manet and degas both depicted well-known women impressionists

Women and Impressionism (DO3C331LE): Assignment 1 16 May, 2004

page 1 of 16

Manet and Degas both depicted well-known women Impressionists.What kinds of images did they produce and what do these

suggest about women’s place in the Impressionist group andtheir broader social and artistic roles?

When the biographical details of Manet, Degas, and the women Impressionists whom they painted are

considered, the way in which they chose to depict the women whom they clearly respected is surprising.

As members of a group of artists whose work and personality clearly influenced each other it is

interesting to note that Manet’s initial contact with Berthe Morisot and Eva Gonzalès was with them as

models. Manet became a close friend of the Morisot after she posed for his picture The Balcony in 1868,

and she later married his brother in 1874 (Denvir, 1987:42). After The Balcony Manet went on to paint

several works over the next few years with Morisot as the subject. He met Eva Gonzalès a year later in

1869 when she became “first his model and then his student” (Garb, 2004:1).

Unlike Manet, Degas had acknowledged the American born Mary Cassatt as an artist before she modelled

for him; she exhibited with the Impressionists at their fourth annual exhibition after her works had been

rejected by the Salons in 1875 and 1877 (Mathews, 2004:1). They remained close friends and she often

modelled for him, although in several of the works she remains anonymous (Pool, 1967:146ff).

The Balcony, for which Morisot modelled, is both the earliest and most well known of the depictions of

any of the women Impressionists and it is an interesting picture in that the overall construction is not

dissimilar to many of Morisot’s own works. As in so many of her pictures the women are placed behind a

physical barrier, in this case the rail, confining them to their private sphere while other figures, in this

instance Manet as the painter and the viewer, are in the public space. Morisot is the seated figure and her

gaze is away from the artist into the distance unlike the other woman who looks straight ahead. Had it not

been for this distracted stare the picture’s subject would be unremarkable: the figures are all well dressed

and exhibiting the trimmings of refinement. When the picture was first shown in 1869, the phrase “femme

fatale” (Denvir 1987:43), suggesting a dangerously attractive woman, was used in relation to the painting


page 2 of 16

which, as is so frequently the case, highlights the emphasis on the work being for a male viewer and

disregarding the subjects’ identity.

Morisot’s distant expression can also be seen in Manet’s Repose (1869-70) as she stares past the artist,

possibly towards, as it could feel to the spectator, the door from the room. The setting for this picture is

indoors and she is seated on a luxuriously coloured and padded couch, firmly situated in her domestic

world. Her position emphasises the private nature of the picture as it would be considered too slovenly for

a woman in public; indeed a contemporary reviewer described it as a “dishevelled manner” and

questioned why Manet chose to portray her in that way (Gaulois 1873).

In both The Balcony and Repose Morisot is shown holding a fan, and this motif is clearly elaborated on in

Berthe Morisot with a Fan (1872) where her face is covered with a, now open, fan. This is a far darker

picture: with the exception of her shoes she is dressed in black, and the viewer is unable to see her face.

The situation is far sparser with its plain background and upright chair, and there are no indications of the

opulence seen in the earlier paintings.

These three paintings are impersonal and with the subject’s distant look and hidden face they could be

perceived as making the viewer feel awkward and out of place, as the women Impressionists, female

professional artists, themselves were seen by contemporary Parisian society as being. In a dramatic

contrast to these, Manet’s other paintings of Morisot portray what appears to be a woman of different

character.

In Berthe Morisot au bouquet de violettes (1872) although she is clothed in black the neutral background

detracts from it and makes the effect of wearing the mourning dress questionable. She is dressed to go

out, away from the private domain of the home and into the public spaces usually unavailable to

unaccompanied women. Although she is looking directly at the painter, she still has a distant look in her


page 3 of 16

eyes, but they seem to be focussed within the painter or viewer rather than on escaping the domesticity of

the other settings.

The two portraits of 1873 seem to be intimate encounters with Morisot rather than posed pictures. The

way in which she is adjusting her dress in the watercolour makes this image more photographic and

captures an instant giving a view that Schapiro describes as giving “the momentary position of the casual

or mobile spectator” (1937:1). The Portrait de Berthe Morisot étendue shows a direct, almost erotic

engagement between the subject and artist and, regardless of the austere setting and dark clothes,

Morisot’s outlook seems to be more confident with an expression seemingly challenging the

contemporary subdominant position of women in society.

Manet’s Portrait of Eva Gonzalès (1870) is a very different picture as it portrays an artist working rather

than showing her in a general domestic environment. However, the ridiculousness of the scene is almost

immediately apparent as her dress and general demeanour are inappropriate to the task in hand, her

physical position would make it impossible to paint, and the fact that the painting on which she is

apparently working is already framed seems to make a mockery of the situation. The subject of her

painting is telling in that it is a still life, and enforces the fact that women could only paint as a hobby or

pastime. As with the earlier pictures of Morisot she is not involved with either her work or the artist,

rather she is looking distantly out the picture. The entire scene is posed for the male viewer, it is the

woman who is clearly lit, not the picture on which she is working, and she is dressed like an angelic

figure who could be viewed conforming to the female stereotype as an ‘angel of the studio’. Garb

describes the painting as “invok[ing] the nineteenth century stereotype of the ‘lady amateur’ and bel[ying]

the seriousness of Gonzalès’s attitude to art” (2004:1).

The Portrait of Mary Cassatt by Degas shows the subject dressed in outdoor clothes, but her demeanour

is wistful and her expression is one of distraction which does not convey the implicit challenge to

woman’s place in society as Monet’s similar portrait of Berthe Morisot au bouquet de violettes does. The


page 4 of 16

paintings of Cassatt and Cassatt with her sister in the Louvre are very similar although they are separated

by five years. Both show female figures engaged in the ladylike pursuit of visiting the Louvre and the

paintings’ constructions are similar as in both the standing subject has their back to the artist, and the

seated figure has her face hidden by a book and her headgear. This lack of identity is telling in that,

without the title, the models could be anyone and their direct link with art, or more specifically the

Impressionists, is irrelevant. Indeed Degas told a friend that he wanted the 1880 painting “to show ‘a

women’s crushed respect and absence of all feeling in the presence of art’” (Poole, 1967:148) and the

impression of being crushed from above can be seen in the differing angles of the standing woman’s

body. If this was the purpose of the painting it emphasises the lack of importance of the model’s identity

beyond that fact they are female, but more interestingly it creates an uncomfortable dichotomy between

Degas’s noted friendship with Cassatt and his apparent opinion of her understanding of and attitude

towards art. A further tension can be seen in the fact that Degas was a keen supporter of Morisot and felt

that she was too important an artist for the Impressionists to be without.

Although the Louvre was a public space the later painting with her sister includes a door frame or pillar

which gives the work a voyeuristic feel as if the artist, and therefore viewer, is intruding into the private

world of the Cassatts and their trip to the gallery. This sense of the private world echoes the domestic

situation in which women were conventionally trapped extending to all of their activities.

With the exception of the Portrait of Eva Gonzalès none of the paintings of the female Impressionists

give any indication that the subjects were artists; considering Gonzalès’s impractical attire and ludicrous

positioning for painting the model for the painting could easily have been anyone. In a similar way the

model for Manet’s Berthe Morisot with a Fan need not have been her as the figure is only identified by

the painting’s title which suggests the possible importance of the subject despite the depiction of

anonymity. Cassatt’s anonymous appearances, such as Degas’s milliner, have already been alluded to and

this lack of identity conforms to the contemporary view of the relative unimportance of women within

society.


page 5 of 16

By creating art works which implicitly conform to stereotypical views of society Manet and Degas could

perhaps be seen to be endorsing the conservatism of the epoch, rather than trying to create something

wholly original and challenging as the Impressionist movement was perceived to be doing. It is

interesting to note that Degas rejected the epithet “Impressionist”, preferring to see himself as a “‘Realist’

or ‘Naturalist’ painter … [and] a keen observer of everyday life” (Monnier 2004:3) a label which suggests

that in his art his “tendency to regard things as they really are” (OED 1989: realism 2) provides an

accurate representation of the way in which women were treated in nineteenth century Paris.

(1613 words)


page 6 of 16

Bibliography and References

Denvir, B (ed) (1987) The Impressionists at First Hand London: Thames and Hudson Ltd

Farwell, B (2004) ‘Manet, Edouard’ in The Grove Dictionary of Art Online (http://www.groveart.com)

Garb, T (2004) ‘Gonzalès, Eva’ in The Grove Dictionary of Art Online (http://www.groveart.com)

Garb, T (2004a) ‘Morisot, Berthe’ in The Grove Dictionary of Art Online (http://www.groveart.com)

reviewer in the Gaulois (1873) quoted in Shennan, M (1996) The First Lady of Impressionism Stroud: Sutton Publishing

House, J ‘Realism and Impressionism’ in Hooker, D (ed) (1994) History of Western Art London: Boxtree Ltd

Mathews, NM (2004a) ‘Cassatt, Mary’ in The Grove Dictionary of Art Online (http://www.groveart.com)

Monnier, G (2004) ‘Degas, Edgar’ in The Grove Dictionary of Art Online (http://www.groveart.com)

Oxford English Dictionary (1989) ‘realism’(http://dictionary.oed.com/cgi/entry/00198438?single=1&query_type=word&queryword=realism&edition=2e)

Parker, R and Pollock, G (1981) Old Mistresses: Women, Art and Ideology London: Routledge & Kegan Paul

Pollock, G (1998) Mary Cassatt: Painter of Modern Women London: Thames & Hudson

Pool, P (1967) Impressionism London: Thames and Hudson Ltd

Schapiro, M (1937) ‘The Nature of Abstract Art’ in Marxist Quarterly 1 quoted onhttp://www.udel.edu/ArtHistory/werth/courses/154/slide16.htm (University of Delaware)


page 7 of 16

Manet: The Balcony (1868)


page 8 of 16

Manet: Repose (Berthe Morisot) (1869-1870)


page 9 of 16

Manet: Berthe Morisot with a Fan (1872)


page 10 of 16

Manet: Berthe Morisot au bouquet de violettes (1872)


page 11 of 16

Manet: Portrait of Berthe Morisot (1873)


page 12 of 16

Manet: Portrait de Berthe Morisot étendue (1873)


page 13 of 16

Manet: Portrait of Eva Gonzalez (1870)


page 14 of 16

Degas: Portrait of Mary Cassatt (ca. 1880-1884)


page 15 of 16

Degas: Mary Cassatt at the Louvre (1880)


page 16 of 16

Degas: Mary Cassatt and her sister at the Louvre (1885)

manet and degas both depicted well-known women impressionists

Documents