mark twain regional council of governments broadband study findings
DESCRIPTION
MoBroadbandNow ProjectTRANSCRIPT
MARK TWAINREGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
BROADBAND STUDY
Regional Technology Planning Team Report
August 2011
BROADBAND RESIDENTIAL NEEDS STUDY
RESIDENTIAL STUDY BACKGROUND
Survey mailed June 2011 4000 homes randomly sampled.
491 returned /12% response rate
400 returned surveys analyzed Provides margin of error of ± 5 percentage points
7
RESIDENTIAL STUDY: WHO RESPONDED ?
NOTE: 4.5 % OF RESPONDENTS DID NOT INDICATE OR INDICATED A COUNTY OUTSIDE THE REGION AS THEIR COUNTY OF RESIDENCE
County Frequency % of total respondents
County pop as % of Mark Twain Region Population
Audrain 65 17% 18%Macon 56 15% 11%Marion 63 16% 21%Monroe 46 12% 7%Pike 44 12% 13%Ralls 31 8% 7%Randolph 60 16% 18%Shelby 17 4% 5%
RESIDENTIAL SURVEY: WHO RESPONDED ?
RESIDENTIAL SURVEY: AGE OF RESPONDENTS
RESIDENTIAL SURVEY: INCOME OF RESPONDENTS
Median Income of Surveyed HH > Median HH income of the region(36% did not respond to income question)
CountyMedian Household Income (Census)
Audrain 38,379Macon 36,336Marion 38,778Monroe 37,859Pike 38,971Ralls 47,890Randolph 33,980Shelby 35,261Mark Twain Region 38,432
Missouri 45,149
RESIDENTIAL SURVEY: COMPUTER OWNERSHIP AND INTERNET ACCESS AT HOME
RESIDENTIAL SURVEY: WHEN DID HOUSEHOLD FIRST OWN A COMPUTER AND WHEN DID THEY FIRST HAVE ACCESS TO BB/ HSI AT HOME ?
2%5%
16% 15%
62%
10%
27%
37%
8%11%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Less than 1yr 1-3 yrs 4-7 yrs 8-10 yrs More 10 yrs
% HH with Computer % HH with BB or HSI at home
Computer trend line Internet trend line
RESIDENTIAL STUDY – TYPE OF INTERNET SERVICE
KEY ISSUE: SPEED
15
KEY ISSUE: NUMBER OF PROVIDERS AND COST
APPLICATIONS (RESIDENTIAL)
14%15%16%
20%20%21%22%
29%33%
38%41%
60%60%62%64%65%
81%86%
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Home-based businessSell online
Share something online that you createdLook for a place to live
Take class or do homeworkContribute to a web site or blog
Work from homeLook for job online
Play online video or gamesWatch TV or other videos
Visit state or local Gov. sitesBuy online
News or politicsHealth or medical information
Online bankingSocial networking site
Information to buy services and productsKeep in touch with friends and family
RESIDENTIAL STUDY – IMPORTANCE OF INTERNET AND COMPUTER ACCESS
49%
22%
15%
7%
7%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Very Important
Important
Somewhat Important
Not at all important
Don't know
BUSINESS STUDY BACKGROUND
Online survey available from: April 2011 to August 2011
149 local businesses responded 18% were satellite offices 17% had satellite locations
32 questions about broadband or high-speed Internet services in the Mark Twain region
19
BUSINESS STUDY – RESPONSES BY COUNTY
20
Audrain 16%
Macon 10%
Marion 21%
Monroe 3%
Pike 0%
Ralls 1%
Randolph 10%
Shelby 39%
EMPLOYEE BUSINESS SIZE
21
BUSINESS CATEGORIES
22
DO YOU HAVE INTERNET SERVICE AT YOUR BUSINESS?
Do you have Internet service at your business? NO =4% Yes = 96%
23
CURRENT INTERNET PROVIDER
Top 3 MentionedCenturyTel/CenturyLinkMark TwainAT&T
Service established Early 90s-2010
24
TYPES OF INTERNET CONNECTIONS
25
WHY NOT BROADBAND?
26
BROADBAND SERVICE RATINGS
27
SUPPORTED INTERNET APPLICATIONS
28
HOW IMPORTANT
29
95% said would be beneficial if broadband capacity were improved in the region.
COST OF SERVICE
30
ONLINE BUSINESS SURVEY
53 businesses had other comments about broadband service availability in the region. Some included:Rural areas need broadband. Specifically
mentioned: Shelby County, City of Paris, City of Moberly.
Need more than a wireless option.Rural areas lagging behind urban areas. Current broadband not fast enough (DSL customer) Poor customer service.
31
INDIVIDUAL SECTOR DATA
Agriculture Economic
Development Sector Energy Sector
Environment Sector Healthcare Sector Higher Ed Sector K-12 Education Sector Library Sector
Local Government Public Safety Tourism Workforce
Development
32
MAPS
Review maps provided by State of Missouri
33
BROADBAND PROVIDERS RESPOND
Feedback on data and current initiatives from broadband providers.
34
BROADBAND STRATEGIC PLANNING
Will identify strategies, and related directions, initiatives, goals and objectives, that can be employed by interested parties within the region.
It is a large scale, high-level planning exercise It provides specific guideposts and pathways
to better help the region build long term broadband sustainability
Addresses both availability (supply) and adoption (demand) within the region.
35
BROADBAND STRATEGIC PLANNING PROCESS
The Strategic Planning process is split into four (4) phases: Phase 1 (Today): Needs Assessment and Existing
Information Review – A detailed understanding of the current broadband climate and the current and future broadband-related needs in the region.
Phase 2 (Beginning Today): How to move from the current broadband environment to the one needed within the region. Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Challenges (SWOC)
analysis will be performed.
36
SWOC ANALYSIS The definitions of the four (4) SWOC elements are as
follows: Strengths – Broadband-related systems, practices,
processes, and resources that are highly valued by the region.
Weaknesses – Areas that need improvement; reasons why stakeholders are not able to wholeheartedly embrace broadband; and, areas that tend to compromise the achievement of high levels of availability and adoption.
Opportunities – Favorable situations/circumstances not yet taken advantage of that may positively impact the development and acceptance of broadband.
Challenges – Present and future situations/circumstances that may negatively impact broadband development and acceptance as perceived by the region.
37
SWOC ANALYSIS Phase 2: cont’d
The analysis should cover a wide range of issues including those centered on: residential, business and institutional broadband availability
and adoption, whether available bandwidth(s) are sufficient for current as well
as near and long term needs and applications, potential upgrade and expansion possibilities, reliability of existing networks, related matters.
Providers are asked during Phase 2 to present their ideas on possibilities for advancing the broadband environment.
38
UNDERSTANDING SWOC
SWOC ANALYSIS
40
SWOC ANALYSIS The definitions of the four (4) SWOC elements are as
follows: Strengths – Broadband-related systems, practices,
processes, and resources that are highly valued by the region.
Weaknesses – Areas that need improvement; reasons why stakeholders are not able to wholeheartedly embrace broadband; and, areas that tend to compromise the achievement of high levels of availability and adoption.
Opportunities – Favorable situations/circumstances not yet taken advantage of that may positively impact the development and acceptance of broadband.
Challenges – Present and future situations/circumstances that may negatively impact broadband development and acceptance as perceived by the region.
41
BROADBAND STRATEGIC PLANNING PURPOSE AND PROCESS
Phase 3: Findings Review and Initial Strategic Plan Element Development – The RTPT will review the initial findings, priorities, potential strategic directions and actions, timelines and resources needed related to those potential directions. In this phase, a number of potential strategic
directions and initiatives will be identified, reviewed, discussed, and then incorporated into the initial draft of the Strategic Plan.
42
BROADBAND STRATEGIC PLANNING PURPOSE AND PROCESS
Phase 4: Drafting and Finalization of the Strategic Plan by the RTPT. The Strategic Plan will consist of :
1. Introduction and Regional Overview2. Purpose Statement3 Detailed SWOC Findings and Analysis4. Strategic Direction(s)
Short, medium and long term goals and objectives to boost broadband adoption and availability.
Action Items and Implementation Plan
5. Financial, human and organizational resource considerations6. Timelines and benchmarks for measuring progress
43
Additional Discussion
44
Connect with us at MOBroadbandNow
http://mobroadbandnow.com/
Broadband Summit Nov. 17, 2011Capital Plaza Hotel, Jefferson City
Follow us on Facebook and Twitter
45
THANK YOU FOR YOUR PARTICIPATION IN THE MARK TWAIN
BROADBAND PLANNING PROJECT!
46