management models - xinxii · the general electric business screen low high medium strong average...
TRANSCRIPT
Management Models...
150 Slides Product
Price
People
Processes
Place
Promotion
Customer
Service
Powered by www.drawpack.com. All rights reserved.
Key Words...
Break-even – Financing Life Cycle – Economies of
Scale – Elasticity – Sales Cycles – Market Potential –
Portfolio Matrix – Product Model – Four P’s –
Push/Pull Strategy – Marketing Mix – PDCA Cycle –
SWOT – Value Chain – Ansoff Matrix – BCG Matrix –
7-S Model – Core Competencies – GE Business
Screen – Nine Cell Industry – Risk/Reward Diagram –
Porter’s Five Forces – Industry Competition – Generic
Strategies – Geobusiness Model – Porter’s Diamond –
Matrix Design – PIMS – Leavitt’s Diamond – Belbin’s
Team Roles – Theory X/Y – Maslow’s Hierarchy –
Herzberg’s Theory – Cultural Web – Pareto Curve –
CIM Concept – Value Drivers
The General Electric Business Screen
Low
High
Medium
Strong Average Weak
COMPETITIVE POSITION
INDUSTRY
ATTRACITVENESS
Attractiveness/Competitive Position
Strategies
High
• Grow
• Seek dominance
• Maximize
investment
• Evaluate
potential for
leadership via
Segmentation
• Identify
weaknesses
• Build strengths
• Specialize
• Seek niches
• Consider
acquisitions
• Identify
growth
segments
• Invest strongly
• Maintain
position
elsewhere
• Identify growth
segments
• Specialize
• Invest
selectively
• Specialize
• Seek niches
• Consider exit
• Maintain
overall
position
• Seek cash flow
• Invest at
maintenance
levels
• Prune lines
• Minimize
investment
• Position to
divest
• Trust leader‘s
statesmanship
• Sic on
competitor‘s
cash generators
• Time exit and
divest
Medium
Low
Strong Average Weak
COMPETITIVE POSITION
INDUSTRY
ATTRACTIVENESS
Company Position/Industry
Attractiveness Screen
HOLD
HARVEST
HARVEST
BUILD BUILD
HARVEST
HOLD
HOLD
BUILD
Industry attractiveness
Medium Low High
Low
M
ediu
m
Hig
h
Bu
sin
ess
un
it s
tren
gth
s
A Representative Nine-Cell Industry
Attractiveness-Competitive Strength
Matrix
Business C
Business E
Strong Average
High
Low
Business F Business A
Business B
Business D
Weak
Medium
Low priority for investment
Medium priority for investment
High priority for investment
COMPETITIVE STRENGTHS/BUSINESS POSITION
LONG-TERM
INDUSTRY
ATTRACTIVENESS
GE / McKinsey Multifactor Portfolio Matrix
INDUSTRY ATTRACTIVENESS
BU
SIN
ES
S S
TR
EN
GT
H
Invest
Manage
Selectively
for Earnings
Invest
Invest
Manage
Selectively
for Earnings
Manage
Selectively
for Earnings
Harvest or
Divest
Harvest or
Divest
Harvest or
Divest
Portfolio Positions and
Defensive Strategic Market Plans
Very Attractive
Mark
et A
ttra
ctiv
enes
s
Very Unattractive
Very Strong Very Weak Competitive Advantage
Harvest or Divest
Protect
Protect or Harvest
Harvest or Divest
Protect or Harvest
Protect or Focus
Protect or Focus
Protect
Market Attractiveness – Portfolio Classification and Strategies
MA
RK
ET
AT
TR
AC
TIV
EN
ES
S
Medium Weak 5.00
3.67
2.33
1.00
Strong
Joints
Hydraulic
Pumps
Clutches
BUSINESS STRENGHT
Low
Medium
High
(a) Classification
Aerospace Fittings
Relief Valves
Fuel Pumps
Flexible
Diaphragms
2.33 3.67 5.00 1.00
Invest / grow
Harvest / divest
Selectivity / earnings
Contrasting Characteristics of Upstream
and Downstream Companies
Raw Primary Product Consumer
materials manufacturer Fabricator producer marketer Retail
Supply flow
UPSTREAM
ORGANIZATIONS
DOWNSTREAM
ORGANIZATIONS
Centre of gravity
of a manufacturing
industry
Consumer
Contrasting characteristics of upstream and downstream companies
Upstream
Commodity
Standardize
Maximize end users
Low-cost producers
Sales push
Line-driven organization
Process innovation
Capital budget
Capital-intensive
Technological know-how
Supply and trading/manufacturing and engineering
Downstream
Proprietary
Customize
Target end users
High margins
Marketing pull
Line/staff
Product innovation
R & D/advertising budget
People-intensive
Marketing skills
Product development/marketing
Supply stages in a manufaturing industry (supply chain)
Porter‘s Five Forces I
Potential Entrants
Substitutes
Buyers Suppliers
Industry
competitors
Rivalry among
existing firms
Threat of substitute products
Threat new entrants
Bargaining
power of
suppliers
Bargaining
power of
buyers
Porter‘s Five Forces II
RIVALRY
AMONG
COMPETING
SELLERS
Potential
New Entrants
Buyers
Suppliers of
raw materials,
parts,
components or
other resource
inputs
Firms in other
industries
offering
Substitute
Products
Forces Driving Industry Competition
Potential Entrants
Industry
competitors
Rivalry among
existing firms
Substitutes
Buyers Suppliers
Threat of
substitute products
or services
Bargaining power
of suppliers Bargaining power
of buyers
Threat of
new entrants
Barriers and Profitability
Low
High
High Low
ENTRY
BARRIERS
EXIT BARRIERS
PROFITS=LOW
RETURNS=STABLE
PROFITS=HIGH
RETURNS=STABLE PROFITS=HIGH
RETURNS=RISKY
PROFITS=LOW
RETURNS=RISKY
Four Routes to Strategic Advantage
KFS
Intensify funtional
differentiation
Relative superiority
Exploit competitor‘s
weakness
Strategic degrees of
Freedom
Maximize user
benefit
Aggressive
initiatives
Ask „why-why‘s“
Compete
(wisely)
Route 1
Avoid
head-on
competition
Route 2 Route 4
Route 3
Business/Product Offered
Old/Existing New/Creative
The Generic Strategies II
Cost Leadership Differentiation
Cost Focus Differentiation Focus
Broad
Target
Narrow
Target
Lower Cost Differentiation
COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
COMPETITIVE
SCOPE
Five Modified Competitive Strategies
Overall
Low-Cost
Leadership
Strategy
Broad
Differentiation
Strategy
Focused
Low-Cost
Strategy
Focused
Differentiation
Strategy
Best-Cost
Provider
Strategy
A Narrow
Buyer-Segment
(or Market Niche)
A Broad
Cross-Section
of Buyers
Lower Cost Differentiation
TYPE OF COMPETITVE
ADVANTAGE BEING PURSUED
MARKET
TARGET
Sweeney‘s Generic Strategies
Marketer
Emphasizes
• Quality
• Dependability
• Range
Innovator
Emphasizes
• Quality
• Product/service
• Performance
• Speed
• New product/service
• Development
Caretaker
Emphasizes
• Price/ cost
• Dependability
• Quality
Innovator
Emphasizes
• Quality
• Product/service
• Performance
• Flexibility
• Speed
Traditional Enhanced
Enhan
ced
B
asic
Cust
om
er s
ervic
e cr
iter
ia
Str
ateg
ic c
han
ge
involv
es e
nhan
cing
the
oper
atio
n‘s
infr
astr
uct
ure
Strategic change involves enhancing
The operation‘s structure