Title: Interventions targeting air travellers early in the pandemic may delay local outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2 (Supporting Information)

Authors: Samuel Clifford1+, Carl A.B. Pearson1, Petra Klepac1, Kevin Van Zandvoort1, Billy J. Quilty1, CMMID COVID-19 working group, Rosalind M. Eggo1*, Stefan Flasche1*

Affiliations: 1Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, WC1E 7HT London, UK*authors contributed equally+corresponding author. Sam.Clifford@lshtm.ac.uk

Figure S1: All scenarios for Figure 1 - complementary cumulative density functions (CCDF) of the estimated number of days an outbreak is delayed given an intervention consisting of a combination of traveller screening and sensitization and contact tracing. Within each panel, and for a given delay, the CCDF shows the percentage of simulations which result in a delay of at least that long for each screening regime (no screening, exit only, exit and entry). Comparisons are made to no contact tracing and no screening.

Figure S2: All scenarios for Figure 1 - complementary cumulative density functions (CCDF) of the estimated number of days an outbreak is delayed given an intervention consisting of a combination of traveller screening and sensitization and contact tracing. Within each panel, and for a given delay, the CCDF shows the percentage of simulations which result in a delay of at least that long for each level of traveller sensitisation (0%, 30%, 50%, 70%). Comparisons are made to no contact tracing and no screening.

Figure S3: All scenarios for Figure 1 - complementary cumulative density functions (CCDF) of the estimated number of days an outbreak is delayed given an intervention consisting of a combination of traveller screening and sensitization and contact tracing. Within each panel, and for a given delay, the CCDF shows the percentage of simulations which result in a delay of at least that long for each rate of arrival of infected travellers (1, 10 and 100 per week). Comparisons are made to no contact tracing and no screening.

Table S1 shows the percentage of the delays in Figures 1, S1-S3 that are infinitely long as a function of the traveller sensitisation. These values are independent of whether or not screening is performed, as well as λand k .

Table S1: Proportion of delays which are infinitely long under varying levels of traveller sensitisation. Results from

105 simulations.

Traveller Sensitisation 0% 30% 50% 70%

% Outbreaks Averted 0% 3% 23% 90%

In Table S2 we present the full summary statistics of the sensitivity analysis. We caution the reader in interpreting any delay in the hundreds or thousands of days, as it is likely that as the outbreak continues the number of infected arrivals will increase. The simulation assumes a constant arrival rate for the entire duration.

Table S2. Sensitivity analysis summary statistics providing the inner 50% and 95% confidence intervals and medians (all rounded to the nearest day) for the estimated number of days an outbreak is delayed given an intervention consisting of a combination of traveller screening and sensitisation and contact tracing. Comparisons are made to no contact tracing and no screening (there are no “No screening” results at 0% sensitisation as this is the baseline against which comparisons are to be made).

Dispersion parameter, k

Arrivals/week, λ

Sensitisation, ϱ

ScreeningNumber of days for which the given percentage of

delays are at least this long

97.5% 75% 50% 25% 2.5%

0.16(SARS-like)

1 0% Exit only 4 15 24 37 83

Exit and entry 5 17 28 43 97

30% No screening 3 8 14 28 ∞

Exit only 13 35 57 98 ∞

Exit and entry 14 39 64 109 ∞

50% No screening 12 33 79 1191 ∞

Exit only 32 93 199 2579 ∞

Exit and entry 36 103 219 2829 ∞

70% No screening 111 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

Exit only 257 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

Exit and entry 285 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

10 0% Exit only <1 1 2 4 8

Exit and entry 1 2 3 4 10

30% No screening <1 1 1 3 ∞

Exit only 1 3 6 10 ∞

Exit and entry 1 4 6 11 ∞

50% No screening 1 3 8 118 ∞

Exit only 3 9 20 257 ∞

Exit and entry 4 10 22 279 ∞

70% No screening 11 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

Exit only 26 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

Exit and entry 28 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

100 0% Exit only <1 <1 <1 <1 1

Exit and entry <1 <1 <1 <1 1

30% No screening <1 <1 <1 <1 ∞

Exit only <1 <1 1 1 ∞

Exit and entry <1 <1 1 1 ∞

50% No screening <1 <1 1 12 ∞

Exit only <1 1 2 26 ∞

Exit and entry <1 1 2 28 ∞

70% No screening 1 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

Exit only 3 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

Exit and entry 3 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

0.54(COVID-19)

1 0% Exit only <1 3 8 15 41

Exit and entry <1 4 9 17 47

30% No screening 1 3 5 11 ∞

Exit only 2 10 21 40 ∞

Exit and entry 2 12 23 45 ∞

50% No screening 3 12 29 422 ∞

Exit only 7 33 76 923 ∞

Exit and entry 8 36 83 1006 ∞

70% No screening 41 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

Exit only 94 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

Exit and entry 101 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

10 0% Exit only <1 <1 1 1 4

Exit and entry <1 <1 1 2 5

30% No screening <1 <1 1 1 ∞

Exit only <1 1 2 4 ∞

Exit and entry <1 1 2 4 ∞

50% No screening <1 1 3 42 ∞

Exit only 1 3 8 93 ∞

Exit and entry 1 4 8 102 ∞

70% No screening 4 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

Exit only 9 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

Exit and entry 10 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

100 0% Exit only <1 <1 <1 <1 <1

Exit and entry <1 <1 <1 <1 <1

30% No screening <1 <1 <1 <1 ∞

Exit only <1 <1 <1 <1 ∞

Exit and entry <1 <1 <1 <1 ∞

50% No screening <1 <1 <1 4 ∞

Exit only <1 <1 1 9 ∞

Exit and entry <1 <1 1 10 ∞

70% No screening <1 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

Exit only 1 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

Exit and entry 1 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

2(Flu-like)

1 0% Exit only <1 1 3 7 26

Exit and entry <1 1 3 8 30

30% No screening <1 1 3 6 ∞

Exit only <1 3 9 21 ∞

Exit and entry <1 4 10 23 ∞

50% No screening 1 6 14 191 ∞

Exit only 1 14 37 418 ∞

Exit and entry 1 15 41 459 ∞

70% No screening 17 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

Exit only 39 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

Exit and entry 43 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

10 0% Exit only <1 <1 <1 1 3

Exit and entry <1 <1 <1 1 3

30% No screening <1 <1 <1 1 ∞

Exit only <1 <1 1 2 ∞

Exit and entry <1 <1 1 2 ∞

50% No screening <1 1 1 19 ∞

Exit only <1 1 4 42 ∞

Exit and entry <1 2 4 46 ∞

70% No screening 2 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

Exit only 4 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

Exit and entry 4 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

100 0% Exit only <1 <1 <1 <1 <1

Exit and entry <1 <1 <1 <1 <1

30% No screening <1 <1 <1 <1 ∞

Exit only <1 <1 <1 <1 ∞

Exit and entry <1 <1 <1 <1 ∞

50% No screening <1 <1 <1 2 ∞

Exit only <1 <1 <1 4 ∞

Exit and entry <1 <1 <1 5 ∞

70% No screening <1 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

Exit only <1 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

Exit and entry <1 ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞