mediators and metaphorical analysis: the tims model
DESCRIPTION
This interactive presentation is based on a two year study of Florida family court based mediators. Analysis of their metaphors about conflict concepts resulted in the Theoretical Integrative Model of Systems (TIMS). This theoretical model identifies layers of influence that become our accepted reality in mediation. Participants will use the resulting assessment instruments to identify how metaphors and language contribute to mediation style and delivery. The presentation will conclude with practical ways for mediators and managers to utilize the TIMS model and assessment tools to initiate program changes.TRANSCRIPT
Mediators and Metaphorical Analysis:
The TIMS Model
Rebecca Storrow, Ph.D.
Vice President
American Arbitration Association
954-372-4341
Association for Conflict Resolution
Annual Conference
October 10, 2013 2:00-3:30pm
Minneapolis, Minnesota
2
TIMS Model of Mediation Influences
Today’s Presentation
1. What research reveals about decisions we make inmediation.
2. What metaphors reveal to us in mediation
3. Description of the study and TIMS Model
3
TIMS Model of Mediation Influences
Why we should study language in mediation …
1. Quality Improvement2. Economy3. Diversity4. Mediation is Complex
4
TIMS Model of Mediation Influences
● Metaphors structure our perceptions (Lakoff &
Johnson, 1980)
● Metaphorical analysis provides insight intothought patterns and understandings (Cameron & Low,
1999; de Guerrero & Villamil, 2002)
● Metaphorical Coherence: supports what wepay attention to (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980).
5
TIMS Model of Mediation Influences
Current assessment measures - quantitative statistics,settlement rates, and credentials - do not reveal:
1. Who we are (Essential Nature)
2. How we practice○ stage-based approach, contingency approach, or purists?
3. How we learn (perceive, predict, and interpret)
6
TIMS Model of Mediation Influences
Mediation Styles and Models Literature Review
● Mediation styles have been historically difficult to measure andconceptualize.
● Two dimensions - neutrality and normative style (Greenhouse, 1985).
● Gulliver’s (1979) continuum from passive to leader.
● A staged approach cited most frequently. (Black & Joffee, 1985, Coogle, 1985,Kessler, 1985).
● Mediators are usually consistent in their style from case to case, even undervarying case dynamics and issues (Kressel, 2000).
● Kolb (1994) cited a disparity between mediators’ espoused orientations andactual practice
7
TIMS Model of Mediation Influences
Why Metaphors? Literature Review
● Mediators use metaphors frequently (Cohen, 2003)
● Mediator strategies grow out of assumptions aboutthe nature of conflict, conflict resolution, and their own particularcapacities (Silbey and Merry, 1986)
● Many mediators are not clearly aware of how theirmetaphorical orientations impact their work (Lang and
Taylor, 2000)
● Metaphorical analysis is an effective tool tounderstand the complex nature of mediation (Finneran,
2006)
8
TIMS Model of Mediation Influences
Harvard Negotiation Study of Negotiation
using Collage
http://people.hbs.edu/mwheeler/
9
TIMS Model of Mediation Influences
Research Questions Studied Mediators’:
1.Essential nature
2.Description of practice
3.Perceptions of parties and application
4.System(s)
5.Ethical dilemmas
6.Mediator learning
10
TIMS Model of Mediation Influences
Stage 1 Questionnaires● Qualitative content analysis so metaphors
and patterns could emerge freely(Denzin & Lincoln, 2003; Groenwald, 2004; Guba & Lincoln, 1994; Holloway,
1997; Kvale & Brinkman, 2009).
● Openness to information (Sandelowski, 1995a, Huberman,
2002).
11
TIMS Model of Mediation Influences
Stage 1 – Site Selection
● Familiarity with Florida
● Florida Supreme Court certification
● Diversity
(Florida Courts Website, 2011; US Census Bureau website, 2011).
Stage 1 - Participant Selection
• Florida Dispute Resolution Center online mediator search function
• Random selection of 600 Florida Supreme Court certified familymediators (out of 2,173 family certified in Florida)
• 85 completed questionnaires
12
TIMS Model of Mediation Influences
Stage 1 - Questionnaire
1.Family mediation is like (a/an)__________
2.A mediator is like (a/an) ______________
3.Conflict is like (a/an) _________________
4.People in conflict are like (a/an) ________
5.Divorce is like (a/an) _________________
6.Anger is like (a/an) __________________
7.Forgiveness is like (a/an) _____________
13
TIMS Model of Mediation Influences
Stage 1 – Statewide Survey Findings
14
TIMS Model of Mediation Influences
Stage 1 – Frequency of metaphors
● mediation the most frequently stated metaphor was “opportunity” (8items)
● mediator resulted in “referee” (10 items)
● conflict resulted in both “battle/war” (10 items) and “animals” (10 items)
● people in conflict resulted in “child(ren)/kids” (14 items) and “animals” (8items)
● divorce resulted in “death” (14 items)
● anger resulted in “destructive acts of nature” (18 items) and “fire/flame”(11 items)
● forgiveness resulted in “soothing acts of nature” (5 items).
Neutraland
Positive
Negative
Positive
15
TIMS Model of Mediation Influences
Stage 1Metaphorical Content Analysis
16
TIMS Model of Mediation Influences
Stage 1Metaphorical Content Analysis (continued)
17
TIMS Model of Mediation Influences
Stage 1Metaphorical Content Analysis (continued)
18
TIMS Model of Mediation Influences
Stage 1Metaphorical Content Analysis (continued)
19
TIMS Model of Mediation Influences
Stage 1Metaphorical Content Analysis (continued)
20
TIMS Model of Mediation Influences
Stage 1Metaphorical Content Analysis (continued)
21
TIMS Model of Mediation Influences
Stage 1Metaphorical Content Analysis (continued)
22
TIMS Model of Mediation Influences
Stage 1Metaphorical Content Analysis (continued)
23
TIMS Model of Mediation Influences
Discussion
Predominantly negative metaphors for conflict,people in conflict, anger, and divorce
Mediators often described parties as “lost”,“fighting children”, “pack of dogs”, or “wild animals”;this may effect how these mediators empathize withand empower parties
Mediators often described conflict as a destructiveforce such as an “earthquake” or somethingunhealthy such as illness or “cancer.”
What is the impact of a lack of focus on the benefits inconflict?
24
TIMS Model of Mediation Influences
Discussion Continued
● Predominance of positive metaphors forforgiveness, mediators, and mediation
● More research is needed regarding mediators’ positiveself perceptions as experts and guides.
○ How do mediators rationalize parties who are unable to grasptheir “opportunity”
● Anger was described as an “act of nature”, inevitableand controllable. Conflict however, was described as abattle or war which would generally be considered aproactive and manmade event.
○ What might this dynamic contribute to expression of strongemotions in mediation?
25
TIMS Model of Mediation Influences
Stage 2 Rationale for Phenomenological Approach
● Phenomenology examined mediators’ internal meanings made from lived experience (van Manen, 1990)
● Mediators were able to tell their stories (Denzin &Lincoln, 2003)
● It provided a complex picture of mediators
Court mediators’ common complaint of not being understood (Heliker,1997)
26
TIMS Model of Mediation Influences
Stage 2 - Participant Selection
● Process○ Half hour guided interviews
with 22 participants
● Demographics○ 13 female ○ 9 male○ 20 Caucasians○ 2 Hispanics born and raised
outside of the UnitedStates
○ 14 mediators married
○ 3 divorced○ 1 single○ 4 unknown marital status. ○ Ages 33 to 80 ○ 50% currently or previously
court staff mediators○ 50%private mediators.
27
TIMS Model of Mediation Influences
Stage 2 – AnalysisClark Moustakas’ (1994) modification of the van Kaam method of analysis ofphenomenological data
● Double Coding with two independent researchers
● Horizonalized the data – gave equal weight
● Considered the full scope of relationships and experiences
● Reduced to core themes and root metaphors
● Developed a composite description and global analysis (Marshall andRossman, 1999).
● Considered through the lenses of four interpretive theories
Stage 2 – Interview Findings
28
Uniqueness of Approach
• Many of the mediators described having a “unique”approach that came from their distinctive set of experiencesin life.
– Several mediators stated to have spent years to discover atechnique or tool that can is well documented and taught incourses on mediation, i.e. “Ra ra” method.
• They stated they have not observed other mediators
Stage 2 – Interview Findings
29
Private Versus Court Staff Mediators
• Private mediators tended to look unfavorably on the skilllevel of court staff mediators.
– Court program mediation is like “public transportation …you get a ride on the bus”, whereas private mediation islike “Hertz Rent-a-Car ... you get a working vehicle to getyou from here to there.”
TIMS Model of Mediation Influences
30
Stage 2 – Interviews
31
1 – Control
• “I try to keep people here”, “I wouldn’t want to adjournbecause it’s difficult to get them back.”
• Focus on settling came predominantly from privatemediators, whereas it has been institutionalized mediationthat have often been cited by private mediators as using moresettlement focused styles (Alfini, et al., 1994).
Stage 2 – Interviews
32
2 – Cognition / Logic“business” metaphor including learning / logic
• “If you want the warm and fuzzies, you need a differentkind of mediator.”
• “I don’t do that anymore” and “I’ve learned throughtime.”
Stage 2 – Interviews
33
3 – Movement / Change“journey” metaphor
• “Cut and run” “buck up and move forward”
• Two people in a boat on the water who must “row together,work together to get to shore.”
• Mediator was usually a guide or facilitator for movement/change.
• Longer interviews
Stage 2 – Interviews
34
4 – Balance
• “…bring things back to whole”, “Wholeness is up to theparties…” and “…it just spirals.”
• Neutrality, dichotomy, circles or cycles, and evenjuggling.
• Juggling – this professed multi-tasker used statementssuch as “missed our meeting” and “I missed an e-mail”.
Stage 2 – Interviews
35
5 – Communication
• A tool that helps parties communicate effectively.
• Humor to “…keep it light.”
• “Active listening” and using “…reframing whenappropriate.”
• Caucus more important among Communicationoriented mediators.
Stage 2 – Interviews
36
6 – Gender
• Benevolent Sexism: protecting the female parties -“…wanting to help the wife” and “…going into advocateposition for the wife.”- Stereotypes - “Nowadays women are resentful if they
have to support their husbands for a while.”
• “…the issue of power balancing”
37
TIMS Model of Mediation Influences
Contributions
○ A complex understanding
○ Training might emphasize(1) positive benefits of conflict,(2) experiential learning like observation,(3) mutual learning opportunities, and(4) effects of language/metaphors(5) Qualitative research as a complement to quantitative
statistics(6) Identification of layers of metaphorical
influence supported the emergence of four theories
38
TIMS Model of Mediation Influences
Theories That Emerged Through Analysis
4. Systems Theory: Systems, rules, and statutes create a structure whichinfluences how we do things in institutionalized programs
3. Structuration Theory: Activities are repeated and reinforced, and thencodified in procedures.
2. Habitus & Field Theory: People who do the same things are drawn toeach other developing fields of relationships (ADR field, legal field,Conferences, Professional Associations, etc.). People in similar fieldsdevelop similar understandings, i.e. Court Staff and Private Mediators
1. Symbolic Interactionism Theory: Mediators/practitioners are influencedby each level of the system (Metaphorical Coherence) when makingmeanings in mediation, developing style, and learning.
39
TIMS Model of Mediation Influences
SYSTEM
Activities
Fields
Engagement
INTERVENTION POINTS for Assessment, Training, Change, etc.
FourIntervention
Points
Practice/Service1. Experience2. Style3. Learning4. Delivery
Qualitative Assessment of InstitutionalizedMediation Service Delivery
© 2013 Rebecca Storrow
40
TIMS Model of Mediation Influences
SAFE Assessment
SYSTEM
• INTERNAL SYSTEM
• ORGANIZATIONAL TYPE
• ORGANIZATIONAL SIZE
• ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE –Mission, Vision, Values
• EXTERNAL SYSTEM
• OUTSIDE STRESSES ANDOPPORTUNITIES FOR SYSTEM
ACTIVITIES
• INTERNAL ACTIVITIES
• INTERNAL PROCESSES, SYSTEMS
• SYSTEMS OF MEASURMENT /QUALITY ASSURANCE MEASURES
• EXTERNAL ACTIVITIES
• SERVICES PROVIDED
FIELDS
• INTERNAL FIELDS
• RELATIONSHIPS WITHIN THEORGANIZATION
• EXTERNAL FIELDS
• RELATIONSHIPS TO OTHERORGANIZATIONS
• RELATIONSHIPS INMARKETPLACE
ENGAGEMENT
• INTERNAL ENGAGEMENT
• Symbols, Language, and MeaningMaking of Practitioners or ServiceProviders
• EXTERNAL ENGAGEMENT
• Quality Assurance Assessments ofPractice or Service
• External Feedback
IV
III
II
I
© 2013 Rebecca Storrow
41
TIMS Model of Mediation Influences
Exercise
Using the interviews,enter metaphors intothe matrix to completeyour assignedAssessment Tool.
We will then look formetaphoricalcoherence down andacross layers
42
TIMS Model of Mediation Influences
Discussion and Questions?
ProQuest Link to complete study:
http://gradworks.umi.com/35/10/3510548.htmlThank you,
Dr. Rebecca Storrow Articles posted on http://jocm.net/
954-372-4341
www.adr.org
Mediation.org
Metaphors have a way of holdingthe most truth in the least space.
Orson Scott Card