maximizing patent term - fish patent term powerpoint... · ... seeking to obtain a patent will...
TRANSCRIPT
STR
ATE
GIE
S FO
R
MA
XIM
IZIN
G P
ATE
NT
TE
RM
SAM
UE
L S.
WO
OD
LE
Y, P
H.D
. Fi
sh &
Ric
hard
son
“Sta
ndar
d” P
aten
t Ter
m (3
5 U
.S.C
. §15
4(a)
) –
Beg
ins w
hen
pate
nt is
sues
–
Ends
“20
yea
rs fr
om fi
ling”
–
20 y
ears
from
dat
e w
hen
the
appl
icat
ion
for p
aten
t was
file
d in
the
Uni
ted
Stat
es, o
r –
20 y
ears
from
dat
e w
hen
first
non
-pro
visi
onal
, prio
rity
appl
icat
ion
filed
in
the
Uni
ted
Stat
es (f
or d
ivis
iona
l, co
ntin
uing
and
con
tinua
tion-
in-p
art a
pplic
atio
ns)
–Fi
ling
date
of U
.S. p
rovi
sion
al a
pplic
atio
n(s)
and
fore
ign
prio
rity
appl
icat
ions
und
er P
aris
Con
vent
ion
not c
onsi
dere
d w
hen
calc
ulat
ing
20
year
exp
iratio
n da
te
–“D
ate
whe
n fil
ed in
the
Uni
ted
Stat
es”
is
–D
ate
whe
n no
n-pr
ovis
iona
l app
licat
ion
filed
in th
e U
.S. P
aten
t and
Tra
dem
ark
Off
ice,
or
–D
ate
PCT
appl
icat
ion
desi
gnat
ing
Uni
ted
Stat
es w
as fi
led
2 2
Bey
ond
the
Stan
dard
20
Yea
rs
Pate
nt T
erm
Adj
ustm
ent (
PTA
) –
Gov
erne
d by
35
U.S
.C. §
154
(b)
–M
eant
to c
ompe
nsat
e fo
r USP
TO d
elay
s exa
min
ing
and
issu
ing
pate
nt
–En
sure
s tha
t “no
app
lican
t dili
gent
ly se
ekin
g to
obt
ain
a pa
tent
will
re
ceiv
e a
term
of l
ess t
han
17 y
ears
”
Pate
nt T
erm
Ext
ensi
on (P
TE)
–G
over
ned
by 3
5 U
.S.C
. § 1
56
–M
eant
to c
ompe
nsat
e fo
r del
ays i
n re
gula
tory
app
rova
l pro
cess
for
phar
mac
eutic
al a
nd o
ther
pro
duct
s sub
ject
to p
re-m
arke
t app
rova
l
Tota
l Pat
ent T
erm
= “
Stan
dard
Ter
m”
+ PT
A +
PTE
3
Pate
nt T
erm
Adj
ustm
ent (
PTA
)
PTA
= (D
ays o
f PTO
Del
ay) –
(Day
s of A
pplic
ant D
elay
) –
Can
hav
e da
ys a
dded
to p
aten
t ter
m, b
ut c
an n
ever
hav
e da
ys
subt
ract
ed (P
TA ≥
0)
–PT
A =
0 if
app
lican
t del
ay e
qual
s or e
xcee
ds P
TO d
elay
Elig
ibili
ty:
–A
vaila
ble
to a
pplic
atio
ns fi
led
on o
r afte
r May
29,
200
0 –
For U
.S. n
atio
nal p
hase
app
licat
ions
, PC
T fil
ing
date
mus
t be
on o
r af
ter M
ay 2
9, 2
000
Rul
es a
nd R
egul
atio
ns G
over
ning
PTA
: –
37 C
.F.R
. §§
1.70
2 –
1.70
5 –
M.P
.E.P
. §§
2730
- 27
36
4
The
AB
C’s
of P
aten
t Ter
m A
djus
tmen
t
35 U
SC 1
54(b
)(1)
(A) –
“A
Del
ay”
–PT
O fa
ilure
to ti
mel
y is
sue
Off
ice
Act
ions
, or
repl
y to
App
lican
t’s re
spon
ses t
o O
ffic
e A
ctio
ns
35 U
SC 1
54(b
)(1)
(B) –
“B
Del
ay”
–PT
O fa
ilure
to is
sue
pate
nt w
ithin
thre
e ye
ars f
rom
app
licat
ion
filin
g
35 U
SC 1
54(b
)(1)
(C) –
“C
Del
ay”
–D
elay
resu
lting
from
•
App
eal (
BPA
I or F
eder
al C
ourt)
•
Inte
rfer
ence
s •
Secr
ecy
Ord
ers
5
“A D
elay
” - 3
5 U
SC 1
54(b
)(1)
(A)
PTO
has
: –
14 m
onth
s to
issu
e 1st
Off
ice
Act
ion
•A
Res
trict
ion
Req
uire
men
t or O
A o
n m
erits
, not
Not
ice
to F
ile M
issi
ng P
arts
•
Mea
sure
d fr
om a
ctua
l fili
ng d
ate
for a
pplic
atio
ns u
nder
35
USC
111
(a)
•Fo
r app
licat
ions
und
er 3
5 U
SC 3
71 (P
CT
Nat
iona
l Pha
se)
–M
easu
red
from
dat
e on
whi
ch P
CT
appl
icat
ion
“ful
fille
d th
e re
quire
men
ts
of se
ctio
n 37
1” 3
5 U
SC 1
54(b
)(1)
(A)(
i)(II
) –
PTO
mea
sure
s fr
om c
ompl
etio
n of
all
§ 37
1(c)
requ
irem
ent
(can
be
late
r tha
n da
te N
atio
nal P
hase
com
men
ces)
–4
mon
ths t
o •
repl
y to
resp
onse
or a
ppea
l by
appl
ican
t •
issu
e ac
tion
afte
r BPA
I dec
isio
n •
issu
e pa
tent
afte
r iss
ue fe
e pa
ymen
t
Star
ts a
ccum
ulat
ing
day
afte
r dea
dlin
e 6
“B D
elay
” –
35 U
SC 1
54(b
)(1)
(B)
For d
elay
due
to P
TO fa
ilure
to is
sue
pate
nt w
ithin
3 y
ears
of
“act
ual f
iling
dat
e of
the
appl
icat
ion
in th
e U
nite
d St
ates
” 35
USC
154
(b)(
1)(B
) –
Star
ts a
ccum
ulat
ing
on d
ay a
fter a
pplic
atio
n pe
ndin
g fo
r 3 y
ears
Even
ts th
at st
op th
e “3
yea
r clo
ck”
–Fi
ling
an R
CE
stop
s 3 y
ear c
lock
fore
ver
•C
an g
et “
B D
elay
” on
ly fo
r tim
e be
fore
RC
E fil
ing
date
–In
terf
eren
ce (m
ay re
cove
r tim
e as
“C
Del
ay”)
–
Secr
ecy
Ord
er (m
ay re
cove
r tim
e as
“C
Del
ay”)
–
Not
ice
of A
ppea
l •
May
reco
ver t
ime
as “
C D
elay
” on
ly fo
r “su
cces
sful
” ap
peal
7
“Jap
an T
obac
co”
Issu
e H
ow to
mea
sure
3 y
ear p
ende
ncy
(for
“B
Del
ay”)
–
For a
pplic
atio
ns u
nder
35
USC
111
(a)
•M
easu
red
from
act
ual f
iling
dat
e in
USP
TO
–Fo
r app
licat
ions
und
er 3
5 U
SC 3
71 (P
CT
Nat
iona
l Pha
se)
•R
egul
atio
ns sa
y m
easu
re fr
om w
hen
“nat
iona
l sta
ge c
omm
ence
d un
der 3
5 U
SC
371(
b) o
r (f)
” 3
7 C
FR 1
.702
(b) (
emph
asis
add
ed)
–PT
O p
ract
ice
had
been
to m
easu
re fr
om w
hen
natio
nal s
tage
co
mpl
eted
und
er 3
5 U
SC 3
71(c
)!!
F&R
cha
lleng
ed fo
r US
7,46
5,44
4 (J
apan
Tob
acco
) –
PTO
gra
nted
pet
ition
, adj
uste
d PT
A
–PT
O is
sues
form
al n
otic
e ac
know
ledg
ing
“Jap
an T
obac
co”
erro
r •
“in
proc
ess”
of c
orre
ctin
g th
e pr
oble
m
•Pa
tent
ees m
ust f
ile re
ques
t for
cor
rect
ion
with
in 2
mon
ths a
fter p
aten
t gra
nt
•N
o pr
ovis
ion
for r
etro
activ
e re
med
y 8
“C D
elay
” –
35 U
SC 1
54(b
)(1)
(C)
For d
elay
s due
to
–In
terf
eren
ces
–Se
crec
y or
ders
–
App
eals
•
App
eal m
ust r
esul
t in
final
dec
isio
n by
Boa
rd o
r Fed
eral
Cou
rt, re
vers
ing
the
reje
ctio
n of
at l
east
one
cla
im
9
Cal
cula
ting
PTA
: O
verla
ppin
g D
elay
Per
iods
Th
e st
atut
e [3
5 U
SC 1
54(b
)(2)
(A)]
: –
To th
e ex
tent
that
per
iod
of “
A D
elay
” an
d “B
Del
ay”
over
lap,
the
perio
d of
adj
ustm
ent s
hall
not e
xcee
d th
e ac
tual
num
ber o
f day
s the
is
suan
ce o
f the
pat
ent w
as d
elay
ed
–Pr
even
ts d
oubl
e co
untin
g w
here
ther
e is
ove
rlap
in “
A”
and
“B”
Del
ay
–PT
O in
terp
rete
d as
ent
ire p
erio
d w
hen
appl
icat
ion
is p
endi
ng
•G
rant
ed p
aten
tees
A D
elay
or B
Del
ay, w
hich
ever
was
larg
er, b
ut n
ot b
oth
Wye
th v
. Kap
pos (
591
F.3d
136
4 (F
ed. C
ir., J
an. 2
010)
): –
Ove
rrul
ed P
TO in
terp
reta
tion
of st
atut
e –
Pate
ntee
is e
ntitl
ed to
the
addi
tion
of “
A”
and
“B”
Del
ay to
ext
ent
they
do
not o
ccur
on
the
sam
e ca
lend
ar d
ay(s
) 10
Wye
th v
. Kap
pos
Incr
ease
s PTA
for m
any
pate
nts p
endi
ng m
ore
than
thre
e ye
ars
–“B
” D
elay
doe
s not
beg
in to
acc
rue
until
app
licat
ion
is p
endi
ng m
ore
than
thre
e ye
ars
–A
pplic
ant a
lso
entit
led
to a
ny “
A”
Del
ay o
ccur
ring
durin
g fir
st th
ree
year
s of p
rose
cutio
n Ja
n. 2
0, 2
010:
PTO
and
DO
J ann
ounc
e th
ey w
ill n
ot a
ppea
l, m
akin
g Fe
d. C
ir. d
ecis
ion
final
Ja
n. 2
6, 2
010:
PTO
pub
lishe
s int
erim
pro
cedu
re fo
r cal
cula
ting
PTO
per
Wye
th
–Pr
ovid
es te
mpo
rary
gra
ce p
erio
d fo
r sel
ecte
d pa
tent
s –
Onl
y ap
plic
able
to p
aten
ts is
sued
prio
r to
Mar
. 2, 2
010
whe
re re
ques
t fo
r rec
alcu
latio
n is
file
d w
ithin
180
day
s of g
rant
•
i.e.,
for p
aten
ts g
rant
ed fr
om a
bout
Sep
t. 3,
200
9 to
Mar
. 2, 2
010
11
App
lican
t Del
ays
PTA
redu
ced
by “
the
perio
d of
tim
e du
ring
whi
ch th
e ap
plic
ant f
aile
d to
eng
age
in re
ason
able
eff
orts
to c
oncl
ude
pros
ecut
ion
of th
e ap
plic
atio
n” 3
5 U
SC 1
54(b
)(2)
(C)
12
Com
mon
App
lican
t Del
ays
Filin
g re
spon
se m
ore
than
thre
e m
onth
s afte
r PTO
Off
ice
Act
ion
mai
led
•Ev
ery
day
afte
r 3- m
onth
dat
e co
unts
(wee
kend
s, ho
liday
s, et
c.)
•E.
g., f
iling
resp
onse
on
Mon
day
whe
n th
ree
mon
th d
ue d
ate
is S
atur
day
coun
ts a
s 2
days
of A
pplic
ant D
elay
Inco
mpl
ete
repl
y •
e.g.
, non
-res
pons
ive
and
non-
com
plia
nt a
men
dmen
ts
Subm
ittin
g su
pple
men
tal r
eply
Su
bmitt
ing
IDS
afte
r res
pons
e to
Off
ice
Act
ion,
unl
ess
•Fi
led
w/in
30
days
of a
ctio
n in
cou
nter
part
fore
ign
appl
icat
ion,
and
•
All
art f
irst c
ited
in th
e fo
reig
n ac
tion
13
Rev
iew
and
Cor
rect
ion
of P
TA
At A
llow
ance
–
PTO
cal
cula
tes P
TA “
to d
ate”
and
indi
cate
s on
Not
ice
of A
llow
ance
•
Onl
y A
and
C D
elay
cal
cula
ted
at th
is st
age
–A
pplic
ant m
ust c
halle
nge
any
PTA
err
ors b
y pe
titio
n on
or b
efor
e pa
ymen
t of t
he Is
sue
Fee
(37
CFR
1.7
05(b
))
•Pa
tent
gen
eral
ly d
oes n
ot is
sue
until
PTO
dec
ides
pet
ition
At I
ssua
nce
–PT
O c
alcu
late
s any
oth
er d
elay
that
has
occ
urre
d af
ter a
llow
ance
(in
clud
ing
any
B D
elay
) –
Pate
ntee
mus
t cha
lleng
e an
y ad
ditio
nal P
TA a
war
ded
at is
suan
ce
with
in 2
mon
ths o
f iss
ue d
ate
(37
CFR
1.7
05(d
))
14
App
eal o
f PTA
Det
erm
inat
ion
App
lican
t dis
satis
fied
with
fina
l det
erm
inat
ion
of P
TA b
y Pa
tent
and
Tra
dem
ark
Off
ice
–M
ay a
ppea
l by
civi
l act
ion
in D
.D.C
. –
App
eal m
ust b
e m
ade
with
in 1
80 d
ays a
fter t
he g
rant
of t
he p
aten
t –
No
appe
al o
r cha
lleng
e of
PTA
by
third
par
ties
PTO
ofte
n ha
s not
con
clud
ed fi
nal r
evie
w o
f PTA
mat
ters
ra
ised
at i
ssua
nce
by th
e 18
0-da
y de
adlin
e –
App
lyin
g 18
0-da
y de
adlin
e to
B D
elay
mat
tes w
ould
ofte
n ca
use
civi
l act
ion
to b
e fil
ed b
efor
e re
ceiv
ing
PTO
’s fi
nal d
ecis
ion
15
App
eal A
fter P
aten
t Iss
ues
The
Stat
ute:
–
35 U
SC 1
54(b
)(4)
(A):
“app
lican
t dis
satis
fied
with
a d
eter
min
atio
n m
ade
by th
e D
irect
or u
nder
par
agra
ph (3
) sha
ll ha
ve re
med
y by
a c
ivil
actio
n ag
ains
t the
Dire
ctor
fled
in th
e U
nite
d St
ates
Dis
trict
Cou
rt fo
r the
D
istri
ct o
f Col
umbi
a” (e
mph
asis
add
ed)
–35
USC
154
(b)(
3): “
Dire
ctor
shal
l – (i
) mak
e a
dete
rmin
atio
n of
the
perio
d of
any
pat
ent t
erm
adj
ustm
ent u
nder
this
subs
ectio
n, a
nd sh
all
tran
smit
a no
tice
of th
at d
eter
min
atio
n w
ith th
e w
ritte
n no
tice
of
allo
wan
ce.”
(em
phas
is a
dded
) N
ovar
tis v
. Kap
pos
–C
ivil
actio
n fil
ed Ju
ly 6
, 201
0 –
Cha
lleng
es P
TA c
alcu
late
d fo
r pat
ents
issu
ed b
efor
e W
yeth
•
All
pate
nts-
in-s
uit i
ssue
d m
ore
than
180
day
s bef
ore
civi
l act
ion
filed
16
Nov
artis
v. K
appo
s
Lega
l The
ory
Pres
ente
d by
Nov
artis
–
Stat
ute’
s 180
-day
dea
dlin
e fo
r app
eal a
pplie
s onl
y to
PTA
det
erm
inat
ion
mad
e in
con
junc
tion
with
not
ice
of a
llow
ance
•
PTA
cal
cula
tion
at is
suan
ce is
not
a d
eter
min
atio
n “u
nder
par
agra
ph (3
) of s
tatu
te
•18
0-da
y de
adlin
e in
appl
icab
le to
B-D
elay
det
erm
inat
ions
–N
ovar
tis la
cked
kno
wle
dge
of P
TO’s
impr
oper
inte
rpra
tatio
n of
stat
ute
–D
isco
very
of e
rror
cou
ld n
ot h
ave
occu
rred
prio
r to
Wye
th
–A
dmin
istra
tive
Proc
edur
e A
ct (A
PA) b
arrs
civ
il ac
tion
com
men
ced
mor
e th
an si
x ye
ars a
fter r
ight
of a
ctio
n ac
crue
s (pa
tent
issu
es)
Succ
ess w
ould
mea
n pa
tent
s with
Wye
th e
rror
s cou
ld b
e co
rrec
ted
even
if n
ot d
isco
vere
d un
til m
ore
than
180
day
s afte
r pat
ent
issu
ance
17
Pate
nt T
erm
Ext
ensi
on (P
TE)
Purp
ose
is to
rem
edy
loss
of p
aten
t ter
m d
ue to
del
ays i
n re
gula
tory
pro
cess
es fo
r pha
rmac
eutic
als a
nd o
ther
pro
duct
s su
bjec
t to
pre-
mar
ket a
ppro
val
Gov
erne
d by
: –
Stat
ute:
35
USC
§15
6 –
PTO
Rul
es a
nd R
egul
atio
ns
•37
CFR
§§
1.71
0 - 1
.791
•
MPE
P §§
275
0-27
64
18
Elig
ibili
ty fo
r PTE
Elig
ible
pat
ents
mus
t cla
im:
–A
pro
duct
subj
ect t
o re
gula
tory
revi
ew b
efor
e co
mm
erci
al m
arke
ting
or u
se
•H
uman
dru
gs, a
ntib
iotic
dru
gs a
nd h
uman
bio
logi
cs
•Fo
od a
dditi
ves a
nd c
olor
add
itive
s •
Med
ical
dev
ices
•
Ani
mal
dru
g pr
oduc
ts
•V
eter
inar
y bi
olog
ical
pro
duct
s
–M
etho
d of
usi
ng p
rodu
ct su
bjec
t to
regu
lato
ry re
view
–
Met
hod
of m
anuf
actu
ring
prod
uct s
ubje
ct to
regu
lato
ry re
view
19
Elig
iblit
y fo
r PTE
(con
t’d)
Prod
uct m
ust h
ave
been
subj
ect t
o re
gula
tory
revi
ew b
efor
e co
mm
erci
al m
arke
ting
or u
se
Prod
uct m
ust b
e sp
ecifi
cally
reci
ted
in th
e cl
aim
–
Can
not r
ely
on “
com
pris
ing”
lang
uage
to a
rgue
pro
duct
is in
here
ntly
in
clud
ed.
•Se
e, fo
r exa
mpl
e, V
usio
n (U
S 4,
911,
932)
, Mar
ch 1
9, 2
009.
–Pa
tent
cla
imin
g m
etab
olite
of a
ppro
ved
prod
rug
is n
ot e
ligib
le
•Th
e cl
aim
ed in
gred
ient
mus
t be
pres
ent i
n dr
ug-p
rodu
ct w
hen
adm
inis
tere
d •
Hoe
schs
t-Rou
ssel
Pha
rmac
eutic
als,
Inc.
v. L
ehm
an, 1
09 F
.3d
756
(Fed
. Cir.
199
7)
–U
ncle
ar if
pat
ent o
nly
clai
min
g pr
oduc
t/use
/man
ufac
ture
by
equi
vale
nts (
but n
ot li
tera
lly) i
s elig
ible
for P
TE
20
Elig
ibili
ty fo
r PTE
(con
t’d)
Onl
y gr
ante
d pa
tent
s elig
ible
for P
TE
–C
an n
ot fi
le P
TE a
pplic
atio
n un
til p
aten
t iss
ues
Mus
t file
app
licat
ion
for P
TE b
efor
e pa
tent
exp
ires
–C
an fi
le b
efor
e re
gula
tory
app
rova
l if p
aten
t wou
ld e
xpire
bef
ore
end
of re
view
per
iod
Mus
t file
app
licat
ion
for P
TE w
/in 6
0 da
ys a
fter a
ppro
val
Onl
y on
e PT
E gr
ante
d pe
r pro
duct
per
pat
ent
–Pa
tent
mus
t not
hav
e be
en p
revi
ousl
y gr
ante
d PT
E un
der §
156
–
If p
aten
t cov
ers t
wo
dist
inct
pro
duct
s, an
d bo
th a
re su
bjec
t to
regu
lato
ry re
view
, onl
y on
e ex
tens
ion
of th
e pa
tent
is p
ossi
ble
21
Reg
ulat
ory
Del
ay P
erio
d
Leng
th o
f reg
ulat
ory
revi
ew p
erio
d ca
lcul
ated
by
FDA
It is
the
sum
of:
–T
estin
g Ph
ase
= D
ate
IND
bec
ame
effe
ctiv
e fr
om d
ate
ND
A fi
led
-- a
nd --
–
App
rova
l Pha
se =
Dat
e N
DA
file
d un
til d
ate
appr
oved
22
Cal
cula
ting
PTE
USP
TO c
alcu
late
s PTE
bas
ed o
n re
gula
tory
revi
ew p
erio
d –
Subt
ract
s fro
m re
gula
tory
revi
ew p
erio
d:
•Ti
me
appl
ican
t did
not
act
with
due
dili
genc
e •
Tim
e be
fore
pat
ent i
ssue
d
–PT
E =
(½ x
Tes
ting
Phas
e) +
App
rova
l Pha
se
–M
axim
um P
TE =
5 y
ears
–
Can
not r
esul
t in
tota
l rem
aini
ng p
aten
t ter
m o
f mor
e th
an 1
4 ye
ars
•M
easu
red
from
dat
e of
regu
lato
ry a
ppro
val t
o da
te o
f exp
iratio
n w
ith P
TE a
nd
any
PTA
Exte
nsio
n pe
riod
runs
from
exp
iratio
n da
te o
f pat
ent
–A
s sho
rtene
d by
any
term
inal
dis
clai
mer
, or
–A
s ext
ende
d by
Pat
ent T
erm
Adj
ustm
ent
23
One
PTE
per
Pro
duct
per
Pat
ent
Onl
y on
e PT
E gr
ante
d pe
r pro
duct
per
pat
ent
–Pa
tent
mus
t not
hav
e be
en p
revi
ousl
y gr
ante
d PT
E un
der §
156
–
If p
aten
t cov
ers t
wo
dist
inct
pro
duct
s, an
d bo
th a
re su
bjec
t to
regu
lato
ry re
view
, onl
y on
e ex
tens
ion
of th
e pa
tent
is p
ossi
ble
If a
ppro
ved
prod
uct c
over
ed b
y m
ultip
le p
aten
ts, o
nly
one
can
be e
xten
ded
–B
ut, p
aten
tee
can
subm
it m
ore
than
one
app
licat
ion
base
d on
sam
e re
gula
tory
per
iod
–PT
O w
ill a
sk a
pplic
ant t
o ch
oose
whi
ch p
aten
t to
exte
nded
–
If a
pplic
ant d
oes n
ot re
spon
d, fi
rst p
aten
t to
expi
re is
ext
ende
d
24
Firs
t Com
mer
cial
Mar
ketin
g or
Use
Prod
uct m
ust h
ave
been
subj
ect t
o re
gula
tory
revi
ew b
efor
e co
mm
erci
al m
arke
ting
or u
se
–N
o PT
E w
here
pat
ent c
laim
s com
bina
tion
of tw
o pr
evio
usly
ap
prov
ed d
rugs
•
Arno
ld P
artn
ersh
ip v
. Dud
as, 3
62 F
.3d
1338
(Fed
. Cir.
200
4)
•N
o PT
E fo
r Vic
opro
fen
(com
bina
tion
of ib
upro
fen
and
hydr
ocod
one)
•
At l
east
one
of t
wo
activ
e in
gred
ient
s in
com
bina
tion
mus
t be
new
to m
arke
tpla
ce
as a
dru
g pr
oduc
t
–N
o PT
E w
here
pat
ent c
laim
s new
form
ulat
ion
of p
revi
ousl
y ap
prov
ed “
prod
uct”
•
Fiso
ns P
LC v
. J. Q
uigg
, 876
F.2
d 99
(Fed
. Cir.
198
9)
25
Act
ive
“Ing
redi
ent”
“Dru
g pr
oduc
t” =
act
ive
ingr
edie
nt o
f new
dru
g –
“inc
ludi
ng a
ny sa
lt or
est
er o
f the
act
ive
ingr
edie
nt”
[35
USC
§ 1
56(f
)(2)
]
PTE
not p
ossi
ble
whe
re a
“sa
lt” o
r “es
ter”
of a
ctiv
e in
gred
ient
was
pre
viou
sly
appr
oved
B
ut, w
here
“sa
lt” o
f act
ive
ingr
edie
nt h
ad b
een
prev
ious
ly
appr
oved
, pat
ent c
over
ing
an “
este
r” o
f the
act
ive
ingr
edie
nt
still
elig
ible
for e
xten
sion
–
New
pro
duct
not
a “
salt”
or “
este
r” o
f the
pre
viou
sly
appr
oved
pr
oduc
t –
Gla
xo O
pera
tions
UK
Ltd
. v. Q
uigg
, 894
F.2
d 39
2 (F
ed. C
ir. 1
990)
26
Scop
e of
Pro
tect
ion
Dur
ing
PTE
Onl
y “u
se a
ppro
ved
for t
he p
rodu
ct”
is p
rote
cted
dur
ing
PTE
(35
USC
§ 1
56(b
)(1)
) Fo
r pat
ent c
over
ing
met
hod
of m
anuf
actu
ring
prod
uct,
prot
ectio
n lim
ited
to m
etho
d us
ed in
mak
ing
the
appr
oved
pr
oduc
t –
To in
frin
ge p
rodu
ct-b
y-pr
oces
s cla
ims,
mus
t man
ufac
ture
pro
duct
by
proc
ess r
ecite
d in
cla
ims.
Mus
t ND
A h
olde
r man
ufac
ture
pro
duct
by
sam
e pr
oces
s?
–Pr
obab
ly n
ot
27
Scop
e of
Pro
tect
ion
Und
er P
TE (c
ont’d
) A
ctiv
e “m
oiet
y” v
. Act
ive
“ing
redi
ent”
–
Act
ive
“moi
ety”
app
roac
h fo
r PTE
enf
orce
men
t doe
s not
requ
ire
sam
e ac
tive
ingr
edie
nt in
as t
he a
ppro
ved
prod
uct
Pfiz
er, I
nc. v
. Dr.
Redd
y’s L
abs.
Ltd.
, 359
F.3
d 16
1 (F
ed. C
ir. 2
004)
–
PTE
for p
aten
t cov
erin
g am
lodi
pine
bes
ylat
e an
d am
lodi
pine
m
alea
te (s
alts
of a
mlo
dipi
ne)
–A
ppro
ved
prod
uct w
as N
orva
sc®
(am
lodi
pine
bes
ylat
e)
–D
r. R
eddy
’s so
ught
app
rova
l of a
mlo
dipi
ne m
alea
te
–PT
E co
vere
d pr
oduc
ts w
ith a
ctiv
e m
oiet
y (a
mlo
dipi
ne) a
nd sa
lts
(bes
ylat
e an
d m
alea
te)
Inco
nsis
tent
with
Gla
xo O
pera
tions
UK
Ltd
. v. Q
uigg
, 894
F.2
d 39
2 (F
ed. C
ir. 1
990)
? 28
Act
ive
“Ing
redi
ent”
v. A
ctiv
e “M
oiet
y”
Phot
ocur
e AS
A v.
Kap
pos,
603
F.3d
137
2 (F
ed. C
ir. 2
010)
–
Prev
ious
ly m
arke
ted
drug
pro
duct
was
Lev
ulan
Ker
astic
k®
(am
inol
evul
inic
aci
d H
Cl o
r “A
LA h
ydro
chlo
ride”
) top
ical
solu
tion
–Ph
otoc
ure
soug
ht P
TE fo
r reg
ulat
ory
appr
oval
of M
etvi
xia®
(m
ethy
l am
inol
evul
inat
e H
Cl o
r “M
AL
hydr
ochl
orid
e”)
•M
ethy
l est
er o
f ALA
hyd
roch
lorid
e
–PT
O d
enie
d PT
E ap
plic
atio
n •
Sam
e ac
tive
moi
ety
(am
inol
evul
inat
e or
“A
LA”)
in b
oth
prod
ucts
–C
ourt
reve
rses
•
“Act
ive
ingr
edie
nt”
in 3
5 U
SC 1
56 d
oes n
ot m
ean
“act
ive
moi
ety”
•
Act
ive
ingr
edie
nt w
as M
AL
hydr
ochl
orid
e, a
new
dru
g (d
iffer
ent f
rom
ALA
hyd
roch
lorid
e)
29
Act
ive
“Ing
redi
ent”
v. A
ctiv
e “M
oiet
y”
(con
t’d)
Mus
t wha
t is e
xten
ded
be th
e sa
me
as w
hat i
s cov
ered
dur
ing
the
exte
nsio
n?
–PT
E gr
ante
d if
no p
revi
ous c
omm
erci
al m
arke
ting
or u
se o
f the
ac
tive
ingr
edie
nt (i
nclu
ding
its s
alts
and
est
ers)
as a
dru
g pr
oduc
t •
Phot
ocur
e AS
A v.
Kap
pos,
603
F.3d
137
2 (F
ed. C
ir. 2
010)
-- b
ut --
–
PTE
enfo
rced
aga
inst
all
prod
ucts
con
tain
ing
the
sam
e ac
tive
moi
ety
as p
rodu
ct su
bjec
t to
regu
lato
ry re
view
•
Pfiz
er, I
nc. v
. Dr.
Redd
y’s L
abs.
Ltd.
, 359
F.3
d 16
1 (F
ed. C
ir. 2
004)
30
Stra
tegi
es to
Max
imiz
e Pa
tent
Ter
m
Max
imiz
e PT
A b
y m
inim
izin
g ap
plic
ant d
elay
–
File
resp
onse
s on
or b
efor
e th
ree-
mon
th d
eadl
ine
•A
void
usi
ng w
eeke
nd/h
olid
ay c
arry
-ove
rs
•U
se o
f ful
l 3 m
onth
per
iod,
with
out e
xcee
ding
, may
incr
ease
pen
denc
y tim
e w
ithou
t pen
aliz
ing
for A
pplic
ant D
elay
–A
void
inco
mpl
ete/
non-
com
plia
nt re
plie
s –
Avo
id su
pple
men
tal a
men
dmen
ts/re
spon
ses
–Fi
le e
lect
roni
cally
–
File
Info
rmat
ion
Dis
clos
ure
Stat
emen
ts
•B
efor
e re
ceip
t of f
irst o
ffic
e ac
tion
•W
ith re
ply
to n
on-f
inal
off
ice
actio
n (I
DS
filed
afte
r res
pons
e is
trea
ted
as “
supp
lem
enta
l rep
ly”)
•
With
in 3
0 da
ys o
f for
eign
off
ice
actio
n (w
ith c
ertif
icat
ion
unde
r 37
CFR
1.7
04(d
))
31
Stra
tegi
es fo
r Max
imiz
ing
Pate
nt T
erm
(c
ont’d
) A
void
Req
uest
ing
Con
tinue
d Ex
amin
atio
n (R
CEs
) –
Filin
g R
CE
perm
anen
tly st
ops t
he 3
yea
r clo
ck fo
r PTA
–
Petit
ion
to h
ave
final
ity o
f off
ice
actio
n w
ithdr
awn
(if a
ppro
pria
te)
•Fi
nal O
ffic
e A
ctio
n in
appr
opria
te if
exa
min
er m
akes
a n
ew re
ject
ion
not
nece
ssita
te b
y A
pplic
ant’s
pre
viou
s am
endm
ent
•E.
g., a
men
dmen
t onl
y ca
ncel
ing
depe
nden
t cla
ims a
nd a
men
ding
inde
pend
ent
clai
ms t
o re
cite
the
canc
eled
dep
ende
nt c
laim
lim
itatio
ns
32
Stra
tegi
es fo
r Max
imiz
ing
Pate
nt T
erm
Pros
ecut
ion
by A
ppea
l: –
Con
side
r fili
ng a
Not
ice
of A
ppea
l and
App
eal B
rief i
nste
ad o
f RC
E –
If a
ppea
l goe
s to
Boa
rd, C
-Del
ay a
vaila
ble
if de
cisi
on fa
vora
ble
to
App
lican
t •
Onl
y ne
ed to
reve
rse
one
clai
m re
ject
ion
–Ex
amin
er m
ay re
open
pro
secu
tion,
issu
e ne
w O
ffic
e A
ctio
n •
Can
resp
ond
to n
ew O
ffic
e A
ctio
n or
rein
stat
e ap
peal
•
If A
pplic
ant r
espo
nds,
any
C-d
elay
acc
rued
dur
ing
appe
al p
roce
ss is
lost
, but
A-
and
B-D
elay
still
ava
ilabl
e
–In
terv
iew
Exa
min
er to
strik
e de
al
–Ex
amin
er “
thro
ws i
n th
e to
wel
” an
d al
low
s
33
Stra
tegi
es fo
r Max
imiz
ing
PTA
Avo
id U
nnec
essa
ry T
erm
inal
Dis
clai
mer
s –
Filin
g Te
rmin
al d
iscl
aim
er m
ay li
mit
or e
limin
ate
PTA
–
Con
side
r fili
ng st
rate
gies
to m
inim
ize
over
lap
that
mig
ht c
reat
e do
uble
pat
entin
g •
E.g.
, fili
ng to
incr
ease
Res
trict
ion
Req
uire
men
ts a
nd re
spon
ding
with
out t
rave
rse
•D
oubl
e pa
tent
ing
reje
ctio
n ov
er d
ivis
iona
l app
licat
ions
not
app
ropr
iate
(w
ith so
me
exce
ptio
ns)
File
com
plet
e N
atio
nal P
hase
app
licat
ions
–
14-m
onth
clo
ck fo
r firs
t Off
ice
Act
ion
does
not
star
t unt
il ap
plic
atio
n is
“co
mpl
ete”
–
Con
side
r fili
ng a
con
tinua
tion,
rath
er th
an N
atio
nal P
hase
, of P
CT
34
Pate
nt F
iling
Stra
tegi
es
File
new
app
licat
ions
as p
rodu
cts d
evel
oped
and
impr
oved
–
New
form
ulat
ions
of e
xist
ing
drug
s –
New
com
bina
tions
of e
xist
ing
drug
s –
Ster
eose
lect
ivity
, sin
gle
enan
tiom
ers
–N
ew in
dica
tions
Mus
t be
new
and
non
-obv
ious
ove
r exi
stin
g pa
tent
ap
plic
atio
ns a
s prio
r art
–U
npub
lishe
d U
S ap
plic
atio
n no
t prio
r art
if sa
me
inve
ntor
s or s
ame
oblig
atio
n to
ass
ign
[35
USC
103
(c)]
–
Publ
ishe
d ap
plic
atio
ns m
ay b
e pr
ior a
rt un
der §
102(
a) o
r §10
2(b)
35
Pate
nt F
iling
Stra
tegi
es (c
ont’d
)
File
firs
t as p
rovi
sion
al a
pplic
atio
ns
–Fi
le a
s non
-pro
visi
onal
one
yea
r lat
er
–Pa
tent
term
20-
year
s fro
m fi
rst n
on-p
rovi
sion
al fi
ling
–B
uys a
n ex
tra y
ear o
f pat
ent t
erm
Avo
id fi
ling
Con
tinua
tions
-in-P
art (
CIP
s)
–C
IP p
aten
t ter
m is
20-
year
s fro
m fi
rst n
on-p
rovi
sion
al to
whi
ch it
cl
aim
s prio
rity
•ev
en if
firs
t non
-pro
visi
onal
doe
s not
des
crib
e or
ena
ble
the
CIP
’s in
vent
ion
–Pr
iorit
y ap
plic
atio
n m
ay b
e “p
rior a
rt” a
gain
st C
IP if
prio
rity
does
no
t des
crib
e an
d en
able
inve
ntio
n cl
aim
ed in
CIP
•
e.g.
, CIP
cla
ims o
bvio
us o
ver p
ublis
hed
prio
rity
appl
icat
ion
or o
ver u
npub
lishe
d pr
iorit
y ap
plic
atio
n w
ith d
iffer
ent i
nven
tors
(and
diff
eren
t obl
igat
ions
to a
ssig
n) 36