marineline (siloxirane) coating for ships engaged in the carriage of edible oils and chemicals...
TRANSCRIPT
MarineLINEMarineLINE (Siloxirane) (Siloxirane) Coating for Ships Engaged Coating for Ships Engaged
in the Carriage of Edible Oils in the Carriage of Edible Oils and Chemicals Presented toand Chemicals Presented to
FOSFA International FOSFA International
August 10, 2004August 10, 2004ByByDonald J. KeehanDonald J. Keehan
Cargo Versatility - Can Carry Virtually All IMO Cargoes
Carry More Cargoes than Stainless Steel
Clean Tanks Faster than Stainless Steel Tanks or Other types of Coated Tanks
MarineLINE
Resists More Chemicals than Stainless Steel and Other Coatings
Resistance to 131 Most Carried Chemical Cargoes
MarineLINE
Market Limitations Prior to MarineLine
Problems with Zinc Silicate Coatings
• Absorbs Cargo Quickly• Retains Oil Like Cargoes• Subsequent Cargo
Contamination• Limit Back Hauling Capability
Not Resistant to Acids, Caustics, and Acid Containing Oils and Urea
MarineLINE
Market Limitations Prior to MarineLineProblems with Phenolic Epoxy Coating
• Absorbs Cargoes to High Levels (depending on cargo)• Absorbs Cargo Relatively Slowly• Releases Absorbed
Cargo Very Slowly• Small Traces May be
Retained• Subsequent Cargo
Contamination
MarineLINE
Epoxies 3-dimensional screen-like structure when polymerized
The greater the distance between crosslinks the greater the permeation causing chemical attack and absorption
Epoxies used in coatings have Two (2) Functional Groups per molecule giving Four (4) Crosslinks
Limitation of Epoxy Coatings
MarineLINE
28 Functionality vs. Epoxy 2 Functionality in same area:
784 crosslinks vs. 4 crosslinks
Higher Functionality Produces Higher Crosslink Density...
Giving:
Higher Chemical Resistance
Higher Temperature Resistance
Resistance to Permeation (absorption)
MarineLINE
Epoxy’s Open Screen StructureMarineLine 784’s Closed
Screen Structure
MarineLine vs. Phenol Epoxy
MarineLINE
MarineLINE is approximately 3 times smoother than Phenol Epoxies and over 4 Times smoother than Stainless Steel (as confirmed by Independent Laboratory)
MarineLINE Ra 0.7 - 0.9
Phenol Epoxy Ra 1.8 - 2.1
Stainless Steel Ra 3.2 - 4.5
MarineLINE The Technology
behind Easier Cleaning
Surface Energy / Surface Tension
MarineLINE is Over 40 Times More Slippery than Stainless Steel and almost 5 times Slipperier than Phenol Epoxies
Material Dynes / cm
Stainless Steel * 1800.0 Copper * 1160.0
Phenol Epoxy 142.0
Water * 73.0
MarineLine 34.0
Teflon * 18.5
Material Dynes / cm
Stainless Steel * 1800.0 Copper * 1160.0
Phenol Epoxy 142.0
Water * 73.0
MarineLine 34.0
Teflon * 18.5
Surface Energy is measured in Dynes/cm
* Source: N.K. Adams The Physics and Chemistry of Surfaces
MarineLINE The Technology Behind Easier Cleaning
Chemical Resistance
Non Absorbent Qualities
VerifiedIndependent Test Certified by Members of International Association of Classification Societies (IACS)
MarineLINE
• % Absorption After 45 Days Immersion • Days Recovery (Desorption) with Ventilation @ 30°C
Test by Independent Testing Laboratory
MarineLine vs. Phenolic Epoxy
MarineLINE
MarineLine vs. Phenolic Epoxy
• % Absorption after 45 days
• Days Recovery (Desorption) with Ventilation at 30oC.
Test by Independent Testing Laboratory
MarineLINE
MarineLine vs. Phenolic Epoxy• % Absorption after
45 days
• Days Recovery (Desorption) with Ventilation at 30oC.
Test by Independent Testing Laboratory
MarineLINE
MarineLINE
Test Protocol:
1) 3 Steel Boxes Coated With MarineLine and Bottoms Reinforced With Fiberglass Impregnated With MarineLine Resin - Boxes Blasted and Coated Inside Cargo Tanks of M/T Joran - Boxes Cured in Oven at 80°C for 6 Hours
All Tests Witnessed and Certified by DNV Italy and RINA
Laboratorio Chimico Merceologico Genoa, Italy, Dr. R. Cosulich
MarineLINE
2) Each Box Was Loaded With a Chemical for 30 Days.
Chemicals Tested:
• 80% Acetic Acid • 50% Phosphoric Acid• Methanol • 96% Sulfuric Acid• Ethylene Dichloride • Caustic Soda • Virgin Naphtha • Premium Gasoline
All Tests Witnessed and Certified by DNV Italy and RINA
Laboratorio Chimico Merceologico Genoa, Italy, Dr. R. Cosulich
MarineLINE
3) After 30 Days, the Boxes Were Emptied. Coated and Lined Surfaces Were Checked for Chemical Attack.
4) Each Chemical Was Checked for Contamination From Previous Chemical or MarineLine Coating.
5) Boxes Were Washed With Salt and Fresh Water Before Loading With Next Chemical.
6) MarineLine Coating Was Washed With Methanol & Analyzed for Chemical Residual.
All Tests Witnessed and Certified by DNV Italy and RINA
Laboratorio Chimico Merceologico Genoa, Italy, Dr. R. Cosulich
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
50%Phosphoric
Acid
50%Caustic
Acid
80% AceticAcid
96%Sulphuric
Acid
EthyleneDichloride
(EDC)
VirginNaptha
PremiumGasoline
Purity BeforePurity After
Product Purity (Non-Contamination) Before & After 30 day Immersion
Product Tested
MarineLINE
Test Certified by DNV and RINA
0
20
40
60
80
100
50%Phosphoric
Acid
50% CausticAcid
80% AceticAcid
96%Sulphuric
Acid
EthyleneDichloride
(EDC)
Virgin Naptha PremiumGasoline
Methanol
Purity % Before Purity % After
Wall Wash Methanol Analysis (non-absorption)
Before and After 30 Day Immersion
MarineLINE
Test Certified by DNV and RINA
MarineLINESiloxirane Coating
Approvedfor
Food and
Potable Water
Siloxirane Coating
MarineLINE
Tanker Operators Statements
MarineLINE
"It was found that conventional intensive cleaning methods used for Zinc and Epoxy coated tanks does not have much effect on MarineLine coating.MarineLine coated tanks can be cleaned quicker in the same way as cleaning stainless steel tanks. Rust remover and caustic based detergents used to spray and scrub were used to scrub and remove dried up patches of sulphur after Sulphured Gas Oil last cargo. After this simple cleaning the tank can be made ready for methanol and MEG (methanol wall wash standard) cargoes quickly."
Capt. Ramu Naidu
Aurora Tanker’s M/T “Selendang Sari”
Tanker Operators Statements
MarineLINE
Mr. Jan Slooter, MDClearwater Group
“M/T “Coralwater” changes cargoes on weekly basis. As an example ships 5 P/S had 7 different cargoes over 7 week period. Sequence of cargoes, spent caustic, nitrobenzene, epichlorohydrin, acryonitrile, EDC, analine, and formaldehyde. Prior to unloading sample of each cargo was taken for test and verification on non-contamination. After each unloading tanks were washed with hot salt water, followed by fresh water wash. Tanks were certified clean by methanol wall wash test prior to loading next cargo.
Over 5-year period M/T “Coralwater” has never had a cargo contamination claim. Ship has carried over 400 different cargoes.
Our MarineLine coated ships clean easier and faster than our older stainless steel ships.”
MarineLINE
Herning’s MarineLine coated M/T “Serra Theresa” is carrying French Cognac to Ukraine and Ethyl Alcohol on return voyages.
MarineLINEOver 50 MarineLine coated ships operatingsince 1994 without a contamination claim
Additional 60 tankers contracted for MarineLine
coating by 2007
Thank You.For Complete Chemical Listing see MarineLINE-Resistance also on this CD (Excel ‘97 format)
For Additional Information Please Contact:Advanced Polymer Coatings, LLC
Avon, Ohio 44011 U.S.A.Phone: (+01) 440-937-6218
Fax: (+01) 440-937-5046email: [email protected]