management of hospitalized patients with cirrhosis

80
10/26/2015 1 Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis Bilal Hameed, MD Division of Transplant Hepatology University of California, San Francisco I have no financial relationships to disclose within the past 12 months relevant to my presentation My presentation does not include discussion of off-label or investigational use

Upload: others

Post on 08-Dec-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

1

Management of Hospitalized Patients with

Cirrhosis

Bilal Hameed, MD

Division of Transplant Hepatology

University of California, San Francisco

I have no financial relationships to disclose within the past 12 months

relevant to my presentation

My presentation does not include discussion of off-label or investigational

use

Page 2: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

2

Outline

Complications of cirrhosis 1. Portal hypertension related variceal bleed

2. Ascites, hyponatremia and hydrothorax

3. Hepatic encephalopathy

4. Renal failure and HRS

Infections in cirrhosis

Liver transplantation

Compensatedcirrhosis

Decompensatedcirrhosis

Death

Natural History of Cirrhosis

Development of complications:

Variceal hemorrhage Ascites Encephalopathy Jaundice

Page 3: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

3

Question

Most common decompensation in patient with cirrhosis?

1. Variceal bleed.

2. Hepatic encephalopathy.

3. Ascites.

4. HCC.

5. Jaundice.

Ascites (58%)JaundiceEncephalopathyGI hemorrhage

Probability of developing event

0

20

60

80

100

0 60

40

20 40 80 100 120 140 160

MonthsGines et. al., Hepatology 1987.

Complications in Compensated Cirrhosis

Page 4: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

4

6040 80 100 120 140 1600

40

60

80

20

200

100

Months

Probability of survival

All patients with cirrhosis

Decompensated cirrhosis

180

Median survival~ 9 years

Median survival~ 1.6 years

Gines et. al., Hepatology 1987.

Decompensation Shortens Survival

Esophageal Varices

Seen in 50% patients with cirrhosis

10-15% of all GI bleeds (~ 40,000 patients)

$1.2 billion in health care expenditure

Page 5: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

5

Small varicesSmall varices Large varicesLarge varicesNo varicesNo varices

7-8%/year7-8%/year 7-8%/year7-8%/year

Merli et al. J Hepatol 2003;38:266Merli et al. J Hepatol 2003;38:266

Varices Increase in Diameter Progressively

%Patients without bleeding

%Patients without bleeding

100100

5050

2525

00

00 1212 2424

7575

36361212 2424 3636

Large Varices * *

p<0.01 *p<0.01 *

2-year probability of first bleed: Small varices: 7% Large varices: 30%

2-year probability of first bleed: Small varices: 7% Large varices: 30%

Time (months)Time (months)

No Varices

Small Varices

*Merli et al., Hepatol 2003,

**Conn et al., Hepatology 1991

*Merli et al., Hepatol 2003,

**Conn et al., Hepatology 1991

Large Varices Are More Likely To Rupture

Page 6: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

6

What is the Risk of Mortality with Variceal Bleed?

1980 2013

2 months mortality 40%

6 weeks mortality 20%

•Pharmacotherapy•Endoscopic innovations•IR Procedures•Better ICU care

Better Bleeding Control Resulted in Decrease Mortality

Page 7: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

7

Case Presentation

60-year-old female with NASH cirrhosis is brought to the ER because of melena. No prior endoscopy. Hgb is 8 (baseline 11).

What is the best pharmacologic treatment option?

1. IV PPI

2. IV PPI and IV octreotide

3. PO PPI, octreotide and antibiotics

4. IV PPI, octreotide and antibiotics

Case Presentation

60-year-old female with NASH cirrhosis is brought to the ER because of melena. No prior endoscopy. Hgb is 8 (baseline 11).

What is the best pharmacologic treatment option?

1. IV PPI

2. IV PPI and IV octreotide

3. PO PPI, octreotide and antibiotics

4. IV PPI, octreotide and antibiotics

Page 8: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

8

Role of Endoscopy

40-50% have non variceal source of bleeding like PUD, esophagitis, MW tear etc.

Dig Dis. 2005;23:11-7.

Case Presentation

50-year-old male with HCV related cirrhosis is brought to the ER because of melena and hypotension (SBP 80 mmHg). What is the first priority in the management of this patient?

Emergent upper endoscopy.

Start antibiotics for SBP prophylaxis.

Transfuse blood.

Venous access and hemodynamic stability.

Page 9: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

9

Case Presentation

50-year-old male with HCV related cirrhosis is brought to the ER because of melena and hypotension (SBP 80 mmHg). What is the first priority in the management of this patient?

Emergent upper endoscopy.

Start antibiotics for SBP prophylaxis.

Transfuse blood.

Venous access and hemodynamic stability.

Treatment of Acute Variceal Hemorrhage

General Management: IV access and fluid resuscitation

Airway protection

Antibiotic prophylaxis

Correct coagulopathy

Specific therapy: Pharmacological therapy

Early endoscopic therapy: band ligation

Shunt therapy: TIPS, surgical shunt

Page 10: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

10

Transfusion Strategy: Too Much is Bad!

921 pts (277 with cirrhosis)

Restrictive (Hgb <7) vs liberal transfusion (Hgb <9)

Liberal strategy had increase portal pressure and rebleeding (11% vs 22%)

Survival was improved with restrictive transfusions

Villanueva et al, NEJM 2013

Control Antibiotic Absolute rate(n=270) (n=264) difference

(95% CI)

Infection 45% 14% -32%(-42 to –23)

SBP / Bacteremia 27% 8% -18%(-26 to –11)

Death 24% 15% -9%(-15 to –3)

Control Antibiotic Absolute rate(n=270) (n=264) difference

(95% CI)

Infection 45% 14% -32%(-42 to –23)

SBP / Bacteremia 27% 8% -18%(-26 to –11)

Death 24% 15% -9%(-15 to –3)

Bernard et al., Hepatology 1999; 29:1655Bernard et al., Hepatology 1999; 29:1655

Meta-analysis of 5 randomized trials

Prophylactic Antibiotics Improve Outcomes

Page 11: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

11

Hou M-C et al., Hepatology 2004Hou M-C et al., Hepatology 2004

Prophylactic antibiotics (n=59)Prophylactic antibiotics (n=59)

%free of

varicealhemorrhage

%free of

varicealhemorrhage

1.01.0

0.6

0.6

0.2

0.2

0.8

0.8

1100

No antibiotics (n=61)No antibiotics (n=61)

0022 33 1212 3030Follow-up (months)Follow-up (months)

1818 2424

0.4

0.4

Ofloxacin 200 mg iv q12 hr for 2 days, then oral 200 bid for 5 days

Ofloxacin 200 mg iv q12 hr for 2 days, then oral 200 bid for 5 days

Greatest benefit in first

7 days

Prophylactic Antibioics Reduce Probability of Recurrent Variceal

Hemorrhage

Pharmacological Treatment for Acute Variceal Bleed

Somatostatin Variable results in meta-analysis

Octreotide

Vasopressin

Terlipressin (Not available in US) Vasopressin analogue

Improve survival in some studies

Page 12: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

12

Pharmacologic therapy

Parameter Vasopressin Octreotide

Dose 20 U bolus; 0.4-0.6 U/min IV

50 bolus; 50 /hr IV

Hemostasis ~ 50% > 80%

Rebleed ~ 50% 14-30%

Complications 32-64% 0-15%

Mortality 5% 0

Gastroenterology 1995;109:1289-94 Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;20:S18-22 Dig Liver Dis. 2004;36:S93-100

Endoscopic Band Ligation

Page 13: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

13

Refractory Variceal Bleeding

Balloon tamponade

TIPS

Surgical shunt

Hepatic veinHepatic vein

Portal veinPortal veinSplenic veinSplenic vein

Superior mesenteric veinSuperior mesenteric vein

TIPSTIPS

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt

1. Second rebleed for esophageal varices

2. First rebleed for gastric varices

3. Rebleed on combination endoscopic plus pharmacologic therapy (10-20%)

Page 14: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

14

Portal Hypertensive Bleed

Gastric Varices Portal HTN Gastropathy Typical GAVE “watermelon stomach

Case 56 yr with acute variceal bleed (1st episode)

Bleeding controlled with band ligation

No bleeding for 5 days

Child score 10. MELD 15 MAP 90 mmHg

Which is the best discharge regimen?

1) Beta blockers and nitrates

2) Serial ligation alone

3) Ligation and beta blockers

4) TIPS

5) Portacaval shunt

Page 15: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

15

Case 56 yr with acute variceal bleed (1st episode)

Bleeding controlled with band ligation

No bleeding for 5 days

Child score 10. MELD 15 MAP 90 mmHg

Which is the best discharge regimen?

1) Beta blockers and nitrates

2) Serial ligation alone

3) Ligation and beta blockers

4) TIPS

5) Portacaval shunt

(19 trials)(19 trials)(26 trials)(26 trials) (54 trials)(54 trials)

%%

RebleedingRebleeding

8080

6060

4040

2020

00UntreatedUntreated -

blockers-

blockersSclero-therapySclero-therapy

(18 trials)(18 trials)

LigationLigation

(6 trials)(6 trials)

HVPG-Responder

s*

HVPG-Responder

s*(6 trials)(6 trials)

-blockers+ ISMN

-blockers+ ISMN

(2 trials)(2 trials)

Ligation+

-blockers

Ligation+

-blockers

Bosch and García-Pagán, Lancet 2003; 361:952Bosch and García-Pagán, Lancet 2003; 361:952

* HVPG <12 mmHg or >20% from

baseline

* HVPG <12 mmHg or >20% from

baseline

Lowest Rebleeding Rates are Obtained in HVPG Responders and With Ligation + -Blockers

Page 16: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

16

Acute Variceal BleedKey Points

Ascites

Page 17: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

17

Causes of Ascites

Cause ProportionCirrhosis 80%

Malignancy 10%

Heart Failure 4%

Nephrotic Syndrome 2%

Tuberculosis 2%

Pancreatitis 1%

Others (Budd Chiari) 1%

Case

47 yr old male with hepatitis C cirrhosis now presented with new onset abdominal distention and leg swelling.

Ultrasound showed large ascites. No evidence of portal vein thrombosis.

INR 2.2

530

62

50 667.0

140

Page 18: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

18

Which Statement is correct?

1. Need correction of INR before paracentesis.

2. No need to send cell count as no abdominal pain and fever.

3. SAAG of > 1.1 is only seen in portal hypertension.

4. Direct inoculation into blood culture bottles at the bedside improves yield.

Which Statement is correct?

1. Need correction of INR before paracentesis.

2. No need to send cell count as no abdominal pain and fever.

3. SAAG of > 1.1 is only seen in portal hypertension.

4. Direct inoculation into blood culture bottles at the bedside improves yield.

Page 19: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

19

SAAG

Serum-ascites albumin gradient SAAG = serum albumin – ascites albumin

SAAG ≥1.1 g/dL is 97% accurate at diagnosing ascites due to portal hypertension

High SAAG and high total protein (>2.5 g/dL) suggests cardiac cause

Probability of Survival is Poor After Developing Ascites

56% 5 year survival

Planas et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006

Page 20: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

20

When to Perform Paracentesis

Rule out SBP

Any new onset ascites

Any admission to hospital

Worsening of controlled ascites

Any change in clinical status

-- Encephalopathy

-- Unexplained renal failure

Ascitic Fluid Analysis

Runyon, Hepatology 2004

Routine Optional(Suspicion for Infection)

Unusual

Cell count & differential

Culture (bedside) AFB

Albumin Glucose Bilirubin

Total Protein LDH Triglyceride

Amylase Cytology

Gram stain

Page 21: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

21

First-Line Therapy

Tense ascites

Paracentesis

Sodium restriction(<2 Gm/24 Hrs)and diuretics*

Non-tense ascites*Diuretics: Spironolactone 100 mg/day,furosemide 40 mg/day or bumetanide1 mg/day; uptitrate stepwise to spironolactone 400 mg/day, furosemide160 mg/day or bumetanide 4 mg/day astolerated

RefractoryAscites 10 %

Second-Line Therapy

• Repeated large volume paracentesis

• TIPS

• Liver Transplantation

Management of Ascites

Adapted from Runyon BA. Hepatology. 2009; 49:2087-2107.

Treatment of Refractory Ascites

Page 22: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

22

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

Bleeding Ascites Pre-opDecompression

71%

25%4%

Courtesy Dr.Jeanne M. LaBerge

TIPS Indications:UCSF

Treatment: Serial LVP

Colloid replacement is important

Patients receiving albumin had less hemodynamic deterioration, renal failure and hyponatremia

Recommendation to administer 6-8 gm albumin per L of ascites removed if more than 5 L removed

Recent meta-analysis of 17 studies have shown improved survival in the albumin group

Bernardi M, Carceni P et al. Hepatology 2012Gines et al, Gastro 1988

Page 23: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

23

Routine prophylactic use offresh frozen plasma or platelets before

paracentesis? Not recommended

Complications were reported in only about 1% of patients

Bleeding conditions occur in less than 1 per 1,000 patients who require paracentesis

Coagulopathy should preclude paracentesis only when there is clinically evident hyperfibrinolysisor DIC

Pache I et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005.Caldwell SH et al. Hepatology 2006.

Ascitic Fluid Analysis: cell count

Normal ascites

Total WBC upper limit 500 cells/mm3

Total count can concentrate with diuresis, but not PMN count

PMNs normally account for 25-30%

SBP definition PMNs >250 cells/mm3

Culture: Direct inoculation into blood culture bottles at the bedside to improve yield

Page 24: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

24

SBP Start broad spectrum antibiotics immediately

Community acquired SBP- Causes: Gram negative (E.Coli)

- 3rd generation cephalosporin (cefotaxime for 5-7 days)

Hospital acquired SBP- High risk of ESBL E.coli

Treatment Failure- Secondary bacterial peritonitis

- Resistant organism

Treatment Trials for SBP

Study N Results p HospitalMortality

Cefotaxime vs ampicillin/tobramycin

73 Cure 85% vs 56% <0.02 33% vs 43%

Cefotaxime5 vs 10 days

100 Cure 93% vs 91%Recurrence 12% vs 13%

NS 33% vs 43%

Oral ofloxacinvs cefotaxime

123 Resolution 84% vs 85%

NS 19% vs 19%

Cefotaximewith or without Albumin

126 Resolution 98% vs 94%

Renal failure10 vs 33%

NS

0.002

10% vs 29%

Page 25: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

25

Probability of SBP recurrence

Months0

1.0

.8

.4

.2

.6

3 6 12 24 360

Recurrence of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis is Common

Titó et al., Hepatology 1988; 8:27

70%

Case

47 yr old male with hepatitis C cirrhosis with ascites. He is on lasix and aldactone which was recently increased.

Exam showed large ascites.

Now fatigue and worsening encephalopathy.

116

5.0 20 1.00103

Page 26: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

26

Which statement is NOT True

Need to stop diuretics.

Start hypertonic saline.

Fluid restriction.

Associated with increase mortality.

Potential Consequences of Hyponatremia

Hepatic encephalopathy

Reduced quality of life

Neurologic consequences after liver transplantation

Central Pontine Myelinolysis

High incidence in patients with Na<127 prior to OLT

Associated with rapid correction of sodium

May not be reversible

Increased risk of hepatorenal syndrome and death

Page 27: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

27

Types of Hyponatremia in Cirrhosis

HypovolemicHyponatremia

HypervolemicHyponatremia

Definition Na<130 in setting of intense sodium loss and contraction of intravascular volume

Na<130 in setting of solute free water retention and expansion of ECF volume

Clinical Findings

Develops in a few daysSigns of dehydrationNo ascites/edemaEncephalopathy present

May be transientAscites/edema presentEncephalopathy variable

Causes Over diuresisSodium lossDiarrhea

Excess of solute-free water(spontaneous, fluid induced, drug induced, infections)

Management Stop diureticsTreat diarrheaGive sodium cautiously

Reduce fluid intake: free water restriction

Increase free-water excretion

Types of Hyponatremia in Cirrhosis

HypovolemicHyponatremia

HypervolemicHyponatremia

Definition Na<130 in setting of intense sodium loss and contraction of intravascular volume

Na<130 in setting of solute free water retention and expansion of ECF volume

Clinical Findings

Develops in a few daysSigns of dehydrationNo ascites/edemaEncephalopathy present

May be transientAscites/edema presentEncephalopathy variable

Causes Over diuresisSodium lossDiarrhea

Excess of solute-free water(spontaneous, fluid induced, drug induced, infections)

Management Stop diureticsTreat diarrheaIV albuminGive sodium cautiously

Reduce fluid intake: free water restriction

Increase free-water excretion

Page 28: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

28

Conclusions

Ascites is very common in cirrhosis Should be tapped whenever new, different, or

admitted to the hospital

Low index of suspicion for SBP

Need IV albumin for LVP

Hyponatremia should be managed according to overall volume status of the patient

Case

47 yr old male with NASH cirrhosis. History of hepatic hydrothorax. Now with worsening SOB.

He had 2 thoracentesis last month.

Best long term treatment for him?

1. Chest tube placement

2. Pleurodesis

3. TIPS procedure

4. Liver transplant

Page 29: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

29

Hepatic Hydrothorax

Occurs in 5-10% with decompensated cirrhosis

Passage of ascites through diaphragmatic defect

Risk of spontaneous bacterial pleuritis

Mainstay is control of ascites

Chest tube is not indicated

Hepatic Hydrothorax:Treatment Options

Repeated thoracentesis

TIPS (50% patient may not be candidate)

VATS and diaphragmatic repair (low success rate and high mortality)

Denver shunt (pleuro-venous shunt)

PleurX Catheter

Liver Transplantation

Page 30: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

30

Hepatic Encephalopathy

Case

47 yr old male with hepatitis C cirrhosis. Wife brought him to ER with 3rd episode of hepatic encephalopathy.

On exam he is sleepy and has asterixis.

What is not needed in the work up?

1. Infectious work up

2. Rectal exam/melena

3. Diagnostic paracentesis

4. Ammonia level

Page 31: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

31

Prevalence of Hepatic Encephalopathy

Two forms of HE are recognized: Overt and Minimalbased on the nature and severity of clinical manifestations

Overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) occurs in:

‒ 30 to 45% of cirrhotic patients

‒ 10 to 50% of patients with TIPS

Poor Survival

42% at 1 year

23% at 3 years

Mullen KD et al. Semin Liver Dis. 2007. Poordad FF. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006.Bustamante J et al. J Hepatol. 1999.

Blood Ammonia and Diagnosis of HE

Accuracy is Technique-Dependant

Efficient venous draw, rapid transport on ice to reliable lab, quick analysis, pH controlled

Not Specific

Elevated in TPN, GI hemorrhage, intense muscular activity, and urosepsis

Limited Reliability

Overt HE is not always accompanied by a very high ammonia

Not a Guide to Treatment

Not a useful clinical endpoint for HE treatment in practice

Page 32: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

32

Case

A 63-year-old woman with NASH cirrhosis in the ER.

She had slurring of her speech and was “confused,” according to her husband that worsened overnight

It was difficult for her to maintain her balance and fell while in the bathroom and hit her head

First step in management is?

1. Blood cultures

2. Ultrasound

3. Head CT

4. Diagnostic paracentesis

Precipitating Factors Involved in Overt HE

GI hemorrhageConstipationPortosystemic shuntDeterioration in liver function

Psychoactive Medications

BenzodiazepinesNarcotics, sedatives

Dietary proteinNoncompliance

Blei AT et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:1968-1976. Mullen KD et al. Semin Liver Dis. 2007;27(suppl 2):32-47.

Infection ShockAnemiaSurgery

Renal/electrolyte disturbances:Renal failure Metabolic alkalosis HypovolemiaHypokalemiaHyponatremia

Page 33: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

33

HE Treatment Goals

Blei AT et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001.

Provide supportive care

Identify and remove precipitating factors

Reduce nitrogenous load from gut

Assess need for long-term therapy

1

2

3

4

Reduction of nitrogenous load from gut Bowel cleansing

Non-absorbable disaccharides (lactulose)

Antibiotics (rifaximin, metronidazole)*

Agents that bind NH3 in the gut Na benzoate Na phenylacetate Na hydroxybutyrate Glycerol phenyl butyrate

Drugs that affect neurotransmission (flumazenil)

Manipulation of splanchnic circulation (occlusion of portal-systemic collaterals) Occlude TIPS shunt if present

* Neomycin (historical interest).Adapted from Blei AT et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96(7):1968-1976.

Treatment Options for HE

Page 34: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

34

Current Therapy Options for HE

Drug Name Drug Class Indication

LactulosePoorly absorbed disaccharide

• Decrease blood ammoniaconcentration

• Prevention and treatment of portal-systemic encephalopathy

RifaximinNon-aminoglycoside semi-synthetic, nonsystemic antibiotic

Reduction in risk of overt hepatic encephalopathy (HE) recurrence in patients ≥ 18 years of age.

NeomycinAminoglycoside antibiotic

Adjuvant therapy in hepatic coma

MetronidazoleSynthetic antiprotozoal and antibacterial agent

Not approved for HE

Vancomycin Aminoglycoside antibiotic

Not approved for HE

Adapted from http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/Drugs/GastrointestinalDrugsAdvisoryCommittee/UCM203247.pdf, accessed 02/17/11

• Mechanism of action:

– A non-absorbable dissacharide

– Bacterial flora metabolizes in the colon to lactic acid lowers the colonic pH

• Administered orally, by mouth or through a nasogastric tube or via retention enemas

• Start 25 mL every 1-2 hours until at least two soft or loose bowel movements. Subsequently, the dosing is titrated to 3-4 soft stools per day

• Monitor stool output and side effects

Lactulose

Mullen KD et al. Semin Liver Dis. 2007;27(Suppl 2):32-47. Ferenci P. Semin Liver Dis. 2007;27(suppl 2):10-17.Bajaj JS. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010;31:537-547.

Page 35: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

35

Bass NM. Semin Liver Dis. 2007.. Mullen KD et al. Semin Liver Dis. 2007.

• Minimally absorbed (<0.4%) oral antibiotic

• No clinical drug interactions reported

• No dosing adjustment required in patients with liver disease or renal insufficiency

• Approved for overt recurrent HE risk reduction in patients ≥18 years of age

Rifaximin

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

0 28 56 84 112 140 168

Rifaximin: Time to Breakthrough HE Episode (Primary Endpoint)

Rifaximin

Placebo

Pro

port

ion

With

out

HE

Bre

akth

roug

h

0.77

0.53

Days Post-Randomization

58% in risk of HE breakthrough (P<.0001)

Bass et al. N Engl J Med. 2010.

Page 36: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

36

Nutritional Management in HE

Importance of preserving muscle mass

Avoidance of protein restriction Protein generally well-tolerated at 1.0-1.5 g/kg/d

More vegetable, less animal sources

Branch-chain amino acids (BCAA): Many studies, analyses - remains controversial

HE Summary

HE is very common in the cirrhotic patient

Ammonia is not useful for clinical endpoint in HE treatment

Look for precipitating factors of HE

Minimize narcotics and sedatives

Lactulose and rifaximin are the main treatment options

Page 37: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

37

Renal Dysfunction in Cirrhosis

The Kidneys are also important?

Renal dysfunction is one of the most important risk factors for adverse outcomes in patients with cirrhosis

Found in 20% of cirrhotics admitted to the hospital

The average cirrhotic will experience ~2 episodes per year

Acute kidney injury (AKI) in cirrhosis is associated with:

7-fold increase in overall mortality

Fede, J Hep 2012. Martin-Llahi, Gastro 2011. Tsien, Gut 2013.

Page 38: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

38

Case

50 yr old female with hepatitis C cirrhosis complicated by ascites. He is on diuretics.

No new medications. Normal creatinine last week.

125

5 16 2.5

Case

What is the most likely etiology his AKI?

1. Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS).

2. Obstructive (post-renal).

3. Pre-renal azotemia.

4. ATN.

5. Cryoglobulinemia.

Page 39: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

39

Case

What is the most likely etiology his AKI?

1. Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS).

2. Obstructive (post-renal).

3. Pre-renal azotemia.

4. ATN.

5. Cryoglobulinemia.

Differential Diagnosis of Renal Dysfunction in Cirrhotics

Pre-renal azotemia Hepatorenal

syndrome

Intrinsic renal disease

Post-renal disease

Page 40: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

40

Intrinsic Renal DiseaseType Typical clinical setting

Acute tubular necrosis(ATN)

Hypotension, IV contrast, prolonged hepatorenal syndrome

Acute interstitial nephritis (AIN)

Beta-lactam antibiotics (Zosyn, Augmentin), cephalosporins(ceftriaxone), NSAIDs

IgA nephropathy* Cirrhosis, especially alcoholic

Membranous nephropathy* Hepatitis B / C

Membranoproliferativeglomerulonephritis (MPGN) / cryoglobulinemia*

Hepatitis B / C

* Renal biopsy is needed to make the diagnosis.

Pre-Renal Azotemia

The most common cause of AKI in cirrhosis

Diagnostic evaluation:

Urine studies (fractional excretion of sodium)

R/o obstruction

Management:

DiureticsDiuretics

Diarrhea (lactulose)Diarrhea

(lactulose)

Acute GI bleed

Acute GI bleed

LVP w/o albuminLVP w/o albumin

NSAIDs, ACE-I

NSAIDs, ACE-I

Common causes of

renal hypo-perfusion

in cirrhotics:

Poor PO

intake

Poor PO

intake

• IV hydration with IV albumin 1g/kg• Treat the underlying cause • Remove the offending agent

Page 41: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

41

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS)

Functional pre-renal azotemia

85% have an identifying stressor

Tsien, Gut 2013. Arroyo, J Hep 2013.

Type 1 Type 2

Rapid (<2 weeks) Speed Slower course

2x baseline and>2.5 mg/dL

Creatinine >1.5 mg/dL

Typically SBP Associated with Refractory ascites

ReversibleResponse to

treatmentMay be reversible but usually recurs

Extremely poor (days-weeks)

Prognosis Poor (months)

Diagnostic Criteria of Hepatorenal Syndrome

International Ascites Club Guidelines.

• Presence of cirrhosis with ascites

• Serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dL

• No improvement in creatinine after:• Withdrawal of diuretics, and• 1 g/kg IV albumin per day (up to

100g/day max) for 2 days

• Absence of circulatory shock

• No recent administration of nephrotoxic medications

• Absence of intrinsic renal disease• Normal renal ultrasound• Bland urinalysis (no blood; <0.5 g/day

protein)

Page 42: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

42

HRS management: vasoconstrictors

Vasoconstrictors: V1 agonists

Vasopressin and its analogues (terlipressin)

A1-adrenergic agonists

Norepinephrine

Midodrine

Glucagon release inhibitor

Octreotide

Gines and Schrier, NEJM 2009

Management of Hepatorenal Syndrome

STEP 1

STEP 2

STEP 3

• IV Albumin 1g/kg per day x 2 days (max 100g/day)

• Treat precipitating factors

Manage what you can

• Midodrine 7.5 mg PO TID• Octreotide 100 mcg SQ TID

• Continue IV albumin 25-50 g/day)

Start vasoconstrictors

• Raise mean arterial pressure (MAP) by >15 mmHg

• Max midrodine 15 mg TID, octreotide 200 mcg TID

Titrate

Page 43: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

43

Key Points

Acute kidney injury is an important

prognostic marker in cirrhotics

50% risk of death in the first month

Causes can be categorized as:

Hepatorenal syndrome is diagnosed after an IV albumin challenge and ruling out other causes of AKI

Managed with midodrine, octreotide, and albumin

Pre-renal (most common)

Intrinsic renalPost-renal

Case

59 yr old male with HCV cirrhosis, complicated by ascites and HE. His meld score is 18.

Admitted to the ICU with hypotention and sepsis.

1. What is his mortality?

2. Most likely source of infection?

Page 44: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

44

Infections in Cirrhosis

Bacterial infections are the leading cause of mortality in cirrhosis

One third patients have at least one infection

Increase in MDR organisms (40% in some latest studies)

Fernandez J et al. Hepatology 2011; Arvaniti V et al. Gastroenterology 2010

Bacterial Infections in Cirrhosis

Site Percentage

SBP 30 %

UTI 25 %

Pneumonia 20 %

Soft Tissue infection 10 %

Sepsis 5 %

Other 10 %

Page 45: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

45

Infections: Hospitalized Cirrhotic patients

207 patients studied

Most first infections were HCA (71%), then nosocomial (15%)

Second infections were seen in 24%

30 day mortality: 23%

Bajaj J et al. Hepatology 2012

CA: community acquired (blue)HCA: hospital acquired (brown)Noso: nosocomial (green)

Septic Shock in cirrhotic patients

Retrospective, 635 pt’s with sepsis

Mortality 75%

Fungal infections seen in 10% patients

Septic shock but Culture negative: 25%

Arabi YM et al. Hepatology 2012

Page 46: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

46

Does Timing and choice of antibiotics makes a difference? Inappropriate initial empiric antimicrobial

therapy was administered in 25%

The median time to appropriate antimicrobial was 7.3 hours

In bacterial septic shock, a single rather than 2 or more appropriate antimicrobials was used in 73%

Arabi YM et al. Hepatology 2012

Timing of Antibiotics by onset of hypotension and mortality

Hours

Arabi YM et al. Hepatology 2012

Page 47: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

47

Key Points

Sepsis mortality is high in cirrhosis (60-80%)

Bacterial infections are the most common infections

Low threshold for starting the antibiotics

Increase in resistant organisms

Liver Transplantation

Page 48: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

48

Liver TransplantationTiming of Referral

Early referral is the key Complications of Cirrhosis (Child’s B or C) Ascites Portal hypertensive bleeding Hepatic encephalopathy Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis Synthetic function abnormalities

Waiting list priority is based on liver disease severity (=MELD), not waiting time

Deceased Donor Liver AllocationFebruary 2002 Changes:

Child-Turcotte-Pugh Score MELD Score

■ Ascites ▬ Creatinine

■ Encephalopathy ▬ Bilirubin

■ Bilirubin ▬ Protime INR

■ Protime INR

■ Albumin

MELD Score = 0.957 x Loge (creatinine mg/dL) + 0.378 x Loge(bilirubin mg.dL) + 1.120 x Loge(INR) + 0.643

Page 49: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

49

Meld Score Predicts 90 Day Mortality

Patient/Graft Survival Among U.S. Liver Transplant Recipients.

69%74%

85% 87%

54%60%

Page 50: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

50

53 yo male patient with HCV/HIV and alcholic cirrhosis, current MELD score of 20.

BMI is 39.5

History of renal cancer s/p resection 3 yrs (3 cm)

Portal vein thrombosis on ultrasound

Last alcohol use 5 months back (heavy use)

Question

Which is the factor will limit his transplant listing?

1. Obesity, BMI 39.5.

2. HIV.

3. Hx of renal cell cancer.

4. PVT.

5. Alcohol use.

Page 51: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

51

Which is the factor will limit his transplant listing?

1. Obesity, BMI 39.5 (BMI 40-50 need eval)

2. HIV (HIV/HCV high risk)

3. Cancer (need to see 5 yr survival and recurrence)

4. PVT (Not a contra-indication)

5. Alcohol use (6 months sober)

Key Points Avoid narcotics, sedatives and NSAID’s

Tylenol is safe (max dose 2 grams per day)

Avoid IV fluids (NS). If needed use IV albumin

Low threshold of starting antibiotics

Any change in clinical status need infectious work up and paracentesis

Please monitor stool output on lactulose

Early referral to transplant center

Page 52: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

52

THANK YOU

“Is life worth living? It all depends on the liver.”William James, American philosopher (1842)

Acute Liver Failure

Page 53: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

53

Case Presentation

18-year-old woman

Binge-drinking on New Year Eve 1/1: Tired, “hungover”

1/2: Nausea, vomiting, abd pain, moody, sleepy

1/3: Confused, disoriented, agitated, calling people by wrong names, talking to objects

Past History

PMH: asthma, binge drinking

Meds: beclamethasone, albuterol, ranitidine, minocycline

SH: Lives with parents

Page 54: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

54

Initial Labs

130

4.5 20 1.18103

15.437.7

362

10,299 10,6513.7

199

7.42/35/52

Lactate 5.8NH3 150

INR 7.2

APAP 30

Coagulopathy

INR > 1.5

Encephalopathy

No pre-existing liver disease

Duration < 26 weeks

Page 55: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

55

Acute Liver Failure

Hep B

Autoimmune HELLP

HSV Wilson Disease

DILI

Acetaminophen

Hep A

CoagulopathyComa

InfectionRenal failureBleeding

CAUSE

EFFECT

Indeterminate

Budd-Chiari

Shock

Etiology of Acute Liver Failure Adult Registry (n = 2,224)

ALF Study Group, Jan 201546%

11%12%

Page 56: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

56

Acetaminophen cases as % of all ALF per year

Prognosis in ALF: Etiology is a Main

Determinant

Good prognosis:

APAP 66%

Ischemia66%

Pregnancy 55%

Hepatitis A 56%

Transplant free survival rates differ greatly

(Age is NOT an important determinant)*

*Schiødt FV, et al., Liver Transplant 2009

Page 57: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

57

Prognosis in ALF: Etiology is a Main Determinant

Good prognosis:

APAP 66%

Ischemia 66%

Pregnancy 55%

Hepatitis A 56%

Transplant free survival rates differ greatly

Bad prognosis:

Drugs 27%

Indeterminate 25%

Autoimmune 26%

Hepatitis B 26%

Wilson Disease 0%

(Age is NOT an important determinant)*

*Schiødt FV, et al., Liver Transplant 2009

Specific Therapies

1. Acetaminophen2. Autoimmune3. HBV4. HSV5. Amanita6. Pregnancy

A. NAC/ CharcoalB. CorticosteroidsC.Entecavir/tenofovirD.AcyclovirE. Silibinin/PenicillinF. Delivery

Page 58: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

58

Initial Management

Must have high index of suspicion at time of admission

Condition progresses rapidly

Changes in consciousness occur hour-by-hour

Admission or early transfer to ICU warranted

Principles of care

Intensive care management of severe, rapidly progressive multi-organ system failure

Only effective treatment: emergent liver transplantRapid psycho-social evaluation critical

Order sets and daily checklists can be used

No substitute for experience

Page 59: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

59

Treatment for APAP OverdoseN-acetylcysteine (NAC) is an effective

antidote!

IV NAC will totally prevent toxicity if given < 12 hrs

Uncertain benefit after 30 hours

Supportive care in ICU: may develop fatal

complications: brain edema.

Initial evaluation: is it ALF? If so, is he/she a LT

candidate? If so, consider early transfer to OSU.

Acute Liver Failure: An Orphan Disease

Still very rare but interesting!

Requires specialty care

Outcomes improved in recent era

Transplantation still the centerpiece of care

Treatment trials underway; use NAC for all (?)

Recognize the hallmarks of ALF: coma/high INR

Refer early

Page 60: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

60

Page 61: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

61

≥6 mmHgSinusoidal PHT

Portal Hypertension: HVPG measurement

≥ 12 mmHgVarices & Ascites

Reduction of HVPG to <12 or at least by 20% reduces the risk of rebleeding from 46-65% to 0-13%

Variceal Hemorrhage SuspectedVariceal Hemorrhage Suspected

Initial ManagementInitial Management

NO

Rescue TIPS/Shunt surgeryRescue TIPS/Shunt surgery

Balloon TamponadeBalloon Tamponade

YES

Early rebleeding?Early rebleeding?

Acute Hemorrhage Controlled?Acute Hemorrhage Controlled?

YES

2nd Endoscopy2nd Endoscopy

Further bleeding

NO

Prophylaxis against recurrent hemorrhagProphylaxis against recurrent hemorrhag

Management of Acute Variceal Hemorrhage

Page 62: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

62

Control of Acute Variceal HemorrhageControl of Acute Variceal Hemorrhage

NO

Surveillance Endoscopyand/or

Life-long Pharmacotherapy

Surveillance Endoscopyand/or

Life-long Pharmacotherapy

Prophylactic Pharmacotherapyand/or

Endoscopic Variceal Band Ligation

Prophylactic Pharmacotherapyand/or

Endoscopic Variceal Band Ligation

Recurrent HemorrhageRecurrent HemorrhageYES

NO YES

Initiate combination RxInitiate combination Rx TIPS/Shunt SurgeryTIPS/Shunt Surgery

Further bleeding

Is patient on EVL + Pharmacotherapy?Is patient on EVL + Pharmacotherapy?

Prophylaxis of Recurrent Variceal Hemorrhage

Infections:Hospitalized Cirrhotic patients

Distribution of 1st Infection’s % of first & second infection(body sites)

CA: community acquiredHCA: hospital acquiredNoso: nosocomial

Bajaj J et al. Hepatology 2012

Page 63: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

63

Secondary Prevention Variceal Bleeding

The combination of endoscopic therapy with medical therapy is the initial approach to prevent variceal re-bleeding.

Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2002;5(6):471

Liberal vs Restrictive Transfusion Strategy

Villanueva et al, NEJM 2013

Page 64: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

64

Medical therapyAcute resuscitationIV Vasoactive drugs Antibiotic prophylaxis

Endoscopic therapyBandingInjection therapy

TIPSCovered stent

Garcia-Tsao G. NEJM 2010; 362: 823-832

Therapy for Variceal Bleeding

Epidemiology

Most common complication of cirrhosis

Within 10 years of diagnosis of compensated cirrhosis, 50% of patient with develop ascites

Development of ascites = 50% two year mortality

Diuretic refractory ascites = 50% one year mortality

Development of SBP = 30% one year mortality

Page 65: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

65

Pharmacologic therapy

Octreotide is superior and safer compared to vasopressin

Octreotide infusion for 5 days prevent early re-bleeding

Endoscopic Variceal Band Ligation

Bleeding controlled in 90%

Rebleeding rate 30%

Compared with sclerotherapy: Less rebleeding

Lower mortality

Fewer complications

Fewer treatment sessions

Page 66: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

66

TIPS in the Treatment of Variceal Hemorrhage

Recurrent variceal hemorrhage (at second rebleed for esophageal varices, at first rebleed for gastric varices)

Rebleed on combination endoscopic plus pharmacologic therapy (10-20%)

In patients with Child A/B cirrhosis, the distal spleno-renal shunt is as effective as TIPS (dependent on local expertise)

Treatment: Diuretics

Monotherapy spironolactone more successful than use of furosemide alone Loop diuretics depend on secretion into the tubule

for action. Secretion is impaired in cirrhosis Monotherapy spironolactone can cause

hyperkalemia

Optimal regimen: spironolactone 100 mg/d and furosemide 40 mg/d single daily dose Increases should be made every 3-5 days as

needed, maintaining ratio Ratio may need to be < 100/40 in patients with

parenchymal renal disease

Maximum doses: 400 mg/d spironolactone, 160 mg/d furosemide

Page 67: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

67

Natural History of Hepatorenal Syndrome (HRS)

Arroyo et al., Gastroenterology 2002; 122:1658

5

3

1

0

Months

Creatinine(mg/dL)

6

0 - 4 0 1 3

4

2

- 6 - 2 2Weeks

Type 2 HRS Type 1 HRSSBP

CefotaximeCefotaximeTherapeutic paracentesesTherapeutic paracenteses

Ascites and Hyponatremia are Always Present in HRS

Besides renal failure, patients with HRS have sodium and water retention

Ascites is universal in patients with HRS. If ascites is absent, renal failure is more likely due to other causes

Hyponatremia is almost universal in HRS. If serum sodium is normal, diagnosis of HRS is unlikely

Page 68: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

68

Overt Hepatic Encephalopathy

Associated with a poor prognosis

Retrospective review of 111 cirrhotic patients for 12±17 months following first episode of acute OHE:

82 (74%) died during follow-up period

Survival probability

42% at 1 year

23% at 3 years

Bustamante J et al. J Hepatol. 1999;30(5):890-895.

The Acute Episode of HE

Supportive care, airway protection

Head imaging

Precipitating causes

Dehydration - lactulose overtreatment?

Missed medication dose(s)

Infection (SBP, UTI)

Specific medical therapy

Transplant candidacy

Page 69: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

69

RFHE3001 Trial: Rifaximin for Maintaining Remission in Hepatic Encephalopathy

Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-

controlled, phase III trial of efficacy and safety of

rifaximin 550 mg BID for 6 months in maintenance of

remission in patients with recurrent, overt HE

Cirrhosis and /or portal hypertension

Two or more episodes of HE (Conn score ≥2) within

6 months of screening

Conn score 0 or 1 at screening

NM Bass, KD Mullen, S Sigal, A Sanyal, F Poordad, K Merchant, S Huang, A Shaw, E Bortey, WP Forbes Presented at: 44th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of the Liver; April 25, 2009; Copenhagen, Denmark.

Sepsis MortalityCirrhosis v/s Non cirrhosis

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Cirrhosis Non cirrhosis

30 day mortality

%

Mortality in Sepsis

60-80%

50%

Fernandez et al. Hepatology 2006; Plessier et al. Liver Int 2003

Page 70: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

70

Predictors of hemorrhage: Variceal size Red signs Child B/C

NIEC. N Engl J Med 1988; 319:983

Variceal hemorrhage Varix with red signs

Page 71: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

71

Liver insufficiency

Varicealhemorrhage

Complications of Cirrhosis Result from Portal Hypertension or Liver Insufficiency

Cirrhosis Ascites

Encephalopathy

Jaundice

Portal hypertension

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis

Hepatorenalsyndrome

HE Clinical Diagnosis

Knowledge of existing liver disease/portosystemicshunting

Precipitating factors

Altered mental state, hypertonicity, asterixis, fetor hepaticus

Reversibility with treatment

Testing to exclude other causes of altered mental state (brain imaging, EEG, lumbar puncture)

No consensus on diagnostic criteria

Mullen et al. Semin Liver Dis. 2007

Blei et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001

Page 72: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

72

Number Needed to Treat

1 of 4 cases of breakthrough HE can be avoided with 6 months of rifaximin (NNT=4)

1 of 9 cases of hospitalization-related HE can be avoided with 6 months of rifaximin (NNT=9)

Bass et al. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1071-1081.

Routine prophylactic use offresh frozen plasma or platelets before

paracentesis?

In a study of 1100 large volume paracenteses there were no hemorrhagic complications despite a) no prophylactic transfusions, b) platelet counts as low as 19,000 cells/mm3 (19 x 106 /L)(54% <50,000) and c) international normalized ratios for prothrombin time as high as 8.7 (75% >1.5 and 26.5% >2.0)

Grabau CM et al. Hepatology 2004

Page 73: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

73

One controlled trial randomized patients with SBP to receive cefotaxime alone versus cefotaxime plus 1.5 g albumin per kg body weight within 6 hours of enrollment and 1.0 g/kg on day 3. A decrease in mortality from 29% to 10% was reported

A more recent study has shown that albumin should be given when the serum creatinine is >1 mg/dL, blood urea nitrogen >30 mg/dL, or total bilirubin >4 mg/dL but is not necessary in patients who do not meet these criteria.

MELD

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

90-d

ay S

urv

ival

MELD

90%

7%

e

INRBilirubinCreatinine

Page 74: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

74

147

Bacterial Infections in Hospitalized Cirrhotic Patients

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

1980’s Non-cirrhotics

Deschenes(1999)n=140

%

Fernandez(2002)

n=1,567

32%34%

20%

6%

~46%

41%

Dupeyron(2001)n=589

Borzio(2001)n=405

Cirrhosis: ICU admissions

ICU admissions related to cirrhosis in the US is about 26,000 per year with an estimated cost of $3 billion

Olson JC, Kamath PS. Curr Opin Crit Care 2011

Page 75: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

75

Non-Pharmacologic Treatment of Acute Variceal Hemorrhage

Endoscopic Band Ligation

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portal-systemic Shunting (TIPS)

Mostly Historical Interest Embolization of varices

Injection Sclerotherapy

Questions

What is the risk of variceal bleed in cirrhosis?

What is your goal Hgb/HCT?

Use of IV octreotide? Other medications?

Use of IV antibiotics?

Control of bleeding? Banding vs. medications?

Page 76: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

76

Acute Variceal Hemorrhage

Labs

130

4.5 20 1.18103

102 1204.5

199

INR 1.6 1219

62

Page 77: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

77

Treatment: Serial LVP

If patient compliant with diet, should need no more than 8.4 L every two weeks

LVP does result in protein and complement depletion, may indirectly predispose to asciticfluid infection

Every tap should be tested for cell count and differential Prevalence of occult infection low

Evans et al, Hepatology 2003: 3.5%

Lactulose Therapy in HE

Standard of care

Poorly tolerated

Unpalatable

Flatulence and abdominal pain

Diarrhea

Nausea/ Ileus in large doses

Hypernatremia

Gerber T, Schomerus H. Drugs. 2000;60:1353-1370; Mullen KD, Dasarathy S. In: Schiff ER, et al, eds. Schiff’s Disease of the Liver, ed 8. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1999, pp 545-581; Williams R, et al. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000;12:203-208.

Page 78: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

78

140 consecutive cirrhotic patients recovering from a bout of HE

Randomized to lactulose (30-60 ml/day) or placebo (non-blinded)

Primary endpoint = an episode of overt HE

Follow-up 1-20 months (median = 14 mo.)

Lactulose resulted in a 58% reduction in the incidence ofovert HE (p=0.001)

Gastroenterology. 2009;137:885-891

Prevention of Overt Episodic HE: Is Drug Therapy Effective?

Page 79: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

79

52 year-old man with cirrhosis due to HCV, listed for LT. Complications include ascites and encephalopathy

Labs at time of listing: MELD 17

Which of the following changes in lab parameters will increase his MELD score the most?

INR Bilirubin Creatinine

Baseline 1.5 3.0 1.2

Change in Labs 3 months later

#1 3.0 3.0 1.2

#2 1.5 6.0 1.2

#3 1.5 3.0 2.4

MELD17

251924

Question

Ascites

Page 80: Management of Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis

10/26/2015

80

Pathophysiology of HRS

Portal hypertension

Splanchnic vasodilation

Low effective arterial blood

volume

BP, no ascites, no edema

Disease progression

Refractory ascites, anasarca, severe

BP

Decompensated Cirrhosis

Renal Failure (HRS)

Renal Failure (HRS)

Compensated Cirrhosis

Adapted from Gines, NEJM 2009.

SBP: Emergence of enterococci

170 episodes of culture positive ascites

Gram +ve infections in 50% cases

Enterococcus spp: 28% cases

Poor survival in enterococcus group

Reuken PA et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2012