managing a power system with 40% wind dr alan rogers eirgrid
TRANSCRIPT
Managing a Power System with 40% Wind
Dr Alan RogersEirGrid
Outline
• Current Situation• Case study: August 26th 2009 > 40% Wind• Power System Stability• System Stability Tools• Conclusions
Current Status
• Oct 2009: 1119MW of wind generation connected• End of 2009: 1250MW installed• End of 2010: 1600MW installed
• Minimum Generation (August 2009): 1632MW exported• Expected Winter Peak Load 2009: 4750MW• Current Maximum Wind Generation: 999MW
• Rapidly moving towards:– 50% instantaneous wind penetration
– 33% capacity penetration (Installed Wind MW / Peak MW)
Maximum Percentage Wind during 2009
Hourly Wind Variability
Increased Wind needs more flexible conventional plant
Maximum Hourly Change in Wind MW vs Maximum Wind
-500.0
-400.0
-300.0
-200.0
-100.0
0.0
100.0
200.0
300.0
400.0
0.0 200.0 400.0 600.0 800.0 1000.0 1200.0 1400.0
Wind / MW
MW
/ h
ou
r
On this day, wind peaked at 750MW and dropped by 370MW in one hour
Case StudyAugust 26th 2009 3:45am > 40% Wind
• Wind generation now regularly exceeds 40% of demand• Highest wind penetration in the world on a synchronous system• Occurs during night valleys, when demand is at its lowest• Conventional Generation Dispatch must be carefully managed
– Geographical spread of generation for voltage control– Certain amount of flexible plant to cope with sudden changes in wind
(e.g. hydro)– Large machines to provide inertia, synchronizing torque, and short-
circuit power
• Approximate Dispatch on August 26th:– 870MW Wind– 850MW Large conventional machines at minimum load– 200MW Peat / Hydro / Small-scale Gas
Change in Dispatch from Low to High Wind
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
MW
Large Conventional Small Conventional Wind Generation
Night Valley Dispatches: Aug 14th (Low Wind) vs Aug 26th (High Wind)
Calm
Windy1 x MP min HNC min2 x TB min HN2 minPBCCGT min 3 x TH pumping
Case Study – Control Issues
• Wind generation peaked at 880MW on August 26th
• 30MW of non-firm wind was curtailed in South-West• NCC expected severe contingencies in North-West, so SONI agreed to
import 20MW at both Strabane and Enniskillen to alleviate contingencies
Night Valley Frequency TracesAug 26 & Sep 30
49.98
50
50.02
50.04
50.06
50.08
50.1
50.12
1 3601
Time (seconds)
Fre
qu
en
cy
(H
z)
High Wind
Low Wind
Normal fluctuations in demand cause frequency jitter
Wind MW fluctuations make jitter amplitude larger PQ issue / freq control issue
Power System Stability
Power System Stability
Rotor-angleStability
VoltageStability
FrequencyStability
Transient Stability
Small-signal
Stability
MVAr Balance
Tap-changerActions
Short-term
Long-term
System Stability Tools• Online Wind Security Assessment Tool (WSAT) in development:
Real-time Analysis (every 30mins)
– Transient Stability Analysis – Full Dynamic Simulation• Faults at every bus / Tripping of large machines / Relay Actions• Does the system remain as one synchronous area?• Do any machines trip unexpectedly?
– Voltage Stability Analysis (Margin to Voltage Collapse / N-1 Contingencies)
• Voltages in range / Overloads / Voltage Collapse
– Frequency Stability• How low will frequency go / frequency recovery / system inertia ?
• Damping Monitor Relay
– Analyzing low frequency modes 0.001Hz – 99Hz
– Oscillatory Events / Magnitudes / Damping / Duration
– Any systemic change in behaviour with high wind penetration?
System Security: August 26th
• Voltage Security Assessment – extra 500MW wind could be accomodated before voltage collapse / unsolved loadflow
– Yellow region means secure but with some overloads if certain lines trip
• Transient Security Assessment showed that a large generator trip would cause a frequency drop to about 49.3 Hz
– This is normal. No other problems were flagged
• No stability problem with 40% instantaneous wind during SNV as far as we can tell
– Key limitations: Thermal Limits / Conventional Plant Constraints
643.4 843.4 1043.4 1443.4 1843.4 2243.4 2643.4 Wind
Conclusions
• 40% instantaneous wind becoming more common• Change in Dispatch / System Behaviour
– Flexible Generation Requirements– Extensive dynamic simulations required
• Power System Stability Tools– WSAT– Damping Monitor
• 2020: 37% Average Wind Energy– Very high instantaneous penetration in theory (70/80%)– Careful study of stability limits will be required
Possible 2020 Fuel Mix
Fuel Mix 2020
15%
5%
1%
36%
37%
2%1%
2%1%
Coal
Peat
Oil
Gas
Wind
Hydro
Pumped Hydro
Wave/Tidal
Biomass