making research data repositories visible – the re3data.org registry frank scholze | karlsruhe...

Download Making Research Data Repositories Visible – The re3data.org Registry Frank Scholze | Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, KIT Library Heinz Pampel, Paul

If you can't read please download the document

Upload: anthony-joseph

Post on 24-Dec-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Slide 1
  • Making Research Data Repositories Visible The re3data.org Registry Frank Scholze | Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, KIT Library Heinz Pampel, Paul Vierkant | GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, LIS LIBER 2015 | London, June 26, 2015
  • Slide 2
  • Slide 3
  • Background European Commisson. (2014). Horizon 2020 Annotated Model Grant Agreements. Version 1.6.2.Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/amga/h2020-amga_en.pdf Funders' data policies Example: European Commission
  • Slide 4
  • Background NPG (2013). Availability of data and materials. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/authors/policies/availability.html PLOS (2014). PLOS Editorial and Publishing Policies. Retrieved from http://www.plosone.org/static/policies.action Journal Data Policies Nature Publishing Group [...] authors are required to make materials, data and associated protocols promptly available to readers without undue qualifications. PLOS PLOS journals require authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception.
  • Slide 5
  • Reproducability and trust
  • Slide 6
  • re3data.org - Mission global registry of research data repositories covers all academic disciplines helps researchers, funding bodies, publishers, libraries and scholarly institutions to find research data repositories promotes a culture of sharing, increased access and better visibility of research data Pampel, H. et al. (2013). Making Research Data Repositories Visible: The re3data.org Registry. PLOS ONE, 8(11), e78080. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078080
  • Slide 7
  • Schema Vierkant, P., et al. (2014). Schema for the Description of Research Data Repositories. Version 2.2. http://doi.org/10.2312/re3.006 39 Properties 2.2 Version Based on Analyses, Feedback and Experience
  • Slide 8
  • Icons Vierkant, P., et al. (2014). Schema for the Description of Research Data Repositories. Version 2.2. doi:10.2312/re3.006
  • Slide 9
  • Quality Requirements: be run by a legal entity, such as a sustainable institution (e.g. library, university) clarify access conditions to the data and repository as well as the terms of use have focus on research data
  • Slide 10
  • Workflow
  • Slide 11
  • simple search box filters results icons
  • Slide 12
  • Slide 13
  • Slide 14
  • Slide 15
  • Slide 16
  • RDR Typology Institutional Disciplinary Multidisciplinary Project
  • Slide 17
  • RDR indexed by re3data
  • Slide 18
  • RDR by Country
  • Slide 19
  • Icons and numbers From a total of 1260 RDR in re3data (June 2015)
  • Slide 20
  • Champions by discipline From a total of 88 RDR (June 2015)
  • Slide 21
  • Integration of re3data in Guidelines Funder Example: European Commission http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/hi/oa_pilot/h2020-hi-oa-pilot-guide_en.pdf Institutional Example: Bielefeld University Verzeichnisse, wie das DFG-gefrderte "Registry of Research Data Repositories", bilden die Grundlage fr die Suche nach geeigneten Publikationsorten fr die Forschungsdaten. Universitt Bielefeld (2011): Resolution zum Forschungsdatenmanagement. https://data.uni-bielefeld.de/de/resolution Publisher Example: Nature Publishing Group Physics, astrophysics, astronomy and geoscience databases should be registered with re3data.org. Scientific Data (2013): Data policies. http://www.nature.com/sdata/data-policies
  • Slide 22
  • Cooperation Deutsche Initiative fr Netzwerkinformation (DINI) DataCite (MoU, April 2012) OpenAIRE (MoU, October 2013) BioSharing (MoU, November 2013) Databib (MoU, March 2014) DataCite (Formal cooperation, March 2015)
  • Slide 23
  • Dimensions of sustainability TECHNICAL LEGAL FINANCIAL ORGANISATIONAL
  • Slide 24
  • Organizational sustainability Merger with DataBib under the auspices of DataCite re3data.org working group within DataCite International Editorial Board Cooperations within Research Data Alliance (RDA) and the research data repository community Community building and feedback loops during RFC phases (e.g. re3data.org schema)
  • Slide 25
  • Technical sustainability Open interfaces RESTful API OpenSearch Documentation: http://www.re3data.org/api/doc Used e.g. by OpenAIRE Open metadata Documentation: http://www.re3data.org/schema/ Long-term hosting commitment by KIT
  • Slide 26
  • Legal sustainability Open licenses CC BY for the website CC 0 for metadata
  • Slide 27
  • Financial sustainability Technical maintenance financed by DataCite from 2016 Further development managed by DataCite Further project funding
  • Slide 28
  • Thanks to the team Michael Witt Purdue University, Distributed Data Curation Center (D2C2) Roland Bertelmann, Claudio Fuchs, Heinz Pampel GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Library and Information Services (LIS) Maxi Kindling, Jessica Rcknagel, Peter Schirmbacher, Paul Vierkant Humboldt-Universitt zu Berlin, Berlin School of Library and Information Science (BLIS) Hans-Jrgen Goebelbecker, Gabriele Kloska, Evelyn Reuter, Edeltraud Schnepf, Angelika Semrau, Michael Skarupianski, Robert Ulrich Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), KIT Library
  • Slide 29
  • [email protected] http://re3data.org With the exception of all photos and graphics, this slides are licensed under the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Licence: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/