managing high risk young persons in social welfare institutions multifunc
DESCRIPTION
Managing High Risk Young Persons in Social Welfare Institutions MultifunC Multifunctional Treatment in Residential and Community Settings. Developmental Project in Norway and Sweden. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Managing High Risk Young Persons in Social Welfare Institutions MultifunC](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56813bb1550346895da4e567/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Managing High Risk Young Persons in
Social Welfare Institutions
MultifunCMultifunctional Treatment in Residential and Community
SettingsDevelopmental Project in
Norway and Sweden
![Page 2: Managing High Risk Young Persons in Social Welfare Institutions MultifunC](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56813bb1550346895da4e567/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
1.1. Review of the research on residential Review of the research on residential treatment of antisocial behaviour in treatment of antisocial behaviour in juveniles (2001-2002). juveniles (2001-2002).
2.2. Development of a residential treatment Development of a residential treatment program based on the research (2003-program based on the research (2003-2004).2004).
3.3. Implementing the treatment program – Implementing the treatment program – MultifunC - in Norway (five units) and in - in Norway (five units) and in Sweden (two units) (2005-2007). Later also in Sweden (two units) (2005-2007). Later also in Denmark.Denmark.
4.4. Evaluation of the program (2010-14)Evaluation of the program (2010-14)
1.1. Review of the research on residential Review of the research on residential treatment of antisocial behaviour in treatment of antisocial behaviour in juveniles (2001-2002). juveniles (2001-2002).
2.2. Development of a residential treatment Development of a residential treatment program based on the research (2003-program based on the research (2003-2004).2004).
3.3. Implementing the treatment program – Implementing the treatment program – MultifunC - in Norway (five units) and in - in Norway (five units) and in Sweden (two units) (2005-2007). Later also in Sweden (two units) (2005-2007). Later also in Denmark.Denmark.
4.4. Evaluation of the program (2010-14)Evaluation of the program (2010-14)
![Page 3: Managing High Risk Young Persons in Social Welfare Institutions MultifunC](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56813bb1550346895da4e567/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
”Principles of effective intervention/treatment”
Andrews, Zinger, Hoge, Bonta, Gendrau og Cullen (1990).
Carleton University
![Page 4: Managing High Risk Young Persons in Social Welfare Institutions MultifunC](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56813bb1550346895da4e567/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Risk Principle: Intensivity of intervention should match individual risk level. Target high-risk offenders (those with many risk factors).
Risk Principle: Intensivity of intervention should match individual risk level. Target high-risk offenders (those with many risk factors).
Need Principle: Targets of interventions should be known dynamic risk factors (criminogenic needs).
Need Principle: Targets of interventions should be known dynamic risk factors (criminogenic needs).
Responsivity Principle: The intervention should bematched to the individual learning style. Use methods based oncognitive behaviour and social learning theory.
Responsivity Principle: The intervention should bematched to the individual learning style. Use methods based oncognitive behaviour and social learning theory.
![Page 5: Managing High Risk Young Persons in Social Welfare Institutions MultifunC](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56813bb1550346895da4e567/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
1. Target those offenders with high probability of recidivism (high risk).
2. Provide most intensive treatment and use most resources on high risk individuals.
3. Intensive treatment for low risk offenders can increase recidivism, specially if they are mixed with high risk offenders.
![Page 6: Managing High Risk Young Persons in Social Welfare Institutions MultifunC](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56813bb1550346895da4e567/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Forensic Adolescent Network. SAH. 3.10.08 Vizard, Mc Grory and Farmer 6
AdultOffending
Life-Course Persistent(High-risk)
Good Outcome
Adolescent Limited(Low-risk)
Infancy Childhood Adolescence Adulthood
‘Life-Course Persistent’ trajectory - early neuro-psychological and many environmental risk factors
Early differences in cognitive, behavioural and personality functioning. Similar presentation with ‘Adolescent Limited’ individuals during adolescent period. Adolescent Limited have few risk factors. Driven by antisocial peers.
Different needs!
Important differences between groups of children with antisocial behaviour (High risk and low risk)
Moffitt, 1993; Pardini and Frick, 2013Developmental Trajectories
![Page 7: Managing High Risk Young Persons in Social Welfare Institutions MultifunC](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56813bb1550346895da4e567/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
History of antisocial behaviour
Antisocial personality pattern
Antisocial cognition
The
“Big
Fou
r”
Ri
sk F
acto
rs
Antisocial associates
Family and/or marital
School and/or work
Leisure and/or recreation
The
“Cen
tral E
ight
” Risk
Fac
tors
Substance abuse
Major Risk Factors
![Page 8: Managing High Risk Young Persons in Social Welfare Institutions MultifunC](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56813bb1550346895da4e567/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Effects for low risk Effects for high risk
Matched with the same risk level in interventions outside institutions
![Page 9: Managing High Risk Young Persons in Social Welfare Institutions MultifunC](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56813bb1550346895da4e567/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Lowenkamp, Smith and Bechtel, 2007
![Page 10: Managing High Risk Young Persons in Social Welfare Institutions MultifunC](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56813bb1550346895da4e567/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Factor Risk Dynamic Need
History of Antisocial Early & continued Build noncriminal behaviour involvement in a number alternative behaviours
antisocial acts in risky situations
Antisocial personality Adventurous, pleasure Build problem-solving, self-seeking, weak self management,
anger mgt &control, restlessly coping skillsaggressive
Antisocial cognition Attitudes, values, beliefs Reduce antisocial cognition,
& rationalizations recognize risky thinking &
supportive of crime, feelings, build up alternative
cognitive emotional states less risky thinking & feelings
of anger, resentment, & Adopt a reform and/or
defiance anticriminal identity
Antisocial associates Close association with Reduce association w/ criminals & relative criminals, enhance isolation association w/
prosocial peoplefrom prosocial people
Adopted from Andrews, D.A. et al, (2006). The Recent Past and Near Future of Risk and/or Need Assessment. Crime and Delinquency, 52 (1).
![Page 11: Managing High Risk Young Persons in Social Welfare Institutions MultifunC](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56813bb1550346895da4e567/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Factor Risk Dynamic Need
Family Key elements are Reduce conflict, buildcaring, better positive relationships,
monitoring and/or communication, enhance supervision monitoring & supervision
School and/or work Low levels of performance Enhance performance,
& satisfaction rewards, & satisfaction
Leisure and/or recreation Low levels of involvement Enhance involvement & satisfaction in anti- & satisfaction in prosocialcriminal leisure activities activities
Substance Abuse Abuse of alcohol and/or Reduce SA, reduce the drugs personal & interpersonal
supports for SA behaviour,enhance alternatives to SA
Adopted from Andrews, D.A. et al, (2006). The Recent Past and Near Future of Risk and/or Need Assessment. Crime and Delinquency, 52 (1).
![Page 12: Managing High Risk Young Persons in Social Welfare Institutions MultifunC](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56813bb1550346895da4e567/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
The most effective interventions are behavioural
1. Focus on current factors that influence behaviour2. Action oriented (practical training)3. Offender behaviours are appropriately reinforced
The most effective behavioural models are
1. Social learning—practice new skills and behaviours
2. Cognitive behavioural approaches that target criminogenic needs
Slide 12
![Page 13: Managing High Risk Young Persons in Social Welfare Institutions MultifunC](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56813bb1550346895da4e567/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Adherence to Risk, Need, General Responsivity by Setting: Community Based versus Residential Programs
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
0 1 2 3
Residential
CommunityRec
idiv
ism
Source: Adopted from Andrews and Bonta (2006). The Psychology of Criminal Conduct (4 th). Newark: LexisNexis.
Decrease
Increase
# of Principles Adhered to in Treatment
![Page 14: Managing High Risk Young Persons in Social Welfare Institutions MultifunC](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56813bb1550346895da4e567/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
«A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of young offender treatment programmes in Europe» (Løsel et al., 2011).
Behavioural and cognitive behavioural treatments more effective than other types
Adherence to the principles of risk, need and responsivity (RNR) showed less re-offending than control group
![Page 15: Managing High Risk Young Persons in Social Welfare Institutions MultifunC](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56813bb1550346895da4e567/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
![Page 16: Managing High Risk Young Persons in Social Welfare Institutions MultifunC](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56813bb1550346895da4e567/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Balance between Structure and support (Gold and Balance between Structure and support (Gold and Osgood, 1992; Brown et al, 1998), control and Osgood, 1992; Brown et al, 1998), control and autonomy (Sinclair and Gibbs, 1998), effects of autonomy (Sinclair and Gibbs, 1998), effects of peer culture (Dodge, Dishion and Lansford, 2006), peer culture (Dodge, Dishion and Lansford, 2006), need of re-integration interventions and aftercare, need of re-integration interventions and aftercare, ((Altschüler, 2005; Liddle , 2002), fidelity..............fidelity..............………………………………
Liddle, 2002: Residential treatment needs to be understood as part of a continuum of services. The quality of the post-treatment environment--particularly relationships with family and non-criminal friends and involvement in school and pro-social activities--are critical predictors of recovery.
In addition to the work of the reaserchers from Carleton University,In addition to the work of the reaserchers from Carleton University,MultifunC is based on research on several other topics thatMultifunC is based on research on several other topics that
are important in residential treatment;are important in residential treatment;
In addition to the work of the reaserchers from Carleton University,In addition to the work of the reaserchers from Carleton University,MultifunC is based on research on several other topics thatMultifunC is based on research on several other topics that
are important in residential treatment;are important in residential treatment;
![Page 17: Managing High Risk Young Persons in Social Welfare Institutions MultifunC](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56813bb1550346895da4e567/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Influence of antisocial peers and antisocial peer cultures are important risk factors.
In residential settings an unintended consequence might be that the group might contribute to the development and maintenance of antisocial behaviour, and then to iatrogenic effects of the treatment (Dodge, Dishion and Lansford, 2006).
The risk of negative influence from antisocial peers implies that the period of time used in residential setting should be as short as possibly, and should be linked to community services and aftercare.
![Page 18: Managing High Risk Young Persons in Social Welfare Institutions MultifunC](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56813bb1550346895da4e567/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Lowenkamp and Latessa (2005): This question has already been answered. The core of aftercare programs should follow the basic tenets of effectice treatment programs.
Provide the most intensive aftercare programs to high risk juveniles.
Target risk factors on several domains; that means the juvenile, family, school or work, leisure time and friends!
![Page 19: Managing High Risk Young Persons in Social Welfare Institutions MultifunC](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56813bb1550346895da4e567/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Assessm
en
t
Transfer CommunityInstitution
Family
behaviour
School or work
Peers and leisure time
Other problems
Critical with aftercare and support outside residential placement
![Page 20: Managing High Risk Young Persons in Social Welfare Institutions MultifunC](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56813bb1550346895da4e567/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
The challenges in treatment of juvenile justice involved youth is not a result of a lack of knowledge. We now have research on best practices.
We have learned about the importance of advancing our work on an ecological platform and to target risk factors on several domains, better connecting youth to family, school and to pro-social peers while utilizing a strenght based approach.
The true challenge is not a lack of knowledge of what works, but rather in translating the robust body of knowledge into practice.
![Page 21: Managing High Risk Young Persons in Social Welfare Institutions MultifunC](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56813bb1550346895da4e567/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
A limitation of much of the existing research is that group care residential treatment is seen as a uniform costruct (James, 2011).
Most studies do not report on specific group care models, and provide only limited information on the type of group care.
There exists only a few such models (Teaching Family Model and Positive Peer Culture), and there is a need for developing models that is described, and then to evaluate the effects.
And that is what Norway and Sweden have done…….
![Page 22: Managing High Risk Young Persons in Social Welfare Institutions MultifunC](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56813bb1550346895da4e567/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Small units (8 juveniles in each unit)
Open institutions (non-secure). This does not mean that they are free to go………..
Located close to community services (school, leisure/recreation activities and communication /transport)
Makes it possibly to establish prosocial contacts, to be in
local schools, training in new skills in natural settings, and to maintain contact with family.
![Page 23: Managing High Risk Young Persons in Social Welfare Institutions MultifunC](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56813bb1550346895da4e567/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Juveniles with serious behaviour problems Juveniles with serious behaviour problems (crime, substance abuse, violence, etc.).(crime, substance abuse, violence, etc.).
High risk for future criminal behaviour High risk for future criminal behaviour (high total sum of risk factors – static and (high total sum of risk factors – static and dynamic)dynamic)
Before placement Before placement the Risk level is the Risk level is assessed assessed with the risk inventory with the risk inventory Youth Level of Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory Service/Case Management Inventory (YLS/CMI)(YLS/CMI)
Juveniles with serious behaviour problems Juveniles with serious behaviour problems (crime, substance abuse, violence, etc.).(crime, substance abuse, violence, etc.).
High risk for future criminal behaviour High risk for future criminal behaviour (high total sum of risk factors – static and (high total sum of risk factors – static and dynamic)dynamic)
Before placement Before placement the Risk level is the Risk level is assessed assessed with the risk inventory with the risk inventory Youth Level of Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory Service/Case Management Inventory (YLS/CMI)(YLS/CMI)
![Page 24: Managing High Risk Young Persons in Social Welfare Institutions MultifunC](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56813bb1550346895da4e567/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
• Prior and current offences/dispositions
• Family circumstances/parenting• Education/Employment• Peer relations• Substance abuse• Leisure/recreation• Personality/behaviour• Attitudes/orientation
![Page 25: Managing High Risk Young Persons in Social Welfare Institutions MultifunC](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56813bb1550346895da4e567/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Treatment
Targets
Treatment
Targets
•Behaviour
•Skills
•Attitudes
•Behaviour
•Skills
•Attitudes
Family
•Parental skills
•Communication
•Decrease antisocial
•Increase prosocial
•Decrease antisocial
•Increase prosocial
•Attendance
•Skills
•Behaviour
•Attendance
•Skills
•Behaviour
Peers
SchoolJuvenile
![Page 26: Managing High Risk Young Persons in Social Welfare Institutions MultifunC](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56813bb1550346895da4e567/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Residential / institution
Transition Reintegration / aftercareTreatment
JuvenileJuvenile
SchoolSchool
PeersPeers
FamilyFamily
Community
Focus of
treatment
Inntake
Motivation Motivation Prepare Family
Assesment Focused Treatment re-entry support
Structure Treatment climate
Motivation Motivation Prepare Family
Assesment Focused Treatment re-entry support
Structure Treatment climate
Duration of residential stay: Duration of aftercare:
about 6 months (not fixed) about 4-5 months (not fixed)
![Page 27: Managing High Risk Young Persons in Social Welfare Institutions MultifunC](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56813bb1550346895da4e567/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
For each juvenile there areTreatment teams across all teams including one or several staff from each team.
LeaderLeader
Assessment
and
Planning team
Assessment
and
Planning team
Mileau therapy
-team
Mileau therapy
-team
Educational/
Pedagogical
team
Educational/
Pedagogical
team
Family- and
After-care team
Family- and
After-care team
![Page 28: Managing High Risk Young Persons in Social Welfare Institutions MultifunC](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56813bb1550346895da4e567/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
The treatment mileau:Control where this is neccesary, but no unneccessary control Involvement of the juveniles wherever this is possiblyStructure, but not unneccessary structurePrinciples from ”Core correctional practice” - staff behaviour
Interventions with focus on individual juveniles:Motivating for change (based on Motivational Interviewing)Behavioural analysis and/or MST’s fit-cirkelContingency Management Systems/Tocen economy and
behavioural contractsAggression Replacement Training (ART)Weekly treatment goals and evaluation of progress
(intesivity)
The treatment mileau:Control where this is neccesary, but no unneccessary control Involvement of the juveniles wherever this is possiblyStructure, but not unneccessary structurePrinciples from ”Core correctional practice” - staff behaviour
Interventions with focus on individual juveniles:Motivating for change (based on Motivational Interviewing)Behavioural analysis and/or MST’s fit-cirkelContingency Management Systems/Tocen economy and
behavioural contractsAggression Replacement Training (ART)Weekly treatment goals and evaluation of progress
(intesivity)
![Page 29: Managing High Risk Young Persons in Social Welfare Institutions MultifunC](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56813bb1550346895da4e567/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Motivational interviewing is a directive, client-centered counseling style for eliciting behaviour change by helping clients to explore and resolve ambivalence.
Compared with nondirective counselling, it is more focused and goal-directed. The examination and resolution of ambivalence is its central purpose, and the counselor is intentionally directive in pursuing this goal.
![Page 30: Managing High Risk Young Persons in Social Welfare Institutions MultifunC](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56813bb1550346895da4e567/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Treatment levels & Contingency Treatment levels & Contingency ManagementManagement
Intensive TE
General TE
Individual TE
Contingency contract
CC (further) Family contract
Intake Residential treatment Re-entry Aftercare
![Page 31: Managing High Risk Young Persons in Social Welfare Institutions MultifunC](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56813bb1550346895da4e567/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Tocen economy and Motivational Interviewing motivates for change. The basis for actual change is new skills which makes changes possibly.
Aggression Replacement Training (ART) consists of a multimodal intervention design that combines: Training in control of aggression
(ACT), Training of social skills, andLearning of moral thinking
(Goldstein og Glick, 1994).
![Page 32: Managing High Risk Young Persons in Social Welfare Institutions MultifunC](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56813bb1550346895da4e567/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
School orwork
School orwork
YouthYouth
Family
team
Family
team
PeersPeers
ParentsParents
![Page 33: Managing High Risk Young Persons in Social Welfare Institutions MultifunC](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56813bb1550346895da4e567/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
FocusFocusIncreasing family Increasing family
affection/communication affection/communication
Increasing monitoring/supervision skillsIncreasing monitoring/supervision skills
Methods:Methods:Principles from Parental Management Principles from Parental Management
Training (PMT) during the residential Training (PMT) during the residential staystay
Principles from Multisystemic Therapy Principles from Multisystemic Therapy (MST) during leaves and aftercare(MST) during leaves and aftercare
FocusFocusIncreasing family Increasing family
affection/communication affection/communication
Increasing monitoring/supervision skillsIncreasing monitoring/supervision skills
Methods:Methods:Principles from Parental Management Principles from Parental Management
Training (PMT) during the residential Training (PMT) during the residential staystay
Principles from Multisystemic Therapy Principles from Multisystemic Therapy (MST) during leaves and aftercare(MST) during leaves and aftercare
![Page 34: Managing High Risk Young Persons in Social Welfare Institutions MultifunC](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56813bb1550346895da4e567/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Written Manuals for each topic (assessment, treatment, aftercare and so on) is included in the treatment model
Training program for staffs
Weekly phone-consultations with checklists and discussions with each institution
Regularly Boosters on spesific topics
![Page 35: Managing High Risk Young Persons in Social Welfare Institutions MultifunC](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56813bb1550346895da4e567/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Bergen Youth Centre
Stjørdal Youth Centre
Tromsø Youth Centre
Sandefjord Youth Centre Ås Youth Centre
Brätte-gården
The existing
MultifunC-
institutions
Råby Youth CentreTwo units in Denmark
![Page 36: Managing High Risk Young Persons in Social Welfare Institutions MultifunC](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56813bb1550346895da4e567/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
MultifunC will be presented in a chapter in a book in USA and England 2014: THERAPEUTIC RESIDENTIAL CARE WITH CHILDREN AND YOUTH, IDENTIFYING PROMISING PATHWAYS TO EVIDENCE-BASED INTERNATIONAL PRACTICE. Accepted for publication: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London, U.K. and Philadelphia,U.S.A. Edited by Whittaker, Fernandez del Valle and Holmes.
We have some guidelines from reserach, but there is no «Magic bullet» (Lipsey, 2007).
MultifunC will be presented in a chapter in a book in USA and England 2014: THERAPEUTIC RESIDENTIAL CARE WITH CHILDREN AND YOUTH, IDENTIFYING PROMISING PATHWAYS TO EVIDENCE-BASED INTERNATIONAL PRACTICE. Accepted for publication: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London, U.K. and Philadelphia,U.S.A. Edited by Whittaker, Fernandez del Valle and Holmes.
We have some guidelines from reserach, but there is no «Magic bullet» (Lipsey, 2007).
![Page 37: Managing High Risk Young Persons in Social Welfare Institutions MultifunC](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022070404/56813bb1550346895da4e567/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Target high risk juveniles:
► Adress both individual and contextual factors (criminogenic needs) including cognition, attitudes, education, peer associations, and family issues
► Are able to manage serious negatively behaviour (violence)
► Enhance intrinsic motivation through use of constructive communication, such as motivational interviewing
► Balance between control and autonomy ► Balance between structur and support► Systematic and structured training in social skills► Use cognitive behavioural techniques► Training in school or work► Are linked to community and help establish prosocial
contacts► Includes aftercare as an integrated part of the
intervention► Measures performance and use this information for
continuous improvement (quality assurance)