materials and methods presentation
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Materials and methods presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051318/58e8f7fc1a28ab1f248b5d7d/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Materials and Methods
1. Astri Ollivia K. (16716251013)2. Nana Apriliana (16716251014)3. Mustikaning Ayu S. (16716251009)
![Page 2: Materials and methods presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051318/58e8f7fc1a28ab1f248b5d7d/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Framework Content Syllabus Communicative Language Teaching Some claims for current materials Multi component syllabus Learners and learning Related developments References
Outlines
![Page 3: Materials and methods presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051318/58e8f7fc1a28ab1f248b5d7d/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
As cited in McDonough, Shaw & Masuhara (2013: 3-4): Nowadays, the possible relationship between
English and globalization makes a teacher a worldwide job or occupation.
Despite all the differences, they share professional common framework that comprises of context and syllabus.
Framework
![Page 4: Materials and methods presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051318/58e8f7fc1a28ab1f248b5d7d/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
As cited in McDonough, Shaw & Masuhara (2013: 5-8): Context which comprises of learners and setting
can influence the goal that every educational program has.
Learner variables can be general to individual. Setting includes whole teaching and learning
environment. By having this consideration, it will lead to that the
selection of an appropriate type of syllabus content and specification.
Context
![Page 5: Materials and methods presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051318/58e8f7fc1a28ab1f248b5d7d/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
• Age • Mother tongue
Physical
• Interests• level of proficiency• aptitude• academic and educational level• attitude to learning• motivation• reasons for learning• preferred learning styles• personality
Mental
Graphic 1. Learner variables (McDonough, Shaw & Masuhara, 2013: 7-8)
![Page 6: Materials and methods presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051318/58e8f7fc1a28ab1f248b5d7d/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
• Physical • Socio-
cultural• Time
• Administration• Monitoring • evaluation
• Teachers • Number of
pupils • Support
personnel
• The position of English at school, curriculum or country
Position Human resources
Environment and time
Management
Graphic 2. Setting variables (McDonough, Shaw & Masuhara, 2013: 8-9)
![Page 7: Materials and methods presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051318/58e8f7fc1a28ab1f248b5d7d/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
A syllabus is a document containing what should
be learnt. (Hutchinson & Waters, 1987: 80) A syllabus refers to an explicit and coherent plan
containing what is to be taught in particular course in which the aim is to guide teacher and learners. (Feez & Joyce, 1998: 2)
“The syllabus here is defined as the general statement as to the pedagogical arrangement of the learning content.” (McDonough, Shaw & Masuhara, 2013: 11)
Syllabus (Definitions)
![Page 8: Materials and methods presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051318/58e8f7fc1a28ab1f248b5d7d/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Syllabus offers practical way to break down the
complexity of language learning process into manageable and teachable units. (Hutchinson & Waters, 1987: 83-84)
Syllabus can fulfill aims as closely as possible. (McDonough, Shaw & Masuhara, 2013: 11)
Richards and Rodger (2011), as cited in McDonough, Shaw & Masuhara (2013: 11), states the place of syllabus in a programme planning in three levels, i.e., approach, design, and procedure.
Syllabus (Importance)
![Page 9: Materials and methods presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051318/58e8f7fc1a28ab1f248b5d7d/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Hutchinson & Waters (1987: 85-87)• Topic • Structural/
situational • Functional/
notional • Skill• Situational • Task-based • Discourse/skill • Skill and
strategies
Feez & Joyce (1998: 14 – 18)• Structural• Situational • Topic-based• functional/-
notional• Process• Task-based• mixed
McDonough, Shaw & Masuhara (2013: 13)• Grammatical/
structural• Functional/
notional• Situational• Skill-based• Topic-based• Task-based
Graphic 1. Types of syllabus
![Page 10: Materials and methods presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051318/58e8f7fc1a28ab1f248b5d7d/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
• Based on grammar items .• e.g. Prepositions, pronouns, etc.
Grammatical/ structural
• Based on language functions.• e.g. Appologizing, thanking, etc.
Functional-notional
• Based on the situation and setting.• e.g. At a hotel, in the restaurant, etc. Situational• Based on skills.• e.g. Writing a memo, reading for info,
etc.Skills-based
• Based on the logic of the topic itself. • e.g. Job seeking process, etc.Topic based
• Based on communicative tasks.• e.g. Interviews, meeting people, etc.Task-based
![Page 11: Materials and methods presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051318/58e8f7fc1a28ab1f248b5d7d/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Most syllabuses are based on a combination of
two or more of the types. (McDonough, Shaw & Masuhara, 2013: 13)
The notion of syllabus should be distinguished from syllabus inventory. (McDonough, Shaw & Masuhara, 2013: 14)
A syllabus is a working document that should be used flexibly and appropriately to maximise the aims and the processes of learning. (Hutchinson & Waters, 1987: 94)
Syllabus (notes)
![Page 12: Materials and methods presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051318/58e8f7fc1a28ab1f248b5d7d/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Communicative Language
Teaching (CLT)
1960s
1970s to
early 1980s
New millenniu
m era
![Page 13: Materials and methods presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051318/58e8f7fc1a28ab1f248b5d7d/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Communicative Language
Teaching (Examples)
![Page 14: Materials and methods presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051318/58e8f7fc1a28ab1f248b5d7d/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
![Page 15: Materials and methods presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051318/58e8f7fc1a28ab1f248b5d7d/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
As cited in McDonough, Shaw & Masuhara
(2013: 22), Richards & Rodgers (2001: 172) define CLT as “an approach in the sense that it represent ‘a diverse set of principles that reflect a communicative view of language and language learning and that can be used to support a wide variety of classroom procedures’.”
Communicative Language Teaching (Definition)
![Page 16: Materials and methods presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051318/58e8f7fc1a28ab1f248b5d7d/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
• Syllabus (Wilkins, 1976)
Phase 1
• Need assessment (Munby, 1978)
Phase 2 • Classroom
activities (Prabhu, 1987)Phase
3
Communicative Language Teaching (Phases)
Taken from: McDonough, Shaw & Masuhara (2013: 22-23)
![Page 17: Materials and methods presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051318/58e8f7fc1a28ab1f248b5d7d/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
1• The concept of ‘being communicative’ includes what a language has the
potential to mean, as well as formal grammar properties.
2• There is often a stated requirement for ‘authenticity’.
3• The communicative approach cconcerns with “accuracy” and “appropriacy”.
4• A concept of communication does not have to be based on sentence-level
criteria, it can allow language to be described, and language learning to take place, over longer stretches.
5• ‘Communicative’ can in fact refer to all four language skills.
6• There is distinction between the ‘what’ and the ‘how’.
Communicative Language Teaching (Implications)
Taken from: McDonough, Shaw & Masuhara (2013: 23-31)
![Page 18: Materials and methods presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051318/58e8f7fc1a28ab1f248b5d7d/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
As cited in McDonough, Shaw & Masuhara (2013), Clandfield and Jeffries (2010); Clare and Wilson (2011); Dellar and Walkley (2010); Harmer (2012); Rea et al., (2011) mention: learn English as it is used in our globalized world. need variety of teaching situation to relate the
classroom activity and real life. teach real-world vocabulary and grammar structure. integrate skill series which flexible for all learning style. prepares learners to use English independently.
Some claims for current materials
![Page 19: Materials and methods presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051318/58e8f7fc1a28ab1f248b5d7d/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Multi-component syllabusDellar and Walkley (2011) cited in McDonough, Shaw & Masuhara
(2013)
![Page 20: Materials and methods presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051318/58e8f7fc1a28ab1f248b5d7d/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Word MeaningSingWrite Read
MenyanyiMenulisMembaca
The emphasis of lexis
Current way:• rationalize vocabulary as content• base teaching on an understanding
of the psycho-logical mechanisms
Traditional ways:
![Page 21: Materials and methods presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051318/58e8f7fc1a28ab1f248b5d7d/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
As cited in McDonough, Shaw & Masuhara (2013): Willis defined tasks are always activities
where the target language is used by the learner for a communicative purpose.
Key phases are pre- task, task cycle and language focus.
Task Based Approach
![Page 22: Materials and methods presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051318/58e8f7fc1a28ab1f248b5d7d/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
As cited in McDonough, Shaw & Masuhara (2013: 42), the current course book design is concerned in general terms with a perspective on ‘the learner’, it is because : an analysis of the characteristics of
learners as individuals can offer a helpful view on the construction of materials and methods.
Learners will naturally need to engage in process of teaching
Learners and Learning
![Page 23: Materials and methods presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051318/58e8f7fc1a28ab1f248b5d7d/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
As cited in McDonough, Shaw & Masuhara (2013: 47), there are several changes related to the shift of view of ELT, namely: New prespective of English as lingua franca Intercultural sensitivity Diversification of learners and learning
contexts
Related Developments
![Page 24: Materials and methods presentation](https://reader034.vdocument.in/reader034/viewer/2022051318/58e8f7fc1a28ab1f248b5d7d/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
McDonough, J., Shaw, C., & Masuhara, H.
2013. Materials and Methods in ELT: A Teacher’s Guide, Third Edition. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. 1987. English for specific purpose: a learning-centred approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Feez, S., & Joyce, H. 1998. Text-based syllabus design. Sydney: Macquarie University.
References