mbs census spotlight on: language 824 - 155 carlton street ... · great falls lac du bonnet sprague...

SUBJECT: 2011 Census: Language A Manitoba Perspective

Statistics Canada has released data on Language from the 2011 Census of Population. This data has been made available on the Internet via Statistics Canada's Census module (http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/dp-pd/index-eng.cfm).

The Manitoba Bureau of Statistics (MBS) has prepared this document to examine characteristics such as: Mother Tongue, Home Language and Official Languages. The main focus is on Manitoba, its Economic Regions and its Census Subdivisions.

Manitoba is divided into 8 Official Regions for Data Collection (also known as Economic Regions). The following table illustrates the association between data collection region, economic region, and census division.

OFFICIAL REGION FOR ECONOMIC CENSUS 2011 PERCENTDATA COLLECTION REGION DIVISION CENSUS DISTRIBUTION (%)

Southeast 10 1, 2, 12 104,535 8.65South Central 20 3, 4 60,660 5.02Southwest 30 5, 6, 7, 15 108,870 9.01North Central 40 8, 9, 10 48,290 4.00Winnipeg 50 11 666,830 55.19Interlake 60 13, 14, 18 88,855 7.35Parklands 70 16, 17, 20 42,090 3.48North 80 19, 21, 22, 23 88,145 7.30

Manitoba Total 1,208,270 100.00NOTE: NUMBERS MAY NOT ADD TO TOTALS DUE TO RANDOM ROUNDING.

Data Source: Statistics Canada, 2011 Census

The map on page 2 also illustrates these relationships.

Note on Random Rounding: Statistics Canada applies a procedure known as "Random Rounding", in order to ensure confidentiality standards are met. This procedure randomly rounds the counts (including totals) either up or down to a multiple of 5 or in some cases 10. This procedure can result in the same count in the same (or a different) table being rounded up in one execution and rounded down in the next. As a result, the sum of the values may not equal the total listed and the same counts taken from two different tables may have small differences.

Highlighting Current Statistical Activities Of Interest to Manitobans

824 - 155 Carlton Street Winnipeg, Manitoba

R3C 3H8

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Manitoba Bureau of Statistics

November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

MBS Census Spotlight On: Language

- 1 -

Mafeking

Grand Rapids

Gypsumville

Lundar

Eriksdale

Ashern

Moosehorn

AlonsaMcCreary

Glenella

Fisher Branch

Arborg

Riverton

Hodgson

Berens River

Bloodvein

Powerview-Pine Falls

St Georges

Great Falls

Lac duBonnet

Sprague

Rennie

Bissett

Brandon

PortagePrairiela

WINNIPEG

Roblin

Russell

BinscarthAngusville

Rossburn

Inglis

Grandview

GilbertPlains

OchreRiver

Ste. Rosedu Lac

Virden

Reston

Oak Lake

Alexander

RiversKenton

Oak RiverMiniota

Strathclair Newdale

ShoalLake

McAuley

St-Lazare

Elkhorn

Birtle

Foxwarren

Melita

PiersonWaskada

Napinka

Boissevain

Minto

HartneyTilson

Swan RiverMinitonas

Bowsman

The Pas

Dauphin

EthelbertFork River

Rorketon

Souris

DeloraineKillarney

Nesbitt

Wawanesa

Belmont

Cartwright

Holland

Notre Dame

TreherneSt Claude

Elm Creek

Roland

Somerset

Pilot Mound

Crystal City

WinklerManitou

Miami

Dunrea

Neepawa

Arden

ForestStation

Minnedosa

Rapid City

Morden

PlumCoulee

Altona

Gretna

Carman

Emerson

Morris

St. Pierre-Jolys

Letellier Dominion City Vita

LaBroquerie

Oakbank

Dugald

Stonewall

Rosser

Teulon

Inwood

Woodlands

BirdsHill

Hadashville

Niverville

St.Adolphe

Lorette

Ste. Anne

White-mouth

Ellie

St. Laurent

Starbuck

Sanford

Gimli

SelkirkEast

Selkirk

Steinbach

Beausejour

Lake

Cedar

Winnipegosis

Lake

Lake

Manitoba

Winnipeg

Lake

Dauphin

Lake

Winnipegosis

Hamiota

Erickson

Glenboro

Carberry

Gladstone

MacGregor

Langruth

Assiniboine

River

Red

Riv

er

Cartography by: Manitoba Conservation

GeoManitoba MAN 2438

EDWARD

PIPESTONE

ARCHIE

ELLICE

RUSSELL

SHELLMOUTH-BOULTON

RIVER

SHELL

RIVER

SWAN

HILLS-BURG

SILVER

CREEK

WALLACE

ALBERT

ARTHUR

MINIOTA

BIRTLE

MINITONAS

GRANDVIEW

ROSSBURN

SHOALLAKE

HAMIOTA

WOODWORTH

SIFTON

CAMERON

BRENDA

WIN-CHESTER

BLAN-SHARD

ETHELBERT

GILBERTPLAINS

STRATH-CLAIR

DALY

WHITEHEAD

GLENWOOD

WHITEWATER

MORTON

SASKAT-CHEWAN

HARRISON

DAUPHIN

MOSSEY RIVER

WILLIAM

ODANAH

ELTON

OAKLAND

CORNWALLIS

RIVER-SIDE

KILLARNEY-TURTLE

MOUNTAIN

STRATH-CONA

MINTO

CLAN-

RIVER

OCHRE

LAWERENCE

STE.ROSE

McCREARY

ROSE-DALE

LANGFORD

NORTH CYPRESS

SOUTH CYPRESS

ROBLIN

ARGYLE

Baldur

LANS-DOWNE

GLENELLA

VICTORIA

LOUISE

NORTH NORFOLK

WESTBOURNE

LAKEVIEW

SOUTHNORFOLK

LORNE

PEMBINA

PORTAGE La PRAIRIE

SIGLUNES

ERIKSDALE

THOMPSON

STANLEY

DUFFERIN

GREY

COLDWELL

ST.

LAURENT

WOODLANDS

ST. FRANCOIS

ROLAND

RHINELAND

CARTIER

XAVIER

ROSSER

MACDONALD

MORRIS

MONT-CALM

ROCKWOOD

BIFROST

GIMLI

ST

ANDREWS

E. ST.

PAUL

HE

AD

ING

LE

Y

W. ST.

PAUL

RIT-CHOT

DE SALA-

BERRY

FRANKLIN

HANOVER

SPRINGFIELD

CLEMENTS

BROKEN-

HEAD

TACHE

LA BRO-

QUERIE

STE. ANNE

ST

LAC DU BONNET

WHITE-MOUTH

STUARTBURN

REYNOLDS

PINEY

MOUNTAIN

MOUNTAIN

PARK

ALONSA

GRAHAMDALE

GRAHAM-

DALE

FISHER

ARMSTRONG

ALEXANDER

KELSEY

KELSEY

PINAWA

� Manitoba Bureau of Statistics

OFFICIAL REGIONS

FOR DATA COLLECTION

INTERLAKE

NORTH

SOUTHWEST

PARKLANDS

SOUTH CENTRAL

NORTH CENTRAL

SOUTHEAST



R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 2 -

Comparability of language data between Censuses

Prior to 2011, data and analysis for language was based on the long-form Census sent to 20% of households. In 2011, the language questions were on the Census form sent to 100% of households. Statistics Canada's evaluation of the knowledge of official languages and firstofficial language spoken data for 2011 indicates comparability with previous Censuses.Caution, however, is advised when comparing trends in mother tongue and home language.

According to Statistics Canada1, changes in patterns of response to both the mother tongue and home language questions appear to have arisen due to changes made in the placement and context of the language questions on the 2011 Census questionnaire relative to previous Censuses. As a result, Canadians appear to have been less inclined than in previous Censuses to report languages other than English or French as their only mother tongue, and also more inclined to report multiple languages as their mother tongue and as the language used most often at home.

Complete analysis of factors affecting comparability of language results between the Censuses will be available in the forthcoming Statistics Canada publication, "Methodological Document on the 2011 Census Language Data", Catalogue no. 98-314-X2011051.

1 Languages Reference Guide, 2011 Census - Catalogue no. 98-314-X2011005.



R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 3 -

Mother Tongue

The mother tongue concept refers to the first language learned at home in childhood and still understood. Individuals may provide a single language as a response, or list more than one (multiple responses). The total response for a language is the sum of the single responses for that language, plus any multiple responses that include it.

At the Manitoba level, responses to the 2011 Census question on mother tongue were primarily English-single (72.9%). French-single responses made up 3.5% of the total responses for Manitoba, while single responses of an Aboriginal language comprised 3.0%. The remaining 20.6% of the total responses were either other single language responses, or multiple responses.

In the Economic Region (ER) of Winnipeg, 71.5% of all responses were English-single, while 3.6% responded French-single. 0.6% of the total responses listed a single Aboriginal language and 24.4% provided either other single responses, or a multiple language response.

85.1% of the total responses in the Southwest region were single responses of English, the highest share among the regions. At the other extreme, the South Central region only had a 59.4% response rate for English-single.

Half of Manitoba's ERs had a French-single response rate of less than three percent. The North, at 0.7%, had the lowest share, while the Southeast had the largest share of French-single, with 8.8%.

Of the total responses in the North ER, 32.0% were a single response of an Aboriginal language, the largest rate among Manitoba's regions. In the Southeast region, only 0.2% of all responses were Aboriginal language-single.

The North region had the smallest share of other responses among the regions, at 3.5%. Of the North's other responses, 62.4% were other single language responses, and 37.6% were multiple language responses. At the other extreme, the South Central region, with 37.0%, had the highest share of other responses. Accounting for 31.5% of all South Central's responses, single responses of German made up the majority (85.1%) of the other responses in the region.

Across the province, English was the top ranked single language response to the mother tongue question. In five of the eight Economic Regions, German was the second most frequent single response. In the regions of Winnipeg, Parklands and North, however, the second ranked languages were Tagalog (Pilipino, Filipino), Ukrainian and Cree, n.o.s., respectively. French was ranked third in five of the eight ERs, with Spanish, Ukrainian and Oji-Cree being third in the Southwest, Interlake and North, respectively.

68.659.4

85.176.7 71.5

84.8 84.6

63.8

8.8

3.3

5.33.6

32.0

22.437.0

12.5 15.624.4

12.8 11.13.5

72.9

3.53.0

20.6

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Southeast SouthCentral

Southwest NorthCentral

Winnipeg InterlakeParklands North Manitoba

Percent Share

Chart 1: Mother Tongue (Share of All Responses - Single & Multiple)

English-Single French-Single Aboriginal Language-Single Other Responses

NOTE: "English-Single", "French-Single" & "Aboriginal Language-Single" are single responses;"Other Responses" consists of other single responses, plus multiple responses.

Prepared by MBS from: Statistics Canada, 2011 Census



R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 4 -

2011 Top 5 Mother Tongue Single Responses by ER - Showing Share (%)

Economic Region 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th

Southeast English(69.6%)

German(16.0%)

French(9.0%)

Ukrainian (1.3%)

Russian(1.2%)

South Central English(60.3%)

German(32.0%)

French(3.4%)

Russian(1.7%)

Dutch(0.5%)

Southwest English(85.9%)

German(4.2%)

Spanish(1.9%)

French(1.6%)

Ukrainian(1.4%)

North Central English(77.6%)

German(11.9%)

French(5.4%)

Ojibway(2.3%)

Ukrainian(0.6%)

Winnipeg English(73.5%)

Tagalog*(5.1%)

French(3.7%)

German (2.5%)

Ukrainian(1.5%)

Interlake English(85.8%)

German(5.2%)

Ukrainian(2.3%)

French(1.9%)

Polish(0.9%)

Parklands English(85.8%)

Ukrainian(6.1%)

French(2.4%)

German (2.0%)

Ojibway(1.6%)

North English(64.7%)

Cree, n.o.s.(20.2%)

Oji-Cree(7.0%)

Ojibway(4.0%)

Dene(1.1%)

Manitoba English(74.4%)

German(5.7%)

French(3.6%)

Tagalog* (2.9%)

Cree, n.o.s.(1.6%)

*Tagalog (Pilipino, Filipino) Share of single responses. n.o.s. - not otherwise specified. NOTE: NUMBERS MAY NOT ADD TO TOTALS DUE TO RANDOM ROUNDING.


In Manitoba, responses including English made up 74.9% of the mother tongue total responses.

Total responses including German accounted for 5.8%, French comprised 4.0% of responses, and 3.4% included Tagalog (Pilipino, Filipino). Cree, n.o.s. contributed 1.7% to the total, while Ukrainian appeared in 1.6% of all responses.

The remaining top 15 languages all had response rates of less than one percent, ranging from 0.9% for Panjabi (Punjabi), to 0.4% for Italian.

At the Manitoba level, 2.1% of the total responses were multiple responses, with 1.6% being English and a non-official language. English and French bilingualism made up 0.3%, while French and a non-official language comprised 0.1%.

74.95.8

4.03.4

1.71.60.90.80.70.70.70.60.60.60.4

0 20 40 60 80

EnglishGermanFrench

Tagalog (Pilipino, Filipino)Cree, n.o.s.

UkrainianPanjabi (Punjabi)

SpanishOjibway

Chinese, n.o.s.Polish

Oji-CreeRussian

PortugueseItalian

Percent

Chart 2: Mother TongueManitoba's Top 15 Total Responses

NOTE: Based on total responses (single & multiple) for a language as a share of all responses (single & multiple) for Manitoba;n.o.s - not otherw ise specified.




R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 5 -

Home Language (Most Often)

The home language (most often) concept refers to the language spoken most often at home. Individuals may provide a single language as a response, or list more than one (multiple responses). The total response for a language is the sum of the single responses for that language, plus any multiple responses that include it.

At the Manitoba level, English-single formed the majority (84.4%) of responses to the 2011 Census question on the language spoken most often at home. French-single responses made up 1.5% of the total responses for Manitoba, while single responses of an Aboriginal language comprised 1.8%. The remaining 12.3% of the total responses were either other single language responses, or multiple responses.

In the ER of Winnipeg, 83.0% of all responses were English-single, while 1.5% responded French-single, 0.1% listed an Aboriginal language single response and 15.4% provided either other single responses, or a multiple language response.

95.6% of the total responses in the Parklands region were single responses of English, the highest share among the regions. At the other extreme, the North region had only a 75.9% response rate for English-single.

Half of Manitoba's ERs had a French-single response rate of less than one percent, with the lowest share being 0.2% in the North. The Southeast had the largest share of French-single, with 4.7%.

Of the total responses in the North ER, 21.5% were a single response of an Aboriginal language, the largest rate among Manitoba's regions. The lowest regional rate was in the Southeast, where less than 4 out of every 10,000 responses were Aboriginal language-single.

The North region had the smallest share of other responses among the regions, at 2.4%. Of the North's other responses, 35.9% were other single language responses, and 64.1% were multiple language responses. At the other extreme, the South Central region (20.1%) had the highest share. Single responses of German comprised the majority, 75.1%, of the other responses in the South Central, accounting for 15.1% of all responses in the region.

Across the province, English was the top ranked single language response to the language spoken most often at home question. In five of the eight Economic Regions, German was the second most frequent single response. In the regions of Winnipeg, Parklands and North, however, the second ranked languages were Tagalog (Pilipino, Filipino), Ukrainian and Cree, n.o.s., respectively. French was ranked third in five of the eight ERs, with Spanish, Ojibway and Oji-Cree being third in the Southwest, Parklands and North, respectively.

84.2 78.190.8 86.5 83.0

94.5 95.6

75.9

4.7 21.511.0

20.18.5 10.0 15.4

4.9 3.1

84.4

12.3

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%




Percent Share

Chart 3: Home Language - Most Often (Share of All Responses - Single & Multiple)

English-Single French-Single Aboriginal Language-Single Other Responses

NOTE: "English-Single", "French-Single" & "Aboriginal Language-Single" are single responses;"Other Responses"consists of other single responses, plus multiple responses.




R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 6 -

2011 Top 5 Home Language (Most Often) Single Responses by ER - Showing Share (%)



German(7.2%)

French(4.9%)

Russian(0.5%)

Tagalog*(0.2%)

South Central English(81.0%)

German(15.7%)

French(1.7%)

Russian(0.8%)

Spanish(0.2%)


German(2.6%)

Spanish(1.7%)

Chinese, n.o.s. (0.9%)

French(0.5%)


German(7.7%)

French(2.4%)

Ojibway(1.1%)

Tagalog*(0.2%)


Tagalog*(2.9%)

French(1.6%)

Panjabi (Punjabi) (1.1%)

Chinese, n.o.s.(0.7%)


German(2.3%)

French(0.4%)

Polish (0.2%)

Ojibway(0.2%)

Parklands English(97.2%)

Ukrainian(0.7%)

Ojibway(0.7%)

French(0.5%)

German(0.3%)


Cree, n.o.s.(12.2%)

Oji-Cree(6.4%)

Ojibway(2.5%)

Dene(0.8%)


German(2.4%)

Tagalog*(1.6%)

French(1.6%)

Cree, n.o.s.(0.9%)



In Manitoba, responses listing English on its own made up 87.6% of the home language (most often) single responses.

Single responses of German accounted for 2.4%, while responses of Tagalog (Pilipino, Filipino) comprised 1.6%, with 18,775 responses. The 17,950 responses of the single language of French also made up 1.6% of all the single responses.

The remaining top 15 languages all had response rates of less than one percent, ranging from 0.9% for Cree, n.o.s., to 0.2% for Vietnamese.

At the Manitoba level, 3.6% of the total responses were multiple responses, with 3.3% being English and a non-official language. English and French bilingualism made up 0.2%, while French and a non-official language comprised 0.1%.

87.62.41.61.60.90.60.50.50.50.30.30.20.20.20.2

0 20 40 60 80 100

EnglishGerman

Tagalog (Pilipino, Filipino)French

Cree, n.o.s.Panjabi (Punjabi)

Oji-CreeChinese, n.o.s.

SpanishRussianOjibway

UkrainianPortuguese

PolishVietnamese

Percent

Chart 4: Home Language (Most Often)Manitoba's Top 15 Single Responses

NOTE: Based on single responses for a language as a share of single responses for Manitoba;n.o.s - not otherw ise specified.




R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 7 -

Home Language (Other Regular)

The home language (other regular) concept refers to the other language spoken on a regular basis at home, aside from the one spoken most often. Individuals may provide a single language as a response, or list more than one (multiple responses). The total response for a language is the sum of the single responses for that language, plus any multiple responses that include it.

At the Manitoba level, forming the majority of responses to the 2011 Census question on home language (other regular), 85.9% of responses indicated no additional language spoken on a regular basis. English-single responses made up 5.8% of the total responses for Manitoba, while single responses of French comprised 1.6%. The remaining 6.7% of the total responses were either other single language responses, or multiple responses.

In the ER of Winnipeg, 85.9% of all responses were "none", while 5.5% responded English-single, 1.8% listed French as a single response and 6.9% provided either other single responses, or a multiple language response.

93.7% of the total responses in the Interlake region were "none", the highest share among the regions. At the other extreme, the North region had only a 69.4% response rate for "none".

The lowest share of English-single responses was in the Parklands, with 1.2%. The Interlake, with a rate of 1.8%, was the only other region with a rate less than two percent. The North region had the largest share of English-single, with 16.9%.

Three of Manitoba's ERs had a French-single response rate of less than one percent, the lowest share being 0.4% in the North. The Southeast had the largest share of French-single, at 3.3%.

The Southwest region had the smallest share of other responses among the regions, at 2.8%.Of the Southwest's other responses, 95.4% were other single language responses, and 4.6% were multiple language responses. At the other extreme, the North region (13.3%) had the highest share. The majority, 69.5%, of the other responses in the North region were single responses of Cree, n.o.s., which accounted for 9.2% of all responses.

In most Economic Regions, English was the top ranked single language response. The South Central (German) and Parklands (Ukrainian) were the two exceptions. French was ranked second in the Southwest, North Central and Winnipeg, with the Southeast and Interlake having German, the South Central and Parklands having English, and the ER of North having Cree, n.o.s. French was ranked third in half of the eight ERs, with the Southwest and North Central having German, Winnipeg having Tagalog (Pilipino, Filipino) and the North region having Ojibway.

84.8 81.093.3 89.1 85.9

93.7 93.1

69.4

5.76.9

3.0 5.75.5

16.9

3.36.2 10.9

3.3 6.9 3.7 4.613.3

85.9

5.86.7

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%




Percent Share

Chart 5: Home Language - Other Regular (Share of All Responses - None, Single & Multiple)

None English-Single French-Single Other Responses

NOTE: "None" indicates no additional language spoken regularly; "English-Single" & "French-Single" are single responses;"Other Responses" consists of other single responses, plus multiple responses.




R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 8 -

2011 Top 5 Home Language (Other Regular) Single Responses by ER - Showing Share (%)



German(26.8%)

French(22.1%)

Russian(3.7%)

Ukrainian(2.8%)

South Central German (47.0%)

English(36.9%)

French(6.8%)

Russian(4.2%)

Spanish(1.3%)


French(12.1%)

German(10.8%)

Ukrainian (5.8%)

Spanish(3.8%)


French(17.4%)

German(14.6%)

Ojibway(6.5%)

Ukrainian(1.2%)


French(12.9%)

Tagalog*(8.6%)

German (5.4%)

Ukrainian(3.1%)


German(17.2%)

French(13.1%)

Ukrainian (12.0%)

Portuguese(4.4%)

Parklands Ukrainian (38.5%)

English(17.5%)

French(16.4%)

Ojibway(9.6%)

German(6.8%)


Cree, n.o.s.(30.3%)

Ojibway(5.4%)

Oji-Cree(3.7%)

French(1.5%)


French(11.7%)

German(10.3%)

Cree, n.o.s. (5.6%)

Tagalog*(5.0%)



In Manitoba, responses listing English on its own made up 41.9% of the home language (other regular) single language responses.

Single responses of French accounted for 11.7%, while responses of German comprised 10.3%. Cree, n.o.s. and Tagalog (Pilipino, Filipino) made up 5.6% and 5.0%, respectively.

The remaining top 15 languages all had response rates of less than five percent, ranging from 3.4% for Ukrainian, to 0.8% for Chinese, n.o.s.

At the Manitoba level, 0.2% of the total responses were multiple responses, with 0.1% being English and a non-official language. French and a non-official language also comprised 0.1%, while English and French bilingualism made up less than 2 out of every 10,000 responses.

41.911.7

10.35.6

5.03.4

2.22.1

1.51.21.21.00.90.90.8

0 10 20 30 40 50

EnglishFrench

GermanCree, n.o.s.

Tagalog (Pilipino, Filipino)Ukrainian

OjibwaySpanish

PortuguesePolish

RussianItalian

Panjabi (Punjabi)Oji-Cree

Chinese, n.o.s.

Percent

Chart 6: Home Language (Other Regular)Manitoba's Top 15 Single Responses

NOTE: Based on single responses for a language as a share of single responses for Manitoba;n.o.s - not otherw ise specified.




R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 9 -

Knowledge of Official Languages

The knowledge of official languages concept refers to the ability to conduct a conversation in English only, French only, both English and French, or neither English nor French. Responses are based on the self-assessment of a respondent’s ability to speak the two official languages.

For Manitoba as a whole, responses to the 2011 Census question on knowledge of official languages were primarily English only, at 90.0%. French only responses made up 0.1%, while English and French bilingualism comprised 8.6%. The remaining 1.2% indicated knowledge of neither English nor French.

In the ER of Winnipeg, 88.3% of responses were English only, while 0.1% indicated French only, 10.3% listed English and French bilingualism and 1.3% responded knowing neither English nor French.

97.0% of the responses in the North region were English only, the highest share among the regions. At the other extreme, the Southeast region had a response rate of only 84.1%.

Half of Manitoba's ERs had a French only response rate of less than 0.1%, the lowest share being in the North, with less than 3 out of every 10,000 responses. The Southeast had the largest share of French only, at 0.3%.

The lowest share of English and French bilingualism responses was in the North, with 2.3%.Comparatively, at 14.3%, the Southeast region had the largest share. Winnipeg was the only other region to have double-digit rates, reaching 10.3%.

Among the regions, the Parklands had the smallest share of responses indicating knowledge of neither English nor French, at 0.1%. At the other extreme, the South Central region (2.9%) had the highest share.

First Official Language Spoken

The first official language spoken concept is derived for use with the application of the Official Languages Act. It takes into account, first the knowledge of the two official languages, second the mother tongue, and third, the home language. For people who can't be classified into the main categories of English or French, residual categories of "English and French" and "neither English nor French", are used.

According to 2011 Census results, the majority, 95.3%, of Manitobans were classified as having English as their first official language spoken. 3.4% were assigned to French, while 1.1% were in the "neither English nor French" category and 0.2% were classed as "English and French".

84.191.3 94.2 90.4 88.3

94.7 94.9 97.0

14.3 5.7 4.4 8.9 10.35.0 5.0

90.0

8.6

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%




Percent Share

Chart 7: Knowledge of Official Languages (Share of Population)

English Only French Only English and French Neither English nor French

NOTE: Refers to the respondent's assesment of their ability to conduct a conversation in the tw o official languages.Prepared by MBS from: Statistics Canada, 2011 Census



R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 10 -

On Reserve Languages

Manitobans living in a Census Subdivision legally affiliated with First Nations or Indian bands, such as an Indian reserve or Indian settlement are classified as living "on reserve'.

Mother Tongue For residents living on reserve, single responses of English formed the majority (54.3%) of the responses to the 2011 Census question on mother tongue.French-single responses comprised 0.1% of the total responses, while an Aboriginal language on its own made up 44.4%. The remaining 1.2% of all the responses were either other single language responses, or multiple responses.

Home Language (Most Often) Among on reserve residents, single responses of English made up 68.8% of all responses to the question on the language spoken most often at home. French single responses comprised just over 2 out of every 10,000 total responses, while an Aboriginal language on its own made up 30.1%. The remaining 1.1% of all the responses were either other single language responses, or multiple responses.

Home Language (Other Regular) 60.7% of all the responses from residents living on reserve indicated that no additional language was spoken at home on a regular basis, aside from the one used most often. 23.1% indicated a single response of English and 0.1% listed French as a single response. 16.1% indicated a single Aboriginal language, while the remaining 0.1% provided either another single language response, or a multiple language response.

The following three tables provide selected language data for Manitoba's Census Subdivisions, while Tables 4 and 5 provide an overview of language data for Manitoba's Economic Regions.

For various reasons2, Statistics Canada has suppressed data for certain geographic units. A list of Manitoba's Census Subdivisions that have been suppressed is provided in Table 6.

2 See Statistics Canada's "2011 Data Quality and Confidentiality Standards and Guidelines (Public)"

N/A

54.3

0.1

44.4

1.2N/A

68.8

0.0

30.1

1.1

60.7

23.1

0.116.1

0.10

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

None English-Single

French-Single

AboriginalLanguage-Single

OtherResponses

Percent Share

Chart 8: On Reserve Languages - Manitoba (Share of All Responses - Single & Multiple)

Mother Tongue Home Language (Most Often) Home Language (Other Regular)

NOTE: "On Reserve" includes reserves and settlements; "None" indicates no additional language used regularly; "English-Single", "French-Single" & "Aboriginal Language-Single" are single responses; "Other Responses" consists of other single responses, plus multiple responses; N/A - Not Applicable.




R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 11 -

Table 1: Selected Mother Tongue Characteristics2011 Census - 100% Data(Manitoba Census Subdivisions sorted by type1)

Name

English - Single

(% Share)2

French - Single

(% Share)3

AboriginalLanguage -

Single(% Share)4

OtherResponses

(% Share)5

Manitoba 72.9 3.5 3.0 20.6

CitiesBrandon 83.1 1.3 0.6 15.0Dauphin 83.1 1.5 0.9 14.4Flin Flon (Part) 92.0 1.3 1.0 5.5Portage la Prairie 88.8 2.3 1.2 7.7Selkirk 91.9 1.1 0.5 6.6Steinbach 60.9 1.8 0.1 37.3Thompson 82.1 2.0 5.5 10.4Winkler 47.3 0.2 0.0 52.4Winnipeg 71.4 3.6 0.6 24.4

City Total 72.6 3.3 0.6 23.5

TownsAltona 57.1 0.9 0.0 41.9Arborg 74.5 0.9 0.0 24.5Beausejour 84.4 1.5 0.0 13.9Birtle 88.9 2.4 0.8 7.9Boissevain 93.0 0.7 0.0 6.7Carberry 91.4 0.6 0.3 7.6Carman 84.6 2.9 0.0 12.5Churchill 83.9 2.5 7.5 6.2Deloraine 91.4 1.6 0.0 6.4Emerson 84.7 5.3 0.0 10.7Erickson 84.9 1.1 2.2 11.8Gilbert Plains 82.8 1.3 0.6 15.3Gillam 85.5 2.0 5.5 7.4Gladstone 85.8 1.2 0.6 11.7Grand Rapids 78.7 2.1 12.8 6.4Grandview 84.4 1.3 0.0 13.8Gretna 58.6 0.9 0.0 39.6Hamiota 90.4 0.6 0.0 9.0Hartney 89.9 2.5 0.0 7.6

Prepared by MBS from: Statistics Canada, 2011 Census November 16, 2012



R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 12 -


Name

English - Single

(% Share)2

French - Single

(% Share)3


Single(% Share)4

OtherResponses

(% Share)5

(towns continued)Lac du Bonnet 88.0 4.6 0.0 8.1Leaf Rapids 82.2 1.1 12.2 6.7Lynn Lake 75.5 1.1 17.0 6.4MacGregor 81.4 1.1 0.5 17.0Manitou 89.2 1.9 0.0 8.3Melita 96.7 1.0 0.0 2.9Minitonas 84.6 1.0 1.0 14.4Minnedosa 91.7 1.0 0.2 7.3Morden 72.9 1.4 0.1 25.5Morris 76.3 5.7 0.3 17.4Neepawa 81.0 1.0 0.1 18.0Niverville 76.5 2.5 0.1 20.9Oak Lake 93.5 2.6 0.0 3.9Pilot Mound 92.2 2.6 0.0 6.0Plum Coulee 48.2 0.6 0.0 51.2Powerview-Pine Falls 81.1 10.0 1.9 6.9Rapid City 94.0 2.4 0.0 3.6Rivers 91.8 0.9 0.4 6.5Roblin 83.1 1.2 0.6 14.2Rossburn 69.5 1.0 1.0 28.6Russell 85.8 1.9 0.0 12.3Snow Lake 93.8 1.4 0.7 4.9Souris 90.2 2.0 0.3 7.5Ste. Anne 56.3 36.3 0.0 7.7Ste. Rose du Lac 74.2 18.8 0.5 5.9Stonewall 93.6 1.8 0.1 4.5Swan River 86.9 1.1 1.9 10.3Teulon 89.1 1.8 0.0 9.1The Pas 89.3 1.2 3.4 6.2Treherne 90.7 4.2 0.0 5.1Virden 92.8 1.7 0.3 5.3Winnipeg Beach 84.2 3.0 0.0 13.4

Town Total 82.5 2.7 0.9 13.9




R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 13 -


Name

English - Single

(% Share)2

French - Single

(% Share)3


Single(% Share)4

OtherResponses

(% Share)5

VillagesBenito 84.7 0.0 0.0 15.3Binscarth 89.4 3.5 0.0 5.9Bowsman 96.6 0.0 1.7 1.7Cartwright 75.0 0.0 0.0 23.3Crystal City 84.4 2.6 0.0 13.0Dunnottar 89.2 2.9 0.7 6.5Elkhorn 96.6 1.1 0.0 2.2Ethelbert 72.7 0.0 1.8 21.8Glenboro 94.4 2.4 0.0 2.4McCreary 86.4 4.5 0.0 10.2Notre Dame de Lourdes 22.8 65.9 0.0 11.4Riverton 91.5 0.0 0.9 7.5Somerset 50.6 41.4 0.0 5.7St. Claude 45.5 47.3 0.0 7.1St-Lazare 58.8 33.3 0.0 5.9St-Pierre-Jolys 45.8 47.7 0.0 6.9Waskada 97.2 0.0 0.0 2.8Wawanesa 95.4 1.9 0.0 2.8Winnipegosis 86.2 0.8 0.8 13.0

Village Total 74.0 17.1 0.3 8.2

Rural MunicipalitiesAlbert 100.0 1.6 0.0 1.6Alexander 78.7 11.4 0.8 8.9Alonsa 84.6 2.8 5.1 7.1Archie 96.9 3.1 0.0 1.5Argyle 80.3 5.3 0.0 14.4Armstrong 79.8 1.6 0.0 18.3Arthur 98.8 1.2 0.0 1.2Bifrost 63.7 0.8 0.3 35.1Birtle 87.4 3.9 0.0 7.9Blanshard 83.8 1.9 0.0 14.3Brenda 97.9 1.1 0.0 1.1




R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 14 -


Name

English - Single

(% Share)2

French - Single

(% Share)3


Single(% Share)4

OtherResponses

(% Share)5

(rural municipalities continued)Brokenhead 87.5 1.7 0.0 10.6Cameron 69.0 6.0 0.0 25.0Cartier 52.0 8.9 0.2 39.0Clanwilliam 90.4 1.2 0.0 8.4Coldwell 92.1 2.3 0.4 4.9Cornwallis 88.5 3.4 0.2 8.0Daly 83.1 1.8 0.0 14.5Dauphin 87.5 1.6 0.2 10.7De Salaberry 42.9 35.2 0.0 22.2Dufferin 74.7 4.0 0.0 21.5East St. Paul 82.8 1.2 0.1 16.1Edward 98.3 0.0 0.0 0.9Ellice 70.9 25.3 0.0 2.5Elton 93.2 1.2 0.0 5.2Eriksdale 92.3 0.6 0.0 7.7Ethelbert 64.8 1.4 0.0 33.8Fisher 72.2 3.3 0.3 24.2Franklin 63.6 6.2 0.8 29.4Gilbert Plains 90.1 1.2 0.0 9.3Gimli 86.5 1.7 0.1 11.7Glenella 62.5 1.0 0.0 35.6Glenwood 70.2 0.0 0.0 28.9Grahamdale 87.1 1.8 2.2 8.9Grandview 86.2 1.5 0.0 12.3Grey 66.9 14.6 0.0 18.5Hamiota 97.6 0.0 0.0 1.2Hanover 55.2 1.3 0.0 43.4Harrison 83.1 1.2 0.0 15.1Headingley 89.2 2.3 0.2 8.3Hillsburg 89.4 1.2 0.0 11.8Kelsey 91.4 1.5 3.5 3.3Killarney - Turtle Mountain 86.2 1.4 0.0 12.3




R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 15 -


Name

English - Single

(% Share)2

French - Single

(% Share)3


Single(% Share)4

OtherResponses

(% Share)5

(rural municipalities continued)La Broquerie 46.0 16.3 0.0 37.6Lac du Bonnet 80.7 5.9 0.2 13.2Lakeview 88.7 0.0 4.8 8.1Langford 87.6 0.7 0.0 11.8Lansdowne 79.9 0.7 0.0 19.4Lawrence 76.9 7.7 0.0 17.6Lorne 56.8 23.1 0.3 20.2Louise 75.3 1.1 0.0 24.2Macdonald 85.9 5.1 0.0 9.0McCreary 90.5 4.2 0.0 4.2Miniota 83.4 1.7 0.0 15.4Minitonas 91.0 1.0 0.0 8.0Minto 80.5 1.6 0.0 18.8Montcalm 44.7 38.9 0.4 16.0Morris 60.3 5.0 0.0 35.1Morton 91.4 1.4 0.0 7.1Mossey River 76.9 0.9 0.0 22.2Mountain (North) 90.6 1.6 3.1 5.5Mountain (South) 77.7 1.1 2.1 19.1North Cypress 73.4 1.4 0.0 25.5North Norfolk 67.7 0.5 0.4 31.4Oakland 82.5 1.9 0.0 15.1Ochre River 89.4 5.3 1.1 4.2Odanah 75.7 0.0 0.0 23.4Park (South) 87.2 2.1 0.0 10.2Pembina 78.5 3.8 0.0 17.9Piney 71.5 8.7 0.3 19.5Pipestone 92.6 1.4 0.0 6.0Portage la Prairie 76.6 3.4 0.5 19.5Reynolds 80.5 5.4 0.0 14.4Rhineland 44.7 0.2 0.0 55.0Ritchot 66.1 25.3 0.0 8.6




R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 16 -


Name

English - Single

(% Share)2

French - Single

(% Share)3


Single(% Share)4

OtherResponses

(% Share)5

(rural municipalities continued)Riverside 72.7 3.9 0.0 22.7Roblin 64.0 0.5 0.5 34.9Rockwood 86.4 1.7 0.1 11.8Roland 69.8 0.9 0.0 29.2Rosedale 69.6 0.9 0.3 28.8Rossburn 75.8 1.0 0.0 23.2Rosser 79.3 1.9 0.0 18.9Russell 94.6 1.1 0.0 5.4Saskatchewan 91.2 0.9 0.0 8.8Shell River 88.9 0.9 0.5 9.2Shellmouth-Boulton 84.9 1.6 0.0 13.4Shoal Lake 81.0 0.8 0.0 18.1Sifton 93.7 2.5 0.0 4.4Siglunes 86.0 1.5 2.2 10.7Silver Creek 87.0 1.1 0.0 12.0South Cypress 74.3 2.4 0.0 23.4South Norfolk 58.2 19.1 0.0 22.2Springfield 84.2 2.7 0.1 13.0St. Andrews 87.2 1.3 0.1 11.4St. Clements 85.4 2.1 0.1 12.3St. Francois Xavier 81.0 5.2 0.4 13.7St. Laurent 67.7 22.3 1.2 9.2Stanley 38.6 0.2 0.0 61.1Ste. Anne 65.4 17.3 0.0 17.4Ste. Rose 67.3 28.8 0.7 2.6Strathclair 84.6 1.3 0.7 12.8Strathcona 93.8 1.6 0.0 4.7Stuartburn 60.9 3.0 0.0 36.1Swan River 90.6 1.0 0.4 8.1Tache 69.6 15.8 0.0 14.7Thompson 63.4 1.1 0.0 35.8Victoria 78.1 8.0 0.0 13.8




R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 17 -


Name

English - Single

(% Share)2

French - Single

(% Share)3


Single(% Share)4

OtherResponses

(% Share)5

(rural municipalities continued)Victoria Beach 88.0 5.3 0.0 6.7Wallace 77.1 0.7 0.7 21.2West St. Paul 77.2 1.2 0.0 21.6Westbourne 59.8 0.3 0.3 39.7Whitehead 93.8 1.3 0.0 5.2Whitemouth 74.4 1.3 0.0 24.6Whitewater 79.1 0.8 0.0 20.2Winchester 96.1 1.0 0.0 2.9Woodlands 84.8 2.3 0.1 12.8Woodworth 95.3 1.7 0.6 2.3

Rural Municipality Total 75.2 5.1 0.2 19.6

Local Government DistrictsPinawa 86.2 2.8 0.0 11.1

Local Government District Total 86.2 2.8 0.0 11.1

Indian reservesBerens River 13 48.3 0.0 50.7 1.0Birdtail Creek 57 75.3 0.0 23.5 0.0Black River 9 86.5 0.0 13.5 0.0Bloodvein 12 39.5 0.0 58.1 2.3Brochet 197 46.4 0.0 51.8 0.9Buffalo Point 36 81.3 9.4 3.1 9.4Canupawakpa Dakota First Nation 56.9 0.0 37.9 5.2Chemawawin 26.5 0.0 72.6 1.3Churchill 1 40.6 0.0 53.1 7.8Crane River 51 91.8 0.0 8.2 0.0Cross Lake 21.6 0.1 78.3 0.0Dakota Tipi 1 87.9 0.0 6.1 3.0




R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 18 -


Name

English - Single

(% Share)2

French - Single

(% Share)3


Single(% Share)4

OtherResponses

(% Share)5

(Indian reserves continued)Ebb and Flow 52 70.8 0.0 28.1 0.8Fairford 74.1 0.5 19.3 7.1Fisher River 96.1 0.0 3.9 0.0Fort Alexander 3 84.5 0.0 15.0 0.5Gambler 92.9 0.0 7.1 7.1Garden Hill First Nation 25.4 0.0 73.9 0.5God's Lake 23 37.5 0.0 60.2 1.9God's River 86A 10.9 0.8 86.6 2.5Grand Rapids 33 53.8 0.0 45.5 0.0Hole or Hollow Water 10 83.2 0.0 17.6 0.0Jackhead 43 82.6 0.0 15.2 0.0Keeseekoowenin 61 93.3 0.0 6.7 0.0Lac Brochet 197A 10.4 0.0 89.6 0.0Little Grand Rapids 14 26.8 0.0 72.6 0.0Little Saskatchewan 48 86.3 0.0 13.8 0.0Long Plain (Part) 6 83.3 0.0 15.8 0.9Moose Lake 31A 19.3 0.0 76.6 4.7Nelson House 170 67.1 0.0 32.9 0.0Norway House 17 66.2 0.0 33.4 0.5Opaskwayak Cree Nation 78.8 0.0 20.3 0.8Oxford House 24 19.3 0.0 80.7 0.0Pauingassi First Nation 5.1 0.0 94.9 0.0Peguis 1B 97.3 0.0 2.3 0.0Pine Creek 66A 81.8 0.0 17.5 0.7Poplar River 16 50.6 0.0 48.8 1.2Pukatawagan 198 55.6 0.0 44.1 0.3Red Sucker Lake 1976 12.8 0.0 83.3 4.5




R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 19 -


Name

English - Single

(% Share)2

French - Single

(% Share)3


Single(% Share)4

OtherResponses

(% Share)5

(Indian reserves continued)Sandy Bay 5 68.7 0.0 29.1 2.0Shamattawa 1 6.5 0.0 93.5 0.5Shoal River Indian Reserve 65A 42.9 0.6 55.9 0.6Split Lake 51.9 0.0 46.4 1.7St. Theresa Point 6.1 0.0 91.8 2.1Swan Lake 7 66.2 0.0 32.4 0.0Swan Lake 65C 30.0 0.0 70.0 0.0The Narrows 49 84.8 0.0 15.8 0.0Waterhen 45 70.1 0.0 29.9 0.0York Landing 65.6 0.0 31.1 2.2

Indian reserve Total 52.8 0.1 46.1 1.0

Indian SettlementIlford 57.1 0.0 39.3 0.0South Indian Lake 68.0 0.0 30.7 1.3

Indian Settlement Total 66.3 0.0 32.0 1.1

Unorganized 81.6 1.9 11.0 5.5

(1) Please contact Statistics Canada for detailed definitions of Census Subdivisiontypes.(2) English single response, as a percent share of total responses (single and multiple).(3) French single response, as a percent share of total responses (single and multiple).(4) Aboriginal Language single response, as a percent share of total responses(single and multiple).(5) Other single responses, plus multiple responses, as a percent share of total responses(single and multiple).Please see Statistics Canada's 2011 Census Dictionary (Cat. No. 98-301-X2011001) for more detailed definitions of these concepts.

Note: Census Subdivisions suppressed by Statistics Canada have been excluded. Numbers may not add to totals due to random rounding.




R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 20 -

Table 2: Language Spoken Most Often at Home2011 Census - 100% Data(Manitoba Census Subdivisions sorted by type1)

Name

English - Single

(% Share)2

French - Single

(% Share)3


Single(% Share)4

OtherResponses

(% Share)5

Manitoba 84.4 1.5 1.8 12.3


City Total 83.8 1.3 0.2 14.7





R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 21 -


Name

English - Single

(% Share)2

French - Single

(% Share)3


Single(% Share)4

OtherResponses

(% Share)5


Town Total 93.5 0.9 0.2 5.4




R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 22 -


Name

English - Single

(% Share)2

French - Single

(% Share)3


Single(% Share)4

OtherResponses

(% Share)5


Village Total 85.1 11.5 0.0 3.7





R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 23 -


Name

English - Single

(% Share)2

French - Single

(% Share)3


Single(% Share)4

OtherResponses

(% Share)5





R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 24 -


Name

English - Single

(% Share)2

French - Single

(% Share)3


Single(% Share)4

OtherResponses

(% Share)5





R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 25 -


Name

English - Single

(% Share)2

French - Single

(% Share)3


Single(% Share)4

OtherResponses

(% Share)5





R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 26 -


Name

English - Single

(% Share)2

French - Single

(% Share)3


Single(% Share)4

OtherResponses

(% Share)5









R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 27 -


Name

English - Single

(% Share)2

French - Single

(% Share)3


Single(% Share)4

OtherResponses

(% Share)5





R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 28 -


Name

English - Single

(% Share)2

French - Single

(% Share)3


Single(% Share)4

OtherResponses

(% Share)5





Unorganized 91.2 0.3 5.5 2.8

(1) Please contact Statistics Canada for detailed definitions of Census Subdivisiontypes.(2) English single response, as a percent share of total responses (single and multiple).(3) French single response, as a percent share of total responses (single and multiple).(4) Aboriginal Language single response, as a percent share of total responses(single and multiple).(5) Other single responses, plus multiple responses, as a percent share of total responses(single and multiple).Please see Statistics Canada's 2011 Census Dictionary (Cat. No. 98-301-X2011001) for more detailed definitions of these concepts.





R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 29 -

Table 3: First Official Language Spoken2011 Census - 100% Data(Manitoba Census Subdivisions sorted by type1)

NameEnglish(% Share)

French(% Share)

BothEnglish and

French(% Share)

NeitherEnglish nor

French(% Share)

Manitoba 95.3 3.4 0.2 1.1


City Total 95.3 3.1 0.3 1.3





R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 30 -



French(% Share)

BothEnglish and

French(% Share)

NeitherEnglish nor

French(% Share)


Town Total 97.1 2.3 0.1 0.5




R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 31 -



French(% Share)

BothEnglish and

French(% Share)

NeitherEnglish nor

French(% Share)


Village Total 83.0 16.7 0.3 0.1





R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 32 -



French(% Share)

BothEnglish and

French(% Share)

NeitherEnglish nor

French(% Share)





R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 33 -



French(% Share)

BothEnglish and

French(% Share)

NeitherEnglish nor

French(% Share)





R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 34 -



French(% Share)

BothEnglish and

French(% Share)

NeitherEnglish nor

French(% Share)





R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 35 -



French(% Share)

BothEnglish and

French(% Share)

NeitherEnglish nor

French(% Share)









R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 36 -



French(% Share)

BothEnglish and

French(% Share)

NeitherEnglish nor

French(% Share)





R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 37 -



French(% Share)

BothEnglish and

French(% Share)

NeitherEnglish nor

French(% Share)





Unorganized 98.0 1.6 0.0 0.4

(1) Please contact Statistics Canada for detailed definitions of Census Subdivisiontypes.Please see Statistics Canada's 2011 Census Dictionary (Cat. No. 98-301-X2011001) for more detailed definitions of these concepts.





R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 38 -

Tabl

e 4:

Sel

ecte

d La

ngua

ge C

hara

cter

istic

s - N

umbe

r20

11 C

ensu

s - 1

00%

Dat

a(M

anito

ba E

cono

mic

Reg

ions

)

Lang

uage

Cha

ract

eris

tics

(Num

ber o

f Peo

ple)

Sout

heas

tSo

uth

Cen

tral

Sout

hwes

tN

orth

Cen

tral

Win

nipe

gIn

terla

kePa

rkla

nds

Nor

thM

anito

baPo

pula

tion

by M

othe

r Ton

gue

103,

795

59,9

7510

7,21

047

,475

658,

200

87,3

2541

,370

87,7

501,

193,

095

Sin

gle

resp

onse

s10

2,22

558

,990

106,

155

46,9

0064

0,68

586

,275

40,7

6586

,580

1,16

8,57

0E

nglis

h71

,175

35,6

0091

,195

36,3

9047

0,62

074

,035

34,9

8555

,985

869,

990

Fren

ch9,

155

1,99

51,

685

2,53

523

,515

1,60

098

561

542

,090

Non

-offi

cial

lang

uage

s21

,900

21,3

9513

,270

7,97

514

6,54

510

,640

4,79

529

,975

256,

500

Ger

man

16,4

0018

,900

4,45

55,

560

16,3

354,

485

815

210

67,1

55Ta

galo

g (P

ilipi

no, F

ilipi

no)

470

8058

015

532

,600

205

8090

34,2

65C

ree,

n.o

.s.

3010

105

351,

115

4513

017

,500

18,9

70U

krai

nian

1,35

010

51,

445

255

9,43

01,

950

2,47

528

017

,295

Pan

jabi

(Pun

jabi

)65

4080

259,

300

135

522

09,

870

Spa

nish

210

160

2,02

560

6,11

513

535

808,

825

Ojib

way

150

135

225

1,08

01,

645

410

650

3,45

57,

760

Chi

nese

, n.o

.s.

4020

1,01

520

6,33

070

4030

7,57

0P

olis

h35

025

185

505,

855

760

7560

7,37

0O

ji-C

ree

100

150

685

105

6,05

06,

785

Rus

sian

1,21

01,

030

255

503,

955

165

5515

6,73

0P

ortu

gues

e11

525

5015

5,36

044

05

956,

105

Italia

n70

540

253,

735

235

525

4,14

0C

anto

nese

2020

8020

3,20

525

155

3,39

5V

ietn

ames

e35

1040

53,

150

5510

203,

325

Oth

er L

angu

ages

11,

355

790

2,68

062

037

,700

1,52

538

51,

855

46,9

50M

ultip

le re

spon

ses

1,57

098

51,

055

570

17,5

201,

045

605

1,17

524

,525

Eng

lish

& F

renc

h49

090

155

165

2,57

017

095

653,

800

Eng

lish

& n

on-o

ffici

al la

ngua

ge(s

)98

078

581

536

013

,745

740

460

1,05

518

,940

Fren

ch &

non

-offi

cial

lang

uage

(s)

9510

560

4092

512

035

401,

425

Eng

lish,

Fre

nch

&no

n-of

ficia

l lan

guag

e(s)

1010

255

280

1515

536

5

Pre

pare

d by

MB

S fr

om:

Sta

tistic

s C

anad

a, 2

011

Cen

sus

Nov

embe

r 16,

201

2



R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 39 -

Tabl

e 4:

Sel

ecte

d La

ngua

ge C

hara

cter

istic

s - N

umbe

r20

11 C

ensu

s - 1

00%

Dat

a(M

anito

ba E

cono

mic

Reg

ions

)

Lang

uage

Cha

ract

eris

tics

(Num

ber o

f Peo

ple)

Sout

heas

tSo

uth

Cen

tral

Sout

hwes

tN

orth

Cen

tral

Win

nipe

gIn

terla

kePa

rkla

nds

Nor

thM

anito

baPo

pula

tion

by H

ome

Lang

uage

10

3,79

559

,975

107,

210

47,4

7565

8,20

087

,325

41,3

7087

,750

1,19

3,09

5(L

angu

age(

s) S

poke

n M

ost O

ften)

Sin

gle

resp

onse

s10

1,20

057

,865

105,

675

46,7

6562

5,78

586

,150

40,7

1586

,410

1,15

0,56

0E

nglis

h87

,380

46,8

5597

,345

41,0

8054

5,99

082

,505

39,5

8066

,595

1,00

7,33

0Fr

ench

4,92

596

550

51,

120

9,71

038

518

515

517

,950

Non

-offi

cial

lang

uage

s8,

890

10,0

407,

825

4,56

570

,090

3,26

095

019

,660

125,

280

Ger

man

7,24

09,

070

2,70

53,

605

2,47

01,

960

120

1027

,175

Taga

log

(Pili

pino

, Fili

pino

)23

045

375

9517

,855

9545

3518

,775

Cre

e, n

.o.s

.0

510

023

50

3510

,555

10,8

45P

anja

bi (P

unja

bi)

3540

4515

7,02

070

013

57,

360

Oji-

Cre

e0

05

029

05

05,

505

5,80

0C

hine

se, n

.o.s

.20

151,

000

154,

590

3535

155,

735

Spa

nish

125

100

1,79

035

3,31

545

1535

5,46

5R

ussi

an53

043

514

040

2,77

570

205

4,01

0O

jibw

ay30

8545

515

395

170

275

2,17

03,

695

Ukr

aini

an12

015

355

101,

660

155

305

202,

640

Por

tugu

ese

2010

155

2,30

010

50

402,

490

Pol

ish

655

255

2,15

020

55

102,

475

Vie

tnam

ese

2010

250

2,38

035

05

2,47

5C

anto

nese

1015

6510

2,20

515

105

2,33

0K

orea

n45

517

040

1,96

515

1020

2,27

0O

ther

Lan

guag

es1

395

195

1,08

017

518

,460

295

105

1,09

521

,715

Mul

tiple

resp

onse

s2,

600

2,11

01,

535

705

32,4

201,

175

655

1,34

042

,535

Eng

lish

& F

renc

h37

590

100

115

1,64

080

4045

2,48

0E

nglis

h &

non

-offi

cial

lang

uage

(s)

2,17

51,

975

1,37

557

529

,905

1,04

560

51,

280

38,9

30Fr

ench

& n

on-o

ffici

al la

ngua

ge(s

)25

4535

1046

040

510

635

Eng

lish,

Fre

nch

&no

n-of

ficia

l lan

guag

e(s)

205

250

415

105

1048

5

Pre

pare

d by

MB

S fr

om:

Sta

tistic

s C

anad

a, 2

011

Cen

sus

Nov

embe

r 16,

201

2



R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 40 -

Tabl

e 4:

Sel

ecte

d La

ngua

ge C

hara

cter

istic

s - N

umbe

r20

11 C

ensu

s - 1

00%

Dat

a(M

anito

ba E

cono

mic

Reg

ions

)

Lang

uage

Cha

ract

eris

tics

(Num

ber o

f Peo

ple)

Sout

heas

tSo

uth

Cen

tral

Sout

hwes

tN

orth

Cen

tral

Win

nipe

gIn

terla

kePa

rkla

nds

Nor

thM

anito

baPo

pula

tion

by H

ome

Lang

uage

10

3,79

559

,975

107,

210

47,4

7065

8,20

087

,320

41,3

7087

,750

1,19

3,09

5(O

ther

Lan

guag

e(s)

Spo

ken

Reg

ular

ly)

Non

e88

,045

48,5

8510

0,04

542

,280

565,

145

81,8

0038

,500

60,8

851,

025,

280

Sin

gle

resp

onse

s15

,475

11,1

457,

025

5,14

091

,170

5,39

52,

805

26,7

8016

4,94

0E

nglis

h5,

875

4,11

03,

265

2,71

536

,160

1,61

549

014

,795

69,0

35Fr

ench

3,42

075

585

089

511

,735

705

460

390

19,2

20N

on-o

ffici

al la

ngua

ges

6,17

56,

275

2,90

51,

530

43,2

803,

075

1,85

011

,595

76,6

90G

erm

an4,

140

5,23

576

075

04,

900

930

190

7016

,975

Cre

e, n

.o.s

.30

595

1580

525

958,

115

9,18

0Ta

galo

g (P

ilipi

no, F

ilipi

no)

130

2016

530

7,83

565

2530

8,29

0U

krai

nian

430

2540

560

2,82

565

01,

080

855,

565

Ojib

way

5065

130

335

1,11

518

027

01,

445

3,59

0S

pani

sh16

014

027

045

2,75

585

3045

3,53

5P

ortu

gues

e55

520

102,

110

235

530

2,46

5P

olis

h60

550

151,

655

210

1020

2,03

0R

ussi

an57

046

510

510

750

3010

101,

955

Italia

n30

520

51,

500

750

101,

645

Pan

jabi

(Pun

jabi

)20

510

101,

430

355

451,

560

Oji-

Cre

e10

515

041

50

099

01,

440

Chi

nese

, n.o

.s.

1010

605

1,14

015

55

1,24

5A

rabi

c20

2030

588

520

010

990

Dut

ch14

011

060

6047

575

2515

955

Oth

er L

angu

ages

130

014

574

017

512

,655

450

115

670

15,3

00M

ultip

le re

spon

ses

275

250

140

451,

885

125

6585

2,87

5E

nglis

h &

Fre

nch

50

200

190

00

522

5E

nglis

h &

non

-offi

cial

lang

uage

(s)

110

125

2510

770

1510

151,

085

Fren

ch &

non

-offi

cial

lang

uage

(s)

160

120

9035

910

110

5565

1,55

0E

nglis

h, F

renc

h &

non-

offic

ial l

angu

age(

s)0

00

015

00

020

Pre

pare

d by

MB

S fr

om:

Sta

tistic

s C

anad

a, 2

011

Cen

sus

Nov

embe

r 16,

201

2



R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 41 -

Tabl

e 4:

Sel

ecte

d La

ngua

ge C

hara

cter

istic

s - N

umbe

r20

11 C

ensu

s - 1

00%

Dat

a(M

anito

ba E

cono

mic

Reg

ions

)

Lang

uage

Cha

ract

eris

tics

(Num

ber o

f Peo

ple)

Sout

heas

tSo

uth

Cen

tral

Sout

hwes

tN

orth

Cen

tral

Win

nipe

gIn

terla

kePa

rkla

nds

Nor

thM

anito

baK

now

ledg

e of

Offi

cial

Lan

guag

es10

3,79

559

,975

107,

210

47,4

7065

8,20

087

,325

41,3

7087

,750

1,19

3,10

0E

nglis

h on

ly87

,315

54,7

5010

0,97

542

,920

581,

290

82,6

7539

,265

85,1

451,

074,

330

Fren

ch o

nly

285

8065

6092

535

2025

1,49

0E

nglis

h an

d Fr

ench

14,8

403,

405

4,68

04,

225

67,4

954,

395

2,05

02,

050

103,

145

Nei

ther

Eng

lish

nor F

renc

h1,

360

1,74

51,

490

265

8,48

521

535

535

14,1

35

Firs

t Offi

cial

Lan

guag

e Sp

oken

103,

795

59,9

7510

7,21

047

,470

658,

200

87,3

2541

,370

87,7

501,

193,

100

Eng

lish

93,5

0056

,320

104,

215

44,8

2562

5,08

585

,650

40,4

5086

,635

1,13

6,69

0Fr

ench

8,78

01,

870

1,45

02,

345

22,7

601,

400

850

550

39,9

95E

nglis

h an

d Fr

ench

190

6516

050

2,13

065

3560

2,74

5N

eith

er E

nglis

h no

r Fre

nch

1,33

01,

720

1,39

025

08,

230

210

3551

013

,675

(1) O

ther

Lan

guag

es is

a s

ub-to

tal o

f tho

se la

ngua

ges

not d

ispl

ayed

sep

arat

ely

here

.n.

o.s

- not

oth

erw

ise

spec

ified

Ple

ase

see

Sta

tistic

s C

anad

a's

2011

Cen

sus

Dic

tiona

ry (C

at. N

o. 9

8-30

1-X

2011

001)

for m

ore

deta

iled

defin

ition

s of

thes

e co

ncep

ts.

Not

e: N

umbe

rs m

ay n

ot a

dd to

tota

ls d

ue to

rand

om ro

undi

ng.

Pre

pare

d by

MB

S fr

om:

Sta

tistic

s C

anad

a, 2

011

Cen

sus

Nov

embe

r 16,

201

2



R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 42 -

Tabl

e 5:

Sel

ecte

d La

ngua

ge C

hara

cter

istic

s - P

erce

nt S

hare

2011

Cen

sus

- 100

% D

ata

(Man

itoba

Eco

nom

ic R

egio

ns)

Lang

uage

Cha

ract

eris

tics

(Per

cent

Sha

re o

f Tot

al)

Sout

heas

tSo

uth

Cen

tral

Sout

hwes

tN

orth

Cen

tral

Win

nipe

gIn

terla

kePa

rkla

nds

Nor

thM

anito

baPo

pula

tion

by M

othe

r Ton

gue

(%)

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

Sin

gle

resp

onse

s98

.598

.499

.098

.897

.398

.898

.598

.797

.9E

nglis

h68

.659

.485

.176

.771

.584

.884

.663

.872

.9Fr

ench

8.8

3.3

1.6

5.3

3.6

1.8

2.4

0.7

3.5

Non

-offi

cial

lang

uage

s21

.135

.712

.416

.822

.312

.211

.634

.221

.5G

erm

an15

.831

.54.

211

.72.

55.

12.

00.

25.

6Ta

galo

g (P

ilipi

no, F

ilipi

no)

0.5

0.1

0.5

0.3

5.0

0.2

0.2

0.1

2.9

Cre

e, n

.o.s

.0.

00.

00.

10.

10.

20.

10.

319

.91.

6U

krai

nian

1.3

0.2

1.3

0.5

1.4

2.2

6.0

0.3

1.4

Pan

jabi

(Pun

jabi

)0.

10.

10.

10.

11.

40.

20.

00.

30.

8S

pani

sh0.

20.

31.

90.

10.

90.

20.

10.

10.

7O

jibw

ay0.

10.

20.

22.

30.

20.

51.

63.

90.

7C

hine

se, n

.o.s

.0.

00.

00.

90.

01.

00.

10.

10.

00.

6P

olis

h0.

30.

00.

20.

10.

90.

90.

20.

10.

6O

ji-C

ree

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.0

6.9

0.6

Rus

sian

1.2

1.7

0.2

0.1

0.6

0.2

0.1

0.0

0.6

Por

tugu

ese

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.8

0.5

0.0

0.1

0.5

Italia

n0.

10.

00.

00.

10.

60.

30.

00.

00.

3C

anto

nese

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.5

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.3

Vie

tnam

ese

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.5

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.3

Oth

er L

angu

ages

11.

31.

32.

51.

35.

71.

70.

92.

13.

9M

ultip

le re

spon

ses

1.5

1.6

1.0

1.2

2.7

1.2

1.5

1.3

2.1

Eng

lish

& F

renc

h0.

50.

20.

10.

30.

40.

20.

20.

10.

3E

nglis

h &

non

-offi

cial

lang

uage

(s)

0.9

1.3

0.8

0.8

2.1

0.8

1.1

1.2

1.6

Fren

ch &

non

-offi

cial

lang

uage

(s)

0.1

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.1

Eng

lish,

Fre

nch

&0.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

0no

n-of

ficia

l lan

guag

e(s)

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Pre

pare

d by

MB

S fr

om:

Sta

tistic

s C

anad

a, 2

011

Cen

sus

Nov

embe

r 16,

201

2



R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 43 -

Tabl

e 5:

Sel

ecte

d La

ngua

ge C

hara

cter

istic

s - P

erce

nt S

hare

2011

Cen

sus

- 100

% D

ata

(Man

itoba

Eco

nom

ic R

egio

ns)

Lang

uage

Cha

ract

eris

tics

(Per

cent

Sha

re o

f Tot

al)

Sout

heas

tSo

uth

Cen

tral

Sout

hwes

tN

orth

Cen

tral

Win

nipe

gIn

terla

kePa

rkla

nds

Nor

thM

anito

baPo

pula

tion

by H

ome

Lang

uage

(%)

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

(Lan

guag

e(s)

Spo

ken

Mos

t Ofte

n)

Sin

gle

resp

onse

s97

.596

.598

.698

.595

.198

.798

.498

.596

.4E

nglis

h84

.278

.190

.886

.583

.094

.595

.775

.984

.4Fr

ench

4.7

1.6

0.5

2.4

1.5

0.4

0.4

0.2

1.5

Non

-offi

cial

lang

uage

s8.

616

.77.

39.

610

.63.

72.

322

.410

.5G

erm

an7.

015

.12.

57.

60.

42.

20.

30.

02.

3Ta

galo

g (P

ilipi

no, F

ilipi

no)

0.2

0.1

0.3

0.2

2.7

0.1

0.1

0.0

1.6

Cre

e, n

.o.s

.0.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

112

.00.

9P

anja

bi (P

unja

bi)

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.0

1.1

0.1

0.0

0.2

0.6

Oji-

Cre

e0.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

06.

30.

5C

hine

se, n

.o.s

.0.

00.

00.

90.

00.

70.

00.

10.

00.

5S

pani

sh0.

10.

21.

70.

10.

50.

10.

00.

00.

5R

ussi

an0.

50.

70.

10.

10.

40.

10.

00.

00.

3O

jibw

ay0.

00.

10.

01.

10.

10.

20.

72.

50.

3U

krai

nian

0.1

0.0

0.3

0.0

0.3

0.2

0.7

0.0

0.2

Por

tugu

ese

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.3

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.2

Pol

ish

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.3

0.2

0.0

0.0

0.2

Vie

tnam

ese

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.2

Can

tone

se0.

00.

00.

10.

00.

30.

00.

00.

00.

2K

orea

n0.

00.

00.

20.

10.

30.

00.

00.

00.

2O

ther

Lan

guag

es1

0.4

0.3

1.0

0.4

2.8

0.3

0.3

1.2

1.8

Mul

tiple

resp

onse

s2.

53.

51.

41.

54.

91.

31.

61.

53.

6E

nglis

h &

Fre

nch

0.4

0.2

0.1

0.2

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

Eng

lish

& n

on-o

ffici

al la

ngua

ge(s

)2.

13.

31.

31.

24.

51.

21.

51.

53.

3Fr

ench

& n

on-o

ffici

al la

ngua

ge(s

)0.

00.

10.

00.

00.

10.

00.

00.

00.

1E

nglis

h, F

renc

h &

non-

offic

ial l

angu

age(

s)0.

00.

00.

00.

00.

10.

00.

00.

00.

0

Pre

pare

d by

MB

S fr

om:

Sta

tistic

s C

anad

a, 2

011

Cen

sus

Nov

embe

r 16,

201

2



R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 44 -

Tabl

e 5:

Sel

ecte

d La

ngua

ge C

hara

cter

istic

s - P

erce

nt S

hare

2011

Cen

sus

- 100

% D

ata

(Man

itoba

Eco

nom

ic R

egio

ns)

Lang

uage

Cha

ract

eris

tics

(Per

cent

Sha

re o

f Tot

al)

Sout

heas

tSo

uth

Cen

tral

Sout

hwes

tN

orth

Cen

tral

Win

nipe

gIn

terla

kePa

rkla

nds

Nor

thM

anito

baPo

pula

tion

by H

ome

Lang

uage

(%)

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

(Oth

er L

angu

age(

s) S

poke

n R

egul

arly

)

Non

e84

.881

.093

.389

.185

.993

.793

.169

.485

.9S

ingl

e re

spon

ses

14.9

18.6

6.6

10.8

13.9

6.2

6.8

30.5

13.8

Eng

lish

5.7

6.9

3.0

5.7

5.5

1.8

1.2

16.9

5.8

Fren

ch3.

31.

30.

81.

91.

80.

81.

10.

41.

6N

on-o

ffici

al la

ngua

ges

5.9

10.5

2.7

3.2

6.6

3.5

4.5

13.2

6.4

Ger

man

4.0

8.7

0.7

1.6

0.7

1.1

0.5

0.1

1.4

Cre

e, n

.o.s

.0.

00.

00.

10.

00.

10.

00.

29.

20.

8Ta

galo

g (P

ilipi

no, F

ilipi

no)

0.1

0.0

0.2

0.1

1.2

0.1

0.1

0.0

0.7

Ukr

aini

an0.

40.

00.

40.

10.

40.

72.

60.

10.

5O

jibw

ay0.

00.

10.

10.

70.

20.

20.

71.

60.

3S

pani

sh0.

20.

20.

30.

10.

40.

10.

10.

10.

3P

ortu

gues

e0.

10.

00.

00.

00.

30.

30.

00.

00.

2P

olis

h0.

10.

00.

00.

00.

30.

20.

00.

00.

2R

ussi

an0.

50.

80.

10.

00.

10.

00.

00.

00.

2Ita

lian

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.2

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.1

Pan

jabi

(Pun

jabi

)0.

00.

00.

00.

00.

20.

00.

00.

10.

1O

ji-C

ree

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.0

1.1

0.1

Chi

nese

, n.o

.s.

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

Ara

bic

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.1

Dut

ch0.

10.

20.

10.

10.

10.

10.

10.

00.

1O

ther

Lan

guag

es1

0.3

0.2

0.7

0.4

1.9

0.5

0.3

0.8

1.3

Mul

tiple

resp

onse

s0.

30.

40.

10.

10.

30.

10.

20.

10.

2E

nglis

h &

Fre

nch

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Eng

lish

& n

on-o

ffici

al la

ngua

ge(s

)0.

10.

20.

00.

00.

10.

00.

00.

00.

1Fr

ench

& n

on-o

ffici

al la

ngua

ge(s

)0.

20.

20.

10.

10.

10.

10.

10.

10.

1E

nglis

h, F

renc

h &

non-

offic

ial l

angu

age(

s)0.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

00.

0

Pre

pare

d by

MB

S fr

om:

Sta

tistic

s C

anad

a, 2

011

Cen

sus

Nov

embe

r 16,

201

2



R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 45 -

Tabl

e 5:

Sel

ecte

d La

ngua

ge C

hara

cter

istic

s - P

erce

nt S

hare

2011

Cen

sus

- 100

% D

ata

(Man

itoba

Eco

nom

ic R

egio

ns)

Lang

uage

Cha

ract

eris

tics

(Per

cent

Sha

re o

f Tot

al)

Sout

heas

tSo

uth

Cen

tral

Sout

hwes

tN

orth

Cen

tral

Win

nipe

gIn

terla

kePa

rkla

nds

Nor

thM

anito

baK

now

ledg

e of

Offi

cial

Lan

guag

es (%

)10

010

010

010

010

010

010

010

010

0E

nglis

h on

ly84

.191

.394

.290

.488

.394

.794

.997

.090

.0Fr

ench

onl

y0.

30.

10.

10.

10.

10.

00.

00.

00.

1E

nglis

h an

d Fr

ench

14.3

5.7

4.4

8.9

10.3

5.0

5.0

2.3

8.6

Nei

ther

Eng

lish

nor F

renc

h1.

32.

91.

40.

61.

30.

20.

10.

61.

2

Firs

t Offi

cial

Lan

guag

e Sp

oken

(%)

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

Eng

lish

90.1

93.9

97.2

94.4

95.0

98.1

97.8

98.7

95.3

Fren

ch8.

53.

11.

44.

93.

51.

62.

10.

63.

4E

nglis

h an

d Fr

ench

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.3

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.2

Nei

ther

Eng

lish

nor F

renc

h1.

32.

91.

30.

51.

30.

20.

10.

61.

1

(1) O

ther

Lan

guag

es is

a s

ub-to

tal o

f tho

se la

ngua

ges

not d

ispl

ayed

sep

arat

ely

here

.n.

o.s

- not

oth

erw

ise

spec

ified

Ple

ase

see

Sta

tistic

s C

anad

a's

2011

Cen

sus

Dic

tiona

ry (C

at. N

o. 9

8-30

1-X

2011

001)

for m

ore

deta

iled

defin

ition

s of

thes

e co

ncep

ts.

Not

e: N

umbe

rs m

ay n

ot a

dd to

tota

ls d

ue to

rand

om ro

undi

ng.

Pre

pare

d by

MB

S fr

om:

Sta

tistic

s C

anad

a, 2

011

Cen

sus

Nov

embe

r 16,

201

2



R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 46 -

Table 6: Suppression List for Manitoba Census Subdivisions2011 Census(sorted by type1 of census subdivision)

NameGeographic

Code

2011Census

Count

2006Census

CountLocal Government Districts

Mystery Lake 4622017 10 0

Indian reservesBrokenhead 4 4613062 - 467 ^Chemawawin 3 4619082 10 18Dakota Plains 6A 4609026 111 65Dauphin River 48A 4619062 - 84 ^Dog Creek 46 4618055 680 617Fairford (Part) 50 4619060 0 0Fisher River 44A 4619058 30 44Fox Lake 2 4623027 193 103Gambler 63 (Part) 4615049 5 10Opaskwayak Cree Nation 21B 4621034 32 37Opaskwayak Cree Nation 21C 4621035 20 15Rolling River 67 4615071 343 336Rolling River 67B 4615072 0 10Roseau Rapids 2A 4602026 107 125Roseau River 2 4602027 588 568Shoal Lake (Part) 39A 4601082 0 0Shoal Lake (Part) 40 4601079 0 0Sioux Valley Dakota Nation 4606040 1,147 1,079Split Lake (Part) 171 4623060 0 0Valley River 63A 4616046 364 427Wasagamack 4622800 1,411 1,160Waywayseecappo First Nation 4616017 1,219 1,127

Indian SettlementGillam 4623025 72 0Granville Lake 4623039 16 98

UnorganizedDivision No. 17 4617092 101 204Division No. 18, West Part 4618093 0 0Division No. 23 4623062 5 171

(1) Please contact Statistics Canada for detailed definitions of Census Subdivisiontypes.

^Note: Incompletely Enumerated Indian Reserve for the 2011 CensusPrepared by MBS from: Statistics Canada, 2011 Census November 16, 2012



R3C 3H8


November 2012

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


- 47 -

mbs census spotlight on: language 824 - 155 carlton street ... · great falls lac du bonnet sprague...

Documents