maintenance technology feb 2010

52

Upload: applied-technology-publications

Post on 11-Mar-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Maintenance Technology February 2010 Magazine...Your Source For CAPACITY ASSURANCE SOLUTIONS

TRANSCRIPT

Page 2: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

For more info, enter 61 at www.MT-freeinfo.com

Page 3: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

For more information on Royal Purple, visit royal-purple-industrial.com today.

“...we extended drain intervalsfrom every 15 days to everythree months AND reduced

engine repairs and replacements.”

Luis GarzaKingfisher Marine

Most efforts to improve operating efficiency and lower

maintenance costs are labor intensive and involve painful

cultural changes. Numerous progressive companies have

experienced significant cost savings simply by upgrading

lubricants. You can learn how by reading the special report

‘Lowest Total Cost of Ownership’. This special report

includes extensive case studies that document real-world

savings through lubricant upgrades.

Get your FREE copy of the ‘Lowest Total Cost ofOwnership’ today by calling 866-447-5173 . . .

For more information on Royal Purple, visit royal-purple-industrial.com today.

For more info, enter 62 at www.MT-freeinfo.com

Page 4: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

Produced by:

As companies continue to experience mounting pressure to reduce cost, meet higher safety standards, and optimize performance, they must look for the latest SAP EAM solutions and strategies available. At SAP-Centric EAM 2010, we will be getting back to the basics to help you stay competitive in today’s global economy. You will gain practical, easy-to-apply advice from SAP EAM experts, as well as dive deep into the core foundation of your business. Join us in Tampa, Florida, and learn how you can achieve not only asset optimization, but overall performance optimization excellence as well.

Tampa Marriott Waterside Hotel & MarinaTampa, Florida

www.sap-centric-eam.com

March 28 - 31, 2010

MasterData

ExpertAdvice

AnalysisHistoryWorkCompletion

ExecutionPlanning & Scheduling

WorkIdentification

8 informative tracks following the maintenance end-to-end business process

© 2010 by Eventure Events, LLC. All rights reserved. Eventure and SAP-Centric EAM logos are trademarks of Eventure Events, LLC. The SAP logo is a trademark or registered trademark of SAP AG in Germany and several other countries and is reproduced with the permission of SAP AG. All other products and service names mentioned are the trademarks of their respective companies.

Focus on the basics to ignite change at...

For more info, enter 63 at www.MT-freeinfo.com

Page 5: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

FEBRUARY 2010 MT-ONLINE.COM | 3

20 Inpro/Seal Takes It One Part At A TimeTh is Illinois-based manufacturer has built a global niche by producing custom-fi tted

bearing isolators, 24-hour turnaround and top-tier customer service.Rick Carter, Executive Editor

24 How To Begin Measuring Maintenance Effectiveness: Part IVLucky you! Th ere is one KPI that comes close to taking into account almost all variables

in a production process. What is it?Raymond L. Atkins, Contributing Editor

28 ■ What You Need To Know About “Self-Priming” Centrifugal Pumps■ Pump Bearing Reliability: 4 Installation Procedures To Maximize Performance■ Fluid-Handling Matters

ContentsFEBRUARY 2010 • VOL 23, NO 2 • WWW.MT-ONLINE.COM

FEATURES

DEPARTMENTS 6 My Take

8 Uptime

12 For On The Floor

27 Lubrication Checkup

39 The Green Edge

44 Solution Spotlight

45 Marketplace

46 Classifi ed

46 Information Highway

47 Supplier Index

48 Viewpoint

ON THE ROAD TO EXCELLENCE

THE FUNDAMENTALS

SPECIAL PUMP MAINTENANCE PRIMER

Your Source For CAPACITY ASSURANCE SOLUTIONS

14 Human Centered Design Supports Improved Job PerformancePutting it as simply as possible, application of new design principles in capacity-

assurance technologies is boosting usability and productivity.Adam Lund, Emerson Process Management

CAPACITY ASSURANCE SOLUTIONS

© M

YKOL

A VE

LYCH

KO —

FOTO

LIA.C

OM; ©

XAN

DROS

—FO

TOLIA

.COM

April 27-30, 2010Hyatt Regency O’Hare • Rosemont (Chicago), ILHyatt Regency O’Hare • Rosemont (Chicago), IL

www.MARTSconference.comwww.MARTSconference.com

Registration Is Now Open!Registration Is Now Open!

MAINTENANCE and RELIABILITY TECHNOLOGY SUMMIT

TECHNOLOGYM A I N T E N A N C E

®YEARS

Page 6: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

February 2010 • Volume 23, No. 2

ARTHUR L. RICEPresident/CEO

[email protected]

BILL KIESELExecutive Vice President/Publisher

[email protected]

JANE ALEXANDEREditor-In-Chief

[email protected]

RICK CARTERExecutive Editor

[email protected]

ROBERT “BOB” WILLIAMSONKENNETH E. BANNISTER

RAYMOND L. ATKINSContributing Editors

RANDY BUTTSTADTDirector of Creative Services [email protected]

GREG PIETRASEditorial/Production Assistant

[email protected]

ELLEN SANDKAMDirect Mail

800-223-3423, ext. 110 [email protected]

EDWARD KANEReprint Manager

800-382-0808, ext. 131 [email protected]

Editorial Offi ce:1300 South Grove Ave., Suite 105

Barrington, IL 60010847-382-8100 / FAX 847-304-8603 WWW.MT-ONLINE.COM

MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY® (ISSN 0899-5729) is published monthly by Applied Technology Publi-cations, Inc., 1300 S. Grove Avenue, Barrington, IL 60010. Periodicals postage paid at Barrington, Illinois and additional offi ces. Arthur L. Rice, III, President. Circulation records are maintained at MAINTE-NANCE TECHNOLOGY®, Creative Data, 440 Quad-rangle Drive, Suite E, Bolingbrook, IL 60440. MAINTE-NANCE TECHNOLOGY® copyright 2009 by Applied Technology Publications, Inc. Annual subscription rates for nonqualifi ed people: North America, $140; all oth-ers, $280 (air). No subscription agency is authorized by us to solicit or take orders for subscriptions. Postmas-ter: Please send address changes to MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY®, Creative Data, 440 Quadrangle Drive, Suite E, Bolingbrook, IL 60440. Please indicate position, title, company name, company address. For other circulation information call (630) 739-0900. Ca-nadian Publications agreement No. 40886011. Canada Post returns: IMEX, Station A, P.O. Box 54, Windsor, ON N9A 6J5, or email: [email protected]. Sub-missions Policy: MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY gladly welcomes submissions. By sending us your sub-mission, unless otherwise negotiated in writing with our editor(s), you grant Applied Technology Publications, Inc. permission, by an irrevocable license, to edit, repro-duce, distribute, publish, and adapt your submission in any medium, including via Internet, on multiple occa-sions. You are, of course, free to publish your submission yourself or to allow others to republish your submission. Submissions will not be returned.“MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY®” is a registered trademark of Applied Technology Publications, Inc.Printed in U.S.A.

Subscriptions:FOR INQUIRIES OR CHANGES CONTACT JEFFREY HEINE,

630-739-0900 EXT. 204 / FAX 630-739-7967

Your Source For CAPACITY ASSURANCE SOLUTIONS

4 | MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY FEBRUARY 2010

TECHNOLOGYM A I N T E N A N C E

®YEARS

Make

M A I N T E N A N C E

TECHNOLOGY®

Your Source ForYour Source For CAPACITY ASSURANCE SOLUTIONSCAPACITY ASSURANCE SOLUTIONS

www.subscribeMT.comb ib MTb ib MT

Apply for a Apply for a FREEFREE, , one-year subscription atone-year subscription at

www.vibralign.com800-379-2250

©2010 Vibralign, Inc.

Contact VibrAlign today to see how fast alignment can be.

Innovations like over-sized

digital detectors, line lasers,

and True Position Sensing

(TPS). TPS allows the XA and

the GO to compensate for both

intended AND unintended

movements of the moveable

machine made during the

alignment process. The result?

Alignments usually can be

completed in just one set of

horizontal and vertical moves

without re-measurement in

between. Now that’s fast.

Innovative technology in the Fixturlaser XA and GO means there’s no faster way to complete alignment!

For more info, enter 64 at www.MT-freeinfo.com

www

Page 7: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

For more info, enter 65 at www.MT-freeinfo.comForForFForForFoForForForForFoFoForFoForoFoFoFororoorForFoororFor momomomommmmmmomomo morerereeerrerererreere infinfiinfininffinfinfinfi finini ffiiininninninfinfnffinfoooooooo, entententententententtente tentntentntttentnnteneeententerererererererererererrrrereererrererer 65666566556665665565 atatatattatttttatttttatataattttatattat wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww MTMTMTMTMTMTMMMTMMMMMMMTMMMTMTMMTMMMTMTMT.MT-frfrfrfrfrffffrfffrff-freeieeinfonfo co.comm

For more info, enter 66 at www.MT-freeinfo.com

Page 8: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

6 | MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY FEBRUARY 2010

MY TAKE

The lake next to our home is frozen solid. I’ve been slipping and sliding out to my old Jeep each morning—and all the way back again each night—for what seems like way too long. Here it is, the day aft er this year’s (to my way of thinking) super-exciting Super Bowl. We’re on standby in Chicagoland for yet another substantial snowfall accompanied by “blizzard quality” winds. I hate to complain,

though, about the brutality of it all, given the monster snow- and ice-events that have whipped across the South and East of late. Folks up here are supposed to be accustomed to frigid conditions and everything they bring. I am not.

A transplanted South-Texan, I’m totally out of my league when it comes to harsh winters. Having spent most of my life in a semitropical climate with a year-round growing season, as far as I’m concerned, springtime anywhere can never come too soon. Th at’s why I’ve been seriously checking and double-checking the giant willow trees outside our windows daily—for weeks and weeks—looking for a little hint of new green life. Th e farmer’s daughter in me knows that those buds have got to be in there somewhere, getting ready to get down to business in a big way.

I’m not just hopeful; I’m confi dent. It’s something that’s kept me going through the long, dark, dreary, messy days of winter ever since I moved up this way several years ago. And, now, for the point of this column: My certainty that nature will eventually reawaken each spring is not much diff erent than the palpable belief in a coming economic recovery that I’ve recently been sensing (and hearing about) with more and more suppliers to industry. Th ey know that better times, like the coming spring, are just around the corner, and that their organizations need to be getting ready to get down to business in a real big way!Sensing and hearing about this confi dence is one thing. Actually seeing it is another. Th at’s what I had the pleasure of doing down in Concord, NC, the fi rst week of February. Despite a horrendous ice storm that had shut down much of the region around Charlotte a couple of days earlier, I, along with editors from several other publications, joined Ingersoll Rand (which had just hosted hundreds of its distribu-tors and sales team members) for what the company was calling an “Innovation Showcase.” While there, we learned about a number of things the company had been doing as the recession raged. Remarkably, it introduced 50 new products in 2009. Spell that “fi ft y.” New compressors and compressor components, fi ltration technologies, pumps, lubrication-related devices, controllers, tools, services, etc., all of these new off erings are aimed at giving you exactly what you’ve been telling us for a long time—and what you have been telling Ingersoll Rand in extensive user surveys—that you’ve been looking for: improved reli-ability, effi ciency and productivity. (As an example, see this month’s Solution Spotlight on page 44.)

Clearly, Ingersoll Rand is not the only company that’s been working away through the downturn to have in-demand-type capacity-assurance solutions ready for the marketplace come spring—make that “as better times begin to roll.” We’ll try to bring more of them to your attention, soon. In the meantime, what have you and your company been doing to gear up for “spring?” Let us know!

[email protected]

Spring Is On The Way…Whatcha’ Been Up To?

Jane Alexander, Editor-In-Chief

Page 9: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

To learn more about SKF and SKF lubrication solutions, visit

www.skf.com/lubrication

Innovative lubrication solutions as a

competitive edge? Are you serious?

Discover the benefi ts of SKF lubrication solutions –

from a supplier and a knowledge partner.

Add an optimized lubrication system to your new off-highway vehicle

design and profi t from an increase in reliability and durability that

benefi ts your customers. Whatever your needs, CAN-Bus can be seam-

lessly integrated with automatic and centralized lubrication systems.

By allowing separate control and monitoring of the lubrication in each

machine section, you can effi ciently prevent unwanted stops and ex-

tend service intervals. At our research center and development facil-

ities, SKF tribologists and application engineers ensure that our solutions

precisely match your specifi cations. And we’re always on hand to offer

fi rst-class service and training, close to where you are.

The Power of Knowledge Engineering

The SKF CAN-Bus system can control and

monitor up to four independent lubrication

sections.

abs09003_anz_knowledge_us_200_3x273_1.indd 1 11.08.2009 11:24:51 Uhr

For more info, enter 67 at www.MT-freeinfo.com

Page 10: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

8 | MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY FEBRUARY 2010

UPTIME

My contention that we can “Beat China” when it comes to manufacturing sets the stage for this month’s column. In my December 2009 column, I listed the seven “strengths” of American industry that we need to exploit now. Let’s review:

■ Advanced manufacturing technology—but it must be reliable, fi rst time, every time.

■ Market proximity—but we must deliver on time.

■ Workmanship—but we must attract and retain a skilled, competent workforce.

■ Productivity—but we have to do our very best, the fi rst time, every time.

■ Widespread electric power and utilities—but they, too, must be reliable.

■ Responsiveness—but we must listen to our customers and be agile enough to respond to market changes quickly.

■ Capitalism—but we must drive waste, fraud and abuse from the system at all levels.

Note these words: “reliable”…”agile”…”competent”…“our very best”…”on time.” Regrettably, these admi-rable qualities do not come about automatically. The simple, yet powerful, motto that I suggested—“Do it right the fi rst time”—is truly a competitive advan-tage. But printing this rallying cry on a poster, sending it out in e-mails to all employees or wearing “DIRTFT” buttons will not make it happen. The concept must become woven into the fabric of the work culture. This “work culture” can be simply defi ned as the “collective behaviors of people on the job.”

All of this begs the question: How do we change or align the “work culture” to become more reliable, more agile, more customer-responsive? What we’re talking about here is the “soft side” of competitive-ness. From the top down, senior executives, manage-ment and front-line leadership have to drive changes

in the work culture in order to address competitive pressures head on. Then, the entire workforce must be engaged to make things happen.

In our profession—the profession of maintenance and reliability—we are real good at focusing on what it takes to maintain EQUIPMENT. We are also real good at developing WORK PROCESSES that defi ne the procedures and methods for getting maintenance and reliability work accomplished properly. The bottom line is that PEOPLE must be engaged to make equipment reliable using these work processes! Some-times we are not so good at that. Thus, we must put the people-factor back into maintenance to make our businesses competitive and fi nancially successful.

How others have done itHere are a couple of examples of the PEOPLE-side of improving competitiveness from the early days of successful American companies.

McCormick and Company…Developing a prescription for struggling times: Let’s go back to the 1930s and look into what grew into the world’s largest spice company. In 1932, at the height of the Great Depression, Charles P. McCormick instituted a new business philosophy. His guiding belief was that a company, whatever its products or services, was nothing without its workforce, and an empowered workforce made for an empowered, effi cient and successful company. This original 1932 corporate philosophy and system of participative management was formally published as Multiple Management in 1938. McCor-mick’s main theme was “business is people.”

Interestingly, McCormick led the successful culture change of a struggling company he had inherited (upon the sudden death of his uncle) in 1932, after the stock market crash and at the height of the Depression. Within a year of taking up the head position, cutting weekly work hours from 56 to 45, increasing wages 10% and establishing his “Multiple Management” philosophy, he saw the company return to profi tability.

(FYI: In 1949, an updated and expanded version of the Multiple Management book was published under the title The Power of the People. It’s a great read!)

Bob Williamson, Contributing Editor

Put The People-Factor Back Into Maintenance

Page 11: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

FEBRUARY 2010 MT-ONLINE.COM | 9

UPTIME

Ford Motor Company…Setting a new industry standard: Henry Ford built his fi rst car in 1896. In 1903, he founded the Ford Motor Company, based on his vision to revolutionize the auto-mobile manufacturing industry. In 1924, Ford produced its 10-millionth car. Then in 1926, in his book Today and Tomorrow (reprinted by Productivity Press, 1988), Ford detailed what most experts today describe as the foundations of the Toyota Production System (more than 50 years ahead of Toyota’s breakthrough).

In his 1926 writings, Ford described his equipment reliability philosophy: “Machines do not often break down because there is continuous cleaning and repair work on every bit of machinery on the place…It is the fault of management if a machine or a series of machines leaves anything to be done by hand.” He continued with his philosophy on abolishing central tool rooms: “A man (men) cannot be paid high wages for standing around waiting for tools…New tools are brought to (him) them.” (Amazingly progressive for 1926!)

Henry Ford led a radical work culture change in the motor vehicle manufacturing business with something called the “Ford Principles of Management.” They are:

1. Do the job in the most direct fashion, without both-ering with red tape or any of the ordinary divisions of authority.

2. Pay every man well…and see that he is employed all the time through 48 hours a week and no longer.

3. Put all machinery in the best possible condition, keep it that way and insist upon absolute cleanliness every-where in order that a man may learn to respect his tools, his surroundings and himself.

As president of the company, Ford set clear expectations for how work was to get done, people were to be treated and equipment was to be maintained. And it worked extremely well.

Decline of the British auto industryUnfortunately, the British auto manufacturing industry was unable (or unwilling) to adopt Ford’s proven manu-facturing methods. For example, in 1913, on the eve of World War I, Ford’s American plant produced over 200,000 vehicles, compared to 5000 that year at Peugeot (France’s largest automaker), and 3000 at Wolseley Motor Company (Britain’s largest). By 1924, Ford was producing his Model T in England—advertising it as “92% British built.”

A great debate subsequently ensued in England over “Fordism and the British system of mass production.” The less-productive, higher-cost British system of piecework and mass production prevailed. Combining this type of system with powerful trade-union stewards, management apathy, government labor protection, government wage controls and the 1975 government takeover fi nally led to the demise of the British motor vehicle industry. Productivity (and quality) suffered. In 1976, England produced 5.5 equivalent motor vehicles per employee; Germany produced 7.9. U.S. autoworkers, however, produced 26.1 vehicles per employee—a rate nearly fi ve times that of their British counterparts! This classic example of failure to address competitive oppor-tunities (or challenges) through WORK CULTURE CHANGE is documented in Roy Church’s book, The Rise and Decline of the British Motor Industry (Cambridge University Press, 1994). It’s another timely read.

Dawn of the quality movementSix decades ago, (c. 1950), an American, Edwards Deming, introduced the “Quality Movement” to post-war Japanese industries. Their success later led (in the 1980s) to U.S. business leaders recognizing the power of engaging (and “empowering”) all employees to build quality into every step they perform. Total Quality Control evolved into Total Quality Management and small group problem-solving activities. Accordingly, while Quality Assur-ance/Quality Control (QA/QC) departments specify and communicate quality standards, it was now up to people, their equipment and tools to build quality products every step of the way. The prior decades-old approach of turning out quantities of products and inspecting for defects at the end of the process or at key points along the way had led to high scrap and rework rates that increased the cost per unit produced.

International quality standards surfaced in the 1990s. ISO 9000 quality standards, and QS 9000 for the U.S. “Big Three” auto industry suppliers, were developed for the purposes of standardizing, documenting and assuring use of quality-fi rst methods. Yet, despite documented proce-dures and methods, it was still up to people, their equipment and tools to build quality into every step. This dependence on people to build quality in, as opposed to inspecting defects out, relied on a signifi cant WORK CULTURE CHANGE. The business case for improving quality was so compelling that senior executives set new expectations for defect-free production. A radical paradigm shift in the WORK PROCESSES represented a new requirement in the competitive marketplace. The QA/QC department alone could not have accomplished that culture change.

Page 12: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

www.crcindustries.com/ei

Whether you are looking for a precision cleaner, degreaser, lubricant, or sealant product, CRC will alwaysprovide solutions that work. CRC has been the brand of choice in the Industrial market for over 50 years!Go online to www.crcindustries.com/ei to see our entire product offering of MRO maintenance chemicals.

Use our online product selector guide to easily find the perfect solution for your individual application needs.

Your Best SolutionTM

PrecisionCleaners

Degreasers Lubricants andPenetrants

Sealants, Adhesivesand Threadlockers

10 | MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY FEBRUARY 2010

UPTIME

Culture change is about peopleNo matter how well our processes, equipment and facili-ties are designed, built and installed, they must be properly operated and maintained throughout their life cycle for business success. The culture of maintenance and reliability is MUCH MORE than the maintenance department can handle by itself. As I’ve said before, Reliability Culture must be led from the top with new expectations and accountabili-ties. People at all levels in the business MUST be engaged and empowered to sustain equipment performance and improve equipment reliability.

There are countless historical examples of creating high-performing and productive work cultures. Consider (as I have,

since the late 1980s) the original principles of Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) as documented and taught by its founder Seiichi Nakajima. Here you will discover elements of and methods for creating a work culture that leads to the highest levels of equipment performance and reliability. Sadly, TPM has been grossly misinterpreted and poorly implemented by many in America as a result of its “not invented here” factor. Could this ignorance of and resistance to implementing proven people-side methodologies and approaches in main-tenance and reliability be taking us down the same dark road as the British auto industries? We can’t afford to gamble. Let’s put the people-factor back into maintenance in 2010. MT

[email protected]

For more info, enter 68 at www.MT-freeinfo.com

A reliability culture must be led from the top, with new expectations and

accountabilities. People at all levels MUST be engaged and empowered to

sustain equipment performance and improve equipment reliability.

Page 13: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

For more info, enter 65 at www.MT-freeinfo.com

• Materials tear, jam or curl

• Webs and fi lms cling to themselves

• Electronic sensors fail, making false readings

• Hazardous sparks or shocks

• Product clings to itself, rollers, machine beds

• Dust attraction ruins surface fi nishes

When the humidity is low, static electricity problems will happen.

EXAIR manufactures a complete line of static eliminators to remedy common static problems. Many use our engineered air ow products to minimize air use and noise while delivering maximum results by moving more static eliminating ions to the product surface.

If you would like to discuss an application or request a catalog, contact:

Prevent Shocks, Jamming, Tearing and Static Cling!

Ion Air Jet™Delivers a concentrated blast ofionized air prior to shrink wrapping, packaging and printing.

Ionizing BarEliminates static cling, dust attraction and jamming on paper, plastics and lm.

Watch Our Brief Video!How To Get Rid of Static & Dust!

www.exair.com/48/47048.htm

www.exair.com/48/470.htm

Manufacturing Intelligent Compressed Air Products Since 1983

Ion Air Cannon™Ideal for hard to reach spaces or con ned areas that require a concentrated ionized ow.

Super Ion Air Knife™Produces a laminar sheet of air ow that oods an area or surface with static eliminating ions.

Super Ion Air Wipe™The uniform 360° ionized airstream neutralizes and cleans continuously moving surfaces.

Ion Air Gun™Eliminates static and dust fromparts prior to assembly, packaging, painting or nishing.

11510 Goldcoast Drive • Cincinnati, Ohio • 45249-1621 • (800) 903-9247 • fax: (513) 671-3363E-mail: [email protected] • www.exair.com

@exair

For more info, enter 69 at www.MT-freeinfo.com

Page 14: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

12 | MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY FEBRUARY 2010

FOR ON THE FLOOR

Had a group of maintenance pros been asked 25 years ago about their knowledge of and prefer-ence for various maintenance improvement strategies, I’m not sure there would have been great depth of response. While programs such as PdM, RCM, TPM, SMED, RCFA and others were not unknown, they were not used to the extent they are today. “Flavors of the Month” would probably have been a common answer.

By contrast, when asked the above question recently, Maintenance Technology Reader Panelists provided detailed answers that indicate both their familiarity with such strategies, and their practical understanding of where and how each works best. With regard to implementation, however, modern concerns place many Panel-ists in a bind. Fluctuating production needs and working conditions caused by an unstable economy, for example, now demand that main-tenance crews be fl exible. While these conditions seem to have reduced experimentation (fl avor of the month), they have ushered in a more hard-boiled approach that Panelists say is as likely to invite strategic implementation as it is to shut it down.

The long and winding road“I’ve used RCM, TPM and SMED much more than RCFA,” says a maintenance technician in the Midwest. “But I believe that each of these works best per its application.” Success, he believes, also depends on the level of maturity of each manu-facturing environment. In other words, is the company setting benchmarks or is it in the red trying to become profi table? “I have no doubt,” he says, “that SMED or eliminating wastes would be [used] most heavily in companies that are not mature, less profi table or below a benchmark.” He adds that SMED could be viewed as a fundamental building block that must never be removed. Or, he notes, “every other method will collapse.”

This Panelist reports that signifi cant personnel changes across all departments at his operation have caused his employer to take a “shotgun” approach to maintenance. Despite his experi-ence in TPM and RCM gained from a previous employer, he says, “we are still making improve-ments in SMED.”

Another Panelist also fi nds himself in the posi-tion of having more experience in maintenance improvement than his company can (or chooses to) use.

“I have used parts of TPM, and liked it,” says a food-industry maintenance supervisor in the Upper Midwest. “I have also worked with a non-computer-based PM system, using hand-written PM forms. But selling PM is tough, because payback is not immediate.” He adds that while he’s seen many maintenance systems evolve into strong, high-performance programs, without the support of upper management, “it’s a waste of time and money.” Despite computerized systems, he laments, the organization doesn’t have enough skilled people to do all that needs to be done. At his current company, the maintenance team has been reduced to the fi re department and not much more. “We now mostly run to failure,” he observes. “It is a very high-pressure environment to work in.”

A maintenance journeyman for a utility in the Northeast deals with the same disturbing trend. As he puts it, “I have seen systems and methods come and go, and my opinion is that PM is the best. But, even if a machine is scheduled out of service, the company wants it back as soon as possible. [This can be diffi cult] if there is an unexpected problem, as there is bound to be as equipment gets older.”

He believes this is where real-world issues get in the way of potential maintenance gains. “Welcome to the fi eld-expediency world of today,” he says. “Now we must do more with less people, and we are unable to stock parts because the company is

Less Flavor, More Pressure

An outlet for the views of today’s capacity assurance professionals

Rick Carter, Executive Editor

Page 15: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

FEBRUARY 2010 MT-ONLINE.COM | 13

FOR ON THE FLOOR

taxed on the value of these parts.” His company’s CMMS, which, he reports, showed promise, has been rendered only partly useful because they keep wanting to stretch the recommended times between maintenance. “The run-to-failure mode seems to be the one we almost always fall back into,” he adds, noting that performing main-tenance tasks on a running machine “just isn’t economically feasible.”

Sticking with PMsYet another Panelist notes that while he has seen many programs chosen, few catch on. “We have used just about all of them,” explains this auto-industry PM leader. One success included shifting time-based PMs to PMs based on parts produced, which improved production uptime by 62%. “So we started to do this process to a number of machines,” he says, “but we did not fi nish all of them, which was a real shame.” He now guides workshops where maintenance, production and engineering get together and create strategy-based solutions that save money and show increases in production. “But again,” he says, “we start out with good intention, and never follow through.” Today, his faith is in a recently reinvigorated PM program. With this, he believes, improvements again should be seen.

A utility-industry mechanical mainte-nance supervisor in the Upper Midwest also puts stock in his operation’s PM program, which is coupled with PdM and planning and scheduling. “I was involved in developing and championing this program,” he recalls, adding that results include boosting MTBF in process equipment from 1–3 years to 8–10 years. Simi-larly, the program helped increase his plant’s critical-equipment replacement cycle from 1–6 years to 5–12. And, while maintenance costs have increased, he reports that they’ve done so “at an average of 7% below the rate of infla-tion for the past 26 years.” This Panelist also

notes that the program’s success has created a harmonious working relationship between operations and maintenance, and has enabled the 38-year-old facility to set production and availability records. “This facility consistently ranks among the top low-cost generating plants” in the company, he says.

Strategy, with Culture ChangeWhile some Panelists have had the opportunity to fully implement maintenance programs and shepherd them to success, others report frustra-tion in these efforts. Often they blame a lack of management commitment. A former practitioner who is now a consultant based in the Southwest points to this outcome being the result of a culture that does not accept strategies like equipment ownership as fundamentally important. Steering cultures in this direction “is always a challenge,” he says. “However, convincing senior plant or corporate management of the benefi ts of these programs and selling the up-front cost layout is critical to their success.”

Like most Panelists, this consultant also believes “that different concepts are necessary for different situations.” Though he does have a favorite approach (“real-time condition-based monitoring, coupled with a good predictive program and TPM equipment-ownership philosophy”), he knows that this, too, will fail without other elements fi rmly in place. “It must be used in an organization with good mainte-nance engineering and planning and scheduling,” he observes, “and where maintenance is accepted as a profi t contributor, not a cost center.” MT

What’s on your mind?Have a question or comment on what you’ve just read in this column? Have a suggestion for a future Reader Panel question? Let us hear from you. E-mail: [email protected]

“Convincing senior plant or corporate management of the

benefi ts of [maintenance] programs and selling the up-front

cost layout is critical to their success.”

Page 16: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

CAPACITY ASSURANCE SOLUTIONS

Putting it as simply as

possible, application of

new design principles

in capacity-assurance

technologies is boosting

usability and productivity.

Adam LundEmerson Process Management

It’s a fact of life. Tools of the capacity-assurance trade have

grown increasingly complex over the years. Advanced hand-

held fi eld communicators, vibration analyzers and predic-

tive maintenance software provide a wonderful means for

managing automation systems and the assets they control in

order to prevent breakdowns and avoid unexpected shutdowns.

At the same time, it’s often been diffi cult for users to understand—

and respond appropriately in a timely manner to—ever-growing

streams of information that come out of many advanced tech-

nologies. The application of new, human centered design tech-

niques to these tools, though, is changing all that. Applying such

principles in the tools’ design can lead to easier commissioning,

confi guring and maintaining of plant assets than ever before.

14 | MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY FEBRUARY 2010

Page 17: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

CAPACITY ASSURANCE SOLUTIONS

FEBRUARY 2010 MT-ONLINE.COM | 15

Identifying and delivering the essentialsThe human centered design concept is aimed at identifying the information most needed by plant personnel and getting it to them in an easy-to-use format. This requires under-standing the tasks frequently performed by end-users and presenting helpful information in a consistent fashion.

Years of professional analysis of industry work practices show that personnel are often overwhelmed with multiple systems and user interfaces, making it diffi cult to fi nd critical information, especially while on a job in the fi eld. The need for easier access to the diagnostics available in smart fi eld instrumentation was apparent, along with clear presentation of that information and reliable trouble-shooting procedures to follow in case trouble is indicated.

Human centered solutions now

New device dashboards. . . Emerson’s commitment to human centered design and reducing product complexity (see Sidebars) is evident in intuitively designed interfaces known as Device Dash-boards for more than 50 fi eld devices. The new screens for our AMS™ Suite: Intelligent Device Manager PdM software give workers an instant view of the critical items they need to evaluate, diagnose, and confi gure each device. Expert guidance is also provided to streamline the most important and frequently performed tasks by plant opera-tions, engineering and maintenance personnel.

Powered by enhanced Electronic Device Description Language (EDDL), these human-centric dashboards func-tion independent of communications protocols such as HART®, WirelessHART™ and FOUNDATION™ fi eldbus. Their role is simple: Provide a framework for the uniform display of device information to make complex informa-tion easier to understand.

Creating the basic structure for the new graphical inter-face (shown in Fig. 1) was a major step in implementing the human centered design concept to aid maintenance personnel. Following identifi cation of the most common tasks performed by technicians in the fi eld, application of human centered design principles led to screen displays that provide information on 80% of those common tasks by telling if the device is working (or not), if alerts are present and if the device is communicating and providing access to calibration functions. The information presented is simple to understand—with no confusing technical jargon to interpret.

The design of the new dashboards features notice-able improvements in the navigation structure, which has been revamped to group information and functions into three primary areas: “Overview,” “Configure” or “Service Tools” (depending on the job at hand). When first checking out a device, a technician will see the “Overview” screen that contains the “Status” condition of the selected device. If the status displays as “Good,”he/she knows there is no problem with that device, but can also check the gauges in the “Primary Purpose Vari-ables” area to confirm that the device is operational. A “Shortcuts” section provides more information and links to commonly used device capabilities, such as “Calibra-tion” methods.

If there is a problem (as shown in Fig. 2), the word “Maintenance” will appear in the “Device” box, along with a button for further evaluation. This will provide guidance for further action to determine the nature of the problem and whether the device needs to be replaced or repaired. In this case, the temperature transmitter indicates that it automatically switched to a back-up sensor when the primary sensor failed—and a pop-up window is available with problem-solving instructions.

The Time Has Come…“In evaluating how people use maintenance tools,

we found a common problem,” says Peter Zornio, chief strategic offi cer at Emerson. “The routine steps required by plant personnel to work through automation system issues were often cumbersome and confusing, and the interfaces were very product and feature oriented instead of task-centric. They assumed the user had a detailed knowledge of the product. Based on the inputs of many process-industry workers, we have initiated an

across-the-board overhaul of our products intended to improve the speed and accuracy of their job performance and to increase each individual’s productivity.”

According to Zornio, by putting increased emphasis on ease-of-use, Emerson can help its customers meet the demographic challenge as knowledgeable maintenance veterans retire and their places are taken by less expe-rienced personnel. “The time has come,” he says, “for technology to begin serving people.”

Page 18: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

CAPACITY ASSURANCE SOLUTIONS

16 | MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY FEBRUARY 2010

Revised device descriptions. . . Every smart field device stores diagnostics, but not all devices have the same information—which may cause wildly different displays depending on the Device Descriptions (DD) provided by the manufacturer. Device Descriptions are essentially files of field device attri-butes residing in a host (such as Emerson’s AMS Device Manager PdM software). These DDs vary from manufac-turer to manufacturer with respect to how information is extracted and presented. As a result, multiple, often confusing instrument displays confront plant mainte-nance personnel.

Revising the DDs on Emerson fi eld devices has been another part of implementing the human centered design concept. This is especially important in giving the same “look” or appearance to the screens for HART and fi eldbus devices. This type of technical achievement will help fi eld personnel be more productive because they can use the

same procedures to manage devices regardless of commu-nication protocol.

The condition of any fi eld device can be displayed in this way as long as the DD is written according to the guide-lines. For us, the principal focus has been to update DDs of smart devices including Rosemount, Fisher, Micro Motion, and CSI branded products. A great deal of effort has gone into this project, and the DDs of the most frequently used devices have already been rewritten and stored in the latest versions of AMS™ Device Manager and the DeltaV™ and Ovation™ digital automation system hosts–and more are underway.

The road to human centered designMoving in the direction of human centered design has been a natural and very logical step for our company. Although they invested almost exclusively on technological develop-ment over the years, Emerson offi cials also recognized the

Fig. 1. In the basic structure for the new graphical interface, application of human centered design principles led to screen displays that provide infor-mation on 80% of the most common tasks performed by technicians in the fi eld. These displays tell if a device is working (or not), if alerts are present and if the device is communicating and providing access to calibration functions, with no confusing technical jargon to interpret.

Fig. 2. If there is a problem, the word “Maintenance” appears in the “Device” box, along with a button for further evaluation. This will provide guidance for further action to determine the nature of the problem and if repair or replacement is necessary. Here, a temperature transmitter indicates that it has automatically switched to a back-up sensor upon failure of the primary sensor. A pop-up window leads to problem-solving instructions.

Page 19: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

FEBRUARY 2010 MT-ONLINE.COM | 17

need to focus on the people who use those technologies and determine ways to accommodate their needs.

Having acknowledged the importance of human centered design and made the strategic decision to support its applica-tion, company management initiated a relationship with Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, PA—specifi -cally the university’s Human Computer Interaction Institute, a recognized leader in the study of how humans interact with technology. Dave Parsons, who has exten-sive human interface design experience, joined Emerson to initiate a new human centered design capability. This led to the study of instrument technician work practices and a greater understanding of their needs.

The fi rst project was development of the new dashboard structure, which Parsons called a “signifi cant cultural change because for once technology did not drive the design of a man-machine interface. Basically, we restructured the underlying information architecture so the presentation makes sense to users.”

Now, Emerson has established the Human Centered Design (HCD) Insti-tute with a simple goal of making prod-ucts that aren’t just reliable, compatible and cost-effective; they can also improve usability and increase productivity.

“Carnegie Mellon helped us set direc-tion and get started,” say Duane Toavs, director of the HCD Institute. “We have a corporate mandate to interact with the design teams for all of our brands, incorporating human centered design practices in everything they do. We have an ongoing research challenge that we expect will make a profound difference in how people accomplish their tasks when using our technologies.”

Design and testingDuring the dashboard project, human centered designers worked with marketing personnel and tech-nologists to create prototype Device Dashboard screens for several of Emerson’s most popular devices, including pressure and temperature transmitters and digital valve control-lers. The conceptual dashboards

Get moredone

Ti32 Thermal ImagerAmazing 320 x 240 clarity

at an affordable price!

New

©2009-2010 Fluke Corporation. 3622761A

Rugged, reliable,affordable

Available for the fi rst Available for the fi rst time ever—an affordable time ever—an affordable imager that will help you imager that will help you fi nd problems fast. In these fi nd problems fast. In these tough times, helping you tough times, helping you get more done is worth get more done is worth its weight in gold.its weight in gold.

Schedule a demo Schedule a demo by March 31, 2010by March 31, 2010and receive a FREEand receive a FREEFluke hardhat. YourFluke hardhat. Yourjob is tough—yourjob is tough—yourtools should be too.tools should be too.

Call 1-800-760-4523Call 1-800-760-4523

3622761A_MainTech.indd 1 1/13/10 1:03 PM

For more info, enter 70 at www.MT-freeinfo.com

Page 20: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

CAPACITY ASSURANCE SOLUTIONS

18 | MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY FEBRUARY 2010

were then introduced to many customers through usability testing to evaluate the product’s straightforwardness of use. This technique helped determine which designs were most helpful to users in completing common maintenance tasks easily and in minimum time.

Usability testing differs from other methods of customer review—such as market research—because it shows how

effi ciently users are able to complete tasks instead of relying exclusively on asking for opinions. Usability testing takes customer opinions into account, but is more concerned with comparing what test participants do than what they say. This is an important distinction; a participant might remark that he/she likes the way the screen looks, but if the task could not be completed, the visually appealing screen might actually be hard to use.

Usability testing was conducted in a controlled setting with the tests repeated in the same way in order to obtain valid comparisons of multiple users. The data gathered are both quantitative, i.e. task completion rates or the amount of time users spent on certain tasks, and qualitative, including emotional responses, opinions, likes, and dislikes. Usability testing also takes into account the backgrounds and relative levels of experience of the users, and it is important to have a mix of user backgrounds. Video and audio recordings made during usability test sessions were reviewed by design and development staff to pick up anything they might not have observed during a session. (Editor’s Note: A signifi cant round of usability testing was conducted with visitors to the Emerson Exchange in Orlando, FL, in October 2009.)

Going forwardSo far, the focus of the HCD Institute has been on the presentation of device information, but revision of the Device Dashboards is just the beginning of Emerson’s work in terms of human centered design. Going forward, this concept will be applied to AMS Suite and the DeltaV and Ovation automation systems with the intention of making every product more intuitive, more specifi c to the role of each type of user and, overall, simpler to use. MT

Adam Lund is principal usability engineer with Emerson Process Management.

For more info, enter 1 at www.MT-freeinfo.com

Emerson’s new Human Centered Design Institute was estab-lished after more than fi ve years of work-practice analysis, new product development re-engineering and organizational training. The Institute’s goal is to bring about a signifi cant improvement in ease-of-use and workforce productivity products that are reliable, compatible and cost-effective. User work practices and improved task completion (usability or workforce productivity) are at the heart of every new Emerson product.

Duane Toavs, director of the Human Centered Design Institute, notes that the corporation had been incubating this HCD process since the early days of its Smart Wire-less designs, some years ago. “Collaborating with Carnegie Mellon University helped us set direction and get started,

leading to our staffi ng of this Human Centered Design Institute that spans design teams for all of our brands,” he says.

Human Centered Design is a multi-disciplined science. User Personas and Stakeholder Maps, along with intensive observational research, usability testing, and heuristics anal-ysis are key elements of the practice. They provide the insight to blend the disciplines of industrial, graphical and human interface design into products that are easier to use. It’s not as complicated as it sounds.

Human Centered Design expert that he is, Toavs quickly (and succinctly) cuts to the chase: “Getting inside the heads of users, including how they interface with each other and our technologies, is the foundation of Human Centered Design.”

Making process control technology easier to use. . .

ATP List ServicesEllen Sandkamwww.atplists.com

1300 S. Grove Ave., Suite 105, Barrington, IL 60010847-382-8100 x110 / 800-223-3423 x110

[email protected] / [email protected]

Customized, Targeted Lists For

Your Marketing Needs

For more info, enter 71 at www.MT-freeinfo.com

Page 21: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

FEBRUARY 2010 MT-ONLINE.COM | 19For more info, enter 65 at www.MT-freeinfo.com

So Much You Can’t Afford To Ignore!

Visit www.energysummitonline.com for more details

& Innovation Summit 2010

MAY 18-20, 20107:30 am — 5:00 pmAmway Grand Plaza

Grand Rapids, Michigan

So Much To Learn And Discuss!

How to innovate with new opportunities in the energy sector

Status of energy effi ciency, ISO-50001 & proven paths to success

Training to meet the new ASME/ANSI standards

REGISTER NOW!

Interested in showing customers how to reduce energy costs with your company’s products? Call Kathleen Hoyle at (269) 352-4583

for information on sponsorship opportunities.

For more info, enter 73 at www.MT-freeinfo.com

MARK

YOUR

CALENDAR

The future of manufacturing is in the hands of today’s young people.

Nuts, Bolts & Thingamajigs, the foundation of the Fabricators & Manufacturers Association Int’lis focused on securing the future of manufacturing, innovation and invention in North America.This happens when young people are introduced to the joy and pride of “tinkering”. When ayoung person learns they can make something useful and practical with their own hands,they’ve taken the fi rst step to a career. Hundreds of students learn this each year at NBTsummer manufacturing camps. High school grads can apply for NBT scholarships to study attechnical schools or colleges and prepare for the highly skilled manufacturing jobs of the future.

Insure the future of your industry with a gift. Your corporate pledge, personal donation or legacy gift will launch careers for skilled mechanics, electricians, machinists, engineers, laser operators, and so much more.

Donate today at www.nutsandboltsfoundation.org or call 815-381-1338

Meet Nuts, Bolts & Thingamajigs founder and spokesperson, actor John Ratzenberger at the MARTS conference. Attend his keynote at 8:00 a.m. April 28, followed by a book signing. Make a $20 donation to NBT and obtain an autographed copy of his book, We’ve Got it Made in America.

Visit www.martsconference.com for more information.

Don’t Miss Out!

For more info, enter 72 at www.MT-freeinfo.com

Page 22: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

ON THE ROAD TO EXCELLENCE

This Illinois-based

manufacturer has built

a global niche by

producing custom-fi tted

bearing isolators,

24-hour turnaround and

top-tier customer service.

Rick CarterExecutive Editor

When it comes to discrete manufacturing, few are

more genuinely discrete than Inpro/Seal Co., the

Rock Island, IL-based manufacturer of bearing

isolators. The company is so discrete it literally

often makes only one part at a time. That’s one unique part, not

one of a batch. And, no, Inpro/Seal is not two guys with a lathe

and some metal stock operating out of a garage. Inpro/Seal is

80 employees working comfortably in a 12-year-old, 84,000-

sq.-ft. air-conditioned facility turning out more than 400,000

bearing isolators annually, and generating roughly $30 million

in annual sales. The company, recently acquired by Waukesha

Bearings Corp., a Dover company (see Sidebar), has been at it

since 1965. Today, it claims to have 4 million isolators installed

in rotating equipment around the world.

Inpro/Seal Takes It One Part At A Time

20 | MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY FEBRUARY 2010

Page 23: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

ON THE ROAD TO EXCELLENCE

FEBRUARY 2010 MT-ONLINE.COM | 21

What’s the catch? This too, hinges on that word “unique.” The bearing isolator began as a pump retrofi t part with a unique purpose. Essentially a bearing protection device, it was designed by company founder Dave Orlowski to extend the life of pump bearings by sealing out the elements that destroy them—water, particulates and other undesirables—and sealing in lubrication. Early versions lasted 20 years, quickly saving thousands of dollars in bearing maintenance and replacement costs. New ones, now standard equipment on hundreds of pump and motor models built in the U.S. and around the world, can last virtually forever, as can those retrofi tted to older equipment.

Success for this novel product wasn’t instant. A big challenge was (and is) the fact that production of its many variants cannot be 100% standardized. Often, one size fi ts just one—not all.

“We are very much an engineer-to-order and customer-service-based company,” says Neil Hoehle, director of sales and engineering. “We look at applications to see what the best possible solution is for that application, and provide it to the customer in the same time frame or less that he could order something out of a parts catalog from some-body else.” This literally means, for example, that an order received by noon or even later on any day can often be in the customer’s hands the following morning. Seeing that this valuable service can be offered successfully—and repeatedly—has been an ongoing mission for Inpro/Seal and its employees.

Hoehle (pronounced “Hailey”) started with Inpro/Seal 28 years ago. He notes that while much has changed in bearing isolators in this time—the product’s recognition, along with its uses and designs—the lack of standardization remains. Even today, most of the company’s 75,000 skus (some 50,000) are made only in quantities of one or two, about 30% of which are not stock items. Numbers like these suggest a few things: that Inpro/Seal charges a premium for its products; that its products are of the highest quality; and third, that the customer service Hoehle referenced is untouchable. As it turns out, all three are essentially true, with particular emphasis on service.

“Quite often, we were dealing with companies that had equipment down for repair or emergencies and needed very quick turnaround,” says Hoehle of the company’s formative years. “That was a great opportunity for us to allow the engi-neer-to-order function and quick response to come together. When companies need us the most,” he says, “we try to be there.” This modestly stated mission translates to not only the same-day-shipment promise for many of its products, but on-site installation assistance for big jobs or companies in dire straits, whether in Illinois, Houston or the Pacifi c Rim.

The quick turnaroundWhile an Inpro/Seal bearing isolator is not overly complex, it nonetheless requires machining, mostly in bronze, on one of the company’s 27 CNC machines (25 lathes, two mills) or 10 manual lathes, followed by fi nal assembly, inspection

and shipping. For never-before-made parts, accurate on-site measurements are required, usually taken by the customer, which are transmitted to the Rock Island facility. They are then translated into either a new CNC program or a blueprint given to a machinist who will make the part manually.

Today, Inpro/Seal can turn orders around in 24 hours or less for 80% of its annual output. Some are delivered from stock the company builds and holds for contract customers; the rest are newly made when the order arrives. Signifi cantly, when new parts are needed, the manufacturing process that once took an average of two hours per unit now takes about 15 minutes. Practically everything else in the process takes longer, including waiting for Fed-Ex pick-up.

But quick does not mean easy. “This is something we’ve worked at for years,” says Hoehle. “It wasn’t like we sat down and wrote a plan and there was a magic bullet. It takes continuous cooperation and communication through distribution chan-nels, regional managers, inside customer support, engineering, manufacturing and the manufacturing engineers. Now we’ve gotten pretty good at it,” he says, “but it’s really more of an art than a science.” One advantage, he adds, is that because Inpro/Seal only makes bearing isolators and a small selection of related products, “we can focus all of our resources on that.”

The way team members deliver on the company’s 24-hour- turnaround promise is really the “art” that Hoehle talks about. For parts that are routinely measured in tolerances of thou-sandths of an inch, it’s critical that everyone involved be on the same page. Some companies might need rigid production directives to do that, but Inpro/Seal found another way. “We are integrated through practice, not through policy,” says Hoehle, explaining that his operation is built on valued experience and worker autonomy—not top-down orders or even regular meetings. “We have irregular regular meetings,” Hoehle quips, admitting that many would deem such a strategy untenable.

“For us to have quick response,” Hoehle adds, “people must be allowed to operate in a fairly broad zone of freedom. They can’t be waiting for a memo or a decision or having to check with somebody else. At the same time, you want them to know

Assembler Carol Ponce puts together an Inpro/Seal bearing isolator, one of 300 she’s likely to complete on a typical work day.

Page 24: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

ON THE ROAD TO EXCELLENCE

22 | MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY FEBRUARY 2010

what they need to do to satisfy the customer, so we defi ne kind of loosely where the gutters are, if you think of it as a bowling alley.”

Each bearing isolator is, of course, not completely unique. Common design features exist that allow for a degree of uniformity in production as well as the use of standard work orders that cover much of the production process. Also, modern technology now enables a large portion of the engi-neering groundwork—compiling standard design information, translating it to CNC programs and storing it for later access—to be completed ahead of time.

“One thing that really helped us achieve 24-hour turn-around is when we started using standardized 3D modeling templates,” says engineering manager Mike Becker. “Basically, we have a seal that can vary in different sizes, but instead of drawing it from scratch every time, we created programs where we enter the dimensions, and the program builds a to-scale print automatically from that. I wrote programs for the majority of the models we use, so instead of taking two hours to do a part from scratch,” he says, “we now do it in less than 15 minutes.” Becker adds that having completed engi-neering drawings for 80% of the company’s output means that “we probably have between 1500 and 2000 parametric programs built into our engineering system.”

Becker and his fi ve-member staff stay involved up front to keep the engineering process on track and moving forward. They oversee all incoming orders, which involves confi r-mation of measurements, making engineering revisions, handling machining and programming issues, and some-times, simply talking to customers. “Customers can get me on the phone directly,” he says, “and these calls often help get things done quicker.”

The human touchThe path to quick turnaround, though, is not always high-tech, especially in a company that determined it wouldn’t outsource any of its operations. “We automate as much as we can,” says Hoehle, “but to offer customers the response they require, we sometimes need the fl exibility to make something one-off right from scratch. For this, or for a small run, the time it would take to program and set up the CNC is sometimes longer than it would take for an experienced manual lathe operator to just make one himself. In our organization and with our strategy,” he adds, “I think this manual component will always be there.”

It’s this component that not only keeps one wall of Inpro/Seal’s facility looking like a traditional machine shop, but ensures the company’s ongoing need for experienced machinists. “The most diffi cult thing to deal with in the past two or three years is what you could call our custom shop,” says Hoehle. “Because we do so many one-offs and customized parts, we still have people running manual lathes and manual mills. But to kids getting out of school today, even tech-school graduates, manual milling is like something from the Stone Age. Actually getting people who can take a manual lathe in a mill and a piece of raw material and a print, and give you a fi nished product at the end of the day is almost a lost art. We’ve pretty much determined,” he says, “that to get people where we need them to be in manu-facturing, we have to train them ourselves.”

This is where Donnie Ogle fi ts in. One of Inpro/Seal’s most experienced employees, Ogle has been at the company nearly as long as Hoehle. In that time, he has served in virtually every production capacity and knows as much or more than anyone on site about bearing isolators. In June, he assumed the title of Trainer after it was decided no one was better qualifi ed to pass this information on to a new generation of workers. One of Ogle’s fi rst tasks was to create an all-encompassing in-house training manual.

“We call it a training binder,” says Ogle, “and it covers measuring, metrology, and will soon include a blueprint-reading course.” Ogle is also the go-to person for information about company history and where Inpro/Seal products are used. “I’ve heard people here say they didn’t know what a

Production expert Donnie Ogle has responsibility for helping new hires get up to speed and keeping shop-fl oor veterans up to date.

About Waukesha BearingsFounded in 1946, Waukesha Bearings joined Dover in 1977. The company is a leading designer and manufacturer of hydrodynamic bearings and magnetic bearing systems for high-performing turbomachinery in oil & gas, power-generation, marine and industrial markets. Typical applications include gas-, steam- and hydro-turbines, centrifugal gas compressors, gearboxes, pumps and motors. Headquartered in Pewaukee, WI, Waukesha has facilities in the U.S., UK, Mexico, Russia, India and Japan, and localized sales representation around the world.

The acquisition of Inpro/Seal in December 2009 added an adjacent product to Waukesha’s custom-engineered bearing solutions for the oil & gas and power-gen markets. The companies share a real commitment to providing innova-tive solutions and superior service to their customers. As the originator of bearing isolator technology, Inpro/Seal brand has a strong history, especially in North America. The addition of Waukesha’s global footprint provides signifi cant opportunities for growth internationally, allowing Inpro/Seal to better serve a global customer base with customized bearing- and system- protection products.

Page 25: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

ON THE ROAD TO EXCELLENCE

FEBRUARY 2010 MT-ONLINE.COM | 23

certain piece of equipment was for or where our products are used,” says Ogle. “So one thing I really like doing is giving new hires a well-rounded orientation before they get to the shop fl oor, so they know what they’re doing out there and what they’re part of.”

Not surprisingly, Ogle is also the shop-fl oor problem solver, the communication bridge between shifts, and the coordinator of on-the-job operator training. Inpro/Seal also relies on Ogle to helps guide its 6S (with safety) program as part of the company’s lean initiative. His 6S duties include surprise audits, after which Ogle awards fl ags (green, yellow or red) that refl ect the 6S status of each area audited. “I’ve taught our people that 6S is part of lean,” he says, “but it takes maintenance and a mindset.” The company’s well-tenured workforce is “getting used to doing it daily,” he adds, “but you can’t ever quit following up.”

Full speed aheadInpro/Seal’s upcoming challenges naturally include competi-tors, says Hoehle, but also the company’s ability to continue serving a diverse range of bearing-protection needs. “And this will come from having that communication channel open,” he says. “Customers will tell you what their prob-lems are if you ask them the right questions. This is where a lot of our new products come from: just listening. That’s

vital information. Any time a customer tells you he’s got a problem,” Hoehle asserts, “you ought to be listening.”

And, if things go as Inpro/Seal expects, there should be plenty of listening to do. Despite its long-running success, the company and its new owners believe Inpro/Seal has captured only about 1% of the total available market for its products. Fed-Ex, take note. MT

A green fl ag signifi es this workstation’s passing grade in a 6S inspection.

For more info, enter 2 at www.MT-freeinfo.com

For more info, enter 74 at www.MT-freeinfo.com

Page 26: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

24 | MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY FEBRUARY 2010

Raymond L. AtkinsContributing Editor

We have discussed several KPIs over the course of this

series, each of which has measured one or more

components in the overall production process. These

various metrics have been presented as the tools

management can use in measuring the health of portions of the

process. Still, the question arises: Is there a single metric that takes

into account all of the variables in a given production process?

There is one that comes close. It’s known as “TEEP,” which stands

for Total Effective Equipment Productivity.

TEEP is an ideal or best-case benchmark against which a production process is measured. It is the comparison between the theoretical capacity of a machine versus that machine’s actual performance. TEEP uses as its litmus test the hypothetical output of a machine if it ran perfectly, all the time. As an example, suppose you have a machine in your process that is rated to produce one part per hour. TEEP assumes that if it were to run continuously at the capacity determined by the machine manufacturer’s OEM specifi cations, this equipment would produce 24 parts per day, 365 days per year—and that this benchmark is the number against which your actual performance should be measured. Consider the number to be an absolute (whether it can actually be obtained), like absolute zero or the speed of light. The formula for this calcula-tion is Actual Parts per Unit of Time X Total Time/Theoretical Parts per Unit of Time = TEEP.

How To Begin Measuring Maintenance Effectiveness

PHOT

O ©

SLE

EPYD

RAGO

N –

FOT

OLIA

.COM

Lucky you! There is one

KPI that comes close

to taking into account

almost all variables in

a production process.

What is it? Read on.

Part IV

Recapping Parts I – IIIAs we’ve noted throughout this series, key performance indicators (KPIs) are the metrics that an organiza-tion chooses to use as their measures of process performance. They can vary among industries and among individual processes. To begin managing by metrics, an organization must fi rst collect meaningful and pertinent data—information that is important to the operation of the business—which is then converted into one or more KPIs. These tools can be used to immediately evaluate the performance of a process variable, as well as provide a means for tracking that variable over time.

Page 27: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

FEBRUARY 2010 MT-ONLINE.COM | 25

A SPECIAL SUPPLEMENT TO MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY

Now, don’t throw the magazine away and reach for the television remote. It’s not as diffi cult as it sounds. I’ll say it in English this time: TEEP is the number of good widgets you are making in a given time period compared to the total number of widgets the machine is capable of making if it ran perfectly at its rated capacity during that same period of time.

Let’s look at the machine we just referenced. You have a process that produces widgets, and your primary machine is an old, but well-maintained widget-maker that is rated at one unit per hour. Your plant works two eight-hour shifts each day over a fi ve-day work week, with the weekend being devoted to maintenance efforts. Your process continually achieves uptimes above 90%, and you seldom have any quality issues. Last week, the plant produced a total of 77 widgets at this machine center during your 80 planned production hours.

The TEEP percentage for this rather rosy scenario would be as follows: 77 actual widgets produced X 168 total hours in the week/168 possible widgets = 77%. What does this number tell us? Basically, a TEEP percentage of 77% indicates that 23% of this particular process capacity was unrealized—even though this same process is running exceptionally well when evaluated by less stringent measures. (FYI: a handy TEEP calculator is available to you at http://www.downtimecentral.com/oee.shtml.) By the way, if your particular process is achieving a TEEP percentage above 75%, that is an excellent number, and you may take a moment to congratulate yourself.

“But wait,” you say. “I don’t want to run three shifts, seven days a week. I’m producing between 70 and 80 widgets per week. That’s world-class output within my particular industry, especially considering the equipment I have, and that’s all the widgets I can sell, anyway. So why would I want to compare myself to a standard that makes no sense for me?”

Why, indeed? TEEP is not for everyone. It’s a strategic measure that is used in, among other things, determining the need for capital outlay. Suppose that the giant widget plant down the road—your main competition, perhaps—has a big fi re or some other issue that causes a serious curtail-ment in its ability to turn out product. This leads to a widget shortage, and the price per unit skyrockets. At last, you can sell as many of the things as you can produce—and pretty much get your own price. Your unfortunate competitor will be limping along for at least a year, and as you look for ways

to take advantage of what could be an extremely profi table time for your business, your eyes might drift to and linger upon the 23% of your unrealized capacity (as determined by your 77% TEEP).

There are several options open to you at this point. You can weed out the few rejects and breakdowns you have and push your TEEP to 80%. You can add a third shift and increase your TEEP or add an extra production day to do the same. You can go to a seven-day/24-hour schedule if you have high confi dence in your maintenance program’s ability to work around the extra demands you are placing upon the process. You can even attempt to speed up your widget-maker—if such an action can be undertaken economically, and provided you keep in mind that there are often unforeseen consequences to running a process in excess of its rated capacity. Regardless of what you do, the TEEP measure is the benchmark that lets you know how much additional production is available without addi-tional capital expenditure (such as adding more machines, replacing older equipment, etc.).

Benchmarking against what?Since we are on the subject, we should spend a few moments discussing the concept of benchmarks, which are those standards—sometimes theoretical—against which we measure and track our own performances. What should these numbers be? What is “world-class?” Who decides?

There is a consensus among maintenance consultants and scholars alike that benchmarks should be challenging but achievable—and I agree with that guideline. As for the actual numbers, however, there is little agreement. Benchmarks differ across industries, across plants and across machine centers. Take uptime as an example.

For years, a production uptime percentage above 80% was considered to be a good effort, and 85% was thought to be outstanding. As maintenance practices and machine technology have improved, the best of the best have continued to ease their uptimes in the direction of 88%, then 90% and fi nally to 95% or higher.

The issue for each plant and for every manager is to benchmark their own processes against achievable goals—and to encourage small but steady increments of improve-ment in their own unique process. Aspiring to a challenging benchmark should be a positive experience for the entire organization. To illustrate this point, let’s go back to the widget industry for a moment.

TEEP is not for everyone. It’s a strategic measure that is used in,

among other things, determining the need for capital outlay.

Page 28: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

26 | MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY FEBRUARY 2010

Suppose you are the production manager for the original widget plant in your organization (the old workhorse), and you have the task of operating technologically obsolete machinery that has been poorly maintained for much of its history. The factory runs uptimes in the mid-70s and makes a small profi t. Further assume that upper manage-ment has determined that large capital outlays are not in your facility’s future. Times are hard, and they’ll continue to run the plant as long as it pays to do so. But, if you drop into the red, that may be all she wrote. Under conditions such as these, it is probably not wise to benchmark yourself against the leading plant in your industry—a brand-new, technological marvel that consistently posts uptime percent-ages in the mid- to high-90s.

It’s not a case of never being able to get there from here. If you establish a proper PM (preventive maintenance regimen), initiate PdM (predictive maintenance) as budgets allow, do realistic, honest root-cause analyses (RCAs) for every process failure, work safely and begin a conscientious training program, you can wash away most sins over time. There is, however, another component you must consider.

If you are consistently running uptime percentages in the mid-70s and are benchmarking against a goal of 95%, you may fi nd that your rate of improvement drops over time. Specifi cally, your organization may develop a morale problem, because the goal is perceived as being out of reach. If your process has consistently run uptimes in the 75th percentile and through world-class techniques you are

able to raise this average to 80%, you have achieved a huge gain in effectiveness. Conversely, if the new and improved 80% uptime is compared to a 95% goal, it still seems as if the organization has an impossibly long way to go. If, though, the benchmark were 85%, then your people have moved halfway toward their goal—a goal they perceive as being reasonable and achievable. Remember, as goals are reached, new, higher ones can be set. Thus, by making each new goal plateau achievable, you are not limiting the long-term potential of the company, particularly if you reward the attainment of these plateaus as they are reached.

Use your metrics effectivelyTo manage by metrics, you must fi rst make the conscious decision to gather accurate data that is meaningful to your organization. The accuracy of your data is the critical component of the process. You must then convert the data into KPIs that your organization is capable of maintaining. Put simply, the gathering and manipulation of data into a useable form is an important job that must be performed by personnel who realize this fact and who are capable of performing the task. Finally, your KPIs should be bench-marked against realistic numbers. You must learn to walk before you can begin to run. MT

Ray Atkins is based in Rome, GA. E-mail: [email protected]; visit his Website: www.raymondlatkins.com; or hear him speak at MARTS 2010 (www.MARTSconference.com)

Applied Technology Publications, SUCCESS by DESIGN and the Autism Society of Illinois are joining together in an effort to give voice to autism during MARTS 2010.

Originally planned as a publishing awards event, we have expanded the scope of this occasion to raise awareness and funds for autism, a growing disorder that has already touched the hearts and lives of countless professionals in the industrial engineering, reliability, main-tenance, energy and environmental sectors. Collaboration with the Autism Society was specifi c in that this organization is out on the front line 24/7, providing immediate support and services to families affected by autism. It’s a type of challenging endeavor with which MARTS attendees can well identify as they, themselves are on the front line keeping critical infrastructure and industrial operations up and running no matter what.

Kicking Off MARTS 2010 With A Worthy CauseThese “Reliability Gives Voice To Autism” activities will take place at the Hyatt Regency O’Hare on the evening of April, 27, 2010, starting with a cocktail reception at 5 p.m, followed by a gala charity dinner, live entertainment and door prizes. You won’t want to miss this exciting and worthy event, which also helps kick off MARTS 2010!

We look forward to having you join us and others across the Reliability Community in giving “Voice To Autism” at MARTS 2010!

For more details, including information on sponsorship opportunities, visit:

www.MARTSconference.comOr contact:

Bill Kiesel, Publisher of Maintenance Technology and Lubrication Management & Technology magazines at:

[email protected]; or: 847.382.8100 x116

ReliabilityGivesVoice

To

at MARTS 2010Autism

w

A SPECIAL SUPPLEMENT TO MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY

For more info, enter 75 at www.MT-freeinfo.com

Page 29: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

Alarm Limits For TAN

For more info, enter 3 at www.MT-freeinfo.com

By Dr. Lube, aka Ken Bannister

Symptom:“What’s the best way to set alarm limits for TAN in lube oil analysis? Also, if a TAN alarm is exceeded, how fast do we need to react, and is there a difference between conventional and synthetic TAN limits?”

Diagnosis:TAN (Total Acid Number) defi nes the amount of acid and acid-like materials present in oil. Measured in milligrams of potassium hydroxide per gram, 1 mg KOH/g is the equivalent of one acid number. Depending on an oil’s use, acidic components caused by water, rust, corrosion and oxidation accumulate over time, causing acidity and its corresponding TAN # to increase. Unattended, these acids will continue to deplete oil additives, corrode surfaces, reduce pumpability and deposit themselves as lacquers on hot surfaces.

Critical TAN numbers are dependant on the oil type. Typically, light duty industrial and R & O (rust and oxidation inhibited) oils have a maximum TAN # of 2. Antiwear and EP (extreme pressure) oils have allowable maximum levels up to 4 before they must be changed. While the thermal- and oxidation-stability and natural detergency of synthetics give them an advantage over conventional lubricants, their TAN # limits will still vary depending on the type of synthetic.

Prescription:A single test rarely gives us the picture we are looking for; such is the case with TAN testing. An oil’s acidity level will decrease initially, then eventually rise as the oil ages and additives deplete, requiring us to trend monitor the TAN # over time and in numerous samples. We must also read the TAN # in conjunction with other results. For example, an increase in acidity will manifest as an increase in viscosity. A rapid rise in the number also could indicate a rise in the oil’s water content. Conversely, depletion of rust inhibitor, detergent and antiwear additives will increase the TAN #. In combustion-engine oil, the combination of a rise in TAN # and a fall in TBN # (Total Base Number or alkalinity level) is used to determine an oil-change condition.

Oil type, ambient conditions and oil-use factors all combine to dictate the required oil analysis test(s) and setting of critical TAN # limits. This informa-tion is best obtained by working with a single lab that will perform the same test consistently over the oil’s life span and assist the user in determining the correct limits for the application. Once a pre-determined alarm or critical state is recognized, action must be taken ASAP (within 24-48 hrs).

Lubrication questions? E-mail: [email protected] (Dr. Lube, aka Ken Bannister, will be a featured part of MARTS 2010. To register for and/or learn more about his value-added pre-conference workshop “Liquid Gold: Implementing a Winning Lube Strategy for Maximum Gain,” visit www.MARTSconference.com)

ubricationheckupCC

LLToday, more and more companies are seeking to intensify predictive maintenance practices — increasingly depending on oil analysis to ensure equipment reliability and reduce costs.

ExxonMobil’s state-of-the-art Signum Oil Analysis program—available exclusively to ExxonMobil customers —is specifically tailored to monitor critical indicators in used oil. Based on leading equipment builder specifications and international standards, this program delivers the knowledge you need to better understand the condition of your company’s lubricants and equipment. What’s more, Signum Oil Analysis is convenient: Our technically advanced o i l -ana lys is program includes capabilities that can be accessed online.

Discover how Signum Oil Analysis can translate into more than cost-saving benefits. This pacesetting program, supported by experienced ExxonMobil lubrication professionals, can help your operation soar to greater heights.

For more information, go tosignumoilanalysis.com.

©20

09 E

xxon

Mob

il C

orpo

ratio

n.

The

Exxo

nMob

il lo

goty

pe a

nd P

egas

us d

esig

n ar

e re

gist

ered

trad

emar

ks o

f Exx

on M

obil

Cor

pora

tion

or

one

of i

ts s

ubsi

diar

ies.

For more info, enter 76 at www.MT-freeinfo.com

FEBRUARY 2010 MT-ONLINE.COM | 27

Page 30: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

SPECIAL PUMP MAINTENANCE PRIMER

28 | MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY FEBRUARY 2010282828 ||| MM MAINAINAINTENTENTENANCANCANCE TE TE TECHECHECHNOLNOLNOLOGYOGYOGY FEFE FEBRUBRUBRUARYARYARY 2020 20101010

Savvy pump users

will want to consider

these approaches,

remember these tips

and, by all means,

heed these cautions.

Gene VogelElectrical Apparatus Service

Association (EASA)

Most maintenance and operations personnel who work

with centrifugal pumps have been warned to never

start a pump unless it is primed. They have been

warned that a pump that is started when loaded with

air may cause the seal or packing to be scorched and permanently

damaged, and that when the suction liquid level is below the

pump (suction lift), the pump would not begin to pump. Then

they encounter a pump that is said to be self-priming. At this

point, they begin to question if all that caution is necessary.

The real scoopThe fact is that no centrifugal pump is truly self-priming in suction lift situa-tions. Furthermore, there actually are several approaches where a pump may be started when loaded with air. First, though, in all cases the seal must be protected from overheating. That requires more than just a cooling mechanism, since mechanical seals and packing depend on some small amount of liquid to migrate between the stationary and rotating members to lubricate them.

28 | MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY FEBRUARY 2010

Fig. 1. Use of a secondary priming pump (courtesy of Godwin Pumps)

What You Need To Know

About ‘Self-Priming’

Centrifugal Pumps

Secondary eductorpump creates the vacuum.

Discharge check valve closes so a vacuum can be created in the volume.

Page 31: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

SPECIAL PUMP MAINTENANCE PRIMER

FEBRUARY 2010 MT-ONLINE.COM | 29FEBFEBFEBRUARUARUARYRYRY 201201201000 MTMTMT-ONLONLONLINEINEINE COCO.COMMM ||| 292929

Protecting the sealsA properly primed pump would have the seal vented—ensuring that the seal is supplied with pumpage or fl ush liquid for cooling and lubrication. Centrifugal pumps classifi ed as “self-priming” are most often equipped with double seals that have a barrier fl uid in the chamber between the two seals. This barrier fl uid supplies the necessary cooling and lubrication to protect the seals from scorching when the pump is started dry. (See the “API Seal Plans” for more information on double seals and barrier fl uids, or contact your seal distributor.)

Assuming the seal has been provided with adequate cooling and lubrication, the concern now is whether the fl uid is above (fl ooded suction) or below (suction lift) the pump. The problem, of course, is with suction lift. The task is to create suffi cient suction to lift the liquid into the pump. The impeller can’t do that. The impeller is designed to develop a pressure differ-ential with liquid in the impeller and pump housing. Common liquids are more than 800 times as dense as air. Centrifugal pumps won’t pump air.

Finding a solutionThere are two common approaches to the problem. The most straightforward is to provide the pump with an auxiliary pumping device that will evacuate the air out of the pump and draw the liquid in (see Fig. 1).

It is assumed the suction line is submersed in the liquid, forming an air seal. Similarly, the discharge must also have an air seal, which is usually provided by means of a ball- or fl apper-type check valve that prevents air from being drawn into the pump housing from the discharge line. The secondary “air pump” may be a diaphragm- or eductor-type unit, and electrically, mechanically or pneumatically driven.

With the pump suction and discharge sealed, the secondary pump will pump the air out and draw the liquid in. When the liquid is drawn up to the level of the impeller, the impeller begins to pump, forcing open the discharge check valve. A pressure switch will then shut down the secondary air pump.

A second approach is to build the pump housing in such a way that liquid will remain in the housing when both suction and discharge lines are drained. Suction and discharge nozzles may be located well above the impeller, creating a “tank” below that houses the impeller and volute (see Fig. 2). A ball or fl apper check valve on suction or discharge may prevent siphoning of the liquid in the tank when the pump is stopped. When the pump is restarted, the fl uid in the tank is suffi cient to develop suction lift and draw

fl uid into the pump, tank and impeller, and to purge the air out the discharge. The pump is said to “digest” the air. This approach requires that on initial installation of a new or rebuilt pump, there must be an initial prime loaded into it. If, for any reason, the pump tank is drained, the unit will not begin to pump—thus, the self-priming feature of this pump is only effective after an initial prime. This style of equipment may be referred to as a “re-priming” pump.

Secondary air-pump exampleFor an interesting example of a pump that uses a secondary air pump for priming, visit http://www.loyno.edu/history/journal/1995-6/haydel.htm to read an article about the drainage pumps in New Orleans, LA. They have both suction and discharge submersed, so a discharge check valve is not required. For an example of pumps that use the re-prime approach, visit the Websites of WEMCO, Gorman-Rupp, ITT Goulds or other pump manufacturers. MT

Gene Vogel is a pump and vibration specialist with the Elec-trical Apparatus Service Association, Inc. (EASA), based in St. Louis, MO. EASA is an international trade organization of over 2100 electromechanical sales and service fi rms in 58 countries. This article is based on one that fi rst ran in the association’s May 2009 Currents publication.

Fig. 2. An example of a re-priming pump

FEBRUARY 2010 MT-ONLINE.COM | 29

Anti-siphonfl apper valve

Suctionnozzle

Discharge nozzle

For more info, enter 4 at www.MT-freeinfo.com

Page 32: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

SPECIAL PUMP MAINTENANCE PRIMER

30 | MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY FEBRUARY 2010

In tough working environments, where contaminants constantly threaten bearings and other pump components, keeping equipment up and running poses a real challenge. Slurry-handling operations are that type of place.

Special to MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY From NSK

NSK engineers devote their attention to the needs of bearings in the

real-life applications and wide range of challenging environments in

which they will be used. One such application is an impeller slurry

pump. It’s a category of machinery that often sees substantial down-

time, high maintenance costs and high levels of premature bearing failure.

30 | MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY FEBRUARY 2010

Protecting your slurry-handling pumps. . .

Pump Bearing Pump Bearing Reliability:Reliability:

4 Installation 4 Installation Procedures Procedures

To Maximize To Maximize PerformancePerformance

Page 33: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

SPECIAL PUMP MAINTENANCE PRIMER

FEBRUARY 2010 MT-ONLINE.COM | 31

In the case of one cement producer, centrifugal, slurry-handling screw-pump downtime due to failed bearings was resulting in high costs for bearing replacement, maintenance and line downtime—something the company couldn’t afford to ignore. Screw pumps operating in a cement plant are going to be subjected to extreme levels of cement dust and dirt. While maintenance practices in these operations can be less than desirable, in this particular case, dust contamination was determined to be the root cause of the bearing failures.

With hardening concrete ready to pump and pour, an unexpected pump failure is a major issue. Centrifugal, slurry-handling screw pumps call for specifi c bearing installation practices to ensure they achieve top perfor-mance under contaminated conditions:

■ The bearing inner ring for this type of pump is not held in place by the fi t between the shaft, sleeve and bearing. It is mounted on a screw bushing assembly bolted to the end of the pump shaft. Metric bolts are utilized in the bearing assembly and they need to be installed to the correct torque specifi cation. Thread locker must also be used on these bolts to help maintain their position. This practice ensures that the bearing assembly does not spin on the shaft. If your bearing is slipping on the screw bushing and/or the screw bushing is slipping on the shaft, the bolts holding the plate against the bearing inner ring are the wrong type, wrong torque—or both.

■ Lubrication has a signifi cant impact on the operation of machinery and its bearings. This is especially true in contaminated environments. For slurry pumps, high-quality EP (extreme-pressure) greases are the best option. Bentone-based greases, suitable for antifriction bearing lubrication at temperatures from 0 F to +300 F, are preferred.

■ Maintenance and re-lubrication are also vital to the life of your bearings. For screw pumps that operate continuously, monthly re-lubrication is recommended, as is monthly preventive maintenance. During the re-lubrication process, check the grease for oiliness and dirt contamination, and adjust the re-lube schedule accordingly.

■ Operating temperatures can be used as a guide for re-lubrication. A sustained temperature drop after adding grease could indicate insuffi cient lubrication was initially supplied. Conversely, a noticeable rise in operating temperatures could indicate excess grease supply.

Applications such as this demand not only correct mainte-nance and installation practices, but the right components as well. NSK can provide answers. The attached chart lists our general recommendations for centrifugal pump bearings. MT

For more info, enter 5 at www.MT-freeinfo.com

FEBRUARY 2010 MT-ONLINE.COM | 31

BORESYMBOL

BEARING BORE SIZE SHAFT DIAMETER TOLERANCE SHAFT STRAIGHTNESS AND ALIGNMENT**

METRIC (MM) METRIC (MM)

+MAX STRAIGHT+MIN ALIGN+MAX STRAIGHT+MIN ALIGN

INCH INCHBORE(mm)

BORE(inch)

02030405

06070809

10111213

14151617

18192021

22242628

15172025

30354045

50556065

70758085

9095

100105

110120130140

0.59060.66930.78740.9843

1.18111.37801.57481.7717

1.96852.16542.36222.5591

2.75592.95283.14963.3465

3.54333.74023.93704.1339

4.33074.72445.11815.5118

0.0090.0090.0110.011

0.0110.0130.0130.013

0.0130.0150.0150.015

0.0150.0150.0150.018

0.0180.0250.0250.028

0.0280.0280.0330.033

0.0130.0130.0130.013

0.0130.0130.0130.013

0.0130.0130.0130.013

0.0130.0130.0130.013

0.0130.0130.0130.013

0.0180.0180.0180.018

* For Ball Bearings And Cylindrical Roller Bearings

** TIR= Total Indicator Runout (for alignment it means both parallel and angular readings) Shafts from 18 to 100mm use k5 and k6 fi t

Shafts from 100 to 140mm use M5 and M6 fi t

Housing for held bearing use K7 fi t

Housing for fl oat bearing use J7

0.0510.0510.0510.051

0.0510.0510.0510.051

0.0510.0510.0510.051

0.0510.0510.0510.051

0.0510.0510.0510.051

0.0760.0760.0760.076

0.00050.00050.00050.0005

0.00050.00050.00050.0005

0.00050.00050.00050.0005

0.00050.00050.00050.0005

0.00050.00050.00050.0005

0.00070.00070.00070.0007

0.0020.0020.0020.002

0.0020.0020.0020.002

0.0020.0020.0020.002

0.0020.0020.0020.002

0.0020.0020.0020.002

0.0030.0030.0030.003

0.00010.00010.00020.0002

0.00020.00020.00020.0002

0.00020.00020.00020.0002

0.00020.00020.00020.0003

0.00030.00030.00030.0013

0.00130.00130.00150.0015

0.00040.00040.00040.0004

0.00040.00050.00050.0005

0.00050.00060.00060.0006

0.00060.00060.00060.0007

0.00070.00100.00100.0011

0.00110.00110.00130.0013

0.00000.00000.00010.0001

0.00010.00010.00010.0001

0.00010.00010.00010.0001

0.00010.00010.00010.0001

0.00010.00010.00010.0005

0.00050.00050.00060.0006

NSK General Recommendations For Centrifugal Pumps*

Pump Bearing Reliability:

4 Installation Procedures

To Maximize Performance

Page 34: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

SPECIAL PUMP MAINTENANCE PRIMER

32 | MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY FEBRUARY 201032 | MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY FEBRUARY 2010

Nothing gets by us.

Keeping contamination under control®

TM

(615) [email protected]

Don’t Plan for Contamination – Avoid It Keep contamination where it belongs – outside your machines. Des-Case desiccant breathers keep out air, water and air particles as small as 0.3 microns. Most importantly, they keep you away from unnecessary downtime and costly repairs.

Get Started Now with a Free Sample Breather!

Request yours: www.descase.com/sample

The Hydraulic Institute (HI), under the approval of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI),

is seeking qualifi ed individuals in North America to participate in the review

process for the draft updated Standard ANSI/HI 1.4 Rotodynamic (Centrifugal) Pumps for Manuals Describing Instal-lation, Operation, and Maintenance. Interested individuals and organiza-

tions directly and materially affected by this standard, including pump users and specifi ers, are asked to e-mail Karen Anderson, at [email protected], or call (973) 267-9700 x123.

Gas-Lubricated Seals

Centrifugal pump users can install EagleBurgmann’s double Cartex® GSDN bi-directional gas-lubri-

cated seals to standardize new units or recondition existing ones that have conventional stuffi ng box packings or liquid-lubricated mechanical seals. This new product line has been designed so that seat and shaft sleeve rotate along with the pump shaft, while the springs remain stationary. Internal pressuriza-tion together with centrifugal forces create a self-cleaning effect at the sliding faces during ongoing operation. This prevents harmful contamination and increases operational reliability, espe-cially in applications where the media contains solids. The manufacturer notes that these seals remain closed and balanced, even in critical situations during startup and shutdown, as well as if a fault occurs in the buffer gas supply.

EagleBurgmann Industries LPHouston, TX

Calling Centrifugal Pump Users & Specifi ers

For more info, enter 161 at www.MT-freeinfo.comFor more info, enter 85 at www.MT-freeinfo.com

Fluid-Handling Matters…

Page 35: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

For more info, enter 65 at www.MT-freeinfo.comFor more info, enter 77 at www.MT-freeinfo.com

CUSTOM SIGNS & LABELSON SITE & ON DEMAND

The best features and functionalities of Brady’s portable label printers are new combined into one esty-to-use, top-of-the-line portable thermal tranfer printer - Brady’s NEW BMPTM71 Printer. Whether you need raised panel labels or 2” wide vinyl pipe markers, you only need ONE label maker.

View a demo and request a sample pack:www.bradyid.com/bmp71

environments

WITH BRADY’S NEWEST PRINTER

Page 36: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

For more info, enter 65 at www.MT-freeinfo.comFor more info, enter 78 at www.MT-freeinfo.com

Maintenance Management SoftwareThe world’s absolute best

is now available

On-DemandIt’s simply the best full-featured Work Order and Preventive MaintenanceSoftware package backed by a company that’s been creating innovativeCMMS Software for over 27 years...

Delivered FAST directly over the Internet to your PC workstations

Pay on a Month-to-Month basis with no contractual lock in!

Easy to use and set up! No need to get IT professionals involved!

Fast, No-Hassle CMMS!Starting at only $89 per month!

MAPCON On-Demand™ uses Java Swing™ technology to deliver the fastest, most comprehensive CMMS in the industry directly to your staff. There is no ‘penalty’ to upgrade or downgrade On-Demand™ options! On-Demand is an SaaS service billed monthly.

Find out more! Call 1-800-922-4336 today!Free 30-Day Evaluation, too!

MAPCON On-Dem the fast d

Find out more

Visit our website, www.MAPCON.com and enter the promo code M-T-2010 toget your 1st month of On-Demand FREE!

Get 1st Month FREE!

Page 37: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

Don’t Miss The Capacity Assurance Conference!

®®®®®®

PRESENTED BY:

MAINTENANCE and RELIABILITY TECHNOLOGY SUMMIT

New Speakers! Critical Topics! Powerful Presentations!The premier educational event

for maintenance professionals,

MARTS 2010 covers the widest

range of topics in its history.

With 30 one-hour Conferences

and 17 full-day Workshops,

MARTS off ers valuable,

job-critical information for:

Plant and Facility Managers

Maintenance Engineers

and Managers

Maintenance Team Leaders

and Members

Plant Operators and

Engineers

Reliability Engineers

and Managers

... at the comfortable

Hyatt Regency O’Hare hotel,

10 minutes from O’Hare Airport

in Rosemont, IL.

* Keynote Speaker John Ratzenberger – the actor, author and manu-facturing activist will speak about Nuts, Bolts & Thingamajigs, his foundation that brings students and manufacturing together.

* Futurist and fi nancial professional Bob Chernow, who will off er predictions for manufacturing, technology, the economy and other key issues.

* A special “Reliability Gives

Voice to Autism” event that kicks off MARTS 2010 with a worthy cause. It will feature dinner and live entertainment while raising awareness and funds for autism.

* Solid representation from industry experts such as Christer Idhammar, Bob Williamson, Doc Palmer and many others, including Enrique Mora, who will present a Spanish-only Workshop on TPM.

MARTS 2010 MARTS 2010 Highlights: Highlights:

APRIL 27-30, 2010Or Call Tom Madding: 847.382.8100 x108

Hyatt Regency O’Hare, Rosemont (Chicago), IL

www.MARTSconference.com

FEBRUARY 2010 MT-ONLINE.COM | 35

Page 38: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

36 | LUBRICATION MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2010

Is to provide a comprehensive

training, educational and professional

development opportunity for

maintenance and reliability technicians,

engineers, supervisors and managers

in all industries and major facilities.

MAINTENANCE and RELIABILITY TECHNOLOGY SUMMITAPRIL 27-30, 2010

MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMAAAAAAAAAIIIIIIIINNNNNNNNNNTTTTTTTTTTEEEEEEEEENNNNNNNNNNAAAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNNNNNNCCCCCCCCCCCCCCEEEEEEEEEEEE aaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnnnddddddddddd RRRRRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLLIIIIIIIIAAAAAAAAAABBBBBBBBBBBBIIIIIIIIIILLLLLLLLLLLLIIIIIIIIITTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEECCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIITTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMAAAAAAAAAAAAIIIIIIIINNNNNTTEEENNNAAAANNNNCCCCEEE dddd RRRRREEEEEELLLLLLLLIIIIIIIAAAAAABBBBBBBBIIIIILLLLLLIIIIIIITTTTTTTTTTTYYYYYYYYTTTTTTEEEEEECCCCCHHHHHHNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOLLLLLLLOOOOOOOOOOOGGGGGGGGYYYYYY SSSSSSUUUUUUUMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMIIIIIIIIIITTTTTTTTTT

363636336333363636363633 |||| LLLL L L LUBRUBRUBRUBRBRRUBRUBRUBRUBRBRRUBRICAICAICAICAICAICACICAICAICAICAICAICACAICAAAATIOTIOTIOTIOTIOTIOTTIOITIOTIOTIOTIOTTIOTION MN MN MN MN MMN MNN MN MN MMN MN MANAANAAANAANANAANAAAAAANAANAAGGGEMGEMGEMENTENTENT && & TTECTECHNOHNOLOGLOGYYY JANJANJANJANANUARRUARUARUARRA Y/FY/FY/FY/FY/FY/FEBRBREBRBBREBREBRUARUUARARUARUARY 2Y 2YY 2Y 2010010010001001001010363636363663636363636363636363363636 ||||||||||||| LLLLLLLLLUBRUBRUBRUBRUBRUBRUBRUBRUBRUBRUBRUBRICAICAICAICACACACAICAICAICAICAICACACACATIOTIOTIOTIOTIOTTIOTIOTIOTIOTIOTIOTIOTIOT N MN MN MN MN MMMMN MN MN MN MNN MN MNN MANAANAANAANAANAANAANAANAANANAANAANANAAGEMGEMGEMGEGEMMGEEGEGEGEGEMGGEMG ENTENENTENT &&&TECTTECHNOHNOLOGOLOGYY

MARTS 2010 WorkshopsWorkshops are full-day, intense explorations of a given topic.

Most run from 8:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., with an hour for lunch (included in price).

See www.MARTSconference.com for addition details and to register.

Pre-Conference Workshops: Tuesday, April 27, 2010Lean Equipment Management: The Prescription for Rapid and Sustainable Gains /

Robert M. Williamson, Founder, Strategic Work Systems, Inc.

Liquid Gold: Implementing a Winning Lube Strategy for Maximum Gain /

Ken Bannister, Principal Consultant, Engtech Industries, Inc.

Fundamentals of Mechanical Seals / Mechanical Seal Division of the Fluid Sealing Association (FSA)

Best Practices in Compression Packing & Gasketing / Compression Packing and Gasket Divisions

of the Fluid Sealing Association (FSA)

Leading Organizational Change / Scott Franklin, Principal Consultant, Life Cycle Engineering

Getting Started with Predictive Maintenance / Mike Gilley and Mike Dixon, Principals,

Fox River Systems

Reliability Centered Maintenance / Anthony “Mac” Smith, Senior Consultant, AMS Associates

4 Lean Tools to Revolutionize Your Maintenance System (Part I) / Ed Stanek, President,

LAI Reliability

Special Spanish-Language Workshop: How to Prevent or Revert Failure in Your TPM Implementation / Enrique Mora, President, LeanExpertise.com

Post-Conference Workshops: Friday, April 30, 2010Lubrication for Profi t: Best Practices for Lube Selection and Application on Process Machinery / Ray Thibault, CLS, OMA I & II; Lubrication Training & Consulting

Motor System Maintenance and Management / Howard Penrose, Ph.D., CMRP; Vice President,

Engineering and Reliability, Dreisilker Electric Motors, Inc.

Contractor Management Strategy / John Elliott, Senior Consultant and Jerry Wanichko, Manager,

T.A. Cook Consultants, Inc.

Ensuring Reliability Through Systematic Work Control / Dave Krings, CMRP, BSME;

President, Nobreakdowns.com

Using SMED to Transform Your Lean Enterprise / Enrique Mora, President, LeanExpertise.com

Maintenance Planning and Scheduling / R. D. (Doc) Palmer, PE, CMRP; Partner,

People and Processes, Inc.

IR Thermography for Electrical and Mechanical Systems / R. James Seff rin, Director of

Infraspection Institute

4 Lean Tools to Revolutionize Your Maintenance System (Part II) / Ed Stanek, President,

LAI Reliability

What is MARTS?The Maintenance & Reliability Technology Summit is

a four-day educational experience and professional

development opportunity for maintenance and

reliability professionals working in industry.

Components include two days of full-day Workshops,

two days of one-hour Conferences, two Professional

Development Courses and Certifi cation Examination

opportunities. All sessions are presented by practitioners

and other industry experts who have signed

on to share their knowledge about industrial skills,

not to sell products or services.

Attendees interested in learning about products and

services have ample opportunity to meet with MARTS

exhibitors, located in common areas.

For exhibition opportunities, contact Tom Madding:

847.382.8100 x108

MARTS 2010 BasicsLocation: Hyatt Regency O’Hare, Rosemont, IL www.ohare.hyatt.com

Dates: Tuesday through Friday, April 27-30, 2010

Workshop Days: Tuesday and Friday (17 full-day Workshops off ered)

Conference Days: Wednesday and Thursday (30 one-hour Conferences off ered; see schedule on next page)

Professional Development Course 1: Certifi ed Lubrication Specialist (CLS) Review, Tuesday through Thursday

Professional Development Course 2: Taking Command of Your Maintenance Process: from Certifi cation to Implementation, Tuesday and Wednesday

Certifi cation Exam Day (for CLS and CMRP):Friday

Note: Individuals interested in taking an exam must register directly with STLE (CLS) and SMRP (CMRP). Link to these sites at www.MARTSconference.com

36 | MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY FEBRUARY 2010

Page 39: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2010 www.LMTinfo.com | 37

The Capacity Assurance Conference!

JANJANANANAAJANJANJANJANJANJANJANJANJANNJANJANJANJANJANJANJJANJANA UARUARUAARARRUARUARUARUARUARUARUARUARRARRUARUARUARUARUARUARUAUAUUA Y/FYYY/FY/FY/FY/FY/FY/FY/FY/FYY/F/YYY/FY/FY/FY/FY/FY/FY/FY/FY/FY/ EBRRREBREBREBREBREBREBREBREBEBRBREEBREBREBREBREBREBREBREBREBE UAUAUAAARRUARUARUARUARUARUARUARUARUUAAUARUARUARARAARRUARUARYY 2Y 2Y 2Y 2Y 2Y 2Y 2Y 2Y 2YY 2Y 2Y 2Y 2Y 22Y 2Y 2Y 2YY 20 00 0010010010010010010010100101000100100100010100010010 wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww LMLMLMLML.LMTiTiTinTinTinTinffffofooffo.comcomcomcomm |||||| 3773737373737

MARTS 2010 Conferences Data Management

Green Lubrication Maintenance & Reliability

StrategyTechnology

Conferences are one-hour presentations, given by an expert in the fi eld.

Accompanied by a PowerPoint presentation, they include ample time for Q&A, and are divided into six categories:

See the schedule below for Conference off erings and other Conference-Day activities:

WEDNESDAY APRIL 28 (15 Conferences)

7:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m.

Continental Breakfast

8:00 a.m. to 8:45 a.m.

Keynote AddressJohn Ratzenberger, actor, director,author and spokesperson for theNuts, Bolts & Thingamajigs Foundation

8:45 a.m. to 9:30 a.m.

Break / Exhibits

9:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m.

Data ManagementInteroperability Between Plant Design and Other Systems for Reduced OPEX and Improved Maintenance, Turnarounds and Reliability Adrian Park, Intergraph Process, Power & Marine

Green The Two New Legs of Lean Bill Adams, Flowserve, and Bill Livoti, Baldor Electric Co.

Strategy

Reliability and Maintenance Management: From Good to Great Christer Idhammar, IDCON, Inc.

10:40 a.m. to 11:40 a.m.

TechnologyUnderstanding Torque Measurements and Torsional Analysis Trent Martz, IVC Technologies

Maintenance & Reliability Where’s Your Reliability Policy? Robert M. Williamson, Strategic Work Systems, Inc.

StrategyForward to the Basics! (Designed for the Rocket Scientists and Over-Achievers Among Us!) Jeff Shiver, People and Processes

11:40 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.

Lunch / Exhibits

1:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m.LubricationHow to Kill a Bearing / Ken Bannister, Engtech Industries, Inc.GreenWorld-Class Companies Need World-Class Motor Management and Maintenance / Noah Bethel, PdMA Corp.Strategy20 Sure-Fire Ways to Shoot Your Maintenance Eff ort in the Foot / Ray Atkins, contributing editor

Maintenace & ReliabilityTotal Process Reliability the ‘Columbia Way’ Gregory Folts, Marshall Institute, Inc.

2:10 p.m. to 3:10 p.m.TechnologyUltrasound for Condition-Based Monitoring and Energy-Effi ciency Improvement / Mike Gilley and Mike Dixon, Fox River Systems

Maintenance & ReliabilityHow to Make Your TPM Implementation a Total Success Enrique Mora, Leanexpertise.comStrategyPlanning Maintenance With Production Support / John Crossan and Randy Quick, Manufacturing Solutions, Intl.

3:10 p.m. to 3:40 p.m.Break / Exhibits

3:40 p.m. to 4:40 p.m.Maintenance & ReliabilityRCM Lessons Learned: An UpdateMac Smith, AMS Associates, and Joe Saba, JMS SoftwareGreenHow to Reduce the Payback Period for Energy Effi ciency Projects / Ralph Semyck, Siemens Industry, Inc.StrategyChange Behavior to Achieve Results: High Impact Learning Tara Denton, Life Cycle Engineering (LCE)

StrategyLife Cycle Costing Management for World-Class Asset Managers / Ali Zuashkiani, Centre for Maintenance Optimization and Reliability Engineering, University of Toronto

4:40 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. Reception / Exhibits

THURSDAY APRIL 29 (15 Conferences)

7:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m.

Continental Breakfast

8:00 a.m. to 8:45 a.m. Keynote AddressBob Chernow, futurist/ fi nancial expert

8:45 a.m. to 9:30 a.m.

Break / Exhibits

9:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m.

StrategyUsing Web 2.0 Technologies and Social Media to Continuously Improve Maintenance and Reliability Jeff Shiver, People and Processes

Maintenance & Reliability The Development of Condition-Based Maintenance in a Service Company Howard Penrose, Dreisilker Electric Motors

StrategyLife Cycle Costing Management

Ali Zuashkiani, University of Toronto

StrategyThe Right Part at the Right Time at Cost-eff ective Prices Richard R. Rosales, ABB

10:40 a.m. to 11:40 a.m.

Maintenance & ReliabilityProspering in a Lean Maintenance Environment Ed Stanek, LAI Reliability Systems

GreenAn Easy Approach for Applying Today’s AC Drives / James Mullinix, Vacon

StrategyO&M Peer Networking Bob Gibson, Scientech

Maintenance & Reliability Classical RCM: Try It, You Are Bound to Like It / Tim Allen, AMS Associates

11:40 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.

Lunch / Exhibits

1:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m.

Maintenance & ReliabilityPlant Floor Reliability: A Four Senses Approach / David Rosenthal, MEMC Electronic Materials

StrategyMaximizing Human Resources Performance within the Maintenance Organization / Michael Gehloff , General Physics Corp.

LubricationBenchmark Your Lube Program Through Oil AnalysisStacy Heston, POLARIS Laboratories

Open Discussion Group Topic TBA / Bob Williamson

2:10 p.m. to 3:10 p.m.

Data ManagementHow to Make Your CMMS Interoperate With the Real-Time Enterprise C.C. (Cliff ) Pedersen, Pedersen Enterprises Inc.

TechnologyInfrared Thermography: What’s Hot in PdM / Jim Seff rin, Infraspection Institute

StrategyApplying Disruptive Learning Techniques in a Manufacturing Environment Mitch Stansloski, Pioneer Engineering

Maintenance & ReliabilityTitle TBA / T.A.Cook Consulting, Inc.

3:10 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.

Break / Exhibits

4:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.

Plenary Session / Closing Remarks

FEBRUARY 2010 MT-ONLINE.COM | 37

Page 40: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

38 | LUBRICATION MANAGEMENT & TECHNOLOGY JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2010

MAINTENANCE and RELIABILITY TECHNOLOGY SUMMITMAINTENANCE d RELIABILITYTECHNOLOGY SUMMITThe Capacity Assurance Conference!

MARTS 2010 Fees And PackagesSpecial FSA Package - $ 1,995.00 Includes 1 FSA Pre-Conference Workshop, MARTS Conference and 1 Post-Conference Workshop

Special Summit Package - $ 1,550.00 Includes 1 Pre-Conference Workshop, MARTS Conference and special Post-Conference

Workshop “Lubrication for Profi t”

FSA/Conference Package - $ 1,590.00 Includes 1 FSA Pre-Conference Workshop and MARTS Conference

Summit Package - $ 1,450.00 Includes 1 Pre-Conference Workshop, MARTS Conference and 1 Post-Conference Workshop

Combo Package - $ 1,190.00 Includes 1 Pre or Post-Conference Workshop and MARTS Conference

Conference Package - $ 895.00 Includes MARTS Conference.

Two Workshop Package - $ 890.00 Includes 1 Pre-Conference and 1 Post-Conference Workshop only

One Workshop Package - $ 495.00 Includes 1 Pre or Post-Conference Workshop

FSA Workshop Package - $ 695.00 Includes 1 Pre-Conference FSA Workshop

Lubrication for Profi t Workshop - $ 545.00 Includes “Lubrication for Profi t” Post-Conference Workshop only

3-Day Certifi ed Lubrication Specialist Workshop - $ 1,195.00 Includes 3 days intense training based on STLE’s CLS program

2-Day Workshop: Taking Command of Your Maintenance Process: from Certifi cation to Implementation- $ 995.00 2-day review of the latest maintenance best practices is designed for busy Maintenance

professionals looking to prepare for certifi cation exams or integrate these concepts into their own

maintenance optimization programs

Certifi cation Exams - Costs Vary Individuals interested in taking the CLS exam or the CMRP exam must register directly

with STLE (CLS) and SMRP (CMRP). Links are available at www.martsconference.com

and are also listed on page 36

3-Day Review Course: Certifi ed Lubrication Specialist (CLS) Review

Instructor: Ray Thibault, Lubrication Training & Consulting

Dates: Tues., April 27 through Thurs., April 29

Times: 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. (except Tues., April 27: 8:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.)

Cost: $1,195

Attendees of this course learn how to evaluate and select lubricants, recommend changes, consolidate inventories, conduct a lube survey, and create and manage a used-lubricant analysis program. Technologies covered include bearings and gears, pneumatics and fl uid power, fl uid conditioning and analysis, and seals. The course was developed specifi cally to prepare candidates for the Certifi ed Lubrication Specialist exam. (Course enrollment does not ensure certifi cation.)

Exam: Certifi ed Lubrication Specialist (CLS)

Administered by the Society of Tribologists and Lubrication Engineers (STLE).

Date: Friday, April 30

Time: 9:00 a.m.

Cost: Varies

Note: You must register separately with STLE to take this exam at MARTS 2010. Register online at www.stle.org or call 847.825.5536.

2-Day Review Course: Taking Command of Your Maintenance Process: from Certifi cation to Implementation

Instructor: Dave Krings, CMRP, BSME; President, Nobreakdowns.com

Dates: Wed., April 28 and Thurs., April 29,

Times: 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.

Cost: $995

This comprehensive review of the latest maintenance best practices is designed for busy maintenance professionals looking to either prepare for certifi cation exams or integrate these concepts into their maintenance programs. An expanded version of the popular “5 Pillars: Maintenance & Reliability Professional Review Course,” this new session off ers more examples of real-life application and provides a general review for various maintenance-industry certifi cations. (Course enrollment does not ensure certifi cation.)

Exam: Certifi ed Maintenance & Reliability Professional

Administered by the Society for Maintenance & Reliability Professionals (SMRP)

Date: Friday, April 30

Time: 9:00 a.m.

Cost: Varies

Note: You must register separately with SMRP to take this exam at MARTS 2010. Register online at www.smrp.org or call 800.950.7354.

APRIL 27-30, 2010

MARTS 2010 Professional Development OpportunitiesTwo professional development courses are off ered at MARTS 2010. These are designed for managers looking for

in-depth, focused reviews, and technicians who want to build their skill sets. Courses are held Tuesday through Thursday.

Professional exams for Certifi ed Lubrication Specialist (CLS) and Certifi ed Maintenance Professional (CMRP) are off ered

on Friday. Individuals interested in taking an exam must register directly with STLE (CLS) and SMRP (CMRP).

Link to these sites at www.MARTSconference.com, or see below.

All packages include continental breakfast, lunch and Wednesday night’s MARTS Reception. For Group Rates, call 847.382.8100 x108.Includes 1 Pre or Post Conference Workshopp

APRIL 27-30, 2010Or Call Tom Madding: 847.382.8100 x108

www.MARTSconference.com

38 | MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY FEBRUARY 2010

For more info, enter 87 at www.MT-freeinfo.com

Page 41: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

THE GREEN EDGE

FEBRUARY 2010 MT-ONLINE.COM | 39

TTTTTTTTTTHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEE GGGGGGGGGGRRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEENNNNNNNNNN EEEEEEEEEEDDDDDDDDDDGGGGGGGGGGEEEEEEEEEE

reen workspace altera-tions come in all stripes, from big ones that can help produce signifi -

cant savings after a payback period to smaller adjustments that can generate savings immediately—and cost little or nothing upfront.

The U.S. General Services Admin-istration (GSA) recently explored and tracked a number of facility and work-space green alterations to determine their effectiveness and savings. While the GSA study focused on federal offi ce space, the strategies it followed are effec-tive in nearly any work environment, including industrial space.

Tiny tweaks capture big benefi tsThe fi rst suggestion by the study’s

authors—which involves turning up the thermostat in summer—is something that any business can easily do. By adjusting summer HVAC output from 74 to 78 F, average energy costs for cooling were cut by 4%, or 10.6 cents per sq. ft. annually in the GSA sample. A side benefi t was that the change also increased employee satisfaction: More than 60% of employees said they were uncomfortable working in the colder temperature.

Another easy, cost-saving measure involved replacing HVAC-system fi lters on schedule, and with high-performance fi lters. The GSA study estimates that 30% of the facilities examined inspected their fi lters too infrequently. By checking maintenance records to ensure proper replacement,

and using fi lters with a Minimum Effi ciency Reporting Value rating of 13 or above, the GSA study predicts these facilities would cut overall HVAC energy expenditures by 2%.

Finally, by replacing bulky CRT monitors with LCD units, businesses can quickly cut their energy use. CRT monitors draw nearly three times the energy of LCDs: 75 watts compared with 20-25 watts of peak energy. LCD screens were also found to produce appropriate brightness levels more consistently—something that current research suggests might improve perfor-mance of visual tasks.

For additional information about the study and other energy-saving alterations for the workplace, visit www.gsa.gov MT

DOES YOUR COMPANY HAVE A GREEN EDGE?E-mail your product and service news to: [email protected]

For information on advertising in the Green Edge section, contact KATHY JAROS at:

Phone: (847) 382-8100 ext. 117 / Fax: (847) 304-8603 / E-mail: [email protected]

iG

© P

KAZM

ERCY

K—FO

TOLI

A.CO

M; ©

KM

IT—

FOTO

LIA.

COM

Little Things Add UpFor Green-Minded Companies

Thinking small is not always bad.

FEBRUARY 2010 MT-ONLINE.COM | 39

Page 42: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

THE GREEN EDGE

40 | MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY FEBRUARY 2010

TTTTTTTTTTTHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEE GGGGGGGGGGGRRRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEENNNNNNNNNNN EEEEEEEEEEEDDDDDDDDDDDGGGGGGGGGGGEEEEEEEEEEE

FEBRUARY 2010

Fuel-Cell Industry Could Generate More Than 1M New Green Jobs

The global fuel-cell industry could create 700,000 green manufacturing jobs over the next decade, according to “Fuel Cells: Sustainability,” an Industry Review

from Fuel Cell Today (FCT), an organization that gathers market-based intelligence on the fuel-cell industry. The group further predicts that more than a million total new jobs could be created during this period to accommodate fuel-cell installation, servicing and maintenance. FCT projects that Asia will dominate in terms of manufac-turing over the next decade, while key adopter regions, including Europe and North America, will be the prime locations for installation and maintenance jobs. The study also raises a number of issues for the fuel-cell industry itself, which, if not addressed, could be a barrier to fuel-cell adoption, including education, skills and training and supply-chain development.

Fuel Cell TodayHertfordshire, United Kingdom

For more info, enter 31 at www.MT-freeinfo.comFor more info, enter 32 at www.MT-freeinfo.com

For more info, enter 33 at www.MT-freeinfo.com

Filter Technology That Reduces Backwash Wastewater

Forsta Filters claims that its Green-Clean technology

can help to reduce backwash wastewater by as much as 75% for industrial users. Without interrupting system fl ow during backwash, the products’ smaller fl ush valves minimize the volume of water required to remove buildup on a fi lter element. Using internal vacuum nozzles, the Green-Clean system scans and removes debris from the fi lter in 15 seconds or less. Forsta offers a full line of self-cleaning water fi lters in 1-36” fl ange size, with screen elements ranging from 5 to 4000 micron. The company’s full line of all-stainless steel self-cleaning water fi lters is designed to provide long-term solutions to a wide range of industrial and municipal applications.

Forsta Filters, Inc.Los Angeles, CA

Compact, Customizable Modular Motors

According to S e w - Eu r o -drive, its new

compact, modular DR motor is well-suited for most any industry, and allows users to specify the exact options needed for any application. Maintenance-friendly modular brakes, encoders and other options help simplify retro-fits and field adjustments. Designed to meet and exceed various international energy standards, these units are available in three efficiency levels: DRS Standard Efficiency (IE1), DRE High Efficiency (IE2) and DRP Premium Efficiency (IE3).

Sew-EurodriveLyman, SC

For more info, enter 79 at www.MT-freeinfo.com

ENGTECHIndustr ies Inc.

Page 43: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

THE GREEN EDGE

FEBRUARY 2010 MT-ONLINE.COM | 41

THE GREEN EDGE

FEBRUARY 2009 MT-ONLINE.COM | 41

TTHHEE GGRREEEENN EEDDGGEETTHHEE GGRREEEENN EEDDGGEE

FEBRUARY 2009 FEBRUARY 2010 FEBRUARY 2010 MT-ONLINE.COMMT-ONLINE.COM || 4141

Go Lean And Green: Align The Machine

Bill HillmanLudeca, Inc.

Did you know that

approximately 50%

of vibration-based

damage to rotating

equipment involves

misalignment issues?

When machinery is

well-aligned, MTBF

increases and power

consumption drops.

Not a bad way to cut

operating costs!

Going green is constantly in the news, and organizations everywhere are rushing to green-up their businesses. Some companies probably become interested in this strategy simply to improve their marketing image. What they soon discover,

however, is that going green also helps to reduce manufacturing costs through waste reduction. And, with the current global population topping 6.75 billion, minimizing waste and conserving resources has become crucial to our survival.

Going green is not something to be taken lightly. Not only is our livelihood at risk, our very lives may depend on how well we meet the challenges of living green. To cover all the benefi ts of going green would require multiple, book-length docu-ments; therefore, we will limit this discussion to the green benefi ts of precision machine alignment. Precision alignment produces these types of benefi ts in four areas: energy savings, improved machine life, better products and less pollution.

Energy savings Eighty percent of the lifetime cost of owning an electric motor is for the electricity purchased for its operation. Knowing this makes it easy to understand why even a small increase in effi ciency leads to substantial savings over the life of the machine. You may have heard that precision shaft alignment makes your machines more effi -cient, thereby reducing power consumption. But just how does it do it?

A 4”-diameter shaft mounted in antifriction bearings may have an internal bearing clearance of 0.002” or two mils. A human hair, on average, has a diameter of between two and three mils. Using this example, the free space allowed for shaft movement is smaller than the diameter of a human hair. If this shaft is solid-coupled to another shaft and the misalignment between the two shafts exceeds two mils, the internal bearing clearance can no longer provide free space for shaft movement. Any misalignment greater than the mounted internal bearing clearance will produce increased friction in the machine. The bearings are then subjected to additional loading because of the misalignment. Movement is restricted by the bearings, and some of the rotational energy is converted into vibratory energy. This vibration can sometimes be severe. Such vibration is destructive to the machine—and a waste of energy.

(Editor’s Note: Th is article fi rstran in the Nov./Dec. ‘09 issue of Lubrication Management & Technology magazine.)

Page 44: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

THE GREEN EDGE

42 | MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY FEBRUARY 2010

TTTTHHHHEEEE GGGGRRRREEEEEEEENNNN EEEEDDDDGGGGEEEE

42 | MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY FEBRUARY 2010

We purchase electricity to perform work. The energy converted to vibration is no longer doing useful work. In effect, we are purchasing electricity and converting some of it into a destructive force that destroys machinery. This author remembers being called in to balance a large fan driven by a steam turbine. Vibration tests indicated misalignment—as opposed to imbalance. Movement could be observed in the massive concrete base that supported the machine. There must have been literally thousands of foot-pounds of energy causing the huge structure to shake. The vibratory energy was being converted into heat and pumped back into the earth through the huge base. I can remember thinking that the intention of the plant was surely not to purchase elec-tricity for heating the planet!

Many industry offi cials believe that fl exible couplings eliminate most misalignment problems—therefore, their practices allow for varying degrees of nonaligned (or poorly aligned) machines. Our company is aware of an instance where the coupling manufacturer’s tolerance was used as the plant alignment standard. The coupling manufacturer’s tolerance, though, is for preventing damage to the coupling, not the coupled machines. Before a coupling can fl ex, there must be some degree of shaft misalignment. This fl exing equates work and requires energy, preventing fl exible couplings from being 100% effi cient.

Improved machine life On occasion, maintenance or production managers may ask why particular machines fail so often. Why indeed?

Let us suppose that the cause of failure on a machine oper-ating at 3600 rpm is shaft misalignment. As noted previously, misalignment places additional loading on bearings, which may result in excessive vibration. This vibration is much like hammer blows to the machine—delivered at a rate equal to the vibration frequency. Misalignment most often produces vibration at a frequency equal to two times shaft speed. In our example this would equate to 7200 hammer blows per minute, or over 10 million impacts every 24 hours. Thus, that typical question asked by the managers would seem to be rather poorly phrased. Instead, they should be wondering how their failing machines have managed to run as long as they have, given the abuse they’ve suffered as a result of shaft misalignment!

In addition to high vibration, shaft misalignment also places shafts in a bind, producing additional loads on both shafts and bearings. If the load on a bearing is doubled, the life of the bearing is reduced by a factor of eight. Severe misalignment can result in broken shafts as well as failed bearings and even failed bearing housing.

Precision shaft alignment will reduce stresses on couplings, bearings, shafts, machine hold-down fasteners, shaft seals and housings. Putting less stress on these components will result in a more reliable machine and longer machine life. This adds up to a greener machine as resources are not wasted on new machine construction when the original is still running and reliable.

Better products Smooth-running machines allow for products that meet the customer’s specifi cations. Rough-running machines are incapable of making smooth products.

■ Smooth-running, reliable machines produce better products because there is less rework.

■ Less rework means less waste.

■Energy, labor, materials and manufacturing time are all reduced, resulting in a greener company.

It is a win/win/win scenario all the way around, since the elimination of rework reduces costs, as well as stress on machinery—which, in turn, increases machine life.

Less pollutionThe leading cause of shaft-seal failure is misalignment. Seal failures can lead to oil, product, water, steam, acid, caustics, dust, air and other types of leaks or spills. The consequences of such events can range from minor to catastrophic.

Many leaks contribute to plant safety hazards and degrade plant morale. At best, a leak is a waste of resources that is likely to contaminate other resources. Leaks of one kind or another can result in the permanent shutdown of a plant. In fact, many of us can probably think of at least one instance where a plant—perhaps even a whole company—has been devastated because of some contaminant emission or seepage.

Leaks and spills cannot be taken lightly—and precision shaft alignment is essential in helping prevent shaft seal fail-ures. Good shaft-alignment practices will certainly help us conform to environmental standards and are a requirement for any plant that operates rotating equipment. Practicing precision shaft alignment may even help reduce the risk of an operation being subjected to an OSHA investigation.

Achieving the benefi tsA rough alignment is better than no attempt at alignment—but a rough alignment will not achieve the precision required for maximum machine effi ciency. Taper gages, rulers, feeler gages and straight edges are simple tools that can be used in performing a rough alignment; however, the use of such tools will not likely achieve the desired precision.

Let us consider for a moment the difference between rough and precision shaft alignment. Figure 1 depicts a typical alignment chart showing the tolerances required for an alignment to qualify as a precision shaft alignment. In order to obtain the full green benefi ts of shaft alignment, tools that can meet or exceed the tolerances shown in Fig. 1 need to be used. Keep in mind that state-of-the-art laser-alignment systems provide more accurate and reliable alignment data than conventional methods—and, thus, save signifi cant time and effort on the part of the end-user.

Page 45: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

THE GREEN EDGE

FEBRUARY 2010 MT-ONLINE.COM | 43

TTTTHHHHEEEE GGGGRRRREEEEEEEENNNN EEEEDDDDGGGGEEEE

Fig. 1. A typical shaft-alignment-tolerance chart

“Going green” requires having sound operating prac-tices and well-developed procedures in place. Adher-ence to guidelines where machines are precision-aligned

when they are installed—or anytime that they are unbolted for maintenance—should be a priority within every “green” busi-ness. Such procedures should also aim to ensure that the machines remain in alignment during operation. This can be accomplished by periodic alignment checks in conjunction with vibration testing.

If operating machines do not remain in alignment, it indi-cates a fault that demands immediate attention. The cause of such defects should be determined and corrected as quickly as they are diagnosed. By integrating predictive and corrective maintenance technologies, machine reliability can be sustained at a level required by the plant. An added benefi t is that healthy machines live longer lives. Keeping machines precision-aligned is a primary factor in making sure that one’s business is oper-ating lean and green.

No, precision shaft alignment alone will not make your plant green. But, by the same token, a green plant will be very diffi cult to achieve without precision shaft alignment. In simple, yet colorful terms, if you want to operate in the black, operate in the green. MT

Bill Hillman is a technical contributor for LUDECA, INC., vendor of alignment, vibration-analysis and balancing equip-ment, including, among other things, the ROTALIGN® ULTRA laser alignment system. Contact him directly at: (903) 927-1962; or e-mail: [email protected]

For more info, enter 34 at www.MT-freeinfo.com

Shaft Alignment Tolerances (short couplings)

Excellent

RPMOffset(mils)

Offset(mils)

Angularity(mils/in)

Angularity(mils/in)

600 5.0 1.0 9.0 1.5

900 3.0 0.7 6.0 1.0

1200 2.5 0.5 4.0 0.8

1800 2.0 0.3 3.0 0.5

3600 1.0 0.2 1.5 0.3

7200 0.5 0.1 1.0 0.2

Acceptable

For more info, enter 80 at www.MT-freeinfo.com For more info, enter 81 at www.MT-freeinfo.comFor more info, enter 81 at www.MT-freeinfo.com

Page 46: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

SOLUTION SPOTLIGHT

44 | MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY FEBRUARY 2010

New Oil-Free Centrifugal

CompressorsDelivering What You Asked For...

Simplicity by design just got better...

Centac C-Series: C1000 700-1,100 sW (900-1,500 hp)

With its new line of C1000 Centac oil-free centrifugal compressors, Ingersoll Rand is continuing a long tradition of simplicity by design and—it appears—

outstanding customer responsiveness. According to the company, this recently introduced series incorporates the best of both time-proven and new technologies, including more than 50 design improvements, to deliver the type of reliable, effi cient, productive operating capabilities that compressed air users demand.

Optimized for superior serviceability, the vertically-split design provides fast access to major components, thus minimizing downtime. Traverse-mounted water-in-tube coolers, for example, can be thoroughly cleaned in place from either side. (Oversized for greater fouling resistance, these coolers provide low CTD and pressure drop to increase compressor effi ciency and reliability.)

The units have a simplifi ed, leak-free oil system with an integrated oil fi lter, in addition to pressure and thermal regu-lation. Leak-free operation is attained using O-ring face seals.

Sleeve bearings in the heavy-duty motor reduce mainte-nance and improve durability. High-quality AMGA-rated gearing is designed for 25-year life. All components are uniform-hardened (as opposed to surface-hardened) to further increase reliability.

Ingersoll Rand’s signature reverse backward-leaning impellers maximize turndown and increase effi ciency. Field removal is simple and requires no special tools.

Flex-pad lobe bearings lead to high load capability and low vibration levels. Tapered land thrust bearings absorb maximum load and are more tolerant to contaminants.

Full fl oating non-contact carbon ring seals minimize air leakage and prevent oil from migrating into the air. According to the manufacturer, single-piece construction provides two to three times better performance than other technologies, which saves valuable compressed air.

For more info, enter 35 at www.MT-freeinfo.com

It’s All About Control...The Right KindThe C1000’s controller features an intuitive high-resolution color display that provides a window into all of the compressor’s vital signs. Besides helping ensure peak perfor-mance, this controller enables predictive maintenance through continuous monitoring and trending of critical parameters. It has an open Web-page architecture allowing users to remotely interact with the compressor from almost anywhere.

Page 47: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

FEBRUARY 2010 MT-ONLINE.COM | 45

CAPACITY ASSURANCE MARKETPLACE

For more info, enter 37 at www.MT-freeinfo.com

For more info, enter 36 at www.MT-freeinfo.com For more info, enter 38 at www.MT-freeinfo.com

Near-Laboratory-Quality Viscosity Measurements Made Easy

The SimpleVIS™ system from Cannon Instrument is a special-ized semi-automated viscometer

that provides quick, reliable kinematic viscosity results with a touch of a fi nger. According to the company, this portable unit is ideal for any site that needs near-laboratory-quality viscosity measurements. Everything to get started is included; the user provides only sample and solvent. Capable of delivering direct kinematic viscosity measurement, with no need to correlate dynamic viscosity data, the product incorporates a modifi ed cross-arm style tube that works with both transparent and opaque oils.

Cannon Instrument Co.State College, PA

Fast, No-Hassle, CMMS “Toolbox”

MAPCON’s On-Demand™ uses cutting-edge SaaS (software-as-a-service) technology to provide companies with comprehensive mainte-nance management

(including work orders and preventive mainte-nance scheduling tools). According to the manu-facturer, On-Demand is delivered “blazingly fast” and economically over the Internet to customer computers, eliminating slowdown that can be associated with using browsers to access infor-mation. The application is billed month-to-month, with no contract periods or penalties for upgrades or downgrades. As a standard policy, MAPCON offers a free 30-day software evaluation to potential customers. New On-Demand subscribers are eligible for a free initial month of service.

MAPCON Technologies, Inc.Des Moines, IA

Printer Offers Hundreds Of Label Options

T he BMP™71 label printer from Brady features more than

400 varieties of label options and what the company claims is the fastest print speed in the portable printer market. It can print on more than 30 different types of materials, including self-laminating sleeves and fl ag labels, indoor/outdoor vinyl and raised-panel labels. Other features include a material-recognition technology that automatically formats a print job according to the inserted cartridge, storage space for 100,000+ label fi les and a print speed of 1.5” per second.

Brady Worldwide, Inc.Milwaukee, WI

POWERFUL STATIC ELIMINATORSEXAIR’S Super Ion Air Knife™ removes static electricity from webs, sheet stock and plastic surfaces where dust, tearing, jamming or hazardous shocks are a problem. The balanced laminar airfl ow of the Super Ion Air Knife effectively eliminates static at distances up to 20 feet away. Production speeds, product quality and surface cleanliness can improve dramati-cally. Other styles include Ion Air Cannon, Ion Air Gun, Ion Air Jet, Ionizing Bars and Ionizing Point. Applications include web cleaning, pre-paint blowoff, bag opening and neutralizing plastic parts.

EXAIR CORPORATION11510 Goldcoast Drive, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45249-1621

Phone 513 671-3322 Toll Free 800 903-9247Fax 513 671-3363 E-mail: [email protected]

Internet: www.exair.com/48/176.htm

For more info, enter 86 at www.MT-freeinfo.com

Page 48: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

46 | MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY FEBRUARY 2010

CAPACITY ASSURANCE MARKETPLACE

For more info, enter 39 at www.MT-freeinfo.com For more info, enter 40 at www.MT-freeinfo.com

For more info, enter 77 at www.MT-freeinfo.comFor more info, enter 75 at www.MT-freeinfo.com

CLASSIFIED

INFO

RMATIO

N H

IGH

WAY

For rate information on advertising in the Classifi ed Section Contact your Sales Rep or KATHY JAROS at:

Phone: (847) 382-8100 ext. 117 / Fax: (847) 304-8603 E-mail: [email protected]

Need Help?Need A Job?Contact Lisa–

TOLL FREE 877-386-1091

Se Habla Español

LISA LINEAL: RecruitingLINEAL Services

[email protected]

Electromechanical • ElectronicElectrical Service & Systems Specialists

RENEWIn order for us to send

to you FREE, we are required by the US Post Offi ce to have a

completed and signed renewal form once a year.

MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY

In order for us to send

to you FREE,we are required by the US Post Offi ce to have a

completed and signed renewal form once a year.

MMAINTENANCETECHNOLOGY

You may renew online at

www.mt-online.comMapcon Technologies, Inc. (MTI) offers three CMMS Soft-ware solutions starting at $495 designed to fi t different sized operations. Our Maintenance Management Software pack-ages are full-featured Work Order and Preventive Mainte-nance Software systems integrating Asset Management, Inventory, Purchasing and PDA Technology.

For more info, enter 83 at www.MT-freeinfo.com www.mapcon.com

PIP is a consortium of process plant owners and engineering construction contractors harmonizing members’ internal standards for design, procurement, construction, and maintenance into industry-wide Practices. PIP has published over 450 Practices. A current listing of published Practices is available on the PIP website at: http://pip.org/practices/index.asp.

For more info, enter 82 at www.MT-freeinfo.comwww.pip.org

INFO

RMAT

ION

HIG

HW

AY

Easy & Safe UL Classifi ed Temporary Electrical Panel Covers

TempCovers™ from Grace Engi-neered Products are designed to serve as temporary protec-

tive panelboard ingress barriers for commercial, residential and main-tenance electrical panels. UL classi-fi ed, they meet all applicable OSHA standards and provide easy and safe access to an electrical panel that is being serviced by a licensed and/or qualifi ed worker. TempCovers™ not only allow the covering and uncovering of a panel in seconds (through the use of non-conductive, shock-reducing magnets), they come with signage indicating high-voltage risk. Puncture- and tear-resistant, they’re rated up to 600 volts.

Grace Engineered Products, Inc.Davenport, IA

Continuous Protection For Commercial Steam & Boiler Applications

McDonnell & Miller’s Series 1575 Combination Low-Water Cut-Off / Pump

Controller is used as a low-water-cut-off, feed water control and alarm for boilers, vessels and tanks. It features a 1 hp pump relay along with adjustable burner and pump settings and a wide range of diagnostic capabilities. The manufacturer notes that the product prevents rapid burner and pump cycling; provides constant operation throughout the pressure range; does not require electrical starters for motors up to 1 hp; and lends itself to easy monitoring and troubleshooting.

McDonnell & MillerAn ITT BrandMorton Grove, IL

Page 49: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

Index February 2010 • Volume 23, No. 2

ADVERTISER WEB RS # PAGE #

FEBRUARY 2010 MT-ONLINE.COM | 47

Your Source For CAPACITY ASSURANCE SOLUTIONS

1300 South Grove Avenue, Suite 105Barrington, IL 60010

PH 847-382-8100 FX 847-304-8603

SALES STAFF

Access MT-freeinfo.com and enter the reader service

number of the product in which you are interested,

or you can search even deeper and link directly

to the advertiser’s Website.

Submissions Policy: Maintenance Technology gladly welcomes submissions. By sending us your submission, unless otherwise negotiated in writing with our editor(s), you grant Applied Technology Publications, Inc., permission, by an irre-vocable license, to edit, reproduce, distribute, publish, and adapt your submission in any medium, including via Internet, on multiple occasions. You are, of course, free to publish your submission yourself or to allow others to republish your sub-mission. Submissions will not be returned.Reproduction of Materials: Materials produced by Maintenance Technology may not be reproduced in any form for any purpose without permission. For Reprints: Contact the publisher, Bill Kiesel - (847) 382-8100 ext. 116.

Your Source For CAPACITY ASSURANCE SOLUTIONS

IA, MT, NE, ND, SD, WY, AB, MB, SK

1300 South Grove Avenue, Suite 105Barrington, IL 60010

847-382-8100 x106; Fax 847-304-8603ARTHUR L. RICE

[email protected]

Classifi ed Advertising/Electronic Sales:1300 South Grove Avenue, Suite 105

Barrington, IL 60010847-382-8100 x117; Fax 847-304-8603

KATHY [email protected]

AR, AZ, NV, NM, OK, UT 1300 South Grove Avenue, Suite 105

Barrington, IL 60010847-382-8100 x116; Fax 847-304-8603

BILL [email protected]

IL, IN, KS, LA, MI, MN, MO, OR, TX, WA,WI, BC

1300 South Grove Avenue, Suite 105Barrington, IL 60010

847-382-8100 x108; Fax 847-304-8603TOM MADDING

[email protected]

CT, ME, MA, NH, NY, RI, VT, ON, QC P.O. Box 1059

Osterville, MA 02655508-428-3331; Fax 508-428-2545

VINCENT [email protected]

AL, CA, CO, DE, FL, GA, MD, MS, NC, NJ, SC, PA, VA, WV, DC

1750 Holmes DriveWest Chester, PA 19382

610-793-3093; Fax 610-793-3094JIM HANLEY

[email protected]

OH, KY, TN135 N. Rocky River Road

Berea, OH 44017440-463-0907; Fax 440-891-1254

JOHN [email protected]

TECHNOLOGYM A I N T E N A N C E

®YEARS

TECHNOLOGYM A I N T E N A N C E

®YEARS

AB SKF .................................................. www.skf.com/lubrication .................... 67 ...........................7

ATP Lists ............................................... www.atplists.com ................................. 71 .........................18

Baker Instument Co. ............................ www.bakerinst.com ............................. 74 .........................23

Brady Worldwide, Inc. ......................... www.bradyid.com/bmp71 .................. 77 .........................33

Castrol Industrial North America Inc. .. www.castrol.com/industrial ................ 66 ...........................5

CRC Industries ..................................... www.crcindustries.com/ei ................... 68 .........................10

Des-Case Corporation ........................ www.descase.com/sample ................... 85 .........................32

Energy Summit .................................... www.energysummitonline.com ......... 73 .........................19

Engtech Industries Inc. ........................ www.engtechindustries.com ............... 79 .........................40

Eventure Events - SAP ......................... www.sap-centric-eam.com ................. 63 ...........................2

Exair Corporation ................................ www.exair.com/48/470.htm ................ 69,86 ..............11,45

Fluke ...................................................... www.fl uke.com ..................................... 70 .........................17

Grace Engineered Products. Inc. ........ www.info.graceport.com/tc ................ 61 .......................IFC

Inpro/Seal Co. ....................................... www.inpro-seal.com/cdr ..................... 100 ......................BC

IMEC ..................................................... www.cmore.mie.utoronto.ca/initiatives . 84 ...................... IBC

Mapcon Technologies, Inc. ................. www.mapcon.com ............................... 78 .........................34

MARTS- Applied Technologies .......... www.martsconference.com................. 75 .........................26

Mobil Industrial Lubricants ................ www.signumoilanalysis.com .............. 76 .........................27

Nuts, Bolts and Thingamajigs............. www.nutsandboltsfoundation.org ..... 72 .........................19

Process Industries Practices ................ www.pip.org ......................................... 81,82 ..............43,46

Royal Purple, Inc. ................................. www.royal-purple-industrial.com ..... 62 ...........................1

Strategic Work Systems, Inc. ............... www.swspitcrew.com ........................... 80 .........................43

VibrAlign, Inc. ...................................... www.vibralign.com .............................. 64 ...........................4

Page 50: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

48 | MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY FEBRUARY 2010

VIEWPOINT

Let’s talk troubleshooting. How do you plan and schedule it? Sounds difficult, if not impossible.

Truth be told, planning and sched-uling are practically made for troubleshooting. Therefore, even if we typically don’t plan or schedule much of anything, we should—at least—plan and schedule troubleshooting. Why is that?

Planning and scheduling form the basis of controlling maintenance, while troubleshooting is the least predictable of all maintenance activities. If not contained, it can ruin overall maintenance productivity.

Planning, though, is not “Plan then execute.” Planning is running a cycle of improvement: We plan, see what we planned wrong and plan better next time, never expecting perfection. Further-more, weekly scheduling is not dictating when each job and each person will interact next week. Weekly scheduling is allocating enough work to fi ll available labor hours as a goal to improve productivity. It is “OK” if the plans are not perfect and it is “OK” if we don’t meet the schedule goal. Still, we get better each time, and complete more work than if we did not plan or schedule.

How do we plan troubleshooting work orders? We count on the fact that a current work order is not the only time we will hear from a given piece of equipment. Each piece of industrial equipment in our plants has one or two predominant failure modes. If we do not know what is wrong this time, we might simply say “troubleshoot and repair,” and then collect feedback. The next time, we can say “troubleshoot and repair, and the following is what we found out last time.” Faithfully repeating this method over the course of several years yields a troubleshooting guide unique to each piece of equipment—a guide born from the experience of a number of different craftpersons. Thus, we must

plan troubleshooting work if we plan anything at all, because a planning system is about learning and improving, and reducing the unknown.

(By the way, parts-information collection is invaluable for troubleshooting. How many times have we all thought, said and/or heard something along the lines of the following? “I don’t know what’s wrong this time, but these are the parts we’ve used in the past.”)

How do we schedule troubleshooting?As impractical/unfeasible as it may seem, we must schedule troubleshooting work orders because we must fi ll all the available crew labor hours for our work goal. If we start setting aside a certain portion of craft time for unknown maintenance, the whole productivity improvement effort falls apart—Parkinson’s Law sets in and all work expands to fi ll the available time.

I once worked (and laughed) with an instru-ment planner who seemed to have only three job plans: “Troubleshoot and repair 2 hours.” “Troubleshoot and repair 4 hours.” “Trouble-shoot and repair 8 hours.” Yet, consider: Any time estimate on a maintenance job keeps the job from expanding unnecessarily, and we can often expect certain troubleshooting to last less than half a day. Why should we default to a mentality of “Come back when you’re fi nished” and perhaps fuel the idea that these jobs might run all day?

Go ahead and take your maintenance program to the next level. Plan and schedule trouble-shooting work. MT

Doc Palmer is the author of McGraw-Hill’s Main-tenance Planning and Scheduling Handbook. Telephone: (904) 228-5700; e-mail: [email protected] (FYI: He’ll also be presenting a post-conference workshop on “Maintenance Plan-ning and Scheduling” at MARTS 2010. For more details, visit www.MARTSconference.com)

Doc Palmer, P.E., MBA, CMRP Managing Partner, Richard Palmer and Associates

Planning & Scheduling Your Troubleshooting

The opinions expressed in this Viewpoint section are those of the author, and don’t necessarily refl ect those of the staff and management of MAINTENANCE TECHNOLOGY magazine.

Page 51: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

For more info, enter 84 at www.MT-freeinfo.com

AN IMPERATIVE NEW 5 DAY COURSE FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO’S

CENTRE FOR MAINTENANCE OPTIMIZATION& RELIABILITY ENGINEERING

APRIL 12TH TO APRIL 16TH

C-MORE

Your Chance to Join the Winner’s Circle.

Some organizations manage their assets well,and others do not. Why? Why are someoutfits good at keeping costs low, reducingstoppages, spotting trouble, achieving greateroutput, while others aren’t? How can youlearn these things? A good place to start is with this stellar five-day program in April.You’ll join a group of like-minded peoplewho are uncondionally-guaranteed to come away with the tools they need to competently and profoundly upgrade theirAsset Management practices.

To learn about specific executable main-tenance strategies that really work, go to theInitiatives program’s website. Full of details,full of excitement. You’ll be glad you did.

This Initiatives Program Delivers Extraordinary Value.Three world-class instructors — led by Dr.Andrew Jardine, a international authorityin the asset management field and a respectedconsultant, author, teacher and innovator in the area of reliability, replacement andequipment maintenance.

The program combines fundamental need-to-know material with new but already provenleading-edge approaches that have shownmeasurable pay-offs.

Participants at earlier, similar courses at theUniversity’s Faculty of Engineering have comefrom the world over and from a great mix of commercial industries and governmentorganizations. Their satisfaction with thesecourses has been impressive.

Attendees at the April course will receive five full days of instruction that includes awide range of case-study examples to showhow the principles have been successfully and widely applied.

Everyone will come away equipped with complete binder-notes on the sessions’ material plus valuable hard-cover books, notto mention a learning experience that theywill probably refer to as “unparalleled”.

VISIT THE INITIATIVES WEBSITE NOW:cmore.mie.utoronto.ca/initiatives

BETTER PHYSICAL ASSET MANAGEMENT.INITIATIVES THAT WORK.

Page 52: Maintenance Technology Feb 2010

Inpro/Seal Company has been in the business of bearing protection for rotating equipment for 32 years and counting. We have been supplying bearing protection for the IEEE-841 motors since they were first introduced. It is only logical that we would expand into the field of motor shaft current mitigation to protect motor bearings. The CDR is:

Machined entirely out of solid corrosion resistant and highly conductive bronze, the CDR/MGS is capable of carrying 12+ continuous amps. They are made exclusively by the Inpro/Seal Company in Rock Island, IL, to ensure consistent quality and same-day shipments when required.

The CDR and MGS (Motor Grounding Seal) products were developed in our own Research and Experimentation Laboratory and then extensively tested and evaluated by professional motor manufacturing personnel. Our standard guarantee of unconditional customer satisfaction of product performance applies. We stand behind our products.

When you order a CDR or MGS from Inpro/Seal, you are assured of the complete responsibility for technology and performance from a single source. We want to earn the right to be your first choice for complete bearing protection.

ROBUST

RELIABLE

REALISTIC

For more information visit www.inpro-seal.com/CDR or contact800-447-0524 for your Inpro/Seal Representative.

For more info, enter 100 at www.MT-freeinfo.com