master of science in agriculture - semantic scholar€¦ · yadav to the maharana pratap university...
TRANSCRIPT
Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Maize (Zea mays L.)
eDdk ¼ft;k est ,y-½ ij lefUor iks"kd rRo izca/ku dk izHkko
MAHENDRA KUMAR YADAV
Thesis
Master of Science in Agriculture (Agricultural Chemistry and Soil Science)
2015
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL CHEMISTRY AND SOIL SCIENCE
RAJASTHAN COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE MAHARANA PRATAP UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE AND
TECHNOLOGY, UDAIPUR - 313001 (RAJ.)
MAHARANA PRATAP UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY, UDAIPUR - 313001 (RAJ.)
RAJASTHAN COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE, UDAIPUR
CERTIFICATE - I
Dated -------------
This is to certify that Mr Mahendra Kumar Yadav has successfully
completed the Comprehensive Examination held on……………… as required under
the regulation for Post-Graduate Studies.
(Dr. H. S. Purohit)
Professor and Head Department of Agricultural
Chemistry & Soil Science
MAHARANA PRATAP UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY, UDAIPUR - 313001 (RAJ.)
RAJASTHAN COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE, UDAIPUR
CERTIFICATE - II
Dated ------
This is to certify that the thesis entitled “Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management
on Maize (Zea mays L.)” submitted for the degree of Master of Science in
Agriculture in the subject of Agricultural Chemistry and Soil Science embodies
bonafide research work carried out by Mr. Mahendra Kumar Yadav under my
guidance and supervision and that no part of this thesis has been submitted for any
other degree. The assistance and help received during the course of investigation have
been fully acknowledged. The draft of this thesis was also approved by the advisory
committee on…………..
(Dr. H.S. Purohit) (Dr. H.S. Purohit) Professor and Head Major Advisor Department of Agricultural Chemistry and Soil Science
(Dr. S.R. Maloo) Dean
Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipur
MAHARANA PRATAP UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY, UDAIPUR - 313001 (RAJ.)
RAJASTHAN COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE, UDAIPUR
CERTIFICATE - III Dated……
…
This to certify that the thesis entitled “Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Maize (Zea mays L.)” submitted by Mr. Mahendra Kumar Yadav to the Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Science in Agriculture in the subject of Agricultural Chemistry and Soil Science after recommendation by the external examiner was defended by the candidate before the following members of the advisory committee. The performance of the candidate in the oral examination on his thesis has been found satisfactory; we therefore, recommend that the thesis be approved.
(Dr. H.S. Purohit) (Dr. S.C. Meena) Major Advisor Advisor
(Dr. H.K. Jain) (Dr. S.L. Mundra) Advisor DRI Nominee
(Dr. H.S. Purohit) Professor and Head
Department of Agricultural Chemistry and Soil Science
Approved
(Dr. G.S. Chouhan) Director Resident Instructions
Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur
MAHARANA PRATAP UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY, UDAIPUR - 313001 (RAJ.)
RAJASTHAN COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE, UDAIPUR
CERTIFICATE - IV
Dated ..........
This to certify that Mr. Mahendra Kumar Yadav, student of M.Sc. (Ag.),
Department of Agricultural Chemistry and Soil Science, Rajasthan College of
Agriculture, Udaipur has made all the corrections / modifications in the thesis entitled
“Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Maize (Zea mays L.)” which were
suggested by the external examiner and the advisory committee in the oral
examination held on ……… The final copies of the thesis duly bound and corrected
were submitted on ……… are enclosed herewith for approval.
(Dr. H.S. Purohit) Major Advisor
(Dr. H.S. Purohit) (Dr. S. R. Maloo) Professor and Head Dean Department of Agricultural Chemistry Rajasthan College of Agriculture and Soil Science Udaipur
CONTENTS
Chapter Particulars Page No.
1 INTRODUCTION
2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE
3 MATERIAL AND METHODS
4 EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
5 DISCUSSION
6 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
*** LITERATURE CITED
*** ABSTRACT (IN ENGLISH)
*** ABSTRACT (IN HINDI)
*** APPENDICES
1. INTRODUCTION
One of the most important challenges facing humanity today is to
conserve/sustain natural resources, including soil and water, for increasing food
production while protecting the environment. As the world population grows, stress
on natural resources increases, making it difficult to maintain food security. Long
term food security requires a balance between increasing crop production,
maintaining soil health and environmental sustainability. In India, effective nutrient
management has played a major role in accomplishing the enormous increase in food
grain production from 52 million tonnes in 1951-52 to 264.38 million tonnes during
2014. However, application of imbalanced and excessive nutrients led to declining
nutrient-use efficiency making fertilizer consumption uneconomical and producing
adverse effects on atmosphere (Aulakh and Adhya, 2005) and ground water quality
(Aulakh et al., 2009) causing health hazards and climate change.
On the other hand, nutrient mining has occurred in many soils due to lack of
affordable fertilizer sources and where fewer or no organic residues are returned to
the soils. Arid and semiarid subtropical soils of Rajasthan, developed under harsh
climate, are inherently poor in organic matter, fertility and water-holding capacity. In
these soils, N, P and S deficiencies are principal yield-limiting factors for crop
production. Integrated nutrient management (INM), which entails the
maintenance/adjustment of soil fertility to an optimum level for crop productivity to
obtain the maximum benefit from all possible sources of plant nutrients organics as
well as inorganic in an integrated manner (Aulakh and Grant, 2008), is an essential
step to address the twin concerns of nutrient excess and nutrient depletion. Integrated
nutrient management is also important for marginal farmers who cannot afford to
supply crop nutrients through costly chemical fertilizers.
Farm yard manure is one of the common manure used by the farmers in
growing crops because of its easy availability and presence of all the nutrients
required by the plants. Farm yard manure refers to the decomposed mixture of dung
and urine of farm animals along with their litter and left over material from roughages
or fodder fed to the cattle. FYM is one of the components of INM as it a cheap and
easily available source of organic nutrients. Integrating FYM with inorganic fertilizer,
scientists are getting very good response of the crop. Application of this source of
organic improves physical, chemical and biological condition of the soils. FYM can
supply all the nutrients required by the plant, however with low quantity.
Vermicompost is a nutrient rich compost which helps better plant growth and
crop yield, improves physical structure of soil, enriches soil with micro-organisms,
attracts deep-burrowing earthworms already present in the soil which indirectly
improves fertility of soil, increase water holding capacity of soil, enhances
germination, plant growth, and crop yield, improves root growth of plants, enriches
soil with plant hormones such as auxins and gibberellic acid. It is helpful in
elimination of biowastes.
Nitrogen is most important nutrient for plant growth and development. It is an
integral part of chlorophyll, which is essential for photosynthesis. Nitrogen is an
important constituent of protoplasm and chlorophyll and is associated with the
activity of every living cell. Phosphorus nutrition plays key role in plant metabolism.
Being involve in various biochemical processes, it ensures transfer and storage of
energy as ADP and ATP, permits conversion and transmission of genetic characters
as it is a constituent of DNA and RNA. Potassium play important role in the
maintenance of cellular organization by regulating of cell membrane and keeping the
protoplasm in a proper degree of hydration. It activates the enzyme in protein and
carbohydrate metabolism and translocation of carbohydrates and imparts resistance to
plants against fungal and bacterial diseases.
In Udaipur region, the most acceptable recommendation for nitrogen,
phosphorus fertilizer for maize is 90 kg N and 40 kg P2O5 ha-1. Existing fertilizer
recommendation often consist of one predeterment rate of nitrogen (N) phosphorus
(P) and potassium (K) for vast area of maize production, such recommendation
assume that the need of maize crop for nutrient is constant over time and over large
areas but the growth and need of a maize crop for supplement nutrients can vary
greatly among fields, seasons and years as a result of differences in crop growing
condition, soil management and climate. Hence the management of nutrients for
maize requires a new approach which enables adjustment in applying N, P and K to
accommodate the field specific need of the maize crop for supplementing nutrients.
In recent years the deterioration in soil health associate with global
predicament of energy along with escalation in the prices of chemical fertilizers
compel use to emphasize on supplementation of chemical fertilizer with low price
nutrient sources such as organic and bio sources (Kumar and Dhar, 2010). Although
increased level of production can be achieved by increased use of chemical fertilizer
alone but it may add to pollution problem and deterioration in soil characteristics and
fertility and this can be maintained at sustainable level by application of farmyard
manure and organic sources.
The food grain requirement in 2025 is estimated to be around 300 mt which
has to be elevated from the current production of 264.38mt (Government of India,
2014a). To achieve this future target, food grain production must increase at an annual
rate of 5.46 mt per year in coming years.
Maize (Zea mays L.) is an important cereal crop of India and plays a pivotal
role in agricultural economy as staple food for larger section of population, raw
material for industries and feed for animals. Though, it is consumed all over country
but it is staple food of people in the hilly and sub mountain tracts of Northern India.
Maize occupies a pride place among cereal crops in India. It has emerged as third
most important food crop after rice and wheat as it represents 24 per cent of total
cereal production.The maize processing industries may encourage the farmers to place
more land under maize in order to sell their surplus maize as a cash crop. Starch is the
main product of maize for which dextrin, liquid glucose, solid glucose, powder
glucose and crystalline dextrose are prepared. Maize is an exhaustive crop having
higher potential than other cereals and absorbs large quantity of nutrients from the soil
during different growth stages.
Maize is grown in world approximately 140 m ha under diverse climatic
conditions. In India, it covers an area of 9.40 m ha with production of 24.19 million
tonnes and productivity status of 2540 kg ha-1contributing nearly 9 per cent in the
national food basket (Govt. of India, 2014b).In the state of Rajasthan, maize covers an
area of 1.05 m ha with production and productivity of 1.95 million tones and 1860 kg
ha-1, respectively (Government of Rajasthan, 2014). The important maize growing
districts of state are Udaipur, Bhilwara, Chittorgarh, Banswara, Jhalawar, Ajmer,
Dungarpur and Pratapgarh. The productivity of this crop in the country as well as the
state of Rajasthan appears meager in front of world average (4200 kg ha1).
Keeping the above consideration, an experiment entitled “Effect of integrated
nutrient management on maize (Zea mays L.)” was conducted during kharif, 2014
at Instructional Farm, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipur with the following
objectives.
1) To study the effect of Integrated nutrient management on productivity of
maize
2) To evaluate nutrient content and uptake pattern by maize
3) To study the fertility and physical properties of the soil
2. REVIEW OF LITERATURE
A review pertaining to research findings on “Effect of Integrated Nutrient
Management on Maize (Zea mays L.)” in the past is presented in this chapter. Since
sufficient information on some of the aspects of continuous application of plant
nutrients in maize is not available, work done on related crops has also been reviewed,
wherever deemed necessary.
2.1 YIELD ATTRIBUTES AND YIELD
2.1.1 Effect of chemical fertilizer
In the field experiment at Ranchi (Jharkhand), Pathak et al. (2002) observed
significant increase in cobs per plant, cob length, cob girth, grain cob-1, 1000-grain
weight and grain yield of maize with application of 100 per cent NPK dose based on
soil test recommendation over control. The magnitude of increase were 115.5, 80.2,
37.8, 155.5, 44.9 and 521.3 per cent, respectively. Shivay et al. (2002) reported that
cob number, cob length, cob diameter, grains cob-1, 1000-grain weight, grain yield
and stover yields of maize increased significantly with increasing doses of nitrogen.
At New Delhi experiment conducted on sandy soil showed that the yield of
maize increased significantly with 100 per cent recommended dose of fertilizer (120,
60, 40 and 5 kg ha-1 of N, P2O5, K2O and Zn, respectively) over the control (Ahlawat
et al., 2005).
Field experiment carried out at Research Farm, PAU, Ludhiana revealed that
with the application of 275 kg ha-1 N gave maximum cob length (16.9 cm), cob girth
(16.8 cm), 1000-seed weight (297 g), shelling per cent (83.8) and grain yield (9.85 t
ha-1) of maize which were statistically at par with 250 kg ha-1 N as 16.7 cm, 16.6 cm,
285.5 g, 82.5 per cent and 9.79 t ha-1, respectively but significantly higher over
control (Mehta et al., 2005)
Kar et al. (2006) conducted an experiment on loamy sand soil of
Bhubaneshwar (Orissa) and reported that application of 80 kg N ha-1 to maize crop
produced significantly higher number of prime cobs, green-cob yield, length and girth
of cobs and green forage yield of sweet corn over control. Experiment conducted on
sandy loam soil of Amritsar (Punjab) revealed that application of 80, 100, 120, and
140 kg N ha-1 to maize crop gave 36, 41.08, 43.36 and 44.36 q ha-1 of grain yieldas
compared to control, respectively (Singh et al., 2006).
Experiment conducted on sandy loam soil of Ludhiana (Punjab) revealed that
application of 150 kg N ha-1resulted in maximum green fodder (81.9 t ha-1) and dry
fodder yield (13.3 t ha-1) of maize which were 147.4 & 29.6 per cent and 82.3 & 10.3
per cent more than that obtained with the application of 90 and 120 kg N ha-1,
respectively (Choudhary et al., 2007). Field experiment was conducted at New Delhi
by Kumar (2008) and reported that maximum cob length (13.8 cm), cob girth
(19.5cm), grains ear-1 (318) and grain yield (3.48 t ha-1) with 120 kg N ha-1 over 80
and 40 kg N ha-1.
Application of 125 per cent of recommended dose of fertilizers (150 kg N,
26.4 kg P and 33.3 kg K2O ha-1) tended to give significantly higher baby corn yield
over recommended dose of fertilizers (Paradkar et al., 2010).
Singh et al. (2010) conducted an experiment on sandy loam soil at Varanasi to
evaluate fertility level and N sources for baby corn and found that significant increase
in baby cob weight, corn weight, cobs per plant, corn girth, cob yield, corn and green
fodder yield were observed with application of 180+38.7+74.7 kg N, P, and K per
ha-1.
A field experiment was conducted at Wadura (J & K) to study the effect of
crop geometry and nitrogen level and it was reported that application of 120 kg N ha-1
found at par with 150 kg N ha-1but significantly improve the yield and yield attributes
over control. (Singh et al., 2012)
Pagani et al.(2012) studied the effects of nitrogen on grain yield and harvest
index in maize and they reported that nitrogen fertilization increased grain yield and
dry matter.
Kumawat et al.( 2014) studied the effect of nitrogen and phosphorus
fertilization on yield, quality and nutrient uptake by sweet corn varieties at Udaipur
and they found that application of 90 kg N + 40 k P2O5ha-1 recorded significantly
higher green cob (9.85 t ha-1) and green fodder yield (19.94 t ha-1), quality parameters
viz., protein, moisture content, N and P uptake over 70 kg N+30 kg P2O5ha-1 and
higher to this level remained at par with each other.
2.1.2 Effect of organic manure
Khan (1966) reported that plant height of maize on loamy soil was better in
plots supplied with vermicompost than plots received FYM.
The increase in plant height and dry matter production of maize was observed
with addition of FYM in the range of 12-15 tonnes per ha than control at different
locations. Application of FYM at 25 t per ha to maize increased the dry matter per
plant and plant height over control (Sahota et al., 1984). Similarly, increase in dry
matter accumulation with increasing level of FYM application (10 t/ha) was recorded
in maize under calcareous soils (Mallesham et al., 1992).
The application of farm yard manure at the rate of 10 t per ha increased the
number of grain per ear, grain weight per ear, 1000 grain weight, grain and stover
yield by 3.9 and 10.9 quintal per ha, respectively over 5 tonnes per ha of rabi
sorghum on medium black soils of Dharwad (Gaudreddy et al. 1989). Similar result
was reported by Negi et al. (1988), Verma (1991) and Srinivasan (1992) reported that
FYM application @10 t per ha increased the grain yield and growth attributes of
maize over control.
Barsukar (1991) noticed that the application of vermicompost increased the
average fresh forage yield and average grain yield of maize over control.
Weight of paddy grain seeds increased significantly with the application of
vermicompost over other treatments (Kale et al., 1992).
Stolyarenko et al. (1992) reported that the application of vermicompost
stimulated root and shoot growth in maize. Hapse (1993) observed increased cane
yield by 12.7 per cent with the application of vermicompost @ 5.0 t per ha to
sugarcane (cv. CO7219) compared to application of chemical fertilizers.
Stephens et al. (1994) observed increased shoot and dry weight of wheat
plants in presence of earth worms. Significantly higher dry matter production was
recorded with the application of vermicompost @ 2.0 to 4.0 t per ha and was at par
with FYM @ 10 t per ha. This might be attributed to the increased uptake of available
nutrients which caused increased photosynthetic rate resulted in higher dry matter
production (Mehta et al., 1994 and Patil, 1995).
The application of FYM @ 30 t per ha significantly increased the growth of
maize in acid Alfisol (Lungu et al., 1993). Application of 23 t FYM per ha resulted in
significantly higher biomass yield of maize over control (Brinton and Seekins, 1994).
The three years of field experiment in maize showed that application of 15 t FYM per
ha improved root growth in sandy loam soils (Gajri et al., 1994).
Sekhon and Agarwal (1994) observed improvement in leaf growth and
development with FYM application in black soil. Maize grain yield was positively
correlated with LAI (r=0.89).
Pattanashetti et al. (2002) conducted a field experiment at the Main
Agricultural Research Station, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad on
maize and reported that the application of FYM recorded significantly higher grain
and stover yield as compared to vermicompost and control and it was at par with
poultry manure.
Prasad et al. (2003) reported that application of organic manure mainly
vermicompost @ 5 t per ha was found beneficial and significantly increased the dry
matter yield of maize. Dry matter production per plant, LAI and silking were
significantly higher with the application of vermicompost @ 5 t per ha along with
poultry manure @ 14 tonnes and 10 tonnes FYM per ha.
The field trials conducted at Kanpur and Udaipur on maize showed that grain
yield and stover yield were significantly higher under 10 to 20 t FYM per ha and also
had significant and positive effect on green cob yield than control (Verma et al., 2003;
Mahala and Shaktawat, 2004 and Khan et al., 2008).
Jayaprakash et al. (2004) and Jayaprakash et al. (2005) studied the growth
parameters of maize with application of organic manures. Application of
vermicompost @ 2 t per ha recorded significantly higher leaf area and LAI as
compared to no organics and was at par with that of application of FYM @ 10 t per
ha. Significantly higher AGR, CGR and NAR were recorded due to application of
vermicompost @ 2 t per ha and FYM @ 10 t per ha over no organics treatments and
were at par with each other (Srinivasan et al., 1993).
The results of field experiments conducted at the main research station,
University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Kanpur and Udaipur on maize showed
that the application of 5 to 10 t FYM per ha produced significantly higher yield
attributes in maize mainly cob length, number of grain row per cob, number of grains
per rows, grain weight per plant and 100 grain weight as compared to vermicompost
and control and it was at par with poultry manure (Pattanashetti et al., 2002; Verma et
al., 2003 and Mahala and Shaktawat, 2004).
Panwar (2008) reported significant increase in cob length, grains cob-1 and
grain yield of maize with the application of FYM over no organic manuring.
Application of organic manures, FYM, poultry manure, green leaf manure and
panchagavya spray resulted in significant increase in growth and yield attributes of
sweet corn such as cob length, cob diameter and number of grains per cob (Yadhav
and Lourduraj).
At Udaipur (Rajasthan), Singh and Nepalia (2009) reported significantly
increased yield and yield attributes of QPM with an application of 10 t ha-1 farm yard
manure and 5 t ha-1vermicompost over no manure control.
A two year field experiment conducted at Agronomic Research Area,
University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan during Autumn 2008 and 2009 and
found that grain yield of maize in both years was significantly increased by
application of nitrogen as Urea (50%) + Farm Yard Manure (50%) over control
(Waseem et al., 2012).
Nasab et. al. (2015) conducted a field experiment taking four levels of
vermicompost (0, 4, 8, and 12 t/ ha) and two varieties of maize and found that both
the factor affect biological yield, seed yield, harvest index and protein content
significantly. They further reported that treatment included level of vermicompost (0,
4, 8, and 12 t/ ha) as main plot and variety (700 & 704) as sub plot. Analysis of
variance showed that the effect of vermicompost and variety on all characteristics
(Biological yield, Seed yield, Harvest index, Protein %) was significant.
2.1.3 Effect of integrated nutrient management
Swarup and Wanjari (2000) reported that the effect of combined application
FYM 10 t ha-1 with NPK treatment was most conspicuous on maize at Palampur and
Ludhiana. At Ranchi, Pathak et al. (2002) recorded maximum cobs plant-1, cob
length, cob girth, 1000-grain weight and grain yield of maize with an application of
75 per cent NPK + 25 per cent N through FYM application which were significantly
higher by 125.4, 87.6, 44.8, 53.0 and 68.09 per cent, respectively over control.
Similarly, an application 10 t FYM ha-1 in addition to recommended fertilizer dose
increased the yield of maize by 14.0 per cent (Kumar and Puri, 2002).
Experiment conducted on clay loam soil of Kangra (H.P.) showed that with
the increase in fertility by applying recommended fertilizer as 120 kg N, 22.5 kg P2O5
and 117 kg K2O ha-1 in combination with 10 t ha-1 farm yard manure and 150 per cent
recommended dose of fertilizer, the yield of maize increased by 5.0 per cent and 8.0
per cent, respectively over the recommended dose of fertilizer (Kumar and Thakur,
2004).
Jamwal (2005) from Jammu, reported highest maize yield with combined use
of FYM 10 tonnes ha-1 + 40 kg N ha-1. Experiment conducted on sandy loam soil of
IARI, New Delhi revealed that an application of 100 per cent NPK (120 kg N + 26.2
kg P + 33.2 kg K ha-1) with 10 tonnes ha-1 farm yard manure resulted in maximum
grain yield (5.32 t ha-1) of maize (Kumar et al., 2005). Verma et al. (2006) on sandy
clay loam soil of Udaipur (Rajasthan) observed highest maize grain and stover yields
by applying 150 per cent NPK, though the results were at par with those obtained with
100 per cent NPK + FYM 10 tonnes ha-1.
At Udaipur, with application of 125 per cent of recommended dose of
nutrients through urea, single super phosphate or diammonium phosphate along with
10 t farm yard manure ha-1 or 5 t vermicompost ha-1 significantly improved the soil
properties, yield and economics of quality protein maize (Singh and Nepalia, 2009).
On the basis of long term experiment conducted on maize - wheat cropping
system at IARI, New Delhi on Typic Haplustept soil, Behera et al. (2009) reported
that the highest grain (2.43 t ha-1) and stover (2.48 t ha-1) yield of maize were obtained
under integrated use of optimal NPK and farm yard manure (100 per cent NPK +
FYM) followed by 100 per cent NPK + Zn. Field experiment conducted at Udaipur
(Rajasthan) on clay loam soils with baby corn, showed that highest dehusked cob
(baby corn) and green fodder yield were obtained by applying 75 per cent NPK + 2.25
t ha-1 vermicompost + biofertilizers followed by 62.5 per cent NPK + 1.875 t
vermicompost ha-1 + bio fertilizer over 50 per cent NPK + 1.50 t vermicompost ha-1 +
biofertilizer and 62.5 per cent NPK + 1.75 t vermicompost ha-1 + biofertilizer
(Dadarwal et al., 2009).
While summarizing the results of field experiment at Udaipur, Balai et al.
(2011) reported 56.7 to 162.8 per cent increase in grain yield and 57.7 to 160.0 per
cent increase in stover yield of maize by applying various INM treatments to fortify
soil over no nutrient application. Application of 100% NPK (120: 60: 30) + FYM 10 t
ha-1 resulted in highest grain (3722 kg ha-1) and Stover (544 kg ha-1) yield. The same
treatment also registered highest shelling percentage (77.6%).
A field study was carried out at Vanavarayar Institute of Agriculture,
Manakkadavu, Kannan et al. (2013)observed that application of vermicompost and
recommended dose of NPK showed its best results with respect to leaf area and plant
height as compared to other treatments. INM practice including vermicompost and
recommended dose of NPK showed its best results with respect to yield
parameterslike number of grains per cob, 100 seed weight and yield (4112 kg ha-1).
Zafar et al. (2013) studied that inorganic P sources with poultry manure
significantly increased plant height, leaf area and chlorophyll content. Average values
showed that combined application of inorganic P with poultry manure increased grain
yield by 19 and 41 per cent over inorganic P and PM alone, respectively.
Pandey and Awasthi (2014) at experimental field of Narendra Dev University
of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, Faizabad during Rabi season on alluvial,
clay soil under irrigated agro-ecosystem of Faizabad district of UP reported that the
grain yield was higher in T4 (29.29 q ha-1) followed by T3 (28.59 q ha-1). However,
straw yield was higher in T3 followed by T4. The result revealed that ratio of grain and
straw yield was good and highest in T4 followed by T2. Recommendation of the result
was RDF along with FYM is suitable combination of grain yield as well as straw
(fodder) for maize crop.
At Udaipur (Rajasthan) results of the investigation reflected that the growth
of maize crop in terms of plant at harvest, LAI at 45 and 60 DAS was maximum by
applying 100% NPK+FYM 10 t/ha, while chlorophyll content at 45 and 60 DAS was
under the influence of 150% NPK. The study also revealed an increase in dry matter
accumulation of 180.16, 149.84 and 54.85% at 30, 45 and 60 DAS, respectively, over
control. The crop attained highest CGR (21.74 and 25.42 g/m2/day, respectively)
between 30-45 and 45-60 DAS and RGR (0.067 and 0.037 g/g/day), respectively,
between 30-45 and 45-60 DAS when fertilized with 100% NPK+FYM 10 t/ha which
was significantly superior over rest of the treatments. (Swati et al., 2014).
2.2 NUTRIENT CONTENT AND UPTAKE
2.2.1 Effect of chemical fertilizer
Tak (2000) at Udaipur (Rajasthan) found significant increase in N, P, K, Zn,
Fe, Cu and Mn concentration in maize plant at various crop growth stages which
increased significantly with increasing fertility levels with maximum at 100 per cent
STR based on nutrient application. An application of Zn at 10 kg ha-1 showed
significant positive effect on N, P, K, and Zn content and uptake as compared to
control. Totawat et al. (2001) while working at Udaipur found that application of N
solely through chemical fertilizer up to 100 per cent of the recommended dose,
improved the major ( N, P, K ) and micro nutrient ( Zn, Cu, Fe, Mn) in grain and
stover content of maize crop.
Goyal (2002) reported that NPK application at increasing level from 50 to 100
per cent significantly increased N, P, K, Zn, Cu, Mn, Fe content in grain and stover
and uptake of these nutrients by maize crop.
Meena et al. (2006) revealed that N, P uptake by maize significantly
increased up to 100 per cent recommended dose of fertilizer to maize which were 18.0
& 19.5% 23.7 & 25.2 per cent higher under 75 and 100 per cent recommended dose
of fertilizer, respectively over 50 per cent recommended dose of fertilizer to maize.
However, K uptake significantly increased up to 75 per cent recommended dose of
fertilizer.
Research results from New Delhi revealed that application of 40, 80 and 120
kg N ha-1 tended to increase nitrogen uptake by pop corn 46.5, 78 and 99 per cent,
respectively (Kumar, 2008).
Ramesh et al. (2008) reported that by the application of chemical fertilizers
the total nitrogen uptake was highest as 332.2 kg ha-1 in maize – linseed cropping
system compared to other sources of manure application. The phosphorous uptake
was highest by applying poultry manure which was at par with the chemical fertilizer
treatment. The potassium uptake was highest in chemical fertilizer treatment (343.6
kg ha-1) which was at par with the poultry manure application.
Field experiment at Federal College of Agriculture, Ibadam, Nigeria showed
that application of 70 kg N and 13 kg P2O5 ha-1 through fertilizers resulted in
significantly higher NPK uptake by maize crop in comparison to sole application of
organics composted waste + stake cow dung (1:1) 10 t ha-1 or conjoint application of
fertilizers and organics at half the sole dose (Makinde and Ayoola, 2010).
Singh et al. (2010) found that the uptake of N,P,K and by baby corn plant
increase significantly with successive increase in level which maximum NPK at
180+38.7+74.7 kg N+P+K ha-1.
Chandrapala et al. (2010) reported that among the nutrient management
practices NPK+Zn+S recorded higher nutrient content and uptake.
Paramasivan et al. (2011) from Coimbatore reported that uptake of N,P and K
by plant increase significantly with successive increase in fertility level, which lead to
maximum N, P, K content and uptake the treatment with 250:60:25: NPK ha-1.
Highest N (280.61 kg ha-1) and highest P (77.41 kg ha-1) under 200:75:25 and K
uptake (219.5 kg ha-1) was noticed for treatment with 200:60:31 NPK.
At Varanasi (UP) Singh et al. (2010) found that the uptake of N,P,K and by
baby corn plant increase significantly with successive increase in level which
maximum NPK at 180+38.7+74.7 kg N+P+K ha-1.
In the field experiment of Jhalawar (Rajasthan), Tetarwal et al. (2011) found
that application of RDF (40 kg N+15kg P2O5+0 kg K2O ha-1) recorded higher uptake
of N, P and Zn (30.0, 12.11 kg ha-1 and 10.9 g ha-1) respectively, compared to control.
Kumawat et al. (2014) studied the effect of nitrogen and phosphorus
fertilization on yield, quality and nutrient uptake by sweet corn varieties at Udaipur
and found that application of 90 kg N + 40 kg P2O5ha-1 recorded significantly higher
green cob yield (9.85 t ha-1) and green fodder yield (19.94 t ha-1), quality parameters
viz., protein, moisture content, N and P uptake over 70 kg N+30 kg P2O5ha-1 and
higher to this level remained at par with each other.
At Ranchi (Jharkhand), an experiment was conducted to assess the nutrient
requirement of maize genotypes. The highest uptake of N (183.6 kg ha-1), P (30.0 kg
ha-1) and K (170.1 kg ha-1) were recorded under application of SSNM, which was
significantly higher over RDF (150 kg N + 60 kg P2O5 + 40 kg K2O ha-1) and farmer’s
practice (100 kg N + 50 kg P2O5 ha-1) (DMR, 2014a).
At Ambikapur (Chhattisgarh), an experiment of nutrient management for
maize genotypes was conducted and recorded highest uptake of N (168.5 kg ha-1), P
(30.8 kg ha-1) and K (156.6 kg ha-1) were recorded under application of SSNM, which
was significantly higher over RDF (150 kg N + 60 kg P2O5 + 40 kg K2O ha-1) and
farmer’s practice (120kg N + 60 kg P2O5 + 40 kg K2O ha-1) (DMR, 2014).
2.2.2 Effect of organic manure
Patidar and Mali (2002) found that application of 10 t ha-1 farm yard manure
increased N, P, and K content by 4.6, 4.6 and 3.1 per cent in grain and 4.0, 2.1 and 6.7
per cent in stover over no farm yard manure, respectively.
At Udaipur, Mehta et al. (2005) found that application of farm yard manure 10
t ha-1 increased N and P uptake by maize crop over no farm yard manure application.
Begum et al. (2007) reported that application of FYM @ 5 t ha with inorganic
N maintain the level of all form of soil N up to maize harvest. Inorganic P showed an
inverse relationship with the organic P content at all growth stage of the wheat-mung
bean-maize crops.
Sujata et al. (2008) reported that among the organic manures, cattle dung
application resulted in the lowest uptake of N, P and K on deep vertisols of Bhopal.
Compared to RDF (100 kg N + 50 kg P2O5 + 25 kg K2O ha-1), an application of FYM
4.9 t ha-1 with 75 per cent or 100 per cent N tended to significantly enhance NPK
uptake by maize crop when cowpea and sunhemp were raised between crop rows and
incorporated in the soil 45 days after sowing, respectively.
2.2.3 Effect of integrated nutrient management
An application of farm yard manure 10 t ha-1 significantly improved N, P and
K content in plants at 60 DAS and in grain and stover at harvest, while the Mn content
significantly improved at all growth stages. The N, P and K uptake increased
significantly with farm yard manure and reached highest with the application of FYM
10 t ha-1 (Tak, 2000).
The study on judicious nutrient management strategy concluded that an
application of recommended dose of fertilizer (100 - 50 - 25 kg ha-1 of NPK), 25 per
cent and 50 per cent dose substituted by FYM resulted in maximum uptake of NPK as
105.0, 14.4, 81.4 kg ha-1 and 110.1, 14.5, 84.5 kg ha-1, respectively over the control
and farmer’s practice (Pathak et al., 2005).
A field experiment conducted for two years under auspices of AICRP - LTFE,
Udaipur showed that application of FYM 10 t ha-1 along with 100 per cent NPK
increased NPK uptake by maize crop to the extent of 14.4, 27.2 and 13.0 per cent,
respectively over sole NPK (Verma et al., 2006). The study conducted on the effect of
integrated nutrient management practices on nutrient uptake and revealed that the
nutrient removal by maize under combined application of FYM, inorganic fertilizer
and bio fertilizer as Azospirillum registered higher NPK uptake over (150 + 60 + 40
kg ha-1 NPK) recommended dose of fertilizer (Thavaprakash and Velayudham,2007).
Ramesh et al. (2008) reported that by the application of chemical fertilizers
the total nitrogen uptake was highest as 332.2 kg ha-1 in maize – linseed cropping
system compared to other sources of manure application. The phosphorous uptake
was highest by applying poultry manure which was at par with the chemical fertilizer
treatment. The potassium uptake was highest in chemical fertilizer treatment (343.6
kg ha-1) which was at par with the poultry manure application. Sujata et al. (2008)
among the organic manures, cattle dung application resulted in the lowest uptake of
N, P and K on deep vertisols of Bhopal compared to RDF (100 kg N + 50 kg P2O5 +
25 kg K2O ha-1), an application of FYM 4.9 t ha-1 with 75 per cent or 100 per cent N
tended to significantly enhance NPK uptake by maize crop when cowpea and sun
hemp were raised between crop rows and incorporated in the soil 45 days after
sowing, respectively.
Das et al. (2010) reported significantly improved uptake of available NPK of
194.8, 11.63, 249.7 kg ha-1, respectively with application of Azolla compost 5 t ha-1
and FYM 5 t ha-1 to maize crop which was 12.3, 36.8 and 9.3 per cent higher than the
control.
Sharma and Banik (2012) conduct experiment and concluded that the nutrient-
use efficiency and soil nutrient balance of integrated nutrient management, five
combinations of organic and inorganic sources of nutrients. Both partial factor
productivity and agronomic-use efficiency of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium was
recorded maximum in F3 (70% RD of NPK through inorganic fertilizers+30% N
through FYM), F2 (70% RD of NPK through inorganic fertilizers+30% N through
vermicompost) and F1 (recommended dose (RD) of NPK (150:26:33) through
fertilizers.
Biradar and Jayadeva (2013) concluded that SSNM through fertilizers for
targeted yield of 10 t ha-1 recorded higher dry matter production (501.4 g), cob length
(20.3 cm), number of grain rows cob-1 (20.5), number of grains row-1 (41.3), number
of grains plant-1 (891.2) test weight (32.9 g) and significantly higher grain yield (9.77
t ha-1) as compared to other treatments and higher nutrient uptake (504.8, 103.1 and
212.3 N, P and K kg ha-1) was also recorded inSSNM through fertilizers for targeted
yield of 10 t ha-1 over 100 per cent RDF (219.4, 32.2 and 73; N, P and K kg ha-1) and
economics.
2.3 SOIL PROPERTIES
2.3.1 Effect of chemical fertilizer
Hile et al. (2007) conducted a field experiment at Nasik district of
Maharashtra was conducted during the kharif and rabi seasons to study the effect of
fertilizer levels on the yield and uptake of nutrients in a maize (cv. 'Super 900
M')+wheat (cv. 'NIAW-301') cropping sequence and observed a significant increase in
the grain yield of the maize-wheat cropping sequence with increase in N level from 0
to 120 kg/ha. The highest net monetary return was recorded with N+P+K and
adequate supply of irrigation water.
On sandy loam soil of Varanasi, a significant variation in available N, P and K
in the soil was observed with each successive increase in fertility level and being
highest with application of 180+38.7+74.7 kg ha-1 (Singh et al., 2010).
Meena et al. (2012) reported that application of 125% RDN gave higher
nitrogen status in soil (297.30 kg ha-1) by 6.3 and 1.9 per cent over 75% RDN and
100% RDN, respectively.
Shankar et al. (2014) found that application of NPK+ZnSO4 @ 12.5 kg
ha-1 + borax @ 10 kg ha-1 maintaining maximum soil fertility of nutrients under semi-
arid Alfisols.
2.3.2 Effect of organic manure
Goyal (2002) reported that application of farm yard manure (equivalent to 34
kg ha-1 P2O5) left significantly higher amount of available nutrients (N, P, K, Cu, Zn,
Mn, Fe) in soil after harvest of maize crop at Udaipur.
In a long term field experiment with different manurial treatments, decline in
soil pH and EC was observed in maize - Indian mustard cropping system. Maximum
reduction was recorded in the plot receiving 100 per cent recommended N through
FYM in rainy season (maize) and 100 per cent recommended N, P2O5 through
fertilizer in winter season (mustard) which may be ascribed to the formation of acid
during decomposition of organic matter (Kumpawat, 2004).
In another study at Udaipur, farm yard manure 10 t ha-1 improved the available
N by 6.2 per cent and 7.9 per cent and available P by 11.9 per cent and 13.4 per cent
compared with application of FYM during two respective years of study (Mahala et
al., 2006).
A study was conducted by Rassol et al. (2007) to evaluate the effect of FYM
on saturated hydraulic conductivity of soil in rice-wheat and maize-wheat cropping
systems in a long term experiment conducted in Panjab, they observed that the
saturated hydraulic conductivity was significantly higher in FYM plots (34 percent)
than in the control plots in rice-wheat, whereas in maize-wheat, it was higher by 70
per cent.
Gopinath et al. (2008) reported a significant decrease in soil bulk density and a
significant increase in soil pH and total organic carbon after application of
vermicompost in two consective growing seasons, at a rate to 60 kg ha 1of N. these
changes in soil properties improve the availability of air and water, thus encouraging
seedling emergence and root growth.
Jat et al. (2012) reported that application of FYM @10 t ha-1 increased the
available N, S, Zn and Fe content of soil to the extent of 11.2, 51.7, 12.7 and 7.4 per
cent respectively as compared to control. The significant increase in available nutrient
content of the soil after harvest of the crop may ascribe to the beneficial role of FYM
in mineralization of native as well as applied nutrients which enhanced the available
nutrient pool of the soil
2.3.3 Effect of integrated nutrient management
Tiwari et al. (2002) reported that status of soil nutrients, their depletion and
build up and crop productivity after twenty eight years of intensive cropping under
various fertilizer and manurial treatment on long term fertilizer experiment at JNKV,
Jabalpur in Typic Haplusterts. The result showed significant increase in available N,
P, K and organic carbon content with 100% NPK + FYM.
A study was conducted by Rassol et al. (2008) to evaluate the increased
organic matter with both FYM and NPK (100:50:50) increased the total soil porosity
and decreased soil bulk density from that in control plots.
On the basis of experiment conducted at Udaipur (Raj), Dadarwal et al. (2009)
reported significantly increased available NPK status of soil after harvest of baby corn
over other treatments with application of 75 per cent NPK along with 2.25 t ha-1
vermicompost and bio fertilizer.
Yadav and Kumar (2009) conducted a long term experiment and found that
the application of 100% NPK through chemical fertilizer of their combined use with
organic N source showed 10-27 kg ha-1 increase in available N and 10.4 to 14.4 kg
ha-1. In available P status of the soil but 67 and 139 kg ha-1 decrease in available K
over the reparative initial value in 20 years of cob rice-wheat cropping practice among
the different organic source of N applying to rice FYM and sesbania green manuring
registered more increase in available N and P content of the soil 100% NPK through
fertilizers alone.
Chandrapala et al. (2010) reported that at Hyderabad application of N, P,
K+FYM to rice crop recorded highest quantity of available soil N, P and K content
after crop harvest. Singh et al. (2010b) reported significantly higher soil fertility status
with integrated nutrient application as 50% N through fertilizers and 50 % N as FYM.
Tetarwal et al. (2011) reported that integrated use of inorganic and organic
sources of nutrient to maize crop influenced physic-chemical properties of soil under
rainfed condition. Application of RDF (40-15-0 Kg N-P2O5-K2O ha-1) + FYM 10tha-1
registered maximum values of available N and P, per cent increase was 1.28 for N and
14.89 for P over initial soil fertility.
Ahmad et al. 2013 from Agricultural Research Institute, Tarnab, Peshawar
was conducted to investigate effect of integrated use of organic and inorganic
fertilizers in a low fertility soil. The soil analysis after crop harvest revealed that soil
organic matter, total N, extractable P and K, EC and total soluble salts were all
greatest for treatment receiving organic sources with 50% of recommended NPK
fertilizers. Soil pH on the other hand was lowest in the corresponding treatments. The
results showed that combining organic sources with 50% of recommended NPK
fertilizers produced the highest grain and biological yields of maize over the 50%
NPK treatment and were statistically at par with those receiving 100% NPK
fertilizers.
A field study was carried out at Vanavarayar Institute of Agriculture,
Manakkadavu, Kannan et al, (2013) observed that Bulk density and pore space was
recorded maximum in INM practice including vermicompost and recommended dose
of NPK. Particle density was recorded maximum in FYM treatments. Organic carbon
was recorded maximum in INM treatment including vermicompost and recommended
dose of NPK.
Maitra et al. (2014) reported that the available nutrient status increased
significantly in post-flax soil after three years of cultivation with the applied S, Zn
and organic manure but significant reduction in available P was recorded with the
applied Zn.
Manzeke et al. (2014) concluded that combined organic resource and Zn
fertilization also resulted in a significant build up of plant available soil P and Zn.
Concentrations of 7.4 mg P kg-1 and 5.5 mg Zn kg-1 were measured after application
of organics, compared with initial values of 5.2 mg kg-1 and 1.15 mg kg-1,
respectively.
3. MATERIALS AND METHODS
A field study entitled “Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on
Maize (Zea mays L.)” was conducted during kharif 2014 at Rajasthan College of
Agriculture, Udaipur. The details of experimental techniques, materials used and
criteria adopted for treatment evaluation during the course of investigation are
presented in this chapter.
3.1 Experimental Site:
The experiment was conducted at the field block B2 of Instructional Farm,
Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipur. The site is situated in south-eastern part of
Rajasthan at an altitude of 579.5 m above mean sea level, at 24o35’ N latitude and
74o42’ E longitude. The region falls under agro-climatic zone IV a (Sub- Humid
Southern Plain and Arawali Hills) of Rajasthan.
3.1.1 Climate and weather conditions:
This zone possesses typical sub-tropical climatic conditions characterized by
mild winters and moderate summers associated with high relative humidity during the
months of July to September. The mean annual rainfall of the region is 637 mm, most
of which is contributed by south west mansoon from July to September.
The mean weekly meteorological parameters recorded at Agromet
observatory, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipur during cropping period are
presented in Table 3.1 and depicted in Fig. 3.1. These observations reveal that
maximum and minimum temperatures ranged between 28.7 to 34.4 ºC and 19.5 to
24.8 ºC, respectively during kharif, 2014. Total amount of rainfall received during
maize crop growth in 2014 was 648 mm and this was well distributed in crop growth
period.
3.1.2 Physico-chemical properties of experimental soils:
The experiment was conducted at the field Instructional Farm, Rajasthan
College of Agriculture, Udaipur. The soil characteristics determined, through standard
methods are presented in Table 3.2.
Table 3.1 Mean weekly meteorological data for crop period (Kharif, 2014)
SMW* No.
Date Temperature (°C) Mean R.H. (%)
Evaporation (mm/day)
Bright sunshine (hrs)
Rainfall (mm)
From To Maxi. Min.
30 18.07.2014 24.07.2014 31.1 24.8 70.57 5.0 2.8 7.8
31 25.07.2014 31.07.2014 29.6 23.7 83.21 2.7 1.0 16.1
32 01.08.2014 07.08.2014 29.3 23.9 84.71 3.1 1.7 10.6
33 08.08.2014 14.08.2014 28.7 23.7 79.21 3.3 1.5 1.0
34 15.08.2014 21.08.2014 30.7 23.2 68.78 4.0 4.7 0.02
35 22.08.2014 28.08.2014 32.0 23.2 79.35 4.0 5.6 8.7
36 29.08.2014 04.09.2014 30.7 23.0 81.64 3.4 5.0 12.4
37 05.09.2014 11.09.2014 29.0 22.7 84.07 3.7 3.0 17.4
38 12.09.2014 18.09.2014 30.0 20.7 80.21 2.8 5.0 8.8
39 19.09.2014 25.09.2014 32.3 19.5 67.93 4.8 9.3 0
40 26.09.2014 02.10.2014 32.2 19.6 63.00 3.5 8.0 0
41 03.10.2014 09.10.2014 34.4 19.8 56.43 4.3 8.5 0
* Standard meteorological week
Table 3.2 Physico-chemical properties of experimental soil
Characteristics Soil Content
A. Mechanical
Sand (%) 35.98
Silt (%) 27.04
Clay (%) 35.98
Textural class clay loam
B. Physical
Bulk density (Mg m-3)
Particle density (Mg m-3)
Porosity (%)
Field capacity (%)
1.45
2.63
52.10
7.92
C. Chemical
pH (1:2) 8.14
EC (1:2) (dS m-1 at 25ºC) 0.66
Organic carbon (g kg-1) 6.80
Available Nitrogen ( kg ha-1) 265
Available phosphorus (kg ha-1) 17
Available potassium (kg ha-1) 356
Available Zn (mg kg-1) 1.55
Available Cu (mg kg-1) 2.3
Available Mn (mg kg-1) 2.0
Available Fe (mg kg-1) 2.8
3.2 Cropping History:
On the experimental site, maize-wheat rotation was followed in three previous
years before the present experimentation. During the course of investigation, maize crop
was grown in kharif 2014.
3.3 Treatment Details and Experimental Design:
3.3.1 Treatments:
T1 : Control
T2 : 50% RDF
T3 : 75% RDF
T4 : 100% RDF
T5 : Vermicompost@ 8 t ha-1
T6 : FYM @ 20 t ha-1
T7 : 50% RDF + Vermicompost @ 4 t ha-1
T8 : 75% RDF + Vermicompost @ 4 t ha-1
T9 : 100% RDF + Vermicompost @ 4 t ha-1
T10 : 50% RDF + FYM @ 10 t ha-1
T11 : 75% RDF + FYM @10 t ha-1
T12 : 100 % RDF + FYM @10t ha-1
3.3.2 Experimental details:
1. Treatment combinations : 12
2. Design : RBD
3. Replications : 3
4. Crop geometry : Row to row distance 60 cm
Plant to plant distance 25 cm
5. Plot size
Gross size : 5 x 3.25m
Net size : 3 x 2.4m
6. Nutrient application : As per treatments
7. Test crop / Variety : Maize cultivar Pratap Makka-5
8. Irrigation : Life saving irrigation
9. Date of sowing : 16/7 /2014
3.3.3 Sources of nutrients:
The sources used for applying N, P and K were urea, di-ammonium phosphate
(adjusted for its N content) and muriate of potash, respectively. FYM and Vermicompost
is used as a source of organic fertilizer.
3.3.4 Doses of nutrients:
The dose of the NPK for maize was worked out from IPNS equations developed
for maize crop for 2.5 t/ha yield target. The NPK dose in kg ha-1 worked out was 90: 40:
40 for maize crop. The doses for farm yard manure and vermicompost is 10 t ha-1 and 8 t
ha-1, respectively. The FYM and Vermicompost were applied before sowing of the maize
crop (content of FYM and Vermicompost given below Table 3.3).
Table 3.3 Composition of FYM and Vermicompost
Nutrient FYM (%) Vermicompost (%) N 0.48 2.94 P2O5 0.18 0.96 K2O 0.45 1.42
3.4 Details of Crop Raising:
Details of field operations carried out for maize are given in Table 3.4
Table 3.4 Schedule of operations during crop period
S.No. Operations Date 1. Field preparation 18.06.2014 2. Layout and bunding 25.06.2014 3. Opening of furrows and fertilizer placement 16.07.2014 4. Sowing 16.07.2014 5. Atrazine spray 18.07.2014 6. Thinning 03.08.2014 7. Plant protection spray 11.08.2014 8. Inter culture or Hoeing and weeding (30 DAS) 15.08.2014 9. Top dressing of urea
(a) 30 DAS (b) 50 DAS
16.08.2014 02.09.2014
10. Life saving irrigation (a) First (b) Second
04.08.2014 02.09.2014
11. Harvesting 15.10.2014 12. Threshing 08.11.2014
3.4.1 Field preparation:
After receiving pre-mansoon showers, the experimental field was prepared by
cross cultivation followed by planking. The crop stubbles, weeds and grasses were
removed from the field. The field was demarcated into different plots as per details given
in Fig. 3.2.
3.4.2 Treatment application:
Fertilizer application was made as per the treatment. Full dose of phosphorus and
potash and half dose of nitrogen were applied at sowing by drilling in crop rows. The
remaining dose of nitrogen was top dressed in two split doses at 30 DAS and 50 DAS.
3.4.3 Seed and sowing:
Maize variety Pratap Makka-5 was sown at the seed rate of 20 kg ha-1 at inter row
of 60 and plant to plant spacing of 25 cm. Furrows were opened through bullock drawn
desi plough and seeds were sown manually at the depth of 5 cm. Before sowing seeds
were treated with Captan 2.0 g kg-1 seed to protect it from fungal diseases and
Chloropyriphos 4 ml kg-1 seed to protect the seed from termites just before sowing.
3.4.4 Weed management:
Atrazine at 0.5 kg ha-1 was applied next day of sowing through foot sprayer, using
600 L ha-1 of water with flat fan nozzle. One manual hoeing and weeding was performed
30 DAS.
3.4.5 Irrigation:
Irrigation in maize was applied as life saving measure. The details of which have
been mentioned in Table 3.4.
3.4.6 Thinning:
In order to maintain plant to plant distance of 25 cm, thinning was done 25 days
after sowing.
3.4.7 Plant protection:
One prophylactic spray of Endosulfan 35 EC (0.07 per cent) was performed
against stem borer at 35 DAS.
3.4.8 Harvesting:
The crop was harvested along with cobs when plant turned golden yellow with the
help of sickle. The net plot crop was harvested close to ground and plants were tied in
bundles and kept for sun drying on threshing floor for few days.
3.4.9 Threshing:
After sun drying of harvested plants of net plot area, cobs were separated from
individual plant. After separation of the cobs from plants, these were dehusked and
shelled through cob sheller and produce of each plot was winnowed and weighed.
3.5 Yield :
a) Grain yield: Cobs of harvested plants of net plot area after proper sun drying
were separated from plants, dehusked and shelled with the help of cob sheller. The
produce was cleaned, weighed and expressed in terms of grains kg ha-1.
b) Stover yield: Stover yield was obtained by subtracting the grain yield per plot
from the respectively biological yield per plot and finally expressed in terms of
stover yield kg ha-1.
3.6 Plant Analysis:
3.6.1 Nutrient content:
The maize plant samples collected at harvesting stage (grain and stover) from each
plot were oven dried. The dried samples were finely ground and used for determination of
N, P, K, and micronutrient (Fe, Mn, Cu & Zn) content as per method furnished in Table
3.2.
3.6.2 Nutrient uptake:
Uptake of macro (N, P, K,) and micronutrient (Fe,Mn,Cu&Zn) at harvest were
computed from the data of N, P, K, Zn, Mn, Cu and Fe and content and grain and stover
yield using the following formulae
% nutrient content in plant material x Yield or dry mater (kg ha-1) Macro nutrient uptake = __________________________________________________________________________________
(kg ha-1) 100 Nutrient content (mg kg-1 or ppm) x Yield or dry matter (kg ha -1) Micro nutrient uptake = ___________________________________________________________________________________
(g ha-1) 1000 3.7 Methods Followed for Chemical and Phyical Analysis of Samples
3.7.1 Soil analysis:
Composite soil samples 0-15 cm depth from each plot were drawn before sowing
and at harvest of crop and analyzed for following as per procedure referred in table 3.2
Chemical analysis:
pH, EC Available N, P and K and DTPA extractable Zn, Fe,Mn, Cu, before
sowing and after harvest of maize
Physical analysis:
Aggregates, Bulk density, Porosity, Hydraulic conductivity
3.7.2 Plant analysis:
Plant material was digested in triacid mixture using HNO3:H2SO4:HClO4 (10:1:4)
(Richards, 1954) for analysis of P, K, Zn, Mn, Cu and Fe. The plant samples were also
digested with sulphuric acid (H2SO4) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) for the analysis of
nitrogen (Jackson, 1973). The standard methods were followed for analysis as given in
below table.
Table- 3.5 : Methods for determination of physico-chemical properties of soil
S. No. Properties Procedure Reference 1. pH (1:2 soil water
suspension) Potentiometeric method using pH meter Richards (1954)
2. EC (1:2 soil water suspension)
Using solubridge method (Conductivity meter)
Richards (1954)
3. Available N By alkaline KMnO4 method Subbiah and Asija (1956)
4. Available P Olsen’s P, 0.5M NaHCO3 method, pH 8.5
Olsen et al.(1954)
5. Available K Neutral normal ammonium acetate extraction and Flame photometry
Richards (1954)
6. Available Zn, Fe, Cu & Mn (mg kg-1)
Extraction by 0.005M DTPA + 0.001M CaCl2 + 0.1M triethanolamine at pH 7.3
Lindsay and Norvell (1978)
7. Bulk Density Core sampler method Piper (1950) 8. Aggregates Wet sieving Yodders
Apparatus 9. Hydraulic
conductivity Constant head method Empirical
approach 10. Porosity Pycnometer Piper(1950) Plant Analysis
S.No Type of analysis Standard Procedure Reference
1. Digestion of plant sample
Wet digestion of plant samples with H2SO4 and H2O2 will be carried out for determination of nitrogen content
Jackson (1973)
2. Nitrogen Colorimetric method using spectrophotometer after development of colour with Nesseler’s reagent
Snell and Snell (1959)
3. Digestion of plant sample
Digestion with di-acid mixture HNO3 HClO4 (10:4)
Johnson and Ulrich (1959)
4. Phosphorus Vandomolybdo phosphoric acid yellow colour method
Jackson (1973)
5. Potassium Flame Photometer method Jackson(1973)
6. Digestion of plant sample
Digestion with tri-acid mixture of HNO3, HClO4 and H2SO4 (10:4:1)
Jackson (1973)
7. Zinc, Iron, Manganese & Copper
Estimation on AAS Lindsay and Norvell (1978)
3.8 Economics of Treatments:
The economics of different treatments was estimated in terms of net profit ha-1.
The cost of cultivation for each treatment was subtracted from gross return and net profit
was worked out. Further, to ascertain profitability on per rupee investment, cost: benefit
ratio was also calculated.
3.9 Statistical Analysis:
In order to test the significance of variation in experimental data obtained for
various treatment effects, data were statistically analysed as described by Panse and
Sukhatme (1989). The critical difference was calculated to assess the significance of
treatment mean wherever the ‘F’ test was found significant at 5 per cent level. The
analysis for all the characters was carried out after find out the test of homogeneity
between error mean sum of square as per methodology given by Gomez and Gomez
(1984).
4. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
The results of the field experiment entitled “Effect of Integrated Nutrient
Management on Maize (Zea mays L.)” conducted in kharif, 2014 at Instructional Farm,
Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipur are presented in this chapter. The data
pertaining to the effect of different treatments on yield, nutrient uptake and soil properties
of maize were statistically analysed for test of significance of the results. The results of
individual effects for different characters are given the Appendices I to XIII at the end.
4.1 EFFECT OF INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMMENT ON YIELD
AND HARVEST INDEX OF MAIZE
4.1.1 Grain yield
An examination of data (Table 4.1 and Fig. 4.1) reveal that variation in grain yield
of maize varied from 1475.56 to 2766.13 kg ha-1. Significant enhancement in grain yield
of maize was recorded by applying various treatments to supply nutrients. The highest
grain yield (2766.13 kg ha-1) was recorded by application of 100 % RDF +
Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 and which was followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1 which
represents 88 and 79 per cent increase yield over control.
4.1.2 Stover yield
Based on measured data (Table 4.1) it can be inferred that stover yield was
significantly increased by enriching the soil with various treatments over no fertilization.
The increase in yield varied from 4127.81 to 7796.69 kg ha-1. The application of 100%
RDF + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 produced highest stover yield (7796.69 kg ha-1) and which
was followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1 which represents 89 and 82 per cent
increase yield over control.
4.1.3 Biological yield
A perusal of data presented in Table 4.1 show that biological yield varied from
5603.37 to 10562.82 kg ha-1 during study by applying various treatments to supply
nutrients. An application of 100% RDF + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 recorded significantly
highest yield (10562.82 kg ha-1) and which was followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1
which represents 89 and 81 per cent increase yield over control.
4.1.4 Harvest index
It is explicit from the data (Table 4.1) that irrespective of application of plant
nutrients in form of chemical or organic or their integrated state did not significantly
influence harvest index of maize crop.
4.2 EFFECT OF INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMMENT ON
NUTRIENT CONTENT OF MAIZE
4.2.1 Nitrogen content in stover
A cursory look of the data (Table 4.2) reveal that in comparison to control, all the
nutrient application treatments gave significantly higher N content in stover of maize
plants at harvest. The soil enriching with 100% RDF + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 tended to
give maximum N content (0.724%) than all other treatments and which was followed by
100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1 which represents 34 and 30 per cent increase N content over
control.
4.2.2 Nitrogen content in grain
An examination of data (Table 4.2) reveal that application of plant nutrients
significantly increased N content in grain at harvest. Maximum N content (1.919%) was
recorded by use of 100% RDF + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 application and which was
followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1 which represents 45 and 38 per cent increase N
content over control.
4.2.3 Phosphorus content in stover
The data (Table 4.3) explicate that application of balanced and integrated nutrient
supply tended to increase the P content over control. Application of integrated use of
100% RDF + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 resulted in maximum P content (0.164%) and which
was followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1 which represents 33 and 32 per cent
increase P content over control.
4.2.4 Phosphorus content in grain
In comparison to control, enrichment of soil by various combinations and sources
of plant nutrients resulted in significantly higher P content in grain. The maximum P
content (0.380%) was accounted in soil fortification with 100% RDF + Vermicompost 4 t
ha-1 (Table 4.3) and which was followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1 which represents
26 and 21 per cent increase P content over control.
4.2.5 Potassium content in stover
A reference to data (Table 4.4) reveal that application of plant nutrients
significantly improved K content in stover at harvest stage. Maximum K content
(1.099%) was found in crop provided 100% RDF + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 and which
was followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1 which represents 13 and 12 per cent
increase K content over control.
4.2.6 Potassium content in grain
The data (Table 4.4) indicates that addition of plant nutrients in balanced or
integrated forms proved significantly superior in increasing K content in maize grain over
no fertilization. Maximum K content (0.444%) of maize grain at harvest was recorded in
100% RDF + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 applied treatment and which was followed by 100%
RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1 which represents 19 and 16 per cent increase K content over
control.
4.2.7 Zinc content in stover
A cursory look of the data (Table 4.5) reveal that in comparison to control, all the
nutrient application treatments gave significantly higher Zn content in stover of maize
plants at harvest. The soil enriching with 100% RDF + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 tended to
give maximum Zn content (24.52 mg kg-1) than all other treatments and which was
followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1 which represents 41 and 40 per cent increase Zn
content over control.
4.2.8 Zinc content in grain
An examination of data (Table 4.5) reveal that application of plant nutrients
significantly increased Zn content in grain at harvest. Maximum Zn content (63.19 mg kg-
1) was recorded by use of 100% RDF + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 application and which was
followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1 which represents 35 per cent increase Zn content
over control.
4.2.9 Iron content in stover
The data (Table 4.6) explicate that application of balanced and integrated nutrient
supply tended to increase the Fe content over control. Application of integrated use of
100% RDF + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 resulted in maximum Fe content (130.83 mg kg-1)
and which was followed by 100% RDF+FYM 10 t ha-1 which represents 18 per cent
increase Fe content over control. the extent of increase in Fe content under various
treatments applications varied from 110.70 ppm in control to 130.83 mg kg-1 in 100%
RDF + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 .
4.2.10 Iron content in grain
In comparison to control, enrichment of soil by various combinations and sources
of plant nutrients resulted in significantly higher Fe content in grain. the maximum Fe
content (74.43 mg kg-1) was accounted in soil fortification with 100% RDF +
Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 (Table 4.6) and which was followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-
1 which represents 15 and 13 per cent increase Fe content over control.
4.2.11 Manganese content in stover
A reference to data (Table 4.7) reveal that application of plant nutrients
significantly improved Mn content in stover at harvest stage. Maximum Mn content
(44.64 mg kg-1) was found in crop provided 100% RDF + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 and
which was followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1 which represents 21 and 19 per cent
increase Mn content over control.
4.2.12 Manganese content in grain
The data (Table 4.7) indicates that addition of plant nutrients in balanced or
integrated forms proved significantly superior in increasing Mn content in maize grain
over no fertilization. Maximum Mn content (15.06 mg kg-1) of maize grain at harvest was
recorded in 100% RDF + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 applied treatment and which was
followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1 which represents 28 and 27 per cent increase
Mn content over control.
4.2.13 Copper content in stover
A cursory look of the data (Table 4.8) reveal that in comparison to control, all the
nutrient application treatments gave significantly higher Cu content in stover of maize
plants at harvest. The soil enriching with 100% RDF + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 tended to
give maximum Cu content (8.43 mg kg-1) than all other treatments and which was
followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1 which represents 31 and 26 per cent increase Cu
content over control.
4.2.14 Copper content in grain
An examination of data (Table 4.8) reveal that application of plant nutrients
significantly increased Cu content in grain at harvest. Maximum cu content (24.27 mg
kg-1) was recorded by use of 100% RDF + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 application and which
was followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1 which represents 17 per cent increase Cu
content over control.
4.3 EFFECT OF INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMMENT ON
NUTRIENT UPTAKE OF MAIZE
4.3.1 Nitrogen uptake at harvest
4.3.1.1 By stover
The data (Table 4.2 and Fig. 4.2) clearly indicate superiority of balanced and
integrated supply of nutrients with respect to N uptake by leaves of maize at harvest.
Maximum N uptake (56.66 kg ha-1) by leaves was obtained by conjugant application of
100% RDF + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 and which was followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t
ha-1 which represents 150 and 137 per cent increase N uptake over control. The minimum
N uptake (22.30 kg ha-1) by leaves was recorded in control.
4.3.1.2 By grain
The N uptake by maize grain at harvest ranged from 19.46 kg ha-1 (control) to
53.10 kg ha-1 (100% RDF + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1). The data (Table 4.2 and Fig.4.2)
reveal that the effect of 100% RDF + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 was significantly superior
over rest of the treatments which was followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1 which
represents 173 and 148 per cent increase N uptake over control.
Total: A perusal of data shows that N uptake by maize plants by applying nutrients in
various forms and combination increased from 41.76 to 109.75 kg ha-1 over
control (Table 4.2 and Fig.4.2). The maximum uptake was recorded by INM in the form
of 100% RDF + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 (109.75 kg ha-1) which was followed by 100%
RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1 (101.21 kg ha-1) which represents 163 and 142 per sent increase N
uptake over control.
4.3.2 Phosphorus uptake at harvest
4.3.2.1 By stover
An assessment of data (Table 4.3) reveal that application of plant nutrients
through chemical fertilizers, organic manures and integrated sources brought about a
significant response in P uptake by leaves of maize at harvest in comparison to control.
The conjoint application of 100% RDF + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 brought about maximum
enhancement in P uptake (12.87 kg ha-1) which was followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t
ha-1 which represents 151 and 141 per cent increase P uptake over control. P uptake by
leaves of maize crop at harvest ranged from 5.12 to 12.87 kg ha-1 in response to
application of nutrients.
4.3.2.2 By grain
The data clearly reflect that the application of plant nutrients significantly increase
to P uptake by grains of maize during experimentation (Table 4.3). Soil fortification with
100% RDF + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 resulted in highest P uptake (10.52 kg ha-1) by maize
grain at harvest. which was followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1 which represents
136 and 121 per cent increase P uptake over control. The overall range of increase in P
uptake by grain due to application of various treatments was 4.46 to 10.52 kg ha-1.
Total: A perusal of data shows in Table 4.3 and depicted in Fig.4.2 that P uptake
by maize plants at harvest by applying nutrients in various forms and combination
increased from 9.58 to 23.38 kg ha-1 over control. The maximum uptake was recorded by
balanced fertilization in the form of 100% RDF + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 (23.38 kg ha-1)
and which was followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1 which represents 144 and 133
per cent increase P uptake over control.
4.3.3 Potassium uptake at harvest
4.3.3.1 By stover
The crop under influence of 100% RDF + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 accumulated
highest uptake of K (85.66 kg ha-1) by leaves of maize at harvest. which was followed by
100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1 which represents 114 and 104 per cent increase K uptake
over control. The data show that K uptake by leaves of maize plants by applying nutrients
in various forms and combination increased from 40.09 to 85.66 kg ha-1 over control
(Table 4.4).
4.3.3.2 By grain
A perusal of data (Table 4.4) reveal that the K uptake by grain of maize varied
significantly by applying various treatments. Applications of all the treatments were
significantly superior over unfertilized control. The maximum K uptake was recorded by
enriching the soil with 100% RDF + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 (12.29 kg ha-1) and which
was followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1 which represents 123 and 109 per cent
increase K uptake over control.
Total: The K uptake by maize at harvest ranged from 45.60 kg ha-1 (control) to
97.95 kg ha-1 (100% NPK + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1). The data (Table 4.4 and Fig.4.2)
reveal that the effect of 100% NPK + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 was significantly superior
over rest of the treatments and which was followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1 which
represents 115 and 105 per cent increase K uptake over control.
4.3.4 Zinc uptake at harvest
4.3.4.1 By stover
Maximum Zn uptake (1914.68 g ha-1) by leaves was obtained by conjugant
application of 100% RDF + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 which was significantly superior over
other treatments. which was followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1 which represents
167 and 156 per cent increase Zn uptake over control. The minimum Zn uptake (717.68 g
ha-1) by leaves was recorded in unfertilized plots.
4.3.4.2 By grain
The Zn uptake by maize grain at harvest ranged from 691.41 g ha-1 (control) to
1751.86 kg ha-1 (100% RDF + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1). The data (Table 4.5 ) reveal that
the effect of 100% RDF + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 was significantly superior over rest of
the treatments and which was followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1 which represents
153 and 100 per cent increase Zn uptake over control.
Total: A perusal of data shows that Zn uptake by maize plants by applying nutrients in
various forms and combination increased from 1409.09 to 3666.53 g ha-1 over control
(Table 4.5 & Fig.4.3). The maximum uptake was recorded by INM in the form of 100%
RDF + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 (3666.53 g ha-1) and which was followed by 100% RDF +
FYM 10 t ha-1 which represents 160 and 149 per cent increase Zn uptake over control.
4.3.5 Iron uptake at harvest
4.3.5.1 By stover
An assessment of data (Table 4.6) reveal that application of plant nutrients
through chemical fertilizers, organic manures and integrated sources brought about a
significant response in Fe uptake by leaves of maize at harvest in comparison to control.
The conjoint application of 100% RDF + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 brought about maximum
enhancement in Fe uptake (10202.08 g ha-1) which was significantly superior over rest of
the treatments and which was followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1 which represents
123 and 114 per cent increase Fe uptake over control. Fe uptake by leaves of maize crop
at harvest ranged from 4573.56 to 10202.08 g ha-1 in response to application of nutrients.
4.3.5.2 By grain
The data clearly reflect that the application of plant nutrients significantly increase
to Fe uptake by grains of maize during experimentation (Table 4.6). Soil fortification
with 100% RDF + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 resulted in highest Fe uptake (2059.75 g ha-1)
by maize grain at harvest and which was followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1 which
represents 115 and 103 per cent increase Fe uptake over control. The overall range of
increase in Fe uptake by grain due to application of various treatments was 956.60 to
2059.75 g ha-1.
Total: A perusal of data shows in Table 4.6 and depicted in Fig.4.3 that Fe uptake by
maize plants at harvest by applying nutrients in various forms and combination increased
from 5530.17 to 12261.83 g ha-1 over control. The maximum uptake was recorded by
balanced fertilization in the form of 100% RDF + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 (12261.83 g ha-
1) and which was followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1 which represents 122 and 112
per cent increase Fe uptake over control.
4.3.6 Manganese uptake at harvest
4.3.6.1 By stover
The crop under influence of 100% RDF + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 accumulated
highest uptake of Mn (3476.42 g ha-1) by leaves of maize at harvest and which was
followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1 which represents 128 and 116 per cent increase
Mn uptake over control. The data show that Mn uptake by leaves of maize plants by
applying nutrients in various forms and combination increased from 1527.95 to 3476.42 g
ha-1 over control (Table 4.7).
4.3.6.2 By grain
A perusal of data (Table 4.7) reveal that the Mn uptake by grain of maize varied
significantly by applying various treatments. Applications of all the treatments were
significantly superior over unfertilized control. The maximum Mn uptake was recorded
by enriching the soil with 100% RDF + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 (416.80 g ha-1) and which
was followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1 which represents 140 and 128 per cent
increase Mn uptake over control.
Total: The Mn uptake by maize at harvest ranged from 1701.28 g ha-1 (control) to
3759.35 g ha-1 (100% NPK + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1). The data (Table 4.7 & Fig.4.3)
reveal that the effect of 100% NPK + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 was significantly superior
over rest of the treatments and which was followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1
which represents 129 and 117 per cent increase Mn uptake over control.
4.3.7 Copper uptake at harvest
4.3.7.1 By stover
An assessment of data (Table 4.8) reveal that application of plant nutrients
through chemical fertilizers, organic manures and integrated sources brought about a
significant response in Cu uptake by leaves of maize at harvest in comparison to control.
The conjoint application of 100% RDF + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 brought about maximum
enhancement in Cu uptake (653.30 g ha-1) which was significantly superior over rest of
the treatments and which was followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1 which represents
146 and 118 per cent increase Cu uptake over control. Cu uptake by leaves of maize crop
at harvest ranged from 265.25 to 653.30 g ha-1 in response to application of nutrients.
4.3.7.2 By grain
The data clearly reflect that the application of plant nutrients significantly increase
to Cu uptake by grains of maize during experimentation (Table 4.8). Soil fortification
with 100% RDF + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 resulted in highest Cu uptake (671.91 g ha-1) by
maize grain at harvest and which was followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1 which
represents 119 and 108 per cent increase Cu uptake over control. the overall range of
increase in CU uptake by grain due to application of various treatments was 307.15 to
671.91 g ha-1.
Total: A perusal of data shows in Table 4.8 and depicted in Fig.4.3 that Cu uptake by
maize plants at harvest by applying nutrients in various forms and combination increased
from 572.40 to 1325.22 g ha-1 over control. The maximum uptake was recorded by
balanced fertilization in the form of 100% RDF + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 (1325.22 g ha-1)
and which was followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1 which represents 132 and 112
per cent increase Cu uptake over control.
4.4 EFFECT OF INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT ON PHYSICO-
CHEMICAL PROPERTIES AND AVAILABLE NUTRIENTS OF SOIL
4.4.1 Effect of integrated nutrient management on Available Nutrient of Soil
4.4.1.1 Available nitrogen
The data presented in the Table 4.9 indicate that all the treatments improved the
available N status of soil over control after harvest of maize crop. Maximum available
nitrogen (275.67 kg ha-1) content was observed under the treatment 100% RDF +
Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 and which was followed by 100% RDF which represents 24 and
20 per cent increase available N over control.
4.4.1.2 Available phosphorus
The data presented in the Table 4.9 indicate that all the treatments improved the
available P status of soil over control after harvest of maize crop. Maximum available
phosphorus (27.33 kg ha-1) content was observed under the treatment 100% RDF +
Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 and which was followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1 which
represents 45 and 41 per cent increase available P over control.
4.4.1.3 Available potassium
It is apparent from the data (Table 4.9) that at the harvest of maize crop maximum
available potassium content of soil was found when soil fortified with 100% RDF +
Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 (376.66 kg ha-1) and which was followed by 100% RDF + FYM
10 t ha-1 which represents 33 and 28 per cent increase available K over control. there was
significant increase in potassium status of the soil on application of either potassic
fertilizer or organic manure over no K application.
4.4.1.4 Available Zinc
The data presented in the Table 4.9 indicate that all the treatments improved the
available Zn status of soil over control after harvest of maize crop. Maximum available
nitrogen (1.719 mg kg-1) content was observed under the treatment 100% RDF +
Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 and which was followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1 which
represents 19 and 18 per cent increase available Zn over control.
4.4.1.5 Available Iron
The data presented in the Table 4.9 indicate that all the treatments improved the
available Fe status of soil over control after harvest of maize crop. Maximum available Fe
(3.37 mg kg-1) content was observed under the treatment 100% RDF + Vermicompost 4 t
ha-1 and which was followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1 which represents 83 and 82
per cent increase available Fe over control.
4.4.1.6 Available Manganese
It is apparent from the data (Table 4.9) that at the harvest of maize crop maximum
available Mn content of soil was found when soil fortified with 100% RDF +
Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 (2.35 mg kg-1) and which was followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t
ha-1 which represents 29 and 28 per cent increase available Mn over control.
4.4.1.7Available Copper
The data presented in the Table 4.9 indicate that all the treatments improved the
available Cu status of soil over control after harvest of maize crop. Maximum available
Cu (2.48 mg kg-1) content was observed under the treatment 100% RDF + Vermicompost
4 t ha-1 and which was followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1 which represents 26 and
24 per cent increase available Cu over control.
4.4.2 Effect of integrated nutrient management on physico-chemical properties of
soil
4.4.2.1 Soil pH:
Data presented in Table 4.10 reveals that there was no significant difference
among different treatments of nutrient management in soil pH. The control treatment did
not change the initial status of pH which was 8.1.
4.4.2.2 Electrical conductivity:
Data presented in Table 4.10 reveals that there was no significant difference
among different treatments of nutrient management in electrical conductivity. The EC
ranged from 0.81 to 0.87 (dSm-1) among different treatments.
4.4.2.3 Aggregates:
Data presented in Table 4.11 and depicted in Fig.4.4 reveals that aggregates
significantly varied from 48.75 to 54.28 per cent among different treatments of nutrient
management. The highest aggregates (54.28 per cent) found under 100% RDF +
Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 treatment and which was followed by Vermicompost 8 t ha-1
which represents 11 and 10 per cent increase aggregates over control.
4.4.2.4 Bulk Density:
Data presented in Table 4.11 reveals that there was no significant difference
among different treatments of nutrient management in bulk density. The bulk density
ranged from 1.360 to 1.520 (Mg m-3) among different treatments.
4.4.2.5 Porosity:
Data presented in Table 4.11 and depicted in Fig.4.4 reveals that porosity
significantly varied from 52.10 to 56.74 per cent among different treatments of nutrient
management. the highest porosity (56.74 per cent) found under 100% RDF +
Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 treatment and which was followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1
which represents 9 and 8 per cent increase porosity over control.
4.4.2.6 Hydarulic conductivity:
Data presented in Table 4.11 and depicted in Fig.4.5 reveals that hydarulic
conductivity significantly varied from 0.271 to 0.299 cm/hr among different treatments of
nutrient management. The hydarulic conductivity (0.299 cm/hr) found under 100% RDF
+ Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 treatment and which was followed by 100% RDF +
Vermicompost 4 t ha-1.
4.5 ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
4.5.1 Net return
Economic evaluation of treatments indicates (Table 4.12 & Fig.4.6) that
application of 100% RDF + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 gave highest net return (` 29999) and
which was followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1 which represents 122 and 104 per
cent increase net return over control.
4.5.2 Benefit cost ratio
It is evident from data (Table 4.12 & Fig.4.7) that highest B C ratio (1.18) was
obtained by applying 100% RDF + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 and which was followed by
100% RDF.
5. DISCUSSION
While presenting the results of the present investigation entitled “Effect of
Integrated Nutrient Management on Maize (Zea mays L.)” in the preceding chapter,
significant variations were noted in number of crop parameters due to effects of different
treatments. An attempt has been made hitherto to discuss the significant effects of these
assuming a pattern in respect of growth, dry matter accumulation, yield and concentration
of nutrients with their uptake by maize plant parts, so as to establish cause and effect
relationship in the light of available evidences and literature.
5.1 EFFECT OF INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT
5.1.1 Effect on yield
The results showed that balanced fertilization of maize crop involving nutrient
combinations of N, P and K, with vermicompost and FYM most effectively enhanced
various yield components in maize viz. grain, stover, biological yield were maximized
when crop was fertilized with balanced and increased levels of nutrient combinations.
The highest grain yield realized with application of balanced and higher level of
plant nutrition could be ascribed due to its profound influence on vegetative and
reproductive growth of the crop.
Hence, marked increase in grain yield with balanced and higher level of
fertilization seems to be due to exploitation of crop genetic potential for vegetative and
reproductive growth. The best result on grain yield was obtained with application of 100
% NPK + vermicompost 4 t ha-1 which was 88 per sent higher over control. This indicates
that maize responds well to integrated nutrient management. The results of the present
investigation indicating positive response of maize crop to balanced fertilization are alike
to findings of several researchers (Kumpawat, 2004; Kumar, 2008; Singh and Choudhary,
2008 and Mehta et al., 2011).
Application of integrated nutrient as 100 % NPK + vermicompost 4 t ha-1
increased yield components of maize crop significantly over control and at par with 100
% NPK + FYM 10 t ha-1(Table 4.1). The significant interactive effect as a consequence of
Vermicompost and fertilizer application is attributed to the favorable nutritional status of
the soil resulting into increased biomass production of the crop. This may also be
attributed to favorable effect of Vermicompost on microbial and root proliferation on soil
which caused solubilizing effect on native phosphorus and other nutrients. Integrative
chemical fertilizers and organic manures was, however, found to be quite promising not
only in maintaining higher productivity but also in providing greater stability in crop
production by synergistic effect of Vermicompost on improving efficiency of optimum
dose of NPK. The results of the present study that Combined use of organic manure and
chemical fertilizer has been found to be providing higher productivity with those reported
by Ramesh et al. (2008), Singh et al. (2009), Dadarwal et al. (2009), Kannan et al.
(2013), Singh et al. (2010), Behera and Singh, (2009), Paradkar et al. (2010), Qiang et al.
(2010), Sharma and Banik (2011).
Data presented in Table 4.1 show that significant increase in stover yield due to
higher fertility levels and balanced fertilization (100 % NPK + vermicompost 4 t ha-1)
could be ascribed to their direct influence on dry matter production in leaf and stem at
successive stages by virtue of increased photosynthetic efficiency. The profound
influence of nutrient application on biological yield seems to be on account of its
influence on vegetative (stover) and reproductive growth (grain) with those reported by
Singh et al., 2006; Kar et al., 2006; Choudhary et al., 2007; Singh et al., 2012.
5.1.2 Effect on nutrient content and uptake
Data presented in Table 4.2 show that integration of 100 % NPK with
Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 brought about significant improvement in N, P,K and micro
nutrient ( Zn, Fe, Mn and Cu) content and uptake over unfertilized control and 100 %
NPK. However, accumulation of N, P, K and micro nutrient ( Zn, Fe, Mn and Cu) were at
par with the results obtained by 100 % NPK + FYM 10 t ha-1. This indicated a favourable
soil micro climate régime induced by the incorporation of Vermicompost.
Application of FYM reduces P fixation by releasing considerable aborints and
variety of organic acids during deposition and as well as inducing chelating effects on
micronutrients which probably enhanced the availability of phosphorus (Behera and
Singh, (2009). Applications of Vermicompost not only solubilize the availability of
micronutrients but also contains significant amount of N, P and K. Thus application of
Vermicompost has resulted in an overall significant increase in uptake of nutrients at
lesser cost but longer in durability or duration.
Combined use of organic manure and chemical fertilizer has been found to be
providing not only in maintaining higher productivity but also in providing stable crop
yields for sustainable crop production through organic manure and balanced use of
chemical fertilizers. These are in confirmation with findings of Sujata et al. (2008),
Behera and Singh, (2009), Dadarwal et al. (2009) and Das et al. (2010) Sharma and
Banik (2012) Kalhapure et al.(2013).
5.1.3 Effect on available nutrients
Combined application of various plant nutrients N, P, K, with vermicompost and
FYM significantly increased their status in soil at harvest of maize crop over control
(Table 4.9). The increase in available nutrient status of soil might be due to microbial as
well as chemical activity in soil.
Results presented in Table 4.9 showed that enhanced application 100 % NPK with
Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 of increased the available nitrogen content in soil at harvest of
maize crop during the year of experimentation. The increase in available nitrogen status
of soil could be ascribed to higher dose N, P, K with organic manure and increased
organic content of the soil. INM considers the integrated nutrient supply of the soil and
productivity targated capable of sustaining higher yields on one hand, and assured
restoration of soil fertility on other (Aulakh et al., 2008). An improvement in available
nutrient status of the soil with the incorporation of chemical fertilizer and organic manure
could be attributed to conserved soil nitrogen and increased availability of other nutrients
as being its constituent as well as mineralize from the native source in soil. The results of
present investigation are in line with the finding of Chandrapala et al. 2010, Tetarwal et
al., 2011, Ahmad at el. (2013), Maitra et al. (2014).
The application of phosphorus @ 50 % RDF, 75 % RDF, 100 % RDF with
vermicompost and FYM resulted in appreciable build up of available P status of soil in
comparison to control (Table 4.9). As the level of phosphorus increased, its content in soil
also increased, probably due to mobilization of native soil phosphorus resulting in
increased P availability. Similar results were reported by Yadav and Kumar (2009), Singh
et al. (2010b), Tetarwal et al. (2011).
The availability of potassium was influenced by various nutrient combination and
maximum was obtained under INM (100 % NPK with Vermicompost 4 t ha-1) at harvest
of maize crop, Similar results were reported by Tiwari et al. (2002), Dadarwal et al.
(2009), Singh et al. (2010b), Tetarwal et al., 2011.
The data presented in table 4.9 reveals that available micronutrients status of soil
at harvest was increased significantly in treatment receiving 100 % NPK with
Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 and conserved soil fertility. The results of present study are in
agreement with those reported by Dadarwal et al. (2009), Singh et al. (2010b),
5.1.4 Effect on properties of soil
The data presented in table 4.10 and 4.11 reveals that no significant variation was
observed in pH, EC, and bulk density of soil after harvest of maize crop due to
application of various nutrients during the year of investigation.
Combined application of various plant nutrients N, P, K, with vermicompost and
FYM significantly increased porosity, aggregates and hydraulic conductivity in soil at
harvest of maize crop over control (Table 4.11). The favorable effects of organic manure
with N, P, K, on soil properties may also be due to increased microbial activities which in
turn release organic acids to bring down to soil pH to a range where the activities of plant
nutrients are maximum. The increase in microbial activity due to the addition of organic
manure , which enhance activity of enzymes that play a key role in transformation,
recycling and availability of plant nutrients in soil (Subba Rao, 1999). Thus, improvement
in nutritional status of plant might have resulted in greater synthesis of amino acids and
protein and other growth promoting substances. Similar results were reported Rassol et
al. (2008), Dadarwal et al. (2009), Singh et al. (2010b), kannan et al, (2013).
5.1.5 Net Returns:
The data presented in table 4.12 showed that application of integrated nutrient
management gave highest net returns as compared to control and other treatments. It is
obvious that B : C as well as net returns increased with increased in grain and stover yield
in maize crop. The integrated nutrient management treatment increased the expenditure
on chemical fertilizer with organic manure over the farmers practice but generated
additional produce excluding the extra cost of treatment resulting in a benefit cost ratio.
The higher net returns in integrated nutrient management have also been stated by Swati
et al., 2014.
Table 4.1: Effect of treatments on yield and harvest index of maize
Treatment Yield (kg ha-1) Harvest
Grain Stover Biological Index (%)
T1 - Control 1475 4127 5603 26.34
T2 - 50% RDF 1676 4705 6381 26.38
T3 - 75% RDF 1840 5131 6971 26.58
T4 - 100% RDF 1918 5202 7120 30.79
T5 - Vermicompost at 8 tha-1 1845 5140 6985 26.42
T6 - FYM at 20 tha-1 1795 5062 6857 26.18
T7 - 50% RDF + vermicompost at 4t ha-1 1801 4980 6781 26.67
T8 - 75% RDF+ vermicompost at 4t ha-1 1964 5406 7370 26.77
T9 - 100% RDF+ vermicompost at 4t ha-1 2766 7796 10562 26.21
T10 - 50% RDF + FYM at 10 t ha-1 1750 4830 6580 26.59
T11 - 75% RDF+ FYM at 10 t ha-1 1920 5294 7214 26.62
T12 -100% RDF+ FYM at 10 t ha-1 2643 7510 10153 26.02
SEm± 67.031 233.196 253.904 1.022
CD (p=0.05) 194.181 675.542 735.531 2.961
C.V.% 5.81 7.38 5.88 6.61
Table 4.2: Effect of INM treatments on nitrogen content and nitrogen uptake by maize
Treatment
Nitrogen content (per cent)
Nitrogen uptake (kg ha-1)
Grain Stover Grain Stover Total
T1 - Control 1.319 0.541 19.46 22.30 41.76
T2 - 50% RDF 1.331 0.545 22.33 25.59 47.92
T3 - 75% RDF 1.526 0.576 28.07 29.51 57.58
T4 - 100% RDF 1.824 0.701 45.93 39.95 85.88
T5 - Vermicompost at 8 tha-1 1.820 0.690 33.59 35.48 69.07
T6 - FYM at 20 tha-1 1.625 0.621 29.17 31.41 60.58
T7 - 50% RDF + vermicompost at 4t ha-1 1.556 0.587 28.01 29.23 57.25
T8 - 75% RDF+ vermicompost at 4t ha-1 1.824 0.657 35.82 35.56 71.38
T9 - 100% RDF+ vermicompost at 4t ha-1 1.919 0.724 53.10 56.66 109.75
T10 - 50% RDF + FYM at 10 t ha-1 1.535 0.534 26.86 25.79 52.66
T11 - 75% RDF+ FYM at 10 t ha-1 1.657 0.587 31.82 31.08 62.89
T12 -100% RDF+ FYM at 10 t ha-1 1.826 0.704 48.34 52.87 101.21
SEm± 0.018 0.011 1.291 1.842 2.530
CD (p=0.05) 0.051 0.031 3.741 5.337 7.330
C.V.% 1.86 2.99 6.67 9.22 6.43
Table 4.3 Effect of INM treatments on phosphorus content and phosphorus uptake by maize
Treatment Phosphorus content
(per cent)
Phosphorus uptake (kg ha-1)
Grain Stover Grain Stover Total
T1 - Control 0.302 0.124 4.46 5.13 9.59
T2 - 50% RDF 0.352 0.145 5.91 6.83 12.74
T3 - 75% RDF 0.364 0.159 6.70 8.18 14.88
T4 - 100% RDF 0.371 0.164 9.36 9.36 18.73
T5 - Vermicompost at 8 tha-1 0.371 0.163 6.85 8.41 15.26
T6 - FYM at 20 tha-1 0.363 0.152 6.52 7.73 14.25
T7 - 50% RDF + vermicompost at 4t ha-1 0.360 0.148 6.50 7.40 13.90
T8 - 75% RDF+ vermicompost at 4t ha-1 0.370 0.160 7.27 8.66 15.92
T9 - 100% RDF+ vermicompost at 4t ha-1 0.380 0.164 10.52 12.84 23.35
T10 - 50% RDF + FYM at 10 t ha-1 0.359 0.148 6.28 7.15 13.43
T11 - 75% RDF+ FYM at 10 t ha-1 0.369 0.159 7.10 8.44 15.54
T12 -100% RDF+ FYM at 10 t ha-1 0.372 0.164 9.84 12.36 22.20
SEm± 0.004 0.002 0.256 0.396 0.498
CD (p=0.05) 0.010 0.007 0.741 1.147 1.443
C.V. % 1.70 2.58 6.09 8.03 5.45
Table 4.4 Effect of INM treatments on potassium content and potassium uptake by maize
Treatment Potassium content (per cent)
Potassium uptake (kg ha-1)
Grain Stover Grain Stover Total
T1 - Control 0.374 0.971 5.51 40.09 45.60
T2 - 50% RDF 0.419 1.056 7.03 49.75 56.78
T3 - 75% RDF 0.422 1.061 7.76 54.44 62.21
T4 - 100% RDF 0.434 1.089 10.92 62.20 73.12
T5 - Vermicompost at 8 tha-1 0.435 1.069 7.84 54.96 62.80
T6 - FYM at 20 tha-1 0.415 1.057 7.45 53.50 60.95
T7 - 50% RDF + vermicompost at 4t ha-1 0.430 1.071 7.74 53.33 61.07
T8 - 75% RDF+ vermicompost at 4t ha-1 0.434 1.087 8.52 58.77 67.30
T9 - 100% RDF+ vermicompost at 4t ha-1 0.444 1.099 12.29 85.66 97.95
T10 - 50% RDF + FYM at 10 t ha-1 0.425 1.064 7.44 51.40 58.83
T11 - 75% RDF+ FYM at 10 t ha-1 0.428 1.068 8.21 56.54 64.75
T12 -100% RDF+ FYM at 10 t ha-1 0.435 1.090 11.49 81.86 93.34
SEm± 0.006 0.006 0.301 2.649 2.712
CD (p=0.05) 0.016 0.018 0.873 7.674 7.855
C.V.% 2.29 1.00 6.13 7.84 7.00
Table 4.5: Effect of INM treatments on Zinc content and Zinc uptake by maize
Treatment Zinc content (mg kg-1)
Zinc uptake (g ha-1)
Grain Stover Grain Stover Total
T1 - Control 46.86 17.39 691.41 717.68 1409.09
T2 - 50% RDF 47.83 18.18 802.87 856.37 1659.24
T3 - 75% RDF 49.26 18.21 906.29 934.52 1840.81
T4 - 100% RDF 49.64 18.60 1251.07 1058.77 2309.84
T5 - Vermicompost at 8 tha-1 57.18 19.55 1036.78 1004.74 2041.51
T6 - FYM at 20 tha-1 55.73 18.22 1000.42 922.32 1922.75
T7 - 50% RDF + vermicompost at 4t ha-1 57.28 18.59 1031.97 926.66 1958.63
T8 - 75% RDF+ vermicompost at 4t ha-1 62.75 23.15 1231.21 1256.30 2487.51
T9 - 100% RDF+ vermicompost at 4t ha-1 63.19 24.52 1751.86 1914.68 3666.53
T10 - 50% RDF + FYM at 10 t ha-1 59.90 22.47 1048.34 1085.56 2133.90
T11 - 75% RDF+ FYM at 10 t ha-1 61.75 23.15 1204.90 1225.46 2430.36
T12 -100% RDF+ FYM at 10 t ha-1 63.08 24.43 1667.52 1834.97 3502.48
SEm± 0.915 0.361 50.451 55.787 87.035
CD (p=0.05) 2.651 1.045 146.150 161.609 252.129
C.V.% 2.82 3.04 7.70 8.44 6.61
Table 4.6: Effect of INM treatments on iron content and uptake by maize
Treatment Fe content (mg kg-1)
Fe uptake (g ha-1)
Grain Stover Grain Stover Total
T1 - Control 64.83 110.70 956.60 4573.56 5530.17
T2 - 50% RDF 68.67 116.60 1151.58 5494.31 6645.89
T3 - 75% RDF 68.69 122.67 1263.98 6301.70 7565.68
T4 - 100% RDF 70.19 124.23 1767.57 7087.94 8855.50
T5 - Vermicompost at 8 tha-1 71.75 129.17 1324.02 6639.25 7963.27
T6 - FYM at 20 tha-1 72.02 129.11 1292.83 6535.72 7828.55
T7 - 50% RDF + vermicompost at 4t ha-1 72.73 125.33 1308.78 6243.33 7552.11
T8 - 75% RDF+ vermicompost at 4t ha-1 73.67 126.43 1447.03 6836.06 8283.08
T9 - 100% RDF+ vermicompost at 4t ha-1 74.43 130.83 2059.75 10202.08 12261.83
T10 - 50% RDF + FYM at 10 t ha-1 70.78 128.67 1238.71 6215.14 7453.85
T11 - 75% RDF+ FYM at 10 t ha-1 73.00 128.93 1401.73 6825.81 8227.55
T12 -100% RDF+ FYM at 10 t ha-1 73.50 130.28 1942.85 9784.60 11727.45
SEm± 0.543 2.053 49.005 335.717 348.381
CD (p=0.05) 1.572 5.947 141.963 972.533 1009.220
C.V.% 1.32 2.84 5.94 8.43 7.25
Table 4.7: Effect of INM treatments on Manganese content and uptake by maize
Treatment Mn content (mg kg-1)
Mn uptake (g ha-1)
Grain Stover Grain Stover Total
T1 - Control 11.75 37.00 173.33 1527.95 1701.28
T2 - 50% RDF 12.52 38.54 211.76 1812.92 2024.68
T3 - 75% RDF 12.68 39.22 233.30 2011.92 2245.22
T4 - 100% RDF 14.03 42.35 353.32 2413.39 2766.72
T5 - Vermicompost at 8 tha-1 14.40 42.45 265.73 2181.77 2447.50
T6 - FYM at 20 tha-1 14.38 42.23 258.18 2137.57 2395.75
T7 - 50% RDF + vermicompost at 4t ha-1 14.33 41.33 258.04 2056.21 2314.24
T8 - 75% RDF+ vermicompost at 4t ha-1 14.46 41.60 284.00 2249.23 2533.23
T9 - 100% RDF+ vermicompost at 4t ha-1 15.06 44.64 416.80 3476.42 3893.21
T10 - 50% RDF + FYM at 10 t ha-1 14.12 40.58 247.04 1960.19 2207.23
T11 - 75% RDF+ FYM at 10 t ha-1 14.37 40.76 275.84 2157.92 2433.76
T12 -100% RDF+ FYM at 10 t ha-1 14.98 43.90 395.61 3297.28 3692.89
SEm± 0.294 0.429 11.950 95.766 98.091
CD (p=0.05) 0.853 1.244 34.619 277.423 284.159
C.V.% 3.66 1.80 7.36 7.30 6.65
Table 4.8: Effect of INM treatments on Copper content and uptake by maize
Treatment
Cu content (mg kg-1)
Cu uptake (g ha-1)
Grain Stover Grain Stover Total
T1 - Control 20.82 6.42 307.15 265.25 572.40
T2 - 50% RDF 23.13 6.93 388.21 325.59 713.80
T3 - 75% RDF 23.36 7.08 429.89 363.30 793.19
T4 - 100% RDF 23.56 7.15 593.61 406.80 1000.41
T5 - Vermicompost at 8 tha-1 23.66 7.90 436.59 406.01 842.59
T6 - FYM at 20 tha-1 23.48 7.20 421.41 364.30 785.72
T7 - 50% RDF + vermicompost at 4t ha-1 23.76 7.36 427.43 367.85 795.28
T8 - 75% RDF+ vermicompost at 4t ha-1 23.90 7.42 469.37 400.68 870.04
T9 - 100% RDF+ vermicompost at 4t ha-1 24.27 8.43 671.91 653.30 1325.22
T10 - 50% RDF + FYM at 10 t ha-1 23.43 7.30 410.07 352.76 762.84
T11 - 75% RDF+ FYM at 10 t ha-1 23.82 7.41 457.37 392.48 849.85
T12 -100% RDF+ FYM at 10 t ha-1 24.17 7.68 638.27 577.03 1215.30
SEm± 0.449 0.200 17.769 18.312 24.925
CD (p=0.05) 1.299 0.579 51.475 53.048 72.206
C.V.% 3.31 4.70 6.54 7.81 4.92
Table 4.9: Effect of INM treatment on available nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, Zn, Fe, Mn and Cu in soil after harvest of maize
Treatment Available nitrogen (kg ha-1)
Available phosphorus
(kg ha-1)
Available potassium (kg ha-1)
Available Zn
(mg kg-1)
Available Fe
(mg kg1)
Available Mn
(mg kg-1)
Available Cu
(mg kg-1)
T1 - Control 242.00 18.88 308.33 1.443 1.84 1.82 1.97
T2 - 50% RDF 270.33 24.69 365.88 1.445 2.64 2.02 2.16
T3 - 75% RDF 278.00 25.33 376.55 1.500 2.69 2.03 2.17
T4 - 100% RDF 284.67 25.75 382.00 1.562 2.87 2.04 2.18
T5 - Vermicompost at 8 tha-1 265.42 24.67 350.15 1.687 3.08 2.07 2.32
T6 - FYM at 20 tha-1 262.41 23.88 348.67 1.543 3.00 2.01 2.30
T7 - 50% RDF + vermicompost at 4t ha-1 275.33 24.91 370.00 1.523 2.92 2.07 2.20
T8 - 75% RDF+ vermicompost at 4t ha-1 286.00 26.02 384.08 1.623 2.98 2.09 2.23
T9 - 100% RDF+ vermicompost at 4t ha-1 300.00 27.33 409.10 1.719 3.37 2.35 2.48
T10 - 50% RDF + FYM at 10 t ha-1 269.08 24.80 369.10 1.520 2.89 2.03 2.15
T11 - 75% RDF+ FYM at 10 t ha-1 285.00 25.33 381.28 1.609 2.93 2.08 2.20
T12 -100% RDF+ FYM at 10 t ha-1 290.00 26.62 395.14 1.710 3.35 2.33 2.45
SEm± 4.452 0.504 1.996 0.031 0.030 0.046 0.062
CD (p=0.05) 12.898 1.460 5.782 0.089 0.086 0.134 0.180
C.V.% 2.80 3.51 0.93 3.39 1.78 3.91 4.81
Table 4.10: Effect of INM treatment on pH and Ec of soil
Treatments pH(1:2) Ec(1:2)
T1 - Control 8.14 0.66
T2 - 50% RDF 8.19 0.87
T3 - 75% RDF 8.23 0.87
T4 - 100% RDF 8.25 0.87
T5 - Vermicompost at 8 tha-1 8.11 0.86
T6 - FYM at 20 tha-1 8.10 0.85
T7 - 50% RDF + vermicompost at 4t ha-1 8.12 0.84
T8 - 75% RDF+ vermicompost at 4t ha-1 8.17 0.84
T9 - 100% RDF+ vermicompost at 4t ha-1 8.21 0.80
T10 - 50% RDF + FYM at 10 t ha-1 8.13 0.83
T11 - 75% RDF+ FYM at 10 t ha-1 8.14 0.82
T12 -100% RDF+ FYM at 10 t ha-1 8.16 0.81
SEm± 0.041 0.074
CD (p=0.05) NS 0.213
C.V.% 0.86 15.87
Table 4.11 Effect of INM treatments on aggregates, bulk density, porosity and hydraulic conductivity of soil
Treatment Aggregates (%)
Bulk density(Mg
m-3)
Porosity (%)
Hydarulic conductivity (cm /hr)
T1 - Control 48.75 1.402 52.10 0.271
T2 - 50% RDF 48.98 1.460 52.29 0.275
T3 - 75% RDF 49.12 1.490 52.32 0.276
T4 - 100% RDF 49.20 1.520 52.36 0.277
T5 - Vermicompost at 8 tha-1 52.06 1.360 54.56 0.285
T6 - FYM at 20 tha-1 53.20 1.390 53.89 0.283
T7 - 50% RDF + vermicompost at 4t ha-1 52.90 1.398 56.47 0.297
T8 - 75% RDF+ vermicompost at 4t ha-1 53.05 1.382 56.51 0.298
T9 - 100% RDF+ vermicompost at 4t ha-1 54.28 1.423 56.74 0.299
T10 - 50% RDF + FYM at 10 t ha-1 51.33 1.398 54.80 0.288
T11 - 75% RDF+ FYM at 10 t ha-1 51.48 1.392 54.83 0.289
T12 -100% RDF+ FYM at 10 t ha-1 53.81 1.395 56.56 0.290
SEm± 1.098 0.022 0.753 0.004
CD (p=0.05) 3.180 NS 2.182 0.013
C.V.% 3.68 2.63 2.40 2.62
Table 4.12: Effect of Integrated nutrient management on net return and B/C ratio of maize
Treatment Net return (` ha-
1) B/C ratio
T1 - Control 13523 0.84
T2 - 50% RDF 15483 0.86
T3 - 75% RDF 17648 0.92
T4 - 100% RDF 25627 1.09
T5 - Vermicompost at 8 tha-1 18635 0.65
T6 - FYM at 20 tha-1 19948 0.74
T7 - 50% RDF + vermicompost at 4t ha-1 20123 0.96
T8 - 75% RDF+ vermicompost at 4t ha-1 22463 1.02
T9 - 100% RDF+ vermicompost at 4t ha-1 29999 1.18
T10 - 50% RDF + FYM at 10 t ha-1 20107 0.99
T11 - 75% RDF+ FYM at 10 t ha-1 22267 1.06
T12 -100% RDF+ FYM at 10 t ha-1 27563 1.10
SEm± 1803.468 0.076
CD (p=0.05) 5224.438 0.220
C.V.% 14.83 14.22
6. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
Results of the field experiment entitled “Effect of Integrated Nutrient
Management on Maize (Zea mays L.)” presented and discussed in preceding chapter
are summarized and concluded in this chapter.
6.2 EFFECT OF DIFFERENT TREATMENTS ON YIELD
The productivity of the crop in terms of grain, stover and biological yields
happened to increase with application of balanced fertilizer under integrated nutrient
management. The maximum grain, stover and biological yield (2766, 7796, and
10562 kg ha-1, respectively) was obtained under 100 % RDF+ vermicompost at 4t ha-1
treatment.
6.3 NUTRIENT CONTENT
6.3.1 Nitrogen content in grain and stover
The highest N content in grain and stover (1.919 and 0.724 per cent) was
recorded under 100 % RDF+ vermicompost at 4t ha-1 treatment and found
significantly superior over rest of nutrient management treatments.
6.3.2 Phosphorus content in grain and stover
Application of phosphorus in different treatment increased P2O5 content as
compared to control . The maximum content (0.380 and 0.164 per cent) of phosphorus
in grain and stover of maize was obtained with the application of 100 % RDF+
vermicompost at 4t ha-1treatment, which was higher over control.
6.3.3 Potassium content in grain and stover
Application of potassium in different treatment increased K2O content as
compare to control. The maximum content (0.444 and 1.099 per cent) of potassium in
grain and stover of maize was obtained with the application of 100 % RDF +
vermicompost at 4t ha-1 treatment,
6.3.4 Zinc content in grain and stover
Application of balanced fertilizer under integrated nutrient management in
different treatment increased Zn content as compared to control. The maximum
content (63.19 and 24.52 mg kg-1) of Zinc in grain and stover of maize was obtained
with the application of 100 % RDF+ vermicompost at 4t ha-1 treatment.
6.3.5 Iron content in grain and stover
Application of balanced fertilizer under integrated nutrient management in
different treatment increased Fe content as compared to control. The maximum
content (74.43 and 130.83 mg kg-1) of Iron in grain and stover of maize was obtained
with the application of 100 % RDF+ vermicompost at 4t ha-1 treatment.
6.3.6 Manganese content in grain and stover
Application of balanced fertilizer under integrated nutrient management in
different treatment increased Mn content as compared to control. The maximum
content (15.06 and 44.64 mg kg-1) of manganese in grain and stover of maize was
obtained with the application of 100 % RDF+ vermicompost at 4t ha-1 treatment.
6.3.7 Copper content in grain and stover
Application of balanced fertilizer under integrated nutrient management in
different treatment increased Cu content as compared to control. The maximum
content (24.27 and 8.43 mg kg-1) of Copper in grain and stover of maize was obtained
with the application of 100 % RDF+ vermicompost at 4t ha-1 treatment.
6.4 EFFECT OF DIFFERENT TREATMENT COMBINATION ON TOTAL
UPTAKE OF NUTRIENTS
6.4.1 Effect on Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium uptake
Total uptake of N, P and K by maize plant significantly increased with the
application of different nutrient management and balanced fertilization treatments.
The maximum total uptake i.e. 109.75, 23.38 and 97.95 kg ha-1 of N, P and K
respectively at harvest was recorded under 100 % RDF + vermicompost at 4t ha-1
treatment which was higher than over rest of treatment.
6.4.1 Effect on Zinc, Iron, Manganese and Copper uptake
Total uptake of Zn, Fe, Mn and Cu by maize plant significantly increased with
the application of different nutrient management and balanced fertilization treatments.
The maximum total uptake i.e. 3666, 12261, 3893 and 1325 g ha-1 of Zn, Fe, Mn and
Cu respectively at harvest was recorded under 100 % RDF + vermicompost at 4t ha-1
treatment which was higher than rest of treatment.
6.5 AVAILABLE SOIL NUTRIENTS
6.5.1 Effect of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium
The highest available Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium 275.67, 27.33,
348.67 kg ha-1 respectively was observed under 100 % RDF + vermicompost at 4 t
ha-1 treatments which was higher than rest of treatment.
6.5.2 Effect of Zinc, Iron, Manganese and Copper
The highest available Zinc, Iron, Manganese and Copper 1.719, 6.74, 11.74,
2.48 mg kg-1 respectively was observed under 100 % RDF + vermicompost at 4t ha-1
treatments which was higher than rest of treatment.
6.6 EFFECT ON SOIL PROPERTIES:
The highest aggregates, porosity and hydraulic conductivity was observed
under 100 % RDF + vermicompost at 4t ha-1 treatments which was higher than rest of
treatment. In pH, Ec, and bulk density no significant difference was observed under
all the treatments
6.6 ECONOMICS:
Economic evaluation of nutrient treatments indicates that maize gave highest
net return (` 29999 ha-1). Best B : C of 1.18 were observed with application of 100%
RDF + vermicompost at 4t ha-1.
6.7 CONCLUSION:
From the results of present investigation, it may be concluded that
application of 100 % RDF + Vermicompost at 4 t ha-1 was significantly effective
in enhancing growth and yield in maize crop with grain yield of 2766 kg ha-1,
net returns of ` 29999 ha-1 and B/C of 1.18 and which was followed by 100%
RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1 with grain yield 2643 kg ha-1, net returns ` 27563 ha-1 and
B/C ratio of 1.10. The nutrient content and uptake was also significantly
increased with application of 100% RDF + vermicompost at 4t ha-1 which was
also followed by 100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1. In the present investigation, the
physico-chemical properties of soil markedly improved by addition of organic
manure along with recommended fertilizers dose of NPK.
LITERATURE CITED Ahlawat, I.P.S., Gangaiah, B. and Singh, O.M. 2005. Effect of fertilizer and stover
management on productivity and soil fertility in chickpea (Cicerarietinum) -
maize (Zea mays) cropping system. Indian Journal of Agricultural
Sciences,75:400-403.
Ahmad, W., Shah, Z., Khan, F., Ali, S. and Malik, W. 2013. Maize yield and soil
properties as influenced by integrated use of organic, inorganic and bio-
fertilizers in a low fertility soil. Soil and Environmen,t32(2): 121-129.
Aulakh, M.S. and Adhya, T.K. 2005.Impact of agricultural activities on emission of
greenhouse gases-Indian perspective. In ‘International Conference on Soil,
Water and Environmental Quality - Issues and Strategies’, (Indian Society of
Soil Science, New Delhi). pp. 319-335.
Aulakh, M.S. and Grant, C.A. 2008.Integrated nutrient management for sustainable
crop production. (The Haworth Press, Taylor and Francis Group: New York).
Aulakh, M.S., Khurana, M.P.S. and Singh, D. 2009.Water pollution related to
agricultural, industrial and urban activities and its effect on food chain: Case
studies from Punjab Journal New Seeds,10:112-137.
Balai, M.L., Verma, A., Nepalia, V. and Kanthaliye, P.C. 2011.Productivity and
quality of maize (Zea mays) as influenced by integrated nutrient management
under continuous cropping and fertilization.Indian Journal of Agricultural
Sciences,81:374-376.
Barsukar, S.S., 1991, Effect of organic and mineral fertilizer on yield of maize grown
according to cereal technology. Agrokhimiya, 12: 43-48.
Behera, S.K. and Singh, D. 2009. Effect of 31 years of continuous cropping and
fertilizer use on soil properties and uptake of micronutrients by maize (Zea
mays) - wheat (Triticumaestivum) system. Indian Journal of Agricultural
Sciences, 79:264-267.
Biradar, A. and Jayadeva, H.M. 2013. Influence of targeted yield approach on yield,
yield attributes, nutrient uptake and economics of maize. Madras Agricultural
Journal, 100(1/3):146-149.
Brinton, W.F. and Seekins, M.D. 1994. Evaluation of farm plot conditions and effects
of fish scrap compost on yield and mineral composition of field grown maize.
Compost Sci. Utiln., 2: 10-16.
Chandrapala, A.G., Yakadri, M., Kumar, R.M. and Raj, G.B. 2010. Productivity and
economics of rice (Oryza sativa)-maize (Zea mays) as influenced by methods
of crop establishment, Zn and S application in rice. Indian Journal of
Agronomy 55:171-176.
Choudhary, M.L., Singh, A. and Parihar, C.M. 2007. Forage production potential of
maize (Zea mays) under different nitrogen levels and crop geometry.
Agronomy Digest,7:17-18.
Dadarwal, R.S., Jain, N.K. and Singh, D. 2009. Integrated nutrient management in
baby corn (Zea mays).Indian Journal of Agricultural Science,79: 023-1025.
Das, A., Patel, D.P., Munda, G.C. and Ghosh, P.K. 2010. Effect of organic and
inorganic sources of nutrients on yield, nutrient uptake and soil fertility of
maize (Zea mays) - mustard (Brassica campestris) cropping system. Indian
Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 80: 85-88.
DMR, 2014a.Nutrient requirement of maize genotypes under different cropping
systems at Ranchi. Annual Report, All India Coordinated Research Project on
Maize, Directorate of Maize Research, New Delhi, pp-A-101.
DMR, 2014b.Nutrient management of maize genotypes under maize mustard
cropping system at Ambikapur.Annual Report, All India Coordinated
Research Project on Maize, Directorate of Maize Research, New Delhi, pp-A-
110.
Gajri, P.R., Arora, V.K. and Chaudhary, M.R. 1994. Maize growth responses to deep
tillage, straw mulching and FYM in course textured soils of North Western
India. Soil Use and Management, 10: 15-20.
Gaudreddy, B.S., Patil, V.S., Radder, G.D. and Chittapur, B.M. 1989. Response of
rabi sorghum to nitrogen, FYM and Azotobacter under irrigated conditions.
Journal of Maharashtra Agriculture University, 14: 266-268.
Government of India.2014b. Economic Survey.Ministry of Finance, Department of
Economic Affairs, Economic Division, Government of India. New Delhi pp
187-216.
Government of India.2014a. Directorate of Economics and Statistic, Government of
India, New Delhi.
Government of Rajasthan 2014. Vital Agricultural Statistic, Directorate of Rajasthan
Jaipur.
Gopinath,K.A., Supradip, S., Mina, B.L., Pande, H., Kundu, S. and Gupta, H.S. 2008.
Influence of organic amendments on growth, yield and quality of Wheat and
on soil properties during transition to organic production. Nutrient Cycling in
Agroecosystems, 82: 51-60.
Goyal, J.P. 2002.Integrated nutrient management in maize - wheat cropping sequence.
Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Agricultural Chemistry and Soil Science,
MaharanaPratap University of Agriculture Technology, Udaipur.
Hapse, D.G. 1993.Organic farming in the light of reduction in use of chemical
fertilizers, Proceeding of 43rdAnn. Deccan Sugar Techn. Assoc., Pune, part-I :
SA : 37- SA51.
Hile, R.B., Patil, H.M., Patil, Y.J. and Bhosale, S.S. 2007. Effects of N, P and K on
productivity and soil fertility in maize (Zea mays)-wheat (Triticumaestivum)
cropping system. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 3(2): 205-
207.
Jackson, M. L. and Ulrich, A. 1973.Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall Inc. Engle
Cliffs, New Jersey.
Jamwal, J.S. 2005.Productivity and economics of maize (Zea mays) – wheat
(Triticumaestivum) cropping system under integrated nutrient supply system in
rainfed areas of Jammu.Indian Journal of Agronomy,50:110-112.
Jat, G., Sharma K.K. and Jat, N.K. 2012 Effect of FYM and mineral nutrients on
physico-chemical properties of soil under mustard in western arid zone of
India. Annals of Plant and Soil Resources,14(2):167-166 (2012)
Jayaprakash, D.C., Sawant, P.S. and Singh, R.S. 2004.Effect of vermicompost on
growth and yield of maize as well as nutrient uptake.Indian Journal
ofAgronomy,23(1): 121-123.
Jayaprakash, T.C., Nagalikar, V.P., Pujari, B.T. and Shetty, R.A. 2005.Effect of
organics and inorganics on growth and yield of maize under
irrigation.Karnataka Journal of Agriculture Science, 18(3): 798-800.
Johnson, C.M. And Ulrich, A. 1959. Analytical methods for use in plant
analysis.California Agricultural Statistical Bulletin, 766.
Kale, R.D., Mallesh, B.C., Bano, K. and Bagyaraj, D.J. 1992. Influence of
vermicompost application on available and selected microbial population in a
paddy field. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 24(12): 1317-1320.
Kannan, R.L., Dhivya, M.,Abinaya, D., Krishna, R.L., and Krishna S.K. 2013. Effect
of Integrated NutrientManagement on Soil Fertility and Productivity in Maize.
Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences, 2 (8): 61-67
Kar, P.P., Barik, K.C., Mahapatra, P.K., Garnayak, L.M., Rath, B.S., Bastia, D.K. and
Khanda, C.M. 2006. Effect of planting geometry and nitrogen on yield,
economics and nitrogen uptake of sweet corn (Zea mays).Indian Journal of
Agronomy,51: 43-45.
Khan, H.Z., Malik, M.A. and Saleem, M.F. 2008.Effect of rate and source of organic
material on the production potential of spring maize (Zea mays L.).Pakistan
Journal of Agriculture Science, 45(1): 40-43.
Khan, K.W. 1966.Earthwormsof West Pakistan and their activity in soil
improvement.Agriculture Pakistan, 17: 415-439.
Kumar, A. 2008. Productivity, economics and nitrogen use efficiency of speciality
corn (Zea mays) as influenced by planting density and nitrogen fertilization.
Indian Journal of Agronomy,53: 306-309.
Kumar, A. and Dhar, S. 2010. Evaluation of organic and inorganic sources of
nutrients in maize and their residual effect on wheat under different fertility
level. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences,80: 364-371.
Kumar, A., Gautam, R.C., Singh, R. and Rana, K.S. 2005a. Growth, yield and
economics of maize (Zea mays)-wheat (Triticumaestivum) cropping sequence
as influenced by integrated nutrient management. Indian Journal of
Agricultural Sciences,75: 709-711.
Kumar, A. and Puri, U.K. 2002.Effect of nitrogen and farmyard manure application
on maize (Zea mays) varieties.Indian Journal of Agronomy,46:255-259.
Kumar, A. and Thakur, K.S. 2004. Effect of integrated nutrient management on
promising composite maize (Zea mays) varieties under rainfed mid-hill
conditions of Himachal Pradesh. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science74:40-
42.
Kumar, A., Thakur, K.S., Munujia, S. 2002. Effect of fertilizer levels on fertility on
promising hybrid maize under rain fed condition of Himachal Pradesh. Indian
Journal of Agronomy, 47: 526-530
Kumpawat, B.S. 2004. Integrated nutrient management for maize (Zea mays)-Indian
mustard (Brassica juncea) cropping system. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 49:
18-21.
Kumawat, P., Kaushik, M.K., Singh, D.andKumawat K. 2014. Yield, nutrient
content, uptake and quality of sweet corn varieties as influenced by nitrogen
and phosphorus fertilization under Southern Rajasthan condition. Annals of
Agri Bio Research,19(1):67-69.
Lindsay, W. L. and Norvell, W. L. 1978. Development of a DTPA soil test for Zn, Fe,
Mn and Cu. Soil Science Society American Journal,42: 421-442.
Lungu, O.I, Temba, I., Cherwa, B. and Lungu, C. 1993. Effects of lime and farm yard
manure on soil acidity and maize growth on an acid Alfisol form Zambia.
Tropical Agriculture, 70: 309-314.
Mahala, H.L. and Shaktawat, M.S. 2004.Effect of sources and levels of phosphorus
and FYM on yield attributes, yield and nutrient uptake of maize (Zea mays
L.).Annals ofAgriculture ResearchNew Series, 25(4): 571-574.
Mahala, H.L., Shaktawat, M.S., and Shivran, R.K. 2006. Direct and residual effect of
source and levels of phosphorus and farmyard manure in maize (Zea mays) -
mustard (Brassica juncea) cropping sequence. Indian Journal of
Agronomy,51:10-13.
Maitra, D.N. Majumdar, B. Saha, A.R. Sarkar, S.Maji, B.2014.Effect of organic
manure, sulfur and zinc on fiber yield, nutrient uptake by flax and residual
fertility status in gangetic alluvial soils of West Bengal Environment and
Ecology,32:1753-1758
Mallesham, A., Reddy, K.G. and Reddy, A.T. 1992. Effect of lime, farm yard manure
and zinc sources on zinc content, uptake and dry matter yield in maize crop.
Andhra Agricultural Journal, 39: 198-201.
Makinde, E.A. and Ayoola, O.T. 2010. Growth, yield and NPK uptake by maize with
complementary organic and inorganic fertilizers.African Journal of Food
Agriculture Nutrition and Development, 10:1-15.
Manzeke, G.M. Mtambanengwe, F. Nezomba, H.Mapfumo, P. Zinc fertilization
influence on maize productivity and grain nutritional quality under integrated
soil fertility management in Zimbabwe. Field Crops Research,166:128-136
Meena, H., Sharma, G.L., Golada, S.L. and Bairwa, R.K. 2012.Effect of integrated
nutrient management on yield and nitrogen uptake by sweet corn.Madras
Agriculture Journal, 99:503-506.
Meena, O.P., Guar, B.L. and Singh, P. 2006. Effect of row ratio and fertility levels on
productivity, economics and nutrient uptake in maize (Zea mays) – soybean
(Glycine max) intercropping system. Indian Journal of Agronomy,51:178-182.
Mehta, S., Bedi, S. and Vashist, K.K. 2011. Performance of winter maize (Zea mays)
hybrid to planting methods and nitrogen levels. Indian Journal of Agricultural
Sciences, 81:50-54.
Mehta, S.C., Poonia, S.R. and Pawar, B.S. 1994. Effect of FYM, Gypsum and zinc on
the performance of maize in sodic soil. Crop Research, 8:480-485.
Mehta, Y.K., Shaktawat, M.S. and Singhi, S.M. 2005. Influence of sulphur,
phosphorus and farmyard manure on yield on yield attributes and yield of
maize (Zea mays) in southern Rajasthan condition. Indian Journal of
Agronomy,50: 203-205.
Nasab, V.N., Mobasser, H.R. and Ganjali, H.R. 2015. Effect of different level of
vermicompost on yield and quality of Maize varieties.International Journal
of Biological Forum,7:856-860.
Negi, S.C., Singh, K.K. and Thakur, R.C. 1988. Response of maize-wheat cropping
sequence to phosphorus and farm yard manure. Journal of Agronomy, 33: 270-
273.
Olsen, S.R., Cole, C.V., Watanable, F.S. and Dean, L.A. 1954. Estimation of
available phosphorus in soil by extraction with sodium bicarbonate USDA,
Circular, 939.
Pagani, A., Echeverria, H., Andrade, F.H.andSainzRozas, H.R. 2012. Effects of
nitrogen and sulfur application on grain yield, nutrient accumulation, and
harvest indexes in maize. Journal of Plant Nutrition,35:1080-1090.
Pandey, K.K. and Awasthi, A. 2014. Integrated nutrient management in the maize
(Zea mays L.) yield and soil properties. International Journal of Agricultural
Sciences.10:244-246.
Panwar, A.S. 2008. Effect of integrated nutrient management in maize (Zea mays) –
mustard (Brassica campestrisvar.toria) cropping system in mid hills altitude.
Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 78: 27-31.
Paradkar, V.K., Tiwari, D.K. and Reddy, R.K. 2010. Response of baby corn to
integrated nutrient management in: Extended Summaries, XIX National
symposium on Resource Management Approaches towards Livelihood
Security, organized by Indian Society ofAgronomy at University of
Agricultural Sciences Bengaluru India, Dec 2-4, 2010. Pp - 37.
Paramasivan, M., Kumaresan, K.R. and Malarvizhi, P. 2011. Effect of balanced
nutrition on yield, nutrient uptake and soil fertility of maize (Zea mays) in
vertisol of Tamil Nadu.Indian Journal of Agronomy,56:133-137.
Pathak, S.K., Singh, S.B. and Singh, S.N. 2002. Effect of integrated nutrient
management on growth, yield and economics in maize (Zea mays) - wheat
(Triticumaestivum) cropping system. Indian Journal of Agronomy,47: 325-
332.
Pathak, S.K., Singh, S.B., Jha, B.N. and Sharma, R.P. 2005. Effect of nutrient
management on nutrient uptake and changes in soil fertility in maize – wheat
cropping system. Indian Journal of Agronomy,50:269-273.
Patidar, M. and Mali, A.L. 2002.Residual effect of farm yard manure, fertilizer and
bio fertilizer on succeeding wheat (Triticumaestivum).Indian Journal of
Agronomy,47: 26-32.
Patil, M.S. 1995.Integrated nutrient management in commercial vegetables. M. Sc.
Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad (India).
Pattanashetti, V.A., Agasimani, C.A. and Babalad, H.B. 2002. Effect of manures and
fertilizers on yield of maize and soybean under intercropping system. Journal
of Maharashtra Agriculture University, 27:206-207.
Piper, C.S. 1950.Soil and plant analysis.The University of Adelaide, Australia.
Prasad, B. K., Singh, D. N. and Singh, S. N. 2003.Effect of long-term use of fertilizer,
lime and manures on growth and yield of sweet corn. Journal of Indian
Society of Soil Science, 34: 271-274.
Ramesh, P., Panwar, N.R., Singh, A.B. and Ramana, S. 2008. Effect of organic
manures on productivity, nutrient uptake and soil fertility of maize (Zea mays)
– linseed (Linumusitatissimum) cropping system. Indian Journal of
Agricultural Sciences, 78: 351-354.
Rasool, R., Kukal, S.S. and Hira, G.S. 2007. Farmyard manure and inorganic
fertilization effects on saturated hydraulic conductivity of soil and crop
performance in rice (Oryza sativa),wheat(Triticumaestivum) and maize (Zea
mays L.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences,77:768-771.
Rasool, R., Kukal, S.S. and Hira, G.S. 2008.Soil organic carbon and physical
properties as affected by long term application of FYM and inorganic fertilizer
in maize-wheat system. Journal of Soil and Tillage Research, 101: 31-36.
Richard, L.A. 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkaline soils.
USDAHand Book, No.60.
Sahota, N.N., Paul, S.R. and Sharma, D. 1984. Response of maize (Zea mays L.) to
nitrogen and phosphorus under rainfed conditions of hill zones of Assam.
Indian Journal of Agronomy, 45:128-131.
Sekhon, N.K. and Agarwal, G.C. 1994. Changes induced in maize leaf growth and
development by organic amendments and N. fertilization in a calcareous
ustochrest soil, in North Western India. Crops and Soil Research, 8: 261-268.
Shankar, M.A. Maruthi, S.G.R. Thimmegowda, M.N. and Nagamani, M.K. 2014.
Indian Journal of Agronomy,59(2):306-316
Sharma, R.C. and Banik, P. 2012. Effect of integrated nutrient management on baby
corn-rice cropping system: economic yield, system productivity, nutrient-use
efficiency and soil nutrient balance. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences,
82:220-224.
Shivay, Y.S., Singh, R.P. and Shivakumar, B.G. 2002.Effect of nitrogen on yield
attributes, yield and quality of maize (Zea mays) in different cropping
systems.Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 72:161-163.
Singh, D. and Nepalia, V. 2009. Influence of integrated nutrient management on
quality protein maize (Zea mays L.) productivity and soils of southern
Rajasthan. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences,79:1020-1022.
Singh, G., Kumar, R. and Kumar, S. 2006. Effect of tillage and nitrogen levels on
growth, yield of maize (Zea mays).Annals of Agricultural Research, New
Series27:198-199.
Singh, M.K., Singh, R.N., Singh, S.P., Yadav, M.K. and Singh, V.K. 2010.Integrated
nutrient management for higher yield, quality profitability of baby corn (Zea
mays).Indian Journal of Agronomy,55:100-104.
Singh, U., Saad, A.A., Ram, T., Chand, L., Mir, S.A. and Aga, F.A. 2012.
Productivity, economics and nitrogen use efficiency of sweet corn (Zea mays
saccharata) as influenced by planting geometry and nitrogen fertilization.
Indian Journal of Agronomy,57:43-48.
Snell, B. V. and Snell, C. P. 1959.Colorimetric methods of analysis.3rd Ed. Vol. 2nd.
Van Nostrand Inc. New York.
Srinivasan, K. 1992 Effect of amendment and zinc levels on the growth and yield of
maize. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 37: 246-249.
Srinivasan, S.D., Lungu, O.I., Cherwa, B. and Lungu, C. 1993.Effect of lime and
FYM on soil fertility and maize growth and yield.Tropical Agriculture, 70:
309-314.
Stephens, P.M., Davoren, C.W., Ryder, M.H. and Doube, B.M. 1994. Influence of
earthworm Aprectodea trapezoids on the colonization of alfalfa roots by
Rhizobium meliloti and the survival of R. meliloti in soil. Biol. Fert. Soils, 18:
63- 70.
Stolyarenko, V.S., Kovelenko, V.E., Samoshkin, A.A., Bondar, P.S., Pashova, V.T.
and Skripnik, L.N. 1992. Growth, development and microelement content in
maize plantlets manured with organic waste bioconversion products.
FizologiyaBiokhimiyaKulTurmykhRastenii, 24: 476-482.
Subbiah, B.V. and Asija, G.L. 1956. A rapid procedure for the estimation of available
nitrogen in soils.Current Science,25: 259-260.
Sujata, M.G., Lingaraju, B.S., Palled, Y.B., K.V. 2008. Importance of integrated
nutrient management practices in maize under rainfed condition. Karnataka
Journal of Agricultural Science, 21: 334-338.
Swarup, A. and Wanjani, R.H. 2000. Three decades of All India Coordinated
Research Project on Long Term Fertilizer Experiments to study changes in
soil quality, crop productivity and sustainability. Indian Institute of Soil
Science, Bhopal, India, P.59.
Swati Priya, Kaushik, M.K., Sharma,S.K., Kumawat, P. 2014. Impact of
integrated nutrient management on growth and productivity of hybrid maize
(Zea mays L.).Annals of Biology, 30:106-108.s
Tak, R.C. 2000.Effect of zinc fertilization at different levels of nitrogen and
phosphorous in conjunction with FYM on nutrient availability and yield of
maize in Alfisol. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Agricultural Chemistry and Soil
Science. MaharanaPratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur.
Teterwal, J.P., Ram, B., Meena, D.S. 2011. Effect of INM on productivity,
profitability, nutrient uptake and soil fertility in rainfed maize (Zea
mays).Indian Journal of Agronomy,56:373-376.
Thavaprakash, N. and Velayudham, K. 2007. Effect of crop geometry, intercropping
and integrated nutrient management practices on cob yield and nutrient uptake
of baby corn.Asian Journal of Agricultural Research,1:10-16.
Tiwari, A., Dwivedi, A.K. and Dikshit, P.R. 2002. Long-term influence of organic
and inorganic fertilization on soil fertility and productivity of soybean-wheat
system in a vertisol.Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science,50: 472-475.
Totawat, K.L., Somani, L.L., Singh, R. and Singh, G. 2001. Integrated nitrogen
management in maize - wheat cropping sequence on typicHaplustalfs of
western India.Annals of Arid Zone,40:439-444.
Velayutham, M. 1961. Integrated plant nutrition system – key to soil productivity
enhancement and sustainable agricultural production.
Verma, A., Nepalia, V. and Kanthaliya, P.C. 2006. Effect of nutrient supply on
growth, yield and nutrient uptake by maize (Zea mays)-wheat
(Triticumaestivum) cropping system. Indian Journal of Agronomy,51:3-6.
Verma, C.P., Kedar Prasad, Singh, H.V. and Verma, R.N. 2003.Effect of soil
conditioners and fertilizers on yield and economics of maize (Zea mays L.) in
maize-wheat sequence.Crop Research, 25:449-453.
Verma, T.S. 1991. Influence of method of farmyard manure application on maize
(Zea mays L.) under rainfed conditions. Crop Research, 4:161-164.
Waseem, M., Ali, A., Tahir, M., Naeem, M., Ayub, M., Iqbal, A., Mohsin, A.U.,
Rehman, H.U., Ali, M., Ghaffari, A., Sarwar, M.A. and Khaliq, A. 2012.
Consequences of diverse use of nitrogen sources on grain yield, grain quality
and growth attributes of hybrid maize (Zea mays L.). African Journal of
Biotechnology,11:13372-13386.
Yadav, D.S. and Kumar, A. 2009. Long term effect of nutrient management on soil
health and Productivity of rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticumaestivum)
system. Indian Journal of Agronomy,54:15-23.
Yolder., R. E. 1936. A direct method of aggregates analysis of soils and a study of the
physical nature erosion losses. Journal of American Society of
Agronomy,28:337-351
Zafar, M., Abbasi, M.K. and Khaliq, A. 2013. Effect of different phosphorus sources
on the growth, yield, energy content and phosphorus utilization efficiency in
maize at Rawalakot Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan Journal of Plant
Nutrition,36:1915-1934.
Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Maize (Zea mays L.)
Mahendra Kumar Yadav* Dr. H.S. Purohit** M.Sc. Scholar Major Advisor
ABSTRACT
A field study entitled “Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Maize
(Zea mays L.)” was conducted during kharif, 2014 at the Instructional Farm of the
Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipur. The soil of the experimental site was
sandy clay loam in texture slightly alkaline in reaction, medium in available nitrogen
and phosphorus and high in potassium, sulphur and zinc.
The objectives of the study were to assess the effect of application of plant
nutrients through organic and inorganic sources and their combination on yield and
nutrient partitioning and accumulation in plant parts productivity, along with
economics of maize production.
The experiment consisted of 12 treatments comprising chemical fertilizers,
organic manure, and their combinations, viz., , 100 % RDF + FYM at 10t ha-1, 75 %
RDF + FYM at 10t ha-1, 50 % RDF + FYM at 10t ha-1, 100 % RDF + vermicompost
at 4t ha-1, 75 % RDF + vermicompost at 4t ha-1, 50 % RDF + vermicompost at 4t ha-1
, FYM at 20t ha-1, vermicompost at 8t ha-1, 100 % RDF, 75 % RDF, 50 % RDF, and
control These treatments were evaluated under randomized block design (RBD) with
three replications. Maize cultivar (pratap makka- 5) was taken as test crop.
The results of the present investigation revealed that the yield of maize crop in
terms of grain, stover and biological yield ( 2766, 7796, 10562 kg ha-1) were
maximum by applying 100% RDF + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 though the results were at
par with those obtained by applying 100% RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1.
Nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, zinc, iron, manganese and copper content
and uptake in grain and stover highest with the application of 100% RDF +
Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 with statistically equivalent result with application of 100%
RDF + FYM 10 t ha-1 .
* Research Scholar, Agricultural Chemistry and Soil Science R.C.A., Udaipur. ** Professor & Head , Agricultural Chemistry and Soil Science R.C.A., Udaipur.
Integrated use of chemical fertilizers and manure increased available N, P, K,
Zn, Fe, Mn and Cu status of the soil.
The application of 100% NPK + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 contributed
significantly to the soil properties under investigation vis., aggregates, porosity and
hydraulic conductivity and balanced as well as higher level of plant nutrition
significantly enhanced the fertility status of soil. The study revealed that soil
enrichment with 100% NPK + Vermicompost 4 t ha-1 resulted in highest monetary
returns of 29999 ha-1 and maximum B/C ratio (1.18).
^^eDdk ¼ft;kest,y-½ ijlefUoriks"kdrRoizca/kudkizHkko**
egsUnzdqekj;kno* MkW- ,p-,l-iqjksfgr** 'kks/kNk= eq[; lykgdkj
vuq{ksi.k
jktLFkkudf"kegkfo|ky;] mn;iqj ¼jktLFkku½ ds izf'k{k.kkRediz{ks= ij [kjhQ 2014 esa ,d v/;;u izk;ksftrfd;kx;kftldk 'kh"kZdgS ^eDdk ¼ft;k est ,y-½ esalefUoriks"kdrRoiazca/kudkizHkkoAiz{ks= dh enkcqybZ&fpduhnkseV] fØ;kesavYi {kkjh;] pwuk;qDr] tksizkI; ukbVªkstu ,oaQkLQksjl ds Lrjksaesa e/;e] gkykafdizksVsf'k;e] xa/kdo tLrsesamPpLrjdhFkh A
ijh{k.kdkmn~ns'; eDdkesaiks"kdrRoksa ds dkcZfudrFkkvdkcZfud ,oa muds la;qDriz;ksxdkizHkkodk;ZØh; ?kVdks] 'kq"dHkkjvkSjikniiks"kdrRoksadkfofHkUuikniHkkxksaesalp;u] forj.k] Qly dh mRikndrkvkSjmRikn ds lkFkvkfFkZdfo'ys"k.kdk v/;;u djukFkkA
ijh{k.kesajklk;fudmoZjd] dkcZfud [kkn ,oa muds la;kstu ds 12 mipkjblizdkjFks&moZjdvuq'kalk dh ek=k dk 100izfr'kr$ 10 Vu xkscj dh [kknizfrgSDVj] moZjdvuq'kalk dh ek=k dk75izfr'kr $ 10 Vu xkscj dh [kknizfrgSDVj] moZjdvuq'kalk dh ek=k dk50izfr'kr $ 10 Vu xkscj dh [kknizfrgSDVj] moZjdvuq'kalk dh ek=k dk 100 izfr'kr $ 4 Vu dspq, dh [kknizfrgSDVj] moZjdvuq'kalk dh ek=k dk75 izfr'kr $ 4 Vu dspq, dh [kknizfrgSDVj] moZjdvuq'kalk dh ek=k dk50 izfr'kr $ 4 Vu dspq, dh [kknizfrgSDVj] 20 Vu xkscj dh [kknizfrgSDVj] 8 Vu dspq, dh [kknizfrgSDVj] moZjdvuq'kalk dh ek=k dk 100 izfr'kr] moZjdvuq'kalk dh ek=k dk 75 izfr'kr] moZjdvuq'kalk dh ek=k dk 50 izfr'kr ,oafu;a=.k A bumipkjksadks ;knfPNd [k.MvfHkdYiuk ¼vkj-ch-Mh-½ esarhuckjiqujkorfd;kx;kAeDdk ¼izrki eDdk&5½ ijh{k.kQlyyhx;hA
*'kks/k Nk=] df"kjlk;u ,oae`nkfoKkufoHkkx] jktLFkkudf"kegkfo|ky;] mn;iqj ¼jktLFkku½
**vkpk;Z ,oafoHkkxk/;{k] df"kjlk;u ,oae`nkfoKkufoHkkx] jktLFkkudf"kegkfo|ky;] mn;iqj ¼jktLFkku½
ijh{k.k ds ifj.kken'kkZrsgSfdmoZjdvuq'kalk dh ek=k dk 100 izfr'kr $ 4 Vu dspq, dh [kknizfrgSDVj ds iz;ksxlseDdkdhQlyesavf/kdrenkuk] dMch
,oatSfodmit ¼2766] 7796] 10562 fdyksxzkeizfr gSDVj½ ik;hx;htkslkaf[;dh; :ilsmoZjdvuq'kalk dh ek=k dk 100izfr'kr$ 10 Vu xkscj dh [kknizfrgSDVj ds cjkcjFkh A
nkukvkSjHkwlsesaukbVªkstu] QkLQksjl] ikSVsf'k;eftad]yksgk] eSxuhtvkSjdkWijdhek=k rFkkbudkvf/kxzg.kmoZjdvuq'kalk dh ek=k dk 100 izfr'kr $ 4 Vu dspq, dh [kknizfrgSDVj ds mipkjesavf/kdreik;kx;ktkslkaf[;dh; :ilsmoZjdvuq'kalk dh ek=k dk100izfr'kr$ 10 Vu xkscj dh [kknizfrgSDVj ds cjkcjFkhA
jklk;fudmoZjd o [kkn ds lefUoriz;ksxlsenkesaizkI; ukbVªkstu] QkLQksjl] iksVsf'k;e] ftad] yksgk] eSxafut o dkWij dh ek=k esaof) gqbZA
moZjdvuq'kalk dh ek=k dk 100 izfr'kr $ 4 Vu dspq, dh
[kknizfrgSDVjenk ds xq.kksaesalkFkZd :ils ;ksxnkunsrhgSAtSlsleqPp;] ljU/kzrkvkSj वचािलत वा हताrFkkenk dh moZjdrklefUorrFkkmPpLrj ds iks"kdrRoksa ds mi;ksxlslkFkZd :ils c<+rhgSA
v/;;u ls ;g KkrgqvkgSfdvf/kdre 'kq) ykHk :i;s 29999
izfrgSDVjvkSjvf/kdreykHk % ykxr ¼1-18½ moZjdvuq'kalk dh ek=k dk 100 izfr'kr $ 4 Vu dspq, dh [kknizfrgSDVjlsizkIrgqbZA
APPENDIX-I Analysis of variance (MSS) for seed yield, stover yield, biological yield and harvest index
Source of variation d. f Seed yield Stover yield Biological yield Harvest index
Replication 2 59211,37 642946.25 1073655.00 5.86 Treatments 11 504718* 3569735.92* 6599573* 4.894*
Error 22 13479 1631141.26 193402 3.134
*Significant at 5% level of significance APPENDIX-II
Analysis of variance (MSS) for nitrogen content and uptake by grain and stover of maize
Source of variation d. f Nitrogen content Nitrogen uptake Total Grain Stover Grain Stover
Replication 2 0.000 0.0003 24.0874 50.106 109.8161
Treatments 11 0.120* 0.0148* 330.3591* 337.585* 1311.9854*
Error 22 0.001 0.0003 5.0038 10.181 19.2050 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
*Significant at 5% level of significance
APPENDIX--III Analysis of variance (MSS) Phosphorus content and uptake by grain and stover of maize
Source of variation d. f Phosphorus content Phosphorus content Total Grain Stover Grain Stover
Replication 2 0.00011 0.00000 1.1174 2.3069 5.1301 Treatments 11 0.00121* 0.00042* 9.2486* 14.2745* 45.62071*
Error 22 0.00004 0.00002 0.1960 0.4705 0.74408 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
*Significant at 5% level of significance
APPENDIX-- IV Analysis of variance (MSS) for potassium content and uptake by grain and stover of maize
Source of variation d. f Potassium content Potassium uptake Total Grain Stover Grain Stover
Replication 2 0.00023 0.00010 1.0525 103.8855 101.5168 Treatments 11 0.00093* 0.00323* 12.024* 503.8000* 664.22824*
Error 22 0.00009 0.00011 0.272 21.05246 22.05879
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
*Significant at 5% level of significance
APPENDIX--V Analysis of variance (MSS) for zinc content and uptake by grain and stover of maize
Source of variation d. f Zinc content Zinc uptake Total Grain Stover Grain Stover Replication 2 3.9956 0.7331 20196.55 47645.05 103593.61
Treatments 11 1337.7753* 22.6823* 299173.624* 416027.686* 1398912.75* Error 22 2.5127 0. 3900 7635.869 9336.632 22725.087
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
*Significant at 5% level of significance
APPENDIX--VI Analysis of variance (MSS) for iron content and uptake by grain and stover of maize
Source of variation d. f Iron content Iron uptake Total Grain Stover Grain Stover
Replication 2 0.86741 18.627 38774.26 1969444.19 2544454.66 Treatments 11 22.60882* 111.144* 323225.021* 7668115.87* 10993260.3*
Error 22 0.88320 12.644 7204.562 338117.17 364108.18
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
*Significant at 5% level of significance
APPENDIX--VII Analysis of variance (MSS) for manganese content and uptake by grain and stover of maize
Source of variation d. f Manganese content Manganese uptake Total Grain Stover Grain Stover Replication 2 0.1405 0.279 1457.12 104447.28 153673.09
Treatments 11 3.2153* 14.311* 15801.43* 964722.18* 1218396.35* Error 22 0.2600 0.553 428.35 27513.23 28865.70
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
*Significant at 5% level of significance
APPENDIX--VIII Analysis of variance (MSS) for copper content and uptake by grain and stover of maize
Source of variation d. f Copper content Copper uptake Total Grain Stover Grain Stover
Replication 2 0.7872 0.2137 5445.98 4115.88 11127.66
Treatments 11 2.3797* 0.7507* 94966.4* 34022.3* 132824.6* Error 22 0.6035 0.1196 947.2 1006.0 1863.8
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
*Significant at 5% level of significance
APPENDIX- IX
Analysis of variance (MSS) for available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in soil at harvest of maize
Source of variation d. f Available nitrogen Available phosphorus Available potassium
Replication 2 19.380 0.0305 44.9791
Treatments 11 699.266* 13.2370* 2002.64815* Error 22 59.470 0.76206 11.95300
*Significant at 5% level of significance
APPENDIX- X Analysis of variance (MSS) for available zinc, iron, maaganese and copper in soil at harvest of maize
Source of variation d. f Available zinc Available iron Available manganese Available copper
Replication 3 0.0072 0.003 0.0021 0.0349
Treatments 11 0.0278* 0.467* 0.03831* 0.0579* Error 22 0.0028 0.003 0.0644 0.0115
*Significant at 5% level of significance
APPENDIX- XI Analysis of variance (MSS) for pH and EC of soil
Source of variation d. f pH EC
Replication 2 0.00542 0.01847
Treatments 11 0.00681* 0.03157* Error 22 0.00495 0.01629 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *Significant at 5% level of significance
APPENDIX- XII Analysis of variance (MSS) for available aggregates, bulk density, porosity and hydraulic conductivity in soil at harvest of maize
Source of variation d. f aggregates bulk density porosity hydraulic conductivity
Replication 3 10.3917 0.0002 1.0273 0.000003 Treatments 11 14.0175* 0.0068* 10.2813* 0.000274*
Error 22 3.6146 0.0014 1.7020 0.000056
*Significant at 5% level of significance
APPENDIX- XIII Analysis of variance (MSS) for net returns and B:C ratio of maize
Source of variation d. f Net returns B : C ratio
Replication 2 33079308 0.05
Treatments 11 161944112* 0.315* Error 22 3901197 0.008 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ *Significant at 5% level of significance