measuring what matters: above and beyond …...measuring what matters: above and beyond requirements...

Measuring What Matters: Above and Beyond RequirementsPerformance Measures Workshop, May 18, 2017

Presentation Overview

• Background - origin and evolution of the

Regional Outcomes Framework.

• Regional Outcomes – metrics and status of

data and forecasting

• Discussion - input as to what measures (and

data) the PSRC should consider after T2040

adoption.

VISION 2040 – Regional Growth Strategy

• Develop compact communities and centers

• Promote growth in Metropolitan, Core and Larger Cities

• Minimize incompatible rural development

• Improve regional jobs-housing balance

• Develop consistent regional targeting methods and planning horizons

Transportation Performance Measurement – Background

• 2008 – Vision 2040

• 2010 – Transportation 2040 – Direction to create project

prioritization process

• 2011 – Congestion and Mobility Report

• 2014 – Transportation 2040 Update, developed and used

Prioritization Process, adopted by the General Assembly

• 2017 – Transportation 2040 Update, will utilize the Regional

Outcomes Framework (built from Prioritization work)

• 2017 – Health / Equity (Physical Activity) and Maintenance and

Preservation have been added as additional outcomes

Regional Outcome Framework – Throughout Planning Stages

VIS

ION

20

40

REG

ION

AL

OU

TCO

MES

Note:

Regional

Outcomes

evolved from

Prioritization

Performance Trends

Planning Stages

Long Range Planning

• T2040 Project Evaluation

• T2040 Scenario Analysis

Short Range Planning/ Federal Funding Process

• TIP

• Project Selection

Co

ng

esti

on

Man

ag

em

en

t P

rocess

• Observed Information

VIS

ION

20

40

REG

ION

AL

OU

TCO

MES

Focus for

Today’s

meeting

Performance Trends

Planning Stages

Long Range Planning

• T2040 Project Evaluation

• T2040 Scenario Analysis

Short Range Planning/ Federal Funding Process

• TIP

• Project Selection

Co

ng

esti

on

Man

ag

em

en

t P

rocess

• Observed Information

Regional Outcome Framework – Throughout Planning Stages

PSRC Regional Outcomes – Above and Beyond RequirementsV

ISIO

N 2

04

0

Air Quality & Climate Change - Clean air and reduce climate change precursors

Freight - Efficient, reliable freight mobility

Health Equity - Travel options promote health and well being

Jobs – Access to Jobs

Multi-Modal - System is integrated and provides alternatives to driving alone

Puget Sound Land and Water - Clean water and land

Safety & System Security - Safe and secure transportation system

Social Equity & Access to Opportunity - Improved mobility for all and reduced negative impacts to vulnerable populations

Maintenance and Preservation - The system is maintained and in good repair

Support for Centers - Support existing and new populations in centers

Travel - Transportation system is efficient, reliable and convenient for people, goods and services

VIS

ION

20

40

Air Quality & Climate Change - Clean air and reduce climate change precursors*

Freight - Efficient, reliable freight mobility *

Health Equity - Travel options promote health and well being

Jobs – Access to Jobs

Multi-Modal - System is integrated and provides alternatives to driving alone *

Puget Sound Land and Water - Clean water and land

Safety & System Security - Safe and secure transportation system *

Social Equity & Access to Opportunity - Improved mobility for all and reduced negative impacts to vulnerable populations

Maintenance and Preservation - The system is maintained and in good repair *

Support for Centers - Support existing and new populations in centers

Travel - Transportation system is efficient, reliable and convenient for people, goods and services *

* Federal requirements integrate

with existing Regional Outcomes

PSRC Regional Outcomes – Above and Beyond Requirements

How and When is Performance Evaluated?

Fall 2017 - Long Range Transportation Plan – Forecasts and modeling updated

every four years (T2040 System Analysis Report)

Spring 2018 - Long Range Transportation Plan – System Performance Report

(new requirement to report on progress meeting targets for federal performance

measures)

Ongoing - Performance Trends – Produced on flexible schedule and online as

data becomes available

Ongoing - Congestion Management Process – Data will be updated online

using new tools

Air Quality & Climate Change

Transportation 2040 Project Screening

Evaluation Questions

VIS

ION

20

40

Regional Outcomes


Freight

Jobs

Multi-Modal

Puget Sound Land and Water

Safety & System Security

Social Equity & Access to Opportunity

Maintenance and Preservation

Support for Centers

Travel

Health Equity • How well does the project reduce air pollutants including

greenhouse gas emissions and criteria pollutants?

• How well does the project avoid impacts to sensitive

populations?

• How well does the project use alternative energy, cleaner

fuels, or less energy?

Clean air and reduce negative impacts on the climate

• Criteria Pollutant Annual Monitoring Reports

and Emissions by Transportation Sector

• Percent Change in Tailpipe CO2 Emissions

on the National Highway System (delayed

indefinitely)

• On Road Mobile Source Emissions(delayed

indefinitely)

• Regional criteria pollutant emissions

• Regional CO2 emissions, and the Four-Part GHG

Strategy

• VMT per capita

• Transportation conformity results

• Estimate of Benefits from Emission Reductions

Federal Planning Requirement

Performance Measures with a social equity component

Performance Trends (Observed Data) Transportation 2040 Forecasts and Modeling


Performance Trends (Observed Data)

Air Quality & Climate Change: Example Metrics

Source: Puget Sound Clean Air Agency and Washington State Department of Ecology

Air Quality & Climate Change: Example Metrics

Transportation 2040 Forecasts and Modeling

VIS

ION

20

40

Regional Outcomes


Freight

Jobs

Multi-Modal





Support for Centers

Travel

Health Equity

• How well does the project provide benefits to freight-related

system users by improving travel time, reliability, and efficiency

for freight haulers (all freight modes), and how well does the

project reduce conflicts?

• How well does the project support planned development in

Manufacturing and Industrial Centers (MICs) and other freight-

related areas?

• How well does the project serve designated Freight and

Goods Transportation System routes?



Freight

Efficient Freight Mobility

• Percent of the Interstate System Mileage

providing for Reliable Truck Travel Times -

Truck Travel Time Reliability (final on May

20)

• Heavy tonnage truck system


• Total Delay for Trucks (PHFN/network)

• Truck Vehicle Miles Traveled (Medium/Heavy)

• Total truck trips to individual MICs

• Per Truck Trip Delay




Freight

Freight: Example Metrics

Freight

Measure Today Future

Daily Truck

Delay Hours36,500 57,600

Daily Truck

Vehicle Miles6,118,800 8,168,500


VIS

ION

20

40

Regional Outcomes


Freight

Jobs

Multi-Modal





Support for Centers

Travel

Health Equity

• Does the project improves opportunities for bicycle and

pedestrian travel.

• Does the project improves bicycle and pedestrian access

within ¼ mile of a (MTS) transit stop.



Health / Equity

Transportation 2040 Project Screening Evaluation Questions: Health/Equity

If yes: Has design on this project begun yet? Yes/No

If yes and this project is located within the Urban Growth Area, do you plan to

follow the Urban Bikeway Design Guide and/or the Urban Street Design

Guide from the National Association of City Transportation Officials? These

guides provide information related to the safety and comfort of bicycle and

pedestrian facilities relative to the adjacent roadway environment. Yes/No

These guides provide information related to the safety and comfort of bicycle

and pedestrian facilities relative to the adjacent roadway environment.

Does the project

improve bicycle and

pedestrian access

within ¼ mile of a

(MTS) transit stop?

Health / Equity

Does the project

improve opportunities

for bicycle and

pedestrian travel?

If yes: Has design on this project begun yet?

If yes and this project is located within the Urban Growth Area, do you plan to

follow the Urban Street Design Guide from the National Association of City

Transportation Officials? This guide provides recommendations for safe and

accessible pedestrian crossings.

Travel Options Promote Health and Well Being for All

• Work in Progress


• Number of Bikers and Walkers

• Percent of Population that Bikes or Walks

• Average Daily Time Spent Biking or Walking



Performance Measures with a social equity

component

Health / Equity

Metrics for Health / Equity are Crosscutting Among

Other Outcome Categories:

Travel, Social Equity & Access to Opportunity, Multimodal,

Air Quality and Climate Change, Safety and Security

Health / Equity: Example Metrics

Active Transport 2014 2040 Plan

Number of Walkers, including Walking to Transit 1,049,535 1,710,545

% of Population who Walks 28% 35%

Number of Bikers 133,075 206,209

% of Population who Bikes 4% 4%

Average daily time spent Walking per Walker (minutes) 52 52

Average Time Spent Biking per Biker(minutes) 31 31

Low Income Active Transport

Number of Walkers, including Walking to Transit 148,204 250,606

% of Population who Walks 34% 42%

Number of Bikers 19,719 32974

% of Population who Bikes 4% 6%

Average daily time spent Walking per Walker(minutes) 57 56

Average Time Spent Biking per Biker(minutes) 31 31


VIS

ION

20

40

Regional Outcomes


Freight

Jobs

Multi-Modal





Support for Centers

Travel

Health Equity

• How well does the project support job retention or expansion

by improving access?

• How well does the project provide access to job-related

training or educational opportunities (vocational schools,

community colleges, universities)?



Jobs

Access to Jobs

• Employment Within ¼ Mile of Transit Service

Access (by county and region)

• Center to Center Travel Times for Driving and

Transit


• Employment Within ¼ Mile of Transit Service

Access

• Center to Center Travel Times for Driving and

Transit




Jobs

1,011,000

2,087,000

742,000

1,517,000

Households

Employees

Total Workers and Households within ¼ mile of transit

Today

2040

68%

70%

69%

71%

73%

79%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2014

2040

Share of jobs within ¼ mile of transit

Region

Minority

Low Income

Jobs: Example Metrics


VIS

ION

20

40

Regional Outcomes


Freight

Jobs

Multi-Modal





Support for Centers

Travel

Health Equity

• How well does the project improve mobility through

alternatives to driving alone?

• How well does the project improve connections between

modes of travel, especially for bicyclists and pedestrians

accessing transit?



Multi-Modal

The System is Integrated and Provides Alternatives to Driving Alone

• Mode Share

• Bus, Ferry, Rail and Vanpool Ridership

• Park and Ride Utilization / Capacity

• Percent of non-SOV Travel


• Mode Share

• Bus, Ferry, Rail and Vanpool Ridership

• Total Trips by Mode




Multi-Modal

Today 2040

Bus Ferry

Multi-Modal: Example Metrics


VIS

ION

20

40

Regional Outcomes

Air Quality & Climate Change*

Freight*

Jobs

Multi-Modal*


Safety & System Security*


Maintenance and Preservation*

Support for Centers

Travel*

Health Equity

• How well does the project minimize critical area and habitat

loss, alteration and fragmentation in designated lands?

• How well does the project minimize impact to designated forest

and agricultural lands?

• How well does the project improve water quality by improving

hydrological functions and/or reducing stormwater runoff?




Clean Water and Land

• Work in Progress


• Percent of Households and Jobs Within the UGA

• Total Jobs Inside / Outside the UGA

• Total Households Inside / Outside the UGA




Puget Sound Land and Water: Example Metrics

Total Households inside/outside of UGAPercent growth inside/outside of UGA - 2040


2%

7%

98%

93%

0% 50% 100% 150%

Jobs as % ofTotal JobGrowth

Householdsas % of

Total HHGrowth

Inside UGA

Outside UGA

VIS

ION

20

40

Regional Outcomes


Freight

Jobs

Multi-Modal





Support for Centers

Travel

Health Equity

• How well does the project support safer travel by all modes

(How well does it alleviate an existing problem)?

• How well does the project improve security? (Specific focus

on facilities identified in the 2011 Puget Sound Transportation

Recovery Annex).




Safe and Secure Transportation System

• Annual serious injuries

• Annual fatalities

• Fatalities per 100 million VMT (5 year

rolling average)

• Serious injuries per 100 million VMT (5

year rolling average)

• Number of non-motorized fatalities and

non-motorized serious injuries


• Total Motor-Vehicle Accidents by Type

• Total Cost by Accident Type




0

50

100

150

200

250

300

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Puget Sound Regional Council MPA

Fatalities (FARS) Fatalities(5-year rolling average) (FARS)

Measure No. 1 - Fatalities

267.2 265.8251.8 253.8

243.6 247.2 251.2271.2

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Puget Sound Regional Council MPA

Non-motorist fatalities and serious injuries

Non-motorist fatalities and serious injuries (5-year rolling average)

Measure No. 5 - Non-motorist fatalities and serious injuries

Safety & System Security: Example Metrics


VIS

ION

20

40

Regional Outcomes


Freight

Jobs

Multi-Modal





Support for Centers

Travel

Health Equity• How well does the project avoid creating new, mitigate

existing, or eliminate previous negative impacts for the

following populations: minority, low-income, elderly, youth,

people with disabilities, and households without vehicles.

• How well does the project improve access to areas of

opportunity?




Improved mobility for all and reduced negative impacts to minority, low income,

youth, people with disability and populations who do not own a vehicle

• Low income populations (ACS)

• Minority populations (ACS)

• Out-of-Pocket Travel Cost by Income, Person

Type

• Commute travel time and cost

• Total travel time and delay by income

• Benefits to areas with high minority and/or low-

income populations



Performance Measures with a social equity

component


Metrics for Social Equity and Access to Opportunity are

Crosscutting Among Other Outcome Categories:

Travel, Support for Centers, Health / Equity, Multimodal,

Jobs, Air Quality and Climate Change

Share of Puget Sound Region Population by Race, 1990-2015

Social Equity & Access to Opportunity: Example Metrics

Table 1: Puget Sound Region Population by Race, 1990-2015

1990 2000 2010

2011-2015 Average

Change 1990-2015

White Alone 2,382,773 2,579,305 2,527,485 2,562,366 7.54%

Black Alone 128,373 159,366 183,986 194,082 51.19%

Asian Alone 172,568 268,550 380,685 416,707 141.47%

Latino / Hispanic (of any race) 81,724 172,062 295,265 334,066 308.77%

All 2,748,895 3,275,847 3,603,425 3,551,166 29.19%


VIS

ION

20

40

Regional Outcomes


Freight

Jobs

Multi-Modal





Support for Centers

Travel

Health Equity

• How well the does the project provide increased mobility and

accessibility for regional growth center(s)?

• How well is the project supported by land use and planning

characteristics?



Support for Centers

Support Existing and New Populations in Centers

• Mode share for centers (ACS)

• Employment growth for centers

• Population growth for centers

• Mode Share in Centers

• VMT per capita in centers

• Travel time by mode between major centers

• Trip out-of-pocket cost to centers by income

• Total trips to Center

• Trips by Households in Center

• Truck trips to Center




Support for Centers

Support for Centers: Example Metrics


VIS

ION

20

40

Regional Outcomes


Freight

Jobs

Multi-Modal





Support for Centers

Travel

Health Equity

• How well does the project improve existing travel problems?

• How large is the scale of the travel problem the project

addresses?

• How well does the project improve future travel problems?

• How does the project improve throughput?



Travel

Travel

The transportation system is efficient, reliable, and convenient for people, goods and

services

• Vehicle Miles Traveled (daily)

• Vehicle Daily Hours of Delay

• Percent of Person-Miles Traveled are

Reliable (Interstate + NHS)

• Annual Hours of Peak-Hour Excessive

Delay Per Capita (all vehicles)

• VMT and VHT per day by user class

• Hours of Delay annually

• Corridor and Center to Center Travel Times for

Driving and Transit

• Total Plan Benefits by Type of Benefit




Travel: Example Metrics


VIS

ION

20

40

Regional Outcomes


Freight

Jobs

Multi-Modal





Support for Centers

Travel

Health Equity

Handled separately in a different process - Maintenance and

preservation investments are included programmatically in the

plan, and are not reviewed on an individual basis.




The System is Maintained and in Good Repair

• Pavement conditions by facility type and

percent of network

• Bridge conditions – structurally deficient and

functionally obsolete

• Transit asset management – average age

(service life, age of fleets)

• No forecasts at this time





Maintenance and Preservation: Example Metrics

Good46%

Fair46%

Poor8%

Regional Total Local Bridge Conditions 2015

Good Fair Poor

Good51%

Fair46%

Poor3%

Regional Total State Bridge Conditions 2015

Good Fair Poor

Regional Outcome Toolbox

Demonstration

Transportation 2040 Plan Update – TPB Decision Guide (draft)

MAR APR MAY JUN JULY SEP NOV DECOCT

Engagement

Board Action

Briefing

Transit Asset Management Targets

Financial Strategy

Regional Outcomes

Climate Change

Safety Targets

Release Plan for Public Comment

Access & Parking

Performance Measures (Health & Equity)

Climate Change

Financial Strategy

Regional Integrated Transit Network

Performance Measures Capacity Project Submittals

Financial Strategy (Revenue & Expenditure Estimates)

Transit Asset Management Project Submittals Health & Social Equity Report

Draft Plan System Analysis Report

Public Engagement Report-out

Information Item

State Facilities Action Plan

Regional Outcomes

Climate Change

Asset Management Proposal



Asset Management Proposal

Regional Outcomes – Next Steps

Syste

m

Level A

naly

sis

June 2017: Summarize Performance Measure Workshop for TPB

Spring and Fall 2017: TPB Approves Safety and Transit Asset

Management Federal Measures

Summer 2017: Update Congestion Management Process

Fall 2017: Release T2040 System Analysis Report

Fall 2018: TPB Approves Highway-Bridge Conditions and System

Performance

Sean Ardussi, AICP

Senior Planner

206-464-7080

[email protected]

Thank you.

Robin Mayhew, AICP

Program Manager

206-464-7537

[email protected]

Craig Helmann

Program Manager

206-389-2889

[email protected]

Suzanne Childress

Principal Modeler

206-971-3282

[email protected]

measuring what matters: above and beyond …...measuring what matters: above and beyond requirements...

Documents