medizinische fakultät effectiveness of the assessment of ...mar 24, 2017 · copd (abc) tool on...
TRANSCRIPT
Medizinische Fakultät
Effectiveness of the Assessment of Burden of COPD (ABC) tool on health-related quality of life
in patients with COPD: a cluster randomised controlled trial in primary and hospital care
Prof. Dr. Daniel Kotz 24 March 2017
Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Institute of General Practice,
Centre for Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology
Maastricht University | University College London | University of Edinburgh
www.daniel-kotz.de
Medizinische Fakultät
DEBRA symposium 30 June 2017 Theme: tobacco smoking and e-cigarette use in Germany: findings from a new national survey (DEBRA) in an international perspective. Düsseldorf, 30 June 2017, 12.00-16.30h Keynote lecture: Prof. Robert West, University College London Free registration: www.debra-study.info
Medizinische Fakultät
Disclosures
Funding sources for presented work
Lung Alliance Netherlands (www.longalliantie.nl)
Industry funding to the investigator in the last 5 years
None
Medizinische Fakultät
COPD
• COPD affects millions of people worldwide, having major impact on daily life
• COPD is more than airway limitation (FEV1)
burden of COPD as experienced by the patient
• how to measure this burden and treat accordingly ("control panel" for physicians)?
[Agusti, Thorax 2013; GOLD 2017]
Medizinische Fakultät
Assessment of Burden of COPD (ABC) tool
• quantification and visualisation of the burden of COPD, thereby
• facilitating the integrated approach crucial for assessment and individualised treatment of COPD
Medizinische Fakultät
ABC tool: development
1. definition of burden Burden of disease is the physical, emotional, psychological and/or social experiences of a patient with COPD. These experiences influence the patient's ability to cope with the consequences of COPD and its treatment.
2. face validity check (patients, healthcare providers)
[Slok, Npj Primary Care Resp Med 2014]
Medizinische Fakultät
ABC tool: development 3. condition a
burden of COPD tool should meet
4. literature review > Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) comes close [Van der Molen, Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003]
[Slok, Npj Primary Care Resp Med 2014]
Medizinische Fakultät
ABC tool: development
5. development ABC scale = CCQ - symptoms - functional state - mental state + 3 items to measure emotions + 1 item to measure fatigue
[Slok, Npj Primary Care Resp Med 2014]
Medizinische Fakultät
Medizinische Fakultät
ABC tool: development
6. development ABC tool = ABC scale + objective parameters - smoking - exacerbations - dyspnoea (MRC) - body mass index - lung function - physical activity > computer algorithm > visualisation (treatment advice)
[Slok, Npj Primary Care Resp Med 2014]
Medizinische Fakultät
Medizinische Fakultät
ABC tool: rationale
• ABC tool = basis for shared decision making
• to support personalised care planning, including a personal treatment goal
• treatment goals often include lifestyle changes
• ABC tool = communication tool in primary and hospital care
Medizinische Fakultät
Aim current study
Assess effectiveness in pragmatic study:
P patients with COPD
I use of ABC tool
C care as usual
O disease-specific quality of life based St. George’s Resp. Questionnaire (SGRQ) over 18 months
Medizinische Fakultät
Netherlands Trial Register, NTR3788
Medizinische Fakultät
Trial design
• pragmatic, two-armed, cluster randomised controlled trial
• 56 healthcare centres across the Netherlands
– 39 primary care
– 17 hospital care
• March 2013 to May 2015
Medizinische Fakultät
Patient in/exclusion criteria
• spirometry-confirmed diagnosis
• 40 years of age or over
• understand and read the Dutch language
• exacerbation <6 weeks before study
• addiction to hard drugs
• life-threatening comorbid condition or pregnancy
Medizinische Fakultät
Intervention vs. control
Intervention: instruction healthcare providers to use ABC tool during routine consultations (min. every 6 months)
Control: care as usual (Dutch COPD healthcare guidelines)
Medizinische Fakultät
Outcomes
Primary: clinically relevant improvement on the SGRQ = decrease of at least 4 points on the total score of the SGRQ between baseline and the 18-month follow-up
Secondary: (amongst others)
• COPD Assessment Test (CAT)
• Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC)
Medizinische Fakultät
Medizinische Fakultät
Slok, BMJ Open 2016
Medizinische Fakultät
Slok, BMJ Open 2016
Medizinische Fakultät Slok, BMJ Open 2016
Medizinische Fakultät
Secondary outcomes
CAT not significant difference: −0.26 points (95%CI: −1.52 to 0.99)
PACIC
higher improvement in intervention group:
0.32 points (95%CI: 0.14 to 0.50)
Medizinische Fakultät
Discussion
• ABC tool seems to have added value for patients with COPD
• patients treated with ABC tool were more likely to report clinically relevant improvement in their quality of life
• in the Netherlands: nationwide implementation in daily care ongoing
Medizinische Fakultät
Discussion
ABC tool for Germany?
Opportunities:
• improved patient care?
Threats:
• lack of time?
• lack of communication skills?
Medizinische Fakultät
Download today's presentation at
www.daniel-kotz.de