materna child nutrition
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/28/2019 Materna Child Nutrition
1/121
The Series identifies a set of ten provennutrition-specific interventions, which if scaled up
from present population coverage to cover 90% ofthe need, would eliminate about 900 000 deathsof children younger than 5 years in the 34 highnutrition-burden countries where 90% of theworlds stunted children live.
www.thelancet.comMaternal and Child Nutrition June, 2013
Maternal and Child Nutrition
-
7/28/2019 Materna Child Nutrition
2/121
The LancetLondon32 Jamestown Road,London NW1 7BY,UKT +44 (0)20 7424 4910F +44 (0)20 7424 4911
The LancetNew York360 Park Avenue South,New York, NY 100101710,USAT +1 212 633 3810F +1 212 633 3853
The LancetBeijingUnit 16, 7F, Tower W1,
Oriental Plaza, Beijing 100738,ChinaT + 86 10 85208872F + 86 10 85189297
Comment
1 Nutrition: a quintessential sustainable development goalR Horton, S Lo
2 Maternal and child nutrition: building momentum or impactMaternal and Child Nutrition Study Group
5 Delivery platorms or sustained nutrition in EthiopiaF Lemma, J Matji
7 Only collective action will end undernutritionA Taylor and others
9 Nutrition-sensitive ood systems: rom rhetoric to actionP Pinstrup-Andersen
10 Global child and maternal nutritionthe SUN risesD Nabarro
12 Early nutrition and adult outcomes: pieces o the puzzleZ A Bhutta
Series
15 Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income andmiddle-income countriesR E Black and others
40 Evidence-based interventions or improvement o maternal and child nutrition:what can be done and at what cost?Z A Bhutta and others
66 Nutrition-sensitive interventions and programmes: how can they help to accelerateprogress in improving maternal and child nutrition?M T Ruel and others
82 The politics o reducing malnutrition: building commitment and accelerating progressS Gillespie and others
Articles
100 Mortality risk in preterm and small-or-gestational-age inants in low-income andmiddle-income countries: a pooled country analysisJ Katz and others
109 Associations o linear growth and relative weight gain during early lie with adulthealth and human capital in countries o low and middle income: fndings rom fvebirth cohort studiesL S Adair and others
Maternal and Child Nutrition June, 2013
Editor
Richard Horton
Deputy Editor
Astrid James
Senior Executive Editors
Pam Das
Sabine Kleinert
William Summerskill
Executive Editors
Stephanie ClarkJustine Davies
Joanna Palmer
Pia Pini
Stuart Spencer
Richard Turner
Managing Editor
Hannah Jones
Web Editors
Richard Lane
Erika Niesner
Senior Assistant Web Editor
Katherine Role
Senior Editors
Niall Boyce
Audrey Ceschia
Lin Guo
Selina Lo
Udani Samarasekera
Onisillos Sekkides
Asia Editor
Helena Hui Wang (Beijing)
North America Editor
Rebecca Cooney (New York)
Conference Editors
Laura Hart
Nicolai Humphreys
Deputy Managing Editor
Laura Benham
Senior Assistant Editors
Olaya Astudillo
Stephanie Bartlett
Abi Cantor
Sean Cleghorn
Tim Dehnel
Dara Mohammadi
Odhran ODonoghue
Helen Penny
Frances Whinder
Farhat Yaqub
Assistant Editors
Neil Bennet
Hannah Cagney
Stephanie Clague
Katherine Gourd
Natalie Harrison
Rebecca Heald
Zena Nyakoojo
Louise Rishton
Media Relations Manager
Daisy Barton
Editorial Assistants
Holly Baker
Nawsheen Boodhun
Nicolas Dolan
Francesca Towey
THE LANCET is a registered
trademark o Reed Elsevier
Properties SA, used under licence.
International Advisory Board
Karen Antman (Boston)
Valerie Beral (Oxord)
Robert Beaglehole (Auckland)
Anthony Costello (London)
Robert Fletcher (Boston)
Suzanne Fletcher (Boston)
Karen Gelmon (Vancouver)
David Grimes (Durham)
Ana Langer (Cambridge, MA)
Judith Lumley (Melbourne)
Elizabeth Molyneux (Blantyre)
Christopher Murray (Seattle)
Alwyn Mwinga (Lusaka)
Marie-Louise Newell (Somkhele)
Magne Nylenna (Oslo)
Peter Piot (London)
Stuart Pocock (London)
Giuseppe Remuzzi (Bergamo)
Caroline Savage (Birmingham)
Ken Schulz (Chapel Hill)
Frank Shann (Melbourne)
Jan Vandenbroucke (Leiden)
Cesar Victora (Pelotas)
Nick White (Bangkok)
Previously published online
See www.thelancet/com or WebExtra content
Cover image Betty Press/Panos
Version verifed by CrossMark
-
7/28/2019 Materna Child Nutrition
3/121
Comment
www.thelancet.com 1
Nutrition: a quintessential sustainable development goalIn the nal paper o our 2008 Lancet Series on maternal
and child undernutrition, Saul Morris and colleagues
wrote that, The international nutrition systemmade
up o international and donor organisations, academia,
civil society, and the private sectoris ragmented
and dysunctional.1 They concluded that, incredibly,
no evidence base existed to prioritise actions to
improve nutrition. And they argued that the voice o
countries must be better heard, elt, and reected in
global decision making. Too oten country priorities
to strengthen nutrition were ignored by donors andagencies alike. 5 years on, thanks to the work o a
consortium o scientists led by Robert E Black rom
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School o Public Health
(the Maternal and Child Nutrition Study Group), we
review the progress made against these ndings and
recommendations.26 Although some news is better
than 5 years ago, there is still a deeply worrying gul
between country needs and global actions. But what is
most dierentan extraordinary opportunity as well as
a severe challengeis the political urgency o nutrition.
This latest Lancet Series updates, with extensive
new data, the contribution undernutrition in itsvarious orms makes to child mortality and morbidity.
Compared with 2008, the result is a radically dierent
picture o the relation between nutritional deciencies
and child health. The overall nding is that 31 million
children younger than 5 years die every year rom
undernutrition; that is a staggering 45% o total child
deaths in 2011.
To address this enormous and too oten hidden cause
o child mortality, the Maternal and Child Nutrition
Study Group propose a new ramework to optimise
the delivery o priority evidence-based interventions
to prevent and treat undernutrition across the wholelie course. Unique to this Series is the systematic
approach to both the timing o the interventions and
to creating an enabling environment or nutrition. The
Maternal and Child Nutrition Study Group emphasises
ten interventions targeted to women o reproductive
age, during pregnancy, and to inants and children.
They calculate the eects o these interventions in
34 countries across Arica, Asia, and the Middle East,
where 90% o the global burden o undernutrition
resides. In doing so, they reinorce the importance o
the rst 1000 days rom conception to 2 years. What
goes right and what goes wrong or etal and child
nutrition during this period has lasting and irreversible
consequences or later lie.
There are several entirely new ndings in this Series.
First, the adolescent girl is identied as especially
vulnerable to the eects o undernutrition. But that very
predicament also makes adolescent girls a group with a
special opportunity too.
Second, the importance o etal growth restriction
or being born small or gestational age is highlighted.According to new estimates, etal growth restriction
causes more than 800 000 neonatal deaths and 20% o
stunting in children younger than 5 years worldwide.
These ndings are presented by Robert E Black and
colleagues,2 and Joanne Katz and colleagues7 in the
companion Article. Third, the Series is not only concerned
with interventions. It also identies delivery platorms
or the implementation o those interventions, most
promisingly in the community and in schools. Fourth,
the Series costs these interventions and explains why
those costsan additional Int$96 billion annually or
the 34 countries identiedare much less prohibitivethan they might at rst seem. And nally, the Series
identies a urther threat to maternal and child
nutritional status: overweight and obesity.
On June 8, 2013, the Governments o Brazil and the
UK will co-host a Nutrition or Growth event. There is
thereore an immediate opportunity to oster political
Published Online
June 6, 2013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
S0140-6736(13)61100-9
See Online/Series
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
S0140-6736(13)60937-X,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
S0140-6736(13)60996-4,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
S0140-6736(13)60843-0, and
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
S0140-6736(13)60842-9
See Online/Articles
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
S0140-6736(13)60993-9 and
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
S0140-6736(13)60103-8
Corbis
-
7/28/2019 Materna Child Nutrition
4/121
Comment
2 www.thelancet.com
Maternal and child nutrition: building momentum for impact
In the 5 years since the Maternal and Child Under-nutrition Series15 was published in The Lancet there
has been a substantial increase in commitment to
reduction o malnutrition at global and national
levels. Most development agencies have developed
or revised their strategies to address undernutrition
ocused on the rst 1000 days o liethe period rom
pregnancy to a childs second birthdayas called or in
the 2008 Series. One o the main drivers o this new
international momentum is the Scaling Up Nutrition
movement.6,7 National commitment in low-income
and middle-income countries (LMICs) is growing,donor unding is rising, and civil society and the
private sector are increasingly engaged.
Despite this progress, improvements in nutrition
still represent a massive unnished agenda. The
165 million children with stunted growth in 2011 have
compromised cognitive development and physical
capabilities, making yet another generation less pro-
ductive than they would otherwise be.8 Countries will
not be able to break out o poverty or sustain economic
advances when so much o their population is unable
support or the interventions that can be quickly scaledup or linked to nutrition programmessuch as early
child development initiatives. It is equally important to
take note o the message o Marie Ruel and colleagues 4
that in certain sectors, such as agriculture, the evidence
o the eect o targeted programmes on maternal and
child nutrition is largely inconclusive and requires new
approaches to eld evaluation.
Since 2008, there have been only limited increases in
donor aid or nutrition. It is true that nutrition is not
so readily attractive to politicians as an international
development priority. Undernutrition has a complex
set o political, social, and economic causes, none owhich are amenable to easy solutions that t within
the timerame o a single political cycle. For this reason,
the outlook today or nutrition is not wholly good. The
target endorsed only a year ago at the World Health
Assemblyto reduce by 40% the number o children
stunted by 2025is already on course to be missed.
As the endpoint o the Millennium Development
Goals approaches, countries and the international
community may agree that nutrition was one o the
great missed opportunities o the past 15 years. But this
neglect can be turned around quickly. As sustainable
development becomes the dominant idea post-2015,nutrition emerges as the quintessential example o a
sustainable development objective. I maternal and
child nutrition is optimised, the benets will accrue
and extend over several generations. This remarkable
opportunity is why Stuart Gillespie and colleagues5 take
a very dierent approach to implementation than in any
previous Lancet Series. Instead o exhorting politicians
and policy makers to do somethingor worse, simplyhoping that political commitment will appear like a
rabbit out o a hatthey set out a practical guide about
how to seize the agenda or nutrition, how to create
political momentum, and how to turn that momentum
into results. This is the prize we have to grasp in the next
18 months.
Richard Horton, Selina LoThe Lancet, London NW1 7BY, UK
We thank the Maternal and Child Nutrition Study Group, led by Robert E Black,
or leading the conception and design o this Series. We also acknowledge the
generosity o the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation or providing nancial support.
1 Morris S, Cogill B, Uauy R, et al. Eective international action againstundernutrition: why has it proven so difcult and what can be done toaccelerate progress? Lancet 2008; 371: 60821.
2 Black RE, Victora CG, Walker SP, et al, and the Maternal and Child NutritionStudy Group. Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet 2013; published online
June 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60937-X.
3 Bhutta ZA, Das JK, Rizvi A, et al, The Lancet Nutrition Interventions ReviewGroup, and the Maternal and Child Nutrition Study Group. Evidence-basedinterventions or improvement o maternal and child nutrition: what canbe done and at what cost? Lancet 2013; published online June 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60996-4.
4 Ruel MT, Alderman H, and the Maternal and Child Nutrition Study Group.Nutrition-sensitive interventions and programmes: how can they help toaccelerate progress in improving maternal and child nutrition?Lancet 2013; published online June 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60843-0.
5 Gillespie S, Haddad L, Mannar V, Menon P, Nisbett N, and the Maternal andChild Nutrition Study Group. The politics o reducing malnutrition:
building commitment and accelerating progress. Lancet 2013; publishedonline June 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60842-9.
6 Maternal and Child Nutrition Study Group. Maternal and child nutrition:building momentum or impact. Lancet 2013; published online June 6.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60988-5.
7 Katz J, Lee ACC, Kozuki N, et al, and the CHERG Small-or-Gestational-Age-Preterm Birth Working Group. Mortality risk in preterm and small-or-gestational-age inants in low-income and middle-income countries:a pooled country analysis. Lancet 2013; published online June 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60993-9.
Published Online
June 6, 2013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
S0140-6736(13)60988-5
-
7/28/2019 Materna Child Nutrition
5/121
Comment
www.thelancet.com 3
to achieve the nutritional security that is needed or ahealthy and productive lie. Undernutrition is estimated
to reduce a nations economic advancement by at
least 8% (direct productivity losses, losses via poorer
cognition, and losses via reduced schooling).9,10
Although preventable child mortality continues to
decrease, undernutrition is responsible or 45% o
deaths o children younger than 5 years, amounting
to more than 3 million deaths each year.8 Deciencies
o essential vitamins and minerals are widespread and
have important adverse eects on child survival and
development. Additionally, overweight in adults and
increasingly in children constitutes an emerging burdenthat is quickly establishing itsel globally, aecting both
poor and rich populations.8
Evidence presented in the accompanying Series on
Maternal and Child Nutrition8,1012 shows the importance
o adolescent and maternal nutrition or the health
o the mother and or ensuring healthy etal growth
and development. Fetal growth restriction is a cause
o 800 000 deaths in the rst month o lie each year,
more than a quarter o all neonatal deaths. 8 Newborn
babies with etal growth restriction have a substantially
increased risk o developing stunting by 24 months
o age. Furthermore, these adverse nutritional insultsearly in lie, when coupled with rapid weight gain later
in childhood, are important determinants o obesity
and non-communicable diseases in adulthood. Thus,
it is imperative to act as early as possible in the crucial
window o opportunity o pregnancy and the rst
2 years o lie.8 The emerging platorms or adolescent
health and nutrition might oer opportunities or
enhanced benets.10
According to our conservative estimates, we identiy
a set o ten proven nutrition-specic interventions,
which i scaled up rom present population coverage
to cover 90% o the need, would eliminate about900 000 deaths o children younger than 5 years in
the 34 high nutrition-burden countrieswhere 90%
o the worlds stunted children liveand reduce the
prevalence o stunting by a th, reducing the number
o children with stunted growth and development
by 33 million.10 The interventions with the largest
predicted eects on child mortality are treatment
o severe acute malnutrition throughout childhood;
promotion o inant and young child eeding, including
breasteeding and appropriate complementary oods;
and zinc supplementation. It is, however, important thatinterventions that have so ar contributed to reductions
in child mortality, such as vitamin A supplementation,
be continued where the need still exists. The cost o
scaling up this set o needed nutrition interventions to
90% coverage is estimated at Int$96 billion per year.10
Additionally, nutrition-sensitive activities should be
pursued in sectors that address the underlying deter-
minants o nutrition. Some, but not all, programmes
in agriculture, cash transers, early child development,
and schooling have been shown to improve nutrition
and broader developmental outcomes or children.11
The studies with the most positive eects had strongdesigns (including nutrition goals and actions), reached
mothers and children early (and or longer durations),
and targeted the poorest and most undernourished
groups. Many also included actions to empower women
and enhance their social status. More evidence is needed
rom programmes that have good designs, strong
implementation, and rigorous evaluation.
An enabling environment or nutrition requires
empirically sound, timely data about the nature o
the problem, evidence or what works and how, good
coherence between sectors, good coordination between
national and subnational levels, sufcient capacity tobuild commitment, implementation o programmes
at scale, and sustainable public and private means to
nance interventions.12
Countries that have managed to improve nutritional
status in these contexts have adopted an approach that
targets the whole o society.13 This approach requires a
good understanding o the political economy o nutri-
tion. Governments and other stakeholders in success-
ul countries have built alliances, managed tensions,
identied win-win outcomes, established strong
Panel: Global nutrition targets for 2025, endorsed by the
World Health Assembly
40% reduction o the global number o children
younger than 5 years who are stunted
50% reduction o anaemia in women o
reproductive age
30% reduction o low birthweight
No increase in childhood overweight
Increase the rate o exclusive breasteeding in the
rst 6 months to at least 50%
Reduce and maintain childhood wasting to less than 5%
-
7/28/2019 Materna Child Nutrition
6/121
Comment
4 www.thelancet.com
accountability mechanisms, and innovated in themobilisation o resources or nutrition.11
The private sector is an important orce in shaping
nutrition outcomes and has the potential to do more.
Much more needs to be known about how dierent
orms o public policy, regulation, and nancial incen-
tives can support private organisations to do the right
things to improve nutrition. Knowledge in this area is
scarce and must be expanded rapidly.
The impetus or improving nutrition is stronger today
than 5 years ago. The World Health Assembly nutrition
targets14 or reduction o stunting, wasting, low birth-
weight, anaemia, and overweight, and increasing exclu-sive breasteeding in the rst 6 months o lie (panel),
can be achieved by 2025 with sufcient support. The
costs o inaction are enormous. As economies grow
and the rate o population growth slows, the returns
to improved cognitive perormance and psychological
unctioning in the workorce will expand substantially.
Benets will be greater where strategies integrate the
promotion o nutrition and child development.15
The new evidence provided in the Maternal and Child
Nutrition Series strengthens the case or a continued
ocus on the rst 1000 days. Investments within this
window can help meet crucial goals: the prevention oundernutrition, overweight, and poor child development
outcomes with longlasting eects on human capital
ormation. Because many women do not access
nutrition-promoting services until month 5 or 6 o
pregnancy, we draw attention to the need to ensure
women enter pregnancy in a state o optimum nutrition.
Nutrition is oundational to both individual and
national development. The post-Millennium Develop-
ment Goals agenda must put the resolution o all orms
o malnutrition at the top o its aims. An increase
in donor spending is crucial i nutrition targets are
to be met or surpassed. Government spending inLMICs needs to match or exceed this rate o increase.
Nutrition budget lines need to be established in all
high-burden countries. Governments need to be
supported to raise public resources or nutrition.
The increased mobilisation o private resources rom
individuals, businesses, and new philanthropies needs
to be incentivised towards the most eective ways o
improving nutrition. Scaling Up Nutrition is a crucial
driver o these needed actions and support or it must
remain strong.
Many nutrition gains have been made, but they needto be protected in the ace o new stressors such as
climate change, humanitarian crises, and ood price
volatility. We need to encourage innovation in design
and delivery o nutrition-specic interventions, to make
them even more aordable at scale. New incentives need
to be established that support innovations in nutrition-
sensitive programme design and implementationto
unleash their potential to achieve their own goals by
providing crucial additional support to eorts to reduce
malnutrition. This Series strengthens the evidence that
good nutrition is a undamental driver o a wide range
o development goals.Investments need to be directed not only to inter-
ventions, but also to the creation o environments
that enable them. This approach requires strategic
investment in commitment building, capacity, and
leadership; timely data describing the nature o the
malnutrition problem and its causes; evidence or
what works; accountability mechanisms; resource
mobilisation; and building o institutions required
or sustainable implementation. A political economy
approach to prioritisation o such investments is crucial
i viable enabling environments are to be created.
More research is needed to develop scalable inter-ventions or improve the eectiveness o existing ones
to have greater eects, especially by preventing etal
growth restriction and growth altering in inancy.
Although promising service delivery platorms exist in
communities, evidence is needed about how to ensure
that nutrition interventions reach the populations
with greatest need. More research is needed into the
barriers to eective implementation and into the costs
and logistics o scaling up: into the crucial elements o
capacity at dierent levels, into the development and
assessment o nancing mechanisms or nutrition,
and into ways to reduce the costs o implementation.Rigorous evidence is needed to show how the private
sector can best support optimum nutrition. Research is
also needed into the drivers o country success, how to
create enabling environments, and into the eatures o
nutrition-sensitive programmes that improve nutrition.
This year, 2013, represents the best opportunity yet
to make these proposed actions a reality. National and
international momentum to address human nutrition
and related ood security and health needs is at a high
level. Nutrition is now more prominent on the agendas
-
7/28/2019 Materna Child Nutrition
7/121
Comment
www.thelancet.com 5
o the UN, G8, and G20, and supporting civil society,business, and academic organisations. We must work
together to seize this opportunity.
Maternal and Child Nutrition Study GroupGroup members: *Robert E Black (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School
o Public Health, USA), Harold Alderman (International Food Policy
Research Institute, USA), Zulqar A Bhutta (Aga Khan University,
Pakistan), Stuart Gillespie (International Food Policy Research
Institute, USA), Lawrence Haddad (Institute o Development
Studies, UK), Susan Horton (University o Waterloo, Canada),
Anna Lartey (University o Ghana, Ghana), Venkatesh Mannar
(The Micronutrient Initiative, Canada), Marie Ruel (International
Food Policy Research Institute, USA), Cesar G Victora (Universidade
Federal de Pelotas, Brazil), Susan P Walker (The University o the
West Indies, Jamaica), Patrick Webb (Tuts University, USA)
REB serves on the Boards o the Micronutrient Initiative, Vitamin Angels, the
Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative, and the NestlCreating Shared
Value Advisory Committee. VM serves on the Nestl Creating Shared Value
Advisory Committee. HA, ZAB, SG, LH, SH, AL, MR, CGV, SPW, and PW declare
that they have no conicts o interest.
1 Black RE, Allen LH, Bhutta ZA, et al, or the Maternal and ChildUndernutrition Study Group. Maternal and child undernutrition: globaland regional exposures and health consequences. Lancet 2008;371: 24360.
2 Bhutta ZA, Ahmed T, Black RE, et al, or the Maternal and ChildUndernutrition Study Group. What works? Interventions or maternal andchild undernutrition and survival. Lancet 2008; 371: 41740.
3 Victora CG, Adair L, Fall C, et al, or the Maternal and Child UndernutritionStudy Group. Maternal and child undernutrition: consequences or adulthealth and human capital. Lancet 2008; 371: 34057.
Delivery platforms for sustained nutrition in Ethiopia
The 2013 Lancet Series on Maternal and Child
Nutrition emphasises the crucial importance o
scale-up o eective nutrition interventions through
health and community delivery platorms. The Series
acknowledges that strong health systems are central to
achievement o this goal, and or progress towards the
2015 Millennium Development Goals (MDGs).1 A broad
consensus exists about the need or strengtheningo health systems to meet the goals o the health-
related MDGs by 2015.1 Because disease-control
programmes and general health services oten
share common service-delivery platorms, they are
necessary and complementary in countries with
a high disease burden, especially in sub-Saharan
Arica.2,3 Some ndings have suggested that health and
nutrition programmes can strengthen health systems
and, similarly, that health systems can strengthen
programme implementation.47 Furthermore, or such
strengthening to take place, a system or platorm or
service delivery should be country led and owned to
ensure sustainability and eectiveness.
Published Online
June 6, 2013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
S0140-6736(13)61054-5
4 Bryce J, Coitinho D, Darnton-Hill I, et al, or the Maternal and ChildUndernutrition Study Group. Maternal and child undernutrition: eectiveaction at national level. Lancet 2008; 371: 51026.
5 Morris SS, Cogill B, Uauy R. Eective international action againstundernutrition: why has it proven so difcult and what can be done toaccelerate progress? Lancet 2008; 371: 60821.
6 Scaling Up Nutrition. A ramework or action. 2010. http://unscn.org/les/Activities/SUN/PolicyBrieNutritionScalingUpApril.pd (accessed April 2,2013).
7 Bezanson K, Isenman P. Scaling up nutrition: a ramework or action.Food Nutr Bull 2010; 31: 17886.
8 Black RE, Victora CG, Walker SP, et al, and the Maternal and Child NutritionStudy Group. Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight inlow-income and middle-income countries. Lancet 2013; published online
June 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60937-X.
9 Horton S, Steckel RH. Global economic losses attributable to malnutrition19902000 and projections to 2050. In: Lombard B, ed. How much haveglobal problems cost the world? A scorecard rom 1900 to 2050.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013 (in press).
10 Bhutta ZA, Das JK, Rizvi A, et al, The Lancet Nutrition Interventions ReviewGroup, and the Maternal and Child Nutrition Study Group. Evidence-basedinterventions or improvement o maternal and child nutrition: what canbe done and at what cost? Lancet 2013; published online June 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60996-4.
11 Ruel MT, Alderman H, and the Maternal and Child Nutrition Study Group.Nutrition-sensitive interventions and programmes: how can they help toaccelerate progress in improving maternal and child nutrition?Lancet 2013; published online June 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60843-0.
12 Gillespie S, Haddad L, Mannar V, Menon P, Nisbett N, and the Maternal andChild Nutrition Study Group. The politics o reducing malnutrition:building commitment and accelerating progress. Lancet 2013; publishedonline June 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60842-9.
13 Dube L, Pingali P, Webb P. Paths o convergence or agriculture, health, andwealth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109: 12294301.
14 WHO. Discussion paper. Proposed global targets or maternal, inant andyoung child nutrition. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2012.
15 Grantham-McGregor S, Cheung YB, Cueto S, et al. Developmental potential inthe rst 5 years or children in developing countries. Lancet 2007; 369: 6070.
Corbis
-
7/28/2019 Materna Child Nutrition
8/121
Comment
6 www.thelancet.com
In the past ew years, many countries have workedto develop systems and inrastructure at the most
decentralised level o services, and these investments
have enabled populations to access essential services
in sectors such as health, agriculture, education, and
social welare. Ethiopia is exemplary in this regard in
view o the countrys progress towards some o the
key MDGs, which is mainly attributable to a decentral-
ised service delivery platormthe Health Extension
Programme.8 Launched in 2003, this programme was
organised to provide uni versal access to primary health
care, mainly preventive services,6,7 through more than
38 000 government-salaried emale health extensionworkers. Two workers were placed in a health post
to serve each kebele (the smallest administrative
unit) o about 5000 people nationwide. Through
this programme new vaccines were introduced and
health services expanded, which improved health
and nutrition care practices, and investments were
made in education and social economic development,
contributing to a reduction in the number o child
deaths by nearly hal.9,10
The present estimate (supported by the Central
Statistical Agency) or the mortality rate in children
younger than 5 years in Ethopia is 77 per 1000 livebirths(compared with 166 in 2000 and 123 in 2005).11 On the
basis o the present trend, Ethiopia is predicted to meet
MDG 4, to reduce child mortality, by 2015, by having
a mortality rate in children younger than 5 years o
68 per 1000 livebirths.12 Furthermore, a comparison o
national levels o malnutrition in the 2000 and 2011
Ethiopia Demographic and Health Surveys (EDHS)
shows that stunting has declined rom 58% to 44%,
underweight rom 41% to 29%, and prevalence o
wasting rom 12% to 10%.10 Globally, the prevalence o
stunting in children younger than 5 years has allen by
36% in the past two decades, rom an estimated 40%in 1990, to 26% in 2011.9
To consolidate the gains and enhance the eectiveness
o the Health Extension Programme, the Government
o Ethiopia has designed a scaling-up strategy, in the
orm o a so-called health development army, which will
scale up documented best practices and use amilies as
role models. Such a strategy is based on social learning
theory whereby peer-to-peer modelling can dissemin-
ate emerging inormation and instil improved health-
seeking behaviours at community level.
The Health Extension Programme plays a crucial partin the success o the national nutrition programme and
strategy that was introduced in Ethiopia in 2008. The
community-based management o acute malnutrition
approach o the Health Extension Programme manages
more than 300 000 children in more than 10 000 health
posts annually, has provided vitamin A supplementation
and deworming tablets to 11 million children and
700 000 pregnant and lactating women every 6 months
since 200506, and distributes iron-olate supplemen-
tation targeted to reach 80% o pregnant women every
year.13 Interventions o the community-based nutrition
programme include inant and young child nutrition,and growth monitoring and promotion via the Triple A
cycle (assess the problem, analyse its causes and possible
solutions, and take appropriate action). The community-
based nutrition programme is currently being supported
in more than 300 ood-insecure woredas (districts),
reaching 1 500 185 (80%) children younger than 2 years.
Eorts o the community-based nutrition programme
have resulted in more than 50% o children in Ethiopia
being exclusively breasted (EDHS, 2011).10 However, the
proportion o children receiving a minimum acceptable
diet is only 4% in Ethiopia, show ing the urgent need to
nalise a national strategy or improvement o quantityand quality o complementary eeding.
The revised national nutrition programme spanning
201315 will address these challenges by emphasising
the rst 1000 days o lie, with a ocus on children
younger than 2 years, pregnant and lactating women,
and adolescent girls, to break the intergenerational
cycle o malnutrition. Furthermore, the revised pro-
gramme will emphasise actions or acceleration o
stunting reduction by ocusing on nutrition-sensitive
interventions in other development sectors such as
education, agriculture, social protection and womens
aairs, and civil society organisations and the privatesector. The role o health extension workers and the
health development army will continue to be central
to achievement o equitable access o all vulnerable
women and children to both curative and preventive
services, and to ensure that targets specied in the
health sector development plan IV o Ethiopia are met.13
Ethiopias actions have enabled development workers
to engage people at risk in an integrated manner
using a unied Health Extension Programme, enabling
achievement o great gains in child survival and
-
7/28/2019 Materna Child Nutrition
9/121
Comment
www.thelancet.com 7
nutrition. The Government o Ethiopia, on the basis oexperiences in the past 10 years o this programme and
the substantial improvements in nutritional status,
believes that even greater eorts can be made to reduce
stunting. The government will continue to optimise the
revised national nutrition programme and the global
eorts on nutrition such as Scaling Up Nutrition (SUN)
and Renewed Eorts Against Child Hunger (REACH),14
which are mechanisms to catalyse urther multisectoral
nutrition-sensitive actions beyond the health sector.
Nutrition, as one o many crucial indicators o health
status, should be used or close programmatic link-
ages and synergies between targeted social protectioninterventions. These synergistic actions across social
services will contribute towards increased resource
allocation or the national nutrition programme, and
ensure that sustainable interventions are scaled up to
improve ood and nutrition security.
*Ferew Lemma, Joan MatjiEthiopian Federal Ministry o Health, PO Box 1234, Addis Ababa,
Ethiopia (FL); and UNICEF Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia (JM)
We declare that we have no conicts o interest.
1 Singh A. Strengthening health systems to meet MDGs. Health Policy Plan
2006; 21: 32628.
Only collective action will end undernutrition
We are in a race against time to eradicate the global
scourge o undernutrition. Undernutrition cripples global
economic growth and development, and uture global
prosperity and security are intimately linked with our
ability to respond adequately to this urgent challenge.
The new Series in The Lancet shows that undernutrition
contributes to the deaths o about 3 million children
each year45% o the total.1 Its results stunt the physicalgrowth and lie chances o millions o people, and or
Arica and Asia estimates suggest that up to 11% o
national economic productivity is lost to undernutrition.2
The evidence provided in this Series should act as a
turning point to galvanise global action. The solution
lies largely in the early years o lie, when the oundations
or human potential are laidgetting the right nutrients
at the right time prevents undernutrition. The result is
heightened educational attainment, adult wages, and
economic productivity.
Women and girls are at the heart o this message.
As the bearers and carers o children, their health and
economic potential is entwined with that o uture
Published Online
June 6, 2013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
S0140-6736(13)61084-3
2 WHO. Everybodys business. Strengthening health systems to improvehealth outcomes: WHOs ramework or action. Geneva: World HealthOrganization, 2007.
3 WHO. The Global Fund strategic approach to health systems strengthening:report rom WHO to the Global Fund Secretariat. Geneva: World HealthOrganization, 2007.
4 Atun R, Bennett S, Duran A. When do vertical (stand-alone) programmeshave a place in health systems? Copenhagen: World Health OrganizationRegional Ofce or Europe and the European Observatory on HealthSystems and Policies, 2008.
5 Atun R, de Jongh T, Secci F, Ohiri K, Adeyi O. A systematic review o theevidence on integration o targeted health interventions into healthsystems. Health Policy Plan 2010; 25: 114.
6 Atun R, de Jongh T, Secci F, Ohiri K, Adeyi O. Integration o targeted healthinterventions into health systems: a conceptual ramework or analysis.Health Policy Plan 2010; 25: 10411.
7 Atun R, Menabde N. Health systems and systems thinking: In: Coker R,Atun R, McKee M, eds. Health systems and the challenge o communicablediseases: experiences rom Europe and Latin America. Berkshire, UK: Open
University Press, 2009: 12140.8 Wakabi W. Extension workers drive Ethiopias primary health. Lancet 2008;
372: 880.
9 UN Childrens Fund. Improving child nutrition: the achievable imperativeor global progress. New York: UNICEF, 2013.
10 Central Statistical Agency, ICF International. Ethiopia Demographic andHealth Survey 2011. March, 2012. http://measuredhs.com/pubs/pd/FR255/FR255.pd (accessed May 22, 2013).
11 WHO. Ethiopia: health prole. May, 2013. http://www.who.int/gho/countries/eth.pd (accessed May 22, 2013).
12 Ministry o Finance and Economic Development, UN Ethiopia. Child survival,health and nutrition. In: Nebede A, Pearson R, eds. Investing in boys and girlsin Ethiopia: past, present and uture, 2012. Ethiopia: UNICEF, 2012: 3553.
13 Federal Democratic Republic o Ethiopia, Ministry o Health. Health SectorDevelopment Program IV, 2010/112014/15. Addis Ababa: FederalDemocratic Republic o Ethiopia Ministry o Health, 2010.
14 REACH Partnership. Annual report 2012. 2012. http://www.reachpartnership.org/documents/312104/315126/REACH+Annual+Report+
2012?version=1.0 (accessed May 22, 2013).
For more on the SUN initiative
see http://scalingupnutrition.
org/resources-archive
Corbis
-
7/28/2019 Materna Child Nutrition
10/121
Comment
8 www.thelancet.com
generations. Unless girls grow well in early childhoodand adolescence and enter into motherhood well
nourished, are lent support during pregnancy,
protected rom heavy physical labour, and empowered
to breasteed and provide good ood or their
babies and toddlers, the intergenerational cycle o
undernutrition will not be broken. This Series shows
that poor maternal nutrition at conception and during
pregnancy is a major contributor to undernutrition in
childhood.1 Empowering women to make the right
choices or their health, and that o their children, is
crucial to solving this challenge.
Why is this such an urgent issue? Important demo-graphic changes are occurring in many countries with
high levels o undernutrition. The ratio o the work-
ing age to non-working age population is rising and
will peak in the next 20 years, and this increase in
the available workorce has substantially boosted
economic growth in many parts o the world.3 Any
such demographic dividend will be even greater in well-
nourished populations. Additionally, rapid urbanisation,
increased sedentary behaviour, and a transition in
dietary patterns has resulted in a ast rise o obesity in
middle-income and even low-income countries. This
Series emphasises that undernourished children are atincreased risk o becoming overweight and developing
non-communicable diseases such as diabetes in later
lie.1 Acting now brings a triple benet: it saves lives
today, maximises economic opportunity, and helps to
reduce obesity and chronic disease in the uture.
This Series shows that there are simple and
proven interventions that can substantially reduce
undernutrition and mortality in children. Many o
these interventions deliver an excellent return on
investment and should be delivered at scale without
delay. However, making a lasting eect on the root
causes o undernutrition will need more eort. Brazilsremarkable experience during the past 20 years shows
us that the right programmes need to be matched with
strong political leadership and determination. Brazils
success resulted rom a whole-government response,
a clear ocus on groups at greatest risk, strong civil
society engagement, and investments to track progress
and use data to strengthen accountability and inorm
policy choices.4
In addition to strong national action on under-
nutrition, we need to take a hard look at our global
agriculture and ood system. As the global populationrises, our ood system needs to keep pace with the
demand or both dietary energy and the essential
vitamins and minerals needed or human health. Our
agriculture and ood system needs to be protable or
armers and the wider ood sector, environmentally
sustainable, and directly supportive o the health and
nutritional needs o populations.
Everyone is part o the solution. Governments
need to lead; businesses need to identiy how to
improve nutrition through their business models
and employment practice; civil society organisations
need to help citizens to drive transparency andaccountability; and the scientic community needs to
keep us ocused on evidence about what works. Policy
commitments, capacity strengthening, and targeted
nancing are all essential.
Global eorts on ood and nutrition will likewise
be substantially boosted by a clear signal o nutrition
priorities in the post-2015 development agenda. This
agenda will do more than steer aid; it should provide
direction on global investment, buy in support rom the
private sector, and encourage a coherent approach rom
international institutions. Nutrition should be centrally
positioned in that agenda to ensure energy and nutrientneeds are met at each stage o lie.
The rst Lancet Series on maternal and child under-
nutrition, published in 2008, helped to start the race
to eradicate poor nutrition. In the past 5 years the
governments o 35 countries have committed to do
more to tackle undernutrition, and have joined the
Scaling Up Nutrition movement. On the last day o the
2012 Olympics, the governments o the UK and Brazil
co-hosted an event in London, UK, to generate political
momentum in the ght against undernutrition. On
June 8, 2013, the Nutrition or Growth high level event
in London will help to secure a global response thatwill include nancial, business, scientic, and political
commitments matched to the scale o the challenge.
Progress will be reviewed annually and again at the
Olympics in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 2016. We cannot
aord to miss this opportunity to act together to
beat undernutrition.
*Anna Taylor, Alan D Dangour, K Srinath ReddyUK Department or International Development, London
SW1A 2EG, UK (AT, ADD); Faculty o Epidemiology and Population
For Scaling Up Nutrition see
http://scalingupnutrition.org
For the frst LancetSeries on
maternal and child
undernutrition see http://www.
thelancet.com/series/maternal-
and-child-undernutrition
-
7/28/2019 Materna Child Nutrition
11/121
Comment
www.thelancet.com 9
Nutrition-sensitive food systems: from rhetoric to action
Action to improve the nutrition sensitivity o oodsystemsand thereby increase the nutritional value o
ood or people around the worldoers substantial
but underused opportunities.1,2 The rhetoric about such
opportunities brought about by the global ood crisis
in 200708 has not resulted in much new action, or
at least two reasons. First, goals other than improved
nutrition are pursued by strong economic and political
interests in both the agricultural sector and the post-
harvest value chain.3 Farmers and other economic
agents in ood systems aim to make money subject
to reasonable levels o risk, and governments pursue
policies that are compatible with the interests opolitically powerul stakeholder groups.4 Malnourished
populations are rarely among these interests.
The very high value o improved nutrition to
societies should be supported by alignments to create
compatibility between nutrition and economic goals
or armers and processors, and political momentum3
has to be created to oster policy interventions that
make ood systems nutrition sensitive. Governments
could pursue two kinds o policy action: they could
either change the behaviour o armers, consumers,
ood processors, and other economic agents in the
system through incentives, regulations, and knowledge;or they could accept present behaviours and introduce
health-specic and nutrition-specic interventions
to compensate or any nutritional damage done
or improvements orgone. Although changing o
behaviour is likely to be more cost-eective and
sustainable, the second option is the most common. For
example, ood-system policies and the private sector
promote inexpensive calories and expensive nutrients,
resulting in overweight and micronutrient deciencies.
Health and nutrition-specic interventions, such
as treatment o chronic diseases and micronutrientsupplementation, are introduced to remedy problems
that could have been avoided.
The appropriate policy interventions to change
behaviour will be context specic and might include
agricultural research to increase productivity o ruit
and vegetable cultivation and reduce micronutrient
deciency; taxes on sugar, sweeteners, and at to reduce
the prevalence o obesity; regulations or advertising
and promotion; and education about nutrition.5 In high-
income and rapidly growing low-income countries, the
agricultural sector has become or is rapidly becoming
a supplier o raw materials or the ood processingindustry, rather than a provider o ood or direct
consumption. As this transition proceeds, the potential
or improvements to nutrition through nutrition-
sensitive ood systems moves rom agriculture to the
post-harvest value chain. The transition amplies health
and nutrition risks by promotion o what Monteiro
Published OnlineJune 6, 2013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
S0140-6736(13)61053-3
BloombergviaGettyImages
Health and Leverhulme Centre or Integrative Research inAgriculture and Health, London School o Hygiene & Tropical
Medicine, London, UK (ADD); and Public Health Foundation o
India, New Delhi, India (KSR)
We declare that we have no conicts o interest.
1 Black RE, Victora CG, Walker SP, et al, and the Maternal and Child NutritionStudy Group. Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight inlow-income and middle-income countries. Lancet 2013; published online
June 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60937-X.
2 Horton S, Steckel RH. Malnutrition: Global economic losses attributable tomalnutrition 19002000 and projections to 2050. In: Lomborg B, ed.How much have global problems cost the world? A scorecard rom 1900 to2050. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013 (in press).
3 Eastwood R, Lipton M. Demographic transition in sub-Saharan Arica:how big will the economic dividend be? Popul Stud (Camb) 2011; 65: 935.
4 Monteiro CA, Benicio MH, Conde WL, et al. Narrowing socioeconomicinequality in child stunting: the Brazilian experience, 19742007.Bull World Health Organ 2010; 88: 30511.
-
7/28/2019 Materna Child Nutrition
12/121
Comment
10 www.thelancet.com
and colleagues call ultra-processed oods,6,7
resultingin unhealthy dietary patterns. However, policy action
to regulate and incentivise the ood industry to avoid
such negative health and nutrition eects and change
consumer preerences is very scarce.
A second reason or lack o action to improve nutrition
is the xation o the health and nutrition community
on randomised controlled trials (RCTs) as the only
legitimate source o evidence.8,9 Unortunately, RCTs
the gold standard in health researchare generally
impossible to apply to the ood system except in small,
usually unimportant, projects. Health and nutrition
eects resulting rom agricultural and other ood-system policies and programmes are very difcult to
assess with RCTs, partly because treatments cannot be
randomised and because the eect pathway is long. Yet
the most promising opportunities or improvement
o health and nutrition are undoubtedly ound in such
policies, and not in home gardens and other minor
projects which are amenable to study within the
ramework o randomised trials.
Although existing evidence obtained by other
approaches is deemed inconclusive1 and does not
support policy intervention, the pathways through
which ood systems can aect nutrition (positivelyor negatively) are well known. Furthermore, key
components making up these pathways, such as
incomes, prices, womens time allocation, dietary
diversity, advertising and promotion, and household
and individual behaviour have a substantial eect
on nutrition. Thus, i pathway analysis shows that
changes in the ood system improve one or more o
these componentseg, dietary diversity or womens
time allocationand such improvements reduce micro-
nutrient deciencies, is such evidence really acceptable
or policy guidance only i it is derived rom RCTs? I
so, the evidence will be limited to small ood-systems
In April, 2010, a policy brieScaling Up Nutrition:
A Framework or Actionwas released at the spring
meetings o the World Bank and International
Monetary Fund. It was a collective eort stimulated
by the publication in January, 2008, o The Lancets
Series on undernutrition. The Lancet Series encouraged
an emphasis on the 1000 day window rom the
start o pregnancy to a childs second birthday, with
interventions that are both cost-eective and yield
high returns or cognitive development, individual
adult earnings, and economic growth. A second Series
on nutrition, published in The Lancet,14 now explicitly
Global child and maternal nutritionthe SUN rises
Published Online
June 6, 2012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
S0140-6736(13)61086-7
For the Scaling Up Nutrition
policy briesee http://
scalingupnutrition.org/
wp-content/uploads/pdf/
SUN_Framework.pdf
programmes such as kitchen garden projects, whereasthe really important changes or nutrition, such as
prioritisation o agricultural research to enhance pro-
ductivity in ruit and vegetable cultivation so as to
reduce prices and improve micronutrient status, and
various policies to change womens time allocation or
prices o various oods, will be ignored because they
cannot be studied in RCTs.1,10
Per Pinstrup-AndersenDivision o Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca,
NY 14853, USA
I declare that I have no conicts o interest.
1 Ruel MT, Alderman H, and the Maternal and Child Nutrition Study Group.Nutrition-sensitive interventions and programmes: how can they help toaccelerate progress in improving maternal and child nutrition?Lancet 2013; published online June 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60843-0.
2 Pinstrup-Andersen P. Food systems and human health and nutrition:an economic policy perspective with a ocus on Arica. Oct 11, 2012. http://iis-db.stanord.edu/evnts/6697/Pinstrup-Andersen_10_11_12.pd(accessed May 2, 2013).
3 Gillespie S, Haddad L, Mannar V, Menon P, Nisbett N, and the Maternal andChild Nutrition Study Group. The politics o reducing malnutrition: buildingcommitment and accelerating progress. Lancet 2013; published online
June 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60842-9.
4 Pinstrup-Andersen P, Watson DD II. Food policy or developing countries:the role o government in global, national, and local ood systems. Ithaca,NY: Cornell University Press, 2011.
5 Herorth A, Jones A, Pinstrup-Andersen P. Prioritizing nutrition inagriculture and rural development: guiding principles or operationalinvestments. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2012.
6 Monteiro CA, Levy RB, Claro RM, deCastro IRR, Cannon G. Increasingconsumption o ultra-processed oods and likely impact on human health:evidence rom Brazil. Public Health Nutr2011; 14: 513.
7 Monteiro CA. Nutrition and health. The issue is not ood, nor nutrients, somuch as processing. Public Health Nutr2009; 12: 72931.
8 Bhutta ZA, Ahmed T, Black RE, et al, or the Maternal and ChildUndernutrition Study Group. What works? Interventions or maternal andchild undernutrition and survival. Lancet 2008; 371: 41740.
9 Bhutta ZA, Das JK, Rizvi A, et al, The Lancet Nutrition Interventions ReviewGroup, and the Maternal and Child Nutrition Study Group. Evidence-basedinterventions or improvement o maternal and child nutrition: what canbe done and at what cost? Lancet 2013; published online June 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60996-4.
10 Masset E, Haddad L, Cornelius A, Isaza-Castro J. A systematic review oagricultural interventions that aim to improve nutritional status ochildren. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute o
Education, University o London, 2011.
-
7/28/2019 Materna Child Nutrition
13/121
Comment
www.thelancet.com 11
shows that the solution to malnutrition relies on acollective eort in which all stakeholdersgovernments,
academia, civil society, UN system organisations,
oundations, development banks, and businessescarry
out specic roles in ensuring that interventions are
delivered equitably and at scale.
The policy brie, which quickly became known as the
SUN Framework, set the stage or the transormation
that is now happening in global nutrition. It called or
country-owned nutrition strategies and programmes;
urgent scaling up o evidence-based and cost-eective
interventions; integration o nutrition within national
strategies or gender equality, agriculture, ood security,social protection, education, water supply, sanitation,
and health care; and a substantial increase in domestic
support and external assistance or nutrition within the
ood security, social protection, and health sectors. The
SUN Road Map, prepared later in 2010 and revised in
2012, set out ways or a wide range o groups to work
together in sharpening, scaling up, and aligning their
responses to peoples nutritional needsand achieving
results.
Alongside the 1000 days advocacy partnership,
the SUN Movement was launched at the UN General
Assembly in September, 2010. It takes orward the SUNRoad Map by encouraging coherence and eectiveness
among all groups working or better nutrition; it is not
an initiative, project, or programme. By April, 2013,
35 countries had joined the SUN Movement with
commitments that are in line with the SUN Framework
and Road Map. These countries nutrition solutions
show the commitments o political leaders, whole-o-
society responses, careul tracking o progress, and the
benets o shared experience.
The second Lancet nutrition Series provides a range
o valuable insights as the SUN Movement moves
through 2013, a year dense with events that willmove nutrition to the heart o the development
agenda. It calls or a substantial increase o political
commitment in responding to the complex causes o
undernutrition. It recognises that the SUN Movement
has the potential to harness such change and yield
durable results.
The rst paper1 o the Series leaves no doubt as to
why nutrition is key or sustainable development
and the wellbeing o entire populations. The second
paper2 strengthens the arguments o the 2008 Lancet
Series by bringing additional evidence to support the
ocus on ensuring that all women, girls, and young
children are able to access specic interventions o
good quality; they should be included in mainstream
eorts or public health, amily planning, and water
and sanitation. The third paper3 sets the oundation
or evidence-based research into achieving outcomes
through nutrition-sensitive strategies in our keyareas: agriculture and ood, social security, early child
development, and classroom education. It draws on
the experience o countries that have made great
progress when stressing that gender and social
equality are the cornerstones o nutritional success.
By ocusing on the political context or eective
action, the ourth paper4 recalls that the realisation o
human rights, a commitment to equity, and gender
equality should be properly prioritised. It includes
important proposals or ways in which business can
best be engaged (and the challenges o doing so), and
encourages increased involvement o civil society at alllevels. It likewise underlines the need or governments
to increase their own accountability or ensuring
that people are able to achieve good nutrition and
to ensure the existence o a air and transparent
ramework or regulating any entity that mighteven
unwittinglyundermine nutritional justice.
At the May, 2012, World Health Assembly,
government representatives agreed ambitious
goals or reduction o all orms o malnutrition,
including obesity. This Lancet Series points out that
BloombergviaGet
tyImages
For the Lancets 2008 Series
on maternal and child
undernutrition see http://www.
thelancet.com/series/maternal-
and-child-undernutrition
For the SUN Movement Revised
Roadmap see http://
scalingupnutrition.org/wp-
content/uploads/2012/10/SUN-
Movement-Road-Map-
Septemeber-2012_en.pdf
For the 1000 days partnership
see http://www.thousanddays.
org
-
7/28/2019 Materna Child Nutrition
14/121
Comment
12 www.thelancet.com
these goals can only be achieved through improved
nutrition governance, more human resources, better
demonstration o results, and increased investments
rom domestic and international sources. In the past
3 years the SUN Movement has provided a platorm
to enable leaders to pledge to intensiy eorts or
improved nutrition. 2013 provides a once-in-a-lietime
opportunity to strengthen worldwide resolve or
improved nutrition, through commitments being made
in a series o international and regional events.
The publication o the second Lancet Series is
timely and reinorces the urgency or transormationo political commitment into actions that lead to
improvements in nutrition. The Series brings scientic
rigour to the challenge o equitable delivery o eective
services at scaleboth now and in the years to come.
The association between nutrition in early lie and
long-term health has been o interest or decades.
Since the articulation o the etal origins hypothesis by
David Barker and colleagues,1 there has been debateabout the implications o etal undernutrition and
early childhood growth on outcomes o importance
in adult health and risks o chronic diseases. Both
epidemiological and animal studies have shown that
the risk o metabolic syndrome is signicantly increased
ater exposure to suboptimum nutrition during crucial
periods o development.1 The importance o these
ndings greatly increased ater reports about the global
burden o non-communicable diseases and risk actorswere published in December, 2012.2
Evidence or the importance o early nutrition or
adult outcomes was derived initially rom obser-
vational cohort studies3 and was reafrmed by analysis
o outcome data rom several cohort studies in
2008.4 This analysis4 was ocused on a meta-analysis
o coefcients rom dierent sites: birthweight,
weight and length Z scores, and stunting at age
2 years. In The Lancet, Linda Adair and colleagues5
report ndings rom a study in which they pooled
data rom ve birth cohorts and investigated how
linear growth and relative weight gain in several ageranges aected adult outcomes. They report that
higher birthweight was associated with an adult body-
mass index o greater than 25 kg/m (odds ratio 128,
95% CI 121135) and a reduced likelihood o short
stature (049, 044054) and o not completing
secondary school (082, 078087). Faster linear
growth was also strongly associated with reduced
likelihood o short adult stature (age 2 years: 023,
020052; mid-childhood 039, 036043) and o
not completing secondary school (age 2 years: 074,AndrewAitchison/InPictures/Corbis
Early nutrition and adult outcomes: pieces of the puzzle
Published Online
March 28, 2013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
S0140-6736(13)60716-3
See Online/Articleshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
S0140-6736(13)60103-8
David NabarroSUN Movement Secretariat, Villa La Pelouse (2nd Floor), Palais Des
Nations, 1201 Geneva, Switzerland
I declare that I have no conicts o interest.
1 Black RE, Victora CG, Walker SP, et al, and the Maternal and Child NutritionStudy Group. Maternal and c hild undernutrition and overweight inlow-income and middle-income countries. Lancet 2013; published online
June 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60937-X.
2 Bhutta ZA, Das JK, Rizvi A, et al, The Lancet Nutrition Interventions ReviewGroup, and the Maternal and Child Nutrition Study Group. Evidence-basedinterventions or improvement o maternal and child nutrition: what canbe done and at what cost? Lancet 2013; published online June 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60996-4.
3 Ruel MT, Alderman H, and the Maternal and Child Nutrition Study Group.Nutrition-sensitive interventions and programmes: how can they help toaccelerate progress in improving maternal and child nutrition?Lancet 2013; published online June 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60843-0.
4 Gillespie S, Haddad L, Mannar V, Menon P, Nisbett N, and the Maternal andChild Nutrition Study Group. The politics o reducing malnutrition:building commitment and accelerating progress. Lancet 2013; publishedonline June 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60842-9.
-
7/28/2019 Materna Child Nutrition
15/121
Comment
www.thelancet.com 13
067078; mid-childhood 087, 083092). Fasterrelative weight gain was associated with an increased
risk o adult overweight (age 2 years: 151, 143160;
mid-childhood 176, 169191) and elevated blood
pressure (age 2 years: 107, 101113; mid-childhood:
122, 115130).
Notwithstanding the key ndings, several limitations
o this pooled analysis should be recognised. The
authors had to make do with disparate inormation
about socioeconomic status and income, and impute
some inormation that was missing. Although they
adjusted or maternal education and socioeconomic
status (largely assets rather than income), otherpotential conounding actors (eg, household and
learning environment) could not be assessed in relation
to attained schooling. Several additional limitations
preclude rm conclusions. Little or no inormation was
available about maternal nutrition and micronutrient
status. Additionally, Adair and colleagues do not
report any outcomes related to intrauterine growth
retardation or gestational age at birth, and merely
report association with birthweight, which might
be oversimplied. Being small or gestational age at
term, and especially preterm, has now been recognised
as a major risk actor or excess newborn and inantmortality6 and accounts or a substantial proportion
o child stunting.7 Prematurity is associated with
increased risks o metabolic syndromes in later lie.8
Potential variations in body composition o newborn
babies might not be captured by mere measurement o
birthweight or size. So-called thin-at inantsie, small
newborn babies that have elevated body at content
have been described9 and could be associated with
increased risks o insulin resistance in childhood.10
These limitations aside, Adair and colleagues nd-
ings5 are some o the most important rom existing
cohorts linking early childhood nutritionespeciallybirthweight and improved patterns o linear growth
with long-term outcomes. They have clear implications
or public health policy and nutrition interventions. As
shown by an analysis o evidence-based interventions, 11
a ocus on improvements in nutrition in pregnancy
and linear growth in the rst 2 years o lie could lead
to substantial reductions in stunting and improved
survival. These improvements orm the basis or the
emphasis on the rst 1000 days o lie, which has
been used eectively to scale up nutrition activities.12
However, this tenet could be too simplistic, becauseit ocuses on care during pregnancy and ignores the
vital contribution o maternal health and nutrition
in the periods beore and just ater conception to
intrauterine and postnatal growth. Evidence supports
an association between micronutrient supplemen-
tation around the time o conception and DNA
methylation13 and increased methylation o the IGF2
genes in childhood,14 indicating that these actors
could aect linear growth postnatally. Although
Adair and colleagues analysis o birth outcomes in
the international cohorts does not shed light on the
importance o maternal health and nutrition beoreconception, these actors might be just as important
as postnatal actors and should be investigated.
What is the way orward? Although the evidence
emerging rom observational studies such as Adair
and colleagues is important or policy, well designed
prospective studies with appropriate interventions and
ollow-up are clearly needed. The outcomes should
include elements o child development, education,
employment, and earnings, which would allow
improved estimation o eect on human capital.
Although expensive and difcult to organise and
implement, such cohort studies are a crucial investmentor the uture and, in view o the interest in human
development in the post-2015 era, should be prioritised
or unding.
Zulfqar A BhuttaDivision o Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi
74800, Pakistan
I declare that I have no conicts o interest.
1 Barker DJ. Sir Richard Doll lecture: developmental origins o chronic disease.Public Health 2012; 126: 18589.
2 Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, et al. A comparative risk assessment o burdeno disease and injury attributable to 67 risk actors and risk actor clustersin 21 regions, 19902010: a systematic analysis or the Global Burden oDisease Study 2010. Lancet 2012; 380: 222460.
3 Barker DJP, Godrey KM, Gluckman PD, Harding JE, Owens JA, Robinson JS.Fetal nutrition and cardiovascular disease in adult lie. Lancet 1993;341: 93841.
4 Victora CG, Adair L, Fall C, et al, or the Maternal and Child UndernutritionStudy Group. Maternal and child undernutrition: consequences or adulthealth and human capital. Lancet 2008; 371: 34057.
5 Adair LS, Fall CHD, Osmond C, et al, or the COHORTS group. Associationso linear growth and relative weight gain during early lie with adult healthand human capital in countries o low and middle income: ndings romve birth cohort studies. Lancet 2013; published online March 28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60103-8.
6 Marchant T, Willey B, Katz J, et al. Neonatal mortality risk associated withpreterm birth in East Arica, adjusted by weight or gestational age:individual participant level meta-analysis. PLoS Med 2012; 9: e1001292.
-
7/28/2019 Materna Child Nutrition
16/121
Comment
14 www.thelancet.com
7 Black RE, Victora CG, Walker SP, et al, and the Maternal and Child NutritionStudy Group. Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight inlow-income and middle-income countries. Lancet 2013; published online
June 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60937-X.
8 Parkinson JRC, Hyde M J, Gale C, Santhakumaran S, Modi N. Preterm birthand the metabolic syndrome in adult lie: a systematic review andmeta-analysis. Pediatrics 2013; published online March 18. DOI:10.1542/peds.2012-2177.
9 Yajnik CS, Fall CH, Coyaji KJ, et al. Neonatal anthropometry:the thin-at Indian babythe Pune Maternal Nutrition Study.Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2003; 27: 17380.
10 Lakshmi S, Metcal B, Joglekar C, Yajnik CS, Fall CH, Wilkin TJ. Dierences inbody composition and metabolic status between white UK and AsianIndian children (EarlyBird 24 and the Pune Maternal Nutrition Study).Pediatr Obes 2012; 7: 34754.
11 Bhutta ZA, Ahmed T, Black RE, et al, or the Maternal and ChildUndernutrition Study Group. What works? Interventions or maternal andchild undernutrition and survival. Lancet 2008; 371: 41740.
12 Save The Children. Nutrition in the rst 1000 days: state o the worldsmothers 2012. May, 2012. http://www.savethechildren.ca/document.doc?id=195 (accessed March 21, 2013).
13 Cooper WN, Khulan B, Owens S, et al. DNA methylation proling atimprinted loci ater periconceptional micronutrient supplementation inhumans: results o a pilot randomized controlled trial. FASEB J 2012;26: 178290.
14 Steegers-Theunissen RP, Obermann-Borst SA, Kremer D, et al.Periconceptional maternal olic acid use o 400 microg per day is related toincreased methylation o the IGF2 gene in the very young child. PLoS One2009; 4: e7845.
-
7/28/2019 Materna Child Nutrition
17/121
Series
www.thelancet.com 15
Maternal and Child Nutrition 1
Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in
low-income and middle-income countries
Robert E Black, Cesar G Victora, Susan P Walker, Zulfqar A Bhutta*, Parul Christian*, Mercedes de Onis*, Majid Ezzati*,
Sally Grantham-McGregor*, Joanne Katz*, Reynaldo Martorell*, Ricardo Uauy*, and the Maternal and Child Nutrition Study Group
Maternal and child malnutrition in low-income and middle-income countries encompasses both undernutrition anda growing problem with overweight and obesity. Low body-mass index, indicative o maternal undernutrition, hasdeclined somewhat in the past two decades but continues to be prevalent in Asia and Arica. Prevalence o maternaloverweight has had a steady increase since 1980 and exceeds that o underweight in all regions. Prevalence o stuntingo linear growth o children younger than 5 years has decreased during the past two decades, but is higher in south
Asia and sub-Saharan Arica than elsewhere and globally aected at least 165 million children in 2011; wastingaected at least 52 million children. Defciencies o vitamin A and zinc result in deaths; defciencies o iodine andiron, together with stunting, can contribute to children not reaching their developmental potential. Maternalundernutrition contributes to etal growth restriction, which increases the risk o neonatal deaths and, or survivors,o stunting by 2 years o age. Suboptimum breasteeding results in an increased risk or mortality in the frst 2 yearso lie. We estimate that undernutrition in the aggregateincluding etal growth restriction, stunting, wasting, anddefciencies o vitamin A and zinc along with suboptimum breasteedingis a cause o 31 million child deathsannually or 45% o all child deaths in 2011. Maternal overweight and obesity result in increased maternal morbidityand inant mortality. Childhood overweight is becoming an increasingly important contributor to adult obesity,diabetes, and non-communicable diseases. The high present and uture disease burden caused by malnutrition inwomen o reproductive age, pregnancy, and children in the frst 2 years o lie should lead to interventions ocused onthese groups.
Introduction
Maternal and child malnutrition, encompassing bothundernutrition and overweight, are global problems withimportant consequences or survival, incidence o acuteand chronic diseases, healthy development, and theeconomic productivity o individuals and societies.Maternal and child undernutrition, including stunting,wasting, and deciencies o essential vitamins andminerals, was the subject o a Series 15 in The Lancet in2008, which quantied their prevalence, short-term andlong-term consequences, and potential or reductionthrough high and equitable coverage o proven nutritioninterventions. The Series identied the need to ocus onthe crucial period o pregnancy and the rst 2 years oliethe 1000 days rom conception to a childs secondbirthday during which good nutrition and healthy growthhave lasting benets throughout lie. The 2008 Series alsocalled or greater national priority or nutrition pro-grammes, more integration with health programmes,enhanced intersectoral approaches, and more ocusand coordination in the global nutrition system o inter-national agencies, donors, academia, civil society, and theprivate sector. 5 years ater that series, we intend notonly to reassess the problems o maternal and childundernutrition, but also to examine the growing problemso overweight and obesity or women and children andtheir consequences in low-income and middle-incomecountries (LMICs). Many o these countries are said tosuer the so-called double burden o malnutrition, with
continuing stunting o growth and deciencies o essential
nutrients along with obesity in national populations andwithin amilies. We also want to assess national progressin nutrition programmes and international actions con-sistent with our previous recommendations.
Published Online
June 6, 2013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
S0140-6736(13)60937-X
This is the frst in a Series o
our papers about maternal and
child nutrition
*Members listed alphabetically
Members listed at end o paper
Johns Hopkins University,
Bloomberg School of Public
Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
(Pro R E Black MD,
Pro P Christian DrPH,
Pro J Katz ScD);Universidade
Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas,
Rio Grande do Sol, Brazil
(Pro C G Victora MD);The
University of the West Indies,
Tropical Medicine Research
Institute, Mona Campus,
Kingston, Jamaica
(Pro S P Walker PhD);
The Aga Khan University andMedical Center, Department of
Pediatrics, Karachi, Pakistan
(Pro Z A Bhutta PhD);World
Key messages
Iron and calcium deciencies contribute substantially to maternal deaths
Maternal iron deciency is associated with babies with low weight (
-
7/28/2019 Materna Child Nutrition
18/121
Series
16 www.thelancet.com
Health Organization,
Department of Nutrition for
Health and Development,
Geneva, Switzerland
(M de Onis MD);Imperial College
of London, St Marys Campus,
School of Public Health,
MRC-HPA Centre for
Environment and Health,
Department of Epidemiology
and Biostatistics, London, UK
(Pro M Ezzati PhD);Institute o
Child Health, University College
London, London, UK (Pro
S Grantham-McGregor FRCP); The
University o the West Indies,
Mona, Jamaica
(Pro S Grantham-McGregor);
Emory University, Atlanta, GA,
USA (Pro R Martorell PhD); and
London School of Hygiene and
Tropical Medicine, London, UK
(Pro R Uauy PhD)
Correspondence to:
Pro Robert Black, Johns Hopkins
University, Bloomberg School o
Public Health, Baltimore,
MD 21205, USA
The present Series is guided by a ramework (gure 1)that shows the means to optimum etal and child growthand development, rather than the determinants oundernutrition as shown in the conceptual modeldeveloped by UNICEF and used in the 2008 Series.1 Thisnew ramework shows the dietary, behavioural, andhealth determinants o optimum nutrition, growth, anddevelopment and how they are aected by underlyingood security, caregiving resources, and environmentalconditions, which are in turn shaped by economic andsocial conditions, national and global contexts, resources,and governance. This Series examines how thesedeterminants can be changed to enhance growth anddevelopment. These changes include nutrition-specicinterventions that address the immediate causes o
suboptimum growth and development. The rameworkshows the potential eects o nutrition-sensitive inter-ventions that address the underlying determinants omalnutrition and incorporate specic nutrition goalsand actions. It also shows the ways that an enablingenvironment can be built to support interventions andprogrammes to enhance growth and development andtheir health consequences. In the rst paper we assessthe prevalence o nutritional conditions and their healthand development consequences. We deem a lie-courseperspective to be essential to conceptualise the nutritionaleects and benets o interventions. The nutritionalstatus o women at the time o conception and duringpregnancy is important or etal growth and development,
and these actors, along with nutritional status in the rst2 years o lie, are important determinants o both
undernutrition in childhood and obesity and relateddiseases in adulthood. Thus, we organise this paper toconsider prevalence and consequences o nutritionalconditions during the lie course rom adolescence topregnancy to childhood and discuss the implications oradult health. In the second paper, we describe evidencesupporting nutrition-specic interventions and the healtheects and costs o increasing their population coverage.In the third paper we examine nutrition-sensitive inter-ventions and approaches and their potential to improvenutrition. In the ourth paper we examine the eatures oan enabling environment that are needed to providesupport or nutrition programmes and how they can beavourably changed. Finally, in a Comment6 we willexamine the desired national and global response to
address nutritional and developmental needs o womenand children in LMICs.
Prevalence and consequences o nutritionalconditionsAdolescent nutritionAdolescent nutrition is important to the health o girlsand is relevant to maternal nutrition. There are 12 billionadolescents (aged 1019 years)in the world, 90% o whomlive in LMICs. Adolescents make up 12% o the populationin industrialised countries, compared with 19% in LMICs(appendix p 2 shows values or ten countries studied indepth).7 Adolescence is a period o rapid growth andmaturation rom childhood to adulthood. Indeed, some
researchers have argued that adolescence is a periodwith some potential or height catch-up in children with
Figure 1: Framework or actions to achieve optimum etal and child nutrition and development
Morbidity andmortality in childhood
Cognitive, motor,socioemotional development
Breastfeeding, nutrient-rich foods, and eatingroutine
Nutrition specificinterventionsand programmes Adolescent health and
preconception nutrition Maternal dietary
supplementation
Micronutrientsupplementation orfortification
Breastfeeding andcomplementary feeding
Dietary supplementationfor children
Dietary diversification Feeding behaviours and
stimulation Treatment of severe acute
malnutrition Disease prevention and
management Nutrition interventions in
emergencies
Feeding and caregivingpractices, parenting,stimulation
Low burden ofinfectious diseases
Food security, includingavailability, economicaccess, and use of food
Feeding and caregivingresources (maternal,household, andcommunity levels)
Knowledge and evidencePolitics and governance
Leadership, capacity, and financial resourcesSocial, economic, political, and environmental context (national and global)
Access to and use ofhealth services, a safe andhygienic environment
School performanceand learning capacity
Adult stature
Obesity and NCDs
Work capacityand productivity
Benefits during the life course
Optimum fetal and child nutrition and development Nutrition sensitiveprogrammes and approaches Agriculture and food security Social safety nets Early child development Maternal mental health Womens empowerment
Child protection Classroom education Water and sanitation Health and family planning services
Building an enabling environment Rigorous evaluations Advocacy strategies Horizontal and vertical coordination Accountability, incentives regulation,
legislation Leadership programmes Capacity investments Domestic resource mobilisation
See Online or appendix
-
7/28/2019 Materna Child Nutrition
19/121
Series
www.thelancet.com 17
stunting rom early childhood.8 Adolescent ertility isthree times higher in LMICs than in high-income coun-tries. Pregnancies in adolescents have a higher risk ocomplications and mortality in mothers9 and children10and poorer birth outcomes than pregnancies in olderwomen.10,11 Furthermore, pregnancy in adolescence willslow and stunt a girls growth.12,13 In some countries, asmany as hal o adolescents are stunted (height-or-ageZscore [HAZ]
-
7/28/2019 Materna Child Nutrition
20/121
Series
18 www.thelancet.com
pregnancy was inversely associated with all-cause mater-nal mortality up to 42 days post-partum ater adjustingor numerous actors. An inverse association existsbetween maternal height and the risk o dystocia (dicultlabour), as measured by cephalopelvic disproportion orassisted or caesarean deliveries.1923
Figure 2 also shows trends or overweight and obesityin women aged 2049 years in dierent UN regions.Oceania, Europe, and the Americas had the highestproportion o overweight and obese women; howevernorthern and southern Arica, and central and west Asiaalso had high prevalences (appendix p 3).
Maternal obesity leads to several adverse maternal andetal complications during pregnancy, delivery, andpost-partum.24 Obese pregnant women (pre-pregnant
BMI 30 kg/m) are our times more likely to developgestational diabetes mellitus and two times more likely todevelop pre-eclampsia compared with women with aBMI 185249 kg/m2).2528 During labour and delivery,maternal obesity is associated with maternal death,haemorrhage, caesarean delivery, or inection;2931 and ahigher risk o neonatal and inant death,32 birth trauma,and macrosomic inants.3337 In the post-partum period,obese women are more likely to delay or ail to lactate andto have more weight retention than women o normalweight.38 Obese women with a history o gestationaldiabetes have an increased risk o subsequent typetwo diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and cardio vasculardisease.39 The early intrauterine environment has a role in
programming phenotype, aecting health in later lie.Maternal overweight and obesity at the time o pregnancyincreases the risk or childhood obesity that continuesinto adolescence and early adulthood, potentiating thetransgenerational transmission o obesity.40,41
Maternal vitamin decienciesAnaemia and ironAnaemia (haemoglobin
-
7/28/2019 Materna Child Nutrition
21/121
Series
www.thelancet.com 19
previous analysis) showed that the odds ratio (OR) ormaternal deaths was 071 (95% CI 060085) or a10 g/L great