maharastra ground water data analysis - iit bombaymaharastra ground water data analysis by ravi...
TRANSCRIPT
Maharastra Ground Water Data Analysis
By Ravi Sagar[10305037]Guided by Prof. Milind Sohoni
October 25, 2011
By Ravi Sagar[10305037] Guided by Prof. Milind Sohoni Maharastra Ground Water Data Analysis
Outline
Variance Analysis of Groundwater Level
Improved Single Well Seasonal Model
Introduction to Spatial Models
Krigging - Spatial Interpolation Technique
Database and Geo Server Demo
Conclusion
Future Work
By Ravi Sagar[10305037] Guided by Prof. Milind Sohoni Maharastra Ground Water Data Analysis
Variance Analysis of Groundwater Level
By Ravi Sagar[10305037] Guided by Prof. Milind Sohoni Maharastra Ground Water Data Analysis
Variance And Its Impact on Models
Variance: Measure of how far the values are spread out fromexpected value(or mean)
It gives the variation of water level over the period
Difficult to model the behavior of wells with high variance
Reasons behind Variance
NoiseGeological PropertiesRainfall
Models should be developed considering causes of variance
By Ravi Sagar[10305037] Guided by Prof. Milind Sohoni Maharastra Ground Water Data Analysis
Low variance and High variance observation wells
Figure: Well with high variance
By Ravi Sagar[10305037] Guided by Prof. Milind Sohoni Maharastra Ground Water Data Analysis
Low variance and High variance observation wells
Figure: Well with low variance
By Ravi Sagar[10305037] Guided by Prof. Milind Sohoni Maharastra Ground Water Data Analysis
Variance of Current Model
Mean varies depending on time for our data
Assuming time constant variance:
σ = {∑n
i=1 (yi−µi )2
n } 12
Table: Top 5 Bore wells with high variance
Well name Variance Depth(m)
Mandawa 12.561928 30Tokavde 10.591332 24Safale 4.466477 25.9Kudan 4.302190 30Sakharshet chalatwad 3.640198 22.5
By Ravi Sagar[10305037] Guided by Prof. Milind Sohoni Maharastra Ground Water Data Analysis
Variance of Current Model
Table: Top 5 Dug wells with high variance
Well name Variance Depth(m)
Washind 1 6.396629 7Talasari 5.252879 7Mangrul 3.221694 7.6Satiwali 3.102799 7.2Dahisar 3.084735 9.5
By Ravi Sagar[10305037] Guided by Prof. Milind Sohoni Maharastra Ground Water Data Analysis
Time Line Graph
Figure: Behavior of Mandawa Bore Well over the period
By Ravi Sagar[10305037] Guided by Prof. Milind Sohoni Maharastra Ground Water Data Analysis
Time Line Graph
Figure: Behavioor of Washind1 DugWell over the period
By Ravi Sagar[10305037] Guided by Prof. Milind Sohoni Maharastra Ground Water Data Analysis
Variance Vs Discrepancy
Is variance affected by discrepancy
Discrepancy is compared with normalized variance
Normalized Variance = Variance / Depth of the well
We are intended to extend the use of variance to R2 model (that isdividing the error value with variance)
Table: Variance Vs Discrepancy for Bore Well
Village Normalized variance Depth(m) Discrepancy countTokavde 0.135601 24.000 1
Mandawa 0.118143 30.000 2Gokhiware 0.090139 18.000 4
Satiwali 0.033998 18.000 23Bhatsai 0.050426 18.000 17
By Ravi Sagar[10305037] Guided by Prof. Milind Sohoni Maharastra Ground Water Data Analysis
Variance Vs Discrepancy
Table: Variance Vs Discrepancy for Dug Well
Village Normalized variance Depth(m) Discrepancy countWashind 1 0.361308 7.000 7
Talasari 0.286490 8.000 5Satiwali 0.244649 7.200 15Dapode 0.208616 5.250 7Titwala 0.150577 7.000 10
Unable to infer the relationship with above results.
By Ravi Sagar[10305037] Guided by Prof. Milind Sohoni Maharastra Ground Water Data Analysis
How to know the Causes of variance
Need to classify the years that are below the model and above themodel
Comparing the variance value with Rainfall and Geological data
This will be done after getting the data from GSDA
Field visits to know human interference and some other noise.
Figure: Observation well
By Ravi Sagar[10305037] Guided by Prof. Milind Sohoni Maharastra Ground Water Data Analysis
Extension to Single Well Seasonal Models
By Ravi Sagar[10305037] Guided by Prof. Milind Sohoni Maharastra Ground Water Data Analysis
Drawbacks in Periodic Model
Periodic models generaly smoother than what actual behavior seemsto be.
Unusual raise of model before monsoon starts
Discontinuity of groundwater data
- i.e sudden raise of water level in the month of June
Need a new model to solve this problems
By Ravi Sagar[10305037] Guided by Prof. Milind Sohoni Maharastra Ground Water Data Analysis
Drawbacks in Periodic Model
Figure: Periodic model of Mandawa bore well
By Ravi Sagar[10305037] Guided by Prof. Milind Sohoni Maharastra Ground Water Data Analysis
Reason behind rapid raise of water level
AGRAR case study of Kolwan valley,Pune,Maharashtra byACWADAMAim is to study
Physical dynamics of rechargeEffect of artificial recharge
Chikhalgaon Water shed with shallow aquifer(20m)
8 Dug wells, 8 Bore wells
Found the interesting results
Dug wells and shallow bore wells (both tap the shallow aquifer) haverapid recharge in the beginning of monsoonBore wells that tap deeper aquifer have consistently slow recharge.
By Ravi Sagar[10305037] Guided by Prof. Milind Sohoni Maharastra Ground Water Data Analysis
Results of AGRAR Case Study
Figure: Taken from AGRAR report
By Ravi Sagar[10305037] Guided by Prof. Milind Sohoni Maharastra Ground Water Data Analysis
Results of AGRAR Case Study
Figure: Taken from AGRAR report
By Ravi Sagar[10305037] Guided by Prof. Milind Sohoni Maharastra Ground Water Data Analysis
Need for Polynomial Model
To solve the problems in previous model
Monotonically increasing behavior of groundwater Data
Starts with zero level in monsoonEnds with any value between zero to depth of the well at the end ofmonsoon.
Can be best represented with polynomial functions
By Ravi Sagar[10305037] Guided by Prof. Milind Sohoni Maharastra Ground Water Data Analysis
Polynomial Model
Generalized function used to fit the datay = akx
k + ak−1xk−1 + · · ·+ a1x + a0 for K=3,4,5.
Figure: Polynomial model of Gokhiware bore well
By Ravi Sagar[10305037] Guided by Prof. Milind Sohoni Maharastra Ground Water Data Analysis
Variance of Polynomial Model
Computed the variance polynomial model
Table: Variance Vs Discrepancy for Dug Well
Village Site Type Normalized variance Depth(m)
Awale Dug Well 0.760082 7.35Kajali Dug Well 0.724898 14Kogde Dug Well 0.695927 7
Kalamdevi Dug Well 0.690580 5.5Mandawa Bore Well 0.597985 30Tokavde Bore Well 0.372142 24
By Ravi Sagar[10305037] Guided by Prof. Milind Sohoni Maharastra Ground Water Data Analysis
Regional Models
By Ravi Sagar[10305037] Guided by Prof. Milind Sohoni Maharastra Ground Water Data Analysis
Need of Regional Models
Scope of single well seasonal model is limited to well
How to know the behavior of ground water level at any arbitrarypoint
How to predict the behavior of entire region
Can be done using the regional models
Regional model divides the space in to sub regions where eachregion has its own behavior model
similar to spatial models
By Ravi Sagar[10305037] Guided by Prof. Milind Sohoni Maharastra Ground Water Data Analysis
Spatial Model
Divides spatial area in to grids or polygons depending up onparticular property value.
Voronoi Diagrams: Decomposes the given space in to voronoiregions depending on distance to voronoi sites.
By Ravi Sagar[10305037] Guided by Prof. Milind Sohoni Maharastra Ground Water Data Analysis
Spatial Interpolation Techniques
Process of estimating the values at unsampled sites with in areacovered by sampled points.
Need spatial interpolation techniques in regional modeling
To estimate the groundwater value at intermediate locationsTo decide the region of a particular point.
Some spatial interpolation techniques
ProximalB-splinesKrigging
By Ravi Sagar[10305037] Guided by Prof. Milind Sohoni Maharastra Ground Water Data Analysis
Krigging - Spatial Interpolation
By Ravi Sagar[10305037] Guided by Prof. Milind Sohoni Maharastra Ground Water Data Analysis
Krigging Interpolation
Krigging Interpolation
Stationary model.
E [Z(xi )] = µ i = 1, 2, ..nR(‖x − x p‖) = R(h) = E [(Z(x)− µ)(Z(x p)− µ)], where ‖x − x p‖ isthe distance between x , x p
Given n measurements of Z , at different locations x1, x2, ...xn,Estimated value of Z at x0 is
Z0 =∑n
i=1 λiZ (xi )
Estimation error
Z0 − Z (x0) = (∑n
i=1 λiZ (xi ))− Z (x0)
By Ravi Sagar[10305037] Guided by Prof. Milind Sohoni Maharastra Ground Water Data Analysis
Krigging Interpolation
Requirements for good estimator.
Unbiasedness:
E [Z0 − Z (x0)] =∑n
i=1 λiµ− µ = (∑n
i=1 λi − 1)µ = 0∑ni=1 λi = 1
Minimum Variance:
E [(Z0 − Z (x0))2] = −∑n
i
∑nj λiλjγ(‖xi − xj‖) + 2
∑ni λiγ(‖xi − x0‖)
γ(‖x − x p‖) = 12E [(Z (x)− Z (x p))2]
By Ravi Sagar[10305037] Guided by Prof. Milind Sohoni Maharastra Ground Water Data Analysis
Krigging Interpolation
Lagrange multiplier system: Ax = b
−∑n
j=1 λjγ(‖xi − xj‖) + v = −γ(‖xi − x0‖)i = 1, 2, ..n∑nj=1 λj = 1
A =
0 −γ(‖x1 − x2‖) · · · −γ(‖x1 − xn‖) 1
−γ(‖x2 − x1‖) 0 · · · −γ(‖x2 − xn‖) 1...
......
...−γ(‖xn − x1‖) −γ(‖xn − x2‖) · · · 0 1
1 1 · · · 1 0
x =
λ1λ2...λn1
b =
−γ(‖x1 − x0‖)−γ(‖x2 − x0‖)
...−γ(‖xn − x0‖)
1
By Ravi Sagar[10305037] Guided by Prof. Milind Sohoni Maharastra Ground Water Data Analysis
Issues in Krigging Interpolation
consider 1-D function with γ(h) = 1 + h for h >0.x1 = 0, x2 = 1, x3 = 3 and x0 =?
0 −2 −4 1−2 0 −3 1−4 −3 0 11 1 1 0
λ1λ2λ3v
=
−3−2−21
λ1 = 0.1304, λ2 = 0.3913λ3 = 0.4783 and v = −0.304
Key assumption: correlation is function of distancewhich is not true in the case of groundwater
We can use the soil property to apply krigging interpolation
By Ravi Sagar[10305037] Guided by Prof. Milind Sohoni Maharastra Ground Water Data Analysis
Example of Krigging Interpolation
Altitude contour map generated using krigging interpolation.
By Ravi Sagar[10305037] Guided by Prof. Milind Sohoni Maharastra Ground Water Data Analysis
Spatial Correlation Between Rainfall Data
22.5 5 5 3 4 5 5 4 521.5 5 2 3 4 4 4 5 520.5 5 0 3 3 3 4 4 419.5 4 1 3 3 3 3 3 318.5 4 0 0 0 2 2 3 217.5 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 416.5 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 115.5 R 0 0 0 1 1 1 1
LatitudeLongitude 73.5 74.5 75.5 76.5 77.5 78.5 79.5 80.5
By Ravi Sagar[10305037] Guided by Prof. Milind Sohoni Maharastra Ground Water Data Analysis
Spatial Correlation Between Rainfall Data
22.5 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 521.5 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 020.5 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 019.5 1 1 0 0 R 0 0 -118.5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 -117.5 0 0 1 0 0 0 -1 -116.5 0 1 0 -1 -1 -1 -1 -115.5 -3 -2 -2 -2 -2 -4 -1 -1
LatitudeLongitude 73.5 74.5 75.5 76.5 77.5 78.5 79.5 80.5
By Ravi Sagar[10305037] Guided by Prof. Milind Sohoni Maharastra Ground Water Data Analysis
Spatial Correlation Between Rainfall Data
22.5 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 R21.5 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 020.5 2 -5 -5 0 0 0 0 019.5 -4 -5 -5 -5 -5 0 -1 -118.5 -5 -5 -5 -5 -5 -5 -1 -117.5 -4 -5 -5 -5 -5 -5 -5 -516.5 -5 -5 -5 -5 -5 -5 -5 -315.5 -5 0 -3 -5 -5 5 -3 -3
LatitudeLongitude 73.5 74.5 75.5 76.5 77.5 78.5 79.5 80.5
By Ravi Sagar[10305037] Guided by Prof. Milind Sohoni Maharastra Ground Water Data Analysis
Database and Geo server demo
Back end databases
PostgresPost Gis
Geo Server to show and manipulate the spatial maps
Will update the MRSAC data sooner
By Ravi Sagar[10305037] Guided by Prof. Milind Sohoni Maharastra Ground Water Data Analysis
Conclusion
Basic data cleaning
Discrepancy analysis
Single well seasonal models With groundwater level as main input
Variance analysis
Initial study on regional models
By Ravi Sagar[10305037] Guided by Prof. Milind Sohoni Maharastra Ground Water Data Analysis
Future Work
Survey of national and international experience
Understanding data analysis models of different states
Dry well modeling and its validation
Extensive modeling using geological and physical parameters (morethan numeric parameters)
Integrating the spatial models with GIS
Groundwater data analysis for a different district
District level water budget
Developing a regime for groundwater monitoring
By Ravi Sagar[10305037] Guided by Prof. Milind Sohoni Maharastra Ground Water Data Analysis