marc bmp manual training module 1
DESCRIPTION
2008-2009 Training PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
BMP Training Module 1
BMPs 101 Sponsored by: MARC Presenters: Andy Sauer, P.E. (CDM) Brenda Macke, P.E. (CDM) November 14, 2008
2
Agenda 8:30-9:30 Lecture 1: BMP Manual Overview
History Definitions Basic BMP Principles BMP Evaluation Process BMP Manual Future Updates
9:40-10:30 Lecture 2: BMP Level of Service, BMP Selection and BMP Value Rating Review the level of service process Discuss BMP Selection Level of service and BMP value rating examples Treatment train
10:30-11:00 Activity 11:10 – 11:50 Lecture 3: BMP Hydrology & Introduction to BMP Design
Water Quality Volume 90% Rainfall Event Methods for calculation
11:50 – 12:00 Lecture 4: Regional Initiatives
3
Lecture 1 BMP Overview
History
Definitions of BMP
Basics BMP Principles
BMP Evaluation Process
BMP Manual Future Updates
Kansas City MO
4
History of BMP Manual City of Lenexa 2001 Revised 2003 for MARC/APWA project Final form adopted 2004 as a APWA
technical reference Utilizes TR-55 Method
Commonly used Well documented
Updates – APWA Water Resources BMP Subcommittee (2005-2007)
Updated BMP Manual – March 2008
5
History of BMP Manual Level of Service Approach Updates Started in January 2005
BMP Subcommittee of APWA March 2008 Manual Update Future Manual Updates
Treatment Train Table Redevelopment LOS Requirements Pervious Pavement Design Guidelines Vegetated Filter Strip Design Guidelines More Design Examples
6
Poll Question No. 1
How many have used, or are familiar with, the current MARC BMP Manual (March 2008)? Used it for a project ______ Review it, and used it as a guide _____ Familiar with the manual but never applied it _____ Attended a training on the manual _____ Never heard of it ________
7
Why we need a BMP Manual?
1972 National Pollutant Discharge System (NPDES) established Under the Clean Water Act
1990 EPA issued the Phase I Stormwater Rule Required NPDES permit for municipalities over
100,000 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s)
1999 EPA issued the Phase II Stormwater Rule Extended the NPDES to smaller communities <
100,000 (10,000 & 100,000) NPDES permits required communities to develop a
program to reduce runoff pollutants from new development and redevelopment sites
8
What is a BMP or green solution?
EPA definition: BMPs can include planning, schedules of activities, prohibitions of practices, maintenance procedures, and other management approaches necessary to prevent or reduce the pollution of waters of the United States
WERF definition: BMPs attempt to mimic
drainage patterns of the natural watershed and provide some treatment to improve quality of the water discharged
9
What is a BMP or green solution?
MARC manual: Stormwater
management practice used to prevent or control the discharge of pollutants and minimize runoff to waters of the U.S. BMPs may include structural or non-structural solutions, a schedule of activities, prohibition of practices, maintenance procedures, or other management practices.
Seattle’s street edge alternatives program (www.lowimpactdevelopment.org)
10
Best Management Practice (BMP)
Best – State of the Practice No definitive answer Past experience, testing, research, Unique to site
Management – Responsible Parties Improve water quality, meet NPDES Phase II Jurisdictional specific Meet specific requirements of a regional
Practice – Action or Implementation Practice = defined to carry out, apply, or to
do or perform often.
11
Basic BMP Principles
Plan for stormwater management Sustainable and “be green” Provide a level of service Improve water quality
Mimic natural hydrology Increase initial abstraction Promote infiltration, retention & ET
“Treat” the stormwater runoff Natural processes Treatment trains
12
Basic BMP Principles
PLAN
MIMIC
TREAT
13
Non-Structural BMPs Preserving native vegetation, existing filtration
and infiltration capacity is the most cost effective and efficient method of treatment
http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater/menuofbmps/index.cfm
PLAN
14
Minimize Development Impacts
Minimize grading
Minimize soil compaction
Minimize tree removal
Reduce impervious surfaces
Reduce road widths
Cluster buildings
Reduce building footprints
PLAN
15
Preserving Natural Hydrology, Infiltration
Capacity Management/Awareness
Community education Revise planning and development codes
• Stream buffer width • Housing density • Street width
Low Impact Development (LID) Preserve existing open space, native
vegetation Pervious landscaping Disconnect impervious cover Prevent soil compaction
PLAN
16
Preserving Natural Hydrology, Infiltration
Capacity
Low Impact Development Center
PLAN
17
PLAN
18
BMP Evaluation Process Mid-Level
PLAN
MIMIC
TREAT
19
Engineered Stormwater Treatment & Infiltration
Capture runoff near the source (Lot Level) Downspouts Driveways
Infiltration Engineered sub-grades Native plants Soil Enhancements
Evapotranspiration (ET) Plant usage Can be significant
Detention/Retention
MIMIC
20
Treatment and Infiltration
Structural BMPs filter and detain runoff Infiltration basins, trenches Bioretention cells Vegetated swales Raingardens
On site A combination of structures may be necessary
Topeka KS
MIMIC
21
Engineered Stormwater Treatment & Infiltration
Seattle’s street edge alternatives program
(www.lowimpactdevelopment.org)
MIMIC
University of Missouri at Kansas City / CDM
22
Treatment and Infiltration: Rain Gardens
Large number being installed locally
Infiltration and evapotranspiration from plants
More green than gray Minimal engineering Decentralized
10,000 Raingardens (www.rainkc.com)
MIMIC
23
BMP Evaluation Process Lowest Level
Extended detention (40 hours) to increase treatment and decrease peak flows
PLAN
MIMIC
TREAT
24
Detention and Treatment
Structural BMPs detain runoff Extended Detention
Basins • Wet • Dry
Extended Detention Wetlands
Infiltration basins Typically used as
larger, centralized facilities
Topeka KS
TREAT
25
Example site
Streambank Biostabilization
Culvert
Grass Swale
Wet Pond
Commercial Building
Bio-Filters
Design Documents – APWA 5600 – BMP Manual – Watershed
Master Plans
TREAT
26
Structural BMP Consideration
Pollutant removal efficiency Water quality volume Site suitability Tributary area Dimensions (depth, length-width ratio) Outlet Emergency spillway Maintenance easement Routine and non-routine maintenance
27
Poll Question No. 2
What sector (public or private) do you represent? Government agencies (city, county, state, or federal) ____ Engineering consulting (development,
design/construction, planning) ______ Non-profit organizations ______ Private citizens _____ Others _____
What is your role? Planners _____ Design Engineers _____ Reviewer/Approval_____ Constructor _____ Regulator ______
28
BMP Evaluation Process
What are the “best” BMPs? Evaluation is usually a function of:
Site location (Location, Location, Location) Receiving water standards or objectives (e.g. TMDL) Desired aesthetics
Treatment Evaluation Percent removal
• Function of water quality coming in • May not be able to meet your water quality objective
Effluent Concentration (MARC Manual) • Pollutant specific • TSS has the greatest amount of data
29
BMP Evaluation General Rule
Aesthetics/Amenity
30
BMP Evaluation
31
BMP Evaluation Process (cont.)
Based on the best available information Can be adjusted to meet local needs BMP Evaluated on 4 Criteria
Water Quality Value • TSS • Median Expected Effluent EMC • Source: International Stormwater Best Management
Practices Database (www.bmpdatabase.org) Volume Reduction Temperature Reduction Oil/Floatables Removal
32
Removal Efficiency
Removal Efficiency
Removal Efficiency
Removal Efficiency
Regional BMP Monitoring
Johnson County Stormwater Management Program University of Kansas – Ted Peltier Kansas State University
Stacy Hutchinson – Biological & Ag. Engineering Alicia Greene – MS Graduate Student Lee Skabelund - Assistant Professor College of Architecture,
Planning & Design University of Missouri at Kansas City
Deb O'Bannon – Civil Engineering
MARC – EPA Grant Ginny Moore
Regional BMP Monitoring
Regional BMP Monitoring
Regional BMP Monitoring
EPA Webcast Slide
41
EPA Webcast Slide
42
EPA Webcast Slide
43
44
BMP Value Rating 4 Goals/Objectives
Reduce Volume • Infiltration • Evapotranspiration (ET)
Remove total suspended solids (TSS) • Settling
Temperature Reduction • Urban heat island
Remove oils and floatables • Screening and netting
45
New Value Rating System – Based on BMP Goals
Condensed Table 5
BMP value table is based on the 4 goals of BMPs
BMP
Median Expected Effluent
EMC TSS
Water Quality Value
Volume Reduction
Temperature Reduction
Oils/Floatables Reduction
Overall Value
Vegetation N/A 5.25 2 1 1 9.25Rain Garden < 10 4 2 1 2 9.0Infiltration Practices < 10 4 2 1 2 9.0Bioretention < 10 4 1.5 1 2 8.5Pervious or Porous Pavement 10 - 20 3 1.5 1 2 7.5Extended Detention Wetland < 10 4 2 0 1 7.0Media Filtration Practices < 10 4 0 0 2 6.0Wetland Swale 10 - 20 3 1 0 1 5.0Bio-Swale 10 - 20 3 1 0 1 5.0Extended Wet Detention 10 - 20 3 2 -1 1 5.0Native Vegetation Swale 10 - 20 3 1 0 0 4.0Extended Dry Detention Basin 20 - 50 2 1 0 1 4.0Turf Grass Swale 10 - 20 3 0 0 0 3.0
Value Ratings
46
BMP Goal: TSS Effluent (Water Quality Value)
Effects of suspended solids Decrease light penetration Damage fish gills Deposits downstream Impacts aquatic habitat
Particulate removal results in wide range of pollutant removal Metals, nutrients, bacteria, oils
Scored 0-4+, >100mg/L to <10mg/L
47
Why use TSS as an indicator of water quality?
TSS has predominantly been used in the past monitor BMPs
TSS is relatively easy to measure TSS can be used as a surrogate to monitor
other contaminants
48
BMP Goal: Volume Reduction
Replicate predevelopment flow conditions Not just reduction of peak flow but reduction of
total runoff volume Reduce velocity and therefore erosive capability Scored 0-2
BMP
Percolation/filtration
ET
Outflow Infiltration
Runoff/inflow Runoff/inflow
Underdrain
49
BMP Goal: Remove Oils and Floatables
Oils can be toxic to plants and wildlife Disrupt other treatment processes
Floatables (trash) Clog hydraulic structures Eyesore Contain pollutants
Scored 0-2
Lenexa KS Lenexa KS
50
BMP Goal: Temperature Reduction
Runoff from paved surfaces can be significantly warmer than surface water and natural runoff
Increased water temperature effects: Decreased dissolved oxygen capacity Increases pollutant reaction rates Increases solubility of many pollutants
Scored -1 to 1, increased temperature to decreased temperature
51
Questions?
Comments.
52
Break (10 minutes)
53
Lecture 2: BMP Level of Service and Value Rating
System
Topeka KS
Hancor Inc.
Kansas City MO
54
BMP Selection Flowchart
Level Of Service
BMP Value Rating
Water Quality Volume/sizing
Placement Maintenance
55
Level of Service
Step 1 – Determine Pre-Development Conditions
Step 2 – Determine Post-Development Conditions
Step 3 – Calculate the difference . . . . . . This is the level of service
56
Level of Service
Level of Service: Rating the predevelopment condition of the site and determining what treatment system will, at a minimum maintain that condition
Step-by-step procedure in BMP manual
Kansas City MO
57
Pre-Development
Insert an aerial photo of an undeveloped area
58
Level of Service Previously Undeveloped
Predevelopment curve number (CN) Vs. post development CN
Area weighted CN = Σ (CNi * Areai) / Total Area
Area weighted CNpost – Area weighted CNpre
Procedure for calculating individual CN is
detailed in Table 1, p. 27 in the BMP manual
59
Level of Service Previously Undeveloped
* Does not meet APWA 5600 definition of “Development”; applies only where more stringent local requirements are in effect
Change in CN Impact Level of service
17 or greater High water quality impact 8
7 to 16 Moderate water quality impact 7
4 to 6 Low water quality impact 6
1 to 3 Minimal water quality impact 5
0 Negligible 4*
-7 to -1 Minimal water quality improvement 3*
-8 to -17 Low water quality improvement 2*
-18 to -21 Moderate water quality improvement 1*
-22 or less High water quality improvement 0*
Table 2, p. 28
60
Level of Service Redevelopment
% impervious surface of existing site vs. % impervious surface of proposed site
Developed sites are grouped into 4 ranges • Range #1 = <12% • Range #2 = 12-25% • Range #3 = 25-65% • Range #4 = >65%
Level of service is base on increase in range Increase in Range # = Range#(proposed) – Range#(existing)
Tables 3 and 4 in manual
61
Level of Service Redevelopment
Increase in range of %imperviousness Impact
Level of Service
+3 High water quality impact 7 +2 Moderate water quality impact 6 +1 Low water quality impact 5 None Negligible water quality impact 4* -1 Low water quality benefit 3* -2 Moderate water quality benefit 2* -3 High water quality benefit 1*
* Does not meet APWA 5600 definition of “Development”; applies only where more stringent local requirements are in effect
62
Future Manual Updates: Level of Service Redevelopment
APWA water resources BMP subcommittee
Evaluated current calculation Proposing a revision
Revision must be approved before becoming a part of
the manual.
63
Poll Question No. 3
Who has calculated a level of service for a previously undeveloped site?
Who has calculated a level of service for a redeveloped site?
64
Post Development BMP Selection
The area weighted value rating (VR) of the site must equal or exceed the level of service (LS) This includes all BMPs for a given site Can be a combination of various BMPs
Determine value ratings for each BMP using Table 5 in Section 4 of manual
65
Post Development BMP Selection
66
Post Development BMP Selection
Calculate the Area weighted average of the VR
Area weighted VR = Σ (VRi * Areai ) / Total Area
Area weighted VR ≥ LS
If the VR does not satisfy the LS requirement an adjustment of the design will have to be made
67
Previously Undeveloped Site Example
10 acres of undeveloped farm land
Acres Cover type Condition
6 Fallow Crop, residue
Good
3 Woods Good
1 Brush Fair
68
Use the NRCS soil survey website to find the HSG http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov
For this example: HSG for silty loam is B
Previously Undeveloped Site Example
69
Using Table 1 in BMP manual to find the CN for each cover type:
Finding the area averaged CN:
CNavg = (6*83+3*55+1*48)/10 = 71
Acres Cover type Condition HSG CN 6 Fallow Crop,
residue Good B 83
3 Woods Good
B 55
1 Brush Good B 48
Previously Undeveloped Site Example
70
10,000 Raingardens (www.rainkc.com)
Previously Undeveloped Site Example – BMP Design
Option 1 8 acres of ¼ acre lot residential
Rain gardens for each lot (32 Rain gardens) Each rain garden can capture ¼ of the lot area
Street runoff directed to 4 rain gardens 1 acre of native vegetation preserved or
established
71
Development plan:
Note: Postdevelopment HSG is assumed to be one group higher then predevelopment unless a soil treatment plan is provided
Area Cover type HSG CN 8 ac 1/4-acre residential
lots
C 83
1 ac Streets NA 98 1 ac Native grass, shrubs
(informal) B (using soil preservation method in appendix A)
48
Previously Undeveloped Site Example – BMP Design
Option 1
72
Post Development area averaged CN: CNavg = (8 ac * 83) + (1 ac * 98) + (1 ac * 48) / 10 ac = 81
Change in CN
CNchange = 81- 71 = 10
Level of service = 7
Previously Undeveloped Site Example – BMP Design
Option 1
73
BMP plan:
Area Cover type BMP Treatment Area
Value Rating
8 ac 1/4-acre residential lots
Rain Garden for each lot 32 Rain Gardens Treat ¼ of the lot
2 ac 9.0
1 ac Streets Rain Garden to capture street runoff 4 Rain Gardens
1 ac 9.0
1 ac Native grass, shrubs
Preserve or Establish Native Vegetation
1 ac 9.25
Previously Undeveloped Site Example – BMP Design
Option 1
74
Option 1 Area averaged VR:
VRavg = (2 ac* 9.0) + (1 ac * 9.0) + (1 ac * 9.25) / 10 ac = 3.63
Does not meet the required level of service of 7 How many rain gardens would it take to meet level of
service? Lot rain gardens would need to treat 5.75 ac (72%) 3 rain gardens per lot
Incorporated into HOA covenant Design Maintenance
Previously Undeveloped Site Example – BMP Design
Option 1
75
4 acres of 1/8 acre lot residential 2.2 acre of native vegetation preserved or
established 3 acre of wooded vegetation preserved
Previously Undeveloped Site Example – BMP Design
Option 2
76
BMP Plan
Area Cover type HSG CN 4 ac 1/8-acre residential lots
C 90
2.2 ac Native grass, shrubs (informal)
B (using soil preservation method in Appendix A)
48
3 ac Woods B 55 0.8 ac Street NA 98
Previously Undeveloped Site Example – BMP Design
Option 2
77
Post Development area averaged CN: CNavg = (4 ac * 90) + (0.8 ac * 98) + (2.2 ac * 48) +
(3 ac * 55) / 10 ac = 71
Change in CN
CNchange = 71- 71 = 0
Level of service = 4
Previously Undeveloped Site Example – BMP Design
Option 2
78
Previously Undeveloped Site Example– Option 2
BMP plan:
Area Cover type BMP Treatment Area
Value Rating
4 ac 1/8-acre residential lots
No BMPs 0 ac 0
0.8 ac Streets No BMP 0 ac 0 3.0 Woodland Preserve 3.0 ac 9.25
2.2 ac Native grass, shrubs
Preserve or Establish Native Vegetation
2.2 ac 9.25
79
Option 2: Higher Density with Woodlands & Native Vegetation Area averaged VR:
VRavg = (3 ac* 9.25) + (2.2 ac * 9.25) / 10 ac = 4.8
Exceeds the required level of service of 4 Portion of site not treated by a BMP
Previously Undeveloped Site Example – Option 2
80
VR Increase by Combining BMPs
Selecting multiple BMPs with complementary treatment mechanisms can increase the value rating
81
Treatment train (VRTT* ATT) Wetland Swale Extended Wet Detention (0.5 ac) Table 6 for VR
Preserve 1 ac of native area
VR Increase by Combining BMPs
82
VR Increase by Combining BMPs
VR = 9.5
83
7.5 acres of ¼ acre lot residential
Runoff enters wetland swale to 0.5 acre Extended Wet Detention Basin
1 acre of native vegetation preserved or established
Previously Undeveloped Site Example – BMP Design
Option 3
84
Development plan:
CN = 82; 82-71 = 11 for a LS = 7 Note: Postdevelopment HSG is assumed to be one group
higher then predevelopment unless a soil treatment plan is provided
Area Cover type HSG CN 7.5 ac 1/4-acre residential
lots C 83
1 ac Streets NA 98 0.5 ac Extended wet
detention NA 98
1 ac Native grass, shrubs (informal)
B (using soil preservation method in appendix A)
48
Previously Undeveloped Site Example – BMP Design
Option 3
85
BMP plan:
Area Cover type BMP Treatment Area
Value Rating
7.5 ac 1/4-acre residential lots
Wetland Swale to Extended Wet Detention
7.5 ac
9.5
0.5 ac Extended wet detention
Extended Wet Detention
0.5 ac
5.0
1 ac Streets No BMP 0 ac 0 1 ac Native
grass, shrubs
Preserve or Establish Native Vegetation
1 ac 9.25
VRavg = (7.5 ac* 9.5) + (0.5 ac * 5) + (1 ac * 9.25) / 10 ac = 8.3
Previously Undeveloped Site Example – BMP Design
Option 3
86
Previously Undeveloped / Redevelopment Site
Examples Detailed examples and
worksheets in BMP manual
87
Woods Fair Condition HSG B Area = 3 Ac
Contoured Crops Good Condition HSG B Area = 19 Ac
Contoured Crops Good Condition HSG B Area = 8 Ac
Total Site = 30 Acres
A
B
Activity – Level of Service
88
Answer Key – BMP Option 1
89
Answer Key – BMP Package1/2/3
90
Answer Key – BMP Package 1 B. Postdevelopment CN
Cover Description Soil HSG1CN from Table 1 Area (ac.)
Product of CN x Area
A - 1/3 Acre Lots C 81 2.10 170A - 1/4 Acre Lots C 83 4.40 365A - Streets (Curb & Gutter) NA 98 1.42 139B - 1/3 Acre Lots C 81 4.43 359B - 1/4 Acre Lots C 83 13.20 1096B - Streets (Curb & Gutter) NA 98 3.25 319Extended Wet Detention Basin NA 98 1.20 118
Totals: 30.00 2565
1 Postdevelopment CN is one HSG higher for all cover types except preserved vegetation, absent documentation showing how postdevelopment soil structure will be preserved.
Area-Weighted CN = total product/total area = 86 (Round to integer)
C. Level of Service (LS) Calculation Change in CN LS
Postdevelopment CN: 86 17+ 87 to 16 7
Predevelopment CN: 74 4 to 6 61 to 3 5
Difference: 12 0 4-7 to -1 3
LS Required (see scale at right): 7 -8 to -17 2-18 to -21 1-22 - 0
91
Answer Key – BMP Package 1 WORKSHEET 2: DEVELOP MITIGATION PACKAGE(S) THAT MEET THE REQUIRED LS
Project: Green Acres - BMP Package 1 By: NAP Date: 11/15/2007Location: Kansas City Metro Checked: BRM Date: 11/12/08Sheet __ of __
1. Required LS (from Table 1 or 1A or Worksheet 1 or 1A, as appropriate): 7
Note: Various BMPs may alter CN of proposed development, and LS; recalculate both if applicable.
2. Proposed BMP Option Package No. ___
Cover/BMP DescriptionTreatment
Area
VR from Table 5
or 61Product of VR
x AreaA -1/4 Ac. Resid. - native veg. swale 4.40 4.00 17.60A - 1/3 Ac. Resid - rain gardens 2.10 9.00 18.90 A - Streets - native veg. swale 1.42 4.00 5.68B - All Resid - Extended Wet Det. Basin 17.63 5.00 88.15B - Streets - Extended Wet Det. Basin 3.25 5.00 16.25B - Extended Wet Detention Basin 1.20 5.00 6.00
Total2: 30.00 Total: 152.58Weighted VR: 5.09
1 VR calculated for final BMP only in Treatment Train. 2 Total treatment area cannot exceed 100 percent of the actual site area.
Meets required LS (Yes/No)? NO
= total product/total area
92
Answer Key – BMP Package 2
93
Answer Key – BMP Package 2 B. Postdevelopment CN
Cover Description Soil HSG1CN from Table 1 Area (ac.)
Product of CN x Area
A - 1/3 Acre Lots C 81 2.15 174A - 1/4 Acre Lots C 83 4.43 368A - Streets (Curb & Gutter) NA 98 1.42 139B - 1/3 Acre Lots C 81 2.00 162B - 1/4 Acre Lots C 83 12.55 1042B - Woods - Preserved B 60 3.00 180B - Streets (Curb & Gutter) NA 98 3.25 319B - Extended Detention Wetland NA 98 1.20 118
Totals: 30.00 2501
1 Postdevelopment CN is one HSG higher for all cover types except preserved vegetation, absent documentation showing how postdevelopment soil structure will be preserved.
Area-Weighted CN = total product/total area = 83 (Round to integer)
C. Level of Service (LS) Calculation Change in CN LS
Postdevelopment CN: 83 17+ 87 to 16 7
Predevelopment CN: 74 4 to 6 61 to 3 5
Difference: 9 0 4-7 to -1 3
LS Required (see scale at right): 7 -8 to -17 2-18 to -21 1-22 - 0
94
Answer Key – BMP Package 2
WORKSHEET 2: DEVELOP MITIGATION PACKAGE(S) THAT MEET THE REQUIRED LS
Project: Green Acres - BMP Package 2 By: NAP Date: 11/15/2007Location: Kansas City Metro Checked: BRM Date: 11/12/08Sheet __ of __
1. Required LS (from Table 1 or 1A or Worksheet 1 or 1A, as appropriate): 7
Note: Various BMPs may alter CN of proposed development, and LS; recalculate both if applicable.
2. Proposed BMP Option Package No. ___
Cover/BMP DescriptionTreatment
Area
VR from Table 5
or 61Product of VR
x AreaA -1/4 Ac. Resid - native veg. swale 4.43 4.00 17.72A - 1/3 Ac. Resid - rain gardens 2.15 9.00 19.35 A - Streets to native veg. swale 1.42 4.00 5.68B - All Res to native veg. swale to EDW 14.55 8.00 116.40B - Streets to native veg. swale to EDW 3.25 8.00 26.00B - EDW 1.20 7.00 8.40 B - Woods - preserved 3.00 9.25 27.75
Total2: 30.00 Total: 221.30Weighted VR: 7.38
1 VR calculated for final BMP only in Treatment Train. 2 Total treatment area cannot exceed 100 percent of the actual site area.
Meets required LS (Yes/No)? YES (If No, or if additional options are being tested, proceed below.)
= total product/total area
95
Answer Key – BMP Package 3
96
Answer Key – BMP Package 3 B. Postdevelopment CN
Cover Description Soil HSG1CN from Table 1 Area (ac.)
Product of CN x Area
A - 1/3 Acre Lots C 81 2.15 174A - 1/4 Acre Lots C 83 4.43 368A - Streets (Curb & Gutter) NA 98 1.42 139B - 1/3 Acre Lots C 81 2.00 162B - 1/4 Acre Lots C 83 12.55 1042B - Streets (Curb & Gutter) NA 98 3.25 319B - Woods - Preserved B 60 3.00 180B - EDW NA 98 1.20 118
Totals: 30.00 2501
1 Postdevelopment CN is one HSG higher for all cover types except preserved vegetation, absent documentation showing how postdevelopment soil structure will be preserved.
(Round to integer)Area-Weighted CN = total product/total area = 83
C.Level of Service (LS) Calculation Change in CN LS
Postdevelopment CN: 83 17+ 87 to 16 7
Predevelopment CN: 74 4 to 6 61 to 3 5
Difference: 9 0 4-7 to -1 3
LS Required (see scale at right): 7 -8 to -17 2-18 to -21 1-22 - 0
97
Answer Key – BMP Option 3 WORKSHEET 2: DEVELOP MITIGATION PACKAGE(S) THAT MEET THE REQUIRED LS
Project: Green Acres - BMP Package 3 By: NAP Date: 11/15/2007Location: Kansas City Metro Checked: Date:Sheet __ of __
1. Required LS (from Table 1 or 1A or Worksheet 1 or 1A, as appropriate): 7
Note: Various BMPs may alter CN of proposed development, and LS; recalculate both if applicable.
2. Proposed BMP Option Package No. ___
Cover/BMP DescriptionTreatment
Area
VR from Table 5
or 61Product of VR
x AreaA -1/4 Ac. Resid. - native veg swale 4.43 4.00 17.72A - 1/3 Ac. Resid - rain gardens 2.15 9.00 19.35 A - Streets to native veg. swale 1.42 4.00 5.68B - All Res to EDW 14.55 7.00 101.85B - Streets to EDW 3.25 7.00 22.75B - EDW 1.20 7.00 8.40 B - Woods - preserved 3.00 9.25 27.75
Total2: 30.00 Total: 203.50Weighted VR: 6.78
1 VR calculated for final BMP only in Treatment Train. 2 Total treatment area cannot exceed 100 percent of the actual site area.
Meets required LS (Yes/No)? NO
= total product/total area
98
Break (10 minutes)
99
Lecture 3 – BMP Hydrology & Introduction to BMP
Design
100
Water Quality Volume (First Flush -> WQv)
Generally considered to be approximately the
first ½ inch of runoff
Runoff from initial rainfall contains the highest concentration of pollutants
BMPs are designed to treat this “first flush” of concentrated runoff not extreme flood events
The Water Quality Volume (WQv) includes this first flush
101
Water Quality Volume (WQv)
Water Quality Volume (WQv): The storage needed to capture and treat 90% of the average annual storm runoff volume
Water Quality storm: The storm event that produces ≤ 90% volume of all daily storms in a year
WQv
WQv = (Precip)*(Runoff coef.)*(Area)
102
Why Use the WQv to size BMPs?
Retain runoff long enough to get water quality benefits
Reducing erosive flows from
smaller runoff events
103
Kansas City Water Quality Storm
Young and McEnroe 2002
Purpose Revise precipitation
frequency estimates Evaluate historical
record for trends in rainfall extremes
Estimate 90% rainfall event for stormwater quality management
1.37 inches
http://kcmetro.apwa.net
104
2003 Kansas City Precip events
0 5
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Daily Precipitation (in)
# of
day
s >
or=
Kansas City Water Quality Storm
Water Quality Storm = 1.37 in
Young and McEnroe
(http://kcmetro.apwa.net)
105
Water Quality Storm Data
Stormwater Manager’s Resource Center www.stormwatercenter.net Provides 90% storm for other locations
Young and McEnroe 2002
106
Water Quality Volume Calculation
Two methods Short-Cut Method
• Sites < 10 acres • Only 1 predominant cover type
Small Storm Hydrology Method
• Larger or more heterogeneous drainage areas
107
WQv Calculation
Short-Cut Method
WQv = P*Rv
P = 24 hour Water Quality Storm (inches) Rv = Volumetric run coefficient =
0.05+0.009(I) I = % site Imperviousness
108
WQv Short-cut Example
Given Tributary area (ATributary) = 2.5 acres %impervious = 80%
WQv = 1.37in * [0.05 + (0.009 * 80%)] = 1.06 in
Multiply by ATributary to get volume
1.06 * 1ft/12in * 2.5 acres = 0.22 ac-ft
If only 50% impervious WQv = 0.14 ac-ft
109
WQv Calculation
Small Storm Hydrology Method
WQv = P*Weighted Rv
Weighted Rv = Σ(Rvi*Aci)/Total area (ac) Rvi = Volumetric runoff coefficient for
cover type (table) Aci = Area of cover type i (ac)
110
Rv Table
BMP MANUAL SECTION 6, TABLE 5 VOLUMETRIC COEFFICIENTS FOR URBAN RUNOFF
FOR DIRECTLY CONNECTED IMPERVIOUS AREAS
(CLAYTOR AND SCHUELER 1996)
Rainfall (inches)
Flat roofs and large unpaved
parking lots
Pitched roofs and large impervious
areas (large parking lots)
Small impervious areas and
narrow streets
Silty soils
HSG-B
Clayey soils HSG-C and D
0.75 0.82 0.97 0.66 0.11 0.20 1.00 0.84 0.97 0.70 0.11 0.21 1.25 0.86 0.98 0.74 0.13 0.22 1.37 0.87 0.98 0.75 0.14 0.23 1.50 0.88 0.99 0.77 0.15 0.24
Note: a reduction factor may be applied to the Rv values for disconnected surfaces, consult the BMP manual hydrology section
111
WQv Small Storm Example
Given: ATributary = 26 ac
Cover Type Rv Area (acres)
Flat roofs 0.87 1.6
Parking lots 0.98 8.8
Narrow streets 0.75 3.3
Silty soil 0.14 12.3
( )∑ =××+×+×+×
=××
= inPAreaTotalAcRvWQv ii 749.037.1
263.1214.03.375.08.898.06.187.0
Multiply by ATributary to get volume
112
Poll Question No. 4
What types of BMPs have been constructed in this area for new development?
What types of BMPs have been constructed in this area for redevelopment?
113
BMPs – Green to Gray
114
Key Points: Vegetation Native Vegetation Preserved or
Established Prevent against erosion Penetration of roots
increases infiltration Removal of pollutants
and suspended solids Aesthetic value
Kansas Biologic Survey (www.kbs.ku.edu/) Miami County, KS
115
Key Points: Vegetation Native Vegetation Preserved or
Established
Prairie Blazing Star, Liatris pycnostachya Kansas City MO
116
Natural Resource Inventory (NRI)
Map showing valuable natural resource assets
Complete for Kansas City area (8 counties)
GIS data and maps
http://www.marc.org/Environment/Smart_Growth/NRI/index.htm
117
NRI – Jackson County
118
Structural BMP Types
Rain Gardens Bioretention Cells Extended Wet Detention Basins Extended Dry Detention Basins Extended Detention Wetlands Infiltration Structures Porous Surfaces
119
Rain Gardens and Rain Barrels
UMKC Raingarden Project
Topeka KS
120
Bioretention Cells at Mize Lake Lenexa, KS
121
Bioretention Swales
Neighborhood Redevelopment
Quinton Heights Topeka, Kansas
122
Extended Detention Wetland
Belle Avenue, Topeka Kansas
123
Extended Wet Detention
Topeka KS
124
Extended Dry Detention
125
Infiltration Basins
126
Porous Pavement
Concrete Promotions
I’Lan Park Leawood KS
127
Hancor Stormwater Quality Unit Installation
128
Vortcapture VC-70 Installation
129
What have other communities done?
BMPs and Green Solution
Experiences from Other Communities Across the Nation Lenexa - www.raintorecreation.org/index.html Lincoln - www.lincoln.ne.gov/city/pworks/watrshed/ Philadelphia – www.phillyriverinfo.org/ Detroit – www.rougeriver.com/ Portland – www.portlandonline.com/bes Milwaukee – www.mmsd.com/home/index.cfm Chicago - egov.cityofchicago.org/ Pittsburgh – www.ninemilerun.org
130
BMP Maintenance
Private Property Annual inspection submittals Tied to HOA Title Restriction
Public Property Inspect after each rainfall event > 0.5 inches Annual inspections Bi-annual maintenance (replanting and
regrading) Vegetation Management Other?
131
Lecture 4 – Regional Initiatives
133
Upcoming Training Sessions
Module #2 – Extended Wet Detention & Wetlands Date: December 12, 2008 Location: Helzberg Auditorium, KCPL
Module #3 – Rain Gardens & Bioretention Date: January 23, 2009 Location: Helzberg Auditorium, KCPL
Module #4 – Extended Dry Detention & Infiltration (Pervious Pavements) Date: February 20, 2008 Location: Helzberg Auditorium, KCPL
134
Questions?
Comments.
Suggestions.