Measuring Depth ofAnesthesia

The word "anesthesia" was first used by the Greek philosopher Dioscorides in the first century of the current era to describe the narcotic effect of the plant mandragora.

The word reappeared in the 1771 Encyclopaedia Britannica, where it was defined as a "privation of the senses.

Plomley, in 1847, was the first to attempt to define depth of anesthesia. He described three stages: intoxication, excitement (both conscious and unconscious), and the deeper levels of narcosis.

In that same year, John Snow described "five degrees of narcotism" for ether anesthesia.

In 1937, Guedel published his classic description of the clinical signs of ether anesthesia. He used clear physical signs involving somatic muscle tone, respiratory patterns, and ocular signs to define four stages.

What Is Anesthesia?The sine qua non of the anesthetized state is unconsciousness, the lack of conscious processing of thoughts.

The crux of the difficulty in defining anesthetic depth is that unconsciousness cannot be measured directly.

The most important is that for any stimulus response pair, depth of anesthesia is the probability of nonresponse.

More generally, depth of anesthesia is the probability of nonresponse to stimulation, calibrated against the strength of the stimulus, the diffiCulty of suppressing the response, and the drug-induced probability of nonresponsiveness.

Anesthetic depth ranges from a 100% probability of an easily suppressed response (verbal answer) to a mild stimulus (e.g., calling one's name) and readily suppressed responses (e.g., verbal answer) to a 100%probability of nonresponse to profoundly noxious stimuli (e.g., intubation) and responses that are difficult to suppress (e.g.,tachycardia).

response surfaces for a profoundstimulus movement response to intubation,

MEMORY AND AWARENESS Recall, Conscious or Explicit

Memory Detection of Auditory Input, Unconscious or Implicit Memory

Recall, Conscious or Explicit Memory

Ghoneim recently reviewed cases of recall in different anesthetic situations.

The incidence of awareness in a non obstetric and noncardiac surgical population approximates 0.2%.

A higher incidence is reported for obstetric general anesthesia, 0.4%.

The incidence in cardiac surgery ranges from 1.1%to 1.5%.

major trauma cases can have a range of awareness from 11% to 43%.

Intraoperative awareness or recall has occurred with high-dose opioid anesthesia.

Two clinical signs possibly predicting the occurrence of recall are movement and autonomic response.

The use of muscle relaxants can eliminate the movement response, which leaves only autonomic activity as a measure of intraoperative awareness.

Detection of Auditory Input, Unconscious or Implicit Memory

Although the patient may not overtly recall a stimulus or an event, auditory input can register in the brain during apparently adequate surgical anesthesia.

Auditory and verbal input must be "meaningful" for it to register in the patient's memory.

Frequently, hypnosis or other cues may be needed to elicit recall.

Ten volunteers undergoing dental surgery were given thiopental followed by nitrous oxide and diethyl ether. Monitoring the EEG for an irregular slow-wave-high-voltage pattern allowed the anesthetist to maintain a similar depth of anesthesia in all patients. This EEGpattern was considered equivalent to moderate to deep ether anesthesia.

During surgery, the anesthetist provided verbal stimulation to the patient in the form of an intraoperative crisis by verbally stating that cyanosis was present and then treated appropriately.

All 10 patients had no spontaneous recall of the simulated intraoperative crisis.

Under hypnosis, however,four patients could remember the frightening words in exact detail.

An additional four remembered someone speaking to them.

All eight became anxious and either emerged spontaneously from their hypnotic trance or refused to continue exploring the event.

One subject had activation of the EEGpattern when the intraoperative crisis occurred, but no recall of the event.

Large effects on memory were produced only by propofol and midazolam.

Thiopental had mild memory effects,

whereas fentanyl had none.

Implications of Explicit, IntraoperativeBlacher described a traumatic post-cardiac surgery neurosis involving anxiety and irritability, repeated nightmares, preoccupation with death, and a reluctance to discuss these symptoms.

He attributed this postoperative state to patients' being awake and paralyzed during open heart surgery.

HYPNOTICS, ANALGESICS, ANDANESTHETIC DEPTH

Inhaled AnestheticsMovement Response and the MAC Concept:MAC is the minimum alveolar concentration

of inhaled anesthetic required to prevent 50% of subjects from responding to a painful stimulus with "gross purposeful movement.“

For determination of MAC in humans, the standard noxious stimulus has been the initial surgical skin incision.

The MAC concept has been expanded by evaluating other clinical end points and defined stimuli.

the MAC of anesthetic that would allow opening of the eyes on verbal command during emergence from anesthesia ("MACawake)

Generally, MACawake values are a third to a fourth the MAC values for surgical incision.

the MAC of inhaled anesthetic that would inhibit movement and coughing during endotracheal intubation ("MACintubation").

Intubation is significantly more stimulating than skin incision, and higher concentrations of inhaled anesthetic are required to eliminate the movement response.

MACBAR: The MAC of anesthetic necessary to prevent an adrenergic response to skin incision,as measured by the concentration of catecholamine in venous blood.

Because cerebral blood perfusion is large, it is possible to achieve an equilibration among end-tidal, alveolar, arterial, and brain anesthetic partial pressures within 15 minutes of exposure to a constant end-tidal anesthetic concentration.If the difference between the inspired and end-tidal partial pressures was less than 10% difference between end-tidal and arterial concentrations would be minimal.

Eger and associates proposed that volatile anesthetics cause a lack of movement response to noxious stimuli by action in the spinal cord and create a hypnotic/amnestic loss of consciousness at a supraspinal, cortical site of action.

Other Clinical Responses: Other Clinical Responses Responses other

than purposeful movement have been investigated as possible clinical measures of the depth of anesthesia:

the rate and volume of ventilation in spontaneously breathing subjects,

eye movement, the diameter and reactivity of pupils to

light, heart rate, arterialblood pressure, and autonomic signs such as sweating.

It has not been possible, however, to use these clinical signs to generate uniform measures of depth of anesthesia for inhaled anesthetics.

Although some clinical signs do correlate with depth of anesthesia for certain inhaled anesthetics, the same cannot be said for other inhaled anesthetics.

Zbinden and colleagues systematically examined the interaction of isoflurane concentrations with the hemodynamic response to different noxious stimuli.

When used as a sole agent, even at high concentrations isoflurane is unable to suppress hemodynamic responses to noxious stimuli.

the addition of analgesic components, such as nitrous oxide and fentanyl, can prevent the sympathetic stimulation and hemodynamic responses seen with noxious surgical stimuli when inhaled anesthetics are used.

.

Intravenously Administered (Nonopioid)Anesthetics

Assessing Depth during Induction of Anesthesia

Assessing Depth during Maintenance of Anesthes

Assessing Depth during Induction of AnesthesiaInduction of anesthesia often consists of a rapid intravenous bolus injection of a hypnotic (e.g., propofol,thiopental, etomidate).

Plasma concentrations peak within a half to 1 minute and decline rapidly on redistribution of the drug.

Clinical end points useful in assessing the depth of anesthesia during induction include loss of verbal responsiveness, loss of eyelid reflex, and loss of corneal reflex.

Typical stimulation occurring during induction of anesthesia includes laryngoscopy and intubation, which constitute profoundly noxious stimuli.

Frequently, response to these two procedures cannot be eliminated completely with just the intravenously administered hypnotic.

Thus, assessment of the depth of anesthesia with the use of clinically relevant noxious stimuli such as laryngoscopy and intubation requires the concurrent administration of other analgesic drugs (opioids or nitrous oxide) to provide reasonable and clinically acceptable hemodynamic control.

Assessing Depth during Maintenance of

Anesthesia

For the patients given 67%nitrous oxide, the plasma concentrations of thiopental necessary to achieve the same surgical end points were as much as 71%lower than those in patients given only thiopental.

Kazama and coworkers found propofol CPso values for the following defined stimuli:

loss of verbal responsiveness, electrical tetanus, laryngoscopy, skin incision, and intubation.

With the addition of a steady-state fentanyl , there was only a minimal decrease in the propofol CPso for loss of verbal responsiveness.

For the other, more intense noxious stimuli (tetanus, laryngoscopy, skin incision, and intubation), a much greater decrease in propofol CPso occurred.

In clinical practice, intravenously administered anesthetic drugs are frequently combined with other drugs that provide additional analgesia (opioids, nitrous oxide, potent inhaled anesthetics).

large intravenously administered doses of thiopental or propofol are less than effective in eliminating the hemodynamic response to relevant clinical stimuli such as laryngoscopy and intubation.

Fentanyl decreases the anesthetic requirement for thiopental or propofol by providing anti nociceptive effects that the intravenous hypnotics do not provide.

Clinically, the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy, intubation, or skin incision is most commonly used to assess depth of anesthesia.

The use of muscle relaxants to ease endotracheal intubation precludes use of the movement response.

Because laryngoscopy and intubation are single events, if clinical depth is inadequate (e.g., in the event of a profound hemodynamic response), additional intravenous anesthetics, opioids, or maintenance anesthetic drugs are rapidly administered.

When precise hemodynamic control becomes important (as in coronary artery disease), larger doses of opioids are used instead of intravenously administered anesthetics.

OpioidsThe analgesia produced by these drugs

through specific receptor systems within the CNS decreases autonomic, endocrine, and somatic responses to noxious stimulation.

Although opioids have been used as sole anesthetics, they create incomplete hypnotic effects at very large doses.

Opioids need to be combined with hypnotic drugs to induce the anesthetic state.

Murphy and Hug found that even high plasma concentrations of fentanyl (20 ng/mL) did not decrease enflurane MAC beyond 60% to 70% of its initial value (Fig. 31-17).

That is, there was a ceiling to the enflurane-sparing effect.

Morphine, sufentanil, and alfentanil also decrease enflurane MAC and have a similar ceiling effect in dogs.

McEwan and coworkers found very similar results in humans.

The maximal MAC reduction was 82% at a steady-state fentanyl plasma concentratio of 10.6 ng/mL.

Similar MAC reduction results have been obtained with other inhaled anesthetics (desflurane, sevoflurane) and other opioids (alfentanil, sufentanil, remifentanil).

ElECTROPHYSIOlOGIC MONITORING

Bispectral Electroencephalographic

Monitoring

In the 1990s, Aspect Medical Systems, a medical device company in Natick, Massachusetts, undertook an integrated research effort to develop the EEG as a measure of anesthetic depth.

The Aspect EEG monitor quantitates the anesthetic effects on the brain, specifically, the hypnotic component of anesthesia.

The device presents a continuous EEG parameter, the bispectral (BIS) index, which ranges from an awake, no-drug-effect value of 95 to 100 to zero with no detectable EEG activity.

1. The simultaneous use of multiple EEGsignal-processing approaches captured incremental information that was not captured with traditional approaches based on a single signal-processing approach.

2. Multiple clinically relevant measures (movement, hemodynamics, drug concentrations, consciousness, recall) in patients and volunteers were gathered with concurrent EEG data.

3. Advanced multivariate statistical data analysis was used to correlate the components of the multiple EEG signal-processing approaches with the clinical data to create the univariate BIS parameter.

4. Prospective clinical evaluation of the BIS index was performed at multiple institutions under varying anesthetic and surgical conditions.

5. The BIS index was recognized as measuring the hypnotic components of the anesthetic and was relatively insensitive to the analgesic (e.g., opioid) components of an anesthetic.

6. Prospective clinical trials demonstrated that BIS monitoringcould improve the outcome of an anesthetic regimen.

7. Simple hardware and sensors were developed and are commercially available to facilitate high-quality signal capture despite the noisy electrical environment of the operating room.

Several factors that will be encountered in clinical anesthesia care can interact with the BIS index:hypothermia decreased the BIS index by 1.12

units per degree Celsius decline in temperature.Infusion of esmolol can also alter the BIS index.Epidural anesthesia can also decrease the amount

of hypnotic anesthetic needed for sedation.Ketamine doses that create unresponsiveness

(0.25 to 0.5 mg/kg) did not change the BIS index.

Bispectral lndex and Clinical Utility/Outcome

The use of BIS monitoring was associated with a significantly reduced incidence of awareness (78%reduction) when compared with historical controls from the same hospitals and investigators.

Mortality was significantly higher if the BIS index was less than 40 in patients older than 40 years.

Increasing age and lower BIS values were both independently associated with higher mortality rates.

Clinical Use of the Bispectral IndexClinical use of BIS monitoring involves

separating the hypnotic and analgesic components of an anesthetic regimen.

The concept entails titration of the hypnotic drug (e.g., isoflurane, desflurane, sevoflurane, propofol, midazolam) to lower the BISvalue to 40 to 60.

This range appears to be the therapeutic window associated with a high probability of unconsciousness.