mcgraw-hill/irwin strategic management copyright © 2005 by the mcgraw-hill companies, inc. all...

8
McGraw-Hill/Irwin STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Gregory G. Dess, G. T. Lumpkin and Marilyn L. Taylor 6 6 Corporate-Level Strategy: Creating Value through Diversification

Upload: dina-hamilton

Post on 24-Dec-2015

244 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: McGraw-Hill/Irwin STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Gregory G. Dess, G. T. Lumpkin and Marilyn

McGraw-Hill/IrwinSTRATEGIC MANAGEMENT

Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Gregory G. Dess, G. T. Lumpkin and Marilyn L. Taylor

66

Corporate-Level Strategy:Creating Value through

Diversification

Page 2: McGraw-Hill/Irwin STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Gregory G. Dess, G. T. Lumpkin and Marilyn

Chapter 6McGraw-Hill/IrwinSTRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Gregory G. Dess, G. T. Lumpkin and

Marilyn L. Taylor

After studying this chapter, you should have a good understanding of:

• How managers can create value through diversification initiatives

• The reasons for the failure of many diversification efforts

• How corporations can use related diversification to achieve synergistic benefits through economies of scope and market power

• How corporations can use unrelated diversification to attain synergistic benefits through corporate restructuring, parenting, and portfolio analysis

• The various means of engaging in diversification—mergers and acquisitions, joint ventures/strategic alliances, and internal development

• The value of real options analysis (ROA) in making resource allocation decisions under conditions of high uncertainty

• Managerial behaviors that can erode the creation of value

Learning ObjectivesLearning ObjectivesTRANSPARENCY-51

Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 3: McGraw-Hill/Irwin STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Gregory G. Dess, G. T. Lumpkin and Marilyn

Chapter 6McGraw-Hill/IrwinSTRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Gregory G. Dess, G. T. Lumpkin and

Marilyn L. Taylor

Creating Value through Related and Unrelated Diversification

Related Diversification: Economies of Scope Leveraging Core Competences

• 3M leverages its competences in adhesives technologies to many industries, including automotive, construction, and telecommunications.

Sharing Activities

• McKesson, a large distribution company, sells many product lines, such as pharmaceuticals and liquor, through its super warehouses.

Related Diversification: Market Power Pooled Negotiating Power

• The Times Mirror Company increases its power over customers by providing “one-stop shopping” for advertisers to reach customers through multiple media—television and newspapers—in several huge markets such as New York and Chicago.

Vertical Integration

• Shaw Industries—a giant carpet manufacturer—increases its control over raw materials by producing much of its own polypropylene fiber, a key input to its manufacturing process.

Exhibit 6.1

Unrelated Diversification: Parenting, Restructuring, and Financial Synergies Corporate Restructuring and Parenting• The corporate office of Cooper Industries adds value to its acquired businesses by performing such

activities as auditing their manufacturing operations, improving their accounting activities, and centralizing union negotiations.

Portfolio Analysis• Novartis, formerly Ciba-Geigy, uses portfolio analysis to improve many key activities, including resource

allocation as well as reward and evaluation systems.

TRANSPARENCY-52

Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 4: McGraw-Hill/Irwin STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Gregory G. Dess, G. T. Lumpkin and Marilyn

Chapter 6McGraw-Hill/IrwinSTRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Gregory G. Dess, G. T. Lumpkin and

Marilyn L. Taylor

Simplified Stages of Vertical Integration: Shaw Industries

Exhibit 6.2TRANSPARENCY-53

Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Raw materials Manufacturing of final product DistributionRaw materials Manufacturing of final product Distribution

Page 5: McGraw-Hill/Irwin STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Gregory G. Dess, G. T. Lumpkin and Marilyn

Chapter 6McGraw-Hill/IrwinSTRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Gregory G. Dess, G. T. Lumpkin and

Marilyn L. Taylor

Benefits and Risks of Vertical Integration

Benefits• Secure a source of raw materials or distribution channels

• Protection and control over valuable assets

• Access to new business opportunities

• Simplified procurement and administrative procedures

Risks• Costs and expenses associated with increased overhead and capital

expenditures

• Loss of flexibility resulting from large investments

• Problems associated with unbalanced capacities along the value chain

• Additional administrative costs associated with managing a more complex set of activities

Exhibit 6.3TRANSPARENCY-54

Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 6: McGraw-Hill/Irwin STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Gregory G. Dess, G. T. Lumpkin and Marilyn

Chapter 6McGraw-Hill/IrwinSTRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Gregory G. Dess, G. T. Lumpkin and

Marilyn L. Taylor

The BCG Portfolio Matrix

Notes:1. Each circle represents one of the corporation’s business units. The size of the circle represents the relative size of the business unit in terms of revenues.2. Relative market share, measured by the ratio of the business unit’s size to that of its largest competitor, is plotted along the horizontal axis.3. Market share is central to the BCG matrix. This is because high relative market share leads to unit cost reduction due to experience and learning curve effects and,

consequently, superior competitive position.

Exhibit 6.4 TRANSPARENCY-55

Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 7: McGraw-Hill/Irwin STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Gregory G. Dess, G. T. Lumpkin and Marilyn

Chapter 6McGraw-Hill/IrwinSTRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Gregory G. Dess, G. T. Lumpkin and

Marilyn L. Taylor

Ten Biggest Mergers of All Time and Their Effect on Shareholder Wealth*

Exhibit 6.5TRANSPARENCY-56

Page 8: McGraw-Hill/Irwin STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Gregory G. Dess, G. T. Lumpkin and Marilyn

Chapter 6McGraw-Hill/IrwinSTRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Gregory G. Dess, G. T. Lumpkin and

Marilyn L. Taylor

The Seven Habits of a Less-Than-Effective Merger

HABIT #1 Be proactive: “Act or be acted upon.”

REALITY Company was slow to see the potential of electronic planning devices which initially cut into product sales.

HABIT #2 Begin with the end in mind: “You carefully think through the product or the service that you want to provide in terms of your market target, then you organize all the elements . . . to meet that objective.”

REALITY The company delayed selling off noncore assets, such as a commercial printing business, which occupied management time and cut into profit margins. Now it’s being sold off.

HABIT #3 Put first things first: “Organize and execute around priorities.”

REALITY After the 1997 merger between Covey’s company and Franklin Resources, management didn’t trim overlapping jobs—thus increasing overhead and hurting margins.

Exhibit 6.6

HABIT #4 Think win/win: “There’s plenty for everybody . . . . One person’s success is not achieved at the expense or the exclusion of the success of others.”

REALITY The two sales staffs were combined, but initially the compensation systems were not. That caused resentment among those who made less.

HABIT #5 Seek first to understand, then to be understood: “An effective salesperson first seeks to understand the needs, the concerns, the situation of the customer.”

REALITY Most sales staff was kept at Utah headquarters, so the company was unable to assess changing client needs out in the field.

HABIT #6 Synergize: “We create new alternatives—something that wasn’t there before.”

REALITY The combined company maintained two headquarters, limiting opportunities to build on each other’s strengths.

HABIT #7 Sharpen the saw: “Preserv[e] and enhanc[e] the greatest asset that you have—you . . . . Renew the four dimensions of your nature—physical, spiritual, mental, and social/emotional.”

REALITY Company was true to this principle by giving workers Sundays off. But that meant closing its 127 stores on a busy shopping day.

Source: Grover, R. 1999. Gurus who failed their own course. Business Week, November 8, 125-126.

TRANSPARENCY-57