magnus ekengern. crisis management cooperation in europe an empirical investigation of comparative...
DESCRIPTION
New Trends in Societal Security research in the Nordic countries 26 - 27 November 2014 in StockholmTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Magnus ekengern. crisis management cooperation in europe an empirical investigation of comparative advantage](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022020218/559adf9a1a28ab162c8b46e2/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Swedish National Defence College
Building Societal Security Research Group
Försvarshögskolan, Utrikespolitiska Institutet, Leiden University
Magnus Ekengren
New trends in societal security
research in the Nordic countries27 November 2014
EU Crisis Management: how do wemake it stronger?
![Page 2: Magnus ekengern. crisis management cooperation in europe an empirical investigation of comparative advantage](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022020218/559adf9a1a28ab162c8b46e2/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
•Why research on EU crisismanagement?
![Page 3: Magnus ekengern. crisis management cooperation in europe an empirical investigation of comparative advantage](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022020218/559adf9a1a28ab162c8b46e2/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
PROBLEMs
• EU resources not used • EU resources overlapinternational capacities
• Unclear division ofcompetence EU - EU member states
• Unclear EU role in transboundary crisis
![Page 4: Magnus ekengern. crisis management cooperation in europe an empirical investigation of comparative advantage](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022020218/559adf9a1a28ab162c8b46e2/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Project 2014-1017
• How can the EU’s crisis management capacity be improved?
• Purpose: when, where and how does EU crisismanagement provide most added value to the EU member states and Europe?
• Goal: proposals for effective division of labour and competence EU – EU member states – international and subregional organizations
![Page 5: Magnus ekengern. crisis management cooperation in europe an empirical investigation of comparative advantage](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022020218/559adf9a1a28ab162c8b46e2/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Focus: transboundary crisis
• Definition: crosses sectors, responsibilities, national jurisdictions
• Characteristics: affects multiple jurisdictions and decison-making levels, calls for public private coordination, and, rapid, unpredictable spread
• Challenges: sense-, mening-, decision-making
![Page 6: Magnus ekengern. crisis management cooperation in europe an empirical investigation of comparative advantage](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022020218/559adf9a1a28ab162c8b46e2/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Qs
EU cooperation:
• In what type of transboudnary crisis?
• In what phase?
• In what sectors?
• In what forms?
•What are the alternatives to EU cooperation in transboundary crisis?
![Page 7: Magnus ekengern. crisis management cooperation in europe an empirical investigation of comparative advantage](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022020218/559adf9a1a28ab162c8b46e2/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Subsidiarity principle
The principle of subsidiarity: determine the level of intervention that is most relevant in the areas of competences shared between the EU and the Member States.
• Does the action have transnational aspects that cannot be resolved by Member States?
• Would national action or an absence of action be contrary to the requirements of the Treaty?
• Does action at European level have clear advantages?
![Page 8: Magnus ekengern. crisis management cooperation in europe an empirical investigation of comparative advantage](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022020218/559adf9a1a28ab162c8b46e2/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Subsidarity principle
Problem
What are the transnational aspects oftransboundary crisis?
Example: Ash cloud crisis2010
Level
What capacity on national level?
What capacities can EU offer?
![Page 9: Magnus ekengern. crisis management cooperation in europe an empirical investigation of comparative advantage](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022020218/559adf9a1a28ab162c8b46e2/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Ash cloud crisis 2010
• April 14, 2010, the volcano Eyjafjallajökull on Iceland erupted
• Guidelines by International Civil Aviation Organization (UN): “safety first”
• April 15, Eurocontrol recommend closure of national air space
• April 15, National Air Traffic Services close national airspace
• April 17, European air traffic dropped by 85%
• 108,000 flights cancelled; 10,5 million stranded; 1,7 billion lost revenue for airlines
• April 17, EU Commission tasked Eurocontrol to develop coordinated EU crisis management plan
• April 19, EU ministers of transport: A three zone-division
• April 20, air traffic up with 40%
• April 22, back to normal
![Page 10: Magnus ekengern. crisis management cooperation in europe an empirical investigation of comparative advantage](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022020218/559adf9a1a28ab162c8b46e2/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Characteristics
• Affected 27 national jurisdictions
• Affected national– European – international level
• National collective action problem: total flight stop
• Weak public-private coordination (no avation
companies)
• Weak cross sectoral coordination
• From aviation to mobility crisis
• Challenges: hundreds of reports, total flight stop only
solution on national level
![Page 11: Magnus ekengern. crisis management cooperation in europe an empirical investigation of comparative advantage](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022020218/559adf9a1a28ab162c8b46e2/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Subsidiarity principle: Ash cloud crisis
Problem Level
Inefficient national decisions and capacity
What can the EU offer?
![Page 12: Magnus ekengern. crisis management cooperation in europe an empirical investigation of comparative advantage](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022020218/559adf9a1a28ab162c8b46e2/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
What can the EU offer?
Before Under After crisis
• Facilitate coordination
• Lead cooperation
• Recommend
• Guidelines (national action plans)
• Capacity goals
• Binding law and rules
• Common procurement
• Common resources (EU budget)
![Page 13: Magnus ekengern. crisis management cooperation in europe an empirical investigation of comparative advantage](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022020218/559adf9a1a28ab162c8b46e2/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
EU level
National
Regional/
local
Levels
Sense-making, communication, prevention,
early warning, preparation, exercise, evaluation?
Sector X,
Phase Y
Decision making, coping, resources
development, resource spool, crisis reports,
preparation, reform work?
coping, resources development, crisis reports,
preparation?
EU crisis management
![Page 14: Magnus ekengern. crisis management cooperation in europe an empirical investigation of comparative advantage](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022020218/559adf9a1a28ab162c8b46e2/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Lessons from ash cloud crisis
• Sense-making needed at EU level
• EU coordination for common message (explainEuropean ”fly zones”)
• Decision making: binding EU rules
• Increased competence for European Aviation SafetyAgency
• EU protection of vulnerable citizens
• EU capacity for learning
![Page 15: Magnus ekengern. crisis management cooperation in europe an empirical investigation of comparative advantage](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022020218/559adf9a1a28ab162c8b46e2/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Project: planned result
• Methods for identifying and evaluating transboundaryvulnerabilities and crisis
• Model for analysis of when, where, how EU cooperation for application of subsidiarity principle
• Empirical case studies
• Proposals: - More effctive division of competence
- ”EU-preparedness guidelines” fortransboundary crisis