managing the environmental impacts of power canada europe roundtable for business toronto, 31 may...

11
Managing the Environmental Impacts of Power Canada Europe Roundtable for Business Toronto, 31 May 2005

Upload: tobias-wesley-cross

Post on 17-Jan-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Current Permitting Assignments  3000 MW nuclear power station restart and life extension  4 reactors in Ontario  570 MW natural gas generation station  Combined cycle station in Ontario  30 MW wind generation facility  20 turbines in Alberta  Hydrogen transportation network  Ontario

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Managing the Environmental Impacts of Power Canada Europe Roundtable for Business Toronto, 31 May 2005

Managing the Environmental Impacts of Power

Canada Europe Roundtable for BusinessToronto, 31 May 2005

Page 2: Managing the Environmental Impacts of Power Canada Europe Roundtable for Business Toronto, 31 May 2005

Canada Canada (1700)(1700)

South South Africa Africa (100)(100)

South South America America

(250)(250)

United States United States (850)(850)

Europe Europe (550)(550)

Asia Pacific Asia Pacific (550)(550)

More than 4,000 people, over 100 offices, 6 continents

Golder Associates – Global & Local

Page 3: Managing the Environmental Impacts of Power Canada Europe Roundtable for Business Toronto, 31 May 2005

Current Permitting Assignments

3000 MW nuclear power station restart and life extension

4 reactors in Ontario 570 MW natural gas generation station

Combined cycle station in Ontario 30 MW wind generation facility

20 turbines in Alberta Hydrogen transportation network

Ontario

Page 4: Managing the Environmental Impacts of Power Canada Europe Roundtable for Business Toronto, 31 May 2005

Current Trends & Issues Ontario Government mandate to shut down coal-fired

generating stations in by 2007 Ministry of Energy RFP for 300 MW renewable and 2400

MW conventional Mandate for some Privatisation of the Energy Sector in

Ontario Predicted electricity shortage for Ontario in the coming

years Concerns regarding nuclear power

Schedule and cost overruns Long-term management of nuclear waste

Sustainability – Long term trend towards electricity generation from renewable sources

Kyoto Accord - Mandate to reduce Global Greenhouse Gas emissions

Page 5: Managing the Environmental Impacts of Power Canada Europe Roundtable for Business Toronto, 31 May 2005

Environmental Assessment

Two environmental assessment regimes relevant to power projects

Provincial Environmental AssessmentEA required under the Ontario

Environmental Assessment Act, Electricity Projects Regulation 116/01

Federal Environmental AssessmentTriggers under the Canadian

Environmental Assessment Act include regulatory action, federal lands or federal money

Page 6: Managing the Environmental Impacts of Power Canada Europe Roundtable for Business Toronto, 31 May 2005

Provincial EA ProcessProvincial EA Process

Prepare Project Description

Apply Screening Criteria to IdentifyPotential Adverse Environmental Impacts

Prepare aScreening

Report

Notice of ProjectCommencement

Consultation with thePublic, First Nations and

Government Agencies

Notice ofCompletion30 Day Review

Assess Environmental ImpactsDevelop Appropriate Mitigation Measures

Significant Net Effects and/orNot All Concerns Resolved

Project Proceeds

No Significant Net EffectsAnd All Concerns Resolved

No Request forElevation of Project

Statement ofCompletion to MOEEnv. Review / Individual EA

Request forElevation of Project

Category ‘B’Category ‘B’EnvironmentalEnvironmentalScreening ProcessScreening Process

Typical time to complete EA is 12 months C of As obtained concurrently

Page 7: Managing the Environmental Impacts of Power Canada Europe Roundtable for Business Toronto, 31 May 2005

Federal EA Process

Typical time to complete EA is 12-24 months Licensing occurs concurrently, but is separate process

to EA

Page 8: Managing the Environmental Impacts of Power Canada Europe Roundtable for Business Toronto, 31 May 2005

Nuclear Power – Regulatory Framework

Single regulator – Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission

Well-defined regulatory regime – Nuclear Safety Control Act and Regulations

Cost recovery for regulatory activities Formal and extensive environmental

assessments required prior to regulatory decisions (Canadian Environmental Assessment Act)

EA and licensing experience with restarting shut down plants, using new fuel and life extension

Page 9: Managing the Environmental Impacts of Power Canada Europe Roundtable for Business Toronto, 31 May 2005

Ontario Nuclear Performance – Q1 2005

ReactorReactor Capacity (MW)Capacity (MW) Capacity Factor (%)Capacity Factor (%)Bruce 3 805 11.08

Bruce 4 805 99.67

Bruce 5 840 98.68

Bruce 6 840 81.33

Bruce 7 840 90.26

Bruce 8 840 100.19

Darlington 1 935 94.11

Darlington 2 935 84.33

Darlington 3 935 97.59

Darlington 4 935 99.34

Pickering 4 542 99.95

Pickering 5 540 44.57

Pickering 6 540 100.07

Pickering 7 540 93.77

Pickering 8 540 99.27

Total 11,412 86.3%

Page 10: Managing the Environmental Impacts of Power Canada Europe Roundtable for Business Toronto, 31 May 2005

Typical Project Concerns

Native prairie Migratory birds and bats Species at risk Land use Noise and visual impacts Tower stability Heritage resources

Page 11: Managing the Environmental Impacts of Power Canada Europe Roundtable for Business Toronto, 31 May 2005

Conclusion Need for electricity is evident (except to public) Renewables will not meet the need Community acceptability of coal plant phase-

out Regulatory approvals process is known and

workable for all sources Provincially imposed schedules for new plants However, Federal-Provincial jurisdictional

issues may be difficult Nuclear plants take a long time to come on

line Opposition to siting all types of facilities Best opportunities appear to be facilities sited

near/adjacent existing facilities