mechanical system verification

Upload: ramanjooloo-deelan

Post on 03-Jun-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical System Verification

    1/26

    1

    Mechanical System VerificationLVDT Calibration

    Use NIST traceable

    micrometer

    Eight point calibration

    Acceptance Criteria Near zero intercept R-squared > 0.99

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical System Verification

    2/26

    2

    Mechanical System VerificationLoad Cell Zero

    Use strain indicator

    Measure load cell zero reading

    Used to determine if load cellhas been fatigued oroverstrained

    Acceptance CriteriaZero reading < 1.5 %

    of full-scale sensitivity

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical System Verification

    3/26

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical System Verification

    4/26

    4

    Mechanical System VerificationLoad Cell Calibration Verification

    Requires NIST traceable

    proving rings

    Utilizes static loading Verifies load cell calibration

    Measures unwanted friction

    Measures unwanted bendingand deflections

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical System Verification

    5/26

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical System Verification

    6/26

    6

    Mechanical System VerificationLoad Cell Calibration Verification

    Acceptance Criteria

    Proving ring versus load cellvalue within 5% of each other

    Proving ring dial gauge versus

    LVDT reading within 5% of

    each other

    Load cell reading versus proving ring load values, run #1

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    0 100 200 300 400 500

    Proving Ring Load, lb

    LoadCellValue,

    lb Replicate 1

    Upper Load Limit

    Lower Load Limit

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical System Verification

    7/26

    7

    Mechanical System VerificationDynamic Response

    Verify overall equipment ability

    to conduct Resilient Modulus

    testingVerify data acquisition process

    Verify data format

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical System Verification

    8/26

    8

    Mechanical System VerificationDynamic Response

    Procedure

    Remove dial gauge from proving ring

    Use external LVDTs or internally

    mounted LVDT for displacement

    measurements

    Apply haversine shaped load pulse

    (.1 seconds on, .9 seconds off)

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical System Verification

    9/26

    9

    Procedure (continued)Apply dynamic load from 10 -

    90% of proving ring capacity @

    10% intervals

    Read deformation using data

    acquisition system

    Mechanical System VerificationDynamic Response

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical System Verification

    10/26

    10

    Acceptance Criteria Generated haversine close to ideal

    Deformation response close tohaversine

    Deformation within 5% ofstandard

    R-square > 0.99

    .002 second or less phase shiftbetween load and deformation

    Ymax/Ymin < 1.10 (10%)

    Load-deformation characteristics, run #1 - 500 lb dynamic (haversine) test.

    0.00

    50.00

    100.00

    150.00

    200.00

    250.00

    300.00

    350.00

    400.00

    450.00

    500.00

    0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12

    Deformation, in

    Load

    CellValue,

    lb

    Replicate 1

    Upper Limit

    Lower Limit

    Mechanical System VerificationDynamic Response

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical System Verification

    11/26

    11

    Dynamic sinusoidal tests

    Verify overall system electronics

    (phase angle measurements)

    Detect misalignment problemsthrough the use of phase angle

    measurements

    Mechanical System VerificationPhase Angles

    Figure A.4. Dynamic Response Check of 500 lb Proving Ring, 1 Hz

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    400

    450

    500

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

    Time, sec

    Load,

    lb

    Acceptance CriteriaPhase angle < 2.8 degrees

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical System Verification

    12/26

    12

    Procedure Use autonomous pressure reading

    device to verify pressure

    Mechanical System VerificationTriaxial Pressure Chamber

    Acceptance Criteria

    Gauge readings 2.5 % oftarget values

    Hold for 10 minutes

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical System Verification

    13/26

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical System Verification

    14/26

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical System Verification

    15/26

    15

    Laboratory Proficiency Testing

    Acceptance CriteriaVertical deformations within 30%

    Approval by Representative based

    on visual observations Conformance to all aspects of the

    protocol

    Haversine wave form close to

    ideal Deformation response reasonable

    Resilient Modulus relationshipreasonable

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical System Verification

    16/26

    16

    PRESENTATION OBJECTIVES

    What is the Resilient Modulus (Mr) StartupProcedure Product Line

    Why Mr Testing and the Startup Procedure is

    Important Development of the MrStartup Procedure

    How to Conduct the MrStartup Procedure

    How to Get Information on the MrTestingand Startup Product Line

    Who Should Use the MrTesting and

    Startup Product Line and Why

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical System Verification

    17/26

    17

    Who Should Use the Product?

    Any organization performingresilient modulus testing State DOTs

    Universities

    Consultant laboratories

    Can be used for other tests as

    well Complex modulus Creep compliance

    Indirect tensile testing, etc.

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical System Verification

    18/26

    18

    When Should Product Be Used?

    General Prior to starting a testing program

    Every year during productiontesting

    After a period of system inactivity

    Other recommendations

    Verify the operation of older

    machines for new applications When equipment is replaced

    When equipment is moved

    Whenever a suspected overload or

    malfunction occurs

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical System Verification

    19/26

    19

    Uncover and Avoid ProblemsElectronics

    Over-ranged load cell

    Inadequate filters

    Amplitude roll off: 2 Hz - 50 Hz

    Unmatched filters

    Excessive time delay (phase

    angle) between channels

    Filters on and off

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical System Verification

    20/26

    20

    Uncover And Avoid ProblemsSoftware

    Software not controlling the load

    adequately

    Inadequate sampling rate

    Raw data with no units Automatic gain control, error range

    too big

    Lack of gain control adjustment

    during testing

    Improper raw data format -

    command values were saved rather

    than the feedback values

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical System Verification

    21/26

    21

    Uncover And Avoid ProblemsMechanical

    System not fast enough to apply proper

    haversine loads - complete upgrade of signal

    conditioning and control

    Oversize servo-value Friction in servo-value piston

    Friction in triaxial cell seals

    Misalignment caused by improperly designed

    triaxial cell fixture

    Excessive deformation, up to 76% of total

    deformation due to bending of triaxial cell

    base plate

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical System Verification

    22/26

    22

    Uncover And Avoid ProblemsMechanical (continued)

    Excessive deformation due to

    unrestrained triaxial cell

    Slippage of LVDT holders

    Lack of control of pressure

    transducer

    Malfunction of air pressure regulator

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical System Verification

    23/26

    23

    Benefits of Use

    Provides guidelines for

    standardization of test process

    Provides a benchmarkperformance standard for

    equipment

    Minimizes equipment and

    operator variability Promotes greater confidence in

    resilient modulus testing and

    resulting pavement design

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical System Verification

    24/26

    24

    Current Status of Product

    P46 test procedure established Videos produced and

    distributed

    Startup procedure published Startup procedures completed FHWA

    Kansas

    North Carolina Minnesota

    University of Rhode Island

    Consultant laboratories

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical System Verification

    25/26

    25

    PRESENTATION OBJECTIVES

    What is the Resilient Modulus (Mr) StartupProcedure Product Line

    Why Mr Testing and the Startup Procedure is

    Important Development of the MrStartup Procedure

    How to Conduct the MrStartup Procedure

    Who Should Use the MrStartup Procedure

    and Why

    How to Get Information on the Mr StartupProcedure?

  • 8/11/2019 Mechanical System Verification

    26/26

    26

    Get and Use Mr Testing andStartup Procedure Product Line

    Download procedure manuals from

    LTPP homepage at

    www.tfhrc.gov

    Order procedure manuals/videos: Through LTPP homepage

    Through LTPP customer service

    (Tel Number: 865-481-2967)