2013D A T A

ForewordThis 9th edition of the Barometer of the As-

sociation of European Metropolitan Transport

Authorities (EMTA) managed by focusing on

key parameters to add particular value to

what transport authorities consider their key

indicators. The Barometer 2013 is conceived

after a thorough review of indicators and

their definitions. This version has now a list

of about 65 indicators.

The scope of organising authorities in mainly

larger metropolitan areas is extended from

urban areas into conurbations and from pu-

blic transit into a broader scope of multi-

modal transport. Their core task includes

governing other modes of transport and a

wider field of competence. Except for so-

cio-demographic indices some key indica-

tors concerning use and demand go beyond

the actual power of members or are pro-

tected by commercial disclaimers.

Despite differences in competence and busi-

ness the new devised Barometer 2013 re-

flects a comprehensive and interesting se-

lection of figures to compare the outcome

of the EMTA membership efforts, mirrored

in a legible and modern layout.

The remit, legal competences and respon-

sibilities of a transport authority are distin-

guishing criteria that greatly define scope

and effectiveness of a PTA in the cooperation

with local operators and the local commu-

nity. It would therefore be helpful to bench-

mark remit and competences of respon-

dents in a next phase.

I hope the 2013 Barometer will give you

food for further thought, debate or study.

“Consistent collection ofmobility indicators helpsto pinpoint trends and

factors that maydetermine the success or

failure of an urban

transport strategy ”Ruud van der Ploeg,

EMTA Secretary general

The Barometer is produced by CRTM Madrid. 1

Evolution of population

9th edition presentationDescription of the PTA(1) areas surveyed

Authority Main city PTA PTA surface PTA urbanised PTA density Annual PTA GDP(2)

responsible population population (km2) surface (km2) (inhab./km2) per capita (€)

Stadsregio Amsterdam 811,185 1,465,478 1,004 807 1,817 31,360 €

Barcelona metropolitan region ATM 1,612,000 5,041,200 3,239 607 8,305 28,800 €

Berlin-Brandenbourg VBB 3,421,829 5,871,022 30,377 3,409 1,722 28,668 €

Bilbao CTB 347,769 1,150,792 2,217 241 4,775 29,249 €

Birmingham CENTRO 1,092,300 2,783,500 899 634 4,390 30,050 €

Brussels metropolitan MRBC 1,163,486 3,319,455 4,300 1,200 2,766 40,758 €

Central Hungarian region (Budapest) BKK 1,735,711 525 358 4,848 20,555 €

Greater Copenhagen MOVIA 671,751 2,523,624 9,176 1,979 1,275 46,803 €

Frankfurt Rhein-Main RMV 701,350 5,102,866 14,000 12,342 413 38,490 €

Helsinki HSL 612,664 1,182,342 1,558 486 2,433 63.706 € (3)

Greater London TFL 8,416,500 8,416,500 1,572 1,042 8,077 47,098 €

Lyon Urban Community SYTRAL 636,302 1,300,000 613 360 3,611 42,830 €

Madrid region CRTM 3,207,247 6,495,551 8,028 1,043 6,228 28,915 €

Greater Montreal AMT 1,959,987 3,931,212 3,980 32,587 €

Oslo Akershus Region RUTER 634,463 1,210,220 5,005 247 4,907 60,362 €

Paris Ile-de-France STIF 2,273,000 11,978,000 12,000 2,530 4,734 51,250 €

Middle Bohemia region (Prague) ROPID 1,244,000 1,882,000 3,100 22,279 €

Metropolitan area The Hague 1,041,800 2,250,000 1,213 440 5,114 36,500 €

Metropolitan area Rotterdam 1,413,600

Stockholm county SL 897,700 2,163,042 6,526 55,347 €

Stuttgart region VRS 604,297 2,419,626 3,011 720 3,363 43,226 €

Turin metropolitan area AMMT 902,137 1,553,232 837 228 6,812 21,354 €

Vienna (Verkehrsverbund Ost Region) VOR 1,766,746 3,679,647 23,563 14,438 255

Vilnius MESP 539,707 700,000 9,731 449 1,559 15,726 €

Warsaw ZTM 1,724,404 2,473,388 2,429 385 6,424 15,511 €(1) PTA: Public Transport Authority. (2) GDP: Growth Domestic Product. (3) GDP value for the main city.

MRDH

2013D ATA

5.5% 2.2%

-1.4% 0.6% 3.6% 5.4% 2.0% 4.2% 1.1% 6.6% 7.7% 7.6% 3.6% 6.1% 9.7% 2.1% 6.2%

9.2%

3.2% -15.3% -16.8%

3.2%

1.0% 8.0%

-1.5% 2.8%

7.3% 10.4%

1.0% 6.0%

1.1% 11.8%

13.8% 8.7%

13.6% 10.0%

19.8% 7.6%

11.8% 3.8% 3.8%

16.2% 0.9%

4.2% 7.6%

16.1%

2008 - 2013 evolution

2003 - 2013 evolution

-20% -15% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%

Amsterdam Barcelona Berlin Bilbao Birmingham Brussels Budapest Copenhagen Frankfurt Helsinki London Lyon Madrid Montreal Oslo Paris Prague

Rotterdam The Hague

Stockholm Stuttgart Turin Vienna Vilnius Warsaw

The average population of cities isabout 1.6 million inhabitants and 3.3million for the PTA area. The averagefor the PTA area increased 3% in thelast five years and 7% for the last 10years. Regarding the average area forthe main cities is 355 km2 and 6,055km2 for the PTA area, with anurbanized area of 1,775 km2 thatrepresents a 30% of the total PTAsurface. In the case of the main citiesthis percentage rise up to 47%.Finally, average annual GDP in PTAarea is 32,169 €.

It is significant the increase ofpopulation that has occurred in citiessuch as Rotterdam, Oslo andStockholm as opposed to the loss ofpopulation over the years is takingplace in Berlin or Vilnius.

2

Car ownership rate The first image represents the relation between car ownership and urbanized PTA area density. The size of the balls represents the population in thePTA area. The average density for the cities is around 4,000 inhab/km2, but two cities (London and Barcelona) have more than 8,000 inhab/km2 (ur-banized population/area). For the great majority of cities its car ownership rate lies between 350 and 500 cars / 1,000 inhabitants.

The second image represents the relation between car ownership and modal share of private motorized modes in main city. The size of the balls rep-resents the density of the main cities. We can observe that the greater the density, the less use of private car.

In main city10.0

18.9

16.0

20.2

8.5

15.3

37.0

21.0

9.0

26.1

44.3

16.1

31.6

18.0

24.0

20.2

14.8

19.2

24.6

30.3

36.0

32.0

45.0

31.5

68.0

54.2

37.7

33.0

58.0

40.1

33.3

48.6

37.2

69.0

47.0

39.5

54.6

53.2

39.3

37.3

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Active modes (cycling. walking) Public transport Rest of motorized modes

67.0

57.4

39.0

62.3

22.8

40.1

24.7

46.0

37.0

35.6

22.5

43.0

33.5

19.0

34.0

55.4

24.0

48.0

47.0

30.5

33.4

33.0

36.1

21.9

12.0

27.6

21.0

26.8

44.5

26.5

37.0

21.0

12.0

33.8

44.3

21.0

40.1

25.0

30.0

31.8

43.0

14.0

15.0

26.6

25.1

39.0

24.6

54.6

22.0

15.0

40.0

10.9

32.7

33.5

37.7

51.0

30.6

33.3

36.0

26.4

56.0

36.0

12.8

33.0

38.0

38.0

42.9

41.6

28.0

39.3

23.5

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

54.0

49.1

39.0

48.3

23.5

30.6 24.7

46.0

33.0

33.8

22.5

35.3

31.2

13.0

28.0

40.3

30.6

27.6

36.1

32.5

Amsterdam Barcelona

Berlin Bilbao

Birmingham Brussels Budapest

Copenhagen Frankfurt Helsinki London Lyon

Madrid Montreal

Oslo Paris

Prague

Rotterdam The Hague

Stockholm Stuttgart

Turin Vienna Vinius

Warsaw

Car ownership rate vs density in PTA area

Car ownership rate vs private motorized sharein main city

1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000Density of PTA area

Car o

wner

ship

rate

in PT

A ar

ea (c

ars/

1,00

0 inh

abita

nts)

Bilbao Amsterdam

BarcelonaBerlin

Copenhagen

London

Lyon

Oslo

ParisBirmingham

Brussels

Budapest

Madrid

Helsinki

Turin

Vilnius WarsawStuttgart

9 14 19 24 29 34 39 44 49Modal share of private motorized modes in main city

Car o

wner

ship

in ma

in cit

y (ca

rs/1,

000

inhab

itant

s)

Amsterdam

BarcelonaBerlin

London

Oslo

Paris

BrusselsFrankfurt

Prague

Madrid

Helsinki

Vienna

Turin

Vilnius

Warsaw

Stuttgart

180

280

230

330

380

430

480

530

580

630

180

280

230

330

380

430

480

530

580

630

BilB bao AmsA terdamA

BarcelonaBerB lilin

CopC enhagen

LLondonL d

Lyony

Oslos

PParisBirminghamnBirmingham

BruB sselss

Buddapesta

M dMadrid

Hellsinki

TTurinr

VilniusVilnius WWarsawaStuSt ttgartStuttgart

owne

rship

in ma

in cit

y (ca

rs/1,

000

inhab

itant

s)AAmsterdamt

BBarcelonaaBBarcelonaBBerlin

LondonoLLondonoLondon

OOsloo

PParis

BrusselsFrankfurtrtnF kff tF kf t

Pragueg e

MadriddMadriddMadrid

Helsinkikis

Vienna

Turinin

Vilniusu

Warsaw

gStStuttgarttStuttgart

180

280

230

330

380

430

480

530

580

630

Modal share of tripsThe average number of trips per capita and day in selected cities is of 2.7 and 2.8 for the PTA area. Of the latter, 35% is made in active modes, 21%in public transport and 44% by private transport. But in the main cities, public transport raises the average to 30% over other motorized modes, thatgets down to 32%.

The PTA areas of Amsterdam, Barcelona, Berlin, Bilbao, Copenhagen, Paris, Vilnius and Warsaw are above the average with respect to the use of al-ternative transport to the car and on the other hand, cities as Birmingham, Brussels, Frankfurt, Stuttgart and Turin use motorized modes above theaverage in the PTA area. Barcelona, Bilbao and Paris are the most sustainable in terms of mobility. Madrid and Warsaw are good examples of a certainbalance on mobility (1/3, 1/3, 1/3) that we should try to get in the whole PTA areas.

In whole PTA area

3

2013D ATA

Public transport demand per inhabitant in PTA areasRegarding the public transport demand, thetrend continues upward in the use of PT. In2011 it was 244 and in 2013 262 journeysper inhabitant, being the bus the most usedtransport mode (120 journeys per inhabi-tant) followed by the metro (83 journeys perinhabitant). Budapest, London, Vilnius andWarsaw remain above the average. In ge-neral in cities with lower population andhigh density the users need to transfer in atrip is much less as opposed to journeysmade in cities with an extended network(and smaller mesh sizes), where makingtransfers is inherent to the network archi-tecture. Some PTA-areas harbouring a re-nowned mega city that attracts a largepotential of business related and touristictravel need to maintain a higher level oftransit capacity than others, the result beingan above average rate of journeys per ca-pita (like in London, Paris and Berlin).

Ticket price for the main city & PTAThe average price for the single ticket in the main city is 2.1 € and 2.8 € in the PTA area. For the monthly pass is 69 € and 85 € respectively. Thedifference in both prices is approximately 30% between the main city and the PTA area. Regarding the monthly pass in the PTA area it should benoted that although most cities have their fares between 30 € and 80 €, there are seven cities that exceed 115 € without a direct relation to neitherthe surface nor the GDP in the PTA area.

The average rate between GDP and monthly pass fare is 2.2% in main city and 3.4% for the PTA area. London continues to be the city with a higherrate, 3.9% (3.8% in 2012) and Frankfurt is in 2013 the city with a lower rate, 0.6% (1.3% in 2012) with respect to the monthly pass.

1.44

2.00

1.50

1.50

2.66

2.10

1.14 3.23

2.60

2.50

2.78 1.70

1.50

2.19

3.28

1.70 0.87

3.00

3.00

3.89 2.20

1.50

2.20 1.01

1.05

3.00

6.85

1.90

7.00

5.1

0.43

7.10

1.70

1.68

44.00

52.75

78.00 33.90

78.47

55.50

31.07

38.00

46.50

152.56

52.20

55.18 71.08

65.10

22.81

58.70 38.00

48.20

28.96 23.94

118.00

153.00 191.00

45.02

41.00

142.60

57.60

94.90

182.62

57.30 10.86

231.00 231.00

85.40

175.10

49.00

39.90

46.92

12.02

Amsterdam Barcelona

Berlin Bilbao

Birmingham Brussels Budapest

Copenhagen Frankfurt Helsinki London Lyon

Madrid Montreal

Oslo Paris

Prague

Rotterdam The Hague

Stockholm Stuttgart

Turin Vienna Vinius

Warsaw

0.00 50.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 250.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 €

Main city PTA

Urban and suburban bus Tram/light rail Metro

Suburban railway

60 65 97 47

100 67

340 84 34

152 286 127

95 63

112 106

91 24 24

139 52

100 48

362 226

37 5

40 3

2 39

225

7 48

4 56

2

40 15

74 48 48

22

26 80

107

43 81

101 76

42 179

23 11

54 150

152 86

64 70 128

129 36 36

152 43

25 117

73

28 97

43

13 17

21

86 43

28 4

29 101

4 5 5

38 36

9

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750

Amsterdam Barcelona

Berlin Bilbao

Birmingham Brussels

Budapest Copenhagen

Frankfurt Helsinki London

Lyon Madrid

Montreal Oslo Paris

Prague

Rotterdam The Hague

Stockholm Stuttgart

Turin Vienna Vinius

Warsaw

Monthly pass priceSingle trip ticket price

4

3.5

4.0

4.0

3.6

1.6

3.5

12.5

4.0 7.7

9.0

1.5

4.9 5.4

5.6

4.1

5.6

6.1

7.5 7.5

42.5

7.1

1.8

21.4

9.6

6.9

11.9

7.0

2.5

4.9

8.1

8.4

4.2

1.3

39.9

25.8

28.8

23.9

43.5 6.6

51.7

44.4 25.8

77.8

58.3 33.4

41.4

44.6

25.7

46.1

13.0

13.0

58.7

22.9

16.8

9.9

32.5

47.1

8.2

0.5

4.2

0.6 3.9

10.1

4.7

0.3 0.3

2.4

1.10

2.0

3.2

0.7

14.9

5.6

5.6

7.4

4.1 8.5

21.0

3.3

0.2

3.1

17.4

5.8

Amsterdam Barcelona

Berlin Bilbao

Birmingham Brussels Budapest

Copenhagen Frankfurt Helsinki London Lyon

Madrid Montreal

Oslo Paris

Prague

Rotterdam The Hague

Stockholm Stuttgart

Turin Vienna Vinius

Warsaw 10 20 30 40 5020 10304050 6070 80

Bus

Tram

Trolley bus MetroTrain

Metro & train vehicle-km per inhabitantBus, tram & trolleybus-km per inhabitant

Vehicle-km per inhabitant and PTA areaThe average number of bus-km per inhabitant is 35.6, seven times more than the number of tram-km per inhabitant that it is 4.5. Just Budapest,Helsinki and London are above this average.

In relation with rail services, metro has an average of 6.8 vehicle-km per inhabitant, double the ratio for commuter train that goes down to 3.4 vehi-cle-km per inhabitant. It is noticeable the high ratio that Helsinki, Vienna and Stockholm have and the low ratio for Brussels or Turin.

Coverage of operational costsThe ratios of coverage of operational costs by fare revenues and by public subsidies continue varying greatly. The size of the balls of the pictureindicate the yearly costs of operation of public transport divided by the population of the PTA area. The average ratio of yearly operational costs perinhabitant for the main cities is about 380 €. Paris, London and Stockholm have the highest rate (more than 700 € per inhabitant and year) andVilnius the minimum (82 € per inhabitant and year).

Most of the cities have a coverage of 40-50% of public subsidies and 45-60% of fare revenues. Related with the coverage of operational costs by farerevenues the average ratio is 47% and 49% for the coverage by public subsidies. Paris has the minimum coverage by public subsidies (19.4%) but it hasa 40% of coverage of operational costs that comes by other revenues (“Versement transport tax”). Prague has the maximum coverage by public subsidieswith 71.3%. We have to take into account that Prague also has the cheapest fares of all the cities so the coverage by fare revenues is only a 28.6%.

Coverage of operational costs vs annual operating cost

Coverage by public subsidies (%)

Cove

rage

by fa

re re

venu

es (%

)

Barcelona

Berlin

Copenhagen

LondonLyon

Montreal

Stockholm

RotterdamOslo

Paris

Brussels The Hague

Budapest

Madrid

Warsaw

VilniusAmsterdamFrankfurt

Prague

Helsinki

26.0

31.0

36.0

41.0

46.0

51.0

56.0

61.0

14.0 24.0 34.0 44.0 54.0 64.0

Barcelona

BerlinB

Copenhagen

LLondonLyon

Montreal

Sto khckholmS khkh l

RRotterdammR ddRR tt dlOsloOslo

PParis

Brussels The Ha H gue

Buddaapestp

Madrid

Warsaw

VilniusAmsterdamFrankfurt

Prague

HHelsinki

5

1.43

2.30

2.03

0.01 4.10

0.60 2.59

5.13

2.26

6.11 2.26

5.20

2.23

2.93

2.55

3.24 0.38 0.38

3.36

1.45

3.91

1.78 2.29

2.09 3.57

0.39

0.46 8.56

1.41 0.82

4.63

1.81

0.71

2.54

1.97 0.71 0.71

1.11

1.17

0.61

0.13 2.33

Bus & tram stops/ 1,000 inhabitants in main city and PTA

Bus & tram stops/km2 surface

12.69

12.1111.03

Amsterdam Barcelona

Berlin Bilbao

Birmingham Brussels Budapest

Copenhagen Frankfurt Helsinki London Lyon

Madrid Montreal

Oslo Paris

Prague

Rotterdam The Hague

Stockholm Stuttgart

Turin Vienna Vinius

Warsaw

1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00

Ratio of bus and tram network lenght Ratio of bus and tram stops

20406080100120140

Metro & train satations/1,000,000 inhabitantsMetro & train satations/100 km2 surface

35.5 64.1

114.6

124.3

24.8 20.8

68.6 8.7

93.5

49.1

75.8 33.1

50.8

30.3

136.3

199.8

148.3

62.6

27.6

27.6

70.7

118.2 66.3

8.5

5.2

10.0

2.2

6.5

7.7

1.6

22.7 0.2

3.4

3.7

40.6

7.0

4.1

3.0

3.3

6.3

9.0

5.1

5.1

2.3

9.5

12.3

3.1

0.9

Amsterdam Barcelona

Berlin Bilbao

Birmingham Brussels Budapest

Copenhagen Frankfurt Helsinki London Lyon

Madrid Montreal

Oslo Paris

Prague

Rotterdam The Hague

Stockholm Stuttgart

Turin Vienna Vinius

Warsaw

B

1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 10,000

887 2,817

4,769

4,939 2,878

174

674

4,110 2,950

1,905

1,015

983 1,612

2,638

2,403 1,012

1,012 4,320

2,554 4,191

4,324

1,292 595

1,295 4,384

922 2,564

8,911

134 2,228

1,130 1,075

1,445 5,432

2,084

1,304

2,633 1,459

1,877 1,877

1,432

2,052 7,777

675 93

606

Bus-tram lenght network/1,000,000 inhabitants

Bus-tram lenght network/1000 km2

Ratio of metro and train networkRatio of metro and train stations

Ratio of bus stops or stationsIt is important when a planner is designing to know the average ratio of number of bus stops or number of railway stations compared to the networklength or surface of the affected territory. Among the cities studied, we can conclude that the average ratio of bus stops per 1,000 inhabitants is 2.63and 3.19 in the case of km2.

Copenhagen, Helsinki and Lyon are above 5 stops per 1,000 inhabitants and Birmingham, Budapest, London and Lyon have a density of stops per km2

well above the average. Regarding the length of bus network, the average is 2,393 km per million inhabitants and 2,320 per 100 km2.

Railway systems are quite different. As average rate, they have 70 stations per million inhabitants and 7 stations per 100 km2 of surface. Londonstands out in terms of number of stations per 100 km2 of surface with 40.6 and Copenhagen, unlike the high ratio of bus stations, has only 0.2stations per 100 km2 of surface. In relation to the number of stations per million inhabitants, there are six cities that are above 100. In contrast to thebus network, the average length of metro and commuter train network per million inhabitants gets down to a tenth, 176, and the same applies per100 km2 of surface that goes down to 226 stations per 100 km2.

6

68

138

482 249

75 42

79

140 306

122

143

23

104

65

139 419

45 45

161

215 221

9

110

438

91

256

10 193

113

106 141

204

539

889

770680

130

263

141 161 161

141 205

67 9

55

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

Metro& train network/1,000,000 inhabitants

Metro & train network/100 km2

2013D ATA

Commercial speedThe commercial speed of public transport is one of the main quality issues that city planners have to deal with in urban areas. The average speed forthe urban bus and the tram is about 20 km/h and for the suburban buses the average rises up to 30 km/h. The same happens with the metro andthe commuter train. The metro runs at 35 km/h in average and the commuter train rises up to 30 km/h.

17.5

12.3 19.4

17.0 16.6

18.5 20.0

26.4

13.5 18.6

14.5 24.6

24.6

20.0 18.7

24.0 21.7

17.5 18.7

19.2

36.8

16.3 14.1

23.2

19.0

20.1

14.4

23.8 18.7

21.5 21.5

31.3

15.0 15.7

17.5

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

19.030.0

Amsterdam Barcelona

Berlin Bilbao

Birmingham Brussels

Budapest Copenhagen

Frankfurt Helsinki London

Lyon Madrid

Montreal Oslo Paris

Prague

Rotterdam The Hague

Stockholm Stuttgart

Turin Vienna Vinius

Warsaw

Urban bus speed (km/h) Tram speed (km/h)

ATM · © Marc Vila

ZTM

TFL · © Michael Garnett

STIF © Recoura Christophe

RUTER © Käss Fore

AMSTERDAM © Arjen Vos

VRS © DBRegio AG,

Stollberg

CRTM

RMV

MRBCOSLO

7

41, rue de Châteaudun • F-75009 Paris Tél. + 33 (0) 1 53 59 21 00 • Fax + 33 (0) 1 53 59 21 33

contact@emta.com • www.emta.com

Oslo

Stockholm

Amsterdam

BrusselsRotterdam

Birmingham

London

Barcelona

Bilbao

FrankfurtPrague

Helsinki

Montreal

Madrid

Cadiz

Lyon

Paris

TurinVienna

Berlin

Copenhagen

Budapest

Warsaw

Vilnius

Stuttgart

Oslo

Stockholm

Amsterdam

BrusselsRotterdam

Birmingham

London

Barcelona

Bilbao

FrankfurtPrague

Helsinki

Montreal

Madrid

Cadiz

Lyon

Paris

TurinVienna

Berlin

Copenhagen

Budapest

Warsaw

Vilnius

Stuttgart

Oslo

Stockholm

Amsterdam

BrusselsRotterdam

Birmingham

London

Barcelona

Bilbao

FrankfurtPrague

Helsinki

Montreal

Madrid

Cadiz

Lyon

Paris

TurinVienna

Berlin

Copenhagen

Budapest

Warsaw

Vilnius

Stuttgart

Public Transport Authority PTA Web Site

STADSREGIO AMSTERDAM www.stadsregioamsterdam.nl

BARCELONA METROPOLITAN REGION ATM www.atm.cat

BERLIN-BRANDENBOURG VBB www.vbb.de

BILBAO CTB www.cotrabi.com

BIRMINGHAM CENTRO www.centro.org.uk

BRUSSELS METROPOLITAN MRBC www.bruxellesmobilite.irisnet.be

CADIZ BAY CMTBC www.cmtbc.es

CENTRAL HUNGARIAN REGION (BUDAPEST) BKK www.bkk.hu

GREATER COPENHAGEN MOVIA www.movia.dk

FRANKFURT RHEIN-MAIN RMV www.rmv.de

HELSINKI HSL www.hsl.fi

GREATER LONDON TFL www.tfl.gov.uk

LYON URBAN COMMUNITY SYTRAL www.sytral.fr

MADRID REGION CRTM www.crtm.es

GREATER MONTREAL AMT www.amt.qc.ca

OSLO AKERSHUS REGION RUTER www.ruter.no

PARIS ILE-DE-FRANCE STIF www.stif.info

MIDDLE BOHEMIA REGION (PRAGUE) ROPID www.ropid.cz

METROPOLITAN AREA THE HAGUE MRDH www.mrdh.nlMETROPOLITAN AREA ROTTERDAM

STOCKHOLM COUNTY SL www.sl.se

STUTTGART REGION VRS www.region-stuttgart.org

TURIN METROPOLITAN AREA AMMT www.mtm.torino.it

VIENNA (VERKEHRSVERBUND OST REGION) VOR www.vor.at

VILNIUS MESP www.vilniustransport.lt

WARSAW ZTM www.ztm.waw.pl