master checkpoint reportcitckids.org/english-844-checkpoint.pdf · centre report number of...

CENTRE REPORT

Number of Students: 68 Centre Number: SD015 Date: May 2014

Number of Teaching Groups: 4 Centre: CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLS Subject: ENGLISH

Performance in each sub-strandFor this part of the report, we have used the overall ability of each student and the difficulty of each question to predict how well each student should perform on each question. We have then compared their predicted performance with their actual performance. If there is a sub-strand where your group of students has performed better than expected, this may indicate that the teaching has been particularly effective in that sub-strand. If there is a sub-strand where your group of students has performed worse than expected, this may indicate that the coverage of the sub-strand was incomplete or that learning in this area has been less thorough than in other areas.

Wc Content Performance was as expectedWa Purpose and audience Performance was worse than expectedWn Text structure Performance was worse than expected

Writing

Us Spelling Performance was worse than expectedUv Vocabulary Performance was worse than expected

Un Sentence structure Performance was as expectedUp Punctuation Performance was worse than expectedUsage

Rx Explicit meaning Performance was better than expectedRi Implicit meaning Performance was better than expectedRu Use of language Performance was better than expected

Reading

Average Cambridge Primary Checkpoint scores are as follows:

Usage Average score = 3.1

Writing Average score = 2.9

English (overall) Average score = 3.4

Reading Average score = 4.0

Explanation of the Cambridge Primary Checkpoint Scale:

• Scores on the Cambridge Primary Checkpoint scale are from 0.0 (the lowestlevel of ability) to 6.0 (the highest level of ability).

• Students achieving between 3.0 and 4.0 have a sound understanding of mostof the curriculum content.

• Students achieving less than 2.0 have a basic understanding of the curriculumcontent. They would benefit from more focus on some areas of the curriculum.

• Students achieving more than 5.0 have an excellent understanding of thecurriculum content.

Note:

Any student who missed a paper has been omitted from the analysis on this page.

REPORT ON TEACHING GROUP 1 - Part 1 : Summary


Name of Teaching Group: E1 E1 Centre: CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLS Subject: ENGLISH


• Scores on the Cambridge Primary Checkpoint scale are from 0.0 (the lowestlevel of ability) to 6.0 (the highest level of ability)


• Student achieving less than 2.0 have a basic understanding of the curriculumcontent. They would benefit from more focus on some areas of the curriculum.

• Student achieving more than 5.0 have an excellent understanding of thecurriculum content.

Note:


Average Cambridge Primary Checkpoint scores for this teaching group are as follows:





Wc Content Performance was as expectedWa Purpose and audience Performance was worse than expectedWn Text structure Performance was worse than expected

Writing

Us Spelling Performance was worse than expectedUv Vocabulary Performance was as expected

Un Sentence structure Performance was worse than expectedUp Punctuation Performance was as expectedUsage

Rx Explicit meaning Performance was better than expectedRi Implicit meaning Performance was better than expectedRu Use of language Performance was better than expected

Reading

For this part of the report, we have used the overall ability of each student and the difficulty of each question to predict how well each student should perform on each question. We have then compared their predicted performance with their actual performance. If there is a sub-strand where your group of students has performed better than expected, this may indicate that the teaching has been particularly effective in that sub-strand. If there is a sub-strand where your group of students has performed worse than expected, this may indicate that the coverage of the sub-strand was incomplete or that learning in this area has been less thorough than in other areas.

Performance in each sub-strand

10 WALLA ISAM OSMAN ELKHIDIR AHMED 3.0 3.2 3.0 2.6

1 MAJID ABDELMONEIM ABDELRAOOF AHMED 2.5 3.2 1.9 2.6

5 YAHIA ABDELLATIF ABDELRAHIM AHMED 4.2 4.6 4.0 3.7

2 MALIK ANAS BEDAWI BABIKER 5.3 6.0 4.7 4.8

3 MOHAMED YASIR NOUR ELDAIM MOHAMED GASHI 3.1 3.8 3.5 0.9

6 ISMAEEL MOHAMED KHEIRI FAGEER 2.5 3.2 2.2 2.1

9 NOUF MUGAHID SIDAHMED HUSSEIN 4.2 4.9 4.5 2.1

4 SOUD HASSAN ABDELKRIM AWAODA 3.9 4.9 3.0 3.7

7 FATIMA MALIK MOHAMMED FADUL 4.5 6.0 3.3 3.2

8 MAWADA MOHAMED ELRASHID ELZAIN 2.7 2.9 2.8 2.1

Class Average 3.5 4.2 3.1 3.0

Student No. Student Name English Reading Usage Writing

REPORT ON TEACHING GROUP 1 - Part 2 : List of Students' Results



Table of Students' Results


Results (Cambridge Primary Checkpoint scores)

11 MINAS HAITHAM HASSAN ABDELHAFIZ 1.2 2.5 1.2 0.0

16 ABD ALMAGEED MOSTAFA ABD ALMAJED ABDELKAREEM MASRE

3.7 5.1 3.0 2.1

14 MOHAMED ISHAG HAMZA MOHAMED 2.7 3.5 2.2 2.1

12 BASAMAT YOUSIF AHMED MAHAMOUD 0.7 1.0 0.0 1.5

13 LUAI ELFATIH AHMED ELSIDDIG 6.0 6.0 5.7 5.4

19 ILAF MUTAZ OSMAN ABDELRAHMAN 4.9 6.0 3.8 4.2

20 FATMA SALAH ABDELAZIZ AHMED 5.7 5.4 5.7 6.0

18 ABDELRAHMAN ELSADIG MOHAMMED AHMED 5.4 6.0 4.3 5.4

15 MOHAMED AMRO MOHAMED ADAM 3.0 3.8 2.8 2.1

17 OUMAR KHALIL IMAD YOUSSEF 1.6 2.2 1.2 1.5









29 AHMED ZAKARIA MOHIELDIN SALIH 3.1 4.6 2.5 1.5

30 TAWHEED TAGELDIEN ABDELAZIZ IBRAHIM 3.0 3.5 3.3 1.5

23 WAAD ISAM OSMAN ELKHIDIR AHMED 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.5

24 NOURAN ALAA MOHAMED SHAFIEK MOHAMED 4.0 4.1 3.8 4.2

21 HADEEL YASSIR OMER MOHAMMED 4.7 4.9 4.7 4.2

22 SHAIMA ISAM OSMAN ELKHIDIR AHMED 3.0 3.5 2.8 2.6

25 ROAA JAMAL ELTAYEB AHMED 3.1 2.9 3.3 3.2

27 MUSTAFA KHALID ALI MOHAMMED 2.8 4.4 1.9 1.5

28 MOHAMED ALFATIH ELHASSAN ELMAHDI YOUSIF 1.4 1.8 0.8 1.5

26 MOHAMED AMGAD MOHAMED ABDELSALAM 4.7 4.4 5.5 3.7









32 MOAYAD BABIKER AHMED ALI 4.3 4.9 4.0 3.7

35 AHMED FEDAIL ABDELAZIZ AHMED FEDAIL HASSAN 4.8 6.0 4.0 3.2

34 HUZYFA MOHAMED IBRAHIM 3.8 4.6 3.3 3.2

31 ZAKARIYA SADIG HASSAN ELSADIG 4.9 5.6 4.3 4.8

33 OSAMA MOHAMMED ELTIGANI MOHAMMED 5.1 5.9 4.7 4.2

37 ZEYNEP MUSA IHSAN ILYAS 4.2 5.1 2.5 5.9

36 ROAA RAED IBRAHIM WALWEEL 1.8 2.2 0.8 2.6









1120211010000000010010110000002210111010110122106 19 11 30 2.5

2121211010100100011010210001012122321101110122115 29 16 45 4.2

2121111001000100010100000000002221210002110002118 18 13 31 2.7

2121111011112110011120200000012211321102111102117 26 22 48 4.5

2121212211100000010021100000002211221102110102114 23 19 42 3.9

2100111011110000010010110001001201221002110001101 18 12 30 2.5

2121001011010000011011100000002222210111110102013 22 13 35 3.1

3121212111110120110021211000012222331112111012012 32 24 56 5.3

21111110111001001100101000000022212111000111011115 19 15 34 3.0

21212100101100000100101000000112001201011100211114 17 14 31 2.7

43223320111121100110212000012122212211121111121113 32 31 63 6.0

21212110110001000110102000000022111210011100011110 18 16 34 3.0

2121211011102000010020211001112221111001111112119 27 18 45 4.2

11111110000000000100200000000001002000100000011112 7 10 17 0.7

21100000100000000100101000000012000110011100120111 13 7 20 1.2

REPORT ON TEACHING GROUP 1 - Part 3 : Marks scored on each question

Table of marks scored by each Student on each question




434554521212212111112221112121222556111211112211

svpnnacuuuuiiiiiiixxxvppnnnnnnnspnnauuixxxuxxxxx

UUUUWWWRRRRRRRRRRRRRRUUUUUUUUUUUUUWWRRRRRRRRRRRR

iii

iiviivii

vvviiiibabababaviiiiba

33333332211098765443321111100ba

111111111111987654321111111111111111119877654321

222222222222222222222111111111111111111111111111

Max

Strand

part

and

Q No

Paper

Students

50 50 100

P1 P2 Test Pri Chkpt

21012112111100000000101010000111120101111110121129 20 15 35 3.1

21101100110100000110021000001122111210011100220130 23 11 34 3.0

11101010100100000000101000000021001210021100010028 13 8 21 1.4

21011112111000000000111000001021001111021110021127 19 13 32 2.8

22223220101120200101221000010122112311121111221118 31 26 57 5.4

21212220111200100111212110000022112211111111221119 29 23 52 4.9

11101110100000000000100100000021102010001101120117 15 8 23 1.6

32221221101010000101202110012122211301111110120026 28 22 50 4.7

21111110111201000100100110010122102111121111021016 24 16 40 3.7

42223330101200000110212010012122212311121110211120 33 27 60 5.7

22222220101001000100111100000121112211021111101124 24 19 43 4.0

22212220011000000000100010000122111110120101020125 19 16 35 3.1

21111010111000001000001011000001101210001101010023 13 11 24 1.8

22122220001220001010112100010122222201021110121121 29 21 50 4.7

22212120010001000100111000000121001110121101110122 18 16 34 3.0






434554521212212111112221112121222556111211112211



iii

iiviivii


33333332211098765443321111100ba

111111111111987654321111111111111111119877654321

222222222222222222222111111111111111111111111111

Max

Strand

part

and

Q No

Paper

Students

50 50 100


11002220100121110100100010001122123410111110220137 28 17 45 4.2

22112221101201201111211100011122111111021111011135 25 26 51 4.8

11001110000000100000101100000021002210001101111136 17 7 24 1.8

32212221111200010111211100010122132211011111021133 28 26 54 5.1

11001111101120000110111110010121132310011101021134 27 14 41 3.8

22222220110121200101211000011122022310021101021131 26 26 52 4.9

21112220111101000100211100011122121210121101210132 27 19 46 4.3






434554521212212111112221112121222556111211112211



iii

iiviivii


33333332211098765443321111100ba

111111111111987654321111111111111111119877654321

222222222222222222222111111111111111111111111111

Max

Strand

part

and

Q No

Paper

Students

50 50 100










Note:







Wc Content Performance was as expectedWa Purpose and audience Performance was as expectedWn Text structure Performance was as expected

Writing

Us Spelling Performance was as expectedUv Vocabulary Performance was as expected

Un Sentence structure Performance was as expectedUp Punctuation Performance was as expectedUsage

Rx Explicit meaning Performance was as expectedRi Implicit meaning Performance was as expectedRu Use of language Performance was better than expected

Reading



46 RAFA ALMUTAZ AHMED MOHAMMED 3.4 4.1 3.3 2.6

45 OMNIA SAMI ELTEGANI ABUELGASIM 5.5 5.6 5.2 5.9

48 SAMAH MUSTAFA MOHAMMED SALIH 4.1 3.8 4.3 4.2

47 RUAA MOHAMED ALI ABDELSEED 4.2 5.1 3.8 3.2

44 OHOOD KHALID MOHAMMED KHAMES 2.3 2.9 1.5 2.6

40 AHMED BABIKIR MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM 4.0 4.6 3.3 4.2

39 ABUBAKR ALSIDIG MOHAMED ELMANA MOHAMED 6.0 5.6 6.0 6.0

41 ASEEL ABUOBIEDA OSMAN MOHMED 4.5 5.6 3.8 3.7

43 MAHMOUD ALDIRDIRY ABDALLA ABDALRAHEEM 3.7 3.8 4.0 2.6

42 AYA HASHIM ALTIGANI ALZAIN 3.0 3.5 2.5 3.2









49 SHAHD EHAB OSMAN IBRAHIM 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9

50 TAHA ABDUAZIZ MOHAMMED AHMED 3.0 4.4 2.5 1.5









21101110001121000111112010010022022210011100011146 22 16 38 3.4

31202222111110000101202100112122233411011111021145 35 23 58 5.5

10011000101100000101101000000122222211121111010150 25 9 34 3.0

00001000000100000000000010000120102100010000020049 11 2 13 0.0

33222222111000000000101000000022222210111111101048 22 22 44 4.1

22102222111100000100201100011122121111011111021147 25 20 45 4.2

22102222111100000110102110000121112210011110021140 23 20 43 4.0

33333332111120100111202100012122123310011110011139 28 35 63 6.0

11001110101100000000100010010121102210010111110144 19 9 28 2.3

32110120101201000000001100010122122210110110121143 25 15 40 3.7

22102221111100000000101010010011021100011111011142 17 17 34 3.0

32102220111110000101211110010022111211121110121141 27 21 48 4.5






434554521212212111112221112121222556111211112211



iii

iiviivii


33333332211098765443321111100ba

111111111111987654321111111111111111119877654321

222222222222222222222111111111111111111111111111

Max

Strand

part

and

Q No

Paper

Students

50 50 100










Note:







Wc Content Performance was as expectedWa Purpose and audience Performance was worse than expectedWn Text structure Performance was as expected

Writing

Us Spelling Performance was as expectedUv Vocabulary Performance was worse than expected


Rx Explicit meaning Performance was better than expectedRi Implicit meaning Performance was as expectedRu Use of language Performance was better than expected

Reading



58 MUNTABA HUSHAM HAMADELNIL OMER 2.0 2.5 1.9 1.5

59 MUNTASER ESAM ALHSSEEN MOHAMED 2.3 2.9 1.5 2.6

60 MUSTAFA MOHAMED SIRELKHATIM ALI 3.0 2.5 3.8 2.1

57 MOHAMED AHMED GAFAR ELHADI 2.0 2.9 1.9 0.9

53 AYA AHMED SAYED ABDULAAL FARAJ 3.1 3.5 2.5 3.7

52 ALMONZIR MOHAMEDAHMED BUSHRA BADAWI 3.3 4.6 2.5 2.6

51 AHMED ELFATIH ABDELRAZIG ALGOUSIE 2.7 3.8 2.5 0.9

55 BASIL ELFARAZDAG ELKHIER 1.5 3.2 0.8 0.0

54 AYA RAHMTALLA ABDELDAIME RAHMTALLA 2.5 2.9 2.8 1.5

56 LAMA NADIR GALAL TAWFIG 4.4 4.9 3.8 4.8









63 TALA AYMAN MANSOUR ABDALLA ZAROUG 3.7 4.4 3.5 2.6

62 SADAD ASHRAF SABIR ALI 3.9 3.8 3.8 4.2

61 RAHA OSAMA HASSAN ELAMIN 4.0 3.8 4.5 3.2

64 WAFAA MOHAMED ELAGIB AHMED 4.6 5.4 4.0 4.2









21001110100100000000100000001002212210011111020159 19 9 28 2.3

21101110010000000000101010000121001111111110010158 17 9 26 2.0

21212220111020010110111110011121112211021111021164 28 21 49 4.6

21212120000000000100200100010122221010010111020160 20 14 34 3.0

31102120101100000010201001011122111111121101020163 24 16 40 3.7

21213210101000000111001010001122212211021111010162 25 17 42 3.9

22212221101000000111111100001122221111111100020061 23 20 43 4.0

11100010021010000110101100010121023311020111120152 26 11 37 3.3

00001000000000000111101110000122222111021111020151 26 5 31 2.7

11101110000100000100001100000022011010021110120157 18 8 26 2.0

21002120110000000110000110000022212211011111021053 23 12 35 3.1

31213220011000000110201010000122122211021111220156 27 20 47 4.4

11100010110101000010001000010011000111020110020055 13 9 22 1.5

21112120001000000111101010000121110010000111020154 15 15 30 2.5






434554521212212111112221112121222556111211112211



iii

iiviivii


33333332211098765443321111100ba

111111111111987654321111111111111111119877654321

222222222222222222222111111111111111111111111111

Max

Strand

part

and

Q No

Paper

Students

50 50 100










Note:







Wc Content Performance was as expectedWa Purpose and audience Performance was as expectedWn Text structure Performance was as expected

Writing

Us Spelling Performance was as expectedUv Vocabulary Performance was as expected


Rx Explicit meaning Performance was as expectedRi Implicit meaning Performance was as expectedRu Use of language Performance was as expected

Reading



65 ABD ALLA HAMDI SULIMAN 2.9 2.5 3.5 2.1

67 ARWA SHAMS ELDAWLA MOHAMED 3.0 3.5 3.0 2.1

68 RAYAN MOHAMED SEED AHMED 3.4 2.9 3.5 4.2

66 AHMED MUAZ AHMED TUNGO 3.4 3.8 3.3 3.2

69 ZAINAB TARIG MOHAMED KHALIL 3.7 4.4 4.0 1.5









21211112111100000010001101000122222010021101121069 24 16 40 3.7

21112220100000000000101010010122122210021101021168 25 13 38 3.4

21122120100000000101100010001022211210111101121166 23 15 38 3.4

21001110101101000100011110010022111210011101021167 23 11 34 3.0

21222120000000000100110010000022121010121101001165 19 14 33 2.9






434554521212212111112221112121222556111211112211



iii

iiviivii


33333332211098765443321111100ba

111111111111987654321111111111111111119877654321

222222222222222222222111111111111111111111111111

Max

Strand

part

and

Q No

Paper

Students

50 50 100


STATEMENT OF ACHIEVEMENT

Student Number: 1 Centre Name: CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLS Centre Number: SD015

MAJID ABDELMONEIM ABDELRAOOF AHMED

Cambridge Primary Checkpoint Score: 2.5

Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 1.9

Writing 2.6

Reading 3.2

Strand results

Explanatory Notes

The results are given using the Cambridge Primary Checkpoint scale. Scores on the Cambridge Primary Checkpoint scale are from 0.0 (the lowest level of achievement) to 6.0 (the highest level of achievement).

This document is a Statement of Achievement in a Cambridge Primary Checkpoint test. Examination certificates are not issued for Cambridge Primary Checkpoint tests.

Student Number: 1 Centre Number: SD015 Date: May 2014

Student Name: MAJID ABDELMONEIM ABDELRAOOF AHMED

Centre: CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLS Subject: English

To be given to the student with the Statement of Achievement

REPORT TO STUDENT

Your Cambridge Primary Checkpoint results are as follows:

Usage score = 1.9

Writing score = 2.6

English (Overall) score = 2.5

Reading score = 3.2

This is what the scores mean:

Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

What you got right and what you got wrong

Most of your answers were as expected for a student with your Cambridge Primary Checkpoint score. However, some of your answers were surprising: the most surprising ones are listed below. They may give you information about what parts of the subject you are good at and what parts you need to work harder at.

Questions you answered well that we expected you to find difficult

11b Reading Use of language 2

8 Reading Explicit meaning 1

10 Reading Implicit meaning 2

14a Usage Sentence structure 1

Question and part Strand Sub-strand Paper

Questions you did not answer well that we expected you to find easy


11iv Usage Punctuation 1

13v Usage Punctuation 2

13iv Usage Sentence structure 2




MALIK ANAS BEDAWI BABIKER


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 4.7

Writing 4.8

Reading 6.0

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: MALIK ANAS BEDAWI BABIKER Centre: CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLS Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 4.7

Writing score = 4.8


Reading score = 6.0


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -





10a Reading Use of language 1






13ii Writing Purpose and audience 2






MOHAMED YASIR NOUR ELDAIM MOHAMED GASHI


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.5

Writing 0.9

Reading 3.8

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: MOHAMED YASIR NOUR ELDAIM MOHAMED GASHI



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.5

Writing score = 0.9


Reading score = 3.8


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -




11iii Usage Sentence structure 1







13iii Writing Text structure 2






SOUD HASSAN ABDELKRIM AWAODA


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.0

Writing 3.7

Reading 4.9

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: SOUD HASSAN ABDELKRIM AWAODA



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.0

Writing score = 3.7


Reading score = 4.9


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -











17 Usage Punctuation 1






YAHIA ABDELLATIF ABDELRAHIM AHMED


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 4.0

Writing 3.7

Reading 4.6

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: YAHIA ABDELLATIF ABDELRAHIM AHMED



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 4.0

Writing score = 3.7


Reading score = 4.6


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -




11ii Writing Text structure 1






11v Usage Spelling 1


13i Writing Content 2





ISMAEEL MOHAMED KHEIRI FAGEER


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.2

Writing 2.1

Reading 3.2

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: ISMAEEL MOHAMED KHEIRI FAGEER



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.2

Writing score = 2.1


Reading score = 3.2


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -












13vii Usage Spelling 2





FATIMA MALIK MOHAMMED FADUL


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.3

Writing 3.2

Reading 6.0

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: FATIMA MALIK MOHAMMED FADUL



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.3

Writing score = 3.2


Reading score = 6.0


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















MAWADA MOHAMED ELRASHID ELZAIN


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.8

Writing 2.1

Reading 2.9

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: MAWADA MOHAMED ELRASHID ELZAIN



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.8

Writing score = 2.1


Reading score = 2.9


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















NOUF MUGAHID SIDAHMED HUSSEIN


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 4.5

Writing 2.1

Reading 4.9

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: NOUF MUGAHID SIDAHMED HUSSEIN



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 4.5

Writing score = 2.1


Reading score = 4.9


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -






16 Usage Sentence structure 1





11i Writing Purpose and audience 1






WALLA ISAM OSMAN ELKHIDIR AHMED


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.0

Writing 2.6

Reading 3.2

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: WALLA ISAM OSMAN ELKHIDIR AHMED



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.0

Writing score = 2.6


Reading score = 3.2


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















MINAS HAITHAM HASSAN ABDELHAFIZ


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 1.2

Writing 0.0

Reading 2.5

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: MINAS HAITHAM HASSAN ABDELHAFIZ



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 1.2

Writing score = 0.0


Reading score = 2.5


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















BASAMAT YOUSIF AHMED MAHAMOUD


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 0.0

Writing 1.5

Reading 1.0

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: BASAMAT YOUSIF AHMED MAHAMOUD



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 0.0

Writing score = 1.5


Reading score = 1.0


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -










7a Reading Explicit meaning 1

7b Reading Explicit meaning 1






LUAI ELFATIH AHMED ELSIDDIG


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 5.7

Writing 5.4

Reading 6.0

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: LUAI ELFATIH AHMED ELSIDDIG



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 5.7

Writing score = 5.4


Reading score = 6.0


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -







13vi Usage Vocabulary 2










MOHAMED ISHAG HAMZA MOHAMED


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.2

Writing 2.1

Reading 3.5

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: MOHAMED ISHAG HAMZA MOHAMED



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.2

Writing score = 2.1


Reading score = 3.5


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















MOHAMED AMRO MOHAMED ADAM


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.8

Writing 2.1

Reading 3.8

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: MOHAMED AMRO MOHAMED ADAM



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.8

Writing score = 2.1


Reading score = 3.8


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -




6 Reading Use of language 1













ABD ALMAGEED MOSTAFA ABD ALMAJED ABDELKAREEM MASRE


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.0

Writing 2.1

Reading 5.1

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: ABD ALMAGEED MOSTAFA ABD ALMAJED ABDELKAREEM MASRE



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.0

Writing score = 2.1


Reading score = 5.1


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















OUMAR KHALIL IMAD YOUSSEF


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 1.2

Writing 1.5

Reading 2.2

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: OUMAR KHALIL IMAD YOUSSEF Centre: CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLS Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 1.2

Writing score = 1.5


Reading score = 2.2


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















ABDELRAHMAN ELSADIG MOHAMMED AHMED


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 4.3

Writing 5.4

Reading 6.0

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: ABDELRAHMAN ELSADIG MOHAMMED AHMED



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 4.3

Writing score = 5.4


Reading score = 6.0


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -




19 Usage Vocabulary 1













ILAF MUTAZ OSMAN ABDELRAHMAN


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.8

Writing 4.2

Reading 6.0

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: ILAF MUTAZ OSMAN ABDELRAHMAN



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.8

Writing score = 4.2


Reading score = 6.0


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -













13b Usage Sentence structure 1




FATMA SALAH ABDELAZIZ AHMED


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 5.7

Writing 6.0

Reading 5.4

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: FATMA SALAH ABDELAZIZ AHMED Centre: CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLS Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 5.7

Writing score = 6.0


Reading score = 5.4


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















HADEEL YASSIR OMER MOHAMMED


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 4.7

Writing 4.2

Reading 4.9

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: HADEEL YASSIR OMER MOHAMMED



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 4.7

Writing score = 4.2


Reading score = 4.9


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















SHAIMA ISAM OSMAN ELKHIDIR AHMED


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.8

Writing 2.6

Reading 3.5

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: SHAIMA ISAM OSMAN ELKHIDIR AHMED



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.8

Writing score = 2.6


Reading score = 3.5


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















WAAD ISAM OSMAN ELKHIDIR AHMED


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 1.9

Writing 1.5

Reading 1.8

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: WAAD ISAM OSMAN ELKHIDIR AHMED



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 1.9

Writing score = 1.5


Reading score = 1.8


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















NOURAN ALAA MOHAMED SHAFIEK MOHAMED


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.8

Writing 4.2

Reading 4.1

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: NOURAN ALAA MOHAMED SHAFIEK MOHAMED



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.8

Writing score = 4.2


Reading score = 4.1


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















ROAA JAMAL ELTAYEB AHMED


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.3

Writing 3.2

Reading 2.9

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: ROAA JAMAL ELTAYEB AHMED Centre: CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLS Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.3

Writing score = 3.2


Reading score = 2.9


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















MOHAMED AMGAD MOHAMED ABDELSALAM


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 5.5

Writing 3.7

Reading 4.4

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: MOHAMED AMGAD MOHAMED ABDELSALAM



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 5.5

Writing score = 3.7


Reading score = 4.4


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















MUSTAFA KHALID ALI MOHAMMED


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 1.9

Writing 1.5

Reading 4.4

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: MUSTAFA KHALID ALI MOHAMMED



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 1.9

Writing score = 1.5


Reading score = 4.4


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















MOHAMED ALFATIH ELHASSAN ELMAHDI YOUSIF


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 0.8

Writing 1.5

Reading 1.8

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: MOHAMED ALFATIH ELHASSAN ELMAHDI YOUSIF



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 0.8

Writing score = 1.5


Reading score = 1.8


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















AHMED ZAKARIA MOHIELDIN SALIH


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.5

Writing 1.5

Reading 4.6

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: AHMED ZAKARIA MOHIELDIN SALIH



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.5

Writing score = 1.5


Reading score = 4.6


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















TAWHEED TAGELDIEN ABDELAZIZ IBRAHIM


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.3

Writing 1.5

Reading 3.5

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: TAWHEED TAGELDIEN ABDELAZIZ IBRAHIM



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.3

Writing score = 1.5


Reading score = 3.5


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















ZAKARIYA SADIG HASSAN ELSADIG


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 4.3

Writing 4.8

Reading 5.6

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: ZAKARIYA SADIG HASSAN ELSADIG



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 4.3

Writing score = 4.8


Reading score = 5.6


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















MOAYAD BABIKER AHMED ALI


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 4.0

Writing 3.7

Reading 4.9

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: MOAYAD BABIKER AHMED ALI Centre: CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLS Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 4.0

Writing score = 3.7


Reading score = 4.9


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















OSAMA MOHAMMED ELTIGANI MOHAMMED


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 4.7

Writing 4.2

Reading 5.9

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: OSAMA MOHAMMED ELTIGANI MOHAMMED



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 4.7

Writing score = 4.2


Reading score = 5.9


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















HUZYFA MOHAMED IBRAHIM


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.3

Writing 3.2

Reading 4.6

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: HUZYFA MOHAMED IBRAHIM Centre: CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLS Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.3

Writing score = 3.2


Reading score = 4.6


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















AHMED FEDAIL ABDELAZIZ AHMED FEDAIL HASSAN


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 4.0

Writing 3.2

Reading 6.0

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: AHMED FEDAIL ABDELAZIZ AHMED FEDAIL HASSAN



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 4.0

Writing score = 3.2


Reading score = 6.0


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















ROAA RAED IBRAHIM WALWEEL


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 0.8

Writing 2.6

Reading 2.2

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: ROAA RAED IBRAHIM WALWEEL Centre: CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLS Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 0.8

Writing score = 2.6


Reading score = 2.2


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















ZEYNEP MUSA IHSAN ILYAS


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.5

Writing 5.9

Reading 5.1

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: ZEYNEP MUSA IHSAN ILYAS Centre: CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLS Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.5

Writing score = 5.9


Reading score = 5.1


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















ABUBAKR ALSIDIG MOHAMED ELMANA MOHAMED


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 6.0

Writing 6.0

Reading 5.6

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: ABUBAKR ALSIDIG MOHAMED ELMANA MOHAMED



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 6.0

Writing score = 6.0


Reading score = 5.6


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















AHMED BABIKIR MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.3

Writing 4.2

Reading 4.6

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: AHMED BABIKIR MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.3

Writing score = 4.2


Reading score = 4.6


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















ASEEL ABUOBIEDA OSMAN MOHMED


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.8

Writing 3.7

Reading 5.6

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: ASEEL ABUOBIEDA OSMAN MOHMED



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.8

Writing score = 3.7


Reading score = 5.6


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















AYA HASHIM ALTIGANI ALZAIN


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.5

Writing 3.2

Reading 3.5

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: AYA HASHIM ALTIGANI ALZAIN Centre: CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLS Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.5

Writing score = 3.2


Reading score = 3.5


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















MAHMOUD ALDIRDIRY ABDALLA ABDALRAHEEM


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 4.0

Writing 2.6

Reading 3.8

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: MAHMOUD ALDIRDIRY ABDALLA ABDALRAHEEM



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 4.0

Writing score = 2.6


Reading score = 3.8


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















OHOOD KHALID MOHAMMED KHAMES


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 1.5

Writing 2.6

Reading 2.9

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: OHOOD KHALID MOHAMMED KHAMES



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 1.5

Writing score = 2.6


Reading score = 2.9


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















OMNIA SAMI ELTEGANI ABUELGASIM


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 5.2

Writing 5.9

Reading 5.6

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: OMNIA SAMI ELTEGANI ABUELGASIM



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 5.2

Writing score = 5.9


Reading score = 5.6


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















RAFA ALMUTAZ AHMED MOHAMMED


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.3

Writing 2.6

Reading 4.1

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: RAFA ALMUTAZ AHMED MOHAMMED



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.3

Writing score = 2.6


Reading score = 4.1


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















RUAA MOHAMED ALI ABDELSEED


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.8

Writing 3.2

Reading 5.1

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: RUAA MOHAMED ALI ABDELSEED Centre: CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLS Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.8

Writing score = 3.2


Reading score = 5.1


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















SAMAH MUSTAFA MOHAMMED SALIH


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 4.3

Writing 4.2

Reading 3.8

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: SAMAH MUSTAFA MOHAMMED SALIH



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 4.3

Writing score = 4.2


Reading score = 3.8


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















SHAHD EHAB OSMAN IBRAHIM


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 0.0

Writing 0.9

Reading 0.0

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: SHAHD EHAB OSMAN IBRAHIM Centre: CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLS Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 0.0

Writing score = 0.9


Reading score = 0.0


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -











7a Reading Explicit meaning 1






TAHA ABDUAZIZ MOHAMMED AHMED


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.5

Writing 1.5

Reading 4.4

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: TAHA ABDUAZIZ MOHAMMED AHMED



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.5

Writing score = 1.5


Reading score = 4.4


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















AHMED ELFATIH ABDELRAZIG ALGOUSIE


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.5

Writing 0.9

Reading 3.8

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: AHMED ELFATIH ABDELRAZIG ALGOUSIE



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.5

Writing score = 0.9


Reading score = 3.8


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















ALMONZIR MOHAMEDAHMED BUSHRA BADAWI


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.5

Writing 2.6

Reading 4.6

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: ALMONZIR MOHAMEDAHMED BUSHRA BADAWI



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.5

Writing score = 2.6


Reading score = 4.6


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















AYA AHMED SAYED ABDULAAL FARAJ


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.5

Writing 3.7

Reading 3.5

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: AYA AHMED SAYED ABDULAAL FARAJ



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.5

Writing score = 3.7


Reading score = 3.5


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















AYA RAHMTALLA ABDELDAIME RAHMTALLA


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 2.8

Writing 1.5

Reading 2.9

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: AYA RAHMTALLA ABDELDAIME RAHMTALLA



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 2.8

Writing score = 1.5


Reading score = 2.9


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















BASIL ELFARAZDAG ELKHIER


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 0.8

Writing 0.0

Reading 3.2

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: BASIL ELFARAZDAG ELKHIER Centre: CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLS Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 0.8

Writing score = 0.0


Reading score = 3.2


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















LAMA NADIR GALAL TAWFIG


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.8

Writing 4.8

Reading 4.9

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: LAMA NADIR GALAL TAWFIG Centre: CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLS Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.8

Writing score = 4.8


Reading score = 4.9


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















MOHAMED AHMED GAFAR ELHADI


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 1.9

Writing 0.9

Reading 2.9

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: MOHAMED AHMED GAFAR ELHADI



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 1.9

Writing score = 0.9


Reading score = 2.9


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















MUNTABA HUSHAM HAMADELNIL OMER


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 1.9

Writing 1.5

Reading 2.5

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: MUNTABA HUSHAM HAMADELNIL OMER



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 1.9

Writing score = 1.5


Reading score = 2.5


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















MUNTASER ESAM ALHSSEEN MOHAMED


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 1.5

Writing 2.6

Reading 2.9

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: MUNTASER ESAM ALHSSEEN MOHAMED



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 1.5

Writing score = 2.6


Reading score = 2.9


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















MUSTAFA MOHAMED SIRELKHATIM ALI


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.8

Writing 2.1

Reading 2.5

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: MUSTAFA MOHAMED SIRELKHATIM ALI



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.8

Writing score = 2.1


Reading score = 2.5


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















RAHA OSAMA HASSAN ELAMIN


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 4.5

Writing 3.2

Reading 3.8

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: RAHA OSAMA HASSAN ELAMIN Centre: CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLS Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 4.5

Writing score = 3.2


Reading score = 3.8


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















SADAD ASHRAF SABIR ALI


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.8

Writing 4.2

Reading 3.8

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: SADAD ASHRAF SABIR ALI Centre: CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLS Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.8

Writing score = 4.2


Reading score = 3.8


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















TALA AYMAN MANSOUR ABDALLA ZAROUG


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.5

Writing 2.6

Reading 4.4

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: TALA AYMAN MANSOUR ABDALLA ZAROUG



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.5

Writing score = 2.6


Reading score = 4.4


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















WAFAA MOHAMED ELAGIB AHMED


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 4.0

Writing 4.2

Reading 5.4

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: WAFAA MOHAMED ELAGIB AHMED Centre: CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLS Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 4.0

Writing score = 4.2


Reading score = 5.4


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















ABD ALLA HAMDI SULIMAN


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.5

Writing 2.1

Reading 2.5

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: ABD ALLA HAMDI SULIMAN Centre: CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLS Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.5

Writing score = 2.1


Reading score = 2.5


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















AHMED MUAZ AHMED TUNGO


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.3

Writing 3.2

Reading 3.8

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: AHMED MUAZ AHMED TUNGO Centre: CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLS Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.3

Writing score = 3.2


Reading score = 3.8


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















ARWA SHAMS ELDAWLA MOHAMED


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.0

Writing 2.1

Reading 3.5

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: ARWA SHAMS ELDAWLA MOHAMED



REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.0

Writing score = 2.1


Reading score = 3.5


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















RAYAN MOHAMED SEED AHMED


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 3.5

Writing 4.2

Reading 2.9

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: RAYAN MOHAMED SEED AHMED Centre: CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLS Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 3.5

Writing score = 4.2


Reading score = 2.9


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -

















ZAINAB TARIG MOHAMED KHALIL


Date: May 2014

Subject: English

Overall result

Usage 4.0

Writing 1.5

Reading 4.4

Strand results

Explanatory Notes




Student Name: ZAINAB TARIG MOHAMED KHALIL Centre: CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLS Subject: English


REPORT TO STUDENT


Usage score = 4.0

Writing score = 1.5


Reading score = 4.4


Excellent

Very good

Good

OK

Poor

Very poor

6.0 -

5.0 -

4.0 -

3.0 -

2.0 -

1.0 -

0.0 -















master checkpoint reportcitckids.org/english-844-checkpoint.pdf · centre report number of...

Documents