march 2006 the international linear collider at the ip – from feedback hardware to electromagnetic...
TRANSCRIPT
March 2006March 2006
The International Linear Collider at the IP The International Linear Collider at the IP – from feedback hardware to – from feedback hardware to electromagnetic backgroundselectromagnetic backgrounds
FONT collaboration
P Burrows, G Christian, C Clarke, C Swinson,
H Dabiri Khah, G White, S Molloy
Tony Hartin
March 2006March 2006
OutlineOutline HardwareHardware
Ground motion and the need for stablisationGround motion and the need for stablisation IP feedback and the FONT projectIP feedback and the FONT project FONT results and BPM sensitivityFONT results and BPM sensitivity
SimulationSimulation Modification of GEANT for low energy transportModification of GEANT for low energy transport 20 mrad crossing angle with different sets of accelerator 20 mrad crossing angle with different sets of accelerator parametersparameters Origin of BPM sprayOrigin of BPM spray Variation with Solenoid and DiD magnetic field Variation with Solenoid and DiD magnetic field
TheoryTheory The background generators: GUINEA-PIG and CAINThe background generators: GUINEA-PIG and CAIN New, non-linear sources of e+e- backgrounds at the IPNew, non-linear sources of e+e- backgrounds at the IP
March 2006March 2006
Luminosity Loss at IP due to ground motionLuminosity Loss at IP due to ground motion
• Relative offsets in final Quads due to fast ground motion leads to beam offsets of several y (2.7 nm for ILC 500 GeV).
•Correct using beam-based feedback system near IP or by active mechanical stabilization of Quads or both.
March 2006March 2006
Intra-train Beam-based Feedback Intra-train Beam-based Feedback
Intra-train beam feedback is Intra-train beam feedback is
last line of defence against last line of defence against
relative beam misalignmentrelative beam misalignment
Key components:Key components:
Beam position monitor (BPM)Beam position monitor (BPM)
Signal processorSignal processor
Fast driver amplifier Fast driver amplifier
E.M. kickerE.M. kicker
Fast FB circuitFast FB circuitTESLA TDR: principal IR
beam-misalignment correction
March 2006March 2006
(FONT1 +) FONT2: beamline configuration(FONT1 +) FONT2: beamline configuration
Dipole and kickers
BPMs
March 2006March 2006
FONT2 results: feedback BPM (Jan 04)FONT2 results: feedback BPM (Jan 04)
Feedback on
Beam flattener on
Beam starting positions
Delay loop on
beam start beam end
1 2 3 4
Latency 54ns, correction factor 14/1
March 2006March 2006
BPM noise from backgroundsBPM noise from backgrounds
Noise form factor sinc(Noise form factor sinc(π.f.T)π.f.T)
Secondary emission down to Secondary emission down to 100 eV needs to be considered100 eV needs to be considered
Geant3 minimum transport is 10 Geant3 minimum transport is 10 keV!keV!
Copper strips with 1 mm gap to wallCopper strips with 1 mm gap to wall
Noise from secondary charges crossing strip-wall gapNoise from secondary charges crossing strip-wall gap
~1pm error for each charge absorbed or emitted. 1e6 hits ~1pm error for each charge absorbed or emitted. 1e6 hits per b.c. would be a problem!per b.c. would be a problem!
March 2006March 2006
Geant model of 20mrad designGeant model of 20mrad design
Background primaries are traced through from Background primaries are traced through from
the IPthe IP
Optimal position for the BPM can be Optimal position for the BPM can be
establishedestablished
BPM hits vary with parameter sets, geometry BPM hits vary with parameter sets, geometry
and magnetic fields.and magnetic fields.
BPM
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 S12 S13 S14 S14n
scheme
hits
2mrad 20mrad 93443
March 2006March 2006
Geant3/4 mod for Low Energy TransportGeant3/4 mod for Low Energy Transport
Geant3 X-section Geant3 X-section parametrization parametrization wrong below wrong below 10kev cut10kev cut
Recode Geant3 Recode Geant3 to parametrize to parametrize real data from real data from NEA siteNEA site
March 2006March 2006
Geant3 total BPM hits and emitted charges Geant3 total BPM hits and emitted charges
LowE mods reveal significant LowE mods reveal significant increase in BPM hits at 100eV increase in BPM hits at 100eV cut. cut.
Generally Factor of 5 increase Generally Factor of 5 increase in BPM compared to default in BPM compared to default Geant cut of 1 MeV, and Geant cut of 1 MeV, and factor of 2 increase against factor of 2 increase against Geant default minimum cutGeant default minimum cut
Can define Geant areas (ROIs) Can define Geant areas (ROIs) around BPMS which are tuned around BPMS which are tuned for Low Energy particlesfor Low Energy particles
Worst case scenario Worst case scenario (scheme14 in the 20mrad (scheme14 in the 20mrad case) ~ 10case) ~ 105 5 hits per strip per bchits per strip per bc
20mrad - Scheme14
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
1MeV 10keV 1keV 100eV 100eV
Geant cuts
Hits
March 2006March 2006
Background Primaries – ILC parameter Sets Background Primaries – ILC parameter Sets High Lumi sets produce the greatest numbers of background pairsHigh Lumi sets produce the greatest numbers of background pairs
Guinea-Pig and Cain include L-L, B-H and B-W processesGuinea-Pig and Cain include L-L, B-H and B-W processes
Beam field is treated linearly i.e. equivalent photon method scaled Beam field is treated linearly i.e. equivalent photon method scaled by the number density of beam field photonsby the number density of beam field photons
BUT.. The beam fields are intense – 10% of Schwinger critical fieldBUT.. The beam fields are intense – 10% of Schwinger critical field
What about non-linear sources of background pairs?What about non-linear sources of background pairs?
High LumiScheme14
Low PScheme13
Large YScheme12
Low QScheme11
NominalScheme10
USSCScheme9
1 TeV TESLA
Scheme 8
High LumiScheme7
Low PScheme6
Large YScheme5
Low QScheme4
NominalScheme3
USSCScheme2
500 GeV TESLA
Scheme 1
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
700000
800000
S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 S12 S13 S14 S14n
G-P CAIN
March 2006March 2006
Where does BPM spray originate from? (20mrad)Where does BPM spray originate from? (20mrad)
X,Y view at z=3.12mX,Y view at z=3.12m
E+ and E- have different E+ and E- have different trajectoriestrajectories
spray originates from annulus spray originates from annulus around extraction linearound extraction line
B
March 2006March 2006
Relation of E distribution of BPM spray-Relation of E distribution of BPM spray-producing pairs to Solenoid fieldproducing pairs to Solenoid field
Increase in leads to energy Increase in leads to energy
peak shiftingpeak shifting
With stronger magnetic field,With stronger magnetic field,
(a)higher energy pairs, and (a)higher energy pairs, and
(b) pairs with lower transverse (b) pairs with lower transverse
momentum will produce spray on momentum will produce spray on
the mask hole edgethe mask hole edgeEnergy(MeV)
BS
March 2006March 2006
The impact of a Detector Integrated Dipole(20mrad)The impact of a Detector Integrated Dipole(20mrad)(Seryi & Parker, Phys Rev ST Accel Beam (Seryi & Parker, Phys Rev ST Accel Beam 8, 8, 041001 (2005)041001 (2005)
Introduced to offset Y displacement Introduced to offset Y displacement at the IP due to solenoid fieldat the IP due to solenoid field
Steers more primaries into Lumi Steers more primaries into Lumi Cal (K. Busser). Extra BPM spray Cal (K. Busser). Extra BPM spray sourcessources
30% more spray hits delivered to 30% more spray hits delivered to the BPMthe BPM
March 2006March 2006
Is there another non-linear source of pairs at the IP?Is there another non-linear source of pairs at the IP?
KnownKnown: multiphoton pair production : multiphoton pair production
rate described by Sokolov-Ternov and onset rate described by Sokolov-Ternov and onset
governed by beam parameter governed by beam parameter Y=E/EY=E/Ecc~0.3. Scheme1 has Y=0.054, ~0.3. Scheme1 has Y=0.054,
Scheme14 has Y=0.376Scheme14 has Y=0.376
•2nd order process rather than 1st order
•Rules for onset are different
•Calculation is complicated, but simplified when the photons are co-linear
eenkkb
eenkkk bb 21 UnknownUnknown: Multiphoton Breit-Wheeler: Multiphoton Breit-Wheeler
2bk1bk
e- e+
March 2006March 2006
Resonances in multiphoton B-WResonances in multiphoton B-W
Multiphoton Breit-Wheeler Resonances
Multiphoton Bremstrahlung (non-resonant)
Ordinary Breit-Wheeler
)1()( 222 mnkqPairs created in intense e-m field have a quasi-level structure and resonant Pairs created in intense e-m field have a quasi-level structure and resonant transitions can occur (Zeldovich, 1967)transitions can occur (Zeldovich, 1967)
22ndnd order IFQED x-section can exceed normal x-sections by orders of magnitude order IFQED x-section can exceed normal x-sections by orders of magnitude (Oleinik, JETP 25(4) 697, 1967)(Oleinik, JETP 25(4) 697, 1967)
22ndnd order Breit-Wheeler process in CIRCULARLY POLARISED field shows the order Breit-Wheeler process in CIRCULARLY POLARISED field shows the same featuresame feature
hepwww.ph.qmul.ac.uk/~hartin/thesis
March 2006March 2006
Experimental evidence for the IFQED Experimental evidence for the IFQED processesprocesses
1st order: One photon pair productionExperiment E144 SLAC. 46 GeV beam with Nd:glass laser peak intensity 0.5x1018 Wcm-2. Up to 4 photons contributed to each event Meyerhofer et al (1996) other non-linear phenomena such as electron mass shift observed
2bk1bk
e- e+
1bk
e- e+
2nd order: Substantial theoretical studies but no experimental efforts yet!
BUT potentially more detectable because of resonances
March 2006March 2006
The field of the relativistic charge beamsThe field of the relativistic charge beamsWith low disruption, approximate to a constant crossed e-m field perpendicular to direction of propagation
SIMPLIFICATION: Beamsstrahlung photons k1 and k2 emitted forward. Assume they are collinear
COMPLICATION: Symmetry of the field seen by the synchrotron photons
AiJ P,n J0Pt2 cos nt+t3 3 dt Ai n cos nt+t3 3 dt K
1 3
March 2006March 2006
Including the external field in IFQED Including the external field in IFQED calculationscalculations
‘Operator Method’: quantum interaction of electron and external field photons but electron trajectory is considered classical. Due to Baier et al (JETP 28(4) p.807, 1969)
Full quantum treatment: Horrendously complex but potentially doable with Vermaseren’s FORM
‘Semi-classical method’: Dirac equation is solved exactly for interaction with a classical plane-wave e-m field. Most common method. Used originally by Narozhnyii, Nikishov and Ritus in the mid 1960s
Ufi
f eiÏ ‰tMfit dt i
March 2006March 2006
IFQED – Dirac Equation SolutionIFQED – Dirac Equation SolutionExponential dependency on external field 4-potential
Fourier Expansion in contributions of n external field photons
Different external field polarisations lead to different “form factor” functions
Circular polarisation Bessel functions n Jn(Q)
Linear polarisation Generalised Bessel–type functions
Constant crossed field-Azimuthally symmetric Airy functions n Ai(n Q)
Constant crossed field –Nonazimuthally symmetric New ‘AiJ’ functions n AiJn(Q)
exp dÏ † i Ae p i Ae2
March 2006March 2006
Calculation of Resonance widthsCalculation of Resonance widthsThe Electron Self Energy must be included in the Multiphoton Breit-Wheeler process
This is a 2nd order IFQED process in its own right.
Renormalization/Regularization reduces to that of the non-external field case
The Electron Self Energy in external CIRCULARLY POLARISED e-m field originally due to Becker & Mitter 1975 for low field intensity parameter =(ea/m)2. Has been recalculated for general
ESE in external CONSTANT CROSSED field is due to Ritus, 1972
Optical theorem: the imaginary part of the ESE is the same form as the Sokolov-Ternov equations
March 2006March 2006
Where do the resonances occur?Where do the resonances occur?Beamsstrahlung photon ES >> 0.511 MeV
Beam photon EB < 0.511 MeV
Processes which give/take energy to the field allowed and mass shell can be reached for physical values
For collinear beamstrahlung photons, resonance condition is r (external field photons) ~ ES/EB
Resonance Peak Resonance Width
March 2006March 2006
Notes on the cross-section calculationNotes on the cross-section calculation
Full trace contains ~ 100,000 termsFull trace contains ~ 100,000 terms
Dramatically simplified byDramatically simplified by
Special “centre of mass-like” reference frameSpecial “centre of mass-like” reference frame
Assume beamsstrahlung photons and beam field photons Assume beamsstrahlung photons and beam field photons are collinearare collinear
Only insert Imaginary part of self energy to get resonance Only insert Imaginary part of self energy to get resonance widthwidth
k1k
2q q r k 0
And the PRELIMINARY results…..?
March 2006March 2006
Results:Results: Stimulated Breit-Wheeler (Non-Resonant)
Compare Stimulated Breit-Compare Stimulated Breit-Wheeler process with ordinary Wheeler process with ordinary Breit-Wheeler processBreit-Wheeler process
Examine the resonant and non-Examine the resonant and non-resonant contributions to the resonant contributions to the cross-section separatelycross-section separately
Nonresonant Stimulated Breit-Nonresonant Stimulated Breit-Wheeler cross-section only a few Wheeler cross-section only a few percent of the ordinary Breit-percent of the ordinary Breit-Wheeler cross-sectionWheeler cross-section
Can be neglected as a source of Can be neglected as a source of extra pairsextra pairs
March 2006March 2006
Results:Results: Stimulated Breit-Wheeler (Resonant)
Differential cross-section can exceed Differential cross-section can exceed the ordinary Breit-Wheeler processthe ordinary Breit-Wheeler process
Stimulated Breit-Wheeler Cross-Stimulated Breit-Wheeler Cross-section up to 2 orders of magnitude section up to 2 orders of magnitude greater than ordinary breit-wheelergreater than ordinary breit-wheeler
Transverse production of pairs seems Transverse production of pairs seems favouredfavoured
PROVISO – calculation for special reference frame. Need to generalise the case!
March 2006March 2006
Summary and Future WorkSummary and Future WorkFONT project continues with digital version and experiments planned at FONT project continues with digital version and experiments planned at ATF2 (KEK)ATF2 (KEK)
GEANT tweakingGEANT tweaking Modified Geant 3 for low energy transportModified Geant 3 for low energy transport Ran pair files through Geant 3 simulation of BDSRan pair files through Geant 3 simulation of BDS
BPM hits are within a factor of 10 of problem levels. More detailed studies BPM hits are within a factor of 10 of problem levels. More detailed studies are needed. Simulation support for planned ESA testsare needed. Simulation support for planned ESA tests
LowE modification's reveal an increase in hits by a factor of 2 and were LowE modification's reveal an increase in hits by a factor of 2 and were important to take into accountimportant to take into account
22ndnd order, nonlinear interactions of beamsstrahlung photons with order, nonlinear interactions of beamsstrahlung photons with the beam fields should be taken into account because the cross-the beam fields should be taken into account because the cross-sections are potentially resonant and can exceed 1sections are potentially resonant and can exceed 1stst order and order and “linear” ordinary cross-sections – established by substantial “linear” ordinary cross-sections – established by substantial theoretical work by several groupstheoretical work by several groups
Preliminary calculations of the Stimulated Breit-Wheeler process Preliminary calculations of the Stimulated Breit-Wheeler process (simplified case) suggests that this will be an issue at the ILC(simplified case) suggests that this will be an issue at the ILC
March 2006March 2006
3 GeV electrons
Focussed Tabletop TeraWatt Laser
low spec laser
Australian Synchrotron
Experimental detection of Stimulated Breit-Experimental detection of Stimulated Breit-Wheeler resonancesWheeler resonances