master's thesis
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
DEVELOPMENT OF AN INTELLIGENT HEADREST USING
SMART MATERIALS
Ajmal Abdu Salam M.Sc. Mechanical Engineering with Industrial Management
Supervisor:
Dr. Olga Ganilova
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES
• To inves;gate the problem of whiplash and the latest achievements in the field
• To study the area of smart materials • To develop a novel design for an intelligent headrest applying smart materials
• Evolvement of an analy;cal model of the smart headrest
© The University of Sheffield
Whiplash Injuries in an Accident
• Whiplash injury results from an rear end accident in which the driver is in a sta;onary vehicle that is struck from behind
• The movement of the neck is followed by massive rebound in the opposite direc;on, causing bone and soD ;ssue injuries
• Around 570,000 whiplash injury claims were made in the UK, last year [ABI 2012]
© The University of Sheffield
What is a Whiplash?
Figure 2. ‘S’ curve during Whiplash [Chiroprac)c Health Blog]
Figure 1. Mechanism of Whiplash [IIHS]
Smart Materials • “A system or material which has built-‐in or intrinsic sensor(s),
actuator(s) and control mechanism(s) whereby it is capable of sensing a s;mulus, responding to it in a predetermined
manner and extent, in a short/appropriate ;me, and rever;ng to its original state as soon as the s;mulus is removed.”
• Examples -‐ Piezo-‐ceramics, Piezoelectric polymers, Magnetostric;ve ceramics, Shape memory alloys, Electro-‐
rheological fluids and Magneto-‐rheological fields etc.
© The University of Sheffield
Comparison of Mechanical Actuators
Actuator
Max. ActuaPon Strain
Max. ActuaPon
Stress (MPa)
Modulus
E (GPa)
Maximum Frequency (s-‐1)
Maximum Power Density
(Wm-‐3)
Density (kgm-‐3)
Efficiency
Low Strain Piezoelectric
5 x 10-‐6 –
3 x 10-‐5
1-‐3
90-‐300
5 x 105 –
3 x 107
1 x 108 –
1 x 109
2600-‐4700
> 0.999
High Strain Piezoelectric
5 x 10-‐5 –
2 x 10-‐4
4-‐9
50-‐80
5 x 105 –
2 x 107
9 x 107 –
5 x 108
7500-‐7800
0.90 – 0.99
Piezoelectric Polymer
2 x 10-‐4 –
1 x 10-‐3
0.5-‐5
2-‐10
1 x 105 –
1 x 107
≈ 3 x 108
1750-‐1900
0.90 -‐ 0.95
SHAPE MEMORY ALLOY
7 x 10-‐3 –
7 x 10-‐2
100-‐700
30-‐90
2 x 10-‐2 –
7 x 100
7 x 105 –
1 x 108
6400-‐6600
0.01 -‐ 0.02
© The University of Sheffield
Table 1. Characteris;c features of the mechanical actuators [The Selec)on of Mechanical Actuators]
Shape Memory Alloys • Shape Memory Alloys are alloys of
metals that have the ability to remember their original shapes.
• The Two Unique Proper;es – 1. One-‐way Effect 2. Two-‐way Effect 3. Pseudo-‐elas;city
• The Advantages – 1. Rela;vely Light Weight 2. Easy to manufacture 3. High Force to Weight Ra;o
© The University of Sheffield
Figure 3. One-‐way and Two-‐way effect of SMA [Issues in the Design of Shape Memory Alloy Actuators]
Figure 4. Pseudo elas;city behavior of SMA [h=p://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0045782596012327]
NiTi -‐ Flexinol® • The NiTi SMA -‐ developed at the
Naval Ordnance Laboratory • ADVANTAGES – 1. Large Recoverable Mo;on 2. Great Duc;lity, 3. Excellent Corrosion Resistance, 4. Stable Transforma;on Temperatures 5. High resis;vity, resul;ng in Cheaper
costs in cyclic applica;ons
Property Value
Density, 6.45 g/cm3
Specific Heat, cA = cM 837.36 J/kg/K
Latent Heat of TransformaPon, XAM 24,190.4 J/kg
Electrical ResisPvity
Austenite, 100 micro-‐ohms*cm
Martensite, 80 micro-‐ohms*cm
TransiPon Temperatures 70 Wire 90 Wire
As 70 90
Af 90 110
Ms 65 80
Mf 45 60
Modulus of ElasPcity
Martensite, Em 28 GPa
Austenite, EA 83 GPa
Poisson’s raPo 0.3
Stress Influence Coefficients
CA 7MPa/℃
CM 7MPa/℃
CriPcal Shear Stress
Start of Martensite De-‐twinning process , 114.0 MPa
End of Martensite De-‐twinning process , 72.4 MPa
Upper Plateau Shear Stress , 183 MPa
Maximum Recoverable Shear Strain, 0.05
© The University of Sheffield
Table 2. Technical Characteris;cs of NiTi Wire [Technical Characteris)cs of FLEXINOL ® ]
Figure 5. NiTi Shape Memory Alloy [http://www.pnk.com.cn/material/shape_memory_alloy.htm]
ProtecPon Systems developed by Automobile Companies
10/10/13 © The University of Sheffield
• Volvo and Jaguar use WhiPS or more commonly known as Whiplash Protec;on System.
• Consists of a recliner along with a modified backrest and a head restraint.
• Toyota uses WIL or Whiplash Injury Lessening system, which has no ac;ve parts but has an improved geometry and a soDer seat back
• This is a concept idea and has not been implemented yet
• Grammar AG and BMW jointly developed ac;ve
head rest systems. • The forward displacement of the seat’s head rest
is ini;ated by a pyrotechnical inflator unit, ac;vated when there is a rear end collision.
Figure 8. Headrest designed by Grammar AG in BMW [Grammar AG]
Figure 7. WIL and RHR Concept [TOYOTA. WIL -‐ Whiplash Injury Lessening]
Figure 6. The WhiPS Seat Mo;on [WHIPS – Volvo’s whiplash protec)on study]
Design Methodology
• Headrest is fiped with a Smart Material Actuator
• One-‐way Shape Memory Effect NiTi used for the NiTi Spring Actuator
• Actuator will have a fixed part and a movable part
• All the components designed in Solidworks
© The University of Sheffield
Design of the NiTi Spring Actuator • NiTi Spring Actuator was designed by
taking the NiTi Wire diameter as 0.510mm, keeping a Spring Index of 6.22. The Spring diameter was calculated to be 3.175mm .
• A bias spring of low s;ffness made of
Titanium provided on the opposite side to provide the required poten;al energy.
© The University of Sheffield
Figure 9. Pre-‐ac;vated and Post-‐ac;vated NiTi Spring Actuators
Pre-‐acPvated Smart Headrest • Carefully designed aDer a study of
the male and female anthropometry data.
• The headrest has a total length of 229.09mm suitable for both male and female.
• The Design is just en;tled to show the headrest and it’s working mechanism
• The en;re headrest will be covered with foam and leather when installed inside the vehicle.
© The University of Sheffield
Figure 10. Pre-‐ac;vated Smart Headrest
Post-‐acPvated Smart Headrest • Phase transforma;on of the NiTi
Spring takes place when the sensor detects an imminent collision, which leads to the contrac;on of the spring in its length.
• Because of this, the top part of
the headrest apached along with hinges ;lts for an angle of 22 degrees.
© The University of Sheffield
Figure 11. Post-‐ac;vated Smart Headrest
Flow-‐chart of the AcPvaPon Mechanism
© The University of Sheffield
ConvenPonal Head Rest
© The University of Sheffield
• During a rear impact, the occupant’s head makes a point contact with the head rest.
• This point contact is not sufficient enough for the headrest to prevent the whiplash.
• The head thus, rotates to more than 45 degrees leading to hyper-‐extension causing whiplash injury.
Figure 12. Contact of Driver with a Conven;onal Headrest
Figure 13. Point Contact of the Driver’s Head in a Conven;onal Headrest
Smart Head Restraint • In this case, the head makes a contact with the
head rest and the area was calculated to be 1532.30 mm2
𝑚↓ℎ ∗ 𝑣↓ℎ + 𝑚↓ℎ𝑟 ∗ 𝑣↓ℎ𝑟 = 𝑚↓ℎ ∗ 𝑣↑′ ↓ℎ + 𝑚↓ℎ𝑟 ∗ 𝑣′↓ℎ𝑟
𝑒= 𝑣↑′ ↓ℎ − 𝑣′↓ℎ𝑟 /𝑚↓ℎ
𝐹= 𝑚↓ℎ ∗ ∆𝑣 /∆𝑡
• From the above equa;ons, the force created by the head due to the contact with the headrest was calculated to be 101.546 Newton at an impact speed of 35 km/hr. and the stress as 0.662 N/mm2. © The University of Sheffield
Figure 14. Contact of Driver with the Smart Head Restraint
Figure 15. Contact Area of the Driver’s Head with the Smart Headrest
EquaPons – [Engineering Mechanics; Dynamics – J.L. Meriam, 6th Edi)on]
CONCLUSIONS • Insight about whiplash injuries due to rear impact collisions and the latest
achievements by the automobile companies to prevent this injury. • Insight into smart materials and shape memory alloy actuators are
compara;vely beper.
• LimitaPon was observed in the wire diameter as it was limited to 0.510mm. • Actua;on Times and the Force generated by SMA Spring were approximated
based on the researches done in the par;cular field
• Smart Head Restraint with NiTi Spring Actuator can arrest the head neck moPon before it goes to hyper-‐extension, thus preven;ng the driver from suffering the whiplash injury when compared to a conven;onal headrest.
© The University of Sheffield
Further Research • In-‐depth research needs to be done on the ac;va;on ;mes of the phase
transforma;ons of the Ni;nol.
• Actua;on force needs to be calculated with bundle wires and larger wire diameters.
• A Locking Mechanism can be used in order to retain the head restraint in its ac;vated state. This can be either mechanically or electronically actuated.
• An effec;ve ANSYS or LS – DYNA simula;on of the head impact on the headrest for a more approximate stress calcula;on on the driver’s head.
• Valida;on of the Smart head rest performance in terms of Whiplash Injury Criterion.
© The University of Sheffield
Thank You !! Any Questions?