PS RAO

MASSMUS Application in Shahapur Canal Naryanpur Karnataka India February 2009.

Dr PS RAO

(1) RAP

(2) CAPACITY & SENSITIVITY

(3) PERTURBATIONS

(4) WATER SHARES and BENEFITS

(5) COST of OPERATION(6) USERS & SERVICE TO USERS

(7) MANAGEMENT UNITS

(8) DEMAND for OPERATION

(9) OPERATION IMPROVEMENTS/UNITS

(10) INTEGRATING SOM OPTIONS

(11) PLAN FOR MODERNIZATION and MONITORING & EVALUATION

(0) WATER SERVICES

VISION OF THE IRRIGATION SYSTEMAND FUTURE SCENARIO BUILDING

Narayanpur systems8 systems

Indi Lift IS

JBC

MBC

SBC

Rampur LIS

Indi BC

NRBC NLBC

Shorapur city

Shahapur city

Shahapur Branch Canal

STEP 1 Censing MUSIrrigation

Cotton Rice

Diversified cropping pattern CROPPING PATTERN FOR KHARIFF

0%

3%

25%

19%

10%

16%

0%

5%3% 19%

0%

0%

MAIZE

SUNFLOWER

COTTON

TUR DAL

GREEN DAL

PADDY

SUGAR CANE

CHILLIES

GROUND NUT

BAZRA

GARDEN CROP

OTHERSCROPPING PATTERN FOR RABI

2%

17%

4%

20%

12%2%16%

0%

3%

24%

0%

0%

0%

WHEET

JOWER

SUNFLOWER

COTTON

TUR DAL

GREEN GRAM

PADDY

SUGAR CANE

CHILLIES

GROUND NUT

BAJRA

GARDEN CROPS

OTHERS

Domestic water

Shettikera tank

Shahapur City reservoirHand pumps along SC

Groundwater recharge by irrigation

Domestic water

Purposely made gate leak to feed dwellers along drainage

People access to canal water along SC

Others MUS

• CATTLE

• DRAINAGE

• FLOOD CONTROL

• SMALL BUSINESS

• POWER PRODUCTION

• ENVIRONMENT RECREATION

7 Water Services met in SBC, classified with the MEA grid

Provisioning Services

Regulating Services

Supporting services

Cultural Services

Irrigation Domestic water Water for cattle Industry and

business (Tourism)

Hydropower

Environmental flows (drainage - support to natural ecosystems)

Flood protection

None Bathing during festivals

RAP MUS

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Number of Services

Inte

gra

tio

n o

f M

US

in

Mg

t

Single Use Systems

Multi-purpose Systems

SHAHAPUR

STEP 2 Capacity & Sensitivity• SERVICES • Characteristics

required for the service

• CAPACITY • SENSITIVITY

• Domestic Water

Highly reliable controlled flow

High quality of water

• reduced during canal closure

• High sensitive to deficit and pollution

• Water to cattle

access to canal water supply to water

ponds

• reduced during canal closure

• Groundwater recharge

canal seepage Field losses specific recharge

facilities

• Reduced by canal lining

• Low sensitive

• Homestead garden

groundwater pumping

• high water table to feed root system

• Groundwater recharge and percolation from adjacent fields

• Low sensitive

• Environment

Environmental flows • Availability of water

• Water scarcity

• Pollution

• Fishery • Presence of water • Minimum water flows or volume in water bodies at season’s end.

• sensitive to long term quality

Improving the capacity

• More animal ramps

• Better (safe) access to canal water

STEP 3 Perturbations

• No specific estimations were possible as the MUS is not recognized within the system

• Further studies recommended

STEP 4 Sizing MUS

• WATER ACCOUNTING

• VALUING WATER

Fields (crops+ fallow), 1010.8

Environmental flows, 56.9

Perennial natural vegetation , 113.8

Fishery in large water bodies , 11.4

Domestic Water, 5.9

Power Plants , 0.0

Animals , 1.5

STEPS 5 to 10

• COSTING WATER SERVICES

• MANAGEMENT

• DEMAND

• IMPROVEMENTS

• INTEGRATION

• PLAN FOR MODERNIZATION

Follow Up

• Further validation in another system

• Good awareness at policy level – to be streamlined for recognizing and valuing

• System managers welcome the tool – more to be trained