madison area metropolitan planning organization (mpo)
DESCRIPTION
MADISON AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO). Update of the Regional Transportation Plan. A Presentation to Dane County’s Transportation, Utilities and Community Facilities Workgroup May 19, 2004. MPO General Responsibilities. Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
MADISON AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING
ORGANIZATION (MPO)
Update of the Regional Transportation Plan
A Presentation to Dane County’s Transportation, Utilities and Community Facilities Workgroup
May 19, 2004
MPO General Responsibilities
• Regional Transportation Plan (RTP)
• Transportation Improvement (TIP)
• Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
• Corridor and sub-area studies
MPO Planning Area Boundary
• Must cover existing urbanized area boundary (defined by U.S. Census Bureau)
• Also covers the contiguous area expected to become urbanized within a 20 year period
MPO Key Responsibility
• Prepare Regional Transportation Plan (RTP)
• Conduct RTP update every 5 years– Current plan, Dane County Land Use and
Transportation Plan, was adopted in 1997 and reaffirmed in 2000.
– Update is required by the end of 2005
Regional Transportation Plan
• Identifies transportation improvements and strategies/actions (e.g. corridor studies) that will lead to an integrated, multi-modal transportation system
• Must have 20 year planning horizon
• Reflects long range land use and development plans, and population and employment forecasts of area
Questions to consider for update:
• How well is the transportation system performing?
• How well do existing plans deal with current and expected problems?
Questions continued:
• Can the transportation system support the kinds of future growth and development that the region desires?
• What are the trends in regional growth and are they desireable?
Countywide Population Growth• From 1970-2000: 136,000 resident
- Annual growth rate of 1.29%
• From 2000-2030: 153,000 residents- Annual growth rate of 1.03%
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030
Dane County Population: 1970 to 2030
Regional Growth TrendsCountywide Population
Period Change Total % Change
1970-2000 ~136,000 ~426,000 47%
2000-2030 ~153,000 ~580,000 36%
Countywide Employment (place of work)
Period Change Total % Change
1970-2000 ~164,000 ~285,000 136%
2000-2030 ~97,000* ~382,000* 34%*
*Preliminary
Regional Growth TrendsCountywide Labor Force
Period Change Total % Change
1970-2000 ~129,000 ~256,000 102%
2000-2030 ~69,000 ~325,000 27%
Employment Outpaces Labor Force
Period Employ. L.F. @Per. End
1970-2000 139% 102% 31,200
2000-2030 34%* 27%* 57,000*
*Preliminary
Regional Travel Trends
• 1990 work-trip commuting to Dane County from adjacent counties ~16,400
• 1990 work-trip commuting from Dane County to adjacent counties ~6,000
Regional Travel Trends
• 2000 work-trip commuting to Dane County from adjacent counties ~30,000
• 2000 work-trip commuting from Dane County to adjacent counties ~9,000
Regional Travel Trends
• 2000 work-trip commuting to Dane County from elsewhere ~37,000
• 2000 work-trip commuting from Dane County to elsewhere ~13,200
~30,000 Work-trips From Adjacent Counties
County Commuters Labor Force % of L.F
Columbia 8,930 28,370 31.5
Dodge 1,440 44,680 3.2
Green 3,650 18,820 19.4
Iowa 3,160 13,140 24.0
Jefferson 3,970 41,590 7.6
Lafayette 440 8,750 5.0
Rock 5,020 80,900 6.2
Sauk 3,430 30,400 11.3
1970 Work-trip Commuting in Dane County
1980 Work-trip Commuting in Dane County
1990 Work-trip Commuting in Dane County
2000 Work-trip Commuting in Dane County
County Population vs. Vehicle Registration Trends
• Total personal vehicle registrations increasing faster than the county’s population over the age of 16.
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
1970 1980 1990 2000
Total # PersonalVehicles Registrations
Total Population Age 16years +
Mode Choice Work-trip Commuting Trends
Dane County
1970-2000
1970 mode choice work-trip commuting for Dane County
1980 mode choice work-trip commuting for Dane County
1980
Drive alone53%
Carpool20%
Transit10%
Walk11%
Bicycle & Other3%
Worked at home3%
1970
Worked at home5%
Bicycle & Other3%
Private Auto-Driver61%
Private Auto-Passenger
12%
Walk13%
Transit6%
1990 mode choice work-trip commuting for Dane County
2000 mode choice work-trip commuting for Dane County
1990
Worked at home
4%
Bicycle & Other3%Walk
8%
Transit5%
Carpool12%
Drive alone68%
2000
Drive alone74%
Worked at home4%
Bicycle & Other2%
Walk6%
Transit4%
Carpool10%
Transit Ridership Trends
8,000,000
9,000,000
10,000,000
11,000,000
12,000,000
13,000,000
14,000,00019
8019
8119
8219
8319
8419
8519
8619
8719
8819
8919
9019
9119
9219
9319
9419
9519
9619
9719
9819
9920
0020
0120
02
Tota
l Pas
seng
ers
260,000
280,000
300,000
320,000
340,000
360,000
380,000
400,000
420,000
Rev
enue
Ser
vice
Hou
rs
Total Passengers Revenue Service Hours
Bicycle Work-trips to Downtown Madison and UW
• From 1990 to 2000, work-trips increased 24% from 2,240/day to 2,770/day
• Compared to other modes of travel, the percentage share also increased from 4.4% to 4.8%
Vehicle Miles of TravelMadison Urban Area
1980 1990 2000
0
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
12,000,000
Estimated Daily Vehicles Miles of Travel (VMT) for the Madison Urban Area
VMT
1990 Roadway Congestion
2000 Roadway Congestion
Verona Road/West Beltline Study
USH 51 Corridor Study
N. Mendota Parkway Study
Land Development Forecasts
• 1970-2000:– Increased by 49%
– About 2.2 sq. mi. a year
• 2000-2030:– Increase by 33%
– About 2.2 sq. mi. a year
– Higher residential densities
– Lower commercial employees per acre
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Squa
re M
iles
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030
Developed Land Area: 1970 to 2030
PlanningNumber of Developed Number of Developed Number of Developed
Areas Persons Acres Persons Acres Persons AcresCentral 70,372 12,872 90,591 15,623 29% 21%Sun Prairie 14,114 3,148 18,833 3,867 33% 23%Waunakee 8,479 1,407 13,140 2,329 55% 66%Verona 7,945 1,580 7,815 1,549 -2% -2%Northern 7,720 1,822 18,886 4,508 145% 147%Stoughton 7,088 1,263 5,766 967 -19% -23%Oregon 5,569 940 17,721 3,152 218% 235%Cottage Grove 5,167 802 19,800 3,275 283% 308%Mount Horeb 4,235 824 5,084 986 20% 20%Marshall 1,816 363 3,327 601 83% 66%16 Smallest USAs 6,872 1,748 11,701 2,914 70% 67%Urban Total 139,377 26,769 212,665 39,771 53% 49%Rural Total 14,073 15,690 11,566 12,189 -18% -22%County Total 153,450 42,459 224,230 51,960 46% 22%Source: Local Land Use Plans and Dane County Regional Planning Commission
2000-2030 Forecast Planned Growth Percent Difference
RPC Forecasts Compared to Local Land Use Plans
RPC Forecasts Compared to Local Land Use Plans
• Reasonable fit between USA forecasts & current Local land use plans
• How will the new local plans fit?• Some urban areas plan for much more growth than
forecast• A few urban areas phase growth beyond 2030• Urban areas with small current growth capacities
are working on new plans
MADISON AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING
ORGANIZATION (MPO)
Update of the Regional Transportation Plan
A Presentation to Dane County’s Transportation, Utilities and Community Facilities Workgroup
May 19, 2004