managing your environmental isolates - pda · pdf filesources of contamination common...
TRANSCRIPT
Good Testing Practices
“Good practice includes the periodic
challenge of media with low levels of
organisms. This includes USP indicator
organisms as well as normal flora.”
-U.S. Food and Drug Administration: “Guide to Inspections of
Microbiological Pharmaceutical Quality Control Laboratories” (1993)
Detection & Identification
It is important to know:
– What is in the cleanroom environment
– The effectiveness of cleaning
and sanitization procedures
– The source of the contaminate
Sources of Contamination
Common culprits:
– Personnel
– Air
– Water
– Processes
Case Studies of Microbial Contamination in Biologic
Product Manufacturing” Suvama, et al., American
Pharmaceutical Review, 2011.
Raw Materials
Personnel
Facility
Utilities
Equipment
Processes
Tracking and Trending
Effective tracking and trending
analysis is essential
– An early warning signal for system
failures
– Provides clues to contamination source
Is It Objectionable?
21 CFR 211.84(d)(6) “Each lot of a component, drug product container,
or closure with potential for microbiological contamination that
is objectionable in view of its intended use shall be subjected to
microbiological tests before use.”
21 CFR 211.113(a) “Appropriate written procedures, designed to
prevent objectionable microorganisms in drug products not required to
be sterile, shall be established and followed.”
21 CFR 211.165(b) “There shall be appropriate laboratory testing, as
necessary, of each batch of drug product required to be free of
objectionable microorganisms.”
“What is an Objectionable Organism?” Sutton, Scott, Ph.D., American
Pharmaceutical Review, October 2012.
Is It Objectionable?
Ultimately, the laboratory must determine if
the organism is objectionable
– Sterile vs. non-sterile products
– Intended use
– Intended recipient
– Intended route of administration
Managing Risk with Testing
Disinfectant Challenge Test
Growth Promotion Test
Antimicrobial Effectiveness Test
Disinfectant Challenge Testing
“…the most frequently isolated microorganisms from an
environmental monitoring program may be periodically
subjected to use-dilution testing with the agents used in the
disinfection program to confirm their susceptibility, as there
are real differences among
different species in resistance
to the lethal effects of
different sanitizers.”
– USP 38 <1072>
Disinfectants and Antiseptics, 2015
Selecting the Right Isolates for Disinfectant
Testing
Provide scientific rationale for the organisms used for your
testing
Choose strains that represent common organisms isolates
from the facility
Choose organisms that are common contaminates or high
risk for the products manufactured at the facility
Avoid unnecessary audit findings
Growth Promotion Testing
The media used in the following tests should be
capable of growing recommended indicator
organisms and environmental isolates
– Environmental monitoring
– Media fills
– Sterility Test
Growth Promotion Testing
“The growth promotion test is a procedure used to
demonstrate the media in the microbiological
environmental monitoring program or in media-fill runs, are
capable of supporting growth of indicator microorganism
and of environmental isolates from samples obtained
through the monitoring program or their
corresponding ATCC strains.”
– USP 38 <1116> Aseptic Processing
Environments, 2015
Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing
“The standard battery of challenge organisms… need not
prevent the inclusion of other species of microorganisms if
deemed useful to measure the biological activity of the
preservative system for a specific product.”– USP <51> Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing, 2015
Product
Product
Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing
Products of any category whose formulas establish more
extreme environmental conditions (pH, water activity, specific
formula conditions) may warrant addition of isolates capable of
survival if not growth under such extreme conditions allowing
measure of preservative efficacy versus intrinsic hostility.
– Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing: Culture Selection and Inoculum Preparation,
Phil Geiss, 2013
Why Use Environmental Isolates?
Environmental isolates may be more resistant to
disinfectants because they adapt to the
environment and limited nutrients
The isolates may need special conditions to grow
Isolates can be harder to detect in
your product
Wild Strains versus Domesticated
Strains
“Wild microorganisms are able to modify their
properties according to their nutrient supply
(for example, phase variation in bacteria) and,
in particular, are able to adapt to limited nutrients.”– Multicellular microorganisms: laboratory versus nature, Zdena Palková, EMBO Reports, 2004
“There is a strong argument that environmental isolates are
the best challenge to media and for validation studies like
sterility test validation. They are the most sensitive micro-
organisms, having become recently exposed to
disinfectants, particular soils etc.”– The Use of Environmental Isolates, Tim Sandle, Pharmaceutical Microbiology blog, January 10,
2010
Preserving Isolate Options
Short-Term Preservation Methods
Long-Term Preservation Methods
Professional Preservation Services
Short-Term Preservation Methods
Preservation Method Pros Cons
Sub-culturing/
Refrigeration
+ Low tech - Highest risk of mutation
- Risk of contamination
- Must remain within 5 passages per
USP
Sub-zero Freezing
(-20°C)
+ Viability can be
maintained for 1-2 yrs.
- Ice crystals and electrolyte
fluctuations can damage organism
- Risk of contamination
- Freezer cost and maintenance
Long-Term Preservation Methods
Preservation
Method
Pros Cons
Ultra-low Freezing
Cryogenic Freezing
+ Reduces probability of
mutation
+ Longer survival rate
- Labor intensive
- Costly
- Must closely monitor temperature
- Vulnerable to power outages and
failures
Lyophilization + Reduced risk of intracellular
ice crystallization; halts all
enzymatic and non-enzymatic
reactions
+ Easy storage
- Requires specialized equipment
- Labor intensive
- Experimentation required; strains
react differently to process
Professional Preservation Services
Turn-key processes for isolate
management
– Isolate identification
– Isolate manufacturing
– Isolate storage
Characterization and seed preparation
Customized format
production
Shipping,
distribution and storage
Step 1: Characterization and Pre-
production
Strain characterization
Determine final isolate specifications for
testing
– Media and conditions should
be mimicked
– Packaging needs
– Distribution requirements
Establish a project timeline
Step 2: Production
Seed stock is established
3-phase quality control checks
– Before preservation
– After preservation
– After packaging
Seed stock for storage
and future useStock for immediate
production
Step 3: Certificates and Reports
Certificate of Analysis– Mean Assay Value and statistics
– Complete DNA sequencing report
– Organisms identification
– Biochemical testing results
Step 4: Shipping and Storage
Isolate is packaged,
shipped and distributed
Isolates are maintained
for future use
Cost Analysis for Outsourcing
Costs of Manual PrepLabor (hrs x wages)
- Handling isolates
- Quantitating samples
- Identification for mutation
- QC for contamination
- Record keeping for audits
Freezer
3rd party identification
Laboratory supplies
Costs of OutsourcingProject price
Identification (included)
Maintenance & storage
(included)
Vs.Higher Cost Lower Cost
Considerations for Outsourcing
Accreditation
Experience
Test-ready format options
Quality reputation
Finished goods storage
Technical support and service
Distribution options
Product warranty
Final Thoughts
All environmental isolates pose
risk in aseptic manufacturing
Current regulations require the
use of isolates in testing
Managing isolates can be difficult
and expensive, but there are
accredited providers to help
Contact Info
Kelly Hedlund
Midwest Regional Sales Manager Territory - IL, IN, MI, MN, ND, OH, WI
Cell: 320-249-4761
Email: [email protected]
Website: www.microbiologics.com/custom-solutions