march 14, 2012 ncma boston education workshop policy update copyright. unpublished work. raytheon...
TRANSCRIPT
March 14, 2012
NCMA Boston Education Workshop
Policy Update
Copyright. Unpublished Work. Raytheon Company.
Customer Success Is Our Mission is a registered trademark of Raytheon Company.
Page 204/20/23
Talking Points Washington Environment
DoD Efficiency Initiative - Impacts, Key Rules
New FAR/DFARS Requirements– Business Systems
– CAS Harmonization
2012 NDAA Update – Rules on the Horizon
Just my thoughts, but…
Page 304/20/23
Current Washington Environment Budget Pressures – Less wiggle room and shrinking
DoD Key target for cuts- Proactive approach– $487B/ 10 years
Efficiency Initiative remains DoD’s priority– Frees up funds needed in budget constrained environment
– More programs at risk of termination—performance counts!
Short term focus - Election year!– More campaigning, less action
Sequestration- The big ax over DoD’s head– If no relief, even more painful budget cuts loom ahead– Automatic $492B in cuts Jan 2013
Page 4
Better Buying Power Initiative –Incentivize Productivity and Innovation in Industry Reward contractors for successful supply chain and indirect
expense management– Part of incentive strategy and aligned to profit
Increase the use of FPIF with 50/50 Cost share-120% ceiling as starting point
Adjust progress payments to incentivize performance– Develop cash flow model and guidance of preferred financing hierarchy– Flow down to subcontractors
Reinvigorate IRAD program—more defense related R&D
Page 5
Promote Real Competition
Competitive Acquisition strategy at each program milestone– Focus on single bid contracts- directed 2% reduction starting in 2011
Negotiations on single bid offers – PCOs use certified or non-certified cost or pricing data
Develop plan to improve competition rate by 10% annually
Increase small business awards– Past performance factor, profit/fee consideration
Page 6
Target Affordability and Controlling Cost Growth Mandate Affordability as a requirement for ACAT programs
– Affordability as a key performance parameter
– Support engineering, cost and schedule tradeoffs
Drive productivity growth through Will Cost/Should Cost management– Should Cost targets as management tools
– Used as basis for contract negotiations and incentives
Eliminate redundancy within warfighter portfolio
Make Production rates economical and hold them stable– Define production rates change limits based on affordability assessments
Page 7
“Incentivize Productivity and Innovation in Industry” – Contract Financing Secretary Carter’s direction to OSD/DPAP - November 2010
– “I expect that the basis of negotiations shall be the use of customary progress payments. After agreement on price on the basis of customary progress payments, the contractor shall have the flexibility to propose an alternate payment arrangement for the Government’s consideration”, such as PBPs.
New OSD Performance Based Payments Analysis Tool at:
www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/cpf/Performance_based_payments.htm
Page 8
DFARS Proposed Rule- Performance Based Payments (PBP)- Overview Provides requirements for the use of the PBP tool to evaluate
alternate financing arrangements
To be used by contracting officers contemplating PBPs from new fixed price contracting awards resulting from solicitations issued after July 1, 2011.
Proposed rule states “PBPs should never exceed the total costs incurred at any point during the contract”
04/20/23
Page 9
RecommendedPerformance Based Payment Process
Advocates two step negotiations to achieve PBPs from Customary Progress Payments– Conclude price negotiations using Customary Progress Payments
– If PBPs are desired, submit PBP milestones schedules and events with expenditure profile
– Government evaluates milestone schedule using cash flow model
– Negotiate consideration (expectation: lower profit in return for improved cash flow) – non-profit consideration is acceptable
– Obtain business clearance approval
– Document adequate consideration for PBPs
04/20/23
Page 10
Cash Flow Model - Experiences to Date This new DoD model of Contract Financing is here to stay
– Part of the Carter Better Buying Power initiative
– DFARS Rule in public comments phase
Uneven execution – Lack of experience using model potentially hampers negotiations
– Slower definitization of UCAs – Result: more actuals, reduces negotiations to profit/fee discussions
Culture of excessive oversight – ignoring/modifying directive– Blind adherence to model reduces second guessing later
Don’t forget about non-profit consideration– What’s else is important to your program? Extended warranties, tech data, etc
– Document! Document! Document! decisions
04/20/23
Page 11
DFARS Business Systems RuleBackground Goal: Improve the effectiveness of the oversight of contractor business
systems– Systems will “provide timely, reliable information for the management of DoD programs”
Allows for Contracting Officers to withhold payments for business systems deficiencies– 5% for systems deficiencies
Cumulative maximum is 10% for multiple systems deficiencies– Reduced to 2% when an acceptable corrective action plan is submitted
Defines six contractors business systems– Purchasing Systems (DCMA)– Property Systems (DCMA)– Earned Value Management Systems (EVMS) (DCMA)– Accounting Systems (DCAA)– Estimating Systems (DCAA)– Materiel Management and Accounting Systems (MMAS) (DCAA)
Applies to all CAS Covered Contracts
Exempts small business contracts
Page 12
DFARS Business Systems RuleKey Changes DCMA/DCAA
– Contracting Officers have the sole authority to determine if system deficiencies warrant withholds DCAA reports deficiency in accordance with GAGAS Contracting Officer consults with auditor, makes determination to withhold or
discontinue withholds
Due Process– Contracting officer initial determination of system deficiency
– Contractor afforded 30 days to respond in writing
– Contracting officer evaluates and makes final determination
– Contractor allowed an additional 45 days to correct deficiency
– DCMA/DCAA “Business Systems Review Panel” assesses all CO determinations before implementing Final Determination for withholds
04/20/23
Page 13
IR&D REPORTING TO DTIC – Final Rule Allowability: The ACO or Corporate ACO shall determine whether
IR&D or B&P projects are of potential interest to DoD. DFARS 231.205-18 (c) (iii)(B)
Requires major contractors to report independent research and development projects
Applies only to major contractors who allocated $11M IR&D/Bid and Proposal costs to covered contracts the preceding fiscal year
Limited to unclassified IR&D project summaries– FOIA Exemption (b) (4) applies (trade secrets, financial information that is
privileged or confidential)
Inputs must be updated at least annually and when project is completed
Page 14
CAS Harmonization – What’s the Big Deal? Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA) amended pension trust
funding requirements– Effective in 2008 for most contractors
Requires DoD to reimburse a larger portion of employee pension costs – recognized allowable costs– Significant contributions into pension trusts required by PPA
– Significant negative cash flow to government contractors Decades before PPA funding recognized as cost under existing CAS Total industry amount of funding not recognized as cost in the billions
PPA mandates harmonization of Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) with PPA funding requirements– Expect accelerated recognition of pension costs when harmonized
BOTTOM LINE: Required change in regulation entitles contractors to equitable adjustments for pension contributions– May impact overhead rates in outyears
Page 15
March 2012
Contracts Policy Update
FY 12 NDAA Key Bills Summary
Copyright. Unpublished Work. Raytheon Company.Customer Success Is Our Mission is a registered trademark of Raytheon Company.
Page 1604/20/23
“Where this new FAR rule come from?” Plenty of sources:
– Congress– Secretary Carter’s Better Buying Power Initiatives– DoD IG
UCA’s a big concern…more to follow
Deliberative process – Most changes allow the public an opportunity to comment before implementation
Industry associations play an important role in shaping policies on key issues– Aerospace Industries Association– National Defense Industry Association– TechAmerica, etc.
Page 17
DoD/IG Report- Undefinitized Contract Actions Required by law to review UCAs
– Provide annual report to Congress
– Latest report Issued Jan 2012
Results:
– 251 UCAs reviewed, 216 had discrepancies Did not meet 180 day definitization requirement Did not adequately support profit determination Obligate funds within allowable limits Did not properly justify the use of a UCA
DoD/IG Recommendations include:– OSD/DPAP revise DFARS 217.74 with additional guidance on the use of UCAs
Template for adequate authorization requests� Why performance needs to begin immediately
Instructions on how to address incurred costs in profit/fee determinations� Reduced risk with substantial incurred costs
04/20/23
Page 18
Summary of the Key Bills in FY 12 NDAA Section 803 – Extension of Applicability of Senior Executive Benchmark
Compensation Amount for Purposes of Allowable Cost Limitations under Defense Contracts– Expands coverage of allowable costs for executive compensation beyond the top 5
executives of a federal contractor to all employees of the contractor.
– Allowable cost cap is $400K
Section 804- Supplier Risk Management– Requires DoD to manage supplier risk by directing contracting personnel to use a
“credit card type bureau” to evaluate supplier risk on all DoD contract actions
Section 805 - DCAA Annual Report– Requires DCAA to submit an annual report summarizing its audit activities the previous
fiscal year.
– Includes significant problems, abuses and deficiencies, number of audit reports and pending, length of time taken for each audit, questioned dollar value, etc.
– Also requires a summary of recommendations to improve the audit process
04/20/23
Page 19
Summary of the Key Bills in FY 12 NDAA Section 806 – Inclusion of Data on Contractor Performance in Past
Performance Databases for Source Selection Decisions– Requires DoD to develop a strategy to ensure timely, accurate and complete information is
included in past performance databases used for source selection decisions
– Requires contractors be afforded up to 14 days to provide comments before information is posted.
Section 813 – Extension of GAO Protest Authority over Task and Delivery Orders– Extends to September 20, 2016 the sunset date for GAO to hear protests of task
and delivery orders under civilian agency contracts over $10M.
Section 815 – Rights in Technical Data and Validation of Proprietary Data Restrictions– Clarifies treatment of IR&D/B&P under which the governmen receives Government
Purpose License Rights in technical data
– Grants DoD the right to require delivery of tech data of which the Government has rights, even if not required in the contract
04/20/23
Page 20
Summary of the Key Bills in FY 12 NDAA Section 816- Covered Contracts for Purposes of Requirements on
Contractor Business Systems– Amends Section 893 of FY 11 NDAA to define “Covered Contract” to mean any contract
subject to cost accounting standards
– Includes firm fixed price contracts
– Exempts contracts for small businesses
Section 818 - Detection and Avoidance of Counterfeit Electronic Parts– Established contractor responsibilities for detecting and avoiding the use or inclusion of
counterfeit parts in goods or services intended for military or national security application
– Includes contractors’ liability, preventative and reporting actions
Section 823 – Prohibition on Collection of Political Information– Prohibits DoD from requiring a contractor to disclose political contributions in conjunction
with a solicitation, RFP or other communications in connection with the award of a federal contract
04/20/23
Page 21
Summary of the Key Bills in FY 12 NDAA Section 841 - Prohibition on Contracting with the Enemy in the US
CENTCOM Theater of Operations– Allows HCA to void or restrict future contract awards to contractor determined by the
Commander, CENTCOM as actively opposing US forces in a theater of operations
Section 842 - Additional Access to Contractor and Subcontractor Records in US CENTCOM Theater of Operations– Allows SecDEF to examine records of contractor or subcontractor in CENTCOM Theater
of Operations to ensure funds are not subject to extortion and corruption
Section 852- Strategy for Securing the Defense Supply Chain and Industrial Base– Requires a sector by sector, tier by tier assessment of the defense industrial base that
must identify critical new and emerging sectors of the defense industrial base
– Requires a risk assessment of the Defense industrial base supply chain
04/20/23
Page 22
Summary of the Key Bills in FY 12 NDAA Section 867- Five year extension of the Mentor Protégé Program
Reauthorization of SBIR and STTR Programs– Increases Phase I ceiling award from $100K to $150K
– Increases Phase II ceiling award from &750K to $1M
Section 822-Higher Procurement Thresholds in Contingency Ops– SAT is $1M, Micro-purchase threshold is $25K
04/20/23
Page 23
Just my Thoughts… Don’t be overwhelmed by a “Culture of Fear”
– “Business Advisor”- make your decisions on stated guidance, experience
– Oversight, second guessing goes with the territory
Contracts – Expected to be at our best in times of turmoil– Team members depend on us to provide the BEST business advice for program
execution
Be proactive! Identify the business risks early
Communicate, Communicate, Communicate!– Collaborate on the thorny issues to ensure a better product
The Warfighter needs us to solve these challenges– You are not in this alone…successful program performance is a shared
responsibility04/20/23