magnetic phase diagram in fexsn1-xamorphous alloys

3
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, VOL. MAG-17, NO. 6, NOVEMBER 1981 3079 MAGNETIC PHASE DIAGRAM IN Fe, Snlmx AMORPHOUS ALLOYS D. Teirlinck, M. Piecuch, J. F. Geny , G. flarchal, Ph . rangin and Chr. Janot prepared by a vapour deposition technique and their magnetic properties have been investigated. Corrpeti- tion of fern- and antifemmagnetic interaction re- sults in quite a coqlex behaviour : x > 0.45 c o m s - pmds to alloys with a typical femmagnetic order and a transition to a parmgnetic state at a Wietempe- rature Tc ; at intemdiate composition (0.40 < x < 0.45) the alloys exhibit a double transition : a first one at TM is a spin-glass-like transition and a second one at Tc > TM is from ferro- to parmgnetism; the al- loys on the tin side (0.25 < x < 0.40) transform direc- tly from spin-glass to paramagnetic state at 31 or re- rrain parmgnetic (x < 0.25)whatever the temperature. Abstract - Amrphous Fex alloys have been . INTRODUCTION Simultaneous presence of different mgnetic irter- actions in an alloy (fern- and antiferrompetism for phases such as spin-glass or cluster glass states. instance) my result in the appearance of new m g n e t i c tallized materials mde of magnetic impurities in non- mgnetic mtrices, in which the competition cones from the coexistence of two types of rragnetic atoms (Pd Fe k [I] for instance) or arises via mschanisT(& Fe [21 or &J [3]). A similar behaviour has been recently observed in mrphous alloys Fex Pd B2-x Si16 [41 , (Nil,o-x FeX)T9 P13Bg [SI (in which Fe is the "mgnetic impur~ty" in non-magnetic Pdg2Si18 or Ni79P13B8 mtrices) and in (Fe, kI-X)75P16Bs A13 [6] (in which Fe and k are two mgnetic species). sured in Fex S~I-~ amorphous alloys which have been pre- In this paper are reported mp.etic data as ma- ?xed in a rather large coqositional range (0.20 < x < 0.75). As the comspor,ding crystallized equi1ibriu.n phases can be f e m m g n e t i c (Fe3Sn) or antiferromgne- tic (Fe Sn and Fe 3-12) , competing short range interac- result in disordered mgnetic phases, similar to that tions are expected in the mrphous mterial and my previously reported [4] [51 [61. Such a behaviour has been m s t l y observed in crys- EXPERIMENTS AND RESULTS Amrphous iron-ti? f i m have been ?repaEd by the vapour quenching mthcd [71 181 [91 ClOl . Evapo- kapton polyimide ribbon cooled to the 1iquid.nitrogen rated tin and iron atoms are deposited on an adhesive rurperature. Tne mryhou state of the samples is characterized by electron diffraction ard electrical resistivity neasulrenmts . Further crystallization is avoided by keeping the alloys in liquid nitrogen. Fagnetic data have been collected using a Foner mgnetoreter, at temperatures ranging from 2 to 300 K table samples have beer. obtained by pilling up the and with an applied rrapetic field up to 20 kOe. Sui- evaporated film in rectangular prism shape (6 x 12 x 0.7 m). In order to account for demgnetization ef- fects, the mgnetization u (9) has been masured for each sample at T = 4.2 K and H = 1300 Oe, as a function huscript received March 4 , 1981 Laboratoim de Physique du Solide (L. A. 155) C. 0. no 140 - 54037 - NANCY-CEDEX (France) ' I -x Fig. 1. C20m-b.y of the mgnetizationmgasuremnts. of the orientation 9 of H with respect. to the sample surface (fig. 1). Changes of u (0 1 , between 0- at ei = 90° and or, at el = 180°, are shown in E?e figure 2. Tne demagnetizing factors N1 , N2 , N3 have been also detenrined in the directions of the Ox, Gy, Oz axes as sham in the figure 1, using hys-ceresis loop data from strangly mgnetic samples ( usat > 120 m / g 70 50 30 Fig; 2. Dependence on the sample orientation of the mgnetization value. Fe at 4.2 K which corresponds t o x > 0.45). Indeed, Mdssbauer investigations have previously given ev?:Lden- ces [lo1 of a uniaxial mgnetic anisotropy in these arrorphous alloys, with the easy direction pewndku- lar to the film plane. A multidorrain structu-r my be suggested. Tnen the rraxirmun slope (do/dH),, in the hysteresis loop is given by fqe reciprocal demgr-eti- ticular orientmior. of the sample. W e have reasured : zing factor l/N [111 ( f i g . 3) corresponding t o the par N1 (el) = 1.5 and N2 (e2)= 11.7 ; N3 cannot be experi- mtally obtained due TO geomtrical constri?s of the experkrts but has been estirrated. to be about 0.2 tlxough the surface ratio of the sample faces. 'The sm. N1 + N2 + Ns = 13 .4 is -hen not too far from +he 12.6 theoretical value. Fig. 3. Determination ofthe demagnetizing factorusing the maximum slope in rhe hysteresis loop. 0018-9464/81/1100-3079S00.75 0 1981 IEEE

Upload: chr

Post on 24-Sep-2016

217 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Magnetic phase diagram in FexSn1-xamorphous alloys

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, VOL. MAG-17, NO. 6 , NOVEMBER 1981 3079

MAGNETIC PHASE DIAGRAM IN Fe, Snlmx AMORPHOUS ALLOYS

D. Teirlinck, M. Piecuch, J. F. Geny , G. flarchal, Ph. rangin and Chr. Janot

prepared by a vapour deposition technique and the i r magnetic properties have been investigated. Corrpeti- t ion of f e r n - and antifemmagnetic interaction re- su l t s in quite a coqlex behaviour : x > 0.45 c o m s - pmds to alloys with a typical femmagnetic order and a t r ans i t i on t o a parmgnet ic s ta te at a Wietempe- rature Tc ; at intemdiate composition (0.40 < x < 0.45) the alloys exhibit a double transition : a f i r s t one a t TM is a spin-glass-like transition and a second one a t Tc > TM is from ferro- to parmgnetism; the al- loys on the tin side (0.25 < x < 0.40) transform direc- t l y from spin-glass t o paramagnetic s ta te at 31 or re- rrain parmgnet ic (x < 0.25) whatever the temperature.

Abstract - Amrphous Fex alloys have been

. INTRODUCTION

Simultaneous presence of different mgnetic irter- actions in an a l loy ( fe rn- and ant i ferrompet ism for

phases such as spin-glass or cluster glass states. instance) my result in the appearance of new mgnetic

ta l l ized materials mde of magnetic impurities i n non- mgnet ic mtr ices , in which the competition cones f r o m the coexistence of two types of rragnetic atoms (Pd Fe k [I] for instance) o r arises via mschanisT(& Fe [21 or &J [3]).

A similar behaviour has been recently observed in mrphous alloys Fex Pd B2-x Si16 [41 , (Ni l , o -x FeX)T9 P13Bg [SI ( i n which Fe is the "mgnetic impur~ty" i n non-magnetic Pdg2Si18 o r Ni79P13B8 mtr ices) and in (Fe, kI-X)75P16Bs A 1 3 [ 6 ] (in which Fe and k are two mgnetic species).

sured i n Fex S ~ I - ~ amorphous alloys which have been pre- In th i s paper are reported mp.etic da ta as ma-

?xed in a rather large coqosit ional range (0.20 < x < 0.75). As the comspor,ding crystallized equi1ibriu.n phases can be f e m m g n e t i c (Fe3Sn) or antiferromgne- t i c (Fe Sn and Fe 3-12) , competing short range interac-

result in disordered mgnetic phases, similar t o t h a t tions are expected in the mrphous mterial and my

previously reported [4] [51 [61.

Such a behaviour has been m s t l y observed in c rys -

EXPERIMENTS AND RESULTS

Amrphous iron-ti? f i m have been ?repaEd by the vapour quenching mthcd [71 181 [91 C l O l . Evapo-

kapton polyimide ribbon cooled t o the 1iquid.nitrogen ra ted t in and iron atoms are deposited on an adhesive

rurperature. Tne m r y h o u s t a t e of the samples is characterized by electron diffraction ard electrical res i s t iv i ty neasulrenmts . Further crystallization is avoided by keeping the alloys in liquid nitrogen.

Fagnetic data have been collected using a Foner mgnetoreter, at temperatures ranging from 2 t o 300 K

table samples have beer. obtained by p i l l ing up the and w i t h an applied rrapetic field up t o 20 kOe. Sui-

evaporated f i lm in rectangular prism shape ( 6 x 1 2 x 0.7 m). In order to account for demgnetization ef- fects, the mgnetization u (9) has been masured for each sample at T = 4 .2 K and H = 1300 Oe, as a function

h u s c r i p t received March 4 , 1981

Laboratoim de Physique du Solide (L. A. 155) C. 0 . no 140 - 54037 - NANCY-CEDEX (France)

'I - x

Fig. 1. C20m-b.y of the mgnetization mgasuremnts.

of the orientation 9 of H with respect. t o t he sample surface (fig. 1). Changes of u ( 0 1 , between 0- a t e i = 90° and or,, at e l = 180°, are shown in E?e figure 2. Tne demagnetizing factors N1 , N2 , N3 have been also detenrined in the directions of the Ox, Gy, Oz axes as sham in the figure 1, using hys-ceresis loop data f r o m strangly mgnetic samples ( usat > 120 m / g

7 0

5 0

3 0

Fig; 2. Dependence on the sample orientation of the mgnetization value.

Fe at 4.2 K which corresponds t o x > 0.45). Indeed, Mdssbauer investigations have previously given ev?:Lden- ces [lo1 of a uniaxial mgnetic anisotropy in these arrorphous alloys, with the easy direction pewndku- lar to the film plane. A multidorrain structu-r my be suggested. Tnen the rraxirmun slope (do/dH),, in the hysteresis loop is given by fqe reciprocal demgr-eti-

t icular orientmior. of the sample. We have reasured : zing factor l/N [111 (f ig . 3) corresponding t o t h e p a r

N1 ( e l ) = 1.5 and N2 ( e 2 ) = 11.7 ; N 3 cannot be experi- m t a l l y obtained due TO geomtrical constri?s of the e x p e r k r t s but has been estirrated. to be about 0.2 tlxough the surface ratio of the sample faces. 'The sm. N 1 + N2 + Ns = 13 . 4 i s -hen not too far from +he 1 2 . 6 theoretical value.

Fig. 3. Determination of the demagnetizing factor using the maximum slope in rhe hysteresis loop.

0018-9464/81/1100-3079S00.75 0 1981 IEEE

Page 2: Magnetic phase diagram in FexSn1-xamorphous alloys

3080

The samples being in the 81 orientation experi- m t s have been carried out as the following :

(i) nngnetization c u r ~ s have been recorded f r o m 4.2 t o 300 K with H up t o 20 kCe. These curves exhibit l inear parts between 15 and 20 kOe whose extrapolation to H = 0 gives saturation values us (x) versus composi- t ion (see f ig. 4 corresponding t o us (x) at 4 .2 K and

Fig. 4. Saturation mgnetization data at 4.2 K as a function of the iron concentration.

which is a refinement of preliminay data previously published [81). "High field" susceptibil i t ies are also deduced f r o m the slopes of these linear parts (fig. 5).

with a constart 1CO Oe external f ie ld . After dem- gnetization a-c room temperature the sanples am coo-

applied and u (TI is m a s u e d f r o m 4.2 K t o 250 K led ir zem field <om to 4.2 K, t5en H = 100 Oe is

and from 250 K t o 4.2 K. Three different -d-iemm- gnetic behaviour have been obtained :

iron (x .L 0.45) the sa-ation rragnetization is (a) For alloys relatively r ich in

rather large ( us > 120 em/g Fe) and the high f i e l d suscegtibility is smaller than 3.5 x IO-'+ em/cm3. The t h e m m g n e t i c curve e A i b i t s a smeared mximm ( f ig . 6 ) . Such a behaviour is typical of a f e m m - m e t whose Curietenprature T, can >e ?etermi?ed as shmn in figure 6. lhe comsgonding value u/H (Tc) is not too f a r from Lts theoretical lhit l / N i 1121.

(ii) t h e m m g n e t i c curves have keen recorded

0 TOlJ 5 0 100 150 2G- 250 3x0

Fig. 5. T h e m r a p e t i c curve u(T) obtaimd f r o m a Feo.4sSno,ss mrphous alloy with a 100 Oe ZP- pl ied f ie ld .

(b) In t he i n t emdia t e compositional range (0.40 < x < 0.451, os ranges from 70 to 120 emu/g Fe and the high f ield swceptLbiliq f r o m 3.5 x t o 6.5 x m/cm3. The o(T) curve

r a m (T & 60 K) similar t o t ha t of the prev5ous (f ig . 7) has a reversible evolution at high tempe-

(a) case, and an irreversible trend below Tx (see figure 7) , o(T) remining practically unchanged when T decreases towam& zero.

Fig. 7. Typical t k m m g n e t i c c w v e in the intemedia- te compositional range.

(c) F-er to the t in s ide (0.25 < x c

emu g/Fe with a larger high field susceptibility 0.40) the mgnetization becores poorer ( os < 0.70

(x 6.5 x IO-^ em/cn3). me themrragnetic c1-e exhlbits a single quite sharp -near TH at

nished when returning to 4.2 K ( f ig . 8 . increasing terperature. This rraximum completely va-

4 1 p F G a _____.__

Fig. 8 . Typical t h e m m g n e t i c curve a t lower iron con- centration.

Page 3: Magnetic phase diagram in FexSn1-xamorphous alloys

CONCLUSION

loys can be proposed by plott ing the composition de- A magnetic phase diagram of the Fe, s ~ - ~ al-

pendences of Tc (x) and TM (x) as previously deter- mined (f ig . 9). The ferromgnetic behaviour observed

Fig. 9. Magnetic phase diagram of the Fe, S ~ I - ~ mr-

tism ; SG spin-glass state). phous system (P = pararagnetism ; F = ferrumgne-

n i t e c luster of iron atom. In the intermediate com- for x > 0.45 rray result of the existence of an infi-

positional range (0.40 < x < 0.45), the in f in i te ferromagnetic cluster coexists with a number of fi- nite clusters or isolated iron atom which x e an- t i f e m g n e t i c a l l y coupled through Fe-s-Fe bridges. Tnen TM would be a blocking temperature for the fi- nite clusters : i n the T < TM range the alloys have a spin-glass behaviour and the f in i te c lus te r sus- cept ibi l i ty keeps on i n m a s i n g up t o Tc the c r i t i - cal temperature f o r the infinite cluster. Thus i3-1ez-e would be two transitions : one a t TM corresponding to the deblocking of the finite cluster and a second one f m m f e r n t o pararragnetism at T,. With less i ron in the alloys (0.25 < x < 0.40) the mfini te c luster has k e n spread out into smll clusters and the remaining transition is from spin-glass like behaviour t o para- mgnetism at TM.

tion mchanism m n g atoms of the sane chemical specie i n concentrated alloys, due t o the coexistence of di- rect femmgnet ic i s te rac t ions Fe-Fe and indirect an- tifernmagnetic interactions Fe-Sn-Fe which are "ran- domly" nixed in the mrphous state. Magnetization ma- surements up t o 150 k0e will be c h e d out i n a next fu tum to determine the cluster sizes.

Thus we have observed f o r Lhe first tire frustra-

REFERENCES r11 G. J. Niewenhws . B. H. Verbeek and J. A. Kvdosh. _ _

J. Appl. Phys. , 50; 1685 (1979). [21 €3. R. Coles, B . 7 . B. sarkissian and R. H. Taylor,

3081

D l Ph. hgin, M. Piecuch, G. Mal and Chr. Janot,

191 Ph. kgin, G. Marchal, C. burey and Chr. Janot,

[lo] B. Rodmacq';-f(i: Piecuch, Chr. Janot , G. Marchdl and

[I11 D. W. Carnegie Jr, C. m a n c h i t a and H. Claw,

C121 H. Claw, phys. Rev. Lett., 2, 26 (1975).

J. Phys., E, 2085,(1978). Phys. Rev. B 21, 3047 (1980).

ph. Mangin, Phys. Rev. B 21, 1911 (1980).

J. Appl. fiys., so, 7318 (1979).

Philos. &g., 2, 489 (1978). 1, 95 (1969).

131 J. Souletie and R. Tournier, J. Law Temp. Phys.,

L41-G. Dublon, Phys. Status Sol idi (a), 6 0 , 287 (1980). [SI J. brand , Rev. Phys. Appl., 15, 1036 (1980). E61 Y. Yeshurun, M. B. S a l m n , K.V. Rao and H. S.

171 G. M a l , Ph. hgin and Chr. Janot, J. Fbys., men, Phys. Rev. Lett., E, 1366 (1980). C 2 , 91 (1974). -