map constraint for abstraction
DESCRIPTION
Presented at IFAW 2012 in Tel Aviv, August 1.TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
![Page 2: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
No need to take notes :^o
You can download this powerpoint(and many more)
from
http://www.core.kochi-tech.ac.jp/hunter/or
http://www.slideshare.net/rolenzo
![Page 3: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Dimensions of Media Object Compehensibility
Lawrie HunterKochi University of Technologyhttp://www.core.kochi-tech.ac.jp/hunter/
KUT
Island of Shikoku
![Page 4: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
KUT TAW scenario
Since 2002: - Japanese government scholarships
- for foreign students - in technical doctoral programmes.
! Graduation requirements:
- 2+ refereed papers in top journals- dissertation in English
Further L2 acquisition to the point of near-independence during the study period is NOT a realistic strategy.
![Page 5: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
SCENARIO
ESPESP
EAPEAP
EAPHUMANITIES
EAPHUMANITIESTAWTAW
EXEX EYEY EZEZ
English for specific purposesEnglish for academic purposesTechnical academic writing
![Page 6: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
![Page 7: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
TAW best practice
Niche languageacquisition to near-independencein TAW
Writing workfocusing on argument andinfo-structures
Training in use of language models:Style Dossier
Preparationfor work withan editor
Preparationfor work witha mentor
![Page 8: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Obstacles to technical EAP learning and skills development Academic English writing typically presents serious difficulties for East Asian students in PhD engineering programs.
1. Weak skills in writing everyday English make a fragile foundation for the learning of formal academic English (FAE).
2. The development of foundation grammar and syntax knowledge does not lead naturally or smoothly to FAE writing knowledge and skill.
3. For students from most East Asian cultures, articulate argument is new cultural territory.
![Page 9: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Using a text-based charting approach, the subjects successfully separated persuasive from information-bearing text.
Of course the mapping approach is not essential to the acquisition of that skill.
Previous study: using Cmap constraint to constrain text analysis
![Page 10: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Possible view of TAW:1. Process
obey usage conventionsobey other conventions
![Page 11: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Possible TAW teaching approaches: 1. Parallel process
research design/results
argument supporting claim
document format
usage/convention
grammar/surface features
![Page 12: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
grammar/surface features
usage/convention
document format
argumentsupporting claim
12
Possible teaching approaches2. layer view
research design/results
![Page 13: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
grammar/surface features
usage/convention
document format
argumentsupporting claim
13
Possible TAW teaching approaches2. layer view
research design/results
most TAW writers start writing here
(simulacrum of argument)
RP language generation should start here
most TAWprograms work here
![Page 14: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Task type: infer research design from casual register report
In an exercise aimed at developing awareness of argument and research design issues, students were required to
infer the details of the research design of a study from a popular-science report of that study.
![Page 15: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Problem 1:
Writing task focus: isolation of argument
How to get the learner to isolate argument?
![Page 16: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Trial pre-task: Text-based task Using a text-based, genre conversion approach, few of the control group students could produce complete, logically structured abstact summaries.
![Page 17: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Question:
Writing task focus: isolation of argument
How to constrain text analysis
-to get the learner to isolate argument?
![Page 18: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Citation as subject Results as subject Claim as subject
claims (that)
proposes (that)
implies (that)
suggests (that)
infers (that)
observes (that)
reveals (that)
demonstrates (that)
indicates (that) disproves
proves (that)
implies (that)
is supported by
is contradicted by
is in agreement with
is in opposition to
assumes (that)
Answer:Limit verb choice in writingto some distinguishing lexical units of the meta-discourse of the scientific method (or engineering research design)
![Page 19: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Citation as subject Results as subject Claim as subject
claims (that)
proposes (that)
implies (that)
suggests (that)
infers (that)
observes (that)
reveals (that)
demonstrates (that)
indicates (that) disproves
proves (that)
implies (that)
is supported by
is contradicted by
is in agreement with
is in opposition to
assumes (that)
Task 1:Subjects were asked to write summaries of the imagined abstract of a casual register article,using only the verbs below.
![Page 20: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Task 1 results:
Most students' summary abstracts -were structurally flawed, -had sequencing problems and -had missing links in rhetorical chains.
![Page 21: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Problem 2:
What other-medium intervention will bring about improved structure and chain completeness in learner writing?
Trial: use graphical media-e.g. Novakian mapping
![Page 22: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Background: depending on the link type, there are 3 main kinds of maps:
1. Associational (mind maps)2. Directed link (Inspiration maps)3. Textured directed link
1. Text labels on links (Novakian)2. Non-verbal links (e.g. ISmaps
![Page 23: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Joseph Novak: Concept mapping
INVERTEBRATE
ANIMALS
VERTEBRATE
can be
MARINETERRESTRIAL
e.g. crabs, lobsters
e.g. beetles,flies
FEATHERSFUR
e.g. robins, penguins
e.g. sheep,cats
MORE
SPECIFIC
COLDBLOODED
ARTHROPODS WARMBLOODED
can be insulated with
aremostly can be
This slide courtesy of Ian Kinchin
![Page 24: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
When is a map Novakian?“The basic Novakian concept map... usually starts with a general concept at the top of the map, and then works its way down ... to more specific concepts.
Abrams, R. An Overview of Concept Mapping. In Meaningful Learning: A Collaborative Literature Review of Concept Mapping. Retrieved March 18, 2008 at http://www2.ucsc.edu/mlrg/clr-conceptmapping.html
![Page 25: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
When is a map Novakian?
Abrams, R. An Overview of Concept Mapping. In Meaningful Learning: A Collaborative Literature Review of Concept Mapping. Retrieved March 18, 2008 at http://www2.ucsc.edu/mlrg/clr-conceptmapping.html
Concepts are placed in [boxes]...
“The basic Novakian concept map... usually starts with a general concept at the top of the map, and then works its way down ... to more specific concepts.
![Page 26: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
When is a map Novakian?
Abrams, R. An Overview of Concept Mapping. In Meaningful Learning: A Collaborative Literature Review of Concept Mapping. Retrieved March 18, 2008 at http://www2.ucsc.edu/mlrg/clr-conceptmapping.html
Concepts are placed in [boxes]... Lines are drawn from a concept to a linking word to a concept.
“The basic Novakian concept map... usually starts with a general concept at the top of the map, and then works its way down ... to more specific concepts.
![Page 27: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
When is a map Novakian?
Abrams, R. An Overview of Concept Mapping. In Meaningful Learning: A Collaborative Literature Review of Concept Mapping. Retrieved March 18, 2008 at http://www2.ucsc.edu/mlrg/clr-conceptmapping.html
Concepts are placed in [boxes]... Lines are drawn from a concept to a linking word to a concept. Sequences of concepts and linking words do not always form grammatically correct sentences.”
“The basic Novakian concept map... usually starts with a general concept at the top of the map, and then works its way down ... to more specific concepts.
![Page 29: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
![Page 30: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Novakian maps (Novak & Cañas, 2006) can be used at any level of abstraction.
Argument mapping
Information structure mapping
Syntactic mapping
Grammatical mapping (pseudo)
Association mapping
![Page 31: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Novakian links:
-verbs (concept maps)
-logical connectors (ISmaps)
-communication moves (rhetoric maps)
-argument communication moves (argument maps)
![Page 32: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
So then, problem 2:
What other-medium intervention will bring about improved structure and chain completeness in learner writing?
Trial: use graphical media-e.g. Novakian mapping-somehow constrain map structure. -somehow constrain map content.
![Page 33: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Task 2:Experimental task: Pre-writing step As a pre-writing step, constrained-link Novakian concept maps were used to express the content of the source article.
Subjects were asked to create Novakian maps summarizing the imagined abstract of a casual register article,using only the listed lexical units as link relations.
Citation as subject Results as subject Claim as subject
claims (that)
proposes (that)
implies (that)
suggests (that)
infers (that)
observes (that)
reveals (that)
demonstrates (that)
indicates (that) disproves
proves (that)
implies (that)
is supported by
is contradicted by
is in agreement with
is in opposition to
assumes (that)
![Page 34: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Task 2:Mapping task (with constraints) 1. Map link relations were restricted to those in the provided verb list.
2. Number of nodes was constrained (max 10).
3. Top-down visual metaphor was imposed.
![Page 35: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Task 2:Mapping task with constraints 1. Map link relations were restricted to those in the provided verb list.
2. Number of nodes was constrained (max 10).
3. Top-down visual metaphor was imposed.
Task 2:Experimental task: writing step Subjects were asked to write summaries of the content of the source article, working from their constrained-link Novakian concept maps.
![Page 36: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Task 2 observations:
Most experimental group students were successful in generating;
(a) an accurate detailed graphical characterization of the study; and
(b) a FAE written expression of that characterization.
![Page 37: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37
Mapping abstract vs text abstract
1 MappingSubjects 13Dyads 6.9/subjectDyads with non-list labels 0.8/subjectMisuses of linking phrases 2.85/subject
2 TextSubjects 9Sentences 3.55/subjectSentences with non-list relations 0.44/subjectMisuses of linking phrases 0.77/subject
![Page 38: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Task 2 observations Most experimental group students were successful in generating
(a) an accurate detailed graphical characterization of the study; and(b) a FAE written expression of that characterization.
Here concept maps appear to constitute an instance of what Tifi (2010) calls a plane of greater generality.
![Page 39: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
Conclusions
The value of the mapping approach in argument analysis:
1. visual accessibility of the representation of text structure
2. forced articulation of relations between argument elements
3. faster performance (lower cognitive load?) than in text approach
![Page 40: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
40
Conclusions
Informal observation of learner behavior in constrained-link scenarios suggests that
Constraining link content can lead TAW learners to accurate, minimal summarization of the arguments in TAW text WITHOUT INSTRUCTION.
![Page 41: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Parallel case: Tifi (2010)
A problem in a frame, and the need to move to a different frame where the problem could be solved with the students' inner resources –
it is necessary to transit through a 'plane of higher generality' to get from the impeding frame to the enabling one.
Problem Xnot solvablein frame A
![Page 42: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Parallel case: Tifi (2010)
A problem in a frame, and the need to move to a different frame where the problem could be solved with the students' inner resources –
it is necessary to transit through a 'plane of higher generality' to get from the impeding frame to the enabling one.
Problem Xnot solvablein frame A
Problem Xsolvable
in frame B
![Page 43: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
43
noaccess<----->
Parallel case: Tifi (2010)
A problem in a frame, and the need to move to a different frame where the problem could be solved with the students' inner resources –
it is necessary to transit through a 'plane of higher generality' to get from the impeding frame to the enabling one.
Problem Xnot solvablein frame A
Problem Xsolvable
in frame B
![Page 44: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
44
Parallel case: Tifi (2010)
A problem in a frame, and the need to move to a different frame where the problem could be solved with the students' inner resources –
it is necessary to transit through a 'plane of higher generality' to get from the impeding frame to the enabling one.
Problem Xnot solvablein frame A
Problem Xsolvable
in frame B
Plane ofhigher
generality
![Page 45: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
45
Speculation re Tifi (2010):Then in Hunter's
'infer the argument of a poorly reported study' exercise:
1 the challenge: to pinpoint the specs of the study
2 the output: to write those specs in FAE
3 the catch: only when the specs are couched in FAE can the students pinpoint them, since they lack grounding in research design/scientific method
![Page 46: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
46
Speculation re Tifi (2010):Then in Hunter's
'infer the argument of a poorly reported study' exercise:
4 the plane of greater generality: the concept map of the research design and results. If lean enough, this map will embody the specs - and the students can in fact arrive at a consensus as to how the map must look.
Is it true then that the visual (more abstract/non-syntactic) representation is somehow supporting thought that text work does not readily support?
![Page 47: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
47
Speculation:RE: the success of mapping as an inroad to analysis of argument.
Does constrained mapping constitute what Tifi (2010) calls“a plane of higher generality” -linking the structure of the argument tothe structure of the abstract?
ARGUMENTin study A,implied in narrative M
ConstrainedCmap
ARGUMENTin study A,explicit in summary S
![Page 48: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Task 2 interpretation
Some sources that may provide an interpretive scaffolding that can in turn to some extent account for the success of this use of constrained Novakian maps.
![Page 49: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
49
Leading the learner to create an abstract argument analysis.
Why?: does using Cmap constraint enable argument analysis?
Argument mapping
Information structure mapping
Syntactic mapping
Grammatical mapping (pseudo)
Association mapping
![Page 50: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Findings of Vancouver study
reaction timedecision errors
reaction to video of tennis strokes
reaction to videoof tennis strokes
random noise
at time of stroke
<
Vancouver study
play video clips
tennisstrokesto right or left
tennis strokesto right or left
subjects quicklydecide
measurereaction time,correctness
randomnoisewith
stroke
ISmaps with rhetorical frames:argument in Sinnett (2010)
Background
complaints aboutgrunting
in pro tennis
study of response
time in tennis
hunter systems
Target behavior?
![Page 51: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
GroundsGrounds ModalityModality Claim
WarrantWarrant
BackingBacking
since
on account of
Toulmin model of argument
Target behavior?
![Page 52: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
GroundsGrounds ModalityModality Claim
WarrantWarrant
BackingBacking
RebuttalRebuttal
since
on account of
unless
Enhanced Toulmin model of argument
Target behavior?
![Page 53: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Receiver makes more errors and is
slowersince
because
unlessWhite noise in video caused reaction error and slowness
Server grunts during service
in tennis
Video reaction is not
equivalent to tennis reactionWhite noise
has the same effect as grunting
It is highly likely that
Toulmin model of argument in Sinnett (2010)
Target behavior?
![Page 54: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Citation as subject Results as subject Claim as subject
claims (that)
proposes (that)
implies (that)
suggests (that)
infers (that)
observes (that)
reveals (that)
demonstrates (that)
indicates (that) disproves
proves (that)
implies (that)
is supported by
is contradicted by
is in agreement with
is in opposition to
assumes (that)
Novakian map links constrained to confine map content to argument discourse
![Page 55: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Sinnett (2010)Sinnett (2010)
claims that
is supported by
assumes that
White noise is equivalent to
grunts
Server grunts during service in tennis cause
receiver slowness and
error
Video reaction is equivalent to
tennis reaction
Subject error and slowness in video
response with white noise bursts
Constrained Novakian
rhetoric map of argument in
Sinnett (2010)
Target behavior
![Page 56: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
56
Arguably important direction
"Tomorrow's literacies... need to be process and systems literacies.”
-John Thackara,
In the Bubble: Designing in a complex world.MIT Press 2005.
![Page 57: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
57
Zoom out: future hegemonies in the expression of argument?
1 The transient mashup (database/new media, Manovich )
The end of the hegemony of narrative? (enter the hegemony of neutrality of data?)
2 Ontology based research writing (Robot Scientist)
![Page 58: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
58
Recent shifts in journal convention
For decades: -document structure as a simulacrum of argument
-depersonalization as rigor in argument
-recently: the return of first person narrative
Shifting sands: return to narrative
![Page 59: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
References/sources
Chandler, P. and J. Sweller (1992) The split-attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology 62: 233-246.CmapTools. Institute for Human & Machine Cognition. http://cmap.ihmc.us/
Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept maps and Vee diagrams: Two metacognitive tools for science and mathematics education. Instructional Science, 19, 29-52. Tifi, A. (2010) The long way to deep understanding. In Concept maps: Making learning meaningful. Proc. of 4th Int. Conference on Concept Mapping. Key words: technical academic writing, EAP, argument, summarization, concept mapping, Novakian mapping
![Page 60: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Constrained-link concept mapping as an inroad to abstract writing Academic English writing typically presents serious difficulties for East Asian students in PhD engineering programs. Weak skills in writing everyday English make a fragile foundation for the learning of formal academic English (FAE). As well, for students from most East Asian cultures, formal argument is new cultural territory. The development of foundation grammar and syntax knowledge does not lead naturally or smoothly to FAE writing knowledge and skill. In an exercise aimed at developing awareness of argument and research design issues, students were required to infer the details of a research design of a given study from a popular-science report of that study. Using a text-based, genre conversion approach, few of the control group students could produce complete, logically structured inferences. When, in a pre-writing step, constrained-link Novakian concept maps were used to express the content of the source article, most experimental group students were successful in generating (a) an accurate detailed graphical characterization of the study; and (b) a FAE expression of that characterization. Here concept maps appear to constitute an instance of what Tifi (2010) calls a plane of greater generality. The set of relations used to constrain the Novakian maps of the content of an imagined study were the distinguishing lexical units of the discourse of the scientific method (or research design). This paper examines some sources that may provide an interpretive scaffolding that can in turn to some extent account for the success of this use of constrained Novakian maps.
![Page 61: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Secondary references Cañas, A. J., & Novak, J.D. (2006) Re-examining the foundations for effective use of concept maps. In Cañas, A. J., & Novak, J.D. (Eds.), Concept Maps: Theory, Methodology, Technology. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Concept Mapping. 494-502.Dansereau, D.F. (2005) Node-Link Mapping Principles for Visualizing Knowledge and Information. In Tergan, S. and Keller, T. (Eds.) Node-Link Mapping Principles for Visualizing Knowledge and Information. Springer. 61-81.Horn, R. E. (2001) Knowledge mapping for complex social messes. A presentation to the “Foundations in the Knowledge Economy” at the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, July 16, 2001. Downloaded April 8, 2008 from http://www.stanford.edu/~rhorn/a/recent/spchKnwldgPACKARD.pdfHunter, L. (2002) Information structure diagrams as link icons. Learning Technology 4(3) July 2002. ISSN 1438-0625. 2002. http://lttf.ieee.org/learn_tech/issues/july2002/index.html#1Jonassen, D.H., Cernusca, D., Ionas, I.G. (2006). Constructivism and instructional design: The emergence of the learning sciences and design research. In R. Reiser & J. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology. Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice-Hall.Moffett, J. (1992). Detecting growth in language. New Hampshire: Boynton/Cook.Mohan, B.A. (1986) Language and content. Addison-Wesley.
![Page 62: Map constraint for abstraction](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022061120/546c18f8af7959d3168b4dc9/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
RegisterRegister FAEFAE
UsageUsage
DossierDossier
AbstractAbstractNominalizationNominalization
ParallelismParallelism
Readability
Readability
Communication moves
Communication moves
HedgingHedging
ClaimClaim
ArgumentArgument
ArgumentArgument
CitationCitation
ParaphrasingParaphrasing
PlagiarismPlagiarism
SummarySummary
CohesionCohesion
ConjunctionsConjunctions
Logic linksLogic links
CoherenceCoherence