measurement of the branching ratio of the k + decay update e. de lucia, r. versaci
DESCRIPTION
Home works (Hausaufgabe) 1.FILFO correction 2.T3 FILTER correction 3.Efficiency checks 4.Time stability 5.Trigger with not overlapping sectors BR (K+ ) = ± (stat.) BR (K+ ) = ± (stat.)Trig over Trig no overTRANSCRIPT
Measurement of the
branching ratio of
the K+ decay
UpdateE. De Lucia, R. Versaci
Home works (Hausaufgabe)
1.FILFO correction 2.T3 FILTER correction 3.Efficiency checks 4.Time stability 5.Trigger with not overlapping sectors
Home works (Hausaufgabe)
1.FILFO correction 2.T3 FILTER correction 3.Efficiency checks 4.Time stability 5.Trigger with not overlapping sectors
BR (K+ ) = 0.6357 ± 0.0009 (stat.)
BR (K+ ) = 0.6366 ± 0.0009 (stat.) Trig over
Trig no over
WORK IN PROGRESS
WORK IN PROGRESS
OLD SLIDESOLD SLIDES
T3FILTER correction (trig no over)Using the whole DATA sample:
13
13
6464
FLAGTTAGTAG
FLAGTSIGSIG
TAG
SIG
xNNxNN
NN
BR(K()) BR x CT3
CT3 = 0.9994 0.0003
BRT3FILTER negligible O(10-6)
T3FILTER correction (trig over)Using the whole DATA sample:
13
13
6464
FLAGTTAGTAG
FLAGTSIGSIG
TAG
SIG
xNNxNN
NN
BR(K()) BR x CT3
CT3 = 0.9995 0.0003
BRT3FILTER negligible O(10-6)
FILFO correction
SIGTAG
TAGFILFOC
11
iFILFO
iAFILFO
iAFILFO
i NNN
CFILFO = 1.00006 0.00032 (DATA)CFILFO = 0.99967 0.00015 (MC)
Using the same set of runs for DATA and MC :
In agreement within the errorsIn agreement within the errors
BRFILFO = 3x10-4BR(K()) BR x CFILFO
Efficiency evaluationOn the sample selected using ECAL we look for a signal event
( i.e. K+ reconstructed in the DC FV)using the same event selection used for the signal sample
KTAG
K
NK
NtagKTAG
=
NK
Ntag
Efficiency checks (I)Remember memo #3x10Remember memo #3x1022
The systematic uncertainties on the efficiency are:
1) Low energy cut (LEC)
BR = 5 x 10-4
(from 10 to 40 MeV)
2) High energy cut (HEC)
BR = 2 x 10-4
(from 70 to 90 MeV)
standard cuts: LEC = 20 MeV HEC = 80 MeV pollution of the EMC sample 1.2%
p*(MeV/c)
Calorimeter sampleCalorimeter sample only true KTrue K
Efficiency checks (II): pollution/compensation
p*(MeV/c)
LEC = 40 MeV HEC = 90 MeV
76% generated True K()pollution 3 %
Calorimeter sampleCalorimeter sample only true KTrue K
LEC = 10 MeV HEC = 90 MeV
25% generatedTrue K()pollution 0.7 %
Efficiency checks (III)Changing the cuts for the selection of the EMC sample we observe the following maximal variations:
DATA efficiency 0 0.3074 (2) 0.3169 (3) 0 3%
Pollution in EMC sample 0.7 % 3 %
Correction (CORR) 0.98008 1.0085 CORR 3%
For each EMC sample:1. evaluate the MC corrections CORR 2. apply CORR to the efficiency 0 measured on EMC DATA sample = 0 x CORR
Then the initial 0 3% becomes O(10-4) BR 5 x 10-4
Changing EMC sample :Changing EMC sample :Pollution and compensation have different Pollution and compensation have different behavioursbehaviours !!!!!!!!
Efficiency checks (IV): Double ratio MC/Data
The double ratio stability is related to our sensitivity to changes The double ratio stability is related to our sensitivity to changes of the pollution/compensation effectsof the pollution/compensation effects
DATA(set2)DATA(set1)
MC(set2)MC(set1)
N.B.set1 and set2 appliedon independent DATA samples
set1 : LEC = 20 MeV HEC = 80 MeV
set2 : LEC = 20 MeV HEC = 85 MeV
2 = 90.33/85A0 = 1.007 0.008
Efficiency checks (IV): Double ratio MC/Data
The double ratio stability is related to our sensitivity to changes The double ratio stability is related to our sensitivity to changes of the pollution/compensation effectsof the pollution/compensation effects
DATA(set2)DATA(set1)
MC(set2)MC(set1)
N.B.set1 and set2 appliedon independent DATA samples
set1 : LEC = 20 MeV HEC = 80 MeV
set2 : LEC = 25 MeV HEC = 80 MeV
2 = 85.43/85A0 = 0.9011 0.007
Checking various distributionsfor the kaonfor the kaon
tof (ns)
KINE
Calorimeter sampleTrue K
Checking various distributionsfor the kaonfor the kaon
pK (MeV/c)pK (MeV/c)
KINEREC
Calorimeter sampleTrue K
Checking various distributionsfor the decay vtxfor the decay vtx
Rxyz (cm)Rxy (cm)
KINE
KINE
Kaon interacting withthe inner DC wall
Kaon interacting withthe inner DC wall
Calorimeter sampleTrue K
Checking various distributionsfor the secondaryfor the secondary
pLAB(MeV/c)
KINE
pLAB(MeV/c)
KINEREC
Kaon stopped in the inner DC wall,Decay at rest then Plab = 236 MeV
Kaon stopped in the inner DC wall,Decay at rest then Plab = 236 MeV
Calorimeter sampleTrue K
Checking various distributions
for the secondaryfor the secondary
pLAB(MeV/c)
MC-Data comparison
DATAMC
Kaon stopped in the inner DC wall,Decay at rest then Plab = 236 MeV
Checking various distributionsfor the secondaryfor the secondary
cos
RECKINE
cos
Calorimeter sampleTrue K
Checking various distributionsfor the secondaryfor the secondary
pT(MeV/c)
L(cm)
REC
REC
Calorimeter sampleTrue K
The “missed” time stability plot
BR K+ = 0.6366 0.0009 (stat.) 0.0012 (syst.)
PDG fit = 0.6343
Chiang = 0.6324
Results
Vus = 0.2223 (25)
Results
BR K+ = 0.6366 0.0009 (stat.) 0.0012 (syst.)
fK /f =1.210±0.014(MILC Coll. hep-lat/0407028)
Following the method from Marcianohep-ph/0406324 :
Vud=0.9740±0.0005 (superallowed -decays)