market data and methods for real estate portfolio ratings (lausberg/wiegner)

15
© Carsten Lausberg 2009, p. 1 Market Data and Methods for Market Data and Methods for Real Estate Portfolio Ratings Real Estate Portfolio Ratings (Lausberg/Wiegner) (Lausberg/Wiegner) Presentation by Carsten Lausberg prepared for the 16th Annual Conference of the European Real Estate Society, June 24-27, 2009 in Stockholm/Sweden Background Introduction Market Data Methods Conclusion University OUTLINE

Upload: bairn

Post on 27-Jan-2016

16 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

University. Background. Introduction. Market Data. Methods. Conclusion. Market Data and Methods for Real Estate Portfolio Ratings (Lausberg/Wiegner). OUTLINE. Presentation by Carsten Lausberg - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Market Data and Methods for  Real Estate Portfolio Ratings (Lausberg/Wiegner)

© Carsten Lausberg 2009, p. 1

Market Data and Methods for Market Data and Methods for Real Estate Portfolio RatingsReal Estate Portfolio Ratings

(Lausberg/Wiegner)(Lausberg/Wiegner)

Presentation by

Carsten Lausberg

prepared for the 16th Annual Conference of the European Real Estate Society,

June 24-27, 2009 in Stockholm/Sweden

Background

Introduction

Market Data

Methods

Conclusion

University

OUTLINE

Page 2: Market Data and Methods for  Real Estate Portfolio Ratings (Lausberg/Wiegner)

© Carsten Lausberg 2009, p. 2

Nürtingen-Geislingen University: One of the Nürtingen-Geislingen University: One of the Pioneers in Real Estate Education in GermanyPioneers in Real Estate Education in Germany

Munich

Stuttgart GEISLINGEN

Located in south-western Germany

3,500 students in 20 degree courses

Several rankings show HfWU in the top flight of Germany‘s business schools (Stern, Spiegel, ManagerMagazin, Stiftung Warentest, Wirtschaftswoche, Focus)

Major in real estate management since 1983

Degree course in real estate management since 1998 (Diplom/Master and B.S.)

Today: Appr. 360 real estate students currently enrolled, 12 real estate professors and more than 27 lecturers, 500 alumni in the real estate industry

Accredited by RICS and FIBAA

Background

Introduction

Market Data

Methods

Conclusion

University

Page 3: Market Data and Methods for  Real Estate Portfolio Ratings (Lausberg/Wiegner)

© Carsten Lausberg 2009, p. 3

Motivation For This StudyMotivation For This Study

Motivation:

Improvement of market transparency in real estate risk management

Rating:

- Central element of modern risk management- Especially for Banks, thanks to Basel II- Huge leap of development- Not well documented in the real estate literature

Subject:

- Internal credit rating for a large group of German banks(4 years, 800 loans in the development sample, 3,000+ in the validation)

- External rating for German open-ended funds(3 years, 35 portfolios, 3,800 properties, 70,000 contracts)

- Market rating for 125 German cities

Background

Introduction

Market Data

Methods

Conclusion

University

Page 4: Market Data and Methods for  Real Estate Portfolio Ratings (Lausberg/Wiegner)

© Carsten Lausberg 2009, p. 4

DefinitionsDefinitions

Rating:

A holistic evaluation of the future perspectives of a property, a real estate portfolio, a real estate product or another issue connected with real estate

on the basis of indicators

Purposes:

- Credit rating- Investment rating

Subjects:

- Physical assetsProperty/ProjectPortfolio

- Financial assets based on propertiesLoans, bonds, MBSStocks

- Others (market, tenant, manager…)

Background

Introduction

Market Data

Methods

Conclusion

University

Page 5: Market Data and Methods for  Real Estate Portfolio Ratings (Lausberg/Wiegner)

© Carsten Lausberg 2009, p. 5

Input DataInput Data

ManagementMarketProperty

Rating Quality

Background

Introduction

Market Data

Methods

Conclusion

University

Method Person Data Others

Page 6: Market Data and Methods for  Real Estate Portfolio Ratings (Lausberg/Wiegner)

© Carsten Lausberg 2009, p. 6

Classification Classification of Market Data of Market Data According to the Frame of ReferenceAccording to the Frame of Reference

Background

Introduction

Market Data

Methods

Conclusion

University

National levele.g., political stability, economic and socio-demographic framework, natural space conditions

Economic conditionse.g., GDP, structure of the economy, unemployment

Location levele.g., submarket data, location quality

Property markete.g., rents, yields, vacancy rates

Spatial reference Factual reference

Regional levele.g., property market, rents, yields, economic and socio-demographicconditions

Social conditions e.g., population, income, purchasing power, household sizes

Page 7: Market Data and Methods for  Real Estate Portfolio Ratings (Lausberg/Wiegner)

© Carsten Lausberg 2009, p. 7

Classification Classification of Market Data of Market Data According to Scale Type and Objectivity According to Scale Type and Objectivity

Background

Introduction

Market Data

Methods

Conclusion

University

Raw datae.g., offer rents, sales volume, number of transactions, number of building permits, number of inhabitants

Classification datae.g., type of use(office/housing/retail…), market type (A-city, prime location), tenant type (A, B, C)

Processed datae.g., market rents, marketyields, vacancy rates, rentforecasts, indices

Expert estimations and opinionse.g., location quality, long-term forecasts, market scoring

quantitative(metric scale)

qualitative(nominal or ordinal scale)

hard(objective)

soft(subjective)

Scale type

Objektivität

Page 8: Market Data and Methods for  Real Estate Portfolio Ratings (Lausberg/Wiegner)

© Carsten Lausberg 2009, p. 8

Evaluating the Suitability of Market DataEvaluating the Suitability of Market Data

Criteria:

- Objectivity, reliability, validity- Long time series - Completeness and consistency- Comparibility of definitions- Availability in a timely fashion and on a low level of aggregation

Problematic fields:

- Market segments with a general lack of data - Correlations

Conclusion:

- Still a lot of work to do- Compromises necessary- Expertise of the rating analyst important

Background

Introduction

Market Data

Methods

Conclusion

University

Page 9: Market Data and Methods for  Real Estate Portfolio Ratings (Lausberg/Wiegner)

© Carsten Lausberg 2009, p. 9

Developing a Real Estate RatingDeveloping a Real Estate Rating

Background

Introduction

Market Data

Methods

Conclusion

UniversityMethods for Development:

- Scoring- Simulation- Combination

1) Scoring

Empirical-statistical approach

- Univariate analysis of all risk factors- Multivariate analysis - Combination of the scorecards to an overall modelEmpirical-qualitative approach

Transfer into a rating grade

Page 10: Market Data and Methods for  Real Estate Portfolio Ratings (Lausberg/Wiegner)

© Carsten Lausberg 2009, p. 10

Developing a Real Estate RatingDeveloping a Real Estate Rating

Background

Introduction

Market Data

Methods

Conclusion

University2) Simulation

Basis: investment calculation (DCF model)

- Simplified- Extended

Partial models to reduce complexity and concentrate on the objectives of the rating

Core: modelling the rental cash flow

Transfer into a rating grade

3) Combination

Page 11: Market Data and Methods for  Real Estate Portfolio Ratings (Lausberg/Wiegner)

© Carsten Lausberg 2009, p. 11

Modelled Contract Rent

Mo

delle

d C

on

tract R

ent

Modelled Contract Rent

I

Frictio

nal V

acancy

II III

Ince

ntives

IV

Modelling the Rental Cash FlowModelling the Rental Cash Flow

2007

Current Contract Rent

Rent [€]

2008 20102009 2011-2012

Forecasted ContractRent

Forecasted Property-Specific Market Rent

Adaptation of Contract Rent to Market Rent

Background

Introduction

Market Data

Methods

Conclusion

University

Page 12: Market Data and Methods for  Real Estate Portfolio Ratings (Lausberg/Wiegner)

© Carsten Lausberg 2009, p. 12

0 1 2 3 …

IN-OUT

=Cashflow

Forecast

Market Model

Cash Flow Model Scorecards

Actual

Market Rent

Time

Total Score

Portfolio Market

Real Estate Market• Rents• Vacancy Rates• Yields• Correlations• Sales• Estimation of lenght of

frictional vacancy• …

Input Data

Economy• Unemployment• Purchasing Power• Building PermitsSociety• Population Growth• Number of Households• Traffic situation…

OTHERDATA

Rating

€€€ €€€ €€€€€€€€€ €€€ €€€€€€

€€€ €€€ €€€€€€

€€€€€€

€€€

Properties• Address• Type• RentableSpaceEnterprise• Liquidity• Financing• Management…

Enter-prise

MARKETDATA

Background

Introduction

Market Data

Methods

Conclusion

University

Page 13: Market Data and Methods for  Real Estate Portfolio Ratings (Lausberg/Wiegner)

© Carsten Lausberg 2009, p. 13

TestingTesting

Background

Introduction

Market Data

Methods

Conclusion

UniversityAbsolutely necessary… but often neglected in practice

Key elements:

- Calibration

- Validation (out of time, out of sample, use-test)

CalibrationScore Number of

loansNumber of defaults

Probability of default

Rating grade

98-100 200 0 0,00% 1a 0,01% AAA94-97 1000 0 0,00% 1b 0,02% AA+88-93 5000 2 0,04% 1c 0,03% AA79-87 10000 5 0,05% 1d 0,04% AA-68-78 8400 3 0,04% 2a 0,05% A+… … … … … 8,00% A

… …

Internal rating model of the bank

Scoring results Probability of default

Rating grade

Master scale of Standard & Poor's

Page 14: Market Data and Methods for  Real Estate Portfolio Ratings (Lausberg/Wiegner)

© Carsten Lausberg 2009, p. 14

Summary and ConclusionsSummary and Conclusions

Background

Introduction

Market Data

Methods

Conclusion

UniversityCombination of data from different sources and mix of methods can contribute to meaningful real estate portfolio ratings

Improvement of the data situation necessary- Official statistics, length of time series, international comparability- Role of researchers, ERES, and others to promote transparency Formalization of risk management in real estate- Standard defintions- BenchmarkingResearch and Development- Methods can be improved- Lack of knowledge and experience as well as wrong incentives

have to be taken into accountTraining- Spreading the knowledge- Necessary to reduce human errors in calculating and interpreting

rating grades

Page 15: Market Data and Methods for  Real Estate Portfolio Ratings (Lausberg/Wiegner)

Contact:

Dr. Carsten Lausberg, M.S.Professor of Real Estate BankingNuertingen-Geislingen UniversityParkstr. 473312 [email protected]