mba 406 syllabus fall 2011[1]
TRANSCRIPT
1
1
MBA 406 - MBA Integrative Experience
William Forster, Ph.D.
Fall 2011
Office: Rauch #369 Course: MBA 406
Office Hours: Thurs 9:15 am - 12:00 pm Schedule: Tuesday 6:10-9:00pm – Rauch 261
All other days/times by appt.
E-mail [email protected] Phone: (610) 758-3435
Course Description The MBA Integrative Experience is places an emphasis on strategic management as a key tool
for creating and sustaining organizational competitive advantage. By taking the point of view of the
general manager, we will view the organization from an overall perspective in the context of the firm’s
internal and external environment. We will examine historical perspectives, contemporary theories, and
practical applications all in the spirit of helping you develop a broad understanding of strategic
management issues and solutions. This course will expose you to rigorous theoretical analysis while
providing you with hands-on, simulated real world business experience.
As the capstone experience in the College of Business & Economics’ MBA program, this course
requires that you integrate the concepts, knowledge, and skills acquired in previous functional courses
and creatively apply them toward understanding and analyzing strategic management issues.
Course Goals By the end of the course, MBA students will be able to:
1) Embrace a general management perspective – think strategically.
2) Develop a working knowledge of crucial strategic management concepts.
3) Hone basic skills for analyzing strategic issues.
4) Formulate and solve complex unstructured organizational problems.
5) Advance competence in a variety of primary and supporting organizational functions (i.e.
the firm’s value chain),
6) Refine self-directed work team skills such as setting and implementing agendas,
understanding other people's perspectives, and dealing with people over whom you have
no formal authority.
7) Sharpen written and verbal communication skills in order to more effectively inform and
influence target audiences.
8) Develop an understanding of the global nature of business.
9) Develop an understanding of sustainability initiatives in business management under the
broad scope of businesses ethics.
10) Discuss the steps in resolving ethical dilemmas in business.
The course objectives will be achieved through an array of methods including case discussions, in-class
discussions/assignments, case analyses, lectures, and a business simulation competition. The business
simulation competition requires thoughtful and timely decisions in order for you to successfully start and
operate a business firm in the computer hardware industry.
Course Readings The text offers a comprehensive and contemporary treatment of the field of strategic
management. The assigned cases from the back of the text must be completed in preparation for our
class meetings. By coming to class prepared, we will have a lively dialogue on the subject matter that
2
2
will serve to raise our collective level of understanding. You will also find that our text will be
especially useful in providing you with in-depth guidance for your team case analyses and business
simulation assignments.
Text: Hitt, Ireland, and Hoskisson (2011). Strategic Management: Competitiveness and Globalization,
9th Edition, Southwestern Publishing. ISBN: 978-1-4390-4230-4.
Business Simulation Software Certificate: ―International Corporate Management with outsourcing‖
version of Marketplace Business Simulation, ISBN: 0-744413-6-8, Innovative Learning, Inc. (available
at University Bookstore)
Additional readings from current articles as posted on CourseSite.
Preparation
This is not a traditional lecture based course. The course will consist primarily of participant-centered
case discussions and student-led analysis. Each week we will discuss a case in some depth as a class,
trying to understand the issues the organizations and their managers face. Your classmates and I expect
you to attend and be well prepared for each class, having read the required conceptual material and
analyzed the assigned case study ahead of time. We also expect you to play an active role in class
discussion. If all class members prepare for, and actively participate in, each class discussion, we will
all learn more from each other and enjoy the course more. Short, occasional lectures will supplement
the cases by suggesting different frameworks and tools that may be useful in addressing the issues
illustrated in the cases. I will cold call on students to open the class and to continue the discussion of the
case. Adequate preparation is essential for the case method to be effective.
Case discussions are intended to present dilemmas as they are encountered by managers, so it is
important to deal with the cases as you find them (i.e. no ―Monday morning quarterbacking‖ based on
knowledge of what happened after the time frame of the case). In case discussion, the present tense
should be interpreted as referring to the time frame of the case or its end. In evaluating the cases, you
should use the concepts and models discussed in the text. Learning how to apply these concepts and
models is essential for success in this class. Ideas from both the current day’s reading and from prior
readings are often useful in the case analysis.
Typical Class Outline
Instructor Led Case Discussion: The first half of most class sessions will be an instructor led case
discussion and lecture. You are expected to have read and thoroughly prepared the first case of each
evening. In a case based course such as this one, it is imperative that everyone be familiar with the case
at hand and be ready to jump into the discussion with his or her own thoughts, perspectives, and
analyses. Most of your class contribution grade will be based on the quantity and quality of your case
based discussions. For guidelines on analyzing an organization and addressing case analyses issues,
refer to "Preparing an Effective Case Analysis" found in your Hitt, et al., textbook. Effective
presentations should follow these guidelines and incorporate the appropriate course material, such as
critical events, financial data, and the like. To help you with these case analyses assignments, we will
spend time in our first class meeting discussing case analyses and the "more fine-grained" key points
that should be considered in your analyses and presentations.
Student Led Case Presentations: The second half of most classes will consist of student presented
cases and case discussions. Each student team will present a case once during the semester. Even if you
are not presenting the case, you are still expected to be generally familiar with it. Teams presenting each
case need to have carefully read the assigned case and to prepare an analysis addressing the strategic
3
3
issues highlighted in the case. In addressing the strategic issues, be sure to carefully consider the case
facts and integrate as much course material as appropriate. Teams presenting are required to prepare a
concise, high-level summary of the case and to present their case analysis and recommendations. Each
team is also required to lead class discussion after their presentation (20-25 minute presentation, ~10
minute discussion). The grading rubric for all team presentation can be found at the end of this syllabus
at attachment 2.
Course Requirements
Class Contribution: Our on-going dialogue each week and in-class assignments demand your
active involvement. Your class contribution grade will be based on both the quantity and quality of your
in class participation during case and other discussions. The easiest way to earn class contribution
points is to perform a thorough case analysis, and express your insights during our case discussions.
You should read, analyze, and be ready to discuss every instructor led case in this course. We will talk
about what constitutes a quality comment during our first class, and around mid-term in the course, you
will provide me with a one-page write-up that will serve as your Class Participation Self-Appraisal. I
will review your write-up and offer comments to you to let you know how you are performing with
regards to class contribution.
Individual Case Analysis: You will select one case from the student led case presentations (not
the one your group is presenting) and prepare an individual analysis of the case before the case is
presented. This written cases analysis should be less than 20 pages long (double spaced not including
charts), and should focus on the areas of the case you find the most important. During the student led
case presentation, I will ask for any insights you may have in addition to the ones highlighted by the
team presenting the case. This is an individual assignment and should be entirely your own work -you
should not use ideas, input, or materials from anyone else. The grading criteria can be found in
attachment 3 at the end of this syllabus.
Teamwork: The class will be assigned into groups of 3-6 members per team. Team assignments
will be made during our first class meeting. The teams will remain intact for the case analysis
assignment and business simulation game competition and presentations. As you already know,
successful teamwork requires that each member be flexible and responsive to others in terms of
temperament, abilities, and schedules. Moreover, it is imperative that each team member work together
in order to maximize your team’s success and the amount of fun to be had from these experiences.
Since these are team projects, I will assign a group grade based on my evaluation and the evaluation of
your peers. The peer evaluations will come from your teammates and from class members not on your
team. For the graded, team based portions of this class do not work with anyone other than your
teammates, the instructor, and the TA. If you have questions on acceptable collaboration, please never
hesitate to ask.
Team Business Simulation Game Competition. The team business simulation competition
requires that your team run a simulated business organization from start-up to maturity. In doing so,
your team will formulate and implement strategic decisions on a weekly basis for twelve decision
periods. Your team's decisions are due into the Marketplace’s Processing Center no later than 12 noon
on the required day. Once the processing center has all your teams’ decisions, they will process your
decisions and distribute the results to you and me within 24 hours, more often within an hour that same
day.
Each team will be competing against the other teams in our class. Your objective is to maximize
your firm's performance based on the nine criteria contained in the game’s ―Balanced Scorecard‖. The
ten criteria include: 1) total business performance, 2) financial performance, 3) market performance, 4)
marketing effectiveness, 5) investments in the firm’s future, 6) human resource management 7) creation
4
4
of wealth, 8) asset management, 9) manufacturing productivity, and 10) financial risk. To continually
blend and integrate our readings with the business simulation competition, the in-class case analysis
assignments will sometimes require that you consider certain aspects of your team's simulation game
results, decision processes and decision rationale.
Team Business Plan Presentation – As part of the simulation, each team is required to create a
comprehensive business plan presentation for their firm. You will give a presentation to Professor
Forster (no more than 20 minutes in length). Additionally, as part of your team’s business plan, each
team is to conduct both a Financial Comparison and Strategic/Tactical Comparison between their
simulated PC firm and a real firm in the computer hardware industry of your choosing (e.g., Dell,
Gateway, HP, Apple, IBM). The required elements for the Financial and Strategic/Tactical Comparisons
are included in attachment 1 at the end of this syllabus. Please provide a copy of your slides at the time
of the presentation.
Team Final Oral Report
Each team is also required to present a "Final Report on Operations". This requires an oral, high-
level presentation to the entire class (no more than 30 minutes in length). Although a formal written
Final Report of Operations is not required, a copy of your presentation should be supplied to Professor
Forster. The Final Report on Operations should encompass four areas: 1) Executive Overview. 2)
Summary of Operations. 3) Summary of Financial Results. 4) Future Plans. Suggestions for the "Final
Report on Operations" will be provided in class.
Finally, I understand that the case analysis and the business simulation game are outcome-
oriented, however, your grade depends heavily on your ability to support your actions and
recommendations. Logical, persuasive arguments are critical to receiving a good grade. All possible
recommendations and decisions involve tradeoffs that need to be addressed in analyses and class
presentations.
5
5
Course Grading Framework
(I) Class Participation 100 points
(I) Individual Case Analysis 50 points
(T) Team Case Presentation 50 points
(T) Final Presentations 30 points
(T) Business Simulation 70 points
Business Plan Presentation 20 Points
Simulation Performance 50 points
( >class median = full pts, < class median=1/2 pts)
Total Business Performance = 12 pts
Financial Performance = 6 pts
Market Performance = 6 pts
Marketing Effectiveness = 4 pts
Investments in Firm’s Future = 4 pts
Human Resource Management = 2pts
Creation of Wealth = 6 pts
Asset Management = 4 pts
Manufacturing Productivity = 4 pts
Financial Risk = 2 pts
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL POINTS 300 points
(I) = Individual Grade (T) = Team Grade
Final grades will be based on the following percentage system:
92% - 100% = A
90% - 91.9% = A-
87% - 89.9% = B+
82% - 86.9% = B
80% - 81.9% = B-
70% - 79.9% = C
Less than 70 % = F
Note: Grades of C- and below may not be used toward your MBA degree. Any student receiving a
grade of C- or below in an MBA core course must repeat the course to be eligible for graduation.
Rebuttals to Grading Any controversies regarding the grading of class participation, the Business Plan, Final Report
on Operations, and/or Business Game Results must be approached through a typed, one-two page paper
submitted to Professor Forster detailing the reason(s) for consideration of additional points. Additional
points may be awarded based on the logic and thoroughness of your argument as well as any supporting
documentation that you can provide which will help substantiate your position. My number one
priority is to ensure that each of you is evaluated fairly and that your grades in this course
accurately reflect the quantity and quality of your contributions. By insisting that any grading
controversies be approached in this manner, we transform a potentially unpleasant activity into a
positive, learning experience.
6
6
Policies
The work you do in this course—either your teamwork or your individual work--- must be your
own. This means that you must be aware when you are building on someone else’s ideas and
acknowledge when you do so. This includes the ideas of your classmates, your professor, and the
authors you read. If you ever have questions about drawing the line between others’ work and your
own, ask me and I will give you clear guidance or you may visit Lehigh’s ―Navigating Information‖
page at http://www.lehigh.edu/library/infolit/tutorials.
You are responsible for all material covered and all announcements made during each class.
Missing class is NOT a valid reason for not being aware of any additional assignments or modifications
to this syllabus.
Statement of Disabilities
If you have a disability for which you are or may be requesting accommodations, please contact
both your instructor and the Office of Academic Support Services, University Center 212 (610-758-
4152) as early as possible in the semester. You must have documentation from the Academic Support
Services office before accommodations can be granted.
Changes
The course syllabus provides a general plan for the course; deviations may be necessary and will be
communicated in class and over CourseSite.
Announcements
Please keep an eye on your e-mail and CourseSight for class specific announcements.
7
7
(Tentative) COURSE SCHEDULE
Please check CourseSite for the current schedule
1st Half of Class 2nd Half of Class
30 Aug Course Introduction HIH: Chapter 1: Strategic Management
Marketplace Simulation Introduction Appendix: Case Analysis
Choose Teams Case: New York Times
Simulation: Quarter 1 Due at Noon on Friday
6 Sep HIH: Chapter 2 - External Environment
HIH: Chapter 3 - Internal Environment
Case: Pro Clean Student Led Case: Nintendo
Simulation: Quarter 2 Due at Noon on Tuesday
13 Sep HIH: Chapter 4 - Business Level Strategy
HIH: Chapter 5 - Competitive Strategy
Case: Nucor Student Led Case: Southwest
Simulation: Quarter 3 Due at Noon
20 Sep HIH: Chapter 6 - Corporate Level Strategy
Case: Motorola Student Led Case: Alibaba
Simulation: Quarter 4 Due at Noon
27 Sep Business Plan Presentations (4 Teams)
Simulation: Quarter 5 Due at Noon
4 Oct Business Plan Presentations (4 Teams)
Simulation: Quarter 6 Due at Noon
11 Oct NO CLASS - Lehigh University Pacing Break
Simulation: Quarter 7 Due at Noon
18 Oct HIH: Chapter 7 - Mergers & Acquisitions
HIH: Chapter 8 - International
Case: Henkel Student Led Case: TNK-BP
Simulation: Quarter 8 Due at Noon
25 Oct Readings on CourseSite Case (instructor led): Great Lakes
Simulation: Quarter 9 Due at Noon
8
8
1st Half of Class 2nd Half of Class
1 Nov HIH: Chapter 9 - Cooperative Strategy
HIH: Chapter 11 - Structure & Controls
Case: Ebay Student Led Case: Nike
Simulation: Quarter 10 Due at Noon
8 Nov HIH: Chapter 12 - Strategic Leadership
Case: Room and Board Student Led Case: Dell
Simulation: Quarter 11 Due at Noon
15 Nov HIH: Chapter 13 - Strategic Entrepreneurship
Case: Under Armour Student Led Case: Apple
Simulation: Quarter 12 Due at Noon
22 Nov Team Time to Work on Simulation/Presentation or Make-up Lesson if Required
29 Nov Final Presentations (4 Teams)
6 Dec Final Presentations (remaining teams) Course Evaluations & Class wrap-up
9
9
Attachment 1: Business Plan Presentation Details
All teams are required to create a comprehensive business plan for their simulated PC hardware firm.
The major elements of the business plan include the following:
Executive Summary
Description of Business and Industry
Market Opportunity Analysis
Marketing Plan and Sales Tactics
Manufacturing Plan (Outsourcing option)
Human Resource Plan
Financial Plan and Funding Request
Tactical Time Chart
Additionally, each team must also conduct both a 1) Strategic/Tactical Comparison and a 1) Financial
Comparison between their simulated PC firm and a real firm in the computer hardware industry, e.g.,
HP, Dell, Gateway, Apple, or IBM. The Strategic/Tactical Comparison will include the following
elements:
Product array
Product positioning
Segment focus
Production and distribution
Global reach
Top management team (TMT) composition
Core competencies
The Financial Comparison must include firm level comparisons (revenue and revenue growth, net
income and net income growth, and stock price and appreciation) as shown on page 10 and industry
level comparisons (using the DuPont Analysis) as shown on page 11.
10
10
Trend Analysis - Dell Computers
Revenues and Revenue Growth
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
1988
Year
Re
ven
ue
-20.0%
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
140.0%
An
nu
al G
row
th
GrowthRevenue
Net Income and Net Income Growth
(500)
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Year
Ne
t In
co
me
-600.0%
-400.0%
-200.0%
0.0%
200.0%
400.0%
600.0%
An
nu
al G
row
th
Growt
h
Net Income
Stock Price and Appreciation
$0.00
$10.00
$20.00
$30.00
$40.00
$50.00
$60.00
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Year
Sto
ck P
ric
e
-100.0%
-50.0%
0.0%
50.0%
100.0%
150.0%
200.0%
250.0%
300.0%
350.0%
400.0%
450.0%
An
nu
al G
row
th
Stock
Price
Growth
11
11
Co
mp
ute
r H
ard
war
e In
du
stry
Du
Po
nt
An
aly
sis
No
t "l
ive"
nu
mb
ers…
.fo
r il
lust
rati
on
on
ly!
Pre
-Tax
Net
Ass
etR
eturn
on
Fin
anci
alR
eturn
on
20
03
Mar
gin
(1-T
ax R
ate)
Mar
gin
Turn
over
Ass
ets
Lev
erag
eE
quit
y
Apple
Com
pute
r13.2
%67.7
%8.9
%1.0
76
9.6
%16.0
34
153.7
%
Del
l In
c.5.9
%65.8
%3.9
%1.3
16
5.1
%3.2
61
16.8
%
Gat
eway
Inc.
13.4
%65.0
%8.7
%0.5
76
5.0
%4.3
66
22.0
%
Hew
lett
-Pac
kar
d10.8
%63.9
%6.9
%0.8
93
6.1
%7.6
92
47.2
%
IBM
1.2
%63.8
%0.8
%2.1
42
1.7
%5.0
51
8.4
%
I
ndust
ry A
ver
age
- W
eighte
d12.1
%67.4
%8.1
%0.8
08
6.6
%3.0
57
20.1
%
I
ndust
ry A
ver
age
8.9
%65.3
%5.8
%1.2
01
5.5
%7.2
81
49.6
%
20
01
Apple
Com
pute
r13.2
%67.7
%8.9
%1.0
76
9.6
%16.0
34
153.7
%
Del
l In
c.5.9
%65.8
%3.9
%1.3
16
5.1
%3.2
61
16.8
%
Gat
eway
Inc.
13.4
%65.0
%8.7
%0.5
76
5.0
%4.3
66
22.0
%
Hew
lett
-Pac
kar
d10.8
%63.9
%6.9
%0.8
93
6.1
%7.6
92
47.2
%
IBM
1.2
%63.8
%0.8
%2.1
42
1.7
%5.0
51
8.4
%
I
ndust
ry A
ver
age
- W
eighte
d12.1
%67.4
%8.1
%0.8
08
6.6
%3.0
57
20.1
%
I
ndust
ry A
ver
age
8.9
%65.3
%5.8
%1.2
01
5.5
%7.2
81
49.6
%
12
12
Attachment 2: Presentation Evaluation Criteria
MBA 406 Case Presentation Evaluation
Your Name: _________________________________ Poor Average Excellent 1. Case Overview (Steps 1-3) 6-----------7-----------8------------9-------------10
* Did the team present the important information from the case? * Helped you to gain familiarity with the situation * Recognized symptoms from the case * Identified Goals of important parties * Presented important information from tables and or other sources
2. Analysis & Plan (Steps 4-6) 6-----------7-----------8------------9-------------10 * Analyzed important background information from book and outside sources
* Chose and utilized useful theoretical models in the analysis * Made a convincing diagnosis of the problem * Developed a sound action plan (feasible, and practical) * Showed creativity and insight in the solution. 3. Presentation skills 6-----------7-----------8------------9-------------10
* Good eye contact, clear, loud speakers, prepared/polished * Good transition from speaker to speaker * Within allotted time, quality of slides (if used)
* In general, how did they do in the presentation itself? ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FOR THE TEAM OR INDIVIDUALS:
13
13
Attachment 3: Written Case Analysis Evaluation
MBA 406 Written Case Analysis Evaluation
Name: _________________________________ Poor Average Excellent 1. Gaining Familiarity (10%) 6-----------7-----------8------------9-------------10
* Identified critical factors in the case. * Identified critical contextual factors and the degree of uncertainty
2. Symptoms & Goals (20%) 6-----------7-----------8------------9-------------10
* Identify symptoms (things not expected or desired) * Critical statements from major parties * Clear understanding of goals of key parties * Financial trends (if applicable)
3. Analysis (30%) 6-----------7-----------8------------9-------------10 * Selected appropriate ideas/theories/models * Correctly applied ideas/theories/models * Dug deeply into information from the case to discover non-obvious relationships
4. Diagnosis & Action Planning (20%) 6-----------7-----------8------------9-------------10 * Used insights gained from analysis to highlight feasible action alternatives * Prioritized problems/predicaments/alternatives regarding timing, importance, etc. * Recommended solutions are appropriate and possible for the organization. 5. Creativity (10%) 6-----------7-----------8------------9-------------10 * Did your analysis and action plan leverage non-obvious facts/insights from the case? * Is the recommended course of action creative in itself or just ‘more of the same’? * How much ‘out of the box’ thinking/analysis/research was used in the case analysis?
6. Overall Presentation and Writing (10%) -----------7-----------8------------9-------------10 * Was the report professionally prepared and well written General case comments: