application of law to anindividual's specific circumstances and dependson many factors. This presentation is not intendedto provide, and should not be relied upon as, legaladvice.
The information provided in this presentation isdrawn entirely from public information. The viewsexpressed in this presentation are the authors’alone and not necessarily those of the authors’clients.
│ www.khlaw.com │ KELLER AND HECKMAN LLP3 Copyright © 2015
Presenters
Alissa D. Jijon practices in the area of food anddrug law. She advises food, dietary supplement,medical device, consumer product, andpharmaceutical clients regarding compliance withU.S. state and federal regulations, as well asinternational requirements.
Ms. Jijon has counseled clients on theapplicability of laws and regulations enforced bythe Food and Drug Administration, the FederalTrade Commission, the Department ofAgriculture, the Environmental Protection Agency,and the Consumer Product Safety Commission.
│ www.khlaw.com │ KELLER AND HECKMAN LLP4 Copyright © 2015
Presenters
Laura D. Venker practices in the areas of foodand drug law and international trade. She advisesfood, drug, medical device, cosmetic, alcoholicbeverage, and consumer product clientsregarding compliance with U.S. state and federalregulations, as well as international requirements.
Ms. Venker has counseled clients on theapplicability of laws and regulations enforced byU.S. Customs and Border Protection, theCommerce Department, the Federal TradeCommission, the Food and Drug Administration,the Department of Agriculture, and the ConsumerProduct Safety Commission.
│ www.khlaw.com │ KELLER AND HECKMAN LLP6 Copyright © 2015
What is a “Made in the USA” Claim?
A voluntary statement intended to emphasizea product’s American content*
A marketing claim, not a regulatoryrequirement
Distinct from Country of Origin Marking
* Exception: Federal law requires the disclosure of U.S.content on automobiles and textile, wool, and fur products.
│ www.khlaw.com │ KELLER AND HECKMAN LLP7 Copyright © 2015
Not to be confused with…
Textile Fiber Products Identification Act
• Mandatory labeling of textile fiber products withthe name of the country where the product wasprocessed/manufactured.
• Textile fiber products made completely in theUnited States must be labeled as “Made in USA”or equivalent.
│ www.khlaw.com │ KELLER AND HECKMAN LLP8 Copyright © 2015
Claim Examples
“Product of USA”
“American-Made”
“USA”
“True American Quality”
│ www.khlaw.com │ KELLER AND HECKMAN LLP9 Copyright © 2015
Country of Origin Marking
In general, U.S. Customs and BorderProtection requires every article of foreignorigin to be marked with its country of origin.
Marking is not required under Customs rulesfor:
• Articles made in the U.S. exclusively from U.S.-origin components; or
• Articles where the foreign content is “substantiallytransformed” by processing in the U.S.
│ www.khlaw.com │ KELLER AND HECKMAN LLP10 Copyright © 2015
Substantial Transformation?
“Substantial transformation” is a conceptassociated only with Country of OriginMarking requirements.
“Substantial transformation” does not converta product into a “Product of the USA” for thepurpose of a “Made in the USA” claim.
│ www.khlaw.com │ KELLER AND HECKMAN LLP11 Copyright © 2015
U.S. Origin = “Made in U.S.A.”, right?
Not necessarily!
• “[W]hether an article may be marked with thephrase ‘Made in the USA’ or similar wordsdenoting U.S. origin, is an issue under theauthority of the Federal Trade Commission(FTC). We suggest that you contact the FTCDivision of Enforcement . . . on the propriety ofproposed markings indicating that an article ismade in the U.S.” (emphasis added)Customs Ruling N257814, October 21, 2014.
│ www.khlaw.com │ KELLER AND HECKMAN LLP13 Copyright © 2015
Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
Key federal guidance is the FTC’s“Complying with the Made in USA Standard,”available at: https://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/business-center/guidance/complying-made-usa-standard
Bottom line: “All or virtually all” productcontent must be of U.S. origin and finalprocessing/assembly must occur in U.S.
│ www.khlaw.com │ KELLER AND HECKMAN LLP14 Copyright © 2015
“All or Virtually All”
“All or virtually all” means that all significantparts and processing that go into the productmust be of U.S. origin.
“[T]he product should contain no – ornegligible – foreign content.”
│ www.khlaw.com │ KELLER AND HECKMAN LLP15 Copyright © 2015
Claim Substantiation
Substantiation for “Made in USA” claimrequires a “reasonable basis” to support theclaim at the time that it is made.
A manufacturer or marketer must have“competent and reliable evidence” to back upits claim.
Note: FTC does not pre-approve claims.
│ www.khlaw.com │ KELLER AND HECKMAN LLP16 Copyright © 2015
Weak Links in the Supply Chain?
Manufacturers and marketers should notassume components purchased in the U.S.are 100% U.S.-made.
But manufacturers can rely on informationprovided by suppliers regarding origin ofcomponents.
• Know your suppliers and know yourmarket.
│ www.khlaw.com │ KELLER AND HECKMAN LLP17 Copyright © 2015
FTC Policy Basics
FTC policy applies to all products advertised orsold in the U.S. (with the exception of thosesubject to specific U.S. content labelingrequirements, e.g., automobiles, clothing, furs)
FTC policy applies to all claims, whetherexpress or implied:
• Express: “Made in USA”; “American-Made”
• Implied: Romance copy emphasizing the “trueAmerican quality” of the company’s work
│ www.khlaw.com │ KELLER AND HECKMAN LLP18 Copyright © 2015
California
Under CA law, a product may not bear a“Made in USA” claim or “similar words” –when the “merchandise or any article, unit, orpart thereof, has been entirely orsubstantially made, manufactured, orproduced outside of the United States.” Cal.Bus. & Prof. Code § 17533.7
Bottom line: Zero tolerance for foreigncontent or processing.
│ www.khlaw.com │ KELLER AND HECKMAN LLP19 Copyright © 2015
Claim Requirements
Country of OriginMarking
“Made in the USA” Claims
FTC California
Not required whereproduct is:
(1)made in the U.S.exclusively from U.S.-origin components; or
(2) “substantiallytransformed” byprocessing in the U.S.
“Made in the USA”claim permittedonly if product is“all or virtually all”made in the U.S.
“Made in the USA”claim permitted only ifno article, unit, or partof the product has beenentirely or substantiallymade, manufactured, orproduced outside of theU.S.
│ www.khlaw.com │ KELLER AND HECKMAN LLP21 Copyright © 2015
The Risks – FTC Enforcement
Investigation and closing letter citingpotentially violative claims and practices
• See, e.g., Letter to A. Gao, Global Syn-Turf, Inc.(March 30, 2015).
• FTC alleged “Made in USA” claims in marketingmaterials implied that all products advertised inthe materials were “all or virtually all” made in theU.S.
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/closing_letters/made-usa/150330musaclosingltr.pdf
│ www.khlaw.com │ KELLER AND HECKMAN LLP22 Copyright © 2015
The Risks – FTC Enforcement
Consent agreement restricting ability to makesimilar claims in future
See, e.g., E.K. Ekcessories, Inc. (2013).
FTC alleged company deceived consumers andonline retailers by claiming products thatcontained substantial foreign content were“Made in the U.S.A.”
https://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/documents/cases/131021ekcessoriesagree_1.pdf
│ www.khlaw.com │ KELLER AND HECKMAN LLP23 Copyright © 2015
California Litigation
Pending lawsuits in California courtshighlight the risks attendant to making“Made in USA” claims on product with anyforeign content.
│ www.khlaw.com │ KELLER AND HECKMAN LLP24 Copyright © 2015
California Litigation – Air Ball
2014: A manufacturer and a major retailersettled a class action lawsuit net andsome bolts of basketball hoop wereallegedly not U.S. origin.
• Hecht-Nielsen et al. v. Lifetime ProductsInc., et al., and Afrouznia et al. v. LifetimeProducts Inc., et al., Case No. 37-2011-00089380-CU-BT-CTL (2014).
│ www.khlaw.com │ KELLER AND HECKMAN LLP25 Copyright © 2015
California Litigation – Claims Unravel
2014: Plaintiffs sued clothingmanufacturers and major retailersfabric, thread, rivets, buttons, and zipperparts of jeans allegedly manufacturedoutside of the U.S.
• Clark v. Citizens of Humanity LLC et al.,Case Number 3:14-cv-01404 (pending).
• Paz v. Adriano Goldschmied et al., CaseNumber 3:14-cv-01372 (pending).
│ www.khlaw.com │ KELLER AND HECKMAN LLP26 Copyright © 2015
California Litigation – Sour Hops?
2015: Plaintiffs sued a major beerproducer beverages allegedly producedusing imported hops.
• Nixon v. Anheuser-Busch, LLC, CaseNumber CGC-15-544985 (pending).
│ www.khlaw.com │ KELLER AND HECKMAN LLP27 Copyright © 2015
Tricks
Qualified Claims
• FTC Guidelines expressly permit appropriatelyqualified “Made in USA” claims, e.g., “Made inUSA of U.S. and imported parts”; “Couchassembled in USA from Italian Leather andMexican Frame.”
• California statute provides no clear guidance onqualified claims, but pending apparel casessuggest such claims are permissible.
│ www.khlaw.com │ KELLER AND HECKMAN LLP28 Copyright © 2015
Traps
Use of terms such as “produced,” “created,”or “manufactured” to limit “Made in USA”claim to a specific process
• Such terms likely convey the idea that the claimis more general in scope.
Representations about entire product lines
• Making a general line claim (“Our products aremade in the USA”) when only some productsmeet the “all or virtually all” standard for theclaim.
│ www.khlaw.com │ KELLER AND HECKMAN LLP29 Copyright © 2015
Traps (cont’d)
Third-party certification
• 2014: Made in the USA Brand,LLC entered into settlement withFTC related to company’sissuance of a “Made in USA”certification seal without eitherverifying the country of origin ofcustomers’ products bearing theseal or clearly disclosing thatcustomers were self-certifying.
│ www.khlaw.com │ KELLER AND HECKMAN LLP31 Copyright © 2015
The Future of “Made in USA” Claims
Resolution of the pending California cases• Will courts uphold truly “zero tolerance” under CA
law?
• Will qualified claims be the subject of futurechallenges?
How does CA’s standard apply to products thatare manufactured with the aid of foreigncontent, but in which foreign content is removedor undetectable post-production?• Processing aids, enzymes, catalysts, and other
“components” that do not necessarily end up infinished products.
www.khlaw.com
Washington, D.C. ● Brussels ● San Francisco ● Shanghai ● Paris
Thank you
Keller and Heckman LLP1001 G Street NW
Suite 500 WestWashington, DC 20001
Alissa D. Jijon+ 1 [email protected]
Laura D. Venker+ 1 202.434.4129